Tag Archives: baptism

COLOSSIANS 2

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using e-mail: martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk
We would be pleased to hear from you.

COLOSSIANS 2

Structure of the chapter

Verses 1-3 Appreciating the mystery of Christ.
Verses 4-19 Avoiding the error of those who deny Christ.
Verses 20-23 Acting on the truth of association with Christ.

Survey of the chapter
Verses 1-3 are really a continuation of the subject of the greatness of the mystery, beginning in 1:24.

Verses 4-19 contain warning about four ways in which heretics would seek to lead them astray.

Verses 20-23 explain one consequence of being dead with Christ.

Structure of verses 1-3

(a) 2:1

The agony: praying and preaching

(b) 2:2a

The ambition: hearts comforted.

(c) 2:2b

The atmosphere: love

(d) 2:2c

The aim: assurance and understanding

(e) 2:3

The abundance: all the treasures

Verses 1-3
Appreciating the mystery of Christ.

2:1
For I would that ye knew what great conflict I have for you, and for them at Laodicea, and for as many as have not seen my face in the flesh;

For I would that ye knew what great conflict I have for you- Paul agonised in prayer, (the word “conflict” is “agona”, from which we derive the word agony, and is used in Luke 22:44 of Christ’s conflict in Gethsemane), in view of the greatness of the truth he has just written about, and in view, also, of the greatness of the danger that lurked all around them, which danger he is about to write about. Agony is the exertion of the athlete as he strives to attain his objective. Paul is not striving to win for himself, but that the Colossians might do so. He knows that hostile spirit-forces are opposing the believers, seeking to make them go off course. Jericho was a barrier to Israel, the stronghold that prevented them from entering in to the inheritance that God had given them. The word Jericho means “City of the moon”, (the moon being the ruler of the night) and Paul reminds the Ephesians believers that they wrestle against “the rulers of the darkness of this world”, Ephesians 6:12.

Even though we have an intercessor on high, Romans 8:34, and an intercessor within, 8:26, we still need to pray ourselves, for the Spirit helps us as we pray; He does not intercede instead of us but alongside of us. Prayer is a sign of our dependence on God and faith in God.

And for them at Laodicea- some twenty-six years later Laodicea had declined in spirituality, being more interested in material riches than spiritual ones. Both Colosse and Laodicea were near the river Meander. This river gradually silted up, however, and left Colosse poorer commercially, and Laodicea richer. Sadly, however, the greater prosperity affected the Laodicean believers, so that they boasted that they were “rich, increased in goods, and had need of nothing”, but they knew not that they were poor, spiritually, Revelation 3:17. This can easily happen when prosperity comes, for dependence upon the Lord can easily decline and we become self-sufficient. We must remember that even though in Old Testament times financial prosperity was a sign of God’s approval, in this age it is not so. In fact, the apostle writes to Timothy that he should turn away from those who said that gain was a sign of godliness, 1 Timothy 6:5. Melchizedek strengthened Abraham with bread and wine before the King of Sodom came to tempt him with the words, “Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself”, Genesis 14:21. As the Lord Jesus said, “What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?”, Matthew 16:26. Starting out on the Christian pathway we should resolve to go in for spiritual things, even if that means less material things. This will be to the profit of our souls. This will prevent the tragedy of looking back on a life spent in worldly pursuits, and asking what, out of the accumulated wealth we have acquired, can we give to buy back the lost opportunities. The answer is, of course, nothing.

And for as many as have not seen my face in the flesh- Paul had an interest in the spiritual progress of all believers, even those he had never seen. It is one of the signs of a true believer that he loves those who are born of God. As John wrote, “every one that loveth Him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of Him”, 1 John 5:1. And the Colossians were marked by this, for in verse 4 of the first chapter Paul can write of their love to all the saints.

We should remember, however, that just because we love a believer it does not mean that we can automatically have fellowship with him, for the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship go together, Acts 2:42. We should only have fellowship with the things and the people that the apostles would have had fellowship with.

2:2
That their hearts might be comforted, being knit together in love, and unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ;

That their hearts might be comforted- the heart of man is the very centre of his being. “Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life”, Proverbs 4:23. Just as the natural heart is critical to our life, (for “the life of the flesh is in the blood”, Leviticus 17:11), and forth from it is circulated our life-blood, so the centre of the moral being of the believer should be safeguarded and comforted. To be comforted means to be strengthened and fortified. A fort was a stronghold in ancient times. So our hearts need to be protected and strengthened to withstand the attacks of the enemy, for he is active, as the next verses show.

Being knit together in love- Satan loves to divide the people of God. The slogan of many a military strategist has been “Divide and rule”. The apostle is earnestly praying that the Colossians might not be disunited. Love is the major uniting bond of believers; love to God and Christ, love to fellow-believers, all grounded in the love of God’s word, as the apostle will go on to say.

And unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding- this is one of Paul’s complicated phrases. It is best understood by beginning at the end and working backwards. The main subject of the phrase is “understanding”. Then we have the “full assurance of understanding”. Then we have “all riches of the full assurance of the understanding”.

The word understanding as used here means literally “to put together”, and refers to the believer’s ability to relate truth to truth so as to gain a right appreciation of Divine things. This demands effort, concentration and persistence, but it reaps a reward, as the word riches indicates.

Full assurance may be thought of as complete confidence. Many believers lack assurance because they do not allow the truth of the word of God to govern their thinking. Instead of appreciating what God has done for them and in them through Christ, they look to themselves, and find failure and weakness. This only unsettles and disturbs, whereas if we look to what God has done we shall be assured in our hearts. This is not to say that we may be complacent about our failures and shortcomings, but we should remember that the true believer is “accepted in the Beloved”, Ephesians 1:4, and not accepted by God because of anything he has done or been.

No wonder the apostle speaks of “all riches”, for every conceivable blessing has been granted to the believer, Ephesians 1:3, and it only remains to enter in to an appreciation of these things in faith.

To the acknowledgement of the mystery of God- we now learn what it is we should understand. There are three strands to it. First, the mystery of God, then the mystery of the Father, and then the mystery of Christ. (We are told that there are manuscript differences here, but we should expect corrupt documents like the Sinaiticus, Vaticanus and Alexandrinus to have perverted readings, for that is Satan’s way of attacking the person of Christ, and sowing doubt as to whether we can know what the word of God is or not. The manuscripts listed above are the basis of the vast majority of the new translations of the Bible, from the Revised Version onwards).

The word mystery refers to information that is only available to those who are initiated. All believers are introduced by the preaching of the gospel to truth regarding God, for it is “the glorious gospel of the blessed God”, 1 Timothy 1:11. The apostle wrote of the mystery of the gospel, Ephesians 6:19. As the gospel is preached, truths about God are set forth for those who show an interest. As the Spirit works in their hearts, men are persuaded of the truth of the scriptures explained to them. Confronted with the glory of God and their nothingness in His sight, they repent, and believe the truth they hear. The great goal the apostle had as he prayed for these Colossian believers is that they fully acknowledge, or are fully acquainted with, the truths that he, as an apostle, had been entrusted with, and which he had passed on to the saints.

Given that a New Testament mystery is about truths that were unknown in former times, but which are now revealed to the believer, we might ask what some of these truths are. Consider the following:

1. The once-for-all sacrifice of Christ. In the Old Testament times, sacrifices were offered “year by year continually”, Hebrews 10:1. There seemed to be no end of this system, until Christ came, and “by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified”, Hebrews 10:14.

2. Permanent cleasing from sin. Instead of relying on the annual Day of Atonement ceremony for purging from sins nationally, and sin offerings brought in between times for personal sins, the believer now finds that “the blood of Jesus Christ, his Son, cleanseth us from all sin”, 1 John 1:7, with the “us” referring to those who walk in the light, a definition of believers.

3. The indwelling of the Holy Spirit. In Old Testament times, the Holy Spirit came to certain people for certain tasks. So Bezaleel was given the Spirit to make the tabernacle vessels, Exodus 31:1-3; and David was given the Spirit to enable him to reign righteously over Israel, 1 Samuel 16:13. But it was not necessarily the case that the Spirit of God stayed, for David sinned badly, and in one of his repentance psalmist he pleads with God to not take His Holy Spirit from him, Psalm 51:11, for that would mean that he was no longer king. Now things are different, for the Lord Jesus told His own in the Upper Room that He would “pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever”, John 14:16.

4. The blessing of the gospel is available to Jew and Gentile alike. In Old Testament times the path to blessing was through Israel. A man had to become a proselyte to be in the good of God’s favour. Now there is no distinction made between Jew and Gentile, as Peter learnt when he saw the vision of the wild beasts in the sheet, Acts 10:8-16. He realised that God was not dealing exclusively with Israel for the time being, for God has, in his words, “put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith”, Acts 15:9.

5. The believer’s inheritance is in heaven. For the Jew, the inheritance was Canaan. And in the future, Canaan under their Messiah. At the present time the inheritance is in heaven, reserved and watched over by God, 1 Peter 1:4.

6. The believer is a citizen of heaven. For Israel, their citizenship was on earth, as subjects of the Messiah. Now the believer is a citizen of heaven, Philippians 1:27, (where conversation is citizenship); and 3:20, (where conversation is “city-state”).

The eternal life we receive when we believe not only enables us to know God initially, but it empowers us to get to know Him increasingly. This is the highest goal set before us, and the life we have been given enables us to achieve it, in dependence upon God. To have the knowledge of God in this way will mean that we have God alone as our object; all other knowledge will recede. Believers will be totally absorbed with who and what God is, in eternity. Moreover, with that knowledge will come insight into all that is mysterious now. Those many things which seem so puzzling will be resolved then, as we are enabled to fathom to some degree the inner secrets of God’s purpose. We should strive for that now, but it will only be fully realised in eternity, when all that hinders us will have been removed.

And of the Father- there was a mystery about God as Father that has now been disclosed to believers. The Lord Jesus, when He prayed to His Father as recorded in John 17, was able to say “I have declared unto them thy name, and will declare it”, verse 26. So the name, (meaning the person), of the Father had been declared by the Son by His life down here. God had not been addressed as Father by any in the Old Testament. The psalmist had used a figure of speech when he wrote of God pitying His children as a father does, Psalm 103:13, but the revelation of God as Father was only given when the Son came to reveal Him. This revelation was so complete that He could say, “He that hath seen me, hath seen the Father”, John 14:9. And as the apostle John wrote, “And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we might know him that is true, and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ”, 1 John 5:20. As a result, when He went back to heaven He ascended back to one who is not only His Father, but ours too, John 20:17.

And of Christ- the name Son tells us of His nature, and His relationship with the Father. The word Christ, however, is a title, and relates to an office. The word means “anointed”, and marks out the Lord Jesus as the long-promised Messiah. There is a further dimension to His Christ-hood, however, as indicated by Peter on the Day of Pentecost. He declared that “God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ”, Acts 2:36. The Jews knew that the Christ or Messiah would be their King; now they learn that He will have another way to exercise His office, for as the Ascended One He unites His people with Himself in a way that can be likened to the way in which the human body is joined to its head. It was the special task of the apostle to set these things out; it remained for the Colossian believers to enter into an understanding of them.

2:3

In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.

In whom are hid- not in the sense of being hidden out of reach to believers, for the apostle is encouraging us to access them. The treasures are, however, out of reach of heretics like the gnostics.

All the treasures of wisdom and knowledge- the claim of the gnostics to have superior knowledge must be spurious, since all the truth resides in Him. (As He Himself said, “I am…the truth”, John 14:6). Since they knew not Christ, they knew not the wisdom that is in Him.

Something of the spiritual excitement of the apostle as he thought of this wisdom and knowledge is conveyed to us by the word treasures. To him, the knowledge Christ gives is worth more than earth’s riches. We read about wisdom in the Book of Proverbs, and there wisdom is personified, (an anticipation of the coming of Christ as the Wisdom of God, 1 Corinthians 1:24), and speaks like this,

“I love them that love me;

and those that seek me early shall find me.

Riches and honour are with me;

yea, durable riches and righteousness.

My fruit is better than gold;

yea, than fine gold;

and my revenue than choice silver.

I lead in the way of righteousness,

in the midst of the paths of judgement:

that I may cause them that love me to inherit substance;

and I will fill their treasures”. Proverbs 8:17-21.

Wisdom is insight into the true nature of things, and knowledge is the information we need to put that wisdom into practice in our lives, so that we may live intelligently to God’s glory, and are able also to resist the teachings of heretics.

(iii) 2:4-19

The enemies of the truth about Christ

Structure of the section

(a) Verses 4-7 Those who beguile

Antidote: Faith in Christ

(b) Verses 8-15 Those who spoil.

Antidote: Truth after Christ

(c Verses 16,17 Those who judge.

Antidote: Reality of Christ.

(d) Verses 18,19 Those who deprive.

Antidote: Support from Christ.

(a) Verses 4-7

Those who beguile

Antidote: Faith in Christ

2:4

And this I say, lest any man should beguile you with enticing words.

And this I say- this introduces a new section, in which the apostle is more specific in his warnings about false teachers. Verse 5 can be considered as a parenthesis, so “this I say” connects with “as ye have therefore” in verse 6.

Lest any man should beguile you with enticing words- having presented the truth as to the person of Christ, Paul is now protecting the minds of the believers from error. In 1:28 he had spoken of warning and teaching. To beguile means to deceive by false reasoning. This is why the apostle prayed that the believers at Colosse might be given wisdom, so that they might discern what was false. “Enticing words” is a description of the persuasive speech of those who promote error. Not having the Spirit of God in their hearts, they have to rely on natural eloquence. Paul writes elsewhere of those who “by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple”, Romans 16:18. This is not to say that preachers and teachers should be hard to listen to, or awkward in their presentation of the truth, but it must be done in the power of the Spirit of God and not of the flesh. Ecclesiastes 12:9-10 reads, “And moreover, because the preacher was wise, he still taught the people knowledge; yea, he gave good heed, and sought out, and set in order many proverbs. The preacher sought to find out acceptable words: and that which was written was upright, even words of truth”.

2:5

For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the spirit, joying and beholding your order, and the stedfastness of your faith in Christ.

For though I be absent in the flesh, yet am I with you in the spirit- Epaphras, (who was from Colosse), had given a faithful report as to conditions in the assembly in that city, and he had endeared the believers to the heart of the apostle. It was a company the apostle would have been happy to associate with, and in his spirit he did so. Every assembly should strive to be the sort of company in which Paul would be happy. Two things are next mentioned as being pleasing to the apostle, namely their order, and the steadfastness of their faith.

Joying and beholding your order- every assembly should be marked by order, the spiritual order of those who keep in step with one another by a mutual love of the word of God and its instructions. In many ways the assembly at Corinth was in disorder, so the apostle had to exhort them to do everything decently and in order, 1 Corinthians 14:40.

And the stedfastness of your faith in Christ- their order was more collective, as they met together, but the steadfastness of their faith is especially seen in their personal lives as they lived by faith day by day, refusing to allow circumstances to move them. Note the connection between order and faith. Disorder prevents faith flourishing, for the distractions are too great. By constantly exposing their souls to the truth of Scripture, their faith would be strengthened, and they would not give way when error about Christ was presented to them.

2:6

As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk ye in him:

As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord- they had received Him by faith, and that initial faith should continue to mark them. John writes of those who “believe on his name”, John 1:12, the sense being, “who keep on believing on his name”. “The just shall live by faith” is the phrase that Paul quotes three times in his epistles to show that justification is by faith. But as found in Habukkuk 2:4, the phrase is, “the just shall live by his faith”. So the initial faith that results in justification, is the same faith by which the justified one lives subsequently. His life is governed by his faith.

He is Christ Jesus, implying that He is exalted to heaven with Divine approval; there is no deficiency in Him, therefore, that needs to be made up by the suggestions of the heretics. He is Lord, and therefore those He authorises to expound the truth, the apostles, should not be set aside in favour of unauthorised false teachers.

So walk ye in him- their unseen Lord should be their guide, not the unbelieving false teachers, no matter how plausible their arguments seemed to be. There are those who use this expression to support their view that things like the Lord’s Supper, and baptism, are not necessary, since they involve things we can see, and, they say, faith and sight are not compatible. This is not the case, however, for faith is necessary in baptism, as even our chapter will show in verse 12, “the faith of the operation of God”. Baptism is a response in faith to the work of God in raising Christ from the dead. So to walk in faith includes being baptised.

2:7

Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with thanksgiving.

Rooted and built up in him- the apostle uses a variety of figures of speech to illustrate what he is teaching. Having spoken of walking in the previous verse, he now uses descriptions of a healthy plant. First of all it is rooted. This reminds us of verse 5, where he spoke of the steadfastness of their faith in Christ. They were not like the stony ground hearers of the parable of the sower, who had begun well, but after a while had withered because, as the Lord said, “these have no root”, Luke 8:13. On the contrary, these were firmly settled in Christ by true and lasting faith.

A plant also needs to grow if it is to be fruitful. Again the secret is “in Him”, for spiritual growth comes when we take advantage of all the resources available to those who are in Christ. This growth would be jeopardised if they listened to the poisonous doctrines of the false teachers.

And stablished in the faith- as a plant grows, it puts out an ever-increasing network of roots, which enable it to draw nutrients from a wide area for the support of its structure. This the believers should do, as they explore the richness of the truth in Christ which nourishes their souls, causing them to grow more into His likeness. Roots also give stability to a plant so that it can withstand the wind. There are hostile winds of doctrine blowing around the believer, and he needs stability to withstand their force, see Ephesians 4:14.

All three of these words, “rooted”, “built up” and “stablished” are perfect participles, which means they express action which is ongoing, and not once-for-all. Believers need to constantly grow and develop in the things of Christ, for eternal life is not a static thing, but progressive and forward-looking.

As ye have been taught- they should continue as they had begun, having been faithfully taught by Epaphras and others, 1:7. They should not be tempted by the novel ideas of the gnostics. As the apostle John exhorted, “Let that therefore abide in you which ye have heard from the beginning”, 1 John 2:24.

Abounding therein with thanksgiving- whilst it is true that the Lord Jesus cursed the fig tree because it bore no fruit, only leaves, nevertheless foliage is necessary for a plant to flourish.

We should never neglect to thank God for the instruction He gives to us through the teachers Christ has given to the body of Christ for our instruction. Those teachers have a difficult and stressful task, as they labour to bring the word of God to us. The apostle will seek the prayers of believers in 4:3 that his ministry might be effective. If an apostle needed prayer, how much more those who are not apostles.

(b) Verses 8-15

Those who spoil.

Antidote: Truth after Christ

2:8

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit- the figure changes, and now the apostle likens false teachers to the wolves that come to snatch away sheep. The Good Shepherd Himself made clear that none can pluck the sheep from either His hand or the hand of His Father, John 10:27-29, nevertheless the threat of damage to the spiritual life of the sheep is real, and the apostle warns of the danger false teachers pose. They use philosophy, which is the product of the human mind, and which has been condemned by God through the cross, as 1 Corinthians 1 makes clear. Christ is the wisdom of God, and all the resources we need to inform our minds and govern our practice are in Him. The wisdom of the world is foolishness with God, but it has an attraction for the carnal mind. We should not confuse this wisdom with the use of logic, which is everywhere used by the apostle in his writings, drawing conclusions in a reasoned way. That logic must be based on Scripture, and not on human speculation which has no authority.

Allied to this philosophy is vain deceit; dealing in error as they do, the false teachers cannot rely on the truth to make their case, but need to employ deceptive methods to promote their cause. The consequence of this is vain, empty and devoid of positive good, and detracts from Christ.

After the tradition of men- Christian traditions, those things handed over to us by the apostles and the Lord Himself, are to be kept faithfully, but the writings of those who oppose the truth should be rejected. There are writings called the New Testament Apocrypha. These writings do not have the sanction of the apostles, being written after they had passed from the scene. Jude can write of the “faith once (for all) delivered unto the saints”, Jude 3, so the body of Christian doctrine, known as the faith, was complete in his day. So the promise of the Lord Jesus had come to pass, for he said, speaking of the Holy Spirit as the Spirit of truth, “he shall guide you into all truth”, John 16:13. It is important to notice that those who attacked the scriptures after the apostle were gone never attacked the apocryphal writings, for they knew they were not part of what Christians believe. Any additions to this body of truth are to be regarded with great suspicion.

There is a lack of discernment about this in our day, and outrageous and often blasphemous writings are made into films and books, and deceive people into thinking that they represent Christian truth, which they do not. The Lord Jesus censured the rulers of His day for the way in which they elevated the traditions of the Jews above the Scriptures, saying, “Ye make the word of God of no effect by your tradition”, Matthew 15:6.

After the rudiments of the world- this expression was used by the apostle in Galatians 4:3,9 in relation to the basic and simple truths that the law was able to impart, but which did not represent the full truth as found in Christ. It seems that the false teachers attacking the Colossians were mixing gnostic speculation with Judaism, to make a combination of ideas that would appeal both to those impressed by intellectualism on the one hand, and those impressed by ritualism and asceticism on the other. Whatever the doctrines were, the apostle is clear that they are of the world, and therefore are not helpful to the believer, who has life from heaven.

And not after Christ- this is the decisive thing which condemns false doctrine. It does not conform to what Christ teaches, nor does it give a correct view of Him personally. We need to ask about any teaching, or proposed action based on teaching, whether it relates well to Christ, or whether it is contrary to Him. He is always the test, as He Himself indicated to the Jews with the question, “What think ye of Christ”, Matthew 22:42.

2:9

For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily.

For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily- Christ is the reference point, for the reason Paul now gives. The reason why everything must centre in Christ is because He is the one through whom the Godhead expresses itself. The word “fulness” was greatly used by the gnostics, and in their teachings it represented the sum total of all the qualities of God which they said were to be found spread around amongst an endless array of minor spirit-beings. This was a total misuse of the word, for the reason stated here. The fulness is in Christ, not in a multitude of lesser beings. Nor is the fulness in Him temporarily, but as a resident, as is indicated by the word “dwelleth”, which is in the present tense.

Every attribute of Deity resides permanently in Christ, and is happy to do so, again as the word “dwelleth” indicates. There is nothing lacking in Him, and He is able to manifest God fully. He left nothing of His Deity behind when He came down from heaven; He left nothing of His manhood behind when He went back to heaven. Hence the fullness dwells bodily.

Early in the history of the world man lost the concept of the One True God, who had every attribute and quality enshrined within Himself. Forsaking this knowledge, man invented false gods, each of whom they believed had some virtue, but none of them possessing every virtue. Satan was only too ready to position himself behind these ideas through his evil agents, and hold man in bondage.

2:10

And ye are complete in him, which is the head of all principality and power:

And ye are complete in him- believers are “in Christ”, reckoned by God to be positionally where Christ is. He is beyond death, and so, in principle, are believers. He is seated in heaven, so are believers, Ephesians 2:6. He is sure of the approval of His Father, so are believers. No wonder the apostle says they are complete “in Him”. Their position is one of full acceptance, full provision, full salvation. And this is heightened by the fact just noticed that He embodies within Himself all the fullness of the Godhead. All that fulness ensures the complete welfare of His people. And this includes the constant nourishment of their souls by means of the truth. He has all fulness and they have no lack.

Clearly, then, they have no need of the heretics, who come along claiming to be able to take them beyond what there is in Christ. This was the strategy of Satan in the Garden of Eden. He did not tempt Eve to murder Adam, or any such thing. He tempted her with the prospect of being as gods, knowing good and evil, Genesis 3:5. In other words, to advance her in knowledge beyond what God had said. She fell, but the Colossians should learn the lesson, and not fall into that trap. Beware of any religion that claims to give the knowledge of God apart from reference to Christ as the Son of God, equal with the Father. “What think ye of Christ? Whose Son is He?”, is always the test, Matthew 22:42. Many profess to think well of Christ, so both questions need to be answered.

Which is the head of all principality and power- He is far above angels because of His Deity, (for He is the creator of angels, 1:16); and also because of His ascension, for He is raised “far above all principality and powers, Ephesians 1:20,21. Verse 15 will tell us He defeated evil spirit-powers at Calvary. So no spirit can override what Christ teaches, for He is above and in control. All teaching must come from Him; He does not delegate this to angels. Indeed, Paul warned the Galatians that even if an angel came and preached to them, they were to think of him as cursed, Galatians 1:8. The Gnostic theory of an almost endless stream of lesser deities linking man to God is a fabrication. See 1 Timothy 1:4, with its reference to “endless genealogies”.

2:11

In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ:

In whom also ye are circumcised with the circumcision made without hands- not only are believers complete in Christ, they are separated unto Him from the sphere where error flourishes. Christ cannot link sinners with Himself, so He must cut them off from their links with Adam if He is to join them to Himself. This He did at the cross, where He dealt with all that Adam represented.

When God made a covenant with Abraham, He made physical circumcision the sign of that covenant. Abraham was now special to Himself, and had the mark on his body to prove it. Such a rite is no longer relevant, so that the apostle described physical circumcision as “concision”, a cutting off and a maiming, Philippians 3:2, whereas believers are now the true circumcision, properly cut off by God from their links with Adam’s world. This means they are cut off from the sphere where heretics operate, for such men are of the world, being unbelievers, and as such have no contact with the things of God.

When he is dealing with the case of the Jew in his epistle to the Romans, the apostle shows that true circumcision is a heart matter, “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men but of God”, Romans 2:28,29. This is why Stephen was justified in calling the Jews who were about to stone him, “uncircumcised in heart and ears”, Acts 7:51.

In putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ- we have seen there was the circumcision of Abraham. There was also the circumcision of Moses, for under his leadership the people became cut off to God nationally by the covenant of the Law given at Sinai. Further, there was the circumcision of Joshua, when the people crossed the Jordan and it was found that some had not been circumcised during the desert journey. All these variations were of physical circumcision, but the circumcision of Christ is spiritual in character. It has to do with the whole person; in other words, it is not limited to part of the body as with the physical ceremony; this circumcision separates the whole person for God. Clearly this is a radical thing. And only the crucifixion of Christ can effect it. It is in His cutting off that the believer is cut off, and that not partially, but wholly.

What is cut off is the body as the vehicle by which sins of the flesh are conceived and committed, the flesh being the sinful self, which is resident in the body. Paul calls the body “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6. He is there concerned with the sin-principle within, whereas here it is the sin-practice that is in view; nonetheless the idea is that the body is the base of operations from which sins proceed. As far as God is concerned, that body has been cut off so that it may be brought over into resurrection conditions to be used for God. That which is called “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6 can be presented to God as a living sacrifice in Romans 12:1, for God has wrought upon it to His glory.

2:12

Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead.

Buried with him in baptism- having cut us off by associating us with Christ in His cutting off by crucifixion, the process is confirmed by “burial”. Just as our circumcision is not literal, so our burial is not either, for it is burial in water, not the earth. When immersed by the act of baptism, the believer is placed in a watery grave, and this is after the likeness of Christ’s state when He was in the tomb, being what the apostle calls “the likeness of His death”, meaning His state of death when He was in the tomb, Romans 6:4.

We can clearly see the error of infant sprinkling, from this verse. How can the sprinkling of a few drops of water on a person even remotely be called a burial? And how can it be said that the baby rises afterwards? And how can the so-called “baptism” of an infant be justified, when the apostle here speaks of “the faith of the operation of God”? The candidate for baptism must have faith, and must be immersed, and must re-emerge, or else the procedure is invalid.

Wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God- baptism has two aspects. It is a burial, and it is a resurrection. Just as surely as the believer, when under the water, is like Christ was in death, so he is like Christ is in resurrection when brought up out of the water. And this is an act of faith, for it something that the believer is responsible for getting done. When Ananias said to Paul, “Arise, and be baptised”, he used the Middle Voice, so the sense was “Get thyself baptised”. Whilst it is true that evangelists are commanded to baptise, they cannot force this on people. After all, evangelists are commanded to preach, but they cannot force people to believe. It is the responsibility of men to believe when the gospel is preached in their hearing; it is the responsibility of believers to get themselves baptised. In fact, the Lord Jesus said, “He that believeth and is baptised shall be saved”, Mark 16:16, so all the time a professed believer remains unbaptised, there is a question-mark over the reality of his profession. This is not to say that baptism contributes to salvation, or else the Lord would have said, “He that believeth not and is not baptised shall be damned”, but He did not.

Notice that the faith that moves the believer to get baptised is faith in the operation of God; it is not faith in baptism. The virtue lies in what God did through Christ by His death, burial and resurrection, not in the process of baptism, as if that is a means of grace.

Who hath raised him from the dead- so baptism is a very positive thing, not only in its practice, for the believer comes up out of the water, but also in its principle, for it is response to the God who raised up Christ. By association with Him we are linked to that which is clear of death and judgement. All that opens up for Christ because He is risen, opens up for believers too.

2:13

And you, being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses;

And you- having established that the believer is a person in a new situation altogether through the resurrection of Christ, the apostle now reviews what it is that he has been delivered from. By so doing he will expand on the expression “the operation of God” of the previous verse. He turns his attention particularly to those who were Gentiles before conversion, for that was, no doubt, the situation with most of the Colossian believers to whom he is writing the epistle.

Being dead in your sins and the uncircumcision of your flesh- not only were they devoid of response to God, being dead, and demonstrating this by sinning, but also they were uncircumcised, for they had not the separating advantages that God had given to the Jews. He had placed a hedge around that nation, but no such restrictions were known by the Gentile. He was left to walk in his own way, as Paul told the idol-worshippers of Lystra, Acts 14:16. Their backs were turned to God and their faces were turned to sin and the world. They were uncircumcised physically and morally. Note it is the uncircumcision of the flesh, not just of the physical body; the whole tendency of the sinner to commit sin, whether of mind or body, is in view, for the flesh is the self-principle and the sin-principle in man.

Hath he quickened together with him- to quicken means to make alive. Paul is showing that this operation is all of God. No credit attaches to the sinner. He is dead, and totally reliant on life from God if he is to live in any real sense of the word. Being dead in sins, he has no stock of merit by which to claim blessing from God. But God is rich in grace, and is pleased to associate those who believe with His Son in His death and resurrection experience.

Having forgiven you all trespasses- nothing contrary to God can be taken over into resurrection. The just basis of this forgiveness is the death of Christ, the subject of the next few phrases.

2:14

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;

Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us- clearly, by the use of the word “us” as opposed to the “and you” of verse 13, the apostle now turns his attention mainly to those believers who were formerly Jews. Not exclusively so, however, for the Gentiles had the law written in their hearts, according to Romans 2:15, and the Jews had the law, not only written on tables of stone by the finger of God, but in the book of the law written by Moses. But it is as if Moses did not write with permanent ink, for here we learn that what was written was blotted out. The law is not the rule of life for the believer. Believers who try to please God by keeping the law will always be defeated, and therefore miserable, as Paul found in Romans 7. The example of Christ is our model, and the Spirit of God encourages us in that.

Which was contrary to us- note the double assertion that the law was not on our side. It was not only against us rather than for us, but also it was “contrary to us”, attacking us relentlessly because of our sinfulness. Paul found that “sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me”, Romans 7:11. Clearly, we need someone to deliver us from the law and its demands.

And took it out of the way- the commandments of the law would represent a stumblingblock to the believer as he seeks to walk the pathway of faith. God has taken this hindrance out of the way, so the path is cleared of obstacles. This is not to say that the Law of God has been disposed of; that cannot be. But it is removed as a means of pleasing God. Believers please God by living like Christ. When they so live, they fulfil the righteousness of the law, meaning all that the law demanded as being right, Romans 8:4. The law as a means of obtaining righteousness has been ended by Christ, Romans 10:4. He is the end of “law for righteousness”, but not the end of the law.

Nailing it to his cross- the subject of the verbs used here is God. So He has quickened, forgiven, blotted out, taken out of the way, nailed, and in verse 15 He is said to spoil, make a show, and triumph. Eight mighty acts that God has performed on the basis of the death, burial, resurrection and ascension of Christ.

It is as if God placed the handwriting of the law into the hands of Christ, and the nails went through not only his hands, but also the manuscript, fastening it to the cross so that it could not be active against the believer. And since it is nailed to the cross, it cannot be re-written. Remember that the law was written in a book as well as on tables of stone, Exodus 24:7.

2:15

And having spoiled principalities and powers, he made a show of them openly, triumphing over them in it.

And having spoiled principalities and powers- the believer has other enemies, and their power must be broken too. The gnostic heretics made a great deal of supposed intermediaries between the believer and God. This verse exposes such mediators as being none other than evil spirit-forces, fallen angels who are still allowed to influence men’s thinking. God has spoiled them through Christ, however, and they are powerless now as far as the believer is concerned. To spoil means to “strip off the armour”. Their protection has been removed, and they are defenceless and defeated foes. The believer is more than a match for them as long as he puts on the armour provided for him by God, Ephesians 6:13. When men asserted that the miracles of Christ were accomplished by the power of Satan, amongst other things the Lord said in reply, “When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace: but when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all the armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils”, Luke 11:21,22. Satan is the strong man, and Christ is the stronger than he. Satan’s defences are taken away, and he is vulnerable to attack.

He made a show of them openly- God has raised up His Son, not only from the grave, but also to His throne, as Peter declared on the Day of Pentecost in the words, “”By the right hand of God exalted…the Lord said unto my Lord, ‘Sit Thou on my right hand'”, Acts 2:33, 34.

Paul refers to Christ’s ascension with the words of the psalmist, “When he ascended up on high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men”, Ephesians 4:8. The initial reference in the psalm is to the ascension of David to the throne of Israel after he had defeated his enemies. So the gifts mentioned were in large part the spoils of war, as a reading of 2 Samuel 8:9-12 will show.

Three ideas therefore come together in the verse quoted. First, the absolute triumph of Christ, as indicated by the fact that having been crucified on a cross, He has now ascended to the very throne of God. Second, the utter defeat of Satan and his forces, crippling them to such an extent that, even though they are allowed a certain amount of latitude, they are easily defeated by means of the resources Christ gives. Third, the bestowal of gifts in grace, to enable believers to grow.

In the expression “He led captivity captive”, captivity is personified to represent all that had held unbelievers captive, and which would try to lead them captive as believers. (It has nothing to do with any supposed transfer of souls from hades to heaven). Such is the triumph of Christ that He can move through the sphere of the prince of the power of the air unhindered. In Daniel 10:12,13 we read of the way in which the progress of the angel Gabriel was hindered by an evil angel-prince, and he had to be assisted by Michael the archangel. No such delay is suffered by Christ, who rises to heaven with “angels and authorities and powers being made subject unto Him”, 1 Peter 3:22.

It is clear from Scripture that the Lord Jesus has defeated the enemy in all of his guises:

The Prince of this world came to Christ when He was down here, yet He could say he “hath nothing in me”, John 14:30. As a result of Calvary the prince of this world will certainly be cast out in the future, John 12:31.

As the Devil, and wielding the power of death, he has been utterly defeated by the death and resurrection of Christ, Hebrews 2:14.

As god of this age he is defeated every time a blinded mind is made to see the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ, 2 Corinthians 4:4-6.

As Satan he is defeated when Christ intercedes for His own, Luke 22:31,32.

As the Devil, the accuser, he is defeated by Christ our advocate, 1 John 2:1.

Triumphing over them in it- the apostle returns at the end of the sentence to the event which started off this sequence. The cross is the ground on which God has defeated the powers of evil. If the Son of God can humble Himself even to the death of the Cross, and be crucified in weakness, (as 2 Corinthians 13:4 puts it), and yet rise again and ascend to God’s throne, He must be superior to any force. And so He is. The Devil is defeated, and so, therefore, are his evil hosts, which he uses to infiltrate the minds of men with error, the “doctrines of demons” that Paul refers to in 1 Timothy 4:1.

(c) Verses 16,17

Those who judge

Antidote: Reality of Christ

2:16

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days:

Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink- the word “therefore” shows that the apostle is about to apply the truths he has just set out, especially with regard to the handwriting of ordinances, which detailed the ceremonies God expected the Israelites to carry out. He lists various features of the Old Testament tabernacle and temple system, which were ordained of God for Israel. The meat would be the flesh of animal sacrifices, some of which the offerer and the priest could eat. The drinks would either be the drink offerings, which were all poured out, but nonetheless were binding on the Israelite to bring, or the prohibition of wine as far as the Nazarites were concerned. The idea is of material things that the Law demanded, but which the apostle will show are out of date. The Colossian heretics were apparently teaching that these things were binding on believers. The apostle warns them not to allow these false teachers to judge or criticise them for not participating in Jewish rituals.

Or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days- these are the prescribed days in Israel’s religious calendar by which their religion was regulated. A holy day was a day during the set feasts; the new moon was the starting point for the month, determining when the feast began; the sabbath days were the weekly ordinance in Israel, in which all unnecessary work ceased, so that the day could be set apart for sacred purposes. There was also a sabbath during the Feast of unleavend bread, Leviticus 23:7, and at the end of the Feast of Tabernacles, on the eighth day, Leviticus 23:39.

2:17

Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ.

Which are a shadow of things to come- there cannot be a shadow unless there is an object to cast a shadow when the light is shone upon it. That object is Christ; the Old Testament ordinances were but shadows. The things of which they spoke were “to come”, in those days, but now they are come. We may study them to see how they spoke of Christ, but now He is come, there is no need for them. To continue with them is to show ignorance of the principles of Christianity. Christendom does indeed continue with these things, and mixes with them the unholy practices of paganism, to produce a system of things which is obnoxious to God. Believers should beware of being unwittingly drawn into these practices, for instance by celebrating Christmas and Easter, which are almost entirely pagan in origin and meaning. The policy of the Emperor Constantine to amalgamate heathenism and Christianity has been a blight on Christian testimony for sixteen cnturies. To go along with it is to perpetuate the tragedy.

But the body is of Christ- the fact that He is the body which casts the shadow is testimony to His pre-existence. It is also a testimony to the fact that He has always been the centre of God’s purpose, even in the days of the tabernacle rituals.

The sacrifice of Christ has rendered animal sacrifices obsolete, Hebrews 10:8,9. He brings real joy, not the figurative joy of the drink offering, 1 John 1:4. In Him the festivals of Israel either have or will have been fulfilled, 1 Corinthians 5:7; 15:23; every day may be held sacred to the Lord, Romans 14:6; the passing of time, as measured by the moon’s phases, is irrelevant, for the believer is in touch with eternal realities, Hebrews 9:12,15:13:20; and as far as the believer is concerned, true rest has been found in Christ, Matthew 11:29. No legalistic celebration of a day can replace or improve on that.

(d) Verses 18,19

Those who deprive

Antidote: Support from Christ

2:18

Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind,

Let no man beguile you of your reward- those who run the race of faith, and who wish to win the reward of a prize, must see to it that no-one and nothing distracts them. Allegiance to Christ demands that we focus on Him. Satan does not want this, so he tries to attract us with other things to stop us concentrating on the things of Christ.

In a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels- the heretics claimed that God was unapproachable, and men need the agency of angels to bridge the gap. This seems to be a humble position, but in fact it ignores the fact there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 1 Timothy 2:5. The humility that finds its roots in the human will or volition, (which is the sense of “voluntary humility”), is spurious. In response to the supposed intervention of angels, the worship of angels began to be practised. There was a temple in honour of Michael the archangel in Colosse, so the apostle’s warnings were very relevant. Today, men worship Mary and the saints, and are likewise condemned by God. Even the apostle John was tempted to worship an angel, but was severely rebuked by him with the words, “See thou do it not…worship God”, Revelation 22:9. If an apostle was tempted, how careful we as ordinary believers should be, for our God is a jealous God, Exodus 20:5.

Intruding into those things which he hath not seen- the unknown spirit-world has a fascination for the natural mind. God has forbidden any attempt to contact the world of the spirits. Through Isaiah He said, “And when they shall say unto you, ‘Seek unto them that have familiar spirits, and unto wizards that peep and that mutter’; Should not a people seek unto their God? For the living to the dead? To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them”, Isaiah 8:19,20. That these things continue is seen from the warning of the Lord Jesus to those who will pass through the time of tribulation that, “if they shall say unto you, ‘Behold he is in the secret chambers’; believe it not”, Matthew 24:26. The spiritist séance, or anything remotely like it, is no place for a believer. It would be appropriate to say that Halloween is anything but hallowed, but is devilish, and the believer should have no association with it in any shape or form, however innocent looking.

Vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind- far from showing true humility, these men are in fact puffed up in pride, claiming to have superior knowledge, and access into higher realms not open to the “ordinary” believer. Their minds are governed by the flesh, being unregenerate persons, and this leads them astray. Their pride is vain and empty pride, based on nothing substantial or spiritual, but rather the imaginings of their own thinking.

2:19

And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God.

And not holding the Head- Christ is the head of the church, which is His body. He is far superior to any real or supposed spirit-powers. To give way to the heresy-mongers is to not “hold the “Head”, that is, to not give Him His proper and supreme place, especially in the matter of building up His people. The heretics did not hold the head, but believers must be careful to do so. A body does not have to hold on to the head to maintain its position in the body, (so union with Christ is not the responsibility of believers, but His), but it does have to rely on the head to govern the supply of nourishment for its maintenance and growth.

From which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered- nourishment is ministered from the head, not from any external sources, least of all devilish ones. No good angel can supply us, either, for all administration is entrusted to Christ as Head. In Ephesians 4:11,12 the apostle writes in similar vein, and there explains that the apostles and prophets with their written ministry, and pastors and teachers with their spoken ministry, are the channels of supply to us directly from our head. To ignore the ministry of the word is to ignore the ministrations of the Head, to our loss, and His dishonour.

And knit together- the joints and bands of our body not only give strength and structure, but also serve as means of supply to the whole body. What is true of the human body is also true of the body of Christ, the church. Much if not all of the disunity and fragmentation of believers could be avoided if there was a response to the teaching the Head sends down. This would not only build up, but bind together.

Increaseth with the increase of God- a body that does not grow is a tragedy, but the church grows and develops with the increase of God. This may be taken to mean the increase God supplies through Christ, or, alternatively, the increase that God is looking for, and the Epistle to the Ephesians makes it clear that what God is looking for and working towards is a likeness to Christ in His people. The language of that passage is as follows:

“till we all come in the unity of the faith,

and of the knowledge of the Son of God,

unto a perfect man,

unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

that we henceforth be no more children,

tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine,

by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness,

whereby they lie in wait to deceive,

but speaking the truth in love,

may grow up into Him in all things,

which is the head, even Christ:

from whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth,

according to the effectual working in the measure of every part,

maketh increase of the body

unto the edifying of itself in love”

Ephesians 4:13-16.

2:20

Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,

Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world- one of the things the believer died to in association with the death of Christ is the ordinances of the law. These have no jurisdiction over dead persons. We are “dead to the law by the body of Christ”, Romans 7:4. In other words, the process the body of Christ went through, namely, death, burial and resurrection, is the process we have been associated with. The elementary and rudimentary matters that the law of Moses set out were for the life of Israel on the earth. They do not fit for heaven. They were symbolic things, having great meaning, indeed, but now set aside by Christ. As such they are not relevant to those who are linked to Him in His heavenly place.

Why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances- believers live in the world by physical necessity, but not moral necessity. They are not of the world, but are sent into it as witness-bearers. They should live as though they are citizens of heaven, as indeed they are, Philippians 3:20, and not as though citizens of the world. Those who were God’s earthly nation in Old Testament times had ordinances to keep, which were appropriate to being on earth. Such things are not relevant to those who are linked to heaven. After all, Paul has told us that the ordinances were blotted out, and then the manuscript was nailed to the cross so that it could not be re-written.

2:21

(Touch not; taste not; handle not;

Touch not- the apostle sums up the ordinances of the law in three short phrases. They are all negative, which is characteristic of the law. The commandments were given by God to prevent sins being committed, and “Thou shalt not” is a constant refrain. The Levites were not allowed to touch the vessels of the tabernacle; the ordinary Israelite was not allowed to touch the altar. The whole nation were forbidden to touch Mount Sinai, but to fence it off and keep away. This was indicative of the fact that closeness of approach to God was not possible under the law.

Taste not- Israel was given dietary laws by God not only for their physical welfare, but also to mark them out as different to the nations. This is why the command to eat prohibited food was so significant to Peter, as he is about to meet Cornelius, a Gentile, in his house, Acts 10:27-29. There were those in the church, especially those who had been Jews, who were reluctant to eat other foods, and the apostle Paul deals with that matter in Romans 14:1-4,6.

Handle not- the first verb “touch” is more strong than this one, which means that there is a progression. First, close contact is forbidden by the law; then less strong contact, as expressed by the words “taste not”, and now the final verb prohibits the slightest contact. Such is the nature of the law, it admits no compromise or slight deviation.

We might contrast these two ideas of not touching and not tasting with the fact that believers can hold and taste. The word used here is the same as that of John 20:17 when the Lord Jesus said to Mary Magdalene, “Touch me not, for I am not yet ascended to my Father”. The implication being that, strangely, after He was gone back to heaven she would be able to touch Him. And so she could, as all believers can, for they are joined to Him vitally. And that in a way not possible under the law.

We may taste, too. When David was hungry, and went into the tabernacle to ask the priest for food, he was given the shewbread that had been replaced that sabbath day with hot bread, 1 Samuel 21:1-6. When he wrote about this later, David exhorted his readers to “taste and see that the Lord is good”, Psalm 34:8. When Peter alludes to those words he writes, “if so be ye have tasted that the Lord is gracious”, 1 Peter 2:3. He is writing to believers as Christian priests, and just as the Aaronic priests had shewbread to taste, so the believer feeds upon Christ the Living Bread. But David was not an Aaronic priest, but was of the tribe of Judah. Nonetheless, since the Lord is gracious, he was allowed the loaves.

2:22

Which all are to perish with the using;) after the commandments and doctrines of men?

Which all are to perish with the using)- all those things that are prohibited under the law are material things, which one day will be dissolved, 2 Peter 3:10. Why be occupied with things that are passing and material, when that which is eternal and spiritual is available to us?

After the commandments and doctrines of men? Originally the things of which Paul is speaking were commandments from God, but they do not come to us in that way, for they are not binding on believers of this age. The false teachers were trying to impose them upon the Colossian believers, however, and as such they had become the commandments of men, and the substance of their doctrine.

2:23

Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body: not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.

Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will worship- to the carnal mind these things seemed the right thing to do, for man is a religious being, and even though he rejects God’s word, he still is inclined to some sort of religious activity. This is true of men universally. The worship the heretics were professing to offer to God was the product of their own will, and was not Divine worship at all.

And humility- they displayed a mock humility, claiming to be so abased before God that they could not approach Him directly. The true believer has “boldness and access with confidence” to God, but only “by the faith of Him”, that is, by faith in Christ who introduces believers into the presence of the Father, and pleads His worth, not theirs, Ephesians 3:12.

And neglecting of the body- the strange doctrine of some was that if you starved and abused the body, then nearness to God might be achieved. We are to mortify the deeds of the body, reckoning the death of Christ to apply to it, in principle, Romans 8:13. We are not required to mortify the body itself. Christianity alone gives the proper place of honour and dignity to the body, and brings about circumstances whereby it may be presented to God as a living sacrifice, Romans 12:1. Needless to say when the apostle said he kept under his body, and brought it into subjection, 1 Corinthians 9:27, he was not saying he abused his body, but that he refused to allow any licence to his body to commit sin

Not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh- as far as God is concerned, these practices, far from pleasing Him, are reckoned to be dishonourable, however much men might approve of them. All these ideas did was satisfy carnal minds; they did not satisfy God, which should be our main aim.

 

 

 

 

THE PERSON OF CHRIST: His baptism

THE PERSON OF CHRIST:  His baptism

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE GOSPEL OF LUKE CHAPTER 3, VERSES 15 TO 22

3:15 And as the people were in expectation, and all men mused in their hearts of John, whether he were the Christ, or not;

3:16 John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose: He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire:

3:17 Whose fan is in His hand, and He will throughly purge His floor, and will gather the wheat into His garner; but the chaff He will burn with fire unquenchable.

3:18 And many other things in his exhortation preached he unto the people.

3:19 But Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip’s wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done,

3:20 Added yet this above all, that he shut up John in prison.

3:21 Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,

3:22 And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art My beloved Son; in Thee I am well pleased.

The significance of Christ’s baptism

The baptism of Christ marks a very significant stage in the life of Christ. He Himself referred to it as “the beginning”, John 15:27, and those who had been with Him from that time were eligible to be chosen as a substitute apostle to Judas, who fell, Acts 1:21,22, as Peter indicates. To be an effective witness they must have seen Him in the full range of circumstances through which He passed. They must also have seen Him in resurrection, so they could honestly testify that the man they saw in resurrection was the very same man they had been with for nearly four years.

Christ also referred to this event in the words, “Him hath God the Father sealed”, John 6:27. The word “seal” was used of the mark that bakers would impress upon their loaves to show they were prepared to stand by their product. So in John 6 the Lord Jesus claims to be the “Bread of God”, and as such had the Father’s mark upon Him.

Again, in the synagogue in Nazareth He referred to His anointing, which took place at His baptism, as support for His Messiahship. To deny that Messiahship was to go against the manifest will of God.

The apostle Peter referred again to this event in the house of Cornelius, who seems to have had some knowledge of the ministry of John the Baptist. “The word which God sent unto the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (He is Lord of all:) that word, I say, ye know, which was published throughout all Judea, and began from Galilee, after the baptism which John preached”, Acts 10:36,37.

Peter went on to refer to the anointing which took place at Christ’s baptism, when He was “anointed with the Holy Spirit and with power”, with the result that He “went about doing good, and healing all that were oppressed of the Devil; for God was with Him”, Acts 10:38.

The apostle Paul alluded to Christ’s baptism as he preached in the synagogue in Antioch of Pisidia. “Of this man’s seed hath God according to His promise raised unto Israel as Saviour, Jesus: when John had first preached before His coming the baptism of repentance to all the children of Israel”, Acts 13:23,24. So the baptism of Christ was His coming, in the sense that He had come within the range of men publicly after long years of obscurity in Nazareth.

The apostle John spoke of this beginning as the point from which the Son of God began to manifest publicly the eternal life that the persons of the Godhead share with one another, and which they desire to share with men, 1 John 1:1-4. Just as the ark of the covenant introduced the people to the land of promise when it crossed the Jordan, so Christ brings His people into blessing through His ministry subsequent to His baptism.

So He is anointed as Sovereign, David’s son, destined to reign. He is anointed as Servant, given the Holy Spirit and power to work for God. He is anointed as Sympathiser, ready to bind up the broken-hearted. (His kingly anointing does not mean He is distant and aloof from His subjects, for He will come where they are to bind up their wounds, Luke 10:33,34). He is anointed and sealed as Son, ready to manifest publicly in the world of men that eternal life He had always enjoyed in the bliss of heaven eternally.

The four-fold presentation in the gospels

It is one of the beauties of the four gospels that they present matters from different angles, yet they combine to give us a composite impression of Christ in all His beauty and grandeur. We shall see this as we proceed, suffice to say at this point that Matthew writes about the Sovereign for the benefit of His subjects; Mark of the Servant for His under-servants; Luke of the Saviour for His people as Samples of Him in His life; John writes of the Son for His scholars, those who are getting to know the only true God and Jesus Christ whom He hath sent. The baptism accounts will further those ends.

Luke’s account

Luke, as a doctor, was very well educated. He writes the first four verses of his gospel in Classical Greek style, as befits a salutation to “most excellent Theophilus”. He then proceeds to write, in 1:5-2;52, after the Hebraistic style of the Old Testament. This is not surprising, since these verses consist of the eye-witness accounts of those in Israel who were closely connected in some way with the birth of Christ, and His subsequent life in the household of Joseph and Mary.

In chapter three the style changes again, for Luke now begins to write in Koine Greek, the language of the ordinary citizen. This is not slang, but the unadorned, home-spun language of every-day. How fitting all this is! Luke is presenting us with a Man who can meet the needs of all classes of men, and one of the ways he does it is by varying his style of writing. He thus aims to capture the attention of all.

So it is that Luke chapter 3 begins with an array of facts about the ruling powers of the time. As in the Book of the Acts, Luke is not afraid to be specific. He has been criticised over the years for certain statements he makes, yet one by one those criticisms have been shown to be unfounded. So we are confronted with some twenty persons, times, offices and territories. How much easier would it have been for Luke to pass by these things, for fear of making a mistake. But he is writing by the Spirit of God, and, moreover, has done his research well, and the result is accurate and reliable. Luke is setting his record of Christ in the context of the history, humanity, and hierarchy of the world.

The word of God to John

He has another object, however, for having catalogued men who were listened to by ordinary folk, since it was thought that they were informed, Luke delights to tell us that the word of God came, not to these, but to John the Baptist. The princes of this world, political or religious, Gentile or Jew, were not fit to receive the revelation of God, but John was. He was the son of Zacharias, and therefore of the priestly family, yet he had not heard the voice of God in the temple courts, but in the wilderness. He had been in the deserts until the day of his showing unto Israel, Luke 1:80, so he had not been in one desert, (such as that around the Dead Sea, with the Essenes, as some would wrongly suggest), but had varied experiences with God in different desert circumstances. The fact that the word of God came to a man in the desert was a scathing rebuke for the priestly class of the day, showing they were not fit to hear the voice of God. It had been the same in Eli’s day, for the voice of God came not to him but to the child Samuel.

The mention of John as son of Zacharias serves also to highlight the fact that the prophecies uttered by his father, (once he had been delivered from his dumbness), as to John’s mission and character, had come to pass, and he had come in the spirit and power of Elijah, to bring the people back to God as Elijah had done.

John is careful to ensure that the people are in no doubt as to his identity. (We know from John 1:19-24 that there was confusion in the minds of the authorities about this). One of the features that distinguishes Christ from John is that whereas the latter baptised with water, Christ would baptise with the Holy Spirit. The water John used had come from the atmospheric heavens originally, but the element Christ would use came from heaven itself, the very presence of God.

The baptism in the Spirit

It is interesting to notice the different ways in which the writers of the four gospel present this. In Matthew we read, “He shall baptise you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire: whose fan is in His hand, and He will throughly purge His floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire”, Matthew 3:11,12. Here the floor is the place where profession is tested, to distinguish between chaff and wheat, and the King will “gather out of His kingdom all things that offend”, Matthew 13:41, and gather His wheat, (true citizens of the kingdom), into the garner, (the security of the kingdom), but will burn up the chaff in the everlasting fire He spoke of in Matthew 25:41.

In Mark, typically, the account is more brief, stating “I indeed have baptised you with water: but He shall baptise you with the Holy Ghost”, Mark 1:8. Mark is presenting the activity of the Servant of Jehovah as He prepares His people to serve Him. For this they must have power, for the energy of the flesh is of no use in the service of Christ. This power from God He gives when they believe. Mark is simply writing about the genuine servants, and does not mention the fire, or, indeed, the garner. Ideally, the servant will only be satisfied when souls are delivered from the fire; and only concerned about being faithful in the work, and leaving the results, (the garner) to the Lord of the Harvest.

In Luke the words are almost the same as in Matthew, but taking into account the different aspect of things that the two writers present, we may say that Luke, (a companion of the apostle Paul), is not so much concerned with the King and His kingdom, but the Saviour and His church, for He is the Saviour of the body, Ephesians 5:23. So now the floor is the place where Christian profession is tested, the gathering into the garner is the taking of His true people to heaven, and the fire is the fire of hell for those whose profession is not genuine.

John’s record of these things is for an entirely different purpose. There is no mention of fan, floor, filled garners, or fire, but the fact that He baptises with the Holy Ghost because He is the Son of God. And the descent of the Spirit upon Him at His baptism was what convinced John of these things, John 1:31-34.

The imprisonment of John

Having made sure we realise the superiority of the Jesus Christ over John the Baptist, Luke records the fact that Herod shut up John in prison, Luke 3:19,20. Now clearly Luke is anticipating things, for in the next verses John is at liberty and baptises Christ. Luke is showing us that even though His forerunner would be cruelly beheaded, a sign that His own mission would not be universally accepted, Christ nonetheless was determined to do His Father’s will, and being baptised was one way of signalling that determination.

Matthew reserves this piece of information about John until chapter 4:12, several months later, and shows that the imprisonment of John was one of the reasons why Christ departed into Galilee. He had stood firm against the Devil in His temptation experience, and the Devil was forced to leave Him, defeated. Yet Christ left one place to go to another because of people rejected Him, even to the extent of trying to kill Him, Luke 4:29,30. He is totally in control; over the Devil in making him leave Him, over men in Himself leaving them. He will die at one place only, and that, Calvary.

Mark emphasises the fact that the service of God must go on, even if one prominent servant has been put in prison. So “after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God”, Mark 1:14. Mark’s gospel opens with the greatest servant of God up to that time, (see Luke 7:28), and then continues, with John’s ministry ended, with the greatest servant of all.

John’s approach is different again, for, writing later than the other three, he clears up a misunderstanding that may have arisen over the timing of Christ’s movements. When we read Matthew and Mark, at first glance we would think that the Galilean ministry of Christ as recorded by them took place immediately after the temptation. It is not so, for the events of John chapters 1-4 took place before the second Galilean tour that Mathew and Mark detail. This John makes clear in John 3:24, for the Son of God had been in Galilee in chapter 1:43-2:12. Then He went up to Jerusalem, and when He returned from thence and went into the land of Judea, it is at that point that John tells us John was not yet cast into prison.

The despised river Jordan

So Luke comes to his account of the baptism of Christ. John, although the son of a priest, is not baptising in the laver in the temple courts, but in the river Jordan. This was the river so despised by Naaman, (for after all, why wash in the dirty water of Jordan when you can wash in the sparkling mountain streams of Damascus?), and is therefore a fitting place for the one who was despised and rejected of men to be baptised in. The multitudes were being baptised there because they had learnt to despise themselves, and had repented of their sins. The one who now approaches John for baptism is totally different, however. Nonetheless, He does come when the people come- He does not stand aloof and distant, but companies with them, as the Ideal Man amongst men. This is characteristic of Luke’s approach, showing one who had a concern for men, and who, although sin apart Himself, came to be their friend.

Association with the remnant

At this point we may consider the reasons for the baptism of Christ, especially since it was not, for Him, the baptism of repentance. The first thing we may say is that He thereby associates with the repentant remnant of Israel. It is of such that the words were written, “the saints that are in the earth, and to the excellent, in whom is all My delight”, Psalm 16:3. Isaiah 57:15 speaks of God as dwelling “with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones”, and this is manifest in this incident.

The beginning

Then His baptism marked the beginning, as we have already noted, of the public manifestation of eternal life in the world. Eternal life being the life of the Eternal God. Of course, all who were in communion with God in old time must have had the life of God, or else they could not have shared Divine things and worshipped God. But the perfect expression of that life by one who is equal with the Father awaited the coming of Christ. It is in Him that the life of God is seen to perfection, without anything of the life of Adam, the life of flesh. The very pointed contrast between these two expressions of life is made by the Lord Jesus Himself in John 17:2,3. He distinguishes very clearly between “all flesh” and “life eternal”, showing that the life of men in the flesh is not the life of God.

That which the apostles saw and heard, they recorded for us, so that we might share with them in the joy of eternal life. John later on writes to the fathers in the family of God, those who were mature in Divine things, and describes them as those who had “known Him that is from the beginning”, 1 John 2:13. This is all the remarkable because he writes of the babes in the family of God that they know the Father, yet the maturer ones know the Son! This is clear testimony to the equality of the Son with the Father, and also to the way in which the Son has manifest in manhood the features of eternal life, so that they can be taken in by the renewed mind, and growth in Divine things can take place.

Commitment to Calvary

We have already noticed in connection with the imprisonment of John, that Christ’s baptism represented His commitment to Calvary. How significant the waters of Jordan were to Him. They represented the barrier that confronted the children of Israel as they approached the land of promise. Yet when the feet of those who carried the ark touched the brim of the waters, those waters were cut off, and the people were free to pass over on dry land, Joshua 3;15,16. For them the waters represented an obstacle no longer, (the waters were held back some sixty miles upstream, at Zaretan), and the inheritance could be entered. So in the baptism of Christ we may see an illustration of what would happen at Calvary. Did He not speak of His death as a baptism, Luke 12:50? There is a difference, however, for not only did the people in Joshua’s day not have to battle with the waters, the ark did not either, for the waters were driven back from it, see Psalm 114:3,5. Not so with our Saviour, for He felt the full force of the flow of the waters of judgement, (Jordan means “river of judgement), so that we may pass over into our inheritance. It had been the same in Noah’s day, (remember that Peter links baptism with the ark of Noah, 1 Peter 3:20,21), for the ark was pitched within and without with pitch to repel the entrance of the waters, so that those inside never saw the waters of judgement. How different was it for Christ, in one sense, for He could say, in the language of the psalm, “Save Me, O God, for the waters are come in unto My soul”, Psalm 69:1.

Demonstration of harmony of Godhead

The baptism of Christ also gave opportunity to the persons of the Godhead to show that each was fully in harmony with Christ and His mission. The Father is heard, and the Spirit is seen. Never before had the Triune God manifested Himself in such a way. In Old Testament times the unity of the Godhead was in view, especially since the nations were sunk in polytheism, in direct defiance of the Only True God of heaven. The nation of Israel were charged with the duty of upholding the uniqueness and oneness of God amongst the heathen world.

With the coming of Christ, however, another feature of the Godhead comes into prominence, namely its triune nature. Each of the persons of the Godhead may rightly be called God, and may represent God. This change of manifestation came about because the Son came from heaven to reveal and manifest God.

So it is that at His formal introduction into public ministry, the three Persons make their presence felt. The Father speaks to the Son; the Spirit descends upon the Son; the Son sees the Spirit descending; the Son prays to the Father.

Endorsement of John the Baptist

Another result of the baptism of Christ was that John the Baptist and his baptism were endorsed by heaven. The comment of Luke later in his gospel is that the Pharisees refused to be baptised by John, and thus showed that they rejected the counsel of God against themselves, Luke 7:30. And still later, as His earthly ministry came to a close, Christ Himself challenged the chief priests and elders about their attitude to John the Baptist. He had purged the temple, and they had asked His authority for so doing. It was in fact the same authority that John the Baptist had, for God had sent and commissioned him, Matthew 21:23-27. If they received not John’s testimony, they would not receive Christ’s. It was a form of judgement upon them when Christ refused to answer their demand.

Fulfilling of all righteousness

So it is that coming to be baptised by John supported what he was doing, that it was of God. When John protested that he was not worthy to baptise such a person as Christ, the Lord Jesus insisted with the words, “thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness”, Matthew 3:15. Several things are involved here. First, it was a righteous thing for John to demand that the people repent of their sin. The Law and the prophets demanded this also, and “all the prophets and the law prophesied until John”, Matthew 11:13.

Second, the ministry of John was of God, and therefore was a righteous ministry. Christ ever supported that which was righteous before God.

Third, His baptism in the Jordan was a preview of Calvary, and Romans 5:18 (margin) calls that “an act of righteousness”. What He did at Calvary in obedience to His Father was in direct contrast to Adam’s single and momentous act of disobeying God by sinning.

Fourth, by His death at Calvary Christ would lay the foundation whereby everlasting righteousness could be brought in and maintained, Daniel 9:24, and a new heavens and a new earth could be established in which righteousness could dwell, 2 Peter 3:13.

Fifth, His baptism was the introduction of the King to His people, and He will reign in righteousness, Isaiah 32:1. His baptism by John was a sign of this. It was followed by His anointing with the Holy Spirit, showing He was God’s Approved one. David had been anointed king in relatively obscure circumstances, and then anointed again when he began to reign, 1 Samuel 16:13; 2 Samuel 5:3. So it is with Christ, for He was anointed of the Holy Spirit at His baptism, and will also be hailed as God’s anointed in a day to come, when God introduces Him into this world again, Hebrews 1:9.

Gaining an entrance

The baptism of Christ was also His entrance into the fold of Israel as the true and good shepherd. The Lord Jesus contrasted Himself with those who had gained position in Israel by climbing up “some other way”, John 10:1. He had come by way of the door, and the porter had opened to Him. If we link this with what Paul said in the synagogue in Antioch in Pisidia, Acts 13:24, we learn that John preached before Christ’s coming, and the word used for coming is “entrance”. He is confirmed as the genuine shepherd as John heralds His arrival and introduces Him to Israel at His baptism.

Humbling Himself in readiness for Calvary

In Philippians 2 the apostle Paul divides the period of Christ’s manhood before the cross. He was “made in the likeness of men”, signifying His conception and birth, so that He is “found in fashion as a man”, and men have the opportunity to realise that He is a real man as He lived amongst them for thirty years in obscurity, verse 7. Then the apostle declares that “being found in fashion as a man He humbled Himself”, verse 8. This marks the point where He deliberately re-affirmed His commitment to the work of the cross, for His self-humbling involves obedience to his Father even the extent and extremity of Calvary. His baptism therefore marks a critical point in His movements down here, as He made His way to there.

Indication of Sonship

So it is that John immerses the Lord Jesus into the waters of the Jordan. It is interesting to notice that when John baptised all the others who came to him, no mention is made of their coming up out of the water. They did come out, of course, but is surely significant that it is not mentioned. John was the last representative of the Law and prophets, and as such could only condemn sinners, for the law was a ministry of condemnation, 2 Corinthians 3:9, not salvation. Christ, however, came to introduce a new era, where grace would reign, and this not only because of His death, but also His resurrection. So it is said of Him alone that He came up out of the water.

Furthermore, He came up “straightway”, for there was no delay. Peter was able to tell the nation on the Day of Pentecost that death was not able to hold Christ. Death holds the bodies even of God’s saints, for their full redemption has not arrived, but with Christ it was not so. Having met every claim that sin and death could make, He rose quickly from the grave, and this was pre-viewed at His baptism. He was “raised from the dead by the glory of the Father”, Romans 6:4, for the Father’s glory demanded that such a person be raised from the dead.

The fact that He comes up from the water straightway shows His eagerness to begin His public ministry, and also that He has nothing to fear from the wilderness temptation that will come so soon after He has emerged from the waters of baptism. The Father’s commendation ringing in His ears will be replaced by the jarring sound of the Tempter’s crafty attempts to drive a wedge between Him and His Father, with manifest and total lack of success.

The descent of the Spirit

As He emerges from the water, there is the two-fold attestation of Him from heaven. The Spirit descends and the Father speaks.

As we consider the sight of the Holy Spirit descending upon Christ, we remember that His coming into manhood raised questions. Can one who is God really come into manhood without being tainted? Does He remain God, even though become man? In view of these questions, the Spirit needs to move to vindicate Him, and assure us of His integrity. So it is that He is “justified in the Spirit”, 1 Timothy 3:16, as the Holy Spirit descends upon Him. Again, we notice the ways in which the gospel writers present this, each with his own point to make.

Matthew tells us it was the Spirit of God that descended on Him; that He descended like a dove; that He saw the dove descend. He is being marked out as king; heaven’s king, God’s king, so it is appropriate that the dove should come from heaven, and that He should be designated the Spirit of God. One day Christ also will emerge from heaven to take His kingdom. That kingdom, although manifest on the earth in that glorious millenial day, does not derive its authority from men, either by right of succession or popular vote. Rather, as Pilate learned, that kingdom is not of this world at all, or else His servants would use worldly methods to bring it in, as Peter was guilty of doing with his sword in Gethsemane, John 18:36.

This is not one of the angels that God makes spirits, Psalm 104:4, but one of the Persons of the Godhead, clearly designated, so there is no reason to doubt the genuineness of His claim to kingship. And He sees the Spirit descend. Many will there be who will doubt His claims, but here at the outset there is the confidence given to Christ by the personal sight of the Spirit descending unto Him from heaven.

Note that the Spirit descends like a dove; He does not swoop like a hawk. How fitting that He should come in this gentle way, for the one upon whom He comes is noted for His meekness and gentleness, Matthew 11:29; 21:5; 2 Corinthians 10:1.

Mark says that He saw the heavens opened. The word he used signifies that the heavens parted asunder, as if the whole of the heavenly host were being invited to see the sight of God’s Son on earth in servant’s form. God had made the angels to serve Him, but none could or did serve so well as His Son, and the Father is pleased to show them this supreme example of servant-hood. After all, we have already noted that the baptism of Christ is the point at which He commits Himself to Calvary, and Philippians 2:8 refers to this moment when, having been found in fashion as a man, He humbled Himself still further to the death of the Cross. The apostle sees in this the supreme example of obedience on the part of the one who had taken the form of a servant.

Luke adds his own detail to the account. The Spirit came “in bodily form as a dove”. It is as if the Spirit takes a form which suits Christ’s condition and character. In Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, Colossians 2:9, and He gave form and substance to spiritual things, and the Spirit acknowledges these things in the way He came.

It is also appropriate that He should come upon Christ as a dove, for the dove is the holy bird, being allowed for sacrifice; is the harmless bird, Matthew 10:16; the undefiled bird, Song of Solomon 5:2; the separate bird, Song of Solomon 2:14; and the one who flies away to be at rest, Psalm 55:6. Fitting bird, therefore, to mark out Christ, “who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens”, Hebrews 7:26.

In John’s gospel there is no account of the actual baptism of Christ, but there is given the conclusion that John the Baptist reached after it had happened. Although a relative of Christ, he did not realise that Jesus was the Messiah until a word from heaven came to him about the matter. His testimony was, “I knew Him not: but He that sent me to baptise with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on Him, the same is He which baptiseth with the Holy Spirit”, John 1:33. As a result of seeing this happen, John goes on to say, “And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.” So it is not especially the word of the Father that John highlights, but the sight of the Spirit, and in particular, that the dove abode on Him. There was nothing in Christ to disturb the Spirit, and the Spirit was pleased to associate with Him fully and publicly. Thus John was convinced, and therefore testified.

The word from heaven.

Centuries before, the word from heaven had been, “I have no pleasure in you, saith the Lord of Hosts, neither will I accept an offering at your hand”, Malachi 1:10. Who was there to remedy this? Only one from heaven, become man, who could give to God the pleasure from man that He looks for, and eventually give Himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling savour”, Ephesians 5:2.

The words “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well-pleased”, are literally, “This is My Son, the beloved, in whom I have found delight”. This shows that the Father had been deriving pleasure from His Son during the years when He was in relative obscurity. He was growing up before Him as a tender plant, Isaiah 53:2, and as such gave God delight. He was like an oasis in the midst of a barren desert. It is relevant to Matthew’s presentation of the king to notice that both David and Solomon had a name which meant “beloved”, see 2 Samuel 12:24,25. David was a man after God’s heart, Acts 13:22, (and as such is a faint picture of Him “in whom I am well-pleased”), and Solomon was promised that God would be a father to him, and he would be His son, corresponding to “this is My beloved Son”, and illustrating this relationship in a feeble but instructive way.

Matthew associates the Lord Jesus with the nation of Israel. He has already linked the words “called My son out of Egypt”, (originally spoken to Israel in reference to the Exodus, Hosea 11:1), to the coming back from Egypt after Joseph and Mary were forced to flee with the child Jesus, Matthew 2:15. He has related the sorrow when Herod killed the infants, 2:16-18, to the future day of tribulation foretold in Jeremiah 31:15, and now we find that Matthew describes Him crossing the Jordan, as Israel did. There is a difference, however, for Israel came out of Egypt, were taken into the wilderness to see what was in their heart, Deuteronomy 8:2, and then crossed the Jordan into the land. With Christ the order is different, for He comes out of Egypt, crosses the Jordan, and then is tempted in the wilderness, for the Father already knew what was in His heart before He went there.

Note that the word used is not only begotten Son, although He is that; He is more, however, for He is firstborn Son as well, and the expression leaves room for this thought. Room is also left for the fact that Christ is God’s dear Son, Colossians 1:13. Perhaps there is not only a prior notice of His kingdom rights in these words, but also of His Calvary rights too, for it was Isaac, just before he was taken to the altar, who was described as Abraham’s son, his only son, whom he loved, Genesis 22:2.

The expression “This is”, in Matthew, is directed to the nation, and to John, so they may be in no doubt as to His identity and authority, whereas in Mark’s account, the words are more directly to Christ. As the Servant of Jehovah He receives the personal commendation of the one He has come to serve. He has been about His Father’s business during His private years, serving Him in the carpenter’s shop and by attendance at the synagogue and temple, but now He is about to serve publicly, and does so confident of His Father’s approval. This is all the more noteworthy because Mark tells us, not just that He came to Jordan from Galilee, but that He came to Jordan from Nazareth in Galilee. Can any good thing come out of Nazareth? asked Nathaniel, John 1:46. He made Himself of no reputation by living in a place of evil reputation, but is now vindicated as being of excellent reputation by His Father.

In Luke the word is even more personal, with the double use of the pronoun. “Thou art…in Thee”. This suits Luke’s approach, for he presents Christ as a real man down here, with feelings and emotions. How needful for Him to be assured as He involves Himself in public service amongst men, that He is indeed loved by His Father, for He will be hated of men. And even those who profess to love Him will prove unreliable at times.

It is also in character for Luke to be the only one to tell us that He came up out of the water praying. Luke’s gospel is the gospel of the Dependant Man, and we are reminded of this now. Here, He is in one of the lowest spots on earth, the Jordan valley. In Luke 9:29 He is on the high mountain, yet is found praying. His baptism is a preview of Calvary, the low spot. His transfiguration is a preview of His kingdom, the high point, see 2 Peter 1:16-19. But whether in suffering or in glory, He acts in complete submission to His Father. No wonder He has not only risen from the grave after His Calvary-baptism, but has ascended up far above all heavens; for He is worthy.

CHRIST AND THE CHURCH: PART 6

CHRIST AND THE CHURCH
PART 6  THE LOCAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCTION
We live in a day of confusion about how Christians should come together.  Some meet as they do because of force of habit, others because of their upbringing, or the nearness of the place of meeting.  Still others feel that they have no need to be loyal to a particular group, but move from place to place.  God is not the author of such confusion, however, therefore its cause must lie elsewhere.  He can be relied upon to guide us in this, as in all matters, especially as proper church fellowship is described as “the fellowship of His Son”, and our God is very careful as to what He associates with His Beloved Son. ‘

THE MEANING OF THE WORD CHURCH
We must first of all establish what is meant by a church.  Nowadays the word is used in several different senses.  We shall look at these first, then test these usages by the only standard, the Word of God.

The church as a building:
Of course the New Testament does speak of the church as a building: “I will build My church”, Matthew 16:18; “the whole building…groweth unto a holy temple in the Lord”, Ephesians 2:21.  But this is using the idea of a building as a metaphor, to put across a spiritual concept.  So the church is indeed a building, but not a physical one.  It is a spiritual building composed of living stones, 1 Peter 2:5.  The Acts of the Apostles speaks of tidings “coming to the ears of the church”, Acts 11:22, so it is people that are in view, not material buildings.

The “church” in connection with a country:
For instance, there is the “Church of England”, meaning those congregations of people, professing to be Christians, who meet in a certain way in England, and have as their leader the Archbishop of Canterbury, and over him the Queen, who is described as the head of the Church of England.  Then there is the “Church of Rome”, consisting of those who recognize the Pope as their head.  This use of the word church is foreign to the word of God, since no man on earth is the head of the church, for the head of the true church is in heaven.  The Scriptures never speak of the church of a particular earthly location, such as Galatia, or Judea.  What are spoken of  are “the churches of Galatia, Galatians 1:2, or the churches of Judea, Galatians 1:22. 

The church as a denomination emphasizing a particular Scripture doctrine, or a prominent Christian leader: 
So there is the “Baptist Church”, with the (commendable) insistence on the baptism of believers.  But no doctrine of Scripture should be elevated above another, and then made a label for a particular group of Christians.  There are Charismatic churches, who emphasize the gifts that were given to the early believers.  Apart from the fact that these gifts have been withdrawn, it is wrong to make them a badge, and thus divide the people of God.  There is the “Lutheran Church”, named after Luther; but this detracts from the preeminence of Christ, who alone should be to the fore.

The church on earth:
In some circles the idea of “the church on earth” is prominent, by which is meant all Christians on the earth at any one moment.  But the church is not an earthly concept, for it is linked to Christ its Head in heaven, and each believer is linked to Him there, as we have seen from Ephesians 2:5,6. It is true there are churches in a particular place on earth, but that is a Scriptural use of words. 

Faced with these varying ideas about the church, the only safe course is to resort to the Scriptures, and enquire, by the help of the Holy Spirit, (who is the Spirit of truth, and who guides into all truth, John 16:13), what it has to say on this important subject.  God desires that His people should meet together in a way that conforms with His mind on the matter, for in so doing Christ will be glorified.  This will  ensure that conditions prevail in which growth in Christian virtues and intelligence may be fostered.  God’s way is always the best way.  So we turn now to the New Testament, for the idea of the church is not found in the Old Testament.

The Greek word rendered church is made up of two parts, the first meaning “out of”, the second meaning “a calling”.  The two together indicate a called out company of people, separated from men in general and called together for specific purposes.’
The English word “church” does not come from the Greek word “eklesia”, but from the Greek word “kuriakos”, which means “belonging to the Lord”.  Whilst it is true that the church does belong to the Lord, the word eklesia relates both to the way in which the church is brought into being, and also to its ongoing character.  By the gospel God separates people to Himself, and then bonds them together so that their separate character might be maintained.

The use of the word “church”
The word is used in four main senses in the New Testament, but not always in connection with Christians.  A brief look, however, at the way the word is used in other senses will help us to see why the Holy Spirit took it up to use in relation to believers.

The word is used in the following ways:
 By Stephen, Acts 7:38, of the nation of Israel when they were in the wilderness.
 By the town-clerk of Ephesus, Acts19:39, of a company of unbelievers.
 By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of all the Christians of this present age, Matthew 16:18, Colossians 1:18.
 By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of the Christians who meet together in a particular locality, Matthew 18:17, 1 Corinthians 1:2.

Stephen’s use of the word church:
Stephen uses the word church of the nation of Israel because they were a called-out company.  They had been redeemed by the blood of the Passover lamb, as described in Exodus 12; “baptised” in the Red Sea, Exodus 14:21,22; 1 Corinthians 10:1,2; and brought to the foot of Mount Sinai to listen to God’s word, Exodus 19:17, 20:1.  As such they give to us an illustration of those in this age who have been called out of the world by the Gospel; redeemed by the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God; baptized in water to signify, amongst other things, allegiance to Him; and gathered together as a church in a locality to bow to the authority of the word of God.  This illustration should not be pressed too far, however, or else we shall arrive at the unscriptural notion that since infants crossed the Red Sea, then infant baptism is in order.  The Scriptures are crystal clear that this is not the case.

The use of the word by the town clerk:
The town clerk of Ephesus used the word in its secular sense in Acts 19:39, when he spoke of a “lawful assembly”.  The townsfolk would understand that he meant by this a gathering of those possessing civic rights in a free Greek city, who were called together for the carrying out of public affairs.  Strangers, and those deprived of citizenship, could not be part of this called out company.’

Characteristics of the members of a local church:
When we put these two uses of the word together, and apply them to a local church, we can say it has the following characteristics:
1.  Only believers.  It is composed only of those who have responded to the call of God in the Gospel, and have been redeemed with the precious blood of Christ, just as a civic assembly did not include strangers.
2.  Only those sound in doctrine and morals.  It is composed only of those who have not forfeited their rights because of moral or doctrinal evil, just as a civic assembly did not consist of those who had been deprived of the rights of citizenship through misconduct.
3.  Only those baptized.  It is composed only of those who have been baptized by immersion in water after they were saved, just as all the people of Israel went through the Red Sea to get to the wilderness.
4.  Only those subject to God’s Word.  It is composed only of those who are prepared to submit to the authority of the Word of God, just as Israel gathered at the foot of Mount Sinai to hear God speaking to them, and then said “all that the Lord hath spoken we will do”, Exodus 19:8.  Moses called that day “the day of the assembly”, Deuteronomy 9:10.
5.  Only those who have joined.  It is composed only of those who have been exercised in heart to join, just as the Israelites had been exercised in heart to sprinkle the blood, cross the sea, and gather at Sinai.  When Paul went to Jerusalem, he “assayed to join himself to the disciples”, Acts 9:26.  The word for join means to cement, or glue, and therefore indicates an act of commitment, not the start of a casual relationship.

The use of the word by the Lord Jesus and the apostles of all believers of this present age:
We have been considering this aspect of things in the first parts of our studies, so will not repeat it here. 

The use of the word by the Lord Jesus of a company of believers gathering together in a particular locality:
The Lord Jesus speaks of those who can be told things, (“tell it to the church”), and make decisions about local matters, Matthew 18:17.  They may only be two three in number, but he promises to be present if they gather in His name.  Also, Paul writes to the believers at Corinth as “the church of God which is at Corinth”, 1 Corinthians 1:2, and Luke writes of “the church that was at Antioch”, Acts 13:1.

It is important to see that, despite both having the same name, the church which is Christ’s body, and church in a locality, have differences, as well as certain similarities, as follows:

The church which is Christ’s body consists of all who are truly saved from the whole period between the coming of the Spirit at Pentecost, when the church was formed, and the coming of Christ into the air to take His own to be with Himself.
A local church obviously cannot consist of all believers of the present age.

The church which is Christ’s body consists of all believers, whatever their spiritual condition, simply because they are credited with the work of Christ, and God looks at them in the light of what His Son means to Him, what the apostle calls being “accepted in the Beloved”, Ephesians 1:6.
A local church should ideally only consist of those who are morally and doctrinally sound, but in view of the human limitations of those in a place of responsibility in the church, this might not always be the case.

The church which is Christ’s body, being a concept in the mind of God, consists of all who believe in this current age.  That is, it includes believers who have died as well as those who have not yet believed, but will, in the foreknowledge of God, do so.
A local church consists only of those who are alive in the body.  Those who die are no longer members of the local assembly.

The church which is Christ’s body is a spiritual building of which Christ is the builder.  As He Himself said, “I will build My church”, Matthew 16:18.
A local church, however, is entrusted to believers to build and adorn, as 1 Corinthians 3:9-15 explains. 

The church which is Christ’s body is an eternal concept, for in the ages to come God will display the exceeding riches of His grace in His people, who have been linked indissolubly to Christ, Ephesians 2:7
A local church may cease to exist for several reasons.  The Lord may remove the lampstand of testimony if there is a persistence in sin, Revelation 2:5.  Or the believers may become so depleted in numbers that they are unable to function as a church.  And when the Lord comes, all true believers will be transported to heaven, and thus there will not be a local church anywhere on earth.

The church which is Christ’s body is completely united, for there is such a thing as the unity of the Spirit, Ephesians 4:3, which is unity that the Holy Spirit forms and maintains.  It is the answer to the prayer of the Lord Jesus to His Father before He died, when He asked that His people might be one, and so they are, John 17:21.
A local church however, may, sadly, be divided.  This was the case at Corinth, for the apostle found out that there were divisions among them, 1 Corinthians 1:10-13.  Some were making Paul their favourite, others Apollos, and others Peter.  There were even those who were claiming to be super-spiritual, and saying they, to the exclusion of the others, were of Christ.

The church which is Christ’s body has a membership which is constant, for none can be excluded from it, for each member is linked to Christ for ever, for “he that is joined to the Lord is one spirit”, 1 Corinthians 6:17.
A local church, however, may have members who fall into doctrinal error, or moral sin.  Such, after careful assessment of the situation by spiritual men, must be put away from the company.  When this happens they are no longer part of the local assembly until such times as they repent, and are received back.  When a person is put away from a particular local church, because the decision of the church is final, and is confirmed in heaven, Matthew 18:18, no other local church should receive them.  If it does, then it not only undermines the decision of the first assembly, but also makes the repentance of the offending person less likely, and so hampers his restoration to full fellowship again.

ROMANS 6

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address:  martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

Section 9 Romans 6:1-23
The believer’s past and present position

Subject of Section 9
Most of the truth found in the epistles is anticipated by the Lord Jesus in His ministry, and this chapter is a case in point. He had said “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free…whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin…If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed”, John 8:32,34,36. Romans chapter 6 explains how we may live free from the service of sin, in the freedom into which the Son of God, by His death, burial and resurrection, introduces us. By being buried in the watery grave of baptism, the believer, who has already died with Christ when he was saved, associates himself with the burial and resurrection of Christ, henceforth to live a new sort of life.

Structure of Section 9

9(a) 6:1-11 The doctrine of identification with Christ
9(b) 6:12-23 The application of the doctrine

Special note on Christian baptism
Just before He ascended back to His Father, the Lord Jesus commanded His disciples to preach and teach, and then to baptize those who believed. His words were, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.” Matthew 28:19,20.
That the apostles were obedient to His command is clear from the Book of the Acts, for as soon as people believed, they baptized them. We read that on the day of Pentecost, Peter said unto them, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost”, Acts 2:38. Note that repentance came first, indicating that those baptised were all of the age of responsibility. Note, too, that every one that repented was required to be baptized.
Because the ones addressed had been guilty of the rejection of Christ, they were required to be baptized to show the genuineness of their conversion before they received the Holy Spirit. Subsequently, the Holy Spirit is given the moment a person believes, or else the argument of the apostle Paul in Galatians 3:2 is destroyed, for he strongly implies there that the Holy Spirit is received when a person initially believes.
After the Ethiopian eunuch was saved, we read, “the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him”, Acts 8:36-38. Note he believed first, then was baptized after both he and Philip had gone down into water, showing it was not sprinkling.
After Saul of Tarsus was converted, we read that he “arose, and was baptized. And when he had received meat, he was strengthened,” Acts 9:18,19. Note Saul was baptized before he had any food, even though he had not eaten for three days. He felt that getting baptized was a matter of urgency.
When Cornelius and his household had believed the gospel and received the gift of the Spirit, Peter said, “Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord.” Acts 10:47,48. Note that they received the Holy Spirit before they were baptized.
Such was the practice followed by the apostles, and since believers are required to continue steadfastly in the apostle’s doctrine, such should be our practice today. But what are the principles behind the practice of baptism? For these we shall have to note the teaching of the chapter before us.

9(a)   6:1-15
The doctrine of identification with Christ

6:1
What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?

What shall we say then? This expression, (or one very similar to it), occurs seven times in the epistle. The apostle wants to involve us in his line of reasoning. He is about to respond to the false teaching about the subject of sin that was current in his day.
Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? This is the suggestion of those who were drawing a false conclusion from 5:20, where the apostle states that “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound”. Compare 3:8 where a similar argument is used by Paul’s opponents, but there in connection with sins, here in connection with the sin-tendency in man. They were saying, in effect, “Let us give way to sin’s rule, so that God’s grace may be further enhanced”. The whole idea of justification by faith alone could be misunderstood in this way, hence the need for teaching on the matter. To continue in sin is to live in a sinful way even when claiming to be a believer.

6:2
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

God forbid- this is a strong expression of opposition to the idea.
How shall we- the argument does not begin with an exhortation, (that comes from verse 12 onwards, beginning with “let not”), but logical reasoning based on what believers know, which should prevent them from making the suggestion of verse 1. The apostle does not speak of inadvisability, but impossibility; not “we ought not”, but “how can we?” “We” is a pronoun of quality, “such as we, united to Christ; how can people in that position act as if they are still united to Adam?”
That are dead to sin, live any longer therein- for the believer, death to sin is a past event, which is to be worked out in the present. There are two proofs normally that a person is dead, the first being the death certificate, (corresponding to the apostle’s official statement of verse 2), and the second, the burial ceremony, (corresponding in the spiritual realm to the believer’s baptism in verse 4). We died to sin when we believed, not when we were baptized, or else salvation would be completed by the work of being baptized, and not by faith in a crucified Saviour.

6:3
Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?

Know ye not? The apostle asks, “Are you ignorant?” Anyone who is aware of the truth of verses 3-5 will not suggest that the believer should continue in sin. As we have noted, the Lord said, “ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, but ignorance tends to bondage.
That so many of us- now we have a pronoun of quantity, and the number of persons baptized is the number baptized into Jesus Christ; the act has the same significance for all believers. There might be a suggestion here that those who said believers could continue in sin were not baptized.
As were baptized into Jesus Christ- baptism signifies publicly that we have moved, (when we believed), into the company of which Jesus Christ is the head, and we wish to work that position out in practice. No longer do we wish to be thought of as those who are in Adam. The apostle has already dealt with the headship of Christ and Adam in chapter 5:12-21.
Baptism is also an act of public submission to Christ, in loyalty and commitment, a fact illustrated by the recognition of Moses as the one who had brought the people through the Red Sea, for they were “baptized unto Moses”, 1 Corinthians 10:2, recognising him as leader.
Baptized into his death- we cannot be subject to Christ without the truth of His death. So we are baptized into Him by being baptized into His death. From verse 4 we see that by death is meant Christ’s state of death, not His act of dying. A person is buried because he is dead; he does not die at the burial ceremony.

6:4
Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.

Therefore we are buried with him- this is the first conclusion which shows we cannot continue in sin, for buried persons are not able to continue as they did before. We are buried in identification with Him in His burial, with our former life past and gone.
By baptism into death- when Israel passed through the Red Sea with the waters heaped up on either side, it was as if they were in a grave, Exodus 14:22. Christian baptism puts us publicly where we are already ideally in the sight of God, and prepares us practically to walk in a new way.
That like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father- “that” means “in order that”, for our baptism has a purpose; it is not just a negative burial out of sight, but the necessary preparation for re-emergence. There is a direct correspondence between Christ’s emergence from the grave, and ours, but this does not appear to be the case in verse 4, but becomes evident in verse 5. The Father’s glory demanded that such a person as Christ should be raised, He having satisfied the Father in life and death.
We also should walk in newness of life- note the lack of a parallel expression regarding us, for the glory of the Father demanded that we remain in the grave if our life as sinners was in view. For us there needs to be a new sort of life, a life which has the newness of the new man, (a man in character like Christ) about it, see Ephesians 4:20-24; Colossians 3:9-11. The “also” links “buried with him” with “walk in newness of life”. It is not that “we also, (as well as Christ), walk in newness of life”, for He did not need to walk in a different sort of way. The apostle writes “should walk” not in sense of “ought to walk”, but raised in order that it may happen.

6:5
For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:

For- now comes the explanation of the correspondence between Christ and the believer mentioned in verse 4.
If we have been planted together in the likeness of his death- we are publicly conjoined with Christ in His state of death in the grave. At the moment we are immersed in the water of baptism, we are like He was when in the sepulchre. But the likeness has a spiritual side, for His life on earth was over, and our old life on earth is over, too.
We shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection- some would limit this to the future resurrection, but this robs the passage of much of its present force. The apostle is not dealing with physical resurrection in this passage. Just as the physical position of being in water had the spiritual counterpart of being buried with Christ, so physically coming out of the water has its counterpart of being raised with Christ. The apostle views us as newly emerged from the water, with a new life before us, hence the “shall be”. So it is not “shall be in the future”, but “shall be from the point of baptism onwards”.

6:6
Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

Knowing this- those who have been baptized have done so because they have got to know something. We are baptized in the knowledge that our old man is crucified with Christ. According to this, persons should be instructed in the principles given in these verses before they are baptized.
That our old man is crucified with him- the old man is the pre-conversion self considered as to its link with Adam. The new man is the post-conversion self considered as to its link with Christ. When the Romans wished to publicly demonstrate that a criminal was not acceptable in their society, they crucified him. So God has declared publicly that our sinful self is not fit for the society of heaven, by associating it with Christ when He was crucified. “Crucified with” means co-crucified, crucified in company with, for we were in the mind of God when Christ was on the cross. In this way the believer may say with the apostle, “I am crucified with Christ”, Galatians 2:20.
Not only did we renounce the old man in repentance, but we embraced the new man in faith. If the old man is the likeness to Adam that marked us because we had links with him, the new man is likeness to Christ now that we are linked to Him by association with His death, burial, and resurrection. This emphasises the great change that comes about when a person is converted. Instead of living as Adam lived after he sinned, the believer begins to “walk, even as he walked”, that is, to live like Christ, 1 John 2:6.
That the body of sin might be destroyed- that is, in order that the body of sin may be made of no effect. The body of sin is our body considered as the headquarters of the sin-principle within us. As far as God is concerned, just as a criminal’s body was rendered powerless by the process of crucifixion so that he was no longer able to engage in a life of crime, so our body, (that sin used as the base of its operations), has been put out of action. This is the ideal situation, when things are considered from God’s side, whereas in our everyday practice we are not to let sin reign in our mortal body, verse 12, so we are not yet delivered finally from sin. It is not the body itself that is made of no effect, but the body as the instrument that the sin-principle uses. The Christian’s body can be presented to God as a living sacrifice, 12:1, so it is not in itself evil.
That henceforth- that is, no longer, from the point of baptism onwards We should resolve that the principles at work in our baptism should constantly be at work in our lives.
We should not serve sin- the mastery of sin has been broken at the cross, for sin can only dominate living people and we have been crucified. By this means the Son makes free indeed, (that is, free to the very core of our being), John 8:36.

6:7
For he that is dead is freed from sin.

For- the reason for freedom from sin, as verse 6 had been the foundation of freedom.
He that is dead is freed from sin- whilst it is true that dead persons are free from the tendency to sin, this is not the point here. The word for freed used here means justified; freed from obligation. The idea is that those who are dead because they have been crucified with Christ have been justly freed from the obligation to obey the dictates of sin within. Christ has borne the liability which our sin placed upon us. The expression does not mean that we are freed from sin by the removal of that sinful nature, for it is not until the resurrection morning that we shall be able to say, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.” 1 Corinthians 15:55,56.

6:8
Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:

Now if we be dead with Christ- the believer is associated with the man who for a short while hung dead on a cross, but was then buried.
We believe we shall also live with him- the apostle might very well have simply made an exact parallel by writing “if we be dead with Christ, we shall live with Him”. However, he inserts “we believe.” If we died with Christ, then we are believers, resting in what His crucifixion achieved, for only such are crucified with Christ. But this faith is not limited to things that are past, but lays hold of that which is future, which in this case is life in association with a risen Christ. Again, the apostle is looking at the believer newly emerged from the waters of baptism. We live with Him from that point on. The mention of believing also reminds us that the Christian life is a life of faith.

6:9
Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.

Knowing that- here is a third word for knowledge, meaning perception. The believer’s faith is based on the perception of the truth that Christ is risen to die no more.
Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more- unlike Lazarus, for instance, Christ shall never die again, for the reason the apostle now gives.
Death hath no more dominion over him- it is indeed true that Christ laid down His life of Himself, but it is also true that, because He undertook to be made sin, He accepted that this involved death having Him in its power for a short time. His resurrection is proof, however, that death’s power is broken, both for Him, and also for His people in association with Him.

6:10
For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.

For in that he died, he died unto sin once- the first reason the apostle cites to establish that death no longer dominates Christ is the fact that His death unto or in relation to sin was once-for-all in character. What He did by going into death was fully effective, and needs no repetition.
But in that he liveth, he liveth unto God- the second reason is found in the fact that He now lives only in relation to God, having nothing to do with the sin-question any more. Death can only dominate in connection with sin.

6:11
Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Likewise reckon ye also yourselves- there is perhaps the implication in the word “reckon” that Christ’s death in relation to sin was the result, on His part, of careful reckoning of the consequences. So likewise, the believer is to seriously reckon with the consequences. Reckon means to make a logical and reasoned calculation.
To be dead indeed unto sin- dead, that is, in reality, (indeed), not simply in theory. We must make the practical application to ourselves of the death of Christ to sin.
But alive unto God- as Christ is alive unto God, the matter of sin forever settled, so we should act on that fact, for we are identified with Him.
Through Jesus Christ our Lord- only because of Christ’s work can we be dead to sin, and only because of His resurrection can we be alive to God, so all depends on Him. The apostle can write “our Lord”, for we have exchanged the lordship of sin for the lordship of Jesus Christ.

9(b)   6:12-23
The application of the doctrine of identification with Christ

6:12
Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.

Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body- because the dominion of sin has been broken by the death and resurrection of Christ, there is no reason why we should submit to its dictatorship. We are dead to sin as far as God is concerned, verse 2; the body of sin has been destroyed, verse 6; we are legally free from obligation to sin, verse 7; and Christ has once-for-all died in relation to sin, verse 10, and we are identified with Him. These are the reasons why sin need no longer be on the throne of the believer’s heart, as before it was, 5:21. The mortal body is a body still liable to death; a reminder from the apostle that we are not yet delivered from indwelling sin, for that awaits our bodily resurrection, 1 Corinthians 15:56. A warning, too, to be on our guard.
That ye should obey it in the lusts thereof- the reign of sin is expressed by the lusts or strong evil desires which it enables men to gratify. We allow sin to reign when we obey its dictates.

6:13
Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.

Neither yield ye your members- the apostle now concentrates on the varied members of the body which can assist sin in its attempts at domination; we are not to yield to their pressure.
As instruments of unrighteousness unto sin- connect “unto sin” with “yield”; we are not to present our members to be used in relation to sin, for that would be to use them for unrighteous ends.
But yield yourselves unto God- not now the individual members of the body, but the whole person, spirit, soul and body, is to be yielded to God as Christ is, verse 10.
As those that are alive from the dead- in line with the truth that we are risen with Christ. This is the practical outworking of the reckoning of verse 11, translating theory into practice.
And your members as instruments of righteousness unto God- having dealt with the person as a whole, he now gives the parallel to the yielding of individual members unto sin, which results in unrighteousness.

6:14
For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.

For sin shall not have dominion over you- “shall” meaning “from this point onwards”, if the truths of previous verses are heeded and practised.
For ye are not under the law, but under grace- this is the reason why sin will not dominate, for grace brings the death, burial and resurrection of Christ to bear upon our persons, and gives us the resources to live victoriously for God. Law, on the other hand, only gives sin an opportunity to assert itself, as chapter seven will show. Compare also 5:20. This verse introduces the idea of law not being able to enable us to overcome sin. From 6:15 to the end of chapter 7 the apostle deals with the false idea of some that the Christian life should be governed by the law of Moses. There were, and are, those who feel that unless the believer is subject to rules and regulations of a legal nature, he will give way to licentiousness, which is the opposite of legality. But the Christian life is marked by liberty, and that liberty is expressed by subjection to the will of God.
The parable of the prodigal son illustrates three possible states: licence, (the prodigal in the far country), legality, (the elder son working in the field, and not transgressing his father’s commandment), and liberty, (the restored prodigal in the father’s house), see Luke 15:11-32. The power to live a life of liberty is the Spirit of God, but before he can enlarge in chapter 8 on the important theme of the indwelling Spirit, the apostle deals in chapter 7 with the believer’s relationship to the law of Moses. In verses 15 to 23 of chapter 6 however, he shows that a life lived in the good of all that grace has brought us into, will not lapse into sinfulness because there are strong incentives to do otherwise.
Note the way the passage builds up to a climax:
Obey, verse 16.
Obedience unto righteousness, verse 16.
Servants of righteousness, verse 18.
Servants to righteousness unto holiness, verse 19.
Servants to God…fruit unto holiness…the end everlasting life, verse 22.

6:15
What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.

What then? Shall we sin- in verse 1 the suggestion was to continue in a manner of life that obeyed the dictates of the sinful tendency within our hearts. Here the suggestion is of continuing to commit sins because we think grace delivers from the consequences. Both ideas are met with “God forbid”, but whereas the first is answered by the doctrine of the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ, the second is met by an appeal to our Christian knowledge as to what is becoming conduct for a true believer, who is a servant of God.
Because we are not under the law, but under grace. God forbid- does freedom from the law mean freedom to sin? The apostle has already hinted in verse 14 that grace is a superior force than law, for it unlocks the power available in the resurrection of Christ. The next verse will show why we should not sin.

6:16
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?

Know ye not- the same word as verse 9, meaning perception, insight. He expresses surprise that as believers they did not know.
That to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey- being a servant and obeying are not separable. A servant is obedient by definition. The question is, which master is he obeying?
Whether of sin unto death- the pre-conversion condition was one of slavery to sin, expressed in obedience to its commands.
Or of obedience unto righteousness- the apostle combines the two things that were true of our Head in 5:18,19, the one act of righteousness, and the obedience of the One. The believer is to display the same characteristics that his Head does. So who we yield to determines who is our master in practice.

6:17
But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.

But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin- the thankfulness of the apostle is most easily connected with what follows, he is thankful that they have obeyed from the heart, not that they were slaves.
But ye have obeyed from the heart- this is the secret of a life of service to God, to obey His truth from the heart, that is, willingly and fervently. “Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life.” Proverbs 4:23.
That form of doctrine which was delivered you- the truths expressed in the gospel are not just for initial salvation, but ongoing, being the terms on which we are to serve God. “If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, John 8:32. The brass for the pillars at the front of Solomon’s temple took the shape of the mould into which it was poured, 1 Kings 7:41,46, so we should be moulded by the truth.

6:18
Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.

Being then made free from sin- when we believe, the truth as to Christ, His person and work, is applied savingly to our hearts by God. In this way the Son makes us free indeed, John 8:36.
Ye became the servants of righteousness- the same act that freed from sin, made us servants committed to righteousness, because of our obedience to the truth of the gospel, the obedience of faith, Romans 16:26. There is no middle ground, such as being delivered from sin, but made servants to the law.

6:19
I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh: for as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.

I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh- the apostle changes from general principles to more detailed illustration. He is being more specific because he knows that the sinful tendencies of the flesh are ready to defeat us.
For as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness- each part of our person, before conversion, was surrendered to sin, resulting in uncleanness. As the Lord Jesus said, “For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies: These are the things which defile a man”, Matthew 15:19,20.
And to iniquity unto iniquity- the sinner is committed to the principle of lawlessness, (for the carnal mind is not subject to the law of God, 8:7), and that commitment results in lawless deeds. To yield to the principle of iniquity in the flesh, (“to iniquity”), will result in the practice of iniquity, (“unto iniquity”).
Even so now- let there be a correspondingly total surrender now that you are a believer.
Yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness- the outworking of righteous principles will result in holy practice, because righteousness, which is conformity to the nature of God, teaches us what to avoid and what to engage in. Holiness is separation to what is of God. Commitment to righteousness and holiness will mean lawlessness is renounced and uncleanness is rejected. See Mark 9:43-50 for truth spoken by the Lord Jesus concerning particular members of the body, and the way in which we may misuse them.

6:20
For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness.

For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness- before conversion, there was no relationship with righteousness at all, for “there is none righteous, no, not one”. Again the apostle emphasises that a life of sin, and a life of righteousness are totally distinct in principle; so we should not be tempted to mix them in practice. “Free from righteousness” also has the idea of the sinner being glad to be clear of the demands of righteousness, an attitude which should be foreign to the believer.

6:21
What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death.

What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? By fruit the apostle means “worthwhile result”. There is no glory for God in a life of sin. The believer shows his change of outlook by being disgusted at what he did before.
For the end of those things is death- the prospect before one who lives in sin is one of death, not life. But the believer has life in view. It is sadly true, however, that the believer may engage in pre-conversion sins, a lapse into moral death as 8:13 will explain.

6:22
But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.

But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God- the apostle now returns to the basic alternatives he spoke of in verse 16, having enlarged on their outworking in verses 17-21.
Ye have your fruit unto holiness- in contrast to a Christ-less life which is lived in shameful unholiness. They can be said to “have” this fruit in the present, so a life lived apart from the law of Moses does produce results in holiness. The apostle says “your fruit”, as if he expects us to value it, and also because no-one else can produce it for us.
And the end everlasting life- the result of actively being servants to God is that we gain increasing insights into who our God is, for everlasting life enables us to get to know the only true God, John 17:3. The believer has eternal life from the start of his spiritual career, but the end or goal of that career is to constantly gain fresh appreciation of God, and this is possible because having eternal life enables us to get to know God.

6:23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

For the wages of sin is death- the word used for wages originally meant “money paid to soldiers”. Sinners are at war with God, 8:7, and they are paid wages which reflect that, and which represent their just deserts, for death is the result of having a sinful nature. As the apostle has already said, “death by sin”, 5:12.
But the gift of God is eternal life- whilst this may be connected with the initial gift of eternal life, in context it relates to the gracious way in which God repays service to Himself by granting fresh appreciations of His glories, hence the word “for”, indicating an explanation of the previous verse.
Note that this is not called wages, for all that God gives is out of His gracious heart towards us; even service rendered to Him does not put Him under obligation to us. As the Lord Jesus said, “So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.” Luke 17:10.
Through Jesus Christ our Lord- all the enabling to serve God comes through Him, whether by His death and resurrection, His example of obedient service, or His present ministry of applying the truth to our souls. Grace and truth came, (and are maintained still), by Jesus Christ, so we do not need the law to enable us to please God, John 1:17.