Tag Archives: law of Moses

ROMANS 10

 

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

 

STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER:

(a) Verses 1 -4 Israel going about.
(b) Verses 5-13 Christ coming down and rising from the dead.
(c) Verses 14-21 Preachers going forth.

SUMMARY OF THE  CHAPTER:

This chapter follows on from chapter 9, and shows God’s provision for Israel in Christ. Their national unbelief is not because of a lack of interest by God in their spiritual welfare, but rather because of their rejection of their Messiah.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS CHAPTER 10, VERSES 1 TO 4:

10:1  Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.

10:2  For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.

10:3  For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

10:4  For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

(a)   Verses 1-4   Israel going about

10:1  Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.

Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved- before, the apostle was prepared to be accursed for their sakes, if that were possible.  Now he indicates his interest in their welfare by praying for them.  In this he is in harmony with his Saviour, who sought their forgiveness when on the cross, Luke 23:34, and also continues to intercede for the nation, transgressors though they are, Isaiah 53:12.

10:2  For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge.

For I bear them record that they have a zeal of God, but not according to knowledge- as was true of the apostle before he was saved.  His zeal knew no bounds on the Damascus Road, but it was in ignorance, 1 Timothy 1:13, for he was rejecting the One who came to the circumcision for the sake of the truth of God, Romans 15:8.

10:3  For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.

For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness- having rejected knowledge, they were necessarily ignorant.  They knew that God was righteous, for He had declared it to them, but they had no personal knowledge of what it was to be right in His sight through faith.
And going about to establish their own righteousness-
because the heart of man is full of pride, it prefers to work rather than rest in the work of another.
Have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God-
becoming righteous before God through the gospel necessitates submission to His word and will, and involves the surrender of our own will.

10:4  For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.

For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone that believeth- Christ has, by His death, brought the law to an end as a possible means of gaining a right standing before God.  Paul wrote, “I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain”, Galatians 2:21. Since His death was not in vain, then it follows that all other means of being right with God, including attempting to keep His law, are of no avail, and are rendered obsolete.  Since there is no definite article before law, then we may read Christ is the end of “law for righteousness”; salvation is on the basis of “faith for righteousness”.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS CHAPTER 10, VERSES 5 TO 13:

10:5  For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.

10:6  But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)

10:7  Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.)

10:8  But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;

10:9  That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

10:10  For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

10:11  For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on Him shall not be ashamed.

10:12  For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon Him.

10:13  For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

(b)    Verses 5-13    Christ coming down from heaven and rising from the dead.

10:5  For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That the man which doeth those things shall live by them.

For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law- how powerful is Paul’s way of reasoning here, for he quotes Moses the lawgiver himself!  “Of the law” means “on the principle of law”.  Of course there is only one righteousness, but Israel sought it by the works of the law, on that principle.
That “the man that doeth those things shall live by them”-
or as the Lord Jesus said to the lawyer after he had quoted a summary of the law, “Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live”, Luke 10:28.  The subsequent story of the Good Samaritan shows three things. 1. That those most zealous for the law, (the priest and the Levite), are unwilling to act unselfishly, and thus love their neighbour as themselves. 2. That man is incapable of working for God, because he has been rendered helpless by sin. 3. The one who loved his neighbour as himself was a Samaritan, who was not under the jurisdiction of the law, which came to Israel exclusively.

10:6  But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thine heart, Who shall ascend into heaven? (that is, to bring Christ down from above:)

But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise- Paul now uses the Old Testament in a way which may seem strange to us, but which would be familiar to those who were used to listening to the rabbis.  They, however, were unrestrained in the way they manipulated the scriptures, whereas the apostle applies the passage he is about to quote in a very disciplined way.  He needs a scripture that does the following things:

1. Quotes Moses.

2. Warns against ignoring the revealed will of God.

3. States there is no need for effort on their part.

4. Assures that there is blessing even for those who have rebelled against God, if they repent.

5. Emphasises the need for confession and faith.

The apostle finds the scripture he needs in Deuteronomy 30:11-14, which reads, “For this commandment which I command thee this day, it is not hidden from thee, neither is it far off.  It is not in heaven, that thou shouldest say, ‘Who will go up for us to heaven, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it’?  Neither is it beyond the sea, that thou shouldest say, ‘Who shall go over the sea for us, and bring it unto us, that we may hear it, and do it’? But the word is very nigh unto thee, in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that thou mayest do it”. He quotes three excerpts from the passage, and then says “that is”, and then gives his application of the principle involved.
Say not in thine heart, who shall ascend into heaven- in his original statement, Moses simply cites an example of a supreme effort.
(That is, to bring Christ down from above)- here is the apostle’s application of the principle involved in the statement by Moses, with particular relevance to the nation of his day whom he longs to see saved.  Their Messiah has already come down from heaven, so they have no need to journey to heaven to bring Him down.

10:7  Or, Who shall descend into the deep? (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.)

Or, who shall descend into the deep? (That is, to bring up Christ again from the dead)-  Moses’ words were ‘Who shall go over the sea for us’.  The reference would be to the Mediterranean Sea, the Great Sea, beyond which lay the great unknown.  The idea is of extreme distance travelled with great effort.  Paul, however, uses the word for sea which emphasises its depth, and thus introduces a further direction to the upwards and outwards already mentioned.  Christ has not to be summoned up from the dead, for He is already risen.

10:8  But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;

But what saith it?- having stated in verses 6 and 7 what men should not say, here is what faith personified says.
“The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart” that is the word of faith, which we preach- works personified would say “Strive to attain”, faith personified says through the preaching of the gospel, “Confess and believe what God has brought near to you”.  In that way the word would be both on the lip and in the heart.

10:9  That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus-  here Paul gives a summary of the minimum that needs to be believed for a person to be saved.  Christ coming down from heaven implies His Lordship and His Deity, which must be accepted if a person is to be saved.  “For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith. Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?” 1 John 5:4,5.  To confess means to say the same thing as God does about His Son, the One sent from heaven.  In this way the word is in the mouth of the sinner when he believes.
And shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved- just as Christ’s coming from heaven implied His Deity and Lordship, so His rising from the dead implies the acceptableness of His work upon the cross for sins.  Thus the person and work of Christ are believed in the heart or innermost being of a man, and there is full agreement with the truth that God brings nigh to us about His Son as the gospel is preached.

10:10  For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation-  note that in this context salvation is equivalent to being reckoned righteous by God. There are two aspects at least to this confession.  In the first instance it involves saying the same thing to God about His Son as He says to us with regard to His Deity.  In this way the word is in the mouth as we speak to God.  But there is also the need to confess Him before men subsequently, see 1 Timothy 6:11-16; Matthew 10:32.  Full salvation does not depend on this second aspect of confession, however, or else salvation would be through something we had done, rather than by pure grace. In verse 9 the order was “mouth…heart”, following the order in the quotation from Deuteronomy; here however it is “heart…mouth”. This guards against the idea that we do not need to confess Jesus Christ as risen, only believe it, nor have to believe He is the Jesus the Lord, only confess it.  Both must be believed, and both confessed.  Needless to say, this has nothing to do with confessing to a human priest, which has no basis in Scripture.

10:11  For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on Him shall not be ashamed.

For the scripture saith, ‘whosoever believeth on Him shall not be ashamed’- a verse already quoted in 9:33 to emphasise the availability of Christ to be believed on.  In Isaiah’s original statement, the wording was ‘shall not make haste’, we shall not need to hastily abandon reliance on Christ, whatever situation arises.

10:12  For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon Him.

For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek- the whosoever” of his quotation in verse 11 has led the apostle to think of the universal application of this principle, despite the fact that he is dealing in the main with the question of Israel.  See 1:16,17, and 3:22,23.
For the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon Him- He is Lord over Jews and Gentiles alike, and is rich to both alike also.  The Jew must own his spiritual bankruptcy as much as the Greek, but when either believes, he is brought into the riches of God’s grace.

10:13  For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

For ‘Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved’- whosoever means ‘every one that’, so any and every individual that calls shall be saved.  To call upon the name means to call to God for salvation on the ground of who the Lord Jesus is, and is the same as confessing with the mouth the Lord Jesus.  In the Old Testament the word for Lord is Jehovah, so this is a testimony to the Deity of the Lord Jesus.  The apostle will develop further the idea of calling in the next section.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS CHAPTER 10, VERSES 14 TO 21:

10:14  How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

10:15  And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!

10:16  But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?

10:17  So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

10:18  But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.

10:19  But I say, Did not Israel know? First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.

10:20  But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought Me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after Me.

10:21  But to Israel He saith, All day long I have stretched forth My hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

(c)   Verses 14-21    Preachers going forth

10:14  How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in Him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

How then shall they call on Him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe on Him of whom they have not heard? And how shall they hear without a preacher?- the apostle now addresses the question as to how “the word of faith, which we preach”, verse 8, reaches those who need it.  He has emphasised that Christ has come down from heaven, and has risen from the dead, and in that sense the word of faith has been brought near by Him personally.  But there is also the fact that Christ has returned to heaven, and is not available as before.  How are men to come into contact with Him now?  The answer lies in the work of the preacher.  His task is to present the truths of the gospel.  These include the fact that the Lord Jesus is the Son of God, and as such is equal with God; that He came into true, real and sinless manhood; that His death was for our sins; that He was raised from the dead bodily; that He is now at the right hand of God; that the benefit of these things is only known by those who own up to being sinners, and call upon God to show them mercy on the basis of the death of His Son. Having mentioned calling on the name of the Lord in the previous verse, the apostle points out that this can only be done meaningfully if there is belief.  But the belief can only happen if they have heard the gospel, and the hearing of that gospel is dependant on the preacher. So the preacher presents the gospel, the sinner believes it, and calls on the Lord for salvation, claiming His promise that all who call on the name of the Lord in this way shall certainly be saved.

There is a very great need in the days in which we live for those who are prepared to give themselves to the study of the scriptures, so they may be able to present to men a well-informed and accurate statement of gospel truth- what the apostle called “the word of the truth of the gospel”, Colossians 1:5.

10:15  And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!

And how shall they preach, except they be sent?- those who go forth with the gospel must have the conviction in their hearts that the Lord is sending them.  He does not send those who are not equipped for the task, who are not leading spiritual lives, and who are not tested, see 1 Timothy 3:8-13.  Nor does He send those who are not willing to go, as Isaiah 6:8 makes clear.
As it is written, ‘How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!’-  of course the beautiful feet are metaphorical, meaning they run to bring a beautiful message.  The expression ‘gospel of peace’ emphasizes God’s side of the gospel in that Christ has made the basis by His death for man to be at peace with God.  ‘Glad tidings of good things’ emphasizes the abundance of blessing which there is for those who believe.

10:16  But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?

But they have not all obeyed the gospel- because the Lord Jesus is the Lord from heaven, He should be obeyed.  God expects the obedience of faith when the word is preached, 1:5, 16:26.  Preachers should not be downcast if those to whom they preach do not believe.  Ezekiel was sent to preach ‘whether they will hear, or whether they will forbear’, (refuse to hear), Ezekiel 2:6,7; 3:10,11; 3:18,19; Acts 20:26,27.
For Esaias saith, ‘Lord, who hath believed our report?’- Paul wants us to be clear that Isaiah was addressing the Lord when he used these words. This emphasizes that the preaching of the gospel is the joint work of the One who sends and the one who is sent. As the Lord Jesus said, when He sent forth His apostles, “Go ye, therefore, and teach all nations…and lo, I am with you”, Matthew 28:19,20.  As a result, we read,  “And they went forth, and preached everywhere, the Lord working with them”; Mark 16:20.  And Paul could write to the Ephesians that “Christ Jesus…came and preached peace”, Ephesians 2:13,17.  Not only does the Lord pledge His presence at the side of those who preach His word, but He is the originator of the message, as the next verse shows, which is based on Isaiah’s word “report”, something to be heard in the heart.

10:17  So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

So then-  summing up the reasoning of verses 14-16.
Faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God- the word for hearing has the idea of a report, so it might be thought of as “Faith cometh by a report, and the report by the word of God”.  Both ends of the chain from God to man are here.  On man’s side, there should be faith, which may be defined as “a firm persuasion about the truth of God, and a reliance wholeheartedly upon that truth”. This is put into practice when we rely entirely upon the Lord Jesus and His work on the cross as He dealt with the question of sins.  On God’s side there is a report. But the report that preachers bring from God is something they have gained from God in the first place, as they listen to His voice before they go forth.  The word of God is His spoken word or saying to the preacher, giving him the right message for those the Lord knows he will be addressing.  See Jeremiah 1:7-9.

10:18  But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world.

But I say, have they not heard?- perhaps some would argue that the reason why people have not believed the report is not that they are unbelieving, verse 16, but that they have not heard it.  After all, verse 14 says “how shall they hear without a preacher?”
Yes verily- that argument is now refuted; it is not true that they have not heard.  it is verily or certainly true that they have. At this point the apostle again quotes the Old Testament and deepens the meaning of the words, as he did in verses 5-8.  This shows his equal authority with David as a Spirit-inspired writer.  The psalmist in Psalm 19 is thinking of the way the glory of God is made known through creation.  Paul uses his words to illustrate the fact that the gospel of the glory of God is widespread too.
Their sound went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the world-
there were present at Jerusalem on the Day of Pentecost devout Jews out of every nation under heaven, Acts 2:5, and Luke details those nations in verses 9-11.  Those that were saved that day would return to their homes and spread the gospel there.  See also Colossians 1:6, “come unto you, as it is in all the world”; Colossians 1:23, “preached to every creature which is under heaven”.  All this was in obedience to the command of the Lord Jesus, Matthew 28:19, Mark 16:15,20.

10:19  But I say, Did not Israel know? First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.

But I say, Did not Israel know?  perhaps the Jews did not realise that the gospel was relevant to them, seeing they had the Law of the Old Testament.
First Moses saith, “I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you”- note the mention again of “no people”, a term for the Gentiles, but which God applied in judgement to Israel, as we have seen, 9:25,26.  It is clear that the Jews were aware of the gospel, and some were angered, e.g. Acts 17:5-8; 18:4-6.  Some however were provoked to jealousy, and wanted to have the blessing that Gentiles were receiving, e.g. Acts 13:43; 18:8. The original significance of “by a foolish nation I will anger you” would be that when the Assyrians came to carry them into captivity, the Jews would be angry at being delivered into the hands of those who were foolish, because they were  ignorant of the true God.

10:20  But Esaias is very bold, and saith, I was found of them that sought Me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after Me.

But Esaias is very bold-  makes a very daring statement.
And saith, “I was found of them that sought Me not; I was made manifest unto them that asked not after Me”- this is a daring statement because the usual principle is that men must seek the Lord to find Him, as Paul himself said, “that they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after Him and find Him, although He be not far from any one of us”, Acts 17:27; here it is the Lord Himself who takes the initiative through His sent preachers.  To ‘ask not after Me’ means they did not consult God in prayer.  Those who were characteristically uninterested in God have been sought out by Him, whereas Israel, who were by profession seekers and consulters, have largely ignored the gospel.

10:21  But to Israel He saith, All day long I have stretched forth My hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

But unto Israel He saith, “All day long have I stretched out My hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people”- despite their unbelief of the gospel, and their arguing against it, God assures them that He still stretches out His hands to them, ready to embrace them in love, as the father did to the prodigal.  This is the ultimate reason why Paul desires the salvation of Israel, verse 1, because it is God’s desire too.  It is well for us to have the same  attitude to things as our God.

1 CORINTHIANS 9

SURVEY OF THE CHAPTER
The chapter consists of a defence by the apostle of his apostleship, and therefore of his authority.  The word “power” in verses 4,5,6, 12 (twice), is the word authority.  It seems there were those in the assembly at Corinth who were suggesting that his claim to be an apostle was suspect.  They perhaps pointed to the fact that he had not been with the Lord Jesus during His public ministry on earth, as he had been converted after Christ had ascended to heaven.  For this reason they were not prepared to act on what he wrote or spoke to them, nor to support him financially in his work.
There have been those during modern times who have also questioned the right of the apostle Paul to write what he did.  Such should remember his words in 1 Corinthians 14:27, “If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord”.  They should also remember that the apostle Peter, (whose apostleship was never disputed), gave Paul the right hand of fellowship, Galatians 2:9, and called him “our beloved brother Paul”, 2 Peter 3:15, even after he had been withstood by Paul on a matter of principle, Galatians 2:11.  If Peter had no doubt as to the veracity of Paul’s claim to apostleship, the Corinthians should not either, and nor should we.
In verses 1-14 the apostle sets out the principles governing the support of those who evangelise and teach.  Then he shows first, in verses 15-23, that he did not use those means of support in every situation, and second, in verses 24-27, this was because he was self-controlled as he ran his Christian race.

STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER

Section (a) Verses 1-14    Support in service.
Section (b) Verses 15-23 Selflessness in service.
Section (c) Verses 24-27 Self-control in service.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 9, VERSES 1 TO 14:

9:1  Am I not an apostle? am I not free? have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord?

9:2  If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you: for the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord.

9:3  Mine answer to them that do examine me is this,

9:4  Have we not power to eat and to drink?

9:5  Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?

9:6  Or I only and Barnabas, have not we power to forbear working?

9:7  Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock?

9:8  Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also?

9:9  For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen?

9:10  Or saith he it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that ploweth should plow in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope.

9:11  If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things?

9:12  If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather? Nevertheless we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ.

9:13  Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar?

9:14  Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.

Section (a)    Verses 1-14    Support in service.

As he confronts his detractors, Paul asks them four questions.  The first has to do with his apostleship; the second with his liberty; the third with his privileges; the fourth with his labours.

9:1  Am I not an apostle? am I not free? have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? are not ye my work in the Lord?

Am I not an apostle?  The word apostle is made up of two Greek words, apo and stello.  The first is a preposition meaning “away from”, in the sense, not of being away, but of moving away.  The second is the verb to send.  An apostle is therefore one who is sent away from a person.  Implied in this are the two ideas of being approved by that person, and bearing his authority.  He is not sent away in dismissal and disapproval, but with a commission to accomplish the will of the sender.  Such was the apostle Paul, and the One who sent Him was Christ Himself.  On the road to Damascus the Lord Jesus said to him, “But rise, and stand upon thy feet: for I have appeared unto thee for this purpose, to make thee a minister and a witness of these things that thou hast seen, and those things in the which I will appear unto thee; delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom I now send thee…” Acts 26:16,17. Some while later, when Paul was in the temple, the Lord had appeared in a vision to him and said, “Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles”, Acts 22:21.  So there is abundant evidence for the fact that Paul was indeed sent from the Lord.  As such, his authority to instruct, warn and rebuke was undoubted, being the authority of the One who had sent him.
Am I not free?  This means that he was, as an apostle of Jesus Christ, free from the supposed authority of men, as they sought to criticise and curtail him in his service.  As he wrote to the Galatians, “Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised Him from the dead)”, Galatians 1:1.  Even those who were apostles because they had been sent forth by Christ when He was upon earth were not able to add anything to him, Galatians 2:6, and in fact gave him the right hand of fellowship, Galatians 2:9.  He was free from men of ill-intent, like some in the assembly at Corinth, and free from men of good-intent, like the other apostles.  This is not to say he was independent, for he was an apostle of Jesus Christ, and was bound by His will.
Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord?  One of the signs of an apostle was that he must have been with the Lord down here, and also seen Him in resurrection.  The words of Peter were, “Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, beginning from the baptism of John, unto that same day that He was taken up from us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of His resurrection”.  So these were the qualifications to be one of the twelve apostles.  Paul was not of the twelve, which is no doubt why he separates  being an apostle from having seen the Lord, in this verse.  He is not an apostle through having been with Christ down here and then seeing Him in resurrection, but he can testify to having seen Him in the glory of heaven, and this the twelve could not do.  They saw the Lord disappearing into heaven, Paul saw Him as having arrived there.  And this is his special witness, for he was entrusted with truth as to the vital connection between believers of this age and Christ in heaven.  Ananias, the man sent to speak to Paul three days after his conversion, said to him, “The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know His will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of His mouth”, Acts 22:14.
The nature of his apostleship fitted the task he was given to do.  It was important for the twelve to have been with Christ when He was here, because they were initially going to testify to Israel, the people Christ had been amongst, and who had crucified Him.  Paul, however, was sent to the Gentiles, and Christ had not been amongst them.
Are not ye my work in the Lord?  Paul now puts the question of his authority in the context of his ministry at Corinth.  How was it that instead of being pagan idolaters, as many of them had been, they were now the worshippers of the true God?  It was because he had ministered among them that this was so, in the mercy of God.  As he says in the second epistle, “Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves”, 2 Corinthians 13:5.  This puts the onus on them.  If they claimed to be true believers, then they would have to admit it was through Paul.  And if it was through Paul, then he had authority as an apostle.

9:2  If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you: for the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord.

If I be not an apostle unto others, yet doubtless I am to you- even if others elsewhere doubted his apostleship, they at least should not do so.
For the seal of mine apostleship are ye in the Lord- not only were they the evidence of the success of his ministry in the gospel, but they were God’s seal of approval on his labours.  They should not lightly regard such evidence of God’s working.

9:3  Mine answer to them that do examine me is this,

Mine answer to them that do examine me is this- it seems there were those who were so presumptuous as to bring the apostle up before the judgement bar of their opinion.  The words “answer” and “examine” are both law-court words, so the Corinthians were serious in their accusation, and Paul is equally serious in his answer to them.  Instead of protesting, and asserting his authority over them, the apostle goes along with the process so as to show he has nothing to hide.  He does so by asking some questions of his own.

9:4  Have we not power to eat and to drink?

Have we not power to eat and to drink?  In the previous verse it was “me”, being a question of apostleship, as well as other things.  Here it is “we”, because he is associating Apollos with himself in these matters, even though Apollos was not an apostle.  He did have a special connection with Corinth as an evangelist, however, as we see from 3:5,6.  So it is as an evangelist that Paul claims the right to eat and drink at the expense of the believers.  Those who engage in pioneer gospel work may expect that those who are converted under their ministry will give them the necessities of life as a mark of appreciation to the Lord for sending them.  He will establish this principle from the Old Testament later in the chapter.

9:5  Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?

Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles- here Paul claims the same right as others to bring his wife with him, as this verse suggests Peter and the other apostles did.  They were to safeguard their wives by not leaving them, perhaps alone, in their house.  This also protected the apostles from any suggestion of wrong-doing as they stayed in the houses of other believers.  The world is ever watching, and all appearance of evil must be carefully avoided.  Unbelievers are always ready to put the wrong construction on a situation where a preacher stays in a home when the husband is at work all day and the wife is in the house.  A celebrated evangelist of the 20th century refused to stay at a hotel or ride in a car with anyone other than his wife or daughter, and this was very wise.
And as the brethren of the Lord- notice that the brethren of the Lord, (that is, the children of Joseph and Mary), are now prominent enough in Christian circles to be held up as an example.  Their former stubbornness to believe has not prevented the believers from respecting them now they have been converted.  Their former hostility to Christ is not held against them.  Nor, for their part, has their former hostility given way to a grudging acceptance of Christ, but they are wholeheartedly committed to His cause.
And Cephas? This reminds us that Peter had a wife.  We know this also from Mark 1:30 for mention is made of his wife’s mother.  How strange that a large section of Christendom believes that their priests should be celibate, yet the one they claim as the first Pope was married!
Perhaps Cephas, or Peter, is mentioned last and separately because it is likely that it was the “Cephas-party” at Corinth, 1 Corinthians 1:12, who were the most antagonistic to Paul, probably being the Jewish element in the assembly.

9:6  Or I only and Barnabas, have not we power to forbear working?

Or I only and Barnabas, have not we power to forbear working?  This would indicate that when the Holy Spirit said to the assembly at Antioch “Separate Me Barnabas and Saul”, Acts 13:2, it was not simply that they were separated to do a task for the Lord.  They were also separated from the need to work secularly, in order that they might serve the Lord full-time.  The apostle is very specific here, however, in saying that the permission to forbear working was only given to Barnabas and himself, “I only, and Barnabas”.  He excludes the persons, including apostles, he has just cited as examples.  Much of the financial resources of believers, at least in the Western world, are expended on payments to preachers who could very well earn a living whilst serving the Lord, and also on the construction and upkeep of elaborate buildings in which to meet.  There is a great need to return to primitive Christianity, so that the finance that goes into such things is diverted into projects where there is real need.  It is significant that the Lord said to those He had previously sent out to preach in Israel but who were now about to venture forth into the wider world, (and therefore we might think had more need of being supported by others), “‘When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye anything?’  And they said, ‘Nothing’.  Then said He unto them, ‘But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one'”, Luke 22:35,36.  So there was a complete reversal of former instructions.

9:7  Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges? who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof? or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock?

Who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges?  We now have a series of questions which highlight the fact that the principle he is contending for is accepted in other departments of life.  No conscript soldier is expected to finance himself, for he is risking his life as he fights on behalf of others.  If they wish to be defended, they must pay his wages.  So those who evangelise, seeking to make inroads into the territory of the enemy of souls, Satan himself, may justifiably expect to be financed in that activity.
Who planteth a vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof?  Those who take the trouble to use time, effort, and money to plant a vineyard are clearly within their rights to eat some of the resulting fruit.  Those who “cultivate the vine”, meaning those who teach the saints, can expect some return for their labours.
Or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock?  Those who act as pastors, and not only feed but tend and care for the flock of God, should not be out of pocket for their labours.  The apostle elsewhere commands that the elders who rule well should be given double honour, 1 Timothy 5:17,18, where the word for honour includes the idea of financial support if necessary.  This is not a go-ahead for the idea of paid pastors, but we should not avoid one principle for the sake of upholding another.  The idea of eating the milk comes from the fact that the milk from sheep and goats was made into cheese.  This, incidentally, is a much more healthy option than dairy produce from cows.

9:8  Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also?

Say I these things as a man? or saith not the law the same also?  Having drawn the conclusions any sensible person would about earthly life, Paul now supports his statements with the statutes of the Law of God.  An illustration, moreover, which includes within it the three ideas of evangelist, teacher and pastor, for he will refer to the work of oxen, and these animals plough the ground, bring in the sheaves, and tread out the corn.

9:9  For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen?

For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn- so mere animals were provided for in God’s law, for he has a great concern for all aspects of His creation.  Not one sparrow falls to the ground without Him noticing, Matthew 10:29, a fact which those who kill birds and animals for “sport” would do well to take note of.
The procedure in the East was to spread the gathered sheaves of corn on the flat surface of the threshing-floor, and then drive an ox over it, either on its own, or dragging a heavy log behind it.  The action of hooves and heavy object would gradually separate the husk from the grain, until it could be winnowed to remove the chaff.  No farmer was to cover the mouth of his ox as it did this, but was to allow it to bend its head and take some of the corn it had trodden out.
This quotation is also found in 1 Timothy 5:18 in connection with the support of elders that rule well.  There it is coupled with an allusion to the Lord’s words in Luke 10:9 about the labourer being worthy of his hire.
Doth God take care for oxen?  The answer is, of course “Yes”, but the scripture means more than this, as the apostle now explains. 

9:10  Or saith He it altogether for our sakes? For our sakes, no doubt, this is written: that he that plougheth should plough in hope; and that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope.

Or saith He it altogether for our sakes?  The word altogether has the force of “certainly”.  So God is taking care of oxen in His statute, but He is certainly also establishing a principle in the spiritual sphere.
For our sakes, no doubt, this is written- the idea of certainty is confirmed by the use of the phrase “no doubt”.  The Old Testament requirement regarding the well-being of oxen may be lifted into the higher sphere of the service of God, and applied to those who serve in that higher sphere.  This application of the Old Testament must be done with care and restraint, lest the truth of Scripture should be undermined.
That he that plougheth should plough in hope- evangelists are to “plough” the consciences and hearts of sinners, so that repentance is wrought in them, and they believe the gospel.  As they do this, they should have the confidence that as a result of them labouring, some will believe, and in gratitude to those who preached Christ unto them, they will give them financial and other support.  Their ploughing has resulted in a harvest, and they have a right to benefit from that harvest.  In this way, pioneer evangelism is self-supporting, and does not divert funds which could more profitably be used elsewhere.  It will also mean that those who have run unsent, and therefore are not the Lord’s messengers, since they have no converts, are not supported, and realise their mistake and seek the Lord’s guidance as to what He really wanted them to do.
And that he that thresheth in hope should be partaker of his hope- the ox that threshed the corn by treading it out should share the prospect of eating the corn with the ox that ploughed the field that yielded the corn.  The hope of the one is the hope of the other.  They both have an interest in the resulting harvest, and both have the right to have some of it.  So the evangelist and the teacher are both entitled to be supported by those they minister to; in the case of evangelists, their converts, in the case of teachers, those who learn from them.  The one who threshes partakes of the hope of the one who ploughs, for unless the latter does his work, the former has no-one to teach.

9:11  If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things?

If we have sown unto you spiritual things- the apostle puts the onus on the Corinthians again, and forces them to think about the answer.  He and Barnabas had engaged in spiritual sowing, scattering the word of God in the hearts of the men of Corinth.  A harvest of souls had resulted; this was a spiritual thing.  They had continued to sow the truth of the Word of God in their hearts after they had been saved; this was another spiritual thing.
Is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnal things?  Is it too great a burden for those who have been saved by their ministry, and nurtured by their teaching, to help and support them by the supply of the things of everyday life?  The word carnal has no suggestion of sinfulness in this context, of course.  It means the ordinary necessities of life.

9:12  If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather? Nevertheless we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ.

If others be partakers of this power over you, are not we rather?  If other teachers came to them and they supported them, how much more claim had Paul and Barnabas over them, who had founded and fostered the assembly.
Nevertheless we have not used this power- despite having marshalled many arguments as to why the Corinthians should support them, the apostle now declares that he and Barnabas declined to accept help from them.  He will say why they did this in the second epistle in the words, “But what I do, that I will do, that I may cut off occasion from them which desire occasion”, 2 Corinthians 11:12.  In other words, he did not want those who opposed him to have occasion or reason to find fault with him on the ground that he preached for financial advantage.
But suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ- instead of claiming his right to support, the apostle put up cheerfully with his self-imposed lack of support from the Corinthians.  He did not wish to put a road-block in the way of the progress of the gospel of Christ in their hearts.  It is a mistake to think that the gospel is only for the unsaved.  The epistle that is pre-eminently the one that defines the gospel is the Epistle to the Romans, written to believers.  The epistle that defends the gospel in the Epistle to the Galatians, written to believers.  There is constant need for believers to be exposed to the principles of the gospel, for it fits believers for everyday living on earth, as well as fitting sinners for heaven.

9:13  Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple? and they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar?

Do ye not know that they which minister about holy things live of the things of the temple?  They must surely have known this fact from the life of Israel recorded in the Old Testament.  The Levites had provision made for them by God, so that they could give themselves wholly over to the service of God in the tabernacle and later the temple.  This is why they were not allowed to have land, for they did not need it, being supported by the tithes of the rest of Israel.
And they which wait at the altar are partakers with the altar?  The priests had a higher privilege still, for they were allowed to take some parts of the offerings that had been laid on the altar for God.  These sacrifices were called the bread of God, Leviticus 21:6, but they also were the food of the priests.

9:14  Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel.

Even so hath the Lord ordained- the will of God in relation to the support of those who preach the gospel is of equal authority to the will of God in a past age regarding the support of the priests and Levites.  It is important that the gospel is not hindered by lack of resources.  Much more could be done in the way of evangelism if the Lord’s people spent less on themselves.  The average wage of those in the Western world puts them in the top 10% of the world’s earners.
Note the elevated view the apostle has of evangelism, for he puts it in the same category as the ministry about the altar.  This reminds us that those who preach the gospel are engaged in priestly activity; not, of course, as Levitical priests, but as Christian ones.  The apostle described himself as serving God in the gospel of His Son, Romans 1:9, where the word for serve means to serve worshipfully.  Preaching should be done with dignity and gravity, having the glory of God in view all the time.
That they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel- just as the priests in the tabernacle system were supported by the tithes and offerings of the people they ministered for, so evangelists should be supported by their converts, and also by those from whom they went out. 

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 9, VERSES 15-23:

9:15  But I have used none of these things: neither have I written these things, that it should be so done unto me: for it were better for me to die, than that any man should make my glorying void.

9:16  For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!

9:17  For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me.

9:18  What is my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel.

9:19  For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.

9:20  And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;

9:21  To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.

9:22  To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.

9:23  And this I do for the gospel’s sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.

Section (b)    Verses 15-23    Selflessness in service.

9:15  But I have used none of these things: neither have I written these things, that it should be so done unto me: for it were better for me to die, than that any man should make my glorying void.

But I have used none of these things- the apostle was completely disinterested in monetary gain.  As he could say to the Ephesian elders, “I have coveted no man’s silver, or gold, or apparel”, Acts 20:33, (unlike Achan in Joshua 7:21).  He could also say, “These hands have ministered to my necessities, and those that are with me”, verse 34.  Far from taking from men, the apostle was energetic in giving to them, both in terms of spiritual good, and material.  Christianity has gained the reputation, through the centuries, that it is concerned with getting gain.  The only way that situation can be reversed is for true believers to redouble their efforts, and show to the world that Christianity is about giving, not receiving.  There are many ways in which this could be done in the sad days in which we live, where so many of the Lord’s people are destitute through no fault of their own.
Neither have I written these things, that it should be so done unto me- he is not writing so that the situation may change.  Rather, he is asserting that he has no interest in altering his position, for he is determined to continue supporting himself when necessary, and will not stand on his rights in this matter.  He is certainly not soliciting funds from the Corinthians.
For it were better for me to die- the apostle would rather die, and therefore cease serving the Lord, than be accused of making a gain from Christian service.  He saw clearly that if he did try to make a gain from it, then this would cancel out any good that might result from his labours.  Notice that the apostle makes the time of his death the time when he ceases to serve the Lord.  He does not envisage a period of retirement.  His opportunities for service may be different in old age, but he intends to carry on to the end.  Is this our attitude?  Or are we planning to give up the Lord’s work in later years?
Than that any man should make my glorying void- note that in a limited sense the believer is allowed to glory, (meaning to boast), but only in those things that are detrimental to self.  As far as our position as believers is concerned, we have nothing to boast of at all, as Romans 3:27 and Ephesians 2:9 clearly state.

9:16  For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of: for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!

For though I preach the gospel, I have nothing to glory of- the fact that he was entrusted with the glorious gospel did not mean he was himself glorious.  The preacher must be lost sight of in the preaching, so that men see “no man, save Jesus only”, Matthew 17:8.  Like John the Baptist, “He must increase and I must decrease” should be the watchword of those who preach, John 3:30.
For necessity is laid upon me- the apostle realised he was under an obligation to preach the gospel.  As he wrote to the Romans, “I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.  So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you who are at Rome also”, Romans 1:14,15.  The work of Christ for him had put him under obligation, and he paid the debt of gratitude by preaching the gospel so as to promote Christ.  All believers have this obligation. The Lord Jesus told His disciples, “So  likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, ‘We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do'”, Luke 17:10.
Not everyone is called to preach, but all are sent into the world to represent Christ in the place that rejected Him, as we learn from John 20:21, “As My Father hath sent Me, even so send I you”.  This was not limited to apostles, for John tells us it was disciples that were gathered together in the upper room, verse 19.
Yea, woe is unto me, if I preach not the gospel!  Paul realised that the question of whether he had discharged his obligations to Christ would come up at the Judgement Seat of Christ.  If he had failed in this area, it would go ill with him, and instead of the Lord’s blessing on his labours, there would be a woe, and censure.  He lived his life in the light of that Judgement Seat, and so should we.

9:17  For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward: but if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me.

For if I do this thing willingly, I have a reward- he tells us what he considers adequate reward in the next verse.
But if against my will, a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me- even if he was unwilling, he still had to take account of the fact that he had been entrusted with the affairs of another, and “it is required in stewards that a man be found faithful”, 1 Corinthians 4:2.  The word dispensation has to do with the administration of the affairs of a household.  Paul was given the task of overseeing the affairs of God’s household, and even if he had not been a willing steward, he could not escape his responsibilities. 

9:18  What is my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without charge, that I abuse not my power in the gospel.

What is my reward then? Verily that, when I preach the gospel, I may make the gospel of Christ without charge- we might have expected him to say that his reward was at the Judgement Seat of Christ.  It reveals much of the heart-attitude of the apostle to Christian things that the only reward he was looking for was to have the satisfaction of preaching only for the sake of Christ.
That I abuse not my power in the gospel- he has told us in verse 3 that he has power to eat and drink at the expense of the saints.  He thought it an abuse of power to claim that right, if those to whom he ministered were hostile to him.  The apostle would not demand his rights, for that is contrary to the spirit of Christ and the gospel. 

9:19  For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more.

For though I be free from all men- he had so ordered his life and service that he was not under obligation to any person.  He was free to speak the truth of God without having to consider whether he was upsetting his sponsors, for he had none.
Yet have I made myself servant unto all- having taking up a position of freedom, he did not use it to pursue his own agenda.  He deliberately took the slave’s place, which is to serve the interests of others, with no consideration of personal comfort or ambition.  He had learnt the lesson of Philippians 2:7, for Christ Jesus had stooped from the highest glory to become a servant; now that mind was in Paul.
That I might gain the more- he sought only the spiritual welfare of men, that he might gain them for Christ and His glory.

9:20  And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;

And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews- he now tells us what being a “servant unto all” involved for him.  Even though he was born a Jew, when he was baptized he put on Christ.  In that position there is neither Jew nor Greek, as Galatians 3:27,28 tells us.  He had to become a Jew in attitude, so that he might win them for Christ.  This shows that his renouncing of things that were gain for him in favour of Christ’s interests, Philippians 3:7, was not a mere gesture, but affected his whole life.
Paul had to withstand Peter and others because they were reverting back to living like Jews to placate the Judaising party, which said believers needed to keep the law.  In that context Peter’s action was wrong, for it undermined the grace of the gospel.  What Paul refers to here is the temporary adoption of Jewish modes of thought and practice in order to gain the hearing of the Jews, for he longed for their salvation.
It is also worth noting in this connection that there are many in Israel today who call themselves Messianic Jews, but who also wish to be known as believers in Christ.  Whilst not suggesting that these people are not truly saved, they are certainly mistaken in trying to live as Jews and Christians at the same time, for the two positions are incompatible.
To them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law- as one crucified with Christ, Paul was no longer under the law as the rule of life.  He did not live a lawless life, however, for he was “under law to Christ”, as he will say in the next verse, and the indwelling Spirit enabled him to fulfil the righteousness of the law, Romans 8:4.  But he did not do this so as to merit eternal life, but because he had received that life as a gift.  He was free of the demands of the law, but on certain occasions, in order not to offend the Jews who still thought themselves to be under law, he had performed various rituals of the law.  We see this when he had Timothy circumcised, Acts 16:3; took a vow, Acts 18:18, and engaged in certain of the temple practices, Acts 21:18-26,.  He was conscious that these things were no longer binding even on Jews, (they had never been binding on Gentiles), but in order to gain the ear of Jews, and not repulse them, he did this things in the exercise of Christian liberty.

9:21  To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law.

To them that are without law, as without law- the Gentiles had never been formally given the legal code of the Mosaic law, for it was a covenant between God and the nation of Israel, and constituted the terms on which they could be reckoned as His people.  This is made clear in Exodus 24:8 and Deuteronomy 4;8.  (Having understood that, we must also understand that God has written a sense of right and wrong into the consciences of all men, as Romans 2:12-15 makes clear).  As a man who was neither Jew nor Gentile, because he was in Christ, and as one who was under grace not law, Romans 6:14, Paul was free to mix with those who had not the law of God as their rule of life, and who in that sense, were without the law.  Note he does not say that he became lawless, because that has wicked connotations; he simply became like those who had not been formally given the law.
(being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,)  As a believer Paul had an enhanced sense of what God’s demands were, but he was not under the law so as to fulfil those demands, for the law supplied no power by which to keep those demands.  In Christ there is power, however, for the Spirit enables the righteous requirement of God in the law to be fulfilled, not as a means of gaining eternal life, but as a suitable response to God’s grace.  This is called the law of Christ, in Galatians 6:2, and consists of living as Christ did when down here, by the power of the indwelling Spirit of God, the same Spirit that filled the Lord Jesus, for He is called the Spirit of God’s Son, Galatians 4:6.
That I might gain them that are without law- Paul’s great delight was to so preach that men realised that the grace of God in Christ was enough to save them, and he never attempted to put Gentiles under law as a means of salvation.

9:22  To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak: I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.

To the weak became I as weak, that I might gain the weak- those who were weak in the faith were not dismissed by the apostle.  He had learnt from Christ, who was patient with men, and even when they were slow to learn, persevered with them until they understood.  The blind man who was healed of his blindness in stages is a figure for the disciples who were only gradually perceiving the teaching they were being given, Mark 8:22-26, and see also verse 18 of that chapter, where the Lord asks the disciples, “Having eyes, see ye not?”
I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some- literally the words could be rendered, “all these things to all men”.  In other words, the apostle is carefully restricting the ways in which he became all things to men.  He would not be anything and everything to men so as to gain them, but he would do and be what he specifies in these verses.  Sadly, this statement has been twisted by some to mean that evangelists are free to use any means in order to win the lost.  This is not the case, and the apostle makes it clear that we should do all to the glory of God, 1 Corinthians 10:31, which immediately excludes the use of anything that is sinful or doubtful.  The evangelist has a very simple commission from God, “Preach the Word”, 2 Timothy 4:2.  He may have every confidence that God will bless His word as He pleases.

9:23  And this I do for the gospel’s sake, that I might be partaker thereof with you.

And this I do for the gospel’s sake- there was no personal advantage for Paul in acting this way.  In fact He was liable to be criticised for his policy, but he was only concerned for the gospel and its success in the hearts of men.
That I might be partaker thereof with you- he anticipates that the Corinthian believers will have a keen interest in the success of the gospel, and will share the apostle’s joy when souls are saved.  The man who found his lost sheep gathered his neighbours together and said “Rejoice with me”, Luke 15:6.  He wanted his neighbours to share his joy, and so did the apostle.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 9, VERSES 24-27:

9:24    Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize? So run, that ye may obtain.

9:25  And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.

9:26  I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:

9:27  But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway. 

Section (c)    Verses 24-27    Self-control in service.

9:24  Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize?  So run, that ye may obtain.

Exhortation to determination.

Know ye not that they which run in a race run all, but one receiveth the prize?  The apostle uses an illustration that they will know well, for the Isthmian Games, which were similar to the Olympic Games, were held near Corinth.  There were strict rules governing not only the actual races, but the preparation and training for them.  This was because the Games were held in honour of the gods, and they did not wish to offend them.  We may think of the runners as they begin, run, and finish.  Those who come to the starting line do so with the intention of running, so it can be said that they all run.  So there is no distinction between the runners at that point.  At the finish, however, there is a very big difference, for only one receives the victor’s garland.
So run, that ye may obtain- what makes the difference between the runners, so that only one gets the prize?  Simply the effort that is put in when the race is in progress.  The apostle is urging the Corinthians to put every effort into the race set before them, and so run that the prize of the Judge’s “Well done!” may be theirs.  Of course the apostle is not suggesting that only one believer during the two thousand years of this age is going to receive a prize.  He is simply contrasting running without maximum effort, and running with maximum effort.

9:25  And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things. Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible.

Exhortation to moderation.

And every man that striveth for the mastery is temperate in all things- not only were there strict rules at the Games to govern the actual activity in the stadium, but also governing the training beforehand.  The participants had to satisfy the judges that they had taken their training seriously, and had controlled their diet and their life-style so as to put in a good performance when the time came, to the glory of the gods. The Corinthians are to see to it that they are temperate, controlling themselves, so that nothing interferes with their Christian striving.  The word for striving is the Greek word from which we get the English word agony, such is the level of effort that is expected of Christians.  To be temperate means to control oneself, not allowing anything of the world or the flesh to interrupt our training programme or our running.
Now they do it to obtain a corruptible crown; but we an incorruptible- each of the Games had its own particular crown, or wreath, for the victor.  But despite the variety, they had one thing in common- they would be made out of foliage that would soon wither.  If athletes took so much time and effort to gain a fading wreath, how much more should believers strive for a crown that shall never fade, and which shall be to the praise, not of the gods, but of the true God of heaven.  This is a great incentive to put lethargy and indifference behind us, and resolve to strive as never before for the honour of our God.

9:26  I therefore so run, not as uncertainly; so fight I, not as one that beateth the air:

Exhortation to avoid hesitation.

I therefore so run, not as uncertainly- in verse 24 it was “ye”.  In verse 25 it was “we”.  Now in this verse it is “I”, showing that the apostle took his exhortations to others very seriously, and applied them to himself.  The very worst thing a runner can do is hesitate.  He must be focussed and consistent in his effort.  To hesitate is to lose the prize.
So fight I, not as one that beateth the air- having spoken of the event that took place on the track, what of that which took place in the ring, where two men were boxing?  The lesson here is simply that to miss the target is to waste energy and lose the prize.  The boxer must concentrate all his effort on landing a punch on his opponent.  To wildly punch the air achieves nothing.

9:27  But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection: lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway. 

But I keep under my body, and bring it into subjection- whilst the metaphors of the contest and the boxing match are not to be taken literally, nevertheless the apostle does refer to his body here, being the seat of the sin principle, and the base from which the flesh operates as it tries to hinder progress and success in the Christian race.  The fact that he did not avail himself of things he had a right to, as mentioned in the former part of the chapter, illustrates the way in which he was ruthless with himself.  He is not appealing to the Corinthians to do something he was not prepared to do himself.
Lest that by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself should be a castaway- he was wary of any way in which the body would get the better of him.  The word castaway has not to do with shipwrecks and desert islands, but continues the metaphor of the Games.  It was possible to pass the test as to one’s training and fitness regime, only to fail to meet the approval of the judges as to conduct during the race.  This would mean certain disqualification.  So the apostle is careful to persevere in keeping his body in subjection, so that he might win the prize at the end.  Of course keeping the body in subjection does not mean self-harm, but does mean that we should not give way to the impulses the body is capable of expressing, for they will prevent fitness for the Christian contest.
Needless to say the apostle is not supposing that he could lose his salvation, because his eternal security does not depend upon him, but upon Christ.  What does depend on him is the winning of the prize, and he will lose it, much-used preacher though he was, if he does not contend according to the rules of the Judge, Christ Himself.  If an apostle was concerned lest this should happen to him, how much more should it concern  the rest of believers.  How embarrassing to herald the gospel, like the man at the Games calling the contestants to the starting line, and then be like an athlete who is disqualified at the end of the race!

If you have concerns about the security of true believers, and wonder whether a converted person can ever be lost, please click on “DOCTRINES OF SCRIPTURE: The eternal security of true believers”, (in the side menu), for help in this matter.

ROMANS 5:12-21-an overview

PLEAE FEEL FREE TO RESPOND TO THIS POST.  CLICK ON “COMMENT” AT THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE AND A MESSAGE BOX SHOULD APPEAR

This passage is critical to a true understand of the chapters that follow it.  It is, however, a complicated section, and these remarks are offered with a view to unfolding its meaning.

It is well-known that the first eight chapters of the epistle to the Romans may be divided into two parts.  The first, 1:1-5:11, deals with sins, the practices of men.  The second, 5:12-8:39, deals with sin, the principle in men.  By sin in this context is not meant one particular sin, but sin as a working principle in men, the force that enables them to commit individual sins.  Sin dwells within men, 7:17, and works in men, 7:13.  So the first section emphasises crimes, whereas the second section the criminal himself. 

It is important that both of these matters be dealt with, for after a person has believed the gospel, 3:26, been justified, 4:5, and had his sins forgiven, 4:7, it may come as a shock to him to find that he is still able to sin.  Indeed, the fact that Christians, sadly, sin, is often cited by unbelievers as reason to not believe, “because Christianity doesn’t work”, or “I wouldn’t be able to keep it up”.  In connection with those objections we should always remember that in the final analysis it is Christ who represents Christianity, for “Christ is all”, Colossians 3:11, but that does not absolve us from the solemn responsibility of being “epistles of Christ, known and read of all men”, 2 Corinthians 3:3. 

At the point where the epistle divides, the apostle sums up his foregoing argument in 5:8,9, where he writes of actions, whether it be of God commending His love, or Christ both dying for us, and also saving us from wrath, or our actions as sinners.  He also anticipates his future argument in 5:10 by emphasis on what state we were in, namely enmity, or what state we have been brought to, reconciliation, and also what state Christ was brought to by our folly, even that of being in death.

Coming to our passage, it may help to set out the main content as follows:

Verse 12 Initial doctrinal statement.
Verses 13,14 Proof that death is the result of the sin-principle within.
Verse 15 Contrast and comparison- offence or gift.
Verse 16 Contrast and comparison- condemnation or justification.
Verse 17  Death reigning or believers reigning in life.
Verse 18 The penalty upon all, and the opportunity for all.
Verse 19 The state of many as sinners, and the state of many as righteous.
Verse 20  The law cannot deal with the sin-principle.
Verse 21  Final doctrinal summary.

Verse 12    Initial doctrinal statement.

5:12  Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

The apostle immediately traces the origin of the sin principle right back to Adam, and then shows that “Him that was to come”, verse 14, is God’s answer.  The Last Adam alone is able to deal with that which the first man Adam brought in.  When he fell, Adam became a sinner by nature and practice, and when he begat a son it was in his image and likeness, to represent him as a sinner, Genesis 5:3.  Thus sin entered into the world.  Like a poison being put into the spring that gives rise to a river, so the river of humanity has been poisoned at source.  Hence the apostle’s use of the words “all men”, and “world”.  Not that sin originated with Adam, for Lucifer was the first to sin, Ezekiel 28:15, but he used Adam as the door through which sin might enter into the human race.

The consequence of the sin of Adam was that its penalty, death, passed on all.  If any question whether this is the case, then the apostle has the answer.  All have sinned, and thus is proved the fact that all have a sin principle within inciting them to sin.  But since that sin principle inevitably results in death, then both sin and death have indeed passed upon all men.

Verses 13,14        Proof that death is the result of the sin-principle within.

5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

5:14  Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

It is important for the apostle to confirm that death is the result of sin within, and not, in general, as a result of particular sins committed.  He does this by referring to the period of time before the law was given at Sinai through Moses.  Before the law-age the principle of sin rested in the hearts of the descendants of Adam the sinner.  But when they sinned, that sin was not put to their account as demanding an immediate penalty.  They did not physically die the moment they sinned.  (The word “reckoned” is not the same as is used in previous passages such as 4:3,4, where it means that God takes account of a person in a certain way.  Here, it means to put a sin to someone’s account for immediate payment by death.  This does not mean that sins committed during the pre-law period are ignored by God, for “God shall bring every secret work into judgement”, Ecclesiastes xxx).  Nevertheless, men still died in the period between Adam and the giving of the law at Sinai, which proves that they did so because of the sin-principle within them, and not because they had transgressed against a known law. 

The consequence of this is very far-reaching, for it shows that even if an unbeliever managed to never sin, (a hypothetical situation, of course), he would still be liable to death because of what he is by nature.  So the gospel is not just about having one’s sins forgiven, but is also about being a new creation, so that there is no obligation to sin. 

Verse 15    Contrast and comparison- offence or gift.                 

5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

By describing Christ as “Him that was to come”, (immediately following Adam’s sin, God announced the coming deliverer), the apostle has prepared the way to revert back to his consideration of Adam’s fall, after the parenthesis of verses 13 and 14.  He does this by presenting both a contrast, “not as”, and a comparison, “so also”.  The comparison is seen in the fact that both Adam and Christ, each being head over those linked to them, affect deeply their respective companies. 

The contrast is between Adam’s offence, and the grace of God.  Further, that offence resulted in the “gift” of death to the many who have died one by one throughout the history of men, whereas the grace of God results in many being given a different sort of gift.  What that gift is we are not yet told.  We are told that what God does through Christ has a “much more” character to it, which is seen in that the gift has abounded.  The seemingly insurmountable problem of Adam’s sin has been overcome by God in Christ.  He has not solved the problem by introducing a stronger judgement than that meted out to Adam, but by acting in grace.  The condemnation of sinners is a righteous necessity with God, but He is under no obligation to bless them, but chooses to do so because of His grace.

Note that in verses 13-17, and also in verse 19, we read of “many”, indicating the greatness of the problem to be addressed, and also the far reaching consequences of the actions of the two men who are in view in the passage.  In verses 12 and 18, (which are linked together), we read of “all”, for there the universality of the problem Adam introduced, and the universality of the provision God has made in response is brought out. 

Verse 16    Contrast and comparison- condemnation or justification.

5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

This verse continues the idea of contrast, (“not as”), and comparison, (“so is”), but whereas verse 15 concentrated on the one offence of Adam, his act of taking a false step, and the fact that God’s act of giving in grace is through one man, Jesus Christ, here the emphasis is on the many offences which result from Adam’s fall, and the way each man relates to those offences.  This is the comparison, for each man has been the means of affecting either adversely (judgement), or for good, (the gift), those involved in each case. 

There is also a contrast, for Adam brought in judgement and condemnation, but Christ brings in justification.  That judgement took the form of condemnation.  God’s verdict, (judgement), went against Adam when he sinned, and he was pronounced guilty, with the implication that there was a sentencing process to follow.  We read of that process in Genesis 3:17-19.  Christ, however, brings in justification, and this despite the many offences committed during the history of men, and the many offences individual sinners commit during their lifetime. 

The condemnation brought in by Adam resulted in men being subject to death, whereas the justification Christ brings in for those who believe not only clears their record, (this is the “Romans 3” side of justification), but also delivers them from obligation to sin in the present, and liability to death in the future.  So it is that the apostle can write in 6:7 that “he that is dead is freed from sin”.  That is, those who by faith are associated with Christ crucified, are no longer under any obligation to sin.  They are not liable to die physically either, for Christ risen has secured their position in resurrection.  Those who are alive when Christ comes will be proof of this, for they shall know resurrection without dying. 

Verse 17    Death reigning or believers reigning in life.

5:17  For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

In verse 16 the emphasis is on sins, but in this verse, on death.  Going right back to the beginning again, the apostle repeats what he wrote in verse 12, that the offence of one man resulted in death.  Now he enlarges on this and declares that death has not only passed upon all men, but has set up its throne in their hearts, and like a wicked tyrant rules their lives.  The abundant grace of God, however, ensures that those who receive the gift of righteousness not only are delivered from the tyranny of death, and receive life, but reign in life.  It is they who are in control.  This is only possible, however, by the agency and strength of Jesus Christ- they have no strength of their own. 

Verse 18    The penalty upon all, and the opportunity for all.

5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

The apostle is now able to take his argument forward from verse 12, having built up a body of background information in verses 13-17 which will enable his readers to follow his line of thought.  He first of all reiterates the truth of verse 12, and reminds us that the offence of Adam has resulted in the condemnation of death upon all men.  He then contrasts the offence of Adam with the righteousness of another man, Jesus Christ.  By righteousness here is meant the act of righteousness carried out by Christ in death, when He set out to reverse the consequences of Adam’s sin, and also bring in rich benefits besides.  Just as the penalty through Adam’s unrighteous act of sinning brought results towards all men, so the blessing through Christ’s righteous act of dying for sin brings results to all men as well.  The word “upon” has the meaning of “towards”, for the penalty came towards all, and so does the gift. 
Not only is the one who believes justified in the sense of “reckoned righteous”, but the legal obligation to death is removed, so justification is “justification of life”.  The ground of resurrection is taken up, so that the believer is clear of the consequences of Adam’s fall.

Verse 19    The state of many as sinners, and the state of many as righteous.

5:19  For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

Not only is the condition of man dealt with by Christ, but the nature as well.  By Adam’s disobedience to the plain command of God, man was made or constituted a sinner.  It is not, of course, that God made men to sin, but that by their link with Adam they have become, sinners by nature.  On the other hand, Christ obeyed His Father, even to the extent of death, and those who believe in Him are reckoned righteous by God- that is how He sees them now. 

Verse 20    The law cannot deal with the sin-principle.

5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

The apostle now deals with a possible objection from Jewish readers.  Can the law not remedy this situation?  The answer is that it cannot, for when the law came in, it resulted in the situation becoming worse, not better, for it showed up sins as never before, and offered no remedy for the nature that produced those sins.  It dealt with the symptoms but not the disease.

The only answer to man’s nature as a sinner is the grace of God in the gospel, which alone has the power to overcome the obstacles represented by sin, death, and the law, and set up its rule in the hearts of men on a righteous basis.  That righteous basis being the death of Christ at Calvary, not the supposed good works of men.

Verse 21    Final doctrinal summary.

5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. 

So it is that the sad truth of verse 12, expressed here as “sin hath reigned unto death”, can be exchanged for “even so might grace reign”.  Grace so dominates the scene that it sweeps sin off its throne in the heart, and robs death of its power over those who believe.  And all this happens on a righteous basis, even the death of Christ, and leaves the way clear for the possession and enjoyment of eternal life in all its fulness.  The apostle is careful at the close of the passage to attribute all this to Jesus Christ, who has shown Himself to be worthy of the title Lord.  He has overcome every dominating principle, and shows Himself superior to them by His death and resurrection.

HEBREWS 2

HEBREWS 2

Survey of the chapter
The first five verses of this chapter are a warning based on the truth of chapter one, the first of five warnings scattered throughout the epistle.  If the word spoken by angels was disobeyed, judgement followed. Why should it be any different if the word spoken by the Son is disobeyed?  Everything in chapter one that impresses us with the glory of Christ also warns us about the danger of rejecting one so glorious as He.  In the subsequent verses, there is first of all a quotation from Psalm 8 about man, which gives the theme of the section, and then the seven-fold work of Christ as man is detailed.  This time the contrast is not with the prophets or angels, but with Adam.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-4

First warning passage- the word through angels and the word through the Lord.

(b) Verses 5-8 Quotation from Psalm 8- man made lower than angels.
(c) Verses  9-10 Christ made lower than angels.
(d) Verse 11   The path of separation from the world of Adam.
(e) Verse 12  The path of (resurrection) life with Christ.
(f)Verse 13  The path of faith.
(g) Verses 14,15   The path of deliverance.
(h) Verses 16-18
The path of victory over temptation.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 2, VERSES 1-4:

2:1  Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip.

2:2  For if the word spoken by angels was stedfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward;

2:3  How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;

2:4  God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?

(a) Verses 1-4   
First warning passage: the word by angels or the word by the Lord

2:1
Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things which we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip.

Therefore we ought to give the more earnest heed to the things which we have heard- one of the failings of Israel in Old Testament times was they had not listened to the prophets.  But now that the Son has spoken to them, dare they ignore Him, as they had ignored the prophets? 
Lest at any time we should let them slip-
the danger facing the Hebrews was of allowing the things they had heard to slip from their minds, as those who were not taking earnest heed to them.  If persisted in, this would result in missing the salvation offered to them.
In chapter one the contrast was between the fragmentary revelations through the prophets, and the full revelation through the Son.  In this chapter, however, the contrast is between the Lord speaking in grace, and angels mediating the law at Sinai.
Israel had sat at the feet of God, Deuteronomy 33:2,3, and heard the law; Judas had listened to Christ in the upper room, but went out to betray, so also the nation could do the same.

2:2
For if the word spoken by angels was stedfast, and every transgression and disobedience received a just recompence of reward;

For if the word spoken by angels was steadfast- note the contrast between letting the word slip, and the steadfast word of God, in whatever age.  “Was steadfast” means “became confirmed”.  By the penalty inflicted when the law was broken, God confirmed that He meant what He said. 
And every transgression and disobedience received a just recompense of reward-
the law was confirmed by judgement, but the gospel is confirmed by acts of grace.  Not only actual transgressions were judged, but also the attitude of disobedience, the refusal to hear with the intention of obeying.

2:3
How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation; which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed unto us by them that heard him;

How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation? The writer associates himself with the nation as a whole.  The Lord Himself had been in their midst, for He was “a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made to the fathers”, Romans 15:8.  There was no escape from just recompense of reward if the law was broken and disobeyed, so we need not expect to escape when a greater word from God is uttered.  Law works are not called for now, however, so it a question of simply ignoring the words of grace, and neglecting to believe them.
Which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord- notice that John the baptist is not included here, for “all the prophets and the law prophesied until John”, Matthew 11:13, but here the prophets and the law are superceded.  The apostle John speaks of “that which ye have heard from the beginning”, 1 John 2:24, meaning from the beginning of Christ’s public ministry at His baptism. At that point John baptised his successor.
Note the great salvation is spoken, for it consists in doctrine.  Israel were looking for salvation in war-terms, deliverance from their political enemies.  Compare Matthew 13, where the mysteries of the kingdom begin with a parable about sowing the word of God, not judging enemies.  The word is spoken by the Lord, the one with as much authority as the God of Sinai, as He indicated in Matthew 5:21,27,33,38.  He is also the Lord of angels, as we learn from the way the angel of the Lord spoke when he said, “a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord”, Luke 2:11. So He was both the Lord of angels and shepherds.
And was confirmed unto us by them that heard him- this is surely decisive evidence that Paul is not the writer of the epistle, for he insists that he received the truth of the gospel from the Lord Himself, and “those who seemed to be somewhat” because they had been with the Lord on earth, added nothing to him, Galatians 2:6.
The word confirmed is connected with the word translated steadfast in verse 2.  The law-threats were confirmed by acts of judgement, grace-promises are confirmed by acts of mercy.

2:4
God also bearing them witness, both with signs and wonders, and with divers miracles, and gifts of the Holy Ghost, according to his own will?

God also bearing them witness- literally “God bearing witness with”.  So when the gospel of the kingdom was being made known by those who heard the Lord themselves, and then bore witness of what they had heard, it could be said that God was associating with them in their witness. The next words tell us how it happened.
Both with signs and wonders and with diverse miracles- the Lord had promised that signs would follow those that believed and preached the gospel, Mark 16:17,18.  Signs are the miracles considered as significant acts, illustrations of doctrine.  Wonders are the miracles looked at as unusual and tremendous events, designed to arrest attention.  The word miracles emphasises that what is done is completely out of the ordinary, and which, because they were accompanied by words of truth, could only be caused by Divine power.  (The devil will instigate miracles to promote error, Revelation 16:14).  These three words had been used by Peter to describe those things which Christ did, and which marked Him out as approved of God, Acts 2:22.  So the witness to the apostles was the same as the witness to Christ.  The miracles were also witness to the fact that Christ was the one qualified to bring in the millenial age, for His miracles were the “powers of the age to come”, 6:5, showing the sort of changes that the reign of Christ will bring in.
And gifts of the Holy Spirit, according to his own will- in view of what the Lord had said about blasphemy against the Holy Spirit, Matthew 12:22-37, this is a reminder that the miracles and the Holy Spirit go together.  The great and wicked mistake of saying Christ worked miracles by Satan must be avoided if they are to know salvation.  Israel had seen God’s works for 40 years in the desert, yet failed to enter in to the “salvation” the land of Canaan represented, 3:9,17-19.  Now God is giving them another 40 years of opportunity before the fall of Jerusalem, again with works of power from God.
The word “gifts” does not refer to the gifts given to believers to further the testimony, in the 1 Corinthians 12 sense.  Rather, the word is literally “distributions”, referring to the strategic way in which the Holy Spirit moved the apostles and others to exercise the gift of the working of miracles.  A reading of the Acts of the Apostles will show this.  The Holy Spirit also retained the right to withdraw the miracles at the time of His choosing, and this He did.  He thus acted according to His Divine will.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 2, VERSES 5-10:

2:5  For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

2:6  But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that Thou art mindful of him? or the son of man that thou visitest him?

2:7  Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory and honour, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:

2:8  Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.

2:9  But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that He by the grace of God should taste death for every man.

2:10  For it became Him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings.

(b) Verses 5-8
Quotation from Psalm 8:
Man made lower than the angels

2:5
For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak.

For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection- the fact that the Lord has come, and men have been sent forth with power to work miracles of confirmation and grace, shows us that angels are no longer to the fore.
The world to come whereof we speak- the habitable earth in its future condition is what the writer speaks of in 1:5-2:4.  There are three major words used in the New Testament for “world”.  There is the word cosmos, which, ideally, is the world of order, beauty and harmony as it came from God, (used in Hebrews 9:1); the opposite of cosmos being chaos.  Sadly, that world has been spoiled, and hence it is now the world, not of harmony, but of hostility.  Another word for world is “aionas”; which has to do with the passing of time, and so is the world of history.  The third word is “oikoumene”, the habitable earth, the world of humanity.
So the writer is here referring to the future state of the earth when man’s day has come to an end, and his rule over the earth is cancelled.  This is the earth as the writer has spoken of it in chapter 1:5-14.  The question is, if that world is not to be subject to angels, then to whom is it to be subject?  And if the answer is man, then the question is, which man?  Who is competent enough to manage the earth for God?
For the answer to this question the writer turns to David’s words in Psalm 8.  Perhaps he penned the psalm after a night out on the hillside looking after the sheep near Bethlehem, his home town.  Just as centuries later shepherds would be guarding their flock on those same hillsides, when the birth of Christ was announced to them.  As David looked within, he saw a frail mortal man; as he looked above, he saw the moon and stars; as he looked around, he thought of men; as he looked back he thought of Adam; as he looked forward he thought of Christ. 

2:6
But one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man, that thou art mindful of him? or the son of man that thou visitest him?

But one in a certain place testified, saying- the writer does not distract us by telling us the name of the psalmist, nor the particular place where the psalm is found.
What is man, that thou art mindful of him? The word used for man in Psalm 8:4 is “enosh”, frail, mortal, man.  Seemingly so fragile, and subject to death, how can God’s purpose be centred there?  He seems almost beneath being noticed by God.
Or the son of man, that thou visitest him? Not only does God notice him, but He also visits him, to make known His ways.  From this we learn that God has great interest in man.  He not only is mindful of man, but moves towards him.  He not only has interest, but intervenes.
We should not think of this expression “son of man” as being a reference to Christ, for that is not how the psalmist uses it; he is simply describing men as sons of Adam, through their fathers, in a long line that stretches back to Adam.  Implied in this is the fact that a sinful nature is passed on from father to son. 

2:7
Thou madest him a little lower than the angels; thou crownedst him with glory and honour, and didst set him over the works of thy hands:
 

Thou madest him a little lower than the angels- both man and the son of man are made by God, either through creation or procreation.  Man will always be lower than angels, so the meaning “for a little while” lower, is not meant here.
Note that it is not “made a little higher than the animals”.  Man was made on the same day as the land animals, as if to highlight the difference between them, Genesis 1:24-27.  The apostle Paul wrote, “there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts,”  1 Corinthians 15:39.  Prominent evolutionists may hoodwink the public that it is “proved” than man came from the lower animals, but it is they themselves who are deceived, for they have adopted a world-view which takes no account of God, and in many instances denies that He exists.  But if God does not exist then there is no logical, rational thought.  So by thinking, the atheist verifies that God exists!

Man is lower than angels because of the following:
Angels are stated to be greater in power and might than men, 2 Peter 2:11.
Angels do not die, being pure spirit.
Angels are fitted to live in heaven.
Angels can move from heaven to earth.
Angels are not limited by an earthly body.
Angels rest not day and night, worshipping God, Revelation 4:8.

So angels are higher because of their power, permanence, privilege and praise of God.  But man is said to be only a little lower, so despite the foregoing, there are things which compensate, for man was made in the image and likeness of God, and the Son of God passed angels by, and became man.
God’s intention to make man is expressed in a unique way, for He said “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”, Genesis 1:26.  That this applies to the male and the female is clear from verse 27.  As far as relationship with God is concerned, there is no bias with God towards the male or the female, all are equal in His sight, and both were created in God’s image and after His likeness.
The Lord Jesus in Matthew 22:15-22 referred to the head of Caesar on a coin as the image of Caesar.  In other words, the image represented Caesar and His authority, and those who used the coin were recognising this.  Part of God’s plan in making man, then, was that He might have someone to represent Him to the rest of the creation.  One of the reasons why murder should be penalised by capital punishment is that man is made in the image of God, see Genesis 9:5,6.
Man is also said to be made after God’s likeness.  It was not necessarily true that Caesar’s image on the coin was a very good likeness, but God made sure that man had the capacity to represent Him well, by giving him certain characteristics which He Himself possesses.

Man was made in the likeness of God in a three-fold way:-
God has personality, and each of the persons of the Godhead has his own particular distinctive features, by which He displays Himself.  So man was given personality, to display God through it.

God has spirituality, which not only means that He is a Spirit, see John 4:24, but also means He can appreciate His own glories.  Man was made so that he might appreciate those Divine glories too, and worship God in his spirit as a result.

God has rationality, which means that He reasons, plans, purposes, and decides.  Man has these abilities too; not, of course, in the sense that He could advise God, see 1 Corinthians 2:16, but so that he could order his life in relation to God’s purpose in an intelligent way.

Sadly, as the subsequent chapters in Genesis show, this perfect state of things did not last long, for man sinned, and Adam “begat a son in his own likeness, after his image”, Genesis 5:3.  The original purpose for which man was created was now only partially realised, and his abilities were now diverted for his own ends.
The remedy for this situation is found in the Lord Jesus, who became man that He might be the head of a new order of things.  He displayed to perfection those things that God looked for in man. As such He is the perfect example to those who believe.  As Ephesians 4:21 says, “the truth is in Jesus”, which means that if we would see a life lived that is true to God’s will, then we may see it in the earthly life of the Lord Jesus.  Only those who are in Christ, and as such are a new creation, are able to represent God adequately.
Some translations of Psalm 8 say that man was made a little lower than God, since the word the psalmist used was “elohim”, and this is a word used many times for God.  But it is also used in a lesser sense, even of the judges in Israel, Exodus 22:28; Psalm 82:6; John 10:34.  In any case when the inspired writer to the Hebrews came to quote the psalm in Greek, he had separate words for God and angel at his disposal, and chose the word for angel.  Does it not go without saying that man is lower than God; how could he be anything else?  And is he only a little lower?
Thou crownedst him with glory and honour- glory is official, honour is moral, and these two perhaps correspond to man made in the image of God, (official position), and after His likeness, (moral character).  So although lower than angels in the ranks of creation, yet man has a potential beyond all the angelic hosts.
The word used for crown here is “stephanos”, a wreath or circlet that was merited, (in contrast to the diadem that was inherited).  It is the crown of the one who won the race as an athlete; who won respect as a citizen; who won a battle as a soldier, and who won a bride as a suitor.
And didst set him over the works of thy hands- man was a steward, responsible for the safekeeping of the property of another, even God.

2:8
Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet. For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him. But now we see not yet all things put under him.

Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet- in the case of Adam this was limited to things on the earth, which the psalmist specifies as sheep, oxen, birds, fish, and other sea creatures.  Being crowned with glory and honour should have ensured that the task was carried out faithfully.  But Adam allowed his authority to be usurped.
For in that he put all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put under him- this shows that there is nothing put under angels, and also that the “all” is not qualified, as if it was only all of a certain range of things, for there is nothing else to be under him.  We must understand this in connection with Adam before we advance to the idea, under the guidance of the writer, that these things can only be fulfilled in Christ. 

Summarising, we may think of what the psalmist says as follows:

What is man, that thou art mindful of him?   The mystery
Thou madest him a little lower than the angels The minority
Thou crownedst him with glory and honour The majesty
Thou didst set him over the works of Thine hands The ministry
Thou hast put all things under his feet  The mastery

But now we see not yet all things put under him- a change has come in, (hence the word “but”), showing that the potential of Psalm 8 has not been realised in Adam, and this situation continues, (hence the word “now”).  There is also the word “yet”, telling us that there is something in prospect.  The “now” refers to conditions under Adam, the “yet” to conditions under Christ.
The emphasis in this chapter is on the manhood of Christ, as in chapter one it was on His Deity, and the remainder of the chapter sets out seven things that Jesus has been able to do by coming into manhood:

Verses 5-8 Vindicate God’s trust in man
Verse 9 Consummate God’s purpose
Verses 10-13 Elevate God’s people
Verse 14 Eradicate the Devil
Verse 15 Emancipate the slaves
Verses 16-17  Propitiate sins
Verse 18 Relate to believers’ sufferings


(c) Verses  9-10
Christ made lower than the angels

2:9
But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death, crowned with glory and honour; that he by the grace of God should taste death for every man.

But we see Jesus- this is the first of seven uses in the epistle of the name which emphasises His manhood.  The Son of God has been made in fashion as a man, to be all that God expected man to be from the beginning.  We turn away from looking at Adam, and allow Jesus to fill our gaze. The writers of the New Testament are very sparing of their use of the name Jesus on its own, and only use it like that when there is a special need to do so.  The disciples never addressed the Lord as Jesus.  He Himself said, “Ye call me Master and Lord: and ye say well; for so I am”, John 13:13.
Who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death- here we see why the writer quoted from Psalm 8, for the full potential of that psalm is not reached in Adam, but in Jesus, who is the second man, and the Last Adam, 1 Corinthians 15:45-47.  By coming into manhood, He, the creator of angels, has become lower than they are, for “made a little lower than the angels” has now become in the writer’s mind the equivalent of saying “became a man”.
Adam was made a little lower than the angels for the enjoyment of life, but sadly, he fell, and this brought in suffering and death.  Only Jesus could remedy this, and He did it by enduring the suffering connected with death.  “For” means “with a view to”, so He became man expressly to die.  Angels do not die, and Adam’s death had no merit, so only Christ’s death can deal with the situation brought in by the fall.
Crowned with glory and honour- not only must He correspond to Adam by being made lower than angels, but He must correspond too in being crowned with glory and honour before His great work is done at the Cross, just as Adam was crowned before his great sin in disobeying God.  So there was seen in Christ the perfect representation and likeness of God that glory and honour involve, and it takes four gospel records to give us just a glimpse of it.
We see this in the brief insight Luke gives to us of the boyhood of the Lord Jesus.  He is taken by Joseph and Mary to Jerusalem for the feast of passover.  Instead of returning with them, He remained behind.  When they at last found Him He was in the Temple “sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions.  And all that heard him were astonished at his understanding and answers”, Luke 2:46,47.  See how his corresponds with what we have said about the image and likeness of God given to man at the beginning:
His personality.
“Wist ye not that I must be about My Father’s business?”.  He is aware of His distinct mission from the Father, even though He had not yet been anointed for public ministry.
This is a sign of His spirituality.
He is with the doctors or teachers in the temple as they discuss the Law.
This shows His rationality, for
He was hearing, asking, and answering questions in a manner which impressed the learned doctors, but without asserting Himself as superior to them, for He ever “made Himself of no reputation”. 

That he by the grace of God should taste death for every man- this phrase refers to the whole of the previous part of the verse.  Note the punctuation, with commas between phrases until the word honour, which is followed by a semi-colon.  This would suggest that “crowned with glory and honour” refers to Him during His life, for the first two statements, “made a little lower”, and, “crowned with glory and honour”, become true in order that He might taste death for every man.  He showed Himself fit to die by His life before God and men.
Adam was made in the image of God, to represent God to creation.  This was a glory indeed.  He was also made after the likeness of God, involving, as we have seen, personality, spirituality and rationality.  These are honourable things, and they were expressed by Adam as far as man is able to manifest them.  Adam fell, however, and lost the dominion to which his crown entitled him.  There is another, however, in whom these features were seen to perfection, and with the eye of faith we discern in Christ when He was here those qualities and characteristics which make a man glorious and honourable.
The words “every man” could be translated “every thing”, and assure us of the far-reaching effects of the work of Christ, which has guaranteed the deliverance of a groaning creation, Romans 8:20,21; Colossians 1:20.  He gave insights into this deliverance when He was here the first time, for He defeated death, disease, demon-possession, danger and distress, as Matthew 8 details.  No wonder the writer speaks of the Hebrews tasting the powers of the age to come, 6:5.  Adam tasted of the forbidden tree, and forfeited his rights over the earth, but Christ has tasted death, (on a tree, Acts 5:30), and purchased for Himself the right to have all creation subject to Himself.  As the creator of all things, He is supreme over them, but since He has become man He must prove his claim.

2:10
For it became him, for whom are all things, and by whom are all things, in bringing many sons unto glory, to make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings.

For it became him- there is no disparity between God’s purpose to bring in glory for the earth through Christ, and the sufferings which He required His Son to pass through.  It is a becoming thing for Him to require, because both sufferings and glories are part of His eternal plan.  Suffering brings in perfection for Christ, and perfection is becoming to God, (“As for God, His way is perfect”, Psalm 18:30), even though it means sufferings for His Son and His people.  The higher good of a restored and delivered creation comes through suffering. 
For whom are all things- notice the mention of “things” in these verses. The expression signifies the sum total of all things in God’s creation which are relevant in each instance: Verse 8 Thou hast put all things under his feet.
For in that he put all in subjection under him.
He left nothing that is not put under him.
But now we see not yet all things put under Him.
Verse 10 For whom are all things.
Verse 10 By whom are all things.

The things put under Adam are restricted to such things as sheep and oxen, Psalm 8:7,8.  Under Christ, however, are all things, whether the earth to come; angels, 1 Peter 3:22, Ephesians 1:21,22, (note the quotation from Psalm 8); all rule and authority and power, 1 Corinthians 15:24,25; and at the end of time, even death itself, 1 Corinthians 15:26,27.  Creation in its entirety is for God; it exists for His sake, and for His glory.  As is said by the heavenly hosts, “For thy pleasure they are, and were created”, Revelation 4:11.  Christ will see to it that His creation is preserved for His glory.
And by whom are all things- God is not only the reason for all things existing, but they have been brought into existence by Him, too.  Yet in chapter one the creation of all things is the work of the Son; so they must be co-equal, as a comparison between John 1:3 and Romans 11:34-36 also shows.  Since God is the originator and the goal of all things, (Revelation 1:8), then He has the right to superintend all things through Christ.
In bringing many sons unto glory- as Firstborn Son of God, the Lord Jesus will have many brethren, Romans 8:29.  Here we learn the pathway through which they are brought to the glory of association with Christ.  Adam brought all descended from him to shame in a corrupted and vain world.  God is ensuring that the last Adam has associates who reach a position of glory.  Note there is no mention of honour here, for the glory is because of association with Christ, which guarantees it, whereas honour depends upon our conduct here.
To make the captain of their salvation perfect through sufferings- the idea of the word captain is chief leader or author.  As one who has passed through this world without mishap already, Christ is perfectly qualified (the meaning of the word perfect) to lead His people through to their ultimate state of salvation, as well as to be the author or source of their salvation from the pitfalls along the pathway of faith.
Some in Israel wanted to appoint a captain to lead them back into Egypt when the way was hard, whereas the faithful ones were satisfied to be led into the land of Canaan under Joshua, whose name means “Salvation of Jehovah”, and is the equivalent to Jesus.  It is interesting to notice that this was not Joshua’s original name.  When he went with Caleb and the other ten spies into Canaan he was Oshea, but Moses renamed him at that time, Numbers 13:16.  It was important that when he eventually led the people into the land that they should realise that the salvation was of the Lord, and not of a man and his military prowess.
Just as Joseph knew sufferings in Egypt before the rest of his family did; and just as Moses knew 40 years of difficulty in the wilderness before the nation did, so Joshua had been a faithful spy, and had risked going into Canaan when it was held by the enemy.  But Joshua was met by the Captain of the host of the Lord as he entered Canaan, Joshua 5:13-15, so there is one superior to Joshua as captain.
So the Lord Jesus has blazed a trail for His people to follow.  He not only died to save from sins judicially, but lives to save from sins practically, showing us the way to tread so that we are saved from sinning.
As a result of these things, we may say that:
The mystery is solved; the minority status is sanctified; the majesty is seen; the ministry is safe; the mastery is and will be successful.  The writer now gives to us five features of this path to glory.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 2, VERSES 11-15:

2:11  For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren,

 2:12  Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee.

 2:13  And again, I will put my trust in him. And again, Behold I and the children which God hath given me.

 2:14  Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

 2:15  And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.


Verse 11
The path of separation from the world of Adam

2:11
For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified are all of one: for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren,

For both he that sanctifieth and they who are sanctified- to sanctify means to set apart.  It is too early in the epistle to think in terms of being sanctified by the sacrifice of Christ, 10:10.  In the context here, the captain of our salvation has separated us from the world of Adam of which we formed part.  In His prayer in John 17 the Lord Jesus spoke of sanctifying Himself, that His people might be sanctified by the truth, verse 19. Sanctification, or holiness, has not to do in the first instance with separation from sin, (we must not confuse sanctification with purification), but rather involves separation from the ordinary, to be occupied with the sacred.  Christ ever sanctified Himself in this sense during His life down here, and this qualifies Him to sanctify His people now.  He had contrasted those who have eternal life with those who only have the life of flesh, John 17:2, and has described His own as given to Him by the Father out of the world, verse 6.  This does not involve being physically removed, but morally distinct.  Given that believers are in the world, He requested that they might be sanctified by the truth.  The truth in question being that regarding the nature of the eternal life believers possess, the very life of God.  It is as we have fellowship with God and His Son in the things of eternal life, (which things were expressed fully by the Son when He was here), that we shall be set apart from the world of Adam.  The closer we get to God, the further we shall be from the world.
Adam associated his race with things that caused them to perish, whereas Christ associates with salvation the race of which He is head.  By passing through this world, and suffering in it, the Lord Jesus has equipped Himself with the experience to lead His people through the same world, with all its sufferings.
Are all of one- the sanctifier, (Christ), and those sanctified, (His people), all emerge out of one common experience of suffering on the way to glory.  He has already come out of the tomb never to suffer again.  But association with Christ in His burial and resurrection begins a life of suffering for the believer, from which suffering he will emerge just a certainly as Christ has emerged.  If we suffer with Him, we shall be glorified together, Romans 8:17, the one experience follows the other. Christ is out of the experience of suffering already, whereas we await that emergence, but because it is certain it can be spoken of as if already accomplished.  It is noticeable that the apostles did not begin to suffer for Christ until He was risen from the dead.
For which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren- scripture says that “A brother is born for adversity”, Proverbs 17:17, and the common experience of suffering bonds us with our captain.  If He passed through suffering, and the people did not, then there might be room for embarrassment if He called us brethren.
Note the way Romans 8 moves from a consideration of sufferings because of a groaning creation, verses 16-27, to the thought that God’s people shall be brethren with His Son, in glory, verses 28-30.  No amount of privation can destroy that, as Romans 8:38,39 declares:  “For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord”.

(e) Verse 12
The path of resurrection life with Christ

2:12
Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren, in the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee.

Saying, I will declare thy name unto my brethren- these are words found in Psalm 22:22 at the point where the scene changes from one of death and great suffering, to resurrection and great glory.  They represent the point where Christ finishes His experience of suffering in this world, and begins to enter His glory. As Peter puts it, “God raised him from the dead and gave him glory”, 1 Peter 1:21.
The Lord described His disciples as those that had continued with Him in His temptations, and despite the way they had forsaken Him in Gethsemane, He still said to the women, “Go tell my brethren that I go before you into Galilee”, Matthew 28:10.  He also spoke of ascending to His Father and theirs, thus showing He was not ashamed to associate with them, even if they had been ashamed, temporarily, to associate with Him.  In this way He began to carry out what He promised in His prayer to His Father in John 17:26, and continued the declaration of the Father’s name or character.
In the midst of the church will I sing praise unto thee- if the first phrase involved teaching the Name, this one involves praising the Name.  Praise is the expression of the works of God, and here the Lord Jesus can be thought of as praising God for His great work of delivering Him from death, in answer to His prayer, Hebrews 5:7.  It is noticeable that after the passover meal a psalm was sung before they left, in accordance with the custom of Israel, whereas we do not read of this in the upper room in the post-resurrection appearances to the disciples there.  Perhaps a psalm, (1 Corinthians 14:26; Ephesians 5:19), now has the more spiritual idea of a personal expression of praise, rather than the repetition of the exercises of others.  By singing praise in the church is meant the recounting by the Lord Jesus of His appreciation of the intervention of His Father on His behalf; He does this as His people speak of Him to the Father.  Psalm 22 does not actually use the word sing in the expression that is quoted here, perhaps confirming that singing is not necessarily in view.
There is a possibility that the declaring of the Name is done while His people are still on earth, whereas the singing of praise in the midst of the church will take place in heaven when all the redeemed are safe home.  So one refers to the local assembly, the other to “the church of the firstborn (ones) which are written (enrolled) in heaven”, 12:23.

(f) Verse 13
The path of faith in God

2:13
And again, I will put my trust in him. And again, Behold I and the children which God hath given me.

And again, I will put my trust in him- this is a quotation from Psalm 18, which is mainly an account of David’s deliverance from the hand of his enemies, including Saul.  Now Saul had persecuted David some 40 or more years before, and he seems to have used this psalm as an expression of his dependence on God at every stage of his life.  The first three verses, from which this quote comes, give to us the attitude of David to adversity, and one feature is his trust in God.  Then he records the way in which God vindicated his trust in him by delivering him from his foes.  So we learn that during the time when His enemies had the upper hand, the Lord Jesus was marked by trust in God.  Indeed, this was ever His attitude, for Psalm 22:9,10 says “I was cast upon thee from the womb; Thou art my God from my mother’s belly; thou didst make me hope when I was upon my mother’s breast”.  As a result, He knew deliverance from Herod.  Children, even unborn children, are remarkably sensitive to the circumstances in which their mother finds herself.  See, for instance, Luke 1:41.  By implication, His brethren will be marked by this trust too, as they follow the path the captain of their salvation has marked out for them.
And again, Behold, I and the children which God hath given me- this is a quotation from Isaiah 8:18.  Isaiah had the task of warning the wicked king Ahaz of impending captivity at the hands of the Assyrians.  As a sign to Israel, Isaiah was instructed by God to name his two sons in a particular way.  One was to be Shear-jashub, a name which means “A remnant shall return”, and the other, Maher-shalal-hash-baz, which means “In making haste to the spoil he hasteneth the prey”.  So when Isaiah said to the nation, “Behold, I and the children which God hath given me”, they were a “sign and a wonder” to Israel.  Maher-shalal-hash-baz was testimony that the Assyrian would indeed hasten to invade the land, and take them as a prey.  The other son, however, was God’s promise that even though that happened, a remnant would return from captivity.
So during the present age believers from the nation of Israel are likewise a testimony to coming judgement on the nation in the form of the Great Tribulation, (and to a lesser extent the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70), and also to the fact that God will be favourable to His people and ensure that a remnant of them will know His salvation.
It is interesting that the Lord Jesus called His brethren “children”, in John 21:5, using the same word which is found here and in the next verse.  So physical descendants are not necessarily in view in the application of the quotation, but a spiritual relationship.  Just as Isaiah’s trust was in God despite the impending judgements, so the trust of the Hebrew believers should be in God despite what would happen to them as a nation in AD 70.

(g) Verses 14-15
The path of deliverance

2:14
Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;

Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood- the children in question being those addressed in the previous verse, the children of God, who are the same as Christ’s brethren, true believers.  The present condition of the children is in view because they were not children before they became partakers.  The verb “are partakers” is in the perfect tense, meaning continuation from the past to the present.  Those who share flesh and blood are in a condition of relative weakness, which leaves them vulnerable to attack by evil as they make their way to glory, therefore their Captain steps in to help.
He also himself- it is necessary for Him to have the same nature as those He leads, so that He may pass through the same experiences, sin apart of course.
Likewise took part of the same- not only does He share flesh and blood with the children, but shares it likewise, or in the same manner. The word likewise is equivalent to “in all things” in verse 17, and hence means similarity which amounts to equality  The manhood  of Christ is real, even though He is without sin, for a sinful nature is not an integral part of humanity.  Adam was a real man before he sinned. He did not have to possess a sinful nature before he was rightly called a man.  1 Corinthians 15:50 distinguishes between flesh and blood, and corruption, showing that our corrupt nature can be considered apart from our flesh and blood condition.  The Lord Jesus took part of flesh and blood in like manner to the children, by birth of a mother, and He subsequently took part in this condition as He lived amongst men.  Perhaps there is an allusion to the other son mentioned by Isaiah, even Immanuel, the child born of the virgin, Isaiah 9:14, see Matthew 1:23.
The notion that Mary was only the carrier of Christ in the womb contradicts the statement here that He “likewise took part of the same”. If Christ was contaminated by being nourished by Mary in the womb, as some suggest, then He must have been contaminated after He was born when He drank His mother’s milk.
The word used of believers is partakers, meaning they have a common, equal share in humanity, whereas Christ took part, which involves coming in from outside the condition, a testimony to His pre-existence before birth.  He took part by virgin birth in that which we take part in by natural generation.
That through death he might destroy him that had the power of death- Psalm 18, which is quoted in verse 13, (also found in 2 Samuel 22), was written when the Lord had delivered David from his enemies, including Goliath and his sons.  In fact 2 Samuel 21:22 links the defeat of Goliath when David was a youth, with the defeat of his four sons by David’s mighty men, when David was an old man.  Goliath had put the fear of death into the hearts of the armies of Israel, but David had delivered them from that fear, and had beheaded Goliath with his own sword.  So Christ has defeated the greatest enemy of all, the Devil, by using the very weapon that he used to terrify men.
By coming into flesh and blood conditions, and by allowing Himself to be condemned to death, the Lord Jesus placed Himself in a position of weakness, 2 Corinthians 13:4. Yet in this weakness He defeated the mightiest force for evil there ever could be.   Since He is now raised from the dead by the power of God, there is no possibility of the Devil being effective against God’s sons.
To destroy means to make of no effect; it does not mean to annihilate.  In the wisdom of God, the Devil is still allowed some measure of activity, but when his final doom is effected it will only take an “ordinary” angel to bind him and cast him into the lake of fire, Revelation 20:1-3. 

2:15
And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage.

And deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage- those under the law were under the ministration of condemnation and death, 2 Corinthians 3:7,9.  This brought bondage, for they were not free from fear of death.  Imagine a believer in Israel who is returning from sacrificing a sin offering.  As he returns to his tent he sins again; yet it is too late to return to the altar.  He goes to sleep that night fearing that he may die, and die, moreover, with sin upon him.  Through Christ’s death, however, this fear is removed, and death may be faced calmly.  This relates especially to believers who formerly were Jews, and therefore under the law.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 2, VERSES 16-18:

2:16  For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

 2:17  Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

 2:18  For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted. 

(h) Verses 16-18
The path of victory over temptation

2:16
For verily he took not on him the nature of angels; but he took on him the seed of Abraham.

For verily he took not on him the nature of angels- the writer has been emphasising that the Lord took our nature, partaking in flesh and blood conditions. Now he assures us that the reason he did not take the nature of angels was because He set out to expressly help men.
The word “took” means to “take up a person to help him, to rescue from peril, and also to succour”. The point is that if He is going to help men in flesh and blood conditions, with the fear of death in their hearts, He needs to come into manhood.
But he took on him the seed of Abraham- that is, His coming is relevant to the first readers of the epistle, the Hebrews, descendants of “Abram the Hebrew”, Genesis 14:13.  They should not think that because the link with Adam has been emphasised in the earlier verses, they have no special place with God.  They are a favoured nation, for “of whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ came”, Romans 9:5, and “Salvation is of the Jews”, John 4:22. The special emphasis, however, is on those descended from Abraham naturally who were believers, and therefore were his seed spiritually, see John 8:33-45; Romans 4:16; Galatians 3:29.
The word “took” is the same as is used in 8:9 of God taking hold of Israel to lead them out of Egypt.  Here our captain takes hold of our hand to lead out of the world.  “For verily” is only found here in the New Testament.  It is used when something is affirmed in an ironical way, and has the idea of “it goes without saying,” or, “of course”.

2:17
Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

Wherefore- this means “for which reason”.
In all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren- for the purpose of taking hold of the seed of Abraham, He needed to be made like them in all things. Note He is made like His brethren, meaning believers.  He is not made like unbelievers in all things, for they have a sinful nature, whereas believers are looked at ideally as being righteous, even whilst in a mortal body.  This confirms that the seed of Abraham in verse 16 means believers.  “Behoved” means “a necessity in view of the subject under discussion”.  Having taken flesh and blood, and come to take hold of believers to help them, it is necessary that He become like them in all relevant things, so that He may minister to them effectively.  The previous verses have shown believers to be delivered by His various ministries; but they are passing through temptations that may cause them to fall, so how can He help them in this?
That he might be- in order that He might take His place as, or be granted the position of.
A merciful and faithful high priest- the word for mercy here indicates the outward manifestation of pity, with need on the part of the one shown mercy, and resources on the part of the one showing it.  It is not simply an attitude, but an act, as demonstrated by the Good Samaritan, who was not content to look from a distance, (as the priest was), but acted in compassion.
Faithfulness marks Him, not only in His relationship with God, 3:2, but also towards believers, the idea behind faithfulness being reliability and stability.  The failures we manifest do not cause our helper to desert us.
In things pertaining to God- in matters that relate to the honour of God.  Aaron was made priest to minister unto God, Exodus 28:1.  The priesthood of Aaron had to do with constant sacrifices and yearly atonement.  Christ dealt with these two aspects before He entered into his ministry, as Hebrews 7:28 makes clear.  His sacrifice renders altar-sacrifices obsolete, chapter 10, and His work of propitiation is once for all, chapter 9.  His priesthood has to do with helping us move through the world safely, and leading the way into the presence of God.
To make reconciliation for the sins of the people- reconciliation, the bringing into harmony of persons formerly at variance, is one result of the work of propitiation.  “To” means “for to”, a similar expression to the “that He might be” of the beginning of the verse.  The change of word indicates that, as the scholars say, “this is a separate telic clause”, (a clause which tells us what the goal is).  So there are two goals in view in the verse, the one issuing from the other. He is made like His brethren with the general object of being a faithful high priest for them, and also to make propitiation.  Compare 1 John 2:1,2, with the advocacy of Christ on the basis of His propitiatory work.  He is the propitiation for our sins in the sense that the one in heaven interceding is the one who once was on the cross propitiating.
The Lord Jesus spoke to Mary Magdalene about His brethren, and indicated that He was about to “ascend to my Father, and your Father, to my God, and your God”, John 20:17.  Thus He would still be the link between His people and God, maintaining them in His dual role of Advocate with the Father, and High Priest in things pertaining to God.
The basis of His advocacy is two-fold.  His person, for He is Jesus Christ the righteous, and His work, for He is the propitiation for our sins, 1 John 2:1,2.  The apostle John was concerned about believers sinning.  The sins of believers are just as obnoxious to God, and just as deserving of wrath, as those of unbelievers.  But we are “saved from wrath through Him”, Romans 5:9, as He pleads the merits of His work.  He is, says John, the propitiatory offering for our sins.  Not was, but is.  In other words, the one who acts for us in heaven as our advocate, is the very same one who hung upon the cross as a sacrifice for our sins.
He is also our high priest.  Hebrews 2:17,18 form a bridge between chapter two, with its emphasis on the reasons why the Lord Jesus took manhood, and the way in which Israel were tempted in the wilderness as noted in chapter three.
Note in particular the word “for” which begins verse 18. Too little attention has been paid to this word, and hence the connection between verses 17 and 18 is often lost.  The reason why we have a high priest who is merciful and faithful is that He has been here in manhood and suffered being tempted.  When His people pass through temptation, then He undertakes to deal with their cause.  Because He has been here, and has been tempted in all points like as we are, He is able to help us when we cry to Him for help.  The word for succour was used by the woman of Canaan in Matthew 15:25 when she cried out, “Lord, help me”.  He is able to point us to the ways in which He overcame in the wilderness temptation, and thus we are strengthened to resist temptation.
But what if we fall, and sin?  In that case He comes to our aid in another way.  We see it typified negatively in Leviticus 10:16-20.  The priests were commanded to eat the sin-offerings, as long as their blood had not been brought into the sanctuary.  This was in order to “bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord”, Leviticus 10:17, where the word for bear is the same as is used for the scapegoat bearing iniquity.  But at the end of the consecration of the priesthood, Moses was angry on God’s behalf, for the priests had failed in this.
One of the functions of priesthood, then, was to personally identify with the sin-offering by eating it, and by so doing bear the iniquity of the congregation, taking responsibility for their failure, but doing so safeguarded by the fact that a sin-offering had been accepted by God.  As they did this the scripture explicitly says they made atonement for the people, Leviticus 10:17.  We see then what the writer to the Hebrews means when he talks of Christ making reconciliation for the sins of the people.  He is indicating that Christ personally identifies Himself with His sin-offering work at Calvary, and thus takes responsibility for the failures of His people under temptation.  This is acceptable to God, and His people are preserved, despite their failure. So it is that sins that would otherwise distance believers from God are dealt with, and reconciliation is effected.

2:18 
For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted. 

For in that he hath suffered, being tempted- only those who resist temptation suffer when they are tempted. The fact that it is not said without qualification that He suffered when He was tempted shows that He always resisted resolutely. He therefore knows what His people pass through when they resist temptation.
He is able to succour them that are tempted- knowing from personal experience the pressure they are under, He is able to suit the help they need to their situation. When His people do not resist temptation, then His work at Calvary safeguards their position before God, hence the mention of reconciliation, (the result of propitiation), in the previous verse. To succour means to run to the aid of a person in danger, when they cry for help. The woman of Matthew 15:25 cried “Lord, help me”, and this is what we need to do. The same word is used also in Hebrews 4:16 in the expression “grace to help in time of need”. Because He has experienced the pressure of temptation, and has overcome, when we go to Him for help He is able to point us to the way in which He overcame, as detailed in the temptation accounts in the gospels.
ause He has experienced the pressure of temptation, and has overcome, when we go to Him for help He is able to point us to the way in which He overcame, as detailed in the temptation accounts in the gospels.

 

 

THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS- THE GOSPEL DEFENDED

The Epistle to the Galatians was written by the apostle Paul to counteract a very dangerous error.  There were those in his day who did not realise that the Law of Moses as a rule of life has been set aside by the person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ.  The Scripture says clearly, “Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth”, Romans 10:4.  In other words, by His coming, the Lord Jesus has introduced those who believe to a new way of life.  Not one dominated by a hopeless attempt to please God by works of merit, but rather, a life that is lived in association with Christ and His death, burial and resurrection.  The Spirit of God empowers those who are true believers to live a life which is well-pleasing to God their Father.  He does this by enabling them to live like Christ.  Such believers do not have the Law of Moses set before them as their rule, but rather, the example of Christ.  The apostle declares that those who live like this “fulfil the law of Christ”, Galatians 6:2.  No longer are they in bondage to the law, but they know the  liberty of  the Spirit, enabling them, in their measure, to imitate Christ.

This is not to say that the Law of God through Moses is no longer valid, for nine out of the ten commandments are binding on believers still, and they are able to fulfill the righteousness of the Law as they  walk  by the Spirit, Romans 8:4.  It does mean, however, that no longer is God making the keeping of His law the way of gaining blessing.  The blessings that God gives in abundance to those who believe are based solely upon the merits and sacrifice of Christ, and not at all on the efforts of men.

If this idea is strange to you, may we suggest you first read the posting entitled “How can we get right with God?” which you will find under “Pages” on the right of the screen.

To access the notes on the epistle, pleae click on the appropriate chapter in the menu bar on the right hand side of the page.

ROMANS 7

 

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address:  martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

Section 10   Romans 7:1-6
Deliverance from the law

Subject of Section 10
As we see from 5:14, the apostle has three men in view, Adam, Moses and Christ, (“him that was to come”). He has shown how we are freed from Adam in principle by the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ, 6:1-14, then how we are freed in practice by the application of the doctrines delivered to us, 6:15-23. He now shows in this section our deliverance from “Moses”, that is, the law. To explain this, he uses two distinct but connected illustrations. First, in verse 1, the illustration using the principle of law in general. This principle is that death ends the dominion of the law over any person, male or female. Second, the illustration in verses 2 and 3 using the principle of the law of the husband, which states that as long as he is alive, his wife is bound to him. Should he die, however, she is free to marry another. It is vitally important to see that the governing principle in the life of the believer is the law of the Spirit, 8:2, and He empowers us to live a life that expresses Christ. The law of Moses cannot give us strength to do this, hence there is the need for the teaching of chapter seven, to show that conclusively.

Structure of Section 10

10(a)

7:1

Death ends the dominion of the law

10(b)

7:2,3

Death ends relationship with the law

10(c)

7:4-6

Resurrection begins relationship with Christ


10(a)   7:1
Death ends the dominion of the law

7:1
Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?

Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) again the apostle appeals to their Christian intelligence as he did in 6:3,6,9,16.
How that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? Either the law of Moses or the law of Rome will illustrate the principle about to be stated, which is that laws only regulate living people. The word for man used here is “anthropos”, meaning man in general, an individual person, male or female.

10(b)   7:2,3
Death ends relationship with the law

7:2
For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.

For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth- in verses 15-23 of the previous chapter the servant/master relationship was in view, with the emphasis on obedience. Here the husband/wife relationship is brought in, with the emphasis on faithfulness and fruitfulness. The law of marriage is stated at the beginning of creation, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” Genesis 2:24. The only One with authority to break the tie is the One who made it, and He only breaks it by the death of one of the partners.
Those who refuse this verse as an argument against divorce say that the apostle is merely using an illustration that is not in the context of instructions concerning marriage. But if there are exceptions to the “married for life” principle, it would undermine the apostle’s doctrine here regarding the law. If divorce is a possibility, then a woman is not bound to her husband as long as he lives, and consequently she is not living in sin if she marries another while he is alive. In the application of the illustration, this would mean that a believer could be linked to the law and to Christ at the same time. This destroys the apostle’s argument.
Moreover, if it is legitimate to divorce, then who is to say that Christ will not divorce believers? It is because He lives for evermore that the believer is safe, but if there is a way for a marriage to be broken, then the believer is not eternally secure.
But if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband- the law of the husband is not his command, but the principle involved in having a husband. The point is that death breaks the connection that was established by marriage. Loosed means discharged, cleared.

7:3
So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.

So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress so binding is this “law of the husband”, that it still operates even if she is unfaithful. She is “an adulteress by trade or calling” if she marries another while her husband is still alive. Note also that her unfaithfulness has not ended the marriage, for if it had, she would not be an adulteress.
But if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man- only if her husband is dead is she free to marry again. She can be rightly married to a second man, but only if the first is dead.

10(c)   7:4-6
Resurrection begins relationship with Christ

7:4
Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.

Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ- note that he does not use the word “therefore”, (implying logical consequence), which would suggest that he is immediately applying the illustration of verses 2 and 3, but “wherefore”, (implying logical connection), because he is first of all using the principle of verse 1, which is that death ends the dominion of the law over a person. Christ took responsibility on the cross for our transgression of the law of Moses, and as a consequence was made a curse, which is far worse than simply being accursed. He has absorbed the consequences of our law-breaking in His own body, has died, and yet has risen again bodily, and by association with Him in that process we are delivered from the law in a righteous way. See Galatians 2:19, where the apostle says, “For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.” So the believer is dead to the law through the law. That is, the very demands that the law made upon us, which were fully met by Christ in His death, have served to be the means of our deliverance. If the law had not made its demands, Christ would not have died, and we would not have been delivered by His death. Nor would we have been buried and raised with Him to live a life free from the law.
That ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead- having used the principle in the illustration of verse 1, he now uses the illustration from verses 2 and 3 to show that the second man, Christ, is the one to whom we are linked, not the first “man”, the law.
The resurrection of Christ proves that the things He did in His death have satisfied the demands of God, enabling Him to link His people with Himself in a place where the law does not operate, namely resurrection ground. It is a risen man who has made us dead to the law. Compare the situation in Joshua 1:2, where we read, “Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan”. When the mediator of the law is dead, the new leader can go through a figurative death and resurrection experience with the people as they cross the Jordan.
That we should bring forth fruit unto God- not only are we expected to be faithful to our “husband” from henceforth, (for He will never go into death and thereby cancel our relationship with Him), but also we are to produce “children” by this marriage, which is what “bring forth fruit” means. The apostle referred to the Galatians as his little children, “of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you”, Galatians 4:19. We should reproduce Christ in our lives.

7:5
For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.

For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law- the characteristic description of sinners is that they are “in the flesh”, see on 8:9. The believer, however, is in the Spirit. Motions are passions, evil desires. Because the mind of the natural man is not subject to the law of God, when the prohibitions of the law come to him he rebels, and does the contrary thing. It is not that the law incites to sin, but the heart of man is contrary to the righteous demands of the law. Perhaps the allusion is to the unfaithful wife of verse 3, who allowed the flesh to overcome her.
Did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death- each part of our body has characteristic sins of which it is capable, and when allowed to, the result is as when a mother bears children in a house where the plague is- they are doomed from birth. The contrast is with the “fruit unto God” of verse 4, which is Christ-likeness.

7:6
But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held- in contrast to when we were natural men in the flesh we are now delivered from the law by the means described in verse 4. Note that this is the common position of all believers as far as God is concerned. Whether all are in practice delivered is another matter. We shall see the consequences of acting as if not delivered from the law from verse seven onwards.
The husband, the law, has “died”, and by so doing has released us from its dominion, as verse 2 had said. When he says the law has died, the apostle is using the word die in a figurative sense, meaning, “has lost its power to dominate us”. The law itself enshrines unchanging principles, and the apostle declares it to be spiritual in verse 14, and delights in it in verse 22. See also Romans 13:8-10. The law has been cancelled as a means of living a life of righteousness as far as the believer is concerned. As the apostle will write later on, “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.” Romans 10:4. Christ has not ended the law as a way of condemning unrighteousness, for that is still one of its functions.
That we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter- lest we should think that our new-found freedom from the law allows us licence, the apostle reverts to the figure of servant/master. Newness of spirit is the new attitude of spirit which now motivates us; no longer is there the drudgery of law-keeping with its failure and misery. The phrase prepares the way for chapter 8. The psalmist appealed to God with the words, “Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me…and uphold me with thy free spirit”, Psalm 51:10,12.
The law is now outdated, for there is an oldness about it as far as being a means of attaining to righteousness, Romans 10:4, and the code of commandments written on stones has been replaced by the living example of Christ. It is Christ that is written on the heart of the believer, 2 Corinthians 3:3.

Section 11   Romans 7:7-25
Defence of the law and despair under the law

Subject of Section 11
In the first part of the section the apostle defends the law, lest it be thought that the fact that the believer is delivered from it implies that it had some defect. In the second half of the section, he shows that the believer who places himself under the law will soon be in despair.
The believer may be looked at in two ways. One, in accordance with God’s present reckoning of him, and the other, (because the body which he had before he was saved is still the same, even though now yielded to God), in accordance with what he was before he was saved.
In these verses Paul is presenting a situation that was personal to him, in which he tries to please God as a believer by the use of the law. So we might think of him going into Arabia subsequent to his conversion, (see Galatians 1:17, and connect with 4:24,25), and finding that even when there was nothing to attract him in the surroundings, yet still the desire to covet was within him. In isolation in Arabia, he would inevitably think of the law given at Sinai in Arabia.
Note the prominence of the words “I” and “me” in the remainder of the chapter, and the absence of the words “Spirit” and “Lord Jesus”, except in verse 25. We note also the expression in verse 25, “I myself”, as if Paul was on his own in trying to please God.
It would be a mistake to think of the matters detailed in the next verses as being normal Christian experience. The apostle is describing himself as one who is trying to please God through law-keeping. When he is doing this we could call him Unreal Paul, whereas when he is living as a believer should, he is Real Paul. True Christian practice is found at the beginning of chapter 8. These verses in chapter seven are a warning to those who believe they can please God by keeping the law.

Structure of Section 11

11(a)

7:7

The law is not sinful

11(b)

7:8-11

The law is condemnatory

11(c)

7:12,13

The law is holy

11(d)

7:14

The law is spiritual

11(e)

7:15-17

The law is good

11(f)

7:18-20

The law is ineffective

11(g)

7:21-23

The law is delightful

11(h)

7:24

The law is weak

11(i)

7:25

Grace gives the victory


11(a)   7:7
The law is not sinful

7:7
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

What shall we say then? Is the law sin? The expression of verse 5, “the motions of sins which were by the law”, and the argument in general in the previous verses about the irrelevance of the law as an aid to Christian living, may give the impression that the apostle is condemning the law, which, after all, was given by God.
“What shall we say then” is a favourite expression of the apostle in this epistle, encouraging involvement by his readers, (“what shall we say?”), and causing them to think about what they are reading. He asks “Is the law sin?” If the result of the application of the law is fruit unto death, then perhaps there is a fault with the law, so that as soon as you introduce it into a situation, sin is the inevitable result. Is this why the apostle is so emphatic that we are not under it?
God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law- Paul will not have it that the law is evil, hence his strong double denial. Far from being sinful, the law exposes sin, so that a person knows it, and has no excuse. How can the law be sinful if it utterly condemns sin?
For I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet- the heart of Paul and the particular command “Thou shalt not covet” were on a collision course, and showed up his lust, his strong desire to do what the law forbade him to do. So the law of Moses upholds God’s standards inflexibly and cannot be said to be sinful.

11(b)   7:8-11
The law is condemnatory

7:8
But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.

But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence- the true alternative to the false idea that the law is sin, (hence the “but”), is that sin used the command as a means of waging its war on God. The word translated “occasion” was originally used of a base of operations in war. Instead of the law working out the will of God in Paul, it was sin that worked, and the result was all manner of concupiscence, which is evil desire. Sin and concupiscence are evil, but the law is not.
For without the law sin was dead- the sin-principle was inactive, (“dead”), not being provoked into using the law to incite Paul to sin whilst Paul did not try to please God through the law. Once he started to do that, things changed.

7:9
For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.

For I was alive without the law once- when Saul of Tarsus was converted he was given life from God apart from law-keeping. He could testify that God “called me by his grace”, Galatians 1:15. he could also say, “And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.” 1 Timothy 1:14.
But when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died- when he afterwards set out to please God by law-keeping, the commandment to not covet came to him with its full force. As a result, the law, which as far as Paul was concerned had died, verse 6, was in effect resurrected, for by trying to keep the law as a believer he had put himself back practically into a position where the law was not dead. As a result the law with its ministry of death dealt a death-blow to his earnest but ignorant desire to serve and please God by the law.

7:10
And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.

And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death- Christ had said to the lawyer, after he had summarised the law, “this do and thou shalt live”, Luke 10:28, so the law, if kept perfectly, would lead to life. But then the Lord spoke the parable of the Good Samaritan, in which the lawyer learned that, far from being the one who worked to help the robbed man, he was the robbed man, left half-dead by the roadside, and therefore unable to “do and live”, Luke 10:30-32. Just as the priest and the Levite, (the representatives of the ceremonial and civil law), would not save the wounded man, so the lawyer learns that neither religious ceremonies nor good works could help him. This lesson Paul had to learn also.
So the law that was designed to bring life, because it is being used in the wrong way, (that is, by a believer trying to please God by its agency), results not in life but in moral death. The apostle Paul is very clear in his epistle to Timothy that the law is not made for a righteous man but for sinners, 1 Timothy 1:9.

7:11
For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me- similar words are used in verse 8, but whereas there the result was sins, here the result is death. This verse explains why Paul found the commandment to be unto death, verse 10.
Sin misled Paul into thinking that he could keep the law now that he was a believer, for “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” Jeremiah 17:9. Thus sin used the command “Thou shalt not covet” to reduce Paul to inactivity as far as living to please God was concerned; he was in moral death.

11(c)   7:12,13
The law is holy

7:12
Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

Wherefore the law is holy- because it is sin and not law that slays Paul, we may say as a logical consequence of the foregoing, (“wherefore”), that the law considered as a whole is totally free from evil, and safeguards the holiness of God, for it slew Paul when he failed to keep it.
And the commandment holy, and just, and good- the particular precepts of the law, illustrated by the one about covetousness emphasized here, partake of the character of the whole, being holy. They are also just, being designed to lead to a righteous life. They are good as well, for the whole law is fulfilled by loving God and one’s neighbour, as Romans 13:8-10 makes clear. See also the intelligent answer of the scribe in Mark 12:32,33, and the Lord’s response, verse 34.

7:13
Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

Was then that which is good made death unto me? The apostle here anticipates an objection which will disparage the law. Was it the law itself that resulted in Paul being slain, verse 11? The answer is no, for the reason he next gives.
God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good- the law brought sin out into the open and exposed it for what it was, and as a result Paul was left for dead as far as pleasing God was concerned. Note the use of the word “working”, for Paul was trying to work good by the law, but sin was also working by using the law.
The meaning becomes clearer if we mentally insert the words from the previous sentence, “was made death unto me”, after the word good. So the idea is that sin, that it might appear sin, was made death to Paul, and the way it happened was that sin used God’s good law to slay him.
That sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful- the commandment in view here is the specific one of verse 7, “Thou shalt not covet”, but in other circumstances any of the commandments of the law would have the same effect. Sin is sinful by definition, but exceeds itself when it manages to deceive believers into thinking they can use the law to please God. That must be bad that uses God’s holy law to prevent a man from trying to please Him!

11(d) 7:14
The law is spiritual

7:14
For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

For we know that the law is spiritual- it is common Christian knowledge that since the law is from God, it cannot be anything other than like Him in character. Moses introduces the commandments of the law by saying, “God spake all these words”, Exodus 20:1. That being the case, they must be spiritual. The word spiritual could be summed up in the words of verse 12, “holy, and just, and good”.
But I am carnal, sold under sin- the problem was that, considered as mere unaided flesh, the Unreal Paul was unholy, unjust and bad. Note the repetition of “I” in the passage, for he is describing his attempt to please God by his own efforts. He was but weak flesh, if unaided by the Spirit. Since he has temporarily abandoned the practice of using the Spirit to please God, he can only be said to be carnal or fleshly. As such he was not only sold (by Adam) to sin as a slave-master, but sold under, for sin dominates ruthlessly. So it is not carnal as opposed to spiritual, but carnal as considered as mere flesh, without the aid of the Spirit.

11(e)   7:15-17
The law is good

7:15
For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

For that which I do I allow not- that which the Unreal Paul does through law-keeping, when the Real Paul surveys it, he disowns as not what he would want to be known by. The reason being that as a believer the Real Paul knows what pleases God.
For what I would, that do I not- that which he really wants to achieve as something he would want to be known by as a believer he fails to accomplish because he, the Real Paul, does not do what he wills to do.
But what I hate, that do I- the reverse is true, for what he does do he hates. This is not the same as a believer failing to achieve the results he should because he is not obeying the prompting of the Spirit. The man of this verse is obeying the prompting of the law, with disastrous results, for that law gives him no power to overcome indwelling sin.

7:16
If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good- the apostle now draws a conclusion from the experience of verse 15. Because Real Paul disapproves of what he has done, then he has consented unto the law that it is good, for the law condemns his shortcoming, and so does he. The general knowledge concerning the law as being spiritual is confirmed in his experience. If he is for good, and against evil, then he is in agreement with the law, which commands good and condemns evil.

7:17
Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me- having begun a life in the Spirit at conversion, but now having lapsed into trying to please God by law-keeping, the real “I”, the Real Paul as we are calling him, is not in control. It is the sin-principle that dwells within him that dominates him. This is the cause of the trouble.
Of course, Paul must take responsibility for his actions; he cannot excuse sin by saying he is not the doer of it. In the extraordinary situation Paul finds himself in, sin has over-ridden him and taken charge, forcing him to do things he knows are not Christian. It is in this sense that he is not responsible for the sin he commits, for the Unreal Paul, the man acting as if he does not possess the Spirit, does not in fact exist.

11(f)   7:18-20
The law is ineffective

7:18
For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing- there is no room in the flesh for anything other than sin. There is no benign influence there at all. There is nothing in the flesh that corresponds to the good law of God. The apostle is now concentrating attention on how to achieve worthwhile things, and knows that nothing beneficial can come from the flesh within. Note the parenthesis, showing that there are two persons Paul calls “me”. There is the “me” that is centred in his flesh, the Unreal Paul, and the new “me”, the Real Paul, who wills to do good, as the next phrase shows.
For to will is present with me- this expression is another indication that Paul is speaking as a converted man, for unsaved people do not will to do God’s will, for their mind is not subject to the law of God, nor can it be, 8:7.
But how to perform that which is good I find not- as he looks within himself for resources to please God, he can find no power to do what is good and right in the sight of God. He is limiting his search to what is within himself in these verses, and is not taking account of the fact that he is indwelt by the Spirit of God. He will tell us the power to do good in the next chapter, when he does take account of the fact that the Spirit of God dwells within him.

7:19
For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

For the good that I would I do not- this is almost a repetition of verse 15, (as if he is going round in circles), but with the added thought that what he wished to do was good. In verse 15 he was showing that he was “sold under sin”, as he said in verse 14. Here, he is showing that he finds that situation to be contrary to his real desires, and that he does not find within himself the resources to do better, for he said in verse 18, “how to perform that which is good I find not”.
But the evil which I would not, that I do- note that he now labels as evil what he said he hated in verse 15. This confirms that he is in agreement with the law of God in the matter, as he has already declared in verse 16.

7:20
Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me- the word “would” is a form of the word “will”. So the apostle is saying that what he did was not as a result of him as a man in the Spirit, the Real Paul, willing or determining to do it, (for in fact he willed to do otherwise), but rather, it was the will of the flesh, his sinful self. As far as God is concerned, the believer is not in the flesh but in the Spirit. As such, he has the power to live in a spiritual way and not a fleshly way.
Note he says it is “no more” I that do it, for before he was saved it was his natural way of acting. Now he is saved, however, it is unnatu  ral to act in this way, so what was true before is no longer true.
If we abandon the help of the Spirit, and seek the help of the law, then we shall find that the will of the flesh takes over, and we act contrary to God for the reasons the apostle has given in verses 7-16. When Paul declares that he did not do the sin, he does not mean to excuse himself for sinning. Rather, he is pinpointing the source of the sin, his flesh, his sinful self. We must remember that what Paul is describing is not normal Christian experience. It is only because he is describing an abnormal situation that Paul can divide himself up, so to speak, and distance himself from his flesh.

11(g)   7:21-22
The law is delightful

7:21
I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me- the word law is used in different ways in these verses; here it simply means the principle that operates in a given set of circumstances. His experience has enabled him to find or discover something. What he discovers is that despite wishing to do good, there is evil residing in his heart waiting to operate. It is present all the time; it is not a passing feeling. We should learn from his discovery, so that we do not have the miserable experience he did.

7:22
For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

For I delight in the law of God after the inward man- this is yet another indication that Paul is writing as a believer. The inward man is his real person, what Peter calls the “the hidden man of the heart”, 1 Peter 3:4, the one we have been calling the Real Paul. The believer delights in the principles of righteousness enshrined in the law of Moses, but that does not mean he is subject to that law as a rule of life. The apostle will show in the next chapter that grace has provided a better way to please God.

7:23
But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind- by seeking to please God by law-keeping, he has exposed himself to danger. He has now discerned the workings of the contrary principle which is based in his body, and which uses the various members of his body to sin. The principle he delights in is the law of God, but the other law within him is hostile.
The fact that he speaks of this law being at war with him shows the seriousness of the situation. It also shows he speaks as a believer, for there is no conflict within the unbeliever, for sin holds total sway over him.
And bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members because he is trying to win the battle against evil in his own strength, Paul loses, and becomes a prisoner of war. The war is between the law of sin in his members which incites to sin, and the law of his mind, which favours good, holiness and righteousness, the characteristics of God’s law. This does not mean that the law of sin is stronger than the law of God. What it does mean is that the believer acting without the help of the Spirit is no match for sin.

1l(h)   7:24
The law is weak

7:24
O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

O wretched man that I am! Like those unfortunate people who are captured, taken as prisoners of war, and paraded through the streets of the victor’s capital as the trophies of his triumph, Paul was reduced to misery, when as a believer he ought to have been full of joy.
Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? He is not referring to the fact that his body is mortal, subject to death and tending to death. He means that as a prisoner he is not at liberty to please God, which for the believer is what true life is. It is a mistake, therefore, to depart from the Authorised Version and read “this body of death”.
The emphasis is on the sort of death to which sin, using his body, has brought him. It is not physical death in this context, (although it is that in other settings), but moral death. As a believer, Real Paul is miserable about the state of things to which his course of action has led him. He needs a stronger power to deliver him from sin within.

1l(i)   7:25
Grace gives the victory

7:25
I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord- in anticipation of the next chapter he gives God thanks. Only when Jesus Christ is recognised as being Lord will the dominion or lordship of sin be defeated, and true Christian joy be known.
So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin- summarising the whole section, the apostle can affirm that he himself, the True Paul, is able to serve the law of God. intelligently, for he serves with the mind. He has not dismissed the law as being of no value, but serves its best interests by showing that it is designed, not to facilitate Christian living, but to condemn sin.
He also admits that if he abandons the help of the Spirit, and seeks to please God by law-keeping, then he will be subject to the law of sin, and that is a tragedy. The way to avoid that tragedy is detailed for us in the next chapter.