We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Under “SELF-PRINT BOOKLETS” you will find help on printing the posts in booklet form. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.
Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.
MATTHEW 16
Setting of the chapter
Christ’s prophecy concerning the church is recorded only in the gospel that emphasises His kingship, so the two ideas are not incompatible. It is perfectly possible for Christ to be the King of Israel, one day to reign on the earth, and also, at this present time, to be the Head of the church. The Mount of Transfiguration event took place after Matthew 16, so the kingdom is still to come. Peter, who was present on the mount, declares that the Old Testament prophetic word had been confirmed to him when Christ was transfigured, 2 Peter 1:16-21.
The prediction concerning the church comes after a succession of indications that Israel intended to reject its rightful king, and that Christ was turning to the Gentiles as a consequence.
Notice the way the Gospel of Matthew shows the Lord Jesus gradually turning from the nation of Israel, in preparation for His new work of building the church after the Day of Pentecost:
11:20-30
He rebukes the cities where most of His mighty works were done; thanks His Father for His wise purpose; indicates that the Father has committed all things into His hands; turns to the individuals in the nation with the words, “Come unto Me”, 11:28.
12:1-8
An appeal to an incident when David, the anointed king, was on the run from Saul, 1 Samuel 21:1-6.
12:9-13
The man with a withered hand. King Jereboam had been judged like this for stretching out his hand against a man of God; how much more dangerous is it for the rulers to seek to destroy the Son of God, 1 Kings 13:1-4. Compare also Zechariah 11:17, where the idol shepherd is Antichrist.
12:14-21
The Pharisees seek to destroy God’s Beloved and Elect One, and He will show judgment to the Gentiles, and in Him shall the Gentiles trust.
12:22-23
The blind and dumb man represents the nation, blind to His glories, and dumb in His praise. The people recognise that He does not hate the blind as David did, 2 Samuel 5:8. Note that when specific blind men are cured in Matthew there is always a reference to Him as Son of David, 9:27; 12:22,23; 20:30-34; 21:9-14.
12:24-37
Unable to deny that Christ performed miracles, the Pharisees assert that He did them by the power of Satan. This is sin against the Holy Ghost, for it was by His power that the works were done, and to equate the Holy Spirit with the Devil is blasphemy. This shows how far the nation had gone in its rejection of Christ.
12:38-42
Both the sign of Jonah the prophet who went to the Gentiles, who repented, and the sign of the Queen of Sheba who came from the Gentiles, and believed; both are indications of the change in God’s dealings which would take place after the death and resurrection of Christ.
12:43-45
The nation is labelled a wicked generation, influenced by evil spirits in its opposition to Christ.
12:46-50
Those who have the closest natural ties are put after those who have spiritual links with Christ. No claim can be made upon Christ because He is a fellow-Jew.
13:1-52
The mysteries of the kingdom of heaven expounded. The king does not wield a sword, but sow seed. Note the significant move out of the house (of Israel), to the seaside, (representing the wider world of the Gentiles). In verse 36 there is a return to the house, for after the church age there will be those in Israel who will need to be aware of God’s plans for the end of the age of tribulation. The disciples represent these at this point, just as they do in Matthew 10, where in verse 25 they are told they will have not have gone over the cities of Judah before Christ comes. Clearly not a reference to the disciples personally.
13:53-58
Christ’s claims to be Son of God are rejected in the words, “Is not this the carpenter’s son?” Unbelief marks the nation to such an extent that it hinders the works of Christ.
14:1-12
A similar situation to when Herod the Great, (Herod the Tetrarch’s father), slaughtered the innocents. The hostility of the authorities is unchanged. Verses 3-12 refer to an incident two years before, for Matthew is highlighting the fact that attitudes have not altered. (Compare Luke 3:19, 20, where the imprisonment of John is recorded, even though he is about to baptise Christ. This emphasises the fact that the baptism of Christ indicated His commitment to rejection and suffering).
14:13-21
A startling contrast is now presented. Herod, on his birthday (when he could be expected to be in a good mood for once), in his hatred, gives John the Baptist’s head on a dish, whereas Christ in compassion feeds five thousand people with bread. Those who, like John the baptist, stand for Christ may expect opposition.
14:22-36
The disciples alone on the lake, with Christ praying on the mountain, and then coming to them. One of Matthew’s dispensational pictures, telling of believers passing through much trouble, (the storm on the lake), but sustained by the intercession of Christ on high. The disciples are being prepared for the absence of the King, who, nonetheless, as a King-Priest, makes intercession for them on high. This will also have meaning for tribulation saints.
15:1-20
The nation exposed for its hypocrisy, preferring the teachings and traditions of men to the commandments of God.
15:21-28
A Gentile “dog” is blessed. Note that the Lord uses the word for dog that means a little dog, the family pet, rather than the scavengers of the streets. He thus shows His gentleness and compassion, for “A bruised reed shall he not break, and smoking flax shall he not quench…and in his name shall the Gentiles trust”, Matthew 12:20,21.
15:29-39
The healing of multitudes, (note the lame and blind are mentioned first), on a mountain, the symbol of a kingdom, then the feeding of the four thousand. Matthew is presenting a foretaste of the millenial age before he tells us of the prediction of the church age. So the kingdom is emphasised both before and after the prophecy regarding the church.
16:1-4
The demand for a sign from the Pharisees and Sadducees, both of whom had rejected the testimony of Christ’s miracle ministry. No further sign to be given, except that of His death and resurrection, as pictured in the experience of Jonah. Fair weather symbolised His works of mercy. Foul weather, the judgments coming upon the nation, whether at AD 70 with the destruction of Jerusalem or in the tribulation period. See 1 Thessalonians 2:15,16. Caesarea Phillipi was the scene of much bloodshed when the Romans suppressed the Jewish rebellion as AD 70 approached.
16:5-12
A warning about moral leaven in preparation for church age conditions. The leaven of the Pharisees is the evil of mere outward profession of religion. The leaven of the Sadducees is evil of rationalism, and the doubting of God’s word. Both these things would prove a snare during the age of the church.
Subject of the chapter
There is a progress of thought in this chapter. First, Christ’s enemies persist in doubting whether His miracles were of God. This was a major reason why He was turning from the nation in its unbelief. He refuses to satisfy their demand, for it was far too late to be asking for a sign, when He had given abundant evidence that He was from God.
Then the subject of doctrine comes up, for the great test for men is whether they are going to listen to the doctrine of Pharisees, Sadducees, Herodians and the common people, or to the doctrine that comes from the Father.
This leads on to the vital question as to who Christ is, and Peter has been listening to the doctrine from heaven, and makes his confession.
Having foretold the building of the church, the Lord warns His own that that cannot cannot happen unless He suffers first. Just as Solomon built the temple on the site of Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac, so the spiritual temple of this age will be founded on the sacrifice of Christ, which, in turn, receives validity from who He is.
Finally, the consequence of all this is set before the disciples. If they would know a reward when He comes in glory, they must deny self, and take up their cross, and follow Christ.
Structure of the chapter
(a) | Verses 1-4 | Demand for a sign from heaven |
(b) | Verses 5-12 | Doctrine of evil men |
(c) | Verses 13-20 | Declaration about the church |
(d) | Verses 21-23 | Declaration about His sufferings |
(e) | Verses 24-28 | Denial of self |
(a) Verses 1-4
Demand for a sign from heaven
16:1
The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came, and tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven.
The Pharisees also with the Sadducees came- these are the two groups that the Lord is about to warn His disciples about, verses 11,12. Normally in disagreement over many issues, they are united in their opposition to Christ. Herod and Pilate will soon be friends on the same basis, Luke 23:12. In the previous chapter the Lord had fed the multitudes with wholesome bread. Now these are coming to try to put leaven into it. The Pharisees were the ritualists of the day, concerned for the letter of the law. The Sadducees were the rationalists, thinking their opinion above the law.
And tempting desired him that he would shew them a sign from heaven- like Satan their master, they only tempt to seek to find a fault, to expose any dross. God tempts to show the pure gold in the faith of His people, as we see in the case of Abraham, Genesis 22:1. But there is no dross in Christ, as has been shown conclusively in the temptation at the beginning of His public life.
The ministry of Christ had been full of signs from heaven, some even performed on Pharisees, Luke 5:17. Since they are tempting Him, they are perhaps implying yet again that His miracles were done by the power of Satan, “signs from hell” so to speak. They show no sign of repenting of their blasphemy against the Holy Spirit.
16:2
He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red.
He answered and said unto them, When it is evening, ye say, It will be fair weather: for the sky is red- instead of satisfying their demand for a sign, He gives them a metaphor. His public ministry had been “fair weather”, with no storms of judgment, only grace and blessing.
16:3
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering. O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times?
And in the morning, It will be foul weather to day: for the sky is red and lowering- His ministry of grace had begun to be interspersed with warnings of judgment upon the nation for their refusal of Him.
O ye hypocrites, ye can discern the face of the sky; but can ye not discern the signs of the times? They had asked for a sign; he points them to the signs of the times, that is, the indications He had been giving as the the change of character in His ministry, for the word “times” refers to the character of a particular period. Christ’s ministry was changing in character, and they were not able to discern it. They prided themselves on spiritual discernment, yet they were hypocrites, for they pretended to be spiritual, but could only understand the natural, like the signs of a change in the weather.
16:4
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas. And he left them, and departed.
A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign- this is what He had called them in 12:39, and they had failed to respond to His rebuke in repentance, unlike the men of Nineveh who repented at the preaching of Noah. They would readily have called the men of Nineveh an evil and adulterous generation, but could not see that the description applied to them as well. And they compounded their evil by pretending to be interested in Divine things by asking for a sign. No wonder He calls them hypocrites!
Special note on adultery as a metaphor
We noted the following in the notes on Matthew 12:
“In the Old Testament the prophets often used adultery as a metaphor for the behaviour of the nation when it went into idolatry, for it represented unfaithfulness to the God who had made the nation His wife. But these are not idolaters in that sense. But there were two aspects to idolatry, the rejection of the true God, and the consequent reverence for false gods. When God gave Israel His commandments, He made it clear that they were neither to make idols or bow down to them. The reason being that He was a Jealous God, Exodus 20:3-5. He is jealous of His own glory, and that of His Son, who is described as “the image of the invisible God”, Colossians 1:15. By image in that context is meant that the Son of God is the one who manifests God fully. God is jealous of the honour of His Son, and if, when He was here, the nation that was most fitted to appreciate Him did not do so, but largely rejected Him, does that not merit the charge of turning from God, and therefore may justly be called adulterous?
And there shall no sign be given unto it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas- He does not expand on the meaning of His reference to Jonah, unlike in chapter 12. He had told them enough then for them to see His point, and respond.
And he left them, and departed- the word Matthew uses for “left” is an intense word, meaning “to leave utterly”. There is a definiteness about His movement here, for it has great significance. It is not just that He departed, with the implication He left them. He left them in spirit, and departed from them in body. The nation, as represented by these rulers, is being abandoned, for it has rejected its Messiah.
(b) Verses 5-12
Doctrine of evil men
16:5
And when his disciples were come to the other side, they had forgotten to take bread.
And when his disciples were come to the other side- we learn from 15:39 that after the feeding of the four thousand, the Lord had come by ship into the region of Magdala, which was on the eastern side of the Sea of Galilee.
They had forgotten to take bread- this is very strange, for after the crowds had been fed, they had gathered up seven baskets full of fragments. So it is not that they had forgotten to buy bread, but omitted to bring any of that which they had gathered up. It is all too easy to be careless in regard to the abundant spiritual provision the Lord has made for us.
16:6
Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.
Then Jesus said unto them, Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees- the Lord turns their failure into an opportunity to introduce to them the need to be right as to doctrine, for if they are going to confess Him aright, they must understand aright. Mark tells us they did not understand the implications of the feeding of the five thousand, for their hearts were hardened, Mark 6:52, which perhaps is one reason why there needed to be another very similar miracle to impress the truth upon them.
16:7
And they reasoned among themselves, saying, It is because we have taken no bread.
And they reasoned among themselves- this is the mistake we make too often; trying to think matters through without recourse to the Lord and His word.
Saying, It is because we have taken no bread- the Lord had given a lengthy discourse after He had fed the five thousand, as recorded in John 6:26-64. During that teaching He explained that the words He spoke to them were spirit, and life. They were to be understood in a spiritual sense, and if taken in that way, they would give eternal life and sustain that life.
So if the bread He spoke of was His wholesome doctrine, the disciples should have realised that when He spoke of leaven He must mean unwholesome doctrine. Instead, they thought on a natural level, and took His word to be a rebuke for their failure to bring bread with them on the journey across the lake.
16:8
Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread?
Which when Jesus perceived, he said unto them, O ye of little faith, why reason ye among yourselves, because ye have brought no bread? The Lord knew their hearts, and that they were reasoning among themselves whether it was because they had forgotten to bring bread that He spoke His warning concerning leaven. The reason why they can be said to have little faith is explained in the next two verses. The Lord is going to graciously use their failure to teach them a much-needed lesson. He not only knew what they were discussing amongst themselves, but also knew about the lack of bread. But this is no problem to Him, as He indicate in the next verse.
16:9
Do ye not yet understand, neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?
16:10
Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up?
Do ye not yet understand- Mark tells us that “they considered not the miracle of the loaves: for their heart was hardened”, Mark 6:52. This is perhaps one reason why the miracle needed to be repeated when the Lord fed the four thousand. They had responded to the fact that the crowds were hungry in a similar way on both occasions, namely, with expression of unbelief, “Whence should we have so much bread in the wilderness as to fill so great a multitude?” Matthew 15:33. And this after they have watched Him feed five thousand a little while before. His charge that they were of little faith was justified. Their mention of the wilderness is significant, for the psalmist speaks of the unbelief of Israel when they were passing though the desert. He wrote, “Yea, they spake against God: they said, Can God furnish a table in the wilderness?” Psalm 78:19. The response of God then was to be wroth, but grace has come with Christ, and He gently chides their lack of understanding and faith, and seeks to lead them on in the truth.
Neither remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? Neither the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many baskets ye took up? If five thousand people can be miraculously fed from five loaves, how easy it is for the Lord to feed Himself and His disciples from nothing. Especially since after the miracles there was more left over than at the beginning. The separate mention of these events shows conclusively that the feeding of the four thousand is not a different version of the feeding of the five thousand.
16:11
How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees?
How is it that ye do not understand that I spake it not to you concerning bread, that ye should beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees? The main point of the feeding of the multitudes was not physical, but spiritual, for the miracle was a sign, a pointer to higher truth. The disciples, of all people, should have understood this, even when others walked away from it, John 6:66. His reference to leaven was of the same sort, a pointer to spiritual truth.
The leaven of the Pharisees was hypocrisy, as directly stated by the Lord in Luke 12:1. They appeared outwardly to be very scrupulous about the commands of the law, but their hearts were far from God, Matthew 15:7-9. The leaven of the Sadducees was rationalism, the rejection of anything they could not see. Hence they denied there were angels, or spirits, or the resurrection of the dead, Acts 23:8. The Pharisees, however, confess these things. So even though these two parties were opposed to one another, they were united in teaching the leaven of error, and hence opposed to Christ. The disciples must beware of them, and so must we, for they have their modern-day counterparts.
16:12
Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees.
Then understood they how that he bade them not beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees- at last they have grasped the lesson, and therefore are in a fit state to move on to the truth He will unfold to them next. Having rid them of leaven, the Lord will grant to them the pure fine flour of doctrine concerning Himself.
(c) Verses 13-20
Declaration about the church
16:13
When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi- this is a place named after Caesar, so a Gentile atmosphere prevails here. But world politics will not prevent the church being built. The disciples, just local fisherman, familiar only with the shores of Galilee, are going to be sent into all the world.
There was a temple dedicated to the god Pan here, but world religion will not prevent God’s purpose through the church either. Nearby one of the sources of the Jordan (the river of death and judgement), gushed out of the rock, but all that was brought in by sin is overcome by Christ. This place is the site of a decisive battle in the days of the Greek empire, but a more decisive battle was won by Christ at Calvary, and no force is of power to frustrate His ongoing purpose to build the church. The area was one of great natural beauty, yet nothing can compare with heavenly realities.
He asked his disciples saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of Man am? That is, what is result of My ministry? “What think ye of Christ” is always the test, Matthew 22:41-46. As He will say later, “If ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins”, John 8:24. Those described as men are the multitudes, in contrast to the Pharisees, whose opinion was obvious. We can see now why He introduced the subject of doctrine and leaven, for the disciples must not mix any leaven of wrong thoughts into their view of Christ. As Son of man He is relevant man and real man, for all must relate to Him in some way, either in faith or unbelief. This is His title in relation to all men, as opposed to Son of Abraham and Son of David which link Him with Israel, and Son of God which tells of His relationship to God. He does not use these titles in His question, but He does use the title Son of Man, even though that is not used in connection with the church. He wants the answer to come from them, and not from a clue in the question.
16:14
And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
And they said, “Some say that thou art John the Baptist- he was a committed, uncompromising, unworldly, preacher. The people saw these features in Christ.
Some, Elias- he was the courageous, reforming, miracle-worker, (unlike John the Baptist, who did no miracles, John 10:41). They saw these features in Christ too.
And others, Jeremias- the weeping prophet, who the Rabbis said was the man of sorrows of Isaiah 53.
Or one of the prophets- the good qualities of all the prophets were seen in Christ. This was no surprise, for the prophets were born of God, and therefore had the life of God. It was to be expected that they would display some of the characteristics of the Lord Jesus, who is God manifest in flesh. But they should have said that the prophets were like Him, not that He was like the prophets.
Note there is no reference to Moses, despite the prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:15-19. See Acts 3:22,23. They found no legality in Christ, but nonetheless they should have believed He was the one Moses spoke of. In Luke 9:7-9 Herod and the people wonder whether Christ is one of these men risen from the dead, so they do not give the Lord credit even for being the Son of Man in His own right, but simply (and superstitiously) think Him to be a resurrected prophet.
16:15
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?- “Ye” and “I are emphatic. “Ye” is in contrast to the people, “I” in contrast to the imaginary Christ men spoke of. “But” anticipates the better answer of the apostles.
16:16
And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
And Simon Peter answered- the name Simon means hearing, so he had lived up to his name. Peter is the Greek form of the name given him by Christ in John 1:42, which means “a stone”. So the two names give the order of his experience. Simon when he heard and responded to God’s word through Christ, Peter as one born again through that word, ready to be built into the church on the Day of Pentecost. He had not been influenced by the Pharisees or Sadducees.
Thou art the Christ- that is, the Messiah of Old Testament prophecy.
The Son of the Living God- the subject of New Testament revelation. To Peter, God is the Living God, in contrast to Pan, the lifeless idol of the heathen, whose temple was not far away. (Note the living things in Peter’s epistles). There is no attempt to compare Him with others, for this is impossible if He is the Son of God. It is sad, however, to hear Peter putting Christ on a level with Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration, 17:4.
If he had answered, “Thou art the Son of Man”, he would have been right in one sense, but it would not be appropriate here. As the Son of God the Lord Jesus shares the nature of God in all its aspects. He possesses the very life of God, and is also the perfect expression of it, whether in eternity, 1 John 1:2, when He was here, John 1:14, or currently, Colossians 2:9. Those who in this age believe in Him, share that life, and hence, as living stones, are built up on Him the living stone, the Son of the living God.
16:17
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona- a reference back to John 1:42, “Thou art Simon the son of Jona. Thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, a stone”. He would later write of coming to Christ as a living stone, and being built up a spiritual house, 1 Peter 2:4,5. The Hebrew word for son comes from the word to build, for a man’s house, or family, was built up by sons. (See Exodus 1:21, where God blessed the midwives with children, or “built them houses”).
For flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee- Peter had not “received by tradition from the fathers”, 1 Peter 1:18.
But my Father which is in heaven- as already indicated, the name Simon means “hearing”, so Peter has listened to the word from the Father as He spoke in Christ. As He had said, “He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me”, John 5:24. The Father spoke in the Son, so to hear the Son’s word with faith, was to believe on the Father, the particular word in question being on the subject of His Deity.
Other indications of this are as follows: “My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me”, John 7:16. “Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto me”, John 6:45. “God…hath spoken unto us in his Son”, Hebrews 1:2.
So the means by which Peter heard is available to us now in the written scriptures. It is not that Peter had a private message from the Father, coming only to him. What he heard was from the lips of Christ, and now that His words have been written down, all have access to this word of the Father too. Even though the Father is in heaven, the word has come to men through Christ who came down from heaven to bring it near.
16:18
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
And I say also unto thee- not “I also say”, as if what the Father said is now followed by what the Son says. Rather, it is “but I say also”, so He is continuing to speak for His Father. This indicates the equal authority of Christ, and establishes His authority over the church. It is a big mistake to speak of the church teaching, as is common in Christendom. It is Christ who teaches by the Spirit; the church learns.
That thou art Peter- as interpreted by John l:42, this means a stone. So Peter is distinguished from the rock, but is linked with the idea of a building.
And upon this rock- not “upon thee”, but upon this, that you have just stated, that I am the Son of the living God.
The following points should be borne in mind in connection with this confession by Peter:
1. The truth of the Sonship of Christ is foundational. “Other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ”, 1 Corinthians 3:11. (If it is essential that He be the foundation of the local assembly, it is clearly vital that He be the foundation of the whole church).
2. The Rabbis described Abraham as the rock on which the earth was founded, so the idea of a system built upon a person was not foreign to the Jews.
3. The word for Peter is “petros”, a masculine word meaning stone or rock. The word for rock is “petra” a feminine word which always and only means rock. A “petros” takes character from a “petra”, just as believers are said by Peter to be partakers of the Divine nature, (and God Himself is called a Rock in Deuteronomy 32:4,15,18,30,31).
4. Peter would be a poor foundation, since he is called Satan in verse 23. Peter refers to Christ as a Living Stone, and believers as living stones built upon Him, 1 Peter 2:4,5. It is not possible for Peter to be the foundation, and also be built on the foundation.
5. Neither in his speaking or his writing does Peter ever state or even suggest that he is the stone, as the Roman Catholics teach. Some time later, the disciples disputed who should be the greatest among them, but we do not read that Peter settled the matter by referring to the Lord’s words here. So even Peter did not believe he had pre-eminence!
6. Pope Pius 4th decreed that nothing should be taught that “the fathers”, (meaning those of post-apostolic times who were thought of as leaders), are not agreed upon. In fact, they are evenly divided, and Augustine changed his view, and said all should believe what they like about it! The statistics are as follows: 17 of the Fathers said the rock was Peter; 44 said it was Peter’s faith; 16 said the rock was Christ; 8 said that it was all the apostles. By the Pope’s own rule, therefore, it should not be taught that Peter is the rock.
I will build my church- note that this is a future work, for there is no suggestion in Scripture that Old Testament believers are part of the church. The truth regarding the church was a mystery hidden in God, (not even in God’s word), until revealed through the apostle Paul. See notes on Ephesians 3. The verb to build is in that tense which speaks of what is continuous in the future, and does not just refer to stones being built on the Rock at conversion, but also their constant edification, Ephesians 4:12; 2:20. The apostle Paul wrote of the church that it “groweth unto a holy temple in the Lord”, Ephesians 2:21. Evangelists and teachers both build on Christ’s behalf. The word for build is to build a house, so the idea is of a homely place. Note that the Lord Jesus Himself takes full responsibility for the work of building, even though in practice He uses those men that He gives as gifts to edify and build up, Ephesians 4:11-16.
And the gates of hell shall not prevail against it- Christ now has the keys to lock the gate so that no Christian goes to hades, the place of the souls of the dead. Also, He now has the key of death to ensure that every Old Testament believer comes out from there at the appropriate time, Revelation 1:18. The Church’s proper place is in association with Christ in resurrection, and is not an earthly concept at all. It has to do with things before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4, whereas Israel, God’s earthly people, will enter a kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world, Matthew 25:34.
Just as the gates of hell did not prevail against Christ to prevent Him from rising from the dead, so the members of the church are secure from every attempt of the enemy to overcome them. As head of the church the Lord Jesus has ascended up on high, and now leads captive all those forces that could possibly lead His people captive, Ephesians 4:8. He will see to it that the members of the church arrive safely in heaven, with none of the forces of evil able to prevent it. If they cannot prevail in that matter, then certainly they shall not prevail in lesser matters.
16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven- the kingdom of heaven is the sphere of profession, for sons of the kingdom of heaven can be cast out into outer darkness, Matthew 8:11,12, whereas only those born again can enter the kingdom of God; there are no mere professors there, John 3:3,5. Jewish scribes were given a symbolic key when they entered their profession. The Lord referred to this when He said, “Woe unto you lawyers, for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered”, Luke 11:52. “Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisee, hypocrites! For ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer them that are entering to go in”, Matthew 23:13.
Peter is given a special role in the matter of entering the kingdom of heaven, for he will be the one to first announce the gospel of God’s grace to both Jews and Gentiles. It is fitting that the one who boldly confesses Christ to be the Son of God should be given this task, for those who enter the kingdom of heaven profess to believe this too. It is fitting that he should not be given the task of admitting to the kingdom of God, for he soon shows his weakness by seeking to prevent Christ going to the cross, verses 21,22.
He will also be the first to lay the doctrinal foundation of Christianity after Pentecost, being given a right perspective on things in view of the change in God’s dealings with men. It is a mistake to think that Peter never really understood the truth of the church. When he writes about “things hard to be understood” in 2 Peter 5:16, he was not telling of his personal difficulty, but that of others.
Peter used one of his keys at Pentecost when he preached to devout Jews, and the other in the house of Cornelius, where he, even though he is the apostle to the circumcision, Galatians 2:8,9, unlocked the door to a Gentile. Paul, the apostle to Gentiles, had passed through Caesarea to go to Tarsus, Acts 9:30, but he was not chosen to go to Cornelius. Even Philip the evangelist, who lived at Caesarea, Acts 8:40, was not used to open the door of faith unto the Gentiles, Acts 14:27. They had not been given the key, but Peter had.
Note that Peter was not given either the keys to heaven, the keys of the kingdom of God, or the keys to the church. It is only the kingdom of heaven, the sphere of profession that he is given authority in. He cannot decide who goes to heaven, nor can he forgive sins, which God alone can do, Luke 5:21,24.
And whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: And whatsoever thou shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven- Peter’s confession was a confession of faith, which all must make if they are to be saved. So as an evangelist, it was Peter’s responsibility to see to it that the truth of the sinfulness of man was impressed upon his hearers, and in this way bind their sins to them, and then tell them the good news of the forgiveness of sins in Christ, and so loose them if they professed to believe. See how he did this in Acts 2:35, where he implies his audience are enemies of Christ, verse 36, that they are guilty of crucifying Him, verse 36 again, and that they need to repent of their sins, verse 38. In this way he bound the sins to the people by his preaching. Then in verse 38 he held out the prospect of the remission of sins, and thus gave them the opportunity of being loosed from their sins.
So also, when he opened the kingdom of heaven to the Gentiles with his other key. He declares that God has appointed Christ to be judge of the living and the dead, Acts 10:42, with its implications with regard to Cornelius’ sins. Then he tells of the possibility of being loosed, as he speaks of the remission of sins in verse 43. The words bound and loosed were used by the rabbis in this way.
Peter’s statement about the Lord Jesus is also a confession of truth, and as a “scribe instructed unto the kingdom of heaven”, Matthew 13:52, and as a steward over his Lord’s household, Luke 12:41-44, (words spoken firstly to Peter), he was to guide the saints into the truth, and as such, must set out what is allowed and what is not. The Lord commanded him with the words “When thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren”, Luke 22:32, and 1 Peter 4:10,11 shows that what the apostles gave were commandments from the Lord Himself. In this context, to bind meant to declare to be binding conduct. To loose meant to release from obligation. In this way, the church is built upon the (doctrinal) foundation of the apostles and prophets, Ephesians 2:20. Notice in that verse how the apostle is quick to add that Jesus Christ is the chief corner stone, holding the whole building together, and giving it alignment.
Because what Peter was doing had Divine permission, then he may be confident that what was bound and loosed by him on earth was endorsed in heaven.
16:20
Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ- clearly this was a temporary measure, since this was one of the main teachings of the apostles. Peter on the day of Pentecost announced that “God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ”, Acts 2:36. Given that He is rejected by the nation, it was inappropriate to make Him known in His national capacity. Individual faith was still a possibility. We also note that the disciples as a body are addressed now, instead of Peter alone.
(d) Verses 21-23
Declaration about His sufferings
16:21
From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.
From that time forth began Jesus to show unto his disciples- this is consistent with His word to them in the previous verse. The making known for the first time of the truth regarding the church marks a definite stage in the dealings of God, and the Lord must be made known appropriately. He is not Jesus the Messiah to the church, specifically, but Christ the Lord. As Messiah He is king of Israel, as Lord He is head of the church.
How that he must go unto Jerusalem- note the “must” of determination to do God’s will. Jerusalem is the city of the great king, but He goes there to hang upon a cross, not sit upon a throne. It is interesting to notice that Matthew only records the presence of Christ in Jerusalem at His temptation, 4:5. Although qualified to reign by His total refusal of the Devil’s offer, and despite the fact that in His Royal Address in Matthew 5-7 He describes Jerusalem as the city of the great king, Matthew 5:35, (and He is the Great King), He nonetheless only goes to Jerusalem to die. This is all the more noticeable because Luke records the journeys of Christ to Jerusalem as early as chapter 9 of his gospel, and John’s gospel is structured around the Lord’s visits there.
And suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes- those that Peter will later describe as “your rulers”, Acts 3:17, and “you builders”, Acts 4:11. The main opinion-formers and leaders in Israel will reject Him, because they prefer human wisdom to Divine revelation. The elders would correspond, perhaps, to the idea of king, (elders would make decisions in the gate, like Absalom of old, who sat in the gate and turned the hearts of the people against David, 2 Samuel 15:1-6). Chief priests would seek to maintain the Levitical order, and the scribes would correspond to the prophets.
And be killed- that He would be killed would make many think that He was not, after all, the true Messiah. In fact, such scriptures as Isaiah 53 would show that He who suffered and died, was the root out of a dry ground, the root of David.
Note the violence of the language- “killed”, a deliberate, cold-blooded outrage upon justice and decency. They killed the prince of life and desired a murderer instead. Jacob had prophesied that the descendants of Levi would slay a man, and so it came to pass, Genesis 49:6.
And be raised again the third day- the Divine response to the killing is the raising. By prophesying these things, the Lord is putting His reputation as a “man that hath told you the truth” to the test. The mark of a prophet sent from God is that his words come true, Deuteronomy 18:15-19, Acts 3:22,23. It is a short-term prophecy, so it is easy to see whether it comes to pass. If such prophecies were fulfilled, (and the Lord made several just prior to His death), then the long-term prophecies such as are found in Matthew 24 will also come to pass.
16:22
Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.
Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke Him, saying, Be it far from thee Lord- perhaps feeling some special authority was his since he had been given great responsibilities in verse 19, Peter acts in typically hasty manner. Instead of taking in the truths being unfolded about Christ’s death and resurrection, he seeks to prevent their fulfilment. Filled with Jewish feelings about the Messiah, he thinks only in terms of a Messianic reign. We can understand him wanting to save the Lord pain, but to rebuke Him was to go much too far.
This shall not be unto thee- his determination was still strong in Gethsemane, where he used a sword to try to prevent the arrest. We must beware of zeal that is not in company with knowledge, Romans 10:2; 1 Timothy 1:13. Little did he realise that he was seeking to frustrate the sovereign will of God, which he himself will call “the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God”, Acts 2:23.
Thankfully his zeal was channelled into righteous actions after Pentecost. Even though he was led on that occasion to quote a passage which spoke of the Day of the Lord, with its warnings of judgment, he quoted it only to speak of salvation, Acts 2:16-21.
16:23
But he turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
But he turned, and said unto Peter- by physically turning, the Lord confronted Peter personally, looking him in the eye, so to speak, and thus spoke directly to him, and not to the others.
Get thee behind me, Satan, thou art an offence unto me- Peter was no doubt taken aback by this stern rebuke. When the Devil sought worship from Christ, he was dismissed immediately, lest anything come between the Lord Jesus and His Father, whom He set always before His face, which was why He was not moved away from God’s will, Psalm 16:8. Peter is seeking to hinder Christ’s progress to the cross by placing the stumblingblock of Jewish prejudice in the way. In fact, he himself was the offence, or stumblingblock. Compare Peter’s reference to Christ in 1 Peter 2:8 as a rock of offence, “petra skandalon”. There the person of Christ offends Israel because He is not what they expected.
Note that whereas in verse 18 Peter is addressed as one who is a stone, now he is a stumblingblock. This shows the folly of thinking that Peter is the rock foundation of the church. This lesson is reinforced by the fact that the Lord calls him Satan.
For thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men- note that men, even believers, when they act contrary to God’s will, are doing the Devil’s work, for Peter is governed by Jewish thoughts, yet is addressed as Satan, for the Lord pinpoints the source of the evil. Savour means to mind, regard, to take a side; “Thou art on man’s side, not God’s”.
For centuries Satan had sought to prevent the birth of Christ by seeking to destroy the line of the Seed of the Woman. Having failed in this, he sought to prevent the Lord’s death as the prophets had foretold it. They had said He would be crucified, but Satan tried to use Herod’s sword at His birth, a suicide-strategy in the temptation, (“cast thyself down”), the sheer drop from the cliff at Nazareth, (in which case His bones would be broken), the storm on the lake, (so that His grave would be unknown), the stones of His enemies, (again involving the breaking of bones), the sword of a different Herod at His trial, the scheme of Pilate to allow the Jews to execute Him by stoning, and the scourging by Pilate. All these would have meant either that His bones would be broken, or He would not be pierced, or His grave would be unknown.
(e) Verses 24-28
Denial of self
16:24
Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
Then said Jesus unto his disciples, If any man will come after me- when He has shown that the cross and suffering are definitely ahead, then the call to discipleship can be issued. A true disciple will count the cost before he sets out, Luke 14:25-35. “Will” speaks of desire, not simply a future event. Those who follow Christ must be aware that He was given a cross, and they might be given the same.
Let him deny himself- nothing must stand in the way of this commitment. Self is a major obstacle to full devotion.
And take up his cross and follow me- the cross of Christ is unique, but the true follower will not shrink from fellowship with Christ in the rejection the cross represents. In this way His cross becomes ours. Needless to say this cross is not a physical piece of wood, but a doctrine. The teaching regarding the cross is brought out in Paul’s epistles. For instance, Galatians 1:20, “I am crucified with Christ”; Romans 6:6, “Our old man was crucified with Christ”; Galatians 5:24, “They that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh”; Galatians 6:14, “The cross…by which the world is crucified to me, and I unto the world”.
16:25
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: and whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it.
For whosoever will save his life shall lose it- the word for life is soul, the person. To save one’s person is to live for self, and is the opposite of denying self. The cross puts an end to self. The believer who lives for self is not living for the Lord, and will find in the day of assessment that he has nothing to be rewarded for. His life will have been wasted and lost. This has nothing to do with losing salvation, which can never happen to a true believer, but it has everything to do with losing reward.
And whosoever will lose his life for my sake shall find it- to lose life is to give up one’s own interests in favour of Christ’s. Note it must be “for my sake”, not with the thought of gaining merit, and certainly not as a form of penance, that neglecting of the body which is condemned in Colossians 2:23, and which in fact is satisfying to the flesh, as that verse says.
At the Judgment Seat of Christ the life lived for Christ will be found in the form of reward, and at Christ’s appearing it will be found in the form of glory for the One who made it possible, and for the enjoyment of life in the kingdom. Compare 1 Peter 1:7, “found unto praise and honour and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ”. Then, “Whom having not seen (as He will be when He comes to earth), ye love”. Love to Christ will displace love for self.
16:26
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? Such an one will “find” nothing at the end of a life seeking gain for himself. In the light of eternity, to gain everything material is to lose an eternal reward. See Philippians 3:7, where the apostle testifies “What things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ”.
Or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul? As a man looks back over a wasted life, (even if he has gained the whole world), he realises that all he has accumulated is not enough to buy back lost opportunities. In Ephesians 5:16, the apostle exhorts us to be “redeeming the time, for the days are evil”, or if we may take the liberty of paraphrasing, “take the hours of the day to the marketplace and sell to the highest bidder, thus putting a high value on them, for days spent as the world spends them are evil and worthless”. How important it is to live in the light of eternity, for the things of time and sense are not lasting, and will not profit spiritually the one occupied with them.
16:27
For the Son of man shall come in the glory of his Father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man according to his works.
For the Son of Man shall come- here the Lord looks on to the day when He does come to reign, and when His followers shall be with Him, and when He shall be glorified in His saints, 2 Thessalonians 1:10. The degree He is glorified then will be the degree we have denied ourselves in favour of His interests now.
In the glory of his Father with his angels- only those things which glorify Christ can be associated with the glory of His Father, and be on display in that day. Other things will have been burnt up. His angels excel in strength and fly swiftly to do heaven’s bidding, and this zeal should mark the believer. The angels will have certain duties to perform at His coming, such as the reaping of the harvest of the earth, Revelation 14:15-19, the gathering of God’s elect from the four quarters of the earth, Matthew 24:31, and the division between the good and the bad among men, to determine whether they go into the kingdom or not, Matthew 13:49,50.
And then shall he reward every man according to his works- reward means recompense. The self-denial has meant hardship, and in the day of glory this will be compensated for. Note that denying self is not a negative thing, for it produces works. For church saints, the reward will, in part, consist of responsibility in the kingdom. The rewards will be granted at the judgment seat of Christ, but those that involve responsibilities in the kingdom will be reserved to be discharged when the kingdom is set up.
16:28
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom- this is a reference to the vision seen on the holy mount, described by Matthew in the next chapter, which confirmed the Old Testament prophecies, 2 Peter 1:16. Note that the preview of the kingdom is given after the revelation about the church, to assure us that the church does not replace the kingdom. The “some” referred to were Peter, James and John. Since the coming kingdom is sure, then living for Christ now is very worthwhile. The more we live for Him now, the more He will be glorified in a day to come.