Tag Archives: sins

MATTHEW 1

We hope you will find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end.  We would be pleased to hear from you.

 

MATTHEW 1

Survey of the New Testament
The Lord Jesus said “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil”, Matthew 5:17. He did this in a three-fold way. First, He brought out the full meaning of the Old Testament, revealing truths that the rabbis had not seen before, and thus fully filled out their meaning. Second, He fully demonstrated in His life the character and conduct that the law and the prophets required of man. And third, He moved on to ensure that the predictions of the Old Testament would be fulfilled, not only in His death and resurrection, but also in His coming reign on the earth. (When on the cross, and before He gave up His spirit, He cried, “It is finished”, meaning that all that the law and the prophets had foretold about His birth, life, and sufferings, were fulfilled up to that point, and He could confidently commit His spirit to God. John himself had used the word in verse 28 when he wrote, “that the scripture might be fulfilled”. So it is that He said to His disciples after His resurrection, “These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me”, Luke 24:44.). When the apostle Peter stood up on the day of Pentecost and announced to the Jews that “God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye crucified, both Lord and Christ”, he did it by quoting, and commenting upon, the Old Testament scriptures, Acts 2:14-36. When the apostle Paul went into the synagogue in Thessalonica, and sought to prove that “Jesus…is Christ”, he did it by reasoning out of the scriptures of the Old Testament, Acts 17:1-4. And when Apollos mightily convinced the Jews that Jesus was the Christ he did it by “shewing by the scriptures”, Acts 18:28.

So we should not think of the New Testament as a rival to the Old Testament. Rather, we should think of it in one sense as the sequel. But, having said that, we should remember that the New Testament contains truth that was not anticipated in the Old Testament, as a reading of Ephesians 3 will show. Whether we think of it as a sequel or a supplement, we should ever remember that the New Testament has equal authority with the Old Testament. The apostle Peter referred to the writings of the apostle Paul, and then alluded to “the other scriptures”, meaning the Old Testament. Thus he thought of both New Testament and Old Testament as being on th
same level of authority.

Survey of the four gospels
Each of the four gospels has its own character, and they present to us that four-fold view of the Lord Jesus that the Spirit desires we have.

MATTHEW

MARK

LUKE

JOHN

Key idea

Government

Giving, Mark 10:45

Grace

Glory

Emphasis

Sovereign

Servant

Saviour

Son

Behold your King!

John 19:14

Behold My servant! Isaiah 42:1

Behold the man! John 19:5

Behold your God! Isaiah 40:9

I will raise unto David a righteous branch, Jer. 23:5

I will bring forth My servant the branch, Zechariah 3:8

The man whose name is the Branch, Zechariah 6:12

The Branch of the Lord…beautiful, Isaiah 4:2

Theme

Undisputed monarch

Untiring minister

Universal and unique Man

Ultimate manifestation

Son of…

Son of Abraham, Son of David

Son of thy handmaiden, Psalm 86:16; Luke 1:38,48

Son of Man

Son of God

Desired result

Subjects of the king to obey Him, Psalm 18:44

Servants of Christ to serve Him, Colossians 3:24

Samples of new man to duplicate Him, Eph. 4:24

Scholars to know Him, John 17:3

Beginning of gospel

Pedigree of the King

Preaching of two servants

Perfect understanding

Person of Christ

Birth of Christ

In relation to Israel

No mention

In relation to mankind

Word became flesh

End of gospel

All authority

The Lord working with them

Leaves behind praising people in the temple

Lovest thou Me?

Ascension of Christ

No record. He is to be King on earth in the future

Ascends to continue His service in heaven.

Ascends as the sort of Man heaven can welcome.

No mention, but see, John 3:13; 6:62; 20:17.

We can easily see from the above that the emphasis with Matthew is on the Lord Jesus as the rightful King of Israel. Luke emphasises the true manhood of Christ, and shows how He relates to all men. Matthew, however, is concerned to show His true kingship, and how He relates to the nation of Israel. The birth-narratives of each gospel serve these two ends. Luke reserves the genealogy of Christ until the beginning of His public ministry, and goes back to Adam to show the genuine way in which the Lord Jesus has become man. He is not man by creation, as Adam, but by birth of a woman.

Matthew is not only writing so that his nation may realise that Jesus of Nazareth has a unique right to the throne of David, he is also showing that the fact that He is of the seed of David is part of the gospel. The apostle Paul indicated this at the very outset of his treatise on the gospel of God, for he said that the gospel was “concerning His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh”, Romans 1:3. The gospel is for Jew and Gentile alike. The fact that a genealogy is included in it shows that the gospel deals with historical facts as well as doctrinal truths.

There are four ways in which persons have come into flesh. Adam, by creation; Eve, by formation; all others apart from Christ, generation; Christ, by incarnation. He is the only incarnate person, having come into manhood from outside, “taking part” extraordinarily, of that which we “partake of” ordinarily, Hebrews 2:14. It was important, as far as Luke was concerned, that the Lord Jesus should actually be born of a woman, and grow up into manhood, in order that He might have the same legitimate feelings and experiences as we do. On the other hand, it was important that His birth should be in a way which ensured His sinlessness, so that He did not have the sinful feelings and experiences we have.

Matthew is concerned about the legality of Christ’s claim to the throne. So it is that he begins with the genealogy of the true kings of Israel, those from the tribe of Judah. It was to the patriarch Judah that Jacob gave the right to rule, whereas to Joseph was given the right of the firstborn, 1 Chronicles 5:1,2. Judah, whilst he was given the right to rule, did not display the character that befits such an office, as we see from Genesis 38, and the incident with Tamar, his daughter in law. Joseph, however, showed the completely opposite character to Judah his brother by resisting the temptations of Potiphar’s wife, Genesis 39. So Christ has the legal right, and the moral right too, for He, Judah-like, is the “Lion of the tribe of Judah”, but is also, Joseph-like, the meek and suffering Lamb of God, Revelation 5:5,6.

The writer to the Hebrews was able to say that “it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah”, Hebrews 7:14, and the apostle Paul referred more than once to the Lord Jesus as being of the seed of David, Romans 1:3; 2 Timothy 2:8. It was no doubt possible to consult the temple records, where the genealogies would be kept, and establish that Jesus Christ was indeed of the seed of David. It may be that those records were destroyed when Titus burnt the temple, so the Spirit of God ensured Matthew and Luke had availed themselves of the information beforehand. (Although there is the possibility that those records were taken from the temple and hidden away, to be consulted when Christ comes to reign to show His claim to David’s throne is legitimate). It may be, however, that both Joseph and Mary were able to recite their respective ancestry, (much as some Chinese tribes can today), and this is what is found in the inspired word now.

Special note on the generations
In Matthew 1:17 the word “eos” is used, (eos David…eos the captivity…eos Christ), and this was employed in Greek “before the names of illustrious men by which a period of time is marked”, Grimme. It is also the preposition which means “up to and including”. So there are three special periods, that of “David”, that of the “Captivity”, with Jechonias prominent, and that of “Christ”. “David” saw the setting up of the kingdom, the captivity saw the setting aside of the kingdom, Jechonias resulted in no Davidic King being available to occupy the throne, as we shall see. Christ comes to reinstate the kingdom in due time, and ensure it will never be set aside again, for “of his kingdom there shall be no end”, Luke 1:33.

The three divisions mentioned in verse 17 do not give the number of begettings, for Abraham is included, and we are not told his father here. The word generation in most cases refers to the man’s life from his birth to the birth of the son mentioned. Hence Abraham’s life up to the birth of Isaac is his generation.

The three lists are of names of people who are important to the genealogy, with the division marked by a critical event. The first event is the setting up of the kingdom, the “David event”, the second one is the “Captivity event”, the third one is the “Christ event”. Notice that despite being twice called “David the king” in verse 6, this is not the formula in verse 17, because it is not so much David as a person but as a time and event marker.

So Matthew’s scheme, defining a generation as “a life up to the birth of a son”, or in David’s case, “his life up to the time he became ‘David the King'”, and then, in the second group, “David’s life as father of Solomon”, is as follows:

First group of fourteen

1. Abraham to the birth of Isaac.

2. Isaac to the birth of Jacob.

3. Jacob to the birth of Judah.

4. Judah to the birth of Phares.

5. Phares to the birth of Esrom.

6. Esrom to the birth of Aram.

7. Aram to the birth of Aminadab.

8. Aminadab to the birth of Naasson.

9. Naasson to the birth of Salmon.

10. Salmon to the birth of Booz.

11. Booz to the birth of Obed.

12. Obed to the birth of Jesse.

13. Jesse to the birth of David.

14. “David the king”, his generation up to the time he became king.

Second group of fourteen

1. “David the king”, his reign and the birth of Solomon.

2. Solomon to the birth of Roboam.

3. Roboam to the birth of Abia.

4. Abia to the birth of Asa.

5. Asa to the birth of Josaphat.

6. Josaphat to the birth of Joram.

7. Joram to the birth of Ozias.

8. Ozias to the birth of Joatham.

9. Joatham to the birth of Achaz.

10. Achaz to the birth of Ezekias.

11. Ezekias to the birth of Manasses.

12. Manasses to the birth of Amon.

13. Amon to the birth of Josias.

14. Josias to the birth of Jechonias about the time of the Captivity.

Third group of fourteen

1. Jechonias to the birth of Salathiel.

2. Salathiel to the birth of Zorobabel.

3. Zorobabel to the birth of Abiud.

4. Abiud to the birth of Eliakim.

5. Eliakim to the birth of Azor.

6. Azor to the birth of Sadoc.

7. Sadoc to the birth of Achim.

8. Achim to the birth of Eliud.

9. Eliud to the birth of Eleazar.

10. Eleazar to the birth of Matthan.

11. Matthan to the birth of Jacob.

12. Jacob to the birth of Joseph.

13. Joseph to the birth of Christ.

14. Christ as the one whose generation Matthew’s gospel records.

The first section begins with a child, Isaac, born by Divine intervention, to Abraham by Sarah. This was after Abraham had made the grave mistake of taking his slave-woman to wife and having Ishmael by her.

The second section begins with a child born after his brother had died, after David had ensured Uriah’s death, so that he could take his wife.

The third section begins with a man who, although having several sons, is condemned to be “childless”, because of idolatry, which is called adultery in the Old Testament, God being the husband of the nation, Jeremiah 31:32. The sections end with a Child born by the intervention of the Spirit of God, with a mother pure and holy, and with no intervention by a father.

(a) Verse 1 -17
Christ’s birth in relation to His ancestry

1:1
The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

The book of the generation of Jesus Christ- the book referred to here is the book in which Christ’s ancestry is set out, being the written record of His lineage in verses 2-16,. The writer to the Hebrews was able to say, “It is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah”, Hebrews 7;14, so he was confident that this was not disputed.

The word generation is “genesis”, meaning birth, so we have here the birth of the Lord Jesus considered as to who was in His ancestry. The birth of Christ is spoken of in three ways in the chapter, and effectively divides it as follows:

(a) Verses 1-17 His birth in relation to ancestry
(b) Verses 18-21 His birth in relation to humanity
(c) Verses 22-25 His birth in relation toDeity

(a)  Verses 1-17
His birth in relation to Deity

The word generations in the plural refers to the various ancestors of Christ, and has to do with the length of time between their birth and the begetting of a son. There are various words used by Matthew in the chapter which have to do with birth, and it may be as well to set them out together here:

Matthew 1:1 “generation” = genesis, ancestry.
Matthew 1:2-16 “begat” = gennao, to beget children.
Matthew 1:3,5,6 “begat” = gennao followed by ek with the genitive, in relation to a mother, (in these cases Thamar, Rachab and Ruth).
Matthew 1:16 “of whom was born” = gennao, but passive, in relation to Mary.
Matthew 1:17 “generations” = genea. The successive members of a genealogy considered as to the time between their birth and the begetting of their son.
Matthew 1:20 “that which is conceived” = gennao, to be begotten. It is translated in 2:1,4 as “was born”, and “should be born”.

But despite these various uses of words connected with being born, Matthew does not record the actual event. He simply tells us the angel said “she shall bring forth”, verse 21, and then, that Joseph knew not Mary, “till she had brought forth”, verse2 25. It is as if Matthew is the official registrar, whereas Luke is more like a personal physician as he records the circumstances of our Lord’s birth.

The Hebrews used a word or phrase from the start of each Old Testament book as its title, so that they did not add to the Word of God. They called the book of Genesis “In the beginning”, because those were its first words. So we can see that the word generation, being the Greek word “genesis”, has the idea of beginning about it. (But we should remember that it is not so much His beginning in connection with His own life upon the earth, but in relation to who has gone before).

So when Matthew uses the word for the book of the generation of Jesus Christ he is indicating that He will bring in a new beginning. And this is the case, for He alone can bring in a new creation, unmarked by sin. But whereas the first creation came in by His command, the new creation is brought in by His cross. The first creation was spoiled by sin, but the new creation is secured by the resurrection of the One who was made sin, yet put away sin. To reign He must rise from the dead, (for Messiah reigns for ever), to rise He must die; to die He must be born.

The son of David, the son of Abraham notice that Matthew does not put David and Abraham in chronological order, even though that is the order in the genealogy. His main theme is the kingship of the Lord Jesus, so he refers first to David, the first rightful king of Israel, (Saul not being of the tribe of Judah), then Abraham, the father of the Hebrew nation. Being descended from David gives Christ the right to the throne of David. Being son of Abraham gives Him the right to God’s promises to Abraham, including the land of Israel. He may claim the blessings of the Abrahamic and the Davidic covenants, and secure them for the nation of Israel.

By calling Him son of Abraham, Matthew is reminding us of His likeness to Isaac, the man who was lifted up on an altar. The apostle tells us in Galatians 3:16 that the covenant with Abraham was actually made with Christ. To die He must be born. To die for sins He must be sinless. To deal with sins He must be God and man. All this is in Matthew 1.

The original son of David, however, was Solomon, the one who was lifted to the throne. The order of mention here, however, David then Abraham, is the order of Matthew’s gospel, with chapters 1-25 showing Him to be the true son of David, with the right to the throne, whereas chapters 26-27 show Him to be the true son of Abraham, with the altar as His destiny. Chapter 28 tells of His resurrection, the sign His altar-work was accepted of God, and thus combines His Isaac-character and His David-character, for He declares that He has all power in heaven and in earth, so is fit to establish the Kingdom of God upon earth with the authority of heaven. Matthew 28:18.

First group
Abraham to David

1:2
Abraham begat Isaac; and Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren;

Abraham begat Isaac- we notice from this statement two further things. First, that Matthew is starting from the past and working towards the present as he tells us Christ’s ancestry. He sees in Christ the man for the future, but who has His roots in the past. Luke’s genealogy of Christ, however, begins with the present, and goes right back to Adam at the beginning of time. He reserves his record until just before the temptation account, as if to challenge Satan to fail where he suceeded before when he tempted Adam. He is True Man in Luke’s account, whereas in Matthew He is True King.

The second feature that distinguishes Matthew’s genealogy of Christ from Luke’s, is that in Matthew the emphasis is on the father begetting, whereas in Luke the emphasis is on the son who was begotten. The one says, “Abraham begat Isaac”, and the other says, “Isaac, which was the son of Abraham”. Matthew emphasises the claim the father gives, whereas Luke emphasises the nature the son receives. This is all the more striking, in that Joseph did not beget Jesus. It was, as we shall see, Mary who did that.

And Isaac begat Jacob; and Jacob begat Judas and his brethren- note that Judah is linked with his brethren, for it is the purpose of God to re-unite the nation under Christ, so that all twelve tribes gather together unto Him, Genesis 49:10. See Hosea 1:11, where we read that the children of Judah, (the two-tribed kingdom of Judah and Benjamin), and the children of Israel, (the ten-tribed northern kingdom), shall be gathered together, and appont themselves one head. It was not necessary to mention Judah’s eleven brothers by name, but Matthew is guided of the Spirit to include them as the ancestors of the twelve tribes of the nation over which the Lord Jesus shall reign. He shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever, Luke 1:33.

1:3
And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;

And Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram- there are three women mentioned in this first section of the genealogy, Thamar, (Tamar), Rachab (Rahab), and Ruth. There is one woman mentioned in section 2, Bathsheba, but not by name. Although the line passes through the male, these women are especially mentioned by Matthew. Matthew did not need to include these women, (for he does not mention Sarah, Rebekah or Rachel, for instance). But he is showing that even though he is concerned with the glories of Christ the King, He has not forgotten His grace and humility. The Lord Jesus made Himself of no reputation even as to His genealogy. The presence of these women as ancestresses did not pollute the line, for even Mary was a sinner, although not of the same sort as these women.

Tamar pretended to be a harlot, Genesis 38:14,15; Rahab was a harlot, Joshua 2:1; Ruth was from a nation of harlots, Moab, Numbers 25:1; Bathsheba was treated like a harlot, 1 Samuel 11:2-4. The fifth woman is in section 3, Mary, pure and chaste, in marked contrast to the other four. Yet for all that, she still needed to know God as her Saviour, for she was not sinless, Luke 1:47, as some would erroneously teach.

The Lord Jesus is recorded in Matthew as saying to the Pharisees, “the publicans and harlots go into the kingdom of God before you”, Matthew 21:31. It is appropriate for Matthew, the ex-publican, to include harlots in the genealogy of the King. He shall save His people from their sins, even if they were harlots or tax-gatherers before.

1:4
And Aram begat Aminadab; and Aminadab begat Naasson; and Naasson begat Salmon;

1:5
And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;

1:6
And Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;

And Jesse begat David the king- Jesse had many sons, but it was David that Samuel anointed to be king over Israel. He becomes the prototype, the one by whom the other kings of Judah were assessed.

David is the only one in the genealogy called a king, and that twice over, emphasising that it is of his line that the Messiah must come and reign as king. The name David is being used here as a time-marker, as we have already noted, for he was not a king when he was begotten, (in contrast to Christ who was “Born king of the Jews”, Matthew 2:2). Matthew tells us there are fourteen generations from Abraham to David. By this he means fourteen life-periods up to a critical event. So the critical events in verse 16 are the life of Jesse up to the time when David could be described as the king. Then the life of David as king up to the time he begat Solomon begins the second grouping.

And David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias- in this way the moral lapse of David is recorded, for he treated Bathsheba in such a way as made her like the harlots mentioned in the list. Matthew could have written “David begat Solomon of Bathsheba”, but the point was that she had been the wife of Uriah until David had engineered his death. Like all sin, even if it is repented of, (as David’s was), it has repercussions, for Ahithophel, David’s counsellor, who abandoned him in favour of Absalom and who became the Old Testament “Judas”, was very probably Bathsheba’s grandfather, see 2 Samuel 11:3, and 23:34. It is solemn to think that the king who was so much associated with glory, (“Solomon in all his glory”, Matthew 6:29), began life surrounded with the shame of his father.

The generation of David up to the birth of Solomon is the fourteenth, and marks the end of the group. So Abraham, the founder of the nation is at the head, and then David the rightful and appointed king is the climax.

There are three sons of David in Matthew 1, namely Solomon, the direct son; Joseph the descendant son, and Christ the designated Son.

Just as Isaac was the first son of section 1, so Solomon is the first of section 2. Isaac was the man of the altar of suffering; Solomon was the man of the throne of glory. If the “Isaac” section of Matthew’s gospel is chapters 26 and 27, then the remainder of the gospel is the “Solomon” section.

Second group:
“David until the carrying away into Babylon”

David ends the first group, and begins the second group, no doubt to emphasise his ongoing relevance as the generations come and go. He is also mentioned twice because his name in the first reference is to mark an event, the “David-event”. Christ is not “Son of Joash”, or any other of the kings apart from David. He gives his name to the dynasty.

1:7
And Solomon begat Roboam; and Roboam begat Abia; and Abia begat Asa;

1:8
And Asa begat Josaphat; and Josaphat begat Joram; and Joram begat Ozias;

1:9
And Ozias begat Joatham; and Joatham begat Achaz; and Achaz begat Ezekias;

1:10
And Ezekias begat Manasses; and Manasses begat Amon; and Amon begat Josias;

1:11
And Josias begat Jechonias and his brethren, about the time they were carried away to Babylon:

So the first group ended with physical adultery, the second group ended with spiritual adultery, namely idolatry. The first group began with a man who had been brought out of idolatry in Babylonia, the second group ends with the nation that came from him being carried to Babylon because of their idolatry. This shows the need for a king who can “save His people from their sins”, as the other kings in the line could not.

Several kings are omitted in this section, the first being Ahaziah the son of Athaliah, the daughter of Omri, who attempted to destroy the seed royal, 2 Chronicles 22:10, and reigned over the land for six years. Matthew makes no notice of this, for Joash was the rightful heir.

The second omission is Joash, who, although in many ways a good king, nonetheless only reigned wisely whilst Jehoiada the high priest was his spiritual guide. After his death, the kingdom deteriorated, and Joash even slew Jehoiada’s son, an event referred to by the Lord Jesus as a prime example of the sins of the fathers, in Matthew 23:35.

The third omission is that of Amaziah, who was slain by Jehu so as to finally obliterate the House of Ahab.

Mannesses is included, despite his great apostasy, for he repented and was restored, and is another token, with the women, of the grace of God.

Then Jehoahaz is omitted, perhaps because he was removed from the throne by Pharoah, king of Egypt, and thereby showed his incompetence.

Jehoiakim is omitted, perhaps because he was made king by Pharoah. He it was who burnt pages of the Scriptures which he had cut out of the prophecy of Jeremiah, Jeremiah 36:21-25, and God’s displeasure is seen in that he is not mentioned in the line of the Messiah.

The brethren of Jechonias are mentioned, just as the brethren of Judah were mentioned in the first section. But they are carried away into captivity, and thus the kingdom of Judah lapses. The brethren of Judah represent hope for the future, whereas the brethren of Jechonias represent hopes dashed.

The last king to be omitted from the list is Zedekiah, perhaps because he was made king by Nebuchadnezzar, the destroyer of Jerusalem, and the instigator of the captivity.

Third group:
“The carrying away into Babylon unto Christ”.

1:12
And after they were brought to Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel; and Salathiel begat Zorobabel;

1:13
And Zorobabel begat Abiud; and Abiud begat Eliakim; and Eliakim begat Azor;

1:14
And Azor begat Sadoc; and Sadoc begat Achim; and Achim begat Eliud;

1:15
And Eliud begat Eleazar; and Eleazar begat Matthan; and Matthan begat Jacob;

1:16
And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.

The group begins with the repetition of the fact they were taken into captivity. Just as David is mention in both the first and second sections to emphasise God’s ongoing commitment to maintain his house, the two-fold mention of captivity stresses that man’s sinfulness was obstructing God’s purpose. Can God remedy the situation and bring in His king? The answer is seen in the preservation of the line of kings until Christ, even though they had not the right or the opportunity to sit on the throne of Israel.

The generations of verses 13, 14 and 15 are not in the Old Testament, the persons concerned having lived between the time of Malachi and Christ. They are a sign that God kept faith with His promise to David, even through the dark years of the inter-testamental period, when He was silent.

Like David, Jechonias is mentioned twice, in 11,12, at the end of the second group and the beginning of the third, for he is not only a person begotten by Josiah, (who was in fact his grandfather, the missing out of Jechonias’ father and uncles being significant, and also serving to highlight the decline from Josiah, the best king of Judah, 2 Kings 23:25), but is also the one who is associated with the captivity.

Special mention must be made of Jehoiachin, otherwise known as Jeconiah and Coniah, in the Old Testament, and Jechonias in this chapter. Like David and Christ he is a marker for a distinct event, in his case, the Captivity. But he is important for another reason. Jeremiah solemnly declared a judgement against him in these words, “Earth, earth, earth, hear the word of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Israel”, Jeremiah 22:29,30. Now Jeconiah had several sons, 1 Chronicles 3:17, but none of them, nor any of their line, were to prosper on the throne of Israel. This is why Zerubbabel was never crowned king after the return from captivity, (even though he was of the line of David), for he was descended from Jechonias. The question is, given that Christ is descended from Jechonias, how can He sit on the throne of David? The answer will be found in the marriage of Joseph to Mary after the Child is conceived and before He is born.

And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ- whereas the other sons in this list are begotten of their fathers, we now arrive at the unique exception. For the words “was born” do not simply refer to the actual birth of Christ, but His being begotten. And the word “begat” which has been used over forty times in the passage in the active mood, is now used again, but this time in the passive. He is begotten, but by Mary, so He is the Seed of the Woman, promised in Eden.

David makes Christ’s kingship possible, Jechonias makes Christ’s kingship impossible. The marriage of Joseph to Mary before Christ’s birth removes the difficulty. Hence the importance of including Mary in the generations, for the word begat, (in the passive), is used of her. If the sequence had been Joseph…Christ, then a misunderstanding might arise. Joseph needs to be in the genealogy to make Christ legally the Seed of David, (as Joseph was physically, verse 20), Mary needs to be in the genealogy to avoid the curse of Jechonias. The other women in the list are not said to have begotten sons, simply that the fathers begat through them. Christ is thus uniquely the “seed of the woman”.

Luke emphasises the moral claim to the throne, as one who had not failed as the rest of David’s house had, 2 Samuel 23:3-5. So it appropriate that he should place the genealogy of Christ after He has lived in Nazareth for many years, and just before He defeats the temptations of the Devil in the wilderness. Joseph was a son or descendant of David, but because of the bar placed on anyone descended through Jeconias occupying the throne of David, he himself had no right to the throne, see Jeremiah 22:28-30; Matthew 1:11,12.

1:17
So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; and from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations; and from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations.

So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations- Hebrew letters have numerical value, and the letters of the name David amount to fourteen. So perhaps this is why Matthew is dividing the genealogy into three groups of fourteen. The name David means “beloved”, and thus the fact that he was beloved of God, (God calls him “a man after mine own heart”, Acts 13:22), is stamped upon the lists. But it also true that God’s Beloved Son is the culmination of the lists. So when the word came at His baptism, “This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased”, there was not only a comment on His life, for He had pleased His Father well whilst living in Nazareth, but it was a comment on His person, for He was the Beloved, the one whose coming into the world represented the climax of the genealogy that had “beloved” stamped on it.

The expression “all the generations” means “all the generations the Holy Spirit guided Matthew to include”, rather than all the generations as a matter of fact. By the omission of certain kings, God indicated that He disapproved of them, and this was enshrined in the Scriptures. This being the case, the genealogy is not simply a transcript from the temple records, as is also seen from the fact that the names of women are included, Phares’ twin brother Zara is mentioned, as are Judah and Jechonias’ brethren, and the carrying away into Babylon, and these things would not be found in a normal genealogy. But Matthew knew that most of the list were in the Book of Chronicles anyway. This is why he is happy to omit cetain kings, for everyone knew they were there, and their omission highlighted their failure. So the missing persons do not give support to the idea that there might be gaps in the generations given in the early chapters of Genesis, (a ploy used by those who wish to make the earth older than it is). The most likely place for omissions is in Genesis 5, but Jude tells us that Enoch was the seventh from Adam, so confirming there are no missing names, Jude 14.

And from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations- so Matthew includes David in this section, to show that even though they were carried into Babylon at the end of the fourteen, the fact that David was at the head of the list justified God persisting with the nation, even after it had gone into captivity.

Matthew mentions Babylon, but he does not mention Jerusalem, even though it is “the city of the great king”, Matthew 5:35. In fact, Matthew does not record that the Lord Jesus went to Jerusalem, (even though He actually did many times, as the other gospels make clear), until He went there to die. He must be like Isaac, and go to the altar, before He can be like Solomon, and sit on the throne in Jerusalem.

(b) Verses 18-21
Christ’s birth in relation to humanity

1:18
Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.

Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise- having spoken of the begetting of the kings of Israel, which was perfectly normal, Matthew is now going to record the begetting that was supernatural. The other kings were born one way, after being begotten of their fathers, this king is born on another wise, namely, begotten of the Holy Spirit. He is true man, (for His development and birth is after the normal manner), but sinless man, (for His conception is not after the normal manner). The preservation of the sinlessness of Christ does not depend on Mary, (who confessed God as her Saviour); nor is it compromised by the women in His pedigree who were immoral. Rather, it is preserved by the fact that His conception was by the agency of the Holy Spirit.

When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together- the expression “when as” means that the previous phrase is being explained. Matthew is summarising the position at the point where Luke left off, with Mary returning from her three-month’s stay in Elizabeth’s house in Judea. She is espoused to Joseph, but they have not “come together” as a result of a formal marriage ceremony.

She was found with child of the Holy Ghost- Matthew is careful to add how it is that Mary is with child, even though at this point in the account Joseph does not know that this is how it came about. As far as Joseph is concerned, she is with child, and discovered to be so, for the fact has become obvious. “Come together” should not be confused with “knew her”.

Luke tells us he had “perfect understanding of all things from the very first”, Luke 1:3, and this includes the beginning of the life of Christ in the womb. The angel had announced to Mary that she would have a child, and Mary had said, “Be it unto me according to thy word”, thus surrendering herself to the will of God. At that point the angel departs, so has nothing to do with the conception, for it is the Holy Spirit who will come upon Mary. She then leaves Nazareth, (and Joseph), and goes into the hill-country of Judea, to see her cousin Elizabeth, who is also expecting a child. Mary is greeted by Elizabeth as a mother as soon as she arrives, so we know that Zecharias is not the father of Mary’s child. She leaves Elizabeth before John is born, so we also know that Mary’s child is not John. She returns to Nazareth and only then does Joseph learn of her condition, so she is not expecting Joseph’s child. The identity and pedigree of the Child is safeguarded all the way through, for it is vital that there be no doubt as to who He is.

With this we may compare the way Christ’s body was the subject of close attention after He died, with each stage from the taking down of His body to the laying in the tomb carefully documented, so that we may be sure it was the person who died on the cross that came forth from the tomb.

Joseph was not physically responsible for the unborn child or he would not have thought of divorcing Mary. He becomes legally responsible for the born child by marrying Mary before the birth.

Special note on Christ’s conception
The truth that the Lord Jesus was born of a virgin is foundational to the Christian faith. A local church is required by God to be the “pillar and ground of the truth”, 1 Timothy 3:15. The fundamentals of the faith should therefore be regularly and systematically taught, to God’s glory. The fact that Christ came into manhood is vitally important. As also is the fact that He was born of a virgin. They affect His honour, and that of His Father. On the one hand, the Son of God cannot unite with Himself anything that is evil. On the other hand, He needs to associate Himself with men in the closest way that is possible for Him. The only way for this to happen is for Him to be really born as a man, but be born of a virgin, thus ensuring that the sin-principle that is normally passed on by a father, is not present in Him. For “by one man sin entered into the world”, and the process was begun when Adam begat a son, and did so in his likeness as a sinner, Genesis 5:3; Romans 5:12.

We need to ask two important questions about this matter.

Why must Christ become man?

1. To be able to die, Hebrews 2:14.

2. To be fully-qualified to sympathise, Hebrews 2:14-18.

3. To be approachable, but still showing His glory, John 1:14.

4. To be of the seed of David according to the flesh, Romans 1:3.

5. To vindicate God’s trust in man in relation to the earth, Hebrews 2:8,9.

6. To enable Him to link believers to Himself, 1 Corinthians 6:15.

7. Because man is lower than angels, and He willed to take the low place, Philippians 2:7,8.

Why must Christ be born of a virgin?

1. So that He does not inherit any taint of Adam’s sin, which is passed on through the male, Romans 5:12.

2. So that He is not prevented from occupying the throne of David in a coming day by the curse pronounced on Jeconiah, Jeremiah 22:22.

3. So that He may unite manhood with His Deity by the Divine Agency of the Spirit of God, and not through any intervention by man.

4. So that His birth may be a sign that God is starting a new mode of dealing with men.

5. So God may indicate that the “seed of the woman” has indeed come, for only Christ fits that description. (the expression “seed of the woman” does not occur in scripture, but is implied in God’s word to the serpent, referring to Eve, “her seed”). His birth is unique to highlight the fact that He is God’s remedy for the sin that came into the world through Adam.

What was involved when He came into manhood?

1. He gained the attributes of man without losing the attributes of God. It was on earth, as a man, that the Lord said, “I and my Father are one”, John 10:30.

2.  He united Godhood and manhood for ever in His Person.

3.  He really became flesh, and was not simply clothed with a body.

4.  He now has two natures in one Person.

5.  The attributes of God and the attributes of man are properly ascribed to that one Person.

1:19
Then Joseph her husband, being a just man, and not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily.

Then Joseph her husband- in Jewish law, as one espoused to Mary, he is her husband, and she is his wife. The law of Jewish espousal was so strong, that if a woman’s betrothed husband died, she was classed as a widow.

Being a just man- we are told three things by Matthew about the character of Joseph, and this is the first. As a just man, he would be careful to obey the commands of the law of God. This would involve him in questioning Mary as to the circumstances by which she was with child. His subsequent course of action will depend on her answer. If she was waylaid in the city, (that is, where others were nearby to hear her call for help, if indeed she did call for help), then she and the man involved are to be stoned to death, Deuteronomy 22:23,24. If she was waylaid in the field, with no-one at hand to hear her cry out, then nothing is to be done to her, for the law mercifully supposes that she was not willing, but the man is to be stoned to death, Deuteronomy 22:25-27. Mary, however, would have assured Joseph that neither of these situations was the case.

However, there is a third consideration. How is Joseph to know that the child is of the royal line of David? Even if he accepts Mary’s account of things, she will only be able to tell him that the angel said the child would be given the throne of His father David, Luke 1:32. One of the reasons why the penalty for adultery and fornication was so harsh in the Old Testament, (apart from the fact that it offended God’s holiness, and also destroyed the social structure of the natiion), was to caution the nation against committing those sins so that the line of the Messiah was preserved intact. The law in general was given in circumstances designed to strike fear into the Israelites, that, as God said, “Ye sin not”, Exodus 20:18,19.

And not willing to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily- now as a just man, Joseph was jealous for the honour of the House of David, but he knew that in Jewish law, if he married Mary, her child would become his child legally. Is it safe to do this, and thus, as a son of David himself, incorporate into the royal line a child whose identity is not known? This is the dilemma that faces him. And this is why he contemplates divorcing Mary, even though he does not believe she is with child by fornication.

He has two options, either to bring her before the elders of the city as one who must be cross-examined, or put her away, (that is, divorce her), privily, or privately, as one whose account is believed. If, as a just man, he believed Mary should be questioned, then he would adopt the former policy. If he believed her account, he would take the latter course, but again as a just man. The justness of his action being in this latter case in regard to Mary, for it is only just to deal with her gently, given that he believes her account. So this is the second feature that marks Joseph, even his gentleness and kindness.

1:20
But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.

But while he thought on these things- the third characteristic of Joseph is his careful consideration of matters. The scripture says, “He that believeth shall not make haste”, Isaiah 28:16.

Behold, the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream- Joseph had no doubt gone to sleep with these things on his mind, and now the answer comes to him in such a way that he is not in a position to dispute it. The angel Gabriel came to Mary, and they had a conversation, for her fears and sincere questions needed to be answered. Joseph, however, only needs to know the answer to a simple question, should he or should he not marry Mary? If not, he must divorce her, for they are betrothed to marry. He cannot simply break off the friendship, for they are legally obligated already.

He does not simply hear a voice, but an angel of the Lord appears to him as well. There would be something about this appearance that would leave him in no doubt that it was a messenger from God.

Joseph, thou son of David- the angel knows his name and his ancestry. By being addressed like this, Joseph is assured that the message has to do with the fact that he is of the royal line of David. The fact that he is a son of David is the matter that is on his mind, and now he is to be given the answer to his dilemma. Both Joseph, verse 20, and Christ, verse 1, are called “son of David”, as if to by-pass all other kings in between, and to show the connection with the one who alone is called a king in the passage. As we shall see, however, Joseph, despite being a son of David, did not have any right to the throne.

Fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife- this shows he had been inclined to marry Mary, for he believed her story, but had a lingering doubt about the identity of the child. It is not “fear to put away”, as if that was his inclination, but rather, “fear not to take”, for that was what, as a just man, he thought it right to do. Note that the angel recognises that Mary is his wife, and also reinforces that truth upon Joseph’s mind by stating it. It would not have been just of him to abandon Mary.

For that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost- thus the angel delicately confirms what Mary would have told him. Note that it is not simply that she conceived with the aid of the Holy Spirit, for no doubt that could have been said about Sarah. The child is directly “of” the Holy Spirit, with the preposition meaning “out of”, or “sourced in”. That is, the conception or begetting of the child is only by the action of the Holy Spirit. The other women in the list given by Matthew are not said to have begotten sons, simply that the fathers begat through them. Christ is thus uniquely the promised “seed of the woman”, as is implied in Genesis 3:15.

Notice that Joseph has not been told the child is “son of David”, and heir to David’s throne, for the simple reason that He is not that yet. Because the line of kings runs through the male side, even Mary being descended from David does not make Him heir to the throne. He will only be son of David in the legal sense when Joseph marries Mary.

1:21
And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS- “she” means “Mary as the one you will have married”; it is as a married woman that Mary will bring forth a son. In this way Joseph learns that he is to marry Mary before the child is born. This will ensure that he will be considered the legal father of the child, with all that that entailed, since he was a son of David. Yet, as we have seen, there was the insurmountable obstacle of the curse on those of Jechonias’ line. However, by being the legal son of Joseph, but not the biological son, the Lord Jesus avoids that obstacle.

So Joseph is assured that the child will be safely brought to the birth, (for the Holy Spirit had not only come upon Mary to effect the conception, but had overshadowed her to preserve her and her child), and will be a son, not a daughter.

He is to reinforce that he is the legal father by naming the child himself, for it was accepted in Jewish law that even if a betrothed woman had conceived by a man other that her espoused husband, by marrying her the husband was reckoned to be the father of the child legally. When the angel spoke to Mary, he told her she would name the child. So the child is named by Mary as the physical mother, and by Joseph as the legal father. They would be agreed as to the name, in contrast to Zecharias and Elizabeth, Luke 1:59-64.

Jesus is the equivalent to the Old Testament name Joshua, and means either “Jehovah is Saviour”, or “Jehovah the Saviour”. Of course, having an illustrious name did not guarantee in ordinary circumstances that the person named would live up to it. For instance, there were wicked kings of David’s line who had names like Jehoram, “Jah is high”; Ahaziah, “Jah possesses”; Jehoahaz, “Jah upholds”; Jehoiakin”, Jah sets up”, and Jeconiah, “Jah is establishing”. The last name being specially interesting, because God (Jah) dis-established him by sending him into captivity; so his name was the reverse of his character and history.

Joshua was originally named Oshea, (“salvation”), but when he was sent by Moses to spy out the promised land, his name was changed to Jehoshua, “salvation of Jehovah” or “Jehovah saves”, Numbers 13:16. So went he eventually took the people into the land as their leader, it was very clear that it was God who brought them in to a place of salvation and blessing, not Joshua.

For he shall save his people from their sins- the “He” is emphatic, meaning “He, and no other”. As Peter said to the rulers who crucified Him, “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby ye must be saved”, Acts 4:12. It is true there would have been many called Jesus in His day, named after Joshua, the renowned soldier-statesman that succeeded Moses as leader of the nation, but only He has the power to save from sins. Joshua could save from the Amalekites, but not from sin.

So the name Jesus is no mere pious hope, but the expression of the character the person will display. The reason why none of those kings in the genealogy of the previous verses could save the people, (whom they would call “their people”, because they were king over them), from their sins, was that they themselves were failures in greater or lesser degree, and often caused the fall of the nation. This one is different, for His name implies that He has no sin of His own, and is therefore in a position to deal with the sins of His people. Far from being responsible for the fall of the nation, He will be the one to elcvate them to honour in His kingdom.

Note that it is sins that He deals with. He is not presented here as one who will overturn the Roman oppression, and deliver the people and set up His kingdom. His conquest will be seen to be successful when men and women are delivered from the greatest oppression of all, namely their sins. God said to the people in Hosea’s day, “But I will have mercy on the house of Judah, and will save them by the Lord their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen”, Hosea 1:7. One of the things that stumbled many in Israel, and even John the Baptist, (Luke 7:19, and see the words of his father in Luke 1:71,74), was the fact that when He came amongst them, He did not call for a rising up against the Roman Emperor. He even chose as one of His apostles Simon the Canaanite. The word Canaanite indicates Simon belonged to the Zealots, the party that were dedicated to the overthrow the Roman rule. Christ called him away from working against the Roman authorities, just as He called Matthew away from working for the Roman Authorities.

If they had remembered Hosea’s words, they would have realised that it was as the Lord their God that He would save, and His Deity would give utmost value to the death He would die at Calvary. It is by this they must be saved. The Lord Jesus cannot rule over an unbelieving, uncleansed nation.

So He will save His people by being God’sd final prophet among them, and imparting truth which, when believed, saves from sins. He will save His people by being their great high priest, the author of eternal salvation to all them that obey Him Hebrews 5:9, and eventually save His people by showing Himself completely in control as King, and bringing them over into resurrection.

(c) Verses 22-25
Christ’s birth in relation to Deity

1:22
Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,

Now all this was done- that is, the sum total of all events surrounding the birth of Christ, whether it be the action of the Spirit of God, the willing submission of Mary, or the courage of Joseph in taking her to be his wife. All combined together, under God’s overruling, to bring about the birth of Christ in the appointed and foretold way.

That it might be fulfilled- there are three ways in which the fulfilment of prophecy is introduced in the New Testament, as follows:

1. Where the Greek word “ina” is used, as here, then it is “in order that it might be fulfilled”, and the event in question completely fulfils the prophecy.

2. Where the word “tole” is found, as in Matthew 2:17, then it is “was fulfilled”, and indicates that the event was merely a case in point, and what happened was an illustration of what was said in the prophecy, (in that instance, that there was tribulation for the mothers of the district. But there will be tribulation for all Israel in a day to come, so the fulfilment is only partial in Matthew 2:7).

3. Where the word “opus” is used, as is the case in Matthew 8:17, it is “so that it might be”, and the fulfilment is not complete, but an event which was within the scope and intention of the prophecy. (The healing of the sicknesses of the body becomes an indicator that the Lord Jesus will deal with the spiritual problem, sin itself, at Calvary).

Which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying- note that the words were recorded by Isaiah, and yet they were the words of the Lord. He chose to speak through the prophet. This reminds us of the unique character of the Holy Scriptures, for, although written by men, yet they are the very word of God to us. Holy men of old spake as they were moved by the Spirit of God, 2 Peter 1:21. Like a sailing ship is borne along on the water by the wind in the sails, but yet all the time the captain is in control. The prophecy in question was uttered over seven hundred years before the event, but the long period of time did not mean the promise had lapsed, for God is faithful.

1:23
Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.

Behold- something of the wonder of the event, and the surprise of it, is expressed in Isaiah’s words. And the wonder was still there centuries later when the thing promised came to pass. Of course, the greatest surprise was that a virgin should conceive.

A virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son- this is impossible naturally, but as the angel said to Mary, “For with God nothing shall be impossible”, Luke 1:37. It is not that a maiden who was a virgin at the time of Isaiah’s prophecy would later on have a child. In that case she would no longer be a virgin. And in any case, the birth of a child to this virgin is spoken of as a sign, but a young woman having a baby is no sign. She must be a virgin and be with child at the same time to fit the requirements of this prediction.

When it comes to deciding what is involved here, our safest course is to be governed by what the Old Testament usage of words is. So when we turn to Genesis 24, we find reference to Rebekah, and we are told in verse 16 that, (a) she was a damsel, (naarah), (b) that she was a virgin, (bethulah), and (c) that she had not been known by man. Clearly, to be described as a “bethulah” was not enough, (especially as it is used in Joel 1:8 of a married woman), so the words “that had not known man” needed to be added to make the situation clear. Now when Rebekah was described in verse 43, the servant calls her “the virgin”, (alma). He is clearly summing up what verse 16 has said, as is shown by the use of the definite article. The servant is giving a summary of what had happened when he first met Rebekah, and therefore she is the definite person he has in mind. So an “alma”, as Mary was, is a maiden; of marriageable age; is not married; has not had relations with a man.

And they shall call his name Emmanuel- notice that whilst it was Mary who was to name the child Jesus, as His true mother, and Joseph who was to name Him likewise, as the legal father, it is “they” who call Him Emmanuel. The “they” are clearly the people whom He will have saved from their sins. They gladly acknowledge that the One who died upon the cross for them, so that their sins might be forgiven, is none other than Emmanuel, God manifest in flesh. The person He is gives value to the work that He did. In the original prophecy, it is the virgin who will call His name Emmanuel, showing that she will recognise the Deity of her child.

Which being interpreted is, God with us- Matthew knows that Israelites will understand the meaning of the name Emmanuel, but he also knows that Gentiles are going to have the gospel preached to them, so for their benefit, since the identity of this person is so important, he translates the name for us. Whereas others have names that simply reflect the pious hopes of the parents, this Child really is who His name declares Him to be. So it is that God’s promise comes literally true, for He saves “by the Lord their God”, Hosea 1:7.

It would be as well to notice the context of this quotation, as found in Isaiah 7.

Isaiah 7:1
And it came to pass in the days of Ahaz the son of Jotham, the son of Uzziah, king of Judah, that Rezin the king of Syria, and Pekah the son of Remaliah, king of Israel, went up toward Jerusalem to war against it, but could not prevail against it.

Here Isaiah describes how the king of the Northern Kingdom of Israel, (formed when ten tribes broke away from Judah and Benjamin), had made a coalition with Assyria against Ahaz, the wicked king of Judah.

7:2
And it was told the house of David, saying, Syria is confederate with Ephraim. And his heart was moved, and the heart of his people, as the trees of the wood are moved with the wind.

Although very wicked, Ahaz was the rightful king of the line of David, which is why, very significantly, he is addressed as the house of David, for he is the current figurehead of the Davidic line. Is this not also why he is included by Matthew in the genealogy, despite his wickedness? The heart of Ahaz and his people are understandably troubled. How will the king react in this situation?

7:3
Then said the Lord unto Isaiah, Go forth now to meet Ahaz, thou, and Shearjashub thy son, at the end of the conduit of the upper pool in the highway of the fuller’s field;

Isaiah the prophet of the Lord meets the king at the end of the conduit of the upper pool. This is a symbolic place, for Jerusalem was vulnerable because the water supply was outside the city. The king needs to trust God and not the devices of men, and He will protect him, and through him, the house of David. Isaiah takes a symbolic person with him, his son, whose name Shear-jashub, had been specially given to him to signify God’s pledge that even though the nation would go into captivity, a remnant would return, for such is the meanng of his name.

7:4
And say unto him, Take heed, and be quiet; fear not, neither be fainthearted for the two tails of these smoking firebrands, for the fierce anger of Rezin with Syria, and of the son of Remaliah.

7:5
Because Syria, Ephraim, and the son of Remaliah, have taken evil counsel against thee, saying,

The prophet tells Ahaz to take heed to the word of the Lord, and to not be disturbed by the threats of the enemy, for the plan of Ephraim and Syria will not be successful, as verses 7-9 explain. He is to act in faith and not fear.

7:6
Let us go up against Judah, and vex it, and let us make a breach therein for us, and set a king in the midst of it, [even] the son of Tabeal:

We learn now that the plan of the coalition is to displace Ahaz, so that there is not a prince of Judah on the throne in Jerusalem. This represents an attack on the Royal Line of the Messiah, and explains why Ahaz is addressed as “house of David”, for its future rests in him, in one sense.

7:7
Thus saith the Lord God, It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass.

7:8
For the head of Syria is Damascus, and the head of Damascus is Rezin; and within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be broken, that it be not a people.

7:9
And the head of Ephraim is Samaria, and the head of Samaria is Remaliah’s son. If ye will not believe, surely ye shall not be established.

Isaiah discerns Ahaz does not believe that God will save him from his enemies, and he therefore warns him against unbelief, or else he will be deposed, for unbelief will mean God’s protection will be withdrawn.

7:10
Moreover the Lord spake again unto Ahaz, saying,

7:11
Ask thee a sign of the Lord thy God; ask it either in the depth, or in the height above.

The word “again” confirms that when the house of David was addressed it was in the person of Ahaz. If Ahaz believed what the prophet had said, and if the Lord was indeed the Lord his God, then He would be give a sign to confirm His word, to confirm His promise of safety, and to ensure the continuance of the royal line.. He could ask the sign to be an occurrence in the heavens, or below. Such was the generosity of God’s offer.

7:12
But Ahaz said, I will not ask, neither will I tempt the Lord.

Ahaz pretends to be too spiritual to need a sign, protesting that it would mean putting the Lord to the test. But if the Lord volunteered to be put to the test, then Ahaz, if he was a believer, should have asked for a sign.

7:13
And he said, Hear ye now, O house of David; Is it a small thing for you to weary men, but will ye weary my God also?

By behaving as he did, the king was causing the nation to be anxious for their safety, and constant anxiety is wearying. Worse than this, however, Ahaz was testing the patience of God.

7:14
Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

Because Ahaz is not fit to receive a sign, it will be in the future, but will have present relevance. The sign is given to “you”, plural, so, Ahaz having rejected the offer of a sign personally, is given one that will apply to the nation in some way, for he will be long gone when it comes to pass. When Matthew quoted these words, he wrote “they shall call his name Emmanuel”, which may be an allusion to the fact that the sign is not given to Ahaz personally, but to the nation. Whilst the nation of Israel as a whole did not recognise Him as their God when He came the first time, when He comes again to them they will say, “Lo, this is our God; we have waited for him, and he will save us: This is the Lord; we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation”, Isaiah 25:9.

7:15
Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil, and choose the good.

The eating of butter and honey in this context is a sign of hardship, as verses 21 and 22 indicate, with the words, “And it shall come to pass in that day, that a man shall nourish a young cow, and two sheep; And it shall come to pass, for the abundance of milk that they shall give he shall eat butter: for butter and honey shall every one eat that is left in the land”.

It might be thought that butter and honey are luxuries, (with echoes of “land of milk and honey”), but the point is that the population of the land is going to be decimated, and there will be a surplus for that reason, not because of productivity. The same goes for the thorns and briers, for there will be no-one to keep the weeds under control.

The eating of milk and honey is said to be “that he may know to refuse the evil and choose the good”. The eating of butter and honey in itself does not teach a child to refuse evil and choose good. But if we see eating butter and honey as a sign that God has intervened in judgement, then the Child will grow up with the evidence even in his home of the privation that being judged of God as a nation brings. He will realise that national unfaithfulness is an evil and will realise that national faithfulness is good. Brought up in harsh conditions in Nazareth, the effects of Roman occupation would be clearly seen by the child Jesus. This was the sure sign that the nation had chosen the evil of idolatry, and rejected the good of obedience.

Notice that the prophet does not say He will learn how to refuse what is evil, and learn how to choose the good, but that He will know to refuse the evil and choose the good; in other words, know the experience, rather that have to learn by trial and error what is evil or good. As one who has no sin-principle within Him, the Lord Jesus did not have within Him any tendency to sin. This is a similar idea to that in Hebrews 5:8 where we read, “though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things that he suffered”. He learned what it was to obey, (for He as God had always commanded), but He did not have to learn to obey, as if He had a rebellious spirit. We read of Christ in Nazareth that He “grew in wisdom”, so He was able to increasingly appreciate the implications of the situation in the nation. Nazareth was a Roman garrison town, and every day there would be reminders that the land was occupied by a foreign power.

7:16
For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings.

If it be asked why there is a certain obscurity about this sign, then the answer is surely that Ahaz had refused a clear sign, so God, in judgement upon him, gives a sign which is clear to those who live when it comes to pass, but not clear to Ahaz. In this way it is comparable to the use of parables by the Lord Jesus, for to the disciples the explanation was given, to the unbelieving nation the words were obscure. See Matthew 13:10-17.

Because he was unbelieving, God kept Ahaz guessing as to when the sign would be fulfilled. He did not know that the child would not be born for seven hundred years. He would anxiously await news that a child had been born and been given the name Immanuel. Then he would count the number of years between the birth of the child and him attaining the age of discretion, for it was during that time that the Northern Kingdom of Israel would be forsaken of both her kings. But that was assuming the child would be born in his lifetime. In the event, He was not, and Ahaz died without having seen the fulfilment of the prophecy.

Ahaz reigned from 739-723 BC. Pekah the king of the Northern Kingdom of Israel was deposed in 736 BC. Hoshea, placed as governor by Tiglath-Pileser the Assyrian, slew Pekah in 735 BC, and was himself carried away to Assyria in 719BC. So both Pekah and Hoshea, successive rulers in Samaria, the capital of the Northern Kingdom, forsook the land. Pekah by being deposed, Hoshea by being carried away captive. So when Ahaz died in 723 BC Hoshea was still in power, which meant the sign and prophecy were not fulfilled in his lifetime. After all, he had refused to ask for a sign, and so God gave the sign but made sure he did not see it realised.

The mention of both Syria, and House of David in this passage is significant. Could it be relevant to the fact that Joseph was called “son of David” by the angel, Matthew 1:20? He was representative of the House, and would provide continuity with Ahaz, but would not be the one through whom the Messiah would come. And is this why Luke mentions Quirinius being Governor of Syria, Luke 2:2? The fact he was governor for the Roman Caesar reinforces the idea that Syria has been forsaken of her king, as Isaiah 7 said would happen. So Joseph is testimony to the fact that the nation of Israel has no king, and Quirinius that Syria has none either.

We return now to Matthew’s narrative:

1:24
Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him, and took unto him his wife:

Then Joseph being raised from sleep did as the angel of the Lord had bidden him- here is another feature that marked Joseph, even his ready obedience to the revealed will of God. He has patiently waited for light, and now, having received it, acts upon it. He will have to share with Mary the reactions of the men and women of Nazareth as word is passed round as to the situation. Yet he is prepared to bear this reproach, just as Moses was prepared to bear the reproach of Christ in Egypt, “for he had respect unto the recompense of the reward”, Hebrews 11:26. The features we have noticed about both Mary and Joseph give us insight into the sort of home in which the Lord Jesus was brought up.

And took unto him his wife- she who was his wife by betrothal, is now his wife by marriage. By marrying her before Christ is born, Joseph ensures that He is truly son of David, and can inherit the throne. In one sense, then, this is the most important marriage in the Bible.

1:25
And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.

And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son- to “know” in this setting, is to have physical relations. At every stage the integrity of the person of the unborn Christ is maintained. The tomb of the Lord Jesus was safeguarded, being sealed and watched over, so that it is certain that only Christ went in, and only Christ came out in resurrection. So when He was in the womb, every safeguard is in place so that we know without a doubt that Mary’s firstborn child is the one conceived of the Holy Spirit. That He is firstborn removes all doubt, for Mary had no child before who could be confused with Him. She presented Him in the temple as required for firstborn sons, Luke 2:23. The title firstborn would have no meaning if Mary did not have other children afterwards. That she did do so is shown by Matthew 13:55,56.

And he called his name JESUS- by that action Joseph formally took the Child Jesus as his own son legally, with all its implications since Joseph was of the royal line of David.

Special note on marriage
This sequence of events regarding Joseph and Mary establishes the principle that when a man and a woman formally and publicly take one another as husband and wife, they are, at that moment, as much married as they will ever be. We should distinguish between being “one flesh”, as in proper marriage, and “one body”, as in a sinful relationship involving fornication. The teaching of 1 Corinthians 6:15,16 is clear. The passage reads as follows:

“Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid. What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? For two, saith He, shall be one flesh. But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit. Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s”.

When we were saved, we were in-dwelt by the Spirit of God, and one of the things He does is join us to the Lord in a union that is on the highest level, that of the Spirit. But it is our bodies that are in-dwelt by the Spirit of God, and therefore we are not only linked to Christ on the level of the spirit, but also as to the body. To use those members so as to be joined temporarily to a harlot is a disgrace. This relationship is only on the level of the body, whereas the Scripture describes true marriage as being a man and a woman becoming one flesh. This is an ongoing relationship, as two lives are bonded together, and is completely different to being bonded in body. Our bodies were bought by Christ’s precious blood, and hence we are no longer our own, for our bodies are the property of God, to be used for His glory.

1 JOHN 3

The apostle had returned in 2:28 to addressing the whole of the family of God.  The rest of the epistle is taken up with the development of various themes that have been introduced during his word to the infants in the family.  If they are going to grow, and if young men are going to become fathers, and if fathers are going to continue to be a help to those less mature in the faith, then there are other things the apostle must write. 
The leading themes of the address to the infants in 2:18-27 are enlarged on in the rest of the epistle.  The apostle is concerned about the progress of the children of God, and he develops matters he has mentioned to the babes in the family, in order that they may progress to being young men, that the young men may progress to being fathers, and that the fathers might be confirmed in their faith.  The themes he develops are as follows:

First theme:  “antichrist shall come”, 2:18.  This is developed in 2:28-3:7, as the apostle shows that the Lord Jesus shall be manifested, and as a result, Antichrist shall be defeated. The subject of the manifestation of Christ, by which He will destroy the antichrist, is brought in by the apostle to emphasise three features that were found in Christ, and which need to be found in us, in view of the fact that we shall be manifested with Him. 

Second theme: “even now are there are many antichrists”, 2:18.  This is developed in  3:8-24.  The apostle is concerned lest the false teachers, (whom he labels antichrists, for they do what Antichrist shall do, deny the Father and the Son), will influence the children of God, and hinder their progress in Divine things.

Third theme:  “ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things”, 2:20.  This is developed in 4:1-6.  By the knowledge the Holy Spirit gives, the believer is able to distinguish between truth and error.

Fourth theme:  “he is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son”, 2:22.  This is developed in 4:7-12.  The believer, far from denying the Father and the Son, acknowledges that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world, that He is the propitiation for our sins, and that He is the Saviour of the world.  As a result they know God, love God, and display God in their attitude to their fellow-believers.

Fifth theme:  “ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father”, 2:24.  This is developed in 4:13-21, where the apostle shows how we may know that we dwell in Him.

Sixth theme:  “this is the promise that He hath promised us, even eternal life”, 2:25.  This is developed in 5:1-11, where the apostle shows that the witness that God gives to His Son, when believed, results in eternal life.

Seventh theme:  “the same anointing teacheth you of all things”, 2:27.  This is developed in 5:12-21, where five vital things the believer knows are dealt with, as the apostle closes his epistle.

FIRST THEME DEVELOPED, 2:28-3:10:  “antichrist shall come”.

The apostle shows that the Lord Jesus shall be manifested, and as a result, Antichrist shall be defeated. The subject of the manifestation of Christ, by which He will destroy the antichrist, is brought in by the apostle to emphasise three features that were found in Christ, and which need to be found in us, in view of the fact that we shall be manifested with Him.

Three features of Christ to imitate in view of our coming with Him:

First feature:  2:28-29 He is righteous. We should practice righteousness.
Second feature:  3:1-3 He is pure. We should purify ourselves.
Third feature:  3:4-6 He is sinless. We should not sin.

First feature:  2:28-29
He is righteous.      We should practice righteousness.

This has already been commented on in the notes on 1 John 2.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN CHAPTER 3, VERSES 1 TO 6:

3:1  Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew Him not
3:2  Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when He shall appear, we shall be like Him; for we shall see Him as He is.
3:3  And every man that hath this hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.
3:4  Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
3:5  And ye know that He was manifested to take away our sins; and in Him is no sin.
3:6  Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

Second feature 3:1-3
He is pure.  We should purify ourselves.

3:1  Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew Him not.

Behold, what manner of love- John, even in old age, is amazed and overwhelmed by the sort of love that the Father has shown towards us.  “What manner of” is literally, “of what country”.  The disciples exclaimed, after Christ had stilled the storm on the lake, “What manner of man is this?”  What they had witnessed was something totally “out of this world”.  So with the love of the Father; it is totally outside the realm of human emotion, for it is the expression of what God is in Himself, for “God is love”, 4:8.  God loves and gives life, whereas in the first family there was hatred and the taking of life, as John will remind us in verse 12. 
The Father hath bestowed upon us- John is sure we will know who he means by “the Father”, even though he has spoken of fathers in the previous chapter.  Just as the Lord Jesus spoke about Himself as “the Son” when He was going to present abstract truth, so here, it is “the Father”.  John uses the word “Father” to emphasise that the sort of love we have been loved with is Father-love.
That we should be called the sons of God- the word translated “son” here is the Greek word teknon, which is derived from the verb meaning “to produce as a mother, bring forth, bear, travail, be delivered”.  Clearly the emphasis is on the fact of a birth, in this case new birth.  But there is, in the context, the idea of likeness to the Son of God, as expressed in the next verse, so it is perfectly fitting to translate as son, rather than as child, since the one to whose likeness we shall be conformed is the Son of God.  By the same token, John avoids using the word which he uses for the Son of God Himself, which is huios.  The words huios and teknon both mean child or son, but teknon is never used of the Lord Jesus.  (In Acts 4:27, the believers say “For of a truth against Thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel were gathered together”.  The word for child they used is pais, which can be translated boy, girl, child, or servant.  Perhaps the translators wished to highlight the vulnerability of the Lord Jesus as the kings of the earth set themselves against Him to crucify Him, so they translated as “child”.  Perhaps they also took the opportunity to distinguish between Christ and David, who is also called a “pais”, (translated as “servant”) in verse 5).

Divine love has ensured that we have a relationship with God that is of the highest and noblest sort.  We are called the sons of God by God Himself, for He has given us the right to be called this.  In his gospel, John wrote “But as many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name: which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God”, John 1:12,13.  So believers have the power or authority to take their place as the sons of God.

Such have not been born of blood, (as Abraham was of the blood-line of Terah); nor are they born of the flesh, (as Ishmael was born of Abraham in the normal way); nor are they born of the will of man, (for to take a servant-maid to produce a son was a heathen custom which Abraham unwisely adopted), but are born of God, (as Isaac was miraculously born of Sarah, an old woman who had been barren all her life).

The fact that Divine love has made us sons of God shows that God wanted it to happen; it was not simply a righteous thing to do, but part of the expression of the will of Him who is essentially love.  To be called the sons of God means that we are known by God under that name; He does not disown His children.  He gives to those who believe the authority to be called (to take their place rightfully as) the sons of God.  There is no doubt to their title or their entitlement; all is regular and in order.
Therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew Him not- because this world is a world of men after the likeness of Adam, who forfeited his relationship with God through sin, it has not the ability to recognise and appreciate Divine things. Satan promised Eve and Adam opened eyes, but in fact through sin their minds were darkened, and then blinded, Ephesians 4:18.  They saw their own shame, but became blind to God’s glory.

As John wrote in His gospel, “He was in the world, and the world was made by Him, and the world knew Him not”.  That is, despite the fact that He was the creator and sustainer of all things, men were so sunk in sin that they were unable to recognise their Creator when His work was manifest in Old Testament times.  He had been in the world, providentially and governmentally overseeing the world behind the scenes, and He had done so as Creator.  Man, however, turned from the knowledge of God and worshipped idols, so it is no surprise to find that they were not able to recognise their Creator’s hand in what was happening in the world. 

Those who are not born of God have no capacity to appreciate Divine things, even when they are expressed in the fullest possible way by the Son of God when He lived down here.  But believers have the life of God by new birth, and this is the reason they are not understood either.  Of course, we should express our faith in good works, and the world may see these and glorify God because of them, but the principles that underlay and motivate those good works they do not understand. 

3:2  Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when He shall appear, we shall be like Him; for we shall see Him as He is.

Beloved, now are we the sons of God- it is true that God has foreordained that His people should ultimately be “conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren”, Romans 8:39, but this is for the future.  But here John asserts that we are now, in the present, sons of God.
John calls us beloved because he has a deep love for his readers.  As he will say in the next chapter “he that loveth Him that begot loveth also them that are begotten of Him”, 5:1.  Because God is love, to be born of Him is to have the capacity to show true love to all those who share the life of God.  John knew what it was to be “the disciple whom Jesus loved”, but he had also heard the command of the Lord Jesus to love one another as He had loved them, John 15:12.  This he was seeking to do, and one way he expressed it was to call his readers beloved in a sincere way. 
And it doth not yet appear what we shall be- so two things are true, one, about the present, that we are the sons of God; two, about the future, that what we shall be is not yet manifest.  John is not saying “it does not yet appear” in the sense that it is not clear to us what we shall be, for he goes on to explain what we shall be, (like Him), so it is apparent to us now as we read his words.  What he means is that what we shall be has not been manifest to the world, (as it will be when the Lord comes to the earth), even though it is manifest to the apostle, and through him to us. 
But we know that, when He shall appear, we shall be like Him- we know this, but the world does not.  We also know what we shall be, for we shall be like Him.  This is proof for the distinction between the coming of the Lord into the air to take His people home to heaven, (often called “The Rapture”), and His coming to the earth, the Revelation.  Those who say we shall be caught up as the Lord descends to earth, must explain when the judgement seat of Christ and the marriage of the Lamb take place. 

1 Corinthians 15:48,49 assures us that as to the body, we shall be changed, so that we shall bear the image of the heavenly, as we now bear the image of the earthly, Adam.  Here, however, the emphasis is on moral likeness.  When it is a question of the body being changed, His voice is the means of effecting it.  Here, it is sight that transforms.

We must remember that John uses the word for know which is based on the word to see.  We see Him by faith now, and in the measure in which the eyes of our understanding are enlightened, (as a light-sensitive film used to be exposed to the light to produce an image), we shall see Him increasingly better.  When the rapture takes place, all hindrances to that process which are represented by the body will be gone, and we shall see as well with the eyes of our understanding as we do with our physical eyes now.  So it is not physical sight that shall transform, but spiritual, as the hindrances are removed. 

The apostle Paul wrote “But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord”, 2 Corinthians 3:18.  The contrast is between the nation of Israel, who have a vail over them as they read the Old Testament, and therefore cannot see the glories of the Lord Jesus expressed there, and Christians, who with an open or unveiled face can see Him there.  And as they do this, they are changed into the same image, for what they see is what they become.  The word for change is the same as is used of the Lord Jesus when He was transfigured before the disciples on the mount.  Just as a butterfly changes by metamorphosis, so that the hidden and inherent beauties are brought out, so with Christ.  The glory that will be seen in a coming day as He reigns upon the earth shone out briefly, to the encouragement of His disciples.  (Incidentally, the final glorious stage of the butterfly is called by biologists the imago.  The final glorious stage of the believer’s transfiguration will be the image of Christ).  So with us, there is a process of change and transformation that goes on as we view Christ in the Scriptures.  And if that form of beholding, which is like looking into a mirror, is able to change us, how much more when we see the Lord Himself with unhindered spiritual vision?  For when He comes our bodies will be rid of the sin-principle that dwells in us now, and which prevents the full appreciation of His beauties.

3:3  And every man that hath this hope in Him purifieth himself, even as He is pure.

And every man that hath this hope in Him- the hope of being changed into His likeness is vested in Himself alone.  It is not hope in the believer, but hope in Christ that is in view.  There is no prospect of us being able to effect the transformation, either now or at His coming; it is entirely His work.
Purifieth himself, even as He is pure- confronted by the realisation that there is much to be changed about us, we are to see to it that all that is contrary to Christ is eradicated from our lives.  In particular, in the context, we should purify ourselves from all wrong thoughts about his person, for such wrong thoughts are impurities.  The standard we have before us as we do this is nothing less than the purity that marks Him.  He is free from anything that could spoil His glory.

Third feature     Verses 3:4-6       
He is sinless.  We should not sin.

3:4  Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law- the word for sin in the Old Testament means to miss the mark.  The New Testament commentary on that is, “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God”, Romans 3:23.  The glory of God is expressed to us in Christ.  We have come short of the standard He set, and therefore have missed the mark.  But John is telling us here that sin is also transgression of God’s law.  The law of God given to Israel was an expression of His will, and made it clear that He hated sin. 
For sin is the transgression of the law- this is not so much a definition of sin, but rather, one of the consequences of it.  The apostle is emphasizing that if we sin we are committing an act of rebellion against God; that is how serious it is.  The next verse will declare to us another way in which He showed His hatred of sin. 

3:5  And ye know that He was manifested to take away our sins; and in Him is no sin.

And ye know that He was manifested to take away our sins- this is a foundational truth of the gospel, that they well knew, for the Spirit had taught them it.  As Paul puts it in Romans 8:3, “For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending His own Son, in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh”.  So His coming, His life, and His sin-bearing all condemned sin.  But He not only came to condemn sin, but to deal with it.  As soon as He came into public view, the Lord Jesus was hailed by John the Baptist as the “Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29.  It was not that He was bearing the sin then, but that He was the one appointed to do it at the time of His Father’s choosing.

On the Day of Atonement, the iniquities, transgressions and sins of the nation of Israel were figuratively placed upon the head of the scapegoat, and it was led into a place from which it could not return.  Thus God illustrated what His Son would do, when He bare sins in His own body on the tree, and went into the darkness of forsakenness and desolation on the cross.  But the scapegoat was led by a fit man, who also illustrates Christ, and that fit man came back from the place of desolation, and so has Christ, in resurrection.  He died unto sin once, Romans 6:10; that is, He died to deliberately address the matter of sin.  Now He lives to God, for He has not to deal with the matter of sin in that way ever again. 
And in Him is no sin- this is the second thing that we know.  We do so because the Scriptures make it clear.  The word came from heaven on more than one occasion, “This is My Beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased”, Matthew 3:17; 17:5.  Would the Father have said that if there was any trace of sin in His Son?  He lived in disreputable Nazareth for thirty years, yet no defilement spoiled Him.  He moved in public ministry amongst men for three and a half years, exposed to relentless pressure from both the Devil and men, yet in no instance was He found wanting; always He was “holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners”, Hebrews 7:26.  Not only is this the second thing we know, but it is also the second thing that condemns sin.  John could write, “this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world”, John 3:19.  The presence of the undiluted holiness of Christ in this world was outright condemnation of its sin, and clearly showed God’s attitude to it.

Notice that John does not write “in Him was no sin”, although that is true, but “in Him is no sin”.  He is not referring simply to the past.  Rather, he is saying that at whatever moment we look at Him, past, present, or future, the only conclusion we can come to is that in Him is no sin.  John is probing His nature and character, and telling us that there is no sin of any sort there.

Notice how John links the Person, “in Him is no sin”, with the work, “to take away our sins”.  Peter does the same when he writes, “Who did no sin”, “who His own self bare our sins in his body on the tree”, 1 Peter 2:22,24.  And also Paul, who wrote, “He hath made Him to be sin for us”, “who knew no sin”, 2 Corinthians 5:21.  We could compare the three sacrifices that are linked together as being most holy, (that is, they meet the approval of a thrice holy God), Leviticus 6:17.  They are, the meal offering, telling of His nature, (John’s view); the sin offering, telling of His being made sin, (Paul’s view), and the trespass offering, speaking of the way He took account of the faults of others, (Peter’s view).  No wonder God specifically mentions in that verse that leaven is to excluded from those offerings, for no suggestion of sin must spoil our thoughts of Christ and His work. 

3:6  Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him, neither known Him.

Whosoever abideth in Him- a person who abides in Christ is comfortable with the truth as to His sinlessness, and rests his soul in that truth. The Spirit of God indwells believers, thus uniting them to the Son of God.  He Himself said, “At that day ye shall know that I am in My Father, and ye in Me, and I in you”, John 14:20.  So He is saying that after the Spirit of God had come at Pentecost, (an event which gives character to the whole of this age, and is what the Lord calls “that day”), the believer will know three things, as follows:
First, that the Son is in the Father, which is a claim to Deity, for it means that everything and anything that the Father is and does, is what the Son is and does too.  They will be sure as to His Deity.
Second, that the believers are in the Son, which means that they have been united together by the agency of the Spirit of God, who comes within them when they first believe.  They will be sure as to their security.
Third, that He is within, which means that the Spirit of Christ indwells them, making good to them all that the Son is.  They will be sure as to their link with Divine Persons.
So it is that believers are united to the Son of God in such a profound way that they can be said to be in Him, absorbed in who and what He is to such a degree that their own identity, in this context, is lost sight of. 
To abide in Him is an extension of this, and involves an appreciation, however small, of who He is.  This grasp of who He is does not cause them to be discomfited, but rather the reverse, for they delight in it.
Sinneth not- the construction John uses here is, according to those expert in such things, “the present participle with the article in the nominative”.  This serves to make “sinneth not” like a title, “a non-sinning one”.  So John is not thinking of individual acts of sin, but is presenting us with God’s view of those who are in the Son.  It cannot be that those who are vitally linked to the Son of God by the Spirit of God can be thought of as sinners.  That they do sin is evident from John’s appeal in 2:1 that we sin not, but here the emphasis is on their standing before God.  John is thinking in absolute terms, as he often does, and presents us with the perfect view of things as God has it.  He will return to this subject in verse 9.
Whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him- if one who “sinneth not” is “a non-sinning one”, then this is the reverse, for the construction is the same.  He is “a sinning one”, or in other words, an unbeliever.  He does not appreciate that the Son of God has been manifest, and that His life is sinless and therefore condemning.  He has not repented, and carries on sinning.
Neither known Him- there has been established no personal relationship with Christ through faith, nor personal appreciation of Him. 

SECOND THEME DEVELOPED, 3:7-24: “already there are many antichrists”, 2:18. 

Second theme: “even now are there are many antichrists”, verse 18.  This is developed in  3:8-24.  The apostle is concerned lest the false teachers, (whom he labels antichrists, for they do what Antichrist shall do, deny the Father and the Son), will influence the children of God, and hinder their progress in Divine things.
The apostle is encouraging the believers to resist the teachings of the antichrists.  The key phrase in this passage is “let no man deceive you”, verse 7.  This reminds us of the apostle’s warnings in 2:26 about those who were trying to seduce the little children; that is, to lead them astray by their deceptive teachings.  He first of all presents, in verses 7-10,  three features which highlight the contrast between believers and antichrists in connection with righteousness.  Then in verses 11-24 he presents three features of the love that true Christians have to one another because they, unlike the antichrists, are “of the truth”, verse 19.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN CHAPTER 3, VERSES 7 TO 10:

3:7  Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as hH is righteous.
3:8  He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.
3:9  Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
3:10  In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

3:7-10  Three contrasts between God’s children and antichrists

First contrast, verse 7 The believer is like Christ, antichrists are like the devil.
Second contrast, verses 8-9 The believer does not sin, antichrists do.
Third contrast, verse 10  The believer is a child of God, antichrists are of the devil.

First contrast, verse 7       
The believer is like Christ, antichrists are like the devil.

3:7  Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as He is righteous.

Little children, let no man deceive you- in 2:18-27 the warning about deceivers was to the infants in the family of God.  Now John warns all who believe to be on our guard.  Even those who have matured in the things of God need to be careful, for the enemy is very crafty.  The word for deceive is the one which gives us the word planet.  Disaster awaited the ancient shipmaster who plotted his course using the planets, for their very name means they are wanderers.  Unlike the “fixed” stars, whose position does not vary from night to night, the planets wander across the heavens.  To allow them to guide us is to be in danger of shipwreck.  So to allow deceivers to direct us is to be heading for spiritual disaster.  This is especially a warning for those who are “shipmasters”, or assembly leaders.  They need to be alert at all times.
Notice that John writes “let no man”, for deceivers can come in various guises.  They do not all peddle their errors in the same way.  However attractive the personality of the deceiver, or however plausible his deceptions seem to be, he must be resisted and turned from.
He that doeth righteousness is righteous- that is, only one who has a righteous nature can do righteous acts.  It is not that a man does righteous things and God calls him righteous in return, for that would deny the gospel.  “There is none righteous, no, not one” is the clear word of God, Romans 3:10.  “By the works of the law there shall no flesh be justified in His sight, for by the law is the knowledge of sin”, Romans 3:20.

A tree is known by its fruit.  The Lord Jesus warned of false prophets with the words, “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.  Ye shall know them by their fruits.  Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?  Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit.  A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.  Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down and cast into the fire.  Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them”, Matthew 7:15-20.  Paul took up the word “wolves” when he warned the Ephesian elders of “grievous wolves”, that would not spare the flock, Acts 20:29.  And John is using the concept “a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit” in both verse 6 and verse 9, when he writes of believers not sinning. 
Even as He is righteous- this is His character, and we shall come with Him and be like Him, verse 2.  Is this not an incentive to be like Him now?  The righteousness of the believer is of the same sort as the righteousness of Christ, (for we are righteous “even as” He is righteous).  This is because righteousness is a characteristic of the nature of God, and He is equal with God.  By new birth we share His nature, and therefore share His righteousness.  It is not His righteous acts during His life that are imputed to us, but rather His righteous nature.

Second contrast, verses 8-9   
The believer does not sin, antichrists do.

3:8  He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning.  For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that He might destroy the works of the devil.

He that committeth sin is of the devil- this implies that those who do righteousness are of God.  But the reverse is true, that those who sin as a matter of habit, are clearly in the grip of the enemy, and take character from him.  Men started sinning only after the devil had brought in his temptation. 
For the devil sinneth from the beginning- note the stark contrast between the beginning of this sinful world-system, lying in the Wicked One as it does, and that which was brought into display from the other “beginning”, the manifestation of the Son of God to the world at His baptism.  That beginning was marked by total resistance to sin, unlike with Adam at his beginning. 
For this purpose the Son of God was manifested- John now tells us how God acted in the light of the sinfulness of the world of men.  He sent His Son, and He was manifested in real manhood.  It was not that God spoke from heaven, but that He sent a person from heaven, who lived a life perfectly in harmony with His character and will.  This is what the possession of eternal life enables a believer to do.  Note that He comes as Son, so that He may reveal the Father.
That He might destroy the works of the devil- the works of the devil may be thought of in two ways, generally, and specifically.  Thought of generally, they are the sins he provokes men to commit.  Christ destroyed such works by condemning them by His life and His doctrine, and also by dying for sins on the cross so that men might be freed from their power and lead a righteous life.  He demonstrated visibly His ability to do this, by releasing men and women from the bondage and corruption that had been brought in by the fall of man.  Every healing act was a rebuff to the Devil, and showed the Son of God had superior power than he.  For instance, He healed the palsied man, and thus showed He had power on earth to forgive sins, Matthew 9:1-8. 
More specifically, the sins are those committed by the deceiving antichrists as they spread lies about Christ.  That is what John is warning us about particularly.  The devil is hard at work deceiving men, for “he deceiveth the whole world”, Revelation 12:9.  It is these deceits that John is warning about as he cautions us to not be taken in by antichrists.  John will show in the next verse that true believers cannot sin like that, either by teaching error or believing it.

3:9  Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for His seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.

Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin- again John is using a form of speech which means “whosoever is born of God is a not-able-to-sin person”.  He has that character.  John is not suggesting there are believers who never sin.  What he is saying is that believers, because they are born of God and therefore have the life of God within them, do not sin as the expression of their nature.  When they sin they act contrary to their position before God as His children.  He is also saying that true believers do not and, indeed, cannot, sin in the sense that they deny Christ and renounce faith in Him.
For His seed remaineth in him- by “His seed” John means the life-principle that God has implanted into those who believe, which can never be taken away, for it remaineth in them.  James tells us that it is by the word of truth that God begets His children, James 1:18, therefore it is a nature that responds to the truth, and cannot deny it. 
There is a close connection between this truth, and the other truth that the Holy Spirit of God indwells the believer, and abides there for ever, John 14:16.
And he cannot sin, because he is born of God- John is telling us that since God’s seed remains in us, and never leaves, there is no time when our character reverts to a sinful one, and therefore we commit sin as matter of course.  Not only does the Spirit of Truth dwell within us, encouraging in the truth, but the new nature we have from God is resistant to error.  We are doubly safe-guarded from the errors of the wicked, but we still need to be alert.

Third contrast, verse 10   
The believer is of God, antichrists are of the devil.

3:10  In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.

In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil- in verse 8 the Son of God was manifested; in 2:19 antichrists were manifested, and now the children of God and the children of the devil are said to be manifested.  A child expresses his father.  The children of God express God, the children of the devil, (that is, everyone else), display their father the devil.  The Lord Jesus told the unbelieving Jews, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do”, John 8:44.  They claimed to have Abraham as their father, but since they did not act like Abraham, they were not his children morally, even though they were descended from him physically, see John 8:33-40.
Whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God- John gives two signs that a person is not a child of God.  This is the first sign, the absence of practical righteousness.  We could think of this phrase as summing up the epistle so far, just as the rest of the verse sums up the rest of the epistle. 
Neither he that loveth not his brother- it is at this point that the epistle divides.  Before, John has emphasised light and righteousness, now he is going to emphasise love, both to God and to fellow-believers.  So he that does not love his brother is not of God.  That is, is not born again.  God, as to His nature, is love, 4:8, and by new birth we become partakers of the Divine nature, 2 Peter 1:4, and are thus enabled to love.  But it is also true of God that He cannot but express Himself; so if we partake of a nature like that, then Divine love will inevitably express itself in us too.

3:11-24  Three things Christian love shows:

First thing Verses 11-12 The one who loves is righteous in practice.
Second thing Verses 13-14 The one who loves has passed from death to life.
Third thing Verses 15-24 The one who loves dwells in God, and He in him, verse 24.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE OF JOHN CHAPTER 3, VERSES 7 TO 10:

3:11  For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.
3:12  Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.
3:13  Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.
3:14  We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren. He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.
3:15  Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.
3:16  Hereby perceive we the love of God, because He laid down His life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.
3:17  But whoso hath this world’s good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?
3:18  My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.
3:19  And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before him.
3:20  For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.
3:21  Beloved, if our heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward God.
3:22  And whatsoever we ask, we receive of Him, because we keep His commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in His sight.
3:23  And this is His commandment, That we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as He gave us commandment.
3:24  And he that keepeth His commandments dwelleth in Him, and He in him. And hereby we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us. 

First thing that Christian love shows
Verses 11-12    The one who loves is righteous in practice.

3:11  For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning, that we should love one another.

For this is the message that ye heard from the beginning- just as the main body of the first half of the epistle began with “This then is the message we have heard of Him”, 1;5, so this second half begins similarly.  We have already noticed that the second half of verse 10 introduces the theme of Christian love.  In the first half of the epistle the main message was that God is light; here it is that God is love.  There the message was from the Son of God, so here, for as the Son of the Father He expresses Divine features perfectly.  The impression that believing hearts gained from viewing Him in His life down here was that God is light, and God is love.  The mention of the beginning reminds us that this impression was gained from the outset of His life until His return to the Father; He was consistent all the way through. 
That we should love one another- not only did an impression come over from the life of the Son of God down here, but He gave a specific command to His own as He spoke to them in the Upper Room.  “A new commandment I give unto you, ‘That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.  By this shall all men know that ye are My disciples, if ye have love one to another'”, John 13:34,35.  There is contained within this command a reference to His life as the disciples knew it, for He says, “As I have loved you”.  They were to translate His love for them into love for one another.

3:12  Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him?  Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.

Not as Cain- having referred to the positive example of Christ, John now gives us a negative example.  We are now being taken back to another “beginning”, the start of the outworking of the nature of Adam in his first son Cain. 
Who was of that wicked one- the real reason why Cain acted as he did was that, as an unbeliever, he had the devil as his role-model.  He was a murderer from the beginning, as the Lord Himself said in John 8:44, “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.  He was a murderer from the beginning”.
And slew his brother- the devil became the murderer of men’s souls when he incited Adam and Eve to sin, even though they knew that in the day they ate they would die.  But he is also responsible for physical murder also, which comes as a direct result of man being dead in trespasses and sins. 
And wherefore slew he him?  How can such a drastic act take place so soon after God pronounced everything to be very good?  What was it that provoked Cain to despatch his brother into eternity?  Was it that he was guilty of some wicked sin that deserved such a punishment?  John gives us the answer to these questions.
Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous- Cain’s act of murdering his brother was an expression of the conflict between righteousness and unrighteousness.  Cain was exposed as a sinner by Abel’s righteous life, and expressed that sinner-ship by doing to his brother physically what his father the Devil had done to his parents spiritually.  John is warning his readers that antichrists, being like Cain, will likewise be hostile and aggressive.  An example of this is the way the Judaising teachers pursued Paul in his travels, as recorded in the Book of Acts.

Second thing that Christian love shows
Verses 13-14    The one who loves has passed from death to life.

3:13  Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you.

Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you- at the beginning of the chapter the apostle marvelled at God’s love.  Now he warns his readers not to be surprised at the world’s hate.  It is as brethren they are hated, fellow-members of the family of God.  John had heard the Lord warn about this the night before He died.  He had said, “If the world hate you, ye know that it hated Me before it hated you.  If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you”, John 15:18,19.  And He went on to say in verse 20, “If they have persecuted Me, they will also persecute you”, so this is one of the ways the hatred will be expressed.  Notice the “ye know that it hated Me”, so they had witnessed the hatred that men expressed towards Him, and knew what to expect.  There does not seem to be any persecution for the disciples all the while the Lord was with them.  Once He was gone, then the Book of Acts records much persecution against them, for the world was no longer able to persecute Him.  This is implied in the words, “it hated Me before it hated you”.

3:14  We know that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren.  He that loveth not his brother abideth in death.

We know that we have passed from death unto life- the words of Christ in the first public discourse John records were as follows, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth My word, and believeth on Him that sent Me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life'”, John 5:24.  God’s reaction when persons believe the truth about His Son is to move them from a position of spiritual death, (that is, death in trespasses and sins, Ephesians 2:1), to a position of spiritual life.  Adam and his wife were plunged into spiritual death by disbelief in the word of God; those who believe are brought into life by belief in the word of God about His Son.
Because we love the brethren- this is one of the hallmarks of a true believer, that he loves fellow-members in the family of God.  No doubt John writes “brethren”, rather than “children of God”, (as he does in 5:2), because he has been referring to Cain’s hatred of his brother.  Believers are like Abel, hated; unbelievers are like Cain, hating. 
He that loveth not his brother abideth in death- instead of moving from death unto life through faith, he remains where he ever was, in spiritual death.  So hatred of believers is a sure sign of spiritual death; love of believers is a sure sign of spiritual life.  John uses the word brother for the one who is not loved, because the one who does not love him claims to be a believer, and John takes him up on that claim. 

Third thing that Christian love shows
Verses 15-24    The one who loves dwells in God, and He in him, verse 24.

3:15  Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer: and ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him.

Whosoever hateth his brother is a murderer- the Lord Jesus taught as follows, “Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, ‘Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgement’:  but I say unto you, that whosoever shall be angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgement'”, Matthew 5:21,22.  The Lord is bringing out the full meaning of the law, (which is part of what He meant when He said He had come to fulfil the law, Matthew 5:17), and is showing that anger with one’s brother is the root cause of murder.  And so it is with hatred of one’s brother.  Given a motive, the means, and opportunity, hatred and anger lead to murder.
And ye know that no murderer hath eternal life abiding in him- because they were believers, John’s readers knew and believed that murder was a direct challenge to the Living God, who had made man in His own image at the beginning.  This is why murder should be met with capital punishment, for God said to Noah, “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made He man”, Genesis 9:6.  So man is to acknowledge that it is God’s will that those who murder should themselves be executed, for the murderer has erased the image of man. 
No-one who has eternal life, and therefore knows God, and possesses the Holy Spirit within, can sink so low as to murder another.  We should, of course, distinguish murder from accidental killing. 

3:16  Hereby perceive we the love of God, because He laid down His life for us: and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren.

Hereby perceive we the love of God- John is about to encourage us in practical love, so he gives to us the greatest example of all, Divine love, as expressed by the Son of God, no less.  Having told us in verse 15 of one who takes life, we are now presented with one who laid down His life, and this is the incentive for us to lay down our lives for fellow-believers.  If murder is the ultimate expression of hatred, then laying down one’s life for others is the ultimate expression of love.
Because He laid down His life for us- the reason we have been able to perceive the love of God is because it has been  clearly demonstrated in the past.  The Son of God, equal with the Father, (which is why John can happily follow “God” with “He”, without explanation), has surrendered His life on our behalf. 
And we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren- the conjunction “and” reminds us that this is the expected response of the believer to the laying down of Christ’s life.  It should follow as a logical consequence- He laid down His life, and we lay down our lives.  This laying down of one’s life may not take the ultimate form of martyrdom; it may have less severe ways of showing itself.  Paul wrote, “Greet Priscilla and Aquila my helpers in Christ Jesus, who have for my life laid down their own necks”, Romans 16:3,4.  We are not told the details of this incident, but that does not matter.  The point is that there were those who were prepared to go that far, and we should be prepared to do so also.  One way in which we may do this is told us in 3:17, where the apostle gives us a negative example.

3:17  But whoso hath this world’s good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him?

But whoso hath this world’s good- the word “but” alerts us to the fact that we are going to be given a example of what not to do; of that which is the very reverse of “laying down our lives for the brethren”.  The word “good” as used here, is a reference to the means whereby life is maintained.  It is not luxury goods that are in view, but the necessities of life.  So there is presented to us the sight of a believer who has the things which the world furnishes in order to sustain his life.  Luxury goods will have no attraction for a spiritual believer.  He will be moderate in all things, and not waste the resources God has given Him on the trifles of this life.  He will want to invest them for eternity.  See Luke 12:13-24.
And seeth his brother have need- but there is another brother in the scenario John is describing.  He does not have the means to sustain his life; why this is the case we are not told.  The brother has need, and the first brother sees it; it is not that he is ignorant of the situation.
And shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him- “bowels of compassion” is an expressive phrase.  There are certain organs in our body which function without us prompting them to do so.  John is here assuming that our compassion will not need to be prompted.  We should be alert to need around us, and instantly seek ways to relieve it.  Considerations of our own personal well-being should recede, and the need of others come to the fore.  Sadly, the professed believer whom John has in mind is not like this, but holds back from doing good to others.  The true believer will welcome opportunities to “lay down our lives for the brethren” in this, and other ways.
How dwelleth the love of God in him?  We may think of this question in two ways.  First, we may ask, “With what justification can it be said that this person has the love of God in his heart?”  Divine love is ever ready to give, as John has reminded us in verse 16, yet here is one who is not prepared to give, and the question has to be asked whether he is a true believer, since a giving attitude is characteristic of Divine love.  Second, we may ask, if he is, after all, a true believer, “Is the love of God at home in this person’s heart, comfortable with the attitudes that it finds there?”  Whatever way we look at John’s question, there is a strong challenge for us. 

3:18  My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.

My little children- verses 13-17 were addressed to believers as brethren, because the negative example of Cain had been mentioned for our warning.  So it is that in that section we have, “love the brethren”, “loveth not his brother”, “hateth his brother”, “lay down our lives for the brethren”, “seeth his brother”.  Now, however, the apostle is reverting to the idea that we are the children of God, because he is going to write further about our relationship with the Father and the Son.
Let us not love in word- of course John is not discouraging us from speaking words of love to our fellow-believers.  The expression is to be taken in context.  He is exhorting us not to love merely in word.  That is, to simply assent to the word of Scripture which says we should love others.  We may do that, but not let the word have any impact upon us.
Neither in tongue- just saying that we love someone is not enough.  Even voicing our intentions is not enough either.
But in deed- actions speak louder than words.  The Lord Jesus did not go around saying He loved people; He demonstrated it in action.
And in truth- let the action be governed by the truth of Scripture, as expressed by the life of the one who declared “I am…the truth”, and who gave expression to the truth in everything He did.  Perhaps if we wish to narrow down what “in truth” means, we could say it is the word “we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren”.  It is as we immerse ourselves in the implications of that exhortation that we can love as we ought.

3:19  And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before Him.

And hereby we know that we are of the truth- giving to others has its compensations, even in this life, let alone the life to come.  The believer who loves in deed and in truth is restful in mind about his relationship to the truth, for he has allowed it to have a profound impact upon him, resulting in practical expressions of love. 
And shall assure our hearts before Him- the second present benefit from showing love is that the heart is thereby confident about a relationship with God.  In the previous verse John envisages one who merely talks in the presence of men about loving.  Here he writes of one who can go into the presence of God and be assured of a vital relationship with Him. 
This is one of several ways in which the believer may have assurance of salvation.  For other passages see Romans 8:14, (the desire to address God as Father, as a result of which the Spirit testifies to our spirit that we are the children of God); Hebrews 10:15-19, (holy boldness in the presence of God as a result of the Spirit’s testimony about the forgiveness of sins); 1 John 2:3-6, (the keeping of His commandments); 1 John 5:9,10, (the belief that Jesus is the Son of God, something that the natural man does not do). 

3:20  For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.

For if our heart condemn us- the apostle is very realistic, and knows that often, especially is we have a very sensitive conscience, even when we have put loving our brother into practice, our heart still condemns us; perhaps with the thought that our love is not great enough.
God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things- God has the perfect grasp of the true situation.  He is, as God, greater in knowledge than we can ever be, and knows all about us; our fears, our motives; our misgivings, our doubts.  He also knows perfectly that we have sought to love our brothers.  He is also greater in love, and is on our side in this matter.

3:21  Beloved, if our heart condemn us not, then have we confidence toward God.

Beloved, if our heart condemn us not- this will be the case when we have realised the truth of the previous verse, and have seen that our lack of confidence is because of our failure to grasp the true situation, which is the situation as God sees it.
Then have we confidence toward God- having seen things as God sees them, and have stopped tormenting ourselves for our supposed failures, (as long as they are supposed, and not real), then that assurance of heart the apostle wrote of in verse 19 can be restored to us.

3:22  And whatsoever we ask, we receive of Him, because we keep His commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in His sight.

And whatsoever we ask, we receive of Him- this is not a licence to ask for everything and anything, but is to be taken strictly in context.  (There are three words to bear in mind when seeking to understand Scripture.  They are: Context, Context, and Context).  The confidence that our hearts have in the presence of God with regard to the reality of our love, (as expressed by love to others), encourages us to ask for further opportunities to show love, and also to be given the resources whereby we may do this.  The apostle is sure that if we ask with this motive, then our request will be granted.  He had heard the Lord Jesus say, “If ye abide in me, and My words abide in you, ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done unto you.  Herein is My Father glorified, that ye bear much fruit; so shall ye be My disciples”, John 15:7,8.  So those in whose hearts the words of the Lord Jesus have found a congenial home, can safely be given the promise that anything they ask will be given, for they will not ask for anything contrary to His will as expressed in His words.  And when this happens, the Father is glorified, for they have asked for help to bear much fruit, and this glorifies Him.  So in John 15 the asking is so as to be fruitful.  In 1 John 3 the asking is so as to be useful.
Because we keep His commandments- this is the first reason the apostle is confident that we will receive, and is similar to the words just quoted, “My words abide in you”.  Those who keep God’s commandments can be entrusted with resources, for they will be faithful in their stewardship of those resources.
And do those things that are pleasing in His sight- this is the second reason the apostle is confident, and it is a consequence of the first reason.  Those who have a heart for the commandments of God are, by definition, those who have a heart for doing that which pleases Him, for His commandments enlighten us as to what pleases Him.  So these are two strong reasons for God to grant us what we ask.

3:23  And this is His commandment, That we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as He gave us commandment.

And this is His commandment- this is the commandment that embraces and gives point to all the other commandments.  Needless to say, the apostle is not referring specifically to the ten commandments written on tables of stone, for these are not the code of conduct for the believer, although Christian conduct will never go against the righteous requirement of the law.  Our standard is Christ, for He has left us “an example, that ye should follow His steps: Who did no sin, neither was guile found in His mouth”, 1 Peter 2:21,22.  The word “example” the apostle uses was a technical word, meaning all the letters of the alphabet, carefully written on the blackboard by the teacher for his students to copy accurately.  In Christ life there is the “full alphabet” of right conduct, and we are to take note of His life, and make His example our guide, so that we reproduce it accurately.
That we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ- this is the foundation of everything.  For faith in Him will result in works of faith and love.  Notice that it is not simply belief in Him.  That is initial faith.  The apostle is speaking here of ongoing faith in relation to the name of His Son, not just faith in His person.  The name of His Son reminds us of all that He was when down here; every aspect of His character; every feature of His person.  All is bound up in His name, and provides the basis for our imitation of Him.  The fact that it is the name of His Son might over-awe us, and we might think that to copy Him is impossible.  But He is Jesus Christ too, so He is real man, and may be followed by those who also are men, and who believe in Him.
And love one another, as He gave us commandment- again, John had first-hand knowledge of this, for he had heard the Saviour say, “As the Father hath loved me, so have I loved you: continue ye in My love”, John 15:9.  And if we were to ask how we are to tell whether we are continuing in His love, He goes on to say, “If ye keep My commandments, ye shall abide in My love; even as I have kept My Father’s commandments, and abide in His love”, verse 10.  So it is not just that we love because He has commanded it; we are to love as He loved us.  In other words, we love one another in the same way He has loved us, namely as a reflection of the love of His Father.  In this way we love in line with His commandment.

3:24  And he that keepeth His commandments dwelleth in Him, and He in him. And hereby we know that He abideth in us, by the Spirit which He hath given us.

And he that keepeth His commandments dwelleth in Him- one of the sure signs that a person dwells in Christ is his careful keeping of His commandments.  This is a very practical way we may assess our lives, and our relationship with God.  Those who act in harmony with the mind of Christ as expressed in His commandments, are clearly comfortable with who He is.  To be in Him is to have a share in His Divine nature.  To abide in Him is to be settled in that position. 
And He in him- the Son of God is at home in the heart of one who keeps His commandments. 
And hereby we know that He abideth in us- it is such a tremendous thought, that the very Son of God indwells our hearts, that we may wonder sometimes how such a great thing can be so.  The apostle anticipates that feeling, and gives to us the way in which we may be really sure that it is the case that Christ is within.
By the Spirit which He hath given us- this is the plain statement of the basis of assurance in this matter.  We shall have to read the next few verses to find out how the Spirit shows us this.  John is no doubt reminded of the words of the Lord jesus when he said, “At that day ye shall know that I am in My Father, and ye in Me, and I in you”, John 14:20.  The indwelling Spirit of God makes the presence of Christ real to us.

 

EPHESIANS 2

 

EPHESIANS 2

Survey of the chapter
Chapter 2 continues the theme of the exaltation of Christ, but whereas in 1:19-23 it was the power of God as it was exercised in relation to Christ, lifting Him to supreme heights of glory, in 2:1-10 it is the power of God as it is exercised towards those who believe. The apostle was praying that the believers might “know…what is the exceeding greatness of his power to usward who believe”, 1:18,19.

The passage may be divided into two sections, verses 1-10, and verses 11-22, and these sections may be thought of in relation to one another as follows:

(i) In verses 1-10, the emphasis is on dealing with the relationship of Jew and Gentile to God, whereas in the remaining verses it is the relationship of Jews and Gentiles to one another.

(ii) In both sections there is a change, for by the time we reach verse ten, those who believe from both Jew and Gentile have come into the good of God’s salvation. And in the second half, those who believe, whether Jew or Gentile before, are brought into a right relationship with one another.

(iii) In the first section the emphasis is on the similarities between Jewish sinners and Gentile sinners. In the second section the differences between each group are stressed.

(iv) In the first section man is viewed individually. In the second section he is seen internationally, with the nations of the Gentiles at variance with the nation of Israel.

(v) In the first section believers are seated together in heavenly places. In the second section they are builded together as a holy temple in the Lord.

Structure of the chapter

Man individually

(a) Verses 1-3 The depravity of the sinner
(b) Verses 4-10 The deliverance of those who believe

 Man internationally

(c) Verses 11-12 The distance of the Gentiles
(d) Verses 13-18 The demolition of the middle wall of partition
(e) Verses 19-22 The dignity of the saints

(a) Verses 1-3
The depravity of the sinner

We shall find in these verses that man is dead, deceived, disobedient, depraved, and doomed. Verse 4, however, will begin with the words, “But God”, and will show that He has the answer to man’s condition.

2:1
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

And you hath he quickened- the words “hath he quickened” are in italics in the Authorised Version, having been supplied from verse 5 to give the sense. Christ was for three days and nights dead in a grave, but was raised from the dead by God, 1:20. Furthermore, God elevated Him to His own right hand, far above all angelic beings. Now God in mercy turns to deal with the condition of sinners, and, wonderfully, determines to link those who believe with His Son, so that they too are quickened, raised and elevated.

Who were dead in trespasses and sins- Christ was literally and physically dead in a grave, but sinners are dead morally in an environment where sins and trespasses are the norm. Trespasses are false steps, blunders, acts that are contrary to Divine Government. Sins are a missing of the mark, a falling short of the glory of God, and an offence to the Divine nature.

God had plainly warned Adam that the day he ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil he would die, Genesis 2:17. Although Adam lived to be 930 years old, he nonetheless died morally the day he sinned, for he was cut off from the life of God, and so was dead.

The idea of death is used in four ways in Scripture, as follows:

1. There is moral death, the separation of the sinner from communion with God. The apostle describes it as being “alienated from the life of God”, Ephesians 4:18.

2. There is physical death, the separation of the spirit of a man from his body, James 2:26.

3. There is carnal death, the separation of the believer from the enjoyment of spiritual things, in accordance with the words of Romans 8:13, “for if ye live after the flesh ye shall die”. In other words, just as the prodigal son was said by his father to be dead for as long as he was separated from the joys of the father’s house, Luke 15:24, so the believer, for as long as he lives carnally, is not able to enjoy spiritual communion with his Father, and in this very precise and restricted sense, is said to be dead. Of course the true believer, whether carnal or spiritual, is eternally secure, because his salvation does not depend on him but on Christ. Nonetheless he can be dead to the joys of the spiritual life.

4. There is also, for the unrepentant sinner, eternal death, for the solemn words of Revelation 20:16 are, “And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire”, and in 21:8 we read, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerors, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death”.

The apostle does not use the preposition “in” here. Rather, he uses the phrase “trespasses and sins” in the dative, which has the sense of “in respect of”. It is not that men were dead to trespasses as if insensitive to them. But they were shown to be dead as far as God was concerned by the fact that they committed trespasses and sins. So the trespasses and sins showed up the fact that man is dead to God. If he lived to God he would not habitually sin. It is clear from Genesis 3 that even as a sinner Adam could interact with God. He was in a state of unbelief, but that did not mean that he could not repent of that position, and start believing. Man believes with the same faculty as he disbelieves.

Some teach that man is totally depraved, in the sense that he cannot respond to God at all. They say that man must be totally cast upon the mercy of God. But if he cannot respond in faith, neither can he cast himself on God. Faced with this dilemma, some say that man must be born again before he can believe. But God does not bestow eternal life on unbelieving sinners. When Nicodemus was confronted with the idea that he must be born again, he asked, (and remember he was dead in trespasses and sins when he asked the question), “how can these things be”? The force of this question is, “How can these things become my experience?” He saw clearly that the new birth was entirely of God, so how did it become a reality for him? The answer soon came to him, that it was “whosoever believeth in Him” that has eternal life. Faith in a crucified Saviour is the way eternal life is received; and to receive eternal life is to be born of God.

2:2
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

Wherein in time past- the apostle will now show what being in trespasses and sins involves, hence the word “wherein”, or “in which condition”. Note the reference to “time past”, and then in verse 4, “but God”, and then “in the ages to come”, in verse 7. God deals with the past as far as believers are concerned, and makes them fit for the eternal future.

Ye walked according to the course of this world- although dead to God, we were very much alive to the world. The word for world is “cosmos”, an organised system. We might think the world to be chaotic, and in one sense it is, but in another it is organised around the central idea of rebellion against God. And unbelievers are active in this environment; in fact their whole manner of life is governed by it. Like a river, humanity is hemmed in by the banks on either side, unable to break free. Men are living their lives in accordance with the way the world is, with no ability to escape.

According to the prince of the power of the air- not only are men drifting down the river of humanity, hemmed in by its banks, and following the course of the river wherever it goes, but there is a worse thing. The position of those banks, or, in other words, the course they are forced to go, is determined by Satan himself, who is the prince of this world, John 14:30, and who sees to it that men live their lives according to his dictates.

The emphasis is not on the personal name of this evil being, but on his power and his activity. He is a prince, indicating that he holds first place in the hierarchy of the forces of evil. He is the one who, as Lucifer, had rebelled against God at the beginning, and had influenced a third of the angels of heaven to likewise rebel, Isaiah 14:12-15; Ezekiel 28:14-17; Revelation 12:4. He is also called the god of this world, 2 Corinthians 4:4, because unwittingly, men further his interests, and so glorify him as if he were God.

He is the prince of the power of the air, meaning that those evil forces that he controls operate in the air surrounding this planet. There is no part of the globe not enveloped by the air, and so there is no part that is not under the influence of these evil agents.

The spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience- being a spirit, this prince can work unseen, and is able to influence men in various ways, filling their minds with ideas contrary to the word of God. It is not normal for him to speak directly to men, but he uses things like the media, a powerful way of instilling his rebellious thoughts into men’s minds. They do not realise this is happening, but happen it does, for men are called children of disobedience. The principle of disobedience that is part of our sin-nature is constantly supplied with material which encourages further disobedience. So it is that Adam has begotten many children who have the same disobedient attitude as he manifested when he first fell.

2:3
Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh- so the condition described in verses 1 and 2 is not limited to the heathen; it is true of the men of Israel too. Even in the times past when they knew God’s direct intervention in their affairs, they were dead in trespasses and sins. So occupation with religion, even a religion ordained of God, does not save from this situation. Religion cannot deal with our sin-nature, which works itself out in the lusts of the flesh. Instead of having desires after God, the sinner has strong desires for sinful things. The flesh is self, with its sin-principle within.

Fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind- the apostle now describes the Jews as fulfilling the desires of the flesh. They did not simply lust after sinful things, but went further and fulfilled and satisfied their lusts. The flesh would emphasise the sensual side of man, whereas the mind would emphasise the intellectual side. There are those who are refined and cultured, and not at all attracted to the baser impulses in man. These too must learn that they are dead in trespasses and sins, and also are under the influence of the enemy of God, Satan himself. “for there is no difference: for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God”, Romans 3:22,23.

And were by nature the children of wrath, even as others- whatever the outward appearance, it is what man is by nature that matters. We learn here that the nature of man, sinful and corrupt as it is, is the object of the wrath of God. To be a child of wrath by nature is to be the product of a nature that merits God’s wrath.

Summing up these verses, we can say we were:

Dead in trespasses and sins, and cut off from the life of God.

Deceived by the prince of the power of the air, rejecting the truth of God.

Disobedient because of our link with Adam who disobeyed God, Romans 5:19, and rebellious towards the government of God.

Depraved because of our lusts, and acting contrary to the holiness of God.

Doomed to endure the wrath of God for all eternity, because of the justice of God.

(b) Verses 4-10
The deliverance of those who believe

In verses 4-5a we have the motive for God working. In verses 5b-6 there is the method of God’s working, and in verses 7-10, the manifestation of His working:

2:4
But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,

But God- it is only when God intervenes that the situation can be remedied. His power is greater that Satan’s, and He triumphs in the salvation of sinners.

Who is rich in mercy- this is pity to those in need, illustrated by the Good Samaritan, who “had compassion on him”, Luke 10:33. Satan has no compassion, for he drags men down. God lifts men up in Christ. As Hannah sang, “He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory”, 1 Samuel 2:8.

Notice that He is not simply merciful in a limited way, but is rich in mercy, lavishing His riches on those who believe, so that they possess “all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ”, 1:3. One of those blessings is to be linked with Christ in heaven.

For his great love- in verses 1-3 the light of God’s person shone upon us, exposing our sinfulness, but now the warmth of God’s love is known. His rich mercy is on the basis of, and to further the cause of, His great love. As the apostle John wrote, “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins”, 1 John 4:10. If sending His Son to die under His wrath was not enough to prevent Him loving us, then nothing else will.

Wherewith he loved us- God’s love is not a theoretical idea, but a practical reality. His love has been expressed. It is clear that the apostle is referring now to those who had believed, for it is only these that know the love of God described here. We should distinguish between God’s general love for men, expressed in the giving of His Son at Calvary, (notice the past tense in John 3:16, “loved”, referring to an historical event), and His particular and special love for His children. God does not love sinners with the special love He reserves for those who have become His children through faith. The apostle makes clear that “the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost that is given unto us”, Romans 5:5, so we cannot know the love of God in the fullest way until we have the Holy Spirit within.

2:5
Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

Even when we were dead in sins- so this personal love of God for His children began before they knew Him, for they were foreseen as those who would believe. Our state of being dead was no obstacle to God, for He was determined to bless.

Hath quickened us together with Christ- this shows that the reference in verse 4 onwards is to believers only. There is no mention of Calvary here, but it is implied in the fact that Christ was quickened and raised from the dead. Christ was quickened from the dead; those who would believe were reckoned in the mind of God as having been quickened together with Him. It awaited the moment of their conversion for this to become a reality.

(by grace are ye saved)- this is a salutary reminder of what verses 1-3 have told us about our condition. The apostle is immediately cautioning us to not think we have in some way merited God’s love and mercy. Far from us deserving this intervention, it is only on the ground of God’s grace (His unmerited favour), that it is available. He will return to this matter in verse 8.

There are three words used in this passage to express God’s attitude:

Grace is favour to the undeserving.

Mercy is pity to the needy.

Kindness is goodness in action.

2:6
And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

And hath raised us up together- not content with quickening us together with Christ, He raised us up as well, lifting us up from the grave of trespasses and sins we were in.

And made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus- there is more to being raised than this, however, for He was raised up to heaven, and so are believers, in the mind of God, and in association with Him. But there is still more, for He has been seated at God’s right hand, and this position is shared by believers, too. We are seated in Him now, (that is, His position is representative of our position), and we shall be seated with Him in a day to come. There surely cannot be any doubt as to the eternal security of the true believer, if he is already seated in Christ in heaven. Nothing can dislodge Christ from His position, so nothing can dislodge the believer. This all happens in reference to Christ Jesus, the ascended and glorified man. By raising us up out of death in trespasses and sins, God also raised us from walking according to Adam’s world. We have been removed from his influence, and brought into the sphere of influence of Christ Jesus.

2:7
That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.

That in the ages to come- the eternal ages will all be needed to fully tell how rich His unmerited favour has been. Each age will beget another, and eternity will unfold the wonder of God’s purpose. That ultimate purpose is to glorify Himself, and this He will do throughout all eternity. Just as He has expressed Himself partially in the different ages of time, so He will do so perfectly in the varied ages of eternity.

He might show the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us- the reason why He has dealt with us in kindness is so that His grace might be magnified eternally. Divine kindness is the practical outworking of His heart of love towards us, motivated by grace, the desire to favour and bless. God will see to it that there is eternal remembrance of His kindness toward us as believers. It will take all eternity to tell it out.

Through Christ Jesus- this is the major reason why all eternity will be needed, for the workings of God’s grace are all channelled through Christ, and so the unfolding of His glories is involved.

2:8
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

For by grace are ye saved through faith- the apostle needs to reinforce this lesson about grace, because man proudly thinks that he has some merit before God. The apostle feels the need to make it very clear, before the ages to come start their course, that the position the believer will occupy in heaven is entirely of God’s grace and kindness, and not at all of our effort. Faith is indeed necessary, but in itself has no value- its value lays in the one believed.

And that not of yourselves- the position of being saved by grace on the principle of faith is totally of God’s doing, and we have no input at all. There are those who devise their own way of dealing with themselves as sinners. They invent a religion of their own, and vainly hope that because it satisfies them, it satisfies God. The apostle decisively condemns such an approach.

The exercise of faith is not a work, since elsewhere the apostle contrasted faith and works with the words, “Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness”, Romans 4:4,5. Faith is ceasing from work, and resting in Christ. Grace is not of works, either, as Romans 11:6 shows, in the words, “And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace”.

The gender of the word “that” would indicate that it refers to the whole phrase “salvation by grace through faith”, and not simply to the word faith.

It is the gift of God- the blessing of being saved by grace through faith is God’s gift to those who believe. So the apostle cautions us against thinking we have merit, by saying “by grace”. He cautions us against thinking we have no responsibility, by saying, “through faith”.

2:9
Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Not of works, lest any man should boast- not only is salvation not of us, in that we are not worthy in ourselves to gain it, but it cannot be worked for, even by those who own up to the fact that as persons they are not worthy. Heaven will indeed be filled with those who boast, but it is a boasting or glorying in God that they are occupied with, not self-congratulation. As was said of Abraham, “For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. For what saith the scripture? ‘Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness'”, Romans 4:2,3.

So salvation is positively by grace and through faith; negatively, is not of ourselves, and not of works.

2:10
For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works- far from being self-made, believers are God’s product, for, as those who are part of the new creation, (which new creation comes about because of the work of Christ at the cross and His subsequent resurrection), they are a new creature in Christ Jesus, 2 Corinthians 5:17. It is in the context of who He is to the Father, and what He has done for the Father, that believers are created anew.

Believers are to be occupied with good works, for that is what they have been created for; it was God’s goal when He did it. This will ensure that in eternity, God will be the more praised. He works through our works, so that His work may be magnified and His name glorified.

Which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them- in subsequent passages in the epistle, the apostle will speak of walking worthy of the calling, 4:1; of walking unlike the Gentiles, 4:17; of walking in love, 5:2; of walking as children of the light, 5:8; and of walking circumspectly, 5:16. These kinds of behaviour will result in works done for God’s glory both now, and in eternity to come. They were foreordained in eternity past, for it was God’s purpose that they should be engaged in. How noble a task it is to walk and work in harmony with Divine and eternal purpose! No wonder the apostle needed to pray that the believers might understand these things better, for they are so immense that it is impossible to take them in, or work them out in practice, apart from Divine help.

Having spoken of Jew and Gentile in relation to God, we come now to the second section of the chapter, in which the apostle explains how Jew and Gentile may be brought together into harmony with one another.

(c) Verses 11-12
The distance of the Gentiles

2:11
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;

Wherefore remember- the apostle now builds upon what he has taught in the previous verses. The word “wherefore” introduces a logical connection with something that has gone before. (The word “therefore” introduces a logical conclusion to what has gone before). He had spoken of the circumstances in which the Jews and the Gentiles had come into the good of the inheritance, in 1:12-14. He had then begun the next section with a “wherefore”, and revealed the things he was praying for, the third thing being that they would know the greatness of the power that wrought in Christ when He was raised from the dead and seated in heavenly places. Having shown in verses 1-10 the way in which God has associated us with Christ in His elevation, he now cautions us against pride and self-satisfaction, as if the Christian’s elevated position before God is in some way the result of his effort.

Moses warned Israel that when they reached the Promised Land they were not to think it was because of their righteousness that they were safely there. He said to them, “Speak not thou in thine heart…saying, ‘For my righteousness the Lord hath brought me in to possess the land:'”, Deuteronomy 9:4. In Deuteronomy 26:1-11 the ritual of the basket of first-fruits was established, and an Israelite was to express his gratitude to God for bringing him from bondage to freedom, by bringing the fruits of the land to God. Ephesians 2:1-3 shows very clearly that sinners have no claim upon God’s goodness, and so they also might well express their gratitude to God, especially since their blessings are on a far higher level than Israel’s.

The Jewish readers of the epistle might have doubts as to the legitimacy of the apostle’s words, when he linked the Gentiles with the Jew in the sharing of the blessings and prospects of the gospel. He needs to show that it is indeed so, and this he proceeds to do.

That ye being in time past- the emphasised word “ye” indicates to us that the apostle is addressing believers who were formerly Gentiles. He had made this distinction between “ye” and “we” in 1:11-14. The phrases “in time past”, and “but now” of verse 13 show he is going to contrast their past position with their present condition.

Gentiles in the flesh- this is how they were born. The world of unbelievers is divided into Gentiles and Jews, the latter being descendants of Abraham, and a very privileged nation. Gentiles were not only “in the flesh”, meaning they had no relationship with God, but they were, by definition, under-privileged as Gentiles.

Who are called uncircumcision- this is how they lived, for to be circumcised was to be separated to God. Because they were not set apart for God, the Jews called them “the uncircumcision” in contempt. We can easily see even from this verse that there is a pressing need for peace to be made between these two parties, for they despise one another.

By that which is called the circumcision- the Jews were called “the c ircumcision”, because God had instituted the rite of circumcision when He made a covenant with Abraham, the father of the nation. Sadly, for the majority it was only a physical operation, and not a spiritual reality. This is reflected in the expression “called the uncircumcision”. He shows in Romans 2:28,29 that true circumcision is in the heart, not in the flesh. His words are, “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God”.

In the flesh made by hands- so the Jew is in the flesh too, if he is not a believer. His circumcision counts for nothing if he does not believe. The circumcision referred to here is one that is done by the hand of man on the flesh of man. It is pure ritual. Only those who have been cut off from Adam’s world by association with Christ crucified can say with the apostle, “We are the circumcision”, Philippians 3:3. This is “circumcision made without hands”, Colossians 2:11, for it happens when we repent, and the Spirit of God links us to Christ in His death, burial and resurrection. This is “the circumcision of Christ”, Colossians 2:11, for it is only known in connection with Him.

2:12
That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

That at that time ye were without Christ the preposition used for “without” is one which means to be cut off from something or someone. To be cut off from Christ means to have no link with the Messiah of Israel. Being without Christ in this way resulted in four disadvantages, which the apostle now sets out.

Being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel- the Gentiles were not citizens in the theocracy of Israel with its freedom and honour. The word here translated “commonwealth” is translated “citizenship” in Acts 22:28. There it is in connection with Paul’s Roman citizenship; here it has to do with being part of the nation of Israel.

And strangers from the covenants of promise- the Gentiles were obviously strangers to the conditional covenant of the law given to Israel at Sinai, but they were strangers to covenants in which God gave unconditional promises too. The covenants of promise were not covenants that only had one promise attached to them, but were concerned with promises rather than prohibitions, as the law was. The covenants were as follows:

The covenant with Abraham to give him the land, Genesis 12:7.

The covenant with Abraham to give him a seed, Genesis 15:4.

The covenant with Israel in Deuteronomy 29 and 30 which promised blessing for the nation after they had returned after being scattered.

The Davidic covenant, which promised David the throne, 2 Samuel 7:12,13.

The New Covenant which was originally promised to the house of Israel, Jeremiah 31:31, and which will be operative for them when Christ reigns in a future day.

The reason why the Gentiles were strangers to these promise-covenants was that these were all centred in Christ, the True Seed of Abraham, for the apostle writes, “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not ‘And to seeds’, as of many; but as of one, ‘And to thy seed’, which is Christ”, Galatians 3:17. So the promises were made to Christ as the True Seed of Abraham, but since the Gentiles were apart from Christ, then they had no claim on the promises.

Having no hope- where there is a promise there is hope, but the Gentiles, not having the promises, had no hope either. There seemed to be no prospect of the situation changing. Of course, we know from chapter three of this epistle that it was in God’s mind to bring Gentiles into blessing, but this was not known in Old Testament times, even by the prophets. The apostle testified before Agrippa, “And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God to our fathers: unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews. Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead?” Acts 26:6-8. Paul testified, in effect, that Daniel 12:2 would come to pass, and the righteous in Israel would rise from the dead to enter the kingdom of Christ on earth. This was their hope, and the Gentiles had no part in it.

And without God in the world- this is a double disadvantage, for they were “in the world”, which is governed by the god of this world, and they had no relationship with the true God of heaven. Paul writes to the Galatians, “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods”, Galatians 4:8. They filled the void that God should have occupied with the worship of idols, which are vanity and emptiness. So general is this ignorance of God, that the Gentiles are described as “the Gentiles that know not God”, 1 Thessalonians 4:5.

Of course there is a sense in which all men know God as Creator, for the apostle wrote, “because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God”, Romans 1:21. All men know intuitively that God exists, and that He has certain characteristics. The majority, alas, choose to ignore Him. So all know about God and His existence, but the Gentiles, as Gentiles, were not in a vital relationship with Him.

(d) Verses 13-18
The demolition of the middle wall of partition

2:13
But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

But now- things are radically different generally, now that Christ has died and been raised again. They are also radically different personally for those who have believed in Him.

In Christ Jesus- this is the title of Christ that emphasises that He is a risen and ascended man. It was first used in Acts 19:4 when Paul was speaking to the disciples of John the Baptist who he came across in Ephesus. They had been baptised into the Jordan, confessing their sins, in order to prepare for the coming of Christ. This was as far as they had progressed, but under Paul’s instruction they realised that the Messiah had come, had died, had risen, and was ascended to heaven. It was to such a person that they were baptised the second time. Before, their hopes had been centred on an earthly Messiah, with an earthly kingdom; now their hopes were centred on Christ in heaven.

Those who are “in Christ Jesus” are linked with Him in such a way that where He is, and in what state He is, they are too. So as earlier verses have shown us, the believer is quickened together with Christ, raised together, and seated together in heavenly places “in Christ Jesus”.

Peter made it clear on the Day of Pentecost that Jesus has now been made Lord and Christ. He was Lord before, Luke 2:11; John 4:1, and He was Christ before, Luke 4:18, (the word Messiah, or Christ, means “anointed”). Now these titles have been given a new dimension, and He manifests His Lordship and Christ-hood in fresh ways, as the one at God’s right hand.

Ye who sometimes- that is, at one time. It is the same word as is translated “in time past”, in verse 2, and “in times past” in verse 3. Clearly the apostle does not mean that they were far off part of the time and not at others.

Were far off- they were far away from Israel promise-wise. To be without God and without Christ is to be truly far off from blessing. Of course, every sinner, Jew or Gentile, is far off from God, alienated from Him by sin, but in this context to be far off is a comparative term in relation to Israel, who in verse 17 are said to be nigh.

Are made nigh- they were not just brought nigh as proselytes in Israel, (those referred to often as “the stranger that is within thy gates”). The nearness is that of those who are in Christ Jesus. If a Jew believes, he is in Christ Jesus; and if a Gentile believes, he is in Christ Jesus too. This nearness is in reference to Christ, and not to the religion of Israel which the proselytes of old time adopted. The Gentiles are not made nigh by adopting the religion of the Jews.

By the blood of Christ- in 1:7 the blood of Christ secured the forgiveness of sins on a personal level. Now the blood of Christ deals with the distance between Jew and Gentile. As soon as Jew or Gentile have a saving interest in the blood of Christ, they are brought together by that saving interest. So the work of Christ (as implied in the phrase “the blood of Christ”), and the person of Christ, (as implied in the phrase “in Christ Jesus”), are the ground of nearness to one another.

The idea of the blood of Christ, the Messiah, was strange to both Jew and Gentile. To the Jew because he thought of the Messiah as a conquering hero, a warrior-king, subduing His enemies and reigning in glory, not hung upon a cross by their enemies. To the Gentile because the idea of a saviour who was crucified in weakness, and who had apparently failed, was folly to them. But the apostle is insistent here, that nearness comes through the blood of Christ.

Terms used for Christ’s work at Calvary

Crucifixion of Christ

The death of Christ as a judicial sentence, whether by men as they condemned Him, or by God as He judged the world and sin by Christ’s death

The cross

The death of Christ as to its shame and reproach

The blood

The death of Christ as a sacrifice, and as the supreme act of surrender to God

Death of Christ

Death speaks of separation, and the death of Christ is the means by which He separates His people from Adam, from their sins, and from their sin-nature

2:14
For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

For he is our peace- Solomon, whose name means “peaceable”, could not even keep his own nation united, let alone Jew and Gentile. At his death his kingdom was rent into ten tribes and two tribes, 1 Kings 11:29-33. It is not a case, however, of administrative ability, or skill in handling people. This peace is vested in a person, for the unity is based on the common interest all believers have in Him.

Who hath made both one- He has brought about complete unity between the believing Jew and the believing Gentile. He prayed to His Father before He died, asking “That they may be one, even as we are one”, John 17:22, and that prayer has been answered. Every believer possesses eternal life, which is the life of God, so they are united in common possession of life of God. The oneness of God is based on the fact that His life is possessed equally by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This is the ground of their oneness, and therefore those who share that life have a share in that oneness.

He also makes one in the sense that believing Gentiles and believing Jews are the same thing, even a new creature in Christ, 2 Corinthians 5:17. This is the one new man of the next verse of our chapter.

And hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us- in the temple courts in Jerusalem there was a low wall, called “the middle wall of partition.” It was 30″ high, and was surmounted by a wooden fence one cubit, (approximately 18″), high. As a result, the way was barred to Gentiles, but they could still view the temple buildings over the wall, and even children could see through the fence. No Gentile was allowed beyond this wall, and inscribed on the sections of the wall, (for there were gaps through which Israelites could pass), were the following words:

“No-one of foreign descent may pass the partition and encircling wall. Whoever is seized is himself responsible for his death which will follow as a result”.

These words were carved into creamy-white chalk, and were painted red. The threat of death was not an idle one. Some time after AD 6 the Romans withdrew the right of the Jews to execute criminals, but with one exception. They could still impose the death penalty on any Gentile who passed beyond the middle wall of partition, even if he was a Roman. This shows the importance of this wall, and the way it represented the radical difference between Jew and Gentile in the realm of religious privilege.

This explains the anger of the Jews against Paul, for they thought he had brought Trophemus, an Ephesian, past that barrier. “And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him, crying out, ‘Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men everywhere against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place’. (For they had seen before with him in the city Trophemus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple)”, Acts 21:27-29. As a result, we read, “And all the city was moved, and the people ran together: and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut. And as they were about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar. Who immediately took soldiers and centurions, and ran down unto them: and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left beating of Paul”, verses 30-32. We see the following things from all this:

1. The zeal with which the rule about the middle wall was preserved.

2. The great anger against Paul for supposedly bringing a Gentile into the temple courts beyond the wall.

3. The lack of reasonableness with which they hastily assumed what in fact was not true. With this we may compare the lack of justice in the trial of Christ.

4. That not content with expelling him from the temple precincts, they shut the doors. The site was cleared, the worshippers dispersed, the place was virtually empty, and all because of misinformed religious fervour.

Paul requested that he might address the crowds, and this he did in the Hebrew language, thus gaining their attention. He gave his testimony, and reached the point where he was telling how the Lord had sent him to preach to the Gentiles. Their response was the same as they had shown to Christ. They said of Him, “Away with this man”, Luke 23:18. They said of Paul, “Away with such a fellow from the earth: for it is not fit that he should live”. They were clearly still of the opinion that since he had spoken of going to preach to the Gentiles, he was sympathetic to them, and saw no distinction between Jew and Gentile. To take a Gentile past the middle wall of partition, and to preach blessing to the Gentiles, was to the Jews one and the same, hence they called for his death again.

So it is that not only did the Jews see the wall as symbolic, so did Paul. And just as the Jews thought that Paul had virtually broken down the wall by his supposed action, so Christ has done so by His work at the cross, as the next verse goes on to show. It is not that the Gentiles are now allowed past the middle wall of partition, it is that all that the wall represented has been abolished.

2:15
Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

Having abolished in his flesh the enmity- when the Lord Jesus died on the cross He made blessing available on a totally different basis. No longer was blessing available only to those who came through the Jewish religion, (past the middle wall of partition, so to speak); it was open to all in Christ. It was by what He did in the flesh, and not through any empty ritual, that the Lord Jesus abolished the enmity that the middle wall of partition represented. Note the decisiveness and thoroughness of this action. The wall of partition is “broken down”, and the enmity is “destroyed”. These are not half measures. Just as the veil in the temple was rent in twain from top to bottom, and thus was made completely useless for the purpose for which it was made, so Christ has thoroughly destroyed the enmity between believing Jew and Gentile that we see expressed in their attitude to Paul in Acts 21. He did this when He was impailed upon a cross because the Jews were hostile to Him. So He has used the expression of their hostility to destroy that hostility, as far as those who believe are concerned.

He has abolished the enmity in the flesh, telling us that it was a costly thing. He could not just issue a command revoking the ordinances. It must be shown what those who were zealous of the ordinances would do to Him when He came into flesh. They thought that He was against the ordinances, (the sabbath, for example), and so they impaled Him on a cross, such was their hatred. But God has used their enmity to bring in blessing to those who believe.

Even the law of commandments contained in ordinances- this is the explanation as to what the enmity was centred around. The law of Moses distinguished the nation of Israel from all other nations. As Moses said, “For what nation is there so great, who hath God so nigh unto them, as the Lord our God is in all things that we call upon Him for? And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgements so righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?” Deuteronomy 4:7,8. The law represented the dividing line between Jew and Gentile, and this was symbolised by the wall of partition in the temple, beyond which no Gentile could pass to share in the privileges of Israel. The law was contained in ordinances. In other words, the law was expressed by ordinances, and these ordinances were the cause of enmity. An ordinance seems to denote established practice based upon an original command. Thus, for instance, there was a command to keep the Passover, and it was to be kept as an ordinance, Exodus 12:17. So “law” links with the giving of the law at Sinai, whereas “ordinances” speak of the ongoing practice of what was commanded there. These things set Israel apart, and they were very jealous of their apartness.

By what He did on the cross the Lord Jesus has set aside the need for ordinances that help in the keeping of the law. It is not that He has abolished the law as such, but has abolished the ordinances that were designed to express obedience to the law. We know from other Scriptures that “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth, Romans 10:4. He has not ended the law, as if it were evil, but He has ended the idea that law could be used to produce righteousness. As Paul wrote to the Galatians, “if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain”, Galatians 2:21. It was because the law could not produce righteousness in sinners, that Christ needed to die. If the law could have produced righteousness He need not have died. The law is not revoked, but it is not the principle that governs the believer in his life. The words of the apostle are decisive, “ye are not under the law, but under grace”, Romans 6:14. The guiding principle of the life of the believer is the example of Christ in His life.

For to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace- He is the uniting centre, and those who are “in Him” are new creatures, not Jews and Gentiles. (To be in Him means that who, what, and where Christ is characterises their spiritual position). It is not that Gentiles are made religious, like Jews are religious. And it is not that Jews are made irreligious, as Gentiles are irreligious. It is not a question of compromise, but of new creation. The Gentile who believes is no longer a Gentile, with no privileges. The Jew is no longer a Jew, and exchanges Jewish privilege for Christian privilege. The new man is what the two, Gentile believer and Jewish believer, have both been made individually. It is not another name for the church. There is not a Jewish new man and a Gentile new man. Both Jew and Gentile have lost their own identity in favour of Christ. This is indicated by the expression “in Himself”; it is what each is in Christ that matters now. Before, it was what they were in themselves. Each is now a new man, and each is the same new man, and that new man is modelled after Christ, just as the old man is modelled after Adam. The new man is not expressly Christ Himself, but Christ reproduced in the believer. Adam was reproduced in us because we received a sinful nature by natural birth, whereas Christ is reproduced in us because we received a new nature at new birth.

If all believers, whatever their former religious background, are modelled on Christ, then that results in peace. When they were in the flesh Gentiles and Jews were opposed to one another, for there was enmity, but now the reverse is the case. Can Christ in one believer be at enmity with Christ in another believer? This is unthinkable. So if believers are not at peace with one another, then they must be exhibiting Adam, not Christ.

2:16
And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body- not only are the two united because of a common nature, but they are also united in the one body, the church, so the unity is both personal and communal. Not only does each have Christ as model, each has Christ as head of the body of which they form part. The body of Christ consists of all believers from Pentecost to the Rapture, and is the company of which He alone is the head.

By the cross- this reconciliation is on the solid basis of the work of the cross, so it is not a loose association, but one that is permanent and unbreakable. The cross is a doctrine, not a piece of wood. The Jews, in their zeal for their ordinances, gave Christ the place of shame at Calvary, putting Him on a cross, but God has turned this into the means of reconciling sinners to Himself.

Having slain the enmity thereby- Christ turned His own death into death for the enmity, for He dealt with the root cause of it. So the middle wall is broken down, the enmity is abolished, and the way it was done was by the cross.

2:17
And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.

And came and preached peace to you which were afar off- Jonah preached to the Gentile Ninevites, as recorded in the book of Jonah, and later had a word for Israel, as recorded in 2 Kings 14:25. Significantly, it is Jonah that the Lord selects as an illustration of the fact that He is going to bless Gentiles as well as Jews. Consequent upon their continued refusal of Him, the Pharisees are told that they will receive no sign but that of the prophet Jonah, who, after a three days and three nights experience, went to Nineveh and preached to it. See Matthew 12:38-41. And so it came to pass, and the fact that Paul puts the preaching to the far-off ones first, highlights that the Jews have nothing to boast of, for they rejected the Messiah when He came exclusively to them.

The difference with Jonah, however, was that he did not preach peace, but judgement. God was at war with Nineveh because of its sin, but now, in Christ, God is reconciling the world, because of Calvary. So it is that Christ, through His sent-servants, preaches peace. We read in Mark’s gospel that “they went forth, and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following”, Mark 16:20. In this way He preaches still.

And to them that were nigh- perhaps this is put last because it is the more surprising, therefore it is reserved as a climax. Unlike the Gentiles who were kept at a distance by the middle wall of partition, Jews could come relatively near to God in the temple courts.

The word of the Lord to the disciples was that they should begin preaching at Jerusalem, Luke 24:27, and so this is what they did. In the Old Testament, when a man was found dead, the city next to the slain man was held responsible, and the elders were required to slay a heifer as a sin offering, wash their hands over it, and say, “Our hands have not shed this blood, neither have our eyes seen it. Be merciful, O Lord, unto thy people Israel, whom thou hast redeemed, and lay not innocent blood to thy people of Israel’s charge. And the blood shall be forgiven them”, Deuteronomy 21:7-9. Now clearly the city of Jerusalem was the city next to the slain Christ, for He was crucified just outside its walls. The people, however, had cried, “His blood be on us, and on our children”, Matthew 27:25, thus saying the opposite of what God required to hear. How perverse this situation is, for it is Pilate who washes his hands, in verse 24.

But in His amazing grace He gives to Jerusalem the opportunity to reverse their decision. So it is that Peter exhorts those who were exercised about their sin to “save themselves from this untoward generation”, Acts 2:40. By confessing their guilt they could come into the good of a sacrifice infinitely better than a heifer, and know God’s forgiveness, and clearance from the guilt of crucifying their Messiah. And it was to give them this opportunity that Christ came and preached to them that were near in terms of national privilege.

2:18
For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.

For through him we both have access- the fact that Paul writes as if Christ personally comes to preach, highlights the fact that He is personally the way. When an easterner is asked the way by a traveller, instead of giving directions, he starts out on the way with him; thus the man becomes the expression of the way, and to follow him is to be on the way. So with the Lord Jesus, but in a much more intense way. He comes to men, Jew and Gentile alike, and offers to be “the way” for them, as long as they will acknowledge their sin, (which is the reason why they are not on the way in the first place), and believe in Him as the one who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father but by Me”, John 14:6.

Significantly, when Paul was accused of taking a Gentile past the middle wall, the doors of the temple were shut to him, Acts 21:30. But this does not matter, for he has access to God, as all believers do. Access is “a bringing or leading into the presence of another”.

This access is first of all for salvation, (“no man cometh unto the Father but by Me”, John 14:6), then for worship, (“let us draw nigh”, Hebrews 10:22), and then, ultimately, for entrance into the Father’s house in heaven, which is the context of John 14.

Note the difference between being nigh, and having access. Whilst the Jewish worshipper could come relatively near His God, he did not have full access to his God. But the Christian does, for he can approach into the holiest in heaven, Hebrews 10:19.

By one Spirit- the Holy Spirit dwells within believing Jews and believing Gentiles alike. This fact might be disputed by Jewish believers at first, which shows that Peter was wise to take men with him when he went to preach to Cornelius. They could bear witness to the effect the preaching had, for the Holy Spirit came upon Cornelius and his company, and this was proved by the fact that they spoke in tongues, Acts 10:45,46. So the Spirit who came upon Peter and the others at Pentecost, now comes also on Cornelius and his friends. There is one Spirit, Ephesians 4:4, and He comes alike upon all who believe. It is by His agency we are enabled to cry “Abba, Father” as we draw nigh to God, Galatians 4:6; Romans 8:14,15. This access is not as the result of the carrying out of ordinances, but is the Christian’s right, as indwelt by the Spirit of God, and He it is who encourages us to draw near.

The doors in Solomon’s temple were of the olive tree, 1 Kings 6:31, olive oil being a symbol of the Spirit of God, see Zechariah 4:1-6. This illustrates the access that the Holy Spirit gives as He encourages us to approach God.

Unto the Father- because the Son has been to earth, and been to the cross, He has made the way whereby sinners may have access to God. And He is known to them as their Father, because they are born of Him, and are therefore in His family. Abraham built an altar to the name of the Lord who appeared to him, Genesis 12:7. In other words, his approach to God was in line with the way God had revealed Himself. So believers address God in line with the way He has been manifested to them by the Son of God. This is why they address Him as “Father”. The Jewish prayer-books carefully avoided referring to God as Father, but the Christian has no such reservations.

(e) Verses 19-22
The dignity of the saints

2:19
Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow-citizens with the saints, and of the household of God;

Now therefore- their present position is as a result of the aforementioned movements of God towards them in Christ.

Ye are no more strangers and foreigners- as those who were formerly apart from Christ, they had no claim on the privileges of Israel. The inscription on the middle wall of partition spoke of those of “foreign descent”, meaning Gentiles. The two words used here do not so much signify distance geographically, but distance religiously. For the word “stranger” does indeed mean an alien, as in verse 12, but it can also mean a guest. The implication being that if you were entertained as a guest it was because you were not part of the household. So also with the word “foreigner”. It literally means “one who lives near”. So the apostle seems to be emphasising the fact that even if a Gentile were a guest or a neighbour in relation to a Jew, he was as far away as he could be in terms of privilege.

But fellow-citizens with the saints- notice the word “fellow”. It denotes that something is shared, and what is shared is citizenship. From being at enmity, they now are in fellowship.

The Gentiles were aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, verse 12, (the word commonwealth denoting citizenship in the theocracy of Israel), but now believing Gentiles are citizens on the same level as believing Jews. But it is not citizenship in Israel that is in view, for believing Jews are no longer citizens of Israel, but of heaven; and so are believing Gentiles, on an equal basis.

And it is with saints that this citizenship is shared, even those who have been set apart by God for Himself. Those who have saved themselves from the untoward nation of Israel that crucified their Messiah, Acts 2:40. So they are not proselytes of Israel, but citizens of heaven. The specific meaning of “the saints” would be the believers who were formerly Jews but had believed and been brought into the church before the first Gentile was saved. The Gentiles who believed joined the saints who were already in receipt of Christian blessing.

And of the household of God- instead of being outsiders, with no relationship with God, they have become part of the family. But it is not the family of Jacob, the nation of Israel, but the family of God. Peter wrote to converted Jews and explained that they were now of the household of God as holy priests, 1 Peter 2:5, and now this is true of believing Gentiles too.

There is no mis-match between the idea of being of the household of God and being stones in a building, for the Old Testament word for stone and son was the same in some instances. Sons are the stones of a man’s house; the sons of Jacob formed the House of Israel. God blessed the Hebrew midwives who saved many a son from being killed. We read that He built them houses, Exodus 1:21. In other words, He gave them sons, fit reward for those who had rescued many Hebrew sons.

2:20
And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;

And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets- in the passage just quoted, Peter describes believers as living stones, and he also describes Christ as the living stone. In other words, believers are made suitable to be linked to Christ, for they have received life from Him. It is no surprise then to be told here that in some way we are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets. Being those initially responsible to preach the word to Jew and Gentile, they were the first to be laid. They themselves represent the doctrinal foundation upon which all believers rest. In Acts 2:42 we read that of new converts that “they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship”. So believers were marked by steadfast observance of all that the apostles taught.

We should not miss the link which the Lord Jesus made between Himself as the Rock, and Peter as a stone. He had deliberately given Peter the name Cephas, meaning “a stone”, John 1:42, in view no doubt of what He would say later on about building the church. John interprets the word Cephas for us, for the Holy Spirit through the apostle is pre-empting any idea that Peter is the rock.

Peter confessed that Jesus was the Christ the Son of the living God. The response of the Lord was, “Blessed are thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed this unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”, Mathew 16:17,18. In our zeal to deny that Peter is the foundation of the church, (a notion which is clearly not true, for “other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ”, 1 Corinthians 3:11), we should not ignore the fact that the Lord did put the name Peter, “a stone”, in close proximity to Himself as the rock. So Peter has something to do with the foundation, but is certainly not the foundation. We should bear in mind the following:

1. The Rabbis described Abraham as the rock on which the earth was founded, so the idea of a system built upon a person was not foreign to the Jews.

2. The word for Peter is “petros”, a masculine word meaning stone or rock. The word for rock is “petra” a feminine word which always and only means rock. A “petros” takes character from a “petra”, just as believers are said by Peter to be partakers of the Divine nature, (and God Himself is called a Rock in Deuteronomy 32:4,15,18,30,31).

3. Peter personally would be a poor foundation, since he is called Satan in Matthew 16:23, just after he has confessed Christ to be the Son of God.

4. Peter refers to Christ as a Living Stone, and believers as living stones built upon Him, 1 Peter 2:4,5. It is not possible for Peter to be the foundation, and also be built on the foundation.

5. Pope Pius 4th decreed that nothing should be taught that the fathers are not agreed upon. They are evenly divided, and Augustine changed his view, and said all should believe what they like about it! The statistics are as follows: 17 of the Fathers said the rock was Peter; 44 said it was Peter’s faith; 16 said the rock was Christ; 8 said that it was all the apostles. So we have a situation where the system which teaches that Peter is the rock on which the church is built, is undecided, and has decreed that if they are undecided the idea should not be taught.

We may safely conclude that the rock-foundation of the church is Christ alone; that the apostles and prophets, being vitally important initial members of the church, may be seen as the first row of stones built upon the foundation, and then the other living stones are built on these. So as far as the church as a spiritual building is concerned, Christ is the foundation. As far as the doctrinal foundation is concerned, Christ is also the foundation, but inasmuch as the apostles were intimately linked with that doctrine, (taking character from Peter’s confession in Matthew 16:16), then the apostle is justified in calling them a foundation too, but in a secondary sense.

Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone- He Himself personally is the corner stone, without any help from others, not even apostles and prophets. The corner stone was that which joined two sides of a building together, giving alignment and stability to the structure. Because of its vital importance in this work, it was called chief. The apostle clearly has the temple of God in Jerusalem in his mind as he makes these statements. We have seen his allusion to the middle wall of partition, and now we find reference to the foundation of the building. The temple in Jerusalem was built on solid rock, and then the foundation stones were laid, including the chief corner stone, the one which linked two walls together. It is as the foundation stones in the first row relate to the chief corner stone, that the whole building is given straightness and a true line.

It is noticeable how much of Christ’s prayer to His Father in John 17 is taken up with the apostles. He was concerned that they might be united in their testimony. His prayer was answered, and they formed the foundation as they taught the truth in relation to Christ. They did not give the building its alignment, however; that came from the chief corner stone. Nor are they the rock-foundation upon which the whole building stands, for that is Christ alone. The living stones in this building are those who believe the truth expressed by Peter when he said, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God”, Matthew 16:16. This is the rock-foundation, and the apostles and prophets, being the first to confess this, and also the first to set this doctrine forth in the church age, are the living expression of that doctrine, and as such are the first row of stones, taking their alignment from the chief corner stone Himself. A similar thought is found in Revelation 21:14, where the foundations of the wall of the future holy Jerusalem have the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb written on them.

2:21
In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:

In whom all the building- because the stones are living stones, they are individually, as to their position, in Him. As such they are stable and firm, for He is the corner stone. It is in Him alone, (“Jesus Christ Himself”, verse 20), that all the building grows, not the apostles.

Fitly framed together- ancient stone-masons were able to square stones so skilfully, that when they were builded on one another, not ever a sheet of paper could be inserted into the joins. Such is the skill of the heavenly Temple-builder, that the powers of evil, (“the gates of hell”, Matthew 16:18), cannot make any inroads. There are divisions in abundance in Christendom, but there are none in the true church.

When Solomon’s temple was being built, the stones were fashioned away from the building site. Scripture says, “And the house, when it was in building, was made of stone made ready before it was brought thither: so that there was neither hammer nor axe nor any tool of iron heard in the house, while it was in building”, 1 Kings 6:7. The parallel passage in 2 Chronicles 8:16 reads, “Now all the work of Solomon was prepared unto the day of the foundation of the house of the Lord, and until it was finished. So the house of the Lord was perfected”. So we see that the preparation beforehand was in view of the laying of the foundation, and also of its completion. Applying these principles to the church, we could say that in the mind of God the work of fitting stones for the church was done before those stones were actually laid. His people were on His mind in eternity, and He associated them with His Son, involving them in His glorious purpose. Then as soon as they believed they were fitted perfectly to be part of that purpose, with the rough edges of the Adamic nature chipped away, so that they conformed perfectly to Christ. Peter shows in 1 Peter 2 that just as Christ is the living stone, so believers are living stones too, (“lively”, verse 5). Just as Christ is elect, (“chosen of God”, verse 4, “elect”, verse 6), so believers are elect, too, (“chosen”, meaning elect, verse 9). Just as Christ is precious to His Father, verse 4, so believers are a “peculiar people”, verse 9, meaning “a people for a possession”. So the “chief corner stone”, verse 6, Christ Himself, and those who are built on Him, are perfectly fitted together. All the unsuitability derived from likenss to Adam is chipped away, and only what the believer is as being in Christ remains.

Groweth unto a holy temple- notice it grows unto, not into, a holy temple. A building grows into something as it develops from incompleteness to completeness. This building, however, is complete from its inception, for the church is viewed here in its ideal condition. The church will be the temple of God in eternity, and the living stones in the building develop in the things of God in view of that.

In the Lord- the holiness of the temple derives from the fact that it is the dwelling-place of the Lord; it is holy as being in Him, the Lord, whose authority repels all unholy elements.

2:22
In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

In whom ye also are builded together- they have not only been builded together perfectly as far as God’s purpose for the church is concerned, but there is an ongoing building, for “builded together” is in the present; it is something happening as Paul writes. So as well as having been built, they are being built. So the “ye also” does not mean, “ye also, as well as Jewish believers”, (for he has not been contrasting Jew with Gentile in the last few verses), but rather, “ye also, as well as having been builded, are currently being builded together”. The emphasis is now on the local assembly in Ephesus, to whom he is writing. As Paul wrote to the Corinthians, “ye are God’s building”, and he went on to tell them that the buildng in question was the temple of God, 1 Corinthians 3:9,16.

For an habitation of God- the idea of being a temple, with its associations of glory and grandeur, now gives way to the idea of a habitation, which in the natural realm is a place where a man is at home and comfortable. The local assembly is the house of God, according to 1 Timothy 3:15, the place where God’s will is to be done.

Through the Spirit- the whole thing is a spiritual concept, and it is only by the power of the Spirit that we are a place for God to inhabit with joy. He ever associates with the glories of His Son, and so the more those glories are reproduced in the people of God, the more He can be at home.

 

 

 

 

 

LEVITICUS 16 The Day of Atonement

SURVEY OF THE CHAPTER

Leviticus 16 gives the account of what was done on the Day of Atonement, the sixth of the seven feasts of Jehovah, as listed in Leviticus 23. As we shall see when thinking of verse 24, not everything that happened that day is mentioned in this chapter. Various sacrifices were offered on the altar of burnt offering beforehand. The emphasis in this chapter is the ceremonies that obtained cleansing from sin. So notable and crucial was this day that the Jews called it “The Day”, for everything depended on the outcome of the rituals that day.

Not only was it a notable day, but it was a national day, as we see from the singular form of the word “people” in verse 15. God dwelt among the nation, and they must be nationally fitted for His presence. The only way the benefits of the day were not received by an individual in Israel was by him opting out of those benefits by refusing to afflict his soul, and by carrying on working. In other words, refusing to repent and act in obedient faith. With men now it is different, for the propitiatory work of Christ is for the whole world, even the whole world that lieth in the wicked one, 1 John 2:2, 5:19. Now, men have to opt in, for the work of Christ was not national, but universal. There is provision for all.

The great object of the Day of Atonement was to make propitiation; which is why the mercy-seat was the focal point of the ceremony. When the writer to the Hebrews refers to that mercy-seat, he uses the word which means place of propitiation. For the mercy-seat was not a seat to sit on, but the word seat is used in the same sense as when we speak of London as “the seat of government”; or Windsor Castle as “the seat of the House of Windsor”. The idea is of a settled place. So on the ark of the testimony there was a settled place for mercy to be shown, which mercy was obtained by the blood of propitiation being sprinkled on it once every year.

At this point we need to define the word propitiation. It may be understood like this: “Propitiation is that aspect of the work of Christ at Calvary by which He gave to God the full and final satisfaction with regard to every claim God had against sin, enabling mercy to be shown to the repentant sinner on a just basis”.

WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR PROPITIATION?

1. Because sins offend God.

As God is the Absolute Standard of righteousness and holiness, all deviations from this standard are highly offensive to Him. Such is the intensity of His holiness that the simple mention of it is enough to make the posts of the doors of the temple in heaven move, Isaiah 6:3,4. His reaction to sin and iniquity is to turn from it, for He is of purer eyes than to behold evil, and who cannot look upon iniquity, Habakkuk 1:13. The very presence of sin in the universe is a grief to God.

2. Because as Moral Governor of the universe, He must be seen to deal with sins.

God has enemies, both devilish and human, and He must be clear of any charge which they may level against Him that suggests He has ignored sins, or at least, ignored some sins. Eternity must not be allowed to run its course without this matter being settled. God deals with some sins instantly, but the majority seem to have gone unpunished. Sentence against an evil work has not been executed speedily, Ecclesiastes 8:11, since God is longsuffering, and waits to be gracious. This situation might give rise to the charge of indifference to sins, and so God must act to defend His honour.

3. Because God must have a just basis for continuing to have dealings with sinful men.

One of the main purposes of the sacrifices on the Day of Atonement in Israel was that God might continue to dwell amongst them despite their uncleanness, Leviticus 16:16. So also when Christ was down here. It was only because God was not imputing trespasses so as to instantly judge them, but rather was working to reconcile unto Himself, that He was prepared to have dealings with men in the person of His Son. See 2 Corinthians 5:19.

4. Because if men are to be shown mercy, have their sins forgiven, and be reconciled to God, there must be a solid basis upon which these things can happen.

God declares Himself to be a Saviour God- He cannot be fully satisfied solely by judging men . The fact that “God is light” demands that this be done, but “God is love” too, and delights to manifest Himself in grace.

5. Because the cycle of sin must be broken.

In other words, if there is not to be an eternal succession of creations, falls, remedies for fall, and new creations, then there must be that established which is once for all, giving the complete answer to the question of sin. Unless this complete answer is given, the new heavens and new earth will not be safe from disturbance.

WHAT ARE THE RESULTS OF PROPITIATION?

1. The demands of God are fully met.

To satisfy God as the Moral Governor of the universe, an adequate and final answer must be found to the question of sin. The demands of His holiness and righteousness are such that every sin must be responded to. Only Christ is adequate for this situation. He it is who has “put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself”, Hebrews 9:26. To put away in that verse means to abolish. As far as God is concerned, and in this context, sin is not. No charge can henceforth be made against God that He has ignored the presence of sin. On the contrary, He has taken account of each and every sin through His Son’s work at Calvary. John wrote, “He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world”, 1 John 2:2. Of course “the sins of” is in italics in that verse. But the words must be supplied because they are implied in the “ours” of the previous statement. If John had written “not for usonly”, then the translation could have continued “but also for the whole world”. Since, however, he uses the possessive pronoun “ours”, which shows he is writing about the sins people possess, then “the sins of” must be inserted. Now the apostle will write later that “we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness”, 1 John 5:19. He sees mankind divided into two clearly defined sections, believers, and the whole world.

John not only clearly distinguishes between believers and the world, but just as clearly states that Christ is the propitiatory offering for both classes. That Christ became the propitiation for the whole world does not mean that the whole world will be saved, since propitiation is only made good to a person when he believes. It does mean, however, that no charge may be levelled against God for not making provision for men. Gospel-blessing may be genuinely offered to all men, for there is abundant provision for all.

2. God’s dealings are vindicated.

In Old Testament times God blessed men by reckoning them righteous when they believed in Him. Romans 3:24,25 indicates that the propitiatory work of Christ vindicates God for so acting. In can be seen now that God was blessing anticipatively, crediting believers with the results of Christ’s work before they had been achieved. He also remitted, or passed over, their sins in forbearance, holding back from judging those sins in virtue of what His Son would do at Calvary.

3. God’s glory is fully displayed.

There is no attribute of God which has not been fully expressed at Calvary. This is why the apostle Paul speaks of rejoicing in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement, Romans 5:11. Atonement in this verse means reconciliation, one of the effects of propitiation. By His sacrificial work at Calvary Christ has brought the character of God out into full and glorious display. Those who are brought by faith into the good of that work are enabled to behold that display, and rejoice in it. Would we know Divine holiness, or righteousness, or love, or wrath, or any other aspect of the Person of God? Then we must look to the cross for the sight of it. We shall not be disappointed.

4. God’s mercy is available.

The repentant sinner who called upon God to be merciful to him, is the first person in the New Testament to use the word propitious- “God be merciful to me on the basis of propitiation”. He went down to his house justified, Luke 18:13,14. Under the terms of the New Covenant, God promises that “I will be merciful (propitious) to their unrighteousness, Hebrews 8:12. The mercy-seat was the same width and breadth as the ark, telling us that the ark (the person of Christ) and the mercy-seat, (the work of Christ), were perfectly matched. But we are not told the thickness of the gold of the mercy-seat, for there is an infinite supply of mercy for those who believe, enough to keep them secure for all eternity.

5. God’s forgiveness is assured.

In Hebrews 10:5-8 we have the Spirit of Christ in the psalmist telling of His work of sacrifice. Then we have the Spirit’s testimony telling us of the results of that work, Hebrews 10:15-17. God promises emphatically that He will not remember the sins and iniquities of His people any more, since He brought those sins into remembrance at Calvary, and Christ dealt with them effectively there. “No more” means in no way, nor at any time. Note that God pledges to positively not remember, not negatively to forget. We may forget, and then remember again, whereas God promises never to remember for ever.

6. God’s people are preserved.

The Lord Jesus spoke to Mary Magdalene after He was risen, and instructed her to tell the brethren that He was about to “ascend unto My Father, and your Father; and to My God, and your God”, John 20:17. Thus He would still be the link between His people and God, maintaining them in His dual role of Advocate with the Father, and High Priest in things pertaining to God.

The basis of His advocacy is two-fold. His person, for He is Jesus Christ the righteous, and His work, for He is the propitiation for our sins, 1 John 2:1,2. The apostle John was concerned about believers sinning. The sins of believers are just as obnoxious to God, and just as deserving of wrath, as those of unbelievers. But we are “saved from wrath through Him”, Romans 5:9, as He pleads the merits of His work. He is, says John, the propitiatory offering for our sins. Not was, but is. In other words, the one who acts for us in heaven as our advocate, is the very same one who hung upon the cross as a sacrifice for our sins.

He is also our High priest. The language of Hebrews 2:17,18 is as follows, “Wherefore in all things it behoved Him to be made like unto His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. For in that He Himself hath suffered being tempted, He is able to succour them that are tempted”. These verses form a bridge between chapter two, with its emphasis on the reasons why the Lord Jesus took manhood, and the way in which Israel were tempted in the wilderness. Note in particular the word “for” which begins verse 18. Too little attention has been paid to this word, and hence the connection between verses 17 and 18 is often lost. The reason why we have a high priest who is merciful and faithful is that He has been here in manhood and suffered being tempted. When His people pass through temptation, then He undertakes to deal with their cause. Because He has been here, and has been tempted in all points like as we are, He is able to help us when we cry to Him for help. The word for succour is used by the woman of Canaan in Matthew 15:25 when she cried out, “Lord, help me”. He is able to point us to the ways in which He overcame in the wilderness temptation, and thus we are strengthened to resist temptation.

But what if we fall, and sin? In that case He comes to our aid in another way. We see it typified negatively in Leviticus 10:16-20. The priests were commanded to eat the sin-offerings, if the blood thereof had not been brought into the sanctuary. But at the end of the consecration of the priesthood, Moses was angry on God’s behalf, for the priests had failed in this. Moses said, “God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord”, Leviticus 10:17. One of the functions of priesthood, then, was to personally identify with the sin-offering by eating it, and by so doing bear the iniquity of the congregation, taking responsibility for their failure, but doing so safeguarded by the fact that a sin-offering had been accepted by God. As they did this the scripture explicitly says they made atonement for the people, Leviticus 10:17. We see then what the writer to the Hebrews means when he talks of Christ making reconciliation or propitiation for the sins of the people. He is indicating that Christ personally identifies Himself with His sin-offering work at Calvary, and thus takes responsibility for the failures of His people under temptation. This is acceptable to God, and His people are preserved, despite their failure.

7. God’s purpose for the earth is furthered.

When Adam the head of the first creation fell, all creation had to be subjected to vanity, or else a fallen man would have been head over an unfallen creation. Now that He has obtained rights over the earth by His death, the Lord Jesus is able to bring in new conditions for God. He can now righteously deliver the present creation from the bondage of corruption into which the fall of man brought it, Romans 8:19-23. Colossians 1:20 assures us that on the basis of the blood of His cross, all things, whether in earth or in heaven, can be reconciled to God, for that alienation between God and His creation which took place at the Fall, can be remedied. Notice it is things, not people, that are spoken of in that verse as being reconciled.

8. God’s intention to create a new heavens and new earth can be realised.

Unless the sin which has marred the first creation is dealt with, God cannot righteously introduce an eternal earth and heavens, for it would not have been evident that He was able to deal with the fall of the first creation. Having dealt with it through Christ, He is able to bring in new things that will never be spoiled. Daniel was told that Messiah the Prince would bring in “everlasting righteousness”, Daniel 9:24, and this He will do, on the basis of His death. It only remains for God to announce “Behold, I make all things new”, Revelation 21:5, and a “new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness”, shall be established, 2 Peter 3:13. At last there will be a settled and congenial place for righteous to dwell in, after all the turmoil brought in by Adam’s sin. At last those profound words spoken by John the Baptist will be fully brought to pass, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29.

STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER

Verses 1-2 The reason why entry to the Holiest of All was limited.  
Verses 3-10 A summary of the events of the day.  
Verses 11-14 The sprinkling of the blood of a sin offering for Aaron and his house.  
Verses 15-17 The sprinkling of the blood of the sin offering for Israel.  
Verses 18-19 The sprinkling of the blood on the altar of incense.  
Verses 20-22 The sending away of the scapegoat with its burden of sins.  
Verses 23-25 The burnt offerings and the fat of the sin offering.  
Verse 26 The return of the fit man.  
Verses 27-28 The burning of the sin offerings.  
Verses 29-34 Instructions to the Israelites.

Before we think of the detail of the chapter, we ought to notice certain cautionary lessons to bear in mind about it.

1. The Lord Jesus was not a priest on earth. Hebrews 7:28 makes that very clear, for the word of the oath that constituted Christ as High Priest is expressly said to be “since the law”. This latter phrase means, not that the oath was since the law was given, but since the law-age came to an end. And since the law-age came to an end at Calvary, then the oath must be after this. In fact, Hebrews 5:6 and 10 uses Psalm 110, an ascension psalm, to show that that is when God saluted Christ as High Priest. So we shall be making a mistake if we try to see in Aaron’s activities on the Day of Atonement a prefiguring of Christ’s priestly activities.

2. The foregoing will prevent us making another mistake, namely seeing a chronological sequence in the fulfilment of the day of atonement ceremonies. We are shown in Hebrews 13:11,12 that just as a man took the carcases of the beasts used as sacrifices outside the camp and burnt them, so Christ went outside the camp, too. But He went outside the camp to go to the cross, whereas the carcases were burnt on the day of atonement at the end of the day, after the other parts of the ceremony had taken place.

3. We should bear in mind that what happened at the altar, at the mercy-seat, at the altar of incense, outside the camp, and out in the distant wilderness, all tell us things about what happened at Calvary.

4. We should also bear in mind that Aaron, the mercy-seat, the five offerings of the ceremony, the fit man, and the other man who burnt the carcases, all have something to contribute to an understanding of what the Lord Jesus did at the cross.

5. The Old Testament teaches mainly by way of contrast, so we need to be aware of that as we go through the passage.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE BOOK OF LEVITICUS CHAPTER 16, VERSES 1 TO 10

16:1 And the Lord spake unto Moses after the death of the two sons of Aaron, when they offered before the Lord, and died;

16:2 And the Lord said unto Moses, Speak unto Aaron thy brother, that he come not at all times into the holy place within the veil before the mercy seat, which is upon the ark; that he die not: for I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy seat.

16:3 Thus shall Aaron come into the holy place: with a young bullock for a sin offering, and a ram for a burnt offering.

16:4 He shall put on the holy linen coat, and he shall have the linen breeches upon his flesh, and shall be girded with a linen girdle, and with the linen mitre shall he be attired: these are holy garments; therefore shall he wash his flesh in water, and so put them on.

16:5 And he shall take of the congregation of the children of Israel two kids of the goats for a sin offering, and one ram for a burnt offering.

16:6 And Aaron shall offer his bullock of the sin offering, which is for himself, and make an atonement for himself, and for his house.

16:7 And he shall take the two goats, and present them before the Lord at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

16:8 And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two goats; one lot for the Lord, and the other lot for the scapegoat.

16:9 And Aaron shall bring the goat upon which the Lord’s lot fell, and offer him for a sin offering.

16:10 But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the Lord, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness.

Verses 1-2 The reason why entry to the Holiest of All was limited.

16:1 And the Lord spake unto Moses after the death of the two sons of Aaron, when they offered before the Lord, and died;

And the Lord spake unto Moses- we immediately notice that the Mediator of the Law is in control of events, for it is the preservation of the covenant people that is in view in the chapter.

After the death of the two sons of Aaron- the consecration of the priesthood is detailed in 60 verses of Scripture, in Leviticus 8 and 9, yet by verse 2 of chapter 10 two of them are dead. We are reminded of the words of Hebrews 7:28, “the law maketh men high priests that have infirmity”.

When they offered before the Lord, and died- so this is not because they have died by natural causes. Fire has come out from the Lord and devoured them, 10:2, for they transgressed the first day they were in office, and offered strange fire before the Lord, “which He commanded them not”. How important it is to approach God with reverence and godly fear: for “our God is a consuming fire”, Hebrews 12:28,29. Not the fear of sinners afraid of God’s wrath, but saints, fearing to enter His presence in a light or faulty way.

Not only did Nadab and Abihu sin on that fateful day, but the other two sons of Aaron also failed in that they burnt the goat of the sin-offering, instead of eating it, Leviticus 10:16,17. The purpose of them eating it was “God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord”. So atonement was made when the priests ate the sin offering. This having broken down, the people are vulnerable, for the priests have shown that they cannot be relied on to bear the iniquity of the congregation. So it is that the day of atonement became an annual necessity.

16:2 And the Lord said unto Moses, Speak unto Aaron thy brother, that he come not at all times into the holy place within the veil before the mercy seat, which is upon the ark; that he die not: for I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy seat.

And the Lord said unto Moses, Speak unto Aaron thy brother-this reminds us of the incident when Aaron and Moses embraced at Horeb, Exodus 4:27, illustrating the fact that the mediator of the law, Moses, and Aaron the High Priest, were united together in the service of God. No one person could combine the two offices except Christ. Note that Aaron is said to officiate as Moses’ brother, and as a priest, not as high priest, for not until the end of the day’s work will he put on his garments for glory and beauty, his high-priestly garb. He will be robed in simple and plain garments, for he is a sinner too.

That he come not at all times- ideally, the priesthood would have been allowed unlimited access to the presence of God. The sin of Nadab and Abihu showed that was not suitable. How different it is for the Christian priest, who has unlimited access to God.

Into the holy place within the veil- this was called the Holiest of All, or the Most Holy Place. The holy place without or outside the veil was simply called the Holy Place, see Exodus 26:33. There are no degrees of holiness in the heavenly sanctuary, for there is no dividing veil there. This holy place was where fire had come out to devour Nadab and Abihu, hence the need for care when seeking to enter. There is a plan of the tabernacle at the end of these notes.

Before the mercy seat, which is upon the ark- the veil is said to be before the mercy-seat, not just as to its position, but to draw attention to the fact that it is a protecting curtain, shielding the priests as they moved in the Holy Place. Aaron is going beyond that shield, so must come according to Divine commandment and prescription. The word for mercy-seat is kapporeth, which has the idea of covering. It is first used in Genesis 6:14, where Noah pitched (kaphar) the ark within and without with pitch, thus ensuring that the waters of the flood did not penetrate into the ark.

The word used of the mercy-seat in Hebrews 9:5 is hilasmos, the place of propitiation. So we are not to think that atonement in the Old Testament was a temporary thing, just covering over the sins for the time being until Christ’s work dealt with them effectively.

The mercy-seat was upon the ark, and fitted the ark exactly. There was no indication of the depth of the solid-gold mercy-seat however. After all, who can measure the mercy of God? The ark is a vessel that has much to tell us about Christ as to His person as the Son of God; the mercy-seat has much to tell us about His work. The writer to the Hebrews implied that it was possible to speak “particularly” or in detail about the ark, although it was not appropriate to do it at the time of writing, Hebrews 9:5.

That he die not: for I will appear in the cloud upon the mercy seat- Aaron’s two eldest sons had died because they entered into God’s presence in a manner that He had not prescribed, the incense they brought being strange incense, and it did not shield them. Only the graces of Christ as illustrated by the sweet incense in the tabernacle can give us peace in presence of God. There were two clouds in the Most Holy Place in the tabernacle on the Day of Atonement; the cloud of glory, otherwise known as the Shekinah, and the cloud of incense shielding Aaron from the sight of that glory. No man can see God and live, but Christians behold the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ, 2 Corinthians 4:6. The glory they see there is the moral glory of one who is the Only Begotten with the Father, John 1:14.

Verses 3-10 A summary of the events of the day.

16:3 Thus shall Aaron come into the holy place: with a young bullock for a sin offering, and a ram for a burnt offering.

Thus shall Aaron come into the holy place- by this expression is meant the Holy Place where the mercy-seat was. The word “thus” means “with this”. Aaron did not actually bring the animal itself in, but the blood of the animal, that was brought in, is the soul of animal, for the life of the flesh is in the blood, Leviticus 17:11. The Lord Jesus, however, entered into the presence of God with His work fully completed. He did not enter with His blood, but by His blood, as Hebrews 9:12 makes clear.

With a young bullock for a sin offering- the bullock is to be in the full vigour of its life. Sin must be actively and forcefully dealt with, and the sin offering blood was the prescribed way. How glad we are to know that Christ vigorously dealt with sin at Calvary in all the energy of His Deity and pure manhood combined. This bullock is for Aaron and his remaining sons, emphasising that he was not sinless, even though high priest in Israel. As Hebrews 7:27 makes very clear, the Lord Jesus did not need a sin offering for Himself, being altogether free from sin.

And a ram for a burnt offering- both a sin offering and a burnt offering are needed on the day of atonement, for there needs to be something for the heart of God as well as the mind of God. The mind of God was set against sin, and the heart of God longed for that which would speak to Him of His Son. Both the fat of the bullock and the carcase of the ram burn on the altar at the same time at the end of day of atonement.

16:4 He shall put on the holy linen coat, and he shall have the linen breeches upon his flesh, and shall be girded with a linen girdle, and with the linen mitre shall he be attired: these are holy garments; therefore shall he wash his flesh in water, and so put them on.

He shall put on the holy linen coat- garments speak of character, and here we see Aaron needing to put on garments to fit him for the presence of God. His character is such that he is not fit as he is. He has to be made ceremonially fit for a task that he is not personally fit for. Christ needs no special garments, for He is ever acceptable in the presence of His Father. He could say to His Father, “I know that Thou hearest Me always”, John 11:42. He was confident of this, for He knew the mind of His Father perfectly. The coat is expressly said to be holy, and being made of linen, (which speaks of practical righteousness, Revelation 19:8), presents to us a picture of the character of one who combined righteousness and holiness perfectly in His person.

And he shall have the linen breeches upon his flesh- Adam and his wife realised they were naked after they had sinned, and so were ashamed, Genesis 3:7. They had not been ashamed before, Genesis 2:25. Sin always brings shame, especially when God makes His presence known. Adam, of course, had to learn that the fig-leaf aprons of his own devising did not prevent him being afraid when God called to him. Only the garments made as a result of sacrifice could fit him for God’s presence, Genesis 3:21. Christ, however, is always fit for His Father’s presence, for He is the Only Begotten in the bosom of the Father, John 1:18. What He means to God because of His spotless character fits Him to act for men.

And shall be girded with a linen girdle- the girdle speaks of willingness to serve. The long and flowing Eastern robes must be tied in if activity is not to be impaired. So in the upper room the Lord Jesus girded Himself with a towel, and thus signified His readiness to serve His own. So here, for Aaron is not only to be active on his own account, but also on account of his family and his nation. He has solemn tasks ahead of him, and he must prepare himself to serve. Notice that he does not wear his normal girdle, which was embroidered with coloured threads in the same way as the ephod, Exodus 28;8. He is coming, not in garments of glory and beauty, but in simple and plain garments as befits one who is dealing with sin. This girdle tells of Christ’s ministry at Calvary, whereas the embroidered girdle tells of His ministry in heaven consequent upon His work at Calvary, for He is the minister of the sanctuary, Hebrews 8:2. When He took the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men, He took servant-hood for ever, for it is part of God’s original intention for man that he should serve God. The service of Christ takes various forms, but His ministry at Calvary when He performed the highest service of all, even the giving of His life as a ransom for many, Mark 10:45, is signified by the linen girdle of Aaron.

And with the linen mitre shall he be attired- head-coverings in Scripture speak of subjection and submission to another. As the representative of Israel, it was appropriate for Aaron to have his head covered as a sign of the nation’s submission to God. Now that Christ has come, an extra tier of submission has been introduced, as 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 explains. Now the man is to be uncovered, because Christ has come to bring in a situation where the man is enabled to be the image of God, (as Adam ought to have been, but failed), and the sister takes the honourable place of signifying the submission of believers to God by covering her head, and thus is the glory of the man, who, in the administrative dealings of God, is to represent and glorify God on behalf of himself and the sisters, as Christ did when He was here. The sisters have their part to play in this by covering their heads in submission to the man, and thus emphasising their assent to Divine order.

But in pre-Christ times it was different, hence the head-covering of Aaron. We are reminded, nonetheless, that the Lord Jesus, as He came into servant-hood, accepted the headship of God, as 1 Corinthians 11:3 plainly declares in the words, “the head of Christ is God”. So it is that in the upper room He said to His own, “That the world may know I love the Father, and as I have received commandment even so I do, arise, let us go hence”, John 14:31. Just a few hours before the cross, then, He signified His submission to His Father by obeying His commandment. The commandment in question being to lay down His life of Himself, as we read in John 10:8.

These are holy garments; therefore shall he wash his flesh in water, and so put them on- as far as Aaron was concerned, the garments were holier than he was, so he has to be ceremonially washed to signify the removal of public sin before he was fit to put them on, let alone to enter the presence of God. He had sinned in the matter of his sons and their failure, and he must ceremonially and publicly renounce those sins before he can officiate for the nation again as their priest. (Compare what Saul did when he washed away his sins by being baptised, Acts 22:16. He had sinned publicly by persecuting believers, and now he must just as publicly renounce those sins in the waters of baptism).

The garments are not holy in any literal sense, but by the holiness of association with holy ceremonies. The Sabbath day is an ordinary day in physical terms, but for Israel it has holy associations, and therefore is a holy day. The mount where the Lord Jesus was transfigured was an ordinary mountain the day before, and the day after, but when the transfiguration was taking place it became a holy mount, as Peter, (who was present) describes it, 2 Peter 1:18.

It does not seem to be the case that the Lord Jesus was ever said to be washed in the gospel records. Certainly the woman of Luke 7 is said to wash His feet, but the idea is of raining copious tears upon Him. Simon had not given Him the courtesy of the usual Eastern welcome, where the host would wash the feet of his guests. What he had omitted, the woman supplied, but in a far more meaningful way. The counterpart of this in the Old Testament is the fact that when the carrying of the vessels of the tabernacle through the wilderness is detailed in Numbers 5, there is no specific mention of the laver. Thus we are presented with the idea of one who travelled through this defiled scene without in any wise contracting defilement. He is, indeed, the “undefiled in the way”, who is “blessed”, Psalm 119:1.

16:5 And he shall take of the congregation of the children of Israel two kids of the goats for a sin offering, and one ram for a burnt offering.

In verse 3 we are told what animals Aaron brought for himself and his house, and now, after the mention of his garments, we are told what he took from the children of Israel by way of offerings. He has to be marked out as their representative by distinctive clothing, before he can take, as one with authority, the offerings from them. As a person, Aaron had forfeited the right to assert his authority, for he had sinned in connection with the day of consecration by not seeing that the ceremony was performed correctly, see chapter 10. Now he is washed and clothed, and he can begin to act for others again.

And he shall take of the congregation of the children of Israel-note that all the parties concerned had to provide their own offerings, for they were under law, which, being a covenant conditional upon their obedience, put the onus upon them. Under grace, however, God freely gives to us, and He has provided the offering in the person of His Son. This is one reason why He is called the Lamb of God, for He is God’s choice and provision.

Two kids of the goats for a sin offering- the two animals make one offering, but one dies, and its blood is sprinkled before God, and the other lives on, but bears the sins of the people away into a place from which it cannot return. The one knows what it is to die, the other knows what it is to bear sin. In this way we are presented with a double type, for both animals represent Christ. The goat that dies is Him as one who died on Calvary’s tree; the other is Him as one who “bare our sins in His own body on the tree”. One provides the blood for the eye of God, the other provides the body bearing sin for the eye of men, as they see it disappear into the wilderness. The one makes propitiation by its death, the other endures isolation whilst it is alive. The Lord Jesus poured out His soul unto death, Isaiah 53:12, and also endured the wrath of God in the three hours of darkness on the cross.

And one ram for a burnt offering- both Aaron and the people are required to supply a burnt offering. This safeguards the person of Christ, for we must not think that when He is dealing with sin, and forsaken because of it, He is any less delightful to His Father. The burnt offering emphasises acceptance with God, and He was always the darling of His Father’s bosom. So the sin offerings are for the demands of God against sin, whereas the burnt offerings are for the delight of God as they remind Him of what lengths His Son will go to so that sin can be dealt with finally. We see these two aspects in the words of John the Baptist, himself the son of a Levitical priest. “Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world, John 1:29, is the sin offering side, and Behold the Lamb of God, verse 36, with no mention of sin, the burnt offering side. The Lamb of God bearing sin alone, and the Lamb of God as the one who is not alone, for His own follow Him.

16:6 And Aaron shall offer his bullock of the sin offering, which is for himself, and make an atonement for himself, and for his house.

This verse is a summary of what takes place as detailed in verses 11-14. At least two things come out in the verse, however. First, that Aaron is a sinner, like the rest of the people. Hebrews 7:27 brings out the contrast with Christ, for “He needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people’s”. Second, that the offerings for Aaron and his house were distinct from the offerings for the nation. This highlights the fact that the nation had forfeited its rights to be a kingdom of priests, as was intended under the covenant of the law, Exodus 19:6. There is no such distinction with Christians, for all are priests to God, as 1 Peter 2:9 makes very clear.

16:7 And he shall take the two goats, and present them before the Lord at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation.

Verses 7-10 are a summary of what is described more fully in verses 15-19, but certain truths are presented to us here which are not found again. First, the two goats stand together at the door of the tabernacle, thus reminding us that what each will do will have relevance to the presence of God. One goat will provide blood which will be taken into God’s presence. The other goat will take sins away from God’s presence, for the tabernacle remained among them in the midst of their uncleanness only because sins were dealt with in God’s prescribed way, verse 16. Second,Aaron presents both goats, or as it may be rendered, “made them stand”. They are not willing victims, for they have to be made to stand, but they do provide us with a contrast, for the Lord Jesus was not forced to undertake the work of atonement, but willingly volunteered. This is set out in Hebrews 10:7, where He is heard to say, “Lo I come…to do Thy will O God”. We see it also when we read that He “offered Himself without spot to God”, Hebrews 9:14, which means He made Himself available as the sacrifice.

16:8 And Aaron shall cast lots upon the two goats; one lot for the Lord, and the other lot for the scapegoat.

The casting of lots was a way of determining the will of God in Old Testament times, and also up to the Day of Pentecost. “The lot is cast into the lap; but the whole disposing thereof is of the Lord”, Proverbs 16:33. Now the will of God is found by the believer reading the Word of God and seeking to understand it by the indwelling Spirit. The decision derived from the casting of lots, however, was simply so that men might know what was in the mind of God. Behind and beyond that was the determination of God. So it is that the apostle Peter charges the nation of Israel with the taking, crucifying, and slaying, of Jesus of Nazareth. But to ensure they realised that they were not in control of that event, he makes it clear that He was delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God. The hands that took Him were wicked hands, yet they did God’s will unwittingly. So Calvary was not a mistake, or a model, (as if Christ were just showing people how to die well), or even only martyrdom, but the means whereby the determining will of God was to be put into effect. So it is that He was the lamb “foreordained before the foundation of the world”, 1 Peter 1:20. Peter also speaks of the sufferings of the Christ, and the glory that should follow”, 1 Peter 1:11. By sufferings of Christ he means, not simply sufferings that we now know belong to Christ, but rather, sufferings that pertained to Him, as part of what being the Messiah entailed. We are glad to know that glories pertain to Him also. He Himself told His own of this on the Emmaus Road when He said “Ought not Christ to have suffered these things, and to enter into His glory?”, Luke 24:26. The “ought” indicating that He owed it to God to suffer, just as He owed it to God to be glorified, so that God can be further glorified in Him, John 17:1.

16:9 And Aaron shall bring the goat upon which the Lord’s lot fell, and offer him for a sin offering.

And Aaron shall bring the goat upon which the Lord’s lot fell-in the case of these two animals, the one that is marked out as the Lord’s is to die, and the other goat is the scapegoat by default. In the case of Christ, however, He is marked out for both of the things these goats do; He is to die, and to bear sin, and He does not do the latter by default, but by God’s foreordination. The mention of the Lord’s lot falling on one animal does serve to distinguish what the two goats effect, for one’s blood propitiates God, the other carries the nation’s guilt away, so in a sense the people have a special interest in the scapegoat, but always remembering that it would not be an effective sin offering on its own.

And offer him for a sin offering- this may be rendered “make him sin”, and has obvious links with 2 Corinthians 5:21, where we read that God “hath made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him”. Whatever God’s reaction to sin is, will be His reaction to this goat. So with Christ, and hence His suffering in the hours of darkness as He is forsaken of His God.

This also highlights the fact that to offer is not the same as to burn on the altar. The wise men presented gifts to the infant Jesus, and the word for present is the equivalent to the word “offer” here. They simply brought their gifts near, and made sure it was known that they were giving them up in favour of Him. So with the believers in Rome, who were exhorted to offer their bodies a living sacrifice, Romans 12:1. The idea is of worshipful surrender. In the case of the people of Israel, a goat as their offered substitute was brought near on their behalf, for they, by their sin, had forfeited their right to approach God for themselves.

16:10 But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the Lord, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness.

This is a summary of what is described in verses 20-22.

But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the Lord, to make an atonement with him- it might be asked that since atonement is by blood, as Leviticus 17:11 definitely says, how is a live goat able to make atonement? Some try to solve this matter by saying it should be “make atonement for him”. Two problems then arise, one when the matter is viewed typically, and one when it is viewed literally. The first problem is that to say “make atonement for him” seems to make Christ in need of atonement, which is clearly not true. The second problem is that animals do not sin, so do not need atonement, at least in that sense. The fact is that the two goats constitute one sin offering, as verse 5 expressly says, and so we learn that atonement is as much by Christ’s forsakenness as it is by His blood. The two aspects of what happened on the cross must not be separated. They should be distinguished and individually appreciated, indeed, but not severed, for our sins have caused us to be separate from God, and only Christ being abandoned by God can deal with that. Our persons deserve death, and only the death of one who subsequently rose again can we be brought into the good of His atoning work on the cross.

And to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness- the goat is not let go in the sense of left to roam free. It is led out into a place from which it cannot return, as verses 21 and 22 will tell us. The goat is condemned to banishment, as a fit illustration of what happens to sinners when they continue in their sin. It also illustrates what happened at Calvary, as we shall see.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE BOOK OF LEVITICUS CHAPTER 16, VERSES 11 TO 17

16:11 And Aaron shall bring the bullock of the sin offering, which is for himself, and shall make an atonement for himself, and for his house, and shall kill the bullock of the sin offering which is for himself:

16:12 And he shall take a censer full of burning coals of fire from off the altar before the Lord, and his hands full of sweet incense beaten small, and bring it within the veil:

16:13 And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the Lord, that the cloud of the incense may cover the mercy seat that is upon the testimony, that he die not:

16:14 And he shall take of the blood of the bullock, and sprinkle it with his finger upon the mercy seat eastward; and before the mercy seat shall he sprinkle of the blood with his finger seven times.

16:15 Then shall he kill the goat of the sin offering, that is for the people, and bring his blood within the veil, and do with that blood as he did with the blood of the bullock, and sprinkle it upon the mercy seat, and before the mercy seat:

16:16 And he shall make an atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions in all their sins: and so shall he do for the tabernacle of the congregation, that remaineth among them in the midst of their uncleanness.

16:17 And there shall be no man in the tabernacle of the congregation when he goeth in to make an atonement in the holy place, until he come out, and have made an atonement for himself, and for his household, and for all the congregation of Israel.

Verses 11-14 The sprinkling of the blood of a sin offering for Aaron and his house.

16:11 And Aaron shall bring the bullock of the sin offering, which is for himself, and shall make an atonement for himself, and for his house, and shall kill the bullock of the sin offering which is for himself:

And Aaron shall bring the bullock of the sin offering, which is for himself, and shall make an atonement for himself, and for his house- we now come to the detail of what is summarised for us in verse 6. Notice that Aaron is said to make atonement, and then kills the bullock, so we learn that the expression “make atonement” is a summary of what follows, so is mentioned before the killing of the animal. We are presented with the contrast to this in Hebrews 7:27, which tells us that Christ “needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people’s: for this He did once, when He offered up Himself”. So every day of atonement, Aaron needed to deal with his own sins by means of a sacrifice external to himself, and then do the same for the people’s sins. Christ, by contrast, does not need to have a sin offering, for He is “holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners”, as the previous verse says. Nor does He need a sacrifice external to Himself when He is dealing with the sins of others, but presents Himself as the all-sufficient sacrifice. The point of the passage is to show that the Lord Jesus has the moral authority to save to the uttermost. If He has a “day by day” need, as Aaron had, to deal with personal sins, then He is clearly not fitted to serve as High Priest for ever, for there must, in that case, be a principle of corruption within Him. But it is gloriously otherwise, and He may continue without interruption His ministry on our behalf. The day of atonement highlighted the fact that “the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity”, Hebrews 7:28, whereas the word of God’s oath has made the Lord Jesus high priest, and He is consecrated for evermore, with no interruption or failure for ever. He entered into His priestly ministry on the basis of the fact, first of all, that He is sinless, and secondly, that He has personally dealt with the sins of men. Aaron could not claim either of those things.

And shall kill the bullock of the sin offering which is for himself- the prescribed ritual for the priest when he offered for himself, was that he should lay his hand upon the head of his sin offering, and then kill it before the Lord, Leviticus 4:4. This meant that he was now identified with his offering, and God reckoned the man’s sin to have been transferred to his offering. Whatever should have happened to the man because of his sin, is about to happen to his substitute-offering. Did he deserve to be judged for his sins? Then the animal will burn in the fire. Did he deserve to die because his sins demonstrated he had a sinful nature, (for the wages of sin is death)? Then the animal will die for him. Does God demand the evidence that the sinner has found a suitable substitute? Then the animal’s blood is sprinkled before Him to give that evidence. And this is what happens on the day of atonement.

It was the offerer who was to kill his sin offering. We shall look in vain for a knife in the list of equipment that was used in connection with the brazen altar. The conclusion we must draw, therefore, is that the sinner himself must bring a knife, and must personally kill his offering with it. Thus there is forcibly brought to his notice the wickedness of his sins, as he sees his substitute die instead of him. It is true that Israel are charged with killing the Prince of Life, Acts 3:15, but this did not make their act sacrificial. They had no interest in having Christ as their sin offering. The fact is that He laid down His life of Himself, and no man took it from Him, John 10:18. His was the initiative all the time, for He was acting, not according to the will of men, but in obedience to His Father’s commandment.

16:12 And he shall take a censer full of burning coals of fire from off the altar before the Lord, and his hands full of sweet incense beaten small, and bring it within the veil:

And he shall take a censer full of burning coals of fire from off the altar before the Lord- this is the first entrance of Aaron into the Holiest of All on this important day. He will come in twice more, thus cautioning us against thinking that this entrance corresponds to the entrance of Christ into the heavenly sanctuary. Nadab and Abihu had come with incense, but when they put it upon the fire they brought, then strange fire resulted. So the burning of the incense revealed the strangeness of the fire. They clearly had not obtained the fire from the altar, which fire had come down from God the previous day, Leviticus 9:24. Since the fire was not from God, it is no surprise to find that the incense finds it out as being strange, even that which is not suitable for God’s presence. There are many who claim to draw near to God as Christians, but even if they appear to think and speak well of Christ, (the incense), if they have not been to the altar first, (that is, are not in the good of Christ’s sacrifice), they run the risk of committing the same sin as the two sons of Aaron.

It is noticeable that fire that came out from the presence of God to consume the sacrifices on the altar, Leviticus 9:24, and fire came out from God to consume Nadab and Abihu, 10:2. The one spoke of God’s approval of what the priests had done around the altar, the other spoke of His disapproval, for they had misused the fire.

It must have been with trembling hands that Aaron went to the altar and took the fire to put in his censer. How could he do this without thinking of what had happened to his sons? How the words of verse 2 must have sobered him, “that he die not”. If he fails, he will die, and with him, the nation will be destroyed. And somewhere out in that camp is “Nahshon, prince of the children of Judah”, 1 Chronicles 2:10, and he is in the line of the Messiah, Matthew 1:4.

By burning coals we are to understand charcoal, the incinerated remains of the wood that has been used to consume the sacrifices that have already been offered that day, Numbers 29:7-11. These are authentic coals, closely associated with the accepted sacrifices. The fire is held in a censer, which Hebrews 9:4 tells us is a golden one. Think how precious the coals are if they are to be carried in a censer of gold. Gold speaks of glory, and there is a glory about the fire that has been associated with the burnt offerings put upon the altar, for they provide the link between the sacrifices of a sweet savour on the altar, (telling of the acceptableness of Christ to His Father even in death), and the incense, (speaking of the acceptableness of Christ in His life).

And his hands full of sweet incense beaten small- no doubt the censer swung upon the arm of Aaron as he approached the Holy of Holies, for his hands were full of incense. The incense was very precious to God, and He forbad anyone to make anything like it, Exodus 30:37,38, for there is no-one who can come near to Christ in His graces and virtues. The incense was a symbol of prayer, as we may learn from Luke 1:9,10. Prayer is the expression of dependence, and Christ was the supremely dependant man, in stark contrast to Nadab and Abihu who manifested a spirit of independence and rebellion.

The incense is beaten small, telling of the life-sufferings of Christ which, instead of causing bitterness as is often the case with other men, only brought out the sweetness further, for the smaller the particles of incense were, the more surface area there would be for exposure to the fire of the coals.

And bring it within the veil- the Lord Jesus approached Calvary in the consciousness that He was totally acceptable to His Father. Aaron has no such confidence however, for he could not look upon the glory of God and live; he must be shielded from the glory by a cloud of incense. His hands are full of what speaks to God of His Son in His life, and his censer is full of that which speaks to God of His Son in His death, and that being the case, he can stand in the presence of God in the worth of another.

16:13 And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the Lord, that the cloud of the incense may cover the mercy seat that is upon the testimony, that he die not:

And he shall put the incense upon the fire before the Lord- the incense is not in contact with the coals until Aaron has reached the Holy of Holies. All the fragrance is therefore reserved for God, who alone can appreciate fully that of which it speaks.

That the cloud of the incense may cover the mercy seat that is upon the testimony- Aaron is shielded by the incense cloud, for there is another cloud in the Holy of Holies, and that is the glory-cloud, for God dwelt between the cherubim on the mercy-seat, 2 Samuel 6:2. Aaron is not fit to see the glory, but he makes a cloud of incense which speaks to God of His Son, who is ever suited to the presence of God.

That he die not- as his sons did. This is why those waiting at the gate of the court were so relieved to see Aaron come out from the sanctuary, for it meant he had not died, and his work was accepted. We see an illustration of this in Luke 1:21, where the people were waiting for Zecharias to emerge from having burnt incense.

16:14 And he shall take of the blood of the bullock, and sprinkle it with his finger upon the mercy seat eastward; and before the mercy seat shall he sprinkle of the blood with his finger seven times.

And he shall take of the blood of the bullock- clearly Aaron has emerged out of the sanctuary and moved to the altar, and taken some of the blood of the bullock that he slew previously, no doubt carrying it in a bason, and now enters the Holiest of All again, where the cloud of incense still lingers to shield him from the glory. (The golden censer is linked with the Holiest of All in Hebrews 9:3,4, so possibly the censer was left there to produce incense even when Aaron was outside at the altar). The life or soul of the bullock is in its blood, and so the sin offering, represented by its blood, is now presented in the very presence of God. Hebrews 9:7 calls this the offering of blood, even though the word offering is normally used in relation to an animal in its entirety.

And sprinkle it with his finger upon the mercy seat eastward-note the emphasis on the quality of the blood, for it is only as much as can be held on a single finger. We remember the language of Peter, “the precious blood of Christ”, 1 Peter 1:19. Who can evaluate the preciousness of the soul of Christ to His Father? But it is because of that value that those who believe are forgiven. And it is because of that value that His death suffices to make propitiation.

There are those who believe that this means Aaron stood facing eastward as he sprinkled the blood. If this were the case, however, would the phrase not read “sprinkle it eastward”, rather than “the mercy-seat eastward”? The latter phrase makes the word eastward refer to the mercy-seat rather than the sprinkling. Man was driven out from the east of Eden, and now if, in repentance, he retraces his steps and turns to God, he finds that the blood is there for his forgiveness.

The blood is sprinkled on the top of the mercy-seat, but on the eastward part of it, (the part most accessible to Aaron), so is directly under the eye of God who dwelt between the cherubim on the mercy-seat. This shows that a suitable sin-offering has been killed, and its life has been forfeited in favour of Aaron and his house.

And before the mercy seat shall he sprinkle of the blood with his finger seven times- now Aaron sprinkles the blood before the mercy-seat, which expression literally means “at the front of the mercy-seat”. The mercy-seat was a thick piece of gold, thick enough to support the over-arching golden cherubim, but how deep we are not told, for who can put a limit on God’s mercy? So it was on the edge of this slab of gold that Aaron sprinkled the blood seven times. So now the blood is facing God, and is facing man; both can see, and rejoice in propitiation made. To dispel any fears, the blood for the eye of man is sprinkled seven times. The Hebrew word for seven means “to be full, to be satisfied, to be complete”. Thus Aaron is assured that as far as he and his house are concerned, there has been given a full, satisfactory and complete answer to the demands of God against their sins. He may impart that joyful news to his household on his return to them at the end of the day. Indeed, they know this as soon as he emerges out of the sanctuary to continue with the next stage of the proceedings.

Verses 15-17 The sprinkling of the blood of the sin offering for Israel.

16:15 Then shall he kill the goat of the sin offering, that is for the people, and bring his blood within the veil, and do with that blood as he did with the blood of the bullock, and sprinkle it upon the mercy seat, and before the mercy seat:

Having returned to the altar, (thus indicating that the Lord Jesus did not fulfil the ceremonies of the day in a chronological order, or else He must have gone to Calvary more than once), he kills the goat for the people and sprinkles its blood as he did the blood of the bullock. The ceremony is identical, for the priest and the people are all sinners, but the priest needs the larger offering, since his responsibility is greater. Aaron is able to kill the goat as the representative of the people, now that his own sins have been atoned for. This is why the bullock and the goat are not killed, and their blood sprinkled, at the same time, for Aaron must be cleansed first before he can act for the people.

16:16 And he shall make an atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions in all their sins: and so shall he do for the tabernacle of the congregation, that remaineth among them in the midst of their uncleanness.

And he shall make an atonement for the holy place- atonement is a result of propitiation, and can apply to things as well as sins, for they can be defiled by contact with sinners. In a day to come, God has promised to be “merciful to His land, and to His people”, Deuteronomy 32:43, the word merciful being based on the word for propitiation. And in Colossians 1:20 we learn that Christ is going to “reconcile all things to Himself”. So the work of Calvary secures the restoration of the land of Israel, and indeed the whole of creation, from the defilement of man’s sin. In particular, its sin of crucifying God’s Son. Here, the holy place means the Holiest of All, (see verse 17), and so that place is now brought into right relationship with God, no doubt needing this because Moses was permitted to enter there as Mediator of the Covenant of the Law.

Because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel, and because of their transgressions in all their sins- God dwelt amongst an unclean people, and He must secure His honour in the light of that. See on verse 21 for transgressions and sins.

And so shall he do for the tabernacle of the congregation-strictly speaking, the tabernacle of the congregation was the covering of goat’s hair that was over the inner curtain of fine twined linen, the latter being the tent, or dwelling place of God, see Exodus 26:1 (tabernacle = mishcan, dwellingplace), and verse 7 (covering upon the tabernacle = the tent upon the mishcan). The second covering represents the tabernacle as the place the people have an interest in. Reference to Exodus 40:21 and 22-26 will show that the ark was put in the tabernacle, whereas the three items of furniture in the Holy Place are said to be in the tent of the congregation, even though the inner curtain and the next curtain both spanned both places. It was a question of what each related to. The tabernacle proper related to God, the tent of the congregation related to the people. So this particular phase relates to what happens next, when the altar is atoned for, whereas the first part of this verse has to do with what has already taken place in connection with the mercy-seat.

That remaineth among them in the midst of their uncleanness- God continued to dwell in the midst of the camp of Israel despite their many defiling sins. The heathen looking on at that situation might suggest that the God of Israel ignored sins, or at best, compromised with them. They would ridicule a God who gave a law condemning sin, but who also allowed that sin. To remove any such charge, God preserves His honour by demanding that atonement be made.

A parallel situation prevailed when Christ was on earth, for “the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us”, John 1:14. If He is God, how can He do this without compromise? The answer is found lower down in the passage, where John the Baptist is heard to exclaim, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, verse 29. Because Calvary was in prospect, neither the honour of God or His Son was compromised.

16:17 And there shall be no man in the tabernacle of the congregation when he goeth in to make an atonement in the holy place, until he come out, and have made an atonement for himself, and for his household, and for all the congregation of Israel.

Only Aaron was authorised to act in the matter of making atonement on this national day. We are reminded of the words of Hebrews 1:2,3, “His Son…when He had by Himself purged our sins”. Only He could go to Calvary and so purge sins that the Majesty of God was satisfied therewith. The expression “by Himself” not only means that He acted alone, but also that the glory is His alone. Although we know that the Father is glorified also. There would be a contradiction there, were it not for the fact that the Father and the Son are one, John 10:30. The Son asked to be glorified, so that He could glorify the Father, John 17:1.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE BOOK OF LEVITICUS CHAPTER 16, VERSES 18 TO 34

16:18 And he shall go out unto the altar that is before the Lord, and make an atonement for it; and shall take of the blood of the bullock, and of the blood of the goat, and put it upon the horns of the altar round about.

16:19 And he shall sprinkle of the blood upon it with his finger seven times, and cleanse it, and hallow it from the uncleanness of the children of Israel.

16:20 And when he hath made an end of reconciling the holy place, and the tabernacle of the congregation, and the altar, he shall bring the live goat:

16:21 And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness:

16:22 And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited: and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness.

16:23 And Aaron shall come into the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall put off the linen garments, which he put on when he went into the holy place, and shall leave them there:

16:24 And he shall wash his flesh with water in the holy place, and put on his garments, and come forth, and offer his burnt offering, and the burnt offering of the people, and make an atonement for himself, and for the people.

16:25 And the fat of the sin offering shall he burn upon the altar.

16:26 And he that let go the goat for the scapegoat shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward come into the camp.

16:27 And the bullock for the sin offering, and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the holy place, shall one carry forth without the camp; and they shall burn in the fire their skins, and their flesh, and their dung.

16:28 And he that burneth them shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward he shall come into the camp.

16:29 And this shall be a statute for ever unto you: that in the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, ye shall afflict your souls, and do no work at all, whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger that sojourneth among you:

16:30 For on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you, to cleanse you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the Lord.

16:31 It shall be a sabbath of rest unto you, and ye shall afflict your souls, by a statute for ever.

16:32 And the priest, whom he shall anoint, and whom he shall consecrate to minister in the priest’s office in his father’s stead, shall make the atonement, and shall put on the linen clothes, even the holy garments:

16:33 And he shall make an atonement for the holy sanctuary, and he shall make an atonement for the tabernacle of the congregation, and for the altar, and he shall make an atonement for the priests, and for all the people of the congregation.

16:34 And this shall be an everlasting statute unto you, to make an atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year. And he did as the Lord commanded Moses.

Verses 18-19 The sprinkling of the blood on the altar of incense.

16:18 And he shall go out unto the altar that is before the Lord, and make an atonement for it; and shall take of the blood of the bullock, and of the blood of the goat, and put it upon the horns of the altar round about.

And he shall go out unto the altar that is before the Lord- there might seem to be a difficulty here. Is this a reference to the altar in the court outside, or to the altar of incense in the Holy Place? The words of Leviticus 4:18 seem conclusive, however. It is written there: “And he shall put some of the blood upon the horns of the altar which is before the Lord, that is in the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall pour out all the blood at the bottom of the altar of the burnt offering, which is at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation”. So there is a clear distinction made in that verse between the two altars, and it is the altar of incense that is called the altar before the Lord. This is confirmed to us by Exodus 30:10, referring to the altar of incense, where we read that “Aaron shall make an atonement upon the horns of it once in a year with the blood of the sin offering of atonements: once in a year he shall make atonement upon it throughout your generations: it is most holy unto the Lord”. The reference to atonements in the plural would possibly refer to the atonement for the priests and the atonement for the people, and also atonement for sanctuary, holy place and altar, made separately by the blood of different animals.

And make an atonement for it- the special attention given to the altar of incense would reflect the fact that Nadab and Abihu had used it in the rebellion against God. It must be purified from association with that rebellion.

And shall take of the blood of the bullock, and of the blood of the goat, and put it upon the horns of the altar round about- in Scripture, horns speak of power, and we are reminded that as a result of His work at Calvary, the Lord Jesus is “able to save to the uttermost all that come unto God by Him”, Hebrews 7:25. The word “able” being the Greek word “dunamis”, from which we get the English word dynamite. The power of the intercession of the Lord Jesus is such that He can save to the uttermost. The blood on the mercy-seat would tell us that “having loved His own which were in the world, He loved them unto the end”, where the word for end is the same as the word for uttermost. He loves and saves to the same extent and with the same energy. Peter was at an extremity when he cried “Lord, save me”, and the Lord “stretched out His hand and caught him”, Matthew 14:30.

It seems that the blood of the bullock and the goat are mingled together on the finger of Aaron, for he takes “of the blood of the bullock, and of the blood of the goat”, but sprinkles “it” upon the altar. So the prayers of the nation and of the priests are safeguarded by the application of blood together. There is not a separate sprinkling of each as there was on the mercy-seat.

16:19 And he shall sprinkle of the blood upon it with his finger seven times, and cleanse it, and hallow it from the uncleanness of the children of Israel.

And he shall sprinkle of the blood upon it with his finger seven times- again the quality of the blood is emphasised, and also the completeness of the work, with the mention of the word seven again.

And cleanse it, and hallow it from the uncleanness of the children of Israel- we are not told that Nadab and Abihu actually used the altar of incense, but they certainly associated it with their sin by the use of incense. Not only is their sin remedied, but also the uncleanness of the children of Israel is taken into account.

We may gain an insight into the current intercession of the Lord Jesus for His own, by noting what He said to the Father in John 17, for He prayed that prayer anticipating His return to heaven. On the one hand He said “these things speak I in the world”, verse 13, but on the other hand He said, “And now I am no longer in the world”, verse 11. He also said, “And for their sakes I sanctify Myself”, verse 19. This, of course, does not mean that He needed to be change from being unsanctified to being sanctified. Rather, He is using the word in the basic sense of setting Himself apart. So just as the altar of incense is hallowed on the day of atonement, so that it can be used through the following year in the service of God, the Lord Jesus has separated Himself by returning to heaven, and commencing an intercessory work which shall never cease.

Verses 20-22 The sending away of the scapegoat with its burden of sins.

16:20 And when he hath made an end of reconciling the holy place, and the tabernacle of the congregation, and the altar, he shall bring the live goat:

And when he hath made an end of reconciling the holy place-in verse 16 we read of “atonement for the holy place”, and here of “reconciling the holy place”, so to reconcile and to make atonement are being used as identical terms. Yet they do not exhaust the meaning of what happened, for the blood is the blood of propitiation, which involves the satisfying of the demands of God, as well as sheltering from the wrath due to sin, whether that sin be on the people, or on the tabernacle and its vessels because of that. The holy place, (meaning the Holy of Holies), is reconciled when blood is sprinkled on the mercy-seat.

And the tabernacle of the congregation- as we have seen, this refers especially to the first part of the tabernacle structure, even though it stretched out over both compartments.

And the altar- the sprinkling of blood on the altar of incense seems to be that which reconciles the tabernacle of the congregation.

He shall bring the live goat- this goat and its fellow had already been presented, that is, made to stand before the door of the tabernacle, verse 7, but now Aaron is said to bring the goat. Where does he bring it to? Does he bring it to the gate of the court, so that the people can clearly see what is happening to their goat?

16:21 And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness:

And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat- this is an act of identification and association by Aaron, as the Divinely-chosen representative of the people. When Aaron had offered the other goat for a sin-offering, he would have laid his hands on that goat as well, in accordance with Leviticus 4:4,15,24,29, and 33. By this had been signified that the offerer was relying on the offering to the extent that the sin he was responsible for was transmitted to the animal-offering. Here, however, Aaron is confessing sins as he lays his hands on the goat, so that they are now resting on the animal and not on the nation. It is not so much the imputation of sin to the animal, as with the goat that died, but the transfer of the burden of sin to the animal so that it can be carried away.

Notice that both hands are laid on the head of the goat, for Aaron is resting entirely on what this goat will do, he is not laying one hand on the goat, and relying on something else as well.

And confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel- not only will the nation see the goat depart, they can hear their sins confessed. They are being given visible and vocal assurances that God is dealing with their sins, and the same sins they hear confessed, are the sins they see disappearing into the distance. Iniquities are literally inequities, the unbalanced way we live our lives, contrary to God’s character.

And all their transgressions in all their sins- notice that it is not transgressions and sins, exactly, but transgressions in all their sins. To transgress is to go across God’s commandments, deliberately setting our will in a contrary course, even though we know what His will is.

Sins are acts which miss the mark, the failure to be “on target”, the target being the will of God. So there are two aspects to those things which Aaron confessed over the head of the goat; iniquities, which are wrong dealings with men, and transgressions and sins, wrongs against God. Sins prohibited by both tables of the law are being dealt with to God’s satisfaction.

Putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away- the word for “send away” here is the same as in Genesis 3:23, where we read that God “drove out” the man. As Isaiah said, “But your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid His face from you”, Isaiah 59:2. We recall that Isaiah also said, “The Lord hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all”, Isaiah 53:6. So it is that the scapegoat becomes like those who are banished from God’s presence through sin, yet it also becomes like the One who accepted from God the responsibility of dealing with sin, even the Lord Jesus Christ.

By the hand of a fit man into the wilderness- we are now introduced to the fit man, who combines with the scapegoat to provide a double illustration of the person of the Lord Jesus. Consider the following features of the Lord Jesus that show Him to be fit to do the work of bearing sin:

1. He was fit because He is totally sinless.The well-known trilogy of verses from the New Testament makes this abundantly clear. Peter, the man of intention, wrote, “He did no sin”, but he went on to write, “Who His own self bare our sins”, 1 Peter 2:22,24. Paul the man of intelligence wrote, He “knew no sin”, but also wrote, God “hath made Him to be sin for us”, 2 Corinthians 5:21. John the man of intuition wrote, “In Him is no sin”, but before that wrote, “He was manifested to take away our sins”, 1 John 3:5. So the apostles are careful to tell us when He was dealing with sin, the Lord Jesus was completely fitted to do so by His own sinlessness.

This is why there needs to be a double illustration, for the fit man cannot bear the load of sins, but the goat can. The fit man is not sinless, but the goat, being a non-moral creature, is. The goat is not inclined to go away from its familiar surroundings, the fit man can do this, and take the goat with him. The goat does not come back, but the fit man can, and does.

2. He was fit because He is fully intelligent.The fitness of the fit man lay in his knowledge of the wilderness, and his ability to take the goat from whence he was confident it would not return. He had experience of the wilderness without the scapegoat, and therefore was able to use that experience as he went with the scapegoat. The Lord Jesus had experience of the wilderness. He had been led into the wilderness to be tempted of the Devil, Matthew 4:1, and was there exposed to the onslaughts of the Evil One, so that it became more than a physical wilderness, as He faced the prince of darkness alone. As He came out from His wilderness experience, John the Baptist saw Him coming to him, and this moved him to exclaim, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29. So the close connection is made between His wilderness triumph, and His fitness to take away sin. Of course He was not bearing sin when tempted of the Devil, for the apostle Peter is very specific that He bare sins “in His own body on the tree”, 1 Peter 2:24, yet nonetheless the wilderness experience was very real, and a foretaste of the pressure that was to come.

He was also fit because He knew fully what were His Father’s demands upon Him. As the Son of His Father, He was perfectly acquainted with His Father’s mind, and as such was fit to undertake the work His Father had in mind for Him.

3. He was fit because He was ready and willing.The phrase “fit man” has been rendered “a man standing ready”. And this corresponds to the words of John the Baptist when he told the people that “there standeth one among you that ye know not”, John 1:26. Significantly, this was said near the Jordan, where the Lord Jesus had signified His commitment to go to Calvary by being baptised. He had come into the world with the words, “Lo, I come to do Thy will O God”, and now He was patiently waiting His Father’s time. And this links with another thought about the word “fit”, and that is that it has connection with the word “time”. The fit man was God’s timely man, ready to act the moment the word of command came. He indicated to His own that that commandment had indeed come, when He said, “As the Father gave Me commandment even so I do”, John 14:31. His hour had come.

4. He was fit because in the event He was successful. The resurrection of the Lord Jesus was not only God’s answer to man’s rejection of Him, but also the infallible sign that the work He did at Calvary was entirely successful. The apostle in effect asks two questions at the end of Romans chapter 4. Why was He delivered? Answer: for our offences. Why was He raised again? Answer: for our justification, by which is meant “because of” our justification by His death. Just as the fit man returned without the goat, his mission successful, so the Lord Jesus has emerged in resurrection, with the question of sins fully dealt with. If some sins were still upon Him, and had not been carried away, then God could not have raised Him.

16:22 And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited: and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness.

And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited- the land of separation and desolation is the destination of this scapegoat, bearing as it does the tremendous load of Israel’s sins. Having heard the sins confessed, they now see them carried away, and no doubt many in Israel mused upon the fact, so graphically presented to them, that sins do indeed separate, and they do mean that, if unforgiven, those sins will consign the sinner to the place of forsaken-ness. God made provision, however, so that the goat might experience the isolation, whilst they could enjoy the continued presence of God amidst the camp of Israel. We see the fulfilment of this at Calvary, where the lamb of God bore away the sin of the world. This is not to say that the whole world is therefore free of its sin. Rather, it means that all the sin has been answered for, and those who believe enter into the good of it. As we can see from Leviticus 23:29, any in Israel who failed to afflict their souls, (meaning repentance), and cease from work, (meaning resting in faith), were to be cut off from the nation. Now the reverse is the case, for no-one is blessed through Calvary unless they believe the gospel. If in Israel’s case they could opt out of the blessing, in the case of men now they need to opt in.

And he shall let go the goat in the wilderness- so Aaron sent the goat away from the gate of the tabernacle which faced east, and the fit man let it go. The one removed the sins from the camp of Israel, the other ensured that the sins were sent to a place of no return. This reminds of the psalmist, who rejoiced that “as far as the east is from the west, so far hath He removed our transgressions from us”, Psalm 103:12. We are glad it is as far as the east is from the west, for that is an infinite distance. If it had been as far as the north is from the south, then that would be a limited distance.

The goat as he wandered in the desolate place was largely unaware of his situation. He may have been fearful, but he would soon become used to his plight. Not so with the Lord Jesus at Calvary. So intense was the suffering He endured because He was forsaken of God, and became the object of His wrath against the sins He was taking responsibility for, (for to “bare sins”, means to “take responsibility for sins”), those hours of darkness and abandonment were limited to just three. But into those hours was compressed an infinite amount of suffering, because an infinite God was satisfying Himself infinitely. No wonder there is wrung from the lips of the Lord Jesus that most heart-rending of cries, “My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?” The goat bore its load of sins until it died, whereas the Lord Jesus carried the load of sins until He emerged from the darkness, for He was in full fellowship with His Father when He gave up His spirit in death. He endured the darkness and the abandonment that His people might know the light and glory of heaven for eternity.

Verses 23-25 The burnt offerings and the fat of the sin offering.

16:23 And Aaron shall come into the tabernacle of the congregation, and shall put off the linen garments, which he put on when he went into the holy place, and shall leave them there:

And Aaron shall come into the tabernacle of the congregation- this is the fourth time that Aaron has entered into the tabernacle, twice to make his way to the Holiest of All, once to go to the altar of incense, and now to change his garments.

And shall put off the linen garments, which he put on when he went into the holy place, and shall leave them there- so in the Holy Place there is a constant reminder of the distinctive work of the day of atonement, as signified by the special garments that Aaron wore on that occasion. Is it not true that the distinctive and once-for-all work of the Lord Jesus will be remembered in heaven for all eternity? And the holy and righteous character He displayed when down here, and which fitted Him for the work, will never be forgotten.

16:24 And he shall wash his flesh with water in the holy place, and put on his garments, and come forth, and offer his burnt offering, and the burnt offering of the people, and make an atonement for himself, and for the people.

And he shall wash his flesh with water in the holy place- as with the plain linen garments, so with the garments of glory and beauty, they were more holy than Aaron was, hence the need for him to bathe before he put them on. Even Aaron’s work of dealing with sin involved contact with animals that were part of a sin-cursed creation, and therefore brought him defilement.

And put on his garments- each of the items of the garments of glory and beauty has something to tell us of the moral glory and beauty of Christ. He was ever glorious and beautiful in character, of course, but now His temporary adoption of the character of a sin-bearer is over, those glories can shine forth without interruption.

And come forth, and offer his burnt offering, and the burnt offering of the people- we see how that the events of the day of atonement are not fulfilled by Christ in chronological order, for as the end of the ceremonies draws near, we are again presented with an illustration of Calvary. We shall see the same thing in connection with the burning of the carcases. We must never forget that the sacrifice of Christ at Calvary had the character of a burnt offering, as well as a sin offering. What was a duty for Aaron was a delight for Christ. He was surrendered utterly to His Father’s will, and was in full communion with His Father both before and after the three hours of darkness, for before the darkness he said, “Father forgive them”, Luke 23:34, and after the darkness, but when still upon the cross He said, “Father, into Thy hands I commend My spirit”, verse 46. Just because Peter says He bare our sins in His own body on the tree, we need not conclude that He was bearing sins all the time He was hanging there. After all, He was hanging on the tree when He was dead, was He bearing sins then? Surely not.

And make an atonement for himself, and for the people- the burnt offering makes atonement because man has not been what he should have been, as well as has not done what he should have done. Not only the sins of himself and the people are dealt with, but also their shortcomings, all those ways in which they had not been perfect before the Lord.

16:25 And the fat of the sin offering shall he burn upon the altar.

And the fat of the sin offering shall he burn upon the altar- the word for burn here is to burn as incense, to make a soothing fragrance. After all the trauma of the work of propitiation, there arises now to God from the same animal that dealt with sin, an aroma sweet. The burning-as-incense of the burnt offering now mingles with the burning of the fat of the sin offering. Now the fat was taken off the sin offering in the same way as it was taken off the peace offering, as Leviticus 4:8-10 tells us. This fat from the inwards of the animal, (speaking of the exercises of the heart of Christ even as He dealt with sins), assists the flame of the burnt offering already on the altar. We are told this in Leviticus 3:11, where the fat is the food of the offering, or in other words, that which feeds the flame that burns the sacrifice. We should remember that in Numbers 29:8-11 we are told that one young bullock, one ram, seven lambs, and the normal continual burnt offering of the morning lamb, was offered on the altar as a matter of routine on the day of atonement, apart from the sacrifices offered by Aaron. Thus the altar was loaded with offerings to God, and the fat of the sin offering assists in the burning of this great amount of flesh.

Verse 26 The return of the fit man.

16:26 And he that let go the goat for the scapegoat shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward come into the camp.

And he that let go the goat for the scapegoat shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water- even superficial contact with the sin-bearing scapegoat involved defilement, so both clothes (speaking of character), and flesh (speaking of constitution), must be bathed. In contrast the Lord Jesus remained at all times pure and holy, for even when bearing sin He was personally sinless. He only suffered wrath because He was our representative.

And afterward come into the camp- the fit man must wash outside the camp, so that he does not bring any defilement from the wilderness into the camp that is newly-cleansed by the blood of atonement. Of course there is a medical reason for this, but the spiritual lesson is the main one.

So not only does Aaron return from where he went, signifying that what he had done had been accepted, so also did the fit man. Both represent Christ in resurrection, for the darkness of those three hours is over for ever, and He can emerge into the light of the resurrection morning because His work on the cross is sufficient to justify.

Verses 27-28 The burning of the sin offerings.

16:27 And the bullock for the sin offering, and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the holy place, shall one carry forth without the camp; and they shall burn in the fire their skins, and their flesh, and their dung.

And the bullock for the sin offering, and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the holy place- only sacrifices the blood of which was taken right in to God were burnt. All the others were to be eaten by the priests, to make atonement constantly for the people, Leviticus 10:16-18, (with which compare Hebrews 2:17). This is one area in which the priesthood failed on the final day of their consecration. This is why the writer to the Hebrews is careful to say, “The bodies of those beasts, whose blood was brought into the sanctuary by the high priest for sin, are burnt without the camp”, Hebrews 13:11.

Shall one carry forth without the camp- we are not told who this person was, but he had the onerous task of carrying the carcases of the bullock and the goat some distance through the camp of Israel, until he reached the outside. He must have made many journeys if he did this alone, for the burden was more than could be carried at one time. As we picture him in our minds, those minds also go to the words of Hebrews 13:12,13, where we read, “Wherefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered without the gate”. Both men are in public view as they do their Divinely-given task, but how different the experience of each! One simply carries the bodies of beasts, and makes a fire so as to consume them, the other goes forth outside the camp to feel the heat of the fire Himself, as God’s fiery vengeance against sin is concentrated against Him. The animals were dead when they were burnt, but He was very much alive, with every sense alert. He had refused the stupefying drink offered to Him on the cross, so He felt all the pain unrelieved. Coupled with the fact that His senses were not dulled at all by sin, as with us.

And they shall burn in the fire- we now meet with others, for the “one” is now accompanied by “they”. No doubt in practical terms this meant that the fire was kept burning by these others, whilst the single man went back and forth to bring out the carcases. In spiritual terms it has a challenge for us, for did not the writer to the Hebrews continue by saying, “Let us go forth therefore unto Him without the camp, bearing His reproach”, Hebrews 13:13.

This ought to be easy for us to do, seeing how He has suffered for us; love to Him should make us want to be where He is- outside the camp. He went outside the city walls of Jerusalem, for that was what corresponded to being outside the camp. In Galatians 4:25 the apostle Paul sees in the Jerusalem of his day, (“Jerusalem which now is”, as opposed to the Jerusalem that shall be when Christ reigns there), the place where the law given at Sinai was prolonged and practised. It was outside of such a place that the Lord Jesus positioned Himself. The duty of each believer is to distance himself from every manifestation of Judaism that is found in the world. We have not to go on a pilgrimage so as to physically pass through the gate of Jerusalem, for the writer, having spoken of the camp, then the gate, reverts back to the camp when he applies the lesson to his readers. It ought to be easy for us to do this, since the word is “go forth unto Him”, indicating that He is outside, waiting to welcome us to the place of separation from all that denies the fullness and finality of the work of Calvary. The fact that the carcases were burnt showed that their blood had been accepted in the very sanctuary itself. We too can be confident that what the Saviour did was accepted by God

Their skins, and their flesh, and their dung there is now a fire burning outside the camp, and a fire burning on the altar within the court of the tabernacle, and the smoke can be thought of as mingling together as it arose to God, telling of accepted sacrifices, and sins cleansed. The skins are equivalent to a man’s clothing, which in turn is indicative of character. The burning of the skins displays the anger of God against our sinful character. The burning of the flesh, would indicate God’s displeasure against our sinful constitution, whereas the burning of the dung speaks of God’s anger against the distastefullness of our sinful ways. Thus the wrath of God was exhausted against every part of us in the person of our substitute.

16:28 And he that burneth them shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward he shall come into the camp.

And he that burneth them shall wash his clothes- the narrative now reverts back to the single person, as if he is representative of the others who seem to assist him. He must wash his clothes even though he has only carried animal bodies. They may carry disease, however, so precautions must be taken, for the flocks and herds of Israel must be safeguarded, or else there would be no more offerings to God. There was no stain on the character of Christ, however, after His work of suffering for sin. The psalmist could call the one placed in the tomb God’s Holy One, Psalm 16:10; Acts 2:27. And the clean, new, and fine linen cloth in which He was wrapped, with the spices, emphasised the same lesson.

And bathe his flesh in water- the man himself must be purified after his task, for he must have no stain upon him afterwards. So the man is made ceremonially like Christ morally, for He is no longer the sin-bearer; that role is for ever passed for Him. He died unto sin once, but now lives to God, Romans 6:10.

And afterward he shall come into the camp- so the three men involved in the day of atonement ceremony all came back from where they went. Aaron came out from the tabernacle; the fit man came back from the wilderness; the unnamed man came back from outside the camp. Each has something to tell us about the finished work of Christ. Aaron tells us that the blood has availed in the presence of God; the fit man tells us that Christ has borne our sins away; the unnamed man tells us that the fire has done its work, and the sin-offering is consumed. Each man left something behind as he came out. Aaron left his garments, the fit man left the goat; the unnamed man left a pile of ashes, all tokens of work well done and accepted. So Christ will be eternally remembered for the character He displayed at Calvary, the sin-bearing He went through with, and the fire He endured and exhausted.

Verses 29-34 Instructions to the Israelites.

16:29 And this shall be a statute for ever unto you: that in the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, ye shall afflict your souls, and do no work at all, whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger that sojourneth among you:

And this shall be a statute for ever unto you- in the Old Testament, the expression “for ever” or “to everlasting”, often simply means “from now on with no end in sight”. For instance, the hills are called “everlasting hills” in Genesis 49:26, although like everything else they shall melt with fervent heat and be dissolved, 2 Peter 3:10. They are everlasting, all other things being equal. And we read of sacrifices being offered “year by year continually”, Hebrews 10:1, continually signifying that there seemed to be no end in view. As far as the work of Christ is concerned, however, it really is for ever. Consider the expressions in the epistle to the Hebrews such as: “For by one offering He hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified”, Hebrews 10:14. “And their sins and iniquities I will remember no more“, verse 17. So it is also that the writer can speak of “eternal redemption”, 9:12; “eternal inheritance”, 9:15; everlastingcovenant”, 13:20. And all this because Christ puts the stamp of His eternal person on all that He does.

That in the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month- because Leviticus chapter 16 is not concerned with the progress of the religious year, as chapter 23 is, then the actual date of the day can be reserved to the end. By this means the two chapters are linked together. Of course the Passover lamb was selected on the 10thday of the month, so the redeeming lamb and the sin-bearing goat are connected, in that both were chosen on the same day, albeit of different months.

Ye shall afflict your souls, and do no work at all- the day of atonement was a national day, but the individual Israelite was only in the good of what happened when he complied with the conditions laid down by God. Those conditions are two in number, and amount to repentance and faith, the same conditions on which anyone now comes into the good of the work of Christ. Affliction of soul means the contrition which comes when sins are thought of as God thinks of them. Ceasing from work is the same as faith, for we read, “But to him that worketh not, but believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness”, Romans 4:5.

Whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger that sojourneth among you- even in Old Testament times, when God was dealing almost exclusively with the nation of Israel, there is indication that He desires all men to be blessed. It is very evidently the case now, for God “will have all men to be saved, and to come unto a knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus; who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time”, Timothy 2:4-6. The ransom paid for all is the sure sign of God’s desire that all men should be saved. The only thing that prevents this is their refusal to afflict their souls and cease from work, or in other words, repent and believe the gospel.

16:30 For on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you, to cleanse you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the Lord.

For on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you-they are to afflict their souls and cease from work on the same day as the priest makes atonement, so that there is the direct connection between the two.

To cleanse you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the Lord- the emphasis in the chapter is on the effect sins have on God’s honour. Can He continue to dwell amongst a people who are so obviously sinful? Only by the cleansing that the blood of atonement affords can He remain among them “in the midst of their uncleanness”, verse 16. We are reminded of the exclamation of the apostle John, as his heart was lifted up in praise to the Lord, “Unto Him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in His own blood, and hath made us kings and priests unto God and His Father; to Him be glory and dominion for ever and ever”, Revelation 1:5,6. And also his other words, “if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship one with another, and the blood of Jesus Christ His Son cleanseth us from all sin”, 1 John 1:7. And yet again, “If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness”, 1 John 1:9.

16:31 It shall be a sabbath of rest unto you, and ye shall afflict your souls, by a statute for ever.

It shall be a sabbath of rest unto you- on whatever day of the week the tenth day fell, it was to be reckoned a sabbath. There seems to be a difference between not doing any servile work, (as was required on the days of unleavened bread, Leviticus 23:7; the wave-loaves day, verse 21; the blowing of trumpets, verse 24; and the feast of tabernacles and ingathering), and not doing any work at all, servile or otherwise, on the day of atonement, Leviticus 23:28. Perhaps this is why the expression here is “sabbath of rest”, (the word sabbath meaning to repose, or rest), as if to say “a real and total rest from any sort of work”. As they rested, the Israelites would know that another was working hard on their behalf in the tabernacle. So believers today can rest in the work of another, even the Lord Jesus, who did His unique and mighty work at Calvary.

And ye shall afflict your souls- to test whether their ceasing from work was merely to comply passively, the requirement to afflict the soul is mentioned again. There must be the positive and active engagement in what was happening that day for the blessing available to be received.

By a statute for ever- as far as Israel knew, there was no point in the foreseeable future when things would be different, and the day of atonement would become unnecessary. This was the situation in the Old Testament, but now things are so very different.

16:32 And the priest, whom he shall anoint, and whom he shall consecrate to minister in the priest’s office in his father’s stead, shall make the atonement, and shall put on the linen clothes, even the holy garments:

Not only was there seemingly no end to the ritual, but an endless line of priests is envisaged, each consecrated simply because their father had been high priest and had now died, and all needing to put on the holy garments to make them ceremonially what they were not morally. As the writer to the Hebrews puts it, “And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death: but this man, because He continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood”, Hebrews 7:23,24. The reason He continues ever being that He has endless life as the Son of God, as is said earlier in that chapter, in verse 16.

16:33 And he shall make an atonement for the holy sanctuary, and he shall make an atonement for the tabernacle of the congregation, and for the altar, and he shall make an atonement for the priests, and for all the people of the congregation. 

This is a summary of the events of the day of atonement, emphasising that Aaron’s successors would need to do exactly the same as he did, for none of them was able to do a work which rendered the day obsolete. If in verse 33 the emphasis is on the person of the priest, here the emphasis is on his work.

16:34 And this shall be an everlasting statute unto you, to make an atonement for the children of Israel for all their sins once a year. And he did as the Lord commanded Moses.

The words “statute” and “commanded” remind us that the chapter is for people under the law, whereas now there has been a change, and the Christian has a High Priest who acts in grace, on the basis of a finished work, as opposed to Levitical priests, who acted under law, on the basis of a work that was never completed. It is noticeable that when Psalm 40 is quoted in connection with the Lord Jesus in Hebrews 10:5-7, the words “Yea, Thy law is within My heart” are omitted. This would emphasise for us that the Lord Jesus went to Calvary not because He was forced to do so by any legal requirement, but because He was willing. Having come to do God’s will, and having successfully finalised that will, He is now sat down of the throne of the One who sent Him forth in the first place.

“He did as the Lord commanded” finds its glorious and fulfilling counterpart in the words of the Lord Jesus Himself, “As the Father gave Me commandment, even so I do”, John 14:31.

HEBREWS 2:11-18

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 2, VERSES 11-15

2:11  For both He that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause He is not ashamed to call them brethren,

 2:12  Saying, I will declare Thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto Thee.

 2:13  And again, I will put my trust in Him. And again, Behold I and the children which God hath given me.

 2:14  Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, He also Himself likewise took part of the same; that through death He might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

 2:15  And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

THE PATH OF SEPARATION FROM ADAM’S WORLD
2:11    For both He that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified- To sanctify means to set apart.  It is too early in the epistle to think in terms of being sanctified by the sacrifice of Christ, 10:10.  In the context, the captain of our salvation has separated us from the world of Adam of which we formed part.  In His prayer in John 17, the Lord Jesus spoke of sanctifying Himself, that His people might be sanctified by the truth.  Sanctification, or holiness, has not to do in the first instance with separation from sin, (we must not confuse sanctification with purification), but rather involves separation from the ordinary, to be occupied with the sacred.  Christ ever sanctified Himself during His life down here, and this qualifies Him to sanctify His people now.  He had contrasted those who have eternal life with those who only have the life of flesh, John 17:2, and has described His own as given to Him by the Father out of the world, verse 6.  This does not involve being physically removed, but morally distinct.  Given that believers are in the world, He requested that they might be sanctified by the truth.  The truth in question being that regarding the nature of the eternal life believers possess, the very life of God.  It is as we have fellowship with God and His Son in the things of eternal life, (which things were expressed fully by the Son when He was here), that we shall be set apart from the world of Adam.  The closer we get to God, the further we shall be from the world.  Adam associated his race with things that caused them to perish, whereas Christ associates with salvation the race of which He is head.  By passing through this world, and suffering in it, the Lord Jesus has equipped Himself with the experience to lead His people through the same world, with all its sufferings. 
Are all of one- the sanctifier, (Christ), and those sanctified, (His people), all emerge out of one common experience of suffering on the way to glory.  He has already come out of the tomb never to suffer again.  But association with Christ in His burial and resurrection begins a life of suffering for the believer.  From which suffering he will emerge just a certainly as Christ has emerged.  If we suffer with Him, we shall be glorified together, Romans 8:17.  Christ is out of the experience of suffering already, whereas we await that emergence, but because it is certain it can be spoken of as if already accomplished.  It is noticeable that the apostles did not begin to suffer for Christ until He was risen from the dead.
For which cause He is not ashamed to call them brethren- “A brother is born for adversity”, Proverbs 17:17, and the common experience of suffering bonds us with our captain.  If He passed through suffering, and the people did not, then there might be room for embarrassment if He called us brethren.  Note the way Romans 8 moves from a consideration of sufferings because of a groaning creation, verses 16-27, to the thought that God’s people shall be brethren with His Son, in glory, verses 28-30.  No amount of privation can destroy that, as Romans 8:38,39 declares:  “For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord”.

THE PATH OF (RESURRECTION) LIFE WITH CHRIST
2:12    Saying, “I will declare Thy name unto My brethren- These are words found in Psalm 22:22 at the point where the scene changes from one of death and great suffering, to resurrection and great glory.  They represent the point where Christ finishes His experience of suffering in this world, and begins to enter His glory, “God raised Him from the dead and gave Him glory”, 1 Peter 1:21. 
The Lord described His disciples as those that had continued with Him in His temptations, and despite the way they had forsaken Him in Gethsemane, He still said to the women, “Go tell My brethren that I go before you into Galilee”, Matthew 28:10.  He also spoke of ascending to His Father and theirs, thus showing He was not ashamed to associate with them, even if they had been ashamed, temporarily, to associate with Him.  In this way He began to carry out what He promised in His prayer to His Father in John 17:26, and continued the declaration of the Father’s name or character. 
In the midst of the church will I sing praise unto Thee”- If the first phrase involved teaching the Name, this one involves praising the Name.  Praise is the expression of the works of God, and here the Lord Jesus can be thought of as praising God for His great work of delivering Him from death, in answer to His prayer, Hebrews 5:7.  It is noticeable that after the Passover meal a psalm was sung before they left, in accordance with the custom of Israel, whereas we do not read of this in the upper room in the post-resurrection appearances to the disciples there.  Perhaps a psalm, (1 Corinthians 14:26; Ephesians 5:19), now has the more spiritual idea of a personal expression of praise, rather than the repetition of the exercises of others.  By singing praise in the church is meant the recounting by the Lord Jesus of His appreciation of the intervention of His Father on His behalf; He does this as His people speak of Him to the Father.  Psalm 22 does not actually use the word sing in the expression that is quoted here, perhaps confirming that singing is not necessarily in view.
There is a possibility that the declaring of the Name is done while His people are still on earth, whereas the singing of praise in the midst of the church will take place in heaven when all the redeemed are safe home.  So one refers to the local assembly, the other to “the church of the firstborn (ones) which are written (enrolled) in heaven”, 12:23.

THE PATH OF FAITH IN GOD
2:13    And again, “I will put my trust in Him”- This is a quotation from Psalm 18, which is mainly an account of David’s deliverance from the hand of his enemies, including Saul.  Now Saul had persecuted David some 40 or more years before, and he seems to have used this psalm as an expression of his dependence on God at every stage of his life.  The first three verses, from which this quote comes, give to us the attitude of David to adversity, and one feature is his trust in God.  Then he records the way in which God vindicated his trust in him by delivering him from his foes.  So we learn that during the time when His enemies had the upper hand, the Lord Jesus was marked by trust in God.  Indeed, this was ever His attitude, for Psalm 22:9,10 says “I was cast upon Thee from the womb; Thou art My God from My mother’s belly; Thou didst make me hope when I was upon My mother’s breast”.  As a result, He knew deliverance from Herod.  Children, even unborn children, are remarkably sensitive to the circumstances in which their mother finds herself.  See, for instance, Luke 1:41.  By implication, His brethren will be marked by this trust too, as they follow the path the captain of their salvation has marked out for them. 
And again, “Behold, I and the children which God hath given Me”- This is a quotation from Isaiah 8:18.  Isaiah had the task of warning the wicked king Ahaz of impending captivity at the hands of the Assyrians.  As a sign to Israel, Isaiah was instructed by God to name his two sons in a particular way.  One was to be Shear-jashub, a name which means “A remnant shall return”, and the other, Maher-shalal-hash-baz, which means “In making haste to the spoil he hasteneth the prey”.  So when Isaiah said to the nation, “Behold, I and the children which God hath given me”, they were a “sign and a wonder” to Israel.  Maher-shalal-hash-baz was testimony that the Assyrian would indeed hasten to invade the land, and take them as a prey.  The other son, however, was God’s promise that even though that happened, a remnant would return from captivity.  So during the present age, believers from the nation of Israel are likewise a testimony to coming judgement on the nation in the form of the Great Tribulation, (and to a lesser extent the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70), and also to the fact that God will be favourable to His people and ensure that a remnant of them will know His salvation.  It is interesting that the Lord Jesus called His brethren “children”, in John 21:5, using the same word which is found here and in the next verse.  So physical descendants are not necessarily in view in the application of the quotation, but a spiritual relationship.  Just as Isaiah’s trust was in God despite the impending judgements, so the trust of the Hebrew believers should be in God despite what would happen to them as a nation in AD 70.

THE PATH OF DELIVERANCE FROM OUR ENEMIES
2:14    Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood- The children in question being those addressed in the previous verse, the children of God, who are the same as Christ’s brethren, true believers.  The present condition of the children is in view because they were not children before they became partakers.  The verb “are partakers” is in the perfect tense, meaning continuation from the past to the present.  Those who share flesh and blood are in a condition of relative weakness, which leaves them vulnerable to attack by evil as they make their way to glory, therefore their Captain steps in to help. 
He also Himself- It is necessary for Him to have the same nature as those He leads, so that He may pass through the same experiences, sin apart, of course. 
Likewise took part of the same- Not only does He share flesh and blood with the children, but shares it likewise, or in the same manner- “Similarly, in like manner, in the same way… is equivalent to ‘in all things’ of verse 17, and hence is used of a similarity which amounts to equality”, Grimme.  The manhood  of Christ is real, even though He is without sin, for a sinful nature is not an integral part of humanity.  Adam was a real man before he sinned- he did not have to possess a sinful nature before he was rightly called a man.  1 Corinthians 15:50 distinguishes between flesh and blood, and corruption, showing that our corrupt nature can be considered apart from our flesh and blood condition.  The Lord Jesus took part of flesh and blood in like manner to the children, by birth of a mother, and He subsequently took part in this condition as He lived amongst men.  Perhaps there is an allusion to the other son mentioned by Isaiah, even Immanuel, the child born of the virgin, Isaiah 9:14, see Matthew 1:23. 
The word used of believers is partakers, meaning they have a common, equal share in humanity, whereas Christ took part, which involves coming in from outside the condition, a testimony to His pre-existence before birth. 
That through death He might destroy Him that had the power of death- Psalm 18, which is quoted in verse 13, and which is found in 2 Samuel 22 also, was written when the Lord had delivered David from his enemies, including Goliath and his sons.  In fact 2 Samuel 21:22 links the defeat of Goliath when David was a youth, with the defeat of his four sons by David’s mighty men, when David was an old man.  Goliath had put the fear of death into the hearts of the armies of Israel, but David had delivered them from that fear, and had beheaded Goliath with his own sword.  So Christ has defeated the greatest enemy of all, the Devil, by using the very weapon that he used. 
By coming into flesh and blood conditions, and by allowing Himself to be condemned to death, the Lord Jesus placed Himself in a position of weakness.  Yet in this weakness He defeated the mightiest force for evil there ever could be.  See 2 Corinthians 13:4.  Since He is now raised from the dead by the power of God, there is no possibility of the Devil being effective against God’s sons.  To destroy means to make of no effect, not annihilate.  In the wisdom of God, the Devil is still allowed some measure of activity, but when his final doom is effected it will only take an “ordinary” angel to bind him and cast him into the lake of fire, Revelation 20:1-3. 

2:15    And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage- those under the law were under the ministration of condemnation and death, 2 Corinthians 3:7,9.  This brought bondage, for they were not free from fear of death.  Imagine a believer in Israel who is returning from sacrificing a sin offering.  As he returns to his tent he sins again; yet it is too late to return to the altar.  He goes to sleep that night fearing that he may die, and die, moreover, with sin upon him.  Through Christ’s death, however, this fear is removed, and death may be faced calmly.  This relates especially to believers who formerly were Jews, and therefore under the law.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 2, VERSES 16-18

2:16  For verily He took not on him the nature of angels; but He took on him the seed of Abraham.

 2:17  Wherefore in all things it behoved Him to be made like unto His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

 2:18  For in that He Himself hath suffered being tempted, He is able to succour them that are tempted. 

THE PATH OF VICTORY OVER TEMPTATION
2:16    For verily He took not on Him the nature of angels- “the nature of” has been added by the translators, since they felt it necessary.  But the word “took” is the key here.  It means to “take up a person to help him, to rescue from peril, and also to succour”.  There is nothing about taking a nature.  The Textus Receptus says “For not indeed of angels takes He hold”.  The point is that He did not come into flesh and blood conditions to help angels, but the seed of Abraham.  Angels have no fear of death, nor does Christ succour them. 
But He took on Him the seed of Abraham- that is, His coming is relevant to the first readers of the epistle, the Hebrews, descended from “Abram the Hebrew”, Genesis 14:13.  They should not think that because the link with Adam has been emphasised in the earlier verses, that they have no special place with God.  “Salvation is of the Jews”, John 4:22.  “Of whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ came”, Romans 9:5.  The special emphasis, however, is on those descended from Abraham naturally who were believers, and therefore were his seed spiritually, see John 8:33-45; Romans 4:16; Galatians 3:29.   The word “took” is the same as is used in 8:9 of God taking hold of Israel to lead them out of Egypt.  Here our captain takes hold to lead out of the world.  Clearly, the statement in 8:9 does not involve taking a nature.  “For verily” is only found here in the New Testament.  “It is used when something is affirmed in an ironical way”- Grimm.  Vine says it means, “Of course,” or “It goes without saying.”

2:17    Wherefore- this means “for which reason”. 
In all things it behoved Him to be made like unto His brethren- For the purpose of taking hold of the seed of Abraham, He needed to be made like them in all things- note He is made like His brethren, meaning believers.  He is not made like unbelievers in all things, for they have a sinful nature, whereas believers are looked at ideally as being righteous, even whilst in a mortal body.  This confirms that the seed of Abraham in verse 16 means believers.  “Behoved” means “a necessity in view of the subject under discussion”.  Having taken flesh and blood, and come to take hold of believers to help them, it is necessary that He become like them in all relevant things, so that He may minister unto them effectively.  The previous verses have shown believers to be delivered by His various ministries; but they are passing through temptations that may cause them to fall- how can He help them in this? 
That He might be- in order that He might take His place as, or be granted the position of. 
A merciful and faithful high priest- the word for mercy here indicates the outward manifestation of pity, with need on the part of the one shown mercy, and resources on the part of the one showing it.  It is not simply an attitude, but an act, as demonstrated by the Good Samaritan, who was not content to look from a distance, (as the priest was), but acted in compassion. 
Faithfulness marks Him, not only in His relationship with God, 3:2, but also towards believers, the idea behind faithfulness being reliability and stability.  The failures we manifest do not cause our helper to desert us.  Cf. “only Luke is with me”, 2 Timothy 4:11, for the writer of the priestly gospel has learnt the constancy of the One he wrote of, and sought to imitate it. 
In things pertaining to God- in matters that relate to the honour of God.  Aaron was made priest to minister unto God, Exodus 28:1.  The priesthood of Aaron had to do with constant sacrifices and yearly atonement.  Christ dealt with these two aspects before He entered into his ministry, as hebrews 7:28 makes clear.  His sacrifice renders altar sacrifices obsolete, chapter 10, and His work of propitiation is once for all, chapter 9.  His priesthood has to do with helping us move through the world safely, and leading the way into the presence of God. 
To make reconciliation for the sins of the people- reconciliation, the bringing into harmony of persons formerly at variance, is one result of the work of propitiation.  “To” means “for to”, a similar expression to the “That He might be” of the beginning of the verse.  The change of word indicates that, as the scholars say, “this is a separate telic clause”, (a clause which tells us what the goal is).  So there are two goals in view in the verse, the one issuing from the other- He is made like His brethren with the general object of being a faithful high priest for them, and also to make propitiation.  Whilst this is put second, the work was done before He became high priest, but the writer perhaps wishes to link His present work of succouring the tempted with the work that is the support for that ministry.  Compare 1 John 2:1,2, with the advocacy of Christ on the basis of His propitiatory work.  He is the propitiation for our sins in the sense that the one in heaven interceding is the one who once was on the cross propitiating.  The alternative reason for propitiation being mentioned second will be given later.
The Lord Jesus spoke to Mary Magdalene about His brethren, and indicated that He was about to “ascend to My Father, and your Father, to My God, and your God”, John 20:17.  Thus He would still be the link between His people and God, maintaining them in His dual role of Advocate with the Father, and High Priest in things pertaining to God. 
The basis of His advocacy is two-fold.  His person, for He is Jesus Christ the righteous, and His work, for He is the propitiation for our sins, 1 John 2:1,2.  The apostle John was concerned about believers sinning.  The sins of believers are just as obnoxious to God, and just as deserving of wrath, as those of unbelievers.  But we are “saved from wrath through Him”, Romans 5:9, as He pleads the merits of His work.  He is, says John, the propitiatory offering for our sins.  Not was, but is.  In other words, the one who acts for us in heaven as our advocate, is the very same one who hung upon the cross as a sacrifice for our sins. 
He is also our High priest.  Hebrews 2:17,18 form a bridge between chapter two, with its emphasis on the reasons why the Lord Jesus took manhood, and the way in which Israel were tempted in the wilderness as noted in chapter three. 
Note in particular the word “for” which begins verse 18. Too little attention has been paid to this word, and hence the connection between verses 17 and 18 is often lost.  The reason why we have a high priest who is merciful and faithful is that He has been here in manhood and suffered being tempted.  When His people pass through temptation, then He undertakes to deal with their cause.  Because He has been here, and has been tempted in all points like as we are, He is able to help us when we cry to Him for help.  The word for succour is used by the woman of Canaan in Matthew 15:25 when she cried out, “Lord, help me”.  He is able to point us to the ways in which He overcame in the wilderness temptation, and thus we are strengthened to resist temptation.
But what if we fall, and sin?  In that case He comes to our aid in another way.  We see it typified negatively in Leviticus 10:16-20.  The priests were commanded to eat the sin-offerings, if the blood thereof had not been brought into the sanctuary.  This was in order to “bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord”, Leviticus 10:17, where the word for bear is the same as is used for the scapegoat bearing iniquity.  But at the end of the consecration of the priesthood, Moses was angry on God’s behalf, for the priests had failed in this.  One of the functions of priesthood, then, was to personally identify with the sin-offering by eating it, and by so doing bear the iniquity of the congregation, taking responsibility for their failure, but doing so safeguarded by the fact that a sin-offering had been accepted by God.  As they did this the scripture explicitly says they made atonement for the people, Leviticus 10:17.  We see then what the writer to the Hebrews means when he talks of Christ making reconciliation or propitiation for the sins of the people.  He is indicating that Christ personally identifies Himself with His sin-offering work at Calvary, and thus takes responsibility for the failures of His people under temptation.  This is acceptable to God, and His people are preserved, despite their failure.

2:18         For in that He hath suffered, being tempted- only those who resist temptation suffer.  The fact that it is said without qualification that He suffered when He was tempted, shows that He always resisted resolutely.  He therefore knows what His people pass through when they resist temptation. 
He is able to succour them that are tempted- knowing the pressure they are under, He is able to suit the help they need to their situation.  When His people do not resist temptation, then His work at Calvary safeguards their position, hence the mention of propitiation in the previous verse.  To succour means to run to the aid of a person in danger when they cry for help.  See Matthew 15:25, “Lord, help me”; and Hebrews 4:16 “Grace to help in time of need”, where the same word as succour is used.  Because He has experienced the pressure of temptation, and has overcome, when we go to Him for help He is able to point us to the way in which He overcame, as detailed in the temptation accounts in the gospels.

 

 

GALATIANS CHAPTER 1

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Under “SELF-PRINT BOOKLETS” you will find help on printing the posts in booklet form.  Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

GALATIANS 1

Survey of the epistle
If in the Epistle to the Romans the gospel is defined, then in the Epistle to the Galatians the gospel is defended. There were those who had been Jews before they were saved, who tried to put Gentile believers under the law of Moses, There were two ways in which they attempted this. Some, according to Acts 15:1, were saying that a man must be circumcised before Christ can save him. Others, according to Acts 15:5, were saying that believers needed to keep the law of Moses as a religious duty, fearing, no doubt, that if there was no restraint imposed on them, they would become licentious. The antidote to licence, however, is not legality, but Christian liberty. Grace is a stronger force than law, as is seen from Romans 6:14- “For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under law, but under grace”. To put believers under law is to say that Christ’s work was not sufficient to fully save.

The Christian life is to be lived according to the “law of Christ”, Galatians 6:2, following His example. The power to do this is the Spirit of God, who acts in us on the principle that we have life in Christ Jesus, Romans 8:2.

Chapters 1 and 2
Historical account of Paul’s life under law and grace.
The experience of grace.
Paul resists the charge of discord with other apostles.

Chapters 3, 4 and 5
Doctrinal, giving seven ways in which grace is superior to law.
The exposition of grace.
Paul resists the charge of despising the law.

Chapter 6
Practical, the outworking of grace in the life.
The expression of grace.
Paul resists the charge of destroying morality.

The following Scriptures tell us the true nature and purpose of the law of Moses:
“Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in His sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.” Romans 3:20.
“Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression”, Romans 4:15.
“Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound.” Romans 5:20.
“For sin shall not have dominion over you, for ye are not under the law, but under grace.” Romans 6:14.
“For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.” Romans 7:5.
“Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law”, Romans 7:7.
“when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died”, Romans 7:9.
“For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh”, Romans 8:3.
“For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse”, Galatians 3:10.
“But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident: for the just shall live by faith. And the law is not of faith.” Galatians 3:11.
“Knowing this, that the law is not made  for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient”, 1 Timothy 1:9.

This is not to say that the law is evil, as the following verses show:
Is the law sin? God forbid.” Romans 7:7.
“Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” Romans 7:12.
“For I delight in the law of God after the inward man”, Romans 7:22.
“the ministration of death…was glorious”, 2 Corinthians 3:7.
“But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully.” 1 Timothy 1:8.

The following are some of the ways of putting believers under law:
1. By dividing God’s people into clergy and laity. This is a going back to Old Testament systems under the Law, which the apostle describes as the elements of the world, and as such are not suited to the citizens of heaven. Every true Christian is a priest unto God, 1 Peter 2:5,9; Revelation 1:6.
2. By practising ceremonies such as christening and confirmation, which bypass the gospel.
3. By thinking that full salvation has to be earned, and is not the portion of every believer. God has accepted (graced) every believer in the person of His Beloved Son, and has given every spiritual blessing in Him, Ephesians 1:3,6.
4. By believing that the gift of the Spirit depends on spiritual progress and devotion. As Galatians 3:2 indicates, every believer has the gift of the Spirit.
5. By denying that it is possible to be sure of salvation. “And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.” John 10:28.
6. By suggesting that only those who are spiritual will participate in the translation of the saints at Christ’s coming. All believers wait for the hope of righteousness by faith, Galatians 5:5. The apostle is clear that whether we wake (watch) or sleep (do not watch), we should live together with Him, 1 Thessalonians 5:10.

Law and grace cannot co-exist, as the following Scriptures show:
For all the prophets and the law prophesied until John.” Matthew 11:13.
“For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.” John 1:17.
“ye are not under the law, but under grace”, Romans 6:14.
“For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.” Romans 10:4.
“and if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace”, Romans 11:6.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-5 Paul’s message as an apostle
(b) Verses 6-9 Paul’s marvelling at the change in the Galatians
(c) Verse 10 Paul’s motivation before conversion and after
(d) Verses 11-24 Paul’s movements before conversion and after

(a) Verses 1-5
Paul’s message as an apostle

1:1
Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)

Paul, an apostle there is a need to assert this, for the law-teachers who opposed Paul would emphasise the fact that the Law was of God; the apostle must show that he has authority from God too. Moses had been sent to the people, and then was the mediator of the law, so can Paul claim like authority? Men embrace relativism, and thus reject the absolute authority of God. But He had His apostles, and gave them authority to teach.
(Not of men- Paul does not use the preposition most often associated with source, “ek”, but rather “apo”. Perhaps he is referring to the “apo” that the word “apostle” begins with. He has been sent (stello) away from (apo) Jesus Christ- that fact is foundational to his position as apostle.
Neither by man- if the first statement declares that he has not been sent directly by men, then this says that he has not been sent indirectly by God either. God did not use the other apostles to appoint him, as was the case with Matthias, Acts 1:15-26.
But by Jesus Christ- He is the one by whom Paul has become an apostle. It was a risen Christ who said to Paul, “Depart:for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles.” Acts 22:21. This lifts Christianity far above the level of a law given on earth. Jerusalem which is above is our mother, not Jerusalem on earth, 4:26. Note that Paul’s apostleship is not of man, but it is of Jesus Christ, who is a man. Yet He is more than man, for He is has equal authority with God the Father to send an apostle. The writings of the apostles put us directly in touch with the truth.
And God the Father- in Old Testament times this aspect of character of God was not to the fore. It is the special feature of Christianity, since the latter is based on the person and work of the Son of God Himself. The Jews said Jesus Christ was contrary to God, so would not be convinced that the sending by Jesus Christ was valid. So his authority is emphasised by the fact it came from God, the same one who gave the law. But He is Father too, reminding us of the particular feature of Christianity, that it brings in the truth that God is the Father of believers because His Son has made it posiible.
Who raised him from the dead)- the grandest possible mark of approval. The law was the ministration of death and condemnation. Paul may not have been with Christ on earth, but he had the great privilege of seeing Him in heaven, so that the marks of an apostle were with him. As he wrote to the Corinthians, “Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are not ye my work in the Lord? 1 Corinthians 9:1. Those who had been with the Lord when He was here on earth, added nothing to him, 2:6.

The resurrection of Christ does the following:
1. Shows He dealt with sins effectively, Romans 4:25. He was raised because of the justification His death secured.
2. Shows He is approved of God, despite being forsaken on the cross.
3. Is the means by which His people are brought to new life in a new sphere, Romans 6:4.
4. Is the assurance to all men that He will judge the world, Acts 17:31.
5. Is the guarantee of the resurrection of believers, 1 Corinthians 15:20.

1:2
And all the brethren which are with me, unto the churches of Galatia:

And all the brethren which are with me- he was not alone in his beliefs, for grace has surrounded him with believers who share life in the family of God with him. His attackers had tried to isolate him, but had not succeeded. When the law was given, Levi “knew not every man his brother”, and they slew three thousand of their brethren. Grace assembles brethren together in harmony.
Unto the churches of Galatia- note the absence of any description of them, such as “faithful in Christ Jesus” Ephesians 1:1; “all the saints”, Philippians 1:1; “the saints and faithful brethren in Christ”, Colossians 1:1. He is worried about them, 4:20, and so cannot be free in his greetings to them.

Peter wrote to Galatia, amongst other places, 1 Peter 1:1, exhorting them not to paganize, whereas Paul is writing to them so that they do not Judaize. Note that the churches are separate entities, but can be written to together, for they would be in fellowship with one another, having Christ as their common Lord, for the apostle wrote to the Corinthian assembly, but also to “all that in every place call upon the name of jesus Christ our Lord”, 1 Corinthians 1:2.

1:3
Grace be to you and peace from God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ,

Grace be to you, and peace- the characteristic salutations of Gentile and Jew respectively. A Gentile would greet another Gentile with “Charis”, meaning grace. The Jew would greet a fellow Jew with “Shalom”, meaning peace. In Christ the division between Jew and Gentile has gone, Ephesians 2:12 onwards. Despite his restrained greeting, he still has their best interests at heart. Grace has been called “the fount of all mercies”, and peace, “the crown of all blessings”.

From God the Father, and from our Lord Jesus Christ- again the equality between the Father and the Son is maintained, this time in connection with the bestowal of spiritual blessings on the saints. Only as they respond to the teaching of this epistle will they come into the good of grace, (as opposed to law), and peace, (as opposed to being unsure of salvation, which would be the result of putting themselves under law).

1:4
Who gave himself for our sins, that he might deliver us from this present evil world, according to the will of God and our Father:

Who gave himself- far from demanding that man give to God, the gospel explains that God is a gracious, giving God, and Christ gave Himself. Grace gives what we could never earn, whereas the law demands what we can never pay. The Old Testament sacrifices that the Law demanded have been fulfilled in His sacrifice. In the parable of the Good Samaritan, it was the representatives of the civil and ceremonial law who failed to help the injured man. In fact, they went on, as a class, to crucify the true Good Samaritan, Christ Himself. He came where we were and like the Samaritan in the parable, bore the total cost himself. His personal safety, His oil and wine, His energy to walk while the man rode, His two pence, and other expenses, and the effort to return to the inn after two days. All these were self-sacrificing acts.

For our sins- His giving of Himself was in death, that He might deal effectively with the question of sins. This supposes His perfection, and our imperfection. It was not possible for the sacrifices under the law to take away sins by themselves. Sins were only forgiven under the law because God took account of what His Son would do at Calvary. See Romans 3:25.

That he might deliver us from this present evil world- the gospel links us with eternity, whereas the law was to do with the elements of the world, Galatians 4:3, and the rudiments of the world, Colossians 2:20. At conversion, the sinner is separated from the world, and is linked with Christ in heaven, Ephesians 2:6. The logical outcome of that is for Christ to come from heaven to take His people to heaven, their proper sphere.

According to the will of God and our Father- Paul is at pains to show that the death of Christ, being in harmony with the will of God, is not at all inferior to the will of God in the law. Moreover, grace introduces us to God as our Father, as the law could not do, as later chapters in the epistle will show.

1:5
To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

To whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen- through Christ the glory of God will be magnified for ever, whereas the glory of the law was temporary, as 2 Corinthians 3:7-11 explains.

Note the principles of the gospel that are brought out by the apostle in his introduction:
1.  The Person of Jesus Christ, implying His manhood and Messiahship.
2.  God the Father, who is revealed in His Son, as the gospel discloses.
3.  Christ’s giving of Himself for our sins, implying His sinlessness, and our sinfulness.
4.  His resurrection from the dead.
5.  His sending of apostles in harmony with the will of the Father.
6. The permanent, eternal glory that has come to God through the person and work of Christ.

(b) Verses 6-9
Paul’s marvelling at the change in the Galatians

1:6
I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:

I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ- it was not that he would not have marvelled if they had removed more slowly. He marvels at two things, that they are removed, and that they are removed so soon. It is a cause of wonder to the apostle why anyone should want to remove from the grace of Christ. Note that to embrace law in any form, however mild, is to remove from grace, see 5:4.

We may take grace here to be a comprehensive term for all the gospel tells us about Christ. This includes the following:

1. His movement in grace, His voluntary stoop from heaven to earth. “For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor”, 2 Corinthians 8:9.

2. His moral perfection as seen in His virtuous character. “We beheld his glory…full of grace and truth”, John 1:14.

3. His matchless and vicarious sacrifice at Calvary. “But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death…that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man”, Hebrews 2:9.

Unto another gospel- the word Paul used here means another of a different sort, a different gospel, diametrically opposed to the one Paul preached. Law and grace are opposites, as Romans 11:6 indicates. Satan is ever ready to suggest ideas, but he is a liar, and the father of it, John 8:44. Men preach a “national gospel“, suggesting that a person who is introduced into the “established church” is saved. They preach a “nativity gospel“, saying that by His birth Christ linked humanity with God. This is blasphemous. Then there is the “need gospel“, which suggests that the gospel is designed to make us materially prosperous. All these are irresponsible gospels, telling people what they want to hear, as opposed to what they need to hear. What some were preaching in Galatia, however, was a law-gospel, for they said one of two things: either, that a Gentile needed to commit to the law by being circumcised before he could be saved, or, that a saved person is obliged to keep the law of Moses.

1:7
Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

Which is not another- the “gospel” of the law-men was not a genuine gospel at all, for it brought into bondage and doubt. Paul will not allow that a different gospel consisting of a mixture of grace and law, is a viable alternative to the grace of Christ. The law is not made for righteous people, but for sinners, 1 Timothy 1:9. How could there be better news that what is anounced in the gospel of God’s grace?

But there be some that trouble you- the mixing of law and grace always means trouble. All it achieves is to sow doubts, fears and uncertainty. This is why those who put themselves under law have no assurance of salvation, because they never know whether they come up to the required standard. Coupled with this lack of assurance is the loss of the sense of eternal security that true believers have as Christ’s sheep, who shall never perish, John 10:28.

And would pervert the gospel of Christ- the word “would” means to desire. So zealous are they for the law of their fathers, that they feel it to be their solemn duty to resist the gospel. So obsessed are the law-men with their mission, that they long to twist the gospel, distorting it beyond recognition. Paul was like this once, as he will soon tell us.

1:8
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

But though we- so sure is Paul that what he and his fellow brethren had preached to the Galatians was unalterable, that he is prepared to be accursed himself if he changes his message. This shows he is not criticizing the law-men out of personal spite, for he is prepared to accept the same penalty as they if he preaches contrary to the gospel he preached before. Paul pronounced a woe upon himself if he did not preach the gospel in 1 Corinthians 9:16, and here he pronounces a woe upon any who preached another gospel.

Or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you- angels are messengers, and were in attendance when the law was given, but even if one came and said that God was reverting to the law in some way in order to bless men, the Galatians are not to listen. He does not say an angel from God, because Satan is able to transform himself into an angel of light, 2 Corinthians 11:14, so if they listen to an angel they might be listening to Satan.

Let him be accursed- to be accursed is to be anathema, or set apart for God to deal with.

1:9
As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

As we said before, so say I now again- this matter is of great importance, and the woe upon those who preach alternative gospels needs to be repeated for emphasis.

If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed- having dismissed himself, his brethren, and angels, if they come preaching contrary to the accepted standard of the gospel, he speaks now of all men, with the law-teachers particularly in mind. If an apostle or an angel are to be accursed, how much more a mere self-appointed messenger. In verse 8 it was the gospel preached, whereas here it is the gospel the Galatians had received, reminding them that they had been committed to the true gospel at one time.

(c) Verse 10
Paul’s motivation before conversion and after

1:10
For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ.

For do I now persuade men, or God- before his conversion, (hence the “now” of contrast), he had sought to persuade Christians to return to the Law, and by so doing, hoped to persuade God of his zeal. Now he did not seek to persuade them like that, and was conscious of the approval of God without promoting Judaism.

Or do I seek to please men? By condemning those who preached a false gospel, the apostle was in danger of angering his opponents, yet this gave him no cause for concern, for he sought the favour of God, not men.

For if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ- he had once sought to please his fellow religionists by persecuting Christians, but now things were different, (hence the “yet”). And the fact that they were different showed the change the gospel had brought into his life and outlook. This verse forms the bridge between verses 1-9 which have to do with the message of the gospel, and verses 11-24 which relate to the messenger of the gospel.

(d) Verses 11-24
Paul’s movements before conversion and after

1:11
But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.

But I certify you, brethren- in verses 1-10 the apostle writes as an apostle, now he writes as a convert, and gives his personal history. He allows that they are brethren in the family of God, just as those he associates with in verse 2, but they need to be informed of the true state of affairs regarding the gospel, lest the false brethren lead them astray.

That the gospel which was preached of me- that is, the gospel which was preached to the Galatians by the apostle. He is taking them back to their initial experience when they were persuaded of the truth of the gospel. Compare 5:8, “This persuasion cometh not of Him that calleth you.”

Is not after man- it is not that which the mind of man could devise. The gospel is just as much of God as the Law is. This is why Paul did not need to confer with “flesh and blood” after he was saved, verse 16.

1:12
For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

For I neither received it of man- his parents could not tell him it, even though they were Hebrews, and had brought him up to be a Hebrew, in every sense of the word, Philippians 3:5. His ancestors could only tell him of Judaism, the religion of the fathers.

Neither was I taught it- he did not learn the gospel from the rabbis in the synagogue school, even though he sat at the feet of Gamaliel, one of the foremost rabbis, Acts 22:3. All this highlights the fact that the gospel is not a modified form of Judaism, although Christendom acts as if it is.

But by revelation of Jesus Christ- instead of receiving Judaism “of man”, he received the gospel directly “of Jesus Christ”. The following are scriptures that tell us of this:

1. Ananias was “a devout man according to the law, having a good report of all the Jews that dwelt there”, Acts 22:12, and he was sent to Paul to tell him, “The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know His will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of His mouth. For thou shalt be his  witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard”, Acts 22:14,15.

2. The apostle revealed later on that the Lord had said to him on the Damascus road, “I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness both of these things which thou hast seen, and those things in the which I will appear unto thee”, Acts 26:16.

3.  “For I have received of the Lord that which I also delivered unto you”, 1 Corinthians 11:23.

4. “For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received”, 1 Corinthians 15:3.

5. “For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord”, 1 Thessalonians 4:15.

6. “How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery”, Ephesians 3:3.

None of the false brethren, seeking to teach Judaism, could claim these revelations.

1:13
For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews’ religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:

For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jew’s religion- note it is not something he had felt he needed to tell them himself, for it was time past, and he had turned his back on it, Philippians 3:13, so they have to hear it from others. He had counted what he had been brought up in as dung, so called it the Jew’s religion, not his own.  The apostle Paul “gave his testimony” several times, but only when necessary to make a point, or  to defend his position. The parade of past sins is not seemly.

How that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it- note the expressions in this passage which convey the energy with which he involved himself in what he then felt to be right: “Beyond measure”, “Profited…above”, “More exceedingly zealous”. All this serves to highlight the change that came about when he was called by the gospel. He has not believed in Christ because he was not familiar enough with the religion of his fathers, nor because he was half-hearted about it.

1:14
And profited in the Jews’ religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.

And profited in the Jew’s religion above many my equals in mine own nation- as a Jew, Israel was his own nation, but now he calls Judaism the Jew’s religion, for he has separated from it. As a student, Saul of Tarsus was progressing beyond most of his fellow-pupils in the school of Gamaliel. This is what is meant by “profited”.

Being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers- this is the reason for his strong advance in Judaism, for he was marked by great zeal, alas without knowledge, like the rest of his nation, Romans 10:2. He did not believe the gospel because he was confused and undecided about Judaism.

1:15
But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by His grace,

But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb- so the removal of Paul from under the law was part of God’s good pleasure, just as much as it had been His good pleasure to put Israel under the law. God’s timing is always perfect. The God who separated him from the traditions of his fathers, was the God who separated him from his mother’s womb. So all the time he was learning Judaism, God was preparing him for evangelism. God allowed him to espouse Judaism, so that he might better expose it. He was circumcised to commit to the law, and had his Bar Mitzvah to become a son of the law. Then he sat at the feet of Gamaliel to learn the law. He was well-placed to assess the law-system, and count it but dung, Philippians 3:7,8 once he realised the superiority of Christ and grace.

And called me by His grace- the means used to call Paul was the grace of God as expressed in Christ at Calvary. He was not called by the use of the truth of the law. Note the reference to his mother, and fathers, or ancestors, for the law was the national religion of Israel, and the terms of God’s covenant with them.

1:16
To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:

To reveal his Son in me- not “reveal his Son to me”, but that, being saved, the Son of God might be made known through Paul, whether in his character, as Christ was formed in him, 4:19, or his preaching, as he presented Christ crucified to the people, 3:1.

That I might preach him among the heathen- it was as one who represented Christ in word and character that Paul went to the Gentiles. There must be no discrepancy between the message preached, and the character of the man who preaches it. See Psalm 51:10-13. There were no evangelists under the law; none went to the Gentiles with a message of hope, for the law was the ministry of condemnation. When Jonah went to Nineveh he went with a message of doom, and was disappointed when it did not come to pass, because the Ninevites repented.

Immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood- the gospel is not after man as to its content, nor is an evangelist dependant on man for his commission. He does not say, “I conferred not with my fellow-believers”, although that is what is in view, but rather he does not consult with any on earth, for even apostles are liable to error, as the next chapter shows. See Matthew 16:17.

1:17
Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus.

Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me- such was his confidence that God had spoken fully to him, he felt no need to consult with the other apostles at this point.

But I went into Arabia, and returned again into Damascus- he goes to Arabia, the place where the law was given, 4:25. What more fitting place to learn the contrast between law and grace. Is this where “The law came, sin revived, and I died”, Romans 7:9? This would remind us of Elijah going to “the” cave, (perhaps the very cave Moses dwelt in on Sinai), and learning that the things which accompanied the law, (the wind, the earthquake and the fire, 1 Kings 19:8-18. See also Hebrews 12:18-21), could not express God fully, for God was not in them. It was the still small voice of God that would bring the blessing of the conflict on Mount Carmel to the people, just as the gospel of grace and peace brings us the blessing of Calvary.
Interestingly, Elijah returned from this experience on the way to the wilderness of Damascus. Sadly, he seems not to have had a change of heart about things, as Saul of Tarsus did on the road to Damascus, for he is directed to anoint Elisha as his successor. Like so many since, he does not seem to grasp the superiority of law to grace. By informing us that he returned to Damascus, the apostle is showing the limits of his contacts with the believers, for he already knew those at that place. But he does not return there to appoint a successor.

1:18
Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days.

Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days- the three years is after his conversion, not after his return from Arabia. The apostle is very precise as to the number of days he was in Jerusalem, showing that these events are clear in his mind. His stay with Peter would show they were in harmony, especially since Paul later had to rebuke him. The change was on the part of Peter, not Paul. The word used her for “see” is historeo; they would give one another their personal history and experiences, so each one was fully up-to-date with the other. It is important that Paul and “the first of the apostles”, should be seen to get on well.
This visit is recorded in Acts 9:23-30. Paul preached in Damascus until the Jews sought to slay him. At this point the disciples let him down by the city wall and he escaped and went to Jerusalem. He preached there until the Jews again sought his life, and he went back to his home city of Tarsus.
Later in the epistle he will ask the Galatians, “And I, brethren, if I yet preach circumcision, why do I yet suffer persecution? Galatians 5:11. That those who were zealous for the law persecuted him is a sign that he no longer believes what they do.

1:19
But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord’s brother.

But other of the apostles saw I none, save James, the Lord’s brother- Paul would have a certain fellow-feeling with this man, who had refused to believe when Christ was on earth, and now believed after He was raised from the dead. Note the distinction between James, the Lord’s brother, and the James of chapter 2. The verse reads as if James the Lord’s brother was an apostle, but the sense is that he saw none of the other apostles, and the only person of note he did see was James.  James the Lord’s brother did indeed know the Lord, and see Him in resurrection, but he had not “companied with us”, to use Peter’s words when the replacement for Judas was being arranged, Acts 1:21.

1:20
Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not.

Now the things which I write unto you, behold, before God, I lie not- these personal details are important, establishing as they do the separation of Paul from any form of appointment by men, with all that it would imply. The law-teachers might insinuate otherwise, but Paul was of a clear conscience before God, and he calls on God to witness that he spoke the truth.

1:21
Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia;

Afterwards I came into the regions of Syria and Cilicia- Syria is south of Antioch, whereas Cilicia is his home territory, for he was brought up in Tarsus. Before he goes to the ends of the earth, he must be active near at home in the surrounding areas.  This is a good principle for new preachers to follow.

1:22
And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judaea which were in Christ:

And was unknown by face unto the churches of Judea which were in Christ- these are the churches that were most likely to be influenced by Judaism. As churches they were in Christ, which secures their well-being, and they did not need the law to guarantee their blessing.

1:23
But they had heard only, That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith which once he destroyed.

But they had heard only- the only message about Paul was his conversion and preaching; they had not heard other messages which suggested he had gone back to law, or that he sought to undermine the law. They had not seen him, but they had heard about him.

“That he which persecuted us in times past now preacheth the faith he once destroyed” note Paul preached the faith, setting out the doctrines regarding Christ, that men might have a clear view of Him, and then believe. The apostles “ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ”, Acts 5:42; they taught who He was, then exhorted men to believe on Him. This is still God’s way. The preaching of the gospel is not the stringing together of stories and illustrations, nor is it a constant browbeating of the hearers to “get saved”, or the repeating of over-worked phrases and sound bites. It is the clear setting out of the truths regarding the person of Christ in all its variety and scope. In other words, the teaching of Jesus Christ. Then, on that foundation, the exhortation to the hearers to believe on Him. This is the preaching of Jesus Christ. The evangelist has no right to exhort men to believe unintelligently on a man they know nothing about. As the blind man said, “Who is he, Lord, that I might believe on Him? John 9:36. The apostle made clear in the beginning of his classic treatise of the gospel that the gospel of God is concerning His Son, Romans 1:1,3. It is not sinner-centred but Christ-centred.

1:24
And they glorified God in me.

And they glorified God in me- the grace of God working in a person’s life will glorify God. As a result of the labours and writings of the apostle, multitudes have been transformed from being selfish sinners, to being those who glorify God in their lives down here. And what is begun on earth, shall be continued eternally in heaven.