Tag Archives: Holy Spirit

JOHN 16

We hope you will find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address: martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

Subject of the chapter
This chapter continues the ministry of the Lord Jesus to His apostles as He prepared them for going out into the world with the gospel after He had gone back to heaven. They must first learn to expect opposition, even from the Jewish authorities. He then assures them that the Spirit would come to do the work in the hearts of men that they could never do, that is, to convict them. Once they get into the world they will be confronted with many situations that will bring them to an end of themselves. In that circumstance they must learn to ask for guidance. They will also need to be strong in their faith, and not be overcome by the opposition of the world.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-5 Opposition from the authorities
(b) Verses 6-15 Operations of the Holy Spirit
(c) Verses 16-27 Outcomes of His departure
(d) Verses 28-33 Overcoming the world

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN CHAPTER 16, VERSES 1 TO 15:

16:1 These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should not be offended.

16:2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

16:3 And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.

16:4 But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you.

16:5 But now I go my way to him that sent me; and none of you asketh me, Whither goest thou?

16:6 But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart.

16:7 Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

16:8 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:

16:9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;

16:10 Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;

16:11 Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.

16:12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.

16:13 Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

16:14 He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

16:15 All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

(a) Verses 1-5
Opposition from the authorities

16:1
These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should not be offended.

These things have I spoken unto you- a reference to the warnings of His departure in the previous chapters. He had prepared His disciples for the hatred of the world, 15:18,19; and persecution, 15:20-21. He had sent them into the world, but He had promised that the Spirit of truth would be sent to them, 15:26,27, so that they could testify in such a world effectively.

That ye should not be offended- He does not want them to be caused to stumble on the pathway as He sends them forth into a hostile world. The enemy of the truth will do his best to put obstacles in their way, but His words spoken beforehand will preserve them.

16:2
They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

They shall put you out of the synagogues- this shows that the Jewish authorities will be hostile to Christian truth. Perhaps the apostles did not expect enmity from that quarter. To be put out of the synagogue does not mean physically removed from the building, but rather, excommunicated from every aspect of Jewish life. This would mean they could not buy or sell, have employment, or any contact with fellow-Jews. No-one would marry them, take their wedding, or take their funeral. This is a severe action, and shows the depth of feeling against the things of Christ.

Yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service- not content with rejecting them from the social and religious life of Israel, they think them worthy of the same treatment as they gave to their Leader. We see this expressed by Saul of Tarsus, who “persecuted this way unto death”, Acts 22:4, and consented to the death of Stephen, verse 20. He said himself that “I verily thought with myself that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth. Which things I also did, in Jerusalem: and many of the saints did I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests; and when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them”, Acts 26:9, 10.

Saul thought that by doing these things he was serving God, for at that point he rejected the Deity of Christ. As the Lord had said to His disciples, as He forewarned them of these things, “But all these things will they do unto you for my name’s sake, because they know not him that sent me”, John 15:22. They thought Him to be a blasphemer, and as such should be killed. And so also should His followers be killed.

The apostles need to be warned to expect these things, for they might become unsettled if learned rabbis like Saul disagree strongly with them. They were only ordinary men, most of them simple unsophisticated fishermen, so they need to be reassured beforehand. In this way the Lord imposes His authority on the situation, and strengthens them so they are not over-awed by religious men. A major way in which they will be encouraged is that they will have the Holy Spirit within them, a Divine Teacher.

16:3
And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.

And these things will they do unto you, because they have not known the Father, nor me- despite all He did to reveal the Father, the majority of the men in high places rejected His testimony. They did not know the Father because they did not know the Son. They thought they knew and served the God of Israel, but when He sent His Son, they cast Him out as a blasphemer. The apostle Paul confessed that he had persecuted “ignorantly, in unbelief”, 1 Timothy 1:13. The princes of this world crucified the Lord of Glory in ignorance, 1 Corinthians 2:8.

16:4
But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you.

But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them- He did not tell them to depress or discourage them, but to do the reverse, to nerve them for the fight. The test for a prophet was whether his prophecy came true, Deuteronomy 18:20-22. So the Lord gives His disciples short-term prophecies so they may be encouraged when the way is hard, for they will realise He was fully aware of what the future held for them. He had told them about the following things:

1. His arrest, trial, scourging, crucifixion and rising again, Mark 10:32-34.

2. His betrayal by Judas, John 13:18-21.

3. His impending denial by Peter, John 13:38. By specifying the time of the denial in relation to the cock crowing, the Lord imposed extreme conditions on His prophecy.

4. The scattering of the disciples, despite their vow to not do so, John 16:31,32.

5. His re-gathering of them in resurrection, Matthew 26:31,32. This implies that He would rise quickly, which they did not believe.

6. His departure to heaven, John 14:28,29.

7. His intention to send the Spirit at Pentecost.

As these things came to pass one by one, then they would indeed remember His words and be encouraged, despite the circumstances.

And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you- He left these matters until just before His departure and death, because that was when they needed to know them. To tell them at the start of His ministry would distract them. In any case He had sent them out at first to preach an imminent kingdom, and the idea of His departure was not in view then. It was only as the kingdom was rejected that the emphasis changed, and He began to speak of His going away.

His absence will be a great test for them, but they need to believe in Him as they believe in God, John 14:1. They have not seen God, yet they believe. They will no longer see Him, but they must keep on believing. This is even more important for believers today, for we have never seen Him. But we have the written testimony in the New Testament of those who did see Him.

16:5
But now I go my way to him that sent me; and none of you asketh me, Whither goest thou?

But now I go my way to him that sent me- when He was in the temple courts at the east of tabernacles, the Lord had taught in the treasury, near to the place where the Sanhedrin met and deliberated. He had used almost the same words then as are found here, for He said, “I go my way”, John 8:21. Instead of going the way that the rulers wanted Him to go, He goes the way His Father wanted Him to go.

Here, it is not the hostile rulers that are being served notice that He is in control, but the apostles, who are being encouraged by the fact that He is not the victim of circumstances, but is carrying out His Father’s will. He will return to the one who sent Him, having, in words He would soon speak, “finished the work which thou gavest me to do”, John 17:4. He would not go back with some of the task undone.

And none of you asketh me, Whither goest thou? They were too occupied with themselves and their sorrows. Peter had asked this question in 13:36, but the Lord knew that he was only asking because he thought he was able to follow Him, so he clearly did not think in terms of going to heaven. His expectation was that the Lord was going to claim the throne of David, and he wanted to be associated with that. Subsequently, the Lord had revealed that Judas would betray Him, so He was clearly going to be delivered to the Gentiles, and not the Gentiles delivered to Him. Perhaps they feared to ask in case He had even more bad news to tell them. He does not rebuke them for not asking, but points out they had not asked, so that He could give them the information they needed.

(b) Verses 6-15
Operations of the Holy Spirit

16:6
But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart.

But because I have said these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart- if they had asked for clarification, they would have learnt that going to the cross was a necessary stage on the path to glory. In this way, their sorrow would have been tempered by the joy of knowing that He was going back to the Father with honour.

16:7
Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.

Nevertheless I tell you the truth- the pronoun “I” is emphatic, as if to say, “I, the one who has foretold the truth that I am going away, have the authority to tell you the consequences of My going away”. Despite causing them to sorrow, nevertheless it was in their best interests to know the situation as it really was, and not as they imagined it to be. Even though they had not asked, they needed to know.

It is expedient for you that I go away- that is, it was a profitable thing for them if He went away. They no doubt thought it was a disaster, but the reverse was the case. Far from losing out by His departure, they gain. There are many advantages that come to the believer because the Lord has gone back to heaven, and He now proceeds to explain one of them, even the coming of the Spirit. His presence in the believer’s heart is critical, for it is through this that Christian things are made good to us, and we are enabled to pass them on to others in testimony.

For if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you- the Spirit will do many things, but here He is said to comfort, strengthening their hearts in Christ’s absence. He will do in them what Christ did when with them. Simeon had been waiting for the consolation of Israel, and he found that consolation, (the word has the same idea as comforter in this verse), in Christ the Messiah, Luke 2:25.

John has already told us in one of his explanations that “the Holy Spirit was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified”, John 7:39. But there was also the fact that Christ’s going away involved the work of the cross. Until that sacrificial work had been done, sinners could not be saved and cleansed. The Holy Spirit cannot indwell an uncleansed heart.

But if I depart, I will send him unto you- here the Son sends; in the previous phrase, the Spirit is said to come, implying that His will is operative; in 14:26, the Father sends in the Son’s name, that is, in full recognition of who and what His Son is to Him. So the whole of the Godhead is united in this matter. The same had been true at the baptism of Christ in the Jordan, for the Father spoke, the Son saw, the Spirit descended, Matthew 3:16,17. Notice that there are no qualifications to this promise. They do not have to earn Him, but receive Christ’s gracious gift.

16:8
And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:

And when he is come- note the confidence the Lord has that His prayer to the Father will be answered, and the Spirit will be sent. Peter can say on the day of Pentecost that “being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, He hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear”, Acts 2:33. This is the only place in the book of Acts that a disciple speaks of God as Father, emphasising that Peter is drawing on what he heard the Lord say in the upper room in John 14:16.

He will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment- there are three things involved in the word “reprove”. There is the idea of convicting a person as guilty. There is the condemning of that person. And there is a convincing of the truth of the gospel as the remedy for their sin and guiltiness.

There is a sense in which the actual coming of the Spirit did these three things as far as the world in general is concerned, but there is also a sense that He does them in individuals in the world, for the word is “when He is come”, not “by His coming”.

The apostles were sad because the Lord was leaving them, and sending them into a world that would be hostile to them because they brought the truth of the gospel into a world of error. They might think themselves inadequate for the situation, as indeed they were at that time, but the coming of the Spirit would change all that, and they would be helped mightily as the Spirit sovereignly worked in the hearts of men. They will not need to devise strategies and invent means to convince men, for the Spirit would do the work. It would be their task to simply “preach the word”, 2 Timothy 4:2. How the Spirit convicts is told us in the next three verses.

16:9
Of sin, because they believe not on me;

Of sin- He convicts them of their sin so that they consider their way; He condemns them for their sin and their false views about it; He convinces them of the truth of the gospel, that it contains the answer to sin.

Because they believe not on me- it is not that the only sin they are convicted of is the sin of unbelief. Rather, it is that the reason they are still in a state of sin is that they do not currently believe on Him, despite the fact that He has been on this world and brought the truth of God within their reach.

16:10
Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more;

Of righteousness- the Spirit convicts men because they are devoid of righteousness; He condemns them for being unrighteous; He convinces them that their only hope is the righteousness that God imputes to those who believe.

Because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more- whilst He was here, the Lord upheld the righteousness of God in an unmistakeable way. He who is “Jesus Christ the Righteous”, 1 John 2:1, is no longer here to “preach righteousness in the great congregation”, Psalm 40:9. The Spirit convicts of righteousness instead of, as before, Christ doing it. His going to the Father was a vindication of the stand He took for the truth when He was on earth. The fact they would see Him no more reminds us that He was here in the flesh, and therefore was real man, able to be seen. Righteousness has been upheld perfectly by a man, but He has now gone. The Spirit carries on His work.

16:11
Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.

Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged- those who remain under his influence will share his judgment. The Spirit convicts men of walking “according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience”, Ephesians 2:2. They had the opportunity of following Christ, but chose not to do so, and the Spirit convicts them of that. He also condemns that position, but convinces of the solution, even to believe the gospel and follow Christ. The prince of this world is judged because he spurred men on to crucify God’s Son.

16:12
I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.

I have yet many things to say unto you- the teaching of the Lord Jesus when here on earth did not exhaust the store of wisdom that was available. Luke hints at this when he writes at the beginning of the Acts, “all that Jesus began both to do and teach”, Acts 1:1, which implies that the Book of Acts would record the way in which He continued to do and teach through the preaching of the apostles. He “came and preached peace to them who were afar off, and them that were near”, Ephesians 2:17. The apostles “preached everywhere, the Lord working with them”, Mark 16:20.

But ye cannot bear them now- so it was not that the Lord did not finish His teaching ministry in time. That could never be, for God is never late, nor does He fail. The word “bear” has to do with carrying a burden, and the weight of truth that was to be unfolded to these men was more than they could carry in their current state.

The Levites in the time of the Tabernacle had a heavy task, for they were responsible for moving the tabernacle. In the case of the Gershonites and Merarites, this involved the lifting of heavy materials onto wagons for transportation; in the case of the Kohathites they were required to bear the heavy tabernacle furniture on their shoulders. They would certainly feel the weight of their burdens. The apostles would also have a burden, that of the weighty truths concerning Christ and the church they would be entrusted with making known. There were at least five reasons why they were not able to bear such a burden at that point, as follows:

First, they were in a distressed state because of the news that He was leaving them.

Second, they were about to forsake Him and flee, so the boldness needed to set out new truth was not in their hearts as yet.

Third, they did not have the Spirit indwelling them, so the power to preach New Testament truth was lacking. Their preaching for the previous three years or so had been evangelistic, and consisted of the repetition of what they had heard Him say.

Fourth, they were still not clear about God’s programme in relation to Israel, as is seen by their question in Acts 1:6.

Fifth, there were mysteries yet to be revealed, but that would be done through the apostle Paul, who at this point was not a believer.

16:13
Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come.

Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come- the word “howbeit” signals a change. Something is going to happen to enable them to bear the weight of the truth that is about to be revealed. Their lack of readiness to bear the truth would be remedied. Since the burden they will bear is truth, it is appropriate that the Spirit, when He came upon them at Pentecost, should come in character as Spirit of truth. He is the Spirit who is intimately associated with the truth, and necessarily so, because God is the God of truth, and the Spirit is God. It is not that He would then become the Spirit of truth, for He had associated Himself with the truth Christ had made known during His earthly ministry.

The word from heaven when Christ was on the Mount of Transfiguration was “Hear ye him”, Matthew 17:5. If God had some misgiving about the ministry of Christ, that exhortation would not have come from heaven. In fact, just previously the Lord Jesus had deliberately set His saying alongside the word of the Father. Peter had learnt something from the Father, and then the Lord adds, “And I say also unto thee”, 16:18. In other words, it is as if He says, “What you learned from the Father you learned through Me, and I am now adding to that word”. If that had been presumption, the word “Hear ye Him” on the Mount would not have been uttered.

The word “come” is in that tense which signifies a decisive event, not a prolonged process. One moment they would not have the Spirit, the next moment they would. And immediately they would be able to preach, as we see from a reading of the account of the events on the day of Pentecost, in Acts 2. Note that the Lord is confident that the Holy Spirit will come, which shows He is sure that the Father will respond to His request to send Him, 14:16; Acts 2:33.

He will guide you into all truth- like an expert tour guide, who is able to show tourists who have never visited a place before the interesting features of a particular region, so the Holy Spirit, fully acquainted with the truth, is able to guide the apostles into that truth. Since the Spirit came because Jesus was glorified, John 7:39, then a vast area of truth opens up before the minds of the apostles, and we find this truth in their writings in the New Testament. Needless to say, this truth is spiritual; it is not truth about the physical world, as if the apostles became brilliant scientists in a moment. The fact that the Lord promises this, (and all His promises are honoured), shows that it will come to pass. So when the apostle Paul spoke of his ministry as fulfilling the word of God, Colossians 1:25; or when he wrote about a time when it could be said, “that which is perfect is come”, 1 Corinthians 13:10; or when Jude writes about “the faith once delivered unto the saints”, by which he means “once for all” delivered, Jude 3; and when the Lord warns in the last chapter of the New Testament against adding to the words of the book, Revelation 22:18,19, we know that God’s revelation of truth is complete.

For he shall not speak of himself- this does not mean that the New Testament epistles will contain no information about the Holy Spirit, for that is clearly not true. What it does mean is that the Spirit will not speak independently of the Father and the Son. The fact that He guides into all Divine truth shows that He is familiar with it all, hence the word “for” at the beginning of this phrase. We are being led on gradually here as we listen to the Lord teaching His own. We learn the Spirit will guide into all truth “for” He does not speak of Himself, “but” whatsoever He shall hear, that shall He speak. The Lord goes on to explain this in the next statements.

But whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak- the Lord Jesus said of Himself, “My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me”, John 7:16; “I speak to the world those things I have heard of him”, John 8:26, (the “him” referring to the Father); “and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father’s which sent me, John 14:24; “all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you”, John 15:15. These quotations show His complete insight into the mind and will of His Father. He was privy to the counsels of the Godhead. His coming into manhood had not altered that intimacy. The prophet spoke beforehand of this in the words, “He wakeneth morning by morning, he wakeneth mine ear to hear as the learned”, Isaiah 51:4. He did not hear as the ignorant, but as the learned one. Learned persons converse with those of equal standing with themselves in matters familiar to them. They go over well-trodden territory as they discuss their particular field of knowledge and expertise. They do not hear one another to learn, but to rehearse what they know. So it is with the Lord Jesus. He awoke each morning to commune with His Father about that part of the Divine Counsels was relevant to Him for that day. He did not awake to discover what the counsels were, but to discuss what bearing they had on the day that was before Him.

We are used to the idea that in the Book of Genesis God is heard communing with Himself. For example, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness”, Genesis 1:26; “And the Lord God said, the man is become as one of Us“, 3:22; “Go to, let Us go down, and there confound their language”, 11:7. But in the passages from the New Testament from John chapters 7,8,14 and 15 quoted above we learn that the Persons of the Godhead still commune with One Another. So to be able to hear the Father is to claim Deity.

What is true of the Son is now said to be true of the Holy Spirit, for if the Son hears the Father, then so does the Spirit; He too is privy to Divine counsels and conversation. What He hears He transmits to the apostles, so they have the truth as the Godhead knows it. The apostle Paul could write, “we have the mind of Christ”, 1 Corinthians 2:16. The “we” in this context meaning the apostles. This gives their writings a very special character, and as such should be received and believed. Note that is “whatsoever” He hears, so the Spirit passes on all that we need to know of Divine truth.

And he will shew you things to come- that is, “the things coming He will announce to you”. It is not a question of showing as by visions, but making truth known so that it can be taken in by the apostles and transmitted into inspired preaching and writing. This is not a specific reference to the Book of the Revelation and other prophetic parts of the New Testament, for all the truth that was to be disclosed by the Spirit after Christ had gone back to heaven could be described as “things to come”.

The word “shew” is literally “to announce tidings”, so the idea is of the Spirit having direct access to heavenly counsels, but also bringing back tidings from those counsels to apostles on the earth. Caleb and Joshua brought back tidings about Canaan, (the place that contained “things to come” for Israel), after they had explored that land; in the same way the Holy Spirit is able to tell of heavenly things from first-hand knowledge of the mind of God.

16:14
He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

He shall glorify me- this expression does not begin with the word “and”, so is not a further work that the Spirit will do. Rather, it is the result of the work that has just been detailed. By the speaking and announcing of Divine truth, the Spirit will glorify Christ. This means that various aspects of the glory of Christ will be presented to our minds, and as a result we shall have an enhanced appreciation of His excellencies, and He will be magnified in our hearts. A magnifying glass does not make an object physically bigger, but it makes it bigger in our eyes, and enables us to appreciate its features in more detail. So Christ cannot be more glorious that He is, but He can be magnified in our eyes as the Spirit points out His virtues.

When Moses asked to see God’s glory, God granted him his request, and displayed that glory not only by allowing a glimpse of His glory to be seen, but also by speaking, Exodus 33:18-23; 34:6-8. So now, the glory of God is seen in the face of Jesus Christ, and those glories are told out in the words of Scripture, coming as they do from the Holy Spirit whose ministry it is to glorify Christ. How important, then, to continue steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine, for by this means the glories of Christ are presented to us.

Since the Holy Spirit indwells the gathered companies of God’s people as they meet in assembly fellowship, then the end result of each meeting should be that Christ is magnified. Paul calls this coming together for the better, in 1 Corinthians 11:17.

For he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you- this is the process by which Christ is glorified. The Spirit not only hears truth, but receives it from the Godhead to infallibly impart it to the apostles, and through their writings to us. In particular what He receives is that which Christ describes as “Mine”. Since when this is transmitted to believers it glorifies Christ, then we may say that the truth that the Spirit is said to receive here is especially about Christ. No doubt the major part of this has to do with the mysteries that are unfolded in the New Testament epistles, which bring out truth that was hidden even from the Old Testament prophets. Such themes as the principles at work in His death; the consequences of His resurrection; the implications of His ascension; His headship of the church; His priesthood; the fact that He will head up all things, whether in heaven or earth; that He is the Last Adam; that believers shall be conformed to His image even as to the body; that He will have the church as His bride, and other things besides. Perhaps all these things are summed up in the phrase “the mystery of Christ”, Colossians 4:3.

16:15
All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall show it unto you.

All things that the Father hath are mine- there is a common possession of truth in the Godhead. One does not withhold from another, for they are one. Indeed, persons of the Godhead cannot, by their very nature, do anything independently of one another, or else they would not be One God. This is why the Lord Jesus said “The Son can do nothing of himself”, John 5:19. He was not indicating that in some way He was powerless to act. (After all, it is as Son that He describes Himself thus, so the fact that He shares the nature and essence of God is in view). Rather, He was claiming Deity, in that Divine persons cannot do anything independently of one another. A man may do things independently of another man, and also independently of God, because men are individual units. But the persons of the Godhead are one in essence, and cannot act contrary to one another.

Therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you- the word “therefore” has the sense of “because of this”. The Lord Jesus claims here to have just reason to use the words “take of Mine”. Because the word “take” implies that the Father is handing things to the Spirit, and since all the things the Father has the Son has as well, then the Lord is perfectly justified in saying “shall take of Mine”, and not “shall take of the Father’s”. The three Persons of the Godhead are interacting in this matter as the Spirit takes from the Father the things of the Son.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE GOSPEL OF JOHN CHAPTER 16, VERSES 16 TO 33:

16:16 A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father.

16:17 Then said some of his disciples among themselves, What is this that he saith unto us, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me: and, Because I go to the Father?

16:18 They said therefore, What is this that he saith, A little while? we cannot tell what he saith.

16:19 Now Jesus knew that they were desirous to ask him, and said unto them, Do ye enquire among yourselves of that I said, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me?

16:20 Verily, verily, I say unto you, That ye shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice: and ye shall be sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy.

16:21 A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world.

16:22 And ye now therefore have sorrow: but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man taketh from you.

16:23 And in that day ye shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you.

16:24 Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name: ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full.

16:25 These things have I spoken unto you in proverbs: but the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew you plainly of the Father.

16:26 At that day ye shall ask in my name: and I say not unto you, that I will pray the Father for you:

16:27 For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God.

16:28 I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father.

16:29 His disciples said unto him, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb.

16:30 Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee: by this we believe that thou camest forth from God.

16:31 Jesus answered them, Do ye now believe?

16:32 Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.

16:33 These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.

 

(c) Verses 16-27
Outcomes of His departure

16:16
A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me, because I go to the Father.

A little while, and ye shall not see me- this is further gentle preparation for His departure. There are two different words for see used in verses 16-19. When it is “not see”, it means to not discern or acknowledge something. When it is “see”, it means “to gaze with wide-open eyes, as at something remarkable”. The little while is from the moment He spoke the words until when He was laid in the tomb. After that, they neither saw Him physically, nor did they discern the significance of His short stay in the tomb, or acknowledge those things He had told them about it. We read that after the Lord had foretold His death, and that He would rise again the third day, “they understood none of these things: and the saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things that were spoken”, Luke 18:34. They did not disbelieve He would rise again, for they believed in the resurrection of the dead, Acts 23:6. They did not realise He would rise quickly, however. This was withheld from them so that they could not be accused of imagining the resurrection. They had to be convinced of its truth by the actual event, not by the words foretelling it.

And again, a little while, and ye shall see me- this time the short period is when He was actually in the sepulchre, after which they would see Him again. When they did so, they would do so with eyes wide-open in amazement, so to speak.

Because I go to the Father- this seems strange at first, as if the Lord says “Ye shall see Me because I go to the Father and disappear from sight”. The point is that He promises to show Himself in resurrection so that they may verify that the one they knew on earth is the one they saw go into heaven. The reason why they would see Him was that He needed to be seen not only for forty days, but also as He ascended to the Father. They were not qualified as apostles unless they could testify to His ascension, Acts 1:22. To be a witness to His resurrection they must see His ascension, because there is a link between the two events, as Peter declared in Acts 2:29-36. The reason why Christ’s tomb was empty was because He had been raised by the Father and lifted to heaven. He was raised from the dead and given glory, as if there was nothing between the opened tomb and the throne of God, 1 Peter 1:21.

16:17
Then said some of his disciples among themselves, What is this that he saith unto us, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me: and, Because I go to the Father?

Then said some of his disciples among themselves- they perhaps were in such a state of mind, having had notice that He was leaving them, that their early readiness to ask Him questions has been dampened. So they question things among themselves. In verse 29, they will say, “Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb”. So they distinguished between two ways of speaking, obscurely, and in proverbs. In verse 16 He deliberately spoke obscurely, so that they might ask Him to explain. This would introduce the idea of asking, which He develops in verses 23-26. In verses 21-22 He speaks in a proverb to show that He knew what their feelings would be during the “little while”, and afterwards.

What is this that he saith unto us, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me- they do not realise that He will only be in the tomb a few days. They will not have to wait for the “resurrection of the last day”, to see Him again.

And, Because I go to the Father? They separate “see Me” from “Because I go to the Father”. They should have kept the sentence intact, and asked what He meant, instead of putting their own construction on the words. We should learn the lesson from this, and not try to reconstruct scripture to make it mean what we think it ought to mean. We shall find ourselves puzzling about it even more, just as the disciples were here; and all because they had not asked.

16:18
They said therefore, What is this that he saith, A little while? we cannot tell what he saith.

They said therefore, What is this that he saith, A little while? we cannot tell what he saith- now they separate another phrase from its context. No wonder they cannot tell what He is saying. We shall not understand scripture aright either, if we take it out of its setting. Remember the first three rules for interpreting scripture, Context, Context, Context.

16:19
Now Jesus knew that they were desirous to ask him, and said unto them, Do ye enquire among yourselves of that I said, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me?

Now Jesus knew that they were desirous to ask him- He can read their thoughts, and knows whether they are sincere. As the psalmist said of God, “Thou understandest my thought afar off”, Psalm 139:2. The Lord waited for John to ask who the traitor was, 13:22-25, but there He wanted to give the sign of the sop so that Judas would go out, and His spirit could be free to teach the true disciples further.

And said unto them, Do ye enquire among yourselves of that I said, A little while, and ye shall not see me: and again, a little while, and ye shall see me? The way they are hesitant to ask Him, but ask among themselves illustrates their current lack of communion with Him. He had spoken in a way they did not understand in order to highlight this. They will change after Pentecost, as verse 23 indicates. They will then go to the Father by the Son in the power of the Spirit.

16:20
Verily, verily, I say unto you, That ye shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice: and ye shall be sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy.

Verily, verily, I say unto you, That ye shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice- their Saviour would be “the song of the drunkard”, and the authorities would think they had achieved their purpose. The “Verily, verily” shows He has authority and confidence as He prophesies these things. His short-term prophecies, having been fulfilled, will encourage confidence in the long-term ones. Notice that the Lord does not directly answer the problem they have about the phrase “a little while”. He does answer indirectly, however, in the illustration of the travailing woman, in the next verse. Normally, a woman is in travail for a matter of hours, not of years. So just as the woman sorrows, so will they, but just as she does so for a relatively brief time, so their sorrow also will be for “a little while”.

And ye shall be sorrowful, but your sorrow shall be turned into joy- they would not be sorrowful and joyful at the same time, as if having mixed thoughts. The change from sorrow to joy would be as marked as the change from death to resurrection.

16:21
A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come: but as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world.

A woman when she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come- here is the proverb they will speak of in verse 29.

But as soon as she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for joy that a man is born into the world- the homely illustration will give them comfort as they realise He knows how they will be feeling. A mother endures the pain because she knows there will be a happy result. So the disciples should bear the pain of knowing He had been crucified and slain, knowing also there would be eternally happy results for Him and for all who would believe. They would know the joy of His resurrection, and the sorrow they had known when He was in the grave will never return.

16:22
And ye now therefore have sorrow: but I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no man taketh from you.

And ye now therefore have sorrow- He discerns that sorrow is already in their hearts, as He said in verse 6, and that it would continue for a little while yet. He knew “strong crying and tears” Himself, Hebrews 5:7, so He is fitted to sympathise fully with us in our sorrows. The reason why they have sorrow, (“therefore”), is the same as why a woman has sorrow. She does not sorrow that she is going to have a child, but she sorrows because of the pain that precedes the birth. They should try to see things in that light. What travail they would have in the next few hours, as He is arrested, tried, sentenced and crucified! But they should see it as part of a process that was sure to end in joy.

But I will see you again, and your heart shall rejoice- even though He would leave them to go to the cross, He would rise from the dead and meet with them again. (Note the personal touch, not simply that He would rise from the dead, but that He would see them). The joy of seeing Him in resurrection would give them a joy that could not be spoiled, despite what might happen subsequently. The apostles rejoiced they were “counted worthy to suffer shame for His name”, Acts 5:41. The Lord said, “Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted the prophets which were before you”, Matthew 5:11,12. Even these things would not spoil their joy, any more than the hatred of men had spoiled the Lord’s joy as He served His Father’s interests in His earthly ministry.

And your joy no man taketh from you- a mother has joy when her child is born, but that continues after he is born, so Christ’s emergence from the grave will ensure unbroken joy for His people. His resurrection is the guarantee that all that causes believers sorrow has been dealt with in principle. Once they have shared His resurrection, there will be fulness of joy in the Father’s presence for them, Psalm 16:11; Acts 2:28.

16:23
And in that day ye shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you.

And in that day ye shall ask me nothing- there had been reference to the coming of the Spirit in 14:16-26, and the Lord had used the expression “in that day” as referring to the time after Pentecost when they would have the Spirit within. This shows that the “little while” refers to a past time, despite the way hymn writers use the phrase.

In verses 16-20 the disciples discussed amongst themselves what the Lord meant when He spoke of “a little while”. He had deliberately spoken in a slightly obscure way so that they would realise their need of help to understand. This prepares them for the time when He will not be with them to answer their queries, and also gives Him an opening to explain what provision He will make for them. They will not need to puzzle about it amongst themselves.

Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you- “Verily, verily”, is a phrase unique to John’s gospel. It introduces a development in doctrine; difficult doctrine; denied doctrine; doubted doctrine; definite doctrine; delightful doctrine, and above all, Divine doctrine. The Lord had taught them to say “Our Father”, and to ask for things in that way, but He did not instruct them to ask in His name. His example prayer ended in this way, “for thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen”, Matthew 6:14. Now the emphasis is on asking the Father in the name of the Son.

16:24
Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name: ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full.

Hitherto have ye asked nothing in my name- as the quotation from His model prayer quoted above shows, they had not asked in His name yet. This will change, for God would send forth His Spirit into their hearts, crying, Abba, Father, Galatians 4:6. And because of this, they would appreciate the relationship into which they had been brought as God’s sons, and the Holy Spirit’s cry becomes their cry also, as Romans 8:15 indicates with the words, “ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, ‘Abba, Father'”.

Ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full- instead of enquiring among themselves, as they had just done, the Lord exhorts them to ask for themselves, once they have the Spirit within them. Now that the Spirit has come at Pentecost, all believers have Him within to teach them, and they will know therefore the things appropriate to associate with the Name of God’s Son. Because they ask for suitable things, they will receive them.

The Lord here anticipates three things. First, that they will find their joy in having their requests answered by the Father. Second, because those requests will be in harmony with the character of God’s Son, they will be intelligent as to His character, as the Spirit teaches them. Third, because the things of the world cannot give them true joy, He expects that they will only desire the things of God, and not try to complement them with the supposed joys of earth.

No doubt the apostle John remembered these words as he opened his first epistle, for he recalled the way in which he had seen and heard the Lord when He was here, and then recorded this for us, so that we might have fellowship with Divine persons in the things of Christ, with the result that our joy would be full. His words were, “That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the word of life; (for the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us); that which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ. And these things write we unto you, that your joy may be full”, 1 John 1:1-4.

16:25
These things have I spoken unto you in proverbs: but the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew you plainly of the Father.

These things have I spoken unto you in proverbs- in response to their speaking amongst themselves, He gave them the illustration of a woman in pain, but whose pain and sorrow is turned to joy. This did not fully answer the question about the “little while” directly, but encouraged them to think the thing through. As believers we are expected to think about the things we read in the scriptures.

But the time cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in proverbs, but I shall shew you plainly of the Father- this would be when He spoke through the Spirit’s ministry to them. This shows that He has not given up teaching His own. It is simply that it is done in a different way now that the Spirit indwells each believer. He had already told the apostles that “At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you”, 14:20. So the coming of the Spirit would enable them to understand more fully His relationship with the Father, and their relationship to Him. This is the foundation of everything else, for it covers the whole range of relationships, whether between Divine Persons and each other, or Divine persons and believers.

16:26
At that day ye shall ask in my name: and I say not unto you, that I will pray the Father for you:

At that day ye shall ask in my name- they will ask in line with what the Spirit reveals to them about the Son. This is normal Christian prayer, so the Lord can state that that is how they will pray, for there is no other effective way. They will not necessarily mention the Son’s name at the end of the prayer, (for that is not what “ask in My name” means), but the whole content of the prayer will be in harmony with who He has revealed Himself to be.

And I say not unto you, that I will pray the Father for you- they will be in such an intimate relationship with the Father, (because they will be “in the Son” who is Himself “in the Father”, 14:20), that they will not need the Lord to intervene, but will go straight to the Father through Him, see Ephesians 2:18. Of course it is true that He “ever liveth to make intercession for us”, Hebrews 7:25 but that has to do with supporting us as we pass through trials down here. The context in John 16 is of praying to the Father for ourselves about any matter that concerns us, including those trials.

16:27
For the Father himself loveth you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came out from God.

For the Father himself loveth you- the reason the Father will be well-disposed to our approach to Him is because He loves us. And that love has a two-fold cause.

Because ye have loved me- our Father is sensitive to reactions to His Son. If there are those who genuinely love Him, then He loves them in return. The intensity of that affection will be learned from the Son’s prayer in the next chapter, for He will say, “and hast loved them, as thou hast loved me”, 17:23. This is completely beyond human understanding; to think that any should be loved by the Father in the same manner as He loves His Son! This is a very powerful indicator of the closeness of the relationship of the believer to the Father. It no doubt derives from the truth expressed at the beginning of 17:23, “I in them and thou in me, that they may be made perfect in one”. The Father is completely involved in all His Son is, (“thou in me”). In the same way, the Son is completely involved in all we are in Him, (“I in them”). It is in a sense inevitable that the Father will love us, for the Son is in us, and He loves us as He loves Him, as the end of the verse says.

And have believed that I came out from God- this is the basic reason why the believer loves the Son. All that was involved in Him coming from the presence of God, such as His self-humbling; His taking the form of a servant; His real manhood; His grace and truth when He was here; His work at the cross; all these things endear Him to them. The apostle Paul, referring to his conversion, wrote “And the grace of our Lord Jesus was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus”, 1 Timothy 1:14. His response to Christ’s grace was faith and love, the two things that endear a believer to his Father.

(d) Verses 28-33
Overcoming the world

16:28
I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father.

I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world- this is a very comprehensive statement, and takes in all that He was in eternity, all that He was willing to become as He came amongst men.

Again, I leave the world, and go to the Father- the word “again” divides the verse into two concepts. First, His coming from the Father, ending with the sorrow of the cross; second, His going back to the Father, with the joy of the throne. And in between, there was His reaction to the world, and the world’s reaction to Him. His attitude to the world was one of love to men; the attitude of the world was one of hate, so He left it. But before He left it He expressed His love in the most profound way, by dying on a cross. It is this that draws souls to Himself, and why they love Him. Once He has drawn men to Himself, He goes back to His Father in heaven so as to minister to their needs.

16:29
His disciples said unto him, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb.

His disciples said unto him, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and speakest no proverb- He had deliberately spoken to them less than plainly in verse 16, but now the apostles say He speaks plainly. He had spoken in a proverb in verse 22, but now He speaks in direct terms.

16:30
Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee: by this we believe that thou camest forth from God.

Now are we sure that thou knowest all things, and needest not that any man should ask thee- they were hesitant to ask Him about the little while, and they thought the illustration of the woman in travail to be a digression, but now they realise He has been answering their unasked questions, and this shows them He knew what was in their hearts and minds without them telling Him. This tells them He is indeed one with the Father, for it is only God who can read the hearts of men.

By this we believe that thou camest forth from God- the light is beginning to dawn upon them, and gives a foretaste of how they will understand after Pentecost. If He came out from being with the Father, He must be equal with Him. If He is equal with Him, He must know the hearts of men, because it is God who knows the hearts of men, Jeremiah 17:10. Because of this, He does not need His people to ask Him things, since He knows beforehand what they are thinking, and supplies the answer through the Spirit through the Word. They stop short of saying He came forth from the Father; they still need to advance in appreciation of His relationship with the Father. But that will come “in that day”, after Pentecost, as He had said already, “In that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you”, 14:2

16:31
Jesus answered them, Do ye now believe?

Jesus answered them, Do ye now believe? Since they have said they believed, (and He had exhorted them to this in 14:1), then He prepares them for the fact that their faith will be put to the test. His going to the Father will be for their spiritual profit, to strengthen their faith, but also will test their faith. He puts it in question form so they challenge their own hearts. He knew their hearts already, so He is not expecting them to answer Him.

He is not suggesting that He does not think they are believers. Rather, He is preparing them for the onslaughts of the world, and is asking them so that they ask themselves the question. Having come to a satisfactory conclusion they can face the world. Sadly, they seem not to have done this, as the next verse shows.

16:32
Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone: and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me.

Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is now come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone- in just a short space of time they would forsake Him and flee in Gethsemane, and every one would be scattered and go home. He would be left to face the cross alone. Such would be the pressure upon them, and they need to be strong in faith.

And yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me- His relationship with the Father is eternal and Divine, so cannot be affected by the circumstances of time. But even though He would be deserted by them, and each disciple would be alone in his own home, He would not be on His own. He was ever conscious of the Father’s approval of Him. He does not say “I will not be alone”, as if referring to a limited time, but “I am not alone”, a statement of the situation at all times.

We could illustrate this by noting that the inwards of the sin offering were offered on the altar of burnt offering in the same way as the peace offering was, Leviticus 4:8-10. The inwards represent the inner workings of the heart of Christ. They were not affected by being forsaken on the cross. His feelings for the Father remained constant. The peace offering typifies Christ as the Man in harmony with God at all times, the sin-offering typifies the man who was forsaken because of our sins. But the altar of burnt offering is the place where an entirely acceptable and approved sacrifice was offered. Thus at that altar was brought together the feelings of Christ, the sin-bearing of Christ, (even though the sin offering as a whole was not burnt on the altar, but on the ground), and the acceptability of Christ.

16:33
These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.

These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace- He prepares their hearts for the turmoil that will be in their minds as they reflect on the way they had deserted Him in the garden. And what happened then has happened in different ways many times since, as we have not been faithful as we ought. We shall not have peace by dwelling on past failure, but we will definitely have peace as we relate our circumstances to His circumstances. This is peace “in Him”, as we see how He reacted to adversity.

In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer- the world gives the believer nothing but tribulation, but He gives the power to overcome it, as He overcame it. He overcame it through the consciousness of His relationship with the Father.

I have overcome the world- He can speak in the past tense that He has overcome the world, either as regards His life, which is about to end, or because He anticipates the results of His work at Calvary, John 12:31. What He did, they, in their measure, may do also.

Authority of Scripture

THE INSPIRATION, AUTHORITY, AND SUFFICIENCY OF THE SCRIPTURES

The Lord Jesus believed that the Scriptures were inspired, for He thought of them as words that proceed out of the mouth of God, Matthew 4:4.  He believed they had authority, for He taught that those who sat in the teacher’s seat in the synagogue and expounded the Old Testament were to be obeyed, even though their personal conduct was not right, Matthew 23:2,3.  And since He used the scriptures as His weapon when tempted by the Devil, He must have believed in their sufficiency.

This is decisive for the believer, so that we believe the Scriptures because He who cannot be deceived, and who knows all things, and who withholds nothing that will profit us, believed them and acted upon them.
We now look at various Scriptures that bear upon this subject, beginning with the words of the Lord Jesus Himself, as He prepared His apostles for their mission in the world during His absence.

JOHN 14:15-17

14:15  If ye love Me, keep my commandments.

If ye love Me- The Lord assumes that they would be different to Judas, who had left the Upper Room to betray the Lord Jesus with a kiss.  The token and expression of love is used by Judas as a sign.  Did he really think that the Lord, who knows men’s hearts, would be deceived?  The apostles, on the other hand, would be loyal and true to Him because they loved Him.  Because they were born of God, and God is love, 1 John 4:8, then love to Christ is the expression of the life they had received. 
Keep my commandments- their love is to be put to the test, for they are the nucleus of the church, and have special responsibility in it, as apostles.  They are to set the tone for the church age, and be examples to the rest of the believers.  One of His commandments would be very specific to them, and involved them remaining in Jerusalem until the Spirit came.  Indeed, these words almost seem to make the coming of the Spirit dependent on their obedience.  If the Spirit comes to Jerusalem and they are in Galilee, what then?  The Feast of Pentecost must be celebrated in Jerusalem, and they show their love to the Lord by being there.  So it was the Luke records that “they were all of one accord in one place”, Acts 2:1, and the conditions were met, and the Spirit came. 
Whilst this exhortation is special to the apostles, we should not lose sight of its general application, and remember that obedience to His commands is expected of those who claim to love Him.

14:16  And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you for ever;

And I will pray the Father- the promise to those who love and obey Him will result in the provision of the Holy Spirit.  He, one of the persons of the Godhead, will come in full harmony with the mind of God.  The Son will pray, (and the word for pray is the prayer of an equal, not an inferior), and the Father will send, and the Spirit will come.  Thus the whole Godhead will be active in this matter, such is the importance of the event.  Of course, no one person of the Godhead is active without the consent or agreement of the others, but this is specially marked here.  The age when the Son was on earth is going to be followed by the age when another Divine person is active in the earth.
And He shall give you another Comforter- the word another is that one which means “another of the same sort”, not “another of a different sort”.  This affirms the equality of the Spirit with the Father and the Son in the Godhead.  It also indicates that the Son was the comforter of His own, and this will be continued by the Spirit.  He will point us to those features that were found in Christ, the account of which by His agency will have been recorded in the Four Gospels, so that we may have Christ ministered to our hearts even though He is not present on the earth. 
That He may abide with you for ever- the express purpose of the Spirit’s coming is here said to be so that He may abide, and not go away, as Christ was about to do.  This is testimony to the eternal security of the true believer, for the Spirit indwells the believer in this age, so that wherever the believer is, the Spirit is.  He cannot be lost, therefore. 

14:17  Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth Him not, neither knoweth Him: but ye know Him; for He dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.

Even the Spirit of truth- there are four things we are told about the Spirit in this verse.  First, the character of the Spirit, then the character of the world, then the current position of the Spirit, and then finally the then-future position of the Spirit.
He is called the Spirit of truth because He makes known the truth, and so closely associates with it that the truth becomes part of His title.  We have already seen that He comforts by the application of the truth about Christ to our hearts. 
He is also called “He”, reminding us that the Spirit is not just an influence, but a Divine Person, equal to the Father and the Son.  During His ministry the Lord Jesus spoke of the Holy Spirit comforting, dwelling, teaching, bringing to remembrance, guiding, speaking, showing, glorifying, and receiving.  None of these things can be done by a mere influence.  Those who wish to deny the Deity of the Holy Spirit have an agenda- they wish to deny the Deity of Christ.  They know they cannot do that and also believe in the Deity of the Holy Spirit, because the Godhead is plural, and not dual, as the first verse of the Bible indicates.

John 14:25,26.

14:25  These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. 

These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you- this is another gentle indication that He is leaving them.  He had told them about Judas so that they would not be overwhelmed, and also so that they would maintain confidence in Him when He was arrested and crucified, seeing He, knowing beforehand what was to happen, had forewarned them, 13:18-20.  This short-term prophecy would also give them confidence in His more long-term prophecies. This is important, because a man whose prophecies did not come to pass was to be stoned as an imposter, Deuteronomy 18:20-22.
He had also warned them in the words, “Little children, yet a little while I am with you”, 13:33.  Something of His pity for them is expressed in the words “little children”.  Jehovah pitied His people in Psalm 103:13 “as a father pitieth his children”, and now God manifest in flesh is expressing this.  Peter is obviously taken aback by this statement, so much so that he ignores the following words about love, and concentrates on the idea of the Lord going away.  This going away, however, is so that He may prepare a place for them and return to escort them to heaven.  So these indications of His departure are followed by words of encouragement.  The same is true in our verse, for the mention of not being with them is followed by the assurance that the Spirit would come as a comforter.

14:26  But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in My name, He shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost- the word “but” emphasizes the changed conditions that are about to prevail, yet also serves to introduce the compensating benefit.  The Lord is careful to define who the comforter is, lest they think He is a man.  After all, the Lord has already described Him as “another”, meaning “another of the same sort”, so they could be forgiven for this mistake, seeing Christ was a man.  So “Comforter…Holy Spirit” rids of that notion, as it does in verses 16,17, and 16:7,13.  But even though He is spirit and not flesh and blood, the fact that He is of the same sort as Christ assures us of His Deity.
This careful defining of the Comforter is necessary for its own sake, but also because the Lord well knew that Mahomet would come on the scene in the 7th Century and claim to be the promised comforter.  His claim is forestalled by these words, for how can a man be described as a holy spirit?
The title of Consolation of Israel had been given to the Lord Jesus by Simeon, in Luke 2:25, and it is interesting to notice that when the child Jesus was presented to the Lord in the temple age the age of forty days, Mary offered to God either two turtle doves or two pigeons, (we are not told which).  But the Holy Spirit is seen to come down on Christ at His baptism as a dove, and Luke tells us He came in bodily form, Luke 3:2.  Thus these things give incidental testimony to the unity of Divine persons, for the dove represents the Spirit, but He came in bodily form because the Son was now in the body.
Whom the Father will send in My name- this indicates that the Father sends the Spirit in response to all He sees in His Son.  Whatever He discerns in His Son’s character gives meaning to His sending of the Spirit. We may be assured, then, that there will be no discrepancy between the Son’s attitude to things, and the Spirit’s.  And because the Son’s attitude to things was that of His Father, then the Godhead is, as always, acting manifestly in harmony.  The coming of the Spirit is here the act of the Father, whereas in Acts 2:33 it was the Lord Jesus who shed forth the Spirit, as John the Baptist had predicted in the words, “The same is He which baptizeth with the Holy Spirit”, John 1:33.  Again, the Persons of the Godhead are seen to be in harmony.
He shall teach you all things- the word “He” is emphatic here, which does not make it mean, “He, the Spirit, shall teach you as I did not”, but rather, “He, this same one, difficult as it is for you to take in, shall teach you”.  They had been used to listening to men teaching, whether the Rabbis, or John the Baptist, or Christ, but now it was a Spirit teaching, and they were possibly perplexed.  The solution to their puzzlement is two-fold.  First there is the idea of truth being brought to remembrance so that it could be written down.  The Spirit and the Word would be vitally linked.  Second, it is seen in the fact that the apostles, men in flesh and blood, would be the Spirit’s teaching agencies.  So much so that it becomes their word, John 17:20; Acts 2:16.
Note it is the Spirit who will teach, not the church, as the Roman Catholic system claims.  As soon as men start to claim to originate ideas, there is confusion, as the history of the last two thousand years shows. 
By “all things” is meant, “all things that remain to be taught”.  It is not that the Spirit will start afresh, or else they would not need past things brought to their memory.  There were further truths to be brought to light after the Spirit had come at Pentecost, as 16:12,13 explains.
And bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you- nothing of what Christ had said was going to be lost, but the Spirit of God would gather it up and enable the apostles to remember what He had said.  When they came to write it down, and when they preached it, they were able to give a true account of the Lord’s teaching.  We may be confident that what we read in the Scriptures is a true account.  Luke tells us that many had set themselves the task of writing down the details of the Lord’s life. He does not condemn them for doing this, but the fact that Luke’s gospel gained the approval of the apostles, (as is seen in the fact that the apostle quoted from it in Acts 20:35), shows Luke’s gospel is authoritative.  And it is this because the Spirit of truth inspired it, which could not be said of other attempts at writing a gospel.
Because the apostles were thus guided of the Spirit, that which they preached before the New Testament was written can be relied upon. They were not using their imagination.  So it is that Peter can assure us “we have not followed cunningly devised fables”, 2 Peter 1:16.

John 16:12-16

16:12  I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.

I have yet many things to say unto you- the teaching of the Lord Jesus when here on earth did not exhaust the store of wisdom that was available.  Luke hints at this when he writes at the beginning of the Acts, “all that Jesus began to do and teach”, Acts 1:1, which implies that the Book of Acts would record the way in which He continued to do and teach through the preaching of the apostles.  He “came and preached peace to them who were afar off, and them that were near”, Ephesians 2:17.  The apostles “preached everywhere, the Lord working with them”, Mark 16:20. 
But ye cannot bear them now- so it was not that the Lord did not finish His teaching ministry in time.  That could never be, for God is never late, nor does He fail.  The word “bear” has to do with carrying a burden, and the weight of truth that was to be unfolded to these men was more than they could carry in their current state.  The Levites in the time of the Tabernacle had a heavy task, for they were responsible for moving the tabernacle.  In the case of the Gershonites and Merarites, this involved the lifting of heavy materials onto wagons for transportation; in the case of the Kohathites they were required to bear the heavy tabernacle furniture on their shoulders.  They would certainly feel the weight of their burdens.  The apostles would also have a burden, that of the weighty truths concerning Christ and the church they would be entrusted with making known.
The reason they were not able to bear such a burden at that point is five-fold:
First, they were in a distressed state because of His statement that He was leaving them. 
Second, they were about to forsake Him and flee, so the boldness needed to set out new truth was not in their hearts as yet. 
Third, they did not have the Spirit indwelling them, so the power to preach New Testament truth was lacking.  Their preaching for the previous three years or so had been evangelistic, and consisted of the repetition of what they had heard from Him. 
Fourth, they were still not clear about God’s programme in relation to Israel, as is seen by their question in Acts 1:6. 
Fifth, there were mysteries yet to be revealed, but that would be done through the apostle Paul, who at this point was not a believer.

16:13  Howbeit when He, the Spirit of truth, is come, He will guide you into all truth: for He shall not speak of Himself; but whatsoever He shall hear, that shall He speak: and He will show you things to come.

Howbeit when He, the Spirit of truth, is come- the word “howbeit” signals a change.  Something is going to happen to enable them to bear the weight of the truth that is about to be revealed.  That five-fold reason for their lack of readiness to bear the truth would be remedied.  Since the burden they will bear is truth, it is appropriate that the Spirit, when He came upon them at Pentecost, should come in character as Spirit of truth.  He is the Spirit who is intimately associated with the truth, and necessarily so, because God is the God of truth, and the Spirit is God.  It is not that He would then become the Spirit of truth, for He had associated Himself with the truth Christ had made known during His earthly ministry. 
The word from heaven when Christ was on the Mount of Transfiguration was “Hear ye Him”.  If God had some misgiving about the ministry of Christ, that exhortation would not have come from heaven.  In fact, just previously the Lord Jesus had deliberately set His saying alongside the word of the Father.  Peter had learnt something from the Father, and then the Lord adds, “And I also say unto thee”.  If that had been presumption, the word “Hear ye Him” would not have been uttered.
The word “come” is in that tense which signifies a decisive event, not a prolonged process.  One moment they would not have the Spirit, the next moment they would.  And immediately they would be able to preach, as we see from a reading of the account of the events on the Day of Pentecost, in Acts 2.  Note that the Lord is confident that the Holy Spirit will come, which shows He is sure that the Father will respond to His request to send Him, 14:16; Acts 2:
He will guide you into all truth- like an expert tour guide, who is able to show tourists who have never visited a place before, the interesting features of a particular region, so the Holy Spirit, fully acquainted with the truth, is able to guide the apostles into that truth.  Since the Spirit came because Jesus was glorified, John 7:39, then a vast area of truth opens up before the minds of the apostles, and we find this truth in their writings in the New Testament.  Needless to say, this truth is spiritual; it is not truth about the physical world, as if the apostles became brilliant scientists in a moment. The fact that the Lord promises this, (and all His promises are honoured), shows that it will come to pass.  So when the apostle Paul spoke of his ministry as fulfilling the word of God, Colossians 1:25; or when he wrote about a time when it could be said, “that which is perfect is come”, 1 Corinthians 13:10; or when Jude writes about “the faith once delivered unto the saints”, by which he means “once for all” delivered, Jude 3; and when the Lord warns in the last chapter of the New Testament against adding to the words of the book, Revelation 22:18,19, we know that God’s revelation of truth is complete. 

If we do not know what it is that should not be taken from or added to, how can we avoid the judgement which comes to those who do take away or add? 

For He shall not speak of Himself- this does not mean that the New Testament epistles will contain no information about the Holy Spirit, for that is clearly not true.  What it does mean is that the Spirit will not speak independently of the Father and the Son.  The fact that He guides into all Divine truth shows that He is familiar with it all, hence the word “for” at the beginning of this phrase.  We are being led on gradually here as we listen to the Lord teaching His own.  We learn the Spirit will guide into all truth “for” He does not speak of Himself, “for” whatsoever He shall hear, that shall He speak.  The Lord goes on to explain this in the next statements.
But whatsoever He shall hear, that shall He speak- the Lord Jesus said of Himself, “My doctrine is not Mine, but His that sent Me”, John 7:16; “I speak to the world those things I have heard of Him”, John 8:26, (the “Him” referring to the Father); “and the word which ye hear is not Mine, but the Father’s which sent me, John 14:24; “all things that I have heard of My Father I have made known unto you”, john 15:15.  These quotations show His complete insight into the mind and will of His Father.  He was privy to the counsels of the Godhead.  His coming into manhood had not altered that intimacy.  The prophet spoke beforehand of this in the words, “He wakeneth morning by morning, He wakeneth Mine ear to hear as the learned”, Isaiah 51:4.  He did not hear as the ignorant, but as the learned or instructed one.  Learned persons converse with those of equal standing with themselves in matters familiar to them.  They go over well-trodden territory as they discuss their particular field of knowledge and expertise.  They do not hear one another to learn, but to rehearse what they know.  So it is with the Lord Jesus.  He awoke each morning to learn what part of the Divine Counsels was relevant to Him for that day.  He did not awake to learn what the counsels were, but what bearing they had on the day that was before Him.
We are used to the idea that in the Book of Genesis God is heard communing with Himself.  For example, “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness”, Genesis 1:26; “And the Lord God said, the man is become as one of Us”, 3:22; “Go to, let Us go down, and there confound their language”, 11:7.  But in the passages from the New Testament quoted above we learn that the Persons of the Godhead still commune with One Another.  So to be able to hear the Father is to claim Deity. 
What is true of the Son is now said to be true of the Holy Spirit, for if the Son hears the Father, then so does the Spirit; He too is privy to Divine counsels and coversation.  What He hears He transmits to the apostles, so they have the truth as the Godhead knows it.  This gives their writings a very special character, and as such should be received and believed.  Note that is “whatsoever” He hears, so the Spirit is not selective in His transmission of Divine truth.
And He will show you things to come- that is, “the things coming He will announce to you”.  It is not a question of showing as by visions, but making truth known so that it can be taken in by the apostles and transmitted into inspired preaching and writing.  This is not a specific reference to the Book of the Revelation and other prophetic parts of the New Testament, for all the truth that was to be disclosed by the Spirit after Christ had gone back to heaven could be described as things that are coming. 
The word “show” is literally “to bring back tidings”, so the idea is of the Spirit having direct access to heavenly counsels, but also bringing back tidings from those counsels to apostles on the earth.  Caleb and Joshua brought back tidings about Canaan, (the place that contained “things to come” for Israel), after they had explored that land; in the same way the Holy Spirit is able to tell of heavenly things from first-hand knowledge of the mind of God. 

16:14  He shall glorify Me: for He shall receive of Mine, and shall show it unto you.

He shall glorify Me- this expression does not begin with the word “and”, so is not a further work that the Spirit will do.  Rather, it is the result of the work that has just been detailed.  By the speaking and announcing of Divine truth, the Spirit will glorify Christ.  This means that various aspects of the glory of Christ will be presented to our minds, and as a result we shall have an enhanced appreciation of His excellencies, and He will be magnified in our hearts.  A magnifying glass does not make an object physically bigger, but it makes it bigger in our eyes, and enables us to appreciate its features in more detail.  So Christ cannot be more glorious that He is, but He can be magnified in our eyes as the Spirit points out His virtues.
When Moses asked to see God’s glory, God granted him his request, and displayed that glory not only by allowing a glimpse of His glory to be seen, but also by speaking, Exodus x33:18-23; 34:6-8.  So now, the glory of God is seen in the face of Jesus Christ, and those glories are told out in the words of Scripture, coming as they do from the Holy Spirit whose ministry it is to glorify Christ.
Since the Holy Spirit indwells the gathered companies of God’s people as they meet in assembly fellowship, then the end result of each meeting should be that Christ is magnified.  Paul calls this coming together for the better, in 1 Corinthians 11:17. 
For He shall receive of Mine, and shall show it unto you- this is the process by which Christ is glorified.  The Spirit not only hears truth, but receives it from the Godhead to infallibly impart it to the apostles, and through their writings to us.  In particular what He receives is that which Christ describes as “Mine”.  Since when this is transmitted to believers it glorifies Christ, then we may say that the truth that the Spirit is said to receive here is especially about Christ.  No doubt the major part of this has to do with the mysteries that are unfolded in the New Testament epistles, which bring out truth that was even hidden from the Old Testament prophets.  Such themes as the principles at work in His death; the consequences of His resurrection; the implications of His ascension; His headship of the church; His priesthood; the fact that He will head up all things, whether in heaven or earth; that He is the Last Adam; that believers shall be conformed to His image even as to the body; that He will have the church as His bride, and other things besides.  Perhaps all these things are summed up in the phrase “the mystery of Christ”, Colossians 4:3.

16:15  All things that the Father hath are Mine: therefore said I, that He shall take of Mine, and shall show it unto you.

All things that the Father hath are mine- there is a common possession of truth in the Godhead.  One does not withhold from another, for they are one.  Indeed, persons of the Godhead cannot, by their very nature, do anything independently of one another, or else they would not be One God.  This is why the Lord Jesus said “The Son can do nothing of Himself”, John 5:19.  He was not indicating that in some way He was powerless to act. (After all, it is as Son that He describes Himself thus, so the fact that He shares the nature and essence of God is in view).  Rather, He was claiming Deity, in that Divine persons cannot do anything independently of one another.  A man may do things independently of another man, and also independently of God, because men are individual units.  But the persons of the Godhead are essentially one, and cannot act contrary to one another.
Therefore said I, that He shall take of Mine, and shall show it unto you- the word “therefore” has the sense of “because of this”.  The Lord Jesus claims here to have just reason to use the words “take of Mine”.  Because the word “take” implies the Father, and since all the things the Father has the Son has as well, then the Lord is perfectly justified in saying “shall take of Mine”, and not “shall take of the Father’s”.  The three Persons of the Godhead are interacting in this matter as the Spirit takes from the Father the things of the Son. 

2 Timothy 3:1-9

This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.  For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.  Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.  But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all men, as their’s also was.

The exposure of corrupt men
Verses 1-9 speak of those who have a form of godliness, but who deny the power thereof.  The apostle cites the two magicians who withstood Moses in Pharoah’s palace, Exodus 7:10-12, as examples of those whose religious beliefs and teachings were opposed to the truth of God.   Such men resist the truth, having corrupt minds, and who are reprobate concerning the faith, which is a term meaning the sum total of Christian doctrine.  When tested by the standard of the faith, they are disqualified, despite their form of godliness. They deny the power that enables a godly life to be lived, namely the power of the Holy Spirit. 

2 Timothy 3:10-13

But thou hast fully known my doctrine, manner of life, purpose, faith, longsuffering, charity, patience, persecutions, afflictions, which came unto me at Antioch, at Iconium, at Lystra; what persecutions I endured: but out of them all the Lord delivered me.  Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.  But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

The example of a godly man
Verses 10-13 present the contrast to such men, represented by the apostle, whose doctrine, manner of life, and willingness to suffer for what he believed, were the result of a settled faith in the Scriptures.  Men are not prepared to suffer and die for what they know to be false.

2 Timothy 3:14-17

But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them; and that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. all scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: that the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 

The exhortation to a young man
In verses 14-17 the apostle exhorts Timothy to be the same, by continuing in what he had learned from the scriptures, encouraged by the example of those from whom he learned it.  As a young man he had not outgrown the scriptures, nor could he, or anyone else, do so.

3:15    From a child thou hast known the holy scriptures- Timothy was Jewish on his mother’s side, and his mother and grandmother had believed the gospel.  They had been faithful in exposing him to the reading of the Scriptures in the synagogue, where there would be copies of what was carefully preserved in the Temple.  This is why the apostle is able to call the writings Timothy heard, “The Holy Scriptures”, for they were holy and different, not only by association with the Temple, but also because they were separate from other writings, even those of godly men.  See Luke 4:16,17, and compare Deuteronomy 31:26; 2 Kings 22:8. 
Ultimately, however, their holiness lay in the fact that they came from God, and this was why they were separate from the writings of men.
Which are able to make thee wise unto salvation- even as a believer Timothy needed the wisdom of the scriptures to save him from life’s spiritual perils.  James exhorts us to “Receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls”, James 1:21.  There are those who make shipwreck of the faith because they do not hold faith and a good conscience, 1 Timothy 1:19.
Through faith which is in Christ Jesus- even when we reverence the scriptures as being holy, we must only seek to practice them in dependence upon the Lord; they are not designed to make us self-sufficient.  The Son of God was marked by dependence upon His Father, for He said, “As the living Father hath sent Me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth Me, even he shall live by Me”, John 6:57.  To live by Him is to take in the truths about Himself that are able to nourish our souls. 
All scripture- the use of the singular here indicates Scripture in its entirety, with emphasis on the words used, whereas in verse 15 the idea was that of the collected writings of the Old Testament canon, with the emphasis on the writing done.  Scripture contains the words of evil men and of the Devil himself; they are not inspired when they speak, but those who wrote what they said were inspired as they did so, so we sometimes have the inspired record of what uninspired men said.
Is given by inspiration of God- this is one word in the original, meaning God-breathed.  God breathed out His word by the Spirit, (who is the breath of His mouth, 2 Thessalonians 2:8; Isaiah 4:11), and breathed it into His servants.  They in their turn wrote it down, as we see from Jeremiah 36:1,2, 4-6, 8,17,18, 21-23, 27,28, 32.

“And it came to pass in the fourth year of Jehoiakim the son of Josiah king of Judah, that this word came unto Jeremiah from the Lord, saying, ‘Take thee a roll of a book, and write therein all the words that I have spoken unto thee against Israel, and against Judah, and against all the nations, from the day I spake unto thee, from the days of Josiah, even unto this day…”

“Then Jeremiah called Baruch the son of Neriah: and Baruch wrote from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the Lord, which He had spoken unto him, upon a roll of a book.”

“And Jeremiah commanded Baruch, saying, I am shut up; I cannot go into the house of the Lord:  Therefore go thou, and read in the roll, which thou hast written from my mouth, the words of the Lord in the ears of the people in the Lord’s house upon the fasting day: and also thou shalt read them in the ears of all Judah that come out of their cities.”

“And Baruch the son of Neriah did according to all that Jeremiah the prophet commanded him, reading in the book the words of the Lord in the Lord’s house.”

“And they asked Baruch, saying, Tell us now, How didst thou write all these words at his mouth?
Then Baruch answered them, He pronounced all these words unto me with his mouth, and I wrote them with ink in the book.

So the king sent Jehudi to fetch the roll: and he took it out of Elishama the scribe’s chamber. And Jehudi read it in the ears of the king, and in the ears of all the princes which stood beside the king.
Now the king sat in the winterhouse in the ninth month: and there was a fire on the hearth burning before him.
And it came to pass, that when Jehudi had read three or four leaves, he cut it with the penknife, and cast it into the fire that was on the hearth, until all the roll was consumed in the fire that was on the hearth”.

“Then the word of the Lord came to Jeremiah, after that the king had burned the roll, and the words which Baruch wrote at the mouth of Jeremiah, saying,
Take thee again another roll, and write in it all the former words that were in the first roll, which Jehoiakim the king of Judah hath burned”.

“Then took Jeremiah another roll, and gave it to Baruch the scribe, the son of Neriah; who wrote therein from the mouth of Jeremiah all the words of the book which Jehoiakim king of Judah had burned in the fire: and there were added besides unto them many like words”. 

Note this is not dictation, for the truths God revealed passed through the thought processes of the prophets, so their personality, upbringing, style, were all allowed to express themselves, but all controlled by the Spirit. This is clear from the different characteristics of the books of the Bible.  The Lord Jesus depended on “every word” that came from God, so did not believe some was error or the product of the prophet’s own thinking.  We should not speak of one book of the Bible being more inspired than another. The word inspired is used in a diluted sense nowadays, such as “an inspiring poem”; “he inspired me with his enthusiasm”, but this is not its meaning in Scripture.
And are profitable- that is, they are useful. The Scriptures are for daily use, not occasional academic interest.
For teaching- the act of teaching the faith is to be based on the Scriptures.  Note this destroys the idea of the church having the final authority.
Reproof- when the teaching or doctrine is given, then shortcomings are revealed, and we are convicted of wrong behaviour.  One of the proofs of the integrity of the Scriptures is the spiritual results it produces, see verses 10,11.
For correction- which is restoration to a right state.  Having been exposed to the doctrine, and convicted as to deviations from it, there comes from the same scriptures the correcting doctrine, positively showing the right way.
For instruction in righteousness- having brought us back to the right path, we are instructed how to walk along it, “the paths of righteousness for His name’s sake”, Psalm 23:3. “This is the way, walk ye in it”, Isaiah 30:21.
That the man of God- one who desires to be mature in the things of God, and therefore Christ-like.
May be perfect- given special aptitude for spiritual uses.  The mature believer will have the required aptitude to fulfil the work allotted to him by the Lord.  The grace that accompanies gift will enable the believer to accept the teaching of Scripture relevant to the use of the gift.
Throughly furnished unto all good works- fitted for the task.  Here the emphasis is on the thoroughness with which the Word of God fits us.  We cannot do anything for the Lord without knowing the doctrines of Scripture, for they are the working principles of spiritual action.

THE INSPIRATION OF SCRIPTURE IN 2 Peter 1:12-21

2:12-15
Wherefore I will not be negligent to put you always in remembrance of these things, though ye know them, and be established in the present truth.  Yea, I think it meet, as long as I am in this tabernacle, to stir you up by putting you in remembrance;  Knowing that shortly I must put off this my tabernacle, even as our Lord Jesus Christ hath shewed me.  Moreover I will endeavour that ye may be able after my decease to have these things always in remembrance.

The apostle is aware that he is about to die, for the Lord has indicated in John 21 that he would die before the Lord came, and when he was old, and both conditions are now fulfilled.  He was determined to continue teaching the “present truth”, that is, the truth that was present with them, and also to write, so that his ministry would continue after his death.

1:16-18
For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.  For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.  And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount.

This ministry was worthwhile because it was the making known of solid truth, not cunningly devised fables.  He had actually seen and heard the things of which he wrote.  He cites in particular the Mount of Transfiguration experience, for it had to do with the coming kingdom, and in chapters 2 and 3 he will speak of false prophets, who deny future things.

1:19 
We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in your hearts:

A more sure word of prophecy- as a result of his experience on the mount, the prophetic word of the Old Testament was confirmed to Peter.
A light that shineth in a dark place- compared to the glory that shall fill the earth when Christ reigns, the world is a dark place.  For the believer there is the lamp (that is, something personal, rather than a light like the sun), of the prophetic word to explain the principles of Christ’s Kingdom, so that we may be governed by them now.
Until the day dawn- when the sun of righteousness arises, Malachi 4:2, the “morning without clouds” will have come, 2 Samuel 23:4.  Peter had seen the Lord’s face shine as the sun, giving a preview of this, Matthew 17:2.
And the day-star arise in your hearts- prior to the sunrise, the day-star rises, to give a signal that the day is about to begin.  It does not lighten up the earth, but it does give a sign to those who are awake.  Such is the coming of the Lord for His people.  When that happens, we shall be changed to His likeness, so the light will rise in our hearts, changing us morally, 1 John 3:2.  There is also the fact that when the coming of the Lord becomes precious to us, then our hearts reach forward and, so to speak, bring the day-star into our hearts.  (See Hebrews 11, and the way faith reached forward and laid hold of future things, so that they became real in the soul).  The Lord promised to the overcomers in Thyatira that this would happen.  And in Revelation 22:16 the Lord Jesus describes Himself as “the bright and morning star”.  The response of John is “Even so, come, Lord Jesus”, verse 20.

1:20  Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.

Knowing this first- this is the first principle of Bible interpretation. 
No prophecy of the Scripture is of any private interpretation- The word “is” here is part of the verb to become, and is used with the genitive.  So the idea is of becoming the property of anyone.  We cannot make the prophecy our own property, as if we have exclusive rights to the correct interpretation of it.  All believers share the truth.  The faith is delivered to the saints, Jude 3.  Only false prophets would claim to alone know the truth.
Private interpretation- this is an interpretation which one thinks out for oneself, (as the false prophets did), unaided by the Spirit of God.

1:21  For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.

For- the reason why verse 20 is true.
The prophecy came not- the idea is that the prophecy was borne, the same word as “came” in verse 17, referring to the voice that came to Christ from the Father.  So the same mouth that spoke to the prophets, spoke on the mount of transfiguration.
Not in old time by the will of man- it was not their private invention, any more than we may have a private interpretation.
But holy men of God- those whose will was surrendered to God, and who rejected human wisdom.
Spake as they were moved by the Holy Spirit- the word “moved” was used of a ship when it was carried along as the wind fills its sails.  So if that is the way the prophecy came, by the Spirit, then that is the way the prophecy must be interpreted, by the Spirit.  All this prepares the way for chapters 2 and 3 where false and unholy prophets were attempting to lead the people of God astray.

JOHN 14

We hope you will find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address: martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

JOHN 14

Setting of the chapter
As we noticed when looking at chapter 13, what is called the Upper Room Ministry may be looked at in three sections. In Chapters 13 and 14 we find principles to guide believers as they come together. In Chapters 15 and 16 there are principles that guide believers as they live in the world. In Chapter 17 we gain insight into the present heavenly ministry of Christ for His own as He “ever liveth to make intercession”, Hebrews 7:25.

In chapter 14 therefore we have the attitude of heart that should characterise believers as they come together during the absence of the Lord Jesus. In the previous chapter He has washed the disciples’ feet, indicating that as they come together they must do so having applied the word of God to their pathway since the last time they met, so that the defilement of the world through which they must needs pass does not cling to them. If they do not do this they will bring worldly influences into the holy confines of the assembly gathering.

Survey of the chapter
Chapter 13 closed with the announcement that the Lord Jesus was going away and would be glorified. After Judas had left, He was free to speak of His glory. That glory would be earned at the cross, but would be exhibited initially in heaven. So it was that He gently said to His remaining apostles, “Little children, yet a little while I am with you. Ye shall seek me: and as I said unto the Jews, Whither I go ye cannot come; so now I say to you”. The fact that the apostles and the Jews were in the same situation shows that the going away is physical. It is not a metaphor, as if He is speaking of making progress in some matter beyond what they have attained so far. In that case, they might be able to follow Him. But the going away is from earth to heaven, and they cannot tread that path yet.

In 14:1-3 the Lord balances the idea that He is going away, with the truth that He is coming back for them, to take them to be where He is, in the Father’s house.

There follows a discussion on the subject of the way, suggested by the foregoing. Whilst the disciples could not follow the Lord to heaven, He said they would seek Him, 13:33. The Lord encourages His own to travel the road to heaven in the sense that they make spiritual progress, and grow in heavenly-mindedness. This is why the section centres around the idea of knowing Christ.

They will need to be occupied whilst He is away, which is why in verses 12-14 He speaks of works that they will do. They need power to do these works, and therefore the coming of the Spirit is the subject of verses 15-26.

The rest of the chapter is designed to comfort and strengthen them for the short-term trauma of the crucifixion, and the longer-term stress of His absence. They will be able to cope because He leaves His peace with them. The peace of heart He knew through doing the Father’s will is to be theirs too.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-4 His going to the Father and His coming again
(b) Verses 5-14 The believer coming to the Father
(c) Verses 15-20 The coming of the Spirit
(d) Verses 21-24 The Father and the Son coming to dwell
(e) Verses 25-31 Resources for believers in His absence

(a)   Verses 1-4
His going to the Father and His coming again

14:1
Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.

Let not your heart be troubled- the previous chapter ends with the forecast of Peter’s denial. It is important to notice, then, that “your” is plural, so it is not a personal exhortation to Peter to not be troubled in heart about denying Him. We know from the record of Peter’s denial that afterwards “he went out, and wept bitterly”, Matthew 26:75. And well he might, and well might we if we in any way and to any degree deny the one we call our Lord.

The trouble of heart they were experiencing was due to His statement, “yet a little while I am with you…whither I go ye cannot come”, 13:33. He had been with them for over three years now, and they with Him. Now it seems that things are going to change, and they are troubled. Notice that the exhortation puts the responsibility on the believer to not let his heart be troubled. It will not happen automatically. The application of the truths the Lord is about to impart to the disciples will enable them to heed the exhortation.

Ye believe in God- the first thing to do when troubled in heart is to act in faith. Earthly remedies cannot cure the maladies of the soul. Men may distract their minds from their trouble of heart by the use of many things, some innocent and some evil; but the trouble is still there beneath the surface. The believer has the infallible remedy, namely, trust in God.

Before they met Christ these men were godly Israelites, waiting for the kingdom of God to come. They lived by faith, and that faith brought future things into their souls, and was evidence to them that they would surely come, see Hebrews 11:1. It was not that faith was a substitute for evidence. Rather, it was the response to evidence, for the word of God assures us of things to come, and that is enough for the believer. They knew well the history of their nation, and the example of the sort of people listed in Hebrews 11. The fathers believed in God, and so did the disciples.

Believe also in me- one of the leading features of faith is that it does not need to see what or who is believed in. The Lord Jesus had appeared on the scene in public ministry, announced by the word from heaven that He was God’s Beloved Son, and therefore the long-awaited Messiah. The faith of the Old Testament fathers became a visible reality, and the disciples had believed in Him. But now He has announced that He is leaving them, and therefore they would no longer see Him physically. The faith in the unseen God that they had before He came, which assured them that Messiah was coming, was still to be theirs after He had gone.

Because the Father and the Son are equal, faith in the one is faith in the other, whether they are visible to the eye or not. They are here being commanded to believe in Him in this way. It is true they believed on Him as a miracle-worker, as a fine teacher, as a man of sympathy and concern. But above all this they must believe in Him as a person, even in His absence, when they do not see Him work, and do not hear Him speak. This is the remedy for trouble of heart; it steadies, stabilises, and stimulates.

The apostle Peter learnt the lesson, and writes about the appearing of Jesus Christ, “Whom having not seen, ye love; in whom, though now ye see Him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory: receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls.” 1 Peter 1:8,9. The Lord will later on speak of His joy remaining in us, and that it was full joy, John 15:11.

14:2
In my Father’s house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

In my Father’s house are many mansions- previously in John’s Gospel “My Father’s house” had been the temple at Jerusalem, for when He purged the temple the first time the Lord had said, “make not my Father’s house an house of merchandise”, John 2:16. Despite all the abuses and evils associated with the temple, the Lord saw it as a continuation of the House of God throughout the Old Testament from Solomon’s time, even though that particular temple had been burnt down by Nebuchadnezzar, for “he burnt the house of the Lord”, 2 Kings 25:9. It was rebuilt under Zerubbabel, and then renovated on a grand scale by Herod, to please the Jews. This was the temple in existence in the Lord’s day.

Now in the original temple there were chambers of varying sizes, as we read in 1 Kings 6:5,6,8, “And against the wall of the house he built chambers round about, against the walls of the house round about, both of the temple and of the oracle: and he made chambers round about: the nethermost chamber was five cubits broad, and the middle was six cubits broad, and the third was seven cubits broad: for without in the wall of the house he made narrowed rests round about, that the beams should not be fastened in the walls of the house…The door for the middle chamber was in the right side of the house: and they went up with winding stairs into the middle chamber, and out of the middle into the third.” The same will be true of the Millenial temple described by Ezekiel.

Is it these chambers that the Lord has in mind when He speaks of many mansions? To us today the word brings to mind a very large and impressive house, so it is strange to us to be told of a house with mansions inside it. However, it was not until the 19th century that the word was used of a stately residence. It was used of a manor house in the 16th century, but before that it simply meant an abiding-place. This reflects the connection of the word with the Greek verb “meno” to abide, (hence “mansion”, and “manor-house”). It is a place where you are resident, not merely staying temporarily. One, moreover, where you are at home, abiding in peace and enjoyment.

So it is that to troubled hearts comes the word, that there is a place of peace and comfort ahead, after the disturbance and trial of the pilgrim pathway is over. David had the confidence that he would dwell in the house of the Lord for ever, Psalm 23:6, and this is the hope of the believer of this age. It is not even that Paradise is before them, for that was pleasant parkland surrounding a palace. They are promised a place in the palace.

If it were not so, I would have told you- in a sense, where the saints will dwell is a minor point, for there are far more important things we need to know and believe. But if the Lord assures us He has not withheld from us this minor point, then we may be confident that He has not withheld from us any major point we need to know.

Troubled hearts that have been disturbed by the news that He is going away need to know that there are no further shocks in store. He will soon tell them that He is the truth, for it is found in its entirety in Him. There are no realities outside of Him. We may be confident that He will tell us everything we have the capacity to understand, and hold nothing back from us. He does this through the Spirit of truth, who guides into all truth, John 14:13.

I go to prepare a place for you- if the abiding-places are connected with the heavenly sanctuary, then that place needs to be fitted out, for it was not the dwelling place of men at the time Christ was speaking. The Epistle to the Hebrews will help us here, for although the basis of that book is the Tabernacle system, nevertheless there are fixed principles that we may learn from it, seeing it was a figure of the true and heavenly sanctuary, as Hebrews 9:24 states. The previous verse to that reads, “It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.” verse 23. The earthly sanctuary, the tabernacle, had to be sprinkled with blood initially at its consecration to purify it from the defilement of those who had made it, verse 21. Then the Day of Atonement was needed to maintain it in holiness before God.

The heavenly sanctuary also needed to be purified from defilement, but in this instance the pride of Lucifer when he sought to rise up against God. Until Christ’s blood was shed, there had been no means of doing this, so God looked at the sanctuary in the light of what His Son would do at Calvary. But once He had died, having taken the lowest of all places, (instead of being like Lucifer who sought the highest of all), and having been obedient even unto death, (in contrast to Lucifer who rebelled against the will of God), His blood was effective in purging the heavenly sanctuary from the taint of pride and rebellion.

The writer describes the work of Christ as involving sacrifices in the plural, reminding us that all the sacrifices and offerings of old time have found their fulfilment at the cross, and the varied results they all spoke of have been realised to the full and finally in Him. So it is that the heavenly sanctuary now becomes a fit place for Him to enter, and also for us.

But the Hebrews Epistle also tells us that the Lord Jesus has entered heaven as our forerunner, Hebrews 6:19,20. He has gone where we shall go, and His very presence in heaven as a man with a body is token that it is a fit place for the saints to enter with their resurrection bodies. When He comes again in fulfilment of His promise, He is coming as “the second man”, who is “the Lord from heaven”, 1 Corinthians 15:47. In the context, that means that He is coming in the body He took in resurrection to change His people’s bodies so that they are spiritual bodies, and are thereby fitted for heavenly conditions also. As the apostle Paul says, “For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself. For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord’s. For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living.” Romans 14:7-9. He is going to exercise that Lordship by raising dead saints, and changing living saints, so that they have bodies fitted for heaven.

14:3
And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again- the sadness of His departure is tempered by two things in these statements. First that He is going for our benefit, to prepare a heavenly place for us. Second, that the fact that He is going is the guarantee that He is coming back. The disciples saw Him go into heaven, and both Stephen and John saw Him in heaven, so it is an undoubted fact that He has gone. That is, He has not simply gone away to some unspecified place, but gone to the Father’s house. This is His guarantee to us that He will come again. His coming in the future is as sure as His going in the past.

And receive you unto myself- so it is not just that He will present us to the Father, although that will happen, (for we shall come to the Father by Him, verse 6), but receive to Himself. The apostle Paul spoke of or implied five locations, when he was describing the coming of the Lord at the resurrection day. “For the Lord Himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.” 1 Thessalonians 4:16,17. So there will be those who are in the grave. There will be those alive on the earth. There will be a catching up of both parties together in the clouds. There will be the meeting of the Lord in the air, above the clouds. So we shall be received to Himself, and then escorted through the domain of the prince of the power of the air, to arrive, unharmed and unhindered, in heaven. The saints will move from one location to another under His close supervision. They shall arrive safely in heaven, it is true, but their main object will be Christ their Lord and Saviour.

That where I am, there ye may be also- believers may not be constantly in one place, but they will always be with Him. When He comes to earth to reign they shall come with Him, Colossians 3:4, but He may not always be on the earth, for there is to be a connection between heaven and earth, and movement from one to the other. The prophecy of Ezekiel speaks of a Prince who shall function in the temple, no doubt as Christ’s representative when He is elsewhere. So He is assuring His disciples, and all believers, that the compensation for Him being absent for a time, is to be with Him for all eternity.

14:4
And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know.

And whither I go ye know- there are several references in John’s gospel to the going away of the Lord Jesus, which the disciples knew, but seemingly had pushed to the back of their minds. Were they not godly Israelites looking for the setting up of Messiah’s earthly kingdom? Why should they think their Lord was going to heaven; was He not about to ascend the throne of David? But they should have known where He was going by the following statements:

Speaking to Nicodemus, the Lord said, “And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of Man which is in heaven.” John 3:13.

After the feeding of the five thousand, He said, “What and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before?” John 6:62.

Later in His ministry at the feast of tabernacles He said to the Jews, “Yet a little while am I with you, and then I go unto him that sent me”, John 7:33. From these statements alone the disciples should have known where He was going to.

And the way ye know- not only did they know the end of the way, but they knew what would happen along the way. In John 3:16 He spoke of being lifted up as the serpent had been lifted up in the wilderness. In John 8:28 He said, “when ye have lifted up the Son of Man, then shall ye know that I am he”. In John 12:32 He said, “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me”. And John adds, “This he said, signifying what death he should die”. The disciples knew of only one way of dying when you are lifted up, and that was by crucifixion.

But in the synoptic gospels He was even more specific about what would happen. We read, “From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.” Matthew 16:21. Later, He said, “The Son of man shall be betrayed into the hands of men: and they shall kill him, and the third day he shall rise again. And they were exceeding sorry”, Matthew 17:22,23. As they neared Jerusalem for the last time He said to the twelve disciples, “Behold, we go up to Jerusalem; and the Son of man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests and unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death, and shall deliver him to the Gentiles to mock, and to scourge, and to crucify him: and the third day he shall rise again.” Matthew 20:18,19. All these quotations justify the statements, “whither I go ye know”, and “the way ye know”.

(b)   Verses 5-14
The believer coming to the Father

Special note on the movements in these verses

(a)   Christ to the cross and heaven, alone, 13:36.

(b)   Peter, to suffer crucifixion, 13:36; 21:18,19.

(c)   Repentant sinners, coming to the Father at conversion, 14:6.

(d)   All believers, associated with Christ’s death, burial, resurrection, ascension and present session in heavenly places, Romans 6:1-10; Ephesians 2:5,6.

(e)   All believers, making progress in the knowledge of the Father through the Son, 14:7-10.

(f)   All believers, engaging in worship and prayer, Hebrews 10:19-22; Ephesians 2:18.

(g)   All believers, taken to heaven when He comes again.

14:5
Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way?

Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest- sadly, Thomas speaks for them all, (“we”), and denies that they know where He is going. They are waiting for the kingdom of Messiah to be set up, and they are convinced that He is that Messiah. What other destiny can there be for Him than the throne of glory on earth? The idea of Him going back to heaven without setting up His kingdom was unthinkable. They were like the two on the road to Emmaus, slow of heart to believe all that the prophets had spoken, Luke 24:25. They believed some things, the glory passages, but ignored or misunderstood the suffering passages. And what they did to the prophets they were now doing to the Lord, and were selective in what they were prepared to accept.

And how can we know the way? It is logical to say that if you do not know the end of the journey, you do not know the way to the end. The answer to Thomas’s question is that you know the way by listening to the Lord telling you it. He had told them clearly what His pathway was going to be, but they had not understood Him, allowing their ideas to over-ride His truth. This comes out clearly in Luke’s account, for we read that before He told them He would be delivered over to men, He said, “Let these sayings sink down into your ears”, so He was anticipating that they would be slow to take in the truths He taught them. Then Luke tells us “But they understood not this saying, and it was hid from them, that they perceived it not: and they feared to ask him of that saying.” Luke 9:44,45. It was the same later on, when the Lord went into more detail about His sufferings at the hands of men, for Luke tells us “And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things that were spoken.” Luke 18:34. How often as believers we are like them, and do not listen when the Lord tells us things, but go on with our own thoughts.
There are two sides to this. On the one hand they did not let the sayings sink down into their ears as He exhorted them to do. But on the other hand God overruled in this so that it could not be said that they preached the resurrection out of enthusiasm and imagination, and not out of belief in the evidence.

14:6
Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way- like the other “I am” statements in John’s gospel, this is a figure of speech. In John 6 the Lord had said “I am the bread of life”. So features of literal bread in the physical world, may be applied to Him in a spiritual way. We eat bread literally, but we eat the Bread of Life in a spiritual way for, as He explained in that chapter, He lived by the Father, sustaining His spirit by what and who He knew the Father to be. So believers are sustained in spirit by taking in and mentally absorbing the features that marked the Lord Jesus when He was on earth, as John 6:57 indicates.

The emphatic “I” signals the important fact that He is now developing the conversation, so that from speaking of a literal journey from earth to heaven, He is now speaking of a spiritual journey, namely progress on the way to the knowledge of the Father. He knows the Father perfectly, so He does not have to progress in knowledge of the Father, but He does help us to do so. The fact that He Himself is the way, shows that He is not on the way.

Those features which are true of a roadway, are true of Him. Imagine a solid roadway across some desolate moorland on a foggy, moonless night. On either side are dangerous bogs, ready to suck the unwary traveller to his doom. How can he tell where to go? Simply by staying on the roadway. There is only one over this stretch of moor. It is firm underfoot, and is the safe way to go. The road defines the way, to not diverge is to reach the destination. Christ is the way to the Father; no other route will arrive there.

How does this work out in practice? Notice that He says “I am”, so He was the way as He spoke to them. So we can say that it is as one who lived before them that He is the way. As they “looked upon Jesus as He walked”, they saw every aspect of one who was in possession of the full-knowledge of the Father, and whose life demonstrated the fact. What He knew of the Father was translated into words, works, and ways. By these things He demonstrated what the knowledge of the Father resulted in, and thus He became the model for those who sought that knowledge of the Father.

The truth- we have seen that “the way” is a metaphor for progress. That progress starts at the moment of conversion. He will speak in the next verses of the knowledge of Himself as being the way to the knowledge of the Father. It is the truth of His person that enables us to make progress, for knowing Him increasingly well is the secret. The measure of our appreciation of the glories of His Person is the measure of our progress.

And the life- from the saying “I am…the life” we learn that as we make progress on the way, we do so only because we share His life. He said Himself, “this is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou has sent”, John 17:3. The possession of the life of God enables progress to be made as we gain an increased understanding of God and His Son. The life of the flesh enables unbelievers to understand natural things, and eternal life enables the believer to understand spiritual things, and gives the energy for it as well.

No man cometh unto the Father, but by me- all other ways lead in the wrong direction. They do not lead to the knowledge of the Father. All other thinking is mistaken, for the knowledge of the Father is vested in the Son. All other examples are vain, for only in His life is the example for believers found as they travel the road to the Father.

14:7
If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.

If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also- the “should” is not an indication of what they ought to have done, but rather what they could have done, for the verb is in the subjunctive, which is used to indicate that there is something that can possibly happen. The potential is there, whether realised or not. The verb is also in the pluperfect, which places the action further back than merely in the recent past. The Lord is saying to them that it would have been possible for them to have reached the knowledge of the Father by means of what they had learnt of Him during those years when they had been with Him. The way had been pointed out, the truth had been made known, and the life had been lived- what more was there to do? As John writes, “the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him”, John 1:18. And as He said to His Father just before the cross, “I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do”, John 17:4, which in that context was the manifestation of the Father. So it is possible to make real progress in a relatively short period of time, and this prompts us to ask ourselves what progress have we made?

And from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him- now that they had been given insight into the meaning of His life before them, that it was a demonstration of the way they should walk, they can, as they review the life of Christ, know the Father. Before, they but dimly saw Him, but now He has been manifested to them. And the reason they can now, and from henceforth, do this, is because He is seen in His Son.

14:8
Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.

Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father- when a named disciple addresses the Lord in the upper room, he always, with one exception, prefaces his remark with the title “Lord”. See 13:6,9,25,36,37; 14:5,8,22. The significant exception is when Peter refused to allow the Lord to wash his feet, 13:8. Peter’s will was pitted against Christ’s in that incident, so it is no surprise that he does not call Him Lord. He commended them generally, however, for calling Him Lord, 13:13.

The disciples never called the Lord Jesus simply Jesus when they addressed Him. Of course, the gospel writers constantly speak of Jesus, for they are writing history, and Jesus is the personal name by which He is identified to men. Those who constantly refer to the Lord Jesus as Jesus are either not believers, (for “no man can say that Jesus is the Lord but by the Holy Ghost”, 1 Corinthians 12:3), or uninformed. We have it from His own lips that to call Him Lord is to “say well”, John 13:13, and that should carry great weight with a true believer.

This request on the part of Philip ignores the teaching of verse 7. He is asking for a further revelation, and by using the aorist tense in his request he is asking for it as a event complete in itself. In other words, an instant and final revelation.

And it sufficeth us- it is good to be satisfied with nothing less than a sight of God as Father. Philip’s problem, (as the Lord will point out in the next verse), was that he did not realise that this “shewing” had already been done. It is good to desire to see the glory; it is better to recognise it and respond to it when it is seen. Although the Lord Jesus, in one aspect, made Himself of no reputation in the world of men, it is also true that He “manifested forth his glory, and his disciples believed on him”, John 2:11. Clearly they had not at that point discerned that the glory they saw was not simply of a miracle-worker, but was a display of Divine power. After all, it is God as Creator who makes rain into wine, and that is what the Lord had done at the wedding in Cana.

Notice that to see the Father was, to the apostles as Philip speaks for them, the ultimate goal. Only so could the soul be satisfied. The psalmist expressed it well when he wrote, “One thing have I desired of the Lord, that will I seek after; That I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life, to behold the beauty of the Lord, and to enquire in his temple.” Psalm 27:4. No amount of Christian activity can replace this knowledge of God. In fact, Christian activity without some degree of this knowledge is pointless.

14:9
Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet thou hast not known me, Philip? He that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?

Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you- the time during which He was publicly manifested was three and a half years, yet there was compressed into that period the most profound teaching, and the display of what had pertained eternally. It was as the one who is in the bosom of the Father eternally that the Son declared God. He brought eternal conditions into display, hence a relatively short period of time, as we think of it, is a long time when considered as to its content. We might compare the remark at the end of John’s gospel that the world itself would not be able to contain the books that could be written about Christ’s life, John 21:25. Every believer of the last two thousand years could write a book about the way Christ has revealed the Father to him.

And yet thou hast not known me, Philip? After such an intense display of Deity in manhood, Philip has not advanced as he should have done. Before we criticise him, we might ask ourselves whether we have done any better? Notice that Philip had spoken on behalf of all the disciples in verse 8, using the word “us”, but the Lord applies His answer to him personally, addressing him by his name to assure him that He was speaking to him kindly as a friend, see 15:14,15. He also says “thou” with emphasis, as if to say, “thou, with all thy privileges and advantages as an apostle, one who has been with me constantly from the beginning”.

He that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father? To ask to see when the object desired has already been shown, is folly. Perhaps Philip was thinking in terms of a blaze of splendour. He does not realise he has seen the splendour of the Father, but it came in a form he was able to appreciate. Sadly, he did not.
“There shall no man see me and live” was God’s word to Moses, when he asked to be shown God’s glory, Exodus 33:20. How this dilemma is solved is told us in the next verse. When his request was granted he heard God speaking, declaring His name, Exodus 34:5-7. There was nothing about God as Father in that manifestation of Divine glory to Moses, but John says, “we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father”, John 1:14. This is the final revelation, for God has spoken unto us in His Son, Hebrews 1:2, and in Him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily, Colossians 2:9, so He is competent to show the Father. Whereas Moses heard words, Christ is the Word, comprehending in His person all that God can say and be. To see Christ in His life is to see what and who the Father is.

14:10
Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

Believest thou not that I am in the Father- the sight of the glory of Christ was only known to faith, hence the question as to whether Philip believed. He would no doubt assert he did, but his faith needed to be further informed so that he would realise the implications of the life and works of Christ. They were not simply the activities of a holy miracle-worker, but the outworking in manhood of a Divine relationship.

Being “in the Father” is put first, because the Lord is at pains to emphasise that He was not acting in independence of His Father when Philip saw Him in His ministry. He is in Him in the sense that there is no point at which they diverge, whether it be in essence, character, will, or action. This is not to say that the Father and the Son are one Person. Rather, that one person of the Godhead, the Father, is manifested perfectly by another Person of the Godhead, the Son.

And the Father in me? Conversely there is no moment in which the Father does not fully express Himself in the Son. These two statements depend upon one another. If the Son is not in the Father, then the Father is not in the Son, and vice versa. If the Father is in the Son, then to see the Son with spiritual insight is to see the Father.

The words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself- to reinforce His statement, the Lord speaks of words and works, the way the Son manifested the Father. When Moses requested to see the glory of God, Exodus 33:18, he was rewarded, not by a blaze of glory, but by words, even the proclamation of the name of the Lord in terms of His attributes attitudes and actions, Exodus 34:5-8.

There is an ongoing Divine Conversation, in which the persons of the Godhead commune with one another. See, for example, Genesis 1:26, (“let us make man”); 3:22, “Behold, the man is become as one of us”); 11:7, (“Go to, let us go down”); Isaiah 6:8, (“who will go for us”). The Lord is claiming to be privy to that conversation, not as one who overhears, but as a participant. He does not hear to discover, but to discuss. His ear is that of a learned one, not an ignorant one, for He shared mutually known truth, as Isaiah 50:4 indicates.

We could illustrate it like this. Two university professors who teach the same subject are discussing that subject between themselves. They converse as equals, discussing what they both know. Then they go to their respective lecture halls. Now the situation is different, for they now speak with those who do not know, in order to impart to them their knowledge. The Lord Jesus is in the former category, as one who discusses what He knows. He spoke with the tongue of the learned, because He heard as the learned, Isaiah 50:4.

So what He spoke was what He heard as He conversed with His Father, and not a word was spoken in independence. As He Himself said, “For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.” John 12:49. The expression “sent me” alerts us to the fact that He had come to do His Father’s will as a Servant-Son, and as such received commandments. These are not commandments as from a sergeant major to his recruits. Rather, His Father’s words were so important to Him that He treated them as commands.

But the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works- far from acting in independence of His Father, (hence the word “but”), it is in fact the Father who acts when the Son acts. This is because the Father dwelleth in the Son, for He is at home there; there is nothing in the Son to cause the Father misgivings or disquiet.

Note the change from words to works. The words come to the Son as commandments, and those commandments are passed on in the form of the words Christ spoke when He performed a miracle. John uses the word “work” for miracles, as does the Lord Himself, in John 7:21 for instance. In this way the works are words made visible. (There is a similar thought in a different context in John 8:38). This is important to see in view of verse 12. Philip has only to recollect the miracles he had seen Christ do, to see the Father at work, thereby showing His glory.

14:11
Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works’ sake.

Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me- Philip, and the other ten, (for the word “believe” is in the plural), has a choice if they wish to see the Father. They can either recognise the life of the Father in the life of the Son, and believe the Son simply because He says that is what it is.

Or else believe me for the very works’ sake- or they can believe the Son on the basis of the works, as they demonstrate Divine power in action. So important is it to believe the truth of the deity of Christ that both routes are open to the enquiring mind. We have learnt already, in verse 10, that the Father is shown to be in the Son and the Son in the Father by the fact that the Son does not speak independently of the Father, but when the Son speaks to perform a miracle, that miracle is in fact the work of the Father and Himself together. So in reality to believe on the Son for the sake of the works, is the same as to believe the Father and the Son are in one another. They are not opposing ideas, but different expressions of the same truth.

14:12
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.

Verily, verily, I say unto you- the familiar formula introducing that which is a development, might be doubted, even denied, was difficult, but nonetheless definite, and above all, the words of one who possesses deity. It is the statement of one who is equal with the Father, as if the Father says “verily” and the Son echoes the word.

He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also- as we have seen in verse 10, the Lord equates works and words; “I speak not of Myself: but the Father that dwelleth in Me, He doeth the works“. The works were doctrine in action and manifestation. So to do the same works as He did is to set out the truths as found in the gospel records, the teaching appropriate for the time but nonetheless containing timeless principles.

And greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father- consequent upon the return of Christ to heaven the Spirit would come and guide into all truth, including that which was to be revealed through the apostle Paul. These were words that were on a higher level. The Lord knew them, of course, but could not tell the disciples at that point because they could not bear them, 16:12.

When we are thinking of greater works, we must bear in mind that the Lord has virtually made words and works synonymous, in verse 10. So the works take the form of words. In any case, it is not promised to all believers that they will work miracles, for the question is asked in 1 Corinthians 12:29, “Are all workers of miracles?” and the answer is clearly “No”. So the works believers are able to do are not miracles, for the promise is to all who believe on Him without exception. It is “he that believeth on me”, not, “he that is an apostle”, or “he that has the gift of miracles”. Hence it is open to all believers to do these works. This would include the sisters as they engage in private conversations, as well as brothers as they preach and teach. They are not doing works greater than Christ could do. Rather, they are doing works it was not appropriate for Him to do before the Spirit came to give them deeper insight into His person.

We could look at the doing of these greater works in the following way, by reference to the works in John’s gospel:

1. To turn water into wine was a great work, John 2:1-11, and believers may so set forth the truth of Christ that sinners can be brought into the joy of God’s salvation. By doing this they do a great work. It is a greater work, however, to show the deeper meaning of the miracle, and explain that it sets forth the glories of Christ. We should remember that we have the benefit of the teaching of John’s gospel, which the disciples did not have as they companied with Christ. The gospel was written after the Spirit had come to bring all things into the remembrance of the apostles, John 14:26.

2. To rescue a child from dying was a great work, John 4:46-54, and believers may likewise present the Saviour as the one who can give life to those who are in danger of dying in their sins. It is a greater work to enlarge upon this and explain that He is eternal life personified, and promised that those who believe on Him shall never see death, John 8:51.

3. It was a great work to feed the five thousand so that there was enough and to spare, John 6:5-13, and believers, too, may point to Christ as the Living Bread. They may do a greater work as they enlarge on the truths set out in Christ’s long discourse on the subject in that chapter. Such things as His relationship with the Father; the nature of His mission to earth; His complete submission to the will of His Father, and the way in which that means believers are eternally secure; the nature of His death as He gives His flesh for the life of the world; the way His person sustains the souls of His people as they feed on Him; His promise to raise His people up at the last day; His return to heaven and its consequences. All these are profound subjects, and the setting forth of them, either publicly or privately, is a greater work than simply pointing sinners to Christ the Bread of God, vital and valuable as that work is.

4. To give a blind man his sight was a great work, John 9:1-7, and to preach Christ is to open blind eyes, for Paul said that he was sent to the Gentiles to “open their eyes”, Acts 26:18. This initial opening of the eyes of the understanding, so that men receive Christ by faith, is followed by the greater work of enlightening believers as to the deeper things of God, “and to make all men see, what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ”, Ephesians 3:9.

5. To raise a dead man to life was a great work, John 11:38-44, and believers may so present the Person of Christ that men believe, and gain a share in the benefits of His own resurrection. A greater work, however, is done by those who set out the consequences of the resurrection of Christ, as found in such chapters as Romans 6, 1 Corinthians 15, and Ephesians 2. The believer is associated with Christ in His death, burial and resurrection in a way unknown to the disciples at that time.

14:13
And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.

And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do- to ask in His name is to ask as if it is Himself that is asking. (It is not a question of merely adding His name to the end of a prayer). This is why the Father is certain to respond, for Christ would never ask amiss of His Father. The phrase “because I go to the Father” of verse 12 will soon be explained as an indication that the Holy Spirit would come to guide them, so that they could and would intelligently ask for the right things. The indwelling Spirit would also ensure they had the power to do these works. The Spirit always directs us to ask for the things Christ would ask for. In the context, it is asking for blessing on the truth as it is made known.

That the Father may be glorified in the Son- from His prayer in John 17 we learn that the great desire of the Son was to glorify the Father, even after He had returned to heaven. So He speaks of being given power over all flesh, so that He might give eternal life to those given Him by the Father. In this way the Father is glorified. The way that the offer of eternal life is made to men is through the setting out of the truth by the people of God. They ask for blessing on the word, they preach that word, and eternal life is given to men. There is no greater work they could do than this. Miracles only fitted men for an improved life for their few remaining years on earth; eternal life fits for heaven for all eternity. Notice that the Father is glorified through the Son; it is not that believers are glorified.

14:14
If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.

If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it- the disciples may have been taken aback by the immensity of what the Lord is saying here. Is it really true that everything they ask will be given them? Correctly understood, it is, and so the Lord repeats it to reinforce the definiteness of the promise. Just as He repeats the “verily”, He repeats the promise it introduces.

(c)   Verses 15-20
The coming of the Spirit

14:15
If ye love me, keep my commandments.

If ye love me, keep my commandments- this verse is the condition for the fulfilment of verse 16. The Lord applies a test, which is applicable in the first instance to the apostles. God tests men when He begins to deal in a particular way. He tested Adam and Eve at the beginning of time. He tested Israel at the beginning of the law-age. He tested Saul at the beginning of the kingdom period. He tested Israel by the preaching of John the Baptist, and the presence of Christ. Now He is going to test the apostles at the beginning of the church age on the day of Pentecost. The essential feature that must mark them is love, for “love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God. He that loveth not knoweth not God, for God is love”, 1 John 4:7,8. This love is expressed in loving obedience.

The circumstances of the giving of the law were calculated to strike fear into the hearts of the Israelites, as Moses said to the people, “that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not”, Exodus 20:20. How different is this age, when “the love of Christ constraineth us”, 2 Corinthians 5:14. So it is that we read that on the day of Pentecost the disciples were “all with one accord in one place”, Acts 2:1. The Lord had “commanded them that they should not depart from Jerusalem, but wait for the promise of the Father, which, saith he, ye have heard of me”, Acts 1:4. They obeyed this command, and by so doing set the tone for the whole age, for loving obedience is expected of all His people.

Special note on verses 16-23
Verses 16-20 are addressed to the apostles, “you”, (plural), and those they represent, namely believers of this age. The event in view is Pentecost, and the blessing is collective.

Verses 21-23 are addressed to individuals, “any man”, and they concern individual communion with Christ. The context in view is the believer’s love to God, and the blessing is individual.

14:16
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;

And I will pray the Father- not only is the day of the coming of the Spirit marked by obedience, but also by prayer, even the prayer of the Son to the Father. The giving of the Spirit is a sign therefore that the Father still continues to hear the Son, as He did when He was on earth, John 11:42. In 15:26 the Lord speaks of the Spirit as sent by Himself from the Father, so on the one hand there is a request that the Father should send, and on the other the fact that the Son would send. There is equal authority with the Father, but there is also the attitude of the Servant, whose desire is only to do the will of Him that sent Him. All three Persons of the Godhead are involved unitedly in this important event, just as they were at the baptism of Christ.

And he shall give you another Comforter- notice the confidence the Son has that His request will be granted. The word for “another” signifies “another of the same sort”, thus confirming the deity of the Holy Spirit. He could not be of the same sort otherwise. The word also indicates that the Spirit is a Person, not just an influence. The Son was not just an influence, so neither is the Spirit.

That he may abide with you for ever- the purpose of the giving of the Spirit is that He may abide with believers for ever, so it is not “and he shall abide”, but “that he may abide”, for that is the purpose in view. This is sure testimony to the eternal security of the true believer in Christ. The Lord Jesus was going away, and the disciples would be unnerved by that, but to encourage them they are told of one who shall never leave them. Of course the Lord did not leave them in one very real sense, (“I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee”, Hebrews 13:15), but He would no longer be with them in the body and this would sadden them. They would know His presence in a different way.

14:17
Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.

Even the Spirit of truth- the Lord now defines who this other Comforter is. He is not a person in the flesh, but is the Spirit of God. And because the promise is in the context of the greater works of setting forth Divine truth, He is aptly called the Spirit of truth. He will disclose the truth to all believers so that they may make Christ known in the various ways open to them, and will support and strengthen them as they do so.

Note that the Lord is careful when He mentions this Comforter to define who He is, for He knew Islam would rise up 700 years later and claim that their prophet was the comforter. The history of that religion down the centuries shows plainly that as they worked out the teachings of their prophet it certainly did not bring comfort to men. Violence and murder were in abundance, but comfort was in very short supply. And the same applies today.

Whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him- notice the clear line of distinction drawn here between believers and the world. And the difference highlighted here is that the world is unable to do two things.

First, it cannot see the Holy Spirit. We might think that in this they are no different to believers, for they cannot see the Spirit either. The point is that the world can only appreciate things that are accessible to the natural senses. The spiritual ability to appreciate the things of the Spirit, and therefore the Spirit Himself, is totally lacking in their case, as 1 Corinthians 2:14 explains, “But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”

Second, the world cannot know the Spirit, or in other words, cannot have any meaningful relationship with the Spirit, for He will not link Himself with that which is of Adam. Israel were expressly told not to pour the anointing oil on anyone other than priests, “Upon man’s flesh shall it not be poured”, Exodus 30:32, where the word for man is “adam”. So the Spirit of God cannot indwell anyone who is still a child of Adam, and not a child of God.

But ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you- the disciples already had experience of the working and presence of the Spirit as Christ did miracles in His power. As He said, “But if I cast out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God is come unto you.” Matthew 12:28. So to have Christ by their side was to have the Spirit with them, for He could say, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me”, Luke 4:18. But there was a new experience in store for them, for they would have the Spirit within them. But the word “dwelleth” is in the present tense, and indicates that the Spirit would continue to abide or remain with them, even after He had come within them.

So it was that the Spirit filled every one of the believers on the day of Pentecost, Acts 2:4, and that happens the moment a person believes the gospel, for the apostle Paul states very clearly, “Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.” Romans 8:9.

We should be clear that every believer is filled with the Spirit all the time. When the apostle exhorts us to “be filled with the Spirit”, Ephesians 5:18, he is not saying we need a further supply of the Spirit because for some reason we have become less than full. He means that we should “be” what we “are”, that is, filled with the Spirit. We are to live in the light of the fact that we are filled with the Spirit, and allow Him to control us.

In verse 16, the Lord prophesied that the Spirit would dwell or abide with them. Here, He speaks of the Spirit abiding or dwelling with, and also actually being within. In verse 16, “with” is “meta”, with the genitive. In verse 17, the word “with” is “para”, with the dative. These distinctions would have been appreciated by the apostles when they heard the Lord Jesus speaking in Hebrew, and Greek-speakers who first read them as John translated them would note the difference too.. Both “meta” and “para” mean “with”. But “meta” is “in connection with”, “in company with”, or “among, in the midst of”. Christ companied with men, and with His disciples; He was in their midst, and among them, but He was about to leave them, and leave the world, so they would not have His company in that sense any more; however, they would have the companionship of the Spirit.

The word “para”, however, involves a closer relationship, meaning “by the side of”. In fact, the word for Comforter is “para-clete”, one who draws alongside to help. So we have three ideas. The Spirit is among the people of God for ever, verse 16; He is alongside them to help, verse 17; He is within them to empower, verse 17.

14:18
I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

I will not leave you comfortless- the word used here is not the same as is used in the word Comforter. It has the idea of being an orphan. An orphan is one who is left vulnerable and alone. The Lord will see to it that His own are not like that. He had called the disciples little children in 13:33, and would do so again in John 21:5, (and the apostle John adopts the thought in his epistles), and in Hebrews 2:13 also.

I will come to you- there are several ways we could look at this promise. First, He would come at Pentecost in the person of the Holy Spirit. This is enlarged on in verse 23. Any one of the Persons of the Godhead may fully represent the other. We see this in Romans 8:9,10, where to have the Spirit within is to have Christ within. So here, to have the Spirit within is to have Christ and His Father within.

Second, when individual believers commune with Him He promises to come in unto them and sup with them, and they with Him, Revelation 3:20, a very precious promise, especially for those who live in Laodicean conditions.

Third, and allied to this, is the way He manifests Himself to those who keep His commandments, verse 21. The word for coming in verse 18 is in the present tense, “I am coming to you”, as if He cannot wait to make Himself known to His own.

14:19
Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.

Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more- the world could not see the Holy Spirit, but it could see Christ, for He was manifest in flesh. That physical presence was, in a little while, to be withdrawn from the world, as He ascends back to His Father.

But ye see me- it was true that the disciples would not see Him in that sense either, but in another and very real sense, they would continue to do what they were doing at that moment, namely, see Him with spiritual insight. Their view of Him was not limited to physical sight, so to not see Him physically was no handicap. They saw Him to be the Son of God, and equal with the Father. As the Lord had said, “And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will raise him up at the last day.” John 6:40. They would continue to see Him in that way even when He was gone from their physical sight. When the manna was given the people saw it physically, but “they wist not what it was”, so they did not see the spiritual significance of what they were looking at, Exodus 16:15. So in John 6:42, the chapter where the Lord shows He is the true manna, the bread from heaven, the people said, “is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven”. They saw Him physically, but they had no spiritual insight into His person. But at the end of the discourse on the Bread of Life, Peter confessed “We believe and are sure that thou art that Christ, the Son of the living God”, John 6:69. Moses had told the people that on the day the manna came they would see the glory of the Lord, Exodus 16:7. The disciples had seen the glory that day.

Because I live, ye shall live also- their sight of Him, even when He was gone, would be of a living person, the very embodiment and personification of eternal life. One of the reasons why John wrote his first epistle was so that what he and his fellow-apostles saw and heard might be seen and heard by others who were not physically present at the time.

Because the Lord Jesus is eternal life personified, the eternal life they already had would flourish as they understand Him better by the aid of the Spirit. In John’s gospel there is a close connection between seeing and knowing, for knowing in this context is spiritual insight. Because they knew Him, they could continue to see Him, even when He was no longer visible to the eye, and hence their spiritual life would develop. To possess eternal life is to know God and Jesus Christ, 17:3, and there is to be progress in that knowing, and when this happens we can be said to live in the fullest sense of the term.

It is “because I live”, as He said, that we live; it is no credit to believers, but He works in them by the Spirit, so that they develop in the knowledge of Himself. By seeing Him and knowing Him as the full expression of eternal life, they would live in the good of what He is, and thus themselves live. He is not only the living bread, who, having life in Himself can impart it to those who believe, John 6:51, but He is also the bread of life, verse 48, the sustainer of the life He gives.
The expression “I live” emphasises the fact that Christ as to His Deity is not subject to death, for His life is constant and indissoluble, or as Hebrews 7:16 puts it, “endless”. As He said to John, “I am he that liveth”, Revelation 1:18. John had fallen at His feet as dead; but death, or even its semblance, cannot be allowed in Christ’s presence, therefore the Lord spoke of Himself as the Living One to counteract John’s condition.

14:20
At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.

At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father- “that day” means the present age marked by the fact that the Spirit has come. After the Spirit had come they would be given insight into three things: First, His relationship with the Father. Second, their relationship with Him. Third, His relationship with them.

Their insight into His Person would deepen, and they would not only believe that He was in the Father because He had told them, verses 10,11, but they would know it with conviction. The Spirit would work in them to this end. Note there is no “the Father in Me”, as in verse 10. Having asserted that truth there, the Lord only needs to assure them here that there will be a link between them and the ascended Son of God. In verse 10 the relationship is horizontal, so to speak, with the persons involved being on the same level of Deity. Here the relationship is vertical, with the Son linking us to the Father because He remains in Him. It is not so much that the Father will be in us, but the Son will, by the Spirit, as we learn in the remainder of this verse.

And ye in me- this is a new truth, only to be grasped when the Spirit came. It involved being linked so closely with the Son of God that we can be said to be in Him. That is, personally, vitally, and intimately identified with Him in the bonds of eternal life, enclosed in all that He is, so that all that concerns Him concerns us. Of course, our relationship with Him will never result in us sharing Deity. But we do share His life. As the apostle John wrote, “And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know him that is true. and we are in him that is true, even in his Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.” 1 John 5:20.

And I in you- by the Spirit He will dwell within, for the presence of the Spirit is as good as having Him within. He cannot be in us physically, for He has a body, but He can be in us as the Spirit dwells in us. It is a truly solemn thought that a Person of the Godhead dwells within. How careful this should make us as to our behaviour.

(d)   Verses 21-24
The Father and the Son coming to dwell

14:21
He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.

He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them- just as obedience on the part of the apostles was necessary for the Spirit to come, (for He cannot indwell a rebellious body), so now in relation to “any man”. The good of this verse is not automatically known by all the people of God. There is a condition, and that condition, as with the apostles in verse 15, is obedience. The blessing held out in this verse is for those who, first, have His commandments. That is, they have heard His commands and hold them in their hearts as precious. Just because we are not saved by works of the law we must not think that the Christian life is an unprincipled and lawless life. Christ is our Lord, and has every right to issue commands to us. (We learn from the Lord’s words in 15:10 that the word of the Father to Him was so important to Him that He looked on those words as commandments, with binding force). They are not commands which by keeping we gain the blessing of salvation, but rather, by which we gain the blessing of an enhanced sense of who He is. Second, they keep those commands. They do not hold them as theories, but work them out in practice.

He it is that loveth me- of course all believers love the Lord, for “He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.” 1 John 4:8. Here, however, we have a similar idea to the fact the John describes himself as the disciple whom Jesus loved, John 13:23; 19:26; 21:7; 21:20. Did He not love Peter? Of course, for John 13:1 says, “Jesus…having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them unto the end”. But there was a special bond between John and his Lord, as is seen in that he leant on the bosom of Jesus at supper. Some believers “love much”, Luke 7:47. So just as John had a very special sense that the Lord loved him, so the Lord Jesus likewise has a special attachment to those whose love for Him is strong.

And he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father- the reaction of people to His Son touches the Father’s heart. When He sees one who is devoted to His Son, who loves Him deeply, and show his love by keeping His commandments, then He has a special love for that believer, without in any wise diluting His love for all His people. Just as John was loved by Jesus, and had a special sense of His love, so here the same is true in relation to the Father.

And I will love him- not only is this one loved of the Father, but is loved by the Son also. The Father and the Son are united in their reaction to this believer.
And will manifest myself to him- this is no doubt through the ministry of the Holy Spirit, who takes of the things of Christ and reveals them to us as 16:14 will explain. But that is a work done in the heart of every believer. Here there is something special and individual that we might well covet. What a promise this is to us, that even though He is in heaven, He reveals Himself to those who are on earth. Once again, the sadness of the disciples that He was going away is tempered by this promise that He will come to them personally.

14:22
Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?

Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot- just as there were two Simons in the apostolic band, (so that John needs to distinguish them by saying, Simon Peter, to show he is not writing about Simon the Cananite, who we read of in Matthew 10:4), so there were two men named Judas. The one, Judas Iscariot, was the betrayer, the other was loyal, but John carefully marks the distinction between them here by saying “not Iscariot”. The reason he does this is not only to protect the character of the other Judas, but also to highlight how he addressed the Lord, as we next see.

Lord- this is the difference that John wishes to emphasize. It is noticeable that Judas Iscariot never addressed Christ as Lord, and this is the mark of an unbeliever. The recognition of the Lordship of Christ is vital, and where it is in evidence, is the sure sign of a believer. Salvation comes to those who confess with the mouth the Lord Jesus, Romans 10:9. Because the gospels are in the first place historical records, it is appropriate for the writers to constantly refer to Jesus, but when the disciples addressed Him, they never used this name. We should beware if those who profess to be saved never use it either. It is remarkable that Saul of Tarsus, confronted on the Damascus Road by one who said “I am Jesus”, immediately responded with the title “Lord”, Acts 9:5,6.

How is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world? This is the typical response of a godly Jew who is waiting for the glorious manifestation of Messiah’s kingdom upon the earth. Judas is puzzled, for how could that happen, and only believers see it? He is about to learn that the manifestation is of a quite different kind to the one of which he is thinking.

14:23
Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words- there is nothing in this answer about a coming kingdom. The manifestation will be personal to the man who loves Christ. Notice the “if”, and “any man”, for this experience is not common to all believers, but is reserved for those who are truly in touch with Christ. The distinguishing feature of a man who loves the Lord Jesus is the obedience to His commands that His love to us deserves. These commands are contained in His word, not in the sense of “in the Bible”, but more specifically, in His statements to us, which taken together, make up His collective word to us. We are not given an option of choosing which words we will comply with and which not, as suits us.

But this statement goes further, for it not simply practising His words, or believing them, or obeying them, it is keeping or preserving them. Thus we learn that there is a special place in the heart of Christ for those who preserve His words from the attacks of the enemy. To insist on the integrity and truthfulness of the words of Christ in the face of liberal tendencies, takes courage, and that only comes through love to Christ. Judas Iscariot betrayed Christ and His cause; the other Judas is being given the opportunity to be loyal to Christ, and further His interests, even in a world that still betrays Him.

And my Father will love him- the Father is very sensitive to reactions to His Son. The reward for the one who keeps the words of Christ is to have a special sense of the love of the Father. Of course God loves all His children, but just as Christ loved all “his own”, but John was “the disciple whom Jesus loved”, so there is a special and loving relationship formed between the obedient child and his Father. This is well worth going in for.

And we will come unto him, and make our abode with him- clearly the Son is sensitive to reaction to His word as well, and He, together with His Father, makes His abode with the one who is the object of special favour because of his obedience. To make an abode means to be at home, happy with the atmosphere that prevails. It is a further thought than simply being in a person. The Father and the Son are in each believer, but they may not be fully at home, because of the things that believer allows in his life. The apostle Paul prayed for the Ephesian believers, “that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith”, Ephesians 3:17. He was not praying that they might get saved, for they already were, but that the Lord Jesus, who entered their hearts when they received the Spirit at their conversion, might be at home there, and not just present.

At the beginning of the gospel, two disciples desired to know where Jesus dwelt, and when He said “Come and see”, they came and dwelt where He did, probably in a temporary shelter near the river Jordan, (it was very likely at the time of the feast of tabernacles). It mattered not the outward circumstances, the important thing was to dwell with Him. Now the reverse is the case, He, and His Father, dwell with the obedient child. The psalmist wrote of God’s commandments that “in keeping of them is great reward”. He had little insight, if any, into the greatness of the rewards for believers in this age, but he had grasped the principle.

No doubt this is by the power of the Spirit, for Divine persons can each be represented by the other, even though they are distinct. For instance the apostle Paul wrote, “But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of His. And if Christ be in you…” Romans 8:9,10. So there is the mention of the Spirit, the Spirit of God, and the Spirit of Christ, but the same Spirit in each case, but considered in relation to Himself, to God, and to Christ. Instead of going on to say “And if the Spirit be in you”, Paul writes “if Christ be in you”. So to have the Spirit is to have Christ, for He is able to fully represent Christ to us. So this is the way Christ manifests Himself, not in a blaze of glory to the world, but in the quietness of the heart that loves Him.

14:24
He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father’s which sent me.

He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings- here is the reverse situation to that of the previous verse. John in his writings often presents the opposite side to a statement he has just made- is this where he learnt the technique? It ensures that we are in no doubt, for there are no exceptions. Following the line of argument from verse 21, we might say that the one who does not love the Lord is the one who does not “love much”, Luke 7:47. The one who loves much will keep His sayings, and will have a special sense and appreciation of the presence of the Father and the Son, by the Spirit.

Note that the counterpart of “my words”, is “my sayings”. Is this why the Authorised Version renders the former phrase in the plural, even though the expression translated “my words” is in the singular? It would be well for those who insist on constantly criticizing the Authorised Version to give the noble translators of that version credit for their godliness and learning, and not be so hasty to try to correct them.

And the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father’s which sent me- this shows the seriousness of not keeping, or even believing, the word of Christ, for it does not originate with Him in isolation, but in harmony with His Father. It is not the rejection of the words of a carpenter from Nazareth, but of the Son of God as He speaks for His Father. This is yet another passage where this unity is manifest in the Lord’s speaking. Others are as follows, (notice they are all from John’s Gospel, the one that emphasises the equality of the Son with the Father. The relevant words have been put in bold lettering simply and only for the purpose of making them stand out):

“Now about the midst of the feast Jesus went up into the temple, and taught. And the Jews marvelled, saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never learned? Jesus answered them, and said, My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me. If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. He that speaketh of himself seeketh his own glory: but he that seeketh his glory that sent him, the same is true, and no unrighteousness is in him.” John 7:14-18.

“Then said they unto him, Who art Thou? And Jesus saith unto them, Even the same that I said unto you from the beginning. I have many things to say and to judge of you: but he that sent me is true; and I speak to the world those things which I have heard of him. They understood not that he spake to them of the Father.” John 8:25-27.

I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.” John 8:38.

“He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day. For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.” John 12:48-50.

(e)   Verses 25-31
Resources for believers in His absence

14:25
These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you.

These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you- this is another gentle indication that He is leaving them. He had told them about Judas so that they would not be overwhelmed, and also so that they would maintain confidence in Him when He was arrested and crucified, seeing He, knowing beforehand what was to happen, had forewarned them, 13:18-19. This short-term prophecy would also give them confidence in His more long-term prophecies. This is important, because a man whose prophecies did not come to pass was to be stoned as an imposter, Deuteronomy 18:20-22.

He had also warned them in the words, “Little children, yet a little while I am with you”, 13:33. Something of His pity for them is expressed in the words “little children”. Jehovah pitied His people in Psalm 103:13 “as a father pitieth his children”, and now God manifest in flesh is expressing this. This going away, however, is so that He may prepare a place for them and return to escort them to heaven. So these indications of His departure are followed by words of encouragement. The same is true in our verse, for the mention of not being with them is followed by the assurance that the Spirit would come as a comforter.

14:26
But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost- the word “but” emphasizes the changed conditions that are about to prevail, yet also serves to introduce the compensating benefit. The Lord is careful to define who the comforter is, lest they think He is a man. After all, the Lord has already described Him as “another”, meaning “another of the same sort”, so they could be forgiven for this mistake, seeing Christ was a man. So “Comforter…Holy Ghost” rules out that notion, as it does in verses 16,17, and 16:7,13. But even though He is spirit and not flesh and blood, the fact that He is of the same sort as Christ assures us of His Deity. This careful defining of the Comforter is necessary for its own sake, but also because the Lord well knew that Mahomet would come on the scene in the 7th Century and claim to be the promised comforter. His claim is forestalled by these words, for how can a man be described as a holy spirit?

The title of Consolation of Israel had been given to the Lord Jesus by Simeon, in Luke 2:25, and it is interesting to notice that when the child Jesus was presented to the Lord in the temple at the age of forty days, Mary offered to God either two turtle doves or two pigeons, (we are not told which). But the Holy Spirit is seen to come down on Christ at His baptism as a dove, and Luke tells us He came in bodily form, Luke 3:2. Thus these things give incidental testimony to the unity of Divine persons, for the dove represents the Spirit, but He came in bodily form because the Son was now in the body.

Whom the Father will send in my name- this indicates that the Father sends the Spirit in response to all He sees in His Son. Whatever He discerns in His Son’s character gives meaning to His sending of the Spirit. We may be assured, then, that there will be no discrepancy between the attitude of the Spirit to things, and the attitude of the Son. And because the Son’s attitude to things was that of His Father, then the Godhead is, as always, acting manifestly in harmony. This ensures the continuity of Divine testimony. The Father had sent the Son, but He had taken a body. The Holy Spirit dwells within the body of the believer, as 1 Corinthians 6:19 tells us in the words, “your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God”. He uses the vehicle of the believer’s body to carry out His work.

The coming of the Spirit is here the act of the Father, whereas in Acts 2:33 it was the Lord Jesus who shed forth the Spirit, as John the Baptist had predicted in the words, “the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost”, John 1:33. Again, the Persons of the Godhead are seen to be in harmony. This being the case, we should expect the Scriptures that come as a result of the Spirit’s movements to be in harmony also, and this is certainly the case.

He shall teach you all things- the word “He” is emphatic here, which does not make it mean, “He, the Spirit, shall teach you as I did not”, but rather, “He, this same one, difficult as it is for you to take in, shall teach you”. They had been used to listening to men teaching, whether the rabbis, or John the Baptist, or Christ, but now it was to be the Spirit teaching, and they were possibly perplexed.

The solution to their puzzlement is two-fold. First there is the idea of truth being brought to remembrance so that it could be written down. The Spirit and the Word would be vitally linked. Second, it is seen in the fact that the apostles, men of flesh and blood, would be the Spirit’s teaching agencies. So much so that it becomes their word, John 17:20; Acts 2:41.

Note it is the Spirit who will teach, not the church, as the Roman Catholic system claims. As soon as men start to claim to originate ideas, there is confusion, as the history of the last two thousand years clearly demonstrates.

By “all things” is meant, “all things that remain to be taught”. It is not that the Spirit will start afresh, or else they would not need past things brought to their memory. There were further truths to be brought to light after the Spirit had come at Pentecost, as 16:12,13 explains.

And bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you- nothing of what Christ had said was going to be lost, but the Spirit of God would gather it up and enable the apostles to remember what He had said, just as after He had fed the five thousand, the Lord said to His disciples, “Gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost”, and this they did, John 6:12.

When they came to write it down, and when they preached it, they were able to give a true account of the Lord’s teaching. We may be confident that what we read in the Scriptures is indeed a trustworthy account. Luke tells us that many had set themselves the task of writing down the details of the Lord’s life. He does not condemn them for doing this, but the fact that Luke’s gospel gained the approval of the apostles, (as is seen, for instance, in that the apostle Paul quoted from it in Acts 20:35), shows Luke’s gospel is authoritative. And it is this because the Spirit of truth inspired it, which could not be said of other attempts at writing a gospel. Furthermore, the apostle John was allowed to live a long life, so that he could assess that which was written, and approve the genuinely inspired Scriptures, and condemn all that was spurious. The books of the Apocrypha, (the word means “hidden”), were called that not because they were suppressed, but because they were seen to be not genuine, and therefore should be hidden away as being of no use.

Because the apostles were thus guided of the Spirit, that which they preached before the New Testament was written can be relied upon. They were not using their imagination, nor did they have to depend on their own memory. Nor did they have to draw on traditions, and paste together a collection of them as they saw fit. So it is that Peter can assure us that the apostles “have not followed cunningly devised fables”, 2 Peter 1:16.

14:27
Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.

Peace I leave with you- there were three sweet-savour offerings in the Book of Leviticus, and they spoke of aspects of Christ as to His person. As the fulfilment of the Burnt Offering He was the Accepted Man, pleasing to His Father in all things. As the Meal Offering He was the Ideal Man, the sort of man that God was looking for. As the Peace Offering He is Harmonious Man, at all times in fellowship with His Father.

We might see a connection with this statement and the one before it, that the Spirit would bring to their remembrance what He had said unto them. As He left them to go to His Father, there would be the remembrance of His words, and as they contemplated them great peace would fill their hearts, for it was as if He were still with them. This was one of the ways in which their troubled hearts would be filled with peace.

My peace I give unto you- in His ministry at this time the Lord spoke of several things that were especially His own. For instance, He could speak of My joy, the joy that was personally His, John 15:11. He could speak of My love, John 15:9. Then in His prayer to His Father He spoke of My glory, John 17:24. Here it is My peace. This is peace that is special and unique to Him up to that point, the peace of one whose whole being was in harmony with God.

One of the meanings of the word peace as used of the peace offering is wholeness. This is why when the apostle was praying for the Thessalonian believers he asked the God of peace to sanctify them wholly, so that their whole spirit and soul and body might be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, 1 Thessalonians 5:23. The perfect example of blamelessness in spirit and soul and body is the Lord Jesus. Now He has left us an example that we should follow His steps, 1 Peter 2:21, and in this way He has left peace with us. As we follow His steps we shall be at peace with our Father, just as He was at peace with the Father.

These disciples were about to experience the worst events of their lives, and they would be left sorrowful, perplexed and distressed. They need a special word of assurance to prepare them for this, and they receive it now as He grants them His peace. The last phrase of the Old Testament priestly blessing was, “The Lord lift up his countenance upon thee, and give thee peace”, Numbers 6:26. This is what is happening here. If they remembered His words as they went through the trauma of the next few days, His peace would fill their hearts. They would realise that, great as their distresses were, His were infinitely greater, and yet His heart was at peace as one who was wholly set apart to do His Father’s will. In the measure in which they reacted like He did to the trials, they would know the same peace as He knew.

Not as the world giveth, give I unto you- the world only gives peace to those who compromise with it. He gives peace out of the love of His heart for them. The world gives with ulterior motives, He gives sincerely. The world gives sparingly, He gives substantially. The world gives temporarily, He gives eternal blessings.

Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid- here is His specific exhortation, one that in trying times they may be able to recall as spoken directly to them, designed to calm their fears. One of the distinctive features of the peace offering was its emphasis on the inwards of the animal, and the fat that surrounded them. Now the Hebrews believed that the emotions were centred in that region. So it is peace of heart that the man had as he came with his offering, but in order to preserve the uniqueness of Christ, he must come with the inwards of a substitute, which foreshadowed Christ. Only the Lord Jesus can offer Himself without spot to God as an offering and a sacrifice of a sweet savour to God, Ephesians 5:2; Hebrews 9:14.

We can be troubled by the past, and we can be afraid of the future. As they passed through the experiences of the next few days, they might torment themselves for their failures. The way in which they forsook Him and fled; how they, (except John), had not the courage to stand by the cross; how they betrayed Him, Peter openly, the rest of them by their desertion of Him. Yet in the midst of it all His words would come to their hearts, “Let not your heart be troubled”. He had said this before He told them He was going away, verse 1, and now they need the same word because of the current circumstances. Just as He knew Judas would betray Him, He knew they would desert Him, yet He still spoke words of comfort to them. He knew that in their heart of hearts they were true to Him.

But we can be afraid because of what we think might be in the future. If they let Him down once, might they not do it again? He pre-empts that thought, and gives them His word of cheer so that they do not allow the future to frighten them. The apostle Paul could say, “I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Romans 8:38,39. The believer shares his confidence.

14:28
Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.

Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you- He reminds them of His promise that, even though He was going away, He would come again to receive them to Himself that they might be in the safety and calm of the Father’s house. This prospect would cheer them as they waited for His return. They had heard His words, but how they would react was critical.

If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father- far from being sad, they should turn away from themselves and their own circumstances, and concentrate on the fact He was going back to His Father, and all His sufferings would be over. If we thought of His interests more, and thought of our interests less, our fears would be gone. So, far from being sad for themselves, they should in fact be the opposite, and rejoice for Him, for the following reasons:

1.  He would be rewarded for His service down here as He revealed the Father.

2.  He would be given reputation after the reproach heaped upon Him by men.

3.  He would be recompensed for His sufferings, by being glorified.

4.  He would release the power they needed to fulfil His commands.

For my Father is greater than I- this is an important statement, (as well as a misunderstood one), and we need to bear the following things in mind as we consider it:

1. This statement is pointless if Jesus Christ is merely a creature like the rest of men. It goes without saying that God is greater than a man.

2. The expression “my Father” itself is a claim to Deity, as the Jews recognised in John 5:17. When the Lord said, “My Father worketh hitherto and I work”, they saw this as making Himself equal with God.

3. He is stated to be equal with God in other scriptures, such as follows:

“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” John 1:1.

“I and my Father are one.”, John 10:30.

“Christ Jesus: who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God”, Philippians 2:5,6.

“His dear Son:…Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: for by him were all things created”, Colossians 1:13,15,16.

“his Son…being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person”, Hebrews 1:2,3.

So nothing in the phrase we are considering should be thought of as denying the truth of the Deity of Christ.
4. John writes to specifically set forth the Deity of Christ, (“these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God”, John 20:31), so why is he the only one to record this statement, if it goes against his theme?
We could ask ourselves the question, is a natural father greater than his natural son? Do they not share the same nature? Does not the father beget in his own likeness, and reproduce himself in his son? The father is not greater because he is prior in time, for that does not bestow greatness. Nor is he greater because he is responsible for the begetting of his son, for the son is simply, in a sense, an extension of himself; that does not bestow greatness either.

But what if the father is head of the company he has built up, and when his son leaves school he feels it best that he should be on the payroll like an employee, and obey the dictates of the company director, who just happens to be his father? Is not the father greater than the son in a sense then?

No sooner does the son become an employee, he becomes subject to his father. He must obey if he wishes to remain in the workforce. He may be morally superior to his father; he may be more hardworking than his father, he may be more clever than his father, but the over-riding matter is that he is a servant.

Now the above illustration has many flaws in it in regards to the relationship between God the Father and His Son. But the main point is this, that when the Son of God took upon Him the form of a servant and was made in the likeness of men, He accepted a place of subjection, and with that came the obligation to obey. At that point His Father became, not greater in essence or nature, not greater in integrity or character, not greater is skill or ability, but greater in administrative function. Nevertheless, when He commanded the Lord to do something, it did not in any wise imply that He was inferior to Him.

So what is the connection between the Son going back to the Father and Him being greater than the Son? The Lord was not able to say at that point, for there were certain things they were not able to bear before the Spirit indwelt them. But we now know that the return of the Lord Jesus to heaven opened up a whole range of ministries that He could not engage in until the work of Calvary was over.

We should remember that the Lord Jesus has taken the form of a servant for ever, for part of being a man is the obligation to serve God, and He is a man for ever. Currently He is a minister of the sanctuary, Hebrews 8:2, and in a day to come He said Himself that “he shall gird himself, and make them to sit down to meat, and will come forth and serve them”, Luke 12:37. And even at the end of time, we read, “And when all things shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under Him, that God may be all in all”, 1 Corinthians 15:28.

He was going back to His Father in full recognition that He had much service ahead of Him, which service He would render in obedience to His Father, and this should give the apostles cause for joy, for it would mean He would minister to their needs despite being far away in heaven. All that He had been to them in the past would be secure for them in the future, and more besides.

14:29
And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.

And now I have told you before it come to pass- He had told them that Judas would betray Him, “that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that I am He”, 13:19. Now we have almost identical words in connection with His going away and the ministry that would open up for Him afterwards. So whether it is the sadness of His betrayal, or the joy of His reinstatement in heaven, the apostles were fortified by the fact that He knew beforehand, and that these events did not take Him by surprise. They would thereby be confirmed in their faith in Him. Their faith in Him before was in one who would ascend the throne of David, now their faith would be in one who had ascended to the throne of heaven.

14:30
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

Hereafter I will not talk much with you- He would teach them some more, but not much, for they were not able to bear it until the Spirit came at Pentecost to carry on His teaching work, 16:13. Does He sense the approach of Judas, and does He wish to protect from disturbance the man who kindly gave Him the upper room? It is possible that the house was owned by Mark’s father, and that Judas came to the house first before he tried to locate Him in the Garden of Gethsemane. Was the young man clad only in a linen cloth who followed the arrest party Mark himself, disturbed from his sleep by Judas’ visit, and who then followed the band of soldiers to Gethsemane? See Mark 14:51,52, the only place where this incident is recorded.

For the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me- even though Judas, empowered as he now was by Satan, the prince of this world, would put into operation the arrest, examination, sentence and crucifixion of the Lord Jesus, He was confident, at the outset, that all the accusations were baseless, and that He was innocent of them all. All other men had things in them that Satan could accuse them of, but not He.

This statement by the Lord would strengthen their hearts, for many charges would be laid against Him, and when they heard of them they might waver in their belief in Him. Here is His assurance that all the charges would be baseless, and continued faith in Him was worthwhile.

14:31
But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do. Arise, let us go hence.

But that the world may know that I love the Father- having assured the disciples that there was nothing in Him that the prince of this world could fasten upon to gain an advantage, (as, sadly, there had been with Judas), the positive side is presented here. It is that the Father has everything in Him that He looked for. He asserts His love to the Father, thus assuring the disciples that there was nothing that He would fail to do for Him. He would go to the cross without any resentment or reserve.

Strange as it may seem, this is the only place where it is stated that He loves the Father. We are told several times that the Father loves the Son, but not that He loves Him. How shall we account for this? John writes, “My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth.” 1 John 3:18. Is the same principle here, that the love of the Son for the Father is not stated, because it was so obvious by deed and truth? The disciples knew that He loved the Father, but now the world is going to discover it. To the unbeliever, simply observing the events of the next three days would not reveal the Son’s love to the Father, but if they came into the good of the gospel, they would learn it. So it is “the world may know”, not “the world shall know”. They will have the opportunity to know.

And as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do- even though the Father’s word to the Son was not of the same sort as the ten commandments given to Israel, nevertheless so eager was He to comply, that He treated them like commandments. He did not need to be ordered to obey, for He did so willingly. Not only was He willing, but He was careful to do exactly as the Father said, for it is “as…even so”. The specific commandment in view was the one He spoke of in John 10:17,18, “Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment have I received of my Father.” So it is that He begins the journey from the upper room to the cross, to the tomb, and to heaven. The love of the Son for the Father, resulting in Him obeying His commandments, is the example for the disciples whilst He is absent from them, so they show their love to Him by likewise keeping His commandments, verse 15.

Arise, let us go hence- on the original passover night, the Israelites were told to eat the passover meal “with your loins girded, your shoes on your feet, and your staff in your hand; and ye shall eat it in haste; it is the Lord’s passover”, Exodus 12:11. Just as Israel began their journey to Canaan that night, and ate the meal in readiness to move off, so the Lord and His disciples are beginning a journey. He is about to accomplish His decease, (the word is “exodon”, meaning exodus), Luke 9:31, and depart out of this world. The disciples will soon learn that He has taken them out of the world, morally speaking, but will send them into the word, evangelically speaking. By removing them from the upper room at this point, the Lord is indicating that there is a change in His ministry, and He will now prepare them for conditions in this world in the next two chapters. This will involve fruit-bearing and testimony, the subject of chapters 15 and 16. With this we may compare the change of location in Matthew 13, with the first four of seven parables spoken to the crowds at the sea side, and the last three spoken to the disciples in the house, Matthew 13:1,36. The location is significant in each case.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 CORINTHIANS 6

SURVEY OF THE CHAPTER

Having dealt with the pressing matter of immorality in the assembly, and having reminded the Corinthians how to deal with it, namely by acting as a united company, the apostle now turns to the way the Corinthians were wrongly dealing with things. It seems that the Corinthians, instead of carrying out the instruction of the Lord Jesus in Matthew 18:15-17, and settling personal grievances face to face, had resorted to taking one another before the judgement bar of men. This was a serious matter, and showed their lack of wisdom. It is in the kingdom gospel of Matthew that we find instruction on these matters, for Christ’s kingdom is marked pre-eminently by righteousness, and the assembly is the supreme place now where righteousness should be administered. It is no use expecting unjust and worldly judges to assess assembly disputes righteously.

In the second half of the chapter the apostle gives instruction regarding immorality. The immoral person of chapter 5 was misusing his body, and so the apostle takes the opportunity in verses 12-20 to deal with immoral practices in general, and then in chapter 7 deals with the behaviour that is expected of believers in the moral sphere.

STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER

Section (a) Verses 1-8 The wrong of believers taking fellow-believers to court.
Section (b) Verses 9-11 The marked difference between unbelievers and believers.
Section (c) Verses 12-20 The duty of believers to be pure in body and spirit.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 6, VERSES 1 TO 8

6:1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?

6:2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?

6:3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

6:4 If then ye have judgments of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.

6:5 I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?

6:6 But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers.

6:7 Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded?

6:8 Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren.

Section (a) Verses 1- 8 The wrong of believers taking fellow-believers to court.

6:1 Dare any of you, having a matter against another, go to law before the unjust, and not before the saints?

Dare any of you- because the action goes against the command of the Lord Jesus, it is a daring thing to try to settle minor matters between brethren before the courts of men. This brings the assembly into public disrepute. Of course, if a professed believer is guilty of illegal activity of any sort, he should be handed over to the authorities, and the assembly should make it very public that they have no sympathy with his alleged actions. God has put the “powers that be” in place for the punishment of evil-doers, and to resist them by not co-operating with them is said in Romans 13:2 to be resisting the ordinance of God, “and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation”.

Having a matter against another- the word “matter” is a legal term, involving a law-suit. It is quite clear from later verses that the matter which was dividing two brethren could easily have been resolved, if only the Christ-given means for doing this had been used. Too often, petty grievances are magnified beyond recognition, and other things are brought in, perhaps dwelt on for years, until the situation gets out of hand, and one party feels they have no option but to go to law. All the time, the remedy lay in their own control, as the apostle goes on to show.

Go to law before the unjust- how can unjust persons administer righteous judgements, if they are at fault themselves? They may be versed in the so-called justice of men, but believers have to do with the righteousness of God, and the two do not very often coincide. Roman law allowed private tribunals to settle minor matters, which is perhaps why the Corinthians found it so easy to resort to the law. They might even have reasoned that this was God’s provision for their situation. But this was to ignore Christ’s provision.

And not before the saints? The proper place for the resolution of matters that cause brethren to be at variance is the assembly, see Matthew 18:15-17. If discussion on a one-to-one basis does not work, and then discussion one-to-one with others present to witness does not work, then the matter must be told to the church. If the offending party does not listen to the verdict of the church, then he has raised a doubt about the genuineness of his conversion, and must be treated as an unbeliever until he shows signs, by repentance, of being truly saved

Notice that it is before the saints, (those who are separate from the world) that the matter is to be settled. Their holiness is the main consideration; if they are holy they will act righteously, being governed by the doctrine of God not the precepts of men. By acting righteously believers show they are separated from the faulty reasonings of men, and as those separated in this way, they show themselves to be saints.

6:2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?

Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? As those who would come with Christ when He manifests Himself as Judge, they will clearly be in sympathy with His just judgement. It is not that they will be responsible for personally judging the sins of men, but they will be conformed to the image of the one who will. No doubt the saints will have some part in seeing that Christ’s verdict is administered.

And if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters? If the world in all its complexity will be judged by Christ, and believers will concur with His every verdict, then they should surely be able to decide simple and small matters now. For every believer has been made the righteousness of God in Christ, 2 Corinthians 5:21, and therefore has the capacity to discern righteously. The more we develop in practical righteousness, the more we shall be able to judge righteously. The Corinthians seem not to have progressed very far in this, to their shame.

6:3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?

Know ye not that we shall judge angels? The coming of Christ in glory will result in the evil angelic forces being dealt with. The demons in Christ’s day asked if He had “come hither to torment us before the time”, Matthew 8:29. Satan and his hosts will be consigned to the abyss when Christ comes, for as Isaiah said, “The Lord shall punish the host of the high ones that are on high, and the kings of the earth upon the earth”, Isaiah 24;21. And as Paul wrote, “God shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly”, Romans 16:20. His argument in that passage is the same as here: if saints will do that then in the larger sense, then they should be able to do it now in the lesser sense.

How much more things that pertain to this life? If matters concerning spirit-beings will be handled by us in a day to come, surely we should be able to deal with the everyday things of life on the earth now.

6:4 If then ye have judgements of things pertaining to this life, set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church.

If then ye have judgements of things pertaining to this life- the mundane things he has mentioned in the previous verse that they needed to come to a judgement about, but which the Corinthians seemed to have been going to law with one another about.

Set them to judge who are least esteemed in the church- the literal order of the words is as follows: “who are least esteemed in the church, these set ye up”. In other words there is a description of the current situation: they were setting up as judges those least esteemed in the church. This is a reference to them going to law with unbelievers before unsaved men, who as far as ability to decide spiritual matters was concerned, were of no account, and not esteemed as competent men in this area by believers in the assembly. This situation the apostle condemns in the next verse. That he does not mean to command them to set up the least esteemed brethren to judge is shown by the fact that he contrasts what they were doing with what they should have done, namely, allow those within the assembly to decide, if necessary.

6:5 I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?

I speak to your shame- it is a shameful state of affairs if believers are not able to judge righteously in the small matters of this life. It shows a very low level of competence in practical righteousness. Are the only wise and competent men in the world?

Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? By going to the courts of men, presided over by unjust men, they were cutting themselves off from the Divine wisdom that Christ imparts to His own, for He is made unto us wisdom, 1:30. Learning of Him and His ways will result in advances in wisdom and prudence. By going to the world for wisdom, they condemned themselves as unwise.

No, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?The assembly at Corinth was large, yet there seemed to be a grievous lack of spiritual discernment amongst them. There is no mention of elders in the epistle, so possibly none had matured enough to be recognised as such, even though the assembly had been in existence for five years. By contrast, the assembly at Thessalonica had been established in AD 57, yet in AD 58 the apostle can exhort them to “know them which labour among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you; and to esteem them very highly in love for their work’s sake”, 1 Thessalonians 5:12,13.

6:6 But brother goeth to law with brother, and that before the unbelievers.

But brother goeth to law with brother- the emphasis here is on the fact that they are brothers in the family of God, and as such should not be at variance, sharing a common life as they did. We remember the words of Abraham to Lot, “Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen; for we be brethren”, Genesis 13:8. And as Joseph said to his brethren, (knowing their character all too well), “See that ye fall not out by the way”, Genesis 45:24.

And that before the unbelievers- there is nothing in this passage, or anywhere else in the Scriptures, which suggests that believers should interfere with the course of the public law. If an unbeliever has done wrong, he must be dealt with by the courts. If a believer is involved in an car accident, he has a duty to allow the insurers to recoup their costs in the courts, if necessary. He signed up to that when he took out the insurance.

What is in view in the situation at Corinth is that petty disputes were escalating to such an extent that the law courts were becoming involved in matters on which they had no competence to deal. This was bad enough in itself, but it also brought the name of Christ into the matter, and above all things we must preserve the honour of His name.

6:7 Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another. Why do ye not rather take wrong? why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded?

Now therefore there is utterly a fault among you, because ye go to law one with another- there was no redeeming feature about this situation; there was no excuse for their action, and the apostle condemns it outright. The word fault has to do with moral defect. Their consciences were not responsive to the implications of what they were doing.

Why do ye not rather take wrong? The far better and spiritual course would have been to allow onself to be wronged in this matter, knowing that at the judgement seat of Christ all such matters will be dealt with righteously.

Why do ye not rather suffer yourselves to be defrauded? Why not do what Abraham did, and allow Lot to have first choice of the pasturelands. God saw to it that he did not miss out by doing this, for Lot chose a limited portion, whereas God immediately gave Abraham the whole of the land for his possession, Genesis 13;14,15. Far better to be defrauded now, and recompensed in heaven, than to gain compensation now, but loss of reward in heaven.

6:8 Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren.

Nay, ye do wrong, and defraud, and that your brethren- this may be applied in two ways. First, those who wrong their brethren, and defraud them of their just rights, are to be censured. But second, they also defraud the brethren who are not directly involved in the dispute, for the name of Christ and the integrity of the assembly are both put in jeopardy.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 6, VERSES 9 TO 11

6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

6:10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

6:11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

Section (b) Verses 9-11 The marked difference between unbelievers and believers.

6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? The apostle now puts into sharp contrast the character of those who are likely to be the judges if the believers take their cases before them, and the character of those who should be entrusted with the task of dealing with the matter. It is a question of what the character is of those who are in the kingdom of God, and what the character is of those outside of the kingdom of God. The general description of them must be that they are unrighteous. The apostle has already referred to this fact in verse 1.

Be not deceived- impressive and respectable as the law-court judge may appear, there is every likelihood that beneath the gown and the wig there is the sort of person described here. Are they fit persons to judge on spiritual matters? We must not be deceived into thinking that they are.

Neither fornicators- this is the beginning of a list of ten sorts of person. Is it suitable for a fornicator to judge matters between brethren that may touch upon moral matters? Obviously not. Fornication covers every sort of sexual sin and perversion in the moral realm.

Nor idolaters- how can idolaters, (who in chapter 10:20 are said to offer worship to devils), be expected to adjudicate righteously the affairs of the kingdom of God which will one day destroy them utterly?

Nor adulterers- apart from anything else, this shows that adultery and fornication are not synonymous terms, as some would teach. How can those who are unfaithful to their spouses be expected to be unbiased in their dealings with Christians, for they will know very well that Christianity condemns their immorality, and their opinions will be coloured accordingly.

Nor effeminate- a person who cannot decide whether he is male or female, and dresses and acts accordingly. How can such a morally deficient person be of any use in spiritual matters? He cannot even govern himself in ordinary matters of decency and morality.

Nor abusers of themselves with mankind- those who sink this low are obviously in no position to judge spiritual matters. God has made His mind very clear on the matter of homosexuality. He rained fire and brimstone from heaven on Sodom to show that the “wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men”, Romans 1:18, and see also verses 24,25. Notwithstanding this, because this is the age of His grace, and because the sin-offering work of Christ at Calvary has taken place, and “grace reigns through righteousness”, Romans 5:21, there is hope for these also, if they will repent and believe the gospel. It is a very sad commentary on the standards of today, that what for centuries has been thought of as perverted and distasteful, is being legislated for and condoned. God has not changed, however, and one day He will deal in judgement with such people. And, of course, with all who refuse to repent of their sin, even if they in fact detest sodomy.

6:10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

Nor thieves- those who sit as judges are not always free from the act of stealing. They may do it in sophisticated ways, but it is thieving nonetheless. Such morally deficient persons cannot be expected to judge aright in spiritual things.

Nor covetous- those who are strongly biased towards themselves will also be strongly biased against those who seek to live unselfish lives, as they imitate the One who “pleased not Himself”, Romans 15:3.

Nor drunkards- these are they who are very limited in their ability to control themselves. Despite the many consequences of such addiction, both physical, relational and financial, such people are not able to cope with life. How can they be expected to give unclouded judgements?

Nor revilers- those who are unreasonable in their speaking will very likely be extra-opposed to Christian things, and will therefore not be unbiased.

Nor extortioners- this is a violent act on the part of those who are determined to gain an advantage, especially over the vulnerable. They will think of believers as being this, and so to place one’s-self before such a person in order to get a sympathetic hearing is a pointless exercise.

Shall inherit the kingdom of God- only sons inherit, and these show by their behaviour that, far from being sons of God by faith, they are the children of the Devil.

6:11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

And such were some of you- not all the Corinthians were of this sort before they were saved, but the fact that some were, and were now different, is testimony to the changing power of the gospel. They had been base persons and nobodies, as chapter 1:27-29 describes, but now they were noble, and somebodies, but only because they were in Christ. Only the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ can change men in this way. There are plenty of doctrines that men believe and their lives are changed thereby, (Marxism, for instance), but it is not a change that is according to God. The fact that effeminate and homosexual people had been changed like this shows that these perversions are not conditions that cannot be remedied. There may be some truth in the idea that by genetic coding some men are more at home in the company of men, whereas some men are more at home in the company of women, but that is very far from conceding that homosexuality is gene-based and therefore is in-built. This scripture assures us, then, that Sodomites, (and, by extension, lesbians), are not beyond thee reach of salvation, and the gospel will radically change these when they repent and believe, for “if any man be in Christ, he is a new creation; old things are passed away, behold all things are become new”, 2 Corinthians 5:17.

But ye are washed- the apostle has brought before us ten sorts of persons who because of their moral evil, are excluded from God’s kingdom, just as there were ten lepers who came to the Lord Jesus who, by their disease, were excluded from the society of Israel, Luke 17:11-19. Yet they were cleansed, and were commanded to go and offer the gifts that the law required in Leviticus 14. They would thus set in motion a process whereby they would have sacrifices offered for them, and then they would bathe all over, and be sprinkled with blood and oil. We have the spiritual counterpart of that here. Those who were, in the past, moral lepers, but who were now changed, had come into the good of the sacrifice of Christ for them. As far as their responsibility was concerned, (for “were washed” is in the Middle Voice, telling us they did it for themselves, as opposed to “sanctified” and “justified” which are things done by God for them), they had washed themselves. This they did when they got themselves baptised. It was said to Saul of Tarsus, “And now why tarriest thou? arise, be baptised, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord”, Acts 22:16. His sins had been very public, and he very publicly washed them away in the waters of baptism. This does not mean that sins are washed away judicially by water, for that would deny the gospel, but it does mean that baptism, being a public and visible act, is a public and visible representation of what God has already done.It graphically depicts outwardly what has taken place inwardly, and which the one being baptised wishes to make known without a shadow of doubt. This had happened to the Corinthians, and they had renounced their former life-style in graphic and unmistakable fashion. So just as the leper washed himself all over, not only in a ceremonial way, but also to remove any trace of defilement from his body before he entered into the life of Israel within the camp, so these had done the same in the moral sphere.

But ye are sanctified- not only were the Corinthians defiled before they were saved, they were also unholy. Far from separating themselves from the moral corruption all around, they indulged in it and enjoyed doing so. But now, just as oil was put upon the ear, thumb and toe of the leper externally, so the Spirit of God has taken up residence in the believer internally, and by so doing has separated him from former things, and given him power to live a new and holy sort of life.

But ye are justified- the Corinthians were unrighteous in nature, too, which is why they were filthy, as Psalm 14:3 declares, for disobedience to God’s laws always means that a person distances himself from that which is clean and wholesome, and gravitates towards the opposite things. The apostle highlights being sanctified because of what he will say in verses 12-20; he highlights being justified because of what he has already said in verses 1-10.

In the name of the Lord Jesus- all that has happened by way of change in these people’s lives is due to the value to God of the name of Jesus, who has been made Lord.

And by the Spirit of our God- the power by which the change is wrought is spiritual power, that of the Spirit of God. Only Divine power can bring about the radical transformation that these Corinthians had experienced.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 6, VERSES 12 TO 20

6:12 All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.

6:13 Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.

6:14 And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.

6:15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.

6:16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh.

6:17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.

6:18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

6:19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?

6:20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.

Section (c) Verses 12-20 The duty of believers to be pure in body and spirit.

6:12 All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.

All things are lawful unto me- the apostle speaks of the believer’s attitude to eating meat so as to lead-in to the subject of immorality. The connection being that some were suggesting that immorality was simply the satisfying of one sort of appetite, and eating meat was the satisfying of another sort of appetite. As far as meat-eating is concerned, the apostle was free, (even though brought up as a Jew in accordance with the Old Testament food laws), to now eat any sort of meat.

But all things are not expedient- some foods upset some people’s constitution; some foods are not advisable due to the environment in which the creature lives, for the dietary laws of Leviticus 11 were not an arbitrary way of making a distinction between Israel and the rest of the world. They had medical sense behind them, and we would do well to take heed of that fact. Our Creator knows best. All things are not expedient because those who had a conscience about eating meat might be hindered in their Christian lives if they saw the apostle eating such foods. As such, the foods would not be helpful to the other believer in his desire to walk with God.

All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any- grace sets a believer free from legal restrictions, and allows him to move in line with the guidance of the Spirit of God. If Paul was bound by the dietary laws as a religious ordinance, (as opposed to good advice about what and what not to eat), he would be in bondage to that meat and what it represented. He refuses to be thus brought into bondage, for “ye have been called unto liberty”, Galatians 5:13. Peter and James had been brought under the power of meats when they started to refuse to eat with Gentiles, fearing they would have to eat meat. Paul had to rebuke Peter for this change of behaviour, for the truth of the gospel was in danger, see Galatians 2:11-21.

6:13 Meats for the belly, and the belly for meats: but God shall destroy both it and them. Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.

Immorality is not a non-moral act like eating. The body is for the Lord, but immorality denies this.

The Lord does not sustain the body for immorality.

Meats for the belly- God allows man to eat meat now, as Genesis 9:3 explains. This is why the apostle could say in 1 Timothy 4:3-5 that food is sanctified by the word of God, meaning the word He gave about the subject in Genesis after the flood.

And the belly for meats- He has not only made the meat, but has also so constructed the stomach so that it can digest it for the benefit of the rest of the body. So meats for the body because that is why God made them; the belly for meats for that is how God made it.

But God shall destroy both it and them- exercising His rights as Creator, and after the purpose for which He made the present universe is done, God will bring to nothing all things material, in the sense that He will make all things new, and the need for meat and physical bodies will be gone. The believer anticipates that day, indeed looks for it and hastens unto it, 2 Peter 3:12, and therefore has a right appreciation of the relative importance of the spiritual things of eternity, and the relative unimportance of the natural things of time and sense. The believer is brought into the moral good of this by association with Christ in His resurrection, for in that sphere the spiritual is paramount.

Now the body is not for fornication, but for the Lord- we now have the application of the principles to do with meat-eating transferred to the moral sphere. Not just the belly, but the whole body, in every part, is for the Lord. He has purchased it for His use. He has certainly not done that so it can be abused by engaging in immoral practices.

The Lord is for the body- He preserves it so it can be used in service for Him, (hence He is given the title “Lord”).

6:14 And God hath both raised up the Lord, and will also raise up us by his own power.

The resurrection of Christ is the guarantee of the believer’s resurrection.

Things done in the body will be accounted for in resurrection.

And God hath both raised up the Lord- as Romans 14:9 says, “For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that He might be Lord both of the dead and living.” By His resurrection Christ has acquired rights as Lord over our entire person, body included.

And will also raise up us by His own power- since our bodies will be raised through Him, account will be taken of what we have done. God has the personal power to do this; He does not need another to assist Him. So things done in the body will be accounted for in resurrection; there is no escape from the recompense they deserve, whether good or ill. Some said, “Let us eat and drink; for tomorrow we die”, 1 Corinthians 15:32. They speak like this because they think that the things done now will not be taken account of after death. Those who think and speak like this are deceived.

6:15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid.

The believer’s vital link with Christ forbids immorality.

Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? It might be thought that our spiritual link with Christ as believers has nothing to do with the physical body. This scripture assures us it is not so. This raises an interesting question, which is this. Our body is still indwelt by the sin-principle, and is therefore capable of sinning. It is a soulish body and not a spiritual body as it will be at the resurrection, 1 Corinthians 15:44,45. It is composed of atoms that are part of the creation that was cursed by God and made subject to vanity. Our body is in the bondage of corruption, so how can it be linked to Christ? The answer is found in the fact that dwelling within us is the Spirit of God, and one of His titles is “the Spirit of Him that raised up Jesus from the dead”, Romans 8:11. His presence is the pledge that we shall share in the resurrection of the just, but it also means that God takes account of that in His dealings with us now. So we are linked to Christ even as to the body. Meanwhile the indwelling Spirit safeguards the honour of Christ, for He is the pledge that a spiritual body will certainly be ours, and God takes account of that, and not the fact that we have a physical body with its accompanying sin-principle.

Shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid- this situation has serious consequences for us. If the members even of our body are united to Christ, then we must be very careful what other things or people we unite them to. Being a physical entity, our body can be united in sin with a prostitute. Is that acceptable behaviour for a believer? The apostle answers that question with a thunderous “God forbid!”, or “Let it not be!”.

6:16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith He, shall be one flesh.

What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? The apostle is outraged to think that they are not aware of the intimate physical relationship that is formed when a person is joined in an illicit relationship with a street-girl. As far as the physical act is concerned, they are joined as if they were formally married. This is as far as it goes, however, for they are simply joined in body. They are not joined in any other way. A man, even a believer, who consorts thus with a prostitute, has not entered into a life-long relationship until it is dissolved by death. It is an act no different to that which animals engage in, who have no moral sense.

For two, saith He, shall be one flesh- it might seem at first sight as if the apostle, by quoting this statement which has to do with marriage, is suggesting that to be joined to a harlot is to be in a marriage relationship. This cannot be the case, or else harlotry would not be condemned in Scripture. It is important to notice exactly what the apostle writes in this verse. The word “for” is not part of his quotation about marriage. No reference to marriage either in Genesis 2, Matthew 19, Mark 10, or Ephesians 5, uses the word “for”, so this is the apostle’s word, and indicates the answer to an unspoken query by his readers. They might say to the apostle, “Why is it so sinful to be joined to a harlot?” The apostle answers by saying, in effect, “for (because) God has ordained that marriage should be a one-flesh arrangement, not a one-body one”.

The next word is “two”, which is the first word of the quotation. Then comes “saith He”, so some person is being referred to here. Then comes the remainder of the quotation, “shall be one flesh”. So the quotation is “two shall be one flesh”. The “for” is the apostle’s word. But who is the person? Since the apostle is referring to a Divine institution, we could assume the reference is to God as He speaks in Genesis 2. But the words there are, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh”. Two things are noticeable here. First, that the exact expression “two shall be one flesh” is not in Genesis 2. And second, that the words about two being one flesh are not spoken by God, but are a comment by Moses on the situation when God brought the woman to Adam to be his wife. Adam made a comment in verse 23, and Moses made a comment in verse 24. This is not to say that the words are not God’s mind, for they are. But how do we know? We need to look for the answer in Matthew 19:5,6, and the parallel passage in Mark 10:8. where the Lord Jesus is speaking.

His words in Mark were, “But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; and they twain shall be one flesh: so then, they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined, let not man put asunder”. Now in Mark the Lord Jesus is speaking in conversation, and using these words. So it is He that the apostle refers to in the statement, “Two, saith He,shall be one flesh”.

Matthew, however, indicates that the Lord is quoting the book of Genesis. The words are, “And He answered and said unto them, ‘Have ye not read, that He which made them at the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh? Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder,” Matthew 19:4-6. Notice that the Lord Jesus reckons that Moses’ comment in Genesis 2:24, is God’s word, sanctioned by the inspiration of the Spirit. Notice too that the Lord quotes Genesis 2 using the expression “they twain shall be one flesh”,which give the substance of Genesis 2:24 but are not exactly the same as found there. The Lord is explaining the “they” as meaning the “twain” in question. These twain, (the word simply means “two”), are, on the one hand, the man who has left father and mother, and on the other hand the woman he is now going to cleave to in marriage.

It is only these, who leave and cleave, that are one flesh. A man who consorts with a harlot does not leave and cleave in this way. He does not formally leave the family unit he was brought up in and establish another. Nor does he become one flesh; he only becomes joined in body. It is significant that when the idea of being one flesh is presented, whether in the Old Testament Hebrew or New Testament Greek, the preposition is used which speaks of progress towards a goal. The idea is that “they two shall be set on a course towards being one flesh”. To be one flesh is much more than being one body, for flesh is used of the whole person, as in John 17:2, where “all flesh” means all men. Marriage is a sharing of everything, whether they be goals, ambitions, desires, hopes, experiences, joys, or grief. It is an ongoing process of two persons’ lives merging ever more closely. It is a relationship that is on a vastly higher plane, (even in the case of unbelievers), than an immoral and passing affair. So the moment that this process begins is when the man and woman are pronounced man and wife at the marriage ceremony. They are as truly married then as they will ever be, but they are not as closelymarried then as they will be at the end of their life together, for marriage is a process.

6:17 But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit.

Our links to Christ are spiritual, even though they include the body.

But he that is joined unto the Lord is one spirit- so there are four sorts of joining, and on four levels. The lowest level is the joining of a man with a harlot. This is purely on a physical and perhaps emotional level. The next level is the joining of a man and a woman in marriage. This is on a physical, emotional and, (in the case of believers), a spiritual level. Then there is the joining of the believer to Christ, which is on a spiritual level, but does not discount the body. And the highest level is the joining of the church to Christ as the bride of Christ, to which the apostle alludes in Ephesians 5:31, and is modelled on the institution of marriage. This will be on a spiritual level, and will include the fact that we shall have changed and spiritual bodies. (It is interesting that the apostle quotes the words about marriage as the Lord quotes them, and not as found in Genesis 2:24).

The way in which the current joining takes place is through the indwelling of the Holy Spirit. He it is who links us to Christ. This link is so strong that we can be said to be one spirit, such is the unity that has been made between the believer’s spirit and the Holy Spirit. So we are bonded to Christ in the same way as the persons of the Godhead are bonded together. Just as when the Spirit of God comes to indwell a new believer it is the Father and the Son coming, John 14:23, so the Spirit of God and the believer’s spirit are united together also. In this way the Spirit of God and the believer are one on a spiritual level.

6:18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

Immorality disobeys the command of God.

Immorality is detrimental to the body.

Flee fornication- this is a command, which we disobey at our spiritual and physical peril. There is a stark contrast between the behaviour of Judah and Joseph in the Book of Genesis. In chapter 38 Judah is found consorting with a harlot, so he thinks, although in fact it was his own daughter in law. In the next chapters Joseph is found in Potiphar’s house, and his wife makes advances to him. The scripture pertinently and succinctly says, “He got him out”, 39:12. By fleeing fornication Joseph preserved his honour, and that of the God he worshipped. Subsequently, Judah was not given the full blessing that he might have had upon the default of Reuben, but was only given the right to rule. Joseph, however, was given the firstborn’s place because he was morally superior to Judah. So it was that Joseph’s action was vindicated.

Every sin that a man doeth is without the body- each and every sin, including fornication, is committed against others, whether God or men, and therefore has an external element to it. Even if a person, sadly, should commit suicide entirely at his own hand by fatally harming his own body, it is still a sin towards God, (who holds man’s breath in His hand, Daniel 5:23), and also against those who are left behind. Even a sin like jealousy, which seems to be only an inner feeling, will, sooner or later, express itself against others, and is certainly a sin against God. 

But he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body- not only is the sin of fornication very personal, it is also harmful. This is not only because of the danger of the particular diseases that accompany such activity, but also because it is a gross abuse of the abilities of the body. Paul has already written in verse 13 that the body is not for fornication. God did not create it to be used in that way, but that it might be used in His service. So fornication violates God’s purpose for the body, and must expect His judgement.

6:19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?

Immorality grieves the Spirit of God and profanes His temple.

What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you- the apostle expresses great surprise that the Corinthians are not aware of the character of the indwelling of the Spirit. He is essentially holy, and any place He dwells in becomes sanctified to God, a veritable temple where God makes His presence felt. If the sin of fornication, therefore, is not outside the body but against it, then it must be against the indwelling Spirit. The heathen temples of Corinth were occupied by temple priestesses who were in many cases little more than temple prostitutes. The Christian’s body has sunk to this level if fornication is committed.

Which ye have of God- the Holy Spirit is a gift from God. Shall we treat that precious gift with contempt in this way?

And ye are not your own? The presence of the Holy Spirit is a sure sign that the person involved is purchased; He is the guarantee of that. To commit fornication is to sin like an unbeliever who is in bondage to the sin-principle within. The believer is freed from obligation to sin, and that because he has been purchased, as the next verse says.

6:20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s.

Immorality dishonours God.

For ye are bought with a price- the apostle now justifies his statement about us not being our own. The price of Christ’s blood has been paid for us; all of us, not just our spirits. Notice that although the ransom price has been paid, we are not yet redeemed as to the body, for that will not take place until the Lord comes, Romans 8:23; Ephesians 1:14; 4:30.

Therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God’s- the exhortation in view of the fact that we have been bought, and also in view of the teaching of the whole chapter, is that we should glorify God. To commit fornication is to shame Him; to serve Him faithfully in spirit and body is to glorify Him. It ought not to be difficult for believer to decide between these two options.

1 CORINTHIANS 3

NOTES ON 1 CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 3

Survey of 1 Corinthians chapters 1-3:

Chapter 1
God’s wisdom in history, at Calvary, and in the testimony of the Corinthians.
Chapter 2 God’s wisdom in the ministry of the Paul in principle.
Chapter 3 God’s wisdom in the ministry of Paul in practice.

STRUCTURE OF THE CHAPTER

Verses 1-4 Growth in the truth of God. The responsibility of believers.
The need for maturity.
Verses 5-9 Growth in the tilled field. The responsibility of evangelists and pastors.
The need for productivity.
Verses 10-17 Growth of the temple. The responsibility of teachers.
The need for dignity and beauty.
Verses 18-20 Warning to teachers.  
Verses 21-23 Warning to those taught.  

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 1 TO 4

3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.

3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

3:4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?

Verses 1-4     Growth in the truth of God; the responsibility of believers.

The need for maturity.

In verse 1 the carnality of the Corinthians hinders Paul.

In verse 2 the carnality of the Corinthians hinders progress.

In verses 3-4 the carnality of the Corinthians helps make parties.

3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.

And I, brethren- this is the same as the beginning of chapter 2, but here from the standpoint of the reaction of the Corinthians to his ministry, whereas in chapter 2 it was the responsibility of Paul in his ministry. In chapter 2 God was enabling Paul; here the Corinthians are disabling him. In chapter 2 the “I” is one who has turned from worldly wisdom; in this chapter, the “I” is the one who has wisdom from God. Could not speak unto you as unto spiritual- the condition of heart of those spoken to can have a profound effect on the ministry that is given, and the one who gives it. The end of chapter 2 has spoken of the natural man, the unbeliever, (even though cultured), in contrast to the spiritual man, the believer in his ideal state. A spiritual person is one who walks, (conducts his life), in harmony with the indwelling Spirit of God. He will love the wisdom of God and seek to live his life in accord with it.    But as unto carnal- we are not always, if ever, in an ideal state, and this means carnality, conformity to the flesh that dwells within. The cure for carnality is the doctrine of the epistle to the Romans, especially chapters 6 and 8.  Even as unto babes in Christ-their carnality had led to immaturity. Normally, babes in Christ are those who are newly-saved, and who have therefore not advanced very far in the truth of God. This does not mean they are carnal, for they may be spiritual, even though on the Christian pathway but a short while. The Corinthians, however, were babes even though believers for several years in some cases, (the epistle is being written about five years after Paul went to evangelise Corinth). They had not progressed as they should. So not all babes are carnal, but all carnal believers are immature, no matter how long they have been saved, for growth in spiritual things is not guaranteed by the passing of the years. The apostle is content to call these people his brethren, and to describe them as “in Christ”, even though they were carnal. He had not written them off as if they had passed the point of no return. Those who are in Christ are safe for eternity, but they have a responsibility to respond to God in a spiritual way.

3:2 I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

I have fed you with milk, and not with meat- being immature, they were not able to take in the deeper truths that he would have liked to have imparted to them. Sadly, the Corinthians seemed not to worry about this, but they should have been very concerned, for their immaturity reflected badly upon their Saviour. This is not the same figure of speech as Peter uses in 1 Peter 2. There, he exhorts the believers, however spiritual, to desire the sincere milk of the word as babies desire milk from their mothers. The Jewish rabbis called their pupils “sucklings”.   For hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able- they had not made any progress when the apostle was with them after they were saved, nor had they made any when he was away from them. If we ask how he knows they are immature, then the next verse will tell us.

3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

For ye are yet carnal- they were carnal before; they were carnal still, for they had made no progress in the things of God. It is said of Samuel that his mother brought him a new coat every year, 1 Samuel 2:19, the reason being, of course, that he had outgrown the old one. The Corinthians were still in baby clothes.    For whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions- what started out as envious glances towards other believers developed into strife with them, and that led to divisions within the assembly. They were still meeting together physically, but they were not together spiritually, but were in conflict with one another. This is a sure sign of carnality.     Are ye not carnal, and walk as men? Not only were they carnal in their attitude to one another, but they were imitating the attitudes of the men of the world. In particular, those who gathered round their favourite philosopher and made him into a party leader. To walk as men is not a sign of spiritual maturity, but of carnality.

3:4 For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal?

For while one saith, I am of Paul; and another, I am of Apollos; are ye not carnal? In order not to make it look as if he was criticising Peter in some way, the apostle uses only himself and Apollos as he condemns the party-spirit of the Corinthians. He is just as much against those who wish to make him a leader, as he is against those who want to elevate Peter; he is in no way acting out of envy, unlike the Corinthians.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 5 TO 9

3:5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?

3:6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.

3:7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.

3:8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.

3:9 For we are labourers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, ye are God’s building.

Verses 5-9 Growth in the tilled field; the responsibility of evangelists and pastors.

The need for productivity.

3:5 Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed, even as the Lord gave to every man?

Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos- does the foregoing mean that Paul and Apollos may be discounted, and their ministry not valued? By no means, as the apostle goes on to show.  But ministers by whom ye believed- they had been used in the gospel, and the Corinthians had believed through their ministry; but that did not mean they were anything more than ministers, or servants. For practical reasons it is best if preachers are on a platform, so that their voice may carry better, but that does not make them higher spiritually. The One they serve became a servant, and was content to minister, and did not demand to be ministered unto. We should value those who devote their energies to serving the Lord in a public way, (always remembering that this is but a small part of the work of the Lord), but they should not be idolised and made leaders of a party.  Even as the Lord gave to every man? A realisation that a man is only a minister by Christ’s grace and enabling, that he has nothing of himself to contribute, will safe-guard us from making too much of those who preach. It was also prevent them from making too much of themselves.

3:6 I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.

I have planted- the apostle deliberately uses the humble illustration of the farmer, so that all the credit may be given to God. As an evangelist as well as an apostle, Paul went to Corinth and saw many souls saved. They were plants that, in fact, his heavenly Father had planted, Matthew 15:13, but he is credited with this, under God.   Apollos watered- as we learn from Acts 18:24,28, Apollos was mighty in the Scriptures, and could nurture and encourage those who were newly-saved. Of course Paul was able to do this too, but he is emphasising their combined and united efforts in the gospel. Whether we consider the water as being the Word of God, or the Spirit of God’s influence in the believer’s hearts, the end result was pleasing to God.   But God gave the increase- the sense is that all the time Paul and Apollos were planting and watering, God was simultaneously giving the increase. This is vital in the natural world, and it is God who ensures it; it is vital in the spiritual world too. We may safely leave our God to give the increase in terms of productive growth, to His own glory.

3:7 So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase.

So then neither is he that planteth any thing, neither he that watereth; but God that giveth the increase- just as in the natural world the farmer is totally dependant on God to provide the means whereby growth can take place, so it is in the spiritual world. The farmer is nothing in this regard; God is everything. In Eden the Lord God planted, and made to grow, Genesis 2:8,9.

3:8 Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one: and every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour.

Now he that planteth and he that watereth are one- they have one aim in their activity, even though they have separate tasks to do. They do not set themselves up in opposition to one another, for that would defeat their object of producing a harvest.   And every man shall receive his own reward according to his own labour- even though they are one in aim, they are not one in reward, for it is “his own” reward that will be given. The Lord of the harvest will assess each worker’s effort individually. It was not for the Corinthians to prejudge the result of this assessment by the Lord, and decide that, say, Paul was deserving of honour, for they were not in a position to do this. Paul will return to this subject in the next chapter.  The word for “labour” here has to do with the energy that is put in to the work; in verse 13 the emphasis will be on the results produced by the work.

3:9 For we are labourers together with God: ye are God’s husbandry, ye are God’s building.

For we are labourers together with God- Paul and Apollos saw themselves as labourers together; they might be doing different tasks, but they were working in the same field, and for the same Owner, God Himself. It was not that they were equals to God as He, and they, all worked, but that they worked together doing God’s work. They were sympathetic to, and co-operating in, His work.   Ye are God’s husbandry- the cultivated field they worked in was the local assembly at Corinth. But even though they were the workers, it was God’s field; He took overall responsibility, and to Him was all the glory when something spiritually worthwhile was produced.  Ye are God’s building- at this point the illustration changes from a tilled field to a temple, for that will involve the participation of the Corinthians themselves, as we now see. In God’s field the final responsibility is God’s, whereas what the temple looks like at the finish is up to the Corinthians, and they will be judged accordingly. We should note that the word for temple used here is the one that refers to the inner temple, excluding the outer courts. These latter were for men, whereas the inner shrine was for God. It is a solemn thing to remember that the state of an assembly is dependant on the attitudes and activities of those comprising it.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 10 TO 17

3:10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon.

3:11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.

3:12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble;

3:13 Every man’s work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is.

3:14 If any man’s work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.

3:15 If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.

3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?

3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

Verses 10-17 Growth of the temple; the responsibility of teachers.

The need for dignity and beauty.

3:10 According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation, and another buildeth thereon. But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon.

According to the grace of God which is given unto me- Paul was not only conscious of the grace or free-favour of God towards him in salvation initially, and salvation constantly; he was also conscious of the need for Divine enabling in the matter of serving God. An example of this is seen in Ephesians3:7,8, where he says, “…I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of His power. Unto me, who am the least of all saints is this grace given…” As soon as we seek to work in our own strength, or for our own ends, we cease to do God’s work.  As a wise master-builder- the word is “archi-teknon”, or chief technician. Nowadays, architects only venture forth from their office to ensure the plans are being followed on the building site. In Paul’s case, he was aware of the plans, but was also on the building site labouring. He was a wise architect, for he was guided by the wisdom that God had entrusted to him. Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, (just as Paul was learned in the wisdom of the Greeks and the Jews), but he did not employ the wisdom of Egypt in the making of the tabernacle. Bezaleel and Aholiab were anointed with the Spirit of God to carry out that work, and they did it in accordance with the pattern that Moses had been given in mount Sinai- he did not draw up the plans, nor did he modify God’s plans.   I have laid the foundation- the doctrinal foundation of the assembly at Corinth was laid by the apostle as he preached and taught Jesus Christ. Just as Christ Himself builds the church on the bedrock of who He is, and living stones are built up on Him personally, so the local assembly is built up of living stones; but the point here is the adornment of those stones, as we shall see.   And another buildeth thereon- the apostle moved on, for he was sent “far hence”, and was an apostle of the Gentiles, not remaining long in any spot. He did not settle down in a place, but established the believers in the faith so that they could continue in testimony in his absence. He did stay long enough to make sure the believers were sure of the faith, but not so long as to make them dependant on him. So the building up of the assembly in the faith was left in the hands of the local believers.  But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon- Paul is clearly concerned lest the Corinthians should adopt the wisdom of the world in this building process, as they had in other areas of their lives. He proceeds to give guidance to them so that they may build to the glory of God.

3:11 For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid, which is Jesus Christ.

For other foundation can no man lay than that is laid- the Corinthians have not to start from the very beginning; they simply are to finish what the apostle began. There is only one option when it comes to the foundation of a local company of Christians, and that is that it must be built on Christ. No doctrine, however important, should be made the foundation; no person, however godly, should be used as the foundation. God insists, (for it is His church), that it be founded on His Son, and His Son alone. This easily-understood and vital truth would make decisions about where and how Christians should meet together very simple. We have only to ask what is the basis of a company calling itself a church. If the answer includes anything of man’s ideas, then it is to be rejected.   Which is Jesus Christ- the Corinthians are left in no doubt on this matter. Some of them were making much of Paul; some much of Apollos; some much of Peter. Some were even making out they were super-spiritual and were the Christ-party, implying the others were not. All this is overthrown by the simple truth that the foundation is Jesus Christ, and all subsequent activity must be suited to Him. Making leaders out of men, even apostles, was badly wrong.

3:12 Now if any man build upon this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble;

The apostle uses the expression “if any man” or “if any man’s” five times in the next few verses:

Verse 12 If any man build… The choice of materials to use.
Verse 14 If any man’s work abide… The continuance of materials used.
Verse 15 If any man’s work be burned… The consuming of materials used.
Verse 17 If any man defile the temple… The contamination of other’s materials.
Verse 18  If any man seemeth to be wise… The consideration of what materials to use.

Now if any man build upon this foundation- so the subsequent building on the foundation at Corinth is entrusted to the believers themselves. More particularly, to the teachers amongst them. If any one of them seeks to do some building, he should be aware that there are two different sorts of building material available. We must remember that this building is a temple, as verse 16 will tell us. This helps us to understand the illustration the apostle is using here, for Solomon built a magnificent temple of massive hewn stone, and then adorned that structure. Now it is true that he used wood to clad the stone walls and floor, but that had a disadvantage, in that fire could destroy the walls, as it fact it did when Nebuchadnezzar came to take the people captive. “He burnt the house of God” is the sad story in 2 Chronicles36:19. Having built the main structure, Solomon then plastered the walls with silver, and then with gold, on the inside, and garnished the house with precious stones on the outside. We read of this in 1 Kings 6:21, (gold); 1 Chronicles 29:4, (silver), and 2 Chronicles3:6, (precious stones).   Gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble- the apostle does not state which materials should be used, but leaves the Corinthians to use God-given wisdom to decide. They are helped by two things. First, that the foundation is Jesus Christ, so anything built up on Him must be worthy of Him. Second, that there is going to be a fire, verse 13, that shall try or test the work done. Clearly, the materials used must be able to stand the test of the fire or else they will be burned up. This makes the decision as to what materials to use very simple; whatever is signified by gold silver or precious stones, is suitable; the rest is unsuitable.

We may make certain contrasts between these materials, as follows:

Gold, silver, precious stones Wood, hay, stubble
Hidden in the earth by God Visible to man and grown by man.
Difficult to find and bring to light Easy to find and obtain.
Not natural growth Natural growth
Valuable Wood and hay moderately valuable, stubble almost worthless.
Rare Common.
Compact Bulky.
Pass the test of fire Fail the test of fire.

The Corinthians would be familiar with the effects of fire, because a great fire had swept through the city on one occasion. The mansions of the rich were left undamaged, but the wooden, thatched shacks of the poor were burnt to the ground.

Considering each of these materials in turn:

Gold- this would remind us of the Deity of Christ. Believers need to be built up in this truth to the glory of God. In the previous chapter the apostle has referred to Christ as the Lord of Glory, 2:8. As we dwell upon the glories of Christ we shall be spiritually enhanced.

Silver- the redemptive work of Christ. The truth regarding the character of the work of Christ should be constantly set forth in the assembly, so that the principles involved in it mould and fashion the thinking of the believers. Chapter 1 has told us He is made unto us wisdom, 1:20.

Precious stones- these would speak of the moral beauties of Christ as He displayed perfect manhood in this ugly world. The psalmist desired that “the beauty of the Lord our God be upon us”, and we should desire that the features of Christ should mark us. Each precious stone is produced in a different environment. Subjected to the pressures and heat below the earth’s surface, each jewel is testimony to a different experience. Christ was tempted in all points, and as we imitate Him in His resistance to temptation, we shall be formed into His precious likeness.

Wood-this can be beautiful, as Solomon showed when he used cypress and fir to line the walls of the temple. It has one fatal flaw, however, which in the context here renders it unsuitable, and that is its lack of resistance to fire.

Hay-this can be useful in other contexts, for cattle need hay to flourish. Here, however, it is of no use at all. “All flesh is as grass”, 1 Peter 1:24, and that which is of man has no place in the local assembly, for it is withering and fading, whereas the Word of the Lord endures. We gather in the name of the one who is “fairer than the children of men”, Psalm 45:2, so it inappropriate to incorporate the failing schemes of men into that structure.

Stubble-this is virtually valueless. It can look attractive when the sun shines on it, but it is false gold, and is easily destroyed by fire.

Wood, hay, and stubble represent that which the wisdom of the world produces. They are the result of thinking as the world thinks. There are many ways in which the thoughts of the world can be used in the assembly, such as: the sidelining of the Bible in subtle ways; criticism of the Bible by constant reference to “alternative renderings” and “better manuscripts”; the introduction of entertainment of various sorts; the attempt to attract people by using sport; the failure to mention serious matters such as sin and the Lake of Fire, and the need for repentance; the blurring of the distinction between saint and sinner by the unwise use of the personal pronoun “we”; the dilution of the gospel into mere “following Jesus”, or “having Jesus as your friend”; all these things give character to the testimony of the assembly, and, over time, will change the assembly into a man-centred social club. Such a company is built using wood hay and stubble.

The use of gold, silver, precious stones, however, will result in an assembly that is Christ-centred; where the truth of God’s word in its entirety is believed and proclaimed; where true believers function together to God’s glory, and the moral features of Christ are in evidence. It will be a place of dignity and beauty, where the things of God are taken seriously, and where unbelievers will be constrained to say “God is in you of a truth”, 1 Corinthians 14:24,25. Only by building with the wisdom God gives in Christ can this be achieved.

3:13 Every man’s work shall be made manifest: for the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is.

Every man’s work shall be made manifest- whatever men may think of a person’s activity, the supreme test is yet to come, when all activity shall be assessed by the Lord Himself. He presented Himself to the assembly in Thyatira as one who “hath His eyes like unto a flame of fire”, Revelation 2:18. And He shall scrutinise all that believers claim to have done in His name, and test every activity. After the tabernacle had been made, all the parts were assembled together, “And Moses did look upon all the work, and, behold, they had done it as the Lord commanded, even so had they done it: and Moses blessed them”, Exodus39:43. So shall it be at the judgement seat of Christ, for He shall examine everything with His penetrating gaze. It would be a blessed thing to hear His word of approval.

It might be well at this point to notice the different judgements that the Lord Jesus will engage in:

FOUR JUDGEMENT DAYS

1. JUDGEMENT DAY FOR CHRIST AT CALVARY

Several things happened at Calvary in relation to our sins.

One,  He became the propitiation for our sins, giving God the answer His righteousness demanded because of them, 1 John 2:2. This is the basis of everything else.

Two, He put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself, thus enabling the universe to be completely rid of sin at the end of time, Hebrews 9:26.

Three, He bore our sins in His own body on the tree, 1 Peter 2:24, and thereby took responsibility for them on our behalf.

Four, He gave His life a ransom for many, Mark 10:45, so that those who believe may be freed from the bondage of sin.

Five, He died as an act of righteousness, Romans 5:18, (margin), to enable the entail of the sin of Adam to be removed from those who believe.

Six, He was made sin, so that those who believe may be made the righteousness of God in Him, 2 Corinthians 5:21.

Seven, He was wounded for our transgression, Isaiah 53:5, so that those transgressions might be forgiven.

Eight, He was crucified, so that our former selves might be cancelled out, Romans 6:6.

2. THE DAY OF JESUS CHRIST: THE BEMA IN HEAVEN: 2 Corinthians 5:10, etc.

We should remember that all judgement has been committed to Christ, and this for two reasons. First, because He is the Son of God, and has been entrusted with the task of acting for His Father in this, as in all other matters, John3:35; 5:22,23. Second, because He is Son of Man, John 5:27, and has been in the world so that men might respond to Him. As Son of Man He is in control of all things on earth, being the Last Adam.

There are two words for judgement-seat in Scripture. There is the word “bema”, which is the equivalent to the seat of an umpire. Then there is the word “thronos”, which is the equivalent to the seat of a law-court judge. The believer will never stand before Christ as judge of sins, because He undertook to deal with our sins for us at Calvary, so that we might not be held accountable for them. So whilst the Bema is Christ’s judgement-seat, it is not a judicial process that will be conducted there, although the works of His people will be assessed for their goodness or badness, and each shall receive for what has been done. From 1 Corinthians 4:5 we learn that the bema will take place immediately after the rapture of the saints. The apostle writes, “judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come”.

The following points may be made about the judgement of the Bema.

1. Since we shall have changed bodies the instant Christ comes, we shall stand before the judgement seat in resurrection bodies, 1 Corinthians 15:51-53. We shall therefore agree with the assessment He will give, since all sin, which clouds our judgement now, will be gone from us.

2. He will “bring to light the hidden things of darkness”, 1 Corinthians 4:5, those things that are not suitable for the light of His presence. He will “make manifest the counsels of the hearts”, so He will judge motive as well as deed.

3. He will assess the quality of what we built into the local assembly, so see whether it comes into the character of gold, silver, precious stones, or wood, hay, stubble.

4. He will assess our lives in relation to one another, to see whether we have been biased, or inconsiderate, Romans 14:10-13.

5. He will do what no law-court judge can do, namely give rewards to those who merit them.

6. The personal session we have with Christ will not be a casual affair, for it is God’s will that all shall bow to His Son as they shall bow to Him, and this believers will do at the bema, Romans 14:11.

7. He will assess how we have used the gift he gave us, and whether we have manifested Him by its use, 1 Corinthians 1:8.

3. JUDGEMENT OF THE LIVING NATIONS ON EARTH: Matthew 25:31-46.

All those who have survived the judgements of the future tribulation period will be judged as to whether they are fit to enter the kingdom of Christ about to be set up on earth. The test will be their attitude to the Jewish remnant, His brethren, during the time of trial that they have experienced. Since “he that doeth righteouness is righteous”, 1 John3:7, (and not the other way round- it is the righteous nature that produces the righteous works, not the righteous works that merit being granted a righteous nature), their dealings with the Jews in that day will be the indicator as to whether they have faith or not. To visit, feed, clothe the Jews of that day will be a dangerous thing to do, and will distinguish those who truly believe from the rest. This judgement is often confused in religious circles with the Great White Throne judgement. This is because in christendom generally there is not a right grasp of future events. As a result, many are led astray into thinking that their entrance into heaven is to be decided by whether they have done good works or not. But this idea is directly contradicted by Ephesians 2:9, which definitely states that salvation is “not of works, lest any man should boast”.

4. GREAT WHITE THRONE JUDGEMENT IN SPACE: Revelation 20:11-15.

After the 1000 years reign of Christ, at the very end of time, all the unsaved dead shall be raised from the dead in what the Lord Jesus called “the resurrection of damnation”, John 5:29. No believer will be judged on this great day, for their judgement took place at Calvary. All that they were was judged in the person of Christ, and they rejoice in the words of the Saviour Himself when He said, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth My word, and believeth on Him that sent Me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life”, John 5:24. Words could not be clearer, that true believers do not come into condemnation. The word used for judgement here means the process by which a sentence is assessed, so not even that process will be undergone by the believer, let alone the passing of a sentence. Such is the full clearance from guilt that the death of Christ has obtained for the believer.

For unbelievers it is otherwise, and every sin shall receive its due recompence in a judgement that shall be for all eternity. God keeps a record of the works of men, and nothing is hidden from Him. He will apportion wrath according to the nature of the sins committed, and that wrath will be eternal. Should you be reading these lines as an unbeliever, then take the wise course, and flee from the wrath to come, seeking refuge in Christ, the only Saviour. Have personal dealings with Him in repentance and faith whilst you have opportunity on earth, lest He have dealings with you as your judge in eternity.

For the day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire- the assessment of what a person’s work has been like will take place in the day of the bema, but the revelation of it will be when Christ comes to earth, for “He shall come to be glorified in His saints, and admired in all them that believe”, 2 Thessalonians 1:10. That which they have been and done for Him will have stood the test of the fire at the Bema, and will also stand the test of the flaming fire with which He shall come to earth, 2 Thessalonians 1:8. The works of men shall not stand that test, but the believer will be unscathed. Moreover, that which they have done for Him in their lives will be to His glory in that day, and will be a cause for admiration. The apostle Peter spoke of the same thing in a different context, when he envisaged the result of the trial of our faith being to the praise, honour and glory of the Lord Jesus when He is revealed to earth, 1 Peter 1:7.   And the fire shall try every man’s work of what sort it is-  Note it is the quality, (what sort it is), not the quantity that is in view. Gold, silver, precious stones are very compact, whereas wood, hay, and stubble are bulky. But it is the fire that shall try, not a measuring line, so it is what endures the scrutiny of the fire of Christ’s eyes that shall remain.

3:14 If any man’s work abide which he hath built thereupon, he shall receive a reward.

If any man’s work abide which he hath built thereupon- the great aim for us should be to build with materials that will abide, or survive, the fire. The apostle reminds us again that the building should be done on the foundation. Indeed, only materials built there shall receive a reward.  He shall receive a reward- this reward will be in direct connection with the quality of the work done. There will not be a standard reward received by everyone, for it will be reward or hire, meaning payment by results. The apostle does not specify what the reward is to be, but we may be sure that it will glorify Him who gives it, as we may deduce from 1 Peter 1:7.

3:15 If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss: but he himself shall be saved; yet so as by fire.

If any man’s work shall be burned, he shall suffer loss-  note it is the work that is burned, not the person, although the person does pass through the fire, as the end of the verse will say. The loss he will suffer, (so it is something that will be felt keenly in that day), will be loss of reward, because there was no gold, silver, precious stones; loss of the reward there might have been if time had not been taken up in building with wood, hay, and stubble; loss of satisfaction in having pleased the Lord. These are solemn things, and the loss sustained cannot be reversed, for the time for building is now.  But he himself shall be saved- the person’s salvation is unaffected by this process. After all, only believers will be at the bema anyway, so there is no loss of salvation- that can never happen, in time or eternity. The fire will save this believer from the embarrassment of being eternally associated with materials that are unworthy of Christ. It that sense it will be a great relief, but still the loss of reward will be permanent and regrettable. We should be thankful for prior warning of these things so that we may adjust our activity as necessary. Our God is able to “restore the years the locusts have eaten”, Joel 2:25, and give us opportunity to make up for lost time, if we are exercised in the matter. Yet so as by fire- the “saved” is tempered by the “yet”, for although the salvation is known, nevertheless it is only after the fire has done its purging work, and the offensive material removed. The apostle is pointing out that this is not the ideal scenario, for it would be much better to only have gold, silver and precious stones to carry through the fire.

Needless to say, the notion of an imagined intermediate stage of existence called purgatory, is without foundation in Scripture. Sadly the doctrine has been used to blackmail and coerce men and women down through the years, causing endless heartache, as well as filling the coffers of the Catholic church. The doctrine of purgatory can only be supported by the use of the Apocrypha, (uninspired writings wrongly included in some versions of the Bible), hence the fondness of the Catholic system for those writings.

3:16 Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you?

Know ye not that ye are the temple of God- the local assembly is a very specific sort of building, for it is a temple. A temple is a building that befits God, whose being is august and majestic. Formerly, as heathens, the Corinthians worshipped in a temple; now they are a temple, fitted for the presence of God. The word for temple is “inner temple”, the very dwelling-place of God, and not the range of buildings encircling the temple. The idea is of sanctity and dignity. How a building like that is possible is told us in the next phrase.  And that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? in 6:19 it is the individual believer’s body which is the temple of the Holy Spirit, whereas here it is the local assembly. This cautions us greatly, for we are given the opportunity of building that which is the dwelling-place of a Divine Person, just as really and truly as Solomon built a temple for God to dwell in. How careful we should be in what we contribute to such a building. All materials used must be in harmony with the character of the Spirit in all His holiness. We dare not associate with a Divine person that which is of the world in any way, for it was the world that crucified a Divine person, even God’s Son; materials from such a source are clearly not suitable.

3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.

If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy- such is the value of this temple to God that He is jealous for its integrity and purity. The words defile and corrupt have the same root meaning. “If any man destroy the temple of God, him shall God destroy”. To destroy is to deprive of well-being. In this case, it could be to destroy by building with the wrong materials, which in itself is to be avoided, but which will also spoil the efforts of those who have sought to build with the right materials in the past. The destruction of the person mentioned here has nothing to do with loss of salvation. It is the depriving of a reward that might have been had; this means that for all eternity the person concerned is less glorifying to God than he might have been, which is a very serious thing. In faithfulness and fairness to those who have built rightly, this punishment must and will be inflicted.  For the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are-again the apostle emphasises the dignity of the local assembly, and the fact that is set apart by His presence from everything else. To be given the task of contributing to such a building is an immense privilege.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 18 TO 20

3:18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.

3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

3:20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.

Verses 18-20 Warning to teachers.

3:18 Let no man deceive himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.

Let no man deceive himself- we deceive ourselves when we allow our hearts, (which are naturally deceitful, Jeremiah 17:9), to lead us into wrong practice.   If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world- a believer who is wise in this world’s reckoning is only seemingly wise, he is not really wise. His heart has deceived him.  Let him become a fool, that he may be wise- such a person should renounce the thinking of the world, and embrace the wisdom of God. This will mean the world thinks him to be a fool, but he will be wise according to God, which is the only thing that matters.

3:19 For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God. For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness.

For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God- not only is the wisdom of God foolishness to the world, but the reverse is the case. God has shown up the world in its foolishness by the ways detailed in chapter 1.  For it is written, He taketh the wise in their own craftiness- this is a quotation from Job 5:13. Job is one of the Wisdom Books of the Old Testament, and also one of the oldest. The truth that God would deal with the wise of this world was known in old time, how much more so should it be known now, with Christ having been crucified by the so-called wise of this world. God will surprise the wise of this world in the Judgement Day, when He shows their so-called wisdom to be nothing more than the craftiness that Satan instilled into the mind of Eve in the beginning, and into the minds of the men of the world ever since. They are immersed in this wisdom, and God will find them there at last, much to their astonishment and shame. There is a warning to us here also. We may avoid being surprised by Christ at the bema, when He will expose the way some believers have used the world’s wisdom to build in the assembly. If we take note of the apostle’s warning here, we shall be found to have built using Divine wisdom.

3:20 And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain.

And again, The Lord knoweth the thoughts of the wise, that they are vain- this is a quotation from Psalm 94:11, again from the Wisdom Books. Not only are the thoughts of the wise foolish as far as God is concerned, but also vain; that is, devoid of results. And it is results that God is looking for in connection with the local assembly. Wood, hay, and stubble are vain materials, being the product of minds empty of the wisdom of God. The fact that the thoughts of the wise of this world are known by God should encourage us to recognise the world’s wisdom for what it is, seeing that Christ Jesus has been made the wisdom of God unto us, 1:30.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 3, VERSES 21 TO 23

3:21 Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are your’s;

3:22 Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your’s;

3:23 And ye are Christ’s; and Christ is God’s.

Verses 21-23 Warning to those taught.

3:21 Therefore let no man glory in men. For all things are your’s;

Therefore let no man glory in men- the apostle here returns to the theme that has concerned him since the beginning of the epistle, that of the exaltation of men, including himself. It was a sign that the Corinthians had been influenced by the philosophy of nearby Athens, with its segregation into parties surrounding a favourite teacher.   For all things are your’s- they have not to choose which particular part of Christian privilege they may have a share in, for all of it is for all the people of God.

3:22 Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your’s;

Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas- far from elevating one apostle above another, they should avail themselves of all that each one has to offer by way of truth from Christ.  Or the world- we are free to use the world, but not to abuse it, 1 Corinthians 7:31. We use the world when we build meeting halls, drive to them in our car, read the Bible printed on the presses of unbelievers, take advantage of the freedom that the laws of the land give us. We may use the world in this physical sense, but we dare not embrace its values and twisted thinking.  Or life- God does not take His people to heaven the moment they believe, even though they are fit to go there at that point. We are given opportunity to live for Him; let us see to it that we say with the apostle “For to me to live is Christ”, Philippians 1:21. If we really want to live for Him we shall do what the apostle did, put heart and soul into building for God in the assembly.   Or death- the apostle lived in the expectation that the Lord Jesus could come in his lifetime, so that when he writes about that event in 1 Thessalonians 4:15 he says “we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord”. He was a realist, however, and appreciated it might not be that way. In which case he would know the experience of death. When he wrote about the Christian’s death, however, he always used gentle figures of speech. He wrote of being poured out as a drink offering, 2 Timothy 4:6; of being planted like a seed, 1 Corinthians 15:42-44; of going to sleep, (a reference to the body and not the soul), 1 Thessalonians 4:13; and the apostle Peter spoke of his death as the taking down of the tent of his body, in order that he might move on to eternity in his final exodus out of this world, 2 Peter 1:14, 15.  The Lord Jesus said that “he that liveth and believeth in Me shall never die”, John 11:26, for such is the force of eternal life that all lesser powers, even of death, are overwhelmed by it.

We learn therefore that death is transformed by Christ into a means of blessing, not just because it ushers into eternal bliss, but also because it has a cautionary effect upon us. We need to learn that there is, literally, a deadline, and this should motivate us to live for Christ’s interests while we have the opportunity. It is said of Enoch that “beforehis translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God”, Hebrews 11:5.

Or things present- as we meet together regularly we are constantly presented with opportunities to build something into our fellow-believers. Even when we talk together after the meeting we should strive to encourage one another in the things of God. It is sad when the topic of conversation of believers after the meeting is more akin to the conversation of those in the world. The apostle exhorted the Ephesian believers with the words, “See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise. Redeeming the time, for the days are evil”, Ephesians 4:15,16. We redeem the time when at the beginning of the day we take the hours of the day down to the marketplace, and sell them to the highest bidder. Our God is always the highest bidder; what folly to sell those hours to the world at a low price!   Or things to come; all are your’s- we know from Romans 8:28 that “all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to His purpose”. The reason we know this is given in the next verse, where we learn that the sovereign purpose of God will ensure His people are brought safe home to glory. Eternal things are ours, therefore, but what of the everyday things of life that are yet to come? Are they ours also? Indeed they are, for they will present opportunities to use for Christ’s glory. It is good to have goals in life, and not wander aimlessly; the ambition of the apostle was expressed in 2 Corinthians 5:9 when he wrote, “we labour…that we may be accepted of Him”. The words “we labour” could be translated “are ambitious”, and the word “accepted” could be translated “well-pleasing”.

3:23 And ye are Christ’s; and Christ is God’s.

And ye are Christ’s- every true believer belongs to Christ by the double right of creation and redemption. He calls us His sheep, John 10:3; His disciples, John 15:8; His friends, John 15:14; His brethren, John 20:17. Perhaps these relationships are summed up in the expression “His own”, John 13:1. Since these things are so, there should be a grateful response in our hearts to His love towards us, and we should strive to glorify Him whilst we have time and opportunity down here upon the earth.   And Christ is God’s- this is the ultimate encouragement, to think that the one who died and rose again for us is acknowledged as being God’s own dear Son! Moreover, He is acknowledged as Christ in a fresh way by His ascension back to heaven. Peter’s words on the Day of Pentecost were, “God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ”, Acts 2:36. He was Lord and Christ before, but now those titles have gained new meaning now that He is ascended to heaven. All power in heaven and in earth has been givento Him as a Risen Man, so He is Lord in a fresh sense, and He has become Head of the church as Christ, Ephesians 5:23, with all that guarantees.

Strengthened and encouraged by the precious possessions Paul has enumerated, we should be responsive to Divine grace, and active in the promotion of that which is of God in the locality, namely, the local assembly. May the Lord help us in this, to His glory.

     
     
     
     
     

CHRIST THE BAPTIZER

We have noticed that Christ is the head of the church as one who is ascended to heaven.  We have also noticed that His people are associated with Him in His rising from the dead and ascending to heaven.  This association with Christ is not casual, for Christians are united to Christ in the same way as the human body is united to the head.  That bond is vital and permanent.  There cannot be a functioning human body without a head.  The question we now need to address is how that bond between Christ and “the church which is His body” was formed.  The answer is that it was formed by the harmonious activity of the persons of the Godhead.

The Lord Jesus spoke in His prayer to His Father in these terms: “Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also that shall believe on Me through their word; that they all may be one; as Thou, Father, art in Me, and I in Thee, that they also may be one in Us: that the world may believe that Thou hast sent Me”, John 17:20,21. 

This oneness has nothing to do with organisational unity, as is clear from the fact that it is oneness as Divine Persons have it.  Rather, this unity derives from two things:
1.    The common possession of eternal life.  Eternal life is the life of the Eternal.  At conversion that life is communicated, and the new birth takes place. As John 1:12 puts it, “But as many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name”.  In other words, when a person believes he has the authority to take his place in the family as a child of God.
2.    The giving of the Holy Spirit, who is one of the persons of the Godhead.  This happens the moment a person believes, as is seen from Galatians 3:2, where the apostle makes clear that the Spirit is received through the hearing of faith, not at some subsequent point through works of merit of some sort.

The giving of eternal life and the Holy Spirit, whilst linking believers to God, does not link them with one another.  For this, there needs to be the baptism in the Holy Spirit.  There is a lot of error taught about this subject, with some saying that it is an experience subsequent to conversion, and that the sign that it has happened is the ability to speak in tongues.  However, it was never God’s intention, even during the time when the gift of tongues was operating, that all believers should have the gift of tongues.  This is shown by the words of 1 Corinthians 12:29, “Do all speak with tongues?”  The apostle clearly expects a negative answer.

So that which unites believers of this present age together is the baptism of the Holy Spirit.  This is not baptism that the Holy Spirit performs, but it is baptism that involves the Holy Spirit as the element into which believers are immersed.  John the Baptist spoke of this as he prepared the people for the coming of Christ.  John was careful to ensure that the people were in no doubt as to his own identity.  (We know from John 1:19-24 that there was confusion in the minds of the authorities about this).  So he makes clear that one of the features that distinguishes Christ from himself is that whereas he baptised with water, Christ would baptise with the Holy Spirit.  But this would have two aspects; one, in connection with the church, and the other to do with the nation of Israel in the future.

It is interesting to notice the different ways in which the writers of the four gospel present this.  In Matthew we read, “He shall baptise you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire: whose fan is in His hand, and He will throughly purge His floor, and gather his wheat into the garner; but He will burn up the chaff with unquenchable fire”, Matthew 3:11,12.  Here the floor is the place where profession is tested, to distinguish between chaff and wheat, and when He comes to earth to reign the King will “gather out of His kingdom all things that offend”, Matthew 13:41, and gather His wheat, (true citizens of the kingdom), into the garner, (the security of the kingdom), but will burn up the chaff in the everlasting fire He spoke of in Matthew 25:41.

This is the fire-baptism, but the baptism with the Holy Spirit from Matthew’s perspective is when the nation of Israel is given the Holy Spirit when Christ comes to earth to reign over them.  See Joel 2:28-32; Isaiah 32:15; 44:3.

In Mark, typically, the account is more brief, stating “I indeed have baptised you with water: but He shall baptise you with the Holy Ghost”, Mark 1:8.  Mark is presenting the activity of the Servant of Jehovah as He prepares His people to serve Him.  For this they must have power, for the energy of the flesh is of no use in the service of Christ.  So Mark emphasises the fact that the coming of the Spirit will empower God’s people to serve, (“ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Spirit is come upon you”, Acts 1:8).  This power from God He gives when they believe.  Mark is simply writing about the genuine servants, and does not mention the fire, or, indeed, the garner.  Ideally, the servant will only be satisfied when souls are delivered from the fire; and only concerned about being faithful in the work, and leaving the results, (the garner) to the Lord of the Harvest.

In Luke the words are almost the same as in Matthew, but taking into account the different aspect of things that the two writers present, we may say that Luke, (a companion of the apostle Paul), is not so much concerned with the King and His kingdom, but the Saviour and His church, for He is the Saviour of the body, Ephesians 5:23.  So now the floor is the place where Christian profession is tested, the gathering into the garner is the taking of His true people to heaven, and the fire is the fire of hell for those whose profession is not genuine.  The baptism of the Spirit is what takes place at Pentecost, from Luke’s view of things.

John’s record of these things is for an entirely different purpose.  There is no mention of fan, floor, filled garners, or fire, but the fact that He baptises with the Holy Spirit because He is the Son of God.  And the descent of the Spirit upon Him at His baptism was what convinced John of these things, John 1:31-34.

So Matthew presents the baptism of the Spirit that will take place in the future in connection with the nation of Israel, whereas Luke presents the baptism of the Spirit that happened at Pentecost. The apostle John emphasises the person who does the baptizing, even the Son of God. 

So it is that Luke records, “And when the Day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place.  And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting…and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance”, Acts 2:1,2,4.  It is important to remember that the word for wind and Spirit is the same.  Notice that not only were the disciples filled with the Spirit, but also that the Spirit filled the house where they were sitting.  So they were immersed in the element of the Spirit.  This is the baptism of the Spirit.  And it is to this that the apostle Paul refers in 1 Corinthians 12:12,13, to which we now turn.

“For as the body is one, and hath many members, and all the members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ.  For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free, and have been all made to drink into one Spirit”, 1 Corinthians 12:12,13.

In verse 12, in the expression “For as the body is one”, the apostle uses the figure of the human body to illustrate his point.  He is not using the word as in the phrase, “A body of people”.  He brings out the following points:
1.    The human body is one organic whole, not a mere assembly of parts. 
2.    It has many members, such as limbs, organs, etc. 
3.    All the different parts of that body which has just been described are one, or unified. 
4.    The sum total of the many members makes just one body in number, and one body in character, being a unified whole. 
5.    Such also is the case with Christ and His body, of which He is the head. 
Verse 13 gives us the explanation as to how the unity between Christ and His people, (which is as close as that between the head and the body), is made. 
1.    It is “by one Spirit”, and the preposition used for “by”, emphasises the character of the action which makes into one; the Spirit gives character to the act, hence the result is “the unity of the Spirit”, Ephesians 4:3. 
2.    All were baptized into one body, the church.
3.    This is whether we were Jews or Gentiles, for Divinely-made distinctions have gone; the Jew was separate on the basis of a relationship with Jehovah, now when he believes he is brought into a new unity, that of the body of Christ, which over-rides former things.  So too for the Gentiles; his former pagan-temple associations are gone. 
4.    And whether we were bond or free, for these man-made distinctions, which tend to result in other differences, such as cultural and social, are erased by the baptism.  All such things lose their relevance in the body, where all are equal before God.  We see this in Cornelius’ house, where Peter, a Jew, and Cornelius, a Gentile, were found in an equal relationship with God.  So also between Cornelius, a freeman, and his household servants, who were possibly bondmen. 
5.    We have been all made to drink into one Spirit.  This is something we do, in contrast to the baptism in the Spirit.  Just as villagers might all share one well, so believers all share the refreshment and encouragement of one Spirit.  The expression “made to drink” indicates that we drink by force of circumstances, for the Spirit of God is the only drink, see John 4:13,14; 7:37-39. The sense is, “All have been given the one Spirit to drink”.  In John 4 the Lord was sitting on Jacob’s well as He spoke to the Samaritan woman about drinking.  In other words, a Samaritan Gentile was drinking of an Israelite’s well.  Now Jew and Gentile drink from the same spiritual fountain.  There is not one drink for the Jew and another for the Gentile. This is a sure sign that unity has been achieved.

ROMANS 7

 

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address:  martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

Section 10   Romans 7:1-6
Deliverance from the law

Subject of Section 10
As we see from 5:14, the apostle has three men in view, Adam, Moses and Christ, (“him that was to come”). He has shown how we are freed from Adam in principle by the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ, 6:1-14, then how we are freed in practice by the application of the doctrines delivered to us, 6:15-23. He now shows in this section our deliverance from “Moses”, that is, the law. To explain this, he uses two distinct but connected illustrations. First, in verse 1, the illustration using the principle of law in general. This principle is that death ends the dominion of the law over any person, male or female. Second, the illustration in verses 2 and 3 using the principle of the law of the husband, which states that as long as he is alive, his wife is bound to him. Should he die, however, she is free to marry another. It is vitally important to see that the governing principle in the life of the believer is the law of the Spirit, 8:2, and He empowers us to live a life that expresses Christ. The law of Moses cannot give us strength to do this, hence there is the need for the teaching of chapter seven, to show that conclusively.

Structure of Section 10

10(a)

7:1

Death ends the dominion of the law

10(b)

7:2,3

Death ends relationship with the law

10(c)

7:4-6

Resurrection begins relationship with Christ


10(a)   7:1
Death ends the dominion of the law

7:1
Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?

Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) again the apostle appeals to their Christian intelligence as he did in 6:3,6,9,16.
How that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? Either the law of Moses or the law of Rome will illustrate the principle about to be stated, which is that laws only regulate living people. The word for man used here is “anthropos”, meaning man in general, an individual person, male or female.

10(b)   7:2,3
Death ends relationship with the law

7:2
For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband.

For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth- in verses 15-23 of the previous chapter the servant/master relationship was in view, with the emphasis on obedience. Here the husband/wife relationship is brought in, with the emphasis on faithfulness and fruitfulness. The law of marriage is stated at the beginning of creation, “Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” Genesis 2:24. The only One with authority to break the tie is the One who made it, and He only breaks it by the death of one of the partners.
Those who refuse this verse as an argument against divorce say that the apostle is merely using an illustration that is not in the context of instructions concerning marriage. But if there are exceptions to the “married for life” principle, it would undermine the apostle’s doctrine here regarding the law. If divorce is a possibility, then a woman is not bound to her husband as long as he lives, and consequently she is not living in sin if she marries another while he is alive. In the application of the illustration, this would mean that a believer could be linked to the law and to Christ at the same time. This destroys the apostle’s argument.
Moreover, if it is legitimate to divorce, then who is to say that Christ will not divorce believers? It is because He lives for evermore that the believer is safe, but if there is a way for a marriage to be broken, then the believer is not eternally secure.
But if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband- the law of the husband is not his command, but the principle involved in having a husband. The point is that death breaks the connection that was established by marriage. Loosed means discharged, cleared.

7:3
So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.

So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress so binding is this “law of the husband”, that it still operates even if she is unfaithful. She is “an adulteress by trade or calling” if she marries another while her husband is still alive. Note also that her unfaithfulness has not ended the marriage, for if it had, she would not be an adulteress.
But if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man- only if her husband is dead is she free to marry again. She can be rightly married to a second man, but only if the first is dead.

10(c)   7:4-6
Resurrection begins relationship with Christ

7:4
Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.

Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ- note that he does not use the word “therefore”, (implying logical consequence), which would suggest that he is immediately applying the illustration of verses 2 and 3, but “wherefore”, (implying logical connection), because he is first of all using the principle of verse 1, which is that death ends the dominion of the law over a person. Christ took responsibility on the cross for our transgression of the law of Moses, and as a consequence was made a curse, which is far worse than simply being accursed. He has absorbed the consequences of our law-breaking in His own body, has died, and yet has risen again bodily, and by association with Him in that process we are delivered from the law in a righteous way. See Galatians 2:19, where the apostle says, “For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God.” So the believer is dead to the law through the law. That is, the very demands that the law made upon us, which were fully met by Christ in His death, have served to be the means of our deliverance. If the law had not made its demands, Christ would not have died, and we would not have been delivered by His death. Nor would we have been buried and raised with Him to live a life free from the law.
That ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead- having used the principle in the illustration of verse 1, he now uses the illustration from verses 2 and 3 to show that the second man, Christ, is the one to whom we are linked, not the first “man”, the law.
The resurrection of Christ proves that the things He did in His death have satisfied the demands of God, enabling Him to link His people with Himself in a place where the law does not operate, namely resurrection ground. It is a risen man who has made us dead to the law. Compare the situation in Joshua 1:2, where we read, “Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan”. When the mediator of the law is dead, the new leader can go through a figurative death and resurrection experience with the people as they cross the Jordan.
That we should bring forth fruit unto God- not only are we expected to be faithful to our “husband” from henceforth, (for He will never go into death and thereby cancel our relationship with Him), but also we are to produce “children” by this marriage, which is what “bring forth fruit” means. The apostle referred to the Galatians as his little children, “of whom I travail in birth again until Christ be formed in you”, Galatians 4:19. We should reproduce Christ in our lives.

7:5
For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law, did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death.

For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sins, which were by the law- the characteristic description of sinners is that they are “in the flesh”, see on 8:9. The believer, however, is in the Spirit. Motions are passions, evil desires. Because the mind of the natural man is not subject to the law of God, when the prohibitions of the law come to him he rebels, and does the contrary thing. It is not that the law incites to sin, but the heart of man is contrary to the righteous demands of the law. Perhaps the allusion is to the unfaithful wife of verse 3, who allowed the flesh to overcome her.
Did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death- each part of our body has characteristic sins of which it is capable, and when allowed to, the result is as when a mother bears children in a house where the plague is- they are doomed from birth. The contrast is with the “fruit unto God” of verse 4, which is Christ-likeness.

7:6
But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.

But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held- in contrast to when we were natural men in the flesh we are now delivered from the law by the means described in verse 4. Note that this is the common position of all believers as far as God is concerned. Whether all are in practice delivered is another matter. We shall see the consequences of acting as if not delivered from the law from verse seven onwards.
The husband, the law, has “died”, and by so doing has released us from its dominion, as verse 2 had said. When he says the law has died, the apostle is using the word die in a figurative sense, meaning, “has lost its power to dominate us”. The law itself enshrines unchanging principles, and the apostle declares it to be spiritual in verse 14, and delights in it in verse 22. See also Romans 13:8-10. The law has been cancelled as a means of living a life of righteousness as far as the believer is concerned. As the apostle will write later on, “For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.” Romans 10:4. Christ has not ended the law as a way of condemning unrighteousness, for that is still one of its functions.
That we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter- lest we should think that our new-found freedom from the law allows us licence, the apostle reverts to the figure of servant/master. Newness of spirit is the new attitude of spirit which now motivates us; no longer is there the drudgery of law-keeping with its failure and misery. The phrase prepares the way for chapter 8. The psalmist appealed to God with the words, “Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me…and uphold me with thy free spirit”, Psalm 51:10,12.
The law is now outdated, for there is an oldness about it as far as being a means of attaining to righteousness, Romans 10:4, and the code of commandments written on stones has been replaced by the living example of Christ. It is Christ that is written on the heart of the believer, 2 Corinthians 3:3.

Section 11   Romans 7:7-25
Defence of the law and despair under the law

Subject of Section 11
In the first part of the section the apostle defends the law, lest it be thought that the fact that the believer is delivered from it implies that it had some defect. In the second half of the section, he shows that the believer who places himself under the law will soon be in despair.
The believer may be looked at in two ways. One, in accordance with God’s present reckoning of him, and the other, (because the body which he had before he was saved is still the same, even though now yielded to God), in accordance with what he was before he was saved.
In these verses Paul is presenting a situation that was personal to him, in which he tries to please God as a believer by the use of the law. So we might think of him going into Arabia subsequent to his conversion, (see Galatians 1:17, and connect with 4:24,25), and finding that even when there was nothing to attract him in the surroundings, yet still the desire to covet was within him. In isolation in Arabia, he would inevitably think of the law given at Sinai in Arabia.
Note the prominence of the words “I” and “me” in the remainder of the chapter, and the absence of the words “Spirit” and “Lord Jesus”, except in verse 25. We note also the expression in verse 25, “I myself”, as if Paul was on his own in trying to please God.
It would be a mistake to think of the matters detailed in the next verses as being normal Christian experience. The apostle is describing himself as one who is trying to please God through law-keeping. When he is doing this we could call him Unreal Paul, whereas when he is living as a believer should, he is Real Paul. True Christian practice is found at the beginning of chapter 8. These verses in chapter seven are a warning to those who believe they can please God by keeping the law.

Structure of Section 11

11(a)

7:7

The law is not sinful

11(b)

7:8-11

The law is condemnatory

11(c)

7:12,13

The law is holy

11(d)

7:14

The law is spiritual

11(e)

7:15-17

The law is good

11(f)

7:18-20

The law is ineffective

11(g)

7:21-23

The law is delightful

11(h)

7:24

The law is weak

11(i)

7:25

Grace gives the victory


11(a)   7:7
The law is not sinful

7:7
What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

What shall we say then? Is the law sin? The expression of verse 5, “the motions of sins which were by the law”, and the argument in general in the previous verses about the irrelevance of the law as an aid to Christian living, may give the impression that the apostle is condemning the law, which, after all, was given by God.
“What shall we say then” is a favourite expression of the apostle in this epistle, encouraging involvement by his readers, (“what shall we say?”), and causing them to think about what they are reading. He asks “Is the law sin?” If the result of the application of the law is fruit unto death, then perhaps there is a fault with the law, so that as soon as you introduce it into a situation, sin is the inevitable result. Is this why the apostle is so emphatic that we are not under it?
God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law- Paul will not have it that the law is evil, hence his strong double denial. Far from being sinful, the law exposes sin, so that a person knows it, and has no excuse. How can the law be sinful if it utterly condemns sin?
For I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet- the heart of Paul and the particular command “Thou shalt not covet” were on a collision course, and showed up his lust, his strong desire to do what the law forbade him to do. So the law of Moses upholds God’s standards inflexibly and cannot be said to be sinful.

11(b)   7:8-11
The law is condemnatory

7:8
But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead.

But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence- the true alternative to the false idea that the law is sin, (hence the “but”), is that sin used the command as a means of waging its war on God. The word translated “occasion” was originally used of a base of operations in war. Instead of the law working out the will of God in Paul, it was sin that worked, and the result was all manner of concupiscence, which is evil desire. Sin and concupiscence are evil, but the law is not.
For without the law sin was dead- the sin-principle was inactive, (“dead”), not being provoked into using the law to incite Paul to sin whilst Paul did not try to please God through the law. Once he started to do that, things changed.

7:9
For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died.

For I was alive without the law once- when Saul of Tarsus was converted he was given life from God apart from law-keeping. He could testify that God “called me by his grace”, Galatians 1:15. he could also say, “And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.” 1 Timothy 1:14.
But when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died- when he afterwards set out to please God by law-keeping, the commandment to not covet came to him with its full force. As a result, the law, which as far as Paul was concerned had died, verse 6, was in effect resurrected, for by trying to keep the law as a believer he had put himself back practically into a position where the law was not dead. As a result the law with its ministry of death dealt a death-blow to his earnest but ignorant desire to serve and please God by the law.

7:10
And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death.

And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death- Christ had said to the lawyer, after he had summarised the law, “this do and thou shalt live”, Luke 10:28, so the law, if kept perfectly, would lead to life. But then the Lord spoke the parable of the Good Samaritan, in which the lawyer learned that, far from being the one who worked to help the robbed man, he was the robbed man, left half-dead by the roadside, and therefore unable to “do and live”, Luke 10:30-32. Just as the priest and the Levite, (the representatives of the ceremonial and civil law), would not save the wounded man, so the lawyer learns that neither religious ceremonies nor good works could help him. This lesson Paul had to learn also.
So the law that was designed to bring life, because it is being used in the wrong way, (that is, by a believer trying to please God by its agency), results not in life but in moral death. The apostle Paul is very clear in his epistle to Timothy that the law is not made for a righteous man but for sinners, 1 Timothy 1:9.

7:11
For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me.

For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it slew me- similar words are used in verse 8, but whereas there the result was sins, here the result is death. This verse explains why Paul found the commandment to be unto death, verse 10.
Sin misled Paul into thinking that he could keep the law now that he was a believer, for “The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?” Jeremiah 17:9. Thus sin used the command “Thou shalt not covet” to reduce Paul to inactivity as far as living to please God was concerned; he was in moral death.

11(c)   7:12,13
The law is holy

7:12
Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.

Wherefore the law is holy- because it is sin and not law that slays Paul, we may say as a logical consequence of the foregoing, (“wherefore”), that the law considered as a whole is totally free from evil, and safeguards the holiness of God, for it slew Paul when he failed to keep it.
And the commandment holy, and just, and good- the particular precepts of the law, illustrated by the one about covetousness emphasized here, partake of the character of the whole, being holy. They are also just, being designed to lead to a righteous life. They are good as well, for the whole law is fulfilled by loving God and one’s neighbour, as Romans 13:8-10 makes clear. See also the intelligent answer of the scribe in Mark 12:32,33, and the Lord’s response, verse 34.

7:13
Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

Was then that which is good made death unto me? The apostle here anticipates an objection which will disparage the law. Was it the law itself that resulted in Paul being slain, verse 11? The answer is no, for the reason he next gives.
God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good- the law brought sin out into the open and exposed it for what it was, and as a result Paul was left for dead as far as pleasing God was concerned. Note the use of the word “working”, for Paul was trying to work good by the law, but sin was also working by using the law.
The meaning becomes clearer if we mentally insert the words from the previous sentence, “was made death unto me”, after the word good. So the idea is that sin, that it might appear sin, was made death to Paul, and the way it happened was that sin used God’s good law to slay him.
That sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful- the commandment in view here is the specific one of verse 7, “Thou shalt not covet”, but in other circumstances any of the commandments of the law would have the same effect. Sin is sinful by definition, but exceeds itself when it manages to deceive believers into thinking they can use the law to please God. That must be bad that uses God’s holy law to prevent a man from trying to please Him!

11(d) 7:14
The law is spiritual

7:14
For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin.

For we know that the law is spiritual- it is common Christian knowledge that since the law is from God, it cannot be anything other than like Him in character. Moses introduces the commandments of the law by saying, “God spake all these words”, Exodus 20:1. That being the case, they must be spiritual. The word spiritual could be summed up in the words of verse 12, “holy, and just, and good”.
But I am carnal, sold under sin- the problem was that, considered as mere unaided flesh, the Unreal Paul was unholy, unjust and bad. Note the repetition of “I” in the passage, for he is describing his attempt to please God by his own efforts. He was but weak flesh, if unaided by the Spirit. Since he has temporarily abandoned the practice of using the Spirit to please God, he can only be said to be carnal or fleshly. As such he was not only sold (by Adam) to sin as a slave-master, but sold under, for sin dominates ruthlessly. So it is not carnal as opposed to spiritual, but carnal as considered as mere flesh, without the aid of the Spirit.

11(e)   7:15-17
The law is good

7:15
For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

For that which I do I allow not- that which the Unreal Paul does through law-keeping, when the Real Paul surveys it, he disowns as not what he would want to be known by. The reason being that as a believer the Real Paul knows what pleases God.
For what I would, that do I not- that which he really wants to achieve as something he would want to be known by as a believer he fails to accomplish because he, the Real Paul, does not do what he wills to do.
But what I hate, that do I- the reverse is true, for what he does do he hates. This is not the same as a believer failing to achieve the results he should because he is not obeying the prompting of the Spirit. The man of this verse is obeying the prompting of the law, with disastrous results, for that law gives him no power to overcome indwelling sin.

7:16
If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good- the apostle now draws a conclusion from the experience of verse 15. Because Real Paul disapproves of what he has done, then he has consented unto the law that it is good, for the law condemns his shortcoming, and so does he. The general knowledge concerning the law as being spiritual is confirmed in his experience. If he is for good, and against evil, then he is in agreement with the law, which commands good and condemns evil.

7:17
Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me- having begun a life in the Spirit at conversion, but now having lapsed into trying to please God by law-keeping, the real “I”, the Real Paul as we are calling him, is not in control. It is the sin-principle that dwells within him that dominates him. This is the cause of the trouble.
Of course, Paul must take responsibility for his actions; he cannot excuse sin by saying he is not the doer of it. In the extraordinary situation Paul finds himself in, sin has over-ridden him and taken charge, forcing him to do things he knows are not Christian. It is in this sense that he is not responsible for the sin he commits, for the Unreal Paul, the man acting as if he does not possess the Spirit, does not in fact exist.

11(f)   7:18-20
The law is ineffective

7:18
For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing- there is no room in the flesh for anything other than sin. There is no benign influence there at all. There is nothing in the flesh that corresponds to the good law of God. The apostle is now concentrating attention on how to achieve worthwhile things, and knows that nothing beneficial can come from the flesh within. Note the parenthesis, showing that there are two persons Paul calls “me”. There is the “me” that is centred in his flesh, the Unreal Paul, and the new “me”, the Real Paul, who wills to do good, as the next phrase shows.
For to will is present with me- this expression is another indication that Paul is speaking as a converted man, for unsaved people do not will to do God’s will, for their mind is not subject to the law of God, nor can it be, 8:7.
But how to perform that which is good I find not- as he looks within himself for resources to please God, he can find no power to do what is good and right in the sight of God. He is limiting his search to what is within himself in these verses, and is not taking account of the fact that he is indwelt by the Spirit of God. He will tell us the power to do good in the next chapter, when he does take account of the fact that the Spirit of God dwells within him.

7:19
For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

For the good that I would I do not- this is almost a repetition of verse 15, (as if he is going round in circles), but with the added thought that what he wished to do was good. In verse 15 he was showing that he was “sold under sin”, as he said in verse 14. Here, he is showing that he finds that situation to be contrary to his real desires, and that he does not find within himself the resources to do better, for he said in verse 18, “how to perform that which is good I find not”.
But the evil which I would not, that I do- note that he now labels as evil what he said he hated in verse 15. This confirms that he is in agreement with the law of God in the matter, as he has already declared in verse 16.

7:20
Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.

Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me- the word “would” is a form of the word “will”. So the apostle is saying that what he did was not as a result of him as a man in the Spirit, the Real Paul, willing or determining to do it, (for in fact he willed to do otherwise), but rather, it was the will of the flesh, his sinful self. As far as God is concerned, the believer is not in the flesh but in the Spirit. As such, he has the power to live in a spiritual way and not a fleshly way.
Note he says it is “no more” I that do it, for before he was saved it was his natural way of acting. Now he is saved, however, it is unnatu  ral to act in this way, so what was true before is no longer true.
If we abandon the help of the Spirit, and seek the help of the law, then we shall find that the will of the flesh takes over, and we act contrary to God for the reasons the apostle has given in verses 7-16. When Paul declares that he did not do the sin, he does not mean to excuse himself for sinning. Rather, he is pinpointing the source of the sin, his flesh, his sinful self. We must remember that what Paul is describing is not normal Christian experience. It is only because he is describing an abnormal situation that Paul can divide himself up, so to speak, and distance himself from his flesh.

11(g)   7:21-22
The law is delightful

7:21
I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me- the word law is used in different ways in these verses; here it simply means the principle that operates in a given set of circumstances. His experience has enabled him to find or discover something. What he discovers is that despite wishing to do good, there is evil residing in his heart waiting to operate. It is present all the time; it is not a passing feeling. We should learn from his discovery, so that we do not have the miserable experience he did.

7:22
For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

For I delight in the law of God after the inward man- this is yet another indication that Paul is writing as a believer. The inward man is his real person, what Peter calls the “the hidden man of the heart”, 1 Peter 3:4, the one we have been calling the Real Paul. The believer delights in the principles of righteousness enshrined in the law of Moses, but that does not mean he is subject to that law as a rule of life. The apostle will show in the next chapter that grace has provided a better way to please God.

7:23
But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind- by seeking to please God by law-keeping, he has exposed himself to danger. He has now discerned the workings of the contrary principle which is based in his body, and which uses the various members of his body to sin. The principle he delights in is the law of God, but the other law within him is hostile.
The fact that he speaks of this law being at war with him shows the seriousness of the situation. It also shows he speaks as a believer, for there is no conflict within the unbeliever, for sin holds total sway over him.
And bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members because he is trying to win the battle against evil in his own strength, Paul loses, and becomes a prisoner of war. The war is between the law of sin in his members which incites to sin, and the law of his mind, which favours good, holiness and righteousness, the characteristics of God’s law. This does not mean that the law of sin is stronger than the law of God. What it does mean is that the believer acting without the help of the Spirit is no match for sin.

1l(h)   7:24
The law is weak

7:24
O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

O wretched man that I am! Like those unfortunate people who are captured, taken as prisoners of war, and paraded through the streets of the victor’s capital as the trophies of his triumph, Paul was reduced to misery, when as a believer he ought to have been full of joy.
Who shall deliver me from the body of this death? He is not referring to the fact that his body is mortal, subject to death and tending to death. He means that as a prisoner he is not at liberty to please God, which for the believer is what true life is. It is a mistake, therefore, to depart from the Authorised Version and read “this body of death”.
The emphasis is on the sort of death to which sin, using his body, has brought him. It is not physical death in this context, (although it is that in other settings), but moral death. As a believer, Real Paul is miserable about the state of things to which his course of action has led him. He needs a stronger power to deliver him from sin within.

1l(i)   7:25
Grace gives the victory

7:25
I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin.

I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord- in anticipation of the next chapter he gives God thanks. Only when Jesus Christ is recognised as being Lord will the dominion or lordship of sin be defeated, and true Christian joy be known.
So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin- summarising the whole section, the apostle can affirm that he himself, the True Paul, is able to serve the law of God. intelligently, for he serves with the mind. He has not dismissed the law as being of no value, but serves its best interests by showing that it is designed, not to facilitate Christian living, but to condemn sin.
He also admits that if he abandons the help of the Spirit, and seeks to please God by law-keeping, then he will be subject to the law of sin, and that is a tragedy. The way to avoid that tragedy is detailed for us in the next chapter.