Tag Archives: Christian

ROMANS 6

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address:  martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

Section 9 Romans 6:1-23
The believer’s past and present position

Subject of Section 9
Most of the truth found in the epistles is anticipated by the Lord Jesus in His ministry, and this chapter is a case in point. He had said “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free…whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin…If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed”, John 8:32,34,36. Romans chapter 6 explains how we may live free from the service of sin, in the freedom into which the Son of God, by His death, burial and resurrection, introduces us. By being buried in the watery grave of baptism, the believer, who has already died with Christ when he was saved, associates himself with the burial and resurrection of Christ, henceforth to live a new sort of life.

Structure of Section 9

9(a) 6:1-11 The doctrine of identification with Christ
9(b) 6:12-23 The application of the doctrine

Special note on Christian baptism
Just before He ascended back to His Father, the Lord Jesus commanded His disciples to preach and teach, and then to baptize those who believed. His words were, “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.” Matthew 28:19,20.
That the apostles were obedient to His command is clear from the Book of the Acts, for as soon as people believed, they baptized them. We read that on the day of Pentecost, Peter said unto them, “Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost”, Acts 2:38. Note that repentance came first, indicating that those baptised were all of the age of responsibility. Note, too, that every one that repented was required to be baptized.
Because the ones addressed had been guilty of the rejection of Christ, they were required to be baptized to show the genuineness of their conversion before they received the Holy Spirit. Subsequently, the Holy Spirit is given the moment a person believes, or else the argument of the apostle Paul in Galatians 3:2 is destroyed, for he strongly implies there that the Holy Spirit is received when a person initially believes.
After the Ethiopian eunuch was saved, we read, “the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized? And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him”, Acts 8:36-38. Note he believed first, then was baptized after both he and Philip had gone down into water, showing it was not sprinkling.
After Saul of Tarsus was converted, we read that he “arose, and was baptized. And when he had received meat, he was strengthened,” Acts 9:18,19. Note Saul was baptized before he had any food, even though he had not eaten for three days. He felt that getting baptized was a matter of urgency.
When Cornelius and his household had believed the gospel and received the gift of the Spirit, Peter said, “Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we? And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord.” Acts 10:47,48. Note that they received the Holy Spirit before they were baptized.
Such was the practice followed by the apostles, and since believers are required to continue steadfastly in the apostle’s doctrine, such should be our practice today. But what are the principles behind the practice of baptism? For these we shall have to note the teaching of the chapter before us.

9(a)   6:1-15
The doctrine of identification with Christ

6:1
What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?

What shall we say then? This expression, (or one very similar to it), occurs seven times in the epistle. The apostle wants to involve us in his line of reasoning. He is about to respond to the false teaching about the subject of sin that was current in his day.
Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? This is the suggestion of those who were drawing a false conclusion from 5:20, where the apostle states that “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound”. Compare 3:8 where a similar argument is used by Paul’s opponents, but there in connection with sins, here in connection with the sin-tendency in man. They were saying, in effect, “Let us give way to sin’s rule, so that God’s grace may be further enhanced”. The whole idea of justification by faith alone could be misunderstood in this way, hence the need for teaching on the matter. To continue in sin is to live in a sinful way even when claiming to be a believer.

6:2
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

God forbid- this is a strong expression of opposition to the idea.
How shall we- the argument does not begin with an exhortation, (that comes from verse 12 onwards, beginning with “let not”), but logical reasoning based on what believers know, which should prevent them from making the suggestion of verse 1. The apostle does not speak of inadvisability, but impossibility; not “we ought not”, but “how can we?” “We” is a pronoun of quality, “such as we, united to Christ; how can people in that position act as if they are still united to Adam?”
That are dead to sin, live any longer therein- for the believer, death to sin is a past event, which is to be worked out in the present. There are two proofs normally that a person is dead, the first being the death certificate, (corresponding to the apostle’s official statement of verse 2), and the second, the burial ceremony, (corresponding in the spiritual realm to the believer’s baptism in verse 4). We died to sin when we believed, not when we were baptized, or else salvation would be completed by the work of being baptized, and not by faith in a crucified Saviour.

6:3
Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?

Know ye not? The apostle asks, “Are you ignorant?” Anyone who is aware of the truth of verses 3-5 will not suggest that the believer should continue in sin. As we have noted, the Lord said, “ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, but ignorance tends to bondage.
That so many of us- now we have a pronoun of quantity, and the number of persons baptized is the number baptized into Jesus Christ; the act has the same significance for all believers. There might be a suggestion here that those who said believers could continue in sin were not baptized.
As were baptized into Jesus Christ- baptism signifies publicly that we have moved, (when we believed), into the company of which Jesus Christ is the head, and we wish to work that position out in practice. No longer do we wish to be thought of as those who are in Adam. The apostle has already dealt with the headship of Christ and Adam in chapter 5:12-21.
Baptism is also an act of public submission to Christ, in loyalty and commitment, a fact illustrated by the recognition of Moses as the one who had brought the people through the Red Sea, for they were “baptized unto Moses”, 1 Corinthians 10:2, recognising him as leader.
Baptized into his death- we cannot be subject to Christ without the truth of His death. So we are baptized into Him by being baptized into His death. From verse 4 we see that by death is meant Christ’s state of death, not His act of dying. A person is buried because he is dead; he does not die at the burial ceremony.

6:4
Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.

Therefore we are buried with him- this is the first conclusion which shows we cannot continue in sin, for buried persons are not able to continue as they did before. We are buried in identification with Him in His burial, with our former life past and gone.
By baptism into death- when Israel passed through the Red Sea with the waters heaped up on either side, it was as if they were in a grave, Exodus 14:22. Christian baptism puts us publicly where we are already ideally in the sight of God, and prepares us practically to walk in a new way.
That like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father- “that” means “in order that”, for our baptism has a purpose; it is not just a negative burial out of sight, but the necessary preparation for re-emergence. There is a direct correspondence between Christ’s emergence from the grave, and ours, but this does not appear to be the case in verse 4, but becomes evident in verse 5. The Father’s glory demanded that such a person as Christ should be raised, He having satisfied the Father in life and death.
We also should walk in newness of life- note the lack of a parallel expression regarding us, for the glory of the Father demanded that we remain in the grave if our life as sinners was in view. For us there needs to be a new sort of life, a life which has the newness of the new man, (a man in character like Christ) about it, see Ephesians 4:20-24; Colossians 3:9-11. The “also” links “buried with him” with “walk in newness of life”. It is not that “we also, (as well as Christ), walk in newness of life”, for He did not need to walk in a different sort of way. The apostle writes “should walk” not in sense of “ought to walk”, but raised in order that it may happen.

6:5
For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:

For- now comes the explanation of the correspondence between Christ and the believer mentioned in verse 4.
If we have been planted together in the likeness of his death- we are publicly conjoined with Christ in His state of death in the grave. At the moment we are immersed in the water of baptism, we are like He was when in the sepulchre. But the likeness has a spiritual side, for His life on earth was over, and our old life on earth is over, too.
We shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection- some would limit this to the future resurrection, but this robs the passage of much of its present force. The apostle is not dealing with physical resurrection in this passage. Just as the physical position of being in water had the spiritual counterpart of being buried with Christ, so physically coming out of the water has its counterpart of being raised with Christ. The apostle views us as newly emerged from the water, with a new life before us, hence the “shall be”. So it is not “shall be in the future”, but “shall be from the point of baptism onwards”.

6:6
Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

Knowing this- those who have been baptized have done so because they have got to know something. We are baptized in the knowledge that our old man is crucified with Christ. According to this, persons should be instructed in the principles given in these verses before they are baptized.
That our old man is crucified with him- the old man is the pre-conversion self considered as to its link with Adam. The new man is the post-conversion self considered as to its link with Christ. When the Romans wished to publicly demonstrate that a criminal was not acceptable in their society, they crucified him. So God has declared publicly that our sinful self is not fit for the society of heaven, by associating it with Christ when He was crucified. “Crucified with” means co-crucified, crucified in company with, for we were in the mind of God when Christ was on the cross. In this way the believer may say with the apostle, “I am crucified with Christ”, Galatians 2:20.
Not only did we renounce the old man in repentance, but we embraced the new man in faith. If the old man is the likeness to Adam that marked us because we had links with him, the new man is likeness to Christ now that we are linked to Him by association with His death, burial, and resurrection. This emphasises the great change that comes about when a person is converted. Instead of living as Adam lived after he sinned, the believer begins to “walk, even as he walked”, that is, to live like Christ, 1 John 2:6.
That the body of sin might be destroyed- that is, in order that the body of sin may be made of no effect. The body of sin is our body considered as the headquarters of the sin-principle within us. As far as God is concerned, just as a criminal’s body was rendered powerless by the process of crucifixion so that he was no longer able to engage in a life of crime, so our body, (that sin used as the base of its operations), has been put out of action. This is the ideal situation, when things are considered from God’s side, whereas in our everyday practice we are not to let sin reign in our mortal body, verse 12, so we are not yet delivered finally from sin. It is not the body itself that is made of no effect, but the body as the instrument that the sin-principle uses. The Christian’s body can be presented to God as a living sacrifice, 12:1, so it is not in itself evil.
That henceforth- that is, no longer, from the point of baptism onwards We should resolve that the principles at work in our baptism should constantly be at work in our lives.
We should not serve sin- the mastery of sin has been broken at the cross, for sin can only dominate living people and we have been crucified. By this means the Son makes free indeed, (that is, free to the very core of our being), John 8:36.

6:7
For he that is dead is freed from sin.

For- the reason for freedom from sin, as verse 6 had been the foundation of freedom.
He that is dead is freed from sin- whilst it is true that dead persons are free from the tendency to sin, this is not the point here. The word for freed used here means justified; freed from obligation. The idea is that those who are dead because they have been crucified with Christ have been justly freed from the obligation to obey the dictates of sin within. Christ has borne the liability which our sin placed upon us. The expression does not mean that we are freed from sin by the removal of that sinful nature, for it is not until the resurrection morning that we shall be able to say, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.” 1 Corinthians 15:55,56.

6:8
Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him:

Now if we be dead with Christ- the believer is associated with the man who for a short while hung dead on a cross, but was then buried.
We believe we shall also live with him- the apostle might very well have simply made an exact parallel by writing “if we be dead with Christ, we shall live with Him”. However, he inserts “we believe.” If we died with Christ, then we are believers, resting in what His crucifixion achieved, for only such are crucified with Christ. But this faith is not limited to things that are past, but lays hold of that which is future, which in this case is life in association with a risen Christ. Again, the apostle is looking at the believer newly emerged from the waters of baptism. We live with Him from that point on. The mention of believing also reminds us that the Christian life is a life of faith.

6:9
Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him.

Knowing that- here is a third word for knowledge, meaning perception. The believer’s faith is based on the perception of the truth that Christ is risen to die no more.
Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more- unlike Lazarus, for instance, Christ shall never die again, for the reason the apostle now gives.
Death hath no more dominion over him- it is indeed true that Christ laid down His life of Himself, but it is also true that, because He undertook to be made sin, He accepted that this involved death having Him in its power for a short time. His resurrection is proof, however, that death’s power is broken, both for Him, and also for His people in association with Him.

6:10
For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God.

For in that he died, he died unto sin once- the first reason the apostle cites to establish that death no longer dominates Christ is the fact that His death unto or in relation to sin was once-for-all in character. What He did by going into death was fully effective, and needs no repetition.
But in that he liveth, he liveth unto God- the second reason is found in the fact that He now lives only in relation to God, having nothing to do with the sin-question any more. Death can only dominate in connection with sin.

6:11
Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.

Likewise reckon ye also yourselves- there is perhaps the implication in the word “reckon” that Christ’s death in relation to sin was the result, on His part, of careful reckoning of the consequences. So likewise, the believer is to seriously reckon with the consequences. Reckon means to make a logical and reasoned calculation.
To be dead indeed unto sin- dead, that is, in reality, (indeed), not simply in theory. We must make the practical application to ourselves of the death of Christ to sin.
But alive unto God- as Christ is alive unto God, the matter of sin forever settled, so we should act on that fact, for we are identified with Him.
Through Jesus Christ our Lord- only because of Christ’s work can we be dead to sin, and only because of His resurrection can we be alive to God, so all depends on Him. The apostle can write “our Lord”, for we have exchanged the lordship of sin for the lordship of Jesus Christ.

9(b)   6:12-23
The application of the doctrine of identification with Christ

6:12
Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it in the lusts thereof.

Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body- because the dominion of sin has been broken by the death and resurrection of Christ, there is no reason why we should submit to its dictatorship. We are dead to sin as far as God is concerned, verse 2; the body of sin has been destroyed, verse 6; we are legally free from obligation to sin, verse 7; and Christ has once-for-all died in relation to sin, verse 10, and we are identified with Him. These are the reasons why sin need no longer be on the throne of the believer’s heart, as before it was, 5:21. The mortal body is a body still liable to death; a reminder from the apostle that we are not yet delivered from indwelling sin, for that awaits our bodily resurrection, 1 Corinthians 15:56. A warning, too, to be on our guard.
That ye should obey it in the lusts thereof- the reign of sin is expressed by the lusts or strong evil desires which it enables men to gratify. We allow sin to reign when we obey its dictates.

6:13
Neither yield ye your members as instruments of unrighteousness unto sin: but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God.

Neither yield ye your members- the apostle now concentrates on the varied members of the body which can assist sin in its attempts at domination; we are not to yield to their pressure.
As instruments of unrighteousness unto sin- connect “unto sin” with “yield”; we are not to present our members to be used in relation to sin, for that would be to use them for unrighteous ends.
But yield yourselves unto God- not now the individual members of the body, but the whole person, spirit, soul and body, is to be yielded to God as Christ is, verse 10.
As those that are alive from the dead- in line with the truth that we are risen with Christ. This is the practical outworking of the reckoning of verse 11, translating theory into practice.
And your members as instruments of righteousness unto God- having dealt with the person as a whole, he now gives the parallel to the yielding of individual members unto sin, which results in unrighteousness.

6:14
For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law, but under grace.

For sin shall not have dominion over you- “shall” meaning “from this point onwards”, if the truths of previous verses are heeded and practised.
For ye are not under the law, but under grace- this is the reason why sin will not dominate, for grace brings the death, burial and resurrection of Christ to bear upon our persons, and gives us the resources to live victoriously for God. Law, on the other hand, only gives sin an opportunity to assert itself, as chapter seven will show. Compare also 5:20. This verse introduces the idea of law not being able to enable us to overcome sin. From 6:15 to the end of chapter 7 the apostle deals with the false idea of some that the Christian life should be governed by the law of Moses. There were, and are, those who feel that unless the believer is subject to rules and regulations of a legal nature, he will give way to licentiousness, which is the opposite of legality. But the Christian life is marked by liberty, and that liberty is expressed by subjection to the will of God.
The parable of the prodigal son illustrates three possible states: licence, (the prodigal in the far country), legality, (the elder son working in the field, and not transgressing his father’s commandment), and liberty, (the restored prodigal in the father’s house), see Luke 15:11-32. The power to live a life of liberty is the Spirit of God, but before he can enlarge in chapter 8 on the important theme of the indwelling Spirit, the apostle deals in chapter 7 with the believer’s relationship to the law of Moses. In verses 15 to 23 of chapter 6 however, he shows that a life lived in the good of all that grace has brought us into, will not lapse into sinfulness because there are strong incentives to do otherwise.
Note the way the passage builds up to a climax:
Obey, verse 16.
Obedience unto righteousness, verse 16.
Servants of righteousness, verse 18.
Servants to righteousness unto holiness, verse 19.
Servants to God…fruit unto holiness…the end everlasting life, verse 22.

6:15
What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? God forbid.

What then? Shall we sin- in verse 1 the suggestion was to continue in a manner of life that obeyed the dictates of the sinful tendency within our hearts. Here the suggestion is of continuing to commit sins because we think grace delivers from the consequences. Both ideas are met with “God forbid”, but whereas the first is answered by the doctrine of the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ, the second is met by an appeal to our Christian knowledge as to what is becoming conduct for a true believer, who is a servant of God.
Because we are not under the law, but under grace. God forbid- does freedom from the law mean freedom to sin? The apostle has already hinted in verse 14 that grace is a superior force than law, for it unlocks the power available in the resurrection of Christ. The next verse will show why we should not sin.

6:16
Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?

Know ye not- the same word as verse 9, meaning perception, insight. He expresses surprise that as believers they did not know.
That to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey- being a servant and obeying are not separable. A servant is obedient by definition. The question is, which master is he obeying?
Whether of sin unto death- the pre-conversion condition was one of slavery to sin, expressed in obedience to its commands.
Or of obedience unto righteousness- the apostle combines the two things that were true of our Head in 5:18,19, the one act of righteousness, and the obedience of the One. The believer is to display the same characteristics that his Head does. So who we yield to determines who is our master in practice.

6:17
But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you.

But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin- the thankfulness of the apostle is most easily connected with what follows, he is thankful that they have obeyed from the heart, not that they were slaves.
But ye have obeyed from the heart- this is the secret of a life of service to God, to obey His truth from the heart, that is, willingly and fervently. “Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life.” Proverbs 4:23.
That form of doctrine which was delivered you- the truths expressed in the gospel are not just for initial salvation, but ongoing, being the terms on which we are to serve God. “If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, John 8:32. The brass for the pillars at the front of Solomon’s temple took the shape of the mould into which it was poured, 1 Kings 7:41,46, so we should be moulded by the truth.

6:18
Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.

Being then made free from sin- when we believe, the truth as to Christ, His person and work, is applied savingly to our hearts by God. In this way the Son makes us free indeed, John 8:36.
Ye became the servants of righteousness- the same act that freed from sin, made us servants committed to righteousness, because of our obedience to the truth of the gospel, the obedience of faith, Romans 16:26. There is no middle ground, such as being delivered from sin, but made servants to the law.

6:19
I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh: for as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.

I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh- the apostle changes from general principles to more detailed illustration. He is being more specific because he knows that the sinful tendencies of the flesh are ready to defeat us.
For as ye have yielded your members servants to uncleanness- each part of our person, before conversion, was surrendered to sin, resulting in uncleanness. As the Lord Jesus said, “For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies: These are the things which defile a man”, Matthew 15:19,20.
And to iniquity unto iniquity- the sinner is committed to the principle of lawlessness, (for the carnal mind is not subject to the law of God, 8:7), and that commitment results in lawless deeds. To yield to the principle of iniquity in the flesh, (“to iniquity”), will result in the practice of iniquity, (“unto iniquity”).
Even so now- let there be a correspondingly total surrender now that you are a believer.
Yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness- the outworking of righteous principles will result in holy practice, because righteousness, which is conformity to the nature of God, teaches us what to avoid and what to engage in. Holiness is separation to what is of God. Commitment to righteousness and holiness will mean lawlessness is renounced and uncleanness is rejected. See Mark 9:43-50 for truth spoken by the Lord Jesus concerning particular members of the body, and the way in which we may misuse them.

6:20
For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness.

For when ye were the servants of sin, ye were free from righteousness- before conversion, there was no relationship with righteousness at all, for “there is none righteous, no, not one”. Again the apostle emphasises that a life of sin, and a life of righteousness are totally distinct in principle; so we should not be tempted to mix them in practice. “Free from righteousness” also has the idea of the sinner being glad to be clear of the demands of righteousness, an attitude which should be foreign to the believer.

6:21
What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death.

What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? By fruit the apostle means “worthwhile result”. There is no glory for God in a life of sin. The believer shows his change of outlook by being disgusted at what he did before.
For the end of those things is death- the prospect before one who lives in sin is one of death, not life. But the believer has life in view. It is sadly true, however, that the believer may engage in pre-conversion sins, a lapse into moral death as 8:13 will explain.

6:22
But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the end everlasting life.

But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God- the apostle now returns to the basic alternatives he spoke of in verse 16, having enlarged on their outworking in verses 17-21.
Ye have your fruit unto holiness- in contrast to a Christ-less life which is lived in shameful unholiness. They can be said to “have” this fruit in the present, so a life lived apart from the law of Moses does produce results in holiness. The apostle says “your fruit”, as if he expects us to value it, and also because no-one else can produce it for us.
And the end everlasting life- the result of actively being servants to God is that we gain increasing insights into who our God is, for everlasting life enables us to get to know the only true God, John 17:3. The believer has eternal life from the start of his spiritual career, but the end or goal of that career is to constantly gain fresh appreciation of God, and this is possible because having eternal life enables us to get to know God.

6:23
For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

For the wages of sin is death- the word used for wages originally meant “money paid to soldiers”. Sinners are at war with God, 8:7, and they are paid wages which reflect that, and which represent their just deserts, for death is the result of having a sinful nature. As the apostle has already said, “death by sin”, 5:12.
But the gift of God is eternal life- whilst this may be connected with the initial gift of eternal life, in context it relates to the gracious way in which God repays service to Himself by granting fresh appreciations of His glories, hence the word “for”, indicating an explanation of the previous verse.
Note that this is not called wages, for all that God gives is out of His gracious heart towards us; even service rendered to Him does not put Him under obligation to us. As the Lord Jesus said, “So likewise ye, when ye shall have done all those things which are commanded you, say, We are unprofitable servants: we have done that which was our duty to do.” Luke 17:10.
Through Jesus Christ our Lord- all the enabling to serve God comes through Him, whether by His death and resurrection, His example of obedient service, or His present ministry of applying the truth to our souls. Grace and truth came, (and are maintained still), by Jesus Christ, so we do not need the law to enable us to please God, John 1:17.

ROMANS 5:12-21

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

 

We now begin a study of that section of the Epistle to the Romans which runs from chapter 5 verse 12 to the end of chapter 8, which deals not so much with what we have done, (the word “sins” is only found once from 5:12-8:39), but what we are. In other words, the criminal, not the crimes he has committed. Now that his sins have been forgiven, what is a believer’s relationship with God? What of the nature which caused him to sin before he was saved? By what power is the Christian life lived? And is the security of the believer assured? These questions, and others besides, are answered in the next sections of the epistle.

It might be found helpful to read the summary sections first, to get an idea of the thought-flow of these dificult and complicated verses.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS CHAPTER 5, VERSES 12 TO 21 

5:12  Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

5:14  Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgement was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

5:17  For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

5:19  For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

Suject of Section 8

The apostle begins this fresh section of the epistle in which he deals with what we are by nature, by tracing that nature to Adam. By ‘nature’ is meant those essential features which combine to make a thing what it is. Through the sin and disobedience of the first man, who is the federal head of men as sinners, terrible consequences were passed on to all, which could only be remedied by the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, who becomes the head of those who believe. The teaching of the previous section has prepared the way for what is presented to us now. The apostle assumes we accept the testimony of the early chapters of the Book of Genesis, with its record of the formation of the first man, Adam, his disobedience and fall, and the descent of all mankind from him in a state of sin.

Section 8 Romans 5:12-21

Christ and Adam compared and contrasted
The whole of the purpose of God for mankind centres on the fact that His Son became man, and as such is the second man, the last Adam. He came to “restore that which he took not away”, Psalm 69:4, or, in other words, came to remedy the loss and damage that Adam had brought upon men by his sin.

Structure of Section 8
The passage is very complex, but may be clearer if we note its structure in the following form, where the numbers represent the verses of the section:-

12 [(13-14) 15-17] 18-21

 In other words, the main subject is in verses 12 and 18-21, and verses 13-17 form a parenthesis. Inside this parenthesis there is another, consisting of verses 13 and 14.

8(a) 5:12 Entrance of sin and its consequence
8(b) 5:13-14 Existence of sin before the law-age
8(c) 5:15  Effect of sin and God’s attitude
8(d) 5:16,17 Ending of death’s reign
8(e) 5:18 Extending of a gift to all
8(f) 5:19 Experience of justification by many
8(g) 5:20 Enhancement of sin by the law
8(h) 5:21 Ending of sin’s reign

Looking generally at the passage, we see that verse 12 introduces us to sin and death, verses 13 and 14 show that death is as a result of the sinful nature within, and not normally because of sins committed, verses 15 to 17 deal with death, and verses 18-21 with sin.

8(a) The entrance of sin and its consequence

5:12  Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: 

Wherefore – a logical connection. The word “therefore” introduces a logical consequence, but verses 12-21 of this chapter are not a logical consequence of the preceding chapters, but they do answer the questions that those chapters might raise, and hence have a logical connection. It is important to notice that the counterpart of “wherefore as” in this verse is the “therefore as” of verse 18, hence the parenthesis of verses 13-17 is required by the grammar of the passage.
As by one man- a reference to Adam, the first man, and the federal head of the human race as sinners. “God… hath made of one blood all nations of men…” Acts 17:26, so we are all descended from this one man. There are not many races on the earth, for all have common descent from Adam and Eve his wife.
Sin- the principle of revolt against God, expressed in disobedience.
Entered into the world- sin existed in Satan before he introduced it into the world of men by means of Adam’s trangression. Adam was the door by which we perish, Christ is the door by which we are saved, John 10:9. Sin found an entrance into Adam’s heart, and through him to the rest of the world of men, for he passed on his nature to his children. The man is singled out, even though the woman sinned first, for it is by the man that the nature is passed on to the children.
And death by sin- physical death is a direct consequence of Adam’s fall. He was warned by God that death would come if he sinned, but he disobeyed God’s commandment and reaped the consequences. As a result, his nature became that of a sinful creature, and he passed on that nature to us all. As a consequence, we too are fallen and sinful, and face certain death, but in the mercy of God we are allowed a period to repent. 
And so death passed upon all men
because death is the penalty for having a sinful nature, (“the wages of sin is death” 6:23), and that sinful nature is shared by all in the world because of their link with Adam the sinner. 
For that all have sinned
“for that” means, “on the basis of the fact that”. The fact that the apostle can say, looking back through time, whether during the law-age or before, “all have sinned”, is the basis of the logical conclusion that what Adam did has affected us all, and sin has in fact entered into the whole of the world of men. 

Summary
The sin and death which are in the world are the result of the sin of Adam the first man, who has passed on his sinful nature to us all.

8(b) The existence of sin before the law-age

5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.  

(For until the law sin was in the world- the principle of revolt against the rule of God that sin represents was in the world up until the formal giving of the law to Israel at Sinai.
But sin is not imputed when there is no law- the word translated imputed is only found here and Philemon 18, (“put that on mine account”). It means more than simply thinking of someone in a certain way, (which is the usual meaning of ‘impute’ in the New Testament), but goes further and involves putting something down in an account book as needing to be paid for. So whilst God did not overlook the fact that during the period from Adam to Moses men had sin within, He did not reckon it against them as needing to be paid for by instant death.

5:14  Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.  

Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses- despite the foregoing, men still died in the period between Adam’s sin and Moses’ lawgiving. This proves that death is the consequence of having a sinful nature, and not the consequence of sinning. Only in extreme circumstances are men struck down in death by God because they have committed a particular sin; it is not the general rule.
Even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression- that is, those who had not gone against God’s will as expressed in a known law. Adam, like Israel, was formally given God’s law. The law God gave to Adam was “thou shalt not eat of it”, and the known penalty for transgression was “thou shalt surely die”, Genesis 2:7. It is said of Israel, “they like Adam have transgressed the covenant”, Hosea 6:7 margin. So both Adam and men under the law of Moses were given a commandment with a known penalty. Men in between Adam and Sinai were not in this situation, and therefore the fact that death reigned over them, (that is, was on the throne in their lives), was due to their nature from Adam, not their sinning like Adam.
Who is the figure of Him that was to come- the apostle rounds off this parenthesis by bringing together the two men that are to be compared and contrasted, Christ and Adam. Certain features about Adam in his official position as federal head of the human race provide both a comparison and a contrast with Christ the head of the new creation. 

Summary
That death has passed upon all men because of the act of another is proved by the fact that men died even though they had not transgressed a law they knew about. In His mercy, God promised the seed of the woman immediately sin had entered into the world. 

8(c) The effect of sin and God’s attitude

Key phrases
The offence of one…the gift in grace which is of one man. 

Note the formula in verses 15,16 and 17- “but not as…so also…for if…much more”. Note too that in verses 13-17 and verse 19, the contrast is between one and many, emphasising the greatness of the problem to be addressed, and the greatness of God’s remedy, whereas in verses 12 and 18, it is between one and all, emphasising the universality of the problem, and the universality of the opportunity for benefitting by the remedy.  

5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.  

But not as the offence, so also is the free gift- these words serve the dual purpose of introducing both a comparison and a contrast beteen Adam and Christ, as would be suggested by the word figure in verse 14. Both are heads of a race of people, both performed an act which affected those people, and both pass on their characteristics to the people. But the contrast is marked, for Adam brought in sin, death, and God’s judgement, whereas Christ brings in righteousness, life, and justification. By ‘the offence’ means a trespass, a false step. Adam’s false move has had devastating and universal consequences because of the attitude of heart which lay behind the act. The apostle assumes we accept the record of Genesis 3.  The free gift is God’s  gift in grace, freely bestowed. The words offence and gift are the key to the verse. 
For if through the offence of one many be dead
the long list of men that have died physically down the centuries is directly attributable to the trespass of a single man at the beginning.
Much more- despite the seemingly insurmountable problem, God has overcome it, not by revoking the command which brought the death, but by introducing something far higher and grander.
The grace of God- God’s answer is not further condemnation, John 3:17; Luke 9:56, but the display of grace, unmerited favour to a fallen race. The condemnation of sinners is a righteous necessity, but God has no obligation to bless, yet chooses to do so.
And the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ
 the word “gift” means an act of giving; the word “by ” is literally “in”, speaking of the character of the giving; the second use of the word “by” indicates the personal responsibility placed upon Jesus Christ to deal with the matter of the sin of man.  The grace of God is expressed in the person of Christ, the Last Adam. This contrasts with the personal responsibility of Adam for his offence (the offence of one) and its consequences.
Hath abounded unto many
God delights to overflow in grace, and he does this towards the same number, “the many”, that are affected by affected by Adam’s offence.  The offence of one man brought many into death, but the grace of God which is channelled hrough the one man Jesus Christ flows forth towards that same number, despite the fact that they are many.

Summary
The offence of one man, Adam, has resulted in the death of the many in the world, but the superabounding grace of God in Christ is expressed to that same number.

8(d) The ending of death’s reign

Key phrases
Death reigned through (the agency of) one…reign in life through (the agency of) one. 

5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgement was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.  

And not as it was by one that sinned- the emphasis is now on the one person, rather than the one act of offending.
So is the gift
that spoken of in verse 15, and defined in verse 17 as the gift of righteousness. The phrase “and not” emphasizes that the gift is of a different character to the offence whose effects have been passed on to us, Adam’s gift was deadly; Christ’s is life-giving. The phrase “so is”, on the other hand, emphasizes that there is a comparison between what the two men did.
For the judgement was by one- by is “ek” meaning “out of”, indicating the source. Opinions differ whether the word ‘one’ refers to one man, Adam, or one offence. The comparison with many offences would suggest the latter, although the many offences are committed by many. The point is that there is a great obstacle to be overcome, since one sin has had such ruinous effects, yet there has been a multitude of people since who have committed a multitude of sins, which makes the situation much worse. 
Unto condemnation
the word used here means ” a verdict pronounced with punishment following” a stronger word than is usually used, indicating the gravity of the situation. God’s verdict (“judgement”) went against man, and condemnation in the form of physical death was the result. 
But the free gift
the apostle now reverts back to his original word for gift used in verse 15, grace-gift, indicating how the obstacle of so many sins, (whose presence proves that man is under condemnation), is dealt with. Only grace can do this; the law is powerless, as 8:3 will show. 
Is of many offences
again “of” means “out of”, indicating the source. Just as the one sin of Adam was the reason why condemnation came, so in the wisdom of God, He has seen the many offences of Adam’s descendants as an opportunity for acting in grace, to His own glory. So the free gift is as a result of Adam’s sin, and its need to be remedied. This truth was misapplied by Paul’s opponents in 6:1.
Unto justification- “unto” means “with a view to”, for not all come into the good of what God is prepared to do. Not only does God justify in the sense of reckoning righteous, but in the context here justification means the lifting of the condemnation of death, giving the authority to reign in life. In this way the end of verse 16 prepares the way for the truth of verse 17.

5:17  For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one- the offence of Adam brought death upon men as a tyrant ruling their lives. There is no other cause for death’s reign, for “by one” is repeated to reinforce the point.
Much more- again there is the counteracting of Adam’s fall, but also further blessing. See verse 20, “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound”. 
They which receive abundance of grace
the grace of God mentioned in verse 15, is available. Note the apostle limits it to “they which receive”, not the “many” in general; in other words, believers, not men generally.
And of the gift of righteousness- the gift consisting of righteousness.
Shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ)- instead of merely overthrowing the tyrant death, God enables the believer to reign, but only by the agency and strength of Jesus Christ. Note the “shall”, the full realisation of reigning in life is reserved for the future, although to be anticipated now, as detailed in chapter 6.  

Summary
By the agency of one man, Adam, death reigned over his race, but by the agency of another man, Jesus Christ, God’s grace ensures that those who receive His gift of righteousness reign in life, both now and in the future. And just as the one offence of one man was the starting point of the condemnation, so the many offences of many men has been viewed by God as the starting-point of a process which results in the condemnation being removed.  

8(e) The extending of a gift to all

Key phrases
Judgement came upon all…free gift came upon all. 

5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.  

Therefore as- means “so then”, the counterpart to the “wherefore as” of verse 12. The intervening verses have cleared the way for the truths of verses 18 and 19, and the apostle is now free to take the argument forward.
By the offence of one
the spotlight is again on two federal heads, Adam and Christ. Here, Adam is in view. 
Judgement came upon all men to condemnation
the word judgement has been supplied by the Authorised Version from verse 16 to give the sense. The sentence of the Judge went against Adam and his race. 
Even so
there is a straight comparison now, instead of the “as…much more” of the previous verses.
By the righteousness of one
the one supreme act of righteousness which Christ accomplished on the cross. Not His personal righteousness, for the meaning is fixed by the word used. The act of Adam in making a false step in relation to the will of God, is directly contrasted with the act of Christ when He fulfilled the will of God at the cross.  The Lord Jesus was not dealing with sin during His life, or else He would have been forsaken of God then as well.  It was only during the hours of darkness upon the cross that He was forsaken by His God. 
The free gift came upon all men
the words “free gift” are supplied from verse 16. Upon means “towards”- just as the condemnation came towards all, so does the gift. 
Unto justification of life
with a view to a cancellation of the condemnation, negatively, and the introduction into life in Christ, positively. Life in Christ is the theme of chapters 6 and 8. 

Summary
There is a correspondence between the consequence of Adam’s act, and that of Christ. The one was an offence which brought condemnation, the other was an act of righteousness which brings justification.

8(g) The experience of justification by many

Key phrases
One man’s disobedience….obedience of one. 

5:19  For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.  

For as- a more precise comparison even than the “as…even so” of verse 18, representing a refinement of the reasoning, which finds its climax in this verse, with its doctrine of the nature of men in Adam and men in Christ. The question might well be asked, How does verse 19 advance the argument, since it is so similar to verse 18? The answer is two-fold. First, the apostle now speaks of man by their constitution, made sinners and made righteous. Second, he implies how the state of being righteous is attained, for the disobedience of Adam may be contrasted not only with the obedience of Christ, but by inference with the obedience of faith.
By one man’s disobedience- the word is made up of two words, aside, and hear, giving the idea of refusal to hear. Adam had heard the command of God, but chose to “turn a deaf ear”.
Many were made sinners- made means “constituted”, the word being most often used of appointment to a position. The position appointed to men in Adam is that of being a sinner.
So by the obedience of one- Christ’s obedience to God even to the extent and extremity of the cross is in view, Philippians 2:8. Adam simply had to refrain from eating of the tree of knowledge, Christ had a heavy and sorrowful task before Him, even suffering on a tree, Acts 5:30, but did not waver in His obedience.
Shall many be made righteous- here the righteousness is based on the obedience of Christ, to preserve the contrast with Adam, whereas previously in the epistle the apostle has shown that it is by the obedience of our faith that righteousness is imputed to us.  

Summary
Adam’s disobedience resulted in man being constituted a sinner, whereas the obedience of Christ in going to the cross to deal with sin in obedience to His Father, has brought a state of righteousness to those who are linked to Him by the obedience of faith. 

 8(h) The enhancement of sin by the law

Having prepared the ground for a consideration of the believer’s life in Christ as detailed in chapters 6 and 8, the apostle now prepares for chapter 7, with its consideration of the believer in relation to the law of Moses.

5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

Moreover the law entered-  the law of Moses came onto the scene as a side-issue, “came side-ways in”. This shows that Adam was not put under law as the nation of Israel was at Sinai, as some teach.
That the offence might abound- not in the sense that the number of sins might be increased, but that they might be shown in their true light, so that by a formal giving of the law what was wrong might be highlighted. By this means the initial offence of Adam, verse 15, was exposed in the offences of his race, verse 16.
But where sin abounded- as the law showed up its evil. The apostle reverts to the more general term sin, rather than ‘offence’ and transgression’, in preparation for the next chapters. 
Grace did much more abound
the free favour of God is great enough to deal with all the offences, and to bring in positive things as well. Compare the “much more” of the reasoning of verses 15 and 17. 

8(i) The ending of sin’s reign

5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

That- this means “in order that”, for the superabundance of grace has a purpose.
As sin hath reigned unto  death- the preposition “unto”, is literally “in”, and when it does not denote physical location, it speaks of either power or character, the context deciding. Here the power behind the throne during the reign of sin, is said to be death. Death made sin’s reign a tyranny. Cf. Hebrews 2:15.
Even so might grace reign- grace so abounds that it dominates the scene, sweeps sin off its throne, and robs death of its power over the believer.
Through righteousness- sin reigned in death, whereas grace reigns through righteousness. There is not, then, an exact parallel in the two ideas. God does not simply restore man to innocence, but to a position consistent with righteousness. So grace reigns on a righteous basis, in contrast to the reign of sin which was on the basis of the unrighteous act of Adam.
Unto eternal life- grace superabounds so that not only is death defeated, but eternal life, the life of God, is imparted, not the life of Adam regained.
By Jesus Christ our Lord- He is the direct means by which grace reigns and eternal life is imparted. This full title is fitting now that He has triumphed through the work of the cross, and overthrown the reign of sin. How believers enter into that triumph is the theme of the next three chapters.

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

ROMANS 4

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

The apostle now proceeds to illustrate the principles he has just now been stating at the end of chapter three.

Structure of the chapter

6(d)

4:1-5

The boasting of the natural man excluded

6(e)

4:6-8

The blessedness of the forgiven man explained

6(f)

4:9-12

The blessing for any man ensured

6(g)

4:13-22

The behaviour of the believing man examined

6(h)

4:23-25

The belief in the Risen Man expected


Special note on Abraham
It might be helpful, (since the apostle is going to use the experience of Abraham to illustrate his case), to list the events in Abraham’s life that are singled out for mention by New Testament writers.

1. The God of glory appears to Abram in Ur, Acts 7:2, and he responds in faith, Hebrews 11:8.

2. He reaches Canaan and lives there in faith, Genesis 12:5, Hebrews 11:9.

3. God promises him a son, and Abraham believes God, Genesis 15:5,6; Romans 4:3, Galatians 3:6.

4. Abraham listens to Sarah’s suggestion, and fathers a son, Ishmael, by Hagar, Genesis 16:2,15.

5. Thirteen silent years pass, Genesis 16:16; 17:1.

6. God promises Abraham that he will be the father of many nations, Genesis 17:4. His name is changed from Abram, meaning “exalted father” to Abraham, “father of a multitude”, in remembrance of this promise, Genesis 17:5, Romans 4:17.

7. Abraham and Sarah are both strengthened in faith, and despite their old age Isaac is born, Romans 4:19-21, Hebrews 11:11.

8. Abraham offers Isaac on Moriah, as an act of faith, Hebrews 11:17; obedience, Genesis 22:18; and righteousness, James 2:21-24.

Special note on circumcision
Considered literally and physically, circumcision was an operation performed on male children. God required this to be done on the eighth day of their lives in normal circumstances, for He, as Creator, had so made us that it is on that day we are least likely to bleed to death.

This operation is said to have some medical advantages, but the main point about circumcision is its spiritual significance. Because it was a procedure where the flesh was cut round, (hence the “circum”), and then cut off, (hence the “cision”), it became a sign of being cut off from others and separated off or sanctified to God. We may think of it in the following ways, as the doctrine develops in the Scriptures:

1. Circumcision and Abraham
After he had believed God and been reckoned righteous as a result, Abraham was commanded by God to be circumcised, even though he was an old man. He obeyed God, and circumcision became for him a seal or confirmation of the faith he already had, Romans 4:11.

2. Circumcision and Ishmael
At the same time, God required Abraham to circumcise his son Ishmael, so that he had a mark on his body signifying that God’s covenant was with Abraham, Genesis 17:26.

3. Circumcision and Isaac
When Isaac was born Abraham circumcised him on the eighth day, and he was thereby marked out as Abraham’s true seed, Genesis 21:4.

4. Circumcision and Moses
The rite of circumcision seems to have lapsed after Israel went into Egypt, for when Moses was returning from the desert of Midian it was found that his two sons were not circumcised. The account is in Exodus 4:18-20; 24-26.

When the law was given at Sinai, circumcision was required, as Leviticus 12:3 informs us. This is why the Lord Jesus, when referring to circumcision, said “Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers:) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day?” John 7:22,23. His point was that if a boy was born on a Friday, they would have no problem in circumcising him on the sabbath day, for that was eight days after he was born. Why then should they complain if He healed a man on the sabbath?

When a Hebrew parent circumcised a male child, there was a physical aspect, and a moral one. The physical aspect was that he now bore the mark of an Israelite on him. He was now of The Circumcision, the nation of Israel. But the moral side was that he was now committed to keeping the law of Moses. So important were these two aspects, that God sanctioned the work of circumcising on the day of rest, if the child had been born eight days before. After all, He who controls the timing of everything, even the birth of children, did not ordain that no Hebrew son should be born on a Friday.

Now no one was angry at a Hebrew parent who did this. Nor did they seek to kill him. Rather, they would applaud that he had kept the law. All this being the case, and they felt free to “break” the sabbath in this God-appointed way, then surely the Lord Jesus should not be persecuted for making a man entirely whole, and not merely ceremonially whole, on the sabbath.

For the healing of the impotent man did make him entirely whole. He was healed as to the body, so that he was able to rise at Christ’s bidding. He was healed as to the soul, for the misery of the last thirty-eight years was for ever gone, symbolised by his taking up his bed, for he would not need it again. And he was healed as to the spirit, for as he walked at Christ’s command, he went straight into the temple to praise God. Thereafter the moral implications of Christ’s words to him would be uppermost in his mind, “sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon thee”.

The Jews should ask themselves, which was better, to be miserable and powerless at the Pool of Bethesda, or to be in the temple with renewed body and spiritual joy? The law required that Israel “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.” Exodus 20:8. But that holiness was not merely a negative idea, keeping the day as a special one, different to the rest of the week. It had its very important positive side, to set the day apart for spiritual purposes. And this Christ had done. He had enabled a man to sanctify the sabbath day in a way he could not have done all the while he was impotent.

So we could summarise the argument as follows: if the people who were angry with Christ to the extent of wishing to kill Him, were free to do a lesser thing on the sabbath in order to obey God’s law, surely He could do the greater thing. They did the lesser thing at God’s commandment, He acted likewise at the command of God His Father.

As a result of this connection between the law of Moses and circumcision, it became a sign of being under the law, so that the nation of Israel were the Circumcised, and the Gentiles all around were the Uncircumcised, even if the latter were in fact physically circumcised out of national custom. We have already seen these distinctions in Romans 2:24-29.

5. Circumcision and Joshua
We learn from Joshua 5:2-9 that those who had died under the judgment of God during the wilderness journey had not circumcised their male children. This was not surprising, since those who fell in the wilderness were not believers, Hebrews 3:17,18. The crossing of the Jordan represents a new beginning for Israel, so God commanded that the children be circumcised so that the “reproach of Egypt”, should be “rolled away” from them, Joshua 5:9. This introduces a third aspect of circumcision, for just as a portion of flesh was rolled away from the child, so association with Egypt was rolled away also, since this had not been done in the wilderness. Those who refused the land were also those who longed to return to Egypt. It is no surprise then that an operation that signified separation from Egypt did not appeal to them, and they allowed it to lapse. Centuries before, their ancestors had sold Joseph into Egypt, and eventually the rest of Jacob’s family followed. So they left Canaan and went to live in Egypt. Now whilst this was a fulfilment of prophecy, Genesis 15:13, nonetheless it was failure, and so it seems that this was called the reproach of Egypt, meaning the reproach and shame that came to them for going into Egypt. When they crossed the Jordan with Joshua, this was reversed, and their circumcision signified it.

6. Circumcision and Christ personally
When He was eight days old, Joseph and Mary had Christ circumcised, Luke 2:21, for He had come into the nation of Israel under the law. As the apostle Paul puts it, “But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law”, Galatians 4:4. He was thereby committed to keeping God’s law, which He did perfectly. Unlike other Jews, however, He was not under the law to force Him to obey God. Rather, He obeyed God and thereby kept the law.

7. Circumcision and Christ doctrinally
The apostle Paul wrote to the Colossian believers to warn them of the evil influences in the world around them which would seek to harm them. He tells them that they are “circumcised with the circumcision made without hands”, Colossians 2:11. Not only are believers complete in Christ, verse 10, but they are separated unto Him from the sphere where error flourishes. Christ cannot link sinners with Himself, so He must cut them off from their links with Adam so as to join them to Himself. This He did at the cross, where He dealt with all that Adam represented. This is the circumcision made without hands, for it is not physical, but moral and spiritual. The cross has cut off believers from the world, including the philosophy-world that was attacking the Colossians.

When God made a covenant with Abraham, He made physical circumcision the sign of that covenant. Abraham was now special to Himself, and had the mark on his body to prove it. Such a rite is no longer relevant, so that the apostle described physical circumcision as “concision”, a cutting along and a maiming, Philippians 3:2, whereas believers are now the true circumcision, properly cut off by God from their links with Adam’s world. This means they are cut off from the sphere where heretics operate, for such men are of the world, being unbelievers, and as such have no contact with the things of God.

When he is dealing with the case of the Jew in his epistle to the Romans, the apostle shows that true circumcision is a heart matter, “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men but of God.” Romans 2:28,29. This is why Stephen was justified in calling the Jews who were about to stone him, “uncircumcised in heart and ears”, Acts 7:51.

True circumcision is now “putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ”, Colossians 2:11, and this happens at conversion. What is cut off is the body as the vehicle by which sins of the flesh are conceived and committed, the flesh being the sinful self, which is resident in the body. Paul calls the body “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6. He is there concerned with the sin-principle within, whereas here it is the sin-practice that is in view; nonetheless the idea is that the body is the base of operations from which sins proceed. As far as God is concerned, that body has been cut off so that it may be brought over into resurrection conditions to be used for God. That which is called “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6 can be presented to God in Romans 12:1, for God has wrought upon it to His glory.


6(d)   4:1-5
The boasting of the natural man excluded

4:1
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?

What shall we say then that Abraham, our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? Abraham’s original name was Abram, meaning “exalted father.” God changed this to Abraham, meaning “father of a multitude” after He had promised to make him the father of many nations. The teaching of the chapter revolves around various aspects of the fatherhood of Abraham.
The literal order of the words is, “Abraham our father has found according to the flesh”. In other words, we should connect “according to the flesh” with “found”, and not with “father”. It is not the natural fatherhood of Abraham that is in view, because Gentile Christians do not have him as their natural father. The question on the mind of the apostle is what discovery did Abraham make as a natural man?

4:2
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.

For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory- if, as a natural man, Abraham had been able to earn justification, then he would have had reason to glory or boast in his achievement.
But not before God- such a theoretical justification would not be valid before God, for, as the apostle goes on to show, God’s dealings with Abraham were not on that basis.

4:3
For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

For what saith the scripture? Paul had stated in 3:21 that the righteousness of God was witnessed by the law and the prophets. He had appealed to the prophet Habakkuk in 1:17, and now he appeals to the law, (meaning, in this context, the writings of Moses), by quoting Genesis 15:6. Note the present tense of “saith,” for the apostle believes in the living, up-to-date voice of the scriptures, being God’s word, which “liveth and abideth for ever”, 1 Peter 1:23.
Abraham believed God- this is a reference to Genesis 15:6, after Abraham had declared that he was an old man who was soon to die childless. In response God showed him the multitude of the stars in the sky, and promised “So shall thy seed be”. Abram accepted what God said, even though it was naturally impossible for him and Sarah his wife to have a son. This is the essence of faith, the acceptance of God’s word without reserve, even though it goes beyond natural reasoning. The apostle deliberately uses an incident in the life of Abraham which does not involve him in any activity, such as moving from Ur in faith, Hebrews 11:8, or building an altar, Genesis 12:7.
Note that the apostle refers to the expression found in Genesis 15:6, “believed in the Lord”, and quotes it as “believed God”. To believe in the Lord is to have trust and confidence in the Lord as the one who keeps His promises. This was appropriate in Abraham’s situation, since God had just given Him a promise. This is not the context in Romans 4, where the apostle is dealing with the imputation of righteousness. To believe God is to accept that what He says is true, and the logical outcome of this is to believe Him. The inspired apostle is bringing out different aspects of the truth.
And it was counted unto him for righteousness- God was prepared to count or reckon Abraham to be a righteous man on the basis of his faith. It was not that Abraham was now perfect, but rather that God was prepared to think of him as a righteous man. The basis on which God did this was the then-future work of the Lord Jesus at Calvary, as the apostle has explained in 3:25. He was counted righteous because God anticipated Calvary.

4:4
Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

Now to him that worketh- the apostle gives an everyday illustration to show the difference between justification (being reckoned righteous) by works, and by grace. He had said in 3:24 that justification is by God’s grace, and now he shows this by using a practical example.
Is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt- during the working week the workman puts his employer under obligation, and he discharges that obligation by paying the appropriate wages (reward). God cannot be placed under obligation by any of His creatures however, so any benefit He gives must be on the basis of grace, that is, His free favour. To try to earn justification by works is pointless, since if God were to bless on that basis it would be at the expense of His own honour as the God of grace. Needless to say, God will never dishonour Himself in this or any other way.

4:5
But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

But to him that worketh not- the “but” introduces the alternative to working for righteousness. “Worketh not” involves a man renouncing all idea of being able to earn salvation by works.
But believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly- the opposite of working is resting, and this is what faith does as it relies on the promises of the God who blesses in grace. The ungodly are the impious, those who act contrary to God. We might be surprised that the apostle uses this strong word here, but he is preparing the way for the next example, that of David, in whose case it was a question of forgiveness for hideous sins. When David confessed those sins in Psalm 51 he spoke of having sinned against God, which is the essence of impiety. By using this severe word, the apostle assures us that the grace of God is not limited at all, for even daring rebels may be justified.
His faith is counted for righteousness- even an ungodly, (albeit repentant), man’s faith is valid, and finds a response from God, since the point about faith is in whom it rests. Of course, the ungodliness goes when he believes.

6(e)   4:6-8
The blessedness of the forgiven man described

4:6
Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man- to be reckoned righteous is a great blessing, but Abraham does not describe it, so the apostle brings in David to do it for him. With Abraham it was a question of God imputing righteousness when he believed. In the case of David it was God not imputing sin when he repented.
David sinned badly in the matter of Bathsheba, Uriah’s wife, and 2 Samuel 11 records the sorry incident. Sadly, however, David remained silent, refusing to confess his sin, but at last he was brought to the point of acknowledging his sin, and confessing his transgressions unto the Lord. Then he began to know the blessedness of sins forgiven, and wrote Psalm 32 and Psalm 51 to describe that blessedness.
Note that although David’s sin was personal to him, he speaks of “the man”; in other words, this forgiveness is not limited to David, but is available to all who repent. Perhaps there is also an allusion to Nathan’s accusation of David using the words “Thou art the man”, 2 Samuel 12:7. The man who is convicted by the word of God and repents, is the same man who is forgiven.
Unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works- after he had repented, David wrote, “For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise.” Psalm 51:16,17. David shows deep insight into the ways of God, and realises that God looks for a broken spirit on the part of sinners, not their so-called good works. Thus David was forgiven by God apart from the work of bringing a sacrifice.

4:7
Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.

Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered- in Psalm 32:1, quoted here, the word blessed is in the plural, signifying most blessed. This contains the idea of being spiritually prosperous. Instead of the misery of unconfessed sins, David now experiences the bliss of sins forgiven.
Iniquities are lawless acts, and David had been guilty of breaking the sixth commandment of the law by having Uriah slain; the seventh by taking Bathsheba whilst her husband was still alive; the eighth commandment by stealing another’s wife; the ninth commandment by deceiving Uriah into thinking he was in favour with the king; and the tenth commandment by coveting his neighbour’s wife at the outset.
Not only are iniquities or lawless acts forgiven by the One against whom they were committed, but the sins are covered, indicating that they were no longer under the eye of God. If God covers sins, they will never be uncovered. The lawlessness of David was in marked contrast to the concern of Uriah for the welfare of the ark, which contained the tables of the law, 2 Samuel 11:11.

4:8
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.

Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin- not only was David forgiven, but by the grace of God he was still reckoned to be a righteous man. His fall, although extremely regrettable and dishonourable, had not altered his standing before God. So Abraham illustrates the principle of the imputation of righteousness, whereas David illustrates the principle of the non-imputation of sin, whether past sins, or sins in the future, (note the “will”). The fact that both Abraham and David were believers before these events took place does not alter the principle.

6(f)   4:9-12
The blessing for any man ensured

4:9
Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.

Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only? Does the use of David, a circumcised Jew, as an illustration, mean that the blessedness of having one’s sins forgiven is only available to Jews?
Or upon the uncircumcision also? Can Gentiles know this forgiveness?
For we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness- the apostle reverts to Abraham, his principal example in this passage, and restates the substance of verse 5, after which he had referred to David. He needs to go back to considering Abraham because of the matter of circumcision, which did not come up with David.

4:10
How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.

How was it then reckoned? When he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? This is the critical question. At what point in his career did Abraham believe God, and was reckoned righteous?
Not in circumcision- the apostle puts this first so that his denial might be unmistakeable. Abraham was justified by faith before he was circumcised.
But in uncircumcision- which means that those who are not circumcised, (that is, are Gentiles), may come into blessing as Abraham did. The apostle comments on this by writing, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.” Galatians 3:14. The personal blessing granted to Abraham was the gift of a son. The blessing that Gentiles receive when they believe is the gift of the Spirit, who guarantees all other spiritual blessings.

4:11
And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:

And he received the sign of circumcision- that is, the sign consisting of circumcision.
A seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised- the rite of circumcision was required by God as a sign that Abraham was in covenant relationship with God. But he only had this covenant relationship because he was a believer. So the circumcision became a seal or confirmation of the reality of his faith. As far as Abraham’s physical descendants were concerned, circumcision was simply a sign that they were of Abraham’s line; it said nothing about whether they had a personal relationship to God.
That he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also- Abraham was not the first man to exercise faith, but he is specially taken up by God as an example to those who believe. In this way his characteristics have been passed on, and in this sense he is their father, even though they are neither descended naturally from him, nor circumcised. Of course the apostle, by saying “all them that believe, though they be not circumcised” does not imply that all those who believe were formerly uncircumcised. He is emphasising that Abraham is even the father of those who were not circumcised before.

4:12
And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.

And the father of circumcision- not only is Abraham an example of faith, but he also demonstrates the principle of separation, the idea behind circumcision, a cutting off from the things of man to be involved in the things of God. The family of faith looks up to Abraham as a role-model.
To them who are not of the circumcision only- he is this example to all who believe, whether they were physically circumcised before, or not.
But who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised- believing Jews and Gentiles may find in Abraham one to follow, as he marks out the pathway of faith and separation.

6(c)   4:13-22
The behaviour of the believing man examined

The apostle has asked “Is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not also of the Gentiles?” and had answered his own question in 4:1-12, by the use of two Old Testament worthies, Abraham and David. Now he highlights the character of the God of Abraham and David, by further references to the life of Abraham.

4:13
For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.

For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world- in Genesis 15, the passage the apostle has referred to, God promised Abraham the land of Canaan. But now the idea is extended to include the whole earth. In the final sense the seed of Abraham is Christ, Galatians 3:16,17, and He will inherit the earth, Psalm 2:8; Psalm 72:8.

When God made a covenant with Abraham, Abraham was asleep, so did not pass between the pieces of the covenant victim. But a burning lamp did, and Isaiah looks on to the time when Israel shall be restored to God, and at that time the salvation of Jerusalem shall be “as a lamp that burneth”, Isaiah 62:1. The word used for salvation there is “yeshuah”, the equivalent of the New Testament name Jesus. We can see why the apostle Paul wrote that the covenant was “confirmed…in Christ”, for He was the one who passed through the pieces that night, whilst Abraham was asleep. Abraham’s link with Christ will ensure that he and his seed, will inherit the world, for Christ will inherit the world. Note that the promise is not said by Paul to be to inherit the land of Israel, for that is reserved only for the spiritual seed of Abraham who are descended from him physically.
Was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith- God gave promises to Abraham because, having believed God, he was now righteous by faith. As the apostle points out in Galatians 3:17, the promise to Abraham was four hundred and thirty years before the law was given.

4:14
For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:

For if they which are of the law be heirs- if the inheritance is on the basis of merit, then all is lost, because as soon as we seek to gain merit by works, the law confronts us as those who are transgressors unfit to inherit.

Faith is made void- if we introduce works, faith is robbed of its relevance, and is virtually cancelled, for works implies dependence on self, whereas faith implies dependence on God.

And the promise made of no effect- if no-one inherits, (either because they opt for law-works but cannot do them perfectly, or reject faith), the promise has not achieved its purpose.

4:15
Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.

Because the law worketh wrath- far from enabling man to inherit, the law exposes man’s failure, which merits Divine wrath. The reason for this is next given.
For where no law is, there is no transgression- the law shows up man’s transgressions, not his merit. Only in the absence of law is there absence of transgression, which in turn means absence of wrath. But since the Jew has the law on tables of stone, and the Gentile has the law written in his heart, then both are exposed to wrath as transgressors, being unable to keep the law.

4:16
Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace- the line of thought regarding the promise resumes from verse 13 after the explanation of verses 14 and 15. God’s promise that Abraham and his seed would inherit the world was on the basis of grace (favour shown), not works (merit demanded).
To the end the promise might be sure to all the seed- because the promise is by grace, not law, it is sure to all those who believe. The spiritual seed of Abraham is considered as being of two origins, as is next said, but to both classes the promise is certain.
Not to that only which is of the law- meaning those believers who were formerly Jews. He is not saying that the promise originates from the law, but that some of the people who make up the seed originate from a nation under the law.
But to that also which is of the faith of Abraham- meaning Christians who were formerly Gentiles. As previously explained, this faith of Abraham’s was exercised when he was not circumcised, and therefore no different to a Gentile. The apostle is not speaking of two groups of people, Jews under law and Gentiles under faith, because that would contradict his former statement that those under law do not inherit, verse 13.
Who is the father of us all- that is, of all who are believers. Whether they were Jews or Gentiles formerly is not relevant in this connection.

4:17
(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were.

(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations)- the promise here mentioned was given to Abraham in Genesis 17:5, after which God commanded him to be circumcised as a token of the covenant He had made with him. Paul no doubt chooses this promise because of its connection with circumcision, and also because it implies that Abraham would have a son, or else he could not be the father of many nations. So that is the initial meaning of the promise. But Paul also sees in this promise the fact that people from many nations will call Abraham their father in the faith. Abraham’s original name of Abram, “exalted father”, was changed by God to Abraham, meaning “father of a multitude”. It is Abraham’s reaction to the promise of a son that is developed in the next verses.
Before him whom he believed- in Genesis 17:1 God commanded Abraham to walk before Him and be perfect, which suggests that he had not walked before God wholeheartedly (perfectly) after Ishmael was born. It is only as he walks before God in faith that he is an example.
Even God, who quickeneth the dead- Abraham is now acting in the light of the fact that God is able to quicken his body, and that of Sarah, so that they may have a child. See Hebrews 11:12, where he is described as “him as good as dead.” Perhaps it was because of this that Abraham, in a later incident, believed God could raise Isaac from the dead if he offered him as a sacrifice, Hebrews 11:17-19.
And calleth those things that be not, as though they were- so sure is the birth of a son to Abraham that he can be called or named by God before his conception, Genesis 17:19.

4:18
Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.

Who against hope- when all natural hopes of having a child were gone, and when natural reason said the situation was hopeless.
Believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations- his faith in God was exercised on the sure basis of the hope God’s promise gave him. Hope is not the object of his faith, but rather, God’s promise gave him a sure hope, and he believed on that basis.
According to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be- his faith as he believed in God’s promise of a son, can be expressed in terms of his initial faith in Genesis 15:6, so the one exercise of faith was according to the other. His intervening lapse of faith is over.

4:19
And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb:

And being not weak in faith- as temporarily he seems to have been when he fathered a child by Hagar.
He considered not his own body now dead, when he was about a hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb- before this he seems to have considered these obstacles to be insurmountable, for when he was told that he would have a son, “he laughed, and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? And shall Sarah, that is ninety years old, bear? Genesis 17:17, but now he thinks these doubts not worth taking into consideration.

4:20
He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God;

He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief- he did not doubt God’s word, implying he did before, when he laughed, Genesis 17:17. Compare also Sarah’s reaction, Genesis 18:12,13, then her return to wholehearted faith, Hebrews 11:11.
But was strong in faith, giving glory to God- this is the secret of his restoration, for he has captured again the sight of the God of glory who appeared to him in Ur of the Chaldees at the first, Acts 7:2.

4:21
And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform.

And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform- this is the proper response that should be made to the promises of God. Compare Mary’s response to the news that she, a virgin, would have a son, Luke 1:38, with Abraham and Sarah’s response in Genesis 17:17 and 18:12. Mary was fully persuaded, and Elizabeth, her kinswoman believed also, for she said, “there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord”, Luke 1:45, but Abraham and Sarah were unconvinced initially.

4:22
And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.

And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness- this seems to make his being made righteous in Genesis 15 dependant on what happened 13 years later, which cannot be the case. Rather, the apostle is indicating that the faith of Abraham became strong again, after his temporary lapse when he laughed. He has now returned to the sort of faith that he manifest in Genesis 15. The apostle’s purpose is to return to the subject of being reckoned righteous, not only to apply it to us today, but also to prepare the way for the teaching found in 5:1-11.

6(h)   4:23-25
The belief in the Risen Man expected

4:23
Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;

Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him- the account in Genesis of Abraham’s faith is not just for historical interest, or just so that we might admire his faith.

4:24
But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;

But for us also- the principles involved are just as relevant today.
To whom it shall be imputed- the sense of “shall be” is “shall certainly be”. The “it” refers to the rightousness of verse 22.
If we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead- the same God that brought life out of death when the “dead” bodies of Abraham and Sarah produced a living son, has brought Jesus our Lord from the sphere of death. Abraham believed the birth of Isaac would happen, and Christians believe the resurrection of Christ has happened.
Note that faith is placed in Divine persons, not just in events. We are not only expected to believe the resurrection has taken place, but to believe on the One who performed it. Notice the title “Jesus our Lord”, reinforcing the previous statement, for if He is truly our Lord, then there is personal faith like Abraham’s, and if He is truly our Lord, then we have submitted to His authority by repenting, as David did.

4:25
Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification- the apostle implies two questions, and then answers them. It is as if he asks, “Why was He, Jesus our Lord, delivered by God to death?” The answer is “Because of our offences”. His second question is, “Why was He raised from the dead?” The answer, “Because of the justification which His death secures”. Thus the resurrection of Christ is God’s indication to us that the work of Calvary satisfies His every demand against our sins.
The mention of offences reminds us we were like David, having sinned. The mention of justification reminds us that the believer is justified, like Abraham. The apostle has now brought us back to the idea of justification, and so prepares for the truth of chapter 5, which begins, “Therefore, being justified by faith”.

 

 

 

 

ROMANS 3

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website by e-mailing: martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk. We would be pleased to hear from you.

Continuation of Section 4   2:17-3:20
God’s wrath against men as Legislator

Structure of 3:1-20

4(d)

3:1-8

The charge of infidelity

4(e)

3:9-20

The charge of iniquity

4(f)

3:18-20

The charged ones found guilty

The apostle anticipates objections to what he has just written, and in answering them accuses the Jews of infidelity. He asks a series of double questions, each followed by his answer. Each question and answer section has a particular feature about God as its theme. We could paraphrase these questions and answers as follows:

Theme, verse 2: the oracles of God.

First pair of questions, verse 1: “If previous verses at the end of chapter two are correct, then what is the value in being a Jew and being circumcised?”
Answer, verse 2: “There is much advantage in being a Jew, chiefly because it means ready access to the Scriptures, the oracles of God.”

Theme, verse 3: the faith of God.

Second pair of questions, verse 3: “If some did not believe, does that mean that faith in Him is not worthwhile?” Is faith in God pointless?
Answer, verse 4: “Not at all, (God forbid), because God is true, (He always speaks truth), but men, all of them, are liars. They lie by denying God’s word. It is those who do not believe who make God a liar, 1 John 5:10. So the fault lies with man, not God”.

Theme, verse 6: the righteousness of God.

Third pair of questions, verse 5: “If a good result is achieved when man repents, then has man’s unrighteousness enhanced God’s righteousness? If that is the case, is not God unrighteous when He judges sin?”
Answer, verse 6: “To speak like that is to say God will not judge men at all, which cannot be the case”.

Theme, verse 7: the truth of God.

Fourth pair of questions, verses 7,8: “If my life of denying the truth has enabled truth about God to be made known, then why should I be personally judged, (I also), even if the world is? And further to that, should we not actively sin in order to enhance God’s good name further?
Answer, none given, for the idea is so outrageous that it does not deserve a response.

We shall find that the apostle does not engage in an argument to prove the statements he makes, but is content to show their logical outcome, assuming we shall see the logic of his thinking. That God is true is a given fact as far as the apostle is concerned. He takes it for granted that God cannot be blamed for the reactions of men to His word, that He will definitely judge the world, and that He will condemn those who excuse their sin by saying it glorifies God. These propositions are accepted by reasonable people and do not need to be proved.

First pair of questions

3:1
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?

What advantage then hath the Jew?- the first possible objection has to do with the failures described in 2:21-24. It seems as though there is no benefit in being a Jew.
Or what profit is there of circumcision? In view of the truths set out in 2:25-29, where circumcised persons are said to be no better than the uncircumcised, it might be thought that there is no advantage in being circumcised if outward things are invalid.

Answer to first pair of questions

3:2
Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.

Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God– there are many and varied advantages in being a Jew, and they are listed in Romans 9:4,5. A chief one, which the apostle highlights here, is the possession of the living word of God, which the Jew was expected to observe. Note the connection between “committed”, (entrusted), and “did not believe”, verse 3, (were unfaithful to the trust).

Second pair of questions

3:3
For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?

For what if some did not believe? The apostle has shown at the end of chapter two that simply being a Jew did not in itself gain the praise of God. Without faith it is impossible to please Him, Hebrews 11:6. Note the past tense, “did not believe”. He is thinking of two past instances of unbelief. The first, the lack of belief in the oracles committed to them on the part of Israel. The second, the lack of belief in Christ when He came. He Himself linked these two evidences of unbelief together when He said, “Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?” John 5:45-47.
Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? What is the situation if the majority of the nation to whom the oracles were committed did not believe those oracles, nor believe in Christ when He came in fulfilment of them? The faith of God is contrasted here with the unbelief of Israel. Of course God does not need to exercise faith in anything, so it is not that God has faith. The expression “faith of God” is unique to this passage, but there are seven instances in the New Testament of the phrase, or a similar one, “the faith of Christ”. The idea is of faith that is closely connected with Christ, having Him as its object. So the faith of God is the faith that God expects from men in response to His word, the living oracles of God. The Jew would probably protest that he had faith in the God of Israel. That may be so, but it was defective, and could not be described as the faith of God, the faith God was expecting.
So this question might be paraphrased as, “Does this mean that the unbelief of many in Israel has exposed what God was doing through His Old Testament word and His Son as being ineffective, and as such, should be abandoned?”
Most modern commentators, following the lead of the Revised Version, (a version not to be trusted), substitute “the faithfulness of God” here for “the faith of God” of the Authorised Version. We should remember, however, that Paul had at his disposal a perfectly good word for faithfulness, pistos, but he chose not to use it. The Greek word for faith is pistis, and is translated as faith 239 times in the New Testament. It is translated as assurance, belief, or fidelity, once each. So in the overwhelming majority of instances the word is translated faith.
It is all the more significant that Paul used the word pistis for faith, and did not use the word pistos, when we consider that he has just used the negative of that latter word, apistos, (meaning unbelief in the sense of unfaithfulness) which corresponds to it.
Does it not go without saying that God’s faithfulness, being part of His character, is not rendered useless by the unbelief of men? What does need to be shown is that faith in God is not useless.
Couple with this the fact that the translators of the Authorised Version would have weighed up this matter very carefully. Should we not be prepared to willingly defer to their skill, and to believe that God superintended their work in a remarkable and unrepeated way?
There is a similarly strange expression in Luke 6:12, where the literal rendering of “prayer to God” would be “the prayer of God”. Obviously God does not pray, but it seems the expression means “extraordinary and sublime devotion”. If this is a parallel case, then the faith of God is faith in God which is genuine and evident, and in contrast to the unbelief and hypocrisy of the majority in Israel.
So the point the apostle is making is that the word of God to the nation of Israel may have been met largely with unbelief and consequent unfaithfulness, but that in no wise means that the faith of the minority is useless. God is able to bless individual Jews even if in the main the nation rejects His word.
So Paul’s questions in verse 1, “what advantage?”, and “what profit?” are being answered; at the present time for individual Jews, and in the future for the nation.
To cross over from being amongst the majority to be amongst the minority, the Jew must do what David did when he owned up to his sin, which was committed contrary to the truth, and was an evidence of unfaithfulness. The apostle is about to quote David’s words on this matter.

Answer to second pair of questions

3:4
God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

God forbid- Far be the thought! The apostle strongly rejects the idea that man’s response to God can in any way mean that God’s purpose is frustrated.
Yea, let God be true, but every man a liar- not content with a negative rejection of the idea, the apostle makes a positive demand, which he prefaces with the word yea, telling of his strong feeling about the matter. He has that strong feeling because the honour of God is involved. When Satan came to tempt the woman in Eden, his first words were “Yea, hath God said?” Genesis 3:1. So from the very beginning, Satan has attempted to undermine the word of God. It is as if he said, “Yea, let God be untrue”. Here the apostle counters Satan’s attack on the truth of God and says, “Yea, let God be true”. Let the fact that God is true, and that all men are liars, govern our thinking in this matter. Paul energetically repudiates the idea that God’s word is at the mercy of men’s reaction to it.
When men do not believe the word of God, they elevate their thinking above God’s. They say in effect “I am right, but God is wrong”. Implied in that is the further thought, “I speak truth, but God is a liar”. Such is the wickedness of unbelief. But if the apostle strongly defends the idea that God is true, he equally strongly asserts that every man is a liar, especially when it comes to rejecting the word of God.
Since men are liars, they live out a lie in their lives, as the illustration from the life of David shows. As we have seen in 2:21-24, David broke every one of the last five commandments of the law, and in so doing broke them all, for to offend in one point is to be guilty of all, James 2:10. As a result of his experience, he was caused to acknowledge that God was right and he was wrong. This is an important point, so the apostle reinforces it with a relevant allusion to the Old Testament record.
As it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings- David came into direct confrontation with the word of God over the matter of his adultery with Bathsheba, and acted out a lie to cover his sin. See 2 Samuel 11; Psalm 32. The apostle quotes here from Psalm 51, one of David’s repentance psalms. As Psalm 32:3-5 indicates, David resisted acknowledging his sin at first, but at last came to the point where he gave in, and owned up to his wickedness. When he did this he justified or vindicated God and condemned himself, thus God was glorified as His sayings prevailed in David’s heart. The sayings being the specific commandments he had transgressed.
And mightest overcome when thou art judged- there was another consequence of David’s sin, apart from the rejection of God’s word. As Nathan said to him, “by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme”, 2 Samuel 12:14. By repenting, however, (saying in effect “I am a liar and God is true”), he relieved God of any blame when men pointed the finger at David, God’s anointed. In this way God overcame His accusers when they criticised Him.

Third pair of questions

3:5
But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man)

But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? What can be said about the idea that the unrighteouness of the Jews, (as expressed by them breaking God’s righteous law), in some way brings God’s righteous ways into favourable display? “What shall we say” is usually used in the New Testament when the argument of an opponent is being refuted.
Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? Can God righteously express vengeance against men by judging them, when all the time they are doing that which gives Him fresh opportunity to glorify Himself?
(I speak as a man)- to speak like this is to speak as a natural man without the knowledge of God. To suggest that the righteous God of heaven is not righteous when He judges men is preposterous. To a believer the idea is abhorrent, illogical and unethical.

Answer to third pair of questions

3:6
God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world?

God forbid- again the apostle finds himself strongly rejecting the idea.
For then how shall God judge the world? That God will judge the world has been established in chapters 1 and 2, but this objection would destroy that truth, for it would undermine the just judgment of the world by God. He fully intends to judge the world, and do it in righteousness, Acts 17:31. The apostle goes on to point out in verses 7 and 8 two more consequences of this foolish notion.

Fourth pair of questions

3:7
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I judged as a sinner? If the truth about God contained in the oracles delivered to the Jews has been enhanced by my life lived contrary to that truth, (“my lie”), why am I still to be judged as a sinner? Surely I should be commended for giving God the opportunity to glorify Himself!

3:8
And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

And not rather- this means, “And why should we not develop this idea further?”
(as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? Some were slandering Paul by saying that Paul taught the practice of evil so that good might come to God’s reputation.

Answer to fourth pair of questions

Whose damnation is just- this is so outrageous that the apostle is content to simply say that the judgment of those who suggest such things is just; it only needs the reminder of coming judgment to refute their argument. But let his opponents beware, for the judgment which is just and right for sinners generally, is just and right for slanderers too.

4(e) 3:9-17
The charge of iniquity

Having examined all classes of men, the apostle now presents his final argument on the subject of the universal sin of man, and the consequent danger of the wrath of God. The epistle to the Romans puts man in God’s Law-court, charges him in 1:19-3:8, presents written evidence in 3:9-18, pronounces him guilty in 3:19, then tells of the just means whereby his guilt may be removed, 3:20-25, and the repentant, believing sinner justified, 3:26.

3:9
What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;

What then, are we better than they? In verse 1 the apostle had asked what advantage and profit the Jew had, and his answer was “Much every way.” Now, having disposed of the arguments of his opponents, he is able to ask a final question, which is, “Are we [Jews] better than they [Gentiles]?”
No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin- the Jew has outward advantages, but inwardly, as 2:21-24 shows, he is no better than sinful Gentiles. “Proved” here means “charged, incriminated, accused, put to the test in a judicial way”, and this has been done in 1:18-3:8. The proof in the sense of “the evidence that convinces” is about to be presented from the Old Testament scriptures, from which the apostle extracts fourteen statements proving conclusively that Jews are sinners.

3:10
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

As it is written- the fourteen statements the apostle now sets out are all taken from the Old Testament scriptures, with which the Jew was entrusted to enable him to please God. He did the reverse. It is testimony to the genuineness of those scriptures that even though they condemn them, they were carefully preserved by them.
There is none righteous, no, not one- the nature of man, even of the Jew, is corrupted and depraved by Adam’s fall. Psalm 14:3 reads, “there is none that doeth good, no, not one”, but as the apostle John says, “He that doeth righteous is righteous, even as he is righteous”, 1 John 3:7, for it is the nature that produces the results, such as goodness. If there is not a righteous nature, then there are no good actions, whatever men may claim.

3:11
There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

There is none that understandeth- this is the conclusion the apostle draws from Psalm 14:2, where “The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.” The fact that the next verse says “there is none that doeth good, no, not one”, shows that the conclusion the apostle draws here is valid. If they did understand and seek God they would have done good. The mind of man is ignorant of the truth of God, “having the understanding darkened”, as the apostle says in Ephesians 4:18.
There is none that seeketh after God- the attitude of man is one of apathy towards God. It was to Israel initially that God said, “Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near.” Isaiah 55:6. The failure to seek is a sure sign of the lack of understanding, as Psalm 14:2, (already quoted above), indicates.

3:12
They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

They are all gone out of the way- the will of man makes him continue in the path of departure from God begun in the garden of Eden, Genesis 3. This is true of men generally, for “all we like sheep have gone astray”, Isaiah 53:6. It is also true of men individually, for the prophet went on to say, “we have turned every one to his own way”.
They are together become unprofitable- the life of man is unprofitable to God. This is true of men socially, for they are unprofitable together. There is no profit for God in human society. The reason this is so is given by the psalmist, “they are all together become filthy”, Psalm 14:3. The apostle interprets this for us, explaining that the filthiness is the cause of the unprofitableness to God, for He cannot approve of, or use, unclean things.
There is none that doeth good, no, not one- the works of man are contrary to God, who is essentially good. This is true of man individually.

3:13
Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:

Their throat is an open sepulchre- man is both defiled himself, and likely to defile others. The Lord Jesus likened the Pharisees of His day to whited sepulchres, “full of dead men’s bones, and all uncleanness”, Matthew 23:27. He also said they were like hidden graves that men walked over without knowing, and thus defiled themselves, Luke 11:44.
With their tongues they have used deceit- man is deceitful. “The wicked…go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies”, Psalm 58:3.
The poison of asps is under their lips- the words of men are dangerous. This is because they are worked upon by the god of this world. John the Baptist accused the Pharisees of being a “generation of vipers”, Matthew 3:7. And the Lord Himself told the Jews “Ye are of your father the devil”, John 8:44, and he is “that old serpent, called the devil”, Revelation 12:9.

3:14
Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:

Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness- malice is expressed, (cursing), and malice is harboured, (bitterness). The result is that man’s words are damaging. All these statements were true of Paul when he was Saul of Tarsus, as he breathed out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, Acts 9:1. We could look upon this whole passage as a description of his pre-conversion state.

3:15
Their feet are swift to shed blood:

Their feet are swift to shed blood- the end result of man’s condition is that his life has the potential to be deadly. We see this in the haste with which the Jewish authorities tried and condemned Christ. They arrested Him and led Him away to Caiaphas, who had already said that He should die instead of the people, John 11:50. There was no intention of giving Him a fair trial. They took counsel against Him, not to find out the truth, but to put Him to death, John 11:53. They sought for witnesses, not to gather evidence, but to crucify Him, for that was their only object, Matthew 26:59.

3:16
Destruction and misery are in their ways:

Destruction and misery are in their ways- both in action and effect man is destructive. We see this in the actions of Saul of Tarsus, who by his own testimony “And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women.” Acts 22:4. And he adds later, “when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them”, 26:10.

3:17
And the way of peace have they not known:

And the way of peace have they not known- in his life man is discordant in relation to others, disturbed in relation to himself, and dislocated from God.

3:18
There is no fear of God before their eyes.

There is no fear of God before their eyes- defiance of God characterises man, and he expresses this by disregarding his responsibilities before God and before man.
These statements may appear to be extreme, but the point is that they describe what man is and does if left to himself. Condemnation comes upon us because we are sinners, as well as because we have sinned, so this passage serves to highlight both what we commit, and what we are. Man is totally depraved, which means he is affected by sin in all aspects of his person.
Note this does not mean that men are as bad as they can be, but they do have the potential to be as bad as they can be, and this extreme badness is exposed in verses 10-18. Note also the emphasis on spoken things, for Paul had summarised the sinner’s life as a lie, 3:7. And this living lie works itself out in ways that are hostile to the living and true God.
Finally, Paul turns his attention to man’s eyes, the vehicle by which sin entered the world at the beginning, for Eve saw the forbidden tree, and failed to fear God, Genesis 3:6. As a result, “all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world”, 1 John 2:16.

4(f)   3:18-20
The charged ones found guilty

3:19
Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

Now we know- the apostle has already stated that “as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law”, 2:12, so what he is about to say is a known fact.
That what things soever the law saith- the word for saith gives emphasis to the content of the law.
It saith to them that are under the law- a different word for saith, giving emphasis to the personal challenge of the voice of the law. The law of Moses condemns the sins of verses 10-18. “them that are under the law” refers to the people of Israel, the ones through whom the whole of humanity was put to the test. Their main benefit, possession of the law and life under its authority, 3:1,2, becomes their main accuser.
That every mouth may be stopped- if Israel with all their advantages fails, then there is no hope for the rest of mankind. As the wise man said, “As in water face answereth to face, so the heart of man to man.” Proverbs 27:19. In other words, just as we look into a pool of water and see ourselves, so if we were to look into another man’s heart, we would see ourselves there also, for we all share the same nature. The mouths of sinners are stopped from protesting against the condemnation of God here, and in verse 27 they are stopped from boasting. Job confessed, “Behold I am vile; what shall I answer Thee? I will lay mine hand upon my mouth.” Job 40:4,5.
And all the world may become guilty before God- the whole world is “liable to punishment”, or “liable to pay penalty to God”, since the apostle has now proved universal sinfulness, and therefore universal guiltiness. Man has nothing to say in response to God’s verdict of “Guilty”. They make a great mistake who say they will wait until judgment day to find out their position. God in mercy has declared it to them already, whilst there is time to repent and believe. Man has been brought to trial, lost his case, and is liable now to punishment.

3:20
Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in His sight- if the law condemns us as sinners, it thereby disqualifies us from seeking to gain God’s approval by keeping it.
For by the law is the knowledge of sin- when the commandment confronts the will of man, it shows him to be hostile (for the mind of the flesh is enmity with God, and is not subject to the law of God, Romans 8:7) and exposes him as a sinner.

Section 5   Romans 3:21-26
The work of Christ is central to the gospel

Subject of Section 5
Having shown that man deserves nothing but wrath because of his sin, the apostle now explains that God is willing, in grace, to bestow upon men that which they do not deserve, which they can never earn, and which they will never be able fully to repay. How He does this, whilst still maintaining His just character, is detailed for us in the next few verses.
The expression “righteousness of God” is used in two ways in this passage. In verses 25 and 26 it is the attribute of righteousness which God possesses which is in view, the righteousness which is His intrinsically. In verses 21 and 22, however, the idea is of that righteousness which He reckons or imputes to a person when they believe. Of course the Divine righteousness that is imputed is of the same character as the intrinsic righteousness of God. The difference is that God has that righteousness as an essential attribute, (that is, an attribute of His essence), whereas man needs it to be granted to him, for he is unrighteous by nature. Divine righteousness reckoned is in direct contrast to human righteousness demanded, as when men were under the law.
The English language is derived from various sources, one of which gives us the adjective “righteous”, and another which gives us the adjective “just”. They mean the same thing, namely that which is right according to God’s standard. Righteousness was originally spelt right-wise-ness, meaning that which corresponds to right, just as clock-wise means that which corresponds to the direction the hands of the clock travel.
This passage, then, assures us that in the salvation of sinners, God acts in perfect conformity to the absolute standard of right that He represents in His own person. It also assures us that through faith a person is reckoned by God to be in conformity with that right character of His, not because he has attained such a position by his own efforts, but because God in grace blesses in this way on the basis of the work of Christ.
It is important to notice the emphasis on the righteousness of God, for this leading theme of the gospel is being forgotten today and is being replaced by an over-emphasis on the love of God. It is indeed important to proclaim the general love of God for sinners. We should note, however, that the love of God is spoken of in John 3:16 as being in the past, and that historic display of love which took place at Calvary is the once-for-all declaration of God’s attitude towards men. The grace and mercy of God which are based upon His love, Ephesians 2:4-7, should not be preached at the expense of announcing His righteous demands. The love of God is the expression of His nature, 1 John 4:8; but His nature is also righteous, and there cannot be conflict between the two. Divine love must act righteously, for “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all”, 1 John 1:5.

Structure of Section 5

5(a) 3:21 The righteousness of God and the law
5(b) 3:22 The righteousness of God and faith
5(c) 3:23 The righteousness of God and sin
5(d) 3:24 The righteousness of God and redemption
5(e) 3:25 The righteousness of God and propitiation
5(f) 3:26 The righteousness of God and justification

5(a)   3:21
The righteousness of God and the law

3:21
But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

But- the word presents us with the Divine alternative to the failure of man described in 1:18-3:20. The apostle now resumes where he broke off in 1:17, and having shown conclusively that man is totally unable to attain to personal righteousness, and deserves nothing but wrath from God, begins to unfold the wonder of the gospel which is able to bring sinners into a right relationship with God. Man deserves wrath but God intervenes.
Now- a different situation altogether prevails at the present time compared to the age of the law. See verses 25 and 26, with their references to “sins that are past”, and “at this time”.
The righteousness of God without the law is manifested- it is not now human righteousness demanded, as under the law of Moses, but Divine righteousness manifested. “without the law” means totally apart from attempts to keep the law to earn salvation.
Being witnessed by the law and prophets- the Old Testament gave abundant testimony to the righteous requirements of God. The law gave the directives, the prophets exposed the deviations. Paul is careful to emphasise that the gospel does not overthrow the righteousness of God expressed in the law, just as he emphasised in 1:1,2 that the gospel is in harmony with the Old Testament scriptures.

5(b)   3:22
The righteousness of God and faith

3:22
Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:

Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ- not the unattainable righteousness through works, but that which is freely available to those whose faith is in Jesus Christ. It is not belief about Christ that saves, (although obviously the facts concerning Him must be accepted, for Christianity is based on historical events), but it is faith in, or upon, the Lord Jesus Christ which saves, involving unreserved reliance on Him alone for salvation, on the basis of His death at Calvary. “Faith of Jesus Christ” does not mean Christ’s personal faith, but the faith men place in Him, as opposed to putting faith in the law for salvation, which is in fact putting faith in themselves.
Unto all- the gospel makes a universal offer to men. No one is excluded from the opportunity of blessing, for just as no person is good enough in himself for God to accept him, so no person is too bad. The next phrase tells us the condition upon which that offer is made.
And upon all them that believe- belief in Christ is the unvarying principle upon which God acts. “Upon” signifies that there are objects in view, namely those who believe. Gospel blessing is only available on the condition that it is for those who believe, just as a shopkeeper displays his goods on the understanding that people will pay for them, not steal them. The goods are displayed with that condition in mind. The gospel is sent in the direction of, and arrives at, those who are prepared to believe. This is not to say that the gospel is only applicable to some, but rather that it is only available on the principle of faith.
For there is no difference- each individual, of whatever background, must take his place amongst the “all”, for there are no exceptions to the rule that righteousness can be received only by faith. There is no difference, for all need to believe; there is no difference, for all have sinned.

5(c)   3:23
The righteousness of God and sin

3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

For all have sinned- this is the reason why salvation is made available to all. It is man’s sin, not man’s merit, that causes God to offer blessing to all, hence the “for,” or “because”. Note that the verb sinned is in the past.
And come short of the glory of God- this is the present consequence of past failure. It is too late for man to begin to earn merit, for he has a sinful record, and “God requireth that which is past,” Ecclesiastes 3:15. The glory of God may be defined as “the sum total of God’s attributes and the whole range of His characteristics which combine together to make Him alone worthy of worship”. The glory of God demands that man be righteous if he is to be accepted with Him, but man falls short because of his sin. The demands of God’s glory, however, have been met fully by Christ, hence the apostle goes on to speak of justification through Him. And those who are justified are as good as glorified, 8:30, and no longer come short.

5(d)   3:24
The righteousness of God and redemption

3:24
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

Being justified- the believer is reckoned to be righteous in the sight of God because of the merit of Christ’s work. To be reckoned or thought of by God as righteous, is the same as to be justified. Clearly the apostle is not describing the unrepentant sinner as being justified, but rather, he is referring back to verse 22, and describing “them that believe”.
Freely- this word is translated “without a cause” in John 15:25. There is no reason in man why God should justify him; the cause is found in Christ, for God forgives sins for the sake of Christ, Ephesians 4:32. There is no merit in man, and no hesitation with God.
By his grace- this is the motive in the heart of God which causes Him to justify sinners. Grace is unmerited favour to those who do not deserve it and can never repay it, and is an expression of Divine love, Ephesians 2:4,5.
Through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus- redemption is the means by which we may be justified. Sins committed put us under an obligation to God, for His righteous character demands that they be dealt with. We have no means of satisfying God’s demands, and so are constantly in debt to God. In Old Testament times, when a person was without resources, his near kinsman could act as his redeemer, provided he had both the resolve, and the resources. We see an example of this in Boaz in the book of Ruth.
If men are to have redemption, then they must find it in the One who gave His life a ransom for many, Matthew 20:28. A ransom was the price that must be paid in order to redeem. The Lord Jesus “gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity,” Titus 2:14. Notice it is “that he might”, an expression which tells of a possibility, for his death gives him the right to redeem when we believe. Elihu, Job’s friend, said about God, “Then he is gracious unto him, and saith, Deliver him from going down into the pit: I have found a ransom.” Job 33:24.

Special note on redemption
Redemption may be defined as “the setting free of a slave by the payment of a price”. That price being called a ransom. The carrying out of redemption is presented to us in the Old Testament in two ways. There were those redeemed from bondage, such as the nation of Israel, who were in Egypt as slaves to Pharoah the ruler. And there were those who were redeemed from bankruptcy, such as Ruth, in the book of Ruth. In either case the principle was the same, namely, a state of enslavement, the reality; one who was willing and able to pay the price that set free, the redeemer; the price paid, the ransom; the consequent setting free, the release; gratitude to the redeemer and service to him as the new owner, the response.

The reality
The following are scriptures that set out the reality of the fact that man is a slave to sin, and as such is in need of a redeemer.

1. “Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin“, John 8:34.

These are the words of Christ, and are based on the story of Abraham, Hagar, and Sarah. Hagar was a slave-girl, and Abraham, sadly, had a child by her, Ishmael. He then had a child by Sarah his wife, named Isaac. When the time of Isaac’s weaning came, Abraham made a great feast, and introduced his son Isaac to the community as his heir. Ishmael, a boy of thirteen at the time, mocked, and for this reason was cast out of Abraham’s house. We read this in Genesis 21:8-14. So when the Lord Jesus speaks of the son remaining in the house, and the slave not doing so, John 8:35, He is referring to this incident,.
The Jews claimed to be Abraham’s seed, but the Lord is confronting them with the truth that Ishmael was this too. Only those who are free because He has made them free are like Isaac, and remain in the house in fellowship with the father. Those who are slaves, like Ishmael, have no right to be in the house, but are cast out. The Jews, even though descended from Abraham physically through Isaac, were nonetheless morally like Ishmael, and as such were not in fellowship with God.

2. “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; but with the precious blood of Christ”, 1 Peter 1:18,19.

The apostle Peter is here referring to the departure of the children of Israel from Egypt, as recorded in Exodus chapters 12-15. The only silver and gold the Israelites had at that time was the money the Egyptians gave them to ensure they really went away. But it was not this money that purchased their freedom. What did purchase that freedom was the blood of the lamb on passover night.

3. “that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage”, Hebrews 2:14,15.

Every night, as an Israelite went to sleep, he feared dying with sin on his record. He may have offered a sin-offering during the day, but he may also have sinned on the way home. Christ came to deliver from that fear, and He does so by dealing completely and finally with the question of sins as far as those who believe are concerned. He also made of no effect the power of the devil over them so that they are freed from the fear of death. He did this by going into death voluntarily, and taking His life again by His own act, thus showing that He was in no way in bondage to the power of the devil. That triumph over the devil He shares with those who believe on Him.

4. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us”, Galatians 3:13.

The nation of Israel had been given the law at Sinai as a conditional covenant. The blessing of that covenant depended on their obedience. Because they had no ability to fully obey, they were under a curse, not a blessing. The only way to be set free from that curse was for someone who had not transgressed God’s law to take that curse upon Himself, and thus set free those who would believe in Him. This the Lord Jesus did when on the cross He accepted the consequences that the law-breaking of men had brought upon themselves, and bore those consequences instead.

5. “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.” Galatians 4:8.

Many of the Galatian believers to whom Paul is writing had been idol-worshippers before they were saved, and as such were in superstitious fear of the demon-influence behind those idols. The apostle calls this slave-service. The work of Christ at Calvary had set them free from that fear the moment they believed, since by His death He destroyed the power of the prince of this world, Satan himself, who holds men in slavery to superstition.

6. “And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the first-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.” Romans 8:23.

When Adam sinned and fell, he brought the creation of which he was head down with him. As a result, men’s bodies are in a state of corruption. This is true even of the body of believers in Christ, for their body is the last link with the world of Adam. When Christ comes for His people, He shall change their bodies, so that they are like His glorious body, Philippians 3:21. In this way the bondage of a corrupt body will be forever gone.

7. “None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him: (for the redemption of their soul is precious, and it ceaseth for ever:) that he should still live for ever, and not see corruption.” Psalm 49:7-9.

Psalm 49 is used by Jews as a funeral psalm, for it laments the fact that no-one can redeem another from going into death and the grave. This indicates that the prospect of dying and corrupting is a form of bondage to men, from which no ordinary man can redeem his fellow-man. Only the Lord Jesus can do this. The believer will one day rise from the dead with an incorrupt and incorruptible body, 1 Corinthians 15:42,53. More than that, because the Lord is coming to take His people to heaven, some of them will not even go into the grave at all.

8. “I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death“, Hosea 13:14.

Here God promises to deliver from the hold that the grave has on the bodies of believers. The apostle Paul alludes to this passage when he is dealing with the resurrection of the saints in 1 Corinthians 15:57. Christ shall rescue their bodies from the grave when He comes for His own.

The Redeemer
As we have said, one who undertakes to redeem must first be willing, and then be wealthy. The only one who is both willing to pay the price, and wealthy enough to do so, is the Lord Jesus. The price He was prepared to pay was nothing less than Himself, yielded up to God in death. The root cause of man’s slavery in all its forms is the sin that has brought death into the world. Because He was sinless, and not in any sort of slavery, the Lord Jesus was free to deal with our bondage.
When He preached in the synagogue at Nazareth, the Lord Jesus announced that He was the one of whom Isaiah prophesied in chapter 61 of his book. He quoted the words as follows, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, for he hath anointed me to…preach deliverance to the captives”, Luke 4:18. Yet He did not deliver John the Baptist from prison! The deliverance in view must therefore be of the spiritual kind, the kind of which the eight scriptures quoted above speak.
Redemption is illustrated for us in Exodus 12, where the blood of an innocent lamb was shed and sprinkled, and as a result Israel were delivered from bondage to Pharoah. The apostle Peter takes this up, and speaks of the precious blood of Christ, “as of a lamb without blemish and without spot”, 1 Peter 1:19. Since the blood represents the life of a person, the blood of Christ is precious because His Person is precious to God.
Things may be precious in three ways. They may be precious because they are special. An object may have little monetary value, yet be extremely precious because of what it represents. The blood of Christ is precious because He is without blemish and without spot. He is pure without as to character, and pure within as to nature, and as such is special to God, and to those who believe in Him.
Things can be also be precious because they are, in fact, valuable. Christ is God’s only begotten Son, John 3:16, and His dear Son, Colossians 1:13. God the Father values Him highly, yet freely delivered Him up for us all. We see how valuable His blood was by how precious He is, and by how much it has and will achieve.
Things can also be precious because they are memorable, reminding us of some great event. There was no greater event than the death of the Lord Jesus at Calvary. What could surpass the death of the Son of God? Throughout all eternity the redeemed shall sing a new song, and that song is prompted by the fact that the Lamb was slain, and has redeemed to God by His blood, Revelation 5:9.

The ransom
A ransom was the price paid so that a slave could be bought out of the market-place. On payment of this ransom-price, the slave became the property of the one purchasing his freedom. The ransom price that was necessary to buy sinners out of the slave-market of sin is nothing less than the blood of Christ. His own words were, “For even the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.” Mark 10:45. Wonderful as His earthly ministry was, it was surpassed by what He did at Calvary, where He gave Himself, in all the glory of His person, to God.
1 Timothy 2:6 is to the same effect, where the apostle writes that He “gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time”. This is offered by the apostle as support for what he wrote previously in verse 4, where he stated that God’s desire is that all men should be saved. The genuineness of that desire is seen in that He has appointed His Son as the ransom for all.

The release
When a person believes on the Lord Jesus, having acknowledged slavery to sin, and the complete inability to deliver himself from bondage, certain things happen. We may think of them in connection with the eight scriptures quoted at the outset.

1. “Jesus answered them, whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.” John 8:34.

The Lord Jesus went on to say that “If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.” verse 36. The word “indeed” means “to the very core of your being”. In other words, absolutely free. Not free superficially, or provisionally, or temporarily, but free absolutely and permanently. Such is the thoroughness with which the Lord Jesus frees those who believe in Him.
How does this work out in practice? He also said in that chapter, “and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, verse 32. The truth of the scriptures, when believed, makes free in principle, and when applied to the life, makes free in practice.
An instance of this is the truth of the believer’s association with Christ in His burial and resurrection, which frees us as we act upon it. Romans 6:11 says, “Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.” This is the way of practical deliverance, reckoning to be true in practice what is true in principle; making sure that the truth of the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ affects our thinking and our acting. The apostle goes on in that same chapter to write, “But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine that was delivered you. Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.” Romans 6:17,18. To be free from sin does not mean that believers never sin, or even that they have no ability to sin, but it does mean that the sin-principle within has no right to hold them in bondage any more.

2. “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers”, 1 Peter 1:18.

The vain conversation Peter refers to here is that empty way of life that dominates unsaved people. They have no power to break free from the course on which this world takes them, for the prince of this world ensures that there is plenty to occupy their minds and hearts. Redeemed persons are free of that, however, and their lives can now be taken up with that which is of God.

3. “that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage”, Hebrews 2:14,15.

The true believer does not fear death itself, even though he might fear the process of dying. The apostle Paul reminded the Corinthians that all things were theirs, including death, 1 Corinthians 3:21,22. It is but a servant who ushers them into the presence of their Lord. There is no need to have anxious fears such as an Israelite of old had, for the one who tormented men with the fear of death has been defeated, and his power broken.

4. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us”, Galatians 3:13.

There was a curse pronounced on those who were hung upon a tree or gallows in Old Testament times. Such an one was marked out as being cursed of God because of his crimes. Christ went further, however, for He was not only hung upon a tree or cross and numbered with the transgressors, but He was made a curse. He accepted responsibility for the law-breaking of men, and the judgment it involved. Because He is risen from the dead, we may be assured that no curse will come upon the true believer, since He dealt with the curse instead. It is blessing that comes to the believer, not cursing, Galatians 3:14.

5. “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.” Galatians 4:8.

Many of the Galatian believers had been idol-worshippers before they were saved. Their idols held them in superstitious fear. This was slavery indeed, with no prospect of release until they heard the message of deliverance through Christ which Paul preached. He could announce that Christ has spoiled the evil angels that held men in their grip, making a show over them openly by means of the cross, Colossians 2:15.
When God delivered Israel from Egypt, He also executed judgment on the gods of the Egyptians, Exodus 12:12, for they worshipped demons under the form of natural things like the river Nile, and frogs and lice. These were the things that God used to plague Egypt before the Exodus, thus showing their folly in worshipping them, and also showing His power over them.

6. “And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.” Romans 8:23.

This is the part of redemption that is still in the future, yet is certain to take place. At the Lord’s coming the believer will enter into sonship, (here referred to as adoption), in the fullest possible way, being conformed to the image of God’s Son, Romans 8:29. This involves the change of the body, so that it is set free from the bondage that corruption and decay has brought it into because of Adam’s sin. Then, with bodies freed from every limitation, believers shall serve God as they ought.

7. “None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him…that he should still live for ever, and not see corruption“, Psalm 49:7,9.

Whilst it is true that believers still die, nevertheless the Lord Jesus said, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.” John 8:51. Such is the power of the everlasting life that believers possess, that even death is virtually a non-entity as far as they are concerned. Every person who has believed has already passed from death unto life, John 5:24, so that death is simply the necessary process on the way to the gaining of the resurrection body. The “resurrection chapter”, 1 Corinthians 15, states, using the illustration of the sowing of a seed, “that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die”, verse 36. The farmer who leaves the seed-corn in the barn and does not sow it, should not expect a harvest.

8. “I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death: O death, I will be thy plagues; O grave, I will be thy destruction: repentance shall be hid from mine eyes.” Hosea 13:14.

When he was setting out what shall happen at the resurrection of the saints, the apostle alluded to the verse quoted above. Hosea was prophesying, so he uses the future tense. The apostle wrote as if the saints had been raised, and he writes of their victory on that resurrection morning as they ask, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? 1 Corinthians 15:55. The plague of death shall itself be plagued when Christ comes, and the grave shall be destroyed as far as its power is concerned. In Revelation 1:18 the Lord Jesus announced to John, “I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.” He holds the keys of hell so that no believer of this age shall go there, but shall go to Paradise. He holds the keys of death so that every saint shall rise from the grave.

The response
How should the believer react to this redemption? To answer this we could ask how a slave who had a cruel master should respond when he is freed. Will he not be greatly relieved to be delivered from his former slave-master? Will he not do his best to please the one who has ransomed him? So the believer, delivered from the forms of cruel bondage we have listed, should indeed be grateful to his new Master. Especially as that Master has paid an extremely high price to set him free. There should be devotedness to the one who has set us free at such a cost to Himself. There is no danger of falling into the hands of a cruel slave-master again, since redemption, once known, can never be withdrawn.
But there is a feature about deliverance from slavery by Christ that is very unusual. The one-time slaves are elevated to being sons! This is the language of scripture, “But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.” Galatians 4:4-7.
It is God’s desire to fill heaven with those who are like His Son, and He does it by redeeming those who are slaves to sin, and positioning them as His sons. “For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Romans 8:29.

Having considered these various aspects of redemption, we can see that they combine the two ideas of deliverance from bondage and deliverance from bankrupcy. When the Israelites were in bondage in Egypt, they were not free to serve God. Because of this, they built up a debt of obligation to God from which only the blood of the lamb could rescue them. The same is true in the case of Ruth and Naomi. The latter had left the land of Israel with her husband, and gone to live in Moab. Whilst there, she could not go up to the temple to worship. As for Ruth her daughter-in-law, she would have been an idol worshipper before she converted to the faith of Israel. Both of them were in debt to God because of their previous failure to give Him His due. Only Boaz, their kinsman redeemer, could deliver them.

We return now to verse 25.

5(e)   3:25
The righteousness of God and propitiation

3:25
Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

Whom God hath set forth- this verb is in the Middle Voice, which indicates that the one acting has a personal interest and involvement in the thing that is done. In this case, God has a personal interest in setting Christ Jesus forth. He did so in the words of John the Baptist, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29. Then He did it through the public death of Christ by crucifixion, and then again in the proclamation of the gospel.
To be a propitiation- propitiation is that aspect of the sacrificial death of the Lord Jesus at Calvary whereby He gave to God the full and satisfactory answer to the demands which the righteousness of God made against sins. By so doing, He enabled God to maintain His own integrity and at the same time justify those who believe the gospel.
As the “pro” at the beginning of the word suggests, it is a work done towards God; that is, in relation to what He is Himself. The results manward are secondary. Indeed the work of propitiation would be glorifying to God even if there were no results manward.
Through faith- this is the means by which the benefits resulting from propitiation are gained. Man’s faith does not bring about propitiation, nor does it add to it, but it is vitally necessary, since it is the condition God lays down whereby we may have the blessing that propitiation secures. Faith is the avenue down which the benefits of propitiation come to us.
In his blood- the blood of Christ is that which does finally what the blood of bulls and goats did typically on the Day of Atonement, Leviticus 16:15,16. Christ’s blood effects propitiation, faith secures the benefit. Propitiation is “through faith” only in the sense that only those who exercise faith are in the good of Christ’s work. This was the case on the Day of Atonement, for only those who afflicted their souls, (repented), and abstained from work, (the essence of faith, see Romans 4:5), could continue in the nation, and be in the good of the propitiation made. Leviticus 23:26-32 makes this clear.
To declare his righteousness- at Calvary every Divine attribute, including righteousness, was brought out into fullest display. Anticipating the cross, the Lord Jesus prayed, “Father, glorify thy name.” The Father’s immediate response was, “I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again”, John 12:28. Later, the Lord Jesus can say, as He anticipates the completion of His work on the cross, “Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him”, John 13:31. This is why the gospel can be called “the glorious gospel of the blessed God”, 1 Timothy 1:11, for the glory of God is told out as the truth of the gospel is proclaimed.
For the remission of sins that are past- this means “because of the passing over of sins done before”, that is, in Old Testament times. “Before” does not mean before conversion, but before Christ came into the world. Remission here is not forgiveness, but God passing by sins, and not dealing with them in immediate judgment. There was not, generally, the instant dealing with sins committed before Christ’s death which we might have thought a righteous God would have put into effect.
Through the forbearance of God- His forbearance means His holding up the process of immediately dealing with sins in judgment. Paul said that God winked at the former times of ignorance, Acts 17:30, not in the sense that He ignored what was going on, but He chose not to immediately judge men’s ignorance, and graciously bore with men in view of the coming of Christ. The work of Christ at the cross vindicates God for acting like this. At the present time the reason why sins are not instantly dealt with is because of His longsuffering and grace.

Special note on propitiation
We should never underestimate the importance of that aspect of the work of the Lord Jesus at Calvary known as propitiation. This is because the honour of God, the blessing of men, the introduction of Christ’s millenial kingdom, and the new heavens and the new earth, all depend upon it. When thinking of this vital matter, we need to be clear as to what propitiation actually is. It may be defined as follows: “Propitiation is that aspect of the work of Christ at Calvary whereby He gave to God complete answers to the questions raised by the existence of sin”.

There are seven instances of the use of forms of the word propitiation in the New Testament, and they are as follows, emphasised by being in bold type for the sake of clarity, although not found in bold in the Authorised Version:

1. “God be merciful to me a sinner”, Luke 18:13.

2. “whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood”, Romans 3:25.

3. “that He might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people”, Hebrews 2:17.

4. “For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness”, Hebrews 8:12.

5. “and over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy seat“, Hebrews 9:5.

6. “And He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world”, 1 John 2:2.

7. “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins”, 1 John 4:10.

As we consider this subject in the light of the Scriptures, we could ask ourselves three main questions:

Why was propitiation necessary? How was propitiation achieved? What are the results of propitiation?

Why was propitiation necessary?

Because sins offend God
As God is the Absolute Standard of righteousness and holiness, all deviations from this standard are highly offensive to Him. Such is the intensity of His holiness that the simple mention of it is enough to make the posts of the doors of the temple in heaven move, Isaiah 6:3,4. His reaction to sin and iniquity is to turn from it, for He is of purer eyes than to behold evil, and He cannot look upon iniquity, Habakkuk 1:13. The very presence of sin in the universe is a grief to God.

Because as Moral Governor of the universe, He must be seen to deal with sins
God has enemies, both devilish and human, and He must be clear of any charge which they may level against Him that suggests He has ignored sins, or at least, ignored some sins. Eternity must not be allowed to run its course without this matter being settled. God deals with some sins instantly, but the majority seem to have gone unpunished. Sentence against an evil work has not been executed speedily, Ecclesiastes 8:11, since God is longsuffering, and waits to be gracious. This situation might give rise to the charge of indifference to sins, and so God must act to defend His honour.

Because God must have a just basis for continuing to have dealings with sinful men
One of the main purposes of the sacrifices on the Day of Atonement in Israel was that God might continue to dwell amongst them despite their uncleanness, Leviticus 16:16. So also when Christ was down here. It was only because God was not imputing trespasses so as to instantly judge them, but rather was working to reconcile men unto Himself, that He was prepared to have dealings with men in the person of His Son. As the apostle Paul says, “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them”, 2 Corinthians 5:19.

Because if men are to be shown mercy, have their sins forgiven, and be reconciled to God, there must be a solid basis upon which these things can happen
God declares Himself to be a Saviour God. He cannot be fully satisfied solely by judging men. The fact that “God is light” demands that this be done, but “God is love” too, and delights to manifest Himself in grace.

Because the cycle of sin must be broken
In other words, if there is not to be an eternal succession of creations, falls, remedies for fall, and new creations, then there must be that established which is once for all, giving the complete answer to the question of sin. Unless this complete answer is given, the new heavens and new earth will not be safe from disturbance.

How was propitiation achieved?

The ceremonies of the Day of Atonement as described in Leviticus chapter 16 will help us here. We need to be very careful in our interpretation of them, however. We should remember two things. First, that the Old Testament teaches by way of contrast as well as by comparison. Second, that Christ’s ministry is in connection with a sanctuary which is “not of this building”, Hebrews 9:11. That means it is not part of the creation of Genesis chapter one. So even whilst acting on earth, He was operating in relation to a sphere that is not subject to the limitations of time, space, and matter.
In accordance with this, the writer to the Hebrews indicates that the going forth of the Lord Jesus outside the camp was the counterpart of the carrying of the carcase of the sin offering from the altar, where it had been slain, to a place of burning outside the camp, Leviticus 16:27; Hebrews 13:11,12. But this particular ritual took place almost at the end of the Day of Atonement proceedings, whereas the Lord Jesus went outside the camp before He died. We may say then that in one sense time is irrelevant as far as the work of Christ was concerned.
Again, what took place at the altar in the court of the tabernacle; before the ark in the Holiest of All; outside the camp at the place of burning, and in the wilderness where the scapegoat was taken and let go, all typified some aspect of the work of Christ. So place is irrelevant, too.
And so is matter irrelevant. Christ needed no visible ark to enable Him to convince His Father that His blood had been shed. When the repentant man of Luke 18:13 appealed to God to be merciful to him, (that is, to be gracious towards him on the ground of propitiation made), he went down to his house justified, despite the fact that there was no ark in the temple.
With these cautionary remarks in mind, we look now at Leviticus 16, and note those major parts of the ceremonies of that day which contribute towards making propitiation, the great end for which they were carried out.

A suitable sin offering was brought near
We must remember that the word “offer” that is used in Leviticus 16:6 means to bring near. A sacrifice must be offered before it can be laid on the altar. The blood that purges the conscience of God’s people is the blood of One who “offered himself without spot to God”, Hebrews 9:14. That is, of One who presented Himself for sacrifice in all the spotlessness of His person, confident that He met the approval of His God.

An offering was made sin
In Leviticus 16:9 a different word for offer is used, one which simply means to make. The offering is made in the sense that it is reckoned to be sin. So the animal, having had the sins of Aaron and his household figuratively transferred to it, is by that act made to represent those sins. Whatever happens to the animal subsequently, happens to the sin. The apostle Paul takes up this thought in 2 Corinthians 5:21 when he declares that God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” It is exceedingly solemn to think that God’s reaction to our sin became His reaction to Christ as the sinner’s substitute. So we may learn in the fullest sense what God’s reaction to sin is by looking to the cross where He forsook His Son and poured out His wrath upon Him. Such is the intensity of God’s hatred of sin, and such is His determination to deal with it, that He “spared not his own Son”, not shielding Him at all from the fury of His anger; not lessening the penalty, not relieving the pain. Who can tell the agony of Christ’s soul when He was dealt with by God as if He were sin! Of course, He remained personally what He always had been, pure and holy, just as the sin-offering is said to be most holy, Leviticus 6:17; but He was made sin as our representative.

The offering was slain and its blood was shed
“For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.” Leviticus 17:11. Such are the words of God to His people, teaching us that the shedding of blood is vitally important, for “without shedding of blood is no remission”, Hebrews 9:22. Accordingly, that sins might be dealt with, Christ “hath poured out his soul unto death”, Isaiah 53:12.

The carcase was burnt
Having been presented to God as a living animal at the altar, and having been slain and its blood retained, the animal’s carcase must be taken to the outside place, that it may be subjected to the fires of Divine holiness until nothing is left. How significant the contrast to Christ. For He was subjected to the Divine Fires whilst still alive, on the cross. How He must have suffered! Can we begin to take it in? Will not all eternity be needed to set forth what He was prepared to endure in love for our souls? But endure He did, and exhausted the fire of God’s wrath against sins. The fire exhausted the sin offering, but Christ exhausted the fire, and emerged in resurrection.
We must be careful to distinguish between punishment for sins and penalty for sins. Strictly speaking, no-one can bear the punishment for the sins of another, for personal culpability is implied in the word punishment. A person can bear the penalty for the sins of another, however, and this is what Christ has done. God can still justly punish sinners in the lake of fire, since they refused to believe in the One who bore the penalty, and thereby excluded themselves from the benefits He obtained. While it is true that propitiation is not made by the faith of a person, but by the blood of Christ, it is, nevertheless, made good to the person, (and only to the person), who believes, as Romans 3:25 makes clear.

The blood was sprinkled
We come now to the central action on the Day of Atonement, the sprinkling of the blood both of the bullock for Aaron and his house, and the goat for the nation of Israel, on the mercy-seat. This translates a word which signifies “the place for the covering of sin”. If God covers sins, then they are put completely out of His sight. We ought not to think of this covering as a temporary thing, or else we shall have difficulty understanding why God declared that Israel was cleansed from all their sins that day, Leviticus 16:30. It is true that the Scripture says “For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.” Hebrews 10:4, but what that blood symbolises, even the death of Christ, can. And that not only after Calvary, but before as well.
Now when the writer to the Hebrews referred to this Old Testament mercy-seat, he used the Greek word which means propitiatory, the place where God is propitiated in regard to sins. This makes clear that he did not see a distinction between covering and propitiating. There are various figures of speech used in connection with God dealing with sins. He removes them as far as the east is from the west, Psalm 103:12; He casts them behind His back, Isaiah 38:17; blots them out as if by a thick cloud, Isaiah 44:22; casts them into the depths of the sea, Micah 7:19. These are all metaphors, for sins are not material objects. When God does these things, then the matter is thoroughly dealt with. And so when He covers.
Christ has fully met every demand that God could make about sins. As one of the Persons of the Godhead, He has Divine insight into God’s requirements, and He has fully met those requirements. We are assured of this because He has sat down with confidence at the right hand of the Majesty on high, Hebrews 1:3. He purged sins in harmony with the majesty of God.
But He has also established a sure place in the presence of God for those who believe, so that the apostle Paul can speak of the grace wherein we stand, Romans 5:2. So dominant is the idea of grace with regard to that position, that the apostle uses the word grace to describe it. Only those who have “received the atonement”, Romans 5:11, are in that secure place before God.

The sins were confessed and carried away
The sin-offering for the people consisted of two goats, one for the Lord’s interests, and one for theirs. One, as we have seen, was slain so that its blood could be sprinkled on the mercy-seat. The other was called the scape-goat, or goat that was dismissed and went away. There was no double sin-offering for Aaron and his house, for he had seen the blood on the mercy-seat, and since he had not died, he knew it had been accepted, and his sins were gone. The rest of Israel did not have that experience, however, so to reassure them, they were able to see Aaron lay his hands on their goat, confess over it their sins, and then watch the goat, which carried its dreadful load of their sins, disappear into the wilderness, guided by a man whose fitness lay in his ability to take the animal to a place from which it could not return. The writer to the Hebrews takes up these things in Hebrews 9:26 and 28, where he speaks of Christ appearing to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. This is the counterpart of the blood of the first goat that was slain so that its blood could be sprinkled on the mercy-seat. Then he speaks of Christ bearing the sins of many, and now he is thinking of the scapegoat. When the Lord Jesus was forsaken of His God upon the Cross, He was in a judicial position equal to that of the scapegoat, which was accepted as an offering, but rejected because of the load it bore.

What are the results of propitiation?

The demands of God have been fully met
To satisfy God as the Moral Governor of the universe, an adequate and final answer must be found to the question of sin. The demands of His holiness and righteousness are such that He must respond to every sin. Only Christ is adequate for this situation. He it is who has “put away sin by the sacrifice of himself”, Hebrews 9:26. To put away in that verse means to abolish. As far as God is concerned, and in this context, sin is not. No charge can henceforth be made against God that He has ignored the presence of sin. On the contrary, He has taken account of each and every sin through His Son’s work at Calvary. John wrote, “He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world”, 1 John 2:2. Of course “the sins of” is in italics in that verse, being physically absent from the Greek text. But the words are implied in the “ours” of the previous statement. If John had written “not for us only”, then the translation could have continued “but also for the whole world”. Since, however, he uses the possessive pronoun “ours”, which shows he is writing about the sins people possess, then “the sins of” must be inserted.

Now the apostle will write later “And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.” 1 John 5:19. He sees mankind divided into two clearly defined sections, namely those who are “of God”, that is, believers, and “the whole world”. John not only clearly distinguishes between believers and the world, but just as clearly states that Christ is the propitiatory offering for both classes. That Christ became the propitiation for the whole world does not mean that the whole world will be saved, since propitiation is only made good to a person when he believes. It does mean, however, that no charge may be levelled against God for not making provision for men. Gospel-blessing may be genuinely offered to all men, for there is abundant provision for all.

God’s dealings were vindicated
In Old Testament times God blessed men by reckoning them righteous when they believed in Him. Romans 3:25 indicates that the propitiatory work of Christ vindicates God for so acting. It can be seen now that God was blessing in anticipation, crediting believers with the results of Christ’s work before they had been achieved. He also remitted, or passed over, their sins in forbearance, holding back from judging those sins in virtue of what His Son would do at Calvary.

God’s glory is fully displayed
There is no attribute of God that has not been fully expressed at Calvary. This is why the apostle Paul speaks of rejoicing in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement, Romans 5:11. By His sacrificial work at Calvary Christ has brought the character of God out into full and glorious display. Those who are brought by faith into the good of that work are enabled to behold that display, and rejoice in it. Would we know Divine holiness, or righteousness, or love, or wrath, or any other aspect of the Person of God? Then we must look to the cross for the sight of it. We shall not be disappointed.

God’s mercy is available
The repentant sinner who called upon God to be merciful to him is the first person in the New Testament to use a word based on propitiation; in effect praying, “God be merciful to me on the basis of propitiation”. He went down to his house justified, Luke 18:13,14. Under the terms of the New Covenant, God promises, “I will be merciful to their unrighteousness”, Hebrews 8:12. The mercy-seat was the same width and breadth as the ark, telling us that the ark (Christ as to His Person), and the mercy-seat, (Christ as to His work), were perfectly matched. But we are not told the thickness of the gold of the mercy-seat, for there is an infinite supply of mercy for those who believe, enough to keep them secure for all eternity.

God’s forgiveness is assured
In Hebrews 10:5-9 we have the Spirit of Christ in the psalmist foretelling His work of sacrifice. Then we have the Spirit’s direct testimony telling us of the results of that work, Hebrews 10:15-17. God promises emphatically that He will not remember the sins and iniquities of His people any more, since He brought those sins into remembrance at Calvary, and Christ dealt with them effectively there. “No more” means in no way, nor at any time. Note that God pledges to positively not remember, not negatively to forget. We may forget, and then remember again, whereas God promises never to remember for ever.

God’s people are preserved
The Lord Jesus spoke to Mary Magdalene after He was risen, and instructed her to tell the brethren that He was about to “ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God”, John 20:17. Thus He would still be the link between His people and God, maintaining them in His dual role of Advocate with the Father, and High Priest in things pertaining to God.
The basis of His advocacy is two-fold. His person, for He is Jesus Christ the righteous, and His work, for He is the propitiation for our sins, 1 John 2:1,2. The apostle John was concerned about believers sinning. The sins of believers are just as obnoxious to God, and just as deserving of wrath, as those of unbelievers. But we are “saved from wrath through Him”, Romans 5:9, as He pleads the merits of His work. He is, says John, the propitiatory offering for our sins. Not was, but is. In other words, the one who acts for us in heaven as our advocate, is the very same one who hung upon the cross as a sacrifice for our sins.
He is also our High priest. The language of Hebrews 2:17,18 is as follows, “Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted”. These verses form a bridge between chapter two, with its emphasis on the reasons why the Lord Jesus took manhood, and chapters three and four, which tell of the way in which Israel were tempted in the wilderness.
Note in particular the word “for” which begins verse 18. Too little attention has been paid to this word, and hence the connection between verses 17 and 18 is often lost. The reason why we have a high priest who is merciful and faithful is that He has been here in manhood and suffered being tempted. When His people pass through temptation, then He undertakes to deal with their cause. Because He has been here, and has been tempted in all points like as we are, He is able to assist us when we cry to Him for help. The word for succour is used by the woman of Canaan in Matthew 15:25 when she cried out, “Lord, help me”. He is able to point us to the ways in which He overcame in the wilderness temptation, and thus we are strengthened to resist temptation.
But what if we fall, and sin? In that case He comes to our aid in another way. We see it typified negatively in Leviticus 10:16-20. The priests were commanded to eat the sin-offerings, if the blood thereof had not been brought into the sanctuary. But at the end of the consecration of the priesthood, Moses was angry on God’s behalf, for the priests had failed in this. Moses said, “God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord”, Leviticus 10:17. One of the functions of priesthood, then, was to personally identify with the sin-offering by eating it, and by so doing bear the iniquity of the congregation, taking responsibility for their failure, but doing so safeguarded by the fact that a sin-offering had been accepted by God. As they did this the scripture explicitly says they made atonement for the people, Leviticus 10:17. We see then what the writer to the Hebrews means when he speaks of Christ making reconciliation for the sins of the people as High Priest. He is indicating that Christ personally identifies Himself with His sin-offering work at Calvary, and thus takes responsibility for the failures of His people under temptation as He pleads their cause before God.

God’s purpose for the earth is furthered
When Adam the head of the first creation fell, all creation had to be subjected to vanity, or else a fallen man would have been head over an unfallen creation, Romans 8:19-23. Now that the Lord Jesus has obtained rights over the earth by His death, He is able to bring in new conditions for God. He can now righteously deliver the present creation from the bondage of corruption into which it was brought by the fall of man. Colossians 1:20 assures us that on the basis of the blood of His cross, all things, whether in earth or in heaven, shall be reconciled to God, for that alienation between God and His creation which took place at the fall can be remedied. Notice it is things, not people, that are spoken of in that verse as being reconciled.

God’s intention to create a new heavens and new earth can be realised
Unless the sin that has marred the first creation is dealt with, God cannot righteously introduce an eternal earth and heavens, for it would not have been evident that He was able to deal with the fall of the first creation. Having dealt with it through Christ, however, He is able to bring in new things that will never be spoiled. Daniel was told that Messiah the Prince would bring in “everlasting righteousness”, Daniel 9:24, and this He will do, on the basis of His death. It only remains for God to announce “Behold, I make all things new”, Revelation 21:5, and a “new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness”, shall be established, 2 Peter 3:13. At last there will be a settled and congenial place in which righteousness can dwell, after all the turmoil brought in by Adam’s sin. Then those profound words spoken by John the Baptist will be fully brought to pass, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29.

5(f)   3:26
The righteousness of God and justification

3:26
To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness- having been shown that the work of propitiation vindicates God’s past dealings, we learn here of God’s righteous dealings in the present.
That he might be just- that is, might maintain His righteous character, even while He is blessing guilty sinners.
And the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus- the work of Christ enables God to be two things at the same time, namely, to be just, and also the one who reckons sinners just. It is part of His glory that He does not clear the guilty, Exodus 34:7, but He can with true justice forgive the guilty when they plead the work of Christ on their behalf.
The name Jesus emphasises that it is a real and historical man that enables God to justify. The sinless man has become the sin-offering, so that the sinful men of verses 10-18 might be sin-free.

Section 6   Romans 3:27-4:25
God’s grace towards men as their Justifier

Subject of Section 6
Having shown in a previous parenthesis, 1:18-3:20, the pressing need of the gospel in view of the wrath of God which hung over Jew and Gentile alike, and then having explained the terms of the gospel in 3:21-26, the apostle now expands on the expression he had used in verse 22, “unto all.” Does this really mean that the imputed righteousness of God is unto all men, without exception? Is the same God who is angry against the sins of Jews and Gentiles, also the God who will forgive those sins? To answer this question, the apostle selects two of the most revered figures in Old Testament history to convince his readers, whether Jew or Gentile, that the righteousness of God which comes through faith is indeed available to them all. Before he does this, however, he answers three initial questions that may be on the minds of his readers at this point.

Structure of Section 6

6(a)

3:27, 28

Question One: Can man boast?

6(b)

3:29,30

Question Two: Is God biased?

6(c)

3:31

Question Three: Is law banished?


6(a)   3:27,28
Question One: Can man boast?

3:27
Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

Where is boasting then? The mention of the glory of God in verse 23 has reminded the apostle that God deserves all the glory from His creatures. Does the gospel ensure this, or does it leave room for men to boast, reserving some glory for themselves?
It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith-the answer to this question is that boasting on the part of man is totally excluded by the “law of faith”, that is, the principle of faith. The gospel calls for faith, and by definition faith is reliance totally on another, and hence leaves no room for man to boast that he has tried to do the works of the law. The law of works could not exclude boasting, for it expected human effort, in which a man would tend to boast. The apostle returns to this in 4:1-8.

3:28
Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law- the word ‘conclude’ means ‘reckon with logical thought’. The truth of the gospel, summed up here by the phrase “justified by faith”, will stand the test of the most rigorous examination.

6(b)   3:29,30
Question Two: Is God biased?

3:29
Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:

Is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Given that God specially singled out the people of Israel for unique advantages in the Old Testament, is He still restricting His blessing to them?
Yes, of the Gentiles also- here is the answer, that the one and same God (“it is one God”, verse 30) who blesses Jews with salvation through faith, blesses Gentiles likewise. In this verse the apostle speaks of the two great divisions of humanity in the context of nationality, Jew and Gentile, whereas in the next verse he will refer to them in the context of religion, as those circumcised or uncircumcised.

3:30
Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

Seeing it is one God- there is only one true God, and He is undivided in His person and in His intentions. He blesses men on consistent principles, which are in harmony with His own nature and character.
Which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and the uncircumcision through faith- since salvation is not through law-works, which law was given only to the Jews, the way is open for any to come. “By faith”, or literally “out of faith”, means on the principle of faith, as opposed to the principle of works which the Jews was familiar with, and to which circumcision committed them.
As for the Gentiles, here called the uncircumcision, justification is “through faith”, or literally “by the instrumentality of faith”, for the Gentiles did not have any other instrument before, for they were not interested in keeping God’s law. By circumcising their male sons, the Jews committed them to the law with its system of works, whereas Gentile boys were not thus committed. The apostle returns to this in 4:9-12.

6(c)   3:31
Question Three: Is law banished?

3:31
Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

Do we then make void the law through faith? Are the just requirements of the law cancelled and made of no effect by the gospel?
God forbid: yea, we establish the law- the apostle is emphatic that the gospel establishes the law, upholding as it does all the righteous principles set out in the law of Moses, and is just as insistent as the law in asserting that man is a sinner. See 1 Timothy 1:8-11, where the demands of the law, sound doctrine, and the gospel are in full agreement. Christ Himself said “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” Matthew 5:17,18.
In His death the Lord Jesus met all the claims of the God who had been offended by the breaking of His law, thus showing that far from being indifferent to the law, the gospel makes known that its claims are met in Christ, as the apostle makes clear in Galatians 3:10,13. After all, “justify” is a law-court word, indicating acquittal from all charge. Paul returns to this in 4:13-16.