Tag Archives: church

MATTHEW 16

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Under “SELF-PRINT BOOKLETS” you will find help on printing the posts in booklet form.  Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

MATTHEW 16

Setting of the chapter
Christ’s prophecy concerning the church is recorded only in the gospel that emphasises His kingship, so the two ideas are not incompatible. It is perfectly possible for Christ to be the King of Israel, one day to reign on the earth, and also, at this present time, to be the Head of the church. The Mount of Transfiguration event took place after Matthew 16, so the kingdom is still to come. Peter, who was present on the mount, declares that the Old Testament prophetic word had been confirmed to him when Christ was transfigured, 2 Peter 1:16-21.

The prediction concerning the church comes after a succession of indications that Israel intended to reject its rightful king, and that Christ was turning to the Gentiles as a consequence.

Notice the way the Gospel of Matthew shows the Lord Jesus gradually turning from the nation of Israel, in preparation for His new work of building the church after the Day of Pentecost:

11:20-30
He rebukes the cities where most of His mighty works were done; thanks His Father for His wise purpose; indicates that the Father has committed all things into His hands; turns to the individuals in the nation with the words, “Come unto Me”, 11:28.

12:1-8
An appeal to an incident when David, the anointed king, was on the run from Saul, 1 Samuel 21:1-6.

12:9-13
The man with a withered hand. King Jereboam had been judged like this for stretching out his hand against a man of God; how much more dangerous is it for the rulers to seek to destroy the Son of God, 1 Kings 13:1-4. Compare also Zechariah 11:17, where the idol shepherd is Antichrist.

12:14-21
The Pharisees seek to destroy God’s Beloved and Elect One, and He will show judgment to the Gentiles, and in Him shall the Gentiles trust.

12:22-23
The blind and dumb man represents the nation, blind to His glories, and dumb in His praise. The people recognise that He does not hate the blind as David did, 2 Samuel 5:8. Note that when specific blind men are cured in Matthew there is always a reference to Him as Son of David, 9:27; 12:22,23; 20:30-34; 21:9-14.

12:24-37
Unable to deny that Christ performed miracles, the Pharisees assert that He did them by the power of Satan. This is sin against the Holy Ghost, for it was by His power that the works were done, and to equate the Holy Spirit with the Devil is blasphemy. This shows how far the nation had gone in its rejection of Christ.

12:38-42
Both the sign of Jonah the prophet who went to the Gentiles, who repented, and the sign of the Queen of Sheba who came from the Gentiles, and believed; both are indications of the change in God’s dealings which would take place after the death and resurrection of Christ.

12:43-45
The nation is labelled a wicked generation, influenced by evil spirits in its opposition to Christ.

12:46-50
Those who have the closest natural ties are put after those who have spiritual links with Christ. No claim can be made upon Christ because He is a fellow-Jew.

13:1-52
The mysteries of the kingdom of heaven expounded. The king does not wield a sword, but sow seed. Note the significant move out of the house (of Israel), to the seaside, (representing the wider world of the Gentiles). In verse 36 there is a return to the house, for after the church age there will be those in Israel who will need to be aware of God’s plans for the end of the age of tribulation. The disciples represent these at this point, just as they do in Matthew 10, where in verse 25 they are told they will have not have gone over the cities of Judah before Christ comes. Clearly not a reference to the disciples personally.

13:53-58
Christ’s claims to be Son of God are rejected in the words, “Is not this the carpenter’s son?” Unbelief marks the nation to such an extent that it hinders the works of Christ.

14:1-12
A similar situation to when Herod the Great, (Herod the Tetrarch’s father), slaughtered the innocents. The hostility of the authorities is unchanged. Verses 3-12 refer to an incident two years before, for Matthew is highlighting the fact that attitudes have not altered. (Compare Luke 3:19, 20, where the imprisonment of John is recorded, even though he is about to baptise Christ. This emphasises the fact that the baptism of Christ indicated His commitment to rejection and suffering).

14:13-21
A startling contrast is now presented. Herod, on his birthday (when he could be expected to be in a good mood for once), in his hatred, gives John the Baptist’s head on a dish, whereas Christ in compassion feeds five thousand people with bread. Those who, like John the baptist, stand for Christ may expect opposition.

14:22-36
The disciples alone on the lake, with Christ praying on the mountain, and then coming to them. One of Matthew’s dispensational pictures, telling of believers passing through much trouble, (the storm on the lake), but sustained by the intercession of Christ on high. The disciples are being prepared for the absence of the King, who, nonetheless, as a King-Priest, makes intercession for them on high. This will also have meaning for tribulation saints.

15:1-20
The nation exposed for its hypocrisy, preferring the teachings and traditions of men to the commandments of God.

15:21-28
A Gentile “dog” is blessed. Note that the Lord uses the word for dog that means a little dog, the family pet, rather than the scavengers of the streets. He thus shows His gentleness and compassion, for “A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench…and in his name shall the Gentiles trust”, Matthew 12:20,21.

15:29-39
The healing of multitudes, (note the lame and blind are mentioned first), on a mountain, the symbol of a kingdom, then the feeding of the four thousand. Matthew is presenting a foretaste of the millenial age before he tells us of the prediction of the church age. So the kingdom is emphasised both before and after the prophecy regarding the church.

16:1-4
The demand for a sign from the Pharisees and Sadducees, both of whom had rejected the testimony of Christ’s miracle ministry. No further sign to be given, except that of His death and resurrection, as pictured in the experience of Jonah. Fair weather symbolised His works of mercy. Foul weather, the judgments coming upon the nation, whether at AD 70 with the destruction of Jerusalem or in the tribulation period. See 1 Thessalonians 2:15,16. Caesarea Phillipi was the scene of much bloodshed when the Romans suppressed the Jewish rebellion as AD 70 approached.

16:5-12
A warning about moral leaven in preparation for church age conditions. The leaven of the Pharisees is the evil of mere outward profession of religion. The leaven of the Sadducees is evil of rationalism, and the doubting of God’s word. Both these things would prove a snare during the age of the church.

Subject of the chapter
There is a progress of thought in this chapter. First, Christ’s enemies persist in doubting whether His miracles were of God. This was a major reason why He was turning from the nation in its unbelief. He refuses to satisfy their demand, for it was far too late to be asking for a sign, when He had given abundant evidence that He was from God.

Then the subject of doctrine comes up, for the great test for men is whether they are going to listen to the doctrine of Pharisees, Sadducees, Herodians and the common people, or to the doctrine that comes from the Father.

This leads on to the vital question as to who Christ is, and Peter has been listening to the doctrine from heaven, and makes his confession.

Having foretold the building of the church, the Lord warns His own that that cannot cannot happen unless He suffers first. Just as Solomon built the temple on the site of Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac, so the spiritual temple of this age will be founded on the sacrifice of Christ, which, in turn, receives validity from who He is.

Finally, the consequence of all this is set before the disciples. If they would know a reward when He comes in glory, they must deny self, and take up their cross, and follow Christ.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-4 Demand for a sign from heaven
(b) Verses 5-12 Doctrine of evil men
(c) Verses 13-20 Declaration about the church
(d) Verses 21-23 Declaration about His sufferings
(e) Verses 24-28 Denial of self

(a) Verses 1-4
Demand for a sign from heaven

16:1
The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven.

The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came- these are the two groups that the Lord is about to warn His disciples about, verses 11,12. Normally in disagreement over many issues, they are united in their opposition to Christ. Herod and Pilate will soon be friends on the same basis, Luke 23:12. In the previous chapter the Lord had fed the multitudes with wholesome bread. Now these are coming to try to put leaven into it. The Pharisees were the ritualists of the day, concerned for the letter of the law. The Sadducees were the rationalists, thinking their opinion above the law.

And tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven- like Satan their master, they only tempt to seek to find a fault, to expose any dross. God tempts to show the pure gold in the faith of His people, as we see in the case of Abraham, Genesis 22:1. But there is no dross in Christ, as has been shown conclusively in the temptation at the beginning of His public life.

The ministry of Christ had been full of signs from heaven, some even performed on Pharisees, Luke 5:17. Since they are tempting Him, they are perhaps implying yet again that His miracles were done by the power of Satan, “signs from hell” so to speak. They show no sign of repenting of their blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.

16:2
He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red.

He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red- instead of satisfying their demand for a sign, He gives them a metaphor. His public ministry had been “fair weather”, with no storms of judgment, only grace and blessing.

16:3
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?

And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering- His ministry of grace had begun to be interspersed with warnings of judgment upon the nation for their refusal of Him.

O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times? They had asked for a sign; he points them to the signs of the times, that is, the indications He had been giving as the the change of character in His ministry, for the word “times” refers to the character of a particular period. Christ’s ministry was changing in character, and they were not able to discern it. They prided themselves on spiritual discernment, yet they were hypocrites, for they pretended to be spiritual, but could only understand the natural, like the signs of a change in the weather.

16:4
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.

A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign- this is what He had called them in 12:39, and they had failed to respond to His rebuke in repentance, unlike the men of Nineveh who repented at the preaching of Noah. They would readily have called the men of Nineveh an evil and adulterous generation, but could not see that the description applied to them as well. And they compounded their evil by pretending to be interested in Divine things by asking for a sign. No wonder He calls them hypocrites!

Special note on adultery as a metaphor
We noted the following in the notes on Matthew 12:
“In the Old Testament the prophets often used adultery as a metaphor for the behaviour of the nation when it went into idolatry, for it represented unfaithfulness to the God who had made the nation His wife. But these are not idolaters in that sense. But there were two aspects to idolatry, the rejection of the true God, and the consequent reverence for false gods. When God gave Israel His commandments, He made it clear that they were neither to make idols or bow down to them. The reason being that He was a Jealous God, Exodus 20:3-5. He is jealous of His own glory, and that of His Son, who is described as “the image of the invisible God”, Colossians 1:15. By image in that context is meant that the Son of God is the one who manifests God fully. God is jealous of the honour of His Son, and if, when He was here, the nation that was most fitted to appreciate Him did not do so, but largely rejected Him, does that not merit the charge of turning from God, and therefore may justly be called adulterous?

And there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas- He does not expand on the meaning of His reference to Jonah, unlike in chapter 12. He had told them enough then for them to see His point, and respond.

And he left them, and departed- the word Matthew uses for “left” is an intense word, meaning “to leave utterly”. There is a definiteness about His movement here, for it has great significance. It is not just that He departed, with the implication He left them. He left them in spirit, and departed from them in body. The nation, as represented by these rulers, is being abandoned, for it has rejected its Messiah.

(b) Verses 5-12
Doctrine of evil men

16:5
And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread.

And when his disciples were come to the other side- we learn from 15:39 that after the feeding of the four thousand, the Lord had come by ship into the region of Magdala, which was on the eastern side of the Sea of Galilee.

They had forgotten to take bread- this is very strange, for after the crowds had been fed, they had gathered up seven baskets full of fragments. So it is not that they had forgotten to buy bread, but omitted to bring any of that which they had gathered up. It is all too easy to be careless in regard to the abundant spiritual provision the Lord has made for us.

16:6
Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.

Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees- the Lord turns their failure into an opportunity to introduce to them the need to be right as to doctrine, for if they are going to confess Him aright, they must understand aright. Mark tells us they did not understand the implications of the feeding of the five thousand, for their hearts were hardened, Mark 6:52, which perhaps is one reason why there needed to be another very similar miracle to impress the truth upon them.

16:7
And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread.

And they reasoned among themselves- this is the mistake we make too often; trying to think matters through without recourse to the Lord and His word.

Saying, It is because we have taken no bread- the Lord had given a lengthy discourse after He had fed the five thousand, as recorded in John 6:26-64. During that teaching He explained that the words He spoke to them were spirit, and life. They were to be understood in a spiritual sense, and if taken in that way, they would give eternal life and sustain that life.

So if the bread He spoke of was His wholesome doctrine, the disciples should have realised that when He spoke of leaven He must mean unwholesome doctrine. Instead, they thought on a natural level, and took His word to be a rebuke for their failure to bring bread with them on the journey across the lake.

16:8
Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread?

Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread? The Lord knew their hearts, and that they were reasoning among themselves whether it was because they had forgotten to bring bread that He spoke His warning concerning leaven. The reason why they can be said to have little faith is explained in the next two verses. The Lord is going to graciously use their failure to teach them a much-needed lesson. He not only knew what they were discussing amongst themselves, but also knew about the lack of bread. But this is no problem to Him, as He indicate in the next verse.

16:9
Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?

16:10
Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?

Do ye not yet understand- Mark tells us that “they considered not the miracle of the loaves: for their heart was hardened”, Mark 6:52. This is perhaps one reason why the miracle needed to be repeated when the Lord fed the four thousand. They had responded to the fact that the crowds were hungry in a similar way on both occasions, namely, with expression of unbelief, “Whence should we have so much bread in the wilderness as to fill so great a multitude?” Matthew 15:33. And this after they have watched Him feed five thousand a little while before. His charge that they were of little faith was justified. Their mention of the wilderness is significant, for the psalmist speaks of the unbelief of Israel when they were passing though the desert. He wrote, “Yea, they spake against God: they said, Can God furnish a table in the wilderness?” Psalm 78:19. The response of God then was to be wroth, but grace has come with Christ, and He gently chides their lack of understanding and faith, and seeks to lead them on in the truth.

Neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? If five thousand people can be miraculously fed from five loaves, how easy it is for the Lord to feed Himself and His disciples from nothing. Especially since after the miracles there was more left over than at the beginning. The separate mention of these events shows conclusively that the feeding of the four thousand is not a different version of the feeding of the five thousand.

16:11
How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?

How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? The main point of the feeding of the multitudes was not physical, but spiritual, for the miracle was a sign, a pointer to higher truth. The disciples, of all people, should have understood this, even when others walked away from it, John 6:66. His reference to leaven was of the same sort, a pointer to spiritual truth.

The leaven of the Pharisees was hypocrisy, as directly stated by the Lord in Luke 12:1. They appeared outwardly to be very scrupulous about the commands of the law, but their hearts were far from God, Matthew 15:7-9. The leaven of the Sadducees was rationalism, the rejection of anything they could not see. Hence they denied there were angels, or spirits, or the resurrection of the dead, Acts 23:8. The Pharisees, however, confess these things. So even though these two parties were opposed to one another, they were united in teaching the leaven of error, and hence opposed to Christ. The disciples must beware of them, and so must we, for they have their modern-day counterparts.

16:12
Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.

Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees- at last they have grasped the lesson, and therefore are in a fit state to move on to the truth He will unfold to them next. Having rid them of leaven, the Lord will grant to them the pure fine flour of doctrine concerning Himself.

(c) Verses 13-20
Declaration about the church

16:13
When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?

When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi- this is a place named after Caesar, so a Gentile atmosphere prevails here. But world politics will not prevent the church being built. The disciples, just local fisherman, familiar only with the shores of Galilee, are going to be sent into all the world.

There was a temple dedicated to the god Pan here, but world religion will not prevent God’s purpose through the church either. Nearby one of the sources of the Jordan (the river of death and judgement), gushed out of the rock, but all that was brought in by sin is overcome by Christ. This place is the site of a decisive battle in the days of the Greek empire, but a more decisive battle was won by Christ at Calvary, and no force is of power to frustrate His ongoing purpose to build the church. The area was one of great natural beauty, yet nothing can compare with heavenly realities.

He asked his disciples saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of Man am? That is, what is result of My ministry? “What think ye of Christ” is always the test, Matthew 22:41-46. As He will say later, “If ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins”, John 8:24. Those described as men are the multitudes, in contrast to the Pharisees, whose opinion was obvious. We can see now why He introduced the subject of doctrine and leaven, for the disciples must not mix any leaven of wrong thoughts into their view of Christ. As Son of man He is relevant man and real man, for all must relate to Him in some way, either in faith or unbelief. This is His title in relation to all men, as opposed to Son of Abraham and Son of David which link Him with Israel, and Son of God which tells of His relationship to God. He does not use these titles in His question, but He does use the title Son of Man, even though that is not used in connection with the church. He wants the answer to come from them, and not from a clue in the question.

16:14
And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.

And they said, “Some say that thou art John the Baptist- he was a committed, uncompromising, unworldly, preacher. The people saw these features in Christ.

Some, Elias- he was the courageous, reforming, miracle-worker, (unlike John the Baptist, who did no miracles, John 10:41). They saw these features in Christ too.

And others, Jeremias- the weeping prophet, who the Rabbis said was the man of sorrows of Isaiah 53.

Or one of the prophets- the good qualities of all the prophets were seen in Christ. This was no surprise, for the prophets were born of God, and therefore had the life of God. It was to be expected that they would display some of the characteristics of the Lord Jesus, who is God manifest in flesh. But they should have said that the prophets were like Him, not that He was like the prophets.

Note there is no reference to Moses, despite the prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:15-19. See Acts 3:22,23. They found no legality in Christ, but nonetheless they should have believed He was the one Moses spoke of. In Luke 9:7-9 Herod and the people wonder whether Christ is one of these men risen from the dead, so they do not give the Lord credit even for being the Son of Man in His own right, but simply (and superstitiously) think Him to be a resurrected prophet.

16:15
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?- “Ye” and “I are emphatic. “Ye” is in contrast to the people, “I” in contrast to the imaginary Christ men spoke of. “But” anticipates the better answer of the apostles.

16:16
And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

And Simon Peter answered- the name Simon means hearing, so he had lived up to his name. Peter is the Greek form of the name given him by Christ in John 1:42, which means “a stone”. So the two names give the order of his experience. Simon when he heard and responded to God’s word through Christ, Peter as one born again through that word, ready to be built into the church on the Day of Pentecost. He had not been influenced by the Pharisees or Sadducees.

Thou art the Christ- that is, the Messiah of Old Testament prophecy.

The Son of the Living God- the subject of New Testament revelation. To Peter, God is the Living God, in contrast to Pan, the lifeless idol of the heathen, whose temple was not far away. (Note the living things in Peter’s epistles). There is no attempt to compare Him with others, for this is impossible if He is the Son of God. It is sad, however, to hear Peter putting Christ on a level with Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration, 17:4.

If he had answered, “Thou art the Son of Man”, he would have been right in one sense, but it would not be appropriate here. As the Son of God the Lord Jesus shares the nature of God in all its aspects. He possesses the very life of God, and is also the perfect expression of it, whether in eternity, 1 John 1:2, when He was here, John 1:14, or currently, Colossians 2:9. Those who in this age believe in Him, share that life, and hence, as living stones, are built up on Him the living stone, the Son of the living God.

16:17
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.

And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona- a reference back to John 1:42, “Thou art Simon the son of Jona. Thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, a stone”. He would later write of coming to Christ as a living stone, and being built up a spiritual house, 1 Peter 2:4,5. The Hebrew word for son comes from the word to build, for a man’s house, or family, was built up by sons. (See Exodus 1:21, where God blessed the midwives with children, or “built them houses”).

For flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee- Peter had not “received by tradition from the fathers”, 1 Peter 1:18.

But my Father which is in heaven- as already indicated, the name Simon means “hearing”, so Peter has listened to the word from the Father as He spoke in Christ. As He had said, “He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me”, John 5:24. The Father spoke in the Son, so to hear the Son’s word with faith, was to believe on the Father, the particular word in question being on the subject of His Deity.

Other indications of this are as follows: “My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me”, John 7:16. “Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me”, John 6:45. “God…hath spoken unto us in his Son”, Hebrews 1:2.

So the means by which Peter heard is available to us now in the written scriptures. It is not that Peter had a private message from the Father, coming only to him. What he heard was from the lips of Christ, and now that His words have been written down, all have access to this word of the Father too. Even though the Father is in heaven, the word has come to men through Christ who came down from heaven to bring it near.

16:18
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.

And I say also unto thee- not “I also say”, as if what the Father said is now followed by what the Son says. Rather, it is “but I say also”, so He is continuing to speak for His Father. This indicates the equal authority of Christ, and establishes His authority over the church. It is a big mistake to speak of the church teaching, as is common in Christendom. It is Christ who teaches by the Spirit; the church learns.
That thou art Peter- as interpreted by John l:42, this means a stone. So Peter is distinguished from the rock, but is linked with the idea of a building.
And upon this rock- not “upon thee”, but upon this, that you have just stated, that I am the Son of the living God.

The following points should be borne in mind in connection with this confession by Peter:

1. The truth of the Sonship of Christ is foundational. “Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ”, 1 Corinthians 3:11. (If it is essential that He be the foundation of the local assembly, it is clearly vital that He be the foundation of the whole church).

2. The Rabbis described Abraham as the rock on which the earth was founded, so the idea of a system built upon a person was not foreign to the Jews.

3. The word for Peter is “petros”, a masculine word meaning stone or rock. The word for rock is “petra” a feminine word which always and only means rock. A “petros” takes character from a “petra”, just as believers are said by Peter to be partakers of the Divine nature, (and God Himself is called a Rock in Deuteronomy 32:4,15,18,30,31).

4. Peter would be a poor foundation, since he is called Satan in verse 23. Peter refers to Christ as a Living Stone, and believers as living stones built upon Him, 1 Peter 2:4,5. It is not possible for Peter to be the foundation, and also be built on the foundation.

5. Neither in his speaking or his writing does Peter ever state or even suggest that he is the stone, as the Roman Catholics teach. Some time later, the disciples disputed who should be the greatest among them, but we do not read that Peter settled the matter by referring to the Lord’s words here. So even Peter did not believe he had pre-eminence!

6. Pope Pius 4th decreed that nothing should be taught that “the fathers”, (meaning those of post-apostolic times who were thought of as leaders), are not agreed upon. In fact, they are evenly divided, and Augustine changed his view, and said all should believe what they like about it! The statistics are as follows: 17 of the Fathers said the rock was Peter; 44 said it was Peter’s faith; 16 said the rock was Christ; 8 said that it was all the apostles. By the Pope’s own rule, therefore, it should not be taught that Peter is the rock.
I will build my church- note that this is a future work, for there is no suggestion in Scripture that Old Testament believers are part of the church. The truth regarding the church was a mystery hidden in God, (not even in God’s word), until revealed through the apostle Paul. See notes on Ephesians 3. The verb to build is in that tense which speaks of what is continuous in the future, and does not just refer to stones being built on the Rock at conversion, but also their constant edification, Ephesians 4:12; 2:20. The apostle Paul wrote of the church that it “groweth unto a holy temple in the Lord”, Ephesians 2:21. Evangelists and teachers both build on Christ’s behalf. The word for build is to build a house, so the idea is of a homely place. Note that the Lord Jesus Himself takes full responsibility for the work of building, even though in practice He uses those men that He gives as gifts to edify and build up, Ephesians 4:11-16.
And the gates of hell shall not prevail against it- Christ now has the keys to lock the gate so that no Christian goes to hades, the place of the souls of the dead. Also, He now has the key of death to ensure that every Old Testament believer comes out from there at the appropriate time, Revelation 1:18. The Church’s proper place is in association with Christ in resurrection, and is not an earthly concept at all. It has to do with things before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4, whereas Israel, God’s earthly people, will enter a kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world, Matthew 25:34.
Just as the gates of hell did not prevail against Christ to prevent Him from rising from the dead, so the members of the church are secure from every attempt of the enemy to overcome them. As head of the church the Lord Jesus has ascended up on high, and now leads captive all those forces that could possibly lead His people captive, Ephesians 4:8. He will see to it that the members of the church arrive safely in heaven, with none of the forces of evil able to prevent it. If they cannot prevail in that matter, then certainly they shall not prevail in lesser matters.

16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven- the kingdom of heaven is the sphere of profession, for sons of the kingdom of heaven can be cast out into outer darkness, Matthew 8:11,12, whereas only those born again can enter the kingdom of God; there are no mere professors there, John 3:3,5. Jewish scribes were given a symbolic key when they entered their profession. The Lord referred to this when He said, “Woe unto you lawyers, for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered”, Luke 11:52. “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisee, hypocrites! For ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer them that are entering to go in”, Matthew 23:13.
Peter is given a special role in the matter of entering the kingdom of heaven, for he will be the one to first announce the gospel of God’s grace to both Jews and Gentiles. It is fitting that the one who boldly confesses Christ to be the Son of God should be given this task, for those who enter the kingdom of heaven profess to believe this too. It is fitting that he should not be given the task of admitting to the kingdom of God, for he soon shows his weakness by seeking to prevent Christ going to the cross, verses 21,22.
He will also be the first to lay the doctrinal foundation of Christianity after Pentecost, being given a right perspective on things in view of the change in God’s dealings with men. It is a mistake to think that Peter never really understood the truth of the church. When he writes about “things hard to be understood” in 2 Peter 5:16, he was not telling of his personal difficulty, but that of others.
Peter used one of his keys at Pentecost when he preached to devout Jews, and the other in the house of Cornelius, where he, even though he is the apostle to the circumcision, Galatians 2:8,9, unlocked the door to a Gentile. Paul, the apostle to Gentiles, had passed through Caesarea to go to Tarsus, Acts 9:30, but he was not chosen to go to Cornelius. Even Philip the evangelist, who lived at Caesarea, Acts 8:40, was not used to open the door of faith unto the Gentiles, Acts 14:27. They had not been given the key, but Peter had.
Note that Peter was not given either the keys to heaven, the keys of the kingdom of God, or the keys to the church. It is only the kingdom of heaven, the sphere of profession that he is given authority in. He cannot decide who goes to heaven, nor can he forgive sins, which God alone can do, Luke 5:21,24.

And whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: And whatsoever thou shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven- Peter’s confession was a confession of faith, which all must make if they are to be saved. So as an evangelist, it was Peter’s responsibility to see to it that the truth of the sinfulness of man was impressed upon his hearers, and in this way bind their sins to them, and then tell them the good news of the forgiveness of sins in Christ, and so loose them if they professed to believe. See how he did this in Acts 2:35, where he implies his audience are enemies of Christ, verse 36, that they are guilty of crucifying Him, verse 36 again, and that they need to repent of their sins, verse 38. In this way he bound the sins to the people by his preaching. Then in verse 38 he held out the prospect of the remission of sins, and thus gave them the opportunity of being loosed from their sins.
So also, when he opened the kingdom of heaven to the Gentiles with his other key. He declares that God has appointed Christ to be judge of the living and the dead, Acts 10:42, with its implications with regard to Cornelius’ sins. Then he tells of the possibility of being loosed, as he speaks of the remission of sins in verse 43. The words bound and loosed were used by the rabbis in this way.
Peter’s statement about the Lord Jesus is also a confession of truth, and as a “scribe instructed unto the kingdom of heaven”, Matthew 13:52, and as a steward over his Lord’s household, Luke 12:41-44, (words spoken firstly to Peter), he was to guide the saints into the truth, and as such, must set out what is allowed and what is not. The Lord commanded him with the words “When thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren”, Luke 22:32, and 1 Peter 4:10,11 shows that what the apostles gave were commandments from the Lord Himself. In this context, to bind meant to declare to be binding conduct. To loose meant to release from obligation. In this way, the church is built upon the (doctrinal) foundation of the apostles and prophets, Ephesians 2:20. Notice in that verse how the apostle is quick to add that Jesus Christ is the chief corner stone, holding the whole building together, and giving it alignment.
Because what Peter was doing had Divine permission, then he may be confident that what was bound and loosed by him on earth was endorsed in heaven.

16:20
Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.

Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ- clearly this was a temporary measure, since this was one of the main teachings of the apostles. Peter on the day of Pentecost announced that “God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ”, Acts 2:36. Given that He is rejected by the nation, it was inappropriate to make Him known in His national capacity. Individual faith was still a possibility. We also note that the disciples as a body are addressed now, instead of Peter alone.

(d) Verses 21-23
Declaration about His sufferings

16:21
From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.

From that time forth began Jesus to show unto his disciples- this is consistent with His word to them in the previous verse. The making known for the first time of the truth regarding the church marks a definite stage in the dealings of God, and the Lord must be made known appropriately. He is not Jesus the Messiah to the church, specifically, but Christ the Lord. As Messiah He is king of Israel, as Lord He is head of the church.

How that he must go unto Jerusalem- note the “must” of determination to do God’s will. Jerusalem is the city of the great king, but He goes there to hang upon a cross, not sit upon a throne. It is interesting to notice that Matthew only records the presence of Christ in Jerusalem at His temptation, 4:5. Although qualified to reign by His total refusal of the Devil’s offer, and despite the fact that in His Royal Address in Matthew 5-7 He describes Jerusalem as the city of the great king, Matthew 5:35, (and He is the Great King), He nonetheless only goes to Jerusalem to die. This is all the more noticeable because Luke records the journeys of Christ to Jerusalem as early as chapter 9 of his gospel, and John’s gospel is structured around the Lord’s visits there.

And suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes- those that Peter will later describe as “your rulers”, Acts 3:17, and “you builders”, Acts 4:11. The main opinion-formers and leaders in Israel will reject Him, because they prefer human wisdom to Divine revelation. The elders would correspond, perhaps, to the idea of king, (elders would make decisions in the gate, like Absalom of old, who sat in the gate and turned the hearts of the people against David, 2 Samuel 15:1-6). Chief priests would seek to maintain the Levitical order, and the scribes would correspond to the prophets.

And be killed- that He would be killed would make many think that He was not, after all, the true Messiah. In fact, such scriptures as Isaiah 53 would show that He who suffered and died, was the root out of a dry ground, the root of David.
Note the violence of the language- “killed”, a deliberate, cold-blooded outrage upon justice and decency. They killed the prince of life and desired a murderer instead. Jacob had prophesied that the descendants of Levi would slay a man, and so it came to pass, Genesis 49:6.

And be raised again the third day- the Divine response to the killing is the raising. By prophesying these things, the Lord is putting His reputation as a “man that hath told you the truth” to the test. The mark of a prophet sent from God is that his words come true, Deuteronomy 18:15-19, Acts 3:22,23. It is a short-term prophecy, so it is easy to see whether it comes to pass. If such prophecies were fulfilled, (and the Lord made several just prior to His death), then the long-term prophecies such as are found in Matthew 24 will also come to pass.

16:22
Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.

Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke Him, saying, Be it far from thee Lord- perhaps feeling some special authority was his since he had been given great responsibilities in verse 19, Peter acts in typically hasty manner. Instead of taking in the truths being unfolded about Christ’s death and resurrection, he seeks to prevent their fulfilment. Filled with Jewish feelings about the Messiah, he thinks only in terms of a Messianic reign. We can understand him wanting to save the Lord pain, but to rebuke Him was to go much too far.

This shall not be unto thee- his determination was still strong in Gethsemane, where he used a sword to try to prevent the arrest. We must beware of zeal that is not in company with knowledge, Romans 10:2; 1 Timothy 1:13. Little did he realise that he was seeking to frustrate the sovereign will of God, which he himself will call “the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God”, Acts 2:23.

Thankfully his zeal was channelled into righteous actions after Pentecost. Even though he was led on that occasion to quote a passage which spoke of the Day of the Lord, with its warnings of judgment, he quoted it only to speak of salvation, Acts 2:16-21.

16:23
But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

But he turned, and said unto Peter- by physically turning, the Lord confronted Peter personally, looking him in the eye, so to speak, and thus spoke directly to him, and not to the others.

Get thee behind me, Satan, thou art an offence unto me- Peter was no doubt taken aback by this stern rebuke. When the Devil sought worship from Christ, he was dismissed immediately, lest anything come between the Lord Jesus and His Father, whom He set always before His face, which was why He was not moved away from God’s will, Psalm 16:8. Peter is seeking to hinder Christ’s progress to the cross by placing the stumblingblock of Jewish prejudice in the way. In fact, he himself was the offence, or stumblingblock. Compare Peter’s reference to Christ in 1 Peter 2:8 as a rock of offence, “petra skandalon”. There the person of Christ offends Israel because He is not what they expected.

Note that whereas in verse 18 Peter is addressed as one who is a stone, now he is a stumblingblock. This shows the folly of thinking that Peter is the rock foundation of the church. This lesson is reinforced by the fact that the Lord calls him Satan.

For thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men- note that men, even believers, when they act contrary to God’s will, are doing the Devil’s work, for Peter is governed by Jewish thoughts, yet is addressed as Satan, for the Lord pinpoints the source of the evil. Savour means to mind, regard, to take a side; “Thou art on man’s side, not God’s”.

For centuries Satan had sought to prevent the birth of Christ by seeking to destroy the line of the Seed of the Woman. Having failed in this, he sought to prevent the Lord’s death as the prophets had foretold it. They had said He would be crucified, but Satan tried to use Herod’s sword at His birth, a suicide-strategy in the temptation, (“cast thyself down”), the sheer drop from the cliff at Nazareth, (in which case His bones would be broken), the storm on the lake, (so that His grave would be unknown), the stones of His enemies, (again involving the breaking of bones), the sword of a different Herod at His trial, the scheme of Pilate to allow the Jews to execute Him by stoning, and the scourging by Pilate. All these would have meant either that His bones would be broken, or He would not be pierced, or His grave would be unknown.

(e) Verses 24-28
Denial of self

16:24
Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.

Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me- when He has shown that the cross and suffering are definitely ahead, then the call to discipleship can be issued. A true disciple will count the cost before he sets out, Luke 14:25-35. “Will” speaks of desire, not simply a future event. Those who follow Christ must be aware that He was given a cross, and they might be given the same.

Let him deny himself- nothing must stand in the way of this commitment. Self is a major obstacle to full devotion.

And take up his cross and follow me- the cross of Christ is unique, but the true follower will not shrink from fellowship with Christ in the rejection the cross represents. In this way His cross becomes ours. Needless to say this cross is not a physical piece of wood, but a doctrine. The teaching regarding the cross is brought out in Paul’s epistles. For instance, Galatians 1:20, “I am crucified with Christ”; Romans 6:6, “Our old man was crucified with Christ”; Galatians 5:24, “They that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh”; Galatians 6:14, “The cross…by which the world is crucified to me, and I unto the world”.

16:25
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.

For whosoever will save his life shall lose it- the word for life is soul, the person. To save one’s person is to live for self, and is the opposite of denying self. The cross puts an end to self. The believer who lives for self is not living for the Lord, and will find in the day of assessment that he has nothing to be rewarded for. His life will have been wasted and lost. This has nothing to do with losing salvation, which can never happen to a true believer, but it has everything to do with losing reward.

And whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it- to lose life is to give up one’s own interests in favour of Christ’s. Note it must be “for my sake”, not with the thought of gaining merit, and certainly not as a form of penance, that neglecting of the body which is condemned in Colossians 2:23, and which in fact is satisfying to the flesh, as that verse says.

At the Judgment Seat of Christ the life lived for Christ will be found in the form of reward, and at Christ’s appearing it will be found in the form of glory for the One who made it possible, and for the enjoyment of life in the kingdom. Compare 1 Peter 1:7, “found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ”. Then, “Whom having not seen (as He will be when He comes to earth), ye love”. Love to Christ will displace love for self.

16:26
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?

For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Such an one will “find” nothing at the end of a life seeking gain for himself. In the light of eternity, to gain everything material is to lose an eternal reward. See Philippians 3:7, where the apostle testifies “What things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ”.

Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? As a man looks back over a wasted life, (even if he has gained the whole world), he realises that all he has accumulated is not enough to buy back lost opportunities. In Ephesians 5:16, the apostle exhorts us to be “redeeming the time, for the days are evil”, or if we may take the liberty of paraphrasing, “take the hours of the day to the marketplace and sell to the highest bidder, thus putting a high value on them, for days spent as the world spends them are evil and worthless”. How important it is to live in the light of eternity, for the things of time and sense are not lasting, and will not profit spiritually the one occupied with them.

16:27
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.

For the Son of Man shall come- here the Lord looks on to the day when He does come to reign, and when His followers shall be with Him, and when He shall be glorified in His saints, 2 Thessalonians 1:10. The degree He is glorified then will be the degree we have denied ourselves in favour of His interests now.

In the glory of his Father with his angels- only those things which glorify Christ can be associated with the glory of His Father, and be on display in that day. Other things will have been burnt up. His angels excel in strength and fly swiftly to do heaven’s bidding, and this zeal should mark the believer. The angels will have certain duties to perform at His coming, such as the reaping of the harvest of the earth, Revelation 14:15-19, the gathering of God’s elect from the four quarters of the earth, Matthew 24:31, and the division between the good and the bad among men, to determine whether they go into the kingdom or not, Matthew 13:49,50.

And then shall he reward every man according to his works- reward means recompense. The self-denial has meant hardship, and in the day of glory this will be compensated for. Note that denying self is not a negative thing, for it produces works. For church saints, the reward will, in part, consist of responsibility in the kingdom. The rewards will be granted at the judgment seat of Christ, but those that involve responsibilities in the kingdom will be reserved to be discharged when the kingdom is set up.

16:28
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.

Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom- this is a reference to the vision seen on the holy mount, described by Matthew in the next chapter, which confirmed the Old Testament prophecies, 2 Peter 1:16. Note that the preview of the kingdom is given after the revelation about the church, to assure us that the church does not replace the kingdom. The “some” referred to were Peter, James and John. Since the coming kingdom is sure, then living for Christ now is very worthwhile. The more we live for Him now, the more He will be glorified in a day to come.

EPHESIANS 5

 

EPHESIANS 5

Survey of chapters 4-6
Having given us in chapters 1-3 the explanation of the purpose of God, the apostle Paul now gives in chapters 4-6 exhortation concerning the believer’s walk. That is, the way he progresses through this world under the eye of both God and men. This falls into seven parts, and in each case some aspect of the example of Christ is before us:

1. In 4:1-16 the example is “the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”. In other words, the whole range of Christ’s graces and virtues. This is summed up in the expression “perfect man”, verse 13.

2. In 4:17-32 the example is Christ as the one who replaces Adam as head, and who brings in new things. Here the expression is “the new man”, verse 24.

3. In 5:1-7 the example is Christ in sacrificial love at Calvary, verse 2. He is the surrendered man.

4. In 5:8-21 the example is Christ as the light we should follow. He is the stimulating man, stirring those who are drowsy, verse 14.

5. In 5:22-33 the example is Christ as the Saviour of the body, and there He is the self-less man, nourishing and cherishing His own.

6. In 6:1-9 the example is Christ in relation to others. As a child He was subject; He fathered His disciples, displaying the love of the Father to them, John 15:9, and calling them “children”, John 21:5; He served His Father well, and He was a righteous Master to His disciples. In other words, He was the socially-responsible man.

7. In 6:10-24 the example is Christ in His conflict with the enemy. We are to be strong “in the Lord”, recognising, and imitating, the way He battled with the Devil, and conquered. In this He is the strong and steadfast man.

With this seven-fold aspect of the example of Christ before us, should we not be motivated to walk in ways that please God, and that fulfil His eternal purpose for us?

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-7 We are to walk in love, as Christ loved us
(b) Verses 8-21 We are to walk as children of light, being “light in the Lord”
(c) Verses 22-33 Wives are to be in submission to their husbands, and husbands are to act like Christ towards them

(a) Verses 1-7
We are to walk in love, as Christ loved us.

5:1
Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children;

Be ye therefore followers of God- the “therefore” reminds us that the apostle always presents a logical argument to us, for God graciously tells us the reasons behind what He requires of us. We are pointed back to 4:32, where we are reminded that God has forgiven us for Christ’s sake. We are to imitate that characteristic of God, and forgive one another as God has forgiven us. The fact that it was for Christ’s sake assures us that His forgiveness is conditioned by who and what Christ is. Since He is righteous, then forgiveness must be on a righteous basis, and not on the basis of sentiment. The word of the Lord Jesus was, “If he repent, forgive him”, Luke 17:3,4. It is unrighteous to forgive an unrepentant person. God does not do it, and nor should we.

As dear children- as the children of God we share the life of God, which expresses itself in light and love. Love, for the believer, is the expression of the life of God within. And that love is directed towards others who are born of God, for “every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him”, 1 John 5:1. But we are dear children, not just children. It is possible that there are fathers who do not love their children, but our God is not like that. It is possible that there are children who do not appreciate that they are loved of their father, and we should not be like that. His known and appreciated love towards us should be a powerful stimulus to love fellow-believers, and to forgive them if they sin against us.

5:2
And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour.

And walk in love- the attitude of loving forgiveness the apostle has been encouraging in verse 1, is not to be a passing phase. It is a walk, a life-time’s occupation and endeavour. This demands a high level of commitment, so we are now reminded of Christ’s attitude, so that we may have His example before us constantly.

As Christ also hath loved us- there has been a truly convincing demonstration of Divine love in what the Saviour did at Calvary. Of course He still loves His own, but the apostle is concerned about His never-to-be-forgotten display of love at Calvary. This is additional to the love of God towards us in forgiveness, 4:32, hence the “also”.

And hath given himself for us- He did not love in word and tongue only, but in deed and in truth, 1 John 3:18. There could be no greater surrender than that of Christ as He undertook to be the sacrifice that would bring us into acceptance and harmony with God. True love always delights to go to the limit, and this is perfectly demonstrated at Calvary. His was not a theoretical love, but very practical; and so should ours be.

An offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour- the offerings detailed in Leviticus chapters 1-7 are divided into those of a sweet smelling savour, and those not. The latter are the sin and trespass offerings. Clearly, then, the apostle is thinking of the burnt offering, the meal offering, and the peace offering. These arose to God as a sweet savour, a foretaste of Calvary, when His Son would give body and substance to the shadows. The burnt offering aspect of His work brings us into acceptance, and Ephesians 1:6 has told us we are accepted in the Beloved. The meal offering was brought by a man in the good of the burnt offering, and told of one whose life was at the disposal of God. This was true of Christ, and should also be true of believers; we should “lay down our lives for the brethren”, 1 John 3:16. The man who brought his peace offering also did so because he was in harmony with God through the burnt offering. So Christ, the man pre-eminently in harmony with God in every sense, sacrificed His own interests for the sake of ours, and gave Himself at Calvary. We who are thereby at peace with God should be at peace with our fellow-believers, for the peace offering was a fellowship offering, shared with others.

When Noah emerged onto a new and cleansed earth after the flood, the first thing he did was to offer a sacrifice of a sweet savour. The stench of sin had been purged away by the waters, and now the air is fragrant with that which delighted God, for we read that when Noah made his sacrifice, “the Lord smelled a sweet savour”, Genesis 8:21. So the apostle is careful to mention the fragrance of the offering of Christ, for he is going on to write about that which is a stench in God’s nostrils, the false and spurious love of the men of the world.

5:3
But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints;

But fornication- the “but” signals that we are about to be reminded of that which is not pleasing to God, although it might be pleasing to men. There is a great contrast here with Christ’s selfless love. Ephesus was a city devoted to the goddess Diana, see Acts 19:27. As such, it was given over to licentious and depraved behaviour. And this was made all the worse because it was in the name of their goddess. Vice in the name of religion is the worst vice. Many of the believers in the assembly may have been involved in this before conversion, and certainly they had lived in an atmosphere polluted by depravity. They may have become used to this, and thought it to be normal. Now they are saved, however, their attitude should be radically different, and what was perhaps normal to them before must now be seen to be totally abnormal, and abhorrent to God.

Fornication is any illicit sexual activity, the all-embracing term for immoral physical activity, hence the apostle does not say “all fornication”, as he says “all uncleanness”, for uncleanness has various manifestations, whereas the word fornication itself takes in every sort of manifestation.

Adultery, on the other hand, is immoral behaviour on the part of two persons, one or both of whom may be married to someone else. Note the way in which the two terms are distinguished by the Lord Jesus in Matthew 19:9.

And all uncleanness- a contrast with the sweet smelling savour of Christ’s sacrifice. If fornication is the actual immoral act, then uncleanness is the thought that led to the act. Physical uncleanness can be a sign of moral pollution, but it is the latter that is in view here. Just as physical dirtiness means an ill-savour, so mental dirtiness does too. It is a stench in God’s nostrils. When the Ephesian idolaters boasted of their fame, they said that the city of the Ephesians “is a worshipper of the great goddess Diana”, Acts 19:31. Literally translated, the word “worshipper” is “temple-sweeper”. In other words, such was their devotion to Diana, that the whole city was prepared to sweep the temple courts for her. No amount of sweeping will do away with moral pollution, however, and of that in Diana’s courts there was plenty. The answer to uncleanness is the “washing of regeneration”, Titus 3:5.

Or covetousness- a great contrast with Christ generously giving Himself at Calvary. This may be taken as a general warning about covetousness, but in the context it would refer to the coveting of another man’s wife, or the coveting of an attractive woman’s body. This attitude of mind which views and covets from afar, leads to the uncleanness the apostle speaks of, and then results in the actual immoral act. Elsewhere the apostle writes, “covetousness which is idolatry”, Colossians 3:5, but there it is the general idea of longing for that which will take the place of God in our thoughts. Here the thought is more limited.

Let it not be once named among you- let your name never have to be read out in the assembly as one who has been disciplined for immoral behaviour. The demand is very strict, for not once is a charge of fornication, uncleanness or covetousness to be laid against any believer. The difference between the assembly at Ephesus and the city of Ephesus must be clear-cut. One manifestation of these sins is one too many.

As becometh saints- the word saint was used in secular society for one who was dedicated to the gods. This no doubt was true of many in the assembly before they were saved. Now they are dedicated to the true God, but their behaviour must match their position before Him. The first word of the verse has reminded us of this, and now it is reinforced. We should distinguish between the lapses of verses 3 and 4, and the lifestyle of verse 5.

5:4
Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks.

Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting- these are things that condition people to sin, and lead to the sins of verse 3. Filthiness is obscenity, foolish talking is “the talk of fools, which is foolishness and sin together”, and jesting is coarse joking.

Which are not convenient- that is, not suitable behaviour for those who have known the true and pure love of Christ, and who have a duty to show it to others.

But rather giving of thanks- this is the proper alternative. The three things at the beginning of the verse lead to the sins of verse 3, whereas giving of thanks is the outcome of verse 2. One version of the peace offering was a sacrifice of thanksgiving, Leviticus 7:12.

5:5
For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God.

For this ye know, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person- in verse 3 the emphasis was on the sins of these people, but here it is on the sinner himself. Sins may be forgiven on repentance, but an unrepentant sinner will have no portion in heaven, for “there shall in no wise enter into it anything that defileth”, Revelation 21:27.

Nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God note that a covetous man, because he has elevated the material and visible to prominence, has displaced God, and is therefore an idolater. No man can serve two masters…ye cannot serve God and Mammon”, Matthew 6:24. A person may have two employers at once, for neither can make an absolute claim over his life, but no slave, whose master did have absolute claim, could serve anyone else. So covetous men cannot serve God, and so are banned from any portion in God’s inheritance, for those living there will serve Him eternally. They preferred the material in time, they will be deprived of the spiritual in eternity. They preferred an earthly portion, they will have no heavenly one. Note that it is the kingdom of Christ and God, for they have common ownership. This is to be distinguished from the kingdom of heaven, which consists of all who have professed faith in Christ, some of whom might not be genuine. See Mathew 13:24-30, Luke 13:22-30.

5:6
Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience.

Let no man deceive you with vain words- vain or empty words are teachings which do not produce the walk in love that verse 2 encourages. The false teachers were saying these sins did not matter, (compare the attitude of some in Corinth who made light of sin, 1 Corinthians 5). Some false teachers even said that we should sin more so that God can show His grace more, see Romans 6:1. The next phrase, about the wrath of God, shows sins do matter.

For because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience- the last expression expresses the idea of character. In Colossians 3 the apostle shows that since we shall be coming with Christ when He returns to the earth to take His kingdom, it is inconsistent for us to be engaged now in the things that He will judge then. The sense of the word “cometh” is that it is already on its way.

We should be marked by obedience, as God’s dear children. The great love of Christ for His Father resulted in Him obeying even to the extent of the death of the cross, Philippians 2:8, so “let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus”, Philippians 2:5.

5:7
Be not ye therefore partakers with them.

Be not ye therefore partakers with them- believers will not partake of the wrath that sinners shall know, (Romans 5:9), but they are able to partake of the conduct which marks unbelievers now. The sweet-smelling sacrifice of verse 2 reminds us that the peace offering was one that the offerer could share in, feeding upon a portion of it, while the rest gave God pleasure as it burned upon the altar. Believers are able to share in God’s enjoyment of Christ’s loving sacrifice, and therefore should not have any desire to share with unbelievers in their sinful ways.

(b) Verses 8-21
We are to walk as children of light, being “light in the Lord”.

Structure of the section

Verses 8-10 Reproducing the light
Verses 11-13 Reproving the darkness
Verses 14-17 Reviving the light-giving
Verses 18-20 Rejoicing in the Lord

Verses 8-10
Reproducing the light

5:8
For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord: walk as children of light:

For ye were sometimes darkness, but now are ye light in the Lord- the word “for” links back to the previous section, and gives an added reason to walk in the pathway set out for us in eternity, 2:10. We were not simply in the darkness of ignorance, 4:18, but that darkness had so affected us that we had taken on its character, and could be said to be darkness itself. This reminds of the change in verses 3-5 from the list of sins in verses 3 and 4, and the man who commits the sins in verse 5. The dark deeds have changed him into darkness in the sense that he is unble to distance himself from his sins.

A great change has come about, however, and now believers are so affected by the light of God’s glory and truth that they can be said to be light, but only because they are in the Lord, reckoned by God to have moved from the kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of His dear Son, Colossians 1:13. The Lord Jesus exhorted His hearers, “While ye have light, believe in the light, that ye may be the children of light”, John 12:36. The light they have must be the light they show.

But now are ye light in the Lord- the light of the gospel has “shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of God in the face of Jesus Christ”, 2 Corinthians 4:6. So the light shines into the heart, and then it is to be given out to others. In the beginning God commanded the light to shine out of darkness, and the apostle implies that letting the light shine from our hearts is a command for those who have submitted to His lordship.

Walk as children of light- the logical outcome of this is that we walk, or conduct our lives, in accordance with the light that we have received, so that principle becomes practice, and standing becomes state. As those who are born of God we have the capacity and opportunity to reproduce the life of God. And since God is light, we should shine as light. The love of verse 1 expresses itself in the grace, kindness, forgiveness, giving, and sacrifice of verses 1-7. The light of verse 8 expresses itself in the truth, righteousness, holiness, and judgement of verses 8-20.

5:9
(For the fruit of the Spirit is in all goodness and righteousness and truth;)

(For the fruit of the Spirit- only by the power of the Spirit of God can the light of the glory of God be translated into acceptable behaviour, as verse 8 exhorts us it should. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty to express the light as found in Christ, 2 Corinthians 3:17-4:6. We shall recognise when this has happened when goodness, righteousness and truth are in evidence in our lives. Plants do not flourish in the dark, much less produce fruit to the glory of our Father, see John 15:8. One of the reasons why Christ was rejected was that His holy life condemned the lives of men, who refused to come to the light lest their deeds should be reproved, John 3:20.

In the beginning God made each plant so that it had seed in itself, ensuring that whatever the nature of the plant, it could reproduce itself and be fruitful, Genesis 1:11. Believers are children of the light, and have the capacity to reproduce that light-nature in the form of goodness and righteousness and truth.

The lampstand in the tabernacle was in effect a golden almond tree, and had decorations in the form of buds, indicating life, flowers, indicating beauty, and almonds, indicating fruitfulness. The golden almond tree was supplied by the fruit of the olive tree, the symbol of the Holy Spirit. The fruit of the Spirit can only be produced by His agency.

Is in all goodness and righteousness and truth- the fruit of the Spirit is expressed in these virtues, and we should demonstrate all of them to the fullest possible extent. Evil deeds, unrighteousness and error are expressions of darkness, and we should distance ourselves from them. The perfect demonstration of these virtues is, of course, in Christ. He “went about doing good”, Acts 10:38; He is “Jesus Christ the Righteous”, 1 John 2:1; He described Himself as “a man that hath told you the truth”, John 8:40. The glory of God is seen in the face, (that is, the person) of Jesus Christ, and as we behold Him, we are enabled to “show forth the praises of him who hath called us out of darkness into his marvellous light”, 1 Peter 2:9.

5:10
Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord.

Proving what is acceptable unto the Lord- that which is well-pleasing to the Lord, (the beauty of the almond, see previous verse), will be in evidence in the life of the one who is a child of the light. The proving is done before we act, not after, see Romans 12:1,2. By taking note of the negative example of the world, and the positive example of Christ on earth, we may shine as lights in the world, Philippians 2:15. We may be sure that what He did is acceptable.

Verses 11-13
Reproving the darkness

5:11
And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them.

And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness- no fellowship. The first way of reproving the works of darkness is by not having any sort of fellowship with them. Abraham was more effective for God in relation to Sodom as he stood outside and prayed, than Lot was as he sat inside at the place of influence. “God remembered Abraham, and sent Lot out of the midst of the overthrow”, Genesis 19:29.

But rather reprove them- no compromise. The second way of reproving them is to speak against them. It is not enough to simply stand apart; we must be active in reproof. This is not necessarily by word, but can be by deed. We could think of John the Baptist before Herod, and the way in which Herod was “reproved by him for Herodias his brother Philip’s wife, and for all the evils which Herod had done”, Luke 3:19. Then there was Paul before Felix, “And as he reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgement to come, Felix trembled”, Acts 24:25. But the prime example must be the Lord Jesus Himself before His accusers. Sometimes the reproof was by word, sometimes by silence, as we see from the following:

Reproof by speech:

1. He reproved the high priest by implication for not listening to His teaching, for He spoke openly, often in the temple courts, John 18:19-21.

2. When asked if He was the Son of God, He answered in the affirmative, and then informed the high priest of the consequence of this, namely, that He would come to judge, Matthew 26:64. His right to judge is vested in His Deity, John 5:22, as well as because He is Son of Man, verse 27.

3. He rebuked Pilate with the words, “Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice”, John 18:37. This implied Pilate was not open to the truth.

4. When Pilate claimed to have power over Him to either crucify or release Him, Jesus rebuked him, saying “Thou couldest have no power at all against me, except it were given thee from above: therefore he that delivered me to thee, hath the greater sin”, John 19:11. This is a rebuke not only to Pilate for thinking that he had ultimate power, but also for Caiaphas who, as the high priest, should have been in touch with God, and therefore should have welcomed His Son, and not delivered Him to the authorities to be crucified.

Reproof by silence:

1. He did not respond when the high priest appealed to the testimony of the false witnesses, Matthew 26:63. He does not sanction dishonesty, for He is “Jesus Christ the righteous”, 1 John 2:1.

2. He refused to answer when the high priest acted as both judge and witness, Matthew 27:12. He had no legal obligation to respond in that situation. It was also illegal to try to make an accused person condemn Himself.

3. He remained silent throughout His examination before Herod, Luke 23:9. This was a strong rebuke of Herod’s treatment of John the Baptist.

4. He answered nothing when Pilate referred to the accusations of the high priest, Mark 15:3-5. This was a rebuke to Pilate for allowing faulty and flimsy evidence to carry weight.

5. He answered nothing when Pilate questioned Him again about His kingship, John 19:8,9. This was for two reasons. First, He had already answered the question in a previous interview. Second, Pilate had scourged Him, an act that was only supposed to be carried out on a guilty man. But Pilate had pronounced Him innocent, John 18:38, and then scourged Him as if guilty, 19:1.

5:12
For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret.

For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret- no mention. Just as foolish talking and jesting can lead to involvement in the sins of men that are contrary to light, verses 3,4, so speaking of the dark deeds of men may result in us imitating them. Our reproof of the sins of men need not involve detailed exploration. We should limit ourselves to what Scripture says, and not pry, nor make it the subject of discussion.

5:13
But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light.

But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light- no substitute. If something is reproved by the light of righteousness, then it is a sure sign that it was of the darkness, and that which reproves it is the light of practical righteousness, goodness and truth that is manifest in the lives of God’s people. If reproof happens, then light has done its work. Nothing else will reprove. The apostles did not set up social programmes, for the light of gospel is enough, preached and practised, to rebuke sin. Politics is of this world, and is not light.

Verses 14-17
Reviving the light-giving

5:14
Wherefore he saith, “Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light”.

Wherefore he saith- we have a nature that still responds to the darkness, hence we need these further exhortations. Paul may be alluding to Isaiah 60:1,2, which reads, “Arise, shine; for thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee. For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth, and gross darkness the people: But the Lord shall arise upon thee, and his glory shall be seen upon thee”. So in a day to come the glory of the Lord, which is expressed in the Messiah, shall shine upon the darkened hearts of the men of Israel, and they shall arise.

However, the correspondence between Isaiah and Paul is very incomplete. Although “wherefore he saith” is used in Ephesians 4:8 to introduce an allusion to a psalm, nonetheless, it is possible that Paul is using the usual formula that prefaces a quote from Scripture to give authority to the statement he himself makes in this verse, albeit one that has echoes of Isaiah 60:1,2. So it may be a form of literary device, to startle us into rousing from sleep by a call from Christ Himself through the apostle.

Awake, thou that sleepest- here is a call to awake from indifference, and to arouse to action. This is very similar to the call in Romans 13:11,12, “And that, knowing the time, that now it is high time to awake out of sleep: for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed. The night is far spent, the day is at hand: let us therefore cast off the works of darkness, and let us put on the armour of light”. In other words, believers in this age are to anticipate what will happen to Israel in the future, and arise from their sleep, and begin to fight with the armour of light. This is not a call to the unsaved, but to sleepy saints, a call to alertness.

And arise- it is one thing to wake up, it is a further thing to actually get up, resolved to act. The prodigal said he would arise, and then he did arise. This is a call to apartness.

From the dead- we can be indistinguishable from the unsaved in our lifestyle. It has been known for soldiers to be on the battlefield surrounded by their dead comrades, and they have saved themselves from being taken prisoner by feigning death. That is understandable behaviour, but in the spiritual warfare with which we are engaged, we need to make sure we are different to those who are dead in trespasses and sins, so that we may have an effectual testimony. Some think they must act like the unsaved in order to reach them. The reverse is the case, for only separated believers have a testimony. Abraham was effective for God because he kept away from Sodom; Lot had no testimony because he was in Sodom.

Christ shall give thee light- now a call to awareness. Christ’s promise was that those who followed Him would not walk in darkness, but would have the light of life, John 8:12. If we would have light on our pathway, then we must follow Him, just as Israel followed the pillar of fire in the wilderness.

5:15
See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise,

See then that ye walk circumspectly- this means to make our way through the world accurately. We shall be enabled to do this if our pathway is lit by the glory of Christ.

Not as fools, but as wise- Christ is made unto us wisdom, 1 Corinthians 1:30, and as a consequence our lives can be marked by righteousness, and sanctification and redemption, which results in freedom. Fools walk in the dark and stumble, John 11:10. This is because they have no light in them, for what the light represents must have its right place in the heart.

5:16
redeeming the time, for the days are evil.

Redeeming the time- we are to go to the market-place every morning, so to speak, and sell the hours of the day to the highest bidder. We may be sure that God will offer the highest price. We would be foolish to accept the lower price the world offers. It is important to redeem the time in this way, for the atmosphere of the world we live in is evil, and day to day they rebel against God, and we can easily forget our obligations in this situation.

5:17
Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is.

Wherefore be ye not unwise- lacking in light from the Lord.

But understanding what the will of the Lord is- having proved it by watching His life. It is as we present our bodies a living sacrifice, are not conformed to this world, are transformed by the renewing of the mind, that we are in a position to prove what the will of the Lord is in any situation, Romans 12:1-3.

Verses 18-20
Expression of true joy

5:18
And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit;

And be not drunk with wine- having exhorted the believers to be alert and wise, the apostle now warns against that which will cloud the mind and spoil the testimony of those who are to be light-givers in the world. There is no outright prohibition of drinking wine in the New Testament. The Lord Jesus must surely have drunk wine at the wedding feast in Cana. He would not have turned the water into wine if He disapproved of drinking wine. It was customary for the wedding-guests to supply provisions as gifts for the newly weds, and this was His gift. He instituted the Lord’s Supper with the commodities available at the Passover Supper, and spoke of not drinking again of the fruit of the vine until the kingdom, Luke 22:18, strongly implying that what He had just drunk was the fruit of the vine. And even if we do not accept this implication, then He certainly envisages drinking the fruit of the vine in the kingdom.

The apostle Paul exhorted Timothy to no longer drink water, but to “use a little wine for thy stomach’s sake, and thine often infirmities”, 1 Timothy 5:23. Notice it is “use” not “drink”. The word “use” has the idea of that which is necessary; so this is not drinking for social purposes but medical. The water supply in many parts was not safe, and it was best to drink that which had no water in it. Nowadays in the modern world, there is no problem with the water, so even this medical use is not needed. For the sake of the testimony it is best if believers abstain wholly from alcohol, one of the reasons being given in the next phrase.

Wherein is excess- there is no doubt a reference to the Baccanalian Feasts here, that would be held in Ephesus in honour of Bacchus, the god of wine. The word “excess” is connected with the word for prodigal, who engaged in riotous living. He had to come to himself, showing that his behaviour was not under control. This is the depth of excess to which wine-drinking can so easily lead, and so abstention is the best policy.

But be filled with the Spirit- instead of being under the stupifying and evil influence of intoxicating drink, the believer is to be influenced wholly by the Spirit of God. This will mean He will be in control, not wine.

When the Holy Spirit came at Pentecost, we read that the disciples were all “filled with the Holy Spirit”, Acts 2:4. When the Samaritans believed, they “received the Holy Spirit”, Acts 8:17. When Cornelius and his friends believed, they “received the Holy Spirit”, Acts 10:47. When the disciples of John at Ephesus believed, “the Holy Spirit came upon them”, Acts 19:6. These are synonymous terms, so to receive the Holy Spirit is to be filled with the Holy Spirit. And to be filled is not a subsequent event.

The Holy Spirit is a Divine person, and therefore we cannot have part of Him, for He is indivisible. If He indwells a person, that person cannot be anything other than filled with Him, for He cannot be restricted to part of us. So why does Paul exhort us to be filled? For the simple reason that he is always exhorting believers to be in practice what they are in principle. So the exhortation is not “get filled”, but rather, “be in practice what you are in principle, namely, filled with the Spirit”.

5:19
Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord;

Speaking to yourselves- drunken feasts are an uproar, but this is calm and controlled, as befits the one who is praised by the singing. Much of what passes for praise in the religious world is simply and only worldliness, whether it be the dreary drone of the chant, or the frenzied “praise service” which bears more resemblance to a rock concert than anything else. Those with spiritual discernment will soon recognise how God-dishonouring such practices are.

Notice that the songs should speak. In other words, they should have spiritual and meaningful content. True believers will not be satisfied with the mindless repetition of meaningless catch-phrases. Nor should they be satisfied with singing songs that contain error. The parallel passage in Colossians 3:16 reads, “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another; in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord”. So there is a vital connection between teaching and singing, even if we retain the punctuation as in the Authorised Version.

The fact that the songs are spoken allows for the situation where it would be dangerous to sing. Those who meet in secret for fear of their lives may still praise God with songs that they speak quietly amongst themselves.

Notice, too, that the songs are “to yourselves”. In other words, all participate; they are not entertained by a choir. The idea of a group of singers introduces Judaism into the situation, for that is a relic from temple-times, when Levites worshipped on behalf of the people. Now every true believer is a priest, and needs not others to worship for him.

The songs are “to yourselves”, showing that it is not singing to the unsaved that is in view. It is doubtful whether the apostles would have sanctioned the current format of gospel meetings, which is really modelled on the religious services in Christendom, and is evidence that we have not broken free from all the trappings of Judaism.

In psalms and hymns and spiritual songs- this may well be a three-fold description of every hymn, rather than three sorts of hymn. A psalm is praise to God, an expression of thankfulness for His works. A hymn is expressly a song to God, and not to man, and an expression of worship. Spiritual songs emphasises the character of what is sung, that it is spiritual in nature, having no likeness to the songs of the drunkard.

Singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord- singing needs more effort than speaking, and so shows enthusiasm. There was singing in the upper room after the Lord Jesus had instituted the Lord’s Supper, so the setting aside of the Passover did not involve the setting aside of singing.

Making melody- suggests that we should sing with intelligence. Those who are able to harmonise acceptably should feel free to do so. The one setting the tune should also do so with feeling for the hymn being sung. It is not appropriate to sing a serious hymn to a jolly tune, nor vice versa.

In your heart- singing should spring from love to the Lord, not mere love of singing.

To the Lord- so hymns are not for the benefit of the ones singing, but to the glory of God and His Son.

5:20
Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ;

Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father- none have such reason to be thankful as those who believe in Christ, for they have been brought into the highest blessing, as the first chapter of the epistle has explained. But also, they are constantly the objects of the powerful interventions of their God, and the loving interventions of that same God as their Father. So whether it be blessings for eternity, or blessing for life now, we have much to be thankful for, and we should express that thanks “always”. See Hebrews 13:15.

In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ- this would indicate that the giving of thanks is not a reference exactly to hymn-singing, but praying. Our Lord Jesus Christ, (the fuller title reminding us of the fullness of His person), is the mediator of all spiritual good, and nothing we have is apart from His doing. As we give thanks to our Father in His name, we signify that we recognise our indebtedness to Christ, for the thanksgiving rises to God in all the virtue of the name of His Son, and is therefore accepted in heaven.

5:21
Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God.

Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God- having been exhorted in verse 18 to be filled with the Spirit, they are to express that in a five-fold way, so there is to be speaking, singing, making melody, giving thanks, and now, in this verse, submitting. We are to follow the example of Christ, who subjected Himself to His Father’s will completely. If we fear God, then we shall not push ourselves forward to gain prominence and prestige.

This verse forms a bridge between the general call to submit to one another, and the next verse down to 6:9 where three categories of believers are singled out for instruction in this matter. This involves three aspects of life on the earth, life as husbands and wives, life as children and parents, life as servants and masters, as follows:

5:22-33 Submission of wives
6:1-4 Submission of children
6:5-9 Submission of servants

But there are exhortations for husbands, fathers and masters too.

Special note on headship
It might be helpful, before we look at the next verses, to note the various ways head-ship is manifested according to Scripture, because submission, (the subject of 5:22-6:9), is linked to headship, which involves authority and intelligent control.

Headship in Scripture:
Authority and intelligent control

1. God is exalted head over all, 1 Chronicles 29:11.

This is the standard. He is the originator of the principle, and the supreme and perfect example of head-ship. All other manifestations take their character from this.

2. The head of Christ is God, 1 Corinthians 11:3.

When He came into manhood, the Lord Jesus took the place as man under the head-ship of God. This is part of His great stoop in humility. He demonstrated the perfect model of subjection, thus showing that it not an inferior position, for He is equal with God. So the Godhead is the prime example of headship, whereas Christ in His manhood is the prime example of subjection for us.

3. Christ is head of the body, the church, Colossians 1:18.

By virtue of His death, burial, resurrection and ascension, Christ has been exalted as a man to the highest place of authority. His people are linked to Him in this exaltation, being quickened and raised with Him, and seated in Him in heavenly places. This link with Him is two-fold. First, it is a work of God. He associates with the Lord in this way those who believe. And second, because the Spirit of God has been sent down from heaven to baptise all of God’s people of this present age into one body, 1 Corinthians 12:13, thus linking them permanently with the head in heaven. The metaphor of the physical head and its relationship to the human body is used by the apostle Paul to illustrate the relationship between Christ and His people.

4. Christ is the head of the church, Ephesians 5:23.

This is slightly different to No. 3 inasmuch as Christ is not expressly said in this verse to be the head of the body. The emphasis here is on a company that has an intelligent will of its own, and that will, ideally, is subject to Christ. Even a healthy human body has not a will of its own; it must take directions from its head.

5. Christ is head of all principality and power, Colossians 1:10.

It is re-affirmed here that Christ is head of the angel host. He is not linked to them in head/body terms, but nonetheless is over them with authority. This was true of Him as one with the Godhead, but it is also true of Him as an exalted man.

6. Christ is head over all things to the church, anticipatively, Ephesians 1:22.

In a day to come the Lord Jesus is going to be in control of everything in both heaven and earth. The church is the only company that recognises this at the moment, so He is head over all things as far as the church is concerned.

7. Christ will be head over all things, Ephesians 1:10 manifestly.

This is the mystery of God’s will. It was not evident in Old Testament times that the Messiah would have jurisdiction in heaven as well as earth. This mystery is now disclosed, and we know that God will gather together in one, (the phrase could be translated “head up”), all things in Christ, and there shall be nothing not brought under His righteous rule and authority.

8. Christ is head over every individual believing man.

Every believing man has Christ as his head, and this should caution and humble him as he exercises his head-ship over the woman. This headship of Christ is the reason why the man is to have uncovered head when engaged in spiritual exercises, and short hair.

9. Every believing man is head over every believing woman, 1 Cor. 11:3.

So that godly order prevails, all believing men are to exercise head-ship over every believing woman, and the women signify their recognition of this by having long hair and their heads covered. This headship does not extend to the domestic sphere, or give a brother the right to interfere in a believer’s private affairs. The next category safeguards against that.

10. A husband is the head of his wife, Ephesians 5:23.

This is God’s creatorial order, and is for the best interests of both parties. Nothing is gained by contravening this arrangement.

(c) Verses 22-33
Wives are to be in submission to their husbands, and husbands are to act like Christ towards them

Structure of the passage

Verse 22 Exhortation to wives: Submit
Verse 23 Explanation to wives: The husband is head
Verse 24 Example to wives: The church is subject
Verse 25(a) Exhortation to husbands: Love
Verses 25(b)-29 Example to husbands: The love of Christ
Verses 30,31 Explanation to all: Members of His body
Verse 32 Exclamation about a mystery
Verse 33 Exhortation to husband and wife

Survey of the passage
We come now to the first category of persons that should be submissive, namely wives. This submission is carefully safeguarded, and no licence is given to the husband to abuse or ill-treat his wife. Husbands should ever remember that a wife is free to leave him, as long as she remains unmarried, and is willing to be reconciled to her husband again, 1 Corinthians 7:10,11. There seems to be no such option available to the believing husband. This is a powerful incentive to treat his wife with consideration.

Having spoken of our spiritual “Canaan” in chapter 1, we are now to deal with three matters which could spoil appreciation of “the land”. Two and a half tribes of Israel stayed east of the Jordan, giving as their excuse wives, children, cattle, (business), see Numbers 32. So now the apostle deals with these categories, lest we allow them to hinder our appreciation of spiritual things.

Special note on the word church as used here

It is important to remember that in the following passage the apostle is speaking of the church as an entity in itself. Just as a wife is a person in her own right, so is the church. We see this from the following:

Verse 23 Christ being head of the church is distinct from His relation to it as Saviour of the body.
Verse 24 The church is subject to Christ as a wife is subject to her husband. The figure is not that of the body being subject to the head.
Verse 26 Husbands are to love their wives as Christ loved the church, so the wife and the husband are distinct, as are the church and Christ.
Verse 27 Christ will present the church to Himself, so she is not considered as His body in that context.
Verses 28,29 The husband loves his wife as he loves his own body, showing they are separate. So the Lord loves His betrothed wife as a distinct entity.
Verse 32 The apostle deliberately separates between Christ and the church.

This being the case, we could think of the church as the betrothed wife of Christ, with the actual marriage taking place in heaven after He has come again to receive her unto Himself. We see this illustrated in Mary, who was legally betrothed before she was married to Joseph, but who was nonetheless called his wife, Matthew 1:20, (“take unto thee Mary thy wife”), and Luke 1:5, (“Mary, his espoused wife”). In confirmation of this, Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 11:2, speaking of the Corinthian believers, “I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ”.

Verse 22
Exhortation to wives: Submit.

5:22
Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.

Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands- we must be clear that submission does not in any way imply inferiority, but an intelligent acknowledgement of the order God has set up as Creator. We see this from the fact that Christ, who is equal with God, is also subject to God because He has become man, 1 Corinthians 11:3. Our God knows what is best for us, and if believers are going to function correctly in relation to one another, then they must realise that they cannot improve on Divine order. Unmarried couples have no stability in their relationship, because it is not based on Divine order, but is a rebellion against that order.

Submission is seen to be balanced by benefits for the wife, just as the head-ship of the husband carries heavy responsibilities for him. Christianity is unique in that it elevates womanhood to the highest position. After all, the Son of God came into the world by being born of Mary, thus setting His seal on the value of womanhood and motherhood.

“Own husbands” suggests at least three things. First, that the wife is valued, for she belongs to her husband as a precious possession. Unmarried couples possess one another to get; husbands should possess their wives to give. A husband should not be for-ever telling his wife what he could have done, or been, or had, if he had not married her.

Second, she is legitimate, for they have entered a contract before God and witnesses. That contract is binding. There are those who believe that a couple who have divorced and remarried, and then get saved, are free to continue as they are. This is not the case, for their second “marriage” contract was not valid, since they were not free to marry if their previous husband/wife was still alive, Romans 7:2. The fact that the law of the land allowed them to do this is not the point. It is what the law of God is that matters, for “we must obey God rather than men”, Acts 5:29.

Of course when a person gets saved they are from that point on “in Christ”, and as such are a new creation, 2 Corinthians 5:17. However, this does not mean that earthly obligations have thereby been cancelled. A murderer who gets converted cannot plead that he should not be executed for murder because he is a new creature in Christ Jesus and old things have passed away and all things have become new. He must still be subject to earthly laws, even though the crime he committed has been forgiven by God.

Third, “her own” indicates he is hers alone by promise. By promising to marry a woman, the man pledges “to have and to hold”, and to be true to that promise. The prophet Malachi spoke of those who dealt treacherously against the wife of their youth, Malachi 2:14, and to act like this is decidedly ungodly.

As unto the Lord- this phrase also suggests three things. First, it reminds us that the character of the submission is to be of the same sort as submission to the Lordship of Christ. It is not the submission of fear, but a ready recognition of the authority of the husband. Of course, this will be easy for the wife if the husband is Christ-like.

Second, the submission is as that given to the Lord, which is, or should be, wholehearted. Can we really call Him Lord and then not submit to Him? As He said to the disciples, “why call ye me ‘Lord, Lord’ and do not the things which I say?'” Luke 6:46.

Third, the submission is limited in extent. It only goes as far as submission to the Lord would go. He would not ask His people to sin, so a husband should not ask his wife to sin either. His authority, and her submission, is not to that extent. Submission to a husband who is himself submissive to the Lord will be easy.

Verse 23
Explanation to wives: The husband is head

5:23
For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: And he is the saviour of the body.

For the husband is the head of the wife- the word “for” alerts us to the fact that we are now to be given the reason behind the exhortation of verse 22. The apostle introduces the idea of head-ship as being the reason why the wife is to be submissive to the husband. This shows us that head-ship has to do with authority and intelligent, benign control.

Even as Christ is the head of the church- so the pattern for head-ship and submission is seen in the attitude of the church to Christ its head. Clearly the apostle is thinking of the ideal situation, and is not taking account of failures clearly manifested by the church down through the centuries. We have noted the difference between Christ as head of the body, the church, and Christ being head of the church. In the latter case the church is seen to have a will that is subject and submissive.

Since this is the case, it is not part of the husband, (the head without the body) over part of his wife (her body without the head). The husband in his entirety is head over his wife in entirety. Just as the church is an entity of itself, and as such has a collective will, so the wife has not lost her personal identity by being married to the man, but is able to willingly submit to his authority of her own accord. Christ as head of the body is not in view here. Rather, the church is looked at as betrothed to Christ, and the next phrase tells us how He cares for her before the marriage.

And he is the saviour of the body- instead of being the head of the body here, He is the saviour of the body. Headship speaks of control, whereas saviourhood speaks of care. The emphasis here is on saviour-hood, not lordship. “And He” is emphatic, meaning “He alone”; “He, none less”; “He consciously and deliberately”. He is saviour of a body that belongs to Him, just as husband saves his own body, verse 29. But He is Saviour as an example to husbands, for they should, to a degree, be the saviour of their wives, protecting and encouraging them.

5:24
Example to wives: The church is subject

5:24
Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

Therefore- on basis of fact that Christ is Head and Saviour.

As the church is subject to Christ- this is the ideal situation from God’s view-point. The church is looked at in this epistle as a complete and ideal whole, this being the way God views it. The word “as” signifies “without reserve”, and “conforming to the ideal”. Since every believer is part of the church, and since belief involves submission to His authority, then in principle every believer is subject to Christ. That we are often not subject in practice is sadly true.

So let the wives be to their own husbands in everything- so the ideal example is the church’s submission to Christ; the extent of that submission is said here to be everything. That this does not include absolutely everything, including sin, is obvious from the fact that it is Christ that is submitted to. He will never ask His people to sin.

Verse 25(a)
Exhortation to husbands: To love.

5:25
Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

Husbands, love your wives- it is not “tell your wife you love her”, but, since the apostle goes on to speak of the way Christ acts towards us, it is a question of deeds not words. The apostle John wrote, “My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth”, 1 John 3:18. We might think that husbands would love their wives, or else they would not have married them. But love has to develop and grow, and as married life proceeds there may arise situations where love is strained. Nonetheless the word that husbands should love their wives is still binding, for the verb “love” is in the imperative present, meaning it is a command to love and keep on loving.

Even as Christ also loved the church- the Lord Jesus, having loved His own which were in the world, loved them unto the end, John 13:1. There was no extremity to which they could go from which He could not reach and rescue them. Just as love is to be expressed, so Christ expresses His love to the church in six different ways. He gives, He sanctifies, He cleanses, He nourishes, He cherishes, and finally, He presents to Himself. These actions give to us indisputable proof that the Lord loves the church, for they are not words, but deeds. These actions are the perfect display of His Saviour-hood, for each act saves in some way:

He gives Himself to save from the world.

He sanctifies and cleanses to save from defilement.

He nourishes and cherishes to save from hardship.

He presents to Himself to save from loneliness.

Special note on the word love
Love may be defined as “the expression of an attraction”. Love always has an object and a purpose. In the case of God’s love for the world, it was that some might believe and receive eternal life, “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life”. So God has signalled His general love for mankind in an historical event, (note it is “loved the world”, not “loves the world”), even the giving of His Son as the answer to man’s sin at Calvary. But we should note the “so”, and the second “that”. God loved so that whosoever believeth might have everlasting life; that was His object in loving and giving.

It is the same with Christ’s love for the church. He set His love upon those who would believe in Him. Having done this, (and it happened in eternity), He gave Himself for it with a purpose, that He might set it apart from the world, and ultimately present it to Himself. His love spans time and eternity.

Verses 25(b)-29
Example to husbands: Christ’s love.

And gave himself for it- this was what He was prepared to do, and since it is in the past tense, we may say it is what he did do. Adam gave up a bone to gain a wife, but he still had bones afterwards. Jacob was prepared to work for Laban for many long years to gain his bride, but he had flocks and herds at the end of it. Boaz, a mighty man of wealth, was willing to pay the price to redeem Ruth and the field of Elimelech, Ruth 4:10. Yet we may be sure that Boaz was not penniless after he had paid this price. Our Saviour, however, became poor, so that we might be rich, 2 Corinthians 8:9. He became poor as to privilege, so that we might be rich in privilege. As the apostle Paul writes, He “gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works”, Titus 2:14.

The first mention of love in the Scriptures is that of a father for his son, Genesis 22:2, a faint picture of the Father’s love for His only begotten Son. The second mention follows on from this, for in Genesis 24:67 we learn of the love of Isaac, the son of chapter 22, for his wife. Significantly, the genealogy of Rebekah is given at the end of chapter 22, not chapter 24, thus connecting it with Isaac’s experience on Moriah, where he was laid on the altar. Yet Isaac did not die, for a substitute was provided for him. There was no substitute possible for Christ at Calvary, for who could replace Him?

5:26
That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,

That he might sanctify- this means to set apart from all that is contrary to Himself, and so prepare the way for the presentation in heaven. Since the church is destined for heaven, it must be rid of everything of earth. The meaning of the name Asenath, the bride given to Joseph in Egypt, is “Dedicated to Neith”, an Egyptian god. But she changed allegiance, and was now, as Joseph’s wife, dedicated to God. This was similar to the experience of the Ephesians. As a city, Ephesus was full of those who were dedicated to the goddess Diana, as is seen from the events of Acts chapter 19. In fact, the Greek word for saint originally meant to be “dedicated to the gods”. The believers in the assembly in Ephesus have now been cleansed from such associations, and are now dedicated to the true God, so that they may be called “the saints which are at Ephesus”, Ephesians 1:1.

And cleanse it with the washing of water by the word- in the upper room the Lord Jesus said to His own, after He had washed their feet, “He that is washed, needeth not save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit: and ye are clean, but not all. For he knew who should betray him, therefore said he, ‘Ye are not all clean'”, John 13:10,11. These words were spoken after Peter had objected to having his feet washed, and then had gone to the other extreme and asked for his hands and his head to be washed.

There are two words used for wash in the verses just quoted. In verse 10 the idea is of an all-over wash, such as one would have at the pools of water provided for the purpose in the temple precincts in Jerusalem. On the way from the pool to the altar, however, a certain amount of defilement would be contracted on the feet. We know the temple courts could be dusty, from John 8:6. This needs to be dealt with, not by another all-over bathe, but by the washing of the feet. Stone foot-lavers were provided for this, too. Examples of these foot-baths can still be seen in Jerusalem.

At conversion, we were found to be defiled in every part, and so needed to be washed in every part. The apostle calls this “the washing of regeneration” in Titus 3:5. This washing is effected by the application, through the word of God, of the efficacy of the sacrifice of Christ. Regeneration is a new state of things, free of that defilement into which our first generation, which brought us into Adam’s world, involved us. Subsequent defilement as we make our way home to heaven is to be dealt with by the application of the word of God to the matter. Notice that the giving of Himself is so as to sanctify us, it was part of the goal in view when He died for us. We should not think lightly therefore of this matter of defilement.

There is a sense in which the individual believer is responsible for cleansing himself. As Paul wrote to the Corinthians, “let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God”, 2 Corinthians 7:1. The fact that the apostle used the word “us” shows that even an apostle needed to avail himself of this provision.

There is also a sense in which each believer is responsible to a certain extent for the welfare of his brother. The law said, “Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him”, Leviticus 19:17. So there is a common responsibility to help fellow-believers to see where they have need of adjustment. The Lord Jesus referred to this when He said, “ye ought also to wash one another’s feet”, John 13:14.

In this passage, however, it is the Saviour of the body who takes the initiative; oftentimes, no doubt, using the other two means we have mentioned. The Lord poured water into a bason in John 13, so as to give His disciples an object lesson they could not mistake or forget. It was the equivalent of the laver for the priests of old time. They were bathed at the laver on becoming priests, but they needed to wash their hands and feet thereat whenever they ventured into the presence of God, and also when they ministered at the altar, Exodus 29:4, 30:17-21. The word for laver is derived from a Hebrew word which means a washbowl, so would be the equivalent to the bason the Lord filled with water before washing His disciples’ feet in the upper room. The psalmist asked the question, “Wherewith shall a young man cleanse his way?” Then he answered it by saying, “By taking heed thereto according to thy word”, Psalm 119:9.

It is vitally important that we apply the truth of the word of God to our pathway, for the Lord Jesus said, “If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me”, John 13:8. By saying this He was pointing beyond the washing with literal water, for this could not fit for communion with Him. (After all, Judas was washed with literal water, but he was still not clean from moral defilement, verse 10). When the Word of God has done its cleansing work, then the believer is in a fit state to enjoy the presence of the Lord and have part or fellowship with Him..

5:27
That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

That he might present it to himself a glorious church- He loved, gave, sanctified, cleansed, and now He is able to present a church to Himself that is fitted for the glory of heaven, but more importantly, is fitted to stand by Him in His glory. In the case of Eve, she was brought to Adam by God, Genesis 2:22. In the case of Rebekah, she was sought by the servant of Abraham and met Isaac as he meditated in the field at eventide, Genesis 24:62-64. In the case of Rachel, Jacob went to seek her himself, Genesis 28:1,2. There are indications in these situations of what has happened with regard to the church, and what will happen. Like Eve, the church is produced by God for the delight of His Son. Like Rebekah, the church is brought by another to Him, for the Holy Spirit is at work causing the church to be increasingly attracted to Christ. Like Rachel, the church has been sought by Christ Himself at such cost. So the three persons of the Godhead are involved in this great matter.

But neither Adam, Isaac or Jacob presented a bride to themselves, for every time a marriage takes place, it is as if God as Creator is bringing a woman to the man to present her to him. Only one who is equal in the Godhead, therefore, can do this presentation to Himself. No doubt this was on the mind of the Saviour when He said, in His prayer to His Father, “I will that they also, whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am, that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me”, John 17:24. And will this prayer be answered? We know it will because of the basis of the appeal- “for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world”. In other words, the love of the Father for the Son in eternity is the guarantee that His desire will be granted. This involves His Deity, and so His right to present to Himself is established. So the church will be in glory by His side on the sure basis of the love of the Father for the Son, which can never cease. But even though she will be glorious then, it will be Christ’s glory that she will be taken up with, not her own.

Not having spot- this is the negative side of things, what she will not have, whereas the end of the verse tells of the positive side. The bride of Christ will be the bride of the Lamb, and it is said of Him that He is without blemish and without spot, 1 Peter 2:19. If she is to be with Him in glory therefore, she must be like this too. Spots come on the skin when health is in some way impaired. In verse 29, however, we read of Christ nourishing the church. The apostle Paul wrote to Timothy about being “nourished up in the words of faith and of good doctrine”, 1 Timothy 4:6. He also wrote in verse 3 about sound doctrine, and the word for “sound” has the idea of being healthy. The psalmist prayed to God that his heart might be “sound in thy statutes”, Psalm 119:80, and we would do well to pray this prayer also.

In the case of Ruth, she gleaned for herself after the reapers, Ruth 2:3. Then at the harvest-meal Boaz reached her parched corn, 2:14. If the gleanings were the provision for the poor, parched corn was considered a luxury. Then at the threshing-floor Boaz gave her an abundance, an earnest of the fact that the whole of the threshing-floor would be hers when she was linked to him in marriage, 3:15. So an ever-increasing supply of nourishment was hers.

Or wrinkle- if spots are prevented by sound nourishment, wrinkles are prevented by loving care, and this the Lord shows too, as we shall see in verse 29. Boaz placed his mantle over Ruth, thus signifying that he was determined to care for her and protect her. In this way, the worries that the famine in Moab and the loss of her husband would have brought upon her, were removed, and she was introduced into the security that being married to a mighty man of wealth would bring. We too have every need met in Christ. There is no reason for us to worry or fret with Him as our Saviour.

Or any such thing- so thorough will His care be, that not even anything that could be mistaken for a spot or wrinkle will be in evidence.

But that it should be holy and without blemish- the sanctifying and nourishing will have done its work, and there will be everything that corresponds to Christ in His holiness, and nothing that does not correspond to Christ in His blamelessness.

5:28
So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.

So ought men to love their wives- the apostle has set forth the perfect example in Christ, and the husbands are to love their wives after this sort. It is not possible for husbands to sanctify or cleanse their wives from the defilement of sin, but they should see to it that the household of which they are head is kept free from the defilement the world would bring into it if it was allowed to.

As their own bodies- just as Christ is the Saviour of the body, the church, and expresses that saviour-hood in loving deeds, so the husband is to love his wife as if she were his own body. It is not that the husband owns his wife’s body; the body in view in this phrase is his own, and he must treat his wife as he treats that body of his.

He that loveth his wife loveth himself- such is the union between husband and wife, that they are one, so what is done to one is done to the other. This closeness is not known by those who are not married to one another, for there has not been a formal commitment to each other in that situation. Their relationship is on the level of the body, whereas a married couple have a relationship that is far higher.

5:29
For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:

For no man ever yet hated his own flesh- the apostle widens the application in view of what he will say in the next verse. The flesh in this context is not the soft part of the body, but the nature of man. God said when He was about to judge the world of Noah’s day, “the end of all flesh is come before me”, Genesis 6:13. And when the Lord Jesus was born Luke quotes from Isaiah’s prophecy which said that “all flesh shall see the salvation of God”, Luke 2:3:6; Isaiah 52:10. He Himself spoke of having “power over all flesh”, John 17:2, by which He meant all men.

So the apostle is saying here that it is not part of man’s constitution to hate what he is. God’s requirement in the law was, “Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself”, Leviticus 19:18. So it is in order for a man to love himself, but he is not to love himself exclusively. He is to love his neighbour as he loves himself. It is normal to love self, but selfishness is abnormal, and contrary to God’s will.

But nourisheth and cherisheth it- not only does he care for his body, but he does that which preserves himself as a person. Just as nourishing and cherishing of a wife means more than providing food and shelter for her, so the man is not content with the bare essentials, but seeks to make himself comfortable as a person.

Even as the Lord the church- what a man does to his flesh, Christ does to the church. And He does it as Lord, for He has total control over all that would harm and distress His people. The reason for this is found in the next verse. We should remember that one of the words for husband in the Old Testament is “baal”, meaning lord. The husband is to take control of the situation for the good of his wife, as Christ does for the good of the church.

Verses 30,31
Explanation to all:
We are members of His body.

5:30
For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.

For- here is the underlying reason for the foregoing exhortations. The apostle makes a statement of New Testament truth, and then alludes to an Old Testament illustration.

We are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones- clearly, the figure of a body with its head is not in view here, as is the case in 1 Corinthians 12:27, “Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular”. The context has marriage in view, especially since the next verse is the marriage formula straight from the Book of Genesis.

There are two other possibilities. One is that it refers to Christ’s body materially. This cannot be the answer, however, for we do not share part of His resurrection body. But there is a third option. In view of Paul’s allusion to the marriage formula in verse 31, our minds are being directed back to Genesis 2. God had caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and had taken a rib from his side and made a woman from it. As a result, Adam could say, “This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh”, Genesis 2:23. That the woman was bone of his bone is clear from the record, for God used one of Adam’s bones, namely a rib, to make her. But it is a remarkable fact that the marrow of a bone produces specialist stem cells. Other parts of the body produce stem cells that do a particular task, but the stem cells made by the bone marrow are adaptable, and are the building blocks of the various sorts of cell in the body. So it was also true that the woman was flesh of Adam’s flesh, for she was made from his bone even as to her flesh. There is also the thought that Adam’s words, “This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh” indicate that he understood that the woman God had made for him was of a different sort to the animals he had just named. None of them had the same flesh as he, because, as the apostle Paul states, “All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds”, 1 Corinthians 15:39.

So the woman could say in relation to Adam, “I am bone of his bone, and flesh of his flesh”. The apostle now takes that fact, and applies it figuratively to the church, so that she may say, “We are bone of His bone, and flesh of His flesh”. Figuratively speaking, then, the church has been produced by what Christ did when He gave Himself at Calvary, yielding Himself to death, to the end that the church might be produced. The expression “of His flesh and of His bones” is omitted in some manuscripts, but it is easy to see it should be there, for the next verse is meaningless if there has been no prior reference to Genesis 2:23.

5:31
For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh.

For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother- the apostle now quotes directly from Genesis 2:24. Of course, in the case of Adam there was no father or mother to leave, but God established the principle at the beginning, and this justifies the use of these words.

Father and mother in this setting speak of a sphere of headship, with the man’s father the head of the household, and the man’s mother subject to the husband. Now the man is leaving that situation, and is establishing a new sphere of headship, that of his own. It is not that he totally cuts himself off from his parents, (for he still has filial responsibilities towards them), but that he now becomes involved in a relationship that is closer than that even between a son and his mother and father. It is good for fathers and mothers to take a kind interest in a son’s marriage, and to cultivate a good relationship with their daughter-in-law, but they should not seek to impose their will on the relationship.

And shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh- a new sort of relationship is established, totally different to the relationship a man has with his father and mother. The man and his wife can be joined together because they share the same nature.

They are also different in gender, one is male and one is female. The Lord Jesus linked together what was said in Genesis 1:27, “male and female created he them”, with the word from Genesis 2:24 about leaving father and mother that is quoted by the apostle here. So marriage is between a male and a female, and in particular between a man who has formally and publicly left his father and mother, and signified his intention to cleave to his wife. Note that there must be the formal and public side to the relationship, and even though a wedding may have no religious component, it must still be officially recognised by what is accepted as the government in the place where it happens.

It is significant that when the idea of being one flesh is mentioned, whether in the Old Testament Hebrew or New Testament Greek, the preposition is used which speaks of progress towards a goal. The idea is that “they two shall be set on a course towards being one flesh”. To be one flesh is much more than being one body, for flesh is used of the whole person, as in John 17:2, where “all flesh” means all men. Marriage is a sharing of everything; goals, ambitions, desires, hopes, experiences, joys, griefs. It is an ongoing process of two persons’ lives merging ever more closely. It is a relationship that is on a vastly higher plane, (even in the case of unbelievers), than an immoral and passing affair. So the moment that this process begins is when the man and woman are pronounced man and wife at the marriage ceremony. They are as truly married then as they will ever be, but they are not as closely married then as they will be at the end of their life together, for marriage is a process. . It is very sad when couples drift apart when they get older; they should be bonding even more closely.

Verse 32
Exclamation about a mystery

5:32
This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church.

This is a great mystery- we should notice that the apostle does not actually say that the church will be the bride of the Lamb, but he certainly implies it. It is John who tells us about the Lamb’s wife in Revelation 19:7. He cannot be referring to Israel, for the nation is already married to the Lord. God says “I was a husband to them”, Jeremiah 31:32. Now we know that Paul was entrusted with the task of fulfilling the word of God, Colossians 1:25. In other words, he revealed those mysteries that God had in reserve for the present age, so that all that God desires us to know is available to us. That which is perfect is come, 1 Corinthians 13:10. This being the case, it was not John’s remit to unfold new truth, but simply to elaborate on what had been known from the beginning. So the idea of the Lamb having a wife must be in Paul’s writings somewhere, and this is the place. The apostle hinted at this mystery in 2 Corinthians 11:2,3, where he wrote, “For I am jealous over you with a godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve in his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ”. The apostle sees the assembly at Corinth as a betrothed maiden, and does not want her to be drawn away to a rival. What is true of the local assembly is also true of the church as a whole. Functioning now as a body does in relation to its head, we shall function in a day to come as a wife does in relation to her husband. But just as betrothal was a legally binding contract, so we should be aware of our commitment to Christ, and not let our affections wander.

But I speak concerning Christ and the church- the apostle is still at pains to keep the Lord and the church distinct in our minds. The working principles that operate in the case of a married couple, are to be worked out with us now, for the betrothed maiden was reckoned to be the wife of her intended spouse, as we see from Matthew 1:20,24. And the working principles of marriage are worked out by Christ, as He deals with us as His betrothed one.

Verse 33
Exhortation to husband and wife

5:33
Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.

Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself- the apostle does not want a husband to be so taken up with the spiritual truths he is setting out that he forgets his everyday responsibility to his wife.

And the wife see that she reverence her husband- the wife should not pretend to be so spiritual, absorbed with relationship to Christ, that she forgets her duty to reverence her husband, giving him his due, not necessarily because he is particularly spiritual, but because he has been given a position by God for her welfare.

1 CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

The Old Testament was divided into three sections, the law, the psalms and the prophets. The Lord Jesus sanctioned that division in Luke 24:44. He effectively divided the New Testament also into three sections as He spoke to His own in the upper room. He explained that the Holy Spirit would bring all things to their remembrance, John 14:26. This would involve His earthly ministry as recorded in the four gospels. He also spoke of the Spirit leading them into all the truth, 16:13, which would be the epistles. Then that same Holy Spirit would tell them things to come, verse 13 again, which would include not only the Book of Revelation, but also other scriptures, for there are prophetic passages in the epistles.

It is appropriate that the epistles to the Romans and the Corinthians should stand at the beginning of the more doctrinal section of the New Testament, for they are foundational in character. The epistle to the Romans defines the gospel, and establishes the believer in the truth of his righteous standing before God, whereas the epistle to the Corinthians is collective. It is not God’s purpose that His people should live their lives in isolation, except in unusual circumstances, such as pioneering the gospel in remote regions. Christianity is essentially collective in character. The figures of speech that are used to describe the church make this clear. A temple must have many stones; a flock must have many sheep; a vine must have many branches; a body must have many limbs and organs. Sheep, branches and limbs must be together. It is not enough for them to be many, they must also be together.

God has set down clearly how believers should relate to one another, and we do well to take note, so that we may be in line with His will. Those who believed the gospel on the Day of Pentecost and after, “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers”, Acts 2:42. The word “apostles'” relates to both doctrine and fellowship in that verse, so the believers only believed what the apostles believed and taught, and they only had fellowship in what the apostles were involved in. This made their lives very simple, and it would make ours simple, too, if we followed their example, and continued steadfastly in it. Part of the apostolic doctrine is found in the Epistle to the Corinthians, so let us turn our attention to it, that we may learn its lessons, and follow its instructions, to God’s glory. He is looking for obedience from His people; what Romans 1:5 calls “obedience to the faith”.

SUMMARY OF THE EPISTLE

The First Epistle to the Corinthians may be looked at as the response to communications sent to the apostle from various sources.

In chapters 1-4 he responds to a message from the household of Chloe regarding the disunity of the assembly at Corinth. This the apostle deals with by getting to the heart of the problem, which was the harmful influence the world’s way of thinking was having upon them.

In chapters 5-7 he deals with a matter which, sadly, was commonly reported about them, even their tolerance of moral evil in the company. He shows how they should deal with it in chapter 5, then how they should not deal with it, in chapter 6. They should deal with the matter within the assembly, and not resort to the law-courts of the world. In chapter 7 he gives guidance on the subject of marriage which, if followed, would prevent the immorality they were tolerating. Chapter 7 forms a bridge between two sections, for it follows on from chapters 5 and 6, but also begins the remaining section of the epistle in which the apostle answers questions the Corinthians had asked him. Each answer is prefaced by the words, “Now concerning”, or “as concerning”, or “as touching”.

Chapter 7:1 “Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: it is good for a man not to touch a woman”.

Chapter 7:25 “Now concerning virgins”.

Chapter 8:1 “Now as touching things offered to idols”.

Chapter 12:1 “Now concerning spiritual gifts”.

Chapter 16:1 “Now concerning the collection for the saints.

Chapter 16:12 “Now as touching our brother Apollos”.

STRUCTURE OF CHAPTER 1

(a) Verses 1-3 Introduction and greeting.

(b) Verses 4-9 Expression of thanks for God’s provision for the assembly.

(c) Verse 10 Exhortation to unity.

(d) Verses 11-16 Exposure of disunity.

(e) Verses 17,18 The wisdom of words is damaging.

(f) Verses 19,20 The wisdom of the wise of this world is destroyed.

(g) Verses 21-29 The wisdom of God is demonstrated.

(h) Verses 30,31 The wisdom of God directs all the glory to Himself.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 1 TO 3

1:1 Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,

1:2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their’s and our’s:

1:3 Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.

(a)   Verses 1-3    Introduction and greeting.

1:1 Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes our brother,

Paul called to be an apostle of Jesus Christ- an apostle is one sent forth from another, with the full authority of that person, and with the resources he makes available. We notice how the apostle emphasises his apostleship here, for there were some at Corinth who were disputing whether he was a fully-fledged apostle. They possibly had in mind that he had not been with the Lord Jesus during His earthly ministry, and therefore was not one of The Twelve. This is the point, however, for Paul’s apostleship was from a risen and ascended Christ, and it was such a Person that Paul was commissioned to represent, preach, and teach. In the Second Epistle to the Corinthians Paul asserts the validity of his apostleship, for the signs of an apostle were evident in his ministry, 2 Corinthians 12;12. He also makes clear to the Galatians that those who had been with the Lord Jesus during His earthly ministry, (those who “seemed to be somewhat”), had nothing to add to him by way of authority or truth, Galatians 2:6.

There are not lacking today those who reject the authority of the writings of the apostle Paul. Such should remember the fact that he was sent out by the Lord Jesus personally, Acts 26:15-18, and his writings are the commandments of the Lord, 1 Corinthians 14:6. The apostle Peter recognised them as scripture, and on the same level of authority as the “other scriptures”, meaning the rest of the Word of God, 2 Peter 3:16.

Through the will of God- having been called to be an apostle through the determinative, and therefore settled, will of God, he was resolved to remain within the confines of that will. His apostleship, far from being of man, (self-appointed, or of a man-made order), or through man, (appointed in a secondary way by the other apostles), was from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ, Galatians 1:1. He was “not a whit behind the very chiefest of the apostles”, 2 Corinthians 11:5, for he had done what they had not done, namely, seen the Lord Jesus in resurrection glory in heaven.

If we have a desire to conform to the will of God, we shall be guided by the word of God, for that is the only source of infallible guidance. The apostle shows in Romans 12:1-2 that those who present their bodies a living sacrifice to God in worshipful devotion; who strive not to be conformed to this world; who are constantly transformed as their minds are occupied with the new things Christ has introduced, will find that they will prove what the will of God is. They will not zig-zag through this world trying to find the will of God by trial and error, but will know beforehand what it is. As Abraham’s servant said, “I being in the way, the Lord led me”, Genesis 24:27. Having set out on a course of obedience to Abraham’s instructions, and being dependant upon God, he accomplished his mission successfully. So we, knowing through the doctrine of Scripture what the will of God is for us in principle, shall be enabled to work it out in practice, to His glory.

One of the features, therefore, which marks those who are in assembly fellowship is a desire to hear the word of God. This cannot be done unless there is a willingness to bow to the authority of the apostles, who spoke, and wrote, as those who had been called of the Lord to teach His people. As such, they moved within the confines of the will of God. It is not proper for the will of man to set aside apostolic authority, for that involves challenging God’s sovereign will. We do well to remember the language of the apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 14:37, “If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord”. See also 1 John 4:6, where “us” means the apostles, and 2 Peter 3:1,2.

The very fact that apostles were amongst the Lord’s people at all was evidence that Christ had ascended up on high, had triumphed over the forces of evil, and, having received gifts from His Father, had bestowed them, like the trophies of a great victory, on His people. See Ephesians 4:8-11. To despise, or simply to ignore, the teaching of the apostles, is to regard lightly the magnitude of the triumph of Christ.

The apostles were responsible for laying the doctrinal foundation of the assembly, Ephesians 2:20. To heed their doctrine is vital, to ignore it is fatal. We can go astray in two directions in this matter of doctrine. We can look to the past, and embrace the traditions of men. The Lord Jesus was surrounded in His day by those who taught for commandments the doctrines of men, and He condemned them with the words- “Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition”, Mark 7:9.

Alternatively, we can look to the present, and embrace the trends amongst men. This too is contrary to the will of God, for He has said through the apostle John, “Let that therefore abide in you which ye have heard from the beginning.” 1 John 2:24. The only safe course is to continue steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine, Acts 2:42.

The fact that we are constantly exhorted to heed, and practise, the teaching of the Scriptures, is clear indication that truth may be known. Rather than look to man’s tradition and trends, we should look into God’s truth. It is not the preserve of the few to understand it, but is presented to all believers for their recognition and obedience, 2 Peter 3:2. Nor is it vague in its meaning, but is written in terms which all believers may grasp, if dependant upon the Spirit of God, John 7:17, 1 John 2:27.

Doctrine is not to be accepted or rejected according to the whim of the individual. Apostolic doctrine comes from God, who is the source of all absolute values, and as such is to be accepted without reserve. The modern notion that nothing is settled, and that truth lies in the opinion of the individual, is foreign to the Scriptures.

And Sosthenes our brother- notice that although the epistle comes from Paul alone, (for in verse 4 he says “I thank my God”), nonetheless he associates Sosthenes with himself in his greeting. Now since there is no explanation as to who Sosthenes is, and he is mentioned as if the Corinthians would know who he is, we may perhaps be justified in thinking that he is the man mentioned by Luke as being at one time the chief ruler of the synagogue at Corinth, Acts 18:17. When Paul went to Corith and preached in the synagogue, Crispus the chief ruler of the synagogue was converted, Acts 18:8. It seems as though Sosthenes had been appointed in his place, (thus showing that Crispus immediately left the synagogue and joined himself to Paul, who was teaching in a house next door to the synagogue), and then himself got saved. Subsequently he was ill treated by the Greeks in the city. We see two things here, at least. First, Crispus immediately distanced himself from the synagogue, realising that the coming of Christ had rendered such Old Testament institutions obsolete. Second, Sosthenes made a stand for Christ and was persecuted for it, for “all who will live godly in this world shall suffer persecution”, 2 Timothy 3:12.

Despite being a former chief ruler, (assuming the above to be correct), Sosthenes is simply described here as being “our brother”, showing that the Corinthians knew him as such. In fact, the phrase is even more definite, for “our” is in italics, and the literal rendering would be “the brother”. That is, “the one you Corinthians know of as a brother, and who has relinquished any title the Jewish synagogue may have conferred upon him”. Now that he is in assembly fellowship, he has come into the new brotherhood, those whom the Lord Jesus Himself is not ashamed to call His brethren, Hebrews 2:11.

This is not to say that an assembly should be without those who guide and direct, (the apostle will write later on about the gift of governments, 12:28), but that must be done by the power of the Spirit. A man is not qualified to lead in the assembly simply because he has, or had, some leadership role among men.

1:2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their’s and our’s:

Unto the church of God which is at Corinth- the letter is addressed to a company of believers, described as the church of God which is at Corinth. We know from other scriptures that there was at least one heathen temple in Corinth, and probably more, but this was of Satan. There was at least one synagogue, but this was of the Jews. Only of this company of believers can it be said that it is of God. This means it is important, as everything that is of God must be. It is important to God, for He gave His Son that the church at Corinth might be His. This is true of every genuine church.

The word church is much abused in our day. Some still insist on using the word of a physical building; others use it in a vague way such as in the expression “Church of England”. The use of the word here, however, is very specific.

We must first of all establish what is meant by a church. The only valid way of doing this is to take note of the meaning of the word translated “church”, and also the way it is used in the New Testament.

The Greek word rendered church is made up of two parts, the first meaning “out of”, the second meaning “a calling”. The two together indicate a called out company of people, separated from men in general and called together for specific purposes.

The word is used in four main senses in the New Testament, but not always in connection with Christians. A brief look, however, at the way the word is used in other senses will help us to see why the Holy Spirit took it up to use in relation to believers.

The word is used in the following ways:-

1. By Stephen, Acts 7:38, of the nation of Israel when they were in the wilderness.

2. By the town-clerk of Ephesus, Acts19:39, of a company of unbelievers.

3. By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of all the Christians of this present age, Matthew 16:18, Colossians 1:18.

4. By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of the Christians who meet together in a particular locality, Matthew 18:17, 1 Corinthians 1:2.

The first two uses of the word will help us to understand the last use, which is our present subject. A reading of the passages mentioned above will clearly show that the word church is never used of a material building. It is also clear from 1 Corinthians 5:2,13 that it is possible to be a true believer, and therefore in the church which is Christ’s body, and yet not be in a local church, either because one has been put away from it, or has never joined.

Stephen uses the word church of the nation of Israel because they were a called-out company. They had been redeemed by the blood of the Passover lamb, as described in Exodus 12; “baptised” in the Red Sea, Exodus 14:21,22; 1 Corinthians 10:1,2; and brought to the foot of Mount Sinai to listen to God’s word, Exodus 19:17, 20:1. As such they give to us an illustration of those in this age who have been called out of the world by the gospel; redeemed by the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God; baptised in water to signify, amongst other things, allegiance to Him; and gathered together as a church in a locality to bow to the authority of the word of God. This illustration should not be pressed too far, however, or else we shall arrive at the unscriptural notion that since infants crossed the Red Sea, then infant baptism is in order. The Scriptures are crystal clear that this is not the case.

The town clerk of Ephesus used the word in its secular sense in Acts 19:39, when he spoke of a “lawful assembly”. The townsfolk would understand that he meant by this a gathering of those possessing civic rights in a free Greek city, who were called together for the carrying out of public affairs. Strangers, and those deprived of citizenship, could not be part of this called out company.’

When we put these two uses of the word together, and apply them to a local church, we can say it has the following characteristics:

1. Only believers. It is composed only of those who have responded to the call of God in the gospel, and have been redeemed with the precious blood of Christ, just as a civic assembly did not include strangers.

2. Only those sound in doctrine and morals. It is composed only of those who have not forfeited their rights because of moral or doctrinal evil, just as a civic assembly did not consist of those who had been deprived of the rights of citizenship through misconduct.

3. Only those baptized. It is composed only of those who have been baptized by immersion in water after they were saved, just as all the people of Israel went through the Red Sea to get to the wilderness.

4. Only those subject to God’s Word. It is composed only of those who are prepared to submit to the authority of the Word of God, just as Israel gathered at the foot of Mount Sinai to hear God speaking to them, and then said “all that the Lord hath spoken we will do”, Exodus 19:8. Moses called that day “The day of the assembly”, Deuteronomy 9:10.

5. Only those who have joined. It is composed only of those who have been exercised in heart to join, just as the Israelites had been exercised in heart to sprinkle the blood, cross the sea, and gather at Sinai. When Paul went to Jerusalem, he “assayed to join himself to the disciples”, Acts 9:26. The word for join means to cement, or glue, and therefore indicates an act of commitment, not the start of a casual relationship.

Only the church of God at Corinth was addressed in exactly the way we find here. This would emphasise the basic nature of the epistle, in which first principles are being set out.

It is worth noting that the English word “church” is not derived from the Greek word “eklesia”, but is from the word “kuriakos”, meaning “belonging to the Lord”. Hence it is preferable to use the word assembly when speaking of that which in our Authorised Version is translated church.

We have already briefly considered the ideas behind the word translated here as church. We must now notice, however, the words “of God”. The company of Christians which met in corrupt Corinth belonged to God. How solemn, and yet how encouraging, to remember that the reason an assembly belongs to God is because He has purchased it by “His own blood”, that is, by means of the sacrifice of Christ, Acts 20:28.

The assembly in Corinth could be described in 1 Corinthians 3:9 as His husbandry. They were His cultivated plot, a paradise in the midst of a barren desert. What a privilege it was to be part of such a company, and to have the opportunity to give pleasure to the heart of God, just as a beautiful garden delights the one who tends it and cares for it. We must never lose sight of the fact that the primary purpose of an assembly is to gratify God’s heart. Important as gospel work is, the assembly should not be thought of merely as a gospel mission.

So an assembly exists to give pleasure to its owner. Those who have the immense privilege of forming part of such a company will do their utmost to see that the maximum amount of pleasure is given to God through their efforts. They will also do their utmost to exclude any activity which causes Him displeasure, as indicated in His word.

The fact that an assembly belongs to God also indicates that it is of first importance to Him. Those who long to be in harmony with God’s mind will see to it that the assembly to which they belong is of first importance to them as well, and that the interests of self do not override the vital necessity of being committed wholeheartedly to God’s interests. The pace of life in the world of today makes it necessary as perhaps never before to strive to ensure that spiritual and eternal things have first place in our lives.

To them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints-the word saint is one of those that the Holy Spirit has extracted from its secular use, and lifted to a higher plane. The word saint originally meant “one dedicated to the gods”, one who was devoted to furthering the interests of the idol-system that flourished all around in the pagan world. Now the word means one who is dedicated to the True God, passionate about furthering His interests in the world. It is a word, moreover, that applies to all believers, for the apostle does not divide up the assembly at Corinth into saints and non-saints, but classes every believer in the assembly as a saint. And this is the situation with all believers; they are not called to become saints, as if it is a gradual process, but are saints by Divine calling, and as such should perfect holiness in the fear of God, 2 Corinthians 7:1.

The unbeliever uses the word saint either of someone who has been given that title by the religious establishment, or of someone who stands out from others because of his goodness. The proper use of the word saint is the Scriptural one, which is of those who, having been “sanctified in Christ Jesus”, are called to a life of holiness. To be a saint, to be sanctified, to be holy, to be set apart, are identical terms. When God calls men by the gospel, and they repent and believe, He sets them apart from their former associations and conduct. No longer does He reckon them to be in Adam, but in Christ Jesus, the One who is risen, glorified, and set apart at God’s right hand in heaven. By the call of God, then, they are saints, and His separating call gives character to the rest of their lives.

We must remember that to be a saint, one of God’s separated ones, is a positive thing. After all, holiness is one of God’s attributes. Since He is unchanging, He has always been holy, and therefore was holy before there was anything evil. It follows that holiness is not simply separation from evil, but wholehearted commitment to things that are in harmony with God’s holy character.

Sadly, the Corinthian believers had forgotten this, which is no doubt why the apostle reminds them of sanctification so early in his epistle. He goes on to deal with their lack of holiness in three main areas:

1. Lack of holiness as to the soul, chapters 1-4, where he warns against the world’s wisdom.

2. Lack of holiness as to the body, chapters 5-7, where he warns against the world’s wickedness.

3. Lack of holiness as to the spirit, chapters 8-11, where he warns against the world’s worship.

The apostle shows in 1 Corinthians 1:17-31 that the cross of Christ is the means by which men are brought into right relationship with Himself. They cannot reason their way to a knowledge of Himself by using the wisdom of the world. The princes of this world, those well-versed in its way of thinking, were so ignorant of who Christ really was that they crucified Him! 1 Corinthians 2:8. Only by receiving the wisdom of God revealed in His word, (the theme of chapter 2), can believers be right and holy in their thinking. There is no room in God’s assembly for those who hold and teach doctrine which has its origin in the mind of man, see 1 Corinthians 3:17-20.

The word “corinthian” is found in our dictionaries today, and means an immoral person. The conduct of those around them had influenced the believers at Corinth, hence the apostle had to instruct them in chapters 5-7 as to separation in this area of life too. Just as those who hold wrong doctrine are to be excluded from the assembly, so also, those who are guilty of immoral conduct are to be expelled, for “Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? 1 Corinthians 5:6. It is imperative that those who apply for assembly fellowship take this into account.

All around in Corinth were idol temples, whose devotees offered their sacrifices to demons. The mighty power of God in the gospel had delivered many Corinthians from this, however, and now they were separated to a life of devotion to God. This devotion would express itself in many ways during the week, but as a matter of priority they would meet together on the first day of the week to partake of the Lord’s Supper together, in accordance with His own command. With the loaf and the cup before them, they would remember the Lord Jesus, who had given Himself that they might be brought into relationship with God. As they contemplated the preciousness of His person, they would be moved to “worship God in the Spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh”, Philippians 3:3.

The apostle can describe these saints as those who call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord. This was one of their leading features. Conscious of their need, they find resources to supply that need in one whose concern is for their good. Another reason why the Lordship of Christ is emphasised is because, although they called on the name of the Lord, they were inconsistent in that they were guilty of making men into party leaders, whereas Christ had forewarned them to not call anyone Master, or Leader, “for one is your Master (Leader), even Christ”, Matthew 23:10.

With all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both their’s and our’s- believers can be described as those that call upon the name of the Lord Jesus Christ because that is one of their characteristic and leading features. This feature is true of all believers in every place.  All who call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord are called to sainthood with a Divine calling. This being the case, they should not put their trust in men, as some were doing by forming parties around prominent teachers. Part of their duty as saints or separated ones, was to distance themselves from party-spirit.

All believers know from God’s word that an appeal on the ground of the name of Jesus Christ our Lord will receive a response that takes account of who He is, John 16:23,24. This is because the Father delights to respond to the mention of the name of His Son. The very fact that they are saved at all is due to the fact that they called upon His name, for “whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved”, Romans 10:13. Resting their hope of salvation on Him alone, they were certainly not disappointed, for “the same Lord over all is rich unto all them that call upon Him.” Romans 10:12.

This initial calling upon His name for salvation is followed by a reliance on his name as the gathering-centre of his people. In Matthew 18:20 the Lord Jesus had promised that “where two or three are gathered together in My name, there am I in the midst of them”.

Three matters call for attention in this verse:

1. If He is present at every gathering of this character taking place in any part of the world, The Lord Jesus must be omnipresent, and therefore this promise is founded on His Deity. Those who gather in His name do so because they believe that the Lord Jesus is equal with God.

2. The word “are” is not part of the verb “gather together”. This means that the two or three in question “are” in a particular place because of a particular reason. That reason being that they have deliberately gathered together in His name. Just because two or three Christians are in the same place does not mean that the Lord Jesus is present in the way spoken of here.

3. The preposition translated “in”, is the word “eis”, which is not a static word, but rather indicates progress towards a goal. In this context its use means that those who gather together in the name of the Lord Jesus fully intend that He be central to all that they do when together. The honour of His name is their goal as they meet. The names of men, however saintly, or of doctrines, however important, can never be a substitute for the name of the Lord Jesus.

Whilst preparing His disciples for His going away from them back to heaven, the Lord had said “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in My name, He will give it you” John 16:23. As an assembly gathers together for collective prayer, therefore, they have the assurance that to pray to God in the name of the Lord Jesus is to receive a response. This does not simply mean that they mention His name at the end of their prayers, but that all they ask for should be in harmony with the character of the One who bears that name. It also means that the dignity of His name will regulate them as they come together. They will gladly obey the clear instructions of the Scriptures that it is the male members of the assembly who should lead audibly in prayer, and the female members who should fulfil their very positive and vital role by remaining silent and dressing in a becoming way, 1 Timothy 2.

When Abraham reached the land of Canaan, “The Lord appeared unto Abram…and there builded he an altar unto the Lord, who appeared unto him”, and again, “He builded an altar unto the Lord, and called upon the name of the Lord”, Genesis 12:7,8. Like Abraham before the Lord appeared unto him, many of the Corinthians had formerly worshipped idols, but now they had “turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God” 1 Thessalonians 1:9. Met together with others of like mind, they sought to glorify God as they found Him revealed to them in His Son. “By Him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to His name. But to do good and to communicate forget not: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased”. Hebrews 13:15,16. It is good to be intelligent when addressing God. Abraham called upon God in line with the way He had revealed Himself, in that case as Lord. We have the immense privilege of addressing God as Abba, Father, and we should avail ourselves of that great privilege, and not take a lower ground.

The second half of the quotation given above reminds us that a vital part of the worship of God’s people is the giving of their material possessions to support His interests. Unless the tithes are brought into the storehouse, the windows of heaven will not be opened to pour out a blessing, Malachi 3:10. It is significant and challenging that three things are especially associated with the first day of the week- the resurrection of Christ, John 20:1, the breaking of bread, Acts 20:7, and the collection for the saints, 1 Corinthians 16:1-3.

1:3 Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord Jesus Christ.

It is often pointed out that when the apostle greeted the believers in this way, he was using the two words that Jews and Gentiles would use when they met. A Greek would greet his fellow-Greek with “Charis!”, the Greek word for grace, and a Jew would greet his fellow-Jew with “Shalom!”, the Hebrew for peace. As unbelievers greet one another, however, they are only expressing a kind wish; they have no power to bring the wish to pass. With the apostle, though, the greeting was no mere pious wish, but a prayer for their spiritual blessing. In accordance with the meaning of the word “assembly” both Jews and Greeks had been called out by the gospel from their respective environments, and had come to know the wonder of God’s grace. This grace, however, is ongoing, so the apostle does not have to hope that it be continued, but he does hope that the grace or unmerited favour of God may be enjoyed by them. It is possible to begin to forget that everything worthwhile we have as believers comes to us as a result of the rich grace of God. We should revel in this favour, and this the apostle desires the Corinthians should do.

The same is true of peace. Having been brought into peace with God, (after having been at war with Him as sinners), which peace is constant, the apostle desires that believers be in the good of it. So the unbeliever wants grace and peace for his fellow in the future, whereas the apostle knows his fellow-believers already have it, but wants them to enjoy what they have.

It is to a church or assembly as constituted by God that the apostle sends this greeting, so the emphasis is on collective appreciation. It is a good thing when believers advance together in the things of God, having the same desires and aspirations. See Philippians 2:3:16. Sadly, there was a lack of grace and peace at Corinth, so the apostle seeks that they might be more in evidence. The more they appreciated God’s favour to them, and the peace He had made, the more harmony there would be amongst them, for instead of thinking about themselves, they would think on spiritual things.

The fact that these blessings come equally from God our Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ is a testimony to His equality with the Father. In the ways of God the Lord Jesus is entrusted with administering everything in the house of God, for He is Son over the house, and so it is through Him that these blessings come. That God is our Father is one of the distinctive truths of Christianity, for saints of Old Testament days did not know God in this intimate way. The great privilege of being the children and sons of God is a result of the coming of the Son of God Himself, and the subsequent sending into our hearts of the Spirit of His Son, Galatians 4:6; Romans 8:9.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 4 TO 9

1:4 I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ;

1:5 That in every thing ye are enriched by Him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge;

1:6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you:

1:7 So that ye come behind in no gift; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ:

1:8 Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

1:9 God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of His Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

(b)   Verses 4-9    Expression of thanks for God’s provision for the assembly.

1:4 I thank my God always on your behalf, for the grace of God which is given you by Jesus Christ;

We should not think that “on your behalf” means that the Corinthians were not able to thank God for themselves, but had to leave that to the apostle, for every true believer has access to the Father through the Lord Jesus in the power of the Holy Spirit. Rather, the idea is of thanking God concerning them. The apostle, as he considered the way God had blessed the assembly, was constrained to lift up his heart in thanksgiving to God. We might well follow his example of thankfulness. We live in a world that is “unthankful and unholy”, but this should not be the hallmark of the people of God.

The special subject of the thanksgiving of the apostle is the grace that had been given to them by Jesus Christ. Thinking of grace as unmerited favour, we learn that since they had been saved and brought into assembly fellowship, God had bestowed on them rich blessings, and all because of their association with Jesus Christ, for all God’s benefits are channelled through Him.

1:5 That in every thing ye are enriched by Him, in all utterance, and in all knowledge

Notice that Paul does not highlight the gifts that they were highlighting. He does not mention tongues-speaking. This is all the more marked because it was legitimate at that time to teach the word of God and give words of wisdom by use of the gift of tongues. He commends them for their making known of the truth of God, and for their knowledge of it, and sees in that activity evidence that God has enriched them. They might be poor naturally, but they were rich spiritually. The question on the mind of the apostle was as to how they were using those riches.

The particular benefit the apostle has in mind is the bestowal of gifts. As he will say in verse 7, they came behind in no gift. Every true believer has one or more Divinely-given gifts. The apostle makes this clear in 1 Corinthians 12:6,7. “And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all. But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal”. By the expression “worketh all in all” the apostle indicates that the sum total of the things God desires to accomplish through the gifts given to His people is achieved when all the gifts are used aright by those who possess them. By the expression “to profit withal” the apostle means the profit of all in the company. So in verse 6 he is concerned about God’s purpose, and in verse 7 he is concerned about the profit of the believers. Clearly the matter of the exercise of gift must be important if the purpose of God and the profit of believers is involved.

Only in the context of assembly gatherings can the expression “to every man” in 1 Cor.12:7 be practised. In the systems and arrangements of men, the majority of gifts are assumed to reside in one man, together with special authority to administer the bread and wine of the Lord’s Supper. This is completely foreign to the word of God. The apostle uses the human body as an illustration as he writes in 1 Corinthians 12:12-27, and shows how ridiculous it would be if all the abilities of the human body were concentrated in one member. “If the whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? If the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?” With these things in mind, let us briefly notice what the apostle says about gifts in 1 Corinthians 1:4-8.

Not only does God grant His salvation in grace to those who believe, but He continues to act in grace in the giving of spiritual gifts. Grace, by definition, is unmerited favour, so these gifts are not to be confused with any natural talent that may be possessed already. Nor are they given as a result of growth in spirituality, for then they would be merited-gifts and not grace-gifts.

Note the expressions in verse 5, “in everything”, “all utterance”, “all knowledge”, and also in verse 7, “come behind in no gift”. If there are companies where there seems to be a shortage of gifts, then the fault must lie with men and not God. Perhaps there are believers living near the gathering-place of the assembly, who travel to meet elsewhere. Or maybe there is a failure on the part of those in that assembly to stir up the gift of God which is in them, a possibility the apostle even warned Timothy about, 2 Timothy 1:6.

There are three passages where the subject of gifts is dealt with, 1 Corinthians 12, Romans 12, and Ephesians 4. In the latter passage the gifts are the men themselves who have gift. The Lord Jesus has ascended up to the very highest place in heaven, and it is from that position of power and authority that He has given gifts. These gifts are apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers. The purpose of these gifts is that all the members of the body of Christ, (the sum total of believers of this present age), may progress towards conformity to the moral glory of Christ, in unity with one another, Ephesians 4:12-15. The emphasis here is on the progress of the whole body of believers, not the fact that each believer has a gift.

In Romans 12:6-8 the gifts enable certain actions to be performed, as follows: prophecy; ministry; teaching; exhortation; giving; ruling, showing mercy. Those who have presented their bodies a living sacrifice, who have determined not to be conformed to the world, and who are being constantly transformed by the renewing of their mind, are in a position to exercise these gifts for the furtherance of the spiritual welfare of the saints.

In 1 Corinthians 12:8-10 the list of gifts is as follows: The word of wisdom; the word of knowledge; faith; gifts of healing; working of miracles; prophecy; discerning of spirits; diverse kinds of tongues, and the interpretation of tongues. Now all these gifts have been withdrawn, for there is no need for them now. The completed canon of Scripture supplies us with wisdom and knowledge. The sign the gift of tongues, for instance, represents has made its point, and the need is gone.

Those who claim to have this gift today must show several things. First, that what they have is what believers had at the beginning. Second, that the restoration of the gift is to be expected, (for it is a historical fact that it ceased). Third, that there is a need for the gift. Fourth, that the result of the exercise of the gift is the exaltation of Christ as Lord.

It is very obvious that modern charismatics cannot give satisfactory responses to any of these four points. Until they do, believers would be well advised to distance themselves from the whole movement, including the Alpha Course.

If, as is suggested, these gifts have been withdrawn, it might be asked why they are listed here. Three reasons may be given. First, since they were in use when the epistle was written, it was appropriate to mention them as examples of spiritual gifts. Second, one of them at least, the gift of tongues, was being over-emphasised at Corinth, and the apostle needs to correct this in chapter 14. Third,now that these have been withdrawn, and also now that there are those who claim to possess them, we need a standard by which to assess the genuineness or otherwise of modern claims.

We should ask the following questions of those who claim to possess these gifts today. Why is there a manifestation of this gift now, when centuries passed without it being manifest? What Scripture leads us to believe that the gift would be restored? The gift of tongues was given to further the edification of the saints, see 14:1-19. Can modern tongues pass this test? Is anything intelligible uttered? If it is, does it add to the Word of God, or confirm it? If the former, then it comes under the curse of Revelation 22:18. If the latter, it is unnecessary, for the word of God was completed centuries ago, so that Jude could write about the faith that had been once for all delivered to the saints. There was nothing more to add, for the Spirit had led the New Testament writers into all the truth, as the Lord Jesus had promised He would, John 16:13.

Charismatics seek to evade these searching questions by asserting that they speak with the tongues of angels, and therefore we should not expect to understand them. We should notice, however, that in 1 Corinthians 13:1 the apostle refers to the tongues of men and angels, not the tongues of men orangels. In other words, when angels speak to men, they do so in the language of the men addressed. There is not a choice between angel-tongues and men-tongues. Even if angels do speak a different language in heaven, they do so to be understood in heaven. The purpose of tongues spoken on earth is to be understood on earth. It should be noticed, however, that Isaiah seems to have had no difficulty in understanding what the seraphim said in Isaiah 6:3, nor John in the Book of the Revelation.

We are entitled to enquire whether this gift is exercised according to the principles laid down by the apostles. Are the sisters silent in the gatherings? Have they covered heads and long hair? Are the proceedings conducted in an orderly and dignified way? If the answer to these questions is in the negative, then we may safely conclude that the gift is spurious. It is important to remember that humans are capable of deceiving themselves, and of being deceived. We should also notice that the gifts, including tongues, were not imparted to all. The language of the apostle is clear- “to one…to another”. His question at the end of the chapter is to the same effect, “Do all speak with tongues?” Clearly the answer is that all did not speak with tongues. The idea, then, that the gift should be sought, and that it is an indication that the Spirit dwells within, is false.

The fact that not every believer in those days should have expected to possess the gift of tongues is seen in verse 11, for the gifts are divided severally according to the will of the Spirit. So it is not His will to impart each gift to every believer. The gifts are distributed (“dividing”) to separate individuals, (“severally”). We would do well to ponder this point, and assess our attitude to this truth.

It is good to be clear in our minds that the gift of tongues is not for today. It is equally good to be clear that the Spirit does still distribute to each believer those gifts that are for today. Which should prompt us to ask ourselves whether the gift which has been given is being used. Remember God works in each member of the assembly for the profit of all- any lack of exercise of gift on the part of one, therefore, means that there is less profit for all. Since a gift is a spiritual thing, it should have precedence over natural things. We should not let self and the world stand in the way of the use of gift. The world is increasingly saying, in the language of the king of Sodom to Abraham, “Give me the persons, and take the goods to thyself”. In everyday terms this is the same as saying “Give me your time and energy, and I will give you a large salary”. Abraham was strengthened to resist that temptation, and so should we be, resolutely determining to put the interests of God and His assembly first in both our thoughts and actions. This will undoubtedly involve sacrifices as matters of lesser importance are let go, and the primary purpose in the life of the believer is concentrated upon.

In 1 Corinthians 12:28-30 the apostle lists gifts in their order of importance, for he uses the words “first…secondarily…thirdly”, and thus adjusts the thinking of the Corinthians, who were giving prominence to those gifts he lists last. Included in this list, being appropriate for an assembly epistle, are the two gifts of helps and governments.

Putting these scriptures together, and omitting gifts that no longer exist, we have the following:

Believers as gifts: evangelists; pastors and teachers.

Gifts that believers have: teaching; ministry; exhortation; giving; ruling; showing mercy; helps, and governments. Possibly the ruling and the government are the same, in which case there are seven gifts available to believers.

The question is sometimes asked, “How may I know what my gift is?” We may answer this question by remembering that the apostle uses the figure of a human body to illustrate the doctrine he is setting out. Just as the individual members of our bodies have abilities, so individual believers have gifts or abilities also. Some members of our body have more than one gift or ability, but they are all there to make a contribution.

First, our organs and limbs have been put in place by God “as it hath pleased Him”, 1 Corinthians 12:18, and they function as they do because of this. Some gifts bring with them a certain amount of prominence, such as teaching or exhortation. So it is with spiritual gifts. They are given to individual believers in accordance with the particular function they have to perform. For example, the gift of ruling or will not be given to a sister, for that is not within her range of activity in the assembly.

Second, they show their ability by functioning efficiently. Believers manifest that they have a particular gift when it is obvious that they have the appropriate spiritual ability to work out that gift. It will be equally obvious if they are unfitted for a particular work.

Third, they do so because the life principle in the body gives them energy to operate. Spiritual gifts are the manifestation of the indwelling Spirit of God, 1 Corinthians 12:7, the life-principle in the body of Christ. So He is the source of them, and He is the power by which they function. No amount of natural ability can compensate for a lack of spiritual gift.

A believer therefore may know his or her gift by being in harmony with the Spirit who gave the gift, by having a Spirit-led desire to exercise a particular gift, and by using that gift in a manner honouring to the Lord and helpful to the saints.

Those in a place of responsibility as elders in the assembly should be alert to the first signs of a gift being exercised, and should encourage this in every way possible. They should also step in when it is obvious that a believer is trying to exercise a gift he or she does not have. The assembly should not be wearied with those who are acting out of place. Such persons do indeed have a gift, so they should be helped to find it.

The elders should also ensure that teaching is regularly given on the subject, so that all in the assembly are aware of this aspect of assembly life. There is something for all in the assembly to do for the profit of all. There is no such person as a believer without a gift, for gifts are one way the Spirit of God manifests Himself, and all believers have the Spirit within. To neglect a gift is to quench the Spirit, 1 Thessalonians 5:19, and to deprive the saints of the contribution that should be made.

1:6 Even as the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you:

By means of the gifts given, especially those which involved utterance and knowledge, the truth concerning Christ that is received by faith for salvation initially, is constantly confirmed and reinforced to His glory. There is an ongoing need for the truth to be taught, and the appropriate gifts are given to ensure this happens. The apostles were careful to confirm the souls of those who believed, for the world represents an antagonistic force, and new believers, and, for that matter, older believers too, need constant exposure to apostolic doctrine. The unsearchable riches of Christ are not all learnt the night we get saved, but are entered into as we “follow on to know the Lord”, Hosea 6:3.

1:7 so that ye come behind in no gift, waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.

In this verse the apostle uses the word for coming which means an unveiling. While they wait for the Lord to reveal Himself at His coming, believers are to use their particular gift so that Christ is revealed in the locality by the testimony of the assembly.

At the present time the local assembly is charged with manifesting Christ in the district where they are. Just as a man’s body expresses him to others, so the apostle declares to the assembly at Corinth, (and, by extension, any Divinely-constituted assembly), “ye are (the) body of Christ, and members in particular”, 1 Corinthians 12:27. They were to reveal Him during the time of His absence, all the while waiting for Him to reveal Himself. One of the primary ways of doing this is through the exercise of gift, just as a man expresses what is in his mind by what he is able to do by means of his physical body.

1:8 Who shall also confirm you unto the end, that ye may be blameless in the day of our Lord Jesus Christ.

The use, mis-use or non-use of gift will be reviewed in the day when the Lord Jesus reviews the activities of His people. This is called “the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” because it is the time when His view of things is the only one. The word for “blameless” means “Not blamed when called in to face a charge”. We have been given a gift for a purpose, and it should be our earnest desire to fulfil that purpose. When called into the presence of the Head of the church to give account to Him for the way we have used the gifts He has given, we would surely not want to have a charge of neglect or mis-use of gift made against us, but rather to receive commendation for the use of gift in a God-honouring way. See 1 Corinthians 3:13-15.

1:9 God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of His Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

Fellowship is enjoyed by those who share with one another the things which they have in common. As individuals, believers are able to have fellowship “with” the Father and “with” His Son Jesus Christ”, 1 John 1:3. The fellowship mentioned in this passage, however, is said to be the fellowship “of” His Son. This means that the Corinthian believers were called to share in the things that God’s Son was involved with. Of course, such a fellowship would be of the highest dignity, a fact that may be learned from the way the apostle describes it, using the full title “His Son Jesus Christ our Lord”. In fact the fellowship can be said to be defined by this title, being everything that such a glorious person can righteously associate Himself with. The Corinthians had been called by God to fellowship of such a character. As an assembly, they had been put into the position where they could freely share together in all the things of Christ. Only a Divinely-constituted assembly is in such a position.

Sadly, the Corinthians were failing to appreciate the blessedness of allowing the name of Christ to govern their fellowship. They had begun to divide into parties, and thus earn the rebuke of the apostle for their contentions and divisions. Division and strife are the very opposite of fellowship. Sadly, today, those who profess the Name of Christ are divided into a multitude of sects, but the existence of an assembly in a locality is a protest against that situation.

The Corinthians were slow to separate completely from the idolatry that they had been involved in before they were saved. The apostle reminds them, therefore, of three sorts of fellowship in 1 Corinthians 10:14-22, all expressed by the act of eating and drinking.

1. There was the fellowship known by the Israelite as he brought his offering to the altar, and then feasted upon his portion of the sacrifice, and thus had a share in the things that God had ordained. This would rebuke the Corinthians for their divisions, for the altar in Israel was the focal point of their religious life, just as the Lord Jesus, and no other person or thing, was the centre of Christian life.

2. There was the fellowship known by the idol-worshipper, as he brought his gift to the pagan temple. His fellowship was with the demon forces behind the idol, and he expressed this fellowship by sharing the food which he had offered to the idol. This would rebuke the Corinthians for their connections with idolatry, as the apostle exposed the very heart of idol-worship as being homage to demons.

3. Then there was the fellowship of the Christian assembly. As they drank the cup of wine of the Lord’s Supper, they thereby declared their participation in all the blessing that His shed blood had procured, for the cup is described as the cup of blessing. As they all took and broke the one loaf, they signified that they were sharing in common with one another, as a united company, all the blessings Christ’s blood had secured. The one loaf of which they all partook, was symbolic of their unity as the local representation of the body of Christ.

It is illogical for those who drink of the cup at the Lord’s Supper, and thus signify their involvement in all that the blood of Christ secures, to live the rest of the week in practical denial of this by sharing in worldly things. It is likewise illogical for those who break bread in an assembly, and thereby signify their wholehearted involvement in the things of the assembly, to have fellowship in non-assembly, and therefore non-Scriptural associations, however noble their cause and well-meaning their members.

So the believers in a Scriptural assembly have the immense privilege of sharing with God’s Son the things that can be associated with his name in all its dignity. As they come together to remember the Lord Jesus, they also signify their common delight in the blessings His blood has secured, and their oneness with one another. They pledge themselves by these acts to separate from that which gives the worldling pleasure, and all associations which are of man’s devising.

It may be thought that it is not possible today to practise the things that are commanded us by the apostle in 1 Corinthians 1:1-9. This is not the case, however, for “God is faithful”. He who calls into assembly fellowship is faithful to those thus called. He will not desert them or let them down, but will always provide the spiritual resources necessary to continue steadfastly in Divine things. The only question is whether those who are thus called will be faithful to Him in return, as they respond to the God who in grace gives them the immense privilege of involvement with the fellowship of His Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 10 TO 16

1:10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.

1:11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

1:13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

1:14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;

1:15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

1:16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptized any other.

(c) Verse 10   Exhortation to unity.

1:10 Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgement.

Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ- the apostle bases his appeal for unity on the full name of the Lord Jesus. He is “our” Lord Jesus Christ, the common possession of all believers, apostles included. He is not for the few to monopolise, but for all to recognise. He is “Lord”, so we all need to bow to His authority, as expressed in the Scriptures. He is “Jesus”, the man who lived, died, and rose again for us, so that our affections might be towards Him as we realise how indebted we are to Him. He is “Christ”, the man approved of God, and as such should be our role-model in all things. There is no stronger appeal than one based on the full name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

That ye all speak the same thing- Paul will soon quote what they were saying, and they were expressing totally different and opposing things, for one was saying “I of Paul”, and another “I of Apollos” and so on. These words were expressions of disunity and party-spirit.

And that there be no divisions among you- note the “and”, for it is not “speak…but”. In other words, absence of division and speaking the same thing are both required, for a person may conform by saying orthodox things, but there may still be party-spirit in the heart.

But that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgement- this is the ideal situation Paul is setting before the Corinthians. What is said and done is governed by what we think and decide. The apostle is getting to the heart of the problem here, which was the way the Corinthian believers were thinking. This is why he has much to say in these early chapters about the wisdom of the world and the wisdom of God. Only by embracing the wisdom which is of God can unity be achieved. That wisdom is found in the inspired writings of the Bible, and is the standard by which all things are to judged.

(d) Verses 11-16   Exposure of disunity.

1:11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe- there are two matters that are brought out side by side in Leviticus 19. Verse 16 reads, “Thou shalt not go up and down as a tale-bearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy brother: I am the Lord”. Here is an injunction against spreading gossip amongst the Lord’s people. Whilst Christians are not under the law as a means to gain righteousness, nevertheless the righteous requirements of the law are binding upon them as Romans 8:4 indicates. Leviticus 19:17 reads, “Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him”. In other words, out of a spirit of love and concern, sometimes a believer needs to rebuke another believer, so that the wrong he is guilty of may be put right. And this is how the household of Chloe were acting. If they had been spreading gossip the apostle would have rebuked them. As it was, they were bringing the Corinthian situation before the apostle as the best one to deal with it.

That there are contentions among you- the Corinthian believers were showing a grave lack of love towards one another, and this had developed into open conflict and dispute. Such a situation was dishonouring to the name of the Lord Jesus, and needed to be dealt with quickly, and this the apostle seeks to do.

1:12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

Now this I say- the apostle has listened to the report form the household of Chloe, and has satisfied himself that it is true. He now relates the situation at Corinth in his own words, so there might be no doubt as to the seriousness of the problem.

That every one of you saith- the attitude that needs to be dealt with is so general that all of them can be said to be involved.

I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ-perhaps the converts of Paul would try to make him into a party-leader in gratitude for his work amongst them; perhaps some would be impressed with the eloquence of Apollos, (Acts 18:24), and would favour him; others would be impressed by the energy and vigour of Cephas, (Peter), and would especially favour him, not only for that reason, but also because he had been with the Lord on earth as Paul and Apollos had not; others were claiming a special relationship with Christ, and took the super-spiritual position of claiming to be “The Christ-party”. All such divisions are directly contrary to the spirit of Christianity. The Corinthians had been called into the fellowship of God’s Son, not the fellowship of Paul and the others.

1:13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

Is Christ divided? This is the first of three searching questions, which, when answered correctly, will go a long way adjust the attitude of the Corinthian believers.  The three teachers mentioned in verse 12 each had their special ministry. Paul would emphasise the crucifixion of Christ and His subsequent ascent to heavenly glory. Apollos was versed in the Old Testament, as we see from Acts 18:24-28, and would show how Christ was the fulfilment of the prophecies of old time. Peter had been with the Lord on earth, and could testify first-hand of His ministry. Some believers would be attracted to Paul’s emphasis; some to Apollos’; some to Peter’s, and the temptation would be to only listen to a favourite theme, and hence gather around the one who expounded it. The fact is all the truth of God is for all the people of God, and Paul, Apollos and Peter would not have condoned such behaviour on the part of the Corinthians. Christ is not to be divided into “Fulfiller of prophecy”, “Example on Earth”, and “Crucified and Glorified One”. He is one whole Christ, and we need to be taken up with every aspect of His person.

Was Paul crucified for you? The answer to this question is staggeringly simple; how could the Corinthians have missed this point? Notice that Paul does not bring Apollos or Cephas into the argument. He is content to use himself as an argument, debasing himself in favour of Christ. He will use Apollos with himself in his argument in 4:6, but not here. By His crucifixion the Lord Jesus has forever secured the heart’s affections of His people; to adopt a name other than His is ingratitude indeed.

Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?When they were baptised, the Corinthians were baptised into Jesus Christ, Romans 6:3, committing themselves to a life of loyalty and devotion to Him alone. Their current position was a denial of this.

1:14,15 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius; lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

Paul here indicates his complete disinterest in forming a party under his name. John the Baptist had been sent to baptise, and those who received his preaching were known as John’s disciples. When Paul met some of these at Ephesus, he was able to tell them of the Lord Jesus, and they were then baptised in the name of Christ Jesus, Acts 19:5.

Perhaps he personally baptised Crispus because he had been the chief ruler of the synagogue in Corinth, and the other believers might be slow to be convinced of his genuineness. To foster unity the apostle may have personally done the baptising to show his confidence in the genuineness of Crispus’ conversion.

1:16 And I baptized also the household of Stephanas: besides, I know not whether I baptised any other.

It is clear from the wording here that the apostle is genuinely struggling to remember who, if any, he baptised at Corinth. The apostle was engaged in “labours more abundant”, 2 Corinthians 11:23, and would have no time to write a daily journal. He describes the household of Stephanas as the “firstfruits of Achaia”, 16:15, (Corinth being the capital of that district), so perhaps they were the first ones baptised, and who subsequently did the baptising of other converts.

The remainder of the chapter shows how that the disunity of the Corinthian assembly was the direct result of embracing the thought-forms and opinions of the world. As a result, they began to act like the men of the world, who assembled themselves as parties around the philosopher of their choice.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 17 TO 20

1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.

1:20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

(e) Verses 17,18 The wisdom of words is damaging.

1:17 For Christ sent me not to baptise, but to preach the gospel: not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect.

For Christ sent me not to baptise, but to preach the gospel- this is not to say that the apostle was careless about baptising converts, for it is clear that he was not. We read that when he preached in Corinth, “many of the Corinthians hearing, believed, and were baptised”, Acts 18:8. He wrote to the Romans explaining the doctrine of baptism, Romans 6; he wrote to the Galatians that when they were baptised they had put on Christ, Galatians 3:27; and he showed the Colossians that baptism had taken them out from the sphere where philosophy was relevant, and brought them into association with a risen Christ, Colossians 2:12. Baptism is the practical setting forth of the truth of the gospel, so the two cannot be at variance. What the apostle means is that he not only avoided baptising people himself, for the reason we have noted in verses 14-16, but his commission from the Lord was to evangelise, and leave the baptism of the converts to others. A believer does not have to have special gift to baptise, so any genuine brother may baptise a new convert.

Not with wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should be made of none effect- by his upbringing and education the apostle would have been well-able to speak eloquently, and use the reasoning techniques of the philosophers. He refused to do this, however, since it would rob the gospel of its power, which lay in its appeal for faith, not mental ability. How serious a matter it is to cancel out the work of the cross! Yet it is so easily done if the preaching of the gospel is adulterated by man’s thinking in some way. It is so tempting, especially in these days when response to the gospel, at least in the Western World, is rare, to try to present a message which in some way appeals to the natural man. This destroys the gospel, and we should return to faith in the means God has chosen, and not adopt ideas of our own. Israel were forbidden to lift up a cutting tool on the stones they were intending to make into an altar. If they did so, they would pollute the altar, said God, Exodus 20:25,26. So we, if we lift up the tool of man upon the altar-work of Calvary, we have in practice polluted it, and God cannot use what we do for His glory.

1:18 For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God.

For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness- the apostle now gives two reasons why the wisdom of the wise, when used to preach the gospel, is damaging. First, because the preaching of the cross is foolishness to men, so that shows it is completely different to anything they have thought up. While they hold on to their way of thinking they are perishing, so it is counter-productive to mix a way of thinking that lets a man perish, with a way of thinking that saves him. No mere man has yet devised a system of thought which removes the effects of the fall, and brings into true blessing.

But unto us which are saved it is the power of God- this is the second reason why it is foolish to use the wisdom of the world to preach the gospel by. It will not be the channel of God’s power, but will only pander to the pride of man, for he will think he has acquired some merit by understanding it. Just as those who dismiss the gospel as foolishness are perishing, so those who receive the gospel are being saved. The verbs “perish” and “are saved” are in the same tense, and indicate a current situation. The philosophies of men bring them into increasing ruin and loss of well-being, whilst the reverse is the case for the believer- he is constantly saved and preserved by the truth of the gospel.

(f) Verses 19,20 The wisdom of the wise of this world is destroyed by God.

1:19 For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.

For it is written- there follows a quotation from Isaiah 29:14. The previous verse to the one quoted here was used by the Lord Jesus to show the hypocrisy of the leaders of the nation of Israel, Matthew 15:7-9, so we know that the Jewish rulers are in view.

Wisdom may be defined as “Insight into the true nature of things”. The philosophers of the world were earnestly seeking after this insight, but had never succeeded in finding it. God steps in with the disclosure of His wisdom, but not before He has shown that the wisdom of the world is, in effect, foolishness.

I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent- the wise men of Israel, the chief priests, scribes, and elders of the people, are warned by Isaiah that God will destroy their supposed wisdom, the traditions which they had accumulated over many centuries, and by which they had made the doctrines of men more important than the word of God. He would also bring to nothing, or show to be useless, the understanding which they claimed to have of God and His ways. The way this would happen is that they, the princes of this world, would crucify the Lord of glory because they were ignorant about Him, 1 Corinthians 2:7.

1:20 Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?

God has effectively destroyed the wisdom of this world by the cross, and the apostle adapts another passage from Isaiah to point this out. God said through Isaiah, “Thine heart shall meditate terror. Where is the scribe? Where is the receiver? Where is he that counted the towers? Thou shalt not see a fierce people, a people of a deeper speech than thou canst perceive; of a stammering tongue, that thou canst not understand”, Isaiah 33:18,19. Verse 19 shows that it is foreign armies that are in view, yet God’s promise to His people was that they would not see them as invaders of the land, and verse 18 assures them that they would be calm in the face of terror. As a result, God can ask in triumph the three questions Isaiah lists. Where is the scribe, plotting the line of attack on his map, and writing out the plan of battle? Where is the receiver, or weigher, ready to assess the spoils of victory and weigh them out to those deserving of reward after the battle? Where is the scout who secretly entered the land to assess the vulnerable points and the strong points, counting the watchtowers to see how well-guarded the land was? Such were Isaiah’s words. Paul adapts them, (with the authority of the same inspiring Spirit who guided Isaiah to write), and asks:

Where is the wise?- the man who plans his life according to man’s wisdom, and seeks to win life’s battles thereby?

Where is the scribe?- the one ready to record the triumphs of a life lived according to man’s thinking?

Where is the disputer of this world?- who like the counter of towers, was confident that he was able to succeed against all opposing forces? They are nowhere to be seen, not only because a life lived according to worldly wisdom is the life of a person who is perishing, but also because by the cross God has shown the wise of this world to be weak and ineffective.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 21 TO 31

1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

1:22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:

1:23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock, and unto the Greeks foolishness;

1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

1:25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

1:26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:

1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

1:28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:

1:29 That no flesh should glory in His presence.

1:30 But of Him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:

1:31 That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.

(g) Verses 21-29 The wisdom of God has been demonstrated.

(i) Verse 21(a) In the history of Old Testament times.

(ii) Verses 21(b) to 25 In the Calvary-work of Christ.

(iii) Verses 26 to 29 In the testimony of believers.

1:21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.

(i) The wisdom of God has been demonstrated in the history of Old Testament times.

For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God- the nations were allowed to go their own ways, to show to them that by their own religious thought they could not attain to the knowledge of God. As Paul said to the philosophers of Athens, “God…hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; that they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after Him, and find Him, though He be not far from every one of us”, Acts 17:26,27. It was an exhibition of the wisdom of God that this happened, so that man might realise the bankruptcy of his thinking, and seek the Lord through the nation of Israel, set by God in the midst of the earth to preserve the knowledge of Himself. That they did not do this is shown by the inscription Paul based his address on, “To the Unknown God”. They had a vague notion that there was another God somewhere, and lest they offend Him, they adopted that inscription as an insurance policy. Paul was able to declare unto them the God they so feebly knew. It is vain for man to continue his search for God apart from the revelation God has given of Himself in the Person of His Son, which revelation is full and final.

(ii) The wisdom of God has been demonstrated in the Calvary-work of Christ.

It pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe- having given many centuries of opportunity to men to find Him by themselves, God now presents to men by the preaching of the gospel the way to find true wisdom. This method does not appeal to the wise of this world, so they label it foolishness. Yet despite what men say about the gospel, they cannot dispute that it rescues men from a foolish life-style, and imparts to them knowledge that they could not have gained in the schools of men. This wisdom is not available only to those who are intellectually inclined, because it does not depend for its reception on intelligence, but faith.

That is not to say it is not reasonable and logical to believe the gospel, for it is, but is does mean that the world-view of men must be abandoned, and the thoughts presented in the gospel must be embraced by faith.

Nor does it mean that those who preach the gospel should be haphazard in their speaking, and not present truths in the most understandable way possible, by God’s enabling. The last chapter of Ecclesiastes gives us the plan of action of the writer of the book. “And moreover, because the preacher was wise, he still taught the people knowledge; Yea, he gave good heed, and sought out, and set in order many proverbs. The preacher sought to find out acceptable words: and that which was upright, even words of truth”, Ecclesiastes 12:9,10.

In verse 18 believers are saved constantly, whereas here they are saved decisively. There is no discrepancy, however, for there is initial salvation from sin and its consequences, which salvation is once and for all, with no recall of that salvation by God, and without help from the wisdom of the wise of this world either. There is also ongoing salvation from the pitfalls of the pilgrim pathway, which in the context here mean the dangers presented by the world’s way of thinking and acting.

1:22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:

For the Jews require a sign- even though Christ has died and risen again, they were still asking for evidence that He was the Messiah. After three and a half years of sign-miracles, they had still asked the Lord Jesus for a sign from heaven. His response was, “An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: for as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth”, Matthew 12:39,40. The nation of Israel had ample opportunity to test the claims of those who witnessed to the resurrection of Christ; but their minds were hardened, and biased against the truth.

And the Greeks seek after wisdom- the Greek world constantly sought insight into the true nature of things. They were waiting for the conclusive argument, the line of reasoning that would at last enlighten them. Their quest in Old Testament times was often sincere, but now that Christ crucified is preached they have no excuse for continuing the search for wisdom on their own.

1:23 But we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling-block, and unto the Greeks foolishness;

But we preach Christ crucified- undeterred by the demands of men of intellect, and unembarrassed by the subject he made known, Paul asserts that he and his fellow evangelists preached. They did not debate, rationalise, or argue, but simply made an announcement of facts. He also asserts that they preached Christ, or the Messiah. Despite knowing what the consensus in Israel about Jesus of Nazareth’s claim to Messiahship was, Paul insisted on preaching Him. He further states that in their preaching they emphasised that this Christ was the one who was crucified, and will always be known for that. They did not preach Jesus the teacher, Jesus the miracle worker, Jesus the fine example, although He was all these things. Paul was convinced that the only sort of Christ that God would have preached is Christ crucified.

Unto the Jews a stumbling-block- the idea that a man crucified in shame and disgrace between two thieves on a Roman cross, was worthy to be welcomed as their Messiah, was not something that Jews generally were prepared to accept. But then the majority of Jews were not saved, for they were clinging to the wisdom of the elders, and refusing the wisdom of God.

As we have said, wisdom is insight into the true nature of things. At the cross the character of God, who is the fount of all wisdom, was made known fully. Do we wish to know righteousness, then we see the way God dealt with sin at Calvary. Or love, then we see His love fully expressed in that He did not spare His own Son the horrors of that experience. Or justice, where He poured out His anger against sin upon His own Son. “God is light” and “God is love”, and every ray of glory that shines in His person, as summed up in those two expressions, is seen in full display at Calvary.

And unto the Greeks foolishness- the Greeks were looking for the Ideal Man, and to them such a man would not succumb, but would succeed. People crucified on a cross had succumbed, in their view. They looked for a man who was a victor, not a victim. Crucified people had not been victorious, but they had become victims of circumstance. To them, in a word, crucifixion was a tragedy, not a triumph, and crucified people had no claim on their attention.

Despite this prevailing attitude of both Jew and Gentile, Paul and his fellow-workers persisted in preaching Christ crucified, and there is no reason why their present-day counterparts should not do the same.

1:24 But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.

But unto them which are called- these are they who respond in faith to the message preached. It is by the gospel that God calls men. He does not invite them to participate in a discussion, but to accept His Son as Saviour and Lord.

Both Jews and Greeks- despite the fact that the majority of Jew and Gentile reject the gospel, it is still undeniably true that many have believed and been saved. Despite their different attitudes before, due to culture and background, they have come the same way, and turned to God because of the work of His Son. God has only one gospel.

Christ the power of God- the power of God to destroy the wisdom of the wise, verses 19 and 20, and to save those who believe, verse 18, is vested in Christ, the one men crucified.

1:25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men; and the weakness of God is stronger than men.

Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men- the word “because” tells us that we are now to be given reasons for the statement that Christ is the wisdom and power of God as far as those who are called are concerned. We could look at the statements in this verse in two ways. Either the apostle is exaggerating for the sake of effect, and is showing that even if there were such things as foolishness and weakness with God, then, because He is God, they would be much more wise and powerful than the wisdom and power of men. Or, alternatively, when he writes of the foolishness of God, He is referring to the gospel which men call foolish, because it proclaims salvation through a crucified man. This “foolish” gospel is indeed wiser than men, for it saves, whereas those who believe the wisdom of the wise of this world are perishing.

And the weakness of God is stronger than men- the proclamation of a crucified man as Saviour is nonsense to the unbeliever. In the language of the onlookers at Calvary, “He saved others, Himself He cannot save”, Matthew 27:41. It was the chief priests, scribes, and elders who mocked the Saviour thus; in other words, the religious princes of this world, who crucified the Lord of Glory because they were ignorant of Divine wisdom, 1 Corinthians 2:7.

Of course it goes without saying that there are no such things as foolishness and weakness with God in actual fact, and the apostle would never suggest there are. God is Almighty, and All-wise.

(iii) The wisdom of God has been demonstrated in the testimony of believers.

1:26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called:

For ye see your calling, brethren- having thought of the history of the world, and the events at Calvary, the apostle now directs the thoughts of the Corinthians to their own situation. Their calling is their experience of the calling of God through the gospel.

How that not many wise men after the flesh- as Paul approached the city of Corinth God encouraged him with the thought that He had many people in that city, Acts 18:11. Yet here we read of not many. So the majority of the “many” that God had in His mind, were not the elite of the city, but the lower classes. God is no respecter of persons, so it is not that God did not offer the gospel to the upper classes so energetically as He did to the lower classes. It was simply that the latter were more responsive. The reason they were more responsive was that they had not embraced the thinking of the philosophers, and were more ready to believe the gospel as it came to them.

How that not many wise men after the flesh- these are they who had been educated in the philosophies of men, and felt that they qualified for the title “wise”. Paul discounts this, however, for they are only wise after the flesh, that is, wise as men think and speak, not wise according to God.

Not many mighty- men of influence in some way, whether politically, financially, or religiously. Because of their education, these too would embrace the wisdom of the world. Thinking themselves to be powerful and wise, they saw no need for Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God.

Not many noble, are called- these would be the well-bred, high-born classes, who had the “benefit” of the accumulated wisdom handed down from their ancestors. These were too self-sufficient and grand to follow the despised Nazarene, especially since His life ended with crucifixion.

These are described as those not called, but not because the gospel was not for them, but because they judged that they were not for the gospel. No fault attaches to God, who desires that all men be saved, 1 Timothy 2:4.

1:27 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;

But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise- the choice of God involves the response of men to the gospel, as well as His predestining counsels. 2 Thessalonians 2:13 reads, “But we are bound to give thanks always to God for you, brethren beloved of the Lord, because God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth“. If by “chosen the foolish things” Paul meant “chosen only the foolish things”, then we might be justified in thinking simply of God’s eternal purpose electing only foolish people. But it is evident that some of the wise in this world have been converted to God. Paul himself is an example. So it is not an absolute statement of intention only to call foolish people, but a statement that takes account of the situation as it is. God has chosen foolish people, so that His own wisdom may be glorified, and the ineffectiveness of this world’s wisdom might become more apparent. In this way He confounds or embarrasses the wise, for their inability to live a saved life becomes all the more evident as it is contrasted with the life of those God has saved.

And God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty- those who had no influence on affairs in Corinth or the wider world, were ready to accept the truth of the gospel. Those who were influential were too proud to follow the despised Nazarene. Whatever their human power and influence, however, they had no power to live a life pleasing to God, whereas those of little account in the world were able to do this.

1:28 And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that are:

And base things of the world- they were base, of low-birth, possessing none of the advantages of nobility, and having all the disadvantages of being low-born.

And things which are despised, hath God chosen- because they were uneducated and poor, they would be looked down upon by the upper classes of society.

And things which are not, to bring to nought things that are-of course Paul does not mean these people did not exist, but rather that they might just as well not have existed as far as the elite were concerned. It is such people that God uses to reduce those who seem to be big and powerful to their proper level.

1:29 That no flesh should glory in His presence.

That no flesh should glory in His presence- God is working for His own glory, and He knows that the wise and powerful of this world will find it difficult to leave their attitudes behind them when they get saved. This is why God delights to save the nobodies of this world, so that His glory might be displayed in that sinners of the lowest sort are in His presence for all eternity.

(f) Verses 30-31 The wisdom of God directs all the glory to Himself.

1:30 But of Him are ye in Christ Jesus, who of God is made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemption:

But of Him- the Corinthian believers were what they were solely because of God’s working. They were the result of God putting forth His power through the preaching of the cross. There was nothing out of themselves or other men that had brought them to their current position.

Are ye- before they were nothing and nobody, now they are something and somebody. How that can be said is told us in the next words.

In Christ Jesus- He is not only the crucified man, but also the risen, ascended and glorified man. As such He is able to bring to the highest place of honour in association with Himself. Paul explains to the Ephesians that believers are seated in heavenly places in Christ Jesus, Ephesians 2:6. God has lifted beggars from the dunghill, and set them among princes, 1 Samuel 2:8. The wise of this world were not prepared to go as far as the cross, and ally themselves to the crucified Christ. They thereby forfeit the right to have association with Him in His highest glory.

Who of God is made unto us wisdom- the order of words in the original is “who was made to us wisdom from God”. The wisdom that comes from God is made good to us by Christ Jesus. Only through Him and His death can we know God, and have insight into the true nature of things. The world may grope after God in the dark, but they do so because they have rejected the light that Christ brings.

And righteousness- because we now know God, we know also how to live a life that is in harmony with His character. We need wisdom for that, and this comes from Christ. Paul will later write that Christ was made sin for us, so that we might be made, or become in practice, the righteousness of God in Him, 2 Corinthians 5:21. The life of the believer should be marked by practical righteousness, the expression of the righteous nature imparted by God.

And sanctification- the apostle has already described the Corinthian believers as saints by divine calling, verse 2, and this repeats that thought. In the midst of the squalid conditions prevailing in Corinth, the believers there were able to maintain a separate lifestyle, in the measure in which they availed themselves of Divine wisdom in Christ.

And redemption- not only were they able to live righteous and holy lives, but they were also able to enjoy the liberty that Christ’s death brings to the believer. As the Lord Jesus said, “If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed”, John 8:36. He also said, “and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, John 8:32. So not only are believers righteous and holy by God’s reckoning, they are redeemed also. But each of these three things is to be worked out in practice. It is the truth that makes free, the truth of God’s word, the perfect wisdom. If we direct our lives by its instruction, we shall be made free from all that brings into bondage, whatever form that bondage takes.

1:31 That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord.

That, according as it is written, He that glorieth, let him glory in the Lord- the apostle closes this section of his argument with a quotation from the prophet Jeremiah. The context reads as follows- “Thus saith the Lord, Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, neither let the mighty man glory in his might, let not the rich man glory in his riches: But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he understandeth and knoweth Me, that I am the Lord which exercise loving kindness, judgement, and righteousness, in the earth: for in these things I delight, saith the Lord”, Jeremiah 9:23,24. Clearly the apostle has had this passage in the back of his mind as he penned verses 26-29, for the same classes of men he speaks of, Jeremiah speaks of too. A reading of the early verses of Jeremiah 9 will show that the people of Israel in Jeremiah’s day were no different to the men of Corinth in Paul’s day. They were alike guilty of treachery, lies, and immorality. The answer to this problem was not the wise man glorying in his supposed wisdom, and his ability to remedy the situation; nor the mighty man glorying in his might, thinking that by his influence he could effect change; nor the rich man priding himself on his success, and seeking to pump money into the situation to make it better. None of these solutions is the right one. Only by glorying in the Lord, and trusting in His wisdom, His power, and His rich grace, can the situation be remedied. Notice that in Jeremiah 9 the Lord speaks of Himself as to His activity, for He exercises loving kindness, judgement, and righteousness; so should those who believe be exercised. And in the measure in which the Corinthians, and ourselves, imitate God’s ways, we shall live lives that are glorifying to the Lord, for they will be a reflection of His character.

God and the ages of time. Part 2: The present age.

It is vitally important to have an understanding of the nature of this present age, because that will deliver us from the errors that are taught in some circles. For example, there are those who teach that the present age is simply a continuation of the dealings of God as they were in Old Testament times. That this is not so will be apparent as we study Ephesians chapter 3. The church is a distinct entity, unknown in Old Testament times, and is not to be confused with Israel. Whilst it is true that the nation of Israel has been cast away for a time, it has not been cast away finally, for God intends to recover the nation, so that Christ may rule over it as their Messiah.

A proper understanding of this chapter will deliver us from the notion that God will have dealings with the nation of Israel at the same time as He is calling out the church. The logical outcome of understanding Ephesians 3 is that we realise the Lord Jesus must come for His people at the rapture, (as described in 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; 1 Corinthians 15:51-58), before the last seven years of Daniel’s 70 weeks begin to run their course. This means that such chapters as Matthew 24 and 25 make no reference to the church, and we should avoid quoting them as if they did.

SURVEY OF EPHESIANS 3:1-13

In this section the apostle sets out the details relative to the mystery that he was responsible for explaining to the believers. This mystery, or hitherto unknown truth, had to do with the relationship between believers who had been Jews, and believers who had been Gentiles.

It was revealed to Daniel in Daniel 9:24-27, that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and build Jerusalem unto the reign of the Messiah would be a period of 490 years. This period was divided into three very unequal blocks of time. The first block was of 49 years, and extended down to the prophecy of Malachi, with which the Old Testament closes. The second block, consisting of 434 years, extended until the cutting off of Messiah at Calvary. At this point there remained one 7 year period still to elapse. Unknown to Daniel, it was God’s plan to have another period of time between the death of the Messiah and the final seven years. This is the present age. In Ephesians chapter 3 and Colossians 1:23-29, the apostle explains the mystery about this church age of grace in more detail.

The main subjects covered are as follows:

The steward of the mystery:

Verse 1        Paul’s sufferings.

Verses 7,8 Paul’s humility

Verse 13     Paul’s endurance.

The hiding of the mystery:

Verse 5 It was not known in other ages.

Verse 5 It was not passed on down the generations.

Verse 9 It was hid in God.

Verse 8 Its riches are unsearchable, even by saints of Old Testament.

The revelation of the mystery:

Verse 2 Paul given grace to reveal it.

Verse 3 Revealed to Paul at first.

Verse 4 Written down so that we may understand.

Verse 5 Revealed to other apostles and prophets as well.

The substance of the mystery:

Verse 6

Gentile believers are fellow-heirs with Jewish believers.

Gentile believers are fellow-members of the body of Christ.

Gentile believers are fellow-partakers of God’s promise by the gospel.

The result of the mystery:

Verse 4 Believers are able to understand.

Verse 8 Believers are able to appreciate the rich truth as before they could not.

Verse 10 Angels are able to see the wisdom of God through the church.

Verse 11 God’s eternal purpose is put into effect.

Verse 11 The Lordship of Christ is made known.

Verse 12 Believers may confidently approach God, conscious of their position.

Verse 13 Believers are saved from despair by the glorious truth of the mystery.

SUMMARY OF THE SECTION:

Verses 1-4 The mystery unveiled to Paul.
Verse 5 The mystery unknown by Old Testament saints.
Verse 6 The mystery unfolded to New Testament saints.
Verses 7-10  The mystery understood by the saints.
Verses 10,11  The mystery understood by the angels.
Verses 12,13  The mystery underpinning boldness and confidence.

Verses 1-4 THE MYSTERY UNVEILED TO PAUL

3:1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles,

By “for this cause” the apostle means “for the sake of this”, and not simply “because”. The cause Paul was promoting was that of the truth of the church, as spoken of in 2:11-22. In Acts 21:28,29 Paul was accused of taking Trophemus, an Ephesian, past the middle wall of partition in the Temple at Jerusalem, and we read that “forthwith the doors were shut”, verse 30. From this point on in the book of the Acts, the apostle is a prisoner. The charge the Jews brought against him was provoked by his statement that the Lord had sent him to the Gentiles, Acts 22:21. Soon after this comes the first mention of the phrase “Paul the prisoner”, Acts 23:18. Rome may have bound Paul with a chain, but really he is a prisoner belonging to Christ Jesus, the man who is risen from the dead and ascended in glory to heaven. Because Christ is risen, the ultimate prison house, the grave, has been destroyed. All lesser imprisonments now become bearable. Paul was prepared to suffer for the sake of the truth; how much are we prepared to suffer for it? Or are we going to compromise in the face of opposition?

3:2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward:

The sufferings Paul endured as he travelled amongst the Gentiles were only worthwhile, from a human standpoint, if the believers heard with interest the things he had to say and write to them.

A dispensation is the handling of household affairs as a trusted steward. The word as used here does not denote a period of time, but rather, the administration of divine things during a particular period of time. So as the dispenser or administer of the benefits God had for His people in terms of instruction in His ways, Paul so served that what God had for them was duly passed on to them. So the grace or favour of God in this instance consisted of doctrine, and Paul was the one chosen to pass on that doctrine. God’s grace also enabled Paul to teach the truths of this passage- they could only be known as God in grace revealed them to him, and were not the result of the research he had done.

3:3,4 How that by revelation He made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ)

In chapter 2 the apostle had likened the church to a temple, which was a habitation of God through the Spirit, 2:21,22. Now in those times there was, in connection with the heathen temples, (and Ephesus was famed for its temple to Diana), a body of doctrine that was known as the mysteries of the god. Revelation 2:24 calls these the deep things of Satan, things that were revealed, not to the common worshippers, but only to a favoured few. The mysteries were mysterious only to those not initiated into them. But to those who were thus initiated, they were fully revealed. These doctrines were imparted by a specially selected interpreter of the gods, called a hierophant. When they had been instructed into the secrets of their god, the initiates would be allowed in to his immediate presence as those who were “perfected”.

Now the Spirit of God lifts these concepts from their pagan setting, and sanctifies them to their proper use. Paul was the interpreter, and the saints, once instructed, would have perfect knowledge in those things imparted to the apostle.

Note that he received these things by revelation, for he could not study the Old Testament scriptures and discover them, for they were not found there. As far as saints of old time were concerned, these truths were hidden; now that the apostle has exercised his stewardship, they are made known to church saints.

Ananias told Paul that “The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know His will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of His mouth. For thou shalt be a witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard”, Acts 22:14,15.

The few words he speaks of would include the following:

1. The words of chapter 2, where he shows that the cross of Christ is the basis whereby Jew and Gentile may be brought together into unity. This gives details about being “fellow-heirs”.

2. The words of Galatians 3 where Gentiles are brought into blessing as heirs. This gives details about being “partakers of His promise through the gospel”.

3. The words of 1 Corinthians 12 where Gentiles are shown to be part of the body of Christ, the church. See on verse 6. He is enabled to give a coherent explanation for the fact that Jew and Gentile are united in one body. This gives details about being “fellow-members of the same body”.

Verse 5 THE MYSTERY UNKNOWN BY OLD TESTAMENT SAINTS

3:5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto His holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit;

The word for ages originally meant a begetting, being derived from the word to become. The meaning was transferred from the people to the time in which they lived, inasmuch as a period of time is often described in terms of what happened to the people during it. Paul is emphasising the heavenly origin of these mysteries, and that they are unique to this particular age.

The phrase “sons of men” reminds us that the truths in question were not handed down from father to son in Old Testament times.

The apostle makes it clear in Galatians 1:15-24 that he had visited Jerusalem on two occasions, and had deliberately avoided contact with most of the apostles. Fourteen years later, however, he went up “by revelation”. Now this may simply mean that he went to Jerusalem because Christ revealed to him that this was His will. Or it could mean that he went up according to, or in connection with, the revelation that he had been given about the mystery, which it was now the time to pass on to his fellow apostles. This he did when he “communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles”, Galatians 2:1,2. If this is correct, then it shows how the holy apostles and prophets had the truth of the mystery revealed to them.

It also shows that Paul’s conception of the gospel was of far greater scope that we may sometimes think, for it included insight into God’s ways with men. This also disposes of the notion that the apostle Peter did not understand the church. When he writes that Paul taught things “hard to be understood”, 2 Peter 3:16. it does not necessarily mean he found them hard to understand. It was “the unlearned and unstable” who did this.

The order, “apostles and prophets” is significant, for it prevents us thinking that the prophets were those of Old Testament times. These prophets were those that the church was built upon, as to its doctrine, 2:20. They were holy men, set apart to God’s interests, and not in the least inferior to the Old Testament “holy men of God” that Peter speaks about, 2 Peter 1:21. Now that these hitherto unknown truths have been revealed, and also written down, we have no need for apostles and prophets.

Note the following:

  • The faith, or body of truth, has been once for all delivered to the saints, Jude 3 margin, so that they may earnestly contend for it.
  • The Lord Jesus promised the apostles in the upper room that the Holy Spirit would lead them into all truth, John 16:13, and this promise has been fulfilled.
  • The apostle Paul was the one who “fulfilled the word of God”, Colossians 1:25. That is, the doctrines he instructed the saints in was the climax, the fully filling up, of the body of truth we need to know whilst we are down here. “That which is perfect” has come, 1 Corinthians 13:10.
  • When believfers in Christ get to heaven, fresh truths will be revealed, for we shall then fully know as we are fully known by God now, 1 Corinthians 13:12; but we do not need that knowledge yet, even if we could understand it.
  • We should not expect fresh revelations of doctrine today. Those who declare they have a fresh word from the Lord, however acquired, should be asked what it is. If it turns out to be in the Scriptures anyway, their claim is pointless. If it is something outside of Scripture, then they fall foul of the curse pronounced on those who add to the word of God, Revelation 22:18.

Verse 6 THE MYSTERY UNFOLDED TO NEW TESTAMENT SAINTS

3:6 That the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of His promise in Christ by the gospel:

We come now to the substance of the mystery. At first sight it might seem to be insignificant, until we realise how far-reaching and different these truths are. It is contained in three phrases: “fellow-heirs”; “of the same body”; and “partakers of His promise”. Each of the three expressions has the idea of togetherness about it. So in effect the Gentiles are said to be fellow-heirs, fellow-members of the same body, and fellow-partakers of His promise in Christ by the gospel.

FELLOW-HEIRS

The apostle Paul had begun the epistle by describing the wealth God has given us in Christ. Using words and phrases such as “sonship”, (adoption of children), “redemption”, “obtained an inheritance”, “earnest of our inheritance”, “redemption of the purchased possession”, he is clearly contrasting the believer’s spiritual inheritance in heavenly places with Israel’s earthly inheritance in Canaan. Whereas their blessings depended on obedience to the law, as Moses made clear to them in Deuteronomy 28, ours are secured in Christ, by grace, verse 3. The nation of Israel was chosen because of the fathers, Deuteronomy 7:8, whereas believers of this age are chosen “in Him”, verse 4. Israel were accepted if they kept the law, whereas believers are accepted “in the Beloved”, verse 6. Israel were redeemed nationally by the Passover lamb, whereas we have redemption “through His blood”, verse 7. Israel’s continuance in the inheritance depended on their obedience to God, and their success in driving out the enemy, whereas we are sure of the inheritance, for the Spirit within is earnest or pledge of it.

So those who formerly were Gentiles, now they have believed, come into the inheritance because they are heirs of God just as much as believers who formerly were Jews. Their relationship with these Jewish believers is not a one-sided one. The believing Gentiles have equal share with the one-time Jews, since they are all joint heirs with Christ, Romans 8:17, and He does not discriminate between them.

FELLOW-MEMBERS OF THE SAME BODY

The apostle Paul is the only one to use the figure of a human body and its head to illustrate the relation between Christ and the church. Now that He is risen from the dead and ascended, Christ has become head of the body, the church, Colossians 1:18. Every true believer of this present age is linked to the Head in heaven, for “he that is joined to the Lord is one spirit”, 1 Corinthians 6:17, and “He that established us with you in Christ, (or, as it may be rendered, ‘firmly joined us to Christ’), and hath anointed us, is God”, 2 Corinthians 1:21.

FELLOW-PARTAKERS OF HIS PROMISE IN CHRIST BY THE GOSPEL

In 2:12 we learn that the Gentiles had no claim on the covenants that God made with Israel. These covenants were:

1. The Abrahamic covenant, Genesis 12:1-3), which promised them the land of Canaan.

2. The Mosaic covenant, Deuteronomy 6:3, which promised blessings if they obeyed His law.

3. The Palestinian covenant, Deuteronomy 29 and 30, with its promise of restoration to the land if they rebelled but then repented.

4. The Davidic covenant, 2 Samuel 7:12-17, which promised a king to reign over them.

And all this lack of blessing was because they were “without Christ”, that is, apart from, or cut off from any relationship with Israel’s Messiah. It is through the Christian gospel that they have arrived at their present happy position of having a share in the spiritual and heavenly blessings Christ secures and guarantees. They do not come into blessing by being a convert to Judaism, but by conversion to Christ.

Verses 7-10 THE MYSTERY UNDERSTOOD BY THE SAINTS

3:7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of His power.

It was the apostle Paul who was entrusted with the ministry of unfolding these truths to the other apostles, (when he went up to Jerusalem, if the view expressed in the notes on verse 5 about Galatians 2:1,2 is correct), and to the saints. He could not do so in his own strength, or by his own ability; he could not, for instance, rely on his expertise as a trained rabbi, for these truths were unknown to the rabbis. To discharge his stewardship in a spiritual manner he needed, not the skill of men, but the help of God in the form of grace. The effectual working of Divine power is needed, because Satan is opposed to the progress of Divine truth. The power of God which He put forth to raise Christ from the dead, Ephesians 1:19,20, is put forth again, to thwart the Devil’s hindering tactics.

3:8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ;

The apostle is almost overwhelmed by the responsibility laid upon him. When it was a question of him being a sinner, he said he was chief, 1 Timothy 1:15, but now that he has been made an apostle by the glorified Christ, he is deeply humbled. So much so that he invents a word to describe his status- “leaster”. No doubt the thing which humbled him in this context is the exceptional character of the truth he was commissioned to make known. The rich truth about Christ, and in particular, His relationship with His people at the present time.

This truth was unsearchable, a word which literally means untraceable, untrackable. Paul was enabled to announce truths that it is impossible to either discover or understand with the unaided human mind, and which, moreover, were untraceable by Old Testament saints. Only the believer of this age, energised by the Spirit of God, can enter into the deep things of God, see 1 Corinthians 2:9-16.

3:9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:

Not only do we need to have the truth revealed to us, we need to be enlightened as to how to handle the truth once we have got it. For it is to be worked out in fellowship with other believers, as is seen in the three-fold use of the word “fellow” in verse 6.

The mystery has been hid in God. It was not hidden in God’s word, but in His heart, ready to be disclosed at the moment of His choosing. That moment was when His Son had returned to heaven, His work on earth completely finished. Confusion will result if we try to read the church into the Old Testament. We must not confuse the church with Israel. It is interesting to notice that it is Matthew’s gospel, the gospel of the King, which alone records the prophecy of Christ about the church. Interesting also, that after this has been done in chapter 16, the next chapter records the transfiguration of Christ, which confirmed to Peter that the Old Testament prophecies about the kingdom were still valid, 2 Peter 1:16-19. The kingdom is not cancelled, nor has the church replaced it.

Through Jesus Christ all things had been created, including the ages of time, (for time is part of God’s creation). As the Architect of the Ages, He chooses to tell His secret to His people at this time.

Verses 10,11 THE MYSTERY UNDERSTOOD BY THE ANGELS

3:10 To the intent that now unto the principalities and powers in heavenly places might be known by the church the manifold wisdom of God,

The angels had desired to look into the things that the prophets wrote concerning the sufferings and glory of the Messiah, 1 Peter 1:10-12. Now they are able to plainly see the results of His sufferings. The wisdom of God is His complete insight into the true nature of things. In the present context, it has to do with His ways in this age.

The angels had witnessed the way that Eve had by-passed the authority of Adam, and accepted the authority of Satan. The church is that company which accepts the authority of Christ, and expresses it in obedience to His will. The angels take great interest in those who, despite the fact that Christ left the earth 2000 years ago, having been given insight by God into the true nature of things through Christ who is the wisdom of God, express that wisdom in obedience and love. For instance, the covered head and long hair of the sisters is an object lesson to the angels, for they thereby see Christian women acting contrary to the first woman, who failed to submit to Divine order with disastrous results. We should never underestimate the value of this testimony by the sisters, for they maintain this testimony “because of the angels”, 1 Corinthians 11:10.

3:11 According to the eternal purpose which He purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord:

Not only is the mystery hid in God, and hid from ages and generations, but it has been His purpose eternally to bless Gentiles this way. It is not an emergency plan devised after Israel refused its Messiah and crucified Him. Rather, that rejection of Christ as their Messiah was foreknown, and part of the plan. They still bear the full burden of guilt for slaying Him, but He was “delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God” in the ultimate sense.

Verses 12,13 THE MYSTERY UNDERPINNING BOLDNESS AND CONFIDENCE

3:12 In whom we have boldness and access with confidence by the faith of Him.

Those who were initiated into the mysteries were allowed to approach into the immediate presence of the heathen idol, behind which lurked an evil spirit. The believer’s privilege is far purer and greater, even that of approaching the true God with boldness, and with confidence. Boldness is literally the “absence of fear in speaking”, and would refer to the fact that, instructed in apostolic doctrine, the believer is able to speak to God with intelligence. He also has confidence too, for the truth unfolded by the apostles serve to strengthen the believer’s faith, and assure him of the dignity of the privilege that is his. Heathen idol-worshippers were driven by fear and ignorance- how different is the attitude of the believer!

3:13 Wherefore I desire that ye faint not at my tribulations for you, which is your glory.

Having set forth the truth about the mystery in the previous verses, the apostle is now in a position to appeal to them to be encouraged in the Christian pathway. They should not allow the fact that the apostle went through tribulations and distress as he went about ministering, to make them think that what he taught was not of God. Far from being a sign of God’s disapproval, the trials of the apostle were occasioned in the main by Jewish opponents, who were angry at his emphasis on Gentiles coming into blessing. This blessing was a glorious thing, for it linked them to Christ in glory. Far from being downcast, therefore, because of the apostle’s sufferings, they should see in them a sign present and coming glories were assured.

In the parallel passage to this, Colossians 1:23-29, the apostle rejoices in his sufferings for them. He knew from the outset that he would have to suffer for the sake of Christ, being told it a few days after his conversion, Acts 9:16. He knew also that the full complement of those sufferings had not been reached, for there was “that which is behind of the afflictions of Christ”. This does not mean, of course that there was shortfall in the sufferings of Christ. The shortfall was with Paul. He rejoiced also in the riches of the glory of the mystery, verse 27. And so should we rejoice, as we contemplate the glorious things God has done, and will yet do.

CHRIST AND THE CHURCH: PART 6

CHRIST AND THE CHURCH
PART 6  THE LOCAL ASSEMBLY

INTRODUCTION
We live in a day of confusion about how Christians should come together.  Some meet as they do because of force of habit, others because of their upbringing, or the nearness of the place of meeting.  Still others feel that they have no need to be loyal to a particular group, but move from place to place.  God is not the author of such confusion, however, therefore its cause must lie elsewhere.  He can be relied upon to guide us in this, as in all matters, especially as proper church fellowship is described as “the fellowship of His Son”, and our God is very careful as to what He associates with His Beloved Son. ‘

THE MEANING OF THE WORD CHURCH
We must first of all establish what is meant by a church.  Nowadays the word is used in several different senses.  We shall look at these first, then test these usages by the only standard, the Word of God.

The church as a building:
Of course the New Testament does speak of the church as a building: “I will build My church”, Matthew 16:18; “the whole building…groweth unto a holy temple in the Lord”, Ephesians 2:21.  But this is using the idea of a building as a metaphor, to put across a spiritual concept.  So the church is indeed a building, but not a physical one.  It is a spiritual building composed of living stones, 1 Peter 2:5.  The Acts of the Apostles speaks of tidings “coming to the ears of the church”, Acts 11:22, so it is people that are in view, not material buildings.

The “church” in connection with a country:
For instance, there is the “Church of England”, meaning those congregations of people, professing to be Christians, who meet in a certain way in England, and have as their leader the Archbishop of Canterbury, and over him the Queen, who is described as the head of the Church of England.  Then there is the “Church of Rome”, consisting of those who recognize the Pope as their head.  This use of the word church is foreign to the word of God, since no man on earth is the head of the church, for the head of the true church is in heaven.  The Scriptures never speak of the church of a particular earthly location, such as Galatia, or Judea.  What are spoken of  are “the churches of Galatia, Galatians 1:2, or the churches of Judea, Galatians 1:22. 

The church as a denomination emphasizing a particular Scripture doctrine, or a prominent Christian leader: 
So there is the “Baptist Church”, with the (commendable) insistence on the baptism of believers.  But no doctrine of Scripture should be elevated above another, and then made a label for a particular group of Christians.  There are Charismatic churches, who emphasize the gifts that were given to the early believers.  Apart from the fact that these gifts have been withdrawn, it is wrong to make them a badge, and thus divide the people of God.  There is the “Lutheran Church”, named after Luther; but this detracts from the preeminence of Christ, who alone should be to the fore.

The church on earth:
In some circles the idea of “the church on earth” is prominent, by which is meant all Christians on the earth at any one moment.  But the church is not an earthly concept, for it is linked to Christ its Head in heaven, and each believer is linked to Him there, as we have seen from Ephesians 2:5,6. It is true there are churches in a particular place on earth, but that is a Scriptural use of words. 

Faced with these varying ideas about the church, the only safe course is to resort to the Scriptures, and enquire, by the help of the Holy Spirit, (who is the Spirit of truth, and who guides into all truth, John 16:13), what it has to say on this important subject.  God desires that His people should meet together in a way that conforms with His mind on the matter, for in so doing Christ will be glorified.  This will  ensure that conditions prevail in which growth in Christian virtues and intelligence may be fostered.  God’s way is always the best way.  So we turn now to the New Testament, for the idea of the church is not found in the Old Testament.

The Greek word rendered church is made up of two parts, the first meaning “out of”, the second meaning “a calling”.  The two together indicate a called out company of people, separated from men in general and called together for specific purposes.’
The English word “church” does not come from the Greek word “eklesia”, but from the Greek word “kuriakos”, which means “belonging to the Lord”.  Whilst it is true that the church does belong to the Lord, the word eklesia relates both to the way in which the church is brought into being, and also to its ongoing character.  By the gospel God separates people to Himself, and then bonds them together so that their separate character might be maintained.

The use of the word “church”
The word is used in four main senses in the New Testament, but not always in connection with Christians.  A brief look, however, at the way the word is used in other senses will help us to see why the Holy Spirit took it up to use in relation to believers.

The word is used in the following ways:
 By Stephen, Acts 7:38, of the nation of Israel when they were in the wilderness.
 By the town-clerk of Ephesus, Acts19:39, of a company of unbelievers.
 By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of all the Christians of this present age, Matthew 16:18, Colossians 1:18.
 By the Lord Jesus and His apostles of the Christians who meet together in a particular locality, Matthew 18:17, 1 Corinthians 1:2.

Stephen’s use of the word church:
Stephen uses the word church of the nation of Israel because they were a called-out company.  They had been redeemed by the blood of the Passover lamb, as described in Exodus 12; “baptised” in the Red Sea, Exodus 14:21,22; 1 Corinthians 10:1,2; and brought to the foot of Mount Sinai to listen to God’s word, Exodus 19:17, 20:1.  As such they give to us an illustration of those in this age who have been called out of the world by the Gospel; redeemed by the blood of Christ, the Lamb of God; baptized in water to signify, amongst other things, allegiance to Him; and gathered together as a church in a locality to bow to the authority of the word of God.  This illustration should not be pressed too far, however, or else we shall arrive at the unscriptural notion that since infants crossed the Red Sea, then infant baptism is in order.  The Scriptures are crystal clear that this is not the case.

The use of the word by the town clerk:
The town clerk of Ephesus used the word in its secular sense in Acts 19:39, when he spoke of a “lawful assembly”.  The townsfolk would understand that he meant by this a gathering of those possessing civic rights in a free Greek city, who were called together for the carrying out of public affairs.  Strangers, and those deprived of citizenship, could not be part of this called out company.’

Characteristics of the members of a local church:
When we put these two uses of the word together, and apply them to a local church, we can say it has the following characteristics:
1.  Only believers.  It is composed only of those who have responded to the call of God in the Gospel, and have been redeemed with the precious blood of Christ, just as a civic assembly did not include strangers.
2.  Only those sound in doctrine and morals.  It is composed only of those who have not forfeited their rights because of moral or doctrinal evil, just as a civic assembly did not consist of those who had been deprived of the rights of citizenship through misconduct.
3.  Only those baptized.  It is composed only of those who have been baptized by immersion in water after they were saved, just as all the people of Israel went through the Red Sea to get to the wilderness.
4.  Only those subject to God’s Word.  It is composed only of those who are prepared to submit to the authority of the Word of God, just as Israel gathered at the foot of Mount Sinai to hear God speaking to them, and then said “all that the Lord hath spoken we will do”, Exodus 19:8.  Moses called that day “the day of the assembly”, Deuteronomy 9:10.
5.  Only those who have joined.  It is composed only of those who have been exercised in heart to join, just as the Israelites had been exercised in heart to sprinkle the blood, cross the sea, and gather at Sinai.  When Paul went to Jerusalem, he “assayed to join himself to the disciples”, Acts 9:26.  The word for join means to cement, or glue, and therefore indicates an act of commitment, not the start of a casual relationship.

The use of the word by the Lord Jesus and the apostles of all believers of this present age:
We have been considering this aspect of things in the first parts of our studies, so will not repeat it here. 

The use of the word by the Lord Jesus of a company of believers gathering together in a particular locality:
The Lord Jesus speaks of those who can be told things, (“tell it to the church”), and make decisions about local matters, Matthew 18:17.  They may only be two three in number, but he promises to be present if they gather in His name.  Also, Paul writes to the believers at Corinth as “the church of God which is at Corinth”, 1 Corinthians 1:2, and Luke writes of “the church that was at Antioch”, Acts 13:1.

It is important to see that, despite both having the same name, the church which is Christ’s body, and church in a locality, have differences, as well as certain similarities, as follows:

The church which is Christ’s body consists of all who are truly saved from the whole period between the coming of the Spirit at Pentecost, when the church was formed, and the coming of Christ into the air to take His own to be with Himself.
A local church obviously cannot consist of all believers of the present age.

The church which is Christ’s body consists of all believers, whatever their spiritual condition, simply because they are credited with the work of Christ, and God looks at them in the light of what His Son means to Him, what the apostle calls being “accepted in the Beloved”, Ephesians 1:6.
A local church should ideally only consist of those who are morally and doctrinally sound, but in view of the human limitations of those in a place of responsibility in the church, this might not always be the case.

The church which is Christ’s body, being a concept in the mind of God, consists of all who believe in this current age.  That is, it includes believers who have died as well as those who have not yet believed, but will, in the foreknowledge of God, do so.
A local church consists only of those who are alive in the body.  Those who die are no longer members of the local assembly.

The church which is Christ’s body is a spiritual building of which Christ is the builder.  As He Himself said, “I will build My church”, Matthew 16:18.
A local church, however, is entrusted to believers to build and adorn, as 1 Corinthians 3:9-15 explains. 

The church which is Christ’s body is an eternal concept, for in the ages to come God will display the exceeding riches of His grace in His people, who have been linked indissolubly to Christ, Ephesians 2:7
A local church may cease to exist for several reasons.  The Lord may remove the lampstand of testimony if there is a persistence in sin, Revelation 2:5.  Or the believers may become so depleted in numbers that they are unable to function as a church.  And when the Lord comes, all true believers will be transported to heaven, and thus there will not be a local church anywhere on earth.

The church which is Christ’s body is completely united, for there is such a thing as the unity of the Spirit, Ephesians 4:3, which is unity that the Holy Spirit forms and maintains.  It is the answer to the prayer of the Lord Jesus to His Father before He died, when He asked that His people might be one, and so they are, John 17:21.
A local church however, may, sadly, be divided.  This was the case at Corinth, for the apostle found out that there were divisions among them, 1 Corinthians 1:10-13.  Some were making Paul their favourite, others Apollos, and others Peter.  There were even those who were claiming to be super-spiritual, and saying they, to the exclusion of the others, were of Christ.

The church which is Christ’s body has a membership which is constant, for none can be excluded from it, for each member is linked to Christ for ever, for “he that is joined to the Lord is one spirit”, 1 Corinthians 6:17.
A local church, however, may have members who fall into doctrinal error, or moral sin.  Such, after careful assessment of the situation by spiritual men, must be put away from the company.  When this happens they are no longer part of the local assembly until such times as they repent, and are received back.  When a person is put away from a particular local church, because the decision of the church is final, and is confirmed in heaven, Matthew 18:18, no other local church should receive them.  If it does, then it not only undermines the decision of the first assembly, but also makes the repentance of the offending person less likely, and so hampers his restoration to full fellowship again.