Tag Archives: Christ Jesus

ROMANS 8

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if  you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made. 

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address:  martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk  We would be pleased to hear from you. 

Section 12   Romans 8:1-17
Life in the flesh and life in the Spirit

Subject of Section 12
Romans 8 brings to a conclusion and climax the doctrine of indwelling sin that the apostle began to consider in 5:12. He has traced that sin back to its source in Adam’s fall, and has shown in 5:12-21 that the work of Christ at Calvary is the remedy. He then showed in chapter 6 that freedom from the domination of sin is found in the practical application to our lives of the truths expressed in Christian baptism. In chapter 7 the apostle has made clear that the law of Moses does not help us at all in our desire to overcome sin.
Speaking generally about chapter 8 we may say that it deals with three of the major enemies that confront man now that sin has entered into the world. In verses 1-17 the enemy is the flesh, the sinful self of man. In verses 18-27 the enemy is the bondage and corruption which came in at the fall of man, and which causes men, even believers, to suffer. In verses 28-39 the enemy is Satan as adversary, who accuses and slanders believers.
Chapter 8 may also be thought of as enlarging on the features of believers as sons of God. The position of son involves liberty, dignity, maturity, intimacy and glory, and we find these things in the chapter. In verses 1-4 the believer has liberty, for he has been made free from the law of sin and death. That liberty enables God’s sons to manifest dignity as they live according to the Spirit, as verses 5-11 explain. As a result of this, the believer is under obligation, for we are debtors, verse 12, and the way in which they discharge that debt shows their maturity, verses 12-14. But there is more, for God’s sons have such closeness to Him that they call Him “Abba, Father”. This is their intimacy, as found in verses 15. Then the apostle looks on to the future, when God’s people shall be conformed to the image of His Son, verse 29. This is glory indeed, and will be expressed in the unhindered liberty, dignity, maturity and intimacy of likeness to Christ.
The apostle also introduces us to the important doctrine of the dwelling of the Holy Spirit within the believer, and the consequences thereof. The Holy Spirit is mentioned very rarely in the previous chapters, whereas in chapter 8 He is referred to at least 15 times. Recognition of, and response to, the dwelling of the Spirit of God within the believer is the secret of a spiritually successful Christian life, always remembering that one of His chief ministries is to glorify Christ, John 16:14.

Structure of Section 12

12(a)

8:1-4

New principle:

The law of the Spirit

12(b)

8:5-8

New perception:

The mind of the Spirit

12(c)

8:9-13

New power:

The dwelling of the Spirit

12(d)

8:14-17

New privileges:

The leading of the Spirit

12(a)   8:1-4
New principle: The law of the Spirit

8:1
There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

There is now therefore no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus- the particular word for condemnation the apostle uses here is only found again in this epistle in 5:16,18, and in 8:3 in a verbal form. This gives the clue to its primary meaning in this place, for condemnation in chapter 5 is the passing of the sentence of physical death on man in Adam because he possesses a sinful nature. The fact that the sentence has been reversed is the sure sign that the sin that caused it has been dealt with, (hence the “therefore”, meaning, in effect, “as a consequence of the truth set out in chapters five and six, which show how sin and death were righteously dealt with by Christ in His death, burial and resurrection”). Those who are in Christ Jesus are not touchable by death, being united with Him in resurrection. Nor are they dominated by sin, the cause of death, for the body as the headquarters of sin has been made of no effect as far as they are concerned. This is a sure sign that the condemnation is gone, for 5:16 speaks of justification, which in that context means righteous acquittal from the consequences of possessing the sin-principle within. (The apostle has already established that the believer is delivered from the consequences of his sins, in verses leading up to 5:1).
This freedom from the condemnation that comes through the sin-principle within is not only “now”, being a present reality, but is also total, for there is “no” condemnation. Note the title “Christ Jesus”, which is not found in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, for it especially emphasises the fact that the Man Jesus who lived on earth is now risen and glorified in heaven. His people are associated with Him there.
Who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit- freedom from condemnation does not depend upon our walk, but upon being in Christ Jesus, which is the position of all believers, not just those who walk according to the Spirit. Ideally, all who are in Christ Jesus will only want to walk according to the Spirit, and it is this ideal state that the apostle credits believers with here. To walk after the flesh as a believer is to live out of character. The rest of the chapter is designed to encourage a spiritual manner of life. The phrase highlights the difference between chapter 7 and its occupation with self, and chapter 8, with its occupation with the things of the Spirit.

8:2
For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death.

For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus- the word law is used in several ways in the New Testament, but here it means working principle. The Holy Spirit is described variously in this chapter. For instance, the Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ, verse 9; the Spirit of Him that raised up Jesus from the dead, verse 11; the Spirit of adoption, verse 15. Here He is described as the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus, because He associates with, and makes good to us, the life which we have in the risen Christ Jesus. He does not deal with us as if we have life in Adam, but acts on the principle or law that we have life in Christ Jesus. He associates with the life in Christ Jesus so closely that He can be described as the Spirit of that life.
Hath made me free- note the personal pronoun “me”, after the “them” of verse 1. The apostle is no doubt alluding to his very personal experience as detailed in 7:7-25, which comes to a climax with the words “who shall deliver me from the body of this death?” With the realisation of the true Christian position in a risen Christ comes the realisation of freedom from the sin and death that overwhelmed him in chapter 7. That this freedom is not just for Paul is seen in the fact that he goes on to speak of “us” in verse 4.
From the law of sin and death- in 7:25 Paul is captive to the law of sin, and this results in captivity to death, 7:24. Christ Jesus, however, has died to sin. That is, the defeat of sin was at the forefront of His mind on the cross. But He now lives to God, 6:10, so sin and death have no hold on Him. And this is true also of those who are in Him. Just as sin and death came in for all through Adam, 5:12, so they go out for many through Christ. The believer is freed from the operation of the law of sin and death by the superior principle on which the Spirit works. Working principles need power to put them into effect, and the indwelling Spirit is that power.
This is the believer’s position in God’s view, but since the apostle has to warn about the dangers of living after the flesh, and the possibility of dying, verse 13, we must apply these truths to our lives if this freedom is to be known in practical reality. We have been given the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus to enable us to live free from slavery to indwelling sin.

8:3
For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:

For what the law could not do- literally “for the law being powerless”. Note that by simply writing “the law”, the apostle now speaks of the law of God given at Sinai. The law of Moses was not able to set men free from sin and death. In fact the apostle calls it the ministry of death and the ministry of condemnation in 2 Corinthians 3:7,9. It only condemned sins, it did not deal with the nature which was the root of those sins. Furthermore, it did not give the power to overcome that nature, either.
In that it was weak through the flesh- the weakness, and therefore the inability to deliver, lay in the sinfulness of the flesh of men, not in any deficiency in the law of God. The tools (the commandments of the law) were of the finest quality, but the material on which they worked (the flesh) was rotten. As well ask a master craftsman to make a fine cabinet, and provide him with faulty materials, as use the law to produce a masterpiece from our sinful flesh. It cannot be done.
God sending his own Son- against the background of the powerlessness of the law, and the sinfulness of man, God intervenes in grace and purity. Angels and men were operative at the giving of the law, Acts 7:38,53, but now the fact that a greater work is about to be done is indicated by God sending His own Son, One who is privy to His counsels, and dear to His heart.
In the likeness of sinful flesh- note the guarded way in which the apostle writes here. Not “in sinful flesh”, as if God’s Son were not totally sinless; nor “in the likeness of flesh”, as if He were not really man. Rather, He comes in such a way, and by such means, as preserve the integrity of His holy nature. He comes in the likeness of that which in us is sinful, but which in Him was holy. He is True Man, but also Ideal Man.
By using these words, the apostle shows that he believes that the mother of the Lord Jesus conceived only by the intervention of the Holy Spirit, thus preserving the sinlessness of Christ. These words also dispose of the idea that the apostle did not believe in the uniqueness of the birth of Christ because he does not mention details about the virgin birth. We should remember that Luke was a beloved companion of the apostle, and he would not have had fellowship with one who did not believe what is found so clearly in the gospel that bears his name.
And for sin- His mission was expressly to deal with the root of sin in the nature of men. Some would see a reference to the sin offering here, since the Hebrew word for sin and sin-offering is the same. However when the word sin is used in Hebrew it simply means a single act of sin, which needs to be forgiven. God deals with the root of sin not by forgiving it, but by condemning it, and removing the repentant sinner from the sphere where that sin holds sway. Another difficulty with saying that sin means sin-offering is that the word sin occurs again in the next phrase, and it cannot mean sin-offering there.
Condemned sin in the flesh- this is the verbal form of the word condemnation which occurs in 5:16,18 and 8:1. God has pronounced His condemning verdict on the sin which dwells within us in three related ways. First, by sending His own Son, such was the gravity of the situation to be addressed. How terrible must sin be if only God’s Son can deal with it effectively! Second, by exposing the evil of sin by means of the life of Christ in the flesh. We read, “And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.” John 3:19,20. How terrible must sin be if it makes men hate Christ! Third, by the work of Christ in relation to the sin-question at Calvary. How terrible must sin be if God’s wrath had to be poured out upon none other than His own dear Son to deal with it!

8:4
That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.

That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us- far from destroying God’s law, the coming and work of Christ ensure that the believer is able to fulfil all that the law demanded as being right, (the meaning of “righteousness of the law” here), summed up in the words “judgement, mercy, and faith”, Matthew 23:23. See also Matthew 5:17 and Romans 13:8-10. The law of Moses is not specifically the code of conduct for the believer, but by living like Christ the believer fulfils the law incidentally.
Who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit- the power of the Spirit is the only way God’s righteous requirements can be met; man in the flesh is powerless, as chapter seven has shown.

Special note on the three-fold mention of Son in the chapter
There are seven mentions of the name Son in the epistle to the Romans. There are three in chapter one, another in chapter five, and the remaining three in chapter eight. The first four and the one in 8:29 are simple genitives, indicating that the Son belongs to God and is in relationship to Him. The other two have extra thoughts connected with them, and we will try to see what these are as we consider the three mentions in chapter eight.
In verse 3 the phrase “his own” is what is known as a reflexive and intensive pronoun. It is as if Paul wrote, “his own Son, no less”, or “his own Son and not someone else”. So the emphasis here is on the person of the Son. Given that we were weak and sinful, and that the law could not help us, there was no alternative to God sending His own Son, in all the wonder of His person.
In verse 29 the apostle uses the simple possessive pronoun, in this way emphasising the sonship of the Son. He is telling us that it is God’s purpose to make His people like someone, and that person is His Son. So in this instance the Son is the pattern and prototype Son.
In verse 32 the phrase is different again, and this time indicates that God’s Son is His in a distinct way. This highlights the cost to God of not sparing the one who is His Son in an unique sense. This emphasises the preciousness of the Son.

12(b)   8:5-8
New perception: The things of the Spirit

8:5
For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh; but they that are after the Spirit the things of the Spirit.

For they that are after the flesh- it is important to distinguish between being in the flesh, which is the position of the unbeliever, and walking (conducting our lives) after the flesh, which is all the unbeliever is able to do, and which the believer also is able to do but ought not. To be after the flesh means to take one’s lead and one’s character from the sinful self within. Or, to put it another way, to be after the flesh is to follow the flesh where it leads.
Do mind the things of the flesh- to mind involves a combination of thinking and willing. Self’s interests are considered in the mind, and are put into effect with determination by the will.
But they that are after the Spirit- those who take character and guidance from the indwelling Spirit.
The things of the Spirit- again the mind and the will are operative, but instead of self being to the fore, the matters which the Spirit of God brings before the mind are willingly concentrated on and responded to by the spiritual believer in Christ.

8:6
For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.

For to be carnally minded is death- the mind of the sinful self is characterised by occupation with things that result in the death of effective living for God. In the case of the unbeliever, this means he is in spiritual death. In the case of the carnal believer, he is in a state of moral death. See the comments in verse 13. Because the unbeliever is in death, which means he is separated from God, then he delights in those things which themselves are separated from God. It is sadly possible for a believer to engage in such things also, even though he is not in spiritual death. If he does do this, he is temporarily out of fellowship with God, although his eternal security is not affected.
But to be spiritually minded is life and peace- just as the mind of the flesh is characterised by occupation with things that are marked by death, so the mind of the Spirit is occupied with the things associated with eternal life. The apostle adds “and peace”, and the reason for the mention of this word peace becomes clear in verse 7, where a state of war is described. Great calmness is enjoyed by those who are spiritual. Carnal believers lack this peace because deep down they know they are being untrue to their proper calling.

8:7
Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

Because the carnal mind is enmity towards God- since it is occupied with things which are contrary to God, the mind of the flesh is at war with God, siding with the enemy, sin.
For it is not subject to the law of God- the flesh wars against God because it rebels against His authority as expressed in His law.
Neither indeed can be- this state of affairs cannot be remedied. The gospel does not seek to improve the mind of the flesh, but rather removes the person with that mind out of Adam into Christ Jesus. When this has happened the Spirit of God comes to dwell, so that the mind is now able to think on spiritual things.

8:8
So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God.

So then- the apostle summarises the position as far as the flesh is concerned.
They that are in the flesh cannot please God- having spoken of the mind of the flesh, the apostle now returns to speaking of people in the flesh, to prepare for the contrast with believers in verse 9. Four features of the mind of the flesh are mentioned in verses 6 and 7; first, it is occupied with things marked by death; second, it is at enmity with God; third, it is not subject to God; and fourth, it is incurable. Because of these things they that are in the flesh, that is, unbelievers, have no ability at all to please God.

12(c)   8:9-13
New power: The dwelling of the Spirit

8:9
But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

But ye are not in the flesh- having described the unbeliever as one who is in the flesh and after the flesh, Paul turns to state definitely that the believer is not in the flesh. Clearly the apostle is not using the word flesh to mean the body, (for they were in the body), but rather the sinful self. To be in the flesh means to be in an unchanged natural state.
But in the Spirit- since the contrast is not between the human body and spirit, the Spirit of God is meant. The believer is in a position which derives its character from the Spirit of God Himself. To be in the Spirit means to be in a changed state that is spiritual.
If so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you- the apostle inserts a warning here against false profession, before the teaching relative to the Christian life is further expanded. That the apostle does not suggest some true believers have not the Spirit of God within is seen from his next statement. To dwell means to be at home. The heart of the believer is a suitable home for the Spirit of God, because of the change wrought at conversion. The dwelling of the Holy Spirit within the believer is so transforming, that the believer is lost sight of, and is absorbed, so to speak, in the Spirit. So the Spirit is in the believer and the believer is in the Spirit.
Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his- the whole force of the argument is lost if we think of the Spirit of Christ as being different to the Spirit of God. This verse makes it clear that every believer has the Spirit of God within because he belongs to Christ. The Spirit is called “the Spirit of Christ” to remind us that the result of responding to the Spirit within is Christ-likeness. It is also true that the Spirit indwelling the believer is the same Spirit by which Christ acted when He was here, living a truly spiritual life as our example.

8:10
And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

And if Christ be in you- as indeed He is, in the person of the Spirit, as the Lord made clear in John 14:16.
The body is dead because of sin- the presence of Christ within highlights the truth that the body is dead, for the very fact that the Spirit of God needed to be sent into our hearts is proof that we were unable to please God of ourselves. The reason the body is dead is because the sin-principle uses the body as its base of operations. It is dead in the sense that it is powerless to act for God unaided.
But the Spirit is life because of righteousness- because the Spirit acts on the principle that we have life in Christ Jesus, the Risen Man, verse 2, then by His power we are enabled to live as those who are “alive from the dead”, and to yield the members of our body as “instruments of righteousness”, 6:13. By so doing we present (same word as yield in 6:13) our bodies a living sacrifice, 12:1.

8:11
But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.

But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you- the Spirit is now spoken of as the Spirit of the God of resurrection, as the apostle gives a further consequence of His indwelling. Not only does the Spirit empower us to live spiritual lives whilst we are in the present body, He is also the guarantee of life in resurrection bodies hereafter.
He that raised up Christ from the dead- note the change of title, “raised up Jesus…raised up Christ” The name Jesus reminds us it was a man who had lived on the earth who was raised from the dead. The epistle to the Romans treats us as those who are living on the earth. It does not see us as seated in the heavenly places as the epistle to the Ephesians does. This is why in the next phrase only mortal (tending to death) bodies are spoken of, not dead bodies in a grave. (1 Corinthians 15:51-58 explains the mystery as to how saints who have not died are going to share the resurrection experience).
What encouragement to know that the certain result of being associated with Jesus, the Man after God’s own heart, is to be quickened in resurrection! But He is Christ, the One anointed with the Holy Spirit, and in harmony at all times with Him. This presents us with a challenge as to whether this is true of us as Christians (“Christ-ones”, those who own allegiance to Him, and who are in-dwelt by His Spirit).
Shall also quicken your mortal bodies- quicken means make alive. Bodies which tend to death even though the person possesses life in Christ, will be changed at the resurrection so that all trace of sin and it’s consequence, death, will be removed, with the result that mortality shall be swallowed up of life, 2 Corinthians 5:4.
By his Spirit that dwelleth in you- the presence of the Spirit of God in the believer is the reason why the quickening takes place, and is also the guarantee that it will take place. It is not dependant on the believer’s spirituality. This confirms that every true believer of this church age will be taken to heaven when Christ comes for His own at the Rapture. Once this has happened, every trace of sin and death will have been forever removed from the believer’s body.

Special note on the apostle’s line of thought
As he proceeds through his reasoning in this chapter, the apostle first of all refers to the state of condemnation into which the sin of Adam brought us. Then he mentions the law of God given at Sinai, followed by the coming of God’s Son and His death for sin at Calvary. Then he implies the sinner’s conversion, for he now walks after the Spirit. Having thought of the difference between a life after the flesh and a life after the Spirit, he reaches a climax by speaking of the resurrection of the saints at the Lord’s coming, verse 11, and the change of the body which will take place then.

These things have consequences, so the apostle begins verse 12 with a “therefore”. He will explain the obligations believers have in the light of what God has done for them. Their first obligation is to live, not after the flesh, but after the Spirit, verse 12. According to whether they do the one or the other they shall be either in moral death, or living the true life of a Christian, verse 13. If they do the latter, they will be living as sons, following the leading of the Spirit of God, as He encourages them in spiritual things. It is possible to be a son of God and not live up to the name. The apostle is writing so that believers live the life that befits sons, for only such have the title son of God in practice. The power to live this life is not the law, with its bondage and fear, verse 15, but the Spirit of God in His capacity as the One who causes us to cry Abba, Father. In this way God will be a Father to us, and we sons to Him, not just in name, but in reality.

8:12
Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh.

Therefore, brethren, we are debtors- previously the apostle has explained the nature of the case as to our position before God. Now he presses upon us our responsibilities to God. He uses the title brethren to arrest our attention, and remind us we possess life as those who are in the family of God, and therefore have the ability to respond to the exhortation which follows. Before we were saved we were under obligation to God as sinners, and had nothing to pay, Luke 7:40-43. Now, however, the saving work of God in us has made us eternally indebted to Him, and therefore under obligation to Him as saints. The difference now is that we are able to begin to repay the debt, but only because Divine resources have been given to us.
Not to the flesh- we are not obliged to respond to the attempts of our sinful self to influence us. All of its authority has been removed by Christ when our old man was crucified in company with Him, 6:6.
To live after the flesh- we are not in the flesh, but we still have the ability to live after the flesh because we are still in the body.

8:13
For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.

For if ye live after the flesh ye shall die- this cannot mean lose salvation, for he has just addressed them as brethren, and as such they are eternally secure. He has been careful to apply the test as to the reality of their conversion in verse 9, and has proceeded as if they were really saved. Furthermore, every believer has already passed out of death into life, John 5:24, and shall never see death, John 8:51.
Die in this context therefore must mean the same as when the prodigal’s father said that his son was dead, and is alive again, (in relation to God), was lost and is found, (in relation to his family), Luke 15:24. The prodigal was as good as dead when in the far country, his life did not profit his father at all, and so it is with believers if they live after the flesh. See 1 Timothy 5:6 for a further example. In extreme cases, as with some of the Corinthians, this may mean premature physical death, if their life-style brings grave discredit upon the testimony, and they are disciplined by God because of it, see 1 Corinthians 11:30.
But if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live- note the contrast again between the flesh and the Spirit of God. The flesh is powerless to enable us to live spiritual lives, hence the great blessing of being indwelt by the Spirit of God. The Spirit is life because of, or for the sake of, righteousness, verse 10.
Instead of weakly succumbing to the flesh, the believer is to take the initiative, and mortify (put to death) the deeds of the body, using the power of the Spirit to apply the truths already detailed in chapter 6. It is through the body that the flesh, the self-principle within, manifests itself.
When our self provokes to a sinful deed, then we are to slay that deed immediately, for by crucifying our old man in company with Christ, God has signalled that it is only worthy of death, so we should signal that too. By so doing we shall clear the way for a true expression of spiritual life, which involves all those things from which the Living God derives pleasure, and which those who are in harmony with Him as His sons enjoy also.

Special note on the subject of death
Death is presented to us, in the main, in four different ways in the Scriptures, as follows:

1. Spiritual death. This has to do with the separation of a person from God, who told man at the beginning that if he ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, he would “surely die”, Genesis 2:17. Sadly, man listened to the lie of the Devil, who said, “Ye shall not surely die”, 3:4. So it was that the moment Adam sinned he was separated from God, and “dead in trespasses and sins”, Ephesians 2:1. His communion with God was broken. The Lord Jesus taught the doctrine of spiritual death, for He said that he that believes in Him “is passed from death unto life”, John 5:24.

2. Physical death. As a consequence of spiritual death, man became mortal, and physical death is his lot. As we have already noticed, the apostle Paul put it like this, “Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.” Romans 5:12. Physical death is the separation of the spirit from the body, for James tells us that “the body without the spirit is dead”, James 2:26. The reason this happens, even to believers, is that the sin-principle, which is the cause of physical death, is in all men. Only in the moment of resurrection will believers leave the sin-principle behind, 1 Corinthians 15:54-57.

3. Moral death. As we have noticed already, the apostle wrote “For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.” Romans 8:13. No true believer is in the flesh, (“ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit”, verse 9), but he can walk, or live his life, after the flesh, (which is his sinful side, which still remains because of the sin-principle within the body). All the while he lives like that he is not living the true Christian life, and those hours, or months, or even years spent living in this way do not count in God’s reckoning, and he is temporarily dead as to true Christian living.

4. The second death. This is defined for us in Revelation 21:8, where we read, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.” We know from another scripture that “it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment”, Hebrews 9:27. So the second death is not a second dying, but a second state of death, the first one being when the sinner dies, and body and spirit are separated.

12(d)   8:14-17
New privileges: The leading of the Spirit

8:14
For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.

For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God- only those who obey the prompting of the Spirit of God may be rightly described as the sons of God, for they manifest by their dignified and mature behaviour that they have a nature and character in God’s likeness. The word “they” is emphatic, it is “they and only they”. Clearly the apostle does not anticipate that there will be persons claiming to be sons of God, and yet who do not respond to the guidance of the Spirit. Since all God’s people have the Spirit of God within their hearts, they all must be sons, whatever their state of spiritual development may be. But the sad fact is that we often fail to live as sons, and when in that condition we cannot be said to be led of the Spirit practically, although the Spirit never leaves.
As well as being morally dead when he was in the far country, the prodigal was also not living the life of a son. The father still thought of him as such, (“this my son was dead”), but he was not a son in character and dignity. In fact the prodigal admitted as much himself, for he compared himself unfavourably even with the servants in the house. Only when he returned to fellowship with the father did he know the joy of being a son.
How different it was with God’s Son, for the promise came to Him, “I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son”, Hebrews 1:5. This is not the beginning of the Father/Son relationship, for that was eternal, but it was the beginning of the display in the world of the ideal Father/Son relationship. Everything a perfect son should be to a perfect father was seen in their relationship one with the other. There was glory attaching to that relationship, for the apostle John writes, “and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father”, John 1:14. The glory consisted of the unfailing support of the Father, and the unfailing dependence of the Son.

8:15
For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.

For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear- the Spirit of God cannot be described as the spirit of bondage, for His task is to bring us into liberty. The believer is completely delivered from bondage, whether it be to sin, 6:17,18; the law, Galatians 4:3; idols, Galatians 4:8, or the fear of death, Hebrews 2:15. Each of those forms of bondage involved fear of one sort or another. The special reference is to bondage to the law, which we have seen in chapter 7 brings only to despair. Instead of exclaiming “Who shall deliver me”, 7:24, the believer cries “Abba, Father”.
But ye have received the Spirit of adoption- adoption is the act of placing as sons. The Spirit of God may rightly be described as the Spirit who brings into sonship and who maintains in sonship. He associates with us on the basis that we have been placed before God in the position of sons, for in Galatians 4:6 He comes into our hearts because we are sons. This is further proof that all God’s people are sons, for all have the Spirit within, and the Spirit only comes because they are sons. Whether all believers live and act as sons is another matter.
It is in this sense that the apostle John wrote, “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.” John 1:12. As those who believe, we have eternal life, which gives the ability to grow in the knowledge of God. By doing this, we increasingly become like his Son, and as well as being sons of God by adoption, we become sons of God in practice.

Special note on the translation “sons of God” in John 1:12
The Authorised Version has been criticised for translating the Greek word tekna as “sons”, when the root of the word has to do with childbirth. It is contended that the word should be translated “children”. We should remember that the men who translated the Authorised Version were learned men, who were very well qualified for the task. They would have weighed up the question of whether they should translate as sons or children very carefully.

We should remember also that at the end of the scriptures there is a solemn warning about taking from and adding to the words of scripture. This would include taking from and adding to the sense of the words, as well as the words themselves. This warning was given in the context of the promise of Christ’s coming again, so it is clear that there would be something that could be called the Word of God that was not to be tampered with, and that would last until the Lord’s coming. In the goodness of God the Word of God is with us in its perfect form, and we seek to change it at our spiritual peril.

Could it not be that John is looking on to the future? It is God’s purpose to reveal His Son to this world in a day to come. At that day He will come accompanied with multitudes whom Paul calls the sons of God, Romans 8:19. They will have been conformed to the image of God’s Son, as Romans 8:29 tells us. But what they will display is “the glorious liberty of the children of God”, verse 21. Their glory as children is that they have liberty. Their glory as sons is that they are like the Son of God. It is the same company in view in each case, but the emphasis is different. So in John 1:12 it is “become the sons of God”, whereas in the next verse the same people are born of God, and are therefore His children. The new birth is the beginning, whereas being the sons of God as conformed to the image of God’s Son, is the ending. Notice the way in which the apostle Paul speaks of believers as sons and children in the same passage, Romans 8:14-21. We should remember that in normal circumstances it was a Greek or Roman’s own child that he made his son, as we see from Galatians 4:1-6. This is not to say that believers only become sons after they have been children for a while. The apostle writes in Romans 8:17, “if children, then heirs”, and yet in Galatians 4:7, “if a son, then an heir”. So believers are heirs of God as children, and heirs of God as sons, so they are sons as soon as they are children.

It is God’s purpose to give to His sons even now the power to become the sons of God in the sense that they become increasingly son-like. The word for power is the one that emphasises authority, that is, freedom to act. It would be presumption for believers to take the place of sons if the Son of God Himself had not given them the right. They are trusted to mature in sonship. This is a fitting climax to the section in which John is detailing interventions by the Word. It is as if the sons of God are authorised to continue the task begun by the Word, namely, to manifest God. The grand result of His interventions will be when He comes again with those who have responded to Him and have been made like Him.


Whereby we cry Abba, Father- in the power of the Holy Spirit and by His prompting we commune with God. This cry to our Father is the most intimate, and includes within itself all other experiences we may have of God. In Galatians 4:6 the Spirit cries “Abba, Father”, but since God is not the Father of the Holy Spirit this must mean that He expresses perfectly for us what we express feebly. The double use of the name Abba, (as also with Christ in Gethsemane, Mark 14:36), would signify intensity of feeling, and a deep appreciation of the relationship implied in the term. The fact that one is in Old Testament language and one in New Testament, would perhaps hint at the fact that believers from Jewish and Gentile background may unite in the use of the expression.
It is said that slaves were forbidden to call their masters by this name, so we do not read of Ishmael addressing Abraham in such a way, for he was the son of the slave-woman, Galatians 4:21-23. On the other hand, Abraham’s true son was Isaac, and his first recorded words are “My father”, Genesis 22:7.

8:16
The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God:

The Spirit itself- that is, the Spirit mentioned in the previous verses, “that very One who is the Spirit of adoption”. Note that there is no connecting word between verses 15 and 16, indicating strength of feeling on the part of the apostle, no doubt overawed by the thought of being able to call God his Father.
The Holy Spirit is a Divine Person and not simply an influence, for He teaches, leads, convicts, reveals and comforts, all of which only persons can do. The use of the words “He” and “Him” for the Holy Spirit in John 14:16,26 and 16:7 is not in itself a proof of this, for the pronoun in Greek takes its gender from the antecedent noun, which in those verses is comforter, which is masculine. When the pronoun follows the word Spirit, which is a neuter noun, as in John 14:17; 16:13,14, the Authorised Version still translates by the word He, because in those verses the emphasis is on the fact that He is a Person of the Godhead. He is another of the same sort as Christ, and therefore is a person. By person is meant one who has a centre of intelligent consciousness.
In the verse we are considering, however, the point is that the apostle has just used the word Spirit in a descriptive sense, “Spirit of adoption”, (in contrast to “the spirit of bondage”), so it is proper to translate the pronoun as “itself” since the personal aspect is not to the fore.
Beareth witness with our spirit that we are the children of God  – by encouraging us to commune with God as Father, the Spirit signifies that He reckons us to be indeed God’s children. By responding to this encouragement, we show that we really are in that relationship with God. The Holy Spirit and the believer’s spirit testify to the same truth, for it is beareth witness “with”, not “to”. Thus there is a joint testimony to the reality of the relationship that exists between ourselves and God.
Note the apostle now refers to us as children, even though he has said that we call God Father as His sons. Perhaps the reason for this is found in the reference to our spirit. It is the spirit of man which is acted upon by the Spirit of God when the new birth takes place, John 3:6, and by this means he becomes a child of God.

8:17
And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together.

And if children, then heirs- here heirship is founded on a relationship with God as His children, whereas in the parallel passage in Galatians 4:7 heirship is based on sonship. Since this heirship involves feeling the same things about this groaning creation as Christ did, (for suffering is part of our inheritance at this present time), then the capacity to know things as Divine persons know them is needed, and for this reason believers have been given eternal life as His children.
If so be that we suffer with him- or “provided that”. True believers are sure to suffer with Christ, and are thereby shown to be children of God. What sorrow filled the heart of Christ when He was on the earth and saw the effects of the fall of Adam around Him, knowing all the time that the only way in which the situation could be permanently remedied was by Him tasting death for every man, Hebrews 2:9. Not only did He suffer as He looked on these things, but also when He sympathetically took upon Himself the pains and sorrows of suffering men and women, Matthew 8:17.
Believers carry a burden of suffering in their own bodies, to a lesser or greater degree, and also feel for those all around who suffer, and in the measure in which they feel about things in the way Christ did, they suffer with Him. Sufferings
with Him are to be distinguished from suffering for Him, which happens when we seek to maintain a good testimony despite opposition from the world, Philippians 1:28-30. They are also to be distinguished from the sufferings of Christ, 1 Peter 1:11. These are the sufferings, foretold by the prophets, that pertained to Him, being unique and special to Him.
That we may be glorified together- when He is manifest as the glorious deliverer of a groaning creation, His people will share that glory. Their suffering is the necessary path to that glory, for they shall share the glory as they shared the sufferings.


As we have proceeded through Section 12, we have noticed the following ministries of the Holy Spirit in the believer:

Verse 2 Operating on the fixed principle that Christ is risen
Verse 5 Taking of the things of Christ for our consideration
Verse 9 Dwelling within the believer
Verse 10 Empowering and encouraging practical righteousness
Verse 11 Guaranteeing the quickening of our mortal bodies
Verse 13 Giving strength to mortify the deeds of the body
Verse 14 Leading God’s sons
Verse 15 Encouraging communion with our Father
Verse 16 Bearing witness with our spirit

Section 13 Romans 8:18-27
Sufferings then glory

Subject of Section 13
In 8:17 the apostle had introduced the truth that suffering is part of our inheritance with Christ. He now traces the cause of that suffering to the fact that we are still in the body, which is not as yet redeemed, although the ransom price for its redemption has already been paid at Calvary. He presents a series of conditions which we share with creation, and then outlines the contrasting conditions which will be brought in when Christ comes to earth as the deliverer of creation. In the last division there is presented a contrast between our ignorance as to what to pray for in such circumstances, and the Spirit’s complete insight into our needs.

Structure of Section 13

!3 (a)

8:18

Suffering and glory

13(b)

8:19-21

Bondage and liberty

13(c)

8:22-25

Groaning and redemption

13(d)

8:26-27

Ignorance and knowledge


13(a)   8:18
Suffering and glory

8:18
For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.

For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time- the apostle gives us the benefit of his spiritual calculations, as one who suffered much in the body. He had also been to paradise, 2 Corinthians 12:4, so he knew much about glory as well. But although the things he experienced in paradise were inexpressible, yet we are confident that his reckoning as to the relative importance of suffering and glory is accurate. The present time is the period from the fall of man until Christ’s coming to earth, when creation is characterised by corruption and groaning.
Are not worthy to be compared- literally rendered, the idea is the sufferings “are not heavy enough to make the balance of the apothecary move”, in other words, are of small account, comparatively. The apothecary used his delicate apparatus to weigh very tiny amounts. As the apostle writes elsewhere, “For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory.” 2 Corinthians 4:17.
With the glory that shall be revealed in us- the sense of “shall be” is “shall certainly be”. The word revealed has the idea of being unveiled, as when a curtain is drawn aside, the word used in Revelation 1:1 for the unveiling of Christ. After believers have been glorified at the Rapture, the glory in them shall be manifest to the rest of creation at the Revelation.
See 1 John 3:2 for these two events, where we read, “when he shall appear”, (at the Revelation, His coming to earth), “we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is”, (at the Rapture, His coming into the air). The particular glory in view is that of having bodies delivered from the effects of the fall, and transformed into the likeness of Christ, who has a glorious body. So the subject is not glory manifest to them, but manifest in them, by their instrumentality.
The apostle writes in Philippians 3:20,21, “For our conversation is in heaven; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ: who shall change our vile body, that it may be fashioned like unto his glorious body, according to the working whereby he is able even to subdue all things unto himself.” So the change in the believer’s body is the pattern for the change of creation.

13(b)   8:19-21
Bondage and liberty

8:19
For the earnest expectation of the creature waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God.

For the earnest expectation of the creature- creation is viewed as if it is a person, craning its neck to catch the first glimpse of what is coming. Psalm 148 speaks poetically as if creation is able to praise God intelligently.
Waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God- “waiteth for” has the sense that creation awaits expectantly and eagerly. There is again the idea of revelation, this time of the sons, as they are introduced to a creation about to be delivered by the coming of Christ, the Last Adam.
Note that the apostle emphasises the revelation of the sons, not of the Son of God Himself, although He will in fact come. The appearance of multitudes of mortals who have been changed into the likeness of the Son of God, and are thereby enabled to represent Him, will be the signal that creation is about to be delivered.
It will also be the sign that God is able to deliver, for these sons were once part of a groaning creation, but now they are free. The right to deliver was purchased by Christ when by His blood He laid the foundation for peace between an alienated creation and the God who brought it into being. The apostle writes elsewhere, “And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven”, Colossians 1:20.

8:20
For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope,

For the creature was made subject to vanity- it was not appropriate for Adam, as a fallen creature, to be head over an unfallen creation, so because of his sin the earth was cursed. Vanity is want of vigour, the opposite of the glorious liberty of verse 21. The ground was cursed for man’s sake, Genesis 3:17, for it is not in man’s best interests to be a sinner with nothing to occupy his time. One of the features of Sodom was “abundance of idleness”, Ezekiel 16:49.
Not willingly- the apostle continues to speak of creation as if it is a person with a will, not welcoming the subjection to vanity. This is one of the reasons why creation groans.
But by reason of him who subjected the same in hope- it was God’s will that creation should be affected by the fall of man, in order that the hope of final restoration might be before it, see verses 24 and 25. As soon as Adam sinned, God promised the coming deliverer, Genesis 3:15, who would realise the hope of deliverance from the curse. God cannot therefore be charged with callousness over the issue of the sufferings associated with this life because of the fall.

8:21
Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God.

Because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption- the very selfsame creation that was subjected to vanity shall also be delivered. This shows that the change the apostle is speaking of in this passage is not from an old earth to a new earth, which will happen at the end of time, Revelation 21:1, but rather the regeneration of the old earth. In this way Christ will glorify God as He acts as head over this earth, and thus vindicate Him for originally entrusting the earth to man, Psalm 8:6; Hebrews 2:5-10.
Sin brought corruption in its wake, and this in turn meant that all things were in a state of slavery to that corruption, serving its interests. Everything in the universe is based on the principle of rotation. When motor engineers discover that a car’s brakes are slowing it down, they say the brakes are binding; the circular motion of the wheel is slowed down, with consequent problems. So every atom in the universe is operating as if it has its brakes on, and the bondage thereby becomes the bondage causing corruption, for nothing is working as efficiently now as it did when God created it in perfection at the beginning.
Into the glorious liberty of the children of God- instead of bondage there will be liberty, with creation freed from the hindrances which prevent it fully declaring the glory of its Creator. Instead of corruption, a process of decay and deterioration, there will be glory, as the full splendour of what God created in the beginning, and which He described as very good, will be restored. The same change which shall set the children of God free from the limitations of this present body shall affect the whole of creation. God has begotten His children so that they should be a kind of first-fruits of His creatures, James 1:18. Their change as to the body will be the signal for the change for the whole of creation.

13(c)   8:22-25
Groaning and redemption

8:22
For we know that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now.

For we know that the whole creation groaneth- things around, and personal experience, contribute to this knowledge, together with the testimony of Scripture. Every earthquake, volcanic eruption and tsunami is testimony to a groaning creation.
And travaileth in pain together until now- if groans tell of the consequences of a past fall, then travaileth, whilst indicating pain, also indicates the hope of new birth for creation. The Lord Jesus described the coming kingdom age as “the regeneration”, Matthew 19:28, when conditions in the earth will be changed so as to be fit for Messiah to reign.
Until now- from the fall of man in the past, to the very real and often painful present, as compared to the glorious future when groaning will cease.

8:23
And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.

And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the first-fruits of the Spirit- it is not only inanimate creation that groans. Even though we are indwelt by the Spirit of God, (who is the guarantee of our resurrection and change, verse 11), we still groan. First-fruits of the Spirit means first-fruits consisting of the Spirit and all that His presence implies for the future. This word first-fruits is used of a birth certificate in secular documents. We have within us the proof that the travailing of creation will bring forth results.
Even we ourselves groan within ourselves- “we” is emphatic, even such as we who have the Spirit of God within.
Waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body- we already have “redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins”, Ephesians 1:7, but our bodies are not yet set free from the bondage of corruption.

8:24
For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?

For we are saved by hope- in hope we were saved, for the hope of having redeemed bodies was one of the goals in view when we were saved. We are encouraged in hope because we know that the ransom price for the eventual redemption of the body has already been paid, Ephesians 1:14. This hope saves from despair and from having wrong thoughts about God.
But hope that is seen is not hope, for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? By definition a hope is something not yet realised, so we should not be surprised if we still groan.

8:25
But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it.

But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it- because hope in the New Testament is a certain thing, then the believer is encouraged to patiently wait for the realisation of it, even though meanwhile he has to endure the privations imposed by a groaning body.

13(d)   8:26-27
Ignorance and knowledge

8:26
Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities: for we know not what we should pray for as we ought: but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered.

Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities- as well as the sure hope of change helping us to endure patiently, the Spirit helps too. The indwelling Spirit comes to our aid, for He is a “paraclete”, one who comes alongside to help. He joins with us to help us in our weak condition. He does not take over completely, but jointly helps us as we pray.
The word “helpeth”, is a complex word, meaning “to take hold with at the side for assistance”. The infirmities or weaknesses which are the consequence of being in an unchanged body are too much of a burden for us to carry alone.
For we know not what we should pray for as we ought- note that the apostle assumes that the situation will cause us to be cast upon God in prayer. But what the will of God in such circumstances is, we, (including the apostle), have no way of knowing. We do know that it is not God’s will to remove every sickness from us now, as the apostle himself discovered in 2 Corinthians 12:5-10.
But the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us- this is the way the Spirit helps our infirmities; not by removing them, but by interceding on our behalf so that we are enabled to endure them, and to glorify God through them, 2 Corinthians 12:8,9.
With groanings that cannot be uttered- with words that we could not express ourselves, (even if we knew what to pray for), the Spirit intervenes on our behalf. The believer groans, and the Spirit identifies Himself with those groanings as He engages in intercession with God. It is not so much that the Spirit groans, but that He translates our groanings into meaningful intercession as He associates with us in our need.

8:27
And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God.

And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit- because what the Spirit expresses in the ear of God is a perfected expression of the sincere groaning of the believer in his heart, they are in that sense like-minded, and God appreciates and accepts the intercession of the Spirit as if it were the intercession of the believer.
Because he maketh intercession for the saints according to the will of God- “the will of” has been supplied to make the meaning clear. The Spirit intercedes according to God in the sense that He intercedes infallibly in line with what the will of God is. God knows or understands the Spirit’s intercession because it is in accordance with His will. We are unable to intercede like this because we know not what we should pray for as we ought. In other words, we do not know what the will of God is in these circumstances. So the Spirit identifies both with the sincere desires of our hearts, and the settled will of God, forming a link between the two. He interprets our feeble prayers so that they truly harmonise with the will of God, whilst still remaining the exercise of our hearts.

Section 14   Romans 8:28-39
Overwhelmed or overcoming

Subject of Section 14
Having shown how God has dealt with the first two things brought in by the fall, namely the flesh and a groaning creation, the apostle now turns his attention to the adversary, Satan, through whom man fell. He does not flatter him by a direct mention, but shows that the attempts of the Evil One to accuse the brethren and to divert them from trust in God are completely thwarted.

Structure of Section 14

14(a)

8:28-30

The purpose of God

14(b)

8:31-37

The preservation of God’s people

14(c)

8:38-39

The persuasion of the apostle


14 (a)   8:28-30
The purpose of God

8:28
And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose.

And we know that all things work together for good- whilst we do not know what to pray for in the perplexities of life in the midst of a groaning creation, we do know there is One who superintends it all for the ultimate, long-term good of His people. Jacob said of his trials, “all these things are against me”, Genesis 42:36, whereas Joseph said of those same circumstances, “ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good”, Genesis 50:20. The “all things” refers both to the things that make us groan in the present, and also the various aspects of God’s purpose in eternity that the apostle is about to tell us about. The word good refers to the blessings of verses 29 and 30.
To them that love God- not “to them that God loves”, but the apostle takes it for granted that there will be a response to God from those who are sons of God. We have learnt from Romans 5:3-5 that the trying experiences of life are for our education, and result in the consciousness of the love of God in the heart. So it is that true believers can be defined as those who love God, for they respond in this way to God’s dealings with them.
To them who are the called according to his purpose- if the former phrase relates to the trials spoken of in the previous verses, this phrase relates to what follows in the next verses. What happens in our life-time and what is true in eternity are linked by these two expressions.
Note the apostle does not write, “them who are called according to His purpose”, as if others are called in some other way than according to His purpose. It is, “them who are the called according to His purpose”, so they are a definite company, (hence the definite article), being those who have responded to the gospel, and by this come within the scope of God’s purpose.
The call of the gospel goes out to all men, and those who respond to that call enter into the good of the purpose of God, which is what He has determined shall come to pass. As the apostle wrote to the Thessalonian believers, “God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth: whereunto he called you by our gospel, to the obtaining of the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ”, 2 Thessalonians 2:13,14. So all who hear the gospel invitation are “called”, but only those who respond are “the called”, those who have responded to the gospel. The apostle has described the believers at Rome as “the called of Jesus Christ”, 1:6. He clearly does not mean by this all who have heard the gospel call, whether they have responded in faith or not, but rather that group of people who have believed it.
So it is not that believers have been called with a different sort of call to those who hear the gospel and never believe. Or to put it another way, there is not a general call and an effectual call. The difference in effect when the gospel is preached is because of the response or lack of response of the hearers. The gospel call is thoroughly genuine, and may be preached to all without reserve or limitation.
It is to “the called”, and to these alone, that the assurances of these verses come. Since God’s people are the object of His eternal purpose, the temporary troubles of this life are of little account. Compare 2 Corinthians 4:17, where the apostle declares “For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory”.

8:29
For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.

For whom he did foreknow- the reason why we know all things work together for good is now to be explained. The apostle has carefully defined those of whom he is speaking, namely those who love God and who are the called. So he is not writing about sinners in this passage.
God knew His people before the events of time came their way. Therefore those events cannot affect their position before Him. Peter declares that believers are elect according to the foreknowledge of God, 1 Peter 1:2, and Paul declares that His choice of them in Christ was before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4. So we may say that before time began God foreknew His people, meaning He encompassed in His thoughts all who would believe in Him. He did this in relation to Christ, for His people were “chosen…in Him”, meaning in Christ. His choice of His people is conditioned by His thoughts about His Son, for He purposes to surround His Son with those who are like Him and represent Him. What His Son has been to Him for all eternity is what His people shall be to Him through Christ for all eternity.
He also did predestinate- which means “to set out the boundaries beforehand”. Just as God ordained the geographical boundaries of the tribes of Israel when they entered Canaan, so He has set the bounds of the believer’s position before Him. There is a difference, however, for each tribe had part of the land of promise, whereas each church believer has the whole of the heavenly equivalent to Canaan, namely “all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ, Ephesians 1:3.
To be conformed to the image of his Son- note that the predestination is not to heaven or hell, but rather to a moral position, even that of likeness to Christ. It is God’s purpose that ultimately all His people shall be altered so as to fully manifest and represent the moral features that characterise His Son. This is the idea behind the word image. We could not be conformed to His Son personally, for He is unique, but we shall be conformed to Him enough to be able to represent Him.
This involves a change as to the body, for at present we bear the image of the earthy, 1 Corinthians 15:49, and as such have limitations which prohibit the full expression of what Christ is. This is why the change of the body is called the adoption or son-placing in verse 23, for it will be the consummation of God’s purpose to make us like His Son when we “bear the image of the heavenly”.
That he might be the firstborn among many brethren- so the likeness we shall bear is not the likeness of Christ as the Only-begotten Son, for in that He is unique and alone. As Firstborn however, He will have many brethren sharing and manifesting His glory, and He will be pre-eminent among them. This is the result of Him giving to His people the glory that has been given to Him, in accordance with His prayer in John 17:22.

Special note on foreknowledge
When considering this important subject, we must be guided by the Scriptures alone. They have supreme authority, and disaster awaits those who ignore this fact. Just as the Scriptures were written by men who were borne along by the Spirit of God, and thus wrote the words of God, so those who seek to understand those words must do so by the help of that same Spirit of God. For no Scripture is of any private interpretation, as if the reader is able to understand it unaided. The Spirit-given Scriptures must be Spirit-explained.
This is not to say that we should despise the thoughts of other men; rather, they, and we, must be subject to the Spirit in His role as the Spirit of truth, who is able to take of the things of Christ and reveal them unto us.
The apostle Paul warned the Corinthians against allowing worldly thinking to affect their thoughts of God and His truth. The world crucified Christ in ignorance- eloquent testimony to its failure to understand Divine things. And we believers have not received “the spirit of the world”, that attitude of heart and mind which led it to crucify the Lord of Glory, but rather, we have received “the Spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God”, 1 Corinthians 2:12. In the first instance these words refer to those who wrote the New Testament, so we have infallibly conveyed to us the truth the Spirit imparted to them, so that we may have at our disposal that which will guide us in our search for truth.
With these cautionary thoughts in mind, we consider the great and mysterious subject of Divine foreknowledge. As with the study of any Bible concept, all those Scriptures that have a bearing upon it must be taken into account. Any answer to an exam question which fails to take account of all the information contained in the question, is very likely to be wrong. In the matter before us, it will not take long to quote the Scriptures involved. They are as follows, with the relevant words in bold for the sake of clarity:

“Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain”, Acts 2:23.

“My manner of life from my youth, which was at the first among mine own nation at Jerusalem, know all the Jews; which knew me from the beginning, if they would testify,” Acts 26:4,5.

“For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Romans 8:29.

“God hath not cast away his people, which he foreknew.” Romans 11:2.

“Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ”, 1 Peter 1:2.

“Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you”, 1 Peter 1:20.

“Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away by the error of the wicked, fall from your own steadfastness.” 2 Peter 3:17.

The Greek word used where the text is in bold type is based upon the verb “prognostiko”, meaning “to know first, or beforehand”. We may notice briefly the references to Paul, Acts 26:5, and a believer’s general knowledge, 2 Peter 2:17, for they will serve to remind us that the “knowing before” by unbelievers and believers alike, is general and gradual. General in the sense that men could not know Saul of Tarsus perfectly. They could only look at his life and come to an opinion. So is it also with the knowledge of believers. Peter writes in 2 Peter 3 of the fact that we know things that will happen in the future, but any discussion of prophecy will soon reveal that there are many matters of which we know very little. We are given the outline of future things, and the details await their fulfilment. God’s foreknowledge, however, is not general, but particular and detailed, for all things are open to Him.
God’s foreknowledge is also not general in the sense that it is able to be concerned with specific people, as we shall see from Romans 8:29. There is an element of involvement with particular people in God’s foreknowledge in that verse, but this is often absent from our knowledge of people and events.
The foreknowledge of man is also gradual. As events unfold, (in the case of Saul of Tarsus), or as we grasp the truth of Scripture more firmly, (in the case of future events in 2 Peter 3), then we advance in knowledge. Not so with God, who, being the Eternal God, is not dependent on the passage of time. To Him all is an eternal present. His grasp of all things is total and immediate.
With these reservations in mind, we concentrate now on the references to Divine foreknowledge in the remaining five passages, looking at them in the order in which they occur in the Scriptures.

The foreknowledge of God and Christ’s crucifixion
“Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and slain”, Acts 2:23.

This passage makes clear that the Divine determinate counsel and Divine foreknowledge are not synonymous terms. God’s determinate counsel is His settled purpose with regard to events. God’s foreknowledge is not simply His prior and general knowledge of all things before they happen, but rather His prior and particular knowledge of events and persons as they are included in His gracious purpose. It is clearly events that are in view in the passage just quoted, whereas in Romans 8:29 it is persons. It is not just people that are the subject of foreknowledge, as is sometimes stated, for here it is the deliverance of Christ to Calvary that is in view. Peter is doing three things as he makes his statement. First, he is assuring the nation of Israel that even though they thought they were in control when they crucified Christ, it was not so. God’s settled purpose was being carried out. Moreover, even though it was God’s will that was being done, the hands that did the work were still guilty hands. It was not God who was morally responsible for what had happened, but they. This establishes an important principle, that even when God’s permissive will is carried out by men, the blame for any evil done lies entirely with them.
Second, he is giving assurance to those who had believed on Christ during His ministry, that He had not been the victim of circumstances, but everything was under Divine control. They had great hopes that He would set up His kingdom, instead of which He was nailed to a cross! Does this mean He has lost control? Not so, the apostle is saying in effect, for the crucifixion was part of God’s purpose.
Third, he is assuring all, saved and unsaved, that God’s interests lay with Christ, not just when He was being arrested and crucified, but all along, in time and in eternity. God had taken knowledge eternally of what His Son would do, and in accordance with that He allowed men to work out their plan. The objects of God’s foreknowledge are of special interest to Him, and any who attack those objects of interest place themselves in great peril. No wonder the apostle appealed to his audience to save themselves from the generation who had crucified God’s Son, Acts 2:40.

The foreknowledge of God and the believer (a)
“For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Romans 8:29.

As we have seen, in Romans 8:26-39 the apostle is encouraging the believers in a two-fold way. First, he shows that the sufferings which they experienced, which often perplexed them so much that they did not know what to pray for as they ought, were not outside of Divine control. And if they were tempted to doubt this, then the apostle makes clear that the believer is totally secure within the bounds of Divine Purpose.
Second, he encourages them with the thought that as far as the Courts of Divine Justice are concerned, there is no condemnation for them. If they are arraigned before the courts of men and unjustly accused, tried, and sentenced, they may rest assured that this cannot affect their standing in relation to Divine righteousness.
Before time and space began God had them in His thoughts, for they are the subject of His foreknowledge. Now clearly God would not be God if He did not know beforehand everything that would happen. But here there is a special knowledge which involves relationship; a relationship which God does not have with unbelievers. It is only those who are foreknown in this specialised way that can be described as predestinated, called, justified and glorified. (An example of this sort of knowledge can be found in Amos 3:2, where God says of Israel that “you only have I known of all the families of the earth”. Of course God knows about the other nations, but the nation of Israel was His peculiar treasure, and He knew them as such).
Notice that those foreknown are not just predestinated, but are also called, justified and glorified. The whole scope of God’s purpose is in view. Note also that it is not until the apostle has outlined that purpose that he begins to call the believers “God’s elect”, verse 33. The elect therefore are all those who are in the good of God’s foreknowing, predestinating, calling, justifying and glorifying activity. We shall have reason to look at this point again when considering 1 Peter 1:2.
Notice that those thus known are predestinated, not to heaven, but to a particular status, that of conformity to the image of His Son. The word predestinate might give to us the false impression that destinations, (heaven or hell) are in view. But it is not so, for the word simply means “to mark out the boundaries beforehand”. That there are boundaries to the position is a great comfort to tried saints, but it is important to realise that it is moral position of which the apostle writes, even that of conformity to the image of God’s Son. This ensures that He will be represented and replicated by His people in an unhindered way.
Those thus predestinated are now said to be called. Now this call is the call of the gospel, which, because it concerns “God’s Son Jesus Christ our Lord”, Romans 1:3, is a matter of deepest interest to God. Any who are involved believingly with His Son are the objects of His care and concern. Note the apostle does not say that the predestinated ones believe, but are called. The fact that he goes on to speak of them being justified shows they did in fact believe, for justification is by faith, but the apostle does not introduce anything of man into the reasoning of this passage. He is skilfully turning the believers away from themselves and their troubles so that they may concentrate wholly on God’s purpose.
There are those who believe in two sorts of gospel call, the general and the effectual. By this they mean that God calls all men indiscriminately in the gospel, but only in the case of some does He make this effectual, enabling them to believe. This is erroneous, and is a serious slur on the integrity and sincerity of God. It has led some to speak of a “tongue-in-cheek gospel”, a gospel that is made to sound as if it is for everyone, but which in fact is only for the elect few. It also makes those who hold this view insincere as they preach, for telling the audience that “whosoever will”, may “take of the water of life freely”, Revelation 22:17, whilst all the time believing that perhaps the majority of unbelievers present in the audience are not elect, and therefore cannot come, is insincere. The apostle was able to say “For our exhortation was not of deceit, nor of uncleanness, nor in guile”, 1 Thessalonians 2:3.
The truth is that God has no hidden agenda. He is perfectly righteous in His dealings, not saying one thing while meaning another. He does not present the gospel to men to tantalise them, holding out to them something that He knows full well they cannot have. Cannot have, moreover, not because of some reason lying within them, but a cause lying within Himself, namely, His refusal to give faith to any but the elect.
If it is impossible for men to believe, how is it the god of this world has to blind the minds of men so that they do not believe? The Calvinist says they cannot believe without Divine intervention, but it seems the Devil does not believe that! He uses every tactic he can to prevent men believing, and needs to do so, because the ability to believe is part of man’s constitution as created by God after His image and in His likeness.
So in what sense is this call said to be of those who are predestinated? Does it not appear from the passage that the call is only to these in some way? After all, it is only the elect who are foreknown, predestinated, justified, glorified; is it not also the elect only that are called? When thinking of this we must remember that the apostle is not telling us of a process here, but is unfolding the moral order in which eternal purpose is described. It appears to us that the call comes before the justification, and in practice and experience it does, but in the context here it is not so, and for this reason. When God predestinates to a particular status, then it is done. This is seen when we omit the italicised words in Romans 8:29, “He also did predestinate conformed to the image of His Son”. Our view of things is that the predestination took place in what we call eternity past, and the conformity will be effected in what we call eternity future. But the fact is there is no such thing as eternity past or future, for the words “past” and “future” have to do with time.
So if what we think of as a process is really settled purpose, then it is no surprise that the apostle does not take account of the call of the gospel to those who do not respond to it. He is only interested in showing the way in which a soul becomes involved in God’s eternal plan. So when he states that God called the predestinated ones, he is in no wise implying that the call does not come equally to those not foreknown and predestinated. What he is definitely saying is that those who do respond to the call are certain to be conformed to the image of God’s Son, since that is the way God sovereignly decrees it should happen in practice.
Summarising, we may say the following things about God’s foreknowledge as presented in this passage:

1. It is not general, but specific
2. It is not gradual, but complete
3. It is not temporal, but eternal in its nature

The foreknowledge of God and Israel
“God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew.” Romans 11:2.

When the boundaries of the nations were set after the scattering because of the building of the tower of Babel, then the sons of Adam were divided up in relation to the people of Israel, even though as a nation they were not yet formed. They were in the mind of God, however, for “When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel. For the Lord’s portion is his people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance.” Deuteronomy 32:8,9. When Christ rules as King of Israel, it will be a kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world, Matthew 25:34. He has not cast away the nation utterly, for they are destined for greatness according to His foreknowledge. Note Leviticus 26:45, “But I will for their sakes remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought forth out of the land of Egypt in the sight of the heathen, that I might be their God: I am the Lord.”
God’s foreknowledge in this passage has to do with His dealings with Israel before it became a nation. Paul argues that the God who displayed such interest in their formation and preservation, will not cast them away with the result that His purpose for them is not realised, especially since that purpose involves being ruled over by His Son, the Messiah.

The foreknowledge of God and the believer (b)
“Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ”. 1 Peter 1:2.

Strictly speaking the word elect is connected with the word “strangers” of verse 1. However, to read “to the elect strangers…according to the foreknowledge of God” would not make good sense, and we might think that the specific reference is to being strangers according to the foreknowledge of God, whereas the point is that they are elect according to the foreknowledge of God. Noting this does serve to highlight a very important matter, which is this. Believers, when considered personally, are not described as elect before they have become believers. Of course Ephesians 1:4 does speak of believers, “us”, as being chosen in Him, that is, Christ, before the foundation of the world. The operative words being “in Him”, which occur throughout the passage- “faithful in Christ Jesus…spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ…chosen us in him…in the beloved…in whom we have redemption…gather together in one all things in Christ…even in him…in whom we also have obtained an inheritance”. When, for instance, we read the expression “in whom we have redemption”, we rightly conclude that the redemption is totally Christ’s responsibility, and our only claim upon it is our claim upon Him. The redemption and its benefits lie entirely within Christ, and we have no input at all. So is it with being “chosen in Him”. God’s choice of His people is entirely dependant upon Christ, and only as men are linked to Christ upon believing are they personally in the good of what eternally has been vested in Christ.
There is no such person in the Word of God as an elect sinner. Only when he has believed can he be described as elect. This is not to say that sinners elect themselves, for that is certainly untrue. Election is God’s prerogative alone, but we ought to be open to allowing Him to say how He does it, rather than formulating our own system and imposing it upon the Scriptures.
This verse is critical in seeking to understand election, insofar as that is possible for finite minds. (We should not hide behind our finiteness in order to avoid the issue, however). The apostle is describing elect persons, and he is saying that they are elect “according to” something, “through” something, and “unto” two things:

They are elect according to the foreknowledge of God.

They are elect through sanctification of the Spirit.

They are elect unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ.

So these four things, (not just the first one), are constituent parts of their status as elect ones.

They are elect according to the foreknowledge of God. As we have noticed from Romans 8:29, God’s foreknowledge is neither general nor gradual, but personal and eternal. In His mind, and in eternity, God knowingly took account of certain specific persons. He purposed that those persons will be conformed eventually to the image of His Son, so His foreknowledge takes account of that. (That state of conformity to the image of His Son is another way of saying they are glorified). This state of glory is granted only to those who are justified, so His foreknowledge takes account of that. That state of being justified is the portion only of those who have obeyed the call of the gospel, so His foreknowledge takes account of that also. The result is that the foreknowledge of God has taken account of all these parts of the Divine Purpose, and when those persons obey God’s call in the gospel they may rightly be described as elect.
They are elect through sanctification of the Spirit. Peter is writing to those who had been brought up as part of a nation that God had separated to Himself. “And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation.” were His words to Israel in Exodus 19:6. But Peter’s readers have been saved, and now they are separated to God as individual believers, for sanctification is no longer national. Thus it was that when they believed the gospel the Spirit of God severed them from their natural connections, and they were joined to Christ. Now that they are believers, they may be described as elect. So they are elect through the sanctification of the Spirit.
They are elect unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ. The means whereby God formed a holy nation for Himself was by entering into a covenant with Israel. He stated, “ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people: for all the earth is mine”, Exodus 19:5. In other words, God is saying that He could choose any people wherever they are upon the earth, but He chose the children of Israel to be a people for Him to have for Himself specially, His “peculiar treasure”. And what was to be distinctive about this people? Two things: first, obedience, “if ye will obey my voice”. Second, faithfulness to His covenant, “and keep my covenant”. Now that covenant of the law was ratified by the sprinkling of blood, for we read, “And Moses took the blood, and sprinkled it on the people, and said, Behold the blood of the covenant, which the Lord hath made with you concerning all these words.” Exodus 24:8.
So we can easily see that Peter is using this as a means of contrasting their present individual position with their former national position. God’s choice of the nation and their sanctification was closely connected with obedience and sprinkling of blood. So Peter’s readers, as believers, are God’s elect, for He had taken foreknowledge of them, separated them to Himself in the power of the Spirit, and done so in view of obedience and the sprinkling of blood. But whereas the obedience was to be Israel’s, as they attempted to keep the law, the obedience Peter refers to is Christ’s, (the words “Jesus Christ” relate to both obedience and sprinkling), as He committed Himself to being the covenant victim in accordance with His Father’s command. Before He left the upper room to go to Calvary, He said to His own, “This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you”, Luke 22:20, showing that for Him, the establishing of the new covenant in His blood was a foregone conclusion, so determined was He. It is this precious blood that has been applied to the hearts of His people, so that they are eternally bonded to Him.
Summarising, we may conclude that God’s elect ones are those whom He has foreknown eternally; who have been set apart by the Spirit to be His own; who are in the good of the obedient submission of Christ to His Father’s will that He be the covenant victim for His people.
So we have seen in Romans 8 that all parts of God’s purpose, whether foreknowledge, predestination, calling, justification, or glorification, must come into view before men are described as God’s elect. Likewise we have seen in 1 Peter 1 that God’s people are described as elect in connection with foreknowledge, sanctification, obedience, and sprinkling of blood. That sprinkling of blood assumes our belief in Him.
At this point we may draw a very important conclusion. Since in both Romans 8 and 1 Peter 1 obedience to the call of the gospel is implied, and since all the elements of the purpose of God must be taken account of when considering the foreknowledge of God, we may safely conclude that belief of the gospel by men is part of that of which God takes foreknowledge. And since the believer’s election is in accordance with God’s foreknowledge, we are justified in saying that election takes account of the exercise of faith.

8:30
Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.

Moreover, whom he did predestinate, them he also called- the reason why the end result, that of conformity to Christ in His glory, is sure to be achieved, is now detailed. The word “them” is emphatic, the very same ones that were predestinated, were also called. The apostle is not dealing with the fact that the gospel call is universal, (as if God only called the predestinated ones), but rather with the way in which God’s purpose is brought to fulfilment. Note the dignity that attaches to the gospel, for it is the means God uses to work out His eternal purpose.
And whom he called, them he also justified- note the repetition of “whom…them” to show that the same people are in mind at each stage, and to show that the link from predestination in the past to glorification in the future is unbreakable. The exercise of faith is not mentioned here, although in fact it is vitally important. The apostle is viewing things from God’s side for our comfort and assurance. He does not want us to be distracted from these wonderful truths, perhaps by worrying whether our faith is strong enough. Involvement in God’s purpose is not made more certain by our faith, but it is nonetheless true that justification is by faith. If faith can be implied in God’s justification of the called ones, there is no reason why it cannot be implied in God’s foreknowledge of the called ones.
And whom he justified, them he also glorified- the apostle persists with the past tense, even for future glorification, since he is dealing with the purpose of God, which cannot be frustrated. The glory is that of conformity to Christ, and since He has predestinated us to that position, verse 29, nothing can prevent it. As the apostle will ask later, “For who hath resisted His will?” 9:19. Amidst all the suffering of this present time we may be encouraged with the thought of glory for all eternity. Things truly do work together for good: God’s foreknowledge, His predestination, His call, His justifying those who believe, His glorifying; all these things work together for the ultimate and final good of conformity to the image of God’s Son.

14(b)   8:31-37
The preservation of God’s people

8:31
What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?

What shall we then say to these things? The expression “what shall we say”, or similar, occurs seven times in the epistle, for the apostle wants to carry his readers along with him in a united response to the truths he is unfolding. There follows a series of questions with which the apostle challenges all comers to give reasons why God’s people are not secure. We could summarise them as follows, to help us as we consider them:

First question:

“If God be for us, who can be against us?”

Summary of the response: If God is our defence lawyer, what prosecutor can present a case that overturns His arguments?

Second question:

“Who shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect?”

Summary of the response: If God justifies, then no further charges can be brought.

Third question:

“Who is he that condemneth?”

Summary of the response: The only one who could possibly condemn us is the one who died, rose, ascended, and makes intercession for us.

Fourth question:

“Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?”

Summary of the response: With Divine persons on our side, who can haul us away to prison, separated from all the expressions and results of Christ’s love?

If God be for us, who can be against us? That God is for us is seen from verses 29 and 30. From eternity to eternity He has enclosed His people in His purpose. So whilst there might be adversaries, not one of them can meaningfully be called a real danger. As David said when confronted by Goliath, “the battle is the Lord’s”, 1 Samuel 17:47. Some of the Roman believers may have been brought before the law-courts of men simply because of their stand for Christ. They may rest assured that whatever the outcome of human judgment, their position before the Judge of all the earth is secure.

8:32
He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?

He that spared not his own Son- if in love for His people He was prepared to go so far as to not shield His Son from the suffering of the cross, then His determination to bless is proved beyond any doubt. It is said of God in relation to His dealings with Israel that He will be like a man who spares his own son that serves him, Malachi 3:17. Israel will be spared, God’s Son was not. “His own Son” means His Son in a special and unique way; we may compare this with John 5:18, “his Father”, where the word “own” is understood, meaning His Father in a unique way, and not in the way God is the Father of believers.
But delivered him up for us all- the opposite of shielding Him is to send Him forth to suffer. Judas, Caiaphas, Pilate and the rulers of the nation of Israel all delivered Christ up, but beyond all this He was “delivered by the determinate counsel and foreknowledge of God”, Acts 2:23, the very same counsel that purposed our blessing.
How shall he not with him also freely give us all things? What possible reason can there be for the cancellation of His plan? If the suffering which He knew His Son must endure at Calvary was not a strong enough reason for God to change His mind about delivering Him up, then certainly no lesser consideration will make Him falter.
Since God has freely given Christ to us to suffer on the cross in our place, then He will surely give us all that His death secured. The “all things” includes the blessings of verses 29 and 30. Compare this with the scene on Moriah in Genesis 22, with the father giving up his only son, followed by a confirmation of God’s purpose with regard to Abraham because he had not withheld his son. Isaac was spared but Christ was not. If the blessing came despite the fact that Abraham’s son was spared, how much more certain is the blessing when God’s Son was not spared!

8:33
Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth.

Who shall lay anything to the charge of God’s elect? Paul’s second challenge. “Lay anything to the charge of” means to bring an accusation against. In the face of the undoubted resolve of God to bless His people as demonstrated by Calvary, can it be true that any will still seek to undermine their position? Alas! it is so, for the adversary accuses the brethren day and night still, Revelation 12:10.
It is God that justifieth- the only One competent to bring a charge against believers is the One who justifies them. To accuse them now would be to undermine His own actions and reverse His own decision.

8:34
Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.

Who is he that condemneth? If none can bring charges, then surely none can still condemn, but again the Devil persists. There is a fourfold protection for the believer from the attempts of the enemy to condemn, as the next words show.
It is Christ that died- the first protection, for by His death He dealt with our sins once and for all. He has dealt judicially with what caused us to be condemned.
Yea rather, that is risen again- the second protection, for His rising is proof of the effectiveness of His death, see 4:25. He brings His people into the sphere where there is no condemnation.
Who is even at the right hand of God- the third protection is that Christ is in the place of control and authority as God’s Firstborn Son, charged with the care of His own. He has the position of supremacy over all the forces of evil.
Who also maketh intercession for us- the fourth protection, that of the intercession of One who acts as the advocate for His people with the Father, 1 John 2:1, and who appeals to the value of His propitiatory work, 1 John 2:2. He so intercedes that their faith does not fail under testing. See an example of this in Luke 22:31-32.
Note the words “yea rather…who is even…who also” all expressing a sense of wonder at the strength of the support Christ gives to those who are attacked by the enemy. He died and rose again on earth, where the sins were committed. He has ascended to the right hand of God and intercedes in heaven, the very place where the Devil accuses the brethren day and night.

8:35
Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?

Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? If the case goes against the accused in the courts of men, he is separated from those he loves by imprisonment. Note that whilst the apostle says “who”, he goes on to speak of things. This is because they are things the Devil will use to try to unsettle God’s people, and deprive them of the sense of their Saviour’s love for them. The answer to the one who tries to separate is found in verse 37. All the things listed here were endured by Christ in love for His people, so there is proof from the past that His love will not allow us to be parted from Him.
Shall tribulation- but the pressure this involves only serves to develop Christian character, 5:3-5.
Or distress- this is extreme affliction; but who could have been more afflicted than Christ? “I am the man that hath seen affliction by the rod of his wrath.” Lamentations 3:1.
Or persecution- the Spirit of Christ in the psalmist said, “All thy commandments are faithful: they persecute me wrongfully; help thou me.” Psalm 119:86.
Or famine- “My heart is smitten, and withered like grass; so that I forget to eat my bread. By reason of the voice of my groaning my bones cleave to my skin.” Psalm 102:4,5.
Or nakedness- “They part my garments among them, and cast lots upon my vesture.” Psalm 22:18.
Or peril- “Be not far from me; for trouble is near; for there is none to help.” Psalm 22:11.
Or sword- “Deliver my soul from the sword; my darling from the power of the dog.” Psalm 22:20. Even if the authorities unjustly use the sword of justice which God has placed in their hand, Romans 13:4, and condemn and execute them, believers cannot be cut off from Christ by the sword of men.

8:36
As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.

As it is written- the mention of sword might have seemed extreme, so the apostle supports his idea with an Old Testament quotation.
For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter- this is a quotation from Psalm 44. The context of quotations should always be studied, for the apostles did not pluck texts from the Scriptures at random. In Psalm 44:1-3 the psalmist recounts the way God had intervened for Israel in the past. In verses 4-8 he appeals to God to intervene again in the present. In verses 9-16 he laments that far from delivering them, God had cast them off. In verses 17-22 he asserts that despite this, they had not forgotten God. In verses 23-26 the psalmist appeals to God to intervene again. Paul quotes from verse 22, and it is important to notice that the psalmist claims that they are suffering for the sake of God’s interests, and this means the suffering is meaningful and worthwhile. The words are very similar to those used by Isaiah concerning Christ, “he is brought as a lamb to the slaughter” Isaiah 53:7. Far from separating them from the love of Christ, believers will find that their extreme experience only serves to remind them of His deep love for them.

8:37
Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him that loved us.

Nay- on the contrary. The apostle’s response to the idea that believers can be separated from the love of Christ, verse 36 being a parenthesis.
In all these things- not when delivered from them, but even when in the midst of all of them.
We are more than conquerors- a verb, meaning “we more than overcome”, or “we gain a surpassing victory”. The believer does not simply survive suffering and defeat the opposition that way, but gains a greater victory by using the trial as a means of glorifying God, as the psalmist did, for he said “for Thy sake we are killed all the day”.
Through him that loved us- this is the motivation for the believer under trial. Note the past tense, that particular demonstration of the love of Christ when He went to Calvary. As the beloved said, “love is strong as death…many waters cannot quench love, neither can the floods drown it”, Song of Solomon 8:6,7. The one who strengthens us when we meet the hostility of the enemy is fittingly entitled, “him that loved us”, for His love not only took Him into the place where the prince of this world attacked Him so fiercely, but also the place where the floods of Divine judgment came over Him.

14 (c)   8:38
The persuasion of the apostle

8:38
For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,

For I am persuaded- Divine justice at work in verses 31-34, and Divine love in verses 35-37 combine together to give irrefutable evidence that God is on our side. This being so, none of the “creatures” of this verse, veritable monsters as they may seem, can overturn the purpose of the Creator, whose power, justice and love are infinite.
That neither death- believers may fear the process of dying, but they should not fear death itself, for it is a conquered foe, and is a servant who ushers into the presence of God, as indicated in 1 Corinthians 3:21-23.
Nor life- this can be very dangerous for a believer, with all its temptations and pitfalls. The apostle is confident that no experience in life can separate from the love of Christ.
Nor angels, nor principalities nor powers- since we cannot conceive that the apostle would think holy angels would wish to separate us from Divine things, this must mean evil angels, but despite their power and malignant intentions, they cannot succeed against the believer, for they are subject to Christ, 1 Peter 3:22.
Nor things present- very present trials can never accumulate to overwhelm the believer.
Nor things to come- coming events are all under Divine control, for “Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.” Acts 15:18.

8:39
Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Nor height, nor depth- nothing that looms large on the believer’s horizon, nor any depth of depression and doubt through which he may pass, may serve to affect Christian standing, which does not depend upon what we feel, but on what God says.
Nor any other creature- is this a fleeting, grudging reference to the Devil, whom the apostle has not mentioned before in the epistle? The great accuser of the brethren has nothing to say in view of God’s intervention on our behalf.
Shall be able to separate us from the love of God- Paul is confident about the future because he is confident about the past. The love of God has endured its severest test at Calvary. The giving up by Abraham of his beloved son Isaac on Moriah is but a faint picture of what happened at Calvary. “Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and offer him…for a burnt offering…and Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son”, Genesis 22:2,10.
God has done what none other has the right to do, even introduce love into the proceedings of the Courts of Divine Justice. The Son of the Judge has died for the guilty prisoners in the dock, and they walk free, convinced that they are the objects of His eternal love.
Which is in Christ Jesus our Lord- love has been expressed historically, and in that sense is in the Christ of Calvary, but it is also known presently and personally, being expressed to us now in all its fulness by our Saviour. Because He is Lord, having all power in heaven and earth, then nothing and nobody can snatch the believer from His powerful, loving hand.

EPHESIANS 2

 

EPHESIANS 2

Survey of the chapter
Chapter 2 continues the theme of the exaltation of Christ, but whereas in 1:19-23 it was the power of God as it was exercised in relation to Christ, lifting Him to supreme heights of glory, in 2:1-10 it is the power of God as it is exercised towards those who believe. The apostle was praying that the believers might “know…what is the exceeding greatness of his power to usward who believe”, 1:18,19.

The passage may be divided into two sections, verses 1-10, and verses 11-22, and these sections may be thought of in relation to one another as follows:

(i) In verses 1-10, the emphasis is on dealing with the relationship of Jew and Gentile to God, whereas in the remaining verses it is the relationship of Jews and Gentiles to one another.

(ii) In both sections there is a change, for by the time we reach verse ten, those who believe from both Jew and Gentile have come into the good of God’s salvation. And in the second half, those who believe, whether Jew or Gentile before, are brought into a right relationship with one another.

(iii) In the first section the emphasis is on the similarities between Jewish sinners and Gentile sinners. In the second section the differences between each group are stressed.

(iv) In the first section man is viewed individually. In the second section he is seen internationally, with the nations of the Gentiles at variance with the nation of Israel.

(v) In the first section believers are seated together in heavenly places. In the second section they are builded together as a holy temple in the Lord.

Structure of the chapter

Man individually

(a) Verses 1-3 The depravity of the sinner
(b) Verses 4-10 The deliverance of those who believe

 Man internationally

(c) Verses 11-12 The distance of the Gentiles
(d) Verses 13-18 The demolition of the middle wall of partition
(e) Verses 19-22 The dignity of the saints

(a) Verses 1-3
The depravity of the sinner

We shall find in these verses that man is dead, deceived, disobedient, depraved, and doomed. Verse 4, however, will begin with the words, “But God”, and will show that He has the answer to man’s condition.

2:1
And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

And you hath he quickened- the words “hath he quickened” are in italics in the Authorised Version, having been supplied from verse 5 to give the sense. Christ was for three days and nights dead in a grave, but was raised from the dead by God, 1:20. Furthermore, God elevated Him to His own right hand, far above all angelic beings. Now God in mercy turns to deal with the condition of sinners, and, wonderfully, determines to link those who believe with His Son, so that they too are quickened, raised and elevated.

Who were dead in trespasses and sins- Christ was literally and physically dead in a grave, but sinners are dead morally in an environment where sins and trespasses are the norm. Trespasses are false steps, blunders, acts that are contrary to Divine Government. Sins are a missing of the mark, a falling short of the glory of God, and an offence to the Divine nature.

God had plainly warned Adam that the day he ate of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil he would die, Genesis 2:17. Although Adam lived to be 930 years old, he nonetheless died morally the day he sinned, for he was cut off from the life of God, and so was dead.

The idea of death is used in four ways in Scripture, as follows:

1. There is moral death, the separation of the sinner from communion with God. The apostle describes it as being “alienated from the life of God”, Ephesians 4:18.

2. There is physical death, the separation of the spirit of a man from his body, James 2:26.

3. There is carnal death, the separation of the believer from the enjoyment of spiritual things, in accordance with the words of Romans 8:13, “for if ye live after the flesh ye shall die”. In other words, just as the prodigal son was said by his father to be dead for as long as he was separated from the joys of the father’s house, Luke 15:24, so the believer, for as long as he lives carnally, is not able to enjoy spiritual communion with his Father, and in this very precise and restricted sense, is said to be dead. Of course the true believer, whether carnal or spiritual, is eternally secure, because his salvation does not depend on him but on Christ. Nonetheless he can be dead to the joys of the spiritual life.

4. There is also, for the unrepentant sinner, eternal death, for the solemn words of Revelation 20:16 are, “And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire”, and in 21:8 we read, “But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerors, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death”.

The apostle does not use the preposition “in” here. Rather, he uses the phrase “trespasses and sins” in the dative, which has the sense of “in respect of”. It is not that men were dead to trespasses as if insensitive to them. But they were shown to be dead as far as God was concerned by the fact that they committed trespasses and sins. So the trespasses and sins showed up the fact that man is dead to God. If he lived to God he would not habitually sin. It is clear from Genesis 3 that even as a sinner Adam could interact with God. He was in a state of unbelief, but that did not mean that he could not repent of that position, and start believing. Man believes with the same faculty as he disbelieves.

Some teach that man is totally depraved, in the sense that he cannot respond to God at all. They say that man must be totally cast upon the mercy of God. But if he cannot respond in faith, neither can he cast himself on God. Faced with this dilemma, some say that man must be born again before he can believe. But God does not bestow eternal life on unbelieving sinners. When Nicodemus was confronted with the idea that he must be born again, he asked, (and remember he was dead in trespasses and sins when he asked the question), “how can these things be”? The force of this question is, “How can these things become my experience?” He saw clearly that the new birth was entirely of God, so how did it become a reality for him? The answer soon came to him, that it was “whosoever believeth in Him” that has eternal life. Faith in a crucified Saviour is the way eternal life is received; and to receive eternal life is to be born of God.

2:2
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

Wherein in time past- the apostle will now show what being in trespasses and sins involves, hence the word “wherein”, or “in which condition”. Note the reference to “time past”, and then in verse 4, “but God”, and then “in the ages to come”, in verse 7. God deals with the past as far as believers are concerned, and makes them fit for the eternal future.

Ye walked according to the course of this world- although dead to God, we were very much alive to the world. The word for world is “cosmos”, an organised system. We might think the world to be chaotic, and in one sense it is, but in another it is organised around the central idea of rebellion against God. And unbelievers are active in this environment; in fact their whole manner of life is governed by it. Like a river, humanity is hemmed in by the banks on either side, unable to break free. Men are living their lives in accordance with the way the world is, with no ability to escape.

According to the prince of the power of the air- not only are men drifting down the river of humanity, hemmed in by its banks, and following the course of the river wherever it goes, but there is a worse thing. The position of those banks, or, in other words, the course they are forced to go, is determined by Satan himself, who is the prince of this world, John 14:30, and who sees to it that men live their lives according to his dictates.

The emphasis is not on the personal name of this evil being, but on his power and his activity. He is a prince, indicating that he holds first place in the hierarchy of the forces of evil. He is the one who, as Lucifer, had rebelled against God at the beginning, and had influenced a third of the angels of heaven to likewise rebel, Isaiah 14:12-15; Ezekiel 28:14-17; Revelation 12:4. He is also called the god of this world, 2 Corinthians 4:4, because unwittingly, men further his interests, and so glorify him as if he were God.

He is the prince of the power of the air, meaning that those evil forces that he controls operate in the air surrounding this planet. There is no part of the globe not enveloped by the air, and so there is no part that is not under the influence of these evil agents.

The spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience- being a spirit, this prince can work unseen, and is able to influence men in various ways, filling their minds with ideas contrary to the word of God. It is not normal for him to speak directly to men, but he uses things like the media, a powerful way of instilling his rebellious thoughts into men’s minds. They do not realise this is happening, but happen it does, for men are called children of disobedience. The principle of disobedience that is part of our sin-nature is constantly supplied with material which encourages further disobedience. So it is that Adam has begotten many children who have the same disobedient attitude as he manifested when he first fell.

2:3
Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh- so the condition described in verses 1 and 2 is not limited to the heathen; it is true of the men of Israel too. Even in the times past when they knew God’s direct intervention in their affairs, they were dead in trespasses and sins. So occupation with religion, even a religion ordained of God, does not save from this situation. Religion cannot deal with our sin-nature, which works itself out in the lusts of the flesh. Instead of having desires after God, the sinner has strong desires for sinful things. The flesh is self, with its sin-principle within.

Fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind- the apostle now describes the Jews as fulfilling the desires of the flesh. They did not simply lust after sinful things, but went further and fulfilled and satisfied their lusts. The flesh would emphasise the sensual side of man, whereas the mind would emphasise the intellectual side. There are those who are refined and cultured, and not at all attracted to the baser impulses in man. These too must learn that they are dead in trespasses and sins, and also are under the influence of the enemy of God, Satan himself. “for there is no difference: for all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God”, Romans 3:22,23.

And were by nature the children of wrath, even as others- whatever the outward appearance, it is what man is by nature that matters. We learn here that the nature of man, sinful and corrupt as it is, is the object of the wrath of God. To be a child of wrath by nature is to be the product of a nature that merits God’s wrath.

Summing up these verses, we can say we were:

Dead in trespasses and sins, and cut off from the life of God.

Deceived by the prince of the power of the air, rejecting the truth of God.

Disobedient because of our link with Adam who disobeyed God, Romans 5:19, and rebellious towards the government of God.

Depraved because of our lusts, and acting contrary to the holiness of God.

Doomed to endure the wrath of God for all eternity, because of the justice of God.

(b) Verses 4-10
The deliverance of those who believe

In verses 4-5a we have the motive for God working. In verses 5b-6 there is the method of God’s working, and in verses 7-10, the manifestation of His working:

2:4
But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,

But God- it is only when God intervenes that the situation can be remedied. His power is greater that Satan’s, and He triumphs in the salvation of sinners.

Who is rich in mercy- this is pity to those in need, illustrated by the Good Samaritan, who “had compassion on him”, Luke 10:33. Satan has no compassion, for he drags men down. God lifts men up in Christ. As Hannah sang, “He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory”, 1 Samuel 2:8.

Notice that He is not simply merciful in a limited way, but is rich in mercy, lavishing His riches on those who believe, so that they possess “all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ”, 1:3. One of those blessings is to be linked with Christ in heaven.

For his great love- in verses 1-3 the light of God’s person shone upon us, exposing our sinfulness, but now the warmth of God’s love is known. His rich mercy is on the basis of, and to further the cause of, His great love. As the apostle John wrote, “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins”, 1 John 4:10. If sending His Son to die under His wrath was not enough to prevent Him loving us, then nothing else will.

Wherewith he loved us- God’s love is not a theoretical idea, but a practical reality. His love has been expressed. It is clear that the apostle is referring now to those who had believed, for it is only these that know the love of God described here. We should distinguish between God’s general love for men, expressed in the giving of His Son at Calvary, (notice the past tense in John 3:16, “loved”, referring to an historical event), and His particular and special love for His children. God does not love sinners with the special love He reserves for those who have become His children through faith. The apostle makes clear that “the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost that is given unto us”, Romans 5:5, so we cannot know the love of God in the fullest way until we have the Holy Spirit within.

2:5
Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

Even when we were dead in sins- so this personal love of God for His children began before they knew Him, for they were foreseen as those who would believe. Our state of being dead was no obstacle to God, for He was determined to bless.

Hath quickened us together with Christ- this shows that the reference in verse 4 onwards is to believers only. There is no mention of Calvary here, but it is implied in the fact that Christ was quickened and raised from the dead. Christ was quickened from the dead; those who would believe were reckoned in the mind of God as having been quickened together with Him. It awaited the moment of their conversion for this to become a reality.

(by grace are ye saved)- this is a salutary reminder of what verses 1-3 have told us about our condition. The apostle is immediately cautioning us to not think we have in some way merited God’s love and mercy. Far from us deserving this intervention, it is only on the ground of God’s grace (His unmerited favour), that it is available. He will return to this matter in verse 8.

There are three words used in this passage to express God’s attitude:

Grace is favour to the undeserving.

Mercy is pity to the needy.

Kindness is goodness in action.

2:6
And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

And hath raised us up together- not content with quickening us together with Christ, He raised us up as well, lifting us up from the grave of trespasses and sins we were in.

And made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus- there is more to being raised than this, however, for He was raised up to heaven, and so are believers, in the mind of God, and in association with Him. But there is still more, for He has been seated at God’s right hand, and this position is shared by believers, too. We are seated in Him now, (that is, His position is representative of our position), and we shall be seated with Him in a day to come. There surely cannot be any doubt as to the eternal security of the true believer, if he is already seated in Christ in heaven. Nothing can dislodge Christ from His position, so nothing can dislodge the believer. This all happens in reference to Christ Jesus, the ascended and glorified man. By raising us up out of death in trespasses and sins, God also raised us from walking according to Adam’s world. We have been removed from his influence, and brought into the sphere of influence of Christ Jesus.

2:7
That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.

That in the ages to come- the eternal ages will all be needed to fully tell how rich His unmerited favour has been. Each age will beget another, and eternity will unfold the wonder of God’s purpose. That ultimate purpose is to glorify Himself, and this He will do throughout all eternity. Just as He has expressed Himself partially in the different ages of time, so He will do so perfectly in the varied ages of eternity.

He might show the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us- the reason why He has dealt with us in kindness is so that His grace might be magnified eternally. Divine kindness is the practical outworking of His heart of love towards us, motivated by grace, the desire to favour and bless. God will see to it that there is eternal remembrance of His kindness toward us as believers. It will take all eternity to tell it out.

Through Christ Jesus- this is the major reason why all eternity will be needed, for the workings of God’s grace are all channelled through Christ, and so the unfolding of His glories is involved.

2:8
For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

For by grace are ye saved through faith- the apostle needs to reinforce this lesson about grace, because man proudly thinks that he has some merit before God. The apostle feels the need to make it very clear, before the ages to come start their course, that the position the believer will occupy in heaven is entirely of God’s grace and kindness, and not at all of our effort. Faith is indeed necessary, but in itself has no value- its value lays in the one believed.

And that not of yourselves- the position of being saved by grace on the principle of faith is totally of God’s doing, and we have no input at all. There are those who devise their own way of dealing with themselves as sinners. They invent a religion of their own, and vainly hope that because it satisfies them, it satisfies God. The apostle decisively condemns such an approach.

The exercise of faith is not a work, since elsewhere the apostle contrasted faith and works with the words, “Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on Him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness”, Romans 4:4,5. Faith is ceasing from work, and resting in Christ. Grace is not of works, either, as Romans 11:6 shows, in the words, “And if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace”.

The gender of the word “that” would indicate that it refers to the whole phrase “salvation by grace through faith”, and not simply to the word faith.

It is the gift of God- the blessing of being saved by grace through faith is God’s gift to those who believe. So the apostle cautions us against thinking we have merit, by saying “by grace”. He cautions us against thinking we have no responsibility, by saying, “through faith”.

2:9
Not of works, lest any man should boast.

Not of works, lest any man should boast- not only is salvation not of us, in that we are not worthy in ourselves to gain it, but it cannot be worked for, even by those who own up to the fact that as persons they are not worthy. Heaven will indeed be filled with those who boast, but it is a boasting or glorying in God that they are occupied with, not self-congratulation. As was said of Abraham, “For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. For what saith the scripture? ‘Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness'”, Romans 4:2,3.

So salvation is positively by grace and through faith; negatively, is not of ourselves, and not of works.

2:10
For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works- far from being self-made, believers are God’s product, for, as those who are part of the new creation, (which new creation comes about because of the work of Christ at the cross and His subsequent resurrection), they are a new creature in Christ Jesus, 2 Corinthians 5:17. It is in the context of who He is to the Father, and what He has done for the Father, that believers are created anew.

Believers are to be occupied with good works, for that is what they have been created for; it was God’s goal when He did it. This will ensure that in eternity, God will be the more praised. He works through our works, so that His work may be magnified and His name glorified.

Which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them- in subsequent passages in the epistle, the apostle will speak of walking worthy of the calling, 4:1; of walking unlike the Gentiles, 4:17; of walking in love, 5:2; of walking as children of the light, 5:8; and of walking circumspectly, 5:16. These kinds of behaviour will result in works done for God’s glory both now, and in eternity to come. They were foreordained in eternity past, for it was God’s purpose that they should be engaged in. How noble a task it is to walk and work in harmony with Divine and eternal purpose! No wonder the apostle needed to pray that the believers might understand these things better, for they are so immense that it is impossible to take them in, or work them out in practice, apart from Divine help.

Having spoken of Jew and Gentile in relation to God, we come now to the second section of the chapter, in which the apostle explains how Jew and Gentile may be brought together into harmony with one another.

(c) Verses 11-12
The distance of the Gentiles

2:11
Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;

Wherefore remember- the apostle now builds upon what he has taught in the previous verses. The word “wherefore” introduces a logical connection with something that has gone before. (The word “therefore” introduces a logical conclusion to what has gone before). He had spoken of the circumstances in which the Jews and the Gentiles had come into the good of the inheritance, in 1:12-14. He had then begun the next section with a “wherefore”, and revealed the things he was praying for, the third thing being that they would know the greatness of the power that wrought in Christ when He was raised from the dead and seated in heavenly places. Having shown in verses 1-10 the way in which God has associated us with Christ in His elevation, he now cautions us against pride and self-satisfaction, as if the Christian’s elevated position before God is in some way the result of his effort.

Moses warned Israel that when they reached the Promised Land they were not to think it was because of their righteousness that they were safely there. He said to them, “Speak not thou in thine heart…saying, ‘For my righteousness the Lord hath brought me in to possess the land:'”, Deuteronomy 9:4. In Deuteronomy 26:1-11 the ritual of the basket of first-fruits was established, and an Israelite was to express his gratitude to God for bringing him from bondage to freedom, by bringing the fruits of the land to God. Ephesians 2:1-3 shows very clearly that sinners have no claim upon God’s goodness, and so they also might well express their gratitude to God, especially since their blessings are on a far higher level than Israel’s.

The Jewish readers of the epistle might have doubts as to the legitimacy of the apostle’s words, when he linked the Gentiles with the Jew in the sharing of the blessings and prospects of the gospel. He needs to show that it is indeed so, and this he proceeds to do.

That ye being in time past- the emphasised word “ye” indicates to us that the apostle is addressing believers who were formerly Gentiles. He had made this distinction between “ye” and “we” in 1:11-14. The phrases “in time past”, and “but now” of verse 13 show he is going to contrast their past position with their present condition.

Gentiles in the flesh- this is how they were born. The world of unbelievers is divided into Gentiles and Jews, the latter being descendants of Abraham, and a very privileged nation. Gentiles were not only “in the flesh”, meaning they had no relationship with God, but they were, by definition, under-privileged as Gentiles.

Who are called uncircumcision- this is how they lived, for to be circumcised was to be separated to God. Because they were not set apart for God, the Jews called them “the uncircumcision” in contempt. We can easily see even from this verse that there is a pressing need for peace to be made between these two parties, for they despise one another.

By that which is called the circumcision- the Jews were called “the c ircumcision”, because God had instituted the rite of circumcision when He made a covenant with Abraham, the father of the nation. Sadly, for the majority it was only a physical operation, and not a spiritual reality. This is reflected in the expression “called the uncircumcision”. He shows in Romans 2:28,29 that true circumcision is in the heart, not in the flesh. His words are, “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God”.

In the flesh made by hands- so the Jew is in the flesh too, if he is not a believer. His circumcision counts for nothing if he does not believe. The circumcision referred to here is one that is done by the hand of man on the flesh of man. It is pure ritual. Only those who have been cut off from Adam’s world by association with Christ crucified can say with the apostle, “We are the circumcision”, Philippians 3:3. This is “circumcision made without hands”, Colossians 2:11, for it happens when we repent, and the Spirit of God links us to Christ in His death, burial and resurrection. This is “the circumcision of Christ”, Colossians 2:11, for it is only known in connection with Him.

2:12
That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

That at that time ye were without Christ the preposition used for “without” is one which means to be cut off from something or someone. To be cut off from Christ means to have no link with the Messiah of Israel. Being without Christ in this way resulted in four disadvantages, which the apostle now sets out.

Being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel- the Gentiles were not citizens in the theocracy of Israel with its freedom and honour. The word here translated “commonwealth” is translated “citizenship” in Acts 22:28. There it is in connection with Paul’s Roman citizenship; here it has to do with being part of the nation of Israel.

And strangers from the covenants of promise- the Gentiles were obviously strangers to the conditional covenant of the law given to Israel at Sinai, but they were strangers to covenants in which God gave unconditional promises too. The covenants of promise were not covenants that only had one promise attached to them, but were concerned with promises rather than prohibitions, as the law was. The covenants were as follows:

The covenant with Abraham to give him the land, Genesis 12:7.

The covenant with Abraham to give him a seed, Genesis 15:4.

The covenant with Israel in Deuteronomy 29 and 30 which promised blessing for the nation after they had returned after being scattered.

The Davidic covenant, which promised David the throne, 2 Samuel 7:12,13.

The New Covenant which was originally promised to the house of Israel, Jeremiah 31:31, and which will be operative for them when Christ reigns in a future day.

The reason why the Gentiles were strangers to these promise-covenants was that these were all centred in Christ, the True Seed of Abraham, for the apostle writes, “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not ‘And to seeds’, as of many; but as of one, ‘And to thy seed’, which is Christ”, Galatians 3:17. So the promises were made to Christ as the True Seed of Abraham, but since the Gentiles were apart from Christ, then they had no claim on the promises.

Having no hope- where there is a promise there is hope, but the Gentiles, not having the promises, had no hope either. There seemed to be no prospect of the situation changing. Of course, we know from chapter three of this epistle that it was in God’s mind to bring Gentiles into blessing, but this was not known in Old Testament times, even by the prophets. The apostle testified before Agrippa, “And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God to our fathers: unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews. Why should it be thought a thing incredible with you, that God should raise the dead?” Acts 26:6-8. Paul testified, in effect, that Daniel 12:2 would come to pass, and the righteous in Israel would rise from the dead to enter the kingdom of Christ on earth. This was their hope, and the Gentiles had no part in it.

And without God in the world- this is a double disadvantage, for they were “in the world”, which is governed by the god of this world, and they had no relationship with the true God of heaven. Paul writes to the Galatians, “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods”, Galatians 4:8. They filled the void that God should have occupied with the worship of idols, which are vanity and emptiness. So general is this ignorance of God, that the Gentiles are described as “the Gentiles that know not God”, 1 Thessalonians 4:5.

Of course there is a sense in which all men know God as Creator, for the apostle wrote, “because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God”, Romans 1:21. All men know intuitively that God exists, and that He has certain characteristics. The majority, alas, choose to ignore Him. So all know about God and His existence, but the Gentiles, as Gentiles, were not in a vital relationship with Him.

(d) Verses 13-18
The demolition of the middle wall of partition

2:13
But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

But now- things are radically different generally, now that Christ has died and been raised again. They are also radically different personally for those who have believed in Him.

In Christ Jesus- this is the title of Christ that emphasises that He is a risen and ascended man. It was first used in Acts 19:4 when Paul was speaking to the disciples of John the Baptist who he came across in Ephesus. They had been baptised into the Jordan, confessing their sins, in order to prepare for the coming of Christ. This was as far as they had progressed, but under Paul’s instruction they realised that the Messiah had come, had died, had risen, and was ascended to heaven. It was to such a person that they were baptised the second time. Before, their hopes had been centred on an earthly Messiah, with an earthly kingdom; now their hopes were centred on Christ in heaven.

Those who are “in Christ Jesus” are linked with Him in such a way that where He is, and in what state He is, they are too. So as earlier verses have shown us, the believer is quickened together with Christ, raised together, and seated together in heavenly places “in Christ Jesus”.

Peter made it clear on the Day of Pentecost that Jesus has now been made Lord and Christ. He was Lord before, Luke 2:11; John 4:1, and He was Christ before, Luke 4:18, (the word Messiah, or Christ, means “anointed”). Now these titles have been given a new dimension, and He manifests His Lordship and Christ-hood in fresh ways, as the one at God’s right hand.

Ye who sometimes- that is, at one time. It is the same word as is translated “in time past”, in verse 2, and “in times past” in verse 3. Clearly the apostle does not mean that they were far off part of the time and not at others.

Were far off- they were far away from Israel promise-wise. To be without God and without Christ is to be truly far off from blessing. Of course, every sinner, Jew or Gentile, is far off from God, alienated from Him by sin, but in this context to be far off is a comparative term in relation to Israel, who in verse 17 are said to be nigh.

Are made nigh- they were not just brought nigh as proselytes in Israel, (those referred to often as “the stranger that is within thy gates”). The nearness is that of those who are in Christ Jesus. If a Jew believes, he is in Christ Jesus; and if a Gentile believes, he is in Christ Jesus too. This nearness is in reference to Christ, and not to the religion of Israel which the proselytes of old time adopted. The Gentiles are not made nigh by adopting the religion of the Jews.

By the blood of Christ- in 1:7 the blood of Christ secured the forgiveness of sins on a personal level. Now the blood of Christ deals with the distance between Jew and Gentile. As soon as Jew or Gentile have a saving interest in the blood of Christ, they are brought together by that saving interest. So the work of Christ (as implied in the phrase “the blood of Christ”), and the person of Christ, (as implied in the phrase “in Christ Jesus”), are the ground of nearness to one another.

The idea of the blood of Christ, the Messiah, was strange to both Jew and Gentile. To the Jew because he thought of the Messiah as a conquering hero, a warrior-king, subduing His enemies and reigning in glory, not hung upon a cross by their enemies. To the Gentile because the idea of a saviour who was crucified in weakness, and who had apparently failed, was folly to them. But the apostle is insistent here, that nearness comes through the blood of Christ.

Terms used for Christ’s work at Calvary

Crucifixion of Christ

The death of Christ as a judicial sentence, whether by men as they condemned Him, or by God as He judged the world and sin by Christ’s death

The cross

The death of Christ as to its shame and reproach

The blood

The death of Christ as a sacrifice, and as the supreme act of surrender to God

Death of Christ

Death speaks of separation, and the death of Christ is the means by which He separates His people from Adam, from their sins, and from their sin-nature

2:14
For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

For he is our peace- Solomon, whose name means “peaceable”, could not even keep his own nation united, let alone Jew and Gentile. At his death his kingdom was rent into ten tribes and two tribes, 1 Kings 11:29-33. It is not a case, however, of administrative ability, or skill in handling people. This peace is vested in a person, for the unity is based on the common interest all believers have in Him.

Who hath made both one- He has brought about complete unity between the believing Jew and the believing Gentile. He prayed to His Father before He died, asking “That they may be one, even as we are one”, John 17:22, and that prayer has been answered. Every believer possesses eternal life, which is the life of God, so they are united in common possession of life of God. The oneness of God is based on the fact that His life is possessed equally by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. This is the ground of their oneness, and therefore those who share that life have a share in that oneness.

He also makes one in the sense that believing Gentiles and believing Jews are the same thing, even a new creature in Christ, 2 Corinthians 5:17. This is the one new man of the next verse of our chapter.

And hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us- in the temple courts in Jerusalem there was a low wall, called “the middle wall of partition.” It was 30″ high, and was surmounted by a wooden fence one cubit, (approximately 18″), high. As a result, the way was barred to Gentiles, but they could still view the temple buildings over the wall, and even children could see through the fence. No Gentile was allowed beyond this wall, and inscribed on the sections of the wall, (for there were gaps through which Israelites could pass), were the following words:

“No-one of foreign descent may pass the partition and encircling wall. Whoever is seized is himself responsible for his death which will follow as a result”.

These words were carved into creamy-white chalk, and were painted red. The threat of death was not an idle one. Some time after AD 6 the Romans withdrew the right of the Jews to execute criminals, but with one exception. They could still impose the death penalty on any Gentile who passed beyond the middle wall of partition, even if he was a Roman. This shows the importance of this wall, and the way it represented the radical difference between Jew and Gentile in the realm of religious privilege.

This explains the anger of the Jews against Paul, for they thought he had brought Trophemus, an Ephesian, past that barrier. “And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him, crying out, ‘Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men everywhere against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place’. (For they had seen before with him in the city Trophemus an Ephesian, whom they supposed that Paul had brought into the temple)”, Acts 21:27-29. As a result, we read, “And all the city was moved, and the people ran together: and they took Paul, and drew him out of the temple: and forthwith the doors were shut. And as they were about to kill him, tidings came unto the chief captain of the band, that all Jerusalem was in an uproar. Who immediately took soldiers and centurions, and ran down unto them: and when they saw the chief captain and the soldiers, they left beating of Paul”, verses 30-32. We see the following things from all this:

1. The zeal with which the rule about the middle wall was preserved.

2. The great anger against Paul for supposedly bringing a Gentile into the temple courts beyond the wall.

3. The lack of reasonableness with which they hastily assumed what in fact was not true. With this we may compare the lack of justice in the trial of Christ.

4. That not content with expelling him from the temple precincts, they shut the doors. The site was cleared, the worshippers dispersed, the place was virtually empty, and all because of misinformed religious fervour.

Paul requested that he might address the crowds, and this he did in the Hebrew language, thus gaining their attention. He gave his testimony, and reached the point where he was telling how the Lord had sent him to preach to the Gentiles. Their response was the same as they had shown to Christ. They said of Him, “Away with this man”, Luke 23:18. They said of Paul, “Away with such a fellow from the earth: for it is not fit that he should live”. They were clearly still of the opinion that since he had spoken of going to preach to the Gentiles, he was sympathetic to them, and saw no distinction between Jew and Gentile. To take a Gentile past the middle wall of partition, and to preach blessing to the Gentiles, was to the Jews one and the same, hence they called for his death again.

So it is that not only did the Jews see the wall as symbolic, so did Paul. And just as the Jews thought that Paul had virtually broken down the wall by his supposed action, so Christ has done so by His work at the cross, as the next verse goes on to show. It is not that the Gentiles are now allowed past the middle wall of partition, it is that all that the wall represented has been abolished.

2:15
Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

Having abolished in his flesh the enmity- when the Lord Jesus died on the cross He made blessing available on a totally different basis. No longer was blessing available only to those who came through the Jewish religion, (past the middle wall of partition, so to speak); it was open to all in Christ. It was by what He did in the flesh, and not through any empty ritual, that the Lord Jesus abolished the enmity that the middle wall of partition represented. Note the decisiveness and thoroughness of this action. The wall of partition is “broken down”, and the enmity is “destroyed”. These are not half measures. Just as the veil in the temple was rent in twain from top to bottom, and thus was made completely useless for the purpose for which it was made, so Christ has thoroughly destroyed the enmity between believing Jew and Gentile that we see expressed in their attitude to Paul in Acts 21. He did this when He was impailed upon a cross because the Jews were hostile to Him. So He has used the expression of their hostility to destroy that hostility, as far as those who believe are concerned.

He has abolished the enmity in the flesh, telling us that it was a costly thing. He could not just issue a command revoking the ordinances. It must be shown what those who were zealous of the ordinances would do to Him when He came into flesh. They thought that He was against the ordinances, (the sabbath, for example), and so they impaled Him on a cross, such was their hatred. But God has used their enmity to bring in blessing to those who believe.

Even the law of commandments contained in ordinances- this is the explanation as to what the enmity was centred around. The law of Moses distinguished the nation of Israel from all other nations. As Moses said, “For what nation is there so great, who hath God so nigh unto them, as the Lord our God is in all things that we call upon Him for? And what nation is there so great, that hath statutes and judgements so righteous as all this law, which I set before you this day?” Deuteronomy 4:7,8. The law represented the dividing line between Jew and Gentile, and this was symbolised by the wall of partition in the temple, beyond which no Gentile could pass to share in the privileges of Israel. The law was contained in ordinances. In other words, the law was expressed by ordinances, and these ordinances were the cause of enmity. An ordinance seems to denote established practice based upon an original command. Thus, for instance, there was a command to keep the Passover, and it was to be kept as an ordinance, Exodus 12:17. So “law” links with the giving of the law at Sinai, whereas “ordinances” speak of the ongoing practice of what was commanded there. These things set Israel apart, and they were very jealous of their apartness.

By what He did on the cross the Lord Jesus has set aside the need for ordinances that help in the keeping of the law. It is not that He has abolished the law as such, but has abolished the ordinances that were designed to express obedience to the law. We know from other Scriptures that “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth, Romans 10:4. He has not ended the law, as if it were evil, but He has ended the idea that law could be used to produce righteousness. As Paul wrote to the Galatians, “if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain”, Galatians 2:21. It was because the law could not produce righteousness in sinners, that Christ needed to die. If the law could have produced righteousness He need not have died. The law is not revoked, but it is not the principle that governs the believer in his life. The words of the apostle are decisive, “ye are not under the law, but under grace”, Romans 6:14. The guiding principle of the life of the believer is the example of Christ in His life.

For to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace- He is the uniting centre, and those who are “in Him” are new creatures, not Jews and Gentiles. (To be in Him means that who, what, and where Christ is characterises their spiritual position). It is not that Gentiles are made religious, like Jews are religious. And it is not that Jews are made irreligious, as Gentiles are irreligious. It is not a question of compromise, but of new creation. The Gentile who believes is no longer a Gentile, with no privileges. The Jew is no longer a Jew, and exchanges Jewish privilege for Christian privilege. The new man is what the two, Gentile believer and Jewish believer, have both been made individually. It is not another name for the church. There is not a Jewish new man and a Gentile new man. Both Jew and Gentile have lost their own identity in favour of Christ. This is indicated by the expression “in Himself”; it is what each is in Christ that matters now. Before, it was what they were in themselves. Each is now a new man, and each is the same new man, and that new man is modelled after Christ, just as the old man is modelled after Adam. The new man is not expressly Christ Himself, but Christ reproduced in the believer. Adam was reproduced in us because we received a sinful nature by natural birth, whereas Christ is reproduced in us because we received a new nature at new birth.

If all believers, whatever their former religious background, are modelled on Christ, then that results in peace. When they were in the flesh Gentiles and Jews were opposed to one another, for there was enmity, but now the reverse is the case. Can Christ in one believer be at enmity with Christ in another believer? This is unthinkable. So if believers are not at peace with one another, then they must be exhibiting Adam, not Christ.

2:16
And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body- not only are the two united because of a common nature, but they are also united in the one body, the church, so the unity is both personal and communal. Not only does each have Christ as model, each has Christ as head of the body of which they form part. The body of Christ consists of all believers from Pentecost to the Rapture, and is the company of which He alone is the head.

By the cross- this reconciliation is on the solid basis of the work of the cross, so it is not a loose association, but one that is permanent and unbreakable. The cross is a doctrine, not a piece of wood. The Jews, in their zeal for their ordinances, gave Christ the place of shame at Calvary, putting Him on a cross, but God has turned this into the means of reconciling sinners to Himself.

Having slain the enmity thereby- Christ turned His own death into death for the enmity, for He dealt with the root cause of it. So the middle wall is broken down, the enmity is abolished, and the way it was done was by the cross.

2:17
And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.

And came and preached peace to you which were afar off- Jonah preached to the Gentile Ninevites, as recorded in the book of Jonah, and later had a word for Israel, as recorded in 2 Kings 14:25. Significantly, it is Jonah that the Lord selects as an illustration of the fact that He is going to bless Gentiles as well as Jews. Consequent upon their continued refusal of Him, the Pharisees are told that they will receive no sign but that of the prophet Jonah, who, after a three days and three nights experience, went to Nineveh and preached to it. See Matthew 12:38-41. And so it came to pass, and the fact that Paul puts the preaching to the far-off ones first, highlights that the Jews have nothing to boast of, for they rejected the Messiah when He came exclusively to them.

The difference with Jonah, however, was that he did not preach peace, but judgement. God was at war with Nineveh because of its sin, but now, in Christ, God is reconciling the world, because of Calvary. So it is that Christ, through His sent-servants, preaches peace. We read in Mark’s gospel that “they went forth, and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them, and confirming the word with signs following”, Mark 16:20. In this way He preaches still.

And to them that were nigh- perhaps this is put last because it is the more surprising, therefore it is reserved as a climax. Unlike the Gentiles who were kept at a distance by the middle wall of partition, Jews could come relatively near to God in the temple courts.

The word of the Lord to the disciples was that they should begin preaching at Jerusalem, Luke 24:27, and so this is what they did. In the Old Testament, when a man was found dead, the city next to the slain man was held responsible, and the elders were required to slay a heifer as a sin offering, wash their hands over it, and say, “Our hands have not shed this blood, neither have our eyes seen it. Be merciful, O Lord, unto thy people Israel, whom thou hast redeemed, and lay not innocent blood to thy people of Israel’s charge. And the blood shall be forgiven them”, Deuteronomy 21:7-9. Now clearly the city of Jerusalem was the city next to the slain Christ, for He was crucified just outside its walls. The people, however, had cried, “His blood be on us, and on our children”, Matthew 27:25, thus saying the opposite of what God required to hear. How perverse this situation is, for it is Pilate who washes his hands, in verse 24.

But in His amazing grace He gives to Jerusalem the opportunity to reverse their decision. So it is that Peter exhorts those who were exercised about their sin to “save themselves from this untoward generation”, Acts 2:40. By confessing their guilt they could come into the good of a sacrifice infinitely better than a heifer, and know God’s forgiveness, and clearance from the guilt of crucifying their Messiah. And it was to give them this opportunity that Christ came and preached to them that were near in terms of national privilege.

2:18
For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.

For through him we both have access- the fact that Paul writes as if Christ personally comes to preach, highlights the fact that He is personally the way. When an easterner is asked the way by a traveller, instead of giving directions, he starts out on the way with him; thus the man becomes the expression of the way, and to follow him is to be on the way. So with the Lord Jesus, but in a much more intense way. He comes to men, Jew and Gentile alike, and offers to be “the way” for them, as long as they will acknowledge their sin, (which is the reason why they are not on the way in the first place), and believe in Him as the one who said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father but by Me”, John 14:6.

Significantly, when Paul was accused of taking a Gentile past the middle wall, the doors of the temple were shut to him, Acts 21:30. But this does not matter, for he has access to God, as all believers do. Access is “a bringing or leading into the presence of another”.

This access is first of all for salvation, (“no man cometh unto the Father but by Me”, John 14:6), then for worship, (“let us draw nigh”, Hebrews 10:22), and then, ultimately, for entrance into the Father’s house in heaven, which is the context of John 14.

Note the difference between being nigh, and having access. Whilst the Jewish worshipper could come relatively near His God, he did not have full access to his God. But the Christian does, for he can approach into the holiest in heaven, Hebrews 10:19.

By one Spirit- the Holy Spirit dwells within believing Jews and believing Gentiles alike. This fact might be disputed by Jewish believers at first, which shows that Peter was wise to take men with him when he went to preach to Cornelius. They could bear witness to the effect the preaching had, for the Holy Spirit came upon Cornelius and his company, and this was proved by the fact that they spoke in tongues, Acts 10:45,46. So the Spirit who came upon Peter and the others at Pentecost, now comes also on Cornelius and his friends. There is one Spirit, Ephesians 4:4, and He comes alike upon all who believe. It is by His agency we are enabled to cry “Abba, Father” as we draw nigh to God, Galatians 4:6; Romans 8:14,15. This access is not as the result of the carrying out of ordinances, but is the Christian’s right, as indwelt by the Spirit of God, and He it is who encourages us to draw near.

The doors in Solomon’s temple were of the olive tree, 1 Kings 6:31, olive oil being a symbol of the Spirit of God, see Zechariah 4:1-6. This illustrates the access that the Holy Spirit gives as He encourages us to approach God.

Unto the Father- because the Son has been to earth, and been to the cross, He has made the way whereby sinners may have access to God. And He is known to them as their Father, because they are born of Him, and are therefore in His family. Abraham built an altar to the name of the Lord who appeared to him, Genesis 12:7. In other words, his approach to God was in line with the way God had revealed Himself. So believers address God in line with the way He has been manifested to them by the Son of God. This is why they address Him as “Father”. The Jewish prayer-books carefully avoided referring to God as Father, but the Christian has no such reservations.

(e) Verses 19-22
The dignity of the saints

2:19
Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow-citizens with the saints, and of the household of God;

Now therefore- their present position is as a result of the aforementioned movements of God towards them in Christ.

Ye are no more strangers and foreigners- as those who were formerly apart from Christ, they had no claim on the privileges of Israel. The inscription on the middle wall of partition spoke of those of “foreign descent”, meaning Gentiles. The two words used here do not so much signify distance geographically, but distance religiously. For the word “stranger” does indeed mean an alien, as in verse 12, but it can also mean a guest. The implication being that if you were entertained as a guest it was because you were not part of the household. So also with the word “foreigner”. It literally means “one who lives near”. So the apostle seems to be emphasising the fact that even if a Gentile were a guest or a neighbour in relation to a Jew, he was as far away as he could be in terms of privilege.

But fellow-citizens with the saints- notice the word “fellow”. It denotes that something is shared, and what is shared is citizenship. From being at enmity, they now are in fellowship.

The Gentiles were aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, verse 12, (the word commonwealth denoting citizenship in the theocracy of Israel), but now believing Gentiles are citizens on the same level as believing Jews. But it is not citizenship in Israel that is in view, for believing Jews are no longer citizens of Israel, but of heaven; and so are believing Gentiles, on an equal basis.

And it is with saints that this citizenship is shared, even those who have been set apart by God for Himself. Those who have saved themselves from the untoward nation of Israel that crucified their Messiah, Acts 2:40. So they are not proselytes of Israel, but citizens of heaven. The specific meaning of “the saints” would be the believers who were formerly Jews but had believed and been brought into the church before the first Gentile was saved. The Gentiles who believed joined the saints who were already in receipt of Christian blessing.

And of the household of God- instead of being outsiders, with no relationship with God, they have become part of the family. But it is not the family of Jacob, the nation of Israel, but the family of God. Peter wrote to converted Jews and explained that they were now of the household of God as holy priests, 1 Peter 2:5, and now this is true of believing Gentiles too.

There is no mis-match between the idea of being of the household of God and being stones in a building, for the Old Testament word for stone and son was the same in some instances. Sons are the stones of a man’s house; the sons of Jacob formed the House of Israel. God blessed the Hebrew midwives who saved many a son from being killed. We read that He built them houses, Exodus 1:21. In other words, He gave them sons, fit reward for those who had rescued many Hebrew sons.

2:20
And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;

And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets- in the passage just quoted, Peter describes believers as living stones, and he also describes Christ as the living stone. In other words, believers are made suitable to be linked to Christ, for they have received life from Him. It is no surprise then to be told here that in some way we are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets. Being those initially responsible to preach the word to Jew and Gentile, they were the first to be laid. They themselves represent the doctrinal foundation upon which all believers rest. In Acts 2:42 we read that of new converts that “they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship”. So believers were marked by steadfast observance of all that the apostles taught.

We should not miss the link which the Lord Jesus made between Himself as the Rock, and Peter as a stone. He had deliberately given Peter the name Cephas, meaning “a stone”, John 1:42, in view no doubt of what He would say later on about building the church. John interprets the word Cephas for us, for the Holy Spirit through the apostle is pre-empting any idea that Peter is the rock.

Peter confessed that Jesus was the Christ the Son of the living God. The response of the Lord was, “Blessed are thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed this unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it”, Mathew 16:17,18. In our zeal to deny that Peter is the foundation of the church, (a notion which is clearly not true, for “other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ”, 1 Corinthians 3:11), we should not ignore the fact that the Lord did put the name Peter, “a stone”, in close proximity to Himself as the rock. So Peter has something to do with the foundation, but is certainly not the foundation. We should bear in mind the following:

1. The Rabbis described Abraham as the rock on which the earth was founded, so the idea of a system built upon a person was not foreign to the Jews.

2. The word for Peter is “petros”, a masculine word meaning stone or rock. The word for rock is “petra” a feminine word which always and only means rock. A “petros” takes character from a “petra”, just as believers are said by Peter to be partakers of the Divine nature, (and God Himself is called a Rock in Deuteronomy 32:4,15,18,30,31).

3. Peter personally would be a poor foundation, since he is called Satan in Matthew 16:23, just after he has confessed Christ to be the Son of God.

4. Peter refers to Christ as a Living Stone, and believers as living stones built upon Him, 1 Peter 2:4,5. It is not possible for Peter to be the foundation, and also be built on the foundation.

5. Pope Pius 4th decreed that nothing should be taught that the fathers are not agreed upon. They are evenly divided, and Augustine changed his view, and said all should believe what they like about it! The statistics are as follows: 17 of the Fathers said the rock was Peter; 44 said it was Peter’s faith; 16 said the rock was Christ; 8 said that it was all the apostles. So we have a situation where the system which teaches that Peter is the rock on which the church is built, is undecided, and has decreed that if they are undecided the idea should not be taught.

We may safely conclude that the rock-foundation of the church is Christ alone; that the apostles and prophets, being vitally important initial members of the church, may be seen as the first row of stones built upon the foundation, and then the other living stones are built on these. So as far as the church as a spiritual building is concerned, Christ is the foundation. As far as the doctrinal foundation is concerned, Christ is also the foundation, but inasmuch as the apostles were intimately linked with that doctrine, (taking character from Peter’s confession in Matthew 16:16), then the apostle is justified in calling them a foundation too, but in a secondary sense.

Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone- He Himself personally is the corner stone, without any help from others, not even apostles and prophets. The corner stone was that which joined two sides of a building together, giving alignment and stability to the structure. Because of its vital importance in this work, it was called chief. The apostle clearly has the temple of God in Jerusalem in his mind as he makes these statements. We have seen his allusion to the middle wall of partition, and now we find reference to the foundation of the building. The temple in Jerusalem was built on solid rock, and then the foundation stones were laid, including the chief corner stone, the one which linked two walls together. It is as the foundation stones in the first row relate to the chief corner stone, that the whole building is given straightness and a true line.

It is noticeable how much of Christ’s prayer to His Father in John 17 is taken up with the apostles. He was concerned that they might be united in their testimony. His prayer was answered, and they formed the foundation as they taught the truth in relation to Christ. They did not give the building its alignment, however; that came from the chief corner stone. Nor are they the rock-foundation upon which the whole building stands, for that is Christ alone. The living stones in this building are those who believe the truth expressed by Peter when he said, “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God”, Matthew 16:16. This is the rock-foundation, and the apostles and prophets, being the first to confess this, and also the first to set this doctrine forth in the church age, are the living expression of that doctrine, and as such are the first row of stones, taking their alignment from the chief corner stone Himself. A similar thought is found in Revelation 21:14, where the foundations of the wall of the future holy Jerusalem have the names of the twelve apostles of the Lamb written on them.

2:21
In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:

In whom all the building- because the stones are living stones, they are individually, as to their position, in Him. As such they are stable and firm, for He is the corner stone. It is in Him alone, (“Jesus Christ Himself”, verse 20), that all the building grows, not the apostles.

Fitly framed together- ancient stone-masons were able to square stones so skilfully, that when they were builded on one another, not ever a sheet of paper could be inserted into the joins. Such is the skill of the heavenly Temple-builder, that the powers of evil, (“the gates of hell”, Matthew 16:18), cannot make any inroads. There are divisions in abundance in Christendom, but there are none in the true church.

When Solomon’s temple was being built, the stones were fashioned away from the building site. Scripture says, “And the house, when it was in building, was made of stone made ready before it was brought thither: so that there was neither hammer nor axe nor any tool of iron heard in the house, while it was in building”, 1 Kings 6:7. The parallel passage in 2 Chronicles 8:16 reads, “Now all the work of Solomon was prepared unto the day of the foundation of the house of the Lord, and until it was finished. So the house of the Lord was perfected”. So we see that the preparation beforehand was in view of the laying of the foundation, and also of its completion. Applying these principles to the church, we could say that in the mind of God the work of fitting stones for the church was done before those stones were actually laid. His people were on His mind in eternity, and He associated them with His Son, involving them in His glorious purpose. Then as soon as they believed they were fitted perfectly to be part of that purpose, with the rough edges of the Adamic nature chipped away, so that they conformed perfectly to Christ. Peter shows in 1 Peter 2 that just as Christ is the living stone, so believers are living stones too, (“lively”, verse 5). Just as Christ is elect, (“chosen of God”, verse 4, “elect”, verse 6), so believers are elect, too, (“chosen”, meaning elect, verse 9). Just as Christ is precious to His Father, verse 4, so believers are a “peculiar people”, verse 9, meaning “a people for a possession”. So the “chief corner stone”, verse 6, Christ Himself, and those who are built on Him, are perfectly fitted together. All the unsuitability derived from likenss to Adam is chipped away, and only what the believer is as being in Christ remains.

Groweth unto a holy temple- notice it grows unto, not into, a holy temple. A building grows into something as it develops from incompleteness to completeness. This building, however, is complete from its inception, for the church is viewed here in its ideal condition. The church will be the temple of God in eternity, and the living stones in the building develop in the things of God in view of that.

In the Lord- the holiness of the temple derives from the fact that it is the dwelling-place of the Lord; it is holy as being in Him, the Lord, whose authority repels all unholy elements.

2:22
In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.

In whom ye also are builded together- they have not only been builded together perfectly as far as God’s purpose for the church is concerned, but there is an ongoing building, for “builded together” is in the present; it is something happening as Paul writes. So as well as having been built, they are being built. So the “ye also” does not mean, “ye also, as well as Jewish believers”, (for he has not been contrasting Jew with Gentile in the last few verses), but rather, “ye also, as well as having been builded, are currently being builded together”. The emphasis is now on the local assembly in Ephesus, to whom he is writing. As Paul wrote to the Corinthians, “ye are God’s building”, and he went on to tell them that the buildng in question was the temple of God, 1 Corinthians 3:9,16.

For an habitation of God- the idea of being a temple, with its associations of glory and grandeur, now gives way to the idea of a habitation, which in the natural realm is a place where a man is at home and comfortable. The local assembly is the house of God, according to 1 Timothy 3:15, the place where God’s will is to be done.

Through the Spirit- the whole thing is a spiritual concept, and it is only by the power of the Spirit that we are a place for God to inhabit with joy. He ever associates with the glories of His Son, and so the more those glories are reproduced in the people of God, the more He can be at home.

 

 

 

 

 

HEBREWS 3

 

HEBREWS 3

Survey of the chapter
Chapter 3 continues the theme begun in chapter 2.  There the manhood of Christ is emphasised, and the seven-fold way in which He ministers to His people’s needs.  He sanctifies His people, separating them from Adam’s world, and sets them on the path of faith, a path sure to end in glory.  It is beset by difficulties, however, so He acts as a faithful and merciful high priest, and thus enables His people to reach their destination.
To further show His fitness for this task, the writer contrasts Him with Moses, who was responsible for leading the children of Israel through the desert until they reached Canaan.  Under Moses, however, many of the people fell when they were tried and tested by the wilderness journey.  We, however, have a greater than Moses to help us, and so are encouraged as we press on to heaven.
The verses from 3:7 to 4:13 are based on the words of Psalm 95:7-11, in which the psalmist details the failure of the nation of Israel to listen to God’s voice while they were crossing the wilderness towards Canaan.  So it was that some forfeited their right to the land, and died in the wilderness.  Hebrews 3:7-19 concentrates on those who refused to enter into the land, whereas Hebrews 4:1-11 speaks of those who do enter into God’s rest.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-5  Considering the apostle and high priest of our profession Christ Jesus
(b) Verses 6-13 Obeying the voice of the Son over God’s house
(c) Verses 14-19 Becoming partakers of Christ


THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 1 TO 6:

3:1  Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the Apostle and High Priest of our profession, Christ Jesus;

3:2  Who was faithful to him that appointed him, as also Moses was faithful in all his house.

3:3  For this man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house.

3:4  For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is God.

3:5  And Moses verily was faithful in all his house, as a servant, for a testimony of those things which were to be spoken after;

(a)   Verses 1-5
Considering the apostle and high priest of our profession, Christ Jesus

3:1
Wherefore, holy brethren, partakers of the heavenly calling, consider the apostle and high priest of our profession, Christ Jesus;

Wherefore- this is the translation of a word which is not found in any epistle known to be from Paul.  It means “for which reason”.  Chapter 2:18 has described our high priest as able to succour those that are tempted, so for this reason we should do what we are exhorted in the words following.
Holy brethren- believers have been made the brethren of Christ, 2:12, and He has sanctified them, 2:11, separating them from their former links with Adam, so they can be described as holy brethren.
Partakers of the heavenly calling- as Hebrews they had been called to an earthly inheritance.  They have now exchanged this for a heavenly one, for their High Priest is at the right hand of God, not on David’s throne on earth.  The word “partakers” is the same as “fellows” in 1:9, and the word “partakers” of 3:14, 6:4, 12:8.  It is used in Luke 5:7 of those who were partners in a fishing business.  It denotes those who are sharers together in a common interest, in this case the heavenly things to which believers are called.
Consider the apostle and high priest of our profession- when Israel were about to begin their journey across the desert, they were led by Moses and Aaron, who had met and kissed on Mount Horeb, where later the law would be given, Exodus 4:27.  There is bonded together in these two men the twin ideas of one who represents God’s interests to the people, and who comes out from God’s presence to declare God’s mind, and another who represents the people’s interests in the presence of God, and who comes out from the presence of the people to be before God.  Moses was the apostle-like figure, coming out from and sent by God, whereas Aaron was the priest, going in to God from the people and for their interests.  The Jews used the word apostle of those sent by the High Priest to collect the temple tribute from Jews in foreign lands.  Compare Matthew 21:34.
What was divided between Moses and Aaron is combined to perfection in Christ, who is superior to Moses in 3:2-6, and superior to Aaron in 4:14-5:3.  Moses and Aaron both failed, as is seen in the fact that neither of them entered the land of promise.  Christ did not fail, and is entered in to heaven, 4:14.
The word profession has the idea of saying the same thing.  In this context, it means to be in agreement with God when He tells of the glories and offices of His Son.  He is apostle and high priest in order to make our profession a possibility, and to make the things spoken of in that profession a reality.
Christ Jesus- the title Christ, or Messiah, can justly be connected with the personal name of Jesus.  This combined title is not found in the Gospels, so is a name reserved for Christ as one who, having been here, has become Christ or “anointed one” in a new way.  As Peter said on the day of Pentecost, “God hath made that same Jesus…Lord and Christ”, Acts 2:36.  He was Lord and Christ before, but is now to be thought of as having these titles in a new way.  He has become Christ in a heavenly sense, for He is God’s approved man who fits His people for heaven.

3:2
Who was faithful to him that appointed him, as also Moses was faithful in all his house.

Who was faithful to him that appointed him- the faithfulness of Christ is emphasised here, as His mercy is to the fore in 4:14-16.  To appoint means literally to make, but clearly has the idea of installing into an office, and therefore making Him something officially.  He was appointed as apostle in eternity, as He Himself indicated, for he described Himself as “Him, whom the Father hath sanctified and sent into the world”, John 10:36.  And again, “As thou hast sent me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world”, John 17:18.  He was appointed as high priest in ascension, 5:4,10; 7:21,28.  The word is used in Mark 3:14, where disciples were made, or appointed, apostles.  It is appropriate that He should be appointed apostle as He begins His journey, and appointed high priest as He ends it.
The phrase is literally “being faithful”, so does not confine itself to the past, as “was” might suggest.  He was faithful as apostle when here, He is faithful as high priest up in heaven.
As also Moses was faithful in all his house- the latter words are a quotation from Numbers 12:7.  The context of that passage is relevant.  Numbers 11 records the appointment of the 70 men designated by God to assist Moses in his task of leading the people.  This might have seemed to Aaron and Miriam a sign that God saw weakness in Moses, and this raised a doubt in their minds as to his competence.  They spoke against him in regard to the Ethiopian wife he had taken, perhaps suggesting that this showed lack of right judgement on his part.  They might have thought, “If he cannot order the affairs of his own house aright, how can he administer the house of God?”  “Hath the Lord spoken only by Moses, hath he not spoken also by us?”, they ask. He had indeed used Aaron as Moses’ spokesman in Pharoah’s palace, and Miriam had sung on the banks of the Red Sea to the praise of God, but still it was Moses who was to take the lead role in the affairs of the nation.
God moves to defend Moses’ reputation with the words quoted here, emphasising his faithfulness, for a faithful man is a reliable man; one to whom God can entrust His word, and such was Moses.  Aaron had failed at Sinai and also on the day of the consecration of the priests.
God refers to “mine house”, in Numbers 12:7, so this fixes the meaning here as being God’s house, not Moses’ house.
We should remember that a person’s house is not necessarily the building he lives in.  It can mean his family, as in the expression “House of Jacob”.  The Hebrew word for son is “ben”, but this is connected with the word for build.  In Bible times, sons were what a man’s house was built with. By speaking of Moses as a servant in His house God is indicating that the believers in Israel were His houshold, and Moses was a servant in that household.

3:3
For this man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house.

For this man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses- the word “for” takes us back to the idea of considering Christ.  He is worthy of more glory even than Moses was as the respected leader of Israel.  It would take a very convincing argument to make the Hebrews stop owning allegiance to Moses, but the writer has more than one arguments to advance. The word “more” is an adjective, so the idea is of greater, better, fuller glory.  This is why the Hebrews needed to turn from considering Moses as their leader, and consider Christ Jesus.
Inasmuch as he who hath builded the house hath more honour than the house- the writer now uses a physical illustration to bring out a truth in the spiritual realm. He will speak of a material house and its builder, and then apply the lesson to Moses in relation to God’s spiritual house. The general principle is that the builder of any material house displays access to resources, intelligence, and skill, something that obviously cannot be said of the house itself.  The same is true in the spiritual realm, for Moses functioned in God’s house, and was therefore part of it, and therefore the builder of that house is superior to him. 

3:4
For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is God.

For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is God- this is the reason why Christ is worthy of more glory than Moses. Every physical house is built by man. The word for build emphasises the preparation and establishment of the house. But the man only uses the materials that have already been prepared by God when He built the world.
There might be a glance here at the building of the tabernacle, superinteded as it was by Moses. Later on in the history of Israel the tabernacle was called the house of God, see Matthew 12:4. The idea that Christ built the tabernacle might seem strange to us, but it is clear that the materials that Moses used to actually make the tabernacle were put in place by Christ, for He is the one who made the earth and its fulness.  As John 1:3 puts it, “All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made”.  He it was who placed the gold, silver, brass, and precious stones in the earth, and caused the shittim trees and the flax to grow, so that materials were available for Moses and his helpers to use.  It is true that the tabernacle was built by Moses, and so, like every house on earth, has been built by man, but beyond that Christ supplied the materials, and is therefore worthy of more honour.  So the reason He is worthy of a greater glory than Moses is found in His Deity.

3:5
And Moses verily was faithful in all his house, as a servant, for a testimony of those things which were to be spoken after;

And Moses verily was faithful in all his house, as a servant- this word may be translated as “confidential servant”, which fits in with Numbers 12:8, where God speaks of the way in which He spoke face to face with Moses, in a way which He did not speak to other prophets.  Having heard the voice of God, Moses was faithful in his acting upon that word from God.
It is interesting to notice that the word for servant, “therapon”, is one which gives us the English words “therapeutic”, and “therapy”.  In Numbers 12:13 Moses appeals to God about Miriam with the words “Heal her now, I beseech thee”.  As mediator, he was indirectly responsible for the healing of his sister.  All Aaron could do was appeal to Moses, verses 11,12; Moses, on the other hand, appealed to God.
For a testimony of those things which were to be spoken after- Miriam and Aaron made two criticisms of Moses. First, that he had married an Ethiopian woman, which they may have thought showed a failure in judgement. If he cannot order his own house aright, how can he order God house?
Their second criticism was about their ministry in Israel. They asked, “Hath the Lord indeed spoken only by Moses? Hath he not spoken by us? Numbers 12:2. The Lord does not respond to the first objection, but to the second He says, “Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the Lord will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream. My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house.
With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses? And the anger of the Lord was kindled against them”, verses 8,9.
So the commendation of the faithfulness of Moses comes in the context of his office as a prophet. Aaron was a prophet too, Exodus 7:1, and Miriam was a prophetess, Exodus 15:20, but the Lord makes it clear that the standing of Moses was greater, for He spoke with him directly. We read of Moses meeting with God at the mercy seat, and God spoke to him from between the cherubim, Exodus 25:22. So “
testimony of those things which were to be spoken after” refers to the ongoing communication of the mind of God to Moses. Despite the objections of his brother and sister, God would continue to speak in testimony to him after that point. We shall see the reason for the emphasis on speaking when we reach verse 7, and we are exhorted to hear the voice of the Son of God.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 6 TO 11:

3:6  But Christ as a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.

3:7  Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice,

3:8  Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness:

3:9  When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.

3:10  Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways.

3:11  So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.)

(b) Verses 6-13
Obeying the voice of the Son over God’s house.

3:6
But Christ as a Son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end.

But Christ as a Son over his own house- we have a great priest over the house of God, according to 10:21.  The idea of being faithful is to be understood from the context.  Moses was faithful as a servant…but Christ (was faithful) as a Son.
Whose house are we- just as the House of Israel was built up by Jacob’s descendants, (each one being a “stone” in the building), so the house of God consists of those in the family of God.  In Moses’ day this was made up of the believers in Israel, whereas now it is believers in the church, who are “of the household of God”, Ephesians 2:19. This household is the place where the Father’s will is done, and in which God’s firstborn Son is delegated the task of administering. Hence the importance of hearing and obeying the voice of the Son, verse 7.
If we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end- the problem with Israel was that they did not persevere in the hearing and obeying of the voice of God.  They were not firm to the end, so they murmured instead of rejoicing, and instead of maintaining confidence in God, that He would bring them into the land, were disbelieving.  By holding fast the readers of this epistle would show themselves true believers, and therefore in the house.

3:7
Wherefore (as the Holy Ghost saith, To day if ye will hear his voice,

Wherefore- on the basis of the foregoing truths, we are now exhorted to prove that we are genuinely part of the house.  There follows a parenthesis from 3:7-11 in which part of Psalm 95 is quoted, and a summary of the behaviour of Israel in the wilderness is given to us by the Spirit of God.  This the writer to the Hebrews uses, extracting different phrases from it to challenge his readers.  The whole passage from 3:7-4:13 forms his second warning in the epistle.  Having drawn lessons from the giving of the law at Sinai in 2:1-4, he now proceeds to warn them using the subsequent wilderness experience of Israel.
(as the Holy Ghost saith- so the Holy Spirit is speaking in the present, (saith), in words that were written centuries before by the psalmist.  There now comes a quotation from Psalm 95.  In Hebrews chapter 3 the emphasis is on the middle of the quotation, whereas in chapter 4 the main point is the beginning and ending of the quote.  The word “today” is referred to seven times.
To day if ye will hear his voice- despite having been written by a man, they were the words of the Holy Spirit of God.  As such they have great relevance.  The expression used for Holy Spirit is literally “the Spirit, the Holy”, indicating and emphasising His separateness from anything wrong or corrupt.  He may safely be listened to.
Note, too, that the Holy Spirit is exhorting that we listen to the voice of the Son.  One Divine Person is supporting the ministry of another, as happens again in 10:15.  Note the importance of hearing the voice today, and not delaying obedience.  We are to hear the voice each day, and honestly assess our response to it.
Psalm 95:7 spoke of Israel as the flock of God’s pasture, and the Lord Jesus, the good shepherd, emphasised the importance of hearing His voice, John 10:27.  To ignore the voice of the shepherd might mean we get into danger, or stray.
In Numbers 14:22, after Israel had refused to go into the land, the Lord accused them of not having hearkened to His voice. So the Hebrews to whom the epistle was written could not only fail to hear the voice of the psalm, but also ignore the voice of the Spirit and the voice of the Son.

3:8
Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness:

Harden not your hearts- it is entirely possible to hear the voice, but not have hearts responsive to what is said.  Sadly this was the case with the majority in Israel, in incidents now to be referred to.
As in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness- the meaning of the place-name Meribah, (where, at the beginning of the wilderness journey, the people murmured against God and His goodness), is strife, or provocation, and the other name given to the place by Moses was Massah, which means temptation, Exodus 17:7.  So the failure and sin of the people is recorded for all to know and learn by.  Long after the event, the psalmist recalled it for our instruction.

3:9
When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years.

When your fathers tempted me, proved me, and saw my works forty years- what happened at the beginning of the wilderness journey happened at the end, forty years later in Numbers 20.  (See verse 1 of that chapter, where “the first month” means the first month of the fortieth year).  Again it is a matter of water from the rock, and again the place is named Meribah by Moses.  When placed under trial and testing, instead of being cast upon God, and availing themselves of the ministry of their high priest, they tempted God by suggesting that He was not able to deal with the situation.  Nonetheless, God still allowed them to see His great works for forty years, in the provision of the manna and quails, and their preservation from harm.

3:10
Wherefore I was grieved with that generation, and said, They do alway err in their heart; and they have not known my ways.

Wherefore I was grieved with that generation- God is always grieved when His word is disobeyed, because that is the same as saying He is a liar.  This is how the apostle John saw it, for he wrote, “he that believeth not God hath made Him a liar”, 1 John 5:10.
And said, They do alway err in their heart- it is no surprise to learn that those who fail to listen to God go astray.  The word for err is “planos”, the lights in the sky that sailors plot their course by at their peril, for they are planets, and wander across the night sky.  The psalmist said that Israel “wandered in the wilderness in a solitary way”.  Instead of taken the straight way under God’s direction, they were condemned to wander aimlessly for thirty-eight years.  The erring of their heart was mirrored in the wandering of their feet.  Stephen tells us that “in their hearts they turned back into Egypt”, Acts 7:39; and he is referring to the incident at the foot of Sinai, just a month after crossing the Red Sea.  See verse 17 below, where God was grieved, not just for thirty-eight years, but forty.
And they have not known my ways- preferring their own way, God’s way was unknown to them, for only those responsive to the word of God shall know the way.

3:11
So I sware in my wrath, They shall not enter into my rest.)

So I sware in my wrath- this is the psalmist’s comment on the passage in Numbers 14:27-39 where God says, “As truly as I live, saith the Lord…your carcases shall fall in this wilderness”.  Because God cannot swear by anything higher than Himself, (for there is nothing higher), He swears by Himself, for He, as God, is His own point of reference, Hebrews 6:13.  We shall see in chapter 4 that these words may be rendered slightly differently, so that God, even when He is in the midst of displaying wrath He still remembers mercy, Habakkuk 3;2.
They shall not enter into my rest-  the Canaan-rest God had prepared for His people could not be entered in a state of unbelief and disobedience.  This is the way the words apply to that portion of the nation which were disobedient to the word of God.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 12 TO 19:

3:12  Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.

3:13  But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.

3:14  For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end;

3:15  While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.

3:16  For some, when they had heard, did provoke: howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses.

3:17  But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness?

3:18  And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that believed not?

3:19  So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief.

(c) Verses 12-19
Becoming partakers of Christ

3:12
Take heed, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God.

Take heed, brethren- the quotation from Psalm 95 ends in verse 12, and the line of thought is now resumed from verse 6.  We should not assume that by calling them brethren he is reckoning them to all be believers.  The common mode of address in the synagogue was “Men brethren”, the common interest in God’s dealings with Israel being that which made them into a brotherhood, see Acts 7;2; 13:26,38; 22:1.
Lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief- a heart of unbelief is always evil, which word means “causing grief or pain”.  Hence God speaks of being grieved forty years by their manifest unbelief.  Any one of the nation could be in danger of this; simply being of Israel did not make them immune.  It was one of the twelve apostles that betrayed Christ, and thereby showed himself to be an apostate.
In departing from the living God- the word for departing here means to apostatise, to deliberately go away from the stand one has taken with regard to the truth.  In the parable of the sower, those whose hearts were like the rocky ground, where the seed could not take deep root, “for a while believe, but in time of temptation fall away”, Luke 8:13.  So there is such a thing as temporary faith, where a form of belief is exercised, but which does not take serious note of the consequences.  The apostle Paul calls this believing in vain, 1 Corinthians 15:2.
Those who departed from the living God were those who did not share the life of God, which is eternal life.  No wonder we read their carcases fell in the wilderness, for they were dead while they lived, (for men’s bodies are normally only called carcases after they have died).

3:13
But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.

But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day- daily exhortation is encouraged by the fact that every day is an opportunity to hear the word of God, for the Son constantly brings it to us.  It was those who spoke often to one another in Malachi’s day who were precious to the Lord, Malachi 3:16,17.
Lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin- sin committed because the word of God is not obeyed, will result in a hardening of the heart.  Sin has the ability to deceive us into thinking that it knows the best policy.  We see this in the fact that many in Israel preferred Egypt to Canaan.

3:14
For we are made partakers of Christ, if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast unto the end;

For we are made partakers of Christ- literally “we have become companions of Christ”, so the deed is done.  The word partaker is translated “fellows” in 1:9, and partakers in verses 1 and 14 of this chapter.  The idea is of those who have a close association with another, so that they share in his affairs.  This is a high position to be in, but high privileges bring great responsibilities.
If we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast unto the end- the beginning of the confidence in Christ is the initial, fervent faith in Him they showed at conversion.  A continuance in that attitude is a sure sign of genuineness, and is the opposite of the “departing” of verse 12.  It is not a question of continuing so as to be saved, but continuing because we are saved.

3:15
While it is said, To day if ye will hear His voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation.
3:16
For some, when they had heard, did provoke: howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses.

While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice- having spoken of the whole of the pilgrim journey from initial faith to the end of the journey, the writer now reminds us that we must respond to Christ on a day to day basis.  We cannot maintain our walk as companions with Christ if we neglect His word day after day.
Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation- the psalmist had mentioned provocation because it was the name given to the place in the wilderness where the people murmured against God and Moses, and He provided them water, Exodus 17:7; Numbers 20:13.  See notes on verse 9.
For some, when they had heard, did provoke: howbeit not all that came out of Egypt by Moses- so the nation is divided into those who provoke God by their unbelief and murmuring, and those who respond to His word.  Those under twenty years old when they came out of Egypt, (for that was the minimum age to be included in the census, Numbers 1:3), were spared.  See Numbers 26:63-65.

3:17
But with whom was he grieved forty years? was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness?

But with whom was he grieved forty years? The attitude of heart at the beginning, at Massah, was found at the end, again at Massah; they were unchanged, despite having seen God’s providential and sustaining works for forty years.
Was it not with them that had sinned, whose carcases fell in the wilderness? So God was justified for banning them from the land, for they showed themselves to be sinners for forty long years.  As those who were spiritually dead, it was as if they were dead while they lived, hence their bodies are called carcases before they were put in the grave.  This is why there needed to be the provision in Numbers 19, (Numbers is the wilderness book), if a bone or a grave were touched, for the wilderness became a graveyard.

3:18
And to whom sware he that they should not enter into his rest, but to them that believed not?

3:19
So we see that they could not enter in because of unbelief. 

Only two men over the age of fifty-eight entered the land of promise, Caleb and Joshua, the two faithful spies.  Despite the evidence of the fruitfulness of the land, and despite the encouragements Caleb and Joshua gave to the people as they preached the gospel of good things ahead, 4:2, the people were marked by unbelief.  This unbelief takes the form of disobedience, such is the word used, so we are back yet again to the question of obeying the word of God as it comes to us.  Thus ends a sad section where the emphasis has been on those who did not enter in.  Chapter 4 will concentrate more on those who did, and the reasons why they did.

GALATIANS 2

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Under “SELF-PRINT BOOKLETS” you will find help on printing the posts in booklet form.  Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

 

Survey of the chapter
If in chapter one Paul details his movements, showing that he did not make constant contact with the apostles, except for a courtesy call on Peter, in this chapter he details the contact he did have subsequently. First of all there was the right hand of fellowship, as the other apostles recognised his call from God, then there was a confrontation, because Peter and others had been influenced by those who taught that believers should put themselves under law.

Structure of the chapter

(a)
Verses 1-2 Paul was not summoned He was sent to Jerusalem by God, not by the apostles
  Verses 3-5 Paul not subject He refused to circumcise Titus the Greek
(c)
Verses 6-9 Paul not silenced The apostles recognise his call to preach the gospel to the Gentiles
(d)
Verse 10 Paul not stony-hearted The law commanded love, grace inspires love
(e)
Verses 11-13 Peter’s change of behaviour  
(f)
Verse 14 His action was against logic  
(g)
Verses 15-16 His action was against his beliefs  
(h)
Verse 17 His action was against Christ  
(i)
Verse 18 His action was against his vision  
(j)
Verses 19-21 His action was against the gospel  

(a)   Verses 1-2
Paul not summoned

2:1
Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also.

Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas- Paul was saved about AD 36, and died about AD 69, so for half of his Christian life he was fairly unknown. The same is true of Moses, John the Baptist, and, pre-eminently, Christ Himself. It is salutary to think how much he achieved for the sake of Christ in a relatively short time.

And took Titus with me also- Titus provided a test-case, to demonstrate that circumcision is not necessary for the believer. Note he took Titus also, meaning that Paul took Barnabas, not vice versa. Previously Barnabas had gone to Jerusalem to assure the believers that their former persecutor was genuinely saved, see Acts 9:26-28.

2:2
And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain.

And I went up by revelation- he was not summoned by the apostles to give account of himself, but is directed by a revelation from the Lord, showing he was in harmony with the Lord in his life. He is not behind Moses the lawgiver in this, who spake with God directly, Numbers 12:8; Deuteronomy 34:10.
There may also be the thought that he went to see the apostles to impart to them the revelation of the mystery of the church that had been given to him, as Ephesians 3:3,4 explains. It was revealed to Paul first, and then to the holy apostles and prophets, verse 5. His going up to Jerusalem as this verse tells us may be the time when he passed it on to them.

And communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles- not in the sense that he told them what they did not know, but laid it out before them in all its aspects, so they could see he was not preaching a mixed gospel. He had been preaching in the regions of Syria and Cilicia for many years without any sanction from the apostles.

But privately to them which were of reputation- Paul is concerned that those in responsible positions amongst the saints should be happy with what he was preaching. He was not intent on making a party for himself, but was in full fellowship with the apostles. He did this privately, not in a church council, which might look as if he were being called to account. When it was the truth of the gospel at risk, rather than his own service, he withstood Peter publicly, “before them all”, verse 14.

Lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain- he was concerned that his activity should be useful in the future, and if it had not been in the past, he was ready to make amends.

(b)   Verses 2:3-5
Paul not subject

2:3
But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised:

But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised- those who advocated a return to law-keeping, had to require circumcision if they were to be consistent. Circumcision had become a sign of submission to the law of Moses, even though it was “of the fathers”, John 7:22.  That is, was known and practised by the patriarchs from Abraham onwards, to whom the rite was originally given. As the apostle wrote later, “Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of the God.” 1 Corinthians 7:19. The vital thing is to keep God’s commandments. To the Romans he wrote, “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.” Romans 2:28,29.

2:4
And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage:

And that because of false brethren unawares brought in- if there were those who infiltrated the ranks of the believers in those early days, how careful we should be in these last days, when perilous times have come. The word unawares is used in classical Greek of enemies brought into a city by the help of traitors already within.

Who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus- the Lord could say, “In secret have I said nothing”, John 18:20, and Paul could say, “This thing was not done in a corner”, Acts 26:26. The words “spy out” are used in 2 Samuel 10:3, when the princes of Ammon said David had “Sent his servants unto thee, to search the city, and to spy it out, and to overthrow it”.

That they might bring us into bondage- they came with the intention of assessing the way Jewish believers were living, now that they were saved by grace, and far from desiring to share in this liberty, they came to persuade the Galatians to embrace the Law, and so go back to bondage.

2:5
To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.

To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not even an hour- Paul realised that the whole of God’s purpose would be frustrated if believers reverted to the law in any way, so he stood firm, and so should we in our day.
That the truth of the gospel might continue with you- he is sure that law and gospel do not mix; sure, also, that the gospel is truth, just as much as Law.

2:6
But of these who seemed to be somewhat, (whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me: God accepteth no man’s person:) for they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me:

But of these who seemed to be somewhat- that is, those who were in positions of authority and influence, such as apostles who had been with the Lord when He was on earth, and others who had known the Lord when He was here on earth. Luke writes of those who were ministers of the word, having known Christ when He was on earth, Luke 1:2.
(Whatsoever they were, it maketh no matter to me, God accepteth no man’s person:)- this does not mean that the apostle was indifferent to the influence of these people, but simply that what they once were as disciples of the Lord before the cross, was not the point, for that did not give them any advantage over Paul, or the Galatians. God does not accept a believer because of his privileges, but because of his relationship with the risen Christ; all are equal in this connection. Peter described believers as those who had obtained like precious faith with the apostles, 2 Peter 1:1, so in that respect apostles are no different to other believers.

For they who seemed to be somewhat in conference added nothing to me- this is why the former privilege of these men was not the point, for they did not add anything to Paul’s knowledge of the gospel when he conferred with them.

2:7
But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;

But contrariwise- the reverse was the case.

When they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter- there are not two gospels, but God did give Peter special responsibility to preach to Jews, (which makes the choice of him to preach to Cornelius all the more remarkable, although the Lord did give him the keys of the kingdom of heaven, one of which he used on the Day of Pentecost, and the other in the house of Cornelius), and gave Paul special responsibility to the Gentile world, for which he was admirably fitted by upbringing and outlook.

2:8
(For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)

(For He who wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)- the expression “wrought effectually” is the same as “mighty”, so exactly the same power is put forward by God in the case of each servant. There is no need for either of them to add the influence of the law to their gospel preaching. Note Paul’s recognition of Peter’s leading role- there is no personal jealousy.

2:9
And when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.

And when James, Cephas and John, who seemed to be pillars- there is no irony in the word “seemed”; they were recognised as prominent leaders in the testimony. The word is translated as “of reputation” in verse 2.

Perceived the grace of God that was given unto me- the grace is not only God’s favourable help in the exercise of gift, but the gift itself. It was obvious to these spiritual men that Paul was greatly used of God. Believers are sometimes slow to recognise the gift God has given. On the other hand, it is possible to lay hands on a believer too hastily, 1 Timothy 5:22. A balance must be maintained.

They gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship- note the plural hands, for each of these three was willing to associate with Paul and Barnabas, which is why it is the right hands of fellowship. We tend to shake hands as a formality, but this is not the case here. Greeting was by a holy kiss, Romans 16:16, whereas today, in the Western world at least, we use a handshake to greet one another.

That we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision- so the personal mode of service was recognised. It was not that Peter, James and John would not preach if there were no Jews in the audience, but rather, that to evangelise their own nation was their special task, always remembering the gospel must be preached to every creature.

(d)   Verse 10
Paul not stony-hearted

2:10
Only they would that we should remember the poor; the same which I also was forward to do.

Only- this is the only stipulation they gave to Paul and Barnabas, for they were in total agreement on the truths of the gospel. Grace, however, might be thought of as careless of works, hence this injunction.

That we should remember the poor- this is especially relevant, given the way the Jewish believers has taken joyfully the spoiling of their goods, Hebrews 10:34.

The same which I also was forward to do- Paul was “zealous of good works”, Titus 2:14, and this suggestion from the other apostles presented no problem to him, for it the logical outcome expected of those who have been made rich spiritually. An appreciation of the grace of God should prompt us to far exceed the stipulations of the law as regards giving. God is the God of the fatherless and the widows, but He most often supplies their needs through His people.

(e)   Verses 11-13
Peter’s change of behaviour

2:11
But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.

But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed- Antioch was the first assembly formed after regular preaching to Gentiles was established, hence the freedom of grace was specially enjoyed here, see Acts 11:19-21. The purpose of God was that the tidings of grace should flow out from Jerusalem to the nations, but here the bondage of the law is being brought from its centre, Jerusalem, Galatians 4:25. It was from Antioch that relief had been sent for the poor saints at Jerusalem, by the hands of Paul and Barnabas, Acts 11:27-30. That was the liberty of grace in operation, but Peter now, sadly, brings the bondage of law to Antioch from Jerusalem. Note that an apostle is here exposed as being in the wrong. The apostles were inspired of God to preach and write, and when they did this they were infallible, but at other times they were liable to error, in the measure in which they depended on their own strength. The idea of Papal Infallibility is completely without support in the Scriptures.

2:12
For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision.

For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles- as his vision had indicated it was permissible for him to do this, for Peter himself had said in Cornelius’s house, “Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or to come unto one of another nation; but God hath showed me that I should call no man common or unclean”, Acts 10:28.

But when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision- Peter, the ardent and forceful leader amongst the apostles, is here giving way to the influence of men. “The fear of man bringeth a snare”, Proverbs 29:25.

2:13
And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation.

And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation- dissimulation is hypocrisy, play-acting, appearing to be other than what you really are. The Christian is really delivered from the law, but if he lives as if he is not, then he is play-acting. Note the increasing consequences of Peter’s action, for no man liveth to himself, Romans 14:7. They were truly free men, but were acting as if they were in bondage.

(f)   Verse 14
Peter’s action was against logic

2:14
But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?

But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel- Peter had strayed from the straight path of righteousness. That path of righteousness is now set out by the truth of the gospel, for the law of righteousness, holy and just as it is, did not supply the power to live righteously, but the gospel does, becasue it involves every believer having the Spirit of God within.

I said unto Peter before them all- the matter was of such concern, and was so harmful to the progress of the gospel, that it could not be dealt with privately. Fresh from his commendation by Peter, James and John, and as the apostle to the uncircumcised Gentiles, Paul had a special interest in contending for the truth in this way. Sometimes, no matter how revered the brother involved, and how much temporary disturbance there might be, it is the best course to deal with matters straightforwardly and openly. Of course some matters are of such a sort that they should be dealt with privately, but this was not one of those.

If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of the Gentiles- despite his temporary change of policy, Peter was committed to the truth that those outward things of mere religion which once divided Jew from Gentile, are no longer valid. Paul no doubt had the gift of discerning of spirits, and could tell that Peter’s change of behaviour was not from conviction.

And not as do the Jews- it is not that Peter had combined a Gentile manner of life with a Jewish one when he began to follow the Saviour, but he turned wholly from his religious observance when he turned to Christ, and so no longer lived as if he were a Jew.

Why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?  To live as do the Jews is not simply to adopt Jewish customs for the sake of a varied lifestyle, but in principle to put oneself under the law as a code of conduct for the believer. The matter of diet may seem to be of small account, but it represented a distinction between Jew and Gentile, which at a fundamental level involved commitment to the law which prescribed the diet. It was not logical, then, for Peter to renounce the law, then adopt legal customs of separation from Gentiles. Nor was it logical for him to expect Gentiles to virtually live like Jews when they were not Jews.

(g)   Verses 15,16
Peter’s action was against his beliefs

2:15
We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles,

We who are Jews by nature- Peter and Paul were both born of Jewish parents, and had been brought up to live as Jews, so that it was part of their nature to live like a Jew. They were not converts to Judaism, who might be less zealous of Jewish customs.

And not sinners of the Gentiles- whilst it is true that Peter and Paul were “sinners of the Jews” as to their birth, nonetheless their upbringing under the law had shielded them from the unrestrained excesses of the nations around.

2:16
Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law- despite their upbringing, they had come to realise, (and the prophets would tell them this, as well as their own hearts when they failed to keep the law), that all attempts to be justified by works would fail.

But by the faith of Jesus Christ- this gospel truth had reached their ears, and they knew that for them, law and all its attendant customs and rites must be left behind. This is not the personal faith that marked the Lord Jesus as a dependant and submissive man on the earth, but the faith that that others put in Him.

Even we have believed in Jesus Christ- despite their upbringing under a God-given law, they had turned to Christ in faith.

That we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law- so their understanding of what was involved when they believed was clear, for they had no reservations about leaving “law for righteousness”, for Christ is the end of that as far as believers are concerned, Romans 10:4.
Note the titles of Christ that the apostle uses here: We are justified “by the faith of Jesus Christ”, the historical Jesus has been anointed as Christ on the banks of the Jordan, and is marked out thereby as God’s Approved One, well worthy to be believed.  We are “justified by the faith of Christ”, the one who did all things well, as opposed to relying on our doing.

For by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified- an allusion to Psalm 143:2, which reads, “And enter not into judgement with Thy servant: for in Thy sight shall no man living be justified”. This confirms from the Old Testament that the stand they had taken when they believed the gospel was a wise one.

(h)   Verse 17
Peter’s action was against Christ

2:17
But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid.

But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ- the “but if” indicates that the apostle is arguing as if he and Peter are where the Judaizers wanted them to be, and where Peter, by his change of practice, had put himself; namely, justified by Christ, but clinging to law for full salvation. See Acts 15:5, where the false teachers were saying that Christ was not enough, there must be law-works as well. This is why the apostle uses the word seek, for those who seek have not found what they are looking for, and this is the position of those who say that other things apart from Christ are necessary for justification. Peter had in fact found justification, but was acting as if he was still seeking it by keeping the law.

We also ourselves are found sinners- whenever and however we put ourselves under law, it tests us, and finds us wanting, even as believers. See Romans 7:7-25 for a demonstration of this. In those verses, the apostle defends the law, lest it be thought that the fact that the believer is delivered from it implied some defect in the law. The believer may be looked at from two different viewpoints; one, in accordance with God’s present reckoning of him, and the other, (because the body which he had before he was saved is still the same, even though now yielded to God), in accordance with what he was before he was saved.Paul, in the hypothetical situation he describes in that passage, was seeking and not finding, whereas the law was seeking to expose his sinfulness, and discovering it, hence the expression here, “found sinners”.

Is therefore Christ the minister of sin? To understand this question we should note the following things:
1.  As the apostle Paul said in the synagogue at Antioch, “And by Him all that believe are justified from all things, from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses”, Acts 13:39.
2. Although that is true, it is also true that, until the resurrection day, believers still have the same body as before they believed. Paul describes this body as “the body of sin”, Romans 6:6. It is only to the degree that the believer applies the truth of the fact that “our old man is crucified with Him”, that the sin-principle is destroyed, or made of no effect. If it had been completely destroyed already, believers would never sin, which is clearly not the case, since John wrote “that ye sin not”, 1 John 2:1.
Believers owe the position they are in wholly to Christ’s ministry towards them, for they have no strength of our own. If that ministry only took them so far along the road to justification, and needed the law to supplement it and bring it to completion, and if that position is discovered to be one of sinfulness, as the verses from Romans 7 show it will be, are we to suggest that Christ is responsible for that? Such a thought would be too evil to contemplate. Such is the result if a believer puts himself under law, as Peter seemed to be doing. Note that he does not say even in this theoretical situation that Christ was the minister of sin, but only that it might lead to that question being asked, and he does not want even that to happen.

God forbid! The idea that Christ is the minister of sin is unthinkable, and therefore the situation Paul has imagined is not the true one, and it is otherwise with the believer than that he is in any way helped by the law.

(i)  Verse 18
Peter’s action was against his vision from God

2:18
For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor.

For if I build again the things I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor- far from Christ being the minister of sin, it would be Paul who was the transgressor, for if he went back to law in any way, then that law would expose him as a transgressor of that law. Before he had his vision at Joppa, Peter would not have even gone into a Gentile’s house. He was taught by God, however, that this was not the Christian way, see Acts 10:27-29. As a result of learning this important lesson, which had far-reaching consequences, Peter was happy to have to do with Gentiles. He destroyed the old restrictions, for the best possible reason, God had destroyed them, for the word came to him, “What God hath cleansed, that call not thou unclean”, Acts 10:15. This was like breaking down the “middle wall of partition” that separated the Court of the Gentiles from the rest of the Temple enclosure, see Acts 21:27-29; Ephesians 2:11-18. By reversing his decision, Peter would be building the middle wall of partition again. But Paul uses the personal pronoun “I”, for he is not yet certain that he can include Peter in his realisation of the gravity of building again what God had pulled down.

(j)  Verses 19-21
Peter’s action was against the gospel Paul believed

2:19
For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.

For I, through the law, am dead to the law- as far as Paul was concerned, (and also as far as Peter was concerned, too, in principle, but not now in practice), the law had made its demands against him as a sinner. These demands he could not meet, but Christ met them for him, accepting the consequences of Paul’s law-breaking, and paying the penalty for it. But Paul was “dead to the law by the body of Christ”, Romans 7:4. In other words, the process which Christ went through in the body, namely, of paying the penalty for other’s law-breaking on the cross, being placed in a tomb as one who was really dead, and then rising again bodily, (the sure sign that the penalty the law demanded was paid), was the means of deliverance for Paul, for God was pleased to associate him with the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, Romans 6:1-11. So by the process the body of Christ went through, Paul was dead to the law, for the law only has dealings with living persons, see Romans 7:1-4, and Paul died with Christ. This position, however, came about because the law made its demands, so Paul can say that he is dead to the law through the law.

That I might live unto God- Christ lives unto God, Romans 6:10, and Paul is risen with Him, and thus also lives unto God. But the significant thing is that he lives unto God without being under the law.

2:20
I am crucified with Christ: neverthless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.

I am crucified with Christ- the man who was born and brought up under the law is dead, for God has associated him with Christ when He died on the cross. He could not escape from the law by himself, only by Christ and His death.

Nevertheless I live- Christianity is positive, not simply death to former things, but real life through Christ. The Good Shepherd came to those in the fold of Judaism to lead them out of it, and give them life abundant, John 10:10.

Yet not I- association with Christ risen prevents a return to old things, for “if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature”, 2 Corinthians 5:17. The word “yet” as used here is a time-word. It is no longer I (emphatic), for the old person, Saul of Tarsus, is no longer alive, in God’s reckoning.

But Christ liveth in me- this is because at the moment of conversion the believer is indwelt by the Holy Spirit. This is emphasised in the following scriptures: “If any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. And if Christ be in you…” Romans 8:9,10. “At that day ye shall know that I am in My Father, and ye in Me, and I in you.” John 14:20. By “that day” is meant the Day of Pentecost and after. These scriptures indicate that because the Spirit of God dwells within the believer, Christ can be said to dwell, too, for Divine persons are One. Because this is so, the features of Christ may be manifest through a believer’s life and character, and thus Christ is formed in us, Galatians 4:19.

And the life which I now live in the flesh- such is the power of the gospel that a true Christian life can be lived here and now, with no need to wait until we get to heaven. The law was weak through the flesh, Romans 8:3, and used the flesh to bring a person into bondage, Romans 7:5. By the power of the indwelling Spirit, however, the believer is enabled to live a victorious life, even though the flesh is still present with him as a hindrance. We should distinguish between living in the flesh, which in this verse means living in the body on earth, and living after the flesh in the Romans 8:9,12 sense, for the believer is not in the flesh but in the Spirit.

I live by the faith of the Son of God- faith of the Son of God is first of all, faith which associates with the Son of God, then secondly, faith as expressed in the life of the Son of God down here. He was full of grace and truth, as He expressed eternal life in His person, and of His fullness have all we received, John 1:14,16. Note it is the faith of the Son of God, not of Jesus, for Paul will later show that we are sons, and have the Son of God Himself as our example of dignity and responsibility.

Who loved me, and gave himself for me- the law demanded that man love God and his neighbour, whereas grace presents Christ loving men. This love was not theoretical, but practical, for He willingly surrendered Himself to the cross in the supreme act of grace. If Paul in any measure loves and gives, whether to God or men, it will be because Christ first loved and gave. “We love him, because he first loved us”, 1 John 4:19.

2:21
I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.

I do not frustrate the grace of God- frustrate may either mean set aside, or think lightly of. Neither attitude is appropriate in view of what God in grace has done for us through Christ.

For if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain- the life which Paul lived by faith was a life of righteousness, but if that could have been achieved by the works of the law, then Christ need not have died. To frustrate the grace of God, then, is to suggest that the death of Christ was not necessary.