Tag Archives: cross

MATTHEW 16

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Under “SELF-PRINT BOOKLETS” you will find help on printing the posts in booklet form.  Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

MATTHEW 16

Setting of the chapter
Christ’s prophecy concerning the church is recorded only in the gospel that emphasises His kingship, so the two ideas are not incompatible. It is perfectly possible for Christ to be the King of Israel, one day to reign on the earth, and also, at this present time, to be the Head of the church. The Mount of Transfiguration event took place after Matthew 16, so the kingdom is still to come. Peter, who was present on the mount, declares that the Old Testament prophetic word had been confirmed to him when Christ was transfigured, 2 Peter 1:16-21.

The prediction concerning the church comes after a succession of indications that Israel intended to reject its rightful king, and that Christ was turning to the Gentiles as a consequence.

Notice the way the Gospel of Matthew shows the Lord Jesus gradually turning from the nation of Israel, in preparation for His new work of building the church after the Day of Pentecost:

11:20-30
He rebukes the cities where most of His mighty works were done; thanks His Father for His wise purpose; indicates that the Father has committed all things into His hands; turns to the individuals in the nation with the words, “Come unto Me”, 11:28.

12:1-8
An appeal to an incident when David, the anointed king, was on the run from Saul, 1 Samuel 21:1-6.

12:9-13
The man with a withered hand. King Jereboam had been judged like this for stretching out his hand against a man of God; how much more dangerous is it for the rulers to seek to destroy the Son of God, 1 Kings 13:1-4. Compare also Zechariah 11:17, where the idol shepherd is Antichrist.

12:14-21
The Pharisees seek to destroy God’s Beloved and Elect One, and He will show judgment to the Gentiles, and in Him shall the Gentiles trust.

12:22-23
The blind and dumb man represents the nation, blind to His glories, and dumb in His praise. The people recognise that He does not hate the blind as David did, 2 Samuel 5:8. Note that when specific blind men are cured in Matthew there is always a reference to Him as Son of David, 9:27; 12:22,23; 20:30-34; 21:9-14.

12:24-37
Unable to deny that Christ performed miracles, the Pharisees assert that He did them by the power of Satan. This is sin against the Holy Ghost, for it was by His power that the works were done, and to equate the Holy Spirit with the Devil is blasphemy. This shows how far the nation had gone in its rejection of Christ.

12:38-42
Both the sign of Jonah the prophet who went to the Gentiles, who repented, and the sign of the Queen of Sheba who came from the Gentiles, and believed; both are indications of the change in God’s dealings which would take place after the death and resurrection of Christ.

12:43-45
The nation is labelled a wicked generation, influenced by evil spirits in its opposition to Christ.

12:46-50
Those who have the closest natural ties are put after those who have spiritual links with Christ. No claim can be made upon Christ because He is a fellow-Jew.

13:1-52
The mysteries of the kingdom of heaven expounded. The king does not wield a sword, but sow seed. Note the significant move out of the house (of Israel), to the seaside, (representing the wider world of the Gentiles). In verse 36 there is a return to the house, for after the church age there will be those in Israel who will need to be aware of God’s plans for the end of the age of tribulation. The disciples represent these at this point, just as they do in Matthew 10, where in verse 25 they are told they will have not have gone over the cities of Judah before Christ comes. Clearly not a reference to the disciples personally.

13:53-58
Christ’s claims to be Son of God are rejected in the words, “Is not this the carpenter’s son?” Unbelief marks the nation to such an extent that it hinders the works of Christ.

14:1-12
A similar situation to when Herod the Great, (Herod the Tetrarch’s father), slaughtered the innocents. The hostility of the authorities is unchanged. Verses 3-12 refer to an incident two years before, for Matthew is highlighting the fact that attitudes have not altered. (Compare Luke 3:19, 20, where the imprisonment of John is recorded, even though he is about to baptise Christ. This emphasises the fact that the baptism of Christ indicated His commitment to rejection and suffering).

14:13-21
A startling contrast is now presented. Herod, on his birthday (when he could be expected to be in a good mood for once), in his hatred, gives John the Baptist’s head on a dish, whereas Christ in compassion feeds five thousand people with bread. Those who, like John the baptist, stand for Christ may expect opposition.

14:22-36
The disciples alone on the lake, with Christ praying on the mountain, and then coming to them. One of Matthew’s dispensational pictures, telling of believers passing through much trouble, (the storm on the lake), but sustained by the intercession of Christ on high. The disciples are being prepared for the absence of the King, who, nonetheless, as a King-Priest, makes intercession for them on high. This will also have meaning for tribulation saints.

15:1-20
The nation exposed for its hypocrisy, preferring the teachings and traditions of men to the commandments of God.

15:21-28
A Gentile “dog” is blessed. Note that the Lord uses the word for dog that means a little dog, the family pet, rather than the scavengers of the streets. He thus shows His gentleness and compassion, for “A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench…and in his name shall the Gentiles trust”, Matthew 12:20,21.

15:29-39
The healing of multitudes, (note the lame and blind are mentioned first), on a mountain, the symbol of a kingdom, then the feeding of the four thousand. Matthew is presenting a foretaste of the millenial age before he tells us of the prediction of the church age. So the kingdom is emphasised both before and after the prophecy regarding the church.

16:1-4
The demand for a sign from the Pharisees and Sadducees, both of whom had rejected the testimony of Christ’s miracle ministry. No further sign to be given, except that of His death and resurrection, as pictured in the experience of Jonah. Fair weather symbolised His works of mercy. Foul weather, the judgments coming upon the nation, whether at AD 70 with the destruction of Jerusalem or in the tribulation period. See 1 Thessalonians 2:15,16. Caesarea Phillipi was the scene of much bloodshed when the Romans suppressed the Jewish rebellion as AD 70 approached.

16:5-12
A warning about moral leaven in preparation for church age conditions. The leaven of the Pharisees is the evil of mere outward profession of religion. The leaven of the Sadducees is evil of rationalism, and the doubting of God’s word. Both these things would prove a snare during the age of the church.

Subject of the chapter
There is a progress of thought in this chapter. First, Christ’s enemies persist in doubting whether His miracles were of God. This was a major reason why He was turning from the nation in its unbelief. He refuses to satisfy their demand, for it was far too late to be asking for a sign, when He had given abundant evidence that He was from God.

Then the subject of doctrine comes up, for the great test for men is whether they are going to listen to the doctrine of Pharisees, Sadducees, Herodians and the common people, or to the doctrine that comes from the Father.

This leads on to the vital question as to who Christ is, and Peter has been listening to the doctrine from heaven, and makes his confession.

Having foretold the building of the church, the Lord warns His own that that cannot cannot happen unless He suffers first. Just as Solomon built the temple on the site of Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac, so the spiritual temple of this age will be founded on the sacrifice of Christ, which, in turn, receives validity from who He is.

Finally, the consequence of all this is set before the disciples. If they would know a reward when He comes in glory, they must deny self, and take up their cross, and follow Christ.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-4 Demand for a sign from heaven
(b) Verses 5-12 Doctrine of evil men
(c) Verses 13-20 Declaration about the church
(d) Verses 21-23 Declaration about His sufferings
(e) Verses 24-28 Denial of self

(a) Verses 1-4
Demand for a sign from heaven

16:1
The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven.

The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came- these are the two groups that the Lord is about to warn His disciples about, verses 11,12. Normally in disagreement over many issues, they are united in their opposition to Christ. Herod and Pilate will soon be friends on the same basis, Luke 23:12. In the previous chapter the Lord had fed the multitudes with wholesome bread. Now these are coming to try to put leaven into it. The Pharisees were the ritualists of the day, concerned for the letter of the law. The Sadducees were the rationalists, thinking their opinion above the law.

And tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven- like Satan their master, they only tempt to seek to find a fault, to expose any dross. God tempts to show the pure gold in the faith of His people, as we see in the case of Abraham, Genesis 22:1. But there is no dross in Christ, as has been shown conclusively in the temptation at the beginning of His public life.

The ministry of Christ had been full of signs from heaven, some even performed on Pharisees, Luke 5:17. Since they are tempting Him, they are perhaps implying yet again that His miracles were done by the power of Satan, “signs from hell” so to speak. They show no sign of repenting of their blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

16:2
He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red.

He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red- instead of satisfying their demand for a sign, He gives them a metaphor. His public ministry had been “fair weather”, with no storms of judgment, only grace and blessing.

16:3
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?

And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering- His ministry of grace had begun to be interspersed with warnings of judgment upon the nation for their refusal of Him.

O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times? They had asked for a sign; he points them to the signs of the times, that is, the indications He had been giving as the the change of character in His ministry, for the word “times” refers to the character of a particular period. Christ’s ministry was changing in character, and they were not able to discern it. They prided themselves on spiritual discernment, yet they were hypocrites, for they pretended to be spiritual, but could only understand the natural, like the signs of a change in the weather.

16:4
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.

A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign- this is what He had called them in 12:39, and they had failed to respond to His rebuke in repentance, unlike the men of Nineveh who repented at the preaching of Noah. They would readily have called the men of Nineveh an evil and adulterous generation, but could not see that the description applied to them as well. And they compounded their evil by pretending to be interested in Divine things by asking for a sign. No wonder He calls them hypocrites!

Special note on adultery as a metaphor
We noted the following in the notes on Matthew 12:
“In the Old Testament the prophets often used adultery as a metaphor for the behaviour of the nation when it went into idolatry, for it represented unfaithfulness to the God who had made the nation His wife. But these are not idolaters in that sense. But there were two aspects to idolatry, the rejection of the true God, and the consequent reverence for false gods. When God gave Israel His commandments, He made it clear that they were neither to make idols or bow down to them. The reason being that He was a Jealous God, Exodus 20:3-5. He is jealous of His own glory, and that of His Son, who is described as “the image of the invisible God”, Colossians 1:15. By image in that context is meant that the Son of God is the one who manifests God fully. God is jealous of the honour of His Son, and if, when He was here, the nation that was most fitted to appreciate Him did not do so, but largely rejected Him, does that not merit the charge of turning from God, and therefore may justly be called adulterous?

And there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas- He does not expand on the meaning of His reference to Jonah, unlike in chapter 12. He had told them enough then for them to see His point, and respond.

And he left them, and departed- the word Matthew uses for “left” is an intense word, meaning “to leave utterly”. There is a definiteness about His movement here, for it has great significance. It is not just that He departed, with the implication He left them. He left them in spirit, and departed from them in body. The nation, as represented by these rulers, is being abandoned, for it has rejected its Messiah.

(b) Verses 5-12
Doctrine of evil men

16:5
And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread.

And when his disciples were come to the other side- we learn from 15:39 that after the feeding of the four thousand, the Lord had come by ship into the region of Magdala, which was on the eastern side of the Sea of Galilee.

They had forgotten to take bread- this is very strange, for after the crowds had been fed, they had gathered up seven baskets full of fragments. So it is not that they had forgotten to buy bread, but omitted to bring any of that which they had gathered up. It is all too easy to be careless in regard to the abundant spiritual provision the Lord has made for us.

16:6
Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.

Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees- the Lord turns their failure into an opportunity to introduce to them the need to be right as to doctrine, for if they are going to confess Him aright, they must understand aright. Mark tells us they did not understand the implications of the feeding of the five thousand, for their hearts were hardened, Mark 6:52, which perhaps is one reason why there needed to be another very similar miracle to impress the truth upon them.

16:7
And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread.

And they reasoned among themselves- this is the mistake we make too often; trying to think matters through without recourse to the Lord and His word.

Saying, It is because we have taken no bread- the Lord had given a lengthy discourse after He had fed the five thousand, as recorded in John 6:26-64. During that teaching He explained that the words He spoke to them were spirit, and life. They were to be understood in a spiritual sense, and if taken in that way, they would give eternal life and sustain that life.

So if the bread He spoke of was His wholesome doctrine, the disciples should have realised that when He spoke of leaven He must mean unwholesome doctrine. Instead, they thought on a natural level, and took His word to be a rebuke for their failure to bring bread with them on the journey across the lake.

16:8
Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread?

Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread? The Lord knew their hearts, and that they were reasoning among themselves whether it was because they had forgotten to bring bread that He spoke His warning concerning leaven. The reason why they can be said to have little faith is explained in the next two verses. The Lord is going to graciously use their failure to teach them a much-needed lesson. He not only knew what they were discussing amongst themselves, but also knew about the lack of bread. But this is no problem to Him, as He indicate in the next verse.

16:9
Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?

16:10
Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?

Do ye not yet understand- Mark tells us that “they considered not the miracle of the loaves: for their heart was hardened”, Mark 6:52. This is perhaps one reason why the miracle needed to be repeated when the Lord fed the four thousand. They had responded to the fact that the crowds were hungry in a similar way on both occasions, namely, with expression of unbelief, “Whence should we have so much bread in the wilderness as to fill so great a multitude?” Matthew 15:33. And this after they have watched Him feed five thousand a little while before. His charge that they were of little faith was justified. Their mention of the wilderness is significant, for the psalmist speaks of the unbelief of Israel when they were passing though the desert. He wrote, “Yea, they spake against God: they said, Can God furnish a table in the wilderness?” Psalm 78:19. The response of God then was to be wroth, but grace has come with Christ, and He gently chides their lack of understanding and faith, and seeks to lead them on in the truth.

Neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? If five thousand people can be miraculously fed from five loaves, how easy it is for the Lord to feed Himself and His disciples from nothing. Especially since after the miracles there was more left over than at the beginning. The separate mention of these events shows conclusively that the feeding of the four thousand is not a different version of the feeding of the five thousand.

16:11
How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?

How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? The main point of the feeding of the multitudes was not physical, but spiritual, for the miracle was a sign, a pointer to higher truth. The disciples, of all people, should have understood this, even when others walked away from it, John 6:66. His reference to leaven was of the same sort, a pointer to spiritual truth.

The leaven of the Pharisees was hypocrisy, as directly stated by the Lord in Luke 12:1. They appeared outwardly to be very scrupulous about the commands of the law, but their hearts were far from God, Matthew 15:7-9. The leaven of the Sadducees was rationalism, the rejection of anything they could not see. Hence they denied there were angels, or spirits, or the resurrection of the dead, Acts 23:8. The Pharisees, however, confess these things. So even though these two parties were opposed to one another, they were united in teaching the leaven of error, and hence opposed to Christ. The disciples must beware of them, and so must we, for they have their modern-day counterparts.

16:12
Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.

Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees- at last they have grasped the lesson, and therefore are in a fit state to move on to the truth He will unfold to them next. Having rid them of leaven, the Lord will grant to them the pure fine flour of doctrine concerning Himself.

(c) Verses 13-20
Declaration about the church

16:13
When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi- this is a place named after Caesar, so a Gentile atmosphere prevails here. But world politics will not prevent the church being built. The disciples, just local fisherman, familiar only with the shores of Galilee, are going to be sent into all the world.

There was a temple dedicated to the god Pan here, but world religion will not prevent God’s purpose through the church either. Nearby one of the sources of the Jordan (the river of death and judgement), gushed out of the rock, but all that was brought in by sin is overcome by Christ. This place is the site of a decisive battle in the days of the Greek empire, but a more decisive battle was won by Christ at Calvary, and no force is of power to frustrate His ongoing purpose to build the church. The area was one of great natural beauty, yet nothing can compare with heavenly realities.

He asked his disciples saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of Man am? That is, what is result of My ministry? “What think ye of Christ” is always the test, Matthew 22:41-46. As He will say later, “If ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins”, John 8:24. Those described as men are the multitudes, in contrast to the Pharisees, whose opinion was obvious. We can see now why He introduced the subject of doctrine and leaven, for the disciples must not mix any leaven of wrong thoughts into their view of Christ. As Son of man He is relevant man and real man, for all must relate to Him in some way, either in faith or unbelief. This is His title in relation to all men, as opposed to Son of Abraham and Son of David which link Him with Israel, and Son of God which tells of His relationship to God. He does not use these titles in His question, but He does use the title Son of Man, even though that is not used in connection with the church. He wants the answer to come from them, and not from a clue in the question.

16:14
And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.

And they said, “Some say that thou art John the Baptist- he was a committed, uncompromising, unworldly, preacher. The people saw these features in Christ.

Some, Elias- he was the courageous, reforming, miracle-worker, (unlike John the Baptist, who did no miracles, John 10:41). They saw these features in Christ too.

And others, Jeremias- the weeping prophet, who the Rabbis said was the man of sorrows of Isaiah 53.

Or one of the prophets- the good qualities of all the prophets were seen in Christ. This was no surprise, for the prophets were born of God, and therefore had the life of God. It was to be expected that they would display some of the characteristics of the Lord Jesus, who is God manifest in flesh. But they should have said that the prophets were like Him, not that He was like the prophets.

Note there is no reference to Moses, despite the prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:15-19. See Acts 3:22,23. They found no legality in Christ, but nonetheless they should have believed He was the one Moses spoke of. In Luke 9:7-9 Herod and the people wonder whether Christ is one of these men risen from the dead, so they do not give the Lord credit even for being the Son of Man in His own right, but simply (and superstitiously) think Him to be a resurrected prophet.

16:15
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?- “Ye” and “I are emphatic. “Ye” is in contrast to the people, “I” in contrast to the imaginary Christ men spoke of. “But” anticipates the better answer of the apostles.

16:16
And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

And Simon Peter answered- the name Simon means hearing, so he had lived up to his name. Peter is the Greek form of the name given him by Christ in John 1:42, which means “a stone”. So the two names give the order of his experience. Simon when he heard and responded to God’s word through Christ, Peter as one born again through that word, ready to be built into the church on the Day of Pentecost. He had not been influenced by the Pharisees or Sadducees.

Thou art the Christ- that is, the Messiah of Old Testament prophecy.

The Son of the Living God- the subject of New Testament revelation. To Peter, God is the Living God, in contrast to Pan, the lifeless idol of the heathen, whose temple was not far away. (Note the living things in Peter’s epistles). There is no attempt to compare Him with others, for this is impossible if He is the Son of God. It is sad, however, to hear Peter putting Christ on a level with Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration, 17:4.

If he had answered, “Thou art the Son of Man”, he would have been right in one sense, but it would not be appropriate here. As the Son of God the Lord Jesus shares the nature of God in all its aspects. He possesses the very life of God, and is also the perfect expression of it, whether in eternity, 1 John 1:2, when He was here, John 1:14, or currently, Colossians 2:9. Those who in this age believe in Him, share that life, and hence, as living stones, are built up on Him the living stone, the Son of the living God.

16:17
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona- a reference back to John 1:42, “Thou art Simon the son of Jona. Thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, a stone”. He would later write of coming to Christ as a living stone, and being built up a spiritual house, 1 Peter 2:4,5. The Hebrew word for son comes from the word to build, for a man’s house, or family, was built up by sons. (See Exodus 1:21, where God blessed the midwives with children, or “built them houses”).

For flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee- Peter had not “received by tradition from the fathers”, 1 Peter 1:18.

But my Father which is in heaven- as already indicated, the name Simon means “hearing”, so Peter has listened to the word from the Father as He spoke in Christ. As He had said, “He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me”, John 5:24. The Father spoke in the Son, so to hear the Son’s word with faith, was to believe on the Father, the particular word in question being on the subject of His Deity.

Other indications of this are as follows: “My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me”, John 7:16. “Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me”, John 6:45. “God…hath spoken unto us in his Son”, Hebrews 1:2.

So the means by which Peter heard is available to us now in the written scriptures. It is not that Peter had a private message from the Father, coming only to him. What he heard was from the lips of Christ, and now that His words have been written down, all have access to this word of the Father too. Even though the Father is in heaven, the word has come to men through Christ who came down from heaven to bring it near.

16:18
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

And I say also unto thee- not “I also say”, as if what the Father said is now followed by what the Son says. Rather, it is “but I say also”, so He is continuing to speak for His Father. This indicates the equal authority of Christ, and establishes His authority over the church. It is a big mistake to speak of the church teaching, as is common in Christendom. It is Christ who teaches by the Spirit; the church learns.
That thou art Peter- as interpreted by John l:42, this means a stone. So Peter is distinguished from the rock, but is linked with the idea of a building.
And upon this rock- not “upon thee”, but upon this, that you have just stated, that I am the Son of the living God.

The following points should be borne in mind in connection with this confession by Peter:

1. The truth of the Sonship of Christ is foundational. “Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ”, 1 Corinthians 3:11. (If it is essential that He be the foundation of the local assembly, it is clearly vital that He be the foundation of the whole church).

2. The Rabbis described Abraham as the rock on which the earth was founded, so the idea of a system built upon a person was not foreign to the Jews.

3. The word for Peter is “petros”, a masculine word meaning stone or rock. The word for rock is “petra” a feminine word which always and only means rock. A “petros” takes character from a “petra”, just as believers are said by Peter to be partakers of the Divine nature, (and God Himself is called a Rock in Deuteronomy 32:4,15,18,30,31).

4. Peter would be a poor foundation, since he is called Satan in verse 23. Peter refers to Christ as a Living Stone, and believers as living stones built upon Him, 1 Peter 2:4,5. It is not possible for Peter to be the foundation, and also be built on the foundation.

5. Neither in his speaking or his writing does Peter ever state or even suggest that he is the stone, as the Roman Catholics teach. Some time later, the disciples disputed who should be the greatest among them, but we do not read that Peter settled the matter by referring to the Lord’s words here. So even Peter did not believe he had pre-eminence!

6. Pope Pius 4th decreed that nothing should be taught that “the fathers”, (meaning those of post-apostolic times who were thought of as leaders), are not agreed upon. In fact, they are evenly divided, and Augustine changed his view, and said all should believe what they like about it! The statistics are as follows: 17 of the Fathers said the rock was Peter; 44 said it was Peter’s faith; 16 said the rock was Christ; 8 said that it was all the apostles. By the Pope’s own rule, therefore, it should not be taught that Peter is the rock.
I will build my church- note that this is a future work, for there is no suggestion in Scripture that Old Testament believers are part of the church. The truth regarding the church was a mystery hidden in God, (not even in God’s word), until revealed through the apostle Paul. See notes on Ephesians 3. The verb to build is in that tense which speaks of what is continuous in the future, and does not just refer to stones being built on the Rock at conversion, but also their constant edification, Ephesians 4:12; 2:20. The apostle Paul wrote of the church that it “groweth unto a holy temple in the Lord”, Ephesians 2:21. Evangelists and teachers both build on Christ’s behalf. The word for build is to build a house, so the idea is of a homely place. Note that the Lord Jesus Himself takes full responsibility for the work of building, even though in practice He uses those men that He gives as gifts to edify and build up, Ephesians 4:11-16.
And the gates of hell shall not prevail against it- Christ now has the keys to lock the gate so that no Christian goes to hades, the place of the souls of the dead. Also, He now has the key of death to ensure that every Old Testament believer comes out from there at the appropriate time, Revelation 1:18. The Church’s proper place is in association with Christ in resurrection, and is not an earthly concept at all. It has to do with things before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4, whereas Israel, God’s earthly people, will enter a kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world, Matthew 25:34.
Just as the gates of hell did not prevail against Christ to prevent Him from rising from the dead, so the members of the church are secure from every attempt of the enemy to overcome them. As head of the church the Lord Jesus has ascended up on high, and now leads captive all those forces that could possibly lead His people captive, Ephesians 4:8. He will see to it that the members of the church arrive safely in heaven, with none of the forces of evil able to prevent it. If they cannot prevail in that matter, then certainly they shall not prevail in lesser matters.

16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven- the kingdom of heaven is the sphere of profession, for sons of the kingdom of heaven can be cast out into outer darkness, Matthew 8:11,12, whereas only those born again can enter the kingdom of God; there are no mere professors there, John 3:3,5. Jewish scribes were given a symbolic key when they entered their profession. The Lord referred to this when He said, “Woe unto you lawyers, for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered”, Luke 11:52. “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisee, hypocrites! For ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer them that are entering to go in”, Matthew 23:13.
Peter is given a special role in the matter of entering the kingdom of heaven, for he will be the one to first announce the gospel of God’s grace to both Jews and Gentiles. It is fitting that the one who boldly confesses Christ to be the Son of God should be given this task, for those who enter the kingdom of heaven profess to believe this too. It is fitting that he should not be given the task of admitting to the kingdom of God, for he soon shows his weakness by seeking to prevent Christ going to the cross, verses 21,22.
He will also be the first to lay the doctrinal foundation of Christianity after Pentecost, being given a right perspective on things in view of the change in God’s dealings with men. It is a mistake to think that Peter never really understood the truth of the church. When he writes about “things hard to be understood” in 2 Peter 5:16, he was not telling of his personal difficulty, but that of others.
Peter used one of his keys at Pentecost when he preached to devout Jews, and the other in the house of Cornelius, where he, even though he is the apostle to the circumcision, Galatians 2:8,9, unlocked the door to a Gentile. Paul, the apostle to Gentiles, had passed through Caesarea to go to Tarsus, Acts 9:30, but he was not chosen to go to Cornelius. Even Philip the evangelist, who lived at Caesarea, Acts 8:40, was not used to open the door of faith unto the Gentiles, Acts 14:27. They had not been given the key, but Peter had.
Note that Peter was not given either the keys to heaven, the keys of the kingdom of God, or the keys to the church. It is only the kingdom of heaven, the sphere of profession that he is given authority in. He cannot decide who goes to heaven, nor can he forgive sins, which God alone can do, Luke 5:21,24.

And whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: And whatsoever thou shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven- Peter’s confession was a confession of faith, which all must make if they are to be saved. So as an evangelist, it was Peter’s responsibility to see to it that the truth of the sinfulness of man was impressed upon his hearers, and in this way bind their sins to them, and then tell them the good news of the forgiveness of sins in Christ, and so loose them if they professed to believe. See how he did this in Acts 2:35, where he implies his audience are enemies of Christ, verse 36, that they are guilty of crucifying Him, verse 36 again, and that they need to repent of their sins, verse 38. In this way he bound the sins to the people by his preaching. Then in verse 38 he held out the prospect of the remission of sins, and thus gave them the opportunity of being loosed from their sins.
So also, when he opened the kingdom of heaven to the Gentiles with his other key. He declares that God has appointed Christ to be judge of the living and the dead, Acts 10:42, with its implications with regard to Cornelius’ sins. Then he tells of the possibility of being loosed, as he speaks of the remission of sins in verse 43. The words bound and loosed were used by the rabbis in this way.
Peter’s statement about the Lord Jesus is also a confession of truth, and as a “scribe instructed unto the kingdom of heaven”, Matthew 13:52, and as a steward over his Lord’s household, Luke 12:41-44, (words spoken firstly to Peter), he was to guide the saints into the truth, and as such, must set out what is allowed and what is not. The Lord commanded him with the words “When thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren”, Luke 22:32, and 1 Peter 4:10,11 shows that what the apostles gave were commandments from the Lord Himself. In this context, to bind meant to declare to be binding conduct. To loose meant to release from obligation. In this way, the church is built upon the (doctrinal) foundation of the apostles and prophets, Ephesians 2:20. Notice in that verse how the apostle is quick to add that Jesus Christ is the chief corner stone, holding the whole building together, and giving it alignment.
Because what Peter was doing had Divine permission, then he may be confident that what was bound and loosed by him on earth was endorsed in heaven.

16:20
Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.

Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ- clearly this was a temporary measure, since this was one of the main teachings of the apostles. Peter on the day of Pentecost announced that “God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ”, Acts 2:36. Given that He is rejected by the nation, it was inappropriate to make Him known in His national capacity. Individual faith was still a possibility. We also note that the disciples as a body are addressed now, instead of Peter alone.

(d) Verses 21-23
Declaration about His sufferings

16:21
From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

From that time forth began Jesus to show unto his disciples- this is consistent with His word to them in the previous verse. The making known for the first time of the truth regarding the church marks a definite stage in the dealings of God, and the Lord must be made known appropriately. He is not Jesus the Messiah to the church, specifically, but Christ the Lord. As Messiah He is king of Israel, as Lord He is head of the church.

How that he must go unto Jerusalem- note the “must” of determination to do God’s will. Jerusalem is the city of the great king, but He goes there to hang upon a cross, not sit upon a throne. It is interesting to notice that Matthew only records the presence of Christ in Jerusalem at His temptation, 4:5. Although qualified to reign by His total refusal of the Devil’s offer, and despite the fact that in His Royal Address in Matthew 5-7 He describes Jerusalem as the city of the great king, Matthew 5:35, (and He is the Great King), He nonetheless only goes to Jerusalem to die. This is all the more noticeable because Luke records the journeys of Christ to Jerusalem as early as chapter 9 of his gospel, and John’s gospel is structured around the Lord’s visits there.

And suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes- those that Peter will later describe as “your rulers”, Acts 3:17, and “you builders”, Acts 4:11. The main opinion-formers and leaders in Israel will reject Him, because they prefer human wisdom to Divine revelation. The elders would correspond, perhaps, to the idea of king, (elders would make decisions in the gate, like Absalom of old, who sat in the gate and turned the hearts of the people against David, 2 Samuel 15:1-6). Chief priests would seek to maintain the Levitical order, and the scribes would correspond to the prophets.

And be killed- that He would be killed would make many think that He was not, after all, the true Messiah. In fact, such scriptures as Isaiah 53 would show that He who suffered and died, was the root out of a dry ground, the root of David.
Note the violence of the language- “killed”, a deliberate, cold-blooded outrage upon justice and decency. They killed the prince of life and desired a murderer instead. Jacob had prophesied that the descendants of Levi would slay a man, and so it came to pass, Genesis 49:6.

And be raised again the third day- the Divine response to the killing is the raising. By prophesying these things, the Lord is putting His reputation as a “man that hath told you the truth” to the test. The mark of a prophet sent from God is that his words come true, Deuteronomy 18:15-19, Acts 3:22,23. It is a short-term prophecy, so it is easy to see whether it comes to pass. If such prophecies were fulfilled, (and the Lord made several just prior to His death), then the long-term prophecies such as are found in Matthew 24 will also come to pass.

16:22
Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.

Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke Him, saying, Be it far from thee Lord- perhaps feeling some special authority was his since he had been given great responsibilities in verse 19, Peter acts in typically hasty manner. Instead of taking in the truths being unfolded about Christ’s death and resurrection, he seeks to prevent their fulfilment. Filled with Jewish feelings about the Messiah, he thinks only in terms of a Messianic reign. We can understand him wanting to save the Lord pain, but to rebuke Him was to go much too far.

This shall not be unto thee- his determination was still strong in Gethsemane, where he used a sword to try to prevent the arrest. We must beware of zeal that is not in company with knowledge, Romans 10:2; 1 Timothy 1:13. Little did he realise that he was seeking to frustrate the sovereign will of God, which he himself will call “the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God”, Acts 2:23.

Thankfully his zeal was channelled into righteous actions after Pentecost. Even though he was led on that occasion to quote a passage which spoke of the Day of the Lord, with its warnings of judgment, he quoted it only to speak of salvation, Acts 2:16-21.

16:23
But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

But he turned, and said unto Peter- by physically turning, the Lord confronted Peter personally, looking him in the eye, so to speak, and thus spoke directly to him, and not to the others.

Get thee behind me, Satan, thou art an offence unto me- Peter was no doubt taken aback by this stern rebuke. When the Devil sought worship from Christ, he was dismissed immediately, lest anything come between the Lord Jesus and His Father, whom He set always before His face, which was why He was not moved away from God’s will, Psalm 16:8. Peter is seeking to hinder Christ’s progress to the cross by placing the stumblingblock of Jewish prejudice in the way. In fact, he himself was the offence, or stumblingblock. Compare Peter’s reference to Christ in 1 Peter 2:8 as a rock of offence, “petra skandalon”. There the person of Christ offends Israel because He is not what they expected.

Note that whereas in verse 18 Peter is addressed as one who is a stone, now he is a stumblingblock. This shows the folly of thinking that Peter is the rock foundation of the church. This lesson is reinforced by the fact that the Lord calls him Satan.

For thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men- note that men, even believers, when they act contrary to God’s will, are doing the Devil’s work, for Peter is governed by Jewish thoughts, yet is addressed as Satan, for the Lord pinpoints the source of the evil. Savour means to mind, regard, to take a side; “Thou art on man’s side, not God’s”.

For centuries Satan had sought to prevent the birth of Christ by seeking to destroy the line of the Seed of the Woman. Having failed in this, he sought to prevent the Lord’s death as the prophets had foretold it. They had said He would be crucified, but Satan tried to use Herod’s sword at His birth, a suicide-strategy in the temptation, (“cast thyself down”), the sheer drop from the cliff at Nazareth, (in which case His bones would be broken), the storm on the lake, (so that His grave would be unknown), the stones of His enemies, (again involving the breaking of bones), the sword of a different Herod at His trial, the scheme of Pilate to allow the Jews to execute Him by stoning, and the scourging by Pilate. All these would have meant either that His bones would be broken, or He would not be pierced, or His grave would be unknown.

(e) Verses 24-28
Denial of self

16:24
Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.

Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me- when He has shown that the cross and suffering are definitely ahead, then the call to discipleship can be issued. A true disciple will count the cost before he sets out, Luke 14:25-35. “Will” speaks of desire, not simply a future event. Those who follow Christ must be aware that He was given a cross, and they might be given the same.

Let him deny himself- nothing must stand in the way of this commitment. Self is a major obstacle to full devotion.

And take up his cross and follow me- the cross of Christ is unique, but the true follower will not shrink from fellowship with Christ in the rejection the cross represents. In this way His cross becomes ours. Needless to say this cross is not a physical piece of wood, but a doctrine. The teaching regarding the cross is brought out in Paul’s epistles. For instance, Galatians 1:20, “I am crucified with Christ”; Romans 6:6, “Our old man was crucified with Christ”; Galatians 5:24, “They that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh”; Galatians 6:14, “The cross…by which the world is crucified to me, and I unto the world”.

16:25
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.

For whosoever will save his life shall lose it- the word for life is soul, the person. To save one’s person is to live for self, and is the opposite of denying self. The cross puts an end to self. The believer who lives for self is not living for the Lord, and will find in the day of assessment that he has nothing to be rewarded for. His life will have been wasted and lost. This has nothing to do with losing salvation, which can never happen to a true believer, but it has everything to do with losing reward.

And whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it- to lose life is to give up one’s own interests in favour of Christ’s. Note it must be “for my sake”, not with the thought of gaining merit, and certainly not as a form of penance, that neglecting of the body which is condemned in Colossians 2:23, and which in fact is satisfying to the flesh, as that verse says.

At the Judgment Seat of Christ the life lived for Christ will be found in the form of reward, and at Christ’s appearing it will be found in the form of glory for the One who made it possible, and for the enjoyment of life in the kingdom. Compare 1 Peter 1:7, “found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ”. Then, “Whom having not seen (as He will be when He comes to earth), ye love”. Love to Christ will displace love for self.

16:26
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Such an one will “find” nothing at the end of a life seeking gain for himself. In the light of eternity, to gain everything material is to lose an eternal reward. See Philippians 3:7, where the apostle testifies “What things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ”.

Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? As a man looks back over a wasted life, (even if he has gained the whole world), he realises that all he has accumulated is not enough to buy back lost opportunities. In Ephesians 5:16, the apostle exhorts us to be “redeeming the time, for the days are evil”, or if we may take the liberty of paraphrasing, “take the hours of the day to the marketplace and sell to the highest bidder, thus putting a high value on them, for days spent as the world spends them are evil and worthless”. How important it is to live in the light of eternity, for the things of time and sense are not lasting, and will not profit spiritually the one occupied with them.

16:27
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.

For the Son of Man shall come- here the Lord looks on to the day when He does come to reign, and when His followers shall be with Him, and when He shall be glorified in His saints, 2 Thessalonians 1:10. The degree He is glorified then will be the degree we have denied ourselves in favour of His interests now.

In the glory of his Father with his angels- only those things which glorify Christ can be associated with the glory of His Father, and be on display in that day. Other things will have been burnt up. His angels excel in strength and fly swiftly to do heaven’s bidding, and this zeal should mark the believer. The angels will have certain duties to perform at His coming, such as the reaping of the harvest of the earth, Revelation 14:15-19, the gathering of God’s elect from the four quarters of the earth, Matthew 24:31, and the division between the good and the bad among men, to determine whether they go into the kingdom or not, Matthew 13:49,50.

And then shall he reward every man according to his works- reward means recompense. The self-denial has meant hardship, and in the day of glory this will be compensated for. Note that denying self is not a negative thing, for it produces works. For church saints, the reward will, in part, consist of responsibility in the kingdom. The rewards will be granted at the judgment seat of Christ, but those that involve responsibilities in the kingdom will be reserved to be discharged when the kingdom is set up.

16:28
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom- this is a reference to the vision seen on the holy mount, described by Matthew in the next chapter, which confirmed the Old Testament prophecies, 2 Peter 1:16. Note that the preview of the kingdom is given after the revelation about the church, to assure us that the church does not replace the kingdom. The “some” referred to were Peter, James and John. Since the coming kingdom is sure, then living for Christ now is very worthwhile. The more we live for Him now, the more He will be glorified in a day to come.

COLOSSIANS 2

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using e-mail: martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk
We would be pleased to hear from you.

COLOSSIANS 2

Structure of the chapter

Verses 1-3 Appreciating the mystery of Christ.
Verses 4-19 Avoiding the error of those who deny Christ.
Verses 20-23 Acting on the truth of association with Christ.

Survey of the chapter
Verses 1-3 are really a continuation of the subject of the greatness of the mystery, beginning in 1:24.

Verses 4-19 contain warning about four ways in which heretics would seek to lead them astray.

Verses 20-23 explain one consequence of being dead with Christ.

Structure of verses 1-3

(a) 2:1

The agony: praying and preaching

(b) 2:2a

The ambition: hearts comforted.

(c) 2:2b

The atmosphere: love

(d) 2:2c

The aim: assurance and understanding

(e) 2:3

The abundance: all the treasures

Verses 1-3
Appreciating the mystery of Christ.

2:1
For I would that ye knew what great conflict I have for you, and for them at Laodicea, and for as many as have not seen my face in the flesh;

For I would that ye knew what great conflict I have for you- Paul agonised in prayer, (the word “conflict” is “agona”, from which we derive the word agony, and is used in Luke 22:44 of Christ’s conflict in Gethsemane), in view of the greatness of the truth he has just written about, and in view, also, of the greatness of the danger that lurked all around them, which danger he is about to write about. Agony is the exertion of the athlete as he strives to attain his objective. Paul is not striving to win for himself, but that the Colossians might do so. He knows that hostile spirit-forces are opposing the believers, seeking to make them go off course. Jericho was a barrier to Israel, the stronghold that prevented them from entering in to the inheritance that God had given them. The word Jericho means “City of the moon”, (the moon being the ruler of the night) and Paul reminds the Ephesians believers that they wrestle against “the rulers of the darkness of this world”, Ephesians 6:12.

Even though we have an intercessor on high, Romans 8:34, and an intercessor within, 8:26, we still need to pray ourselves, for the Spirit helps us as we pray; He does not intercede instead of us but alongside of us. Prayer is a sign of our dependence on God and faith in God.

And for them at Laodicea- some twenty-six years later Laodicea had declined in spirituality, being more interested in material riches than spiritual ones. Both Colosse and Laodicea were near the river Meander. This river gradually silted up, however, and left Colosse poorer commercially, and Laodicea richer. Sadly, however, the greater prosperity affected the Laodicean believers, so that they boasted that they were “rich, increased in goods, and had need of nothing”, but they knew not that they were poor, spiritually, Revelation 3:17. This can easily happen when prosperity comes, for dependence upon the Lord can easily decline and we become self-sufficient. We must remember that even though in Old Testament times financial prosperity was a sign of God’s approval, in this age it is not so. In fact, the apostle writes to Timothy that he should turn away from those who said that gain was a sign of godliness, 1 Timothy 6:5. Melchizedek strengthened Abraham with bread and wine before the King of Sodom came to tempt him with the words, “Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself”, Genesis 14:21. As the Lord Jesus said, “What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?”, Matthew 16:26. Starting out on the Christian pathway we should resolve to go in for spiritual things, even if that means less material things. This will be to the profit of our souls. This will prevent the tragedy of looking back on a life spent in worldly pursuits, and asking what, out of the accumulated wealth we have acquired, can we give to buy back the lost opportunities. The answer is, of course, nothing.

And for as many as have not seen my face in the flesh- Paul had an interest in the spiritual progress of all believers, even those he had never seen. It is one of the signs of a true believer that he loves those who are born of God. As John wrote, “every one that loveth Him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of Him”, 1 John 5:1. And the Colossians were marked by this, for in verse 4 of the first chapter Paul can write of their love to all the saints.

We should remember, however, that just because we love a believer it does not mean that we can automatically have fellowship with him, for the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship go together, Acts 2:42. We should only have fellowship with the things and the people that the apostles would have had fellowship with.

2:2
That their hearts might be comforted, being knit together in love, and unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ;

That their hearts might be comforted- the heart of man is the very centre of his being. “Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life”, Proverbs 4:23. Just as the natural heart is critical to our life, (for “the life of the flesh is in the blood”, Leviticus 17:11), and forth from it is circulated our life-blood, so the centre of the moral being of the believer should be safeguarded and comforted. To be comforted means to be strengthened and fortified. A fort was a stronghold in ancient times. So our hearts need to be protected and strengthened to withstand the attacks of the enemy, for he is active, as the next verses show.

Being knit together in love- Satan loves to divide the people of God. The slogan of many a military strategist has been “Divide and rule”. The apostle is earnestly praying that the Colossians might not be disunited. Love is the major uniting bond of believers; love to God and Christ, love to fellow-believers, all grounded in the love of God’s word, as the apostle will go on to say.

And unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding- this is one of Paul’s complicated phrases. It is best understood by beginning at the end and working backwards. The main subject of the phrase is “understanding”. Then we have the “full assurance of understanding”. Then we have “all riches of the full assurance of the understanding”.

The word understanding as used here means literally “to put together”, and refers to the believer’s ability to relate truth to truth so as to gain a right appreciation of Divine things. This demands effort, concentration and persistence, but it reaps a reward, as the word riches indicates.

Full assurance may be thought of as complete confidence. Many believers lack assurance because they do not allow the truth of the word of God to govern their thinking. Instead of appreciating what God has done for them and in them through Christ, they look to themselves, and find failure and weakness. This only unsettles and disturbs, whereas if we look to what God has done we shall be assured in our hearts. This is not to say that we may be complacent about our failures and shortcomings, but we should remember that the true believer is “accepted in the Beloved”, Ephesians 1:4, and not accepted by God because of anything he has done or been.

No wonder the apostle speaks of “all riches”, for every conceivable blessing has been granted to the believer, Ephesians 1:3, and it only remains to enter in to an appreciation of these things in faith.

To the acknowledgement of the mystery of God- we now learn what it is we should understand. There are three strands to it. First, the mystery of God, then the mystery of the Father, and then the mystery of Christ. (We are told that there are manuscript differences here, but we should expect corrupt documents like the Sinaiticus, Vaticanus and Alexandrinus to have perverted readings, for that is Satan’s way of attacking the person of Christ, and sowing doubt as to whether we can know what the word of God is or not. The manuscripts listed above are the basis of the vast majority of the new translations of the Bible, from the Revised Version onwards).

The word mystery refers to information that is only available to those who are initiated. All believers are introduced by the preaching of the gospel to truth regarding God, for it is “the glorious gospel of the blessed God”, 1 Timothy 1:11. The apostle wrote of the mystery of the gospel, Ephesians 6:19. As the gospel is preached, truths about God are set forth for those who show an interest. As the Spirit works in their hearts, men are persuaded of the truth of the scriptures explained to them. Confronted with the glory of God and their nothingness in His sight, they repent, and believe the truth they hear. The great goal the apostle had as he prayed for these Colossian believers is that they fully acknowledge, or are fully acquainted with, the truths that he, as an apostle, had been entrusted with, and which he had passed on to the saints.

Given that a New Testament mystery is about truths that were unknown in former times, but which are now revealed to the believer, we might ask what some of these truths are. Consider the following:

1. The once-for-all sacrifice of Christ. In the Old Testament times, sacrifices were offered “year by year continually”, Hebrews 10:1. There seemed to be no end of this system, until Christ came, and “by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified”, Hebrews 10:14.

2. Permanent cleasing from sin. Instead of relying on the annual Day of Atonement ceremony for purging from sins nationally, and sin offerings brought in between times for personal sins, the believer now finds that “the blood of Jesus Christ, his Son, cleanseth us from all sin”, 1 John 1:7, with the “us” referring to those who walk in the light, a definition of believers.

3. The indwelling of the Holy Spirit. In Old Testament times, the Holy Spirit came to certain people for certain tasks. So Bezaleel was given the Spirit to make the tabernacle vessels, Exodus 31:1-3; and David was given the Spirit to enable him to reign righteously over Israel, 1 Samuel 16:13. But it was not necessarily the case that the Spirit of God stayed, for David sinned badly, and in one of his repentance psalmist he pleads with God to not take His Holy Spirit from him, Psalm 51:11, for that would mean that he was no longer king. Now things are different, for the Lord Jesus told His own in the Upper Room that He would “pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever”, John 14:16.

4. The blessing of the gospel is available to Jew and Gentile alike. In Old Testament times the path to blessing was through Israel. A man had to become a proselyte to be in the good of God’s favour. Now there is no distinction made between Jew and Gentile, as Peter learnt when he saw the vision of the wild beasts in the sheet, Acts 10:8-16. He realised that God was not dealing exclusively with Israel for the time being, for God has, in his words, “put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith”, Acts 15:9.

5. The believer’s inheritance is in heaven. For the Jew, the inheritance was Canaan. And in the future, Canaan under their Messiah. At the present time the inheritance is in heaven, reserved and watched over by God, 1 Peter 1:4.

6. The believer is a citizen of heaven. For Israel, their citizenship was on earth, as subjects of the Messiah. Now the believer is a citizen of heaven, Philippians 1:27, (where conversation is citizenship); and 3:20, (where conversation is “city-state”).

The eternal life we receive when we believe not only enables us to know God initially, but it empowers us to get to know Him increasingly. This is the highest goal set before us, and the life we have been given enables us to achieve it, in dependence upon God. To have the knowledge of God in this way will mean that we have God alone as our object; all other knowledge will recede. Believers will be totally absorbed with who and what God is, in eternity. Moreover, with that knowledge will come insight into all that is mysterious now. Those many things which seem so puzzling will be resolved then, as we are enabled to fathom to some degree the inner secrets of God’s purpose. We should strive for that now, but it will only be fully realised in eternity, when all that hinders us will have been removed.

And of the Father- there was a mystery about God as Father that has now been disclosed to believers. The Lord Jesus, when He prayed to His Father as recorded in John 17, was able to say “I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare it”, verse 26. So the name, (meaning the person), of the Father had been declared by the Son by His life down here. God had not been addressed as Father by any in the Old Testament. The psalmist had used a figure of speech when he wrote of God pitying His children as a father does, Psalm 103:13, but the revelation of God as Father was only given when the Son came to reveal Him. This revelation was so complete that He could say, “He that hath seen me, hath seen the Father”, John 14:9. And as the apostle John wrote, “And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we might know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ”, 1 John 5:20. As a result, when He went back to heaven He ascended back to one who is not only His Father, but ours too, John 20:17.

And of Christ- the name Son tells us of His nature, and His relationship with the Father. The word Christ, however, is a title, and relates to an office. The word means “anointed”, and marks out the Lord Jesus as the long-promised Messiah. There is a further dimension to His Christ-hood, however, as indicated by Peter on the Day of Pentecost. He declared that “God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ”, Acts 2:36. The Jews knew that the Christ or Messiah would be their King; now they learn that He will have another way to exercise His office, for as the Ascended One He unites His people with Himself in a way that can be likened to the way in which the human body is joined to its head. It was the special task of the apostle to set these things out; it remained for the Colossian believers to enter into an understanding of them.

2:3

In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.

In whom are hid- not in the sense of being hidden out of reach to believers, for the apostle is encouraging us to access them. The treasures are, however, out of reach of heretics like the gnostics.

All the treasures of wisdom and knowledge- the claim of the gnostics to have superior knowledge must be spurious, since all the truth resides in Him. (As He Himself said, “I am…the truth”, John 14:6). Since they knew not Christ, they knew not the wisdom that is in Him.

Something of the spiritual excitement of the apostle as he thought of this wisdom and knowledge is conveyed to us by the word treasures. To him, the knowledge Christ gives is worth more than earth’s riches. We read about wisdom in the Book of Proverbs, and there wisdom is personified, (an anticipation of the coming of Christ as the Wisdom of God, 1 Corinthians 1:24), and speaks like this,

“I love them that love me;

and those that seek me early shall find me.

Riches and honour are with me;

yea, durable riches and righteousness.

My fruit is better than gold;

yea, than fine gold;

and my revenue than choice silver.

I lead in the way of righteousness,

in the midst of the paths of judgement:

that I may cause them that love me to inherit substance;

and I will fill their treasures”. Proverbs 8:17-21.

Wisdom is insight into the true nature of things, and knowledge is the information we need to put that wisdom into practice in our lives, so that we may live intelligently to God’s glory, and are able also to resist the teachings of heretics.

(iii) 2:4-19

The enemies of the truth about Christ

Structure of the section

(a) Verses 4-7 Those who beguile

Antidote: Faith in Christ

(b) Verses 8-15 Those who spoil.

Antidote: Truth after Christ

(c Verses 16,17 Those who judge.

Antidote: Reality of Christ.

(d) Verses 18,19 Those who deprive.

Antidote: Support from Christ.

(a) Verses 4-7

Those who beguile

Antidote: Faith in Christ

2:4

And this I say, lest any man should beguile you with enticing words.

And this I say- this introduces a new section, in which the apostle is more specific in his warnings about false teachers. Verse 5 can be considered as a parenthesis, so “this I say” connects with “as ye have therefore” in verse 6.

Lest any man should beguile you with enticing words- having presented the truth as to the person of Christ, Paul is now protecting the minds of the believers from error. In 1:28 he had spoken of warning and teaching. To beguile means to deceive by false reasoning. This is why the apostle prayed that the believers at Colosse might be given wisdom, so that they might discern what was false. “Enticing words” is a description of the persuasive speech of those who promote error. Not having the Spirit of God in their hearts, they have to rely on natural eloquence. Paul writes elsewhere of those who “by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple”, Romans 16:18. This is not to say that preachers and teachers should be hard to listen to, or awkward in their presentation of the truth, but it must be done in the power of the Spirit of God and not of the flesh. Ecclesiastes 12:9-10 reads, “And moreover, because the preacher was wise, he still taught the people knowledge; yea, he gave good heed, and sought out, and set in order many proverbs. The preacher sought to find out acceptable words: and that which was written was upright, even words of truth”.

2:5

For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the spirit, joying and beholding your order, and the stedfastness of your faith in Christ.

For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the spirit- Epaphras, (who was from Colosse), had given a faithful report as to conditions in the assembly in that city, and he had endeared the believers to the heart of the apostle. It was a company the apostle would have been happy to associate with, and in his spirit he did so. Every assembly should strive to be the sort of company in which Paul would be happy. Two things are next mentioned as being pleasing to the apostle, namely their order, and the steadfastness of their faith.

Joying and beholding your order- every assembly should be marked by order, the spiritual order of those who keep in step with one another by a mutual love of the word of God and its instructions. In many ways the assembly at Corinth was in disorder, so the apostle had to exhort them to do everything decently and in order, 1 Corinthians 14:40.

And the stedfastness of your faith in Christ- their order was more collective, as they met together, but the steadfastness of their faith is especially seen in their personal lives as they lived by faith day by day, refusing to allow circumstances to move them. Note the connection between order and faith. Disorder prevents faith flourishing, for the distractions are too great. By constantly exposing their souls to the truth of Scripture, their faith would be strengthened, and they would not give way when error about Christ was presented to them.

2:6

As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:

As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord- they had received Him by faith, and that initial faith should continue to mark them. John writes of those who “believe on his name”, John 1:12, the sense being, “who keep on believing on his name”. “The just shall live by faith” is the phrase that Paul quotes three times in his epistles to show that justification is by faith. But as found in Habukkuk 2:4, the phrase is, “the just shall live by his faith”. So the initial faith that results in justification, is the same faith by which the justified one lives subsequently. His life is governed by his faith.

He is Christ Jesus, implying that He is exalted to heaven with Divine approval; there is no deficiency in Him, therefore, that needs to be made up by the suggestions of the heretics. He is Lord, and therefore those He authorises to expound the truth, the apostles, should not be set aside in favour of unauthorised false teachers.

So walk ye in him- their unseen Lord should be their guide, not the unbelieving false teachers, no matter how plausible their arguments seemed to be. There are those who use this expression to support their view that things like the Lord’s Supper, and baptism, are not necessary, since they involve things we can see, and, they say, faith and sight are not compatible. This is not the case, however, for faith is necessary in baptism, as even our chapter will show in verse 12, “the faith of the operation of God”. Baptism is a response in faith to the work of God in raising Christ from the dead. So to walk in faith includes being baptised.

2:7

Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.

Rooted and built up in him- the apostle uses a variety of figures of speech to illustrate what he is teaching. Having spoken of walking in the previous verse, he now uses descriptions of a healthy plant. First of all it is rooted. This reminds us of verse 5, where he spoke of the steadfastness of their faith in Christ. They were not like the stony ground hearers of the parable of the sower, who had begun well, but after a while had withered because, as the Lord said, “these have no root”, Luke 8:13. On the contrary, these were firmly settled in Christ by true and lasting faith.

A plant also needs to grow if it is to be fruitful. Again the secret is “in Him”, for spiritual growth comes when we take advantage of all the resources available to those who are in Christ. This growth would be jeopardised if they listened to the poisonous doctrines of the false teachers.

And stablished in the faith- as a plant grows, it puts out an ever-increasing network of roots, which enable it to draw nutrients from a wide area for the support of its structure. This the believers should do, as they explore the richness of the truth in Christ which nourishes their souls, causing them to grow more into His likeness. Roots also give stability to a plant so that it can withstand the wind. There are hostile winds of doctrine blowing around the believer, and he needs stability to withstand their force, see Ephesians 4:14.

All three of these words, “rooted”, “built up” and “stablished” are perfect participles, which means they express action which is ongoing, and not once-for-all. Believers need to constantly grow and develop in the things of Christ, for eternal life is not a static thing, but progressive and forward-looking.

As ye have been taught- they should continue as they had begun, having been faithfully taught by Epaphras and others, 1:7. They should not be tempted by the novel ideas of the gnostics. As the apostle John exhorted, “Let that therefore abide in you which ye have heard from the beginning”, 1 John 2:24.

Abounding therein with thanksgiving- whilst it is true that the Lord Jesus cursed the fig tree because it bore no fruit, only leaves, nevertheless foliage is necessary for a plant to flourish.

We should never neglect to thank God for the instruction He gives to us through the teachers Christ has given to the body of Christ for our instruction. Those teachers have a difficult and stressful task, as they labour to bring the word of God to us. The apostle will seek the prayers of believers in 4:3 that his ministry might be effective. If an apostle needed prayer, how much more those who are not apostles.

(b) Verses 8-15

Those who spoil.

Antidote: Truth after Christ

2:8

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit- the figure changes, and now the apostle likens false teachers to the wolves that come to snatch away sheep. The Good Shepherd Himself made clear that none can pluck the sheep from either His hand or the hand of His Father, John 10:27-29, nevertheless the threat of damage to the spiritual life of the sheep is real, and the apostle warns of the danger false teachers pose. They use philosophy, which is the product of the human mind, and which has been condemned by God through the cross, as 1 Corinthians 1 makes clear. Christ is the wisdom of God, and all the resources we need to inform our minds and govern our practice are in Him. The wisdom of the world is foolishness with God, but it has an attraction for the carnal mind. We should not confuse this wisdom with the use of logic, which is everywhere used by the apostle in his writings, drawing conclusions in a reasoned way. That logic must be based on Scripture, and not on human speculation which has no authority.

Allied to this philosophy is vain deceit; dealing in error as they do, the false teachers cannot rely on the truth to make their case, but need to employ deceptive methods to promote their cause. The consequence of this is vain, empty and devoid of positive good, and detracts from Christ.

After the tradition of men- Christian traditions, those things handed over to us by the apostles and the Lord Himself, are to be kept faithfully, but the writings of those who oppose the truth should be rejected. There are writings called the New Testament Apocrypha. These writings do not have the sanction of the apostles, being written after they had passed from the scene. Jude can write of the “faith once (for all) delivered unto the saints”, Jude 3, so the body of Christian doctrine, known as the faith, was complete in his day. So the promise of the Lord Jesus had come to pass, for he said, speaking of the Holy Spirit as the Spirit of truth, “he shall guide you into all truth”, John 16:13. It is important to notice that those who attacked the scriptures after the apostle were gone never attacked the apocryphal writings, for they knew they were not part of what Christians believe. Any additions to this body of truth are to be regarded with great suspicion.

There is a lack of discernment about this in our day, and outrageous and often blasphemous writings are made into films and books, and deceive people into thinking that they represent Christian truth, which they do not. The Lord Jesus censured the rulers of His day for the way in which they elevated the traditions of the Jews above the Scriptures, saying, “Ye make the word of God of no effect by your tradition”, Matthew 15:6.

After the rudiments of the world- this expression was used by the apostle in Galatians 4:3,9 in relation to the basic and simple truths that the law was able to impart, but which did not represent the full truth as found in Christ. It seems that the false teachers attacking the Colossians were mixing gnostic speculation with Judaism, to make a combination of ideas that would appeal both to those impressed by intellectualism on the one hand, and those impressed by ritualism and asceticism on the other. Whatever the doctrines were, the apostle is clear that they are of the world, and therefore are not helpful to the believer, who has life from heaven.

And not after Christ- this is the decisive thing which condemns false doctrine. It does not conform to what Christ teaches, nor does it give a correct view of Him personally. We need to ask about any teaching, or proposed action based on teaching, whether it relates well to Christ, or whether it is contrary to Him. He is always the test, as He Himself indicated to the Jews with the question, “What think ye of Christ”, Matthew 22:42.

2:9

For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily- Christ is the reference point, for the reason Paul now gives. The reason why everything must centre in Christ is because He is the one through whom the Godhead expresses itself. The word “fulness” was greatly used by the gnostics, and in their teachings it represented the sum total of all the qualities of God which they said were to be found spread around amongst an endless array of minor spirit-beings. This was a total misuse of the word, for the reason stated here. The fulness is in Christ, not in a multitude of lesser beings. Nor is the fulness in Him temporarily, but as a resident, as is indicated by the word “dwelleth”, which is in the present tense.

Every attribute of Deity resides permanently in Christ, and is happy to do so, again as the word “dwelleth” indicates. There is nothing lacking in Him, and He is able to manifest God fully. He left nothing of His Deity behind when He came down from heaven; He left nothing of His manhood behind when He went back to heaven. Hence the fullness dwells bodily.

Early in the history of the world man lost the concept of the One True God, who had every attribute and quality enshrined within Himself. Forsaking this knowledge, man invented false gods, each of whom they believed had some virtue, but none of them possessing every virtue. Satan was only too ready to position himself behind these ideas through his evil agents, and hold man in bondage.

2:10

And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

And ye are complete in him- believers are “in Christ”, reckoned by God to be positionally where Christ is. He is beyond death, and so, in principle, are believers. He is seated in heaven, so are believers, Ephesians 2:6. He is sure of the approval of His Father, so are believers. No wonder the apostle says they are complete “in Him”. Their position is one of full acceptance, full provision, full salvation. And this is heightened by the fact just noticed that He embodies within Himself all the fullness of the Godhead. All that fulness ensures the complete welfare of His people. And this includes the constant nourishment of their souls by means of the truth. He has all fulness and they have no lack.

Clearly, then, they have no need of the heretics, who come along claiming to be able to take them beyond what there is in Christ. This was the strategy of Satan in the Garden of Eden. He did not tempt Eve to murder Adam, or any such thing. He tempted her with the prospect of being as gods, knowing good and evil, Genesis 3:5. In other words, to advance her in knowledge beyond what God had said. She fell, but the Colossians should learn the lesson, and not fall into that trap. Beware of any religion that claims to give the knowledge of God apart from reference to Christ as the Son of God, equal with the Father. “What think ye of Christ? Whose Son is He?”, is always the test, Matthew 22:42. Many profess to think well of Christ, so both questions need to be answered.

Which is the head of all principality and power- He is far above angels because of His Deity, (for He is the creator of angels, 1:16); and also because of His ascension, for He is raised “far above all principality and powers, Ephesians 1:20,21. Verse 15 will tell us He defeated evil spirit-powers at Calvary. So no spirit can override what Christ teaches, for He is above and in control. All teaching must come from Him; He does not delegate this to angels. Indeed, Paul warned the Galatians that even if an angel came and preached to them, they were to think of him as cursed, Galatians 1:8. The Gnostic theory of an almost endless stream of lesser deities linking man to God is a fabrication. See 1 Timothy 1:4, with its reference to “endless genealogies”.

2:11

In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:

In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands- not only are believers complete in Christ, they are separated unto Him from the sphere where error flourishes. Christ cannot link sinners with Himself, so He must cut them off from their links with Adam if He is to join them to Himself. This He did at the cross, where He dealt with all that Adam represented.

When God made a covenant with Abraham, He made physical circumcision the sign of that covenant. Abraham was now special to Himself, and had the mark on his body to prove it. Such a rite is no longer relevant, so that the apostle described physical circumcision as “concision”, a cutting off and a maiming, Philippians 3:2, whereas believers are now the true circumcision, properly cut off by God from their links with Adam’s world. This means they are cut off from the sphere where heretics operate, for such men are of the world, being unbelievers, and as such have no contact with the things of God.

When he is dealing with the case of the Jew in his epistle to the Romans, the apostle shows that true circumcision is a heart matter, “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men but of God”, Romans 2:28,29. This is why Stephen was justified in calling the Jews who were about to stone him, “uncircumcised in heart and ears”, Acts 7:51.

In putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ- we have seen there was the circumcision of Abraham. There was also the circumcision of Moses, for under his leadership the people became cut off to God nationally by the covenant of the Law given at Sinai. Further, there was the circumcision of Joshua, when the people crossed the Jordan and it was found that some had not been circumcised during the desert journey. All these variations were of physical circumcision, but the circumcision of Christ is spiritual in character. It has to do with the whole person; in other words, it is not limited to part of the body as with the physical ceremony; this circumcision separates the whole person for God. Clearly this is a radical thing. And only the crucifixion of Christ can effect it. It is in His cutting off that the believer is cut off, and that not partially, but wholly.

What is cut off is the body as the vehicle by which sins of the flesh are conceived and committed, the flesh being the sinful self, which is resident in the body. Paul calls the body “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6. He is there concerned with the sin-principle within, whereas here it is the sin-practice that is in view; nonetheless the idea is that the body is the base of operations from which sins proceed. As far as God is concerned, that body has been cut off so that it may be brought over into resurrection conditions to be used for God. That which is called “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6 can be presented to God as a living sacrifice in Romans 12:1, for God has wrought upon it to His glory.

2:12

Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

Buried with him in baptism- having cut us off by associating us with Christ in His cutting off by crucifixion, the process is confirmed by “burial”. Just as our circumcision is not literal, so our burial is not either, for it is burial in water, not the earth. When immersed by the act of baptism, the believer is placed in a watery grave, and this is after the likeness of Christ’s state when He was in the tomb, being what the apostle calls “the likeness of His death”, meaning His state of death when He was in the tomb, Romans 6:4.

We can clearly see the error of infant sprinkling, from this verse. How can the sprinkling of a few drops of water on a person even remotely be called a burial? And how can it be said that the baby rises afterwards? And how can the so-called “baptism” of an infant be justified, when the apostle here speaks of “the faith of the operation of God”? The candidate for baptism must have faith, and must be immersed, and must re-emerge, or else the procedure is invalid.

Wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God- baptism has two aspects. It is a burial, and it is a resurrection. Just as surely as the believer, when under the water, is like Christ was in death, so he is like Christ is in resurrection when brought up out of the water. And this is an act of faith, for it something that the believer is responsible for getting done. When Ananias said to Paul, “Arise, and be baptised”, he used the Middle Voice, so the sense was “Get thyself baptised”. Whilst it is true that evangelists are commanded to baptise, they cannot force this on people. After all, evangelists are commanded to preach, but they cannot force people to believe. It is the responsibility of men to believe when the gospel is preached in their hearing; it is the responsibility of believers to get themselves baptised. In fact, the Lord Jesus said, “He that believeth and is baptised shall be saved”, Mark 16:16, so all the time a professed believer remains unbaptised, there is a question-mark over the reality of his profession. This is not to say that baptism contributes to salvation, or else the Lord would have said, “He that believeth not and is not baptised shall be damned”, but He did not.

Notice that the faith that moves the believer to get baptised is faith in the operation of God; it is not faith in baptism. The virtue lies in what God did through Christ by His death, burial and resurrection, not in the process of baptism, as if that is a means of grace.

Who hath raised him from the dead- so baptism is a very positive thing, not only in its practice, for the believer comes up out of the water, but also in its principle, for it is response to the God who raised up Christ. By association with Him we are linked to that which is clear of death and judgement. All that opens up for Christ because He is risen, opens up for believers too.

2:13

And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

And you- having established that the believer is a person in a new situation altogether through the resurrection of Christ, the apostle now reviews what it is that he has been delivered from. By so doing he will expand on the expression “the operation of God” of the previous verse. He turns his attention particularly to those who were Gentiles before conversion, for that was, no doubt, the situation with most of the Colossian believers to whom he is writing the epistle.

Being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh- not only were they devoid of response to God, being dead, and demonstrating this by sinning, but also they were uncircumcised, for they had not the separating advantages that God had given to the Jews. He had placed a hedge around that nation, but no such restrictions were known by the Gentile. He was left to walk in his own way, as Paul told the idol-worshippers of Lystra, Acts 14:16. Their backs were turned to God and their faces were turned to sin and the world. They were uncircumcised physically and morally. Note it is the uncircumcision of the flesh, not just of the physical body; the whole tendency of the sinner to commit sin, whether of mind or body, is in view, for the flesh is the self-principle and the sin-principle in man.

Hath he quickened together with him- to quicken means to make alive. Paul is showing that this operation is all of God. No credit attaches to the sinner. He is dead, and totally reliant on life from God if he is to live in any real sense of the word. Being dead in sins, he has no stock of merit by which to claim blessing from God. But God is rich in grace, and is pleased to associate those who believe with His Son in His death and resurrection experience.

Having forgiven you all trespasses- nothing contrary to God can be taken over into resurrection. The just basis of this forgiveness is the death of Christ, the subject of the next few phrases.

2:14

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us- clearly, by the use of the word “us” as opposed to the “and you” of verse 13, the apostle now turns his attention mainly to those believers who were formerly Jews. Not exclusively so, however, for the Gentiles had the law written in their hearts, according to Romans 2:15, and the Jews had the law, not only written on tables of stone by the finger of God, but in the book of the law written by Moses. But it is as if Moses did not write with permanent ink, for here we learn that what was written was blotted out. The law is not the rule of life for the believer. Believers who try to please God by keeping the law will always be defeated, and therefore miserable, as Paul found in Romans 7. The example of Christ is our model, and the Spirit of God encourages us in that.

Which was contrary to us- note the double assertion that the law was not on our side. It was not only against us rather than for us, but also it was “contrary to us”, attacking us relentlessly because of our sinfulness. Paul found that “sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me”, Romans 7:11. Clearly, we need someone to deliver us from the law and its demands.

And took it out of the way- the commandments of the law would represent a stumblingblock to the believer as he seeks to walk the pathway of faith. God has taken this hindrance out of the way, so the path is cleared of obstacles. This is not to say that the Law of God has been disposed of; that cannot be. But it is removed as a means of pleasing God. Believers please God by living like Christ. When they so live, they fulfil the righteousness of the law, meaning all that the law demanded as being right, Romans 8:4. The law as a means of obtaining righteousness has been ended by Christ, Romans 10:4. He is the end of “law for righteousness”, but not the end of the law.

Nailing it to his cross- the subject of the verbs used here is God. So He has quickened, forgiven, blotted out, taken out of the way, nailed, and in verse 15 He is said to spoil, make a show, and triumph. Eight mighty acts that God has performed on the basis of the death, burial, resurrection and ascension of Christ.

It is as if God placed the handwriting of the law into the hands of Christ, and the nails went through not only his hands, but also the manuscript, fastening it to the cross so that it could not be active against the believer. And since it is nailed to the cross, it cannot be re-written. Remember that the law was written in a book as well as on tables of stone, Exodus 24:7.

2:15

And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it.

And having spoiled principalities and powers- the believer has other enemies, and their power must be broken too. The gnostic heretics made a great deal of supposed intermediaries between the believer and God. This verse exposes such mediators as being none other than evil spirit-forces, fallen angels who are still allowed to influence men’s thinking. God has spoiled them through Christ, however, and they are powerless now as far as the believer is concerned. To spoil means to “strip off the armour”. Their protection has been removed, and they are defenceless and defeated foes. The believer is more than a match for them as long as he puts on the armour provided for him by God, Ephesians 6:13. When men asserted that the miracles of Christ were accomplished by the power of Satan, amongst other things the Lord said in reply, “When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: but when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all the armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils”, Luke 11:21,22. Satan is the strong man, and Christ is the stronger than he. Satan’s defences are taken away, and he is vulnerable to attack.

He made a show of them openly- God has raised up His Son, not only from the grave, but also to His throne, as Peter declared on the Day of Pentecost in the words, “”By the right hand of God exalted…the Lord said unto my Lord, ‘Sit Thou on my right hand'”, Acts 2:33, 34.

Paul refers to Christ’s ascension with the words of the psalmist, “When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men”, Ephesians 4:8. The initial reference in the psalm is to the ascension of David to the throne of Israel after he had defeated his enemies. So the gifts mentioned were in large part the spoils of war, as a reading of 2 Samuel 8:9-12 will show.

Three ideas therefore come together in the verse quoted. First, the absolute triumph of Christ, as indicated by the fact that having been crucified on a cross, He has now ascended to the very throne of God. Second, the utter defeat of Satan and his forces, crippling them to such an extent that, even though they are allowed a certain amount of latitude, they are easily defeated by means of the resources Christ gives. Third, the bestowal of gifts in grace, to enable believers to grow.

In the expression “He led captivity captive”, captivity is personified to represent all that had held unbelievers captive, and which would try to lead them captive as believers. (It has nothing to do with any supposed transfer of souls from hades to heaven). Such is the triumph of Christ that He can move through the sphere of the prince of the power of the air unhindered. In Daniel 10:12,13 we read of the way in which the progress of the angel Gabriel was hindered by an evil angel-prince, and he had to be assisted by Michael the archangel. No such delay is suffered by Christ, who rises to heaven with “angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto Him”, 1 Peter 3:22.

It is clear from Scripture that the Lord Jesus has defeated the enemy in all of his guises:

The Prince of this world came to Christ when He was down here, yet He could say he “hath nothing in me”, John 14:30. As a result of Calvary the prince of this world will certainly be cast out in the future, John 12:31.

As the Devil, and wielding the power of death, he has been utterly defeated by the death and resurrection of Christ, Hebrews 2:14.

As god of this age he is defeated every time a blinded mind is made to see the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ, 2 Corinthians 4:4-6.

As Satan he is defeated when Christ intercedes for His own, Luke 22:31,32.

As the Devil, the accuser, he is defeated by Christ our advocate, 1 John 2:1.

Triumphing over them in it- the apostle returns at the end of the sentence to the event which started off this sequence. The cross is the ground on which God has defeated the powers of evil. If the Son of God can humble Himself even to the death of the Cross, and be crucified in weakness, (as 2 Corinthians 13:4 puts it), and yet rise again and ascend to God’s throne, He must be superior to any force. And so He is. The Devil is defeated, and so, therefore, are his evil hosts, which he uses to infiltrate the minds of men with error, the “doctrines of demons” that Paul refers to in 1 Timothy 4:1.

(c) Verses 16,17

Those who judge

Antidote: Reality of Christ

2:16

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink- the word “therefore” shows that the apostle is about to apply the truths he has just set out, especially with regard to the handwriting of ordinances, which detailed the ceremonies God expected the Israelites to carry out. He lists various features of the Old Testament tabernacle and temple system, which were ordained of God for Israel. The meat would be the flesh of animal sacrifices, some of which the offerer and the priest could eat. The drinks would either be the drink offerings, which were all poured out, but nonetheless were binding on the Israelite to bring, or the prohibition of wine as far as the Nazarites were concerned. The idea is of material things that the Law demanded, but which the apostle will show are out of date. The Colossian heretics were apparently teaching that these things were binding on believers. The apostle warns them not to allow these false teachers to judge or criticise them for not participating in Jewish rituals.

Or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days- these are the prescribed days in Israel’s religious calendar by which their religion was regulated. A holy day was a day during the set feasts; the new moon was the starting point for the month, determining when the feast began; the sabbath days were the weekly ordinance in Israel, in which all unnecessary work ceased, so that the day could be set apart for sacred purposes. There was also a sabbath during the Feast of unleavend bread, Leviticus 23:7, and at the end of the Feast of Tabernacles, on the eighth day, Leviticus 23:39.

2:17

Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

Which are a shadow of things to come- there cannot be a shadow unless there is an object to cast a shadow when the light is shone upon it. That object is Christ; the Old Testament ordinances were but shadows. The things of which they spoke were “to come”, in those days, but now they are come. We may study them to see how they spoke of Christ, but now He is come, there is no need for them. To continue with them is to show ignorance of the principles of Christianity. Christendom does indeed continue with these things, and mixes with them the unholy practices of paganism, to produce a system of things which is obnoxious to God. Believers should beware of being unwittingly drawn into these practices, for instance by celebrating Christmas and Easter, which are almost entirely pagan in origin and meaning. The policy of the Emperor Constantine to amalgamate heathenism and Christianity has been a blight on Christian testimony for sixteen cnturies. To go along with it is to perpetuate the tragedy.

But the body is of Christ- the fact that He is the body which casts the shadow is testimony to His pre-existence. It is also a testimony to the fact that He has always been the centre of God’s purpose, even in the days of the tabernacle rituals.

The sacrifice of Christ has rendered animal sacrifices obsolete, Hebrews 10:8,9. He brings real joy, not the figurative joy of the drink offering, 1 John 1:4. In Him the festivals of Israel either have or will have been fulfilled, 1 Corinthians 5:7; 15:23; every day may be held sacred to the Lord, Romans 14:6; the passing of time, as measured by the moon’s phases, is irrelevant, for the believer is in touch with eternal realities, Hebrews 9:12,15:13:20; and as far as the believer is concerned, true rest has been found in Christ, Matthew 11:29. No legalistic celebration of a day can replace or improve on that.

(d) Verses 18,19

Those who deprive

Antidote: Support from Christ

2:18

Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,

Let no man beguile you of your reward- those who run the race of faith, and who wish to win the reward of a prize, must see to it that no-one and nothing distracts them. Allegiance to Christ demands that we focus on Him. Satan does not want this, so he tries to attract us with other things to stop us concentrating on the things of Christ.

In a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels- the heretics claimed that God was unapproachable, and men need the agency of angels to bridge the gap. This seems to be a humble position, but in fact it ignores the fact there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 1 Timothy 2:5. The humility that finds its roots in the human will or volition, (which is the sense of “voluntary humility”), is spurious. In response to the supposed intervention of angels, the worship of angels began to be practised. There was a temple in honour of Michael the archangel in Colosse, so the apostle’s warnings were very relevant. Today, men worship Mary and the saints, and are likewise condemned by God. Even the apostle John was tempted to worship an angel, but was severely rebuked by him with the words, “See thou do it not…worship God”, Revelation 22:9. If an apostle was tempted, how careful we as ordinary believers should be, for our God is a jealous God, Exodus 20:5.

Intruding into those things which he hath not seen- the unknown spirit-world has a fascination for the natural mind. God has forbidden any attempt to contact the world of the spirits. Through Isaiah He said, “And when they shall say unto you, ‘Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep and that mutter’; Should not a people seek unto their God? For the living to the dead? To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them”, Isaiah 8:19,20. That these things continue is seen from the warning of the Lord Jesus to those who will pass through the time of tribulation that, “if they shall say unto you, ‘Behold he is in the secret chambers’; believe it not”, Matthew 24:26. The spiritist séance, or anything remotely like it, is no place for a believer. It would be appropriate to say that Halloween is anything but hallowed, but is devilish, and the believer should have no association with it in any shape or form, however innocent looking.

Vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind- far from showing true humility, these men are in fact puffed up in pride, claiming to have superior knowledge, and access into higher realms not open to the “ordinary” believer. Their minds are governed by the flesh, being unregenerate persons, and this leads them astray. Their pride is vain and empty pride, based on nothing substantial or spiritual, but rather the imaginings of their own thinking.

2:19

And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.

And not holding the Head- Christ is the head of the church, which is His body. He is far superior to any real or supposed spirit-powers. To give way to the heresy-mongers is to not “hold the “Head”, that is, to not give Him His proper and supreme place, especially in the matter of building up His people. The heretics did not hold the head, but believers must be careful to do so. A body does not have to hold on to the head to maintain its position in the body, (so union with Christ is not the responsibility of believers, but His), but it does have to rely on the head to govern the supply of nourishment for its maintenance and growth.

From which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered- nourishment is ministered from the head, not from any external sources, least of all devilish ones. No good angel can supply us, either, for all administration is entrusted to Christ as Head. In Ephesians 4:11,12 the apostle writes in similar vein, and there explains that the apostles and prophets with their written ministry, and pastors and teachers with their spoken ministry, are the channels of supply to us directly from our head. To ignore the ministry of the word is to ignore the ministrations of the Head, to our loss, and His dishonour.

And knit together- the joints and bands of our body not only give strength and structure, but also serve as means of supply to the whole body. What is true of the human body is also true of the body of Christ, the church. Much if not all of the disunity and fragmentation of believers could be avoided if there was a response to the teaching the Head sends down. This would not only build up, but bind together.

Increaseth with the increase of God- a body that does not grow is a tragedy, but the church grows and develops with the increase of God. This may be taken to mean the increase God supplies through Christ, or, alternatively, the increase that God is looking for, and the Epistle to the Ephesians makes it clear that what God is looking for and working towards is a likeness to Christ in His people. The language of that passage is as follows:

“till we all come in the unity of the faith,

and of the knowledge of the Son of God,

unto a perfect man,

unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

that we henceforth be no more children,

tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine,

by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness,

whereby they lie in wait to deceive,

but speaking the truth in love,

may grow up into Him in all things,

which is the head, even Christ:

from whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth,

according to the effectual working in the measure of every part,

maketh increase of the body

unto the edifying of itself in love”

Ephesians 4:13-16.

2:20

Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,

Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world- one of the things the believer died to in association with the death of Christ is the ordinances of the law. These have no jurisdiction over dead persons. We are “dead to the law by the body of Christ”, Romans 7:4. In other words, the process the body of Christ went through, namely, death, burial and resurrection, is the process we have been associated with. The elementary and rudimentary matters that the law of Moses set out were for the life of Israel on the earth. They do not fit for heaven. They were symbolic things, having great meaning, indeed, but now set aside by Christ. As such they are not relevant to those who are linked to Him in His heavenly place.

Why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances- believers live in the world by physical necessity, but not moral necessity. They are not of the world, but are sent into it as witness-bearers. They should live as though they are citizens of heaven, as indeed they are, Philippians 3:20, and not as though citizens of the world. Those who were God’s earthly nation in Old Testament times had ordinances to keep, which were appropriate to being on earth. Such things are not relevant to those who are linked to heaven. After all, Paul has told us that the ordinances were blotted out, and then the manuscript was nailed to the cross so that it could not be re-written.

2:21

(Touch not; taste not; handle not;

Touch not- the apostle sums up the ordinances of the law in three short phrases. They are all negative, which is characteristic of the law. The commandments were given by God to prevent sins being committed, and “Thou shalt not” is a constant refrain. The Levites were not allowed to touch the vessels of the tabernacle; the ordinary Israelite was not allowed to touch the altar. The whole nation were forbidden to touch Mount Sinai, but to fence it off and keep away. This was indicative of the fact that closeness of approach to God was not possible under the law.

Taste not- Israel was given dietary laws by God not only for their physical welfare, but also to mark them out as different to the nations. This is why the command to eat prohibited food was so significant to Peter, as he is about to meet Cornelius, a Gentile, in his house, Acts 10:27-29. There were those in the church, especially those who had been Jews, who were reluctant to eat other foods, and the apostle Paul deals with that matter in Romans 14:1-4,6.

Handle not- the first verb “touch” is more strong than this one, which means that there is a progression. First, close contact is forbidden by the law; then less strong contact, as expressed by the words “taste not”, and now the final verb prohibits the slightest contact. Such is the nature of the law, it admits no compromise or slight deviation.

We might contrast these two ideas of not touching and not tasting with the fact that believers can hold and taste. The word used here is the same as that of John 20:17 when the Lord Jesus said to Mary Magdalene, “Touch me not, for I am not yet ascended to my Father”. The implication being that, strangely, after He was gone back to heaven she would be able to touch Him. And so she could, as all believers can, for they are joined to Him vitally. And that in a way not possible under the law.

We may taste, too. When David was hungry, and went into the tabernacle to ask the priest for food, he was given the shewbread that had been replaced that sabbath day with hot bread, 1 Samuel 21:1-6. When he wrote about this later, David exhorted his readers to “taste and see that the Lord is good”, Psalm 34:8. When Peter alludes to those words he writes, “if so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious”, 1 Peter 2:3. He is writing to believers as Christian priests, and just as the Aaronic priests had shewbread to taste, so the believer feeds upon Christ the Living Bread. But David was not an Aaronic priest, but was of the tribe of Judah. Nonetheless, since the Lord is gracious, he was allowed the loaves.

2:22

Which all are to perish with the using;) after the commandments and doctrines of men?

Which all are to perish with the using)- all those things that are prohibited under the law are material things, which one day will be dissolved, 2 Peter 3:10. Why be occupied with things that are passing and material, when that which is eternal and spiritual is available to us?

After the commandments and doctrines of men? Originally the things of which Paul is speaking were commandments from God, but they do not come to us in that way, for they are not binding on believers of this age. The false teachers were trying to impose them upon the Colossian believers, however, and as such they had become the commandments of men, and the substance of their doctrine.

2:23

Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body: not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.

Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will worship- to the carnal mind these things seemed the right thing to do, for man is a religious being, and even though he rejects God’s word, he still is inclined to some sort of religious activity. This is true of men universally. The worship the heretics were professing to offer to God was the product of their own will, and was not Divine worship at all.

And humility- they displayed a mock humility, claiming to be so abased before God that they could not approach Him directly. The true believer has “boldness and access with confidence” to God, but only “by the faith of Him”, that is, by faith in Christ who introduces believers into the presence of the Father, and pleads His worth, not theirs, Ephesians 3:12.

And neglecting of the body- the strange doctrine of some was that if you starved and abused the body, then nearness to God might be achieved. We are to mortify the deeds of the body, reckoning the death of Christ to apply to it, in principle, Romans 8:13. We are not required to mortify the body itself. Christianity alone gives the proper place of honour and dignity to the body, and brings about circumstances whereby it may be presented to God as a living sacrifice, Romans 12:1. Needless to say when the apostle said he kept under his body, and brought it into subjection, 1 Corinthians 9:27, he was not saying he abused his body, but that he refused to allow any licence to his body to commit sin

Not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh- as far as God is concerned, these practices, far from pleasing Him, are reckoned to be dishonourable, however much men might approve of them. All these ideas did was satisfy carnal minds; they did not satisfy God, which should be our main aim.

 

 

 

 

1 CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

The Old Testament was divided into three sections, the law, the psalms and the prophets. The Lord Jesus sanctioned that division in Luke 24:44. He effectively divided the New Testament also into three sections as He spoke to His own in the upper room. He explained that the Holy Spirit would bring all things to their remembrance, John 14:26. This would involve His earthly ministry as recorded in the four gospels. He also spoke of the Spirit leading them into all the truth, 16:13, which would be the epistles. Then that same Holy Spirit would tell them things to come, verse 13 again, which would include not only the Book of Revelation, but also other scriptures, for there are prophetic passages in the epistles.

It is appropriate that the epistles to the Romans and the Corinthians should stand at the beginning of the more doctrinal section of the New Testament, for they are foundational in character. The epistle to the Romans defines the gospel, and establishes the believer in the truth of his righteous standing before God, whereas the epistle to the Corinthians is collective. It is not God’s purpose that His people should live their lives in isolation, except in unusual circumstances, such as pioneering the gospel in remote regions. Christianity is essentially collective in character. The figures of speech that are used to describe the church make this clear. A temple must have many stones; a flock must have many sheep; a vine must have many branches; a body must have many limbs and organs. Sheep, branches and limbs must be together. It is not enough for them to be many, they must also be together.

God has set down clearly how believers should relate to one another, and we do well to take note, so that we may be in line with His will. Those who believed the gospel on the Day of Pentecost and after, “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers”, Acts 2:42. The word “apostles'” relates to both doctrine and fellowship in that verse, so the believers only believed what the apostles believed and taught, and they only had fellowship in what the apostles were involved in. This made their lives very simple, and it would make ours simple, too, if we followed their example, and continued steadfastly in it. Part of the apostolic doctrine is found in the Epistle to the Corinthians, so let us turn our attention to it, that we may learn its lessons, and follow its instructions, to God’s glory. He is looking for obedience from His people; what Romans 1:5 calls “obedience to the faith”.

SUMMARY OF THE EPISTLE

The First Epistle to the Corinthians may be looked at as the response to communications sent to the apostle from various sources.

In chapters 1-4 he responds to a message from the household of Chloe regarding the disunity of the assembly at Corinth. This the apostle deals with by getting to the heart of the problem, which was the harmful influence the world’s way of thinking was having upon them.

In chapters 5-7 he deals with a matter which, sadly, was commonly reported about them, even their tolerance of moral evil in the company. He shows how they should deal with it in chapter 5, then how they should not deal with it, in chapter 6. They should deal with the matter within the assembly, and not resort to the law-courts of the world. In chapter 7 he gives guidance on the subject of marriage which, if followed, would prevent the immorality they were tolerating. Chapter 7 forms a bridge between two sections, for it follows on from chapters 5 and 6, but also begins the remaining section of the epistle in which the apostle answers questions the Corinthians had asked him. Each answer is prefaced by the words, “Now concerning”, or “as concerning”, or “as touching”.

Chapter 7:1 “Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: it is good for a man not to touch a woman”.

Chapter 7:25 “Now concerning virgins”.

Chapter 8:1 “Now as touching things offered to idols”.

Chapter 12:1 “Now concerning spiritual gifts”.

Chapter 16:1 “Now concerning the collection for the saints.

Chapter 16:12 “Now as touching our brother Apollos”.

STRUCTURE OF CHAPTER 1

(a) Verses 1-3 Introduction and greeting.

(b) Verses 4-9 Expression of thanks for God’s provision for the assembly.

(c) Verse 10 Exhortation to unity.

(d) Verses 11-16 Exposure of disunity.

(e) Verses 17,18 The wisdom of words is damaging.

(f) Verses 19,20 The wisdom of the wise of this world is destroyed.

(g) Verses 21-29 The wisdom of God is demonstrated.

(h) Verses 30,31 The wisdom of God directs all the glory to Himself.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 1 TO 3

1:1 Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,

1:2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their’s and our’s:

1:3 Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.

(a)   Verses 1-3    Introduction and greeting.

1:1 Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,

Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ- an apostle is one sent forth from another, with the full authority of that person, and with the resources he makes available. We notice how the apostle emphasises his apostleship here, for there were some at Corinth who were disputing whether he was a fully-fledged apostle. They possibly had in mind that he had not been with the Lord Jesus during His earthly ministry, and therefore was not one of The Twelve. This is the point, however, for Paul’s apostleship was from a risen and ascended Christ, and it was such a Person that Paul was commissioned to represent, preach, and teach. In the Second Epistle to the Corinthians Paul asserts the validity of his apostleship, for the signs of an apostle were evident in his ministry, 2 Corinthians 12;12. He also makes clear to the Galatians that those who had been with the Lord Jesus during His earthly ministry, (those who “seemed to be somewhat”), had nothing to add to him by way of authority or truth, Galatians 2:6.

There are not lacking today those who reject the authority of the writings of the apostle Paul. Such should remember the fact that he was sent out by the Lord Jesus personally, Acts 26:15-18, and his writings are the commandments of the Lord, 1 Corinthians 14:6. The apostle Peter recognised them as scripture, and on the same level of authority as the “other scriptures”, meaning the rest of the Word of God, 2 Peter 3:16.

Through the will of God- having been called to be an apostle through the determinative, and therefore settled, will of God, he was resolved to remain within the confines of that will. His apostleship, far from being of man, (self-appointed, or of a man-made order), or through man, (appointed in a secondary way by the other apostles), was from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, Galatians 1:1. He was “not a whit behind the very chiefest of the apostles”, 2 Corinthians 11:5, for he had done what they had not done, namely, seen the Lord Jesus in resurrection glory in heaven.

If we have a desire to conform to the will of God, we shall be guided by the word of God, for that is the only source of infallible guidance. The apostle shows in Romans 12:1-2 that those who present their bodies a living sacrifice to God in worshipful devotion; who strive not to be conformed to this world; who are constantly transformed as their minds are occupied with the new things Christ has introduced, will find that they will prove what the will of God is. They will not zig-zag through this world trying to find the will of God by trial and error, but will know beforehand what it is. As Abraham’s servant said, “I being in the way, the Lord led me”, Genesis 24:27. Having set out on a course of obedience to Abraham’s instructions, and being dependant upon God, he accomplished his mission successfully. So we, knowing through the doctrine of Scripture what the will of God is for us in principle, shall be enabled to work it out in practice, to His glory.

One of the features, therefore, which marks those who are in assembly fellowship is a desire to hear the word of God. This cannot be done unless there is a willingness to bow to the authority of the apostles, who spoke, and wrote, as those who had been called of the Lord to teach His people. As such, they moved within the confines of the will of God. It is not proper for the will of man to set aside apostolic authority, for that involves challenging God’s sovereign will. We do well to remember the language of the apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 14:37, “If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord”. See also 1 John 4:6, where “us” means the apostles, and 2 Peter 3:1,2.

The very fact that apostles were amongst the Lord’s people at all was evidence that Christ had ascended up on high, had triumphed over the forces of evil, and, having received gifts from His Father, had bestowed them, like the trophies of a great victory, on His people. See Ephesians 4:8-11. To despise, or simply to ignore, the teaching of the apostles, is to regard lightly the magnitude of the triumph of Christ.

The apostles were responsible for laying the doctrinal foundation of the assembly, Ephesians 2:20. To heed their doctrine is vital, to ignore it is fatal. We can go astray in two directions in this matter of doctrine. We can look to the past, and embrace the traditions of men. The Lord Jesus was surrounded in His day by those who taught for commandments the doctrines of men, and He condemned them with the words- “Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition”, Mark 7:9.

Alternatively, we can look to the present, and embrace the trends amongst men. This too is contrary to the will of God, for He has said through the apostle John, “Let that therefore abide in you which ye have heard from the beginning.” 1 John 2:24. The only safe course is to continue steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine, Acts 2:42.

The fact that we are constantly exhorted to heed, and practise, the teaching of the Scriptures, is clear indication that truth may be known. Rather than look to man’s tradition and trends, we should look into God’s truth. It is not the preserve of the few to understand it, but is presented to all believers for their recognition and obedience, 2 Peter 3:2. Nor is it vague in its meaning, but is written in terms which all believers may grasp, if dependant upon the Spirit of God, John 7:17, 1 John 2:27.

Doctrine is not to be accepted or rejected according to the whim of the individual. Apostolic doctrine comes from God, who is the source of all absolute values, and as such is to be accepted without reserve. The modern notion that nothing is settled, and that truth lies in the opinion of the individual, is foreign to the Scriptures.

And Sosthenes our brother- notice that although the epistle comes from Paul alone, (for in verse 4 he says “I thank my God”), nonetheless he associates Sosthenes with himself in his greeting. Now since there is no explanation as to who Sosthenes is, and he is mentioned as if the Corinthians would know who he is, we may perhaps be justified in thinking that he is the man mentioned by Luke as being at one time the chief ruler of the synagogue at Corinth, Acts 18:17. When Paul went to Corith and preached in the synagogue, Crispus the chief ruler of the synagogue was converted, Acts 18:8. It seems as though Sosthenes had been appointed in his place, (thus showing that Crispus immediately left the synagogue and joined himself to Paul, who was teaching in a house next door to the synagogue), and then himself got saved. Subsequently he was ill treated by the Greeks in the city. We see two things here, at least. First, Crispus immediately distanced himself from the synagogue, realising that the coming of Christ had rendered such Old Testament institutions obsolete. Second, Sosthenes made a stand for Christ and was persecuted for it, for “all who will live godly in this world shall suffer persecution”, 2 Timothy 3:12.

Despite being a former chief ruler, (assuming the above to be correct), Sosthenes is simply described here as being “our brother”, showing that the Corinthians knew him as such. In fact, the phrase is even more definite, for “our” is in italics, and the literal rendering would be “the brother”. That is, “the one you Corinthians know of as a brother, and who has relinquished any title the Jewish synagogue may have conferred upon him”. Now that he is in assembly fellowship, he has come into the new brotherhood, those whom the Lord Jesus Himself is not ashamed to call His brethren, Hebrews 2:11.

This is not to say that an assembly should be without those who guide and direct, (the apostle will write later on about the gift of governments, 12:28), but that must be done by the power of the Spirit. A man is not qualified to lead in the assembly simply because he has, or had, some leadership role among men.

1:2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their’s and our’s:

Unto the church of God which is at Corinth- the letter is addressed to a company of believers, described as the church of God which is at Corinth. We know from other scriptures that there was at least one heathen temple in Corinth, and probably more, but this was of Satan. There was at least one synagogue, but this was of the Jews. Only of this company of believers can it be said that it is of God. This means it is important, as everything that is of God must be. It is important to God, for He gave His Son that the church at Corinth might be His. This is true of every genuine church.

The word church is much abused in our day. Some still insist on using the word of a physical building; others use it in a vague way such as in the expression “Church of England”. The use of the word here, however, is very specific.

We must first of all establish what is meant by a church. The only valid way of doing this is to take note of the meaning of the word translated “church”, and also the way it is used in the New Testament.

The Greek word rendered church is made up of two parts, the first meaning “out of”, the second meaning “a calling”. The two together indicate a called out company of people, separated from men in general and called together for specific purposes.

The word is used in four main senses in the New Testament, but not always in connection with Christians. A brief look, however, at the way the word is used in other senses will help us to see why the Holy Spirit took it up to use in relation to believers.

The word is used in the following ways:-

1. By Stephen, Acts 7:38, of the nation of Israel when they were in the wilderness.

2. By the town-clerk of Ephesus, Acts19:39, of a company of unbelievers.

3. By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of all the Christians of this present age, Matthew 16:18, Colossians 1:18.

4. By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of the Christians who meet together in a particular locality, Matthew 18:17, 1 Corinthians 1:2.

The first two uses of the word will help us to understand the last use, which is our present subject. A reading of the passages mentioned above will clearly show that the word church is never used of a material building. It is also clear from 1 Corinthians 5:2,13 that it is possible to be a true believer, and therefore in the church which is Christ’s body, and yet not be in a local church, either because one has been put away from it, or has never joined.

Stephen uses the word church of the nation of Israel because they were a called-out company. They had been redeemed by the blood of the Passover lamb, as described in Exodus 12; “baptised” in the Red Sea, Exodus 14:21,22; 1 Corinthians 10:1,2; and brought to the foot of Mount Sinai to listen to God’s word, Exodus 19:17, 20:1. As such they give to us an illustration of those in this age who have been called out of the world by the gospel; redeemed by the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God; baptised in water to signify, amongst other things, allegiance to Him; and gathered together as a church in a locality to bow to the authority of the word of God. This illustration should not be pressed too far, however, or else we shall arrive at the unscriptural notion that since infants crossed the Red Sea, then infant baptism is in order. The Scriptures are crystal clear that this is not the case.

The town clerk of Ephesus used the word in its secular sense in Acts 19:39, when he spoke of a “lawful assembly”. The townsfolk would understand that he meant by this a gathering of those possessing civic rights in a free Greek city, who were called together for the carrying out of public affairs. Strangers, and those deprived of citizenship, could not be part of this called out company.’

When we put these two uses of the word together, and apply them to a local church, we can say it has the following characteristics:

1. Only believers. It is composed only of those who have responded to the call of God in the gospel, and have been redeemed with the precious blood of Christ, just as a civic assembly did not include strangers.

2. Only those sound in doctrine and morals. It is composed only of those who have not forfeited their rights because of moral or doctrinal evil, just as a civic assembly did not consist of those who had been deprived of the rights of citizenship through misconduct.

3. Only those baptized. It is composed only of those who have been baptized by immersion in water after they were saved, just as all the people of Israel went through the Red Sea to get to the wilderness.

4. Only those subject to God’s Word. It is composed only of those who are prepared to submit to the authority of the Word of God, just as Israel gathered at the foot of Mount Sinai to hear God speaking to them, and then said “all that the Lord hath spoken we will do”, Exodus 19:8. Moses called that day “The day of the assembly”, Deuteronomy 9:10.

5. Only those who have joined. It is composed only of those who have been exercised in heart to join, just as the Israelites had been exercised in heart to sprinkle the blood, cross the sea, and gather at Sinai. When Paul went to Jerusalem, he “assayed to join himself to the disciples”, Acts 9:26. The word for join means to cement, or glue, and therefore indicates an act of commitment, not the start of a casual relationship.

Only the church of God at Corinth was addressed in exactly the way we find here. This would emphasise the basic nature of the epistle, in which first principles are being set out.

It is worth noting that the English word “church” is not derived from the Greek word “eklesia”, but is from the word “kuriakos”, meaning “belonging to the Lord”. Hence it is preferable to use the word assembly when speaking of that which in our Authorised Version is translated church.

We have already briefly considered the ideas behind the word translated here as church. We must now notice, however, the words “of God”. The company of Christians which met in corrupt Corinth belonged to God. How solemn, and yet how encouraging, to remember that the reason an assembly belongs to God is because He has purchased it by “His own blood”, that is, by means of the sacrifice of Christ, Acts 20:28.

The assembly in Corinth could be described in 1 Corinthians 3:9 as His husbandry. They were His cultivated plot, a paradise in the midst of a barren desert. What a privilege it was to be part of such a company, and to have the opportunity to give pleasure to the heart of God, just as a beautiful garden delights the one who tends it and cares for it. We must never lose sight of the fact that the primary purpose of an assembly is to gratify God’s heart. Important as gospel work is, the assembly should not be thought of merely as a gospel mission.

So an assembly exists to give pleasure to its owner. Those who have the immense privilege of forming part of such a company will do their utmost to see that the maximum amount of pleasure is given to God through their efforts. They will also do their utmost to exclude any activity which causes Him displeasure, as indicated in His word.

The fact that an assembly belongs to God also indicates that it is of first importance to Him. Those who long to be in harmony with God’s mind will see to it that the assembly to which they belong is of first importance to them as well, and that the interests of self do not override the vital necessity of being committed wholeheartedly to God’s interests. The pace of life in the world of today makes it necessary as perhaps never before to strive to ensure that spiritual and eternal things have first place in our lives.

To them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints-the word saint is one of those that the Holy Spirit has extracted from its secular use, and lifted to a higher plane. The word saint originally meant “one dedicated to the gods”, one who was devoted to furthering the interests of the idol-system that flourished all around in the pagan world. Now the word means one who is dedicated to the True God, passionate about furthering His interests in the world. It is a word, moreover, that applies to all believers, for the apostle does not divide up the assembly at Corinth into saints and non-saints, but classes every believer in the assembly as a saint. And this is the situation with all believers; they are not called to become saints, as if it is a gradual process, but are saints by Divine calling, and as such should perfect holiness in the fear of God, 2 Corinthians 7:1.

The unbeliever uses the word saint either of someone who has been given that title by the religious establishment, or of someone who stands out from others because of his goodness. The proper use of the word saint is the Scriptural one, which is of those who, having been “sanctified in Christ Jesus”, are called to a life of holiness. To be a saint, to be sanctified, to be holy, to be set apart, are identical terms. When God calls men by the gospel, and they repent and believe, He sets them apart from their former associations and conduct. No longer does He reckon them to be in Adam, but in Christ Jesus, the One who is risen, glorified, and set apart at God’s right hand in heaven. By the call of God, then, they are saints, and His separating call gives character to the rest of their lives.

We must remember that to be a saint, one of God’s separated ones, is a positive thing. After all, holiness is one of God’s attributes. Since He is unchanging, He has always been holy, and therefore was holy before there was anything evil. It follows that holiness is not simply separation from evil, but wholehearted commitment to things that are in harmony with God’s holy character.

Sadly, the Corinthian believers had forgotten this, which is no doubt why the apostle reminds them of sanctification so early in his epistle. He goes on to deal with their lack of holiness in three main areas:

1. Lack of holiness as to the soul, chapters 1-4, where he warns against the world’s wisdom.

2. Lack of holiness as to the body, chapters 5-7, where he warns against the world’s wickedness.

3. Lack of holiness as to the spirit, chapters 8-11, where he warns against the world’s worship.

The apostle shows in 1 Corinthians 1:17-31 that the cross of Christ is the means by which men are brought into right relationship with Himself. They cannot reason their way to a knowledge of Himself by using the wisdom of the world. The princes of this world, those well-versed in its way of thinking, were so ignorant of who Christ really was that they crucified Him! 1 Corinthians 2:8. Only by receiving the wisdom of God revealed in His word, (the theme of chapter 2), can believers be right and holy in their thinking. There is no room in God’s assembly for those who hold and teach doctrine which has its origin in the mind of man, see 1 Corinthians 3:17-20.

The word “corinthian” is found in our dictionaries today, and means an immoral person. The conduct of those around them had influenced the believers at Corinth, hence the apostle had to instruct them in chapters 5-7 as to separation in this area of life too. Just as those who hold wrong doctrine are to be excluded from the assembly, so also, those who are guilty of immoral conduct are to be expelled, for “Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? 1 Corinthians 5:6. It is imperative that those who apply for assembly fellowship take this into account.

All around in Corinth were idol temples, whose devotees offered their sacrifices to demons. The mighty power of God in the gospel had delivered many Corinthians from this, however, and now they were separated to a life of devotion to God. This devotion would express itself in many ways during the week, but as a matter of priority they would meet together on the first day of the week to partake of the Lord’s Supper together, in accordance with His own command. With the loaf and the cup before them, they would remember the Lord Jesus, who had given Himself that they might be brought into relationship with God. As they contemplated the preciousness of His person, they would be moved to “worship God in the Spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh”, Philippians 3:3.

The apostle can describe these saints as those who call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord. This was one of their leading features. Conscious of their need, they find resources to supply that need in one whose concern is for their good. Another reason why the Lordship of Christ is emphasised is because, although they called on the name of the Lord, they were inconsistent in that they were guilty of making men into party leaders, whereas Christ had forewarned them to not call anyone Master, or Leader, “for one is your Master (Leader), even Christ”, Matthew 23:10.

With all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their’s and our’s- believers can be described as those that call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ because that is one of their characteristic and leading features. This feature is true of all believers in every place.  All who call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord are called to sainthood with a Divine calling. This being the case, they should not put their trust in men, as some were doing by forming parties around prominent teachers. Part of their duty as saints or separated ones, was to distance themselves from party-spirit.

All believers know from God’s word that an appeal on the ground of the name of Jesus Christ our Lord will receive a response that takes account of who He is, John 16:23,24. This is because the Father delights to respond to the mention of the name of His Son. The very fact that they are saved at all is due to the fact that they called upon His name, for “whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved”, Romans 10:13. Resting their hope of salvation on Him alone, they were certainly not disappointed, for “the same Lord over all is rich unto all them that call upon Him.” Romans 10:12.

This initial calling upon His name for salvation is followed by a reliance on his name as the gathering-centre of his people. In Matthew 18:20 the Lord Jesus had promised that “where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them”.

Three matters call for attention in this verse:

1. If He is present at every gathering of this character taking place in any part of the world, The Lord Jesus must be omnipresent, and therefore this promise is founded on His Deity. Those who gather in His name do so because they believe that the Lord Jesus is equal with God.

2. The word “are” is not part of the verb “gather together”. This means that the two or three in question “are” in a particular place because of a particular reason. That reason being that they have deliberately gathered together in His name. Just because two or three Christians are in the same place does not mean that the Lord Jesus is present in the way spoken of here.

3. The preposition translated “in”, is the word “eis”, which is not a static word, but rather indicates progress towards a goal. In this context its use means that those who gather together in the name of the Lord Jesus fully intend that He be central to all that they do when together. The honour of His name is their goal as they meet. The names of men, however saintly, or of doctrines, however important, can never be a substitute for the name of the Lord Jesus.

Whilst preparing His disciples for His going away from them back to heaven, the Lord had said “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in My name, He will give it you” John 16:23. As an assembly gathers together for collective prayer, therefore, they have the assurance that to pray to God in the name of the Lord Jesus is to receive a response. This does not simply mean that they mention His name at the end of their prayers, but that all they ask for should be in harmony with the character of the One who bears that name. It also means that the dignity of His name will regulate them as they come together. They will gladly obey the clear instructions of the Scriptures that it is the male members of the assembly who should lead audibly in prayer, and the female members who should fulfil their very positive and vital role by remaining silent and dressing in a becoming way, 1 Timothy 2.

When Abraham reached the land of Canaan, “The Lord appeared unto Abram…and there builded he an altar unto the Lord, who appeared unto him”, and again, “He builded an altar unto the Lord, and called upon the name of the Lord”, Genesis 12:7,8. Like Abraham before the Lord appeared unto him, many of the Corinthians had formerly worshipped idols, but now they had “turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God” 1 Thessalonians 1:9. Met together with others of like mind, they sought to glorify God as they found Him revealed to them in His Son. “By Him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to His name. But to do good and to communicate forget not: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased”. Hebrews 13:15,16. It is good to be intelligent when addressing God. Abraham called upon God in line with the way He had revealed Himself, in that case as Lord. We have the immense privilege of addressing God as Abba, Father, and we should avail ourselves of that great privilege, and not take a lower ground.

The second half of the quotation given above reminds us that a vital part of the worship of God’s people is the giving of their material possessions to support His interests. Unless the tithes are brought into the storehouse, the windows of heaven will not be opened to pour out a blessing, Malachi 3:10. It is significant and challenging that three things are especially associated with the first day of the week- the resurrection of Christ, John 20:1, the breaking of bread, Acts 20:7, and the collection for the saints, 1 Corinthians 16:1-3.

1:3 Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.

It is often pointed out that when the apostle greeted the believers in this way, he was using the two words that Jews and Gentiles would use when they met. A Greek would greet his fellow-Greek with “Charis!”, the Greek word for grace, and a Jew would greet his fellow-Jew with “Shalom!”, the Hebrew for peace. As unbelievers greet one another, however, they are only expressing a kind wish; they have no power to bring the wish to pass. With the apostle, though, the greeting was no mere pious wish, but a prayer for their spiritual blessing. In accordance with the meaning of the word “assembly” both Jews and Greeks had been called out by the gospel from their respective environments, and had come to know the wonder of God’s grace. This grace, however, is ongoing, so the apostle does not have to hope that it be continued, but he does hope that the grace or unmerited favour of God may be enjoyed by them. It is possible to begin to forget that everything worthwhile we have as believers comes to us as a result of the rich grace of God. We should revel in this favour, and this the apostle desires the Corinthians should do.

The same is true of peace. Having been brought into peace with God, (after having been at war with Him as sinners), which peace is constant, the apostle desires that believers be in the good of it. So the unbeliever wants grace and peace for his fellow in the future, whereas the apostle knows his fellow-believers already have it, but wants them to enjoy what they have.

It is to a church or assembly as constituted by God that the apostle sends this greeting, so the emphasis is on collective appreciation. It is a good thing when believers advance together in the things of God, having the same desires and aspirations. See Philippians 2:3:16. Sadly, there was a lack of grace and peace at Corinth, so the apostle seeks that they might be more in evidence. The more they appreciated God’s favour to them, and the peace He had made, the more harmony there would be amongst them, for instead of thinking about themselves, they would think on spiritual things.

The fact that these blessings come equally from God our Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ is a testimony to His equality with the Father. In the ways of God the Lord Jesus is entrusted with administering everything in the house of God, for He is Son over the house, and so it is through Him that these blessings come. That God is our Father is one of the distinctive truths of Christianity, for saints of Old Testament days did not know God in this intimate way. The great privilege of being the children and sons of God is a result of the coming of the Son of God Himself, and the subsequent sending into our hearts of the Spirit of His Son, Galatians 4:6; Romans 8:9.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 4 TO 9

1:4 I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ;

1:5 That in every thing ye are enriched by Him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge;

1:6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you:

1:7 So that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ:

1:8 Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1:9 God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of His Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

(b)   Verses 4-9    Expression of thanks for God’s provision for the assembly.

1:4 I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ;

We should not think that “on your behalf” means that the Corinthians were not able to thank God for themselves, but had to leave that to the apostle, for every true believer has access to the Father through the Lord Jesus in the power of the Holy Spirit. Rather, the idea is of thanking God concerning them. The apostle, as he considered the way God had blessed the assembly, was constrained to lift up his heart in thanksgiving to God. We might well follow his example of thankfulness. We live in a world that is “unthankful and unholy”, but this should not be the hallmark of the people of God.

The special subject of the thanksgiving of the apostle is the grace that had been given to them by Jesus Christ. Thinking of grace as unmerited favour, we learn that since they had been saved and brought into assembly fellowship, God had bestowed on them rich blessings, and all because of their association with Jesus Christ, for all God’s benefits are channelled through Him.

1:5 That in every thing ye are enriched by Him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge

Notice that Paul does not highlight the gifts that they were highlighting. He does not mention tongues-speaking. This is all the more marked because it was legitimate at that time to teach the word of God and give words of wisdom by use of the gift of tongues. He commends them for their making known of the truth of God, and for their knowledge of it, and sees in that activity evidence that God has enriched them. They might be poor naturally, but they were rich spiritually. The question on the mind of the apostle was as to how they were using those riches.

The particular benefit the apostle has in mind is the bestowal of gifts. As he will say in verse 7, they came behind in no gift. Every true believer has one or more Divinely-given gifts. The apostle makes this clear in 1 Corinthians 12:6,7. “And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal”. By the expression “worketh all in all” the apostle indicates that the sum total of the things God desires to accomplish through the gifts given to His people is achieved when all the gifts are used aright by those who possess them. By the expression “to profit withal” the apostle means the profit of all in the company. So in verse 6 he is concerned about God’s purpose, and in verse 7 he is concerned about the profit of the believers. Clearly the matter of the exercise of gift must be important if the purpose of God and the profit of believers is involved.

Only in the context of assembly gatherings can the expression “to every man” in 1 Cor.12:7 be practised. In the systems and arrangements of men, the majority of gifts are assumed to reside in one man, together with special authority to administer the bread and wine of the Lord’s Supper. This is completely foreign to the word of God. The apostle uses the human body as an illustration as he writes in 1 Corinthians 12:12-27, and shows how ridiculous it would be if all the abilities of the human body were concentrated in one member. “If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?” With these things in mind, let us briefly notice what the apostle says about gifts in 1 Corinthians 1:4-8.

Not only does God grant His salvation in grace to those who believe, but He continues to act in grace in the giving of spiritual gifts. Grace, by definition, is unmerited favour, so these gifts are not to be confused with any natural talent that may be possessed already. Nor are they given as a result of growth in spirituality, for then they would be merited-gifts and not grace-gifts.

Note the expressions in verse 5, “in everything”, “all utterance”, “all knowledge”, and also in verse 7, “come behind in no gift”. If there are companies where there seems to be a shortage of gifts, then the fault must lie with men and not God. Perhaps there are believers living near the gathering-place of the assembly, who travel to meet elsewhere. Or maybe there is a failure on the part of those in that assembly to stir up the gift of God which is in them, a possibility the apostle even warned Timothy about, 2 Timothy 1:6.

There are three passages where the subject of gifts is dealt with, 1 Corinthians 12, Romans 12, and Ephesians 4. In the latter passage the gifts are the men themselves who have gift. The Lord Jesus has ascended up to the very highest place in heaven, and it is from that position of power and authority that He has given gifts. These gifts are apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers. The purpose of these gifts is that all the members of the body of Christ, (the sum total of believers of this present age), may progress towards conformity to the moral glory of Christ, in unity with one another, Ephesians 4:12-15. The emphasis here is on the progress of the whole body of believers, not the fact that each believer has a gift.

In Romans 12:6-8 the gifts enable certain actions to be performed, as follows: prophecy; ministry; teaching; exhortation; giving; ruling, showing mercy. Those who have presented their bodies a living sacrifice, who have determined not to be conformed to the world, and who are being constantly transformed by the renewing of their mind, are in a position to exercise these gifts for the furtherance of the spiritual welfare of the saints.

In 1 Corinthians 12:8-10 the list of gifts is as follows: The word of wisdom; the word of knowledge; faith; gifts of healing; working of miracles; prophecy; discerning of spirits; diverse kinds of tongues, and the interpretation of tongues. Now all these gifts have been withdrawn, for there is no need for them now. The completed canon of Scripture supplies us with wisdom and knowledge. The sign the gift of tongues, for instance, represents has made its point, and the need is gone.

Those who claim to have this gift today must show several things. First, that what they have is what believers had at the beginning. Second, that the restoration of the gift is to be expected, (for it is a historical fact that it ceased). Third, that there is a need for the gift. Fourth, that the result of the exercise of the gift is the exaltation of Christ as Lord.

It is very obvious that modern charismatics cannot give satisfactory responses to any of these four points. Until they do, believers would be well advised to distance themselves from the whole movement, including the Alpha Course.

If, as is suggested, these gifts have been withdrawn, it might be asked why they are listed here. Three reasons may be given. First, since they were in use when the epistle was written, it was appropriate to mention them as examples of spiritual gifts. Second, one of them at least, the gift of tongues, was being over-emphasised at Corinth, and the apostle needs to correct this in chapter 14. Third,now that these have been withdrawn, and also now that there are those who claim to possess them, we need a standard by which to assess the genuineness or otherwise of modern claims.

We should ask the following questions of those who claim to possess these gifts today. Why is there a manifestation of this gift now, when centuries passed without it being manifest? What Scripture leads us to believe that the gift would be restored? The gift of tongues was given to further the edification of the saints, see 14:1-19. Can modern tongues pass this test? Is anything intelligible uttered? If it is, does it add to the Word of God, or confirm it? If the former, then it comes under the curse of Revelation 22:18. If the latter, it is unnecessary, for the word of God was completed centuries ago, so that Jude could write about the faith that had been once for all delivered to the saints. There was nothing more to add, for the Spirit had led the New Testament writers into all the truth, as the Lord Jesus had promised He would, John 16:13.

Charismatics seek to evade these searching questions by asserting that they speak with the tongues of angels, and therefore we should not expect to understand them. We should notice, however, that in 1 Corinthians 13:1 the apostle refers to the tongues of men and angels, not the tongues of men orangels. In other words, when angels speak to men, they do so in the language of the men addressed. There is not a choice between angel-tongues and men-tongues. Even if angels do speak a different language in heaven, they do so to be understood in heaven. The purpose of tongues spoken on earth is to be understood on earth. It should be noticed, however, that Isaiah seems to have had no difficulty in understanding what the seraphim said in Isaiah 6:3, nor John in the Book of the Revelation.

We are entitled to enquire whether this gift is exercised according to the principles laid down by the apostles. Are the sisters silent in the gatherings? Have they covered heads and long hair? Are the proceedings conducted in an orderly and dignified way? If the answer to these questions is in the negative, then we may safely conclude that the gift is spurious. It is important to remember that humans are capable of deceiving themselves, and of being deceived. We should also notice that the gifts, including tongues, were not imparted to all. The language of the apostle is clear- “to one…to another”. His question at the end of the chapter is to the same effect, “Do all speak with tongues?” Clearly the answer is that all did not speak with tongues. The idea, then, that the gift should be sought, and that it is an indication that the Spirit dwells within, is false.

The fact that not every believer in those days should have expected to possess the gift of tongues is seen in verse 11, for the gifts are divided severally according to the will of the Spirit. So it is not His will to impart each gift to every believer. The gifts are distributed (“dividing”) to separate individuals, (“severally”). We would do well to ponder this point, and assess our attitude to this truth.

It is good to be clear in our minds that the gift of tongues is not for today. It is equally good to be clear that the Spirit does still distribute to each believer those gifts that are for today. Which should prompt us to ask ourselves whether the gift which has been given is being used. Remember God works in each member of the assembly for the profit of all- any lack of exercise of gift on the part of one, therefore, means that there is less profit for all. Since a gift is a spiritual thing, it should have precedence over natural things. We should not let self and the world stand in the way of the use of gift. The world is increasingly saying, in the language of the king of Sodom to Abraham, “Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself”. In everyday terms this is the same as saying “Give me your time and energy, and I will give you a large salary”. Abraham was strengthened to resist that temptation, and so should we be, resolutely determining to put the interests of God and His assembly first in both our thoughts and actions. This will undoubtedly involve sacrifices as matters of lesser importance are let go, and the primary purpose in the life of the believer is concentrated upon.

In 1 Corinthians 12:28-30 the apostle lists gifts in their order of importance, for he uses the words “first…secondarily…thirdly”, and thus adjusts the thinking of the Corinthians, who were giving prominence to those gifts he lists last. Included in this list, being appropriate for an assembly epistle, are the two gifts of helps and governments.

Putting these scriptures together, and omitting gifts that no longer exist, we have the following:

Believers as gifts: evangelists; pastors and teachers.

Gifts that believers have: teaching; ministry; exhortation; giving; ruling; showing mercy; helps, and governments. Possibly the ruling and the government are the same, in which case there are seven gifts available to believers.

The question is sometimes asked, “How may I know what my gift is?” We may answer this question by remembering that the apostle uses the figure of a human body to illustrate the doctrine he is setting out. Just as the individual members of our bodies have abilities, so individual believers have gifts or abilities also. Some members of our body have more than one gift or ability, but they are all there to make a contribution.

First, our organs and limbs have been put in place by God “as it hath pleased Him”, 1 Corinthians 12:18, and they function as they do because of this. Some gifts bring with them a certain amount of prominence, such as teaching or exhortation. So it is with spiritual gifts. They are given to individual believers in accordance with the particular function they have to perform. For example, the gift of ruling or will not be given to a sister, for that is not within her range of activity in the assembly.

Second, they show their ability by functioning efficiently. Believers manifest that they have a particular gift when it is obvious that they have the appropriate spiritual ability to work out that gift. It will be equally obvious if they are unfitted for a particular work.

Third, they do so because the life principle in the body gives them energy to operate. Spiritual gifts are the manifestation of the indwelling Spirit of God, 1 Corinthians 12:7, the life-principle in the body of Christ. So He is the source of them, and He is the power by which they function. No amount of natural ability can compensate for a lack of spiritual gift.

A believer therefore may know his or her gift by being in harmony with the Spirit who gave the gift, by having a Spirit-led desire to exercise a particular gift, and by using that gift in a manner honouring to the Lord and helpful to the saints.

Those in a place of responsibility as elders in the assembly should be alert to the first signs of a gift being exercised, and should encourage this in every way possible. They should also step in when it is obvious that a believer is trying to exercise a gift he or she does not have. The assembly should not be wearied with those who are acting out of place. Such persons do indeed have a gift, so they should be helped to find it.

The elders should also ensure that teaching is regularly given on the subject, so that all in the assembly are aware of this aspect of assembly life. There is something for all in the assembly to do for the profit of all. There is no such person as a believer without a gift, for gifts are one way the Spirit of God manifests Himself, and all believers have the Spirit within. To neglect a gift is to quench the Spirit, 1 Thessalonians 5:19, and to deprive the saints of the contribution that should be made.

1:6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you:

By means of the gifts given, especially those which involved utterance and knowledge, the truth concerning Christ that is received by faith for salvation initially, is constantly confirmed and reinforced to His glory. There is an ongoing need for the truth to be taught, and the appropriate gifts are given to ensure this happens. The apostles were careful to confirm the souls of those who believed, for the world represents an antagonistic force, and new believers, and, for that matter, older believers too, need constant exposure to apostolic doctrine. The unsearchable riches of Christ are not all learnt the night we get saved, but are entered into as we “follow on to know the Lord”, Hosea 6:3.

1:7 so that ye come behind in no gift, waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

In this verse the apostle uses the word for coming which means an unveiling. While they wait for the Lord to reveal Himself at His coming, believers are to use their particular gift so that Christ is revealed in the locality by the testimony of the assembly.

At the present time the local assembly is charged with manifesting Christ in the district where they are. Just as a man’s body expresses him to others, so the apostle declares to the assembly at Corinth, (and, by extension, any Divinely-constituted assembly), “ye are (the) body of Christ, and members in particular”, 1 Corinthians 12:27. They were to reveal Him during the time of His absence, all the while waiting for Him to reveal Himself. One of the primary ways of doing this is through the exercise of gift, just as a man expresses what is in his mind by what he is able to do by means of his physical body.

1:8 Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

The use, mis-use or non-use of gift will be reviewed in the day when the Lord Jesus reviews the activities of His people. This is called “the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” because it is the time when His view of things is the only one. The word for “blameless” means “Not blamed when called in to face a charge”. We have been given a gift for a purpose, and it should be our earnest desire to fulfil that purpose. When called into the presence of the Head of the church to give account to Him for the way we have used the gifts He has given, we would surely not want to have a charge of neglect or mis-use of gift made against us, but rather to receive commendation for the use of gift in a God-honouring way. See 1 Corinthians 3:13-15.

1:9 God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of His Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

Fellowship is enjoyed by those who share with one another the things which they have in common. As individuals, believers are able to have fellowship “with” the Father and “with” His Son Jesus Christ”, 1 John 1:3. The fellowship mentioned in this passage, however, is said to be the fellowship “of” His Son. This means that the Corinthian believers were called to share in the things that God’s Son was involved with. Of course, such a fellowship would be of the highest dignity, a fact that may be learned from the way the apostle describes it, using the full title “His Son Jesus Christ our Lord”. In fact the fellowship can be said to be defined by this title, being everything that such a glorious person can righteously associate Himself with. The Corinthians had been called by God to fellowship of such a character. As an assembly, they had been put into the position where they could freely share together in all the things of Christ. Only a Divinely-constituted assembly is in such a position.

Sadly, the Corinthians were failing to appreciate the blessedness of allowing the name of Christ to govern their fellowship. They had begun to divide into parties, and thus earn the rebuke of the apostle for their contentions and divisions. Division and strife are the very opposite of fellowship. Sadly, today, those who profess the Name of Christ are divided into a multitude of sects, but the existence of an assembly in a locality is a protest against that situation.

The Corinthians were slow to separate completely from the idolatry that they had been involved in before they were saved. The apostle reminds them, therefore, of three sorts of fellowship in 1 Corinthians 10:14-22, all expressed by the act of eating and drinking.

1. There was the fellowship known by the Israelite as he brought his offering to the altar, and then feasted upon his portion of the sacrifice, and thus had a share in the things that God had ordained. This would rebuke the Corinthians for their divisions, for the altar in Israel was the focal point of their religious life, just as the Lord Jesus, and no other person or thing, was the centre of Christian life.

2. There was the fellowship known by the idol-worshipper, as he brought his gift to the pagan temple. His fellowship was with the demon forces behind the idol, and he expressed this fellowship by sharing the food which he had offered to the idol. This would rebuke the Corinthians for their connections with idolatry, as the apostle exposed the very heart of idol-worship as being homage to demons.

3. Then there was the fellowship of the Christian assembly. As they drank the cup of wine of the Lord’s Supper, they thereby declared their participation in all the blessing that His shed blood had procured, for the cup is described as the cup of blessing. As they all took and broke the one loaf, they signified that they were sharing in common with one another, as a united company, all the blessings Christ’s blood had secured. The one loaf of which they all partook, was symbolic of their unity as the local representation of the body of Christ.

It is illogical for those who drink of the cup at the Lord’s Supper, and thus signify their involvement in all that the blood of Christ secures, to live the rest of the week in practical denial of this by sharing in worldly things. It is likewise illogical for those who break bread in an assembly, and thereby signify their wholehearted involvement in the things of the assembly, to have fellowship in non-assembly, and therefore non-Scriptural associations, however noble their cause and well-meaning their members.

So the believers in a Scriptural assembly have the immense privilege of sharing with God’s Son the things that can be associated with his name in all its dignity. As they come together to remember the Lord Jesus, they also signify their common delight in the blessings His blood has secured, and their oneness with one another. They pledge themselves by these acts to separate from that which gives the worldling pleasure, and all associations which are of man’s devising.

It may be thought that it is not possible today to practise the things that are commanded us by the apostle in 1 Corinthians 1:1-9. This is not the case, however, for “God is faithful”. He who calls into assembly fellowship is faithful to those thus called. He will not desert them or let them down, but will always provide the spiritual resources necessary to continue steadfastly in Divine things. The only question is whether those who are thus called will be faithful to Him in return, as they respond to the God who in grace gives them the immense privilege of involvement with the fellowship of His Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 10 TO 16

1:10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

1:11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

1:13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

1:14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;

1:15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

1:16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

(c) Verse 10   Exhortation to unity.

1:10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgement.

Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ- the apostle bases his appeal for unity on the full name of the Lord Jesus. He is “our” Lord Jesus Christ, the common possession of all believers, apostles included. He is not for the few to monopolise, but for all to recognise. He is “Lord”, so we all need to bow to His authority, as expressed in the Scriptures. He is “Jesus”, the man who lived, died, and rose again for us, so that our affections might be towards Him as we realise how indebted we are to Him. He is “Christ”, the man approved of God, and as such should be our role-model in all things. There is no stronger appeal than one based on the full name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

That ye all speak the same thing- Paul will soon quote what they were saying, and they were expressing totally different and opposing things, for one was saying “I of Paul”, and another “I of Apollos” and so on. These words were expressions of disunity and party-spirit.

And that there be no divisions among you- note the “and”, for it is not “speak…but”. In other words, absence of division and speaking the same thing are both required, for a person may conform by saying orthodox things, but there may still be party-spirit in the heart.

But that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgement- this is the ideal situation Paul is setting before the Corinthians. What is said and done is governed by what we think and decide. The apostle is getting to the heart of the problem here, which was the way the Corinthian believers were thinking. This is why he has much to say in these early chapters about the wisdom of the world and the wisdom of God. Only by embracing the wisdom which is of God can unity be achieved. That wisdom is found in the inspired writings of the Bible, and is the standard by which all things are to judged.

(d) Verses 11-16   Exposure of disunity.

1:11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe- there are two matters that are brought out side by side in Leviticus 19. Verse 16 reads, “Thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy brother: I am the Lord”. Here is an injunction against spreading gossip amongst the Lord’s people. Whilst Christians are not under the law as a means to gain righteousness, nevertheless the righteous requirements of the law are binding upon them as Romans 8:4 indicates. Leviticus 19:17 reads, “Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him”. In other words, out of a spirit of love and concern, sometimes a believer needs to rebuke another believer, so that the wrong he is guilty of may be put right. And this is how the household of Chloe were acting. If they had been spreading gossip the apostle would have rebuked them. As it was, they were bringing the Corinthian situation before the apostle as the best one to deal with it.

That there are contentions among you- the Corinthian believers were showing a grave lack of love towards one another, and this had developed into open conflict and dispute. Such a situation was dishonouring to the name of the Lord Jesus, and needed to be dealt with quickly, and this the apostle seeks to do.

1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

Now this I say- the apostle has listened to the report form the household of Chloe, and has satisfied himself that it is true. He now relates the situation at Corinth in his own words, so there might be no doubt as to the seriousness of the problem.

That every one of you saith- the attitude that needs to be dealt with is so general that all of them can be said to be involved.

I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ-perhaps the converts of Paul would try to make him into a party-leader in gratitude for his work amongst them; perhaps some would be impressed with the eloquence of Apollos, (Acts 18:24), and would favour him; others would be impressed by the energy and vigour of Cephas, (Peter), and would especially favour him, not only for that reason, but also because he had been with the Lord on earth as Paul and Apollos had not; others were claiming a special relationship with Christ, and took the super-spiritual position of claiming to be “The Christ-party”. All such divisions are directly contrary to the spirit of Christianity. The Corinthians had been called into the fellowship of God’s Son, not the fellowship of Paul and the others.

1:13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

Is Christ divided? This is the first of three searching questions, which, when answered correctly, will go a long way adjust the attitude of the Corinthian believers.  The three teachers mentioned in verse 12 each had their special ministry. Paul would emphasise the crucifixion of Christ and His subsequent ascent to heavenly glory. Apollos was versed in the Old Testament, as we see from Acts 18:24-28, and would show how Christ was the fulfilment of the prophecies of old time. Peter had been with the Lord on earth, and could testify first-hand of His ministry. Some believers would be attracted to Paul’s emphasis; some to Apollos’; some to Peter’s, and the temptation would be to only listen to a favourite theme, and hence gather around the one who expounded it. The fact is all the truth of God is for all the people of God, and Paul, Apollos and Peter would not have condoned such behaviour on the part of the Corinthians. Christ is not to be divided into “Fulfiller of prophecy”, “Example on Earth”, and “Crucified and Glorified One”. He is one whole Christ, and we need to be taken up with every aspect of His person.

Was Paul crucified for you? The answer to this question is staggeringly simple; how could the Corinthians have missed this point? Notice that Paul does not bring Apollos or Cephas into the argument. He is content to use himself as an argument, debasing himself in favour of Christ. He will use Apollos with himself in his argument in 4:6, but not here. By His crucifixion the Lord Jesus has forever secured the heart’s affections of His people; to adopt a name other than His is ingratitude indeed.

Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?When they were baptised, the Corinthians were baptised into Jesus Christ, Romans 6:3, committing themselves to a life of loyalty and devotion to Him alone. Their current position was a denial of this.

1:14,15 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius; lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

Paul here indicates his complete disinterest in forming a party under his name. John the Baptist had been sent to baptise, and those who received his preaching were known as John’s disciples. When Paul met some of these at Ephesus, he was able to tell them of the Lord Jesus, and they were then baptised in the name of Christ Jesus, Acts 19:5.

Perhaps he personally baptised Crispus because he had been the chief ruler of the synagogue in Corinth, and the other believers might be slow to be convinced of his genuineness. To foster unity the apostle may have personally done the baptising to show his confidence in the genuineness of Crispus’ conversion.

1:16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptised any other.

It is clear from the wording here that the apostle is genuinely struggling to remember who, if any, he baptised at Corinth. The apostle was engaged in “labours more abundant”, 2 Corinthians 11:23, and would have no time to write a daily journal. He describes the household of Stephanas as the “firstfruits of Achaia”, 16:15, (Corinth being the capital of that district), so perhaps they were the first ones baptised, and who subsequently did the baptising of other converts.

The remainder of the chapter shows how that the disunity of the Corinthian assembly was the direct result of embracing the thought-forms and opinions of the world. As a result, they began to act like the men of the world, who assembled themselves as parties around the philosopher of their choice.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 17 TO 20

1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.

1:20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

(e) Verses 17,18 The wisdom of words is damaging.

1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptise, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

For Christ sent me not to baptise, but to preach the gospel- this is not to say that the apostle was careless about baptising converts, for it is clear that he was not. We read that when he preached in Corinth, “many of the Corinthians hearing, believed, and were baptised”, Acts 18:8. He wrote to the Romans explaining the doctrine of baptism, Romans 6; he wrote to the Galatians that when they were baptised they had put on Christ, Galatians 3:27; and he showed the Colossians that baptism had taken them out from the sphere where philosophy was relevant, and brought them into association with a risen Christ, Colossians 2:12. Baptism is the practical setting forth of the truth of the gospel, so the two cannot be at variance. What the apostle means is that he not only avoided baptising people himself, for the reason we have noted in verses 14-16, but his commission from the Lord was to evangelise, and leave the baptism of the converts to others. A believer does not have to have special gift to baptise, so any genuine brother may baptise a new convert.

Not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect- by his upbringing and education the apostle would have been well-able to speak eloquently, and use the reasoning techniques of the philosophers. He refused to do this, however, since it would rob the gospel of its power, which lay in its appeal for faith, not mental ability. How serious a matter it is to cancel out the work of the cross! Yet it is so easily done if the preaching of the gospel is adulterated by man’s thinking in some way. It is so tempting, especially in these days when response to the gospel, at least in the Western World, is rare, to try to present a message which in some way appeals to the natural man. This destroys the gospel, and we should return to faith in the means God has chosen, and not adopt ideas of our own. Israel were forbidden to lift up a cutting tool on the stones they were intending to make into an altar. If they did so, they would pollute the altar, said God, Exodus 20:25,26. So we, if we lift up the tool of man upon the altar-work of Calvary, we have in practice polluted it, and God cannot use what we do for His glory.

1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness- the apostle now gives two reasons why the wisdom of the wise, when used to preach the gospel, is damaging. First, because the preaching of the cross is foolishness to men, so that shows it is completely different to anything they have thought up. While they hold on to their way of thinking they are perishing, so it is counter-productive to mix a way of thinking that lets a man perish, with a way of thinking that saves him. No mere man has yet devised a system of thought which removes the effects of the fall, and brings into true blessing.

But unto us which are saved it is the power of God- this is the second reason why it is foolish to use the wisdom of the world to preach the gospel by. It will not be the channel of God’s power, but will only pander to the pride of man, for he will think he has acquired some merit by understanding it. Just as those who dismiss the gospel as foolishness are perishing, so those who receive the gospel are being saved. The verbs “perish” and “are saved” are in the same tense, and indicate a current situation. The philosophies of men bring them into increasing ruin and loss of well-being, whilst the reverse is the case for the believer- he is constantly saved and preserved by the truth of the gospel.

(f) Verses 19,20 The wisdom of the wise of this world is destroyed by God.

1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.

For it is written- there follows a quotation from Isaiah 29:14. The previous verse to the one quoted here was used by the Lord Jesus to show the hypocrisy of the leaders of the nation of Israel, Matthew 15:7-9, so we know that the Jewish rulers are in view.

Wisdom may be defined as “Insight into the true nature of things”. The philosophers of the world were earnestly seeking after this insight, but had never succeeded in finding it. God steps in with the disclosure of His wisdom, but not before He has shown that the wisdom of the world is, in effect, foolishness.

I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent- the wise men of Israel, the chief priests, scribes, and elders of the people, are warned by Isaiah that God will destroy their supposed wisdom, the traditions which they had accumulated over many centuries, and by which they had made the doctrines of men more important than the word of God. He would also bring to nothing, or show to be useless, the understanding which they claimed to have of God and His ways. The way this would happen is that they, the princes of this world, would crucify the Lord of glory because they were ignorant about Him, 1 Corinthians 2:7.

1:20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

God has effectively destroyed the wisdom of this world by the cross, and the apostle adapts another passage from Isaiah to point this out. God said through Isaiah, “Thine heart shall meditate terror. Where is the scribe? Where is the receiver? Where is he that counted the towers? Thou shalt not see a fierce people, a people of a deeper speech than thou canst perceive; of a stammering tongue, that thou canst not understand”, Isaiah 33:18,19. Verse 19 shows that it is foreign armies that are in view, yet God’s promise to His people was that they would not see them as invaders of the land, and verse 18 assures them that they would be calm in the face of terror. As a result, God can ask in triumph the three questions Isaiah lists. Where is the scribe, plotting the line of attack on his map, and writing out the plan of battle? Where is the receiver, or weigher, ready to assess the spoils of victory and weigh them out to those deserving of reward after the battle? Where is the scout who secretly entered the land to assess the vulnerable points and the strong points, counting the watchtowers to see how well-guarded the land was? Such were Isaiah’s words. Paul adapts them, (with the authority of the same inspiring Spirit who guided Isaiah to write), and asks:

Where is the wise?- the man who plans his life according to man’s wisdom, and seeks to win life’s battles thereby?

Where is the scribe?- the one ready to record the triumphs of a life lived according to man’s thinking?

Where is the disputer of this world?- who like the counter of towers, was confident that he was able to succeed against all opposing forces? They are nowhere to be seen, not only because a life lived according to worldly wisdom is the life of a person who is perishing, but also because by the cross God has shown the wise of this world to be weak and ineffective.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 21 TO 31

1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

1:22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:

1:23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;

1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

1:25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

1:26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:

1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

1:28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:

1:29 That no flesh should glory in His presence.

1:30 But of Him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:

1:31 That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.

(g) Verses 21-29 The wisdom of God has been demonstrated.

(i) Verse 21(a) In the history of Old Testament times.

(ii) Verses 21(b) to 25 In the Calvary-work of Christ.

(iii) Verses 26 to 29 In the testimony of believers.

1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

(i) The wisdom of God has been demonstrated in the history of Old Testament times.

For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God- the nations were allowed to go their own ways, to show to them that by their own religious thought they could not attain to the knowledge of God. As Paul said to the philosophers of Athens, “God…hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after Him, and find Him, though He be not far from every one of us”, Acts 17:26,27. It was an exhibition of the wisdom of God that this happened, so that man might realise the bankruptcy of his thinking, and seek the Lord through the nation of Israel, set by God in the midst of the earth to preserve the knowledge of Himself. That they did not do this is shown by the inscription Paul based his address on, “To the Unknown God”. They had a vague notion that there was another God somewhere, and lest they offend Him, they adopted that inscription as an insurance policy. Paul was able to declare unto them the God they so feebly knew. It is vain for man to continue his search for God apart from the revelation God has given of Himself in the Person of His Son, which revelation is full and final.

(ii) The wisdom of God has been demonstrated in the Calvary-work of Christ.

It pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe- having given many centuries of opportunity to men to find Him by themselves, God now presents to men by the preaching of the gospel the way to find true wisdom. This method does not appeal to the wise of this world, so they label it foolishness. Yet despite what men say about the gospel, they cannot dispute that it rescues men from a foolish life-style, and imparts to them knowledge that they could not have gained in the schools of men. This wisdom is not available only to those who are intellectually inclined, because it does not depend for its reception on intelligence, but faith.

That is not to say it is not reasonable and logical to believe the gospel, for it is, but is does mean that the world-view of men must be abandoned, and the thoughts presented in the gospel must be embraced by faith.

Nor does it mean that those who preach the gospel should be haphazard in their speaking, and not present truths in the most understandable way possible, by God’s enabling. The last chapter of Ecclesiastes gives us the plan of action of the writer of the book. “And moreover, because the preacher was wise, he still taught the people knowledge; Yea, he gave good heed, and sought out, and set in order many proverbs. The preacher sought to find out acceptable words: and that which was upright, even words of truth”, Ecclesiastes 12:9,10.

In verse 18 believers are saved constantly, whereas here they are saved decisively. There is no discrepancy, however, for there is initial salvation from sin and its consequences, which salvation is once and for all, with no recall of that salvation by God, and without help from the wisdom of the wise of this world either. There is also ongoing salvation from the pitfalls of the pilgrim pathway, which in the context here mean the dangers presented by the world’s way of thinking and acting.

1:22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:

For the Jews require a sign- even though Christ has died and risen again, they were still asking for evidence that He was the Messiah. After three and a half years of sign-miracles, they had still asked the Lord Jesus for a sign from heaven. His response was, “An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: for as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth”, Matthew 12:39,40. The nation of Israel had ample opportunity to test the claims of those who witnessed to the resurrection of Christ; but their minds were hardened, and biased against the truth.

And the Greeks seek after wisdom- the Greek world constantly sought insight into the true nature of things. They were waiting for the conclusive argument, the line of reasoning that would at last enlighten them. Their quest in Old Testament times was often sincere, but now that Christ crucified is preached they have no excuse for continuing the search for wisdom on their own.

1:23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling-block, and unto the Greeks foolishness;

But we preach Christ crucified- undeterred by the demands of men of intellect, and unembarrassed by the subject he made known, Paul asserts that he and his fellow evangelists preached. They did not debate, rationalise, or argue, but simply made an announcement of facts. He also asserts that they preached Christ, or the Messiah. Despite knowing what the consensus in Israel about Jesus of Nazareth’s claim to Messiahship was, Paul insisted on preaching Him. He further states that in their preaching they emphasised that this Christ was the one who was crucified, and will always be known for that. They did not preach Jesus the teacher, Jesus the miracle worker, Jesus the fine example, although He was all these things. Paul was convinced that the only sort of Christ that God would have preached is Christ crucified.

Unto the Jews a stumbling-block- the idea that a man crucified in shame and disgrace between two thieves on a Roman cross, was worthy to be welcomed as their Messiah, was not something that Jews generally were prepared to accept. But then the majority of Jews were not saved, for they were clinging to the wisdom of the elders, and refusing the wisdom of God.

As we have said, wisdom is insight into the true nature of things. At the cross the character of God, who is the fount of all wisdom, was made known fully. Do we wish to know righteousness, then we see the way God dealt with sin at Calvary. Or love, then we see His love fully expressed in that He did not spare His own Son the horrors of that experience. Or justice, where He poured out His anger against sin upon His own Son. “God is light” and “God is love”, and every ray of glory that shines in His person, as summed up in those two expressions, is seen in full display at Calvary.

And unto the Greeks foolishness- the Greeks were looking for the Ideal Man, and to them such a man would not succumb, but would succeed. People crucified on a cross had succumbed, in their view. They looked for a man who was a victor, not a victim. Crucified people had not been victorious, but they had become victims of circumstance. To them, in a word, crucifixion was a tragedy, not a triumph, and crucified people had no claim on their attention.

Despite this prevailing attitude of both Jew and Gentile, Paul and his fellow-workers persisted in preaching Christ crucified, and there is no reason why their present-day counterparts should not do the same.

1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

But unto them which are called- these are they who respond in faith to the message preached. It is by the gospel that God calls men. He does not invite them to participate in a discussion, but to accept His Son as Saviour and Lord.

Both Jews and Greeks- despite the fact that the majority of Jew and Gentile reject the gospel, it is still undeniably true that many have believed and been saved. Despite their different attitudes before, due to culture and background, they have come the same way, and turned to God because of the work of His Son. God has only one gospel.

Christ the power of God- the power of God to destroy the wisdom of the wise, verses 19 and 20, and to save those who believe, verse 18, is vested in Christ, the one men crucified.

1:25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men- the word “because” tells us that we are now to be given reasons for the statement that Christ is the wisdom and power of God as far as those who are called are concerned. We could look at the statements in this verse in two ways. Either the apostle is exaggerating for the sake of effect, and is showing that even if there were such things as foolishness and weakness with God, then, because He is God, they would be much more wise and powerful than the wisdom and power of men. Or, alternatively, when he writes of the foolishness of God, He is referring to the gospel which men call foolish, because it proclaims salvation through a crucified man. This “foolish” gospel is indeed wiser than men, for it saves, whereas those who believe the wisdom of the wise of this world are perishing.

And the weakness of God is stronger than men- the proclamation of a crucified man as Saviour is nonsense to the unbeliever. In the language of the onlookers at Calvary, “He saved others, Himself He cannot save”, Matthew 27:41. It was the chief priests, scribes, and elders who mocked the Saviour thus; in other words, the religious princes of this world, who crucified the Lord of Glory because they were ignorant of Divine wisdom, 1 Corinthians 2:7.

Of course it goes without saying that there are no such things as foolishness and weakness with God in actual fact, and the apostle would never suggest there are. God is Almighty, and All-wise.

(iii) The wisdom of God has been demonstrated in the testimony of believers.

1:26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:

For ye see your calling, brethren- having thought of the history of the world, and the events at Calvary, the apostle now directs the thoughts of the Corinthians to their own situation. Their calling is their experience of the calling of God through the gospel.

How that not many wise men after the flesh- as Paul approached the city of Corinth God encouraged him with the thought that He had many people in that city, Acts 18:11. Yet here we read of not many. So the majority of the “many” that God had in His mind, were not the elite of the city, but the lower classes. God is no respecter of persons, so it is not that God did not offer the gospel to the upper classes so energetically as He did to the lower classes. It was simply that the latter were more responsive. The reason they were more responsive was that they had not embraced the thinking of the philosophers, and were more ready to believe the gospel as it came to them.

How that not many wise men after the flesh- these are they who had been educated in the philosophies of men, and felt that they qualified for the title “wise”. Paul discounts this, however, for they are only wise after the flesh, that is, wise as men think and speak, not wise according to God.

Not many mighty- men of influence in some way, whether politically, financially, or religiously. Because of their education, these too would embrace the wisdom of the world. Thinking themselves to be powerful and wise, they saw no need for Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

Not many noble, are called- these would be the well-bred, high-born classes, who had the “benefit” of the accumulated wisdom handed down from their ancestors. These were too self-sufficient and grand to follow the despised Nazarene, especially since His life ended with crucifixion.

These are described as those not called, but not because the gospel was not for them, but because they judged that they were not for the gospel. No fault attaches to God, who desires that all men be saved, 1 Timothy 2:4.

1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise- the choice of God involves the response of men to the gospel, as well as His predestining counsels. 2 Thessalonians 2:13 reads, “But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth“. If by “chosen the foolish things” Paul meant “chosen only the foolish things”, then we might be justified in thinking simply of God’s eternal purpose electing only foolish people. But it is evident that some of the wise in this world have been converted to God. Paul himself is an example. So it is not an absolute statement of intention only to call foolish people, but a statement that takes account of the situation as it is. God has chosen foolish people, so that His own wisdom may be glorified, and the ineffectiveness of this world’s wisdom might become more apparent. In this way He confounds or embarrasses the wise, for their inability to live a saved life becomes all the more evident as it is contrasted with the life of those God has saved.

And God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty- those who had no influence on affairs in Corinth or the wider world, were ready to accept the truth of the gospel. Those who were influential were too proud to follow the despised Nazarene. Whatever their human power and influence, however, they had no power to live a life pleasing to God, whereas those of little account in the world were able to do this.

1:28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:

And base things of the world- they were base, of low-birth, possessing none of the advantages of nobility, and having all the disadvantages of being low-born.

And things which are despised, hath God chosen- because they were uneducated and poor, they would be looked down upon by the upper classes of society.

And things which are not, to bring to nought things that are-of course Paul does not mean these people did not exist, but rather that they might just as well not have existed as far as the elite were concerned. It is such people that God uses to reduce those who seem to be big and powerful to their proper level.

1:29 That no flesh should glory in His presence.

That no flesh should glory in His presence- God is working for His own glory, and He knows that the wise and powerful of this world will find it difficult to leave their attitudes behind them when they get saved. This is why God delights to save the nobodies of this world, so that His glory might be displayed in that sinners of the lowest sort are in His presence for all eternity.

(f) Verses 30-31 The wisdom of God directs all the glory to Himself.

1:30 But of Him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:

But of Him- the Corinthian believers were what they were solely because of God’s working. They were the result of God putting forth His power through the preaching of the cross. There was nothing out of themselves or other men that had brought them to their current position.

Are ye- before they were nothing and nobody, now they are something and somebody. How that can be said is told us in the next words.

In Christ Jesus- He is not only the crucified man, but also the risen, ascended and glorified man. As such He is able to bring to the highest place of honour in association with Himself. Paul explains to the Ephesians that believers are seated in heavenly places in Christ Jesus, Ephesians 2:6. God has lifted beggars from the dunghill, and set them among princes, 1 Samuel 2:8. The wise of this world were not prepared to go as far as the cross, and ally themselves to the crucified Christ. They thereby forfeit the right to have association with Him in His highest glory.

Who of God is made unto us wisdom- the order of words in the original is “who was made to us wisdom from God”. The wisdom that comes from God is made good to us by Christ Jesus. Only through Him and His death can we know God, and have insight into the true nature of things. The world may grope after God in the dark, but they do so because they have rejected the light that Christ brings.

And righteousness- because we now know God, we know also how to live a life that is in harmony with His character. We need wisdom for that, and this comes from Christ. Paul will later write that Christ was made sin for us, so that we might be made, or become in practice, the righteousness of God in Him, 2 Corinthians 5:21. The life of the believer should be marked by practical righteousness, the expression of the righteous nature imparted by God.

And sanctification- the apostle has already described the Corinthian believers as saints by divine calling, verse 2, and this repeats that thought. In the midst of the squalid conditions prevailing in Corinth, the believers there were able to maintain a separate lifestyle, in the measure in which they availed themselves of Divine wisdom in Christ.

And redemption- not only were they able to live righteous and holy lives, but they were also able to enjoy the liberty that Christ’s death brings to the believer. As the Lord Jesus said, “If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed”, John 8:36. He also said, “and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, John 8:32. So not only are believers righteous and holy by God’s reckoning, they are redeemed also. But each of these three things is to be worked out in practice. It is the truth that makes free, the truth of God’s word, the perfect wisdom. If we direct our lives by its instruction, we shall be made free from all that brings into bondage, whatever form that bondage takes.

1:31 That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.

That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord- the apostle closes this section of his argument with a quotation from the prophet Jeremiah. The context reads as follows- “Thus saith the Lord, Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, neither let the mighty man glory in his might, let not the rich man glory in his riches: But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth Me, that I am the Lord which exercise loving kindness, judgement, and righteousness, in the earth: for in these things I delight, saith the Lord”, Jeremiah 9:23,24. Clearly the apostle has had this passage in the back of his mind as he penned verses 26-29, for the same classes of men he speaks of, Jeremiah speaks of too. A reading of the early verses of Jeremiah 9 will show that the people of Israel in Jeremiah’s day were no different to the men of Corinth in Paul’s day. They were alike guilty of treachery, lies, and immorality. The answer to this problem was not the wise man glorying in his supposed wisdom, and his ability to remedy the situation; nor the mighty man glorying in his might, thinking that by his influence he could effect change; nor the rich man priding himself on his success, and seeking to pump money into the situation to make it better. None of these solutions is the right one. Only by glorying in the Lord, and trusting in His wisdom, His power, and His rich grace, can the situation be remedied. Notice that in Jeremiah 9 the Lord speaks of Himself as to His activity, for He exercises loving kindness, judgement, and righteousness; so should those who believe be exercised. And in the measure in which the Corinthians, and ourselves, imitate God’s ways, we shall live lives that are glorifying to the Lord, for they will be a reflection of His character.

THE PERSON OF CHRIST: He humbled Himself

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS CHAPTER 2, VERSE 7

 “But made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men”.

 The structure of Philippians 2:5-11 is determined by the punctuation.  The passage consists of just two sentences, divided into seven sections as follows:

(i)    Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
(ii)    Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
(iii)    But made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
(iv)    And being found in fashion as a man, He humbled Himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.
(v)    Wherefore God also hath highly exalted Him, and given Him a name which is above every name:
(vi)    That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;
(vii)    And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

There is a symmetry about these statements: 

The first and seventh correspond: the mind of Christ in eternity, then the mind of all created beings as they enter eternity.
(i)  Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus:
(vii) And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

The second and the sixth: Christ conscious of His equality with God, then all creation conscious of it and recognising it by bowing the knee.
(ii)  Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:
(vi) That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;

The third and the fifth: Christ making Himself of no reputation, then God the Father ensuring that His name or reputation is acknowledged.
(iii)  But made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
(v)  Wherefore God also hath highly exalted Him, and given Him a name which is above every name:

The fourth and central statement:  The meeting-point of it all, the central event of time and eternity, the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ.
(iv) And being found in fashion as a man, He humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.

We come now to the phrase “but made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men”:

BUT
 This reminds of the previous statement, “Thought it not robbery to be equal with God”.  Despite His claim He gave up what that claim resulted in.

 The expression “made Himself of no reputation” is defined by the following two phrases, “took the form of a servant”, and “was made in the likeness of men”.  In other words, He made Himself of no reputation by doing two things, (i) taking the form of a servant, and (ii) being made in the likeness of men. This explanation is demanded by the parts of speech which are used here for “made Himself” and “took”.

 The words “made…of no reputation” are a translation of the verb “kenoo” which means “to empty”.  This has led some unbelievers to invent the Kenosis Theory, saying, blasphemously, that He emptied Himself of His Deity. 

THIS CANNOT BE TRUE BECAUSE:
1.    God changes not as to essence.  “I am the Lord, I change not”, Malachi 3:6. “But Thou art the Same”, Psalm 102:27.   God is immutable, Hebrews 6:17.  If the Son was God before, He is ever God.  If He is not God now, He was never God.

2.    As we have seen, the word “being” does not simply mean “existing”, but subsisting, or always existing.

3.    He took upon Him the form of a servant, so He added the servant’s form to what He was before, thus retaining the form of God.

4.    It is said of Him even now, that “In Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, Colossians 2:9.

5.    The words “I and My Father are one” were spoken by Him when He was here in manhood, John 10:30.  The fact that the Jews immediately took up stones to stone Him for blasphemy, verse 31, shows that they understood His words to be a claim to Deity.

SO WHAT DOES “EMPTY” MEAN?
 Since the expression is expanded by the next two phrases, we may say He emptied Himself by taking the form of a servant, which involved being made in the likeness of men.

 Another way of reaching a conclusion about the phrase is to note the corresponding ones in the remainder of the section, which speak of His exaltation.

 To be given a “name which is above every name”, involves being given reputation.

 The fact that this name is given to Him by God the Father indicates it is a deserved reward.

 Every knee shall bow, thus giving to the Lord Jesus His deserved reverence.

A SERVANT EXPECTS NONE OF THESE THINGS, NOR CAN HE DEMAND THEM
 In heaven, there was the reputation of God-hood; the reward of His Father’s love; the reverence of the heavenly host.

 WHEN A SERVANT AND A MAN HE DID NOT DEMAND THESE THINGS AS HIS RIGHTS, EVEN THOUGH AS EQUAL WITH GOD HE COULD HAVE DONE SO.

We see this from the gospel records, and from the things predicted of Him, which came to pass:
No reputation
 He was known as Jesus of Nazareth, yet Nathaniel voiced the common view when he said, “Can any good thing come out of Nazareth?” John 1:46.
 The prophet said  that He would be “despised and rejected of men”, and that it would be true of Him that “they esteemed Him not”, Isaiah 53:3.
 He plied His humble trade for many years as a carpenter, Mark 6:3, and “the carpenter’s son”, Matthew 13:55.
 When He was crucified, He was “reckoned among the transgressors”, Luke 22:37, as if a criminal.  This is part of what is meant by “death of the cross”.  To die on a cross was the ultimate disgrace, the very opposite of reputation. 

No reward:
 When He was presented to the Lord in the temple at the age of forty days, His mother brought the offering of the poor, Luke 2:24; Leviticus 12:8.  As the apostle wrote, “Ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though He was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor”, 2 Corinthians 8:9.

  In Psalm 22, we find it predicted that He would be deprived of the company of His God; of answers to His prayers; of deliverance from His troubles; and of the respect a human being ought to receive.

 The prophet Daniel foretold that He, (despite being Messiah the Prince), would be cut off and have nothing, Daniel 9:26 margin.  And so it came to pass.

 No reverence:
 It is true that the wise men worshipped Him when He was a baby, as did the shepherds, but Herod, pretending to wish to worship Him also, in reality sought to slay Him, Matthew 2:16.

 The men of Nazareth, not having anything to charge Him with as to His life among them for so many years, nonetheless took Him to brow of the hill to cast Him over the top, Luke 4:29.

 The men of Jerusalem took up stones to stone Him on more than one occasion, John 8:59; 10:31.

 When on the cross it came to pass as was written, “All they that see Me laugh Me to scorn”, Psalm 22:7; Matthew 27:39-44.

 In the language of the parable He told, the husbandman said, “They will reverence my son”, but they took him outside the vineyard and killed him, Matthew 21:37-39.

FORM OF A SERVANT:
 Just as “form of God” means really and manifestly God, so form of servant means servant in reality and manifestation.

 The reality manifested itself clearly during His life here.  Mark’s gospel especially concentrates on this; the key verse of his gospel is “For even the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give His life a ransom for many”, Mark 10:45.

THREE THINGS THAT MARK A TRUE SERVANT ARE FOUND TO PERFECTION IN CHRIST:

(i)  Subjection:
“The head of Christ is God”, 1 Corinthians 11:3.

   “My Father is greater than I”, John 14:28.  This is not to say that the Father is greater morally, or essentially, but because He is not in flesh as Christ is.  The Father has not self-limited Himself in that way as Christ has.  This statement would be pointless, and redundant, if the Lord Jesus were a created being.  John writes to prove the Deity of Christ, so it is part of that aim.  The Lord Jesus said in the Upper Room, (after having washed the disciples’ feet, taking the servant’s place), “the servant is not greater than his lord; neither he that is sent greater than he that sent him”, John 13:16.

(ii)  Service:
 He could say with confidence, “I do always those things that please Him”, John 8:29. 
 His claim was “I am among you as He that serveth”, Luke 22:27.
 He said as He came into the world, “Lo, I come…to do Thy will, O God”, Hebrews 10:7.

Submission: 
 By taking the place of Servant of Jehovah, He willingly gave up His will in favour of His Father’s, as we know from His words in Gethsemane, Luke 22:42, “not My will, but Thine, be done”.
“Though He were a Son, yet learned He obedience by the things which He suffered”, Hebrews 5:8.
“But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do”, John 14:31.
“I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again.  This commandment have I received of My Father”, John 10:18.
“For even Christ pleased not Himself”, Romans 15:3.
“For I came down from heaven, not to do Mine own will, but the will of Him that sent Me”, John 6:38.

GALATIANS 6

GALATIANS 6

Survey of the section
Having spoken of the fruit of the Spirit in chapter 5, the apostle now gives instances of how those who are Christ’s will manifest that fruit in their lives. The apostle has two matters on his mind as he brings the epistle to a close. First, he wants to dispel the notion that those who know the grace of God in Christ are unconcerned about works. He uses the dramatic phrase “the law of Christ”, as he deals with this. Second, that what he has said about the Law given to Israel does not in any way mean that there is no future for that nation. Hence he uses the phrase “the Israel of God” to emphasise that God still has that nation in mind, and will one day bring it into the good of the grace Christians know already.

Structure of the section

(a)

Verses 1-10

The law of Christ and its manifestation

(b)

Verses 11-18

The cross of Christ and its meaning

(a) Verses 1-10
The law of Christ and its manifestation

6:1
Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.

Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault- this is a continuation of the exhortations at the end of chapter 5, where the apostle warns against provoking, envying, and self-seeking. The test is now applied. What will be their reaction to a brother in need of help? Those who walk in the flesh will either have been responsible for his fall, or will not care that he has fallen. Those who walk after the Spirit will seek to help and rescue. It was those who lagged behind in Israel’s march across the wilderness who fell a prey to the enemy. Hence the warnings about being hindered, 5:7, for it rendered them vulnerable.

Ye which are spiritual- those who are walking in the Spirit, and are therefore morally qualified to help. Literally it is, “Ye, the spiritual ones”, so the idea is of more than one spiritual person on his own.

Restore such an one in the spirit of meekness- the spirit of meekness is an attitude of surrender to God’s will, which ensures that the path walked by such a one is pleasing to the Lord, being a constituent part of the fruit of the Spirit, 5:23. It is the opposite of vain-glory, 5:26, which selfishly seeks one’s own advancement even at the expense of others. The word restore is used of mending nets, so the idea is of restoration to usefulness, not restoration to assembly fellowship after excommunication, for that is a matter for the whole assembly.

Considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted- the Devil is opposed to the restoration of believers to usefulness, so will make those who seek to effect it a special target. The word for considering is “skope”, which is part of the word for overseer, “episkope”. Those who “look over” the welfare of others should first scrutinise their own lives. Note that the apostle has reverted to the singular, so individuals are to consider themselves personally. It may be that by learning of the specific details surrounding a believer’s fault the spiritual brother is brought into contact with things he is not accustomed to facing, and this may give the enemy an opportunity to tempt him.

6:2
Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ.

Bear ye one another’s burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ- if this were done, and every believer was the object of care, then perhaps the overtaking in a fault would not be so frequent. The word for burden emphasises the idea of weight of care; it is a burden more than one person can carry, whereas the burden in verse 5 is what any one person is given strength to carry, in terms of responsibility. The Lord Jesus was the supreme Burden-Bearer. In life He bore our griefs and carried our sorrows, Isaiah 53:4, and in death He bare our sins in His own body on the tree, 1 Peter 2:24. As Jehovah’s Perfect Servant He was fully qualified to bear the burdens of others. This is the law of Christ, perfectly displayed by Him when here. Paul by this answers any charge that the Christian, if he does not have the law of Moses to govern him, is lawless.

6:3
For if a man think himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself.

For if a man thinketh himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceiveth himself- the law of Christ is truly carried out only by those who do not consider self, but only others. Christ looked not on His own things, but on the things of others, Philippians 2:4,5. He made Himself of no reputation, even though He was worthy of infinite repute. How much more should we, who in reality are nothing in ourselves! See 1 Corinthians 3:7. The priest and Levite in the Good Samaritan story no doubt thought themselves to be something, and therefore above helping the robbed man.

6:4
But let every man prove his own work, and then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another.

But let every man prove his own work- instead of claiming to be something as far as carrying out the law of Christ is concerned, and instead, also, of being critical of the work of others, the individual servant should carry out a thorough self-assessment of his labour, testing its genuineness and value.

And then shall he have rejoicing in himself alone- “in himself alone” is “as to himself alone”, that is in relation only to himself, for he personally has work that is worthy of God’s praise, and will not have to be content at the Judgement Seat with rejoicing that others have been rewarded.

And not in another- “as to another”. It is not that a believer does not rejoice in what another does, but the point here is that each is responsible for the work given him to do, and instead of only being able to rejoice in what others have done, each should assess their labour so that they have personal cause for rejoicing because of what they have done.

6:5
For every man shall bear his own burden.

For every man shall bear his own burden- as indicated on verse 2, this is the burden of responsibility that each believer has. That burden is to be borne in two senses. First, during the lifetime, full responsibility must be taken for the task allotted- the burden cannot be moved onto someone else. Second, at the Judgement Seat of Christ, the responsibility for what has been done shall be borne by the one doing it. “every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour”, 1 Corinthians 3:8.

6:6
Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth in all good things.

Let him that is taught in the word communicate to him that teacheth in all good things- teachers and taught constitute the sum total of believers. So the teacher is to “bear his own burden” of teaching, and those taught have a burden of responsibility to share the necessary good things of life to them as a token of appreciation. “Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn” is a verse from the Old Testament which the apostle used in 1 Corinthians 9:9-11 to encourage the duty of supporting those who teach the word. In certain circumstances the apostle did not use this means of support, but at other times he did, depending on the attitude of the local believers to him. We should remember, in connection with “all good things”, that according to 2 Corinthians 8:13 there should be an equality in this matter, so that the help given to those who teach should not be at such a level that they live in luxury, (“eased”), whilst others are “burdened” with the task of supporting them. We should also remember that apart from those whom the Lord chose to be apostles, and Matthias who replaced Judas, and Paul and Barnabas, none have the right to “forbear working”, 1 Corinthians 9:6. If that had been obeyed, the system of clergy and laity, whatever form it takes, would not have arisen. The gifts of the Lord’s people should not have to be diverted from helping the poor, (Galatians 2:10), to support those who are perfectly able to support themselves.

6:7
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap- the subject of personal responsibility of the previous verses leads to a solemn warning. The God who created all things has enshrined the principle in His creation that what is sown is reaped. He will not allow those who try to evade this principle to succeed. Whatever is sown, whether the seed of good varieties of plant or the seed of evil, poisonous plants, will reproduce itself without fail.

6:8
For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.

For he that soweth to his flesh, shall of the flesh reap corruption- if seeds of selfishness are sown, (for the text reads, “his own flesh” or self), meaning that the one sowing has not been putting into effect the teaching of the previous verses regarding concern for others, then a like harvest will be reaped. The selfish believer will find that what he has produced is nothing more than a mass of corruption, which will be rejected at the Judgement Seat of Christ.

But he that soweth to the Spirit, shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting- the one who sows with a view to producing that which the Spirit approves of, (the fruit of the Spirit of 5:22,23), will find an abundant harvest at the Judgement Seat, and the Spirit of God will ensure that he has an enhanced appreciation and enjoyment of everlasting life in eternity. Every believer has everlasting life, so does not have to work by sowing to get it, but the degree of appreciation of it will vary according to whether a person has laid hold on eternal life in a practical way, 1 Timothy 6:19.

6:9
And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not.

And let us not be weary in well doing- the apostle is careful again to commend good works, lest the Judaisers should say that grace undermines them. The well doing in particular is that of sowing to the Spirit.

For in due season we shall reap, if we faint not- not only is the principle in creation that what is sown is reaped, there is also the regulation of the seasons. Each believer has his or her allotted span on earth to sow to the Spirit. He who is the Lord of the harvest can be trusted to allow that time of opportunity, whether long or short. When the moment of His choosing comes, then the sowing is done no more, and the reaping at the “due season” of the Bema is awaited. To not be weary in well doing means to not flag in enthusiasm. It may well be that this will mean weariness, but the apostle is not rebuking that. If we faint not means if we do not give up. If we leave the seed in the barn, or only half-sow the field, no harvest, or a small harvest will result.

6:10
As we have therefore opportunity, let us do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith.

As we have therefore opportunity- the apostle is not saying that opportunities will be intermittent, and we should use them when they occur. Rather, he is saying that we have opportunity, for it is present all the time. “Ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good”, Mark 14:7. Significantly, the word “opportunity” means “a season”, and connects with the ideas of sowing and reaping of verses 7-9. Just as there is the “due season” of reaping, so there is a “due season” of sowing.

Let us do good unto all men- the Lord Jesus went about doing good, and whilst we cannot work miracles as He did, nonetheless we have a responsibility to follow the principle. He did not discriminate between men when he blessed them, and nor should we.

Especially unto them who are of the household of faith- the chief area of need is amongst the Lord’s people, since often their stand for the truth results in hardship. Note how the apostle is emphasising the need for good works on the part of those who have experienced the grace of God. The Judaisers would accuse the apostle of discounting good works, but he here show that is not so. He had signified his readiness to remember the poor in 2:10, and he had been instrumental in organising an Asia-wide collection for the poor saints of Judea, so none could justly charge him with indifference to the plight of the poor.

(b) Verses 11-18
The cross of Christ and its meaning

6:11
Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand.

Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand- most often, the apostle used an amanuensis, or secretary, to whom he would dictate his letters. Some Bibles give a note at the end of the epistles saying who it was thought had been the writer. No such note is attached to Galatians, but simply that it was written to the Galatians from Rome. If the apostle had eye problems, the fact that he had painstakingly written the letter himself was a token of his desire to do good, not only to the Galatian believers, but also to the wider world, as the truth found in the epistle was published abroad in the preaching of the gospel. How grateful we should be for this sturdy defence of the truth of the gospel, which has stood God’s people in good stead over the centuries.

6:12
As many as desire to make a fair shew in the flesh, they constrain you to be circumcised; only lest they should suffer persecution for the cross of Christ.

As many as desire to make a fair show in the flesh, they constrain you to be circumcised- the false teachers wished to keep up good appearances, and be marked by zeal for religion. One way they did this was by compelling the Galatians to be circumcised, and thus commit themselves to keeping the law. Not in the sense of physically inflicting the ceremony on them, but by forceful words, threatening them that if they were not circumcised, then they were not truly saved. See Acts 15:1, and compare Galatians 2:3, where the apostle refuses to be compelled. The apostle doubtless had the gift of discerning of spirits, and could tell the motive of these men, and proceeds to tell us what it is.

Only lest they should suffer persecution for the cross of Christ- men are not prepared to willingly suffer and die for what they believe to be false, and these men believed that the preaching of the cross, with its assertion that the work of Christ was enough, and needed no works of man, was a false doctrine. The way they avoided being mistaken for being preachers of the gospel, and suffering as a consequence, was by denying the cross and championing the Law.

6:13
For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the law; but desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh.

For neither they themselves who are circumcised keep the law- the falseness of these men is seen in the fact that the very law they wanted the Galatians to commit themselves to, was the law they did not keep. The Lord condemned the lawyers, who placed heavy burdens on the people, yet would not move a finger to help them, Luke 11:45,46.

But desire to have you circumcised, that they may glory in your flesh- circumcision is an operation on the flesh, and the Judaisers would rejoice if they managed to get some to have it done. But more than this, it would be a sign of carnality to go back to circumcision, and so if the Judaisers rejoiced at this, they showed that they had no spiritual life, and were only able to enjoy the things of the flesh.

6:14
But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.

But God forbid that I should glory- may it never be, writes the apostle, that I glory, or boast in this way. Paul desired to boast in spiritual things alone.

Save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ- by which he means not a piece of wood, but the doctrine of the cross, the truth that the death of Christ has dealt with everything that merited the judgement of God. By dying on a cross for Paul, the Lord Jesus crucified or cut off the world from Paul. As the Lord said, anticipating the cross, “Now is the judgement of this world”, John 12:31, and by submitting to death at the hands of the men of the world, the Lord allowed them to show their true character, and thus be judged. This signified Divine disapproval of all that the world contained and stood for. Inasmuch as the princes of this world crucified the Lord of glory, 1 Corinthians 2:8, and amongst these princes were the chief priests in Israel, then the religion of the law is part of the world from which the cross of Christ has cut Paul off.

And I unto the world- not only did Christ by His crucifixion cancel out the world as far as Paul was concerned, but He cancelled out Paul as far as the world was concerned. The Greek verb “to crucify”, also means “to build a palisade by driving in stakes”. So there may be a double thought. Christ has cancelled out the world by His crucifixion, but because the world still exists, and is a cause of trouble for the believer, He has, by His cross, erected a barrier between the believer and the world.

6:15
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.

For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth anything- this gives the clue as to what aspect of the world the apostle has in mind in the previous verse; it is the world of religion, where to be circumcised had religious significance. By the cross, however, Christ has cancelled the world as far as those who believe are concerned, so that instead of being in it, they are in Christ Jesus, the Risen Man. So bound up together with Christ are their interests, that wherever He is, (and He is gone from the world), they are. The world that began when Adam sinned, has met its full judgement in the cross of Christ, and the believer is now identified with the Last Adam. Circumcision has no force or power (availeth) to effect this, but the cross of Christ has.

Nor uncircumcision- whether a person is circumcised or not is of no account, now that a new situation prevails for the believer. So the uncircumcised Galatians would gain nothing by being circumcised, nor would they gain merit by being in a state of uncircumcision, and so have no religious links with the nation that crucified Christ.

But a new creature- having cancelled out the world and its religion, Christ, as head of the new creation, introduces His people to a new state altogether, where ceremonial and ritual differences are irrelevant. What are relevant in the new creation sphere are the spiritual things established by Christ. It is in Christ, identified with Him, that a person is a new creature, 2 Corinthians 5:17.

6:16
And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.

And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them- those who live their lives in accordance with the principles set out in verses 14 and 15 may have misgivings, for the outward support of religion is gone. Because of this, the apostle brings down upon them the peace of God that will calm their fears.

And mercy- refusal to give in to the forceful persuasions of the Judaisers may mean they are harassed by them. In such circumstances the Galatians need to appreciate and experience the mercy of God, who is kind to His people, and thus strengthens them to bear up when there is opposition.

And upon the Israel of God- clearly, when the apostle spoke of those who “walk according to this rule”, he was anticipating that this, ideally, would be true of all believers. He now speaks of another company, the Israel of God. In Romans 9:6 we learn that “they are not all Israel which are of Israel”, which means that not everyone who is descended from Jacob, otherwise known as Israel, is really “Governed by God”, which is what the name Israel means. As he brings his epistle to a close, the apostle is anxious to dispel any idea that his remarks about circumcision, and his rebukes for the Judaisers, mean that he is against Israel. Far from being against them, he expresses the desire in Romans 10:1 that they be saved. But beyond this, there is his belief that after the present age has run its course, God will begin dealings with the nation of Israel again, and from it will extract those who learn the lesson the Galatians had to learn, that mere religion is of no account with God. It is upon this future company that he brings down the peace and mercy of God, for they will pass through times which are anything but peaceful, and experience from men treatment that is anything but merciful.

6:17
From henceforth let no man trouble me: for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus.

From henceforth let no man trouble me: for I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus- perhaps this is not so much a request for rest from opposition, as a statement that his desire is that in the future, when men oppose him, this will cause him no trouble of mind. The reason why he was beyond being concerned about persecution, was that already there were, in his body, the scars inflicted by those who violently opposed him, see 2 Corinthians 11:23-27. The marks are stigmata, or brand-marks. It was the practice to brand slaves with the name of their master, and to brand soldiers with the name of their commander. The wounds inflicted on Paul were the sure sign of his service for his Master, and his loyalty to his Commander. No circumcision scars could compare with this. The Judaisers used circumcision as a way of escaping persecution, verse 12, whereas Paul’s scars showed he had endured it, for Christ’s sake.

6:18
Brethren, the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen.

Brethren, the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen. The apostle ends with an affirmation of his fellowship with them in the family of God, despite the harsh words he has had to use at times in the epistle. He had begun the letter by associating his brethren with him as he wrote, 1:2, but hopefully, if they heed the teaching of the epistle, he now has the Galatians with him as brethren. He has had things to say about circumcision, the cutting of the flesh. He closes with an emphasis on the spirit, the inner core of being in which the believer serves and worships God, even if his body is not circumcised.