Tag Archives: grace

1 THESSALONIANS `1

1 THESSALONIANS 1

Setting of the epistle
The apostle Paul and Silas, (or Silvanus, a prophet, and one of the “chief men of the brethren”, Acts 15:22,32), had left Philippi, having been subjected to beating and imprisonment for preaching the gospel, Acts 16. They left Timothy and Luke behind, (as is indicated by Luke changing from “us” to “they” in that chapter), and travelled about one hundred miles to Thessalonica, Acts 17:1. They bypassed Amphipolis and Apollonia, for possibly these towns did not have a Jewish synagogue, (which Luke is careful to tell us Thessalonica did have), and it was Paul’s policy to preach in the synagogue first, for it was most likely to contain seeking souls. No doubt he was confident that those saved through his preaching would spread the word to those towns afterwards, which is what in fact happened, 1 Thessalonians 1:8.

It seems that there was no synagogue in Philippi either, but it was the chief city of the region, Acts 16:12, and Paul’s strategy was to preach in places from which the gospel could afterwards radiate. This visit to Philippi was directed of the Spirit, for there were those in Philippi meeting together for prayer as worshippers of God, verse 13.

Paul preached for three sabbath days in the synagogue, and some of the Jews believed, along with a great multitude of Greeks who, because they were in the synagogue, were clearly seeking God, and even some who were the wives of the chief men of the city were converted, Acts 17:4. It is a testimony to the power of the preaching that there were such results from just three addresses. The secret is in the technique used, for Luke tells us that “Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath days reasoned with them out of the scriptures, opening and alleging, ‘that Christ must needs have suffered, and risen again from the dead; and that this Jesus, whom I preach unto you, is Christ'”, Acts 17:2,3. There is no reason why this method should not be used today, with a careful, intelligent and thorough exposition of the scriptures, resulting in real converts, able to withstand opposition.

Sadly, however, many of the Jews were opposed to the gospel, and Paul and Silas had to leave by night to go to Berea, where the people were more welcoming. But the Jews pursued them to this place, and Paul went on to Athens, leaving Silas and Timothy in Berea, Acts 17:14.. This tendency to persecute believers marked the city of Thessalonica, as is seen in remarks the apostle made as he wrote to the assembly at a later date.

When he was in Athens, the apostle sent Timothy back to Thessalonica to establish and encourage the assembly. When he came back, Timothy was able to report that they were progressing well, despite the persecutions and tribulations they were enduring still, 1 Thessalonians 2:1-10. The First Epistle to them is in response to Timothy’s report.

Structure of the epistle

Section 1 1:1-10 Conversion of the Thessalonians
Section 2 2:1-12 Conduct of the apostles
Section 3 2:13-20 Contrariness of the unbelievers
Section 4 3:1-13 Constancy of the Thessalonians
Section 5 4:1-12 Continuance in holiness, love and diligence
Section 6 4:13-18 Concern of the Thessalonians
Section 7 5:1-11 Confidence for the future
Section 8 5:12-28 Conduct in the assembly

Section 1 1:1-10
Conversion of the Thessalonians

Structure of the section

(a) Verse 1 Greetings to the church
(b) Verses 2-4 Gratitude to God for their character
(c) Verses 5-10 Genuineness of their conversion

(a) Verse 1
Greetings to the church

1:1
Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus, unto the church of the Thessalonians which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus Christ: Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

Paul, and Silvanus, and Timotheus- as already noted, Paul and Silas, (here called Silvanus), had preached in Thessalonica, whereas Timothy had meanwhile been left at Philippi. But he had been sent to Thessalonica by the apostle to gain insight into their spiritual state, and now he has returned to report on their welfare, hence his inclusion in the greeting.

Unto the church of the Thessalonians which is in God the Father and in the Lord Jesus Christ- this is a distinctive way of describing the assembly. Faced with opposition as they were, they needed the fatherly encouragement of their God, and the assurance that they were in Him, in the sense that they were enclosed in His purpose and His embrace. They were also in the Lord Jesus Christ, for it is through Him that all spiritual blessings are mediated. Note the testimony to the Deity of Christ in that He is linked to God the Father in a vital way, as in the next phrase also.

Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ- what were the usual greetings of the day are transformed into being a deliberate calling down of spiritual graces upon them from God, rather than, as was the case in everyday greetings of this sort, the mere wish that good may come to the one greeted. Note that Paul now calls God “our” Father, thus linking himself with the assembly in the enjoyment and consciousness of the Father’s love and care.

(b) Verses 2-4
Gratitude to God for their character

1:2
We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers;

We give thanks to God always for you all, making mention of you in our prayers- parted from them, the apostle and his companions are able to mention them before the throne of grace, for the One who sits there is not limited by distance. Prayers uttered in Corinth, (which is probably where Paul was when he wrote the epistle), are just as effective as they are in Thessalonica, for those prayers are directed straight to the sanctuary above, where Christ presents them to God. See Hebrews 8:3,6.

1:3
Remembering without ceasing your work of faith, and labour of love, and patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ, in the sight of God and our Father;

Remembering without ceasing your work of faith- it was to the Corinthians that the apostle wrote, “And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity”, 1 Corinthians 13:13. Christian graces should be accompanied by exercise of heart in the form of work, labour and patience. The apostle is pleased that in the case of the Thessalonians these features were in evidence, for they are a sign of genuineness.

It is clear that salvation is not by works, but is to be followed by the good works “which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them”, Ephesians 2:9,10. The Lord Jesus taught the people “this is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent”, John 6:29. This initial act of faith is to be followed by many other acts of faith. Abraham was justified by faith when he believed God’s promise about him having a son, Genesis 15:6, but it was many years later, when he offered Isaac on the altar, that his faith was made perfect, or reached its goal, James 2:21-24. Abraham was justified by works that day, because those kinds of works are the logical outcome of faith in God, and the faith he had exercised long before had now reached its fullest expression, justifying his title “Friend of God”. 

And labour of love- here the apostle uses a word for work which means “toil to the point of exhaustion”. We shall learn in verse 8 of their earnest endeavours in the gospel, and we can be sure in other ways too. Their labours were not merely out of a sense of duty, or to keep up appearances, but were the genuine outcome of deep love for Christ.

And patience of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ- hope for the believer is not a wistful longing, but a confident expectation. The reason why hope is solid and sure is that it is centred in “our Lord Jesus Christ”, the one whose authority as Lord, and sympathy as Jesus, and competency as Christ assures us that He will never dash our hopes. The two disciples on the road to Emmaus said that “we trusted that it had been he which should have redeemed Israel”, Luke 24:21. Their hopes had been dashed because they had been hoping for the wrong thing, namely deliverance from Rome, whereas Christ came to fulfil scripture, so that “repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem”, verse 47.

In the sight of God and our Father- if men had seen Abraham offering his son on the altar they would have been outraged. If the men of Jericho knew that Rahab was giving shelter to spies as an act of faith, they would have killed her. But these were things done in the sight of God, and in recognition of His claims, and so also were the acts of the Thessalonians.

1:4
Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God.

Knowing, brethren beloved, your election of God- the apostle was confident that the faith of the Thessalonians was the faith of God’s elect. In other words, it was genuine, as is seen in the works, labour and patience they were displaying despite opposition. The apostle Peter described believers as “elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father”, 1 Peter 1:2, telling us that God’s knowledge of them beforehand was the determining factor in His election of them. The apostle Paul wrote to the Thessalonians in his second epistle to them, that “God hath…chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth”, 2 Thessalonians 2:13. God sovereignly ordained that those whom He knew beforehand would believe were to be His chosen ones. The reason He could do this was because He chose them in Christ, not in themselves, Ephesians 1:4. What Christ was and would be to Him conditioned His choice, and gave it validity. God could not have dealings with sinners in any other other way than because of Christ.

(c) Verses 5-10
Genuineness of their conversion

1:5
For our gospel came not unto you in word only, but also in power, and in the Holy Ghost, and in much assurance; as ye know what manner of men we were among you for your sake.

For our gospel came not unto you in word only- the reason they found themselves amongst the elect was because the word of God had come to them, conveyed by the words of the preachers. The apostle could have easily overwhelmed the men in the synagogue with flights of eloquence, but he did not attempt such a thing. He simply explained the meaning of the scriptures. That is all the gospel preacher of today is required to do, for in the light of the coming of Christ to judge, the apostle wrote to Timothy “preach the word”, 2 Timothy 4:1,2. Having quoted from Isaiah about the abiding word of the Lord, the apostle Peter declared, “this is the word which by the gospel is preached unto you”, 1 Peter 1:25. So the gospel is the means by which the word of the Lord is preached. It is not that the gospel is preached using the word, but that the word is preached in the gospel; it is the word of God that is paramount. If the word of God is not explained at a meeting, the gospel has not been preached. No amount of appeals to the unsaved to get saved can replace the setting forth of the truth of the scriptures; in fact, as we read the addresses in the Acts of the Apostles we do not find any appeals at all.

But also in power- it is important that the gospel be preached, but it is vital that it be preached in power. That is, nothing must be allowed to diminish the force of the gospel, which is “the power of God unto salvation”. The preacher must ensure that he is in the right condition of heart to preach the gospel of Christ. We should not equate power in preaching with shouting. The Lord Jesus told His own, “Ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you”, Acts 1:8.

And in the Holy Ghost- Paul’s preaching was “in the Holy Ghost”, for, as the apostle Peter wrote, the gospel is preached “with the Holy Ghost sent down from heaven”, 1 Peter 1:12. We live in the post-Pentecost age, when the Holy Spirit, having come down in a special way at Pentecost, is operating in the world to take out of that world a people for God. The means He uses is the word of God. To ignore that word in the preaching is to ignore the Holy Spirit. Nothing will be accomplished for God in such circumstances.

And in much assurance- the apostle had every confidence in the gospel. He could write to the Roman believers, “I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth”, Romans 1:16. His confidence was justified, for the Thessalonians showed by their lives that they were genuine converts. There is no need for the evangelist to add his contribution to the preaching in the form of emotional stories, or high-pressure salesman tactics. The conversion of a soul is entirely a work of God, and needs no human assistance.

1:6
And ye became followers of us, and of the Lord, having received the word in much affliction, with joy of the Holy Ghost.

And ye became followers of us, and of the Lord- we might have expected these two things to be the other way round. They saw the example of Paul and Silvanus when they were with them, and Timothy, when he was sent to them, and recognised it to be worthy of imitation. They then discovered that the apostle and his companions were simply imitating Christ, and so the Thessalonians came to the point where they followed Christ for Christ’s sake, not because of the preachers.

Having received the word in much affliction, with joy of the Holy Ghost- the circumstances at Thessalonica were difficult, not just for Paul, but also for those who had recently believed. Notwithstanding, their faith in the word of God stood firm, and despite the opposition, they had great Spirit-generated joy in their souls. After the authorities had beaten the apostles on one occasion, we read that “they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name”, Acts 5:41. 

1:7
So that ye were ensamples to all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia.

So that ye were ensamples to all that believe in Macedonia and Achaia- having progressed from following Paul and Silas’ example, to following Christ, they now, in their turn, are fine examples to others in a very wide area. Macedonia and Achaia together are the size of Wales. If it be asked how this large territory saw their example, the next verse will tell us, beginning, as it does , with “for”.

1:8
For from you sounded out the word of the Lord not only in Macedonia and Achaia, but also in every place your faith to God-ward is spread abroad; so that we need not to speak any thing.

For from you sounded out the word of the Lord not only in Macedonia and Achaia- we see now why Paul did not stop at Amphipolis and Apollonia on the way to Thessalonica. If, (as is suggested by the statement that at the latter place there was a synagogue), there was no synagogue in the first two places, then Paul was confident that converts from the Gentile population of Thessalonica would evangelise there eventually. And this they did, as this verse shows.

Notice it is “from you” that the word sounded out. Those who evangelised did not act in isolation, but issued forth from a New Testament assembly. They were not freelancers, accountable only to themselves. Their task was to see men converted, and then gathered together in a scriptural assembly. They could then return to their home assembly to report on what the Lord had done, as Paul and Barnabas did at Antioch in Acts 14:26-27.

But also in every place your faith to God-ward is spread abroad- the apostle seems to change the subject mid-sentence here. He begins with the idea of the word of the Lord being sounded forth, but then goes on to speak of the faith of the Thessalonians. But the preaching of the Thessalonians was an evidence of their faith in God, so that when men heard the Thessalonian believers preaching, their first thought about them was that they were believers in God, having turned from their gods. Their personal testimony and the truth of the gospel coincided, which is an admirable thing, and worthy to be imitated.

That faith was known even in Rome, no doubt, for the authorities there would keep a close eye on any sign of unrest in the empire, and there had been a disturbance made by the Jews at Thessalonica, (which was a Roman colony, and therefore under close supervision by Rome), who said of Paul and Silas that “these all do contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying that there is another king, one Jesus”, Acts 17:7. We may be sure that if a matter was known in Rome, the rest of the empire knew as well.

So that we need not to speak any thing- it is not that Paul did not need to continue preaching. Rather, he did not have to inform others of the faith of the Thessalonians, for it was widely known.

1:9
For they themselves shew of us what manner of entering in we had unto you, and how ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God;

For they themselves shew of us- “they themselves”, (those in every place, verse 8), “shew of us”, (bear testimony to our character when we were at Thessalonica).

What manner of entering in we had unto you- how the preachers behaved themselves when they entered into Thessalonica to preach. The conduct and attitude of the preacher is of immense importance, for initially the audience will judge the message by the messenger. First impressions count for much. How the preacher is dressed, his dignified approach, his attitude to his audience, (not taking them for granted, for instance), his grasp of his subject, his competence in the imparting of God’s truth; all these things, and others, combine to make an immediate impression on the audience.

And how ye turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God- the second thing that unbelievers testified to was the change wrought in the Thessalonians by the gospel. Note that their conversion, (“turned”), was positively towards God. Paul was able, by the Spirit, to convince these idol-worshippers that they were wrong. By his exposition of the Old Testament, he showed that God was an intervening God, breaking into history and controlling events. The very fact, for instance, that the nation of Israel had been brought into the land of promise, was testimony to this. The converts realised that their gods were totally unable to do such a thing, and were therefore false and dead. They had done the wise and logical thing, namely, turn to the true and the living God Paul preached. See Rahab’s testimony for an example of this, Joshua 2:10,11.

But the major reason why they turned to God would have been the fact that Paul preached Christ from the Old Testament. We learn from Acts 17:3 that he told them of Christ, His sufferings, and His resurrection. Since He is God manifest in flesh, and lived amongst men, then God must indeed be the Living God. But He also must be the True God, for He has raised Christ from the dead in fulfilment of His Old Testament predictions, seen now to be true. Pharoah’s magicians admitted that, even though they could imitate some of Moses’ miracles, when it came to life from the dust they had to say, “This is the finger of God”, Exodus 8:19.

Note they did not turn from idols to God, but the reverse. God was the centre of their attention. It is important that preachers present a God-centred and Christ-centred gospel. Too often a gospel meeting is taken up with sinners, and their need, and how they can be blessed. This is indeed part of the gospel, but not the primary focus. The main thrust of the gospel is the presentation of the gospel of the glory of God and of Christ, and this will enable the sinner to realise that a great gulf exists between such glorious persons and himself. The Spirit produces this realisation, and also encourages faith in God.

The conversion of these Thessalonians was evidenced by their service, for they turned to serve. They formerly served idols, and expressed that service by their worship of them. Now they express their allegiance to their new-found God by worshipping Him.

1:10
And to wait for his Son from heaven, whom he raised from the dead, even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come.

And to wait for his Son from heaven- the apostle must have taught the new believers that the one who suffered and rose again had ascended to heaven to the place of supremacy as Psalm 110 said He would, and had promised to come back again, John 14:3. It seems that the apostle taught them much about future events, as we see from 5:1. Even though they were waiting, they were still serving God in the interim, worshipping God and seeking to obey Him in every way, guided by His word.

Whom he raised from the dead- this fact can simply be stated here, for it had been amply proved by the apostle in his word from the Old Testament given in the synagogue. He seems to be working his way backwards here, for he speaks first of Christ’s coming, then His resurrection, then the fact that He is Jesus, implying His birth and life, and then refers to the wrath to come, which echoes the ministry of John the Baptist, who prepared the people for Messiah’s first coming. He had asked the Pharisees and Sadducees, “Who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come”? It was a question that showed that John knew they were not coming to hear him for the right reason, but only out of curiosity and suspicion. They would have come for the right reason if God had warned them to flee.

Even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come- He is Jesus, (meaning Jehovah the Saviour), in every sense of the word, saving His people from their sins, but also delivering them so that they escape the wrath and judgement that is yet to come upon this world. As is said in 5:9, “For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us, that, whether we wake or sleep, we should live together with him”. So certain is this non-appointment to wrath, and deliverance from it, that the apostle can write in the past tense, for the reason Christ’s people are delivered from the wrath about to fall on this world is that Christ has died for them, and brought them into heavenly blessings, so that they are not part of the world now, and hence will not share in its judgement.

There are those who believe that this deliverance from wrath has to do with the Great White Throne judgement. Believers have indeed been delivered from that judgement, for the promise of the Lord Jesus is, “He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life”, John 5:24. Since the one who believes has moved out of spiritual death into spiritual life, he has, for that reason, moved out of the danger of judgement already. He does not have to wait for the Lord to come from heaven to make that a reality. In any case, the coming of the Lord and the Great White Throne are not connected, the latter taking place after the millenial reign of Christ.

1 TIMOTHY 1

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

 

Timing of the epistle
The following is the record of the last years of the apostle Paul’s life:
AD 60 He is charged on three counts: (a) Disturbing Jewish worship, (“a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world”), Acts 24:5. (b) Being ringleader of a sect that said Jesus was King, (“a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes”, verse 5; “saying there is another king, one Jesus”, Acts 17:7). (c) Desecrating the temple, (“who also hath gone about the profane the temple”, Acts 24:6).
He appeals to Caesar and is taken to Rome by sea, as recorded in Acts 27,28.
AD 61 Arrives at Rome.
AD 62 Writes Philemon, Colossians, Ephesians and Philippians from prison.
AD 63 Is acquitted of all charges and goes to Macedonia and Asia Minor.
AD 64 Possibly goes to Spain, something he wanted to do before, Romans 15:24. (?).
AD 66 Returns to Macedonia and writes 1 Timothy. Goes to Ephesus and writes the epistle to Titus. Winters at Nicopolis. Arrested here, (probably in connection with the fire of Rome).
AD 68 In prison awaiting trial. Writes 2 Timothy. Paul asked Timothy to come to him, 2 Timothy 4:9, and he was probably able to, and was imprisoned also.
Paul was convicted and executed in either May or June. Nero died in mid-June. Timothy was released from prison, Hebrews 13:23.

Reason for the epistle
This is two-fold, firstly to be a charge to Timothy, giving him authority to act for the apostle in Ephesus, and then, instructions for the Ephesians. A charge is a personal word, giving authority to act, and encouragement to act. As a result of the personal charges to him, Timothy is helped to be “an example of the believers”, 4:12. He was also to function as a teacher, passing on the instructions given to him by Paul. “If thou put the brethren in remembrance of these things, thou shalt be a good minister of Jesus Christ”, 4:6.

Structure of the epistle
The charge to Timothy and the instructions for the assembly in Ephesus are interwoven in the epistle. There are seven passages where Timothy is the one addressed, and seven passages where the instruction for the Ephesians is set out. It is easy to see when Timothy is given a charge, because the apostle addresses him personally in some way.
The charges to the Ephesian believers come to them because they constitute the house of God, 3:15, and as such are to be conduct themselves in accordance with God’s will as the Father of the household. God’s household consists of those who are born of Him, and have His life, eternal life, in their souls. This is true of all believers in this age, but is to be expressed in a locality as believers meet together in assembly fellowship.

First charge to Timothy:
“As I besought thee…”
1:1-4 Correct the wayward.
He is to deal with false teaching in the assembly at Ephesus on behalf of the apostle.

First charge to the Ephesians:
1:5-17 Love out of a pure heart.
The Father’s love is to be reproduced in the family because the Father’s will is known. That will is made known by the gospel, not law.

Second charge to Timothy:
“This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy”.
1:18-20 War a good warfare.
Timothy had been entrusted with a task, and was to be diligent in executing it.

Second charge to the Ephesians:
2:1-15 Prayer.
The Father’s resources are drawn upon. God supports His house so that they can function in peace in a hostile world.

Third charge to the Ephesians:
3:1-13 Elders and deacons.
The Father’s administration is known.
The house is to be an ordered place, where those whom God has appointed may “take care of the house of God”, 3:5.

Third charge to Timothy:
“These things I write unto thee”.
3:14-16 Bow in worship.
Timothy must remember the greatness of Christ, and behave in the house with reverence.

Fourth charge to the Ephesians:
4:1-5 Warning about demon-doctrines.
The Father’s protection is enjoyed.
The house is to be secure from the attacks of the enemy.

Fourth charge to Timothy:
“Let no man despise thy youth”.
4:6-16 Be a good workman.
Timothy needs spiritual food and spiritual exercise to maintain spiritual fitness for the task given to him.

Fifth charge to the Ephesians:
5:1-20 Provision for widows and elders.
The Father’s care is experienced.
There should be respect for older believers in the house of God.

Fifth charge to Timothy:
“I charge thee before God”. (“thee” is singular).
5:21-25 Act in wisdom.
Timothy needs to cultivate personal piety.

Sixth charge to the Ephesians:
6:1-10 Love of money.
The Father’s children are content.
Godliness with contentment is great gain.

Sixth charge to Timothy:
“But thou, O man of God”.
6:11-16 Bear a good witness.
The example of Christ before Pilate is set before him. Perhaps Timothy will soon face Nero.

Seventh charge to the Ephesians:
6:17-19 Ready to distribute.
The Father’s goodness is expressed.
We are granted resources so that we can give them away. “It is more blessed to give than to receive”, Acts 20:35.

Seventh charge to Timothy:
“O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust”.
6:20-21 As to the truth, be watchful.
Timothy is to keep watch, so that his ministry is not spoiled.

Recipient of the epistle
It is interesting to notice the parallels between the relationship of Moses to Joshua, and Paul to Timothy.

1. Joshua and Timothy both come on the scene unannounced. They have been maturing in private.
2. Both are engaged in warfare, Joshua with Amalek, Exodus 17:8-16; Timothy to war good warfare, 1 Timothy 1:18.
3. Both are associated with a man receiving Divine revelation. Joshua with Moses on Mount Sinai, Exodus 24:13; Timothy with the apostle who received revelations from God, Ephesians 3:3, and who passed them on to Timothy- “the things thou hast heard of me”, 2 Timothy 2:2.
4. Both saw the rebellion of the people of God. Joshua at the foot of Sinai, when Israel made a golden calf, Exodus 32:15-18; Timothy at Ephesus, where “grievous wolves would enter in”, and men would arise “speaking perverse things”, Acts 20:29,30.
5. Both learned the truth of separation. Joshua went outside the camp, distancing himself from the idolatry at the foot of Sinai, Exodus 33:7-11; Timothy was instructed to “depart from iniquity”, 2 Timothy 2:22.
6. Both were content to abide where God’s honour dwelt. Joshua “departed not out of the tabernacle”, Exodus 33:11; Timothy was to “abide still at Ephesus”, 1:3.
7. Both saw some of those who professed to know God depart. Joshua saw the two and a half tribes refuse the land, Numbers 32:1-5, 28; Timothy saw all Asia turn from Paul, 2 Timothy 1:15.
8. Both were given a charge as the older man was about to die, Deuteronomy 31:14, 23; Timothy in 1 Timothy 1:1:5,18.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST PEISTLE TO TIMOTHY CHAPTER 1, VERSES 1 TO 4:
1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope;
1:2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.
1:3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,
1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.

1:1-4 First charge to Timothy: Correct the wayward.
“That thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine”.
He is to deal with false teaching in the assembly at Ephesus on behalf of the apostle.

1:1 Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the commandment of God our Saviour, and Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope;

Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ- it is important for the apostle to stress his authority, for he is about to instruct Timothy, who will himself instruct the believers at Ephesus. The word of instruction is from one who has been sent out by Jesus Christ to further the cause of the truth. The word to Paul was, “The God of our fathers hath chosen thee, that thou shouldest know His will, and see that Just One, and shouldest hear the voice of His mouth. For thou shalt be his witness unto all men of what thou hast seen and heard”, Acts 22:14,15.
By the commandment of God our Saviour- it is appropriate that an epistle that contains charges to both Timothy and the assembly at Ephesus, should remind us at the outset that God is the Supreme Commander. The apostle is himself under orders, and so is Timothy. And so are the Ephesian believers, and so is every child of God.
He is the Saviour-God, so we can count on His help in difficult circumstances, for He has the answer. His saviour-hood is expressed in His commandments, which are all for our spiritual benefit.
And Lord Jesus Christ, which is our hope- He is God and Saviour, too, but the emphasis here is on the hope that is vested in Him. Timothy need not despair if conditions are adverse and disappointing. Hope in the New Testament is confident expectation. Christian hope is not a mere possibility, or even a probability, but a certainty, for the hope is represented by, and is secured by, Christ.

1:2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.

1:2 Unto Timothy, mine own son in the faith– this need not necessarily mean he was converted through Paul. There is a Jewish saying, “If one teaches the son of his neighbour the law, the scripture reckons this the same as if he had begotten him”. No doubt the scripture referred to is the reference to the sons of the prophets, those schooled in the law by prophets, see 2 Kings 2:3,5. Timothy had learnt the Holy Scriptures from his mother and grandmother, who were Jewesses, 2 Timothy 1:5; 3:15, but then he learnt at the feet of the apostle. Yet Paul very graciously linked his work of teaching Timothy with that of his mother and grandmother in the verses just referenced. His father was a Greek, and had not circumcised Timothy, Acts 16:1-3, perhaps indicating that he was not sympathetic to Christian things. In the goodness of God Timothy was provided with a spiritual father. It is significant that Paul should describe Timothy in this way in this epistle, for he is going to set out the way the Father orders His house, the assembly, and Paul is simply expressing that in a practical way, treating Timothy how God His Father treats him. The apostle lamented that the Corinthian assembly had many teachers, but not many fathers, those who could foster the growth of those young in the faith, 1 Corinthians 4:15. It is in this way that “little children” in the family of God are helped to become “young men”, and then themselves “fathers”, 1 John 2:13.
Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord- not only is Paul’s apostleship from both the Father and the Son, but the favours he desires for Timothy will come from them jointly. This is an indication of the equality of the Father and the Son. How can Divine favour come from one who is not Divine?
Grace is favour to those who do not deserve it and cannot fully repay it.
Mercy is pity for those who are in need.
Peace is the result of the former things, when the recipient of grace and mercy responds to these gifts in the right way, and his heart is calmly confident in God.
These favours come from God who is the Father, and governs and cares for His house, and from Jesus Christ our Lord, the one who is entrusted with overall responsibility in the house of God as His Son, see Hebrews 3:6.

1:3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,

As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus- it says much for the spirituality of Timothy that Paul can leave him at Ephesus, confident that he would act as he himself would. Can we be relied on to act according to the same principles as the apostles? The early believers “continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship”, which means that their fellowship together was solely on the basis of the doctrine of the apostles.
When I went into Macedonia- this shows that the apostle was released from prison, and was able to travel about unhindered. He had written to the Philippians, (Philippi is in Macedonia), that he hoped to come and see them shortly, once he had seen “how it will go with me”, no doubt a reference to the outcome of his trial, Philippians 2:24. It seems from the verse we are considering that he did indeed go to Macedonia, which would include going to Philippi.
That thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine- wrong doctrine is not to be tolerated in the assembly. It must be made clear what the Father’s will is. He alone decides the conduct of the house. All who deviate must be dealt with. “Other doctrine” is that which is astray from right doctrine, and supposes that there is a standard, by which to judge. And indeed there is, even the doctrine of the apostles, written down and therefore settled and knowable. In Old Testament times, there was “the shekel of the sanctuary”, Exodus 30:24, which was God’s standard, by which every other weight was to be tested. So God has His standard for truth, and it is found in His word.
The apostle had warned the Ephesian elders of the danger of false doctrine creeping in amongst them, Acts 20:29,30, but he also indicated the antidote, for he said to them, “I commend you to God, and to the word of His grace”, verse 32.

1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.

Around the time of the birth of Christ, men were dissatisfied with mainstream religions, so there arose a system of thought that was basically pantheism. It’s devotees claimed higher knowledge than others, so they were called “gnostics”, those who know. They spurned written revelation, and relied on mystical means of communication with “god”. Their counterpart is the New Age Movement, an umbrella system taking in many sorts of ideas, but all of which are anti-Christian.
The problem of Gnosticism was addressed by the apostle in the Epistle to the Colossians, which emphasises the supremacy of Christ, and shows that in Him, and not in any lesser gods of the gnostics, dwells all the fulness of the Godhead. Completeness is found in Him, not in gnostic speculations.

Neither give heed to fables- having condemned deviations from apostolic doctrine, Paul now condemns false religions. Asia Minor was a hot-bed of heresies, as is the world today. Beware of New Age teachings, for they are the same as ancient gnosticism, the product of a revolt against God’s revealed will.
Fables are statements made without good authority, in contrast to scriptures. Christianity is revelatory, and fixed in writing.
And endless genealogies- the gnostics taught that there were intermediaries between man and God, each one nearer to God than the other. They taught this because to them God could not have dealings with anything material, (which is why they denied that the true God was the God of the Bible), and therefore if we humans, who are material, were to have dealings with Him, it must be through an endless succession of semi-gods, each one a little nearer to God than the previous one. Clearly they had no sense of nearness to God. The Ephesians needed to keep well away from such doctrines. We are told in Acts that some in Ephesus had been involved with the occult, showing that they had a tendency towards such evil and devilish things. See Acts 19:19,20.
Which minister questions- they have no real answers, but just raise doubts. This was Satan’s tactic in Eden, saying, “Hath God said”. Eve should have responded, “Yea, God has said”, but she did not, and left off obeying God, and went against His revealed will.
Rather than godly edifying which is in faith- the remedy for the inroads of evil doctrine is the careful and godly presentation of the truth of God’s word, which edifies the believers, and settles them in the truth of God, so that they refuse evil teachings. In the days of Elisha, the food for the sons of the prophets had been contaminated with wild gourds. They exclaimed, “O thou man of God, there is death in the pot”, 2 Kings 4:40. The remedy given by the prophet was to “bring meal”, and the food was no longer poisonous. The message is clear; the people of God need the pure meal of the word of God, so that the harmful poison of evil doctrine may be neutralised. Failure to hear the word of God preached, and to read it personally, is to be in danger.
So do- these words have been supplied to make the sense more readily perceived. The sentence began in verse 3 with the reminder of Paul’s wish that Timothy remain in Ephesus, and it is implied that he wishes him so to do. Really, Paul has only to remind Timothy of his wish that he stay at Ephesus, and he would be happy to comply. He did not need to be told again. In that sense the “so do” is redundant, because Timothy does not need a further command. He is a genuine son, and will respond to the wish of his father in the faith.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST PEISTLE TO TIMOTHY CHAPTER 1, VERSES 5 TO 17:

1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
1:6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
1:7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
1:8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;
1:9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,
1:10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
1:11 According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.
1:12 And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that He counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry;
1:13 Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.
1:14 And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.
1:15 This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.
1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on Him to life everlasting.
1:17 Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

First charge to the Ephesians:
1:5-17 Love out of a pure heart.
The Father’s love is to be reproduced in the family because the Father’s will is known. That will is made known by the gospel, not law.

1:5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:

1:5 Now the end of the commandment- the result of Timothy complying with the apostle’s wish, and warning the Ephesian believers about evil teaching, is now detailed. This is not a reference to a commandment in the law of Moses, or even a reference to the law itself.
Is charity out of a pure heart- the Father’s love is to be shown to the other members of the house. It is to be love which is genuine, and free of false motives. The apostle John connected love to God, love to the children of God, and obedience to His commandments with the following words, “”Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and everyone that loveth Him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of Him. By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep His commandments.”, 1 John 5:1,2. So here, to be side-tracked by that which is contrary to God is to be hindered as to love to God and fellow-believers. Love which is tainted with false doctrine is not pure love.
And of a good conscience- conscience is the faculty which enables us to assess spiritual things rightly. It is not infallible, so needs to be adjusted by the Scriptures. Hence those who take in false doctrine are not adjusting their conscience correctly.
And of faith unfeigned- the apostle warns against pretend-faith. The false teachers would have this sort of faith, because they did not believe the truth of God, yet pretended to do so that they might deceive the unwary.

1:6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;

From which some having swerved- the word “which” is plural, and would refer to the three desirable things listed in verse 5. Not wishing to cultivate these pure, good and genuine things, these have turned aside, or missed the mark. The target is set out in the previous verse, (“the end of the charge”), and these are missing it. The natural man is inclined towards error, and so is the carnal believer. Paul was resolved to “press toward the mark”, Philippians 3:14, single-mindedly fixing his eye on Christ.
Have turned aside unto vain jangling- not content with missing the true mark, these compound their error by going after false teaching of another sort. The false teachers spoke impressively, but in God’s view they were mere talkers, whose words were useless for the purpose of producing Christian graces, being no more than pointless and unstructured noise.

1:7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

Desiring to be teachers of the law- it seems that when it became evident that fables did not produce spirituality, these men suggested the remedy of law-keeping, to see if that produced holiness. After all, the law was given by God, and the apostle himself described it as holy, Romans 7:12; should obeying it not yield results for God?
Understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm- the false teachers only desired to be teachers of the law, they had no competence in the matter, as the apostle now states. They did not understand what they were saying, for they had not a right appreciation of the meaning of the letter of the law. They did not understand whereof they affirmed, for they did not see the implication of the application of the law to Christians. They were wrong both as to the content of the law and its character, yet they still affirmed their doctrine, as if they were confident of its validity. There are still those who feel that holiness can only be produced in the believer when he keeps the law of Moses. Yet this is directly contrary to the teaching of Scripture, as the apostle now goes on to show.

The word “law” is used in at least four senses in the New Testament, and the context must decide which is meant.
1. We read of “the law of the Spirit of life”, Romans 7:2, where the word law means principle of acting. When Newton discovered various laws of physics, he entitled his treatise on the subject, “Principii”, meaning “Principles. So the Spirit of God acts according to fixed principles in His dealings with believers, hence this is known as the law of the Spirit.
2. There is the word law as it is used of the Law of God given at Sinai through Moses, and therefore sometimes called the law of Moses.
3. There is law in the sense of one of the ten commandments. For instance when Paul writes, “the law came, sin revived, and I died”, Romans 7:9, he is referring to the specific commandment which said “Thou shalt not covet”.
4. There is law as in the expression, “the law and the prophets”. This means the five books of Moses, otherwise known as the Pentateuch.

A covenant is an arrangement between two persons or groups. The covenant of the law which God made with Israel at Sinai was conditional; that is, the benefits of being in covenant relationship with God depended upon them keeping His law. This is why the New Testament is so insistent that believers are not under law, for if they were, their blessings would not be secure, being dependant on their own efforts. Christians are under grace, and their blessings are certain, because they depend on Christ and not on themselves. See Romans 6:14,15; Galatians 3:1-14; 5:1-5; Ephesians 1:3.

The New Testament says the following things about the Law given at Sinai:
1. It is holy, Romans 7:12.
2. It is spiritual, Romans 7:14.
3. It is weak through the flesh, Romans 8:3.
4. It works wrath, Romans 4:15.
5. It entered so that the offence might abound, Romans 5:20.
6. It cannot justify the sinner, Galatians 2:16.
7. It is the ministration of death, 2 Corinthians 3:7.
8. It is ended as a way of becoming righteous, by the death of Christ, Romans 10:4.
9. It is not the means of empowering a believer to please God. Paul found that the law that God had ordained unto life, became death to him. Instead of being the rule of a life pleasing to God, it simply slew the failing saint, because he could not live up to its demands by himself.

We now learn three reasons why it is not the mind of God that we should turn to the law for help:
(a) Verses 8-11
The law is not laid down for believers.
(b) Verses 12-14
The law did not prevent Saul of Tarsus persecuting the church.
(c) Verses 15-17
The law did not achieve his conversion.

1:8 But we know that the law is good, if a man use it lawfully;

But we know that the law is good- this is necessarily the case, because it came from God, and set out His standard. The “we” in the first instance refers to Paul and Timothy, and then all well-taught believers.
If a man use it lawfully- there is a play on words here, “the lawful use of law”. The next verse will show what the lawful use of the law is, and it is not to use it to govern the Christian. That is an unlawful use. It is nonetheless one that is popular in some sections of Christendom. Earnest in their desire to please God, they set out to keep the law. The Epistle to the Galatians was written to correct this.

1:9 Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,

Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man- those who use the law lawfully know that it was not put on the statute book in Israel to guide righteous men. Rather, it exposed unrighteousness, and cast men upon God for His mercy. That mercy was expressed to them by the provision of a system of sacrifices, by which their sins could be forgiven. So this shows that to impose the law upon Christians is directly opposed to God’s intention for the law, for Christians are reckoned righteous by God, so the law is not designed for them at all. Of course, the believer will wish to see that “the righteousness of the law ” is fulfilled in his life, Romans 8:4, but that will only be achieved by walling after the Spirit, as He directs us to live like Christ. The law of Moses is not the rule of the believer’s life. Because he has the Spirit of God within, the believer is able to please God as he imitates the life of Christ. This is called fulfilling the law of Christ, Galatians 6:2. As he does this, the believer incidentally fulfils the righteous requirement of the law. But it is done by walking after the Spirit, not after the flesh.
First of all the apostle gives a six-fold description of the law breaker, consisting of two pairs of adjectives. This gives the general character of those who transgress the law. Then there follows a list of certain kinds of people, who break the law in specific ways.
But for the lawless and disobedient- the first word of these three pairs has to do with the nature of the person, and the second word has to do with the outcome of that nature. So the law is laid down for lawless people, not the law-abiding ones. Since no-one is able to keep the law, it can only condemn. The ideal response in that situation was for the Israelite to cast himself upon the mercy of God, and avail himself of the provision of a sin-offering whereby his sin could be forgiven.
As a result of being lawless in nature, man works out that nature by acting in disobedience to that law. As the writer to the Hebrews said, “every transgression and disobedience received a just recompense of reward”, Hebrews 2:2.
For the ungodly and for sinners- ungodly people refuse to give God His due, and this being the case, they sin without any regard to the glory of God. “All have sinned, and come short of the glory of God”, Romans 3:23.
For unholy and profane- because men have an unholy nature, they have no ability to appreciate what is pleasing to God. Accordingly they act in a way that shows no regard for His holiness, and trample on Divine things.
For murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers- the apostle, having shown how sinners react to God, now makes his way down the ten commandments as they relate to behaviour towards others. The ten commandments could be divided into that which relates to love to God, and that which has to do with love for one’s neighbour. The Lord Jesus sanctioned that division in Luke 10:26-28. We are not told that there were five commandments on each of the two tables of the law. In fact, a measurement of the space taken up by the commandments in Hebrew will show that probably the first four were on the first table and the other six on the second. Certainly that is how Paul is looking at them here, for having spoken of man’s sinful attitude to God, he now turns to man’s attitude to his fellow-men.
He does not speak of murderers of fathers in connection with “Thou shalt not kill”, but in relation to “Honour thy father and mother”, the fifth commandment. Clearly, to slay one’s father and mother is an extreme form of failing to honour them.
For manslayers- this corresponds to the sixth commandment, “Thou shalt not kill”. Man was made in the image of God, and the reason why the death penalty was imposed on the one who takes a man’s life is that he has erased the image of God in a man. So capital punishment is not brought in at Sinai, but was God’s will from the time of Noah, since evil had been rampant before the flood, and God was not prepared to allow that to happen again. This shows that capital punishment was brought in as a deterrent, as well as a just punishment. We should distinguish between one who kills accidentally, and one who murders with premeditation.

1:10 For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;

For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind- these are they who transgress the seventh command, “Thou shalt not commit adultery”. A whoremonger is one who commits fornication, and is distinguished in the New Testament from one who commits adultery, as Hebrews 13:4 shows. A fornicator commits immoral acts, being unmarried. Adultery is committed by one who is married. Those who defile themselves with mankind are sodomites, otherwise known as homosexuals. God utterly abhors such perverted practices, for they represent an attack on the order He has set up as Creator. In the beginning He made them male and female, and a man leaves his father and mother and cleaves to his wife, not his “partner”. We know full well what God thinks of sodomy by his judgement of the Cities of the Plain, Genesis 19. It is only because of the nature of the age we live in that such are not removed from the scene.
There were converted sodomites in the assembly in Corinth, so it is not a question of being unable to live any other way because of one’s genetic makeup. The gospel does not alter genetic makeup, but it does alter sodomites when they repent and believe. Such are washed, showing they were unclean before; they are sanctified, showing they were unholy before; they are justified, showing they were unrighteous before, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11. Clearly, then, there is no such thing as a “homosexual Christian”, for a Christian is washed, sanctified and righteous, and a homosexual is not.
For menstealers- this is clearly an aggravated way of transgressing the command, “Thou shalt not steal”. One of the very worst kinds of stealing is the depriving of a man of his liberty. In a day soon to come, Babylon will trade in “slaves and souls of men”, Revelation 18:13.
For liars, for perjured persons- the ninth commandment said, “Thou shalt not bear false witness, and this is what liars do. Perjured persons go further, and bear false witness in a court of law, to the undermining of justice.
And if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine- the apostle does not make an application of the tenth command, “Thou shalt not covet”, but uses a phrase which encompasses any expression of lawlessness. Such things are contrary to sound doctrine, by which is meant, as the next verse shows, the gospel.
The people listed in verses 9 and 10 are all unbelievers, and it is for them, and to condemn their sins, that the law of Moses was laid down. It was not laid down for righteous persons, even in the Old Testament, let alone in the New. To apply the law to believers, therefore, is to misunderstand the reason for the formal giving of the law. It was always wrong to murder, and the giving of the law did not make it wrong; it condemned the one committing the wrong, and exposed him as not fit for God’s kingdom. This why the apostle said that the law-teachers at Ephesus did not understand what they were saying, for they had not grasped the fundamental principles of the law.

1:11 According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, which was committed to my trust.

According to the glorious gospel of the blessed God- this shows that the gospel is just as much against lawlessness as the law is, for the gospel condemns sin forthrightly. The law exposes the shame of man, and so does the gospel; the law shows somewhat of the glory of God, and so does the gospel, but in a far greater way, as 2 Corinthians 3:9 declares. “For if the ministration of condemnation be glory, much more doth the ministration of righteousness exceed in glory”. One reason why the gospel exceeds in glory is because it provides the remedy for the lawlessness of men, which the law did not, for it could only condemn; the gospel makes righteous.
God is the Blessed God, One who is filled with joy when He saves men through the gospel. The law was given in circumstances that inspired terror; and this was designed, for God was making men fear, so that they did not sin, Exodus 20:18-20. Now, believers hesitate to sin because of the way Christ has manifested God in His fulness, not just as a God of wrath.
The features about God that were displayed in Paul’s conversion justify his use of the word “glorious” in connection with it. He speaks of mercy, in verses 13 and 16; grace in verse 14; salvation and longsuffering in verse 16; these are features of the God of the gospel, but they were not brought out by the law.
Which was committed to my trust- the word “my” is emphatic, which denotes at least two things. First, that the apostle had much more authority to speak on the relationship between the law and the gospel than the law-teachers did, and second, as he goes on to say, he is the example of true conversion to God, and his conversion owed nothing to the law. His training in the law of Moses at the feet of none less than Gamaliel, did not result in his conversion.

1:12 And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord, who hath enabled me, for that He counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry;

And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord- this title emphasises the fact that Christ is exalted and supreme, at God’s right hand. The gospel does not detract from the glory of God and His Son, but rather, makes it known in a fuller way. It was as a result of seeing Christ in glory that Paul was saved. He was not saved by going to Sinai, either physically or figuratively.
Who hath enabled me- to be entrusted with the gospel is a solemn responsibility, and it needs spiritual power to discharge that responsibility. That power is from Christ. The verb has the idea of power that is capable of producing great effects, and this the gospel has. Paul was not empowered by observance of the law, for the law was “weak through the flesh”, Romans 8:4; it has no ability to overcome the failings of even the saintliest of men, but can only condemn them. Paul could write to the Philippians, “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me”, Philippians 4:13.
For that He counted me faithful- faithfulness is discernible almost immediately a person is saved, as we see from the case of Lydia, who said to Paul and his colleagues on the day she was saved, “If ye have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come into my house, and abide there”. The fact that they did so shows they were able to discern that her faith was genuine. So it was with Saul of Tarsus, for as soon as he had said, “Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do?”, he was told to go into the city and it would be told him. So it was evident immediately that his faith was genuine, from his desire to be obedient to the Lord, just as it was evident that Lydia was a true believer by her wish to give the apostle and his fellow-workers hospitality. The apostle John wrote, “We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us”, 1 John 4:6. So the apostles, who were of God in the sense they were authorised by Him, were the test. Lydia clearly passed that test, for she desired the presence of those who were “of God”. We should be concerned if new converts show no interest in being with the saints, or under the sound of God’s word.
Putting me into the ministry- he was at pains to explain to the Galatians that his apostleship was not of man directly, not by man indirectly, Galatians 1:1. Those who had been with the Lord Jesus when He was here had nothing to add to what the apostle already knew, Galatians 2:6. As he conferred with the other apostles, it became clear to Paul that he was not in any way behind them in his knowledge of the gospel. His apostleship was entirely from heaven, where the law of Moses is not relevant.
Needless to say, this putting into the ministry has nothing to do with the practice of making “the ministry” a career. The notion of clergy and laity is foreign to the word of God, and is a practice imitating the system under the law, where certain people were reckoned to be “ministers”, namely the Levites, to the exclusion of the rest. Those who perpetuate that way of doing things have clearly not realised that the old things have been rendered obsolete by the coming of Christ, of whom it is said, “He taketh away the first, that He might establish the second”, Hebrews 10:9.

1:13 Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.

Who was before a blasphemer- the word blasphemer has the idea of speaking injuriously, whether about God or man. The law had no remedy for a blasphemer against God, for it condemned him to death, Leviticus 24:15,16. Yet here is one who denied the Deity of Christ, and consented to the death of Stephen, the one who claimed to see Jesus in heaven at God’s right hand. To deny the Deity of Christ is to dishonour God, for they are equal. The Lord Jesus said, “He that honoureth not the Son, honoureth not the Father which hath sent Him”, John 5:23. And again, “I honour My Father, and ye do dishonour Me”, John 8:49. He honoured His Father by declaring Him to men, and in so doing, necessarily asserted His own Deity. Yet men dishonoured Him by refusing His claims.
And a persecutor- because believers maintained the truth of the Deity of Christ, they became the object of persecution on the part of the Jews. Paul himself testified, “and many of the saints did I shut up in prison, having received authority from the chief priests; and when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them. And I punished them oft in every synagogue, and compelled them to blaspheme; and being exceedingly mad against them, I persecuted them even unto strange cities”, Acts 26:10,11.
And injurious- this is derived from the noun “hubristes”, meaning a violent man. The word has been defined as, “one who, lifted up with pride, either heaps insulting language upon others, or does them some shameful act of wrong”. Saul of Tarsus did both, and he was quite open about it, as his statement quoted above shows. Only the grace of God can change such a man; the law will only condemn.
When Paul described the sins of men in Romans 3:10-18, he could very well have been writing his autobiography. He was a blasphemer, and it could be said of him that, “Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit,” “The poison of asps is under their lips;” “Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:”
He was a persecutor, and so it was true of him, “Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known:” “There is no fear of God before their eyes.” He was injurious, the result of sin, for “There is none righteous, no, not one: there is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable: There is none that doeth good, no, not one”.
But I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief- of course, when he was persecuting believers, Saul of Tarsus thought he was doing God service. The Lord Jesus foretold that this would happen, John 16:2. But he was acting in unbelief, sure that it was God’s will that he exterminate those who claimed that Jesus Christ was God. He showed no mercy to believers, not realising that he needed mercy, and that is what God showed him.
The fact that he did these things ignorantly shows that the law did not reveal his folly to him. In fact, he thought he was keeping the law, for Israel were commanded to stone blasphemers, and that is what he thought Christ was when He claimed equality with God. Saul ignored the fact that He supported His claim with miracles and doctrine. And the most conclusive support was that God raised Him from the dead, for He was “declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead”, Romans 1:4. That He was risen became clear to Saul of Tarsus when Jesus of Nazareth spoke to him from heaven.

1:14 And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant with faith and love which is in Christ Jesus.

And the grace of our Lord was exceeding abundant- so it was the grace of the Lord that saved him, not the law. And it was the grace of the one he was denying, the Lord.
The grace needed to be exceeding abundant in view of the exceeding abundant crimes he was guilty of. Yet there was enough grace to deal with all his sins. As there is to deal with all the sins of any other. As the apostle wrote, “Moreover the law entered, that the sin might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound: that as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord”, Romans 5:20,21.
With faith and love which is in Christ Jesus- this must refer to Paul’s response to the Lord’s abundant grace, or else there would be no need for the repetition of His name. It is a separate thought, and not a continuation of the idea of the grace of the Lord. Faith cannot be given, even by God, for it is the personal and willing response of a man’s heart, Romans 10:10. It is true, however, that God graciously allows men to believe, Philippians 1:29.
Having spoken of his unbelief in verse 13, we now read of his faith. He believed in the God of Israel before, but now he has realised that Jesus of Nazareth is equal with God, and therefore is deserving of faith.
He is also deserving of his love, too, for Paul now realises the debt he owes Him. That debt is measured by the truth of the next verse. So the grace of the Lord Jesus was accompanied by the faith and love of Paul; he mixed the word with faith, c.f. Hebrews 4:2.

1:15 This is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.

This is a faithful saying- there are five places where this expression is used. Here, the saying is about the purpose for Christ’s coming. The other references are in 1 Timothy 4:9; 2 Timothy 2:2; 2:11; Titus 3:8.
Probably the saying refers to commonly used expressions amongst the saints, which because they were based on Scriptural truth could be described as faithful, or dependable. Needless to say, just because an expression is current amongst believers does not make it reliable. Luke makes a distinction between the earnest and sincere attempts of some believers to write an account of the life of Christ, and his inspired account, Luke 1:1-4.
And worthy of all acceptation- it merits the whole-hearted acceptance by all men.
That Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners- the law demanded that we do something, but Christ has done the work. The apostle spoke of Christ coming down from heaven in contrast to men striving to reach heaven by their own works. He wrote, “For Moses describeth the righteousness which is of the law, That “the man which doeth those things shall live by them.” But the righteousness which is of faith speaketh on this wise, “Say not in thine heart, ‘Who shall ascend into heaven?”‘ (that is, to bring Christ down from above:) or, “‘Who shall descend into the deep?'” (that is, to bring up Christ again from the dead.)” But what saith it? “The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart:” that is, the word of faith which we preach; that if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and believe in thine heart that God hath raised Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved”, Romans 10:5-9. The law demanded that men strive for themselves, the gospel demands that they believe in the one who worked for them.
The expression “came into the world” includes the idea of His conception by the Holy Spirit and His birth of the virgin Mary. This is the way that God was manifest in flesh. He did not come into the world in the way angels visit men; rather, He took part of the same flesh and blood as we do, Hebrews 2:14, yet He did so in such a way as to preserve the integrity of His person, Luke 1:35. He did not merely visit men, but dwelt amongst them, John 1:14.
It is interesting that it is Christ Jesus who came. For Christ Jesus is a title reserved for Him when He had gone back to heaven. It is almost as if the success of His coming to save sinners is guaranteed by the nature of the one who came. He was fitted to save when He came, and nothing He did when here disqualified Him.
Notice that He came personally. John says, “For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ”, John 1:17. Moses simply handed over tables of stone, and saw to it that the commands were enforced. Jesus Christ came personally, and displayed the conduct that God was pleased with. He did not simply teach, but Luke writes of what Jesus began to do and teach”, Acts 1:1.
The law could only condemn sinners, but Christ came to save them. But His perfect life could not save, so just as “came into the world” implies incarnation, so “save sinners” implies His death on the cross, (accepting the consequences of a broken law by being hanged on a tree, Galatians 3:13). This is the only means whereby sinners could be saved; they could not be saved by law-keeping, for “by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified”, Galatians 2:16.
Of whom I am chief- the apostle needs to impress upon us his personal indebtedness to Christ, for he has begun the section with the emphatic “my” of verse 11. It is to a one-time blasphemer that the gospel is entrusted, and Paul highlights here the wickedness of his life, even as a zealous law-keeper, as he thought. Notice it is “I am chief”, not “I was chief”. No-one has displaced him as the chief of sinners. This gives hope to all others, for the worst of sinners has been saved.

We are given seven accounts of the conversion of Saul of Tarsus, and they are as follows:

1. The historical account by Luke in Acts 9:1-22. He writes as a Christian historian, setting out the true facts of the case under the inspiration of the Spirit of God.

2. Paul’s account before the gathered crowds in the temple, Acts 22:1-21. Here he emphasises that he was a true Jew, and did nothing against the God of Israel. He speaks in the Hebrew tongue, verse 2, showing reverence for Jewish ways. He was a Jew, verse 3, (the Roman captain thought he was an Egyptian, 21:38). He was born in Tarsus, it was true, “yet”, despite that, he was brought up in Jerusalem at the feet of Gamaliel, verse 3. Gamaliel was one of the most respected rabbis Israel ever had. He was “taught according to the perfect manner of the law of the fathers”, verse 3, so was not a member of some strange Jewish sect. He was zealous toward God, as his listeners were, verse 3. He persecuted Christians to the death, showing his zeal for what he believed to be right, and to defend the honour of God. He was trusted by the chief priests and elders, verse 5. But then he was converted, and having been blinded, God sent to him a man named Ananias, who was “a devout man according to the law”, and “having good report of all the Jews” living in Damascus, verse 12. He came to him with a message from “the God of our fathers”, verse 14. He prayed in the temple at Jerusalem, verse 17. All these facts were presented to his Jewish listeners, to show that Paul was not against them, but they still sought his death.

3. By Paul himself again before Agrippa, Acts 26:1-23. Because he preached that Jesus was alive, as his accusers said, 25:19, he emphasised that he was brought up a Pharisee, for these, in contrast to the Sadducees, believed in the resurrection of the dead. He stressed that he was waiting for the fulfilment of the hope that God made to the patriarchs, that they would live in the kingdom under the Messiah. This implied that they would rise from the dead. Yet it was for this hope’s sake that he was accused of the Jews, verse 7, such was their inconsistency. So it was that he preached nothing that the law and the prophets had not foretold, for they said that “Christ should suffer, and that He should be the first that should rise from the dead”, verse 23.

4. In Galatians 1:15,16, “But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother’s womb, and called me by His grace, to reveal His Son in me, that I might preach Him among the heathen…” Here the emphasis is on grace, for the epistle is a defence of the gospel in view of the men who were seeking to impose the law of Moses upon believers. Paul does not speak of God revealing His Son to him, but in him. The epistle shows that Israel were in infancy under the law, (see 4:1-5), whereas true sonship comes in through Christ as God’s Son, and by the Spirit of His Son. So it is the Son of God that is going to be revealed through the son-character of Paul.

5. In 1 Corinthians 9:1, where he writes, “Am I not an apostle? Am I not free? Have I not seen Jesus Christ our Lord? Are not ye my work in the Lord?” This is a reference to the fact that he had actually seen the Lord Jesus, and was thus qualified to be an apostle, and because of that was not behind those who had been with Christ on earth. He needs to assert this because there were some who cast doubt on the genuineness of Paul’s apostleship because he was not one of “the twelve”.

6. In Philippians 3:12 he expresses the desire to know the Lord better. “Not as though I had already attained, either were already perfect: but I follow after, if that I may apprehend that for which also I am apprehended of Christ Jesus”. Christ had laid hold on him on the Damascus Road, and now Paul longs to lay hold of Divine things more strongly.

7. This passage, where, as chief of sinners he obtained mercy and was shown grace. The law contributed nothing to his salvation.

1:16 Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on Him to life everlasting.

Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy- despite the fact he was chief of sinners, he was the object of mercy, not only for his sake, but for others too.
That in me first Jesus Christ might shew forth all longsuffering- the word translated “first” is the same as the word translated “chief” in the previous verse. So he is chief of sinners, as to the degree of his guilt, but also chief as to the example and encouragement he is to others subsequent to his conversion. He has been shown the full extent of the longsuffering of Christ. (“All longsuffering” is longsuffering of every kind, whether as a sinner or a saint). Christ bore with him patiently even though by persecuting the saints he was persecuting Him, Acts 9:4. If Christ can suffer long with Saul of Tarsus, He can suffer long with any sinner.
For a pattern to them which should hereafter believe on Him to life everlasting- the Greek word for “first” is “protos”, and the Greek word for “pattern” is “hupo-tupos”. Combining the two ideas, we may say that Paul is a proto-type believer. The principles at work in his conversion are the same for everyone. The circumstances may vary greatly, but the principles are exactly the same. Those principles are as follows:

1. That mere religion does not save.
2. That man is opposed to God.
3. That God is longsuffering.
4. That the worst of sinners can be saved.
5. That Jesus Christ must be recognised as Lord.
6. That the Lord Jesus is in heaven, the sure sign that God has been well-pleased with His life and His death.
7. That His death on Calvary was sacrificial, so that sins might be forgiven.
8. That the grace of God is available to all for salvation and preservation.
9. That eternal life is granted immediately to all those who believe.

These principles were all at work in the conversion of Saul of Tarsus, and they provide the pattern for all other subsequent conversions.

Not only is Paul a pattern for those who believe in this age, he speaks of hereafter, meaning in the age after the current church age. For those of the nation of Israel who will be converted to God after the church is gone, will acknowledge, like Paul did, that the right hand of God is a fitting place for the Messiah to be, and they will receive eternal life as they believe in Him in that character. Just as Paul looked heavenwards, and saw the one glorified whom his nation had pierced, so Israel will look heavenwards when Christ comes in glory, and will “look on Him whom they pierced”, John 19:37; Revelation 1:7.

1:17 Now unto the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Now unto the King eternal- Paul now expresses his deep sense of gratitude for the movements of Divine grace towards him. He traces them all to the sovereign workings of the King of eternity, to whom all things are known beforehand, and who is never taken by surprise, or thwarted in His designs. He does not limit himself to the kingship of God expressed in the future reign of Christ over the earth. Rather, he thinks of God’s eternal reign, and rejoices that nothing can frustrate it. Even his own rebellion and hardness of hard were not too difficult for God to deal with.
He has a sense of involvement in God’s eternal purpose. He realises that he, like all other believers of this age, was chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world, Ephesians 1:4; that works had been prepared in eternity for him to do, Ephesians 2:10; that as an apostle he was entrusted with truth that was according to eternal purpose, Ephesians 3:11. When he contemplates these things, and remembers the grace that was shown him so that he could be in the good of them, he is constrained to worship God.
Immortal- there are two similar words, one which means “not capable of dying”, and this one, which means “not capable of being corrupted”. This tells us that in the salvation of sinners God is not compromised. He does not have to change His character in order to bless men. As Paul wrote to the Romans, “that He might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus”, Romans 3:26. Far from diminishing in glory through having dealings with sinners, God is glorified, as is shown by Paul’s doxology here.
Invisible- this emphasises the fact that God is not like us at all. He is not constrained by physical limitations, nor can He be seen by the natural eye. But we should remember the words of the Lord Jesus to His disciples, “he that hath seen Me, hath seen the Father”, John 14:9. This is not a reference to physical sight, as if those who did not see Him when He was here cannot ever know God. The point is that He has manifested the character of God. Every attribute of God was fully displayed in His Son, for “in Him dwelleth all the fullness of the Godhead bodily”, Colossians 2:9. He it is, who, coming into manhood, expounded God in words and deeds. In Him “God was manifest in flesh”, 1 Timothy 3:16. It was this one, who had made God visible, that appeared to him on the Damascus Road. And it was in grace that He did so.
The only wise God- He is the only one who can be said to be wise intrinsically. Lucifer was “full of wisdom” in the day he was created, Ezekiel 28:12, yet he fell, and corrupted himself, so that his wisdom is now used for evil ends. He is constantly frustrated, however, by the only truly wise being, who is the fount of all wisdom.
In His wisdom God allowed men to discover that they had no way of saving themselves, and then, at just the right moment made His wisdom known further by the work of Christ at Calvary, 1 Corinthians 1:20-24. This wisdom is made known at the cross, and is shown when He saves and preserves His people.
Be honour and glory for ever and ever. Amen-  Paul ends his expression of worship with the desire that God might be honoured and glorified eternally. It is the glorious gospel that is going to secure that result. The law could not bring it in, but the grace of God in Christ can, and will. Far from being an inferior thing, the gospel is the most glorious message there ever could be.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE FIRST PEISTLE TO TIMOTHY CHAPTER 1, VERSES 18 TO 20:

1:18 This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare;
1:19 Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck:
1:20 Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.

Second charge to Timothy:
“This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy”.
1:18-20 War a good warfare.

1:18 This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare;

This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy- this second charge is to encourage Timothy, for he has difficult things to do, and he is alone in the doing of them, humanly speaking. He may be encouraged, however, by the confidence Paul has in him as his faithful spiritual son.
According to the prophecies which went before on thee- in verse 3 the charge related to a particular course of action, but now it is in the context of the beginning of Timothy’s ministry as a helper of the apostle. That ministry was in line with the unfolding of the mind of God by the prophets of the apostolic era. It was not that they foretold what Timothy would do, but rather that they forthtold what he should do. This reminder would be a great incentive to Timothy to labour on, for he had been the subject of the Spirit’s ministry through the prophets.
That thou by them mightest war a good warfare- the sense is that by means of the encouragement he derived from the prophecies spoken in connection with his ministry, Timothy was fortified to wage a good spiritual warfare. There was much opposition to face, and its origin was Satan himself, so Timothy needs to be strong and courageous. For every believer, there is hardship and danger, such as when soldiers go to battle.
It was said of the Levites that “they should go in to wait upon the service of the tabernacle of the congregation”, Numbers 8:23. This could be translated, “to war the warfare of the tabernacle of the congregation”. So just as the Levites were active in the literal building, so Timothy is to be active in the spiritual building, the house of God. The assembly at Ephesus had, sadly, become a battleground between truth and error, and Timothy must be valiant as he maintains the truth of God amongst them.

1:19 Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck:

Holding faith- the opposite of faith in this context is unbelief. Timothy is to keep a hold on his reliance on the Scriptures, (which are able to make him “wise unto salvation”, even as a believer, 2 Timothy 3:15), so that the doubts the enemy will seek to suggest to him may be quickly rejected. He must not become like some in the assembly, who were wavering as to Divine things.
And a good conscience- the conscience is that faculty which warns us when we are tending to evil, and straying from the good. The word for “good” used here emphasises that a good conscience is one that is beneficial and helpful to us. The Scriptures speak of a convicted conscience, John 8:9; a conscience void of offence, Acts 24:16; a weak conscience, 1 Corinthians 8:7; a pure conscience, 1 Timothy 3:9, and now a good conscience. The strong belief and a good conscience go together, for the conscience must be informed and adjusted by Scripture if it is to be of benefit to us. As soon as we stop adjusting it by the truth, it becomes defiled, and ineffective.
Which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck- the word “which” refers to the good conscience. They had thrown away the compass of conscience, and had wrecked their spiritual lives on the sunken rocks of infidelity.

1:20 Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.

Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander- the apostle names these two men so that Timothy, and those he is teaching, might have negative examples before them, a warning of the consequences of not keeping the conscience pure.
Whom I have delivered unto Satan- the severe action of excommunicating these men had been undertaken by the apostle, since they were a danger to whatever assembly they were in, and to the Christians generally. The Corinthians assembly needed to take action against one of its members, and they were commanded to do so by the apostle without waiting for him to come to them. “For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, to deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus”, 1 Corinthians 5:3-5. We see from this that the Christian assembly has the power, and the duty, to act in the name, and with the power, of the Lord Jesus Christ, in order to exclude from the company those who are, by their conduct, not suitable.
That they may learn not to blaspheme- once a person is put out of an assembly, they are in the only other place there is, namely, the world. And that is the sphere where Satan operates. Such must learn the hard way, (the word for learn here is “learn by being disciplined and punished”) that the conduct they have manifested is only suited to the world, it is not suited to the assembly. Hopefully, having learnt the error of their ways, they will repent, and thus become fit candidates for restoration to the assembly.
To blaspheme may mean either to speak evil of God, or of men. Whichever is the case with these men, they must be placed in the sphere where such conduct is the norm, and thereby learn that it not appropriate in the assembly of believers.

The eternal security of the true believer

Many believers have anxious thoughts at times as to whether they are truly Christians.  This can be as a result of listening to preachers who exhort their audience to examine themselves on this question.  It is indeed a good exercise to do this, but it needs to be done in accordance with Scripture.  If done otherwise, merely trusting to feelings or experiences, there is a danger that the soul will be cast down and depressed even further than it may have been before.  In this way as healthy spiritual exercise degenerates into obsession with self.
We will consider this matter in two parts.  First, the assurance that God gives in Scripture as to the eternal security of the true believer.  Then, second, the tests that may be applied to confirm that one is a believer.

Introduction
Many true believers are confident that they were “once saved”.  They doubt, however, whether they are “always saved”.  This situation can come about for several reasons.  Some honestly think it arrogant to be sure of heaven.  Others have misinterpreted and misapplied passages of Scripture which deal with those who only profess faith, and are not genuine.  Still others are conditioned to look to personal experiences for assurance.  When these experiences fail to come up to their expectations, then anxious fears arise.
The root cause of these anxieties is an over-occupation with self, instead of occupation with the Saviour; a failure to turn from looking within and around, to looking above and beyond.
If these lines can help anxious souls to a calm appreciation of the sufficiency of the person and work of Christ, to God’s glory, then they will have achieved their object.
The Scriptures would indicate to us that there are various sorts of faith, and we need to be aware of these differences, for they are of vital importance.

Incorrect faith
This is the sort of faith that they have who trust in themselves that they are righteous, as the Lord Jesus indicated in Luke 18:9.  Faith in works, “church” attendance, or the words of a minister of religion, whether over a cradle or over a coffin; these are the things that some sinners believe in.  Such people are not eternally secure.

Insincere faith
The sort of “faith” that is professed for the sake of advantage, perhaps to please parents, friends, or even the electorate in the case of politicians.  Such people are not saved.  It is with the heart that man believeth unto righteousness, Romans 10:10.  The heart, morally considered, is the centre of man’s being, from which everything else issues, Proverbs 4:23.

Impulsive faith
In the parable of the sower as recorded by Luke, the Lord explains that “they on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.” Luke 8:13. It is those who receive the word with gladness, but who wilt under the heat of trial and testing, who only have temporary faith.
We might think that to “receive the word with gladness” is a good thing.  If, however, it denotes that there has been no genuine repentance, and only a belief about Christ, rather than an earnest belief in Him, then such faith is only for a while, and is valueless.  It is true that on the Day of Pentecost “they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls.” Acts 2:41.  It is important to notice, however, before dismissing these people as temporary believers, that verse 37 records that they had already been pricked in their heart.  Clearly the sin of crucifying their Messiah had come home to them with force, and they had repented.

Incomplete faith
John 2:23-25 reads as follows: “Now when He was in Jerusalem at the Passover, in the feast day, many believed in His name, when they saw the miracles which He did. But Jesus did not commit Himself unto them, because He knew all men, and needed not that any should testify of man: for He knew what was in man.”  He who knew the hearts of men was aware that they believed on Him only as a miracle-worker.  It was Passover time, and the religious excitement of the people was at fever pitch.  At the first Passover time, God had done great works through Moses- was this Jesus of Nazareth another great man of God like him?  Because the people were in this frame of mind, He did not trust Himself to them. Their faith was an incomplete faith, and needed further light to become saving faith.  It was not enough to believe that Jesus was a holy man of God, that He was able to work miracles, perhaps by the power of prayer, and that He was an able teacher and a fine example.

Important faith
The Lord Jesus is too concerned about the welfare of the souls of men to leave them to think of Him only as one able to perform miracles.  He went on to explain, therefore, in His conversation with Nicodemus as recorded in John 3:1-21, that the faith that saves is faith in a crucified Saviour.  “And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up: that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.  For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life,” John 3:14-16.  It is as one lifted up upon a cross that we must believe on Him.  The reference to the serpent lifted up in the wilderness gives the clue to the meaning of this lifting up.  It was because of Israel’s sin and rebellion that God provided the remedy of the serpent lifted up, Numbers 21:4-9.  And it was because of the sin and rebellion of the whole world that the Lord Jesus needed to die upon the cross to deal with sins.  Faith in a crucified Saviour results in everlasting life for the one exercising it.  Such is the sure promise of the Saviour Himself.  Those who believe like this are eternally secure.

Faith and repentance
True faith, then, is neither partial nor temporary.  It involves the receiving of the Word of God without reserve, not seeking to escape from its convicting power.
When a sinner realises not only that his state is hopeless and dangerous, but also that Christ is able to give full salvation through His work upon the cross, and then commits himself to Him with true repentance for sin, real faith is in evidence.

It is to such persons that the Scriptural doctrine of the eternal security of the true believer can come with all its comforting assurance.  In considering this doctrine, we shall think of it in connection with the new birth, the will of God, the unity of the Godhead, the Spirit of God, the present position of Christ and His people, and then finally, the purpose of God.

Eternal security and the new birth
We have already alluded to the promise of eternal life to those who believe in the only begotten Son of God, whom God has given at Calvary. It is through the death of the Son of God upon the cross that eternal life is gained by those who look to Him in faith.

In His words recorded in John 17:2,3, the Lord Jesus contrasted men in the flesh, with all their frailty and mortality, with those who have eternal life. he said, “As Thou hast given Him power over all flesh, that He should give eternal life to as many as Thou hast given Him.  And this is life eternal, that they might know Thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom Thou hast sent”. Clearly, then, there is a marked difference between natural life and eternal life.  Natural life, which gives us the ability to know natural things by natural senses, is the result of being born into the family of Adam.  Eternal life, on the other hand, gives us the ability to know Divine things, and comes through being born of God.

John 1:12,13 makes it very clear that the will of man cannot effect the new birth; it is solely God’s doing.  We read of “them which believe on His name: which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.”  Neither Christian parentage, religious ceremony, self-will, or the will of others, are of any avail to bring it to pass.
On the other hand, verse 12 also makes clear that man has the responsibility to receive the Lord Jesus by faith, “But as many as received Him, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on His name.”  God is sovereign.  That means He reigns on His own, with none to dictate to Him.  In the exercise of His sovereignty He has decreed that only those who willingly believe in His Son shall be blessed with eternal life.

Those who are born of God, then, are amongst His children, and share His life.  One of the reasons the Lord Jesus came was to manifest this life in the world of men.  “The life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and show unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us,” 1 John 1:2.  He has this life because He is equal with the Father, whereas believers have this life because God has graciously granted it to them.
Just as those who are born naturally cannot be “unborn”, so those who are born of God are His children for ever.  Since their new birth is the result of the exercise of His sovereign will, and God never changes His mind, then their position in His family is secure, and secure for ever.  The life He gives is eternal life, and the word translated “eternal” is used in Romans 16:26 of “the everlasting God”, so it cannot mean anything less than enduring for ever.

Eternal security and the will of God
“I am the bread of life: he that cometh to Me shall never hunger: and he that believeth on Me shall never thirst,” John 6:35.  These words are part of Christ’s explanation of the miracle of the feeding of the five thousand.  Just as manna had come down for Israel in the wilderness, so Christ has come down to earth as the Bread of God to give life to the world.  When He came, however, they said “Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know?” John 6:42.  They saw Him, but did not realise who He was.  This was so like the response of the people of Israel when the manna was given, for they said, “What is it”, for they did not know what it was, Exodus 16:15.

The total inability of the natural man to appreciate the person of Christ, and to realise that He is worthy of trust, does not frustrate God’s purpose.  The Father will ensure that there are those who come to Christ, as they are drawn to Him by the teaching of the Scriptures.  Those who hear, and learn from the Father through His Word, are sure to come.  His words were, “All that the Father giveth Me shall come to Me;” John 6:37, and, “Every man therefore that hath heard, and hath learned of the Father, cometh unto Me.” John 6:45.

The Saviour makes a firm promise to those who come to Him.  John 6:37 reads, “him that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out.”  The Lord looks upon those who come to Him in genuine faith as a gift from His Father.  Is it conceivable that He would refuse such a gift?

The Son of God came down from heaven expressly to do the Father’s will.  His words were, “For I came down from heaven, not to do Mine own will, but the will of Him that sent Me.  And this is the Father’s will which hath sent Me, that of all which He hath given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day,” John 6:38,39.  That will, then, involves keeping those who have been entrusted to Him.  This keeping extends to the resurrection of the bodies of His people.  If Christ was concerned about fragments of loaves, and instructed His disciples to gather them up “that nothing be lost”, verse 12, then how much more will He be concerned about the bodies of His people.  They, too, shall be gathered up again, for He is determined to lose nothing of that gift His Father has given Him.

Eternal security and the unity of God
John 10 contains the teaching of the Lord Jesus regarding His relationship to His people under the figure of a shepherd and his flock.  In verse 11 the Lord makes one of the “I am” statements in John’s gospel- “I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth His life for the sheep.”  He adds nothing, in this instance, to His plain statement.  Elsewhere in John where we find other “I am” statements, there is a certain responsibility placed upon others, such as to believe, to come, or to follow.  Here, the total responsibility rests upon the Saviour Himself, and since He is the good shepherd, we may rely absolutely upon what He does.
The foundation of blessing and security for the flock is the giving up of the life of the shepherd as His own willing act, in obedience to the will of His Father  This in itself should be enough to reassure His people of His devoted care for them.  He goes further, however, and rests their security upon another basis, that of His Deity.  He has spoken of those who are enemies of the flock, and now shows that He and His Father are united in their care and protection of that flock.
The flock of God has many enemies.  First, in John 10:5, there is the stranger, “and a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.”  He represents those who bring “strange doctrines” Hebrews 13:9.  Even little children in the family of God recognise those who teach error that dishonours their Saviour, and which will seduce them, I John 2:18-27.  Then there are thieves and robbers, verses 8,10, who come not “but for to steal and to kill, and to destroy.”  These picture those who “spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ”, Colossians 2:8.  A further enemy is the hireling, verse 12, whose only interest in the sheep is personal gain, or as Peter graphically puts it, “filthy lucre”, I Peter 5:2.  Finally there is the wolf, verse 12 again, which comes to catch and scatter the sheep.  The apostle Paul warned of men who, like “grievous wolves”, will stop at nothing to disrupt and spoil the flock of God, Acts 20:29.  The Good Shepherd is more than a match for all these enemies.  His voice is so attractive to His sheep that they wish to follow no stranger.
He gives life, and that abundantly, in contrast to the stealing, killing and destroying of the robbers.  He gives His life for the sheep, and this shows Him to be no hireling, who would do the opposite, and give the sheep for his life.  And He gives His word that the wolf will never succeed in snatching His sheep from His hand.  His statement is clear, “I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of My hand,” verse 28.

The confidence of believers in Israel was expressed by the psalmist in the words “And we are the people of His pasture, and the sheep of His hand.” Psalm 95:7.  The reason they give for their confidence is significant, “For He is our God.”  This, too, is the confidence of the Christian, for the shepherd heart of the God of Israel has been manifested to perfection by His Son, who is equal with God.

Having explained in John 10:28 that none can pluck the sheep out of His hand, (echoing the mention of “hand” in Psalm 95:7), the Good Shepherd then reinforces the truth with His statement, “My Father, which gave them Me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of My Father’s hand.  I and My Father are one,” John 10:29,30.  The Father is greater than the enemies of the flock as well, so the sheep are doubly, divinely, secure.

The Jews understood perfectly well the implications of the statement, “I and My Father are one”, for we read they immediately took up stones to stone Him, saying, “for a good work we stone Thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that Thou, being a man, makest Thyself God”.  It is nothing less than a claim to Deity, and coming as it does in the context of the safety of the sheep, is the strongest possible assurance of their complete security  If it is possible to sever the persons of the Godhead from one another, then it is possible to sever Christ’s sheep from Him and His Father.  To sever the persons of the Godhead, however, demands a power superior to Divine power, which does not and cannot exist. The Godhead is safe, and just as safe are the sheep.

Eternal security and the Holy Spirit
Just as it is true that the unity between the Father and the Son is a guarantee of the safety of the believer, so the other person of the Godhead, the Holy Spirit, is involved in this too.

One of the distinctive features of this present age is the fact that every believer is indwelt by the Holy Spirit.  This was not the situation before the Lord Jesus was glorified, as John 7:39 makes clear, “But this spake He of the Spirit, which they that believe on Him should receive: for the Holy Spirit was not yet given; because that Jesus was not yet glorified.”  Of course it is true that men of Old Testament times had been empowered by the Holy Spirit for specific tasks, but now that Christ is glorified in heaven, He is given in a new way.

Especially relevant to our present consideration is the statement of the Lord to His own, “And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you for ever,” John 14:16.  Note it is not “shall abide”, but “that He may abide”.  So it is not only that the Spirit would abide in the future in a new way, although that is true, but also that the very purpose for which the Spirit is given is to abide for ever.  In contrast to Christ, who was leaving them to go back to heaven, the Spirit would stay in them for ever.

Every true believer has the Spirit of God within.  Romans 8:9 is very clear on this point, “Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of His.”  His abiding presence is not in virtue of anything the believer has done, but solely because of God’s grace.  The question of the apostle in Galatians 3:2, “Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?” can receive only one answer, namely, “by the hearing of faith.”  The presence of the Spirit of God within the believer is therefore due to the grace of God entirely; He is neither earned nor merited.

When preparing His own for His departure to heaven, the Lord spoke of the Spirit as dwelling with them already, John 14:17.  This was true because the Lord, full of the Spirit Himself, was personally with them, and in that sense the Spirit was alongside of them.  His promise for the future, however, was that His personal presence would be made good to them by the Spirit of God indwelling them.
One aspect of this indwelling which is particularly relevant to the subject of eternal security, is presented to us in Ephesians 4:30.  There the apostle speaks of being sealed by the Holy Spirit of God  Just as a document is sealed for security, so God has sealed His people by giving them His Spirit.  This sealing is “unto the day of redemption.”  One day the bodies of the saints shall be redeemed from all traces of contact with this old creation.  The sealing, however, is not simply “until” that day, but “unto” it.  When the sealing is done, (and Ephesians 1:13,14. makes clear that this is when faith is exercised), the redemption is already in view as far as God is concerned.  The sealing bridges the interval between initial faith and final redemption.  Once the sealing is done, the redemption is certain.  As far as God is concerned the deed is done, and this should settle the matter for the believing heart.

Eternal security and association with Christ
The second chapter of the Epistle to the Ephesians opens with sinners dead in trespasses and sins, walking according to this world, dominated by Satan himself, walking in lust and self-will, and facing the prospect of God’s wrath. The words of scripture are:
“And you hath He quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins; Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others,” Ephesians 2:1-3.

This is not security, but vulnerability!  But then we are taught that in the purpose of God the position He has given to Christ is shared by all who are united to Him in faith.  It does not matter whether they were Jews or Gentiles before, those who know God’s rich salvation are together in a place of safety in Christ.  The apostle writes:
“But God, who is rich in mercy, for His great love wherewith He loved us, Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;) And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus: That in the ages to come He might shew the exceeding riches of His grace in His kindness toward us through Christ Jesus. For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.
For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them,” Ephesians 2:4-10.

Introduce God and His mercy into a situation, and everything changes. His mighty salvation is detailed for us, and the apostle takes us stage by stage through the process.  Were sinners dead?  So once was Christ, for He died for our sins, but God quickened Him, and quickened believers together with Him.  That which was true on the resurrection morning, as far as God was concerned, comes into effect for the believer as soon as initial belief takes place.  Were sinners in the world?  So once was Christ, as He lay lifeless in the tomb.  But He has been raised from the grave and given heavenly glory, and believers are associated with Him in this too.  Were sinners walking according to the prince of the power of the air?  Christ has defeated that foe, and been exalted above all principality and power, Ephesians 1:21.  Linked with Him in His exaltation, His people are safe from the Evil One’s grasp.  Finally, the ultimate triumph, for instead of being associated with this present world-system, believers are now involved in God’s plan, even to the extent of being seated in heavenly places in Christ.  His place is their place.  He occupies it by merit, they by Divine grace.  Formerly they could only expect God’s wrath in the future, but now in the ages to come they shall be the showpiece of God’s grace and kindness.

With these glorious truths on the page of Holy Scripture, what believer will doubt his security?  The believer is as secure as Christ is, for there is a vital and Divinely-made link between them both.

Eternal security and the purpose of God
In his heart the apostle Paul was persuaded of the truth of the believers security, and was filled with confidence as he penned the closing verses of Romans chapter 8.  Wherein lay his confidence?  In the purpose of God.  Note his words, “For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren.  Moreover whom He did predestinate, them He also called: and whom He called, them He also justified: and whom He justified, them He also glorified.  What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against us?  He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?  Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth.  Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.  Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? shall tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?  As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter.  Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us.  For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord”, Romans 8:28-39. 
As far as God’s purpose is concerned, those whom He has called by the gospel, and justified by the blood of Christ, are already glorified.  So certain is the believer’s future glory, that God speaks of it not even as a present thing, but a past thing.  And that glory involves being conformed to the image of His Son.

Again, what gave the apostle confidence was the fact that God had given His Son at Calvary, not sparing Him any of the sufferings which dealing with sins entailed.  This is the sure pledge, writes the apostle, that God will freely give all things, and this includes the glory of heaven.  It is elementary mathematics that the whole is greater than the part.  If nothing could stop God giving the greatest gift, under the worst circumstances, then there is nothing that will stop Him giving lesser things.  And amongst these is a place in heaven for His people.

The apostle confidently challenges any to successfully bring an accusation against God’s elect people.  The only one who has a right to do this is God Himself, but far from accusing His people He has justified them.
The only one who has the right to sit in judgement and condemn God’s people, is the very one who died for the sins that merit judgement; who rose again to prove those sins were dealt with; who is in the place of supreme authority at God’s right hand; and who constantly intercedes for them before His Father, to safeguard them from the accusations of the Devil.

The conclusion of the matter
We have reviewed some of the passages of Scripture which tell of the total and eternal security of true believers.  Born again by the will of God, the God who does not change His mind, their position in the family is settled.  Drawn to Christ by the teaching of the Scriptures, they have found a ready welcome, and the assurance that they will never be rejected.  Part of Christ’s flock, and therefore protected by the persons of the Godhead in united defence against every wily foe.  Indwelt by God’s Spirit, and that for ever, sealed as His until the day of final redemption.  Linked to Christ in His unassailable and glorious position at God’s right hand.  Involved in God’s purpose which can never be frustrated, and defended from every attempt of the Adversary to accuse.  Well then might all God’s people join with the apostle as he rejoices in the triumphs of God’s grace, “For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Romans 8:38,39.

CHRIST AND THE CHURCH PART 2

PART 2:  HEAD OF ALL THINGS

In Ephesians 1:15-23 the apostle tells us what he prayed for in relation to the Ephesian believers:

1.    That they might know the ministry of the Spirit of God in His capacity as the One who imparts wisdom and understanding.

  Paul is not praying that they might receive the Spirit of God, for he has just written that they were sealed with the Holy Spirit when they believed, verse 13, and that sealing is effective until the day of redemption, when the Lord comes, verse 14:

1:15  Wherefore I also, after I heard of your faith in the Lord Jesus, and love unto all the saints,
1:16  Cease not to give thanks for you, making mention of you in my prayers;
1:17  That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give unto you the Spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him:

2.    That they might know the way God had made them His inheritance:

1:18  The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of His calling, and what the riches of the glory of His inheritance in the saints,

3.    That they might appreciate the power that God put forward to raise Christ from the dead, and lift Him up to the place of highest honour in heaven:

1:19  And what is the exceeding greatness of His power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of His mighty power- not content with speaking of God’s power, or even the greatness of God’s power, he goes further, and speaks of “the exceeding greatness of His power”.  The apostle uses three different words for power in this expression to emphasise the immensity of the work that God performed when He raised and exalted Christ.  “Working” means energy, involving efficient operation.  “Power” means inherent power.  “Mighty” means superior force.  The phrase is literally “the energy of the strength of His might”, which is best understood by working backwards from the end.  The might of God, His superior force, derives its effectiveness from the fact that it is what He possesses because He is God.  It is not acquired power, but inherent, part of His very being.  When that superior, inherent power is put forth, it is put forth with energy, for God does nothing half-heartedly.
Referring to when God created all things Job said “But how little a portion is heard of Him”, Job 26:14.  But this may be rendered “what a whisper is heard of Him”.  He then asked the question, “The thunder of His power, who can understand?  The resurrection and ascension of Christ is the greatest display of power there ever will be, and represents the thunder of God’s power.  Whereas Job wondered whether anyone could understand it, Paul prays that the believers might indeed do so, once the eyes of their understanding were enlightened by the Spirit of God.

1:20  Which He wrought in Christ, when He raised him from the dead- this is His vindication after all the treatment He received at the hands of men.  He was raised “from among” the dead.  The resurrection of Christ introduces a new dimension into resurrection.  The Jews were familiar with the idea of a resurrection of believers, leaving unbelievers in the grave, (for they correctly interpreted Daniel 12:2 like this).  As He approached the cross, the Lord Jesus moved less publicly, lest He arouse the hostility of the authorities to such a point that they moved to arrest Him before His hour had come.  So it is that the Lord charges His disciples to “tell no man what things they had seen, till the Son of Man were risen from the dead”, Mark 9:9.  Now what puzzled the disciples was the preposition He had used in the phrase “risen from the dead”.  It was the preposition “ek”, which literally means “out of”.  It can either be translated like this, or as “out from among”, depending on the context.  Now since the word dead is a plural noun, it means dead persons.  Clearly therefore the phrase does not mean “out of dead persons”, but rather, “out from among dead persons”.  This is what perplexed the disciples, for they were expecting all the just dead to rise at the same time, in accordance with their right understanding of Daniel 12:2, yet here was the resurrection of one just person, leaving other just persons in the grave. 
This is a new concept, but it is one which marks God’s dealings with His people of this age, for Christ is “the first that should rise from (among) the dead”, Acts 26:23, implying that there are others who shall follow.  “Who is the beginning, the firstborn from (among) the dead; that in all things He might the pre-eminence”, Colossians 1:18.

And set Him at His own right hand in the heavenly places- This is His exaltation after His self-humbling to come to earth.  His own words were, “whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted”, Luke 14:11.  Isaiah had prophesied that “He shall be exalted, and extolled, and be very high”, Isaiah 52:13.  In Hebrews 1:3 Christ sits Himself down at the right hand of God.  Here He is made to sit by the power of God.  The place of supreme power as the one administering for God, (for the right hand of the Father is the place of the Firstborn, the one charged with the task of administering for the Father).  Not only has He been raised to the right hand of God, but “by the right hand of God”, Acts 2:33.  This is the fact that gives character to the whole epistle, for the emphasis throughout is on the place Christ has in heaven, and the way in which believers are associated with Him there.

1:21  Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion- He is even set, as a man, over angels, whatever their high rank:
All principality refers to all those angels that had first place in the administering of God’s affairs previously.  Now it is Christ who has the pre-eminence, Colossians 1:18.
Powers are those with right to act, who must now defer to Christ.  He has been given all authority in heaven and earth.
Might refers to those who have been given immense ability to act, but are now subservient to the one who was crucified through weakness, 2 Corithians 13:4.  He was made lower than angels, (who are greater in power and might than men, 2 Peter 2:11), yet now, as man, is elevated higher that the greatest of them.
Every angel given dominion must recognise that He is Lord of all, and must now bow to Him.  Not that they did not do this before He came to earth, but now they do it when He is a man.

And every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come- not only is He set over angels, but He is set over men too, whatever their reputation, (for name = reputation).  Those who have reputation as sinners among sinners in this world, (the word is “age”), or those who will have reputation as saints among saints in the age to come, all must defer to Him, for His name (reputation) is above every name. 

1:22  And hath put all things under His feet- there is no higher place that Christ can go, so all things must be under Him; He is in total control, whatever men might think.  Adam’s dominion only extended to sheep, oxen, etc, Psalm 8:7,8, but there is no limit to Christ’s control.  Even death itself shall give way to Him at last, 1 Corinthians 15:24-27, (notice the quotation from Psalm 8 in that passage). 

And gave Him to be the head over all things to the church- as Head, He is in the place of authority, with none to contradict Him.  The idea of headship first comes in reference to God, when David said, “Thou art exalted as head above all”, 1 Chronicles 29:11.  Here, as man, Christ is given the title that belongs to God, a testimony to His Deity.  Notice that the headship is over all things, and it is the church that recognises it.  The world will know this in the age to come, but it is only believers who acknowledge Christ as head at the present time.  That He is head of the body, the church, is told us both in Ephesians 5:23, and Colossians 1:18.  He has been given to be head, for it is an honour bestowed upon Him by God the Father as recompense for the trials of earth, and in response to His self-humbling.

1:23  Which is His body, the fulness of Him that filleth all in all- so His headship is not merely one of administration, as when we speak of “the head of a corporation”, who might be detached and inaccessible.  Christ’s headship is like that which the head of the human body exercises over the rest of the body.  As head, He in every way and in every particular is the one who makes things complete.  And yet, such is the high dignity granted to the saints, they are said here to be His fulness.  It is as if He who makes all things complete, is not complete without the church.  Just as it was not good for man to be alone, so God made Adam a help, meet or suitable for him, so here, Christ would not be complete unless He had His people with Him and part of Him.
So the headship of Christ is exercised from His place at God’s right hand.  The question is, how is that relevant to believers?  The answer is found in the next verses, as the apostle traces, not the exaltation of Christ now, but that of believers in association with Him.  He had hinted at this in verse 19 when he wrote that the power that God used to raise Christ is “to usward who believe”.  In other words, the same power that lifted Christ, lifts believers.  Now this is not a reference to the future, for when it happened to Christ, in God’s mind and purpose it happened to believers.  So it is that in 2:5-6 we are said to be quickened together with Christ; raised up together; seated together.

And who is it that are thus raised?  The answer is found in 2:1-4:
2:1  And you hath He quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins- so Christ was found dead in a grave; Gentile sinners were dead in trespasses and sins.  He was dead because of our trespasses and sins, for He had none of His own.  Trespasses are false steps, blunders.  Adam had trespassed when he advanced towards the forbidden tree.  Sins involve the missing of a mark or target, in this context, the glory of God, and Adam sinned when he deliberately took the fruit and ate it, thus rebelling against God, and falling short of the standard of perfection that God required.  We were dead in trespasses and sins, cut off from the life of God through ignorance, Ephesians 4:18, and immersed in a life of disobedience to God.  The river of humanity had been poisoned at its source, even Adam, and we were part of that humanity.

2:2  Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience- not only were we drifting down the river of humanity, but we were hemmed in by its banks, following the course of the river wherever it went.  Worst still, the position of those banks, or, in other words, the course we were forced to go, was determined by Satan himself, who is the god of this world, 2 Corinthians 4:4, and who sees to it that men live their lives according to his dictates.  Thus he perpetuates in the children of disobedience the attitude that marked Adam when he fell.

2:3  Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past- the apostle, having described the behaviour of the Gentiles, now turns his attention to the nation of Israel, of which he was a part.  Are they any better?  Has the special relationship they had with God ensured  that they were as they should have been?  The lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind- So he and his fellow-Israelites had sinful lusts, and took every opportunity to gratify those lusts, whether they were physical or mental lusts.  And were by nature the children of wrath, even as others- by their very constitution as people, the Israelites were children destined to suffer the eternal wrath of God.  And in this they were like the others, meaning the Gentiles.

Summing up these verses, we can say we were:
Dead in trespasses and sins.
Deceived by the prince of the power of the air.
Disobedient because of our link with Adam who disobeyed God, Romans 5:19.
Depraved because of our lusts.
Doomed to endure the wrath of God for all eternity.

2:4  But God, who is rich in mercy, for His great love wherewith He loved us- God changes everything.  His great love, (for God is love and God is great), caused Him to be rich in mercy, giving to us what we did not deserve, and withholding from us what we did deserve. 

2:5  Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)- our state of being dead was no obstacle to God, for He was determined to bless.  Christ was quickened from the dead; believers were quickened together with Him.  Only God’s love could motivate Him to do this; only His mercy would activate Him to do it.  Only on the ground of God’s grace (His unmerited favour), is this available- we have no merit of our own to plead.

2:6  And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus- not only quickened together with Christ, but raised up as well, lifted up from the grave of trespasses and sins we were in, and made to stand; given a footing before God, possessing life from God.  But there is more to being raised than this, for He was raised up to heaven, and so are believers, in the mind of God, and in association with Him.  But there is still more, for He has been seated at God’s right hand, and this position is shared by believers, too.  We are seated in Him now, (that is, His position is representative of our position), and we shall be seated with Him in a day to come.

2:7  That in the ages to come He might show the exceeding riches of His grace in His kindness toward us through Christ Jesus- the eternal ages will all be needed to fully tell how rich His unmerited favour has been.  And this is the reason why he has dealt with us in grace, so that His grace might be magnified through all eternity.  That grace has manifested itself in kindness, the practical outworking of His heart of love towards us.

2:8  For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God- the apostle needs to reinforce this lesson about grace, because man proudly thinks that he has some merit before God.  The apostle feels the need to make it very clear, before the ages to come start their course, that the position the believer will occupy in heaven is entirely of God’s grace and kindness, and not at all of our effort.  Faith is indeed necessary, but in itself has no value- its value lays in the one believed.  The position of being saved by grace on the principle of faith is totally of God’s doing, and the blessing of being saved in this way is God’s gift to those who believe.

2:9  Not of works, lest any man should boast- not only is salvation not of us, in that we are not worthy in ourselves to gain it, but it cannot be worked for, even by those who own up to the fact that as persons they are not worthy.  Heaven will indeed be filled with those who boast, but it is a boasting or glorying in God that they are occupied with, not self-congratulation.

2:10  For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them- far from being self-made, believers are God’s product.  As those who are part of the new creation, (which new creation comes about because of the work of Christ at the cross and His subsequent resurrection), believers are to be occupied with good works, for that will ensure that in eternity, God will be the more praised.  He works through our works, so that His work may be magnified and His name glorified.
In subsequent passages in the epistle, the apostle will speak of walking worthy of the calling, 4:1; walking unlike the Gentiles, 4:17; walking in love, 5:2; walking as children of the light, 5:8; and walking circumspectly, 5:16.  These kinds of behaviour will result in works done for God’s glory in eternity to come, remembering that they were foreordained in eternity past, for it was God’s purpose that they should be engaged in.  How noble a task it is to walk and work in harmony with Divine and eternal purpose!  No wonder the apostle needed to pray that the believers might understand these things better, for they are so immense that it is impossible to take them in, or work them out in practice, apart from Divine help.

ROMANS 5:12-21

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

 

We now begin a study of that section of the Epistle to the Romans which runs from chapter 5 verse 12 to the end of chapter 8, which deals not so much with what we have done, (the word “sins” is only found once from 5:12-8:39), but what we are. In other words, the criminal, not the crimes he has committed. Now that his sins have been forgiven, what is a believer’s relationship with God? What of the nature which caused him to sin before he was saved? By what power is the Christian life lived? And is the security of the believer assured? These questions, and others besides, are answered in the next sections of the epistle.

It might be found helpful to read the summary sections first, to get an idea of the thought-flow of these dificult and complicated verses.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS CHAPTER 5, VERSES 12 TO 21 

5:12  Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

5:14  Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgement was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

5:17  For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

5:19  For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

Suject of Section 8

The apostle begins this fresh section of the epistle in which he deals with what we are by nature, by tracing that nature to Adam. By ‘nature’ is meant those essential features which combine to make a thing what it is. Through the sin and disobedience of the first man, who is the federal head of men as sinners, terrible consequences were passed on to all, which could only be remedied by the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, who becomes the head of those who believe. The teaching of the previous section has prepared the way for what is presented to us now. The apostle assumes we accept the testimony of the early chapters of the Book of Genesis, with its record of the formation of the first man, Adam, his disobedience and fall, and the descent of all mankind from him in a state of sin.

Section 8 Romans 5:12-21

Christ and Adam compared and contrasted
The whole of the purpose of God for mankind centres on the fact that His Son became man, and as such is the second man, the last Adam. He came to “restore that which he took not away”, Psalm 69:4, or, in other words, came to remedy the loss and damage that Adam had brought upon men by his sin.

Structure of Section 8
The passage is very complex, but may be clearer if we note its structure in the following form, where the numbers represent the verses of the section:-

12 [(13-14) 15-17] 18-21

 In other words, the main subject is in verses 12 and 18-21, and verses 13-17 form a parenthesis. Inside this parenthesis there is another, consisting of verses 13 and 14.

8(a) 5:12 Entrance of sin and its consequence
8(b) 5:13-14 Existence of sin before the law-age
8(c) 5:15  Effect of sin and God’s attitude
8(d) 5:16,17 Ending of death’s reign
8(e) 5:18 Extending of a gift to all
8(f) 5:19 Experience of justification by many
8(g) 5:20 Enhancement of sin by the law
8(h) 5:21 Ending of sin’s reign

Looking generally at the passage, we see that verse 12 introduces us to sin and death, verses 13 and 14 show that death is as a result of the sinful nature within, and not normally because of sins committed, verses 15 to 17 deal with death, and verses 18-21 with sin.

8(a) The entrance of sin and its consequence

5:12  Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: 

Wherefore – a logical connection. The word “therefore” introduces a logical consequence, but verses 12-21 of this chapter are not a logical consequence of the preceding chapters, but they do answer the questions that those chapters might raise, and hence have a logical connection. It is important to notice that the counterpart of “wherefore as” in this verse is the “therefore as” of verse 18, hence the parenthesis of verses 13-17 is required by the grammar of the passage.
As by one man- a reference to Adam, the first man, and the federal head of the human race as sinners. “God… hath made of one blood all nations of men…” Acts 17:26, so we are all descended from this one man. There are not many races on the earth, for all have common descent from Adam and Eve his wife.
Sin- the principle of revolt against God, expressed in disobedience.
Entered into the world- sin existed in Satan before he introduced it into the world of men by means of Adam’s trangression. Adam was the door by which we perish, Christ is the door by which we are saved, John 10:9. Sin found an entrance into Adam’s heart, and through him to the rest of the world of men, for he passed on his nature to his children. The man is singled out, even though the woman sinned first, for it is by the man that the nature is passed on to the children.
And death by sin- physical death is a direct consequence of Adam’s fall. He was warned by God that death would come if he sinned, but he disobeyed God’s commandment and reaped the consequences. As a result, his nature became that of a sinful creature, and he passed on that nature to us all. As a consequence, we too are fallen and sinful, and face certain death, but in the mercy of God we are allowed a period to repent. 
And so death passed upon all men
because death is the penalty for having a sinful nature, (“the wages of sin is death” 6:23), and that sinful nature is shared by all in the world because of their link with Adam the sinner. 
For that all have sinned
“for that” means, “on the basis of the fact that”. The fact that the apostle can say, looking back through time, whether during the law-age or before, “all have sinned”, is the basis of the logical conclusion that what Adam did has affected us all, and sin has in fact entered into the whole of the world of men. 

Summary
The sin and death which are in the world are the result of the sin of Adam the first man, who has passed on his sinful nature to us all.

8(b) The existence of sin before the law-age

5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.  

(For until the law sin was in the world- the principle of revolt against the rule of God that sin represents was in the world up until the formal giving of the law to Israel at Sinai.
But sin is not imputed when there is no law- the word translated imputed is only found here and Philemon 18, (“put that on mine account”). It means more than simply thinking of someone in a certain way, (which is the usual meaning of ‘impute’ in the New Testament), but goes further and involves putting something down in an account book as needing to be paid for. So whilst God did not overlook the fact that during the period from Adam to Moses men had sin within, He did not reckon it against them as needing to be paid for by instant death.

5:14  Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.  

Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses- despite the foregoing, men still died in the period between Adam’s sin and Moses’ lawgiving. This proves that death is the consequence of having a sinful nature, and not the consequence of sinning. Only in extreme circumstances are men struck down in death by God because they have committed a particular sin; it is not the general rule.
Even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression- that is, those who had not gone against God’s will as expressed in a known law. Adam, like Israel, was formally given God’s law. The law God gave to Adam was “thou shalt not eat of it”, and the known penalty for transgression was “thou shalt surely die”, Genesis 2:7. It is said of Israel, “they like Adam have transgressed the covenant”, Hosea 6:7 margin. So both Adam and men under the law of Moses were given a commandment with a known penalty. Men in between Adam and Sinai were not in this situation, and therefore the fact that death reigned over them, (that is, was on the throne in their lives), was due to their nature from Adam, not their sinning like Adam.
Who is the figure of Him that was to come- the apostle rounds off this parenthesis by bringing together the two men that are to be compared and contrasted, Christ and Adam. Certain features about Adam in his official position as federal head of the human race provide both a comparison and a contrast with Christ the head of the new creation. 

Summary
That death has passed upon all men because of the act of another is proved by the fact that men died even though they had not transgressed a law they knew about. In His mercy, God promised the seed of the woman immediately sin had entered into the world. 

8(c) The effect of sin and God’s attitude

Key phrases
The offence of one…the gift in grace which is of one man. 

Note the formula in verses 15,16 and 17- “but not as…so also…for if…much more”. Note too that in verses 13-17 and verse 19, the contrast is between one and many, emphasising the greatness of the problem to be addressed, and the greatness of God’s remedy, whereas in verses 12 and 18, it is between one and all, emphasising the universality of the problem, and the universality of the opportunity for benefitting by the remedy.  

5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.  

But not as the offence, so also is the free gift- these words serve the dual purpose of introducing both a comparison and a contrast beteen Adam and Christ, as would be suggested by the word figure in verse 14. Both are heads of a race of people, both performed an act which affected those people, and both pass on their characteristics to the people. But the contrast is marked, for Adam brought in sin, death, and God’s judgement, whereas Christ brings in righteousness, life, and justification. By ‘the offence’ means a trespass, a false step. Adam’s false move has had devastating and universal consequences because of the attitude of heart which lay behind the act. The apostle assumes we accept the record of Genesis 3.  The free gift is God’s  gift in grace, freely bestowed. The words offence and gift are the key to the verse. 
For if through the offence of one many be dead
the long list of men that have died physically down the centuries is directly attributable to the trespass of a single man at the beginning.
Much more- despite the seemingly insurmountable problem, God has overcome it, not by revoking the command which brought the death, but by introducing something far higher and grander.
The grace of God- God’s answer is not further condemnation, John 3:17; Luke 9:56, but the display of grace, unmerited favour to a fallen race. The condemnation of sinners is a righteous necessity, but God has no obligation to bless, yet chooses to do so.
And the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ
 the word “gift” means an act of giving; the word “by ” is literally “in”, speaking of the character of the giving; the second use of the word “by” indicates the personal responsibility placed upon Jesus Christ to deal with the matter of the sin of man.  The grace of God is expressed in the person of Christ, the Last Adam. This contrasts with the personal responsibility of Adam for his offence (the offence of one) and its consequences.
Hath abounded unto many
God delights to overflow in grace, and he does this towards the same number, “the many”, that are affected by affected by Adam’s offence.  The offence of one man brought many into death, but the grace of God which is channelled hrough the one man Jesus Christ flows forth towards that same number, despite the fact that they are many.

Summary
The offence of one man, Adam, has resulted in the death of the many in the world, but the superabounding grace of God in Christ is expressed to that same number.

8(d) The ending of death’s reign

Key phrases
Death reigned through (the agency of) one…reign in life through (the agency of) one. 

5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgement was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.  

And not as it was by one that sinned- the emphasis is now on the one person, rather than the one act of offending.
So is the gift
that spoken of in verse 15, and defined in verse 17 as the gift of righteousness. The phrase “and not” emphasizes that the gift is of a different character to the offence whose effects have been passed on to us, Adam’s gift was deadly; Christ’s is life-giving. The phrase “so is”, on the other hand, emphasizes that there is a comparison between what the two men did.
For the judgement was by one- by is “ek” meaning “out of”, indicating the source. Opinions differ whether the word ‘one’ refers to one man, Adam, or one offence. The comparison with many offences would suggest the latter, although the many offences are committed by many. The point is that there is a great obstacle to be overcome, since one sin has had such ruinous effects, yet there has been a multitude of people since who have committed a multitude of sins, which makes the situation much worse. 
Unto condemnation
the word used here means ” a verdict pronounced with punishment following” a stronger word than is usually used, indicating the gravity of the situation. God’s verdict (“judgement”) went against man, and condemnation in the form of physical death was the result. 
But the free gift
the apostle now reverts back to his original word for gift used in verse 15, grace-gift, indicating how the obstacle of so many sins, (whose presence proves that man is under condemnation), is dealt with. Only grace can do this; the law is powerless, as 8:3 will show. 
Is of many offences
again “of” means “out of”, indicating the source. Just as the one sin of Adam was the reason why condemnation came, so in the wisdom of God, He has seen the many offences of Adam’s descendants as an opportunity for acting in grace, to His own glory. So the free gift is as a result of Adam’s sin, and its need to be remedied. This truth was misapplied by Paul’s opponents in 6:1.
Unto justification- “unto” means “with a view to”, for not all come into the good of what God is prepared to do. Not only does God justify in the sense of reckoning righteous, but in the context here justification means the lifting of the condemnation of death, giving the authority to reign in life. In this way the end of verse 16 prepares the way for the truth of verse 17.

5:17  For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one- the offence of Adam brought death upon men as a tyrant ruling their lives. There is no other cause for death’s reign, for “by one” is repeated to reinforce the point.
Much more- again there is the counteracting of Adam’s fall, but also further blessing. See verse 20, “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound”. 
They which receive abundance of grace
the grace of God mentioned in verse 15, is available. Note the apostle limits it to “they which receive”, not the “many” in general; in other words, believers, not men generally.
And of the gift of righteousness- the gift consisting of righteousness.
Shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ)- instead of merely overthrowing the tyrant death, God enables the believer to reign, but only by the agency and strength of Jesus Christ. Note the “shall”, the full realisation of reigning in life is reserved for the future, although to be anticipated now, as detailed in chapter 6.  

Summary
By the agency of one man, Adam, death reigned over his race, but by the agency of another man, Jesus Christ, God’s grace ensures that those who receive His gift of righteousness reign in life, both now and in the future. And just as the one offence of one man was the starting point of the condemnation, so the many offences of many men has been viewed by God as the starting-point of a process which results in the condemnation being removed.  

8(e) The extending of a gift to all

Key phrases
Judgement came upon all…free gift came upon all. 

5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.  

Therefore as- means “so then”, the counterpart to the “wherefore as” of verse 12. The intervening verses have cleared the way for the truths of verses 18 and 19, and the apostle is now free to take the argument forward.
By the offence of one
the spotlight is again on two federal heads, Adam and Christ. Here, Adam is in view. 
Judgement came upon all men to condemnation
the word judgement has been supplied by the Authorised Version from verse 16 to give the sense. The sentence of the Judge went against Adam and his race. 
Even so
there is a straight comparison now, instead of the “as…much more” of the previous verses.
By the righteousness of one
the one supreme act of righteousness which Christ accomplished on the cross. Not His personal righteousness, for the meaning is fixed by the word used. The act of Adam in making a false step in relation to the will of God, is directly contrasted with the act of Christ when He fulfilled the will of God at the cross.  The Lord Jesus was not dealing with sin during His life, or else He would have been forsaken of God then as well.  It was only during the hours of darkness upon the cross that He was forsaken by His God. 
The free gift came upon all men
the words “free gift” are supplied from verse 16. Upon means “towards”- just as the condemnation came towards all, so does the gift. 
Unto justification of life
with a view to a cancellation of the condemnation, negatively, and the introduction into life in Christ, positively. Life in Christ is the theme of chapters 6 and 8. 

Summary
There is a correspondence between the consequence of Adam’s act, and that of Christ. The one was an offence which brought condemnation, the other was an act of righteousness which brings justification.

8(g) The experience of justification by many

Key phrases
One man’s disobedience….obedience of one. 

5:19  For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.  

For as- a more precise comparison even than the “as…even so” of verse 18, representing a refinement of the reasoning, which finds its climax in this verse, with its doctrine of the nature of men in Adam and men in Christ. The question might well be asked, How does verse 19 advance the argument, since it is so similar to verse 18? The answer is two-fold. First, the apostle now speaks of man by their constitution, made sinners and made righteous. Second, he implies how the state of being righteous is attained, for the disobedience of Adam may be contrasted not only with the obedience of Christ, but by inference with the obedience of faith.
By one man’s disobedience- the word is made up of two words, aside, and hear, giving the idea of refusal to hear. Adam had heard the command of God, but chose to “turn a deaf ear”.
Many were made sinners- made means “constituted”, the word being most often used of appointment to a position. The position appointed to men in Adam is that of being a sinner.
So by the obedience of one- Christ’s obedience to God even to the extent and extremity of the cross is in view, Philippians 2:8. Adam simply had to refrain from eating of the tree of knowledge, Christ had a heavy and sorrowful task before Him, even suffering on a tree, Acts 5:30, but did not waver in His obedience.
Shall many be made righteous- here the righteousness is based on the obedience of Christ, to preserve the contrast with Adam, whereas previously in the epistle the apostle has shown that it is by the obedience of our faith that righteousness is imputed to us.  

Summary
Adam’s disobedience resulted in man being constituted a sinner, whereas the obedience of Christ in going to the cross to deal with sin in obedience to His Father, has brought a state of righteousness to those who are linked to Him by the obedience of faith. 

 8(h) The enhancement of sin by the law

Having prepared the ground for a consideration of the believer’s life in Christ as detailed in chapters 6 and 8, the apostle now prepares for chapter 7, with its consideration of the believer in relation to the law of Moses.

5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

Moreover the law entered-  the law of Moses came onto the scene as a side-issue, “came side-ways in”. This shows that Adam was not put under law as the nation of Israel was at Sinai, as some teach.
That the offence might abound- not in the sense that the number of sins might be increased, but that they might be shown in their true light, so that by a formal giving of the law what was wrong might be highlighted. By this means the initial offence of Adam, verse 15, was exposed in the offences of his race, verse 16.
But where sin abounded- as the law showed up its evil. The apostle reverts to the more general term sin, rather than ‘offence’ and transgression’, in preparation for the next chapters. 
Grace did much more abound
the free favour of God is great enough to deal with all the offences, and to bring in positive things as well. Compare the “much more” of the reasoning of verses 15 and 17. 

8(i) The ending of sin’s reign

5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

That- this means “in order that”, for the superabundance of grace has a purpose.
As sin hath reigned unto  death- the preposition “unto”, is literally “in”, and when it does not denote physical location, it speaks of either power or character, the context deciding. Here the power behind the throne during the reign of sin, is said to be death. Death made sin’s reign a tyranny. Cf. Hebrews 2:15.
Even so might grace reign- grace so abounds that it dominates the scene, sweeps sin off its throne, and robs death of its power over the believer.
Through righteousness- sin reigned in death, whereas grace reigns through righteousness. There is not, then, an exact parallel in the two ideas. God does not simply restore man to innocence, but to a position consistent with righteousness. So grace reigns on a righteous basis, in contrast to the reign of sin which was on the basis of the unrighteous act of Adam.
Unto eternal life- grace superabounds so that not only is death defeated, but eternal life, the life of God, is imparted, not the life of Adam regained.
By Jesus Christ our Lord- He is the direct means by which grace reigns and eternal life is imparted. This full title is fitting now that He has triumphed through the work of the cross, and overthrown the reign of sin. How believers enter into that triumph is the theme of the next three chapters.

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

ROMANS 5

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address:  martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk   We would be pleased to hear from you.

Section 7 Romans 5:1-11
The glory of God is central to the gospel

Subject of Section 7
This section deals with the past, present, and future of the believer in the light of the glory of God. The apostle explains three things. First, how one who formerly came short of the glory of God, 3:23, can look forward to, and rejoice in, that glory. Second, how a believer can rejoice even though he is passing through tribulations. And third, how a believer can rejoice in who and what God is. The answers are found in the past, present and future work of the Lord Jesus on the believer’s behalf.

It is important to notice the various renderings of the word translated “rejoice”. In verse 2, “rejoice in hope of the glory of God”; in verse 3, “glory in tribulations also”; in verse 11, “joy in God”. See also “boasting” in 3:27, and “glory” in 4:2. So “rejoice”, “glory”, “joy” and “boast” all mean the same thing in these verses.

Structure of Section 7

7(a) 5:1,2 Rejoicing in hope of the glory of God
7(b) 5:3-10 Rejoicing in tribulations
7(c) 5:11 Rejoicing in God

7(a) 5:1,2
Rejoicing in hope of the glory of God

5:1
Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:

Therefore- the passage develops the consequences of the justification by faith that has been explained in the previous main section, 3:21-26, before the parenthesis of 3:27-4:25.
Being justified- a past event with continuing effect.
By faith- that is, on the principle of faith. Faith has no virtue in itself, so it is not the means of justification, but it is the condition laid d  own by God, the basis on which He is prepared to reckon men righteous. Man entered into sin by disbelieving God; he may enter into salvation by believing God. Man entered into sin by rebelling against God; he may enter into salvation by repenting toward God.
We have peace with God- as far as the believer is concerned, the anger of God because of sins has been removed. This is judicial peace, arrived at in strict accordance with justice, and not as a result of the slackening of God’s demands.
Through our Lord Jesus Christ- nothing we have done personally has contributed to this position, it is entirely due to what Christ has done at Calvary. Peace with God is not conditional at all, whereas the peace of God is, as Philippians 4:6,7 makes clear.

5:2
By whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in hope of the glory of God.

By whom also we have access- as well as ensuring that there is settled peace between ourselves and God, the Lord Jesus is also the One who introduces His people to the Father’s presence, for He said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father but by me”, John 14:6. Through Him both Jew and Gentile believers have access by one Spirit unto the Father, Ephesians 2:18. It is one thing to be reckoned righteous by the Divine Judge, it is a further thing to have access into His immediate presence. But this we have.

By faith- which lays hold of unseen things, Hebrews 11:1, and accepts without reserve the testimony of God’s word. It is because the believer has come by faith to know the truth and possess the life, that he has a place before God.
Into this grace wherein we stand- the word that describes the attitude of God in His unmerited favour towards His people is now transferred to the favour itself. Compare 2 Corinthians 8:6,19, where the word used for the attitude which gave a gift is then used for the gift itself, so the gift had the stamp of grace upon it. So here, the believer’s position by grace has the stamp of Divine grace upon it.
By the grace of God believers have a settled place (they “stand”) in the presence of Him who, were they still in their sins, would be their unsparing judge, and from whose face they would be banished. Their standing is by grace, not merit. The access into the standing is by faith initially, and the enjoyment of it is by faith continually.
And rejoice in hope of the glory of God- sinners have no interest in the glory of God, being occupied with themselves. Believers on the other hand eagerly anticipate the day when God will reveal Himself in all His beauty and majesty. Their hope is conditioned by God’s glory. Far from dreading the actual sight of the glory of God in Christ, the believer rejoices at that prospect, a sure sign that his sins have been dealt with.
Hope in the Scriptures is not a doubtful thing, but a certain prospect. This is confirmed by the fact that in 1 Timothy 1:1 the Lord Jesus is said to be the believer’s hope, and there is no uncertainty with Him. Believers shall not only be in the presence of God in all His beauty and glory, Psalm 27:4, but shall radiate that glory, Rev. 21:11,23,24.

7(b)   5:3-10
Rejoicing in tribulations

5:3
And not only so, but we glory in tribulations also: knowing that tribulation worketh patience;

And not only so- the apostle has established that peace with God ensures that we face the future sight of God with confidence; now he shows that it enables us to face calmly the trials of the present.
But we glory in tribulations also- this is not simply to glory (rejoice) whilst passing through tribulations, but to actually view the tribulations themselves as a reason for rejoicing. The unbeliever views tribulations as a reason for complaining.
Knowing that- glorying in trials is not on account of indifference to pain, but intelligence as to God’s purpose.
Tribulation worketh patience- the heavy log which in ancient times the oxen dragged around the threshing-floor to press the grain out from the ear, was called in Latin a tribula. Tribulation is relentless pressure. The believer is able to rejoice in this pressure, because it is a means to an end. Patience is not simply a passive acceptance of the seemingly inevitable, but a positive resolve to endure to God’s glory.

5:4
And patience, experience; and experience, hope:

And patience experience- this word denotes “proof”. In other words, the trials, when passed through with endurance, afford proof of the genuineness of the believer’s profession. The reality of his faith is being proved experimentally. Compare the seed growing on stony ground in the parable of the sower, Matthew 13:5,6,20,21, with that which grew in the good ground, Matthew 13:8,23. The heat of the sun (explained as “tribulation or persecution…because of the word”, verse 21), withered the rocky ground plant, whereas the ears of a healthy wheat plant were ripened by the same sun. Only the true believer can flourish under tribulation; the false professor will wither and die.
And experience, hope- far from causing the believer to be downcast, tribulations should produce a confident reliance on the faithfulness of God, for after the suffering will come the glory.

5:5
And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.

And hope maketh not ashamed- to have confident expectations whilst in the midst of trying circumstances is not an embarrassment to a believer, for his hope is certain to be realised. The reason why he knows this is next told us, for the love of God assures us.
Because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts- literally, the love is “deluged”, so that just as every part of the earth was flooded in Noah’s day, so every part of the believer’s heart is affected by the love of God. There is, in principle, no nook or cranny where bitterness can be harboured. Note the word “is” not “was”, for it is not only the moment of conversion that is in view. The love of God is currently flooding the heart of the believer within, all the time that tribulation is his portion from without.
By the Holy Spirit which is given unto us- note that there is no doubt that the believer has the Spirit of God within. Note also that He is given, not earned, as the apostle affirms in Galatians 3:2. The Holy Spirit does many things in our hearts, as chapter 8 will show, but here He assures us of Divine love, which has been demonstrated so clearly at Calvary. He also assures of future blessedness, thus saving the believer from despair.

5:6
For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.

For- this word introduces a commentary on the nature of the Divine love which is within the believer’s heart.
When we were yet without strength- we were completely powerless to earn Divine love, like the impotent man of John 5. The “yet” suggests that we had tried to merit God’s love in the past without success.
In due time- the “time appointed” and “the fulness of the time” of Galatians 4:2,4, when the Son of God came to display the Father’s love. He did not come too soon, so we might say we had not been given enough time to earn salvation. He did not come too late, so that we would despair.
Christ died for the ungodly- Israel were looking for the Christ to reign in righteousness; in fact He came to die in righteousness and love, for “Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” John 15:13. See also Song of Solomon 8:6,7. The ungodly are those who have no respect for God, and who represent the strongest possible test for the love of Christ; will He be prepared to die even for these?

5:7
For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.

For scarcely for a righteous man will one die- because the life of a righteous man condemns the sinner’s life, there is little prospect of the sinner sacrificing his life for a righteous man’s sake.
Yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die- there is a slim possibility that a man might go so far as to dare to die, (meaning, “bring himself to die”) for one who has done him some good, “the good man in his experience”.

5:8
But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

But- in contrast to those who are reluctant, or who only dare to die when they have been shown good.
God commendeth his love toward us- God’s love is not a peradventure or a dare, (which are worthless if not carried out), but has been fully demonstrated to be worthy by being put into effect. This is His own particular and special love, which is unique to Himself, for it demands nothing before it is shown, and is lavished upon the unlovely.
In that while we were yet sinners- we were not the sort of people for whom men possibly dare to die, being neither righteous nor good.
Christ died for us- an actual, historic, accomplished event, giving expression to God’s intense love.

Special note on verses 8-10
In verses 8 and 9, the apostle summarises the teaching of the epistle from the beginning, where he emphasises sinful actions, whereas in verse 10 he anticipates the teaching of 5:11-8:39, where he emphasises the sinful state. This may be set out as follows:

Verses 8 and 9

Verse 10

Actions

State

Sinners: guilty of sinful acts

Enemies: by nature and condition

Christ: the man free of sinful actions

Son: His nature in relation to God

Died: an act accomplished

Death: a state entered

“Much more”

“Much more”

Justified: action by God

Reconciled: state before God

Saved, as He intercedes, 8:34

Saved by His risen state

Note the features of Divine love in the believer’s heart:

Unique

His own love

Unhindered

Shed abroad

Unrivalled

Not “scarcely…peradventure”

Undeserved

Sinners: No righteousness before God

Ungodly: No respect for God

Enemies: No relationship with God

Unreserved

Christ really died

5:9
Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.

Much more then- Divine love not only meets us in our tribulations in the present, with the indwelling Holy Spirit constantly reminding us of it, but it safeguards us in the far more awesome Day of Judgment to come.
Being now justified by his blood- the death of Christ was not simply a demonstration of love, but met the claims of Divine justice to the full, hence instead of death the apostle speaks of blood, for “it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul, Leviticus 17:11. Divine justice demands that life must be forfeited if sins are committed, but God is prepared to accept the life of a suitable substitute. That substitute is Christ.
We shall be saved from wrath through him- the eternal wrath of God which sinners shall know, believers shall not know, not because they have lived perfect lives since they first believed, but because they have One who makes intercession for them if any charge is brought against them either now or in the future, Romans 8:33,34. The wrath of God abides on the disobedient unbeliever, but those who believe on the Son of God have everlasting life, and are safe for ever, John 3:36.

Having enlarged, in verse 9, on the statement of verse 8, “Christ died for us”, with special reference to the justifying power of His blood, the apostle now emphasises His reconciling work, again based on His death. For sin not only makes men guilty before God, but also banishes them from His presence.

5:10
For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

For if, when we were enemies- as sinners we needed to be justified, but we were also enemies, so we needed to be reconciled, brought into a harmonious relationship with God. We were enemies because the carnal mind, (that is, the mind of the unsaved person), “is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be”, Romans 8:7.
We were reconciled to God by the death of his Son- death speaks of banishment, whereas the idea of Son speaks of nearness, but here the two are brought together; He who is nearest and dearest to God, dies for those who are furthest and most hostile.
Much more- if God brought us near by the death of His Son, what will He not do now that He has been raised from the dead, showing that the work of Calvary is sufficient? See Romans 8:31,32.
Being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life- if Christ was prepared to die for His enemies, what will He not do for His friends? If He reconciled us to Himself when we were at war with Him, He will not banish us now that we are at peace with Him. Believers are preserved free of condemnation because Christ is in resurrection, the sure sign that His death at Calvary satisfied God, Romans 4:25.

7(c)   5:11
Rejoicing in God

5:11
And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.

And not only so- we not only rejoice in hope of seeing and radiating the glory of God, and rejoice in tribulations, but we joy in God too.
But we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement- atonement is the result of propitiation, and has to do with the fact that Christ’s blood has satisfied every demand against our sin, and on this basis sinners may be righteously brought near to God. By His death on the cross the Lord Jesus satisfied every demand that all aspects of the glory of God made upon us, and in so doing enhanced every one of those glories, see John 12:28; 13:31,32.
Now that he is brought into harmony with God by Jesus Christ, the believer is able to rejoice in the glory of God that was magnified at the cross. Every Divine attribute was brought into full display at Calvary. By gaining an appreciation of the work of Christ done there, the believer progresses in the knowledge of God in all His glory. Far from being terrified now by that glory, he triumphs and rejoices in it.
The work of propitiation has been shown by the apostle both in chapter 3:25, and now here, to be at the heart of the gospel. It is vitally important to try to grasp the immensity of what Christ did at Calvary, and to beware of thinking of His death only in terms of our own justification and forgiveness, blessed as those things are.
It is necessary for the Moral Governor of the universe to clear Himself in relation to every sin that has ever been committed. If He does not do so, He will be in danger of the charge of compliance with that sin. Outrageous as that charge would be, the Devil is evil enough to make it. To protect Divine Honour in this matter, Christ “put away sin by the sacrifice of himself”, Hebrews 9:26. When God made Him sin, 2 Corinthians 5:21, He bore the penalty for sin in His own person. This must not be confused with punishment for sin, however, which the unrepentant sinner will endure for all eternity. In strict justice it is not possible for one person to be punished for the wrongdoings of another, but it is possible for another to endure the penalty of another’s sins. It is perfectly possible for Christ to endure the penalty for sin, and yet the sinner bear the punishment for that same sin in the lake of fire.
We must beware of confusing the work of Christ with the effect of the work. The work was propitiation, which has its own effect God-ward of course, but the effect man-ward for those who believe is reconciliation. There is no limit to the work of propitiation, for it is measurable only in terms of the infinite person who accomplished it. Reconciliation is limited, however, being restricted to those who in the language of Romans 5:11, “have received the atonement”.
If there were those in Israel on the Day of Atonement who refused to afflict their souls and abstain from work, (the equivalent to repentance and faith), they were cut off from their people, Leviticus 23:26-32. The work that had been done for the nation that day was not credited to them. So if there are those who refuse to repent and believe, they are cut off from the reconciliation that Christ obtained at the cross.

We now begin to look at that section of the epistle which deals not so much with what we have done, but what we are. In other words, the criminal, not the crimes he has committed. Now that his sins have been forgiven, what is the believer’s relationship with God? What of the sin-principle that caused him to sin before he was saved? By what power is the Christian life lived? And is the security of the believer assured? These questions, and others besides, are answered in the next sections of the epistle.

Section 8   Romans 5:12-21
Christ and Adam compared and contrasted

Subject of Section 8
The apostle here begins a fresh section of the epistle in which he deals with what we are by nature, by tracing that nature to Adam. By nature is meant those essential features which combine to make a thing what it is. Through the sin and disobedience of the first man, Adam, who is the ancestral head of men as sinners, terrible consequences were passed on to all, which could only be remedied by the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, who becomes the head of those who believe. The teaching of the previous section has prepared the way for what is presented to us now.
The apostle assumes we accept the testimony of the early chapters of the Book of Genesis, with its record of the formation of the first man, Adam, his disobedience and fall, and the fact that he passed on to all mankind a sinful nature.
The whole of the purpose of God for mankind centres on the fact that His Son became man, and as such is qualified to be the last Adam. He came to restore that which He took not away, Psalm 69:4. Part of that restoring work is to remedy the loss and damage that Adam had brought upon men by his sin.

Special note on sin
The word sin is used as a verb and as a noun in scripture. As a verb it means in the majority of cases “to miss the mark”, as when an archer fails to hit the target. God has set the standard for man’s behaviour, and man fails to attain that standard; that failure is sin.
As a noun it either refers to an individual act of missing the mark, or, (in the sense it is mainly used from this point on until the end of chapter eight), “the tendency and ability to act lawlessly”.
Different aspects of the word sin in the scriptures are as follows:
1. Sin in the aggregate, the totality of all the sins that have ever been and ever will be committed. Examples: “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29. “But now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself”, Hebrews 9:26.
2. Sin as an individual act. Example: “And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.” Hebrews 10:17.
3. Sin in the abstract. Example: “and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation”, Hebrews 9:28.
4. Sin as the ability to act lawlessly. Examples: “For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord”, Romans 6:23. “Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me.” Romans 7:17. It is in this latter sense that the apostle uses the word in the following verses.

When God made man at the beginning, He made him in His own image, after His likeness, Genesis 1:26. As a person in God’s image, man was to represent God to the rest of creation. As a person after God’s likeness, man was to replicate Him, displaying godly features.
As a being made in this way man had rationality, the ability to reason; spirituality, the ability to respond to God; personality, the ability not only to express himself as an individual, but also, and primarily, so as to display God.
Sadly, through the fall of man, these abilities have been perverted and corrupted. Instead of reasoning in line with God’s word, man follows the dictates of his own perverted mind, which is enmity with God, and is not and cannot be subject to the law of God, Romans 8:7. Instead of responding to God, man listened to the voice of the Tempter, who denied that God had man’s best interests at heart. Instead of his personality displaying the virtues of God, man displays himself, selfishly putting himself to the fore. He thereby betrays a lack of spirituality.
So it was that when Adam begat Seth, he did so “in his own likeness, after his image”, Genesis 5:3. Note the reversal of the order. In the case of Adam it was “image…likeness”, for the main point is the representation, with the likeness making that representation meaningful and real. In the case of Seth, the likeness is mentioned before the image, for the emphasis is now on the replication of the sinful characteristics of Adam, and the image would refer to Seth consequently representing Adam as a sinner.
So in some way that perhaps cannot be understood, the distorted abilities of Adam were passed on to his children. In this way each of us has the capacity to act contrary to God, and so we are by nature sinners, for it is part of our constitution from birth. It is mainly in this sense that the apostle uses the word sin in the following verses.

Structure of Section 8
The passage is very complex, but may be clearer if we note its structure in the following form, where the numbers represent the verses of the section:

12 [(13-14) 15-17] 18-21.

Put into words, the main subject is in verses 12 and 18-21, (with numbers in bold), and verses 13-17 form a parenthesis, [with square brackets]. Inside this parenthesis there is another, consisting of verses 13 and 14, (with numbers in italics).
Thinking generally about the passage, verse 12 introduces us to sin and death. Verses 13 and 14 show that death is as a result of the sinful nature within, and not normally because of sins committed. Verses 15-17 deal with death, and verses 18-21 with sin.

8(a) 5:12 The entrance of sin and its consequences
8(b) 5:13,14 The existence of sin before the law age
8(c) 5:15 The effect of sin and God’s attitude
8(d) 5:16,17 The ending of death’s reign
8(e) 5:18 The extending of a gift to all
8(f) 5:19 The experience of justification by many
8(g) 5:20 The enhancement of sin by the law
8(h) 5:21 The ending of sins’s reign

8(a)   5:12
The entrance of sin and its consequences

Overview of verse 12
An initial doctrinal statement
The apostle immediately traces the origin of the sin principle right back to Adam, and then shows that “him that was to come”, verse 14, is God’s answer. Only the Last Adam, the Lord Jesus, is able to deal with that which the first man Adam brought in. When he fell, Adam became a sinner by nature and practice, and when he begat a son it was in his image and likeness he did so, to represent him as a sinner, Genesis 5:3. Thus sin entered into the world. Like a poison being put into the spring that gives rise to a river, so the river of humanity has been poisoned at source. Hence the apostle’s use of the words “all men”, and “world”. Not that sin originated with Adam, for Lucifer was the first to sin, Ezekiel 28:15, but he used Adam as the door through which sin might enter into the human race. The consequence of the sin of Adam was that its penalty, death, passed on all.

5:12
Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

Wherefore- indicating a logical connection, (“therefore”, on the other hand, means logical consequence). Romans 5:12-21 is not a logical consequence of the preceding chapters, but it does answer the questions that those chapters might raise. It is important to notice that the counterpart of the “wherefore as” of this verse is the “therefore as” of verse 18, hence the parenthesis of verses 13-17 is required by the wording of the passage.
It is important for the apostle to show that death is a defeated foe as far as the believer is concerned. After all, if the believer, with sins forgiven and with hopes of heaven, (as explained in the preceding verses), is overtaken by death, to what purpose are those blessings? He must demonstrate that the sin which has brought death into the world has been dealt with effectively. This would explain the use of the word “wherefore”, for it signals the taking up of a connection with previous words, without going so far as being a conclusion from previous words as would be signified by the use of the word “therefore”.
As by one man- that is, Adam, the first man, who is the ancestral head of the human race as sinners, for God “hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth”, Acts 17:26. The idea that man is divided into different races is foreign to scripture.
Sin- the ability and tendency to revolt against God, expressed in disobedience.
Entered into the world- sin existed in Satan before he introduced it into the world of men by means of Adam’s transgression. Adam was the door by which we perish, whereas Christ is the door by which we may be saved, John 10:9. Sin found an entrance into Adam’s heart, and through him to the rest of the world. The man is singled out by the apostle, even though the woman sinned first, for Adam was appointed head of creation, and was responsible for what happened, and also because it was by Adam begetting children that the sin-principle entered into the world of men.
And death by sin- physical death is a direct consequence of Adam’s fall. Because we are sinners we have forfeited the right to continue on the earth, but in the mercy of God we are allowed time to repent.
And so death passed upon all men- this happened because death is the penalty for having a sin-tendency within, (“the wages of sin is death” 6:23), and that sinful tendency is shared by all in the world because of their link with Adam the sinner.
For that all have sinned- “for that” means, “on the basis of the fact that”. The consequence of the sin of Adam was that its penalty, death, passed on all. If any question whether this is the case, then the apostle has the answer. All have sinned, and this proves that all have a sin principle within inciting them to sin. But since that sin principle inevitably results in death, then both sin and death have indeed passed upon all men.
That this is personal sinning is seen in the fact that it is an identical statement to the one in 3:23, where the reference is undoubtedly individual. The “have” is in italics in both cases.
The idea that Adam’s descendants sinned when he sinned, he being their representative and head, is ethically unsatisfactory. If the apostle had written, “for that all have become sinners”, then we could see that as being in line with what he says in verse 19. But it is acts of sin that are in view in the phrase “all have sinned”.
Scripture is clear that “The soul that sinneth, it shall die.” Ezekiel 18:20, with the emphasis being on the “it”. In other words the person who sins is the person who shall die, and not anyone else. As the verse goes on to say, “the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father”. Could we not extend that principle, and say that the sons of Adam shall not bear the iniquity of their first father, Adam?
When the apostle tells us in verse 19 that it was by Adam’s disobedience that many were made or constituted sinners, he goes on to make the comparison that by the obedience of Christ many shall be made righteous. But that making of many men righteous was not immediate upon the obedience of Christ, but came when they were brought into relationship with Him at conversion. So we may say that the making of many sinners was not immediate either, but came about when they were introduced to relationship with Adam at their conception. It was then that they were begotten in Adam’s image and likeness just as Seth was, Genesis 5:3, with all that entailed in terms of being sinners.

Special note on the entry of sin into the world
We read in Genesis 1:27, “So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.” Note the repetition of the idea of man being in God’s image, as if God knew we would find it surprising that such a thing should happen. Note also that in verse 26 God had said “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness”, whereas in verse 27 there is the threefold use of the word “created”. Now the latter word has to do with bringing something into existence, (as in Genesis 1:1), whereas the former has to do with the making of something out of pre-existing materials. So God took the dust of the earth and made man, but He did it in such a way that man could be His image and be able to display His likeness. But it can also be said three times over in verse 27 that man was created, for he was a unique combination of spirit and soul and body, and as such was unlike any other of God’s creatures. This justifies the word created, even though man’s body was made of pre-existent material.
As one who had a spirit, Adam could commune with God, who is a Spirit, John 4:24. As one who had a soul, Adam had personality, and the ability to express himself, for he had a rational mind. Adam was all this in a body, in which he appreciated things with his five senses, and where his various powers were centred.
If Adam had not sinned he would have passed on these characteristics to his descendants without alteration. As it is he did sin by disobeying God’s clear and simple command to not eat of the tree unmistakeably positioned in the midst of the garden. As a result, his whole being was altered. His personality became that of a sinner in revolt against God, instead of one dedicated to manifesting and representing God. His spirit is now cut off from God, and he is in spiritual death. His body is now in the bondage of corruption, unable to function as it should to God’s glory. No wonder the apostle called man’s body “the body of sin”, Romans 6:6!
In Genesis 5:1-3 we read, “This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him. Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth”. So having reaffirmed that God was the creator of both male and female, and that man was made in the likeness of God, the record now begins the generations of Adam.
Those generations came about when Adam begat children, but he did so in his own likeness, after his image. As a result Seth, the son named here, is after his father’s image, which means that he represents Adam the sinner, and he does this because he has his likeness as a sinner.
This does not mean that the image of God is completely gone, (for man is still charged with representing God in the earth, as is seen in his responsibility to execute murderers, Genesis 9:6), but it is very much reduced. The same goes for the likeness, which is still present in men, as James 3:9 says, but man only displays the likeness of God in principle, in that he is a rational creature with personality. He fails miserably in the matter of being like God morally and practically. This is why the apostle Paul declares that man comes short of the glory of God. There is a mis-match between what man is now, and what he was at the beginning, able to glorify Him.
Now when Adam and Eve produced children, they did so as those whose bodies were in the bondage of the corruption to which they were subjected when they sinned, Romans 8:20. As the psalmist said, “Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.” Psalm 51:5. This means they passed on that corruption to the children, for as the Lord Jesus said, “That which is born of the flesh is flesh”, John 3:6. So it is that sin entered into the world in a further sense, for it initially entered into the world as represented by Adam, but then he passed it on to his children, by giving them a corrupt body, liable to sin.

Summary
The sin and death which are in the world are the result of the sin of Adam the first man.

8(b)   5:13,14
The existence of sin before the law-age

Overview of verses 13 and 14
Proof that death is the result of the sin-principle within
It is important for the apostle to confirm that death is the result of sin within, and not, in general, as a result of particular sins committed. He does this by referring to the period of time before the law was given at Sinai through Moses. Before the law-age the principle of sin dwelt in the hearts of the descendants of Adam the sinner. But when they sinned, the sin they had committed was not put to their account as demanding an immediate penalty. They did not physically die the moment they sinned.

5:13
(For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

(For until the law sin was in the world- the principle of revolt against the rule of God that sin represents was in the world of men up until the formal giving of the law to Israel at Sinai.
But sin is not imputed when there is no law- the word translated imputed is only found here and Philemon 18, (“put that on mine account”). It is not the same as is used in previous passages such as 4:3,4, where it means that God takes account of a person in a certain way. Here, it means to put a sin to someone’s account, with the threat that it may at any moment result in death. So it means more than simply thinking of someone in a certain way, but goes further and involves putting something down in an account book as needing to be paid for. So whilst God did not overlook the fact that during the period from Adam to Moses men committed sins, He did not reckon it against them as needing to be paid for by instant death.
This does not mean that sins committed during the pre-law period are ignored by God, “For God shall bring every work into judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil.” Ecclesiastes 12:14. What it does mean is that the sins were not threatened with immediate death, unlike the sin of Adam and the sins of men under the law of Moses.
Nevertheless, men still died in the period between Adam and the giving of the law at Sinai, which proves that they did so because of the sin-principle within them, and not because they had transgressed a known law.
The consequence of this is very far-reaching, for it shows that even if an unbeliever managed to never sin, (a hypothetical situation, of course), he would still be liable to death because of what he is by nature. So the gospel is not just about having one’s sins forgiven, but is also about becoming a new creation, so that there is no obligation to sin. The consequence of the sin of Adam was that its penalty, death, passed on all.

5:14
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses- despite the foregoing, men still died in the period between Adam’s sin and Moses’ law-giving. This proves that death is not usually the consequence of sinning, but the consequence of having a sinful nature. Only in extreme circumstances are men struck down in death by God; it is not the general rule.
Even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression- that is, those who had not gone against God’s will as expressed in a known law. Adam, like Israel, was formally given God’s law, which in his case was “thou shalt not eat of it” with a known death penalty for transgression, namely “thou shalt surely die”, Genesis 2:17. The law to Adam was very specific, being limited to not eating of a particular tree in a particular garden. When Adam sinned and was expelled from that garden, the relevance of that law ceased. Hence “from Adam” relates to Adam in the garden, and not Adam for the rest of his life. Men in between Adam and the giving of the law at Sinai did sin like Adam sinned after he was expelled from the garden, but they did not sin against a formally given law as Adam did before he was expelled. Therefore the fact that death reigned over them, (was on the throne in their lives), was due to their nature from Adam, not their sinning like Adam in the garden.
Who is the figure of him that was to come- the apostle rounds off his argument on this point by bringing together the two men who are to be compared and contrasted in the following verses, Christ and Adam. Certain features about Adam in his official position as federal head of the human race provide both a comparison and a contrast with Christ, the head of the new creation.

Summary
That death has passed upon all men because of the act of another is proved by the fact that men died even though they had not transgressed a law they knew about. In His mercy, God promised the seed of the woman immediately sin had manifested itself on earth.

8(c)   5:15
The effect of sin and God’s attitude

Key phrases: The offence of one…the gift in grace which is of one man.

Overview of verse 15
Contrast and comparison: offence or gift
Note that in verses 13-17 we read of “many”, indicating the greatness of the problem to be addressed, and also the far-reaching consequences of the actions of the two men who are in view in the passage. In verses 12 and 18, (which are linked together, the verses in between being a parenthesis, as we have seen), we read of “all”, for there the universality of the problem Adam introduced, and the universality of the provision God has made in response is brought out. The apostle will revert to “many” in verse 19, because there the emphasis is on those who are affected, either men in Adam, or those in the good of the obedience of Christ.
By describing Christ as “him that was to come”, (for immediately following Adam’s sin, God announced the coming deliverer), the apostle has prepared the way to revert back to his consideration of Adam’s fall, after the parenthesis of verses 13 and 14. He does this by presenting both a contrast, “not as”, and a comparison, “so also”.
The comparison is seen in the fact that both Adam and Christ, each being head over those linked to them, affect deeply their respective companies. The contrast is between Adam’s offence, and the grace of God. Further, that offence resulted in the “gift” of death to the many who have died one by one throughout history, whereas the grace of God results in many being given a different sort of gift. What that gift is we are not yet told. What we are told is that what God does through Christ has a “much more” character about it, which is seen in that the gift has abounded. The seemingly insurmountable problem of Adam’s sin has been overcome by God in Christ. He has not solved the problem by introducing a stronger judgment than that meted out to Adam, but by acting in grace. The condemnation of sinners is a righteous necessity with God, but He is under no obligation to bless them, but chooses to do so because of His grace.

5:15
But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

But not as the offence, so also is the free gift- as already noted, these words serve the dual purpose of introducing both a comparison and a contrast, as would be suggested by the word figure (the Greek word gives us the English word “type”) in verse 14. The keys on a old-fashioned typewriter were mostly the opposite way round to the letter written, but some, (o, v, w, x), were the same.
So with Adam and Christ. Both are heads of a race of people, both performed an act which affected those people, and both pass on their characteristics to the people. But the contrast is marked, for Adam brought in sin, death, and God’s judgment through his offence, whereas Christ brings in righteousness, life, and justification as a free gift. An offence is a false step; Adam’s act of disobedience has had devastating and universal consequences because of the attitude of heart which lay behind the act. The apostle assumes we accept the record of Genesis 3.
For if through the offence of one many be dead- the death of the multitudes of men that have died physically down the centuries is directly attributable to the trespass of a single man at the beginning.
Much more- despite the seemingly insurmountable problem, God has overcome it, not by revoking the command which brought the death, but by introducing something far higher and grander.
The grace of God- God’s answer is not further condemnation, John 3:17; Luke 9:56, but the display of grace, unmerited favour to a fallen race. The condemnation of sinners is a righteous necessity, but God has no obligation to bless, yet chooses to do so.
And the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ- the act of giving was the result of God’s gracious character, which is expressed by and mediated through one man alone, Jesus Christ. This contrasts with the personal responsibility of Adam for his offence (the offence of one) and its consequences.
Hath abounded unto many- the cup of blessing is brimful and overflows in grace to the same number, “the many”, affected by Adam’s offence.

Summary
The offence of one man, Adam, has resulted in the death of the many in the world, but the super-abounding grace of God in Christ is expressed to many also.

8(d)   5:16,17
The ending of death’s reign

Key phrases: Death reigned through (the agency of) one…reign in life through (the agency of) one.

Overview of verse 16
Contrast and comparison: condemnation or justification
This verse continues the idea of contrast, (“not as”), and comparison, (“so is”), but whereas verse 15 concentrated on the one offence of Adam, his act of taking a false step, and the fact that God’s act of giving in grace is through one man, Jesus Christ, here the emphasis is on the many offences which result from Adam’s fall, and the way each man relates to those offences. This is the comparison, for each of the two men has been the means of affecting those involved in each case either adversely (judgment), or for good, (the gift).
There is also a contrast, for Adam brought in judgment and condemnation, but Christ brings in justification. God’s verdict, (judgment), went against Adam when he sinned, and he was pronounced guilty, with the implication that there was a sentencing process to follow. We read of that process in Genesis 3:17-19. Christ, however, brings in justification, and this despite the many offences committed during the history of men, and the many offences individual sinners commit during their lifetime.
The condemnation brought in by Adam resulted in men being subject to death, whereas the justification Christ brings in for those who believe not only clears their record, (this is the side of justification emphasised in Romans 3), but also delivers them from obligation to sin in the present, and liability to death in the future. So it is that the apostle can write in 6:7 that “he that is dead is freed from sin”. That is, those who by faith are associated with Christ crucified, are no longer under any obligation to sin. They are not under obligation to die physically either, for Christ risen has secured their position in resurrection.

5:16
And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

And not as it was by one that sinned- the emphasis is now on the one person, rather than the one act of offending.
So is the gift- that spoken of in verse 15, and defined in verse 17 as the gift of righteousness. “And not” emphasises that the gift is of a different character to the offence whose effects have been passed on to us. Adam’s gift was deadly! Christ’s is life-giving. “So is” emphasises that there is a comparison between what the two men did.
For the judgment was by one- that is, originating from one. Opinions differ whether one means one man, Adam, or one offence. The comparison with many offences would suggest the latter. The point is that there is a great obstacle to be overcome, since one sin has had such ruinous effects, yet there has been a multitude of people since who have committed a multitude of sins, which makes the situation much worse.
Unto condemnation- the word means “a verdict pronounced with punishment following”, a stronger word than is usually used, indicating the gravity of the situation. God’s verdict (His judgment) went against man, and condemnation in the form of physical death was the result.
But the free gift- the apostle now reverts back to his original word for gift used in verse 15, grace-gift, indicating how the obstacle of so many sins, (whose presence proves that man is under condemnation), is dealt with. Only grace can do this, for the law is powerless, 8:3.
Is of many offences- again “of” means “out of”, indicating the source. Just as the one sin of Adam was the reason why condemnation came, so in His wisdom God has seen the many offences of Adam’s descendants as an opportunity for acting in grace, to His own glory. So the free gift is as a result of Adam’s sin, and its need to be remedied. This truth was wrongly applied by Paul’s opponents in 6:1.
Unto justification- “unto” means “with a view to”, for not all come into the good of what God is prepared to do. Not only does God justify in the sense of reckoning righteous, but in the context here justification means the lifting of the condemnation of death, giving the authority to reign in life. In this way the end of verse 16 prepares the way for the truth of verse 17.

Overview of verse 17
Death reigning or believers reigning in life

In verse 16 the emphasis is on offences, but in this verse, on death. Going right back to the beginning again, the apostle repeats the substance of what he wrote in verse 12, that the offence of one man resulted in death. Now he enlarges on this and declares that death has not only passed upon all men, but has set up its throne in their hearts, and like a wicked tyrant rules their lives. The abundant grace of God, however, ensures that those who receive the gift of righteousness are not only delivered from the tyranny of death, and receive life, but reign in life. It is they who are in control. This is only possible, however, by the agency and strength of Jesus Christ, for even as believers they have no power of their own.

5:17
For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one- the offence of Adam brought death upon men as a tyrant ruling their lives. There is no other cause for death’s reign, so “by one” is repeated to reinforce the point.
Much more- again there is the counteracting of Adam’s fall, but also further and abundant blessing. See verse 20, where we read, “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound”.
They which receive abundance of grace- the grace of God mentioned in verse 15, is available. Note the apostle limits it to “they which receive”, not the “many” in general; in other words, believers, not men generally.
And of the gift of righteousness- the gift consisting of imputed righteousness. This is given abundantly also.
Shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.) Instead of merely overthrowing death the despot, God enables the believer to reign, but only by the agency and strength of Jesus Christ. Note the “shall”, the full realisation of reigning in life being reserved for the future, although to be anticipated now, as detailed in chapter 6. This brings the parenthesis begun in verse 13 to an end.

Summary
By the agency of one man, Adam, death reigned over his race, but by the agency of another man, Jesus Christ, God’s grace ensures that those who receive His gift of righteousness reign in life, both now and in the future. And just as the one offence of one man was the starting-point of the condemnation, so the many offences of many men has been viewed by God as the starting-point of a process which results in the condemnation being removed.

8(e)   5:18
The extending of a gift to all

Key phrases: Judgment came upon all…the free gift came upon all.

Overview of verse 18
The penalty upon all, and the opportunity for all
The apostle is now able to take his argument forward from verse 12, having built up a body of background information in verses 13-17 which will enable his readers to follow his line of thought. He first of all reiterates the truth of verse 12, and reminds us that the offence of Adam has resulted in the condemnation of death upon all men. He then contrasts the offence of Adam with the righteousness of another man, Jesus Christ.
Righteousness means in this place the act of righteousness carried out by Christ in death, when He set out to reverse the consequences of Adam’s sin, and also bring in rich benefits besides. Just as the penalty through Adam’s unrighteous act of sinning brought results towards all men, so the blessing through Christ’s righteous act of dying for sin brings results to all men as well. The word “upon” has the meaning of “towards”, for the penalty came towards all, and so does the gift.
Not only is the one who believes justified in the sense of “reckoned righteous”, but the legal obligation to death is removed, so justification is “justification of life”. The ground of resurrection is taken up, so that the believer is clear of the consequences of Adam’s fall.

5:18
Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

Therefore as- the counterpart to the “wherefore as” of verse 12. The intervening verses have cleared the way for the truths of verses 18 and 19, and the apostle is now free to take the argument forward.
As by the offence of one- the spotlight is again on two federal heads of men.
Judgment came upon all men to condemnation- the word judgment has been supplied by the Authorised Version from verse 16 to give the sense. The sentence of the Judge went against Adam and his race.
Even so- there is a straight comparison now, instead of the “as…much more” of the previous verses.
Through the righteousness of one- the one supreme act of righteousness which Christ accomplished on the cross. This does not mean His personal righteousness, for the meaning is fixed by the word used. The act of Adam in making a false step in relation to the will of God, is directly contrasted with the act of Christ when He fulfilled the will of God at the cross. Adam stepped aside from the will of God, whereas Christ moved forward in line with it.
The free gift came upon all men- the expression “free gift” is also supplied from verse 16. Just as the condemnation came towards all, so does the gift.
Unto justification of life- with a view to a cancellation of the condemnation, negatively, and the introduction into resurrection life in Christ, positively. Life in Christ is the theme of chapters 6 and 8, and these verses prepare the way for the teaching of those chapters.

Summary
There is a correspondence between the consequence of Adam’s act, and that of Christ. The one was an offence which brought condemnation, the other was an act of righteousness which brings justification.

8(g)   5:19
The experience of justification by many

Overview of verse 19
The state of many as sinners, and the state of many as righteous
Not only is the condition of man dealt with by Christ, but the nature as well. By Adam’s disobedience to the plain command of God, man was made or constituted a sinner. It is not, of course, that God made men to sin, but that by their descent from Adam they have become sinners by nature. On the other hand, Christ obeyed His Father, even to the extent of death, and those who believe in Him are reckoned righteous by God, for that is how He sees them now. Note again that the apostle has gone back to “many”, after the “all” of verse 18. He is now speaking of results, and he cannot say “all made righteous”.

Key phrases: One man’s disobedience….obedience of one.

5:19
For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

For as- a more precise comparison even than the “as…even so” of verse 18, representing a refinement of the reasoning, which finds its climax in this verse with its doctrine of the nature of men in Adam and men in Christ. How does verse 19 advance the argument, since it is so similar to verse 18? The answer is two-fold. First, the apostle now speaks of men by their constitution, made sinners and made righteous. Second, he implies how the state of being righteous is attained, for the disobedience of Adam may be contrasted not only with the obedience of Christ, but by inference with the obedience of faith.
By one man’s disobedience- the word is made up of two words, “aside”, and “hear”, giving the idea of refusal to hear. Adam had heard the command of God, but chose to “turn a deaf ear”.
Many were made sinners- the idea behind the word “made” is that man was constituted or designated a sinner, the word being most often used of appointment to a position. The position appointed to men in Adam is that of being a sinner. It is not, of course, that God forced man to sin.
So by the obedience of one- Christ’s obedience to God even to the extent and extremity of the cross is in view, Philippians 2:8. Adam simply had to refrain from eating of the tree of knowledge, Christ had a heavy and sorrowful task before Him, but did not waver in His obedience, for He died upon a tree, Acts 5:30.
Shall many be made righteous- here the righteousness is based on the obedience of Christ, to preserve the contrast with Adam. Previously the apostle has shown that it is by the obedience represented by our faith that righteousness is imputed to us. At the present time, those who believe are reckoned righteous, and they are not made righteous in the sense that they have no trace of unrighteousness. Perhaps the future tense “shall be made” looks on to the day when all trace of sin shall be removed from the believer when he receives the resurrection body.

Summary
Adam’s disobedience resulted in man being constituted a sinner, whereas the obedience of Christ has brought a state of righteousness to those who are linked to Him by the obedience of faith.

8(h)   5:20
The enhancement of sin by the law

Having prepared the ground for a consideration of the believer’s life in Christ as detailed in chapters 6 and 8, the apostle now prepares for chapter 7, with its consideration of the believer in relation to the law of Moses.

Overview of verse 20
The law cannot deal with the sin-principle
The apostle now deals with a possible objection from Jewish readers. Can the law not remedy this situation? The answer is that it cannot, for when the law came in, it resulted in the situation becoming worse, not better, for it showed up sins as never before, and offered no remedy for the nature that produced those sins. It dealt with the symptoms but not the disease.
The only answer to man’s nature as a sinner is the grace of God in the gospel, which alone has the power to overcome the obstacles represented by sin, death, and the law, and set up its rule in the hearts of men on a righteous basis. That righteous basis being the death of Christ at Calvary, not the supposed good works of men.

5:20
Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

Moreover the law entered- the law of Moses came onto the scene as a side-issue, by the side door, so to speak.
That the offence might abound- by the formal giving of the law the initial offence of Adam, verse 15, was shown up as being multiplied in the sins of his race, verse 16. It is not that the law caused an increase of sins, but it showed up the fact that Adam’s initial offence had multiplied into the abundance of sins his race had committed.
But where sin abounded- as the law showed up its evil. By the application of the law to men’s lives it became abundantly clear that offences against God were widespread.
Grace did much more abound- even in a situation where sins are widespread, the free favour of God is great enough to deal with all the offences, and to bring in an abundance of positive things as well. Compare the “much more” of the reasoning of verses 15 and 17.

Summary
The giving of the law at Sinai served to highlight the presence of sin in the world of men, but it offered no solution. The grace of God in Christ is the only answer.

8(i)   5:21
The ending of sin’s reign

Overview of verse 21
Final doctrinal summary
So it is that the sad truth of verse 12, expressed here as “sin hath reigned unto death”, can be exchanged for “even so might grace reign”. Grace so dominates the scene that it sets up its throne in the believer’s heart. And all this happens on a righteous basis, even the death of Christ, and leaves the way clear for the possession and enjoyment of eternal life in all its fullness. The apostle is careful at the close of the passage to attribute all this to Jesus Christ, who has shown Himself to be worthy of the title Lord. He has overcome every dominating principle, and shows Himself to be superior by His death and resurrection.

5:21
That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

That- here the word means “in order that”, for the super-abounding of grace has a purpose.
As sin hath reigned unto death- the power behind the throne during the reign of sin is said to be death. Death made sin’s reign a tyranny.
Even so might grace reign- grace so abounds that it dominates the scene, sweeps sin off its throne, and robs death of its power over the believer.
Through righteousness-
sin reigned in death, whereas grace reigns through righteousness. There is not, then, an exact parallel in the two ideas. God does not simply restore man to innocence, but to a position consistent with righteousness. So grace reigns on a righteous basis, in contrast to the reign of sin which was on the basis of the unrighteous act of Adam.
Unto eternal life- grace super-abounds so that not only is death defeated, but eternal life, the life of God, is imparted, not merely the life of Adam regained.
By Jesus Christ our Lord- He is the direct means by which grace reigns and eternal life is imparted. This full title is fitting now that He has triumphed through the work of the cross, and overthrown the reign of sin. How believers enter into that triumph is the theme of the next three chapters.

Summary
As he brings his argument to a conclusion, the apostle collects together such words as “grace”, “reign”, “eternal life”, and “our Lord” to show how God has brought in such rich blessing in the face of the sin of Adam and its consequences.

 

 

 

ROMANS 3

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website by e-mailing: martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk. We would be pleased to hear from you.

Continuation of Section 4   2:17-3:20
God’s wrath against men as Legislator

Structure of 3:1-20

4(d)

3:1-8

The charge of infidelity

4(e)

3:9-20

The charge of iniquity

4(f)

3:18-20

The charged ones found guilty

The apostle anticipates objections to what he has just written, and in answering them accuses the Jews of infidelity. He asks a series of double questions, each followed by his answer. Each question and answer section has a particular feature about God as its theme. We could paraphrase these questions and answers as follows:

Theme, verse 2: the oracles of God.

First pair of questions, verse 1: “If previous verses at the end of chapter two are correct, then what is the value in being a Jew and being circumcised?”
Answer, verse 2: “There is much advantage in being a Jew, chiefly because it means ready access to the Scriptures, the oracles of God.”

Theme, verse 3: the faith of God.

Second pair of questions, verse 3: “If some did not believe, does that mean that faith in Him is not worthwhile?” Is faith in God pointless?
Answer, verse 4: “Not at all, (God forbid), because God is true, (He always speaks truth), but men, all of them, are liars. They lie by denying God’s word. It is those who do not believe who make God a liar, 1 John 5:10. So the fault lies with man, not God”.

Theme, verse 6: the righteousness of God.

Third pair of questions, verse 5: “If a good result is achieved when man repents, then has man’s unrighteousness enhanced God’s righteousness? If that is the case, is not God unrighteous when He judges sin?”
Answer, verse 6: “To speak like that is to say God will not judge men at all, which cannot be the case”.

Theme, verse 7: the truth of God.

Fourth pair of questions, verses 7,8: “If my life of denying the truth has enabled truth about God to be made known, then why should I be personally judged, (I also), even if the world is? And further to that, should we not actively sin in order to enhance God’s good name further?
Answer, none given, for the idea is so outrageous that it does not deserve a response.

We shall find that the apostle does not engage in an argument to prove the statements he makes, but is content to show their logical outcome, assuming we shall see the logic of his thinking. That God is true is a given fact as far as the apostle is concerned. He takes it for granted that God cannot be blamed for the reactions of men to His word, that He will definitely judge the world, and that He will condemn those who excuse their sin by saying it glorifies God. These propositions are accepted by reasonable people and do not need to be proved.

First pair of questions

3:1
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?

What advantage then hath the Jew?- the first possible objection has to do with the failures described in 2:21-24. It seems as though there is no benefit in being a Jew.
Or what profit is there of circumcision? In view of the truths set out in 2:25-29, where circumcised persons are said to be no better than the uncircumcised, it might be thought that there is no advantage in being circumcised if outward things are invalid.

Answer to first pair of questions

3:2
Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.

Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God– there are many and varied advantages in being a Jew, and they are listed in Romans 9:4,5. A chief one, which the apostle highlights here, is the possession of the living word of God, which the Jew was expected to observe. Note the connection between “committed”, (entrusted), and “did not believe”, verse 3, (were unfaithful to the trust).

Second pair of questions

3:3
For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?

For what if some did not believe? The apostle has shown at the end of chapter two that simply being a Jew did not in itself gain the praise of God. Without faith it is impossible to please Him, Hebrews 11:6. Note the past tense, “did not believe”. He is thinking of two past instances of unbelief. The first, the lack of belief in the oracles committed to them on the part of Israel. The second, the lack of belief in Christ when He came. He Himself linked these two evidences of unbelief together when He said, “Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?” John 5:45-47.
Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? What is the situation if the majority of the nation to whom the oracles were committed did not believe those oracles, nor believe in Christ when He came in fulfilment of them? The faith of God is contrasted here with the unbelief of Israel. Of course God does not need to exercise faith in anything, so it is not that God has faith. The expression “faith of God” is unique to this passage, but there are seven instances in the New Testament of the phrase, or a similar one, “the faith of Christ”. The idea is of faith that is closely connected with Christ, having Him as its object. So the faith of God is the faith that God expects from men in response to His word, the living oracles of God. The Jew would probably protest that he had faith in the God of Israel. That may be so, but it was defective, and could not be described as the faith of God, the faith God was expecting.
So this question might be paraphrased as, “Does this mean that the unbelief of many in Israel has exposed what God was doing through His Old Testament word and His Son as being ineffective, and as such, should be abandoned?”
Most modern commentators, following the lead of the Revised Version, (a version not to be trusted), substitute “the faithfulness of God” here for “the faith of God” of the Authorised Version. We should remember, however, that Paul had at his disposal a perfectly good word for faithfulness, pistos, but he chose not to use it. The Greek word for faith is pistis, and is translated as faith 239 times in the New Testament. It is translated as assurance, belief, or fidelity, once each. So in the overwhelming majority of instances the word is translated faith.
It is all the more significant that Paul used the word pistis for faith, and did not use the word pistos, when we consider that he has just used the negative of that latter word, apistos, (meaning unbelief in the sense of unfaithfulness) which corresponds to it.
Does it not go without saying that God’s faithfulness, being part of His character, is not rendered useless by the unbelief of men? What does need to be shown is that faith in God is not useless.
Couple with this the fact that the translators of the Authorised Version would have weighed up this matter very carefully. Should we not be prepared to willingly defer to their skill, and to believe that God superintended their work in a remarkable and unrepeated way?
There is a similarly strange expression in Luke 6:12, where the literal rendering of “prayer to God” would be “the prayer of God”. Obviously God does not pray, but it seems the expression means “extraordinary and sublime devotion”. If this is a parallel case, then the faith of God is faith in God which is genuine and evident, and in contrast to the unbelief and hypocrisy of the majority in Israel.
So the point the apostle is making is that the word of God to the nation of Israel may have been met largely with unbelief and consequent unfaithfulness, but that in no wise means that the faith of the minority is useless. God is able to bless individual Jews even if in the main the nation rejects His word.
So Paul’s questions in verse 1, “what advantage?”, and “what profit?” are being answered; at the present time for individual Jews, and in the future for the nation.
To cross over from being amongst the majority to be amongst the minority, the Jew must do what David did when he owned up to his sin, which was committed contrary to the truth, and was an evidence of unfaithfulness. The apostle is about to quote David’s words on this matter.

Answer to second pair of questions

3:4
God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

God forbid- Far be the thought! The apostle strongly rejects the idea that man’s response to God can in any way mean that God’s purpose is frustrated.
Yea, let God be true, but every man a liar- not content with a negative rejection of the idea, the apostle makes a positive demand, which he prefaces with the word yea, telling of his strong feeling about the matter. He has that strong feeling because the honour of God is involved. When Satan came to tempt the woman in Eden, his first words were “Yea, hath God said?” Genesis 3:1. So from the very beginning, Satan has attempted to undermine the word of God. It is as if he said, “Yea, let God be untrue”. Here the apostle counters Satan’s attack on the truth of God and says, “Yea, let God be true”. Let the fact that God is true, and that all men are liars, govern our thinking in this matter. Paul energetically repudiates the idea that God’s word is at the mercy of men’s reaction to it.
When men do not believe the word of God, they elevate their thinking above God’s. They say in effect “I am right, but God is wrong”. Implied in that is the further thought, “I speak truth, but God is a liar”. Such is the wickedness of unbelief. But if the apostle strongly defends the idea that God is true, he equally strongly asserts that every man is a liar, especially when it comes to rejecting the word of God.
Since men are liars, they live out a lie in their lives, as the illustration from the life of David shows. As we have seen in 2:21-24, David broke every one of the last five commandments of the law, and in so doing broke them all, for to offend in one point is to be guilty of all, James 2:10. As a result of his experience, he was caused to acknowledge that God was right and he was wrong. This is an important point, so the apostle reinforces it with a relevant allusion to the Old Testament record.
As it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings- David came into direct confrontation with the word of God over the matter of his adultery with Bathsheba, and acted out a lie to cover his sin. See 2 Samuel 11; Psalm 32. The apostle quotes here from Psalm 51, one of David’s repentance psalms. As Psalm 32:3-5 indicates, David resisted acknowledging his sin at first, but at last came to the point where he gave in, and owned up to his wickedness. When he did this he justified or vindicated God and condemned himself, thus God was glorified as His sayings prevailed in David’s heart. The sayings being the specific commandments he had transgressed.
And mightest overcome when thou art judged- there was another consequence of David’s sin, apart from the rejection of God’s word. As Nathan said to him, “by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme”, 2 Samuel 12:14. By repenting, however, (saying in effect “I am a liar and God is true”), he relieved God of any blame when men pointed the finger at David, God’s anointed. In this way God overcame His accusers when they criticised Him.

Third pair of questions

3:5
But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man)

But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? What can be said about the idea that the unrighteouness of the Jews, (as expressed by them breaking God’s righteous law), in some way brings God’s righteous ways into favourable display? “What shall we say” is usually used in the New Testament when the argument of an opponent is being refuted.
Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? Can God righteously express vengeance against men by judging them, when all the time they are doing that which gives Him fresh opportunity to glorify Himself?
(I speak as a man)- to speak like this is to speak as a natural man without the knowledge of God. To suggest that the righteous God of heaven is not righteous when He judges men is preposterous. To a believer the idea is abhorrent, illogical and unethical.

Answer to third pair of questions

3:6
God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world?

God forbid- again the apostle finds himself strongly rejecting the idea.
For then how shall God judge the world? That God will judge the world has been established in chapters 1 and 2, but this objection would destroy that truth, for it would undermine the just judgment of the world by God. He fully intends to judge the world, and do it in righteousness, Acts 17:31. The apostle goes on to point out in verses 7 and 8 two more consequences of this foolish notion.

Fourth pair of questions

3:7
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I judged as a sinner? If the truth about God contained in the oracles delivered to the Jews has been enhanced by my life lived contrary to that truth, (“my lie”), why am I still to be judged as a sinner? Surely I should be commended for giving God the opportunity to glorify Himself!

3:8
And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

And not rather- this means, “And why should we not develop this idea further?”
(as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? Some were slandering Paul by saying that Paul taught the practice of evil so that good might come to God’s reputation.

Answer to fourth pair of questions

Whose damnation is just- this is so outrageous that the apostle is content to simply say that the judgment of those who suggest such things is just; it only needs the reminder of coming judgment to refute their argument. But let his opponents beware, for the judgment which is just and right for sinners generally, is just and right for slanderers too.

4(e) 3:9-17
The charge of iniquity

Having examined all classes of men, the apostle now presents his final argument on the subject of the universal sin of man, and the consequent danger of the wrath of God. The epistle to the Romans puts man in God’s Law-court, charges him in 1:19-3:8, presents written evidence in 3:9-18, pronounces him guilty in 3:19, then tells of the just means whereby his guilt may be removed, 3:20-25, and the repentant, believing sinner justified, 3:26.

3:9
What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;

What then, are we better than they? In verse 1 the apostle had asked what advantage and profit the Jew had, and his answer was “Much every way.” Now, having disposed of the arguments of his opponents, he is able to ask a final question, which is, “Are we [Jews] better than they [Gentiles]?”
No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin- the Jew has outward advantages, but inwardly, as 2:21-24 shows, he is no better than sinful Gentiles. “Proved” here means “charged, incriminated, accused, put to the test in a judicial way”, and this has been done in 1:18-3:8. The proof in the sense of “the evidence that convinces” is about to be presented from the Old Testament scriptures, from which the apostle extracts fourteen statements proving conclusively that Jews are sinners.

3:10
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

As it is written- the fourteen statements the apostle now sets out are all taken from the Old Testament scriptures, with which the Jew was entrusted to enable him to please God. He did the reverse. It is testimony to the genuineness of those scriptures that even though they condemn them, they were carefully preserved by them.
There is none righteous, no, not one- the nature of man, even of the Jew, is corrupted and depraved by Adam’s fall. Psalm 14:3 reads, “there is none that doeth good, no, not one”, but as the apostle John says, “He that doeth righteous is righteous, even as he is righteous”, 1 John 3:7, for it is the nature that produces the results, such as goodness. If there is not a righteous nature, then there are no good actions, whatever men may claim.

3:11
There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

There is none that understandeth- this is the conclusion the apostle draws from Psalm 14:2, where “The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.” The fact that the next verse says “there is none that doeth good, no, not one”, shows that the conclusion the apostle draws here is valid. If they did understand and seek God they would have done good. The mind of man is ignorant of the truth of God, “having the understanding darkened”, as the apostle says in Ephesians 4:18.
There is none that seeketh after God- the attitude of man is one of apathy towards God. It was to Israel initially that God said, “Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near.” Isaiah 55:6. The failure to seek is a sure sign of the lack of understanding, as Psalm 14:2, (already quoted above), indicates.

3:12
They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

They are all gone out of the way- the will of man makes him continue in the path of departure from God begun in the garden of Eden, Genesis 3. This is true of men generally, for “all we like sheep have gone astray”, Isaiah 53:6. It is also true of men individually, for the prophet went on to say, “we have turned every one to his own way”.
They are together become unprofitable- the life of man is unprofitable to God. This is true of men socially, for they are unprofitable together. There is no profit for God in human society. The reason this is so is given by the psalmist, “they are all together become filthy”, Psalm 14:3. The apostle interprets this for us, explaining that the filthiness is the cause of the unprofitableness to God, for He cannot approve of, or use, unclean things.
There is none that doeth good, no, not one- the works of man are contrary to God, who is essentially good. This is true of man individually.

3:13
Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:

Their throat is an open sepulchre- man is both defiled himself, and likely to defile others. The Lord Jesus likened the Pharisees of His day to whited sepulchres, “full of dead men’s bones, and all uncleanness”, Matthew 23:27. He also said they were like hidden graves that men walked over without knowing, and thus defiled themselves, Luke 11:44.
With their tongues they have used deceit- man is deceitful. “The wicked…go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies”, Psalm 58:3.
The poison of asps is under their lips- the words of men are dangerous. This is because they are worked upon by the god of this world. John the Baptist accused the Pharisees of being a “generation of vipers”, Matthew 3:7. And the Lord Himself told the Jews “Ye are of your father the devil”, John 8:44, and he is “that old serpent, called the devil”, Revelation 12:9.

3:14
Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:

Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness- malice is expressed, (cursing), and malice is harboured, (bitterness). The result is that man’s words are damaging. All these statements were true of Paul when he was Saul of Tarsus, as he breathed out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, Acts 9:1. We could look upon this whole passage as a description of his pre-conversion state.

3:15
Their feet are swift to shed blood:

Their feet are swift to shed blood- the end result of man’s condition is that his life has the potential to be deadly. We see this in the haste with which the Jewish authorities tried and condemned Christ. They arrested Him and led Him away to Caiaphas, who had already said that He should die instead of the people, John 11:50. There was no intention of giving Him a fair trial. They took counsel against Him, not to find out the truth, but to put Him to death, John 11:53. They sought for witnesses, not to gather evidence, but to crucify Him, for that was their only object, Matthew 26:59.

3:16
Destruction and misery are in their ways:

Destruction and misery are in their ways- both in action and effect man is destructive. We see this in the actions of Saul of Tarsus, who by his own testimony “And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women.” Acts 22:4. And he adds later, “when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them”, 26:10.

3:17
And the way of peace have they not known:

And the way of peace have they not known- in his life man is discordant in relation to others, disturbed in relation to himself, and dislocated from God.

3:18
There is no fear of God before their eyes.

There is no fear of God before their eyes- defiance of God characterises man, and he expresses this by disregarding his responsibilities before God and before man.
These statements may appear to be extreme, but the point is that they describe what man is and does if left to himself. Condemnation comes upon us because we are sinners, as well as because we have sinned, so this passage serves to highlight both what we commit, and what we are. Man is totally depraved, which means he is affected by sin in all aspects of his person.
Note this does not mean that men are as bad as they can be, but they do have the potential to be as bad as they can be, and this extreme badness is exposed in verses 10-18. Note also the emphasis on spoken things, for Paul had summarised the sinner’s life as a lie, 3:7. And this living lie works itself out in ways that are hostile to the living and true God.
Finally, Paul turns his attention to man’s eyes, the vehicle by which sin entered the world at the beginning, for Eve saw the forbidden tree, and failed to fear God, Genesis 3:6. As a result, “all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world”, 1 John 2:16.

4(f)   3:18-20
The charged ones found guilty

3:19
Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

Now we know- the apostle has already stated that “as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law”, 2:12, so what he is about to say is a known fact.
That what things soever the law saith- the word for saith gives emphasis to the content of the law.
It saith to them that are under the law- a different word for saith, giving emphasis to the personal challenge of the voice of the law. The law of Moses condemns the sins of verses 10-18. “them that are under the law” refers to the people of Israel, the ones through whom the whole of humanity was put to the test. Their main benefit, possession of the law and life under its authority, 3:1,2, becomes their main accuser.
That every mouth may be stopped- if Israel with all their advantages fails, then there is no hope for the rest of mankind. As the wise man said, “As in water face answereth to face, so the heart of man to man.” Proverbs 27:19. In other words, just as we look into a pool of water and see ourselves, so if we were to look into another man’s heart, we would see ourselves there also, for we all share the same nature. The mouths of sinners are stopped from protesting against the condemnation of God here, and in verse 27 they are stopped from boasting. Job confessed, “Behold I am vile; what shall I answer Thee? I will lay mine hand upon my mouth.” Job 40:4,5.
And all the world may become guilty before God- the whole world is “liable to punishment”, or “liable to pay penalty to God”, since the apostle has now proved universal sinfulness, and therefore universal guiltiness. Man has nothing to say in response to God’s verdict of “Guilty”. They make a great mistake who say they will wait until judgment day to find out their position. God in mercy has declared it to them already, whilst there is time to repent and believe. Man has been brought to trial, lost his case, and is liable now to punishment.

3:20
Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in His sight- if the law condemns us as sinners, it thereby disqualifies us from seeking to gain God’s approval by keeping it.
For by the law is the knowledge of sin- when the commandment confronts the will of man, it shows him to be hostile (for the mind of the flesh is enmity with God, and is not subject to the law of God, Romans 8:7) and exposes him as a sinner.

Section 5   Romans 3:21-26
The work of Christ is central to the gospel

Subject of Section 5
Having shown that man deserves nothing but wrath because of his sin, the apostle now explains that God is willing, in grace, to bestow upon men that which they do not deserve, which they can never earn, and which they will never be able fully to repay. How He does this, whilst still maintaining His just character, is detailed for us in the next few verses.
The expression “righteousness of God” is used in two ways in this passage. In verses 25 and 26 it is the attribute of righteousness which God possesses which is in view, the righteousness which is His intrinsically. In verses 21 and 22, however, the idea is of that righteousness which He reckons or imputes to a person when they believe. Of course the Divine righteousness that is imputed is of the same character as the intrinsic righteousness of God. The difference is that God has that righteousness as an essential attribute, (that is, an attribute of His essence), whereas man needs it to be granted to him, for he is unrighteous by nature. Divine righteousness reckoned is in direct contrast to human righteousness demanded, as when men were under the law.
The English language is derived from various sources, one of which gives us the adjective “righteous”, and another which gives us the adjective “just”. They mean the same thing, namely that which is right according to God’s standard. Righteousness was originally spelt right-wise-ness, meaning that which corresponds to right, just as clock-wise means that which corresponds to the direction the hands of the clock travel.
This passage, then, assures us that in the salvation of sinners, God acts in perfect conformity to the absolute standard of right that He represents in His own person. It also assures us that through faith a person is reckoned by God to be in conformity with that right character of His, not because he has attained such a position by his own efforts, but because God in grace blesses in this way on the basis of the work of Christ.
It is important to notice the emphasis on the righteousness of God, for this leading theme of the gospel is being forgotten today and is being replaced by an over-emphasis on the love of God. It is indeed important to proclaim the general love of God for sinners. We should note, however, that the love of God is spoken of in John 3:16 as being in the past, and that historic display of love which took place at Calvary is the once-for-all declaration of God’s attitude towards men. The grace and mercy of God which are based upon His love, Ephesians 2:4-7, should not be preached at the expense of announcing His righteous demands. The love of God is the expression of His nature, 1 John 4:8; but His nature is also righteous, and there cannot be conflict between the two. Divine love must act righteously, for “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all”, 1 John 1:5.

Structure of Section 5

5(a) 3:21 The righteousness of God and the law
5(b) 3:22 The righteousness of God and faith
5(c) 3:23 The righteousness of God and sin
5(d) 3:24 The righteousness of God and redemption
5(e) 3:25 The righteousness of God and propitiation
5(f) 3:26 The righteousness of God and justification

5(a)   3:21
The righteousness of God and the law

3:21
But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

But- the word presents us with the Divine alternative to the failure of man described in 1:18-3:20. The apostle now resumes where he broke off in 1:17, and having shown conclusively that man is totally unable to attain to personal righteousness, and deserves nothing but wrath from God, begins to unfold the wonder of the gospel which is able to bring sinners into a right relationship with God. Man deserves wrath but God intervenes.
Now- a different situation altogether prevails at the present time compared to the age of the law. See verses 25 and 26, with their references to “sins that are past”, and “at this time”.
The righteousness of God without the law is manifested- it is not now human righteousness demanded, as under the law of Moses, but Divine righteousness manifested. “without the law” means totally apart from attempts to keep the law to earn salvation.
Being witnessed by the law and prophets- the Old Testament gave abundant testimony to the righteous requirements of God. The law gave the directives, the prophets exposed the deviations. Paul is careful to emphasise that the gospel does not overthrow the righteousness of God expressed in the law, just as he emphasised in 1:1,2 that the gospel is in harmony with the Old Testament scriptures.

5(b)   3:22
The righteousness of God and faith

3:22
Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:

Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ- not the unattainable righteousness through works, but that which is freely available to those whose faith is in Jesus Christ. It is not belief about Christ that saves, (although obviously the facts concerning Him must be accepted, for Christianity is based on historical events), but it is faith in, or upon, the Lord Jesus Christ which saves, involving unreserved reliance on Him alone for salvation, on the basis of His death at Calvary. “Faith of Jesus Christ” does not mean Christ’s personal faith, but the faith men place in Him, as opposed to putting faith in the law for salvation, which is in fact putting faith in themselves.
Unto all- the gospel makes a universal offer to men. No one is excluded from the opportunity of blessing, for just as no person is good enough in himself for God to accept him, so no person is too bad. The next phrase tells us the condition upon which that offer is made.
And upon all them that believe- belief in Christ is the unvarying principle upon which God acts. “Upon” signifies that there are objects in view, namely those who believe. Gospel blessing is only available on the condition that it is for those who believe, just as a shopkeeper displays his goods on the understanding that people will pay for them, not steal them. The goods are displayed with that condition in mind. The gospel is sent in the direction of, and arrives at, those who are prepared to believe. This is not to say that the gospel is only applicable to some, but rather that it is only available on the principle of faith.
For there is no difference- each individual, of whatever background, must take his place amongst the “all”, for there are no exceptions to the rule that righteousness can be received only by faith. There is no difference, for all need to believe; there is no difference, for all have sinned.

5(c)   3:23
The righteousness of God and sin

3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

For all have sinned- this is the reason why salvation is made available to all. It is man’s sin, not man’s merit, that causes God to offer blessing to all, hence the “for,” or “because”. Note that the verb sinned is in the past.
And come short of the glory of God- this is the present consequence of past failure. It is too late for man to begin to earn merit, for he has a sinful record, and “God requireth that which is past,” Ecclesiastes 3:15. The glory of God may be defined as “the sum total of God’s attributes and the whole range of His characteristics which combine together to make Him alone worthy of worship”. The glory of God demands that man be righteous if he is to be accepted with Him, but man falls short because of his sin. The demands of God’s glory, however, have been met fully by Christ, hence the apostle goes on to speak of justification through Him. And those who are justified are as good as glorified, 8:30, and no longer come short.

5(d)   3:24
The righteousness of God and redemption

3:24
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

Being justified- the believer is reckoned to be righteous in the sight of God because of the merit of Christ’s work. To be reckoned or thought of by God as righteous, is the same as to be justified. Clearly the apostle is not describing the unrepentant sinner as being justified, but rather, he is referring back to verse 22, and describing “them that believe”.
Freely- this word is translated “without a cause” in John 15:25. There is no reason in man why God should justify him; the cause is found in Christ, for God forgives sins for the sake of Christ, Ephesians 4:32. There is no merit in man, and no hesitation with God.
By his grace- this is the motive in the heart of God which causes Him to justify sinners. Grace is unmerited favour to those who do not deserve it and can never repay it, and is an expression of Divine love, Ephesians 2:4,5.
Through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus- redemption is the means by which we may be justified. Sins committed put us under an obligation to God, for His righteous character demands that they be dealt with. We have no means of satisfying God’s demands, and so are constantly in debt to God. In Old Testament times, when a person was without resources, his near kinsman could act as his redeemer, provided he had both the resolve, and the resources. We see an example of this in Boaz in the book of Ruth.
If men are to have redemption, then they must find it in the One who gave His life a ransom for many, Matthew 20:28. A ransom was the price that must be paid in order to redeem. The Lord Jesus “gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity,” Titus 2:14. Notice it is “that he might”, an expression which tells of a possibility, for his death gives him the right to redeem when we believe. Elihu, Job’s friend, said about God, “Then he is gracious unto him, and saith, Deliver him from going down into the pit: I have found a ransom.” Job 33:24.

Special note on redemption
Redemption may be defined as “the setting free of a slave by the payment of a price”. That price being called a ransom. The carrying out of redemption is presented to us in the Old Testament in two ways. There were those redeemed from bondage, such as the nation of Israel, who were in Egypt as slaves to Pharoah the ruler. And there were those who were redeemed from bankruptcy, such as Ruth, in the book of Ruth. In either case the principle was the same, namely, a state of enslavement, the reality; one who was willing and able to pay the price that set free, the redeemer; the price paid, the ransom; the consequent setting free, the release; gratitude to the redeemer and service to him as the new owner, the response.

The reality
The following are scriptures that set out the reality of the fact that man is a slave to sin, and as such is in need of a redeemer.

1. “Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin“, John 8:34.

These are the words of Christ, and are based on the story of Abraham, Hagar, and Sarah. Hagar was a slave-girl, and Abraham, sadly, had a child by her, Ishmael. He then had a child by Sarah his wife, named Isaac. When the time of Isaac’s weaning came, Abraham made a great feast, and introduced his son Isaac to the community as his heir. Ishmael, a boy of thirteen at the time, mocked, and for this reason was cast out of Abraham’s house. We read this in Genesis 21:8-14. So when the Lord Jesus speaks of the son remaining in the house, and the slave not doing so, John 8:35, He is referring to this incident,.
The Jews claimed to be Abraham’s seed, but the Lord is confronting them with the truth that Ishmael was this too. Only those who are free because He has made them free are like Isaac, and remain in the house in fellowship with the father. Those who are slaves, like Ishmael, have no right to be in the house, but are cast out. The Jews, even though descended from Abraham physically through Isaac, were nonetheless morally like Ishmael, and as such were not in fellowship with God.

2. “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; but with the precious blood of Christ”, 1 Peter 1:18,19.

The apostle Peter is here referring to the departure of the children of Israel from Egypt, as recorded in Exodus chapters 12-15. The only silver and gold the Israelites had at that time was the money the Egyptians gave them to ensure they really went away. But it was not this money that purchased their freedom. What did purchase that freedom was the blood of the lamb on passover night.

3. “that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage”, Hebrews 2:14,15.

Every night, as an Israelite went to sleep, he feared dying with sin on his record. He may have offered a sin-offering during the day, but he may also have sinned on the way home. Christ came to deliver from that fear, and He does so by dealing completely and finally with the question of sins as far as those who believe are concerned. He also made of no effect the power of the devil over them so that they are freed from the fear of death. He did this by going into death voluntarily, and taking His life again by His own act, thus showing that He was in no way in bondage to the power of the devil. That triumph over the devil He shares with those who believe on Him.

4. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us”, Galatians 3:13.

The nation of Israel had been given the law at Sinai as a conditional covenant. The blessing of that covenant depended on their obedience. Because they had no ability to fully obey, they were under a curse, not a blessing. The only way to be set free from that curse was for someone who had not transgressed God’s law to take that curse upon Himself, and thus set free those who would believe in Him. This the Lord Jesus did when on the cross He accepted the consequences that the law-breaking of men had brought upon themselves, and bore those consequences instead.

5. “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.” Galatians 4:8.

Many of the Galatian believers to whom Paul is writing had been idol-worshippers before they were saved, and as such were in superstitious fear of the demon-influence behind those idols. The apostle calls this slave-service. The work of Christ at Calvary had set them free from that fear the moment they believed, since by His death He destroyed the power of the prince of this world, Satan himself, who holds men in slavery to superstition.

6. “And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the first-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.” Romans 8:23.

When Adam sinned and fell, he brought the creation of which he was head down with him. As a result, men’s bodies are in a state of corruption. This is true even of the body of believers in Christ, for their body is the last link with the world of Adam. When Christ comes for His people, He shall change their bodies, so that they are like His glorious body, Philippians 3:21. In this way the bondage of a corrupt body will be forever gone.

7. “None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him: (for the redemption of their soul is precious, and it ceaseth for ever:) that he should still live for ever, and not see corruption.” Psalm 49:7-9.

Psalm 49 is used by Jews as a funeral psalm, for it laments the fact that no-one can redeem another from going into death and the grave. This indicates that the prospect of dying and corrupting is a form of bondage to men, from which no ordinary man can redeem his fellow-man. Only the Lord Jesus can do this. The believer will one day rise from the dead with an incorrupt and incorruptible body, 1 Corinthians 15:42,53. More than that, because the Lord is coming to take His people to heaven, some of them will not even go into the grave at all.

8. “I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death“, Hosea 13:14.

Here God promises to deliver from the hold that the grave has on the bodies of believers. The apostle Paul alludes to this passage when he is dealing with the resurrection of the saints in 1 Corinthians 15:57. Christ shall rescue their bodies from the grave when He comes for His own.

The Redeemer
As we have said, one who undertakes to redeem must first be willing, and then be wealthy. The only one who is both willing to pay the price, and wealthy enough to do so, is the Lord Jesus. The price He was prepared to pay was nothing less than Himself, yielded up to God in death. The root cause of man’s slavery in all its forms is the sin that has brought death into the world. Because He was sinless, and not in any sort of slavery, the Lord Jesus was free to deal with our bondage.
When He preached in the synagogue at Nazareth, the Lord Jesus announced that He was the one of whom Isaiah prophesied in chapter 61 of his book. He quoted the words as follows, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, for he hath anointed me to…preach deliverance to the captives”, Luke 4:18. Yet He did not deliver John the Baptist from prison! The deliverance in view must therefore be of the spiritual kind, the kind of which the eight scriptures quoted above speak.
Redemption is illustrated for us in Exodus 12, where the blood of an innocent lamb was shed and sprinkled, and as a result Israel were delivered from bondage to Pharoah. The apostle Peter takes this up, and speaks of the precious blood of Christ, “as of a lamb without blemish and without spot”, 1 Peter 1:19. Since the blood represents the life of a person, the blood of Christ is precious because His Person is precious to God.
Things may be precious in three ways. They may be precious because they are special. An object may have little monetary value, yet be extremely precious because of what it represents. The blood of Christ is precious because He is without blemish and without spot. He is pure without as to character, and pure within as to nature, and as such is special to God, and to those who believe in Him.
Things can be also be precious because they are, in fact, valuable. Christ is God’s only begotten Son, John 3:16, and His dear Son, Colossians 1:13. God the Father values Him highly, yet freely delivered Him up for us all. We see how valuable His blood was by how precious He is, and by how much it has and will achieve.
Things can also be precious because they are memorable, reminding us of some great event. There was no greater event than the death of the Lord Jesus at Calvary. What could surpass the death of the Son of God? Throughout all eternity the redeemed shall sing a new song, and that song is prompted by the fact that the Lamb was slain, and has redeemed to God by His blood, Revelation 5:9.

The ransom
A ransom was the price paid so that a slave could be bought out of the market-place. On payment of this ransom-price, the slave became the property of the one purchasing his freedom. The ransom price that was necessary to buy sinners out of the slave-market of sin is nothing less than the blood of Christ. His own words were, “For even the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.” Mark 10:45. Wonderful as His earthly ministry was, it was surpassed by what He did at Calvary, where He gave Himself, in all the glory of His person, to God.
1 Timothy 2:6 is to the same effect, where the apostle writes that He “gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time”. This is offered by the apostle as support for what he wrote previously in verse 4, where he stated that God’s desire is that all men should be saved. The genuineness of that desire is seen in that He has appointed His Son as the ransom for all.

The release
When a person believes on the Lord Jesus, having acknowledged slavery to sin, and the complete inability to deliver himself from bondage, certain things happen. We may think of them in connection with the eight scriptures quoted at the outset.

1. “Jesus answered them, whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.” John 8:34.

The Lord Jesus went on to say that “If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.” verse 36. The word “indeed” means “to the very core of your being”. In other words, absolutely free. Not free superficially, or provisionally, or temporarily, but free absolutely and permanently. Such is the thoroughness with which the Lord Jesus frees those who believe in Him.
How does this work out in practice? He also said in that chapter, “and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, verse 32. The truth of the scriptures, when believed, makes free in principle, and when applied to the life, makes free in practice.
An instance of this is the truth of the believer’s association with Christ in His burial and resurrection, which frees us as we act upon it. Romans 6:11 says, “Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.” This is the way of practical deliverance, reckoning to be true in practice what is true in principle; making sure that the truth of the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ affects our thinking and our acting. The apostle goes on in that same chapter to write, “But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine that was delivered you. Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.” Romans 6:17,18. To be free from sin does not mean that believers never sin, or even that they have no ability to sin, but it does mean that the sin-principle within has no right to hold them in bondage any more.

2. “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers”, 1 Peter 1:18.

The vain conversation Peter refers to here is that empty way of life that dominates unsaved people. They have no power to break free from the course on which this world takes them, for the prince of this world ensures that there is plenty to occupy their minds and hearts. Redeemed persons are free of that, however, and their lives can now be taken up with that which is of God.

3. “that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage”, Hebrews 2:14,15.

The true believer does not fear death itself, even though he might fear the process of dying. The apostle Paul reminded the Corinthians that all things were theirs, including death, 1 Corinthians 3:21,22. It is but a servant who ushers them into the presence of their Lord. There is no need to have anxious fears such as an Israelite of old had, for the one who tormented men with the fear of death has been defeated, and his power broken.

4. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us”, Galatians 3:13.

There was a curse pronounced on those who were hung upon a tree or gallows in Old Testament times. Such an one was marked out as being cursed of God because of his crimes. Christ went further, however, for He was not only hung upon a tree or cross and numbered with the transgressors, but He was made a curse. He accepted responsibility for the law-breaking of men, and the judgment it involved. Because He is risen from the dead, we may be assured that no curse will come upon the true believer, since He dealt with the curse instead. It is blessing that comes to the believer, not cursing, Galatians 3:14.

5. “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.” Galatians 4:8.

Many of the Galatian believers had been idol-worshippers before they were saved. Their idols held them in superstitious fear. This was slavery indeed, with no prospect of release until they heard the message of deliverance through Christ which Paul preached. He could announce that Christ has spoiled the evil angels that held men in their grip, making a show over them openly by means of the cross, Colossians 2:15.
When God delivered Israel from Egypt, He also executed judgment on the gods of the Egyptians, Exodus 12:12, for they worshipped demons under the form of natural things like the river Nile, and frogs and lice. These were the things that God used to plague Egypt before the Exodus, thus showing their folly in worshipping them, and also showing His power over them.

6. “And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.” Romans 8:23.

This is the part of redemption that is still in the future, yet is certain to take place. At the Lord’s coming the believer will enter into sonship, (here referred to as adoption), in the fullest possible way, being conformed to the image of God’s Son, Romans 8:29. This involves the change of the body, so that it is set free from the bondage that corruption and decay has brought it into because of Adam’s sin. Then, with bodies freed from every limitation, believers shall serve God as they ought.

7. “None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him…that he should still live for ever, and not see corruption“, Psalm 49:7,9.

Whilst it is true that believers still die, nevertheless the Lord Jesus said, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.” John 8:51. Such is the power of the everlasting life that believers possess, that even death is virtually a non-entity as far as they are concerned. Every person who has believed has already passed from death unto life, John 5:24, so that death is simply the necessary process on the way to the gaining of the resurrection body. The “resurrection chapter”, 1 Corinthians 15, states, using the illustration of the sowing of a seed, “that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die”, verse 36. The farmer who leaves the seed-corn in the barn and does not sow it, should not expect a harvest.

8. “I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death: O death, I will be thy plagues; O grave, I will be thy destruction: repentance shall be hid from mine eyes.” Hosea 13:14.

When he was setting out what shall happen at the resurrection of the saints, the apostle alluded to the verse quoted above. Hosea was prophesying, so he uses the future tense. The apostle wrote as if the saints had been raised, and he writes of their victory on that resurrection morning as they ask, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? 1 Corinthians 15:55. The plague of death shall itself be plagued when Christ comes, and the grave shall be destroyed as far as its power is concerned. In Revelation 1:18 the Lord Jesus announced to John, “I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.” He holds the keys of hell so that no believer of this age shall go there, but shall go to Paradise. He holds the keys of death so that every saint shall rise from the grave.

The response
How should the believer react to this redemption? To answer this we could ask how a slave who had a cruel master should respond when he is freed. Will he not be greatly relieved to be delivered from his former slave-master? Will he not do his best to please the one who has ransomed him? So the believer, delivered from the forms of cruel bondage we have listed, should indeed be grateful to his new Master. Especially as that Master has paid an extremely high price to set him free. There should be devotedness to the one who has set us free at such a cost to Himself. There is no danger of falling into the hands of a cruel slave-master again, since redemption, once known, can never be withdrawn.
But there is a feature about deliverance from slavery by Christ that is very unusual. The one-time slaves are elevated to being sons! This is the language of scripture, “But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.” Galatians 4:4-7.
It is God’s desire to fill heaven with those who are like His Son, and He does it by redeeming those who are slaves to sin, and positioning them as His sons. “For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Romans 8:29.

Having considered these various aspects of redemption, we can see that they combine the two ideas of deliverance from bondage and deliverance from bankrupcy. When the Israelites were in bondage in Egypt, they were not free to serve God. Because of this, they built up a debt of obligation to God from which only the blood of the lamb could rescue them. The same is true in the case of Ruth and Naomi. The latter had left the land of Israel with her husband, and gone to live in Moab. Whilst there, she could not go up to the temple to worship. As for Ruth her daughter-in-law, she would have been an idol worshipper before she converted to the faith of Israel. Both of them were in debt to God because of their previous failure to give Him His due. Only Boaz, their kinsman redeemer, could deliver them.

We return now to verse 25.

5(e)   3:25
The righteousness of God and propitiation

3:25
Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

Whom God hath set forth- this verb is in the Middle Voice, which indicates that the one acting has a personal interest and involvement in the thing that is done. In this case, God has a personal interest in setting Christ Jesus forth. He did so in the words of John the Baptist, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29. Then He did it through the public death of Christ by crucifixion, and then again in the proclamation of the gospel.
To be a propitiation- propitiation is that aspect of the sacrificial death of the Lord Jesus at Calvary whereby He gave to God the full and satisfactory answer to the demands which the righteousness of God made against sins. By so doing, He enabled God to maintain His own integrity and at the same time justify those who believe the gospel.
As the “pro” at the beginning of the word suggests, it is a work done towards God; that is, in relation to what He is Himself. The results manward are secondary. Indeed the work of propitiation would be glorifying to God even if there were no results manward.
Through faith- this is the means by which the benefits resulting from propitiation are gained. Man’s faith does not bring about propitiation, nor does it add to it, but it is vitally necessary, since it is the condition God lays down whereby we may have the blessing that propitiation secures. Faith is the avenue down which the benefits of propitiation come to us.
In his blood- the blood of Christ is that which does finally what the blood of bulls and goats did typically on the Day of Atonement, Leviticus 16:15,16. Christ’s blood effects propitiation, faith secures the benefit. Propitiation is “through faith” only in the sense that only those who exercise faith are in the good of Christ’s work. This was the case on the Day of Atonement, for only those who afflicted their souls, (repented), and abstained from work, (the essence of faith, see Romans 4:5), could continue in the nation, and be in the good of the propitiation made. Leviticus 23:26-32 makes this clear.
To declare his righteousness- at Calvary every Divine attribute, including righteousness, was brought out into fullest display. Anticipating the cross, the Lord Jesus prayed, “Father, glorify thy name.” The Father’s immediate response was, “I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again”, John 12:28. Later, the Lord Jesus can say, as He anticipates the completion of His work on the cross, “Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him”, John 13:31. This is why the gospel can be called “the glorious gospel of the blessed God”, 1 Timothy 1:11, for the glory of God is told out as the truth of the gospel is proclaimed.
For the remission of sins that are past- this means “because of the passing over of sins done before”, that is, in Old Testament times. “Before” does not mean before conversion, but before Christ came into the world. Remission here is not forgiveness, but God passing by sins, and not dealing with them in immediate judgment. There was not, generally, the instant dealing with sins committed before Christ’s death which we might have thought a righteous God would have put into effect.
Through the forbearance of God- His forbearance means His holding up the process of immediately dealing with sins in judgment. Paul said that God winked at the former times of ignorance, Acts 17:30, not in the sense that He ignored what was going on, but He chose not to immediately judge men’s ignorance, and graciously bore with men in view of the coming of Christ. The work of Christ at the cross vindicates God for acting like this. At the present time the reason why sins are not instantly dealt with is because of His longsuffering and grace.

Special note on propitiation
We should never underestimate the importance of that aspect of the work of the Lord Jesus at Calvary known as propitiation. This is because the honour of God, the blessing of men, the introduction of Christ’s millenial kingdom, and the new heavens and the new earth, all depend upon it. When thinking of this vital matter, we need to be clear as to what propitiation actually is. It may be defined as follows: “Propitiation is that aspect of the work of Christ at Calvary whereby He gave to God complete answers to the questions raised by the existence of sin”.

There are seven instances of the use of forms of the word propitiation in the New Testament, and they are as follows, emphasised by being in bold type for the sake of clarity, although not found in bold in the Authorised Version:

1. “God be merciful to me a sinner”, Luke 18:13.

2. “whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood”, Romans 3:25.

3. “that He might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people”, Hebrews 2:17.

4. “For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness”, Hebrews 8:12.

5. “and over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy seat“, Hebrews 9:5.

6. “And He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world”, 1 John 2:2.

7. “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins”, 1 John 4:10.

As we consider this subject in the light of the Scriptures, we could ask ourselves three main questions:

Why was propitiation necessary? How was propitiation achieved? What are the results of propitiation?

Why was propitiation necessary?

Because sins offend God
As God is the Absolute Standard of righteousness and holiness, all deviations from this standard are highly offensive to Him. Such is the intensity of His holiness that the simple mention of it is enough to make the posts of the doors of the temple in heaven move, Isaiah 6:3,4. His reaction to sin and iniquity is to turn from it, for He is of purer eyes than to behold evil, and He cannot look upon iniquity, Habakkuk 1:13. The very presence of sin in the universe is a grief to God.

Because as Moral Governor of the universe, He must be seen to deal with sins
God has enemies, both devilish and human, and He must be clear of any charge which they may level against Him that suggests He has ignored sins, or at least, ignored some sins. Eternity must not be allowed to run its course without this matter being settled. God deals with some sins instantly, but the majority seem to have gone unpunished. Sentence against an evil work has not been executed speedily, Ecclesiastes 8:11, since God is longsuffering, and waits to be gracious. This situation might give rise to the charge of indifference to sins, and so God must act to defend His honour.

Because God must have a just basis for continuing to have dealings with sinful men
One of the main purposes of the sacrifices on the Day of Atonement in Israel was that God might continue to dwell amongst them despite their uncleanness, Leviticus 16:16. So also when Christ was down here. It was only because God was not imputing trespasses so as to instantly judge them, but rather was working to reconcile men unto Himself, that He was prepared to have dealings with men in the person of His Son. As the apostle Paul says, “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them”, 2 Corinthians 5:19.

Because if men are to be shown mercy, have their sins forgiven, and be reconciled to God, there must be a solid basis upon which these things can happen
God declares Himself to be a Saviour God. He cannot be fully satisfied solely by judging men. The fact that “God is light” demands that this be done, but “God is love” too, and delights to manifest Himself in grace.

Because the cycle of sin must be broken
In other words, if there is not to be an eternal succession of creations, falls, remedies for fall, and new creations, then there must be that established which is once for all, giving the complete answer to the question of sin. Unless this complete answer is given, the new heavens and new earth will not be safe from disturbance.

How was propitiation achieved?

The ceremonies of the Day of Atonement as described in Leviticus chapter 16 will help us here. We need to be very careful in our interpretation of them, however. We should remember two things. First, that the Old Testament teaches by way of contrast as well as by comparison. Second, that Christ’s ministry is in connection with a sanctuary which is “not of this building”, Hebrews 9:11. That means it is not part of the creation of Genesis chapter one. So even whilst acting on earth, He was operating in relation to a sphere that is not subject to the limitations of time, space, and matter.
In accordance with this, the writer to the Hebrews indicates that the going forth of the Lord Jesus outside the camp was the counterpart of the carrying of the carcase of the sin offering from the altar, where it had been slain, to a place of burning outside the camp, Leviticus 16:27; Hebrews 13:11,12. But this particular ritual took place almost at the end of the Day of Atonement proceedings, whereas the Lord Jesus went outside the camp before He died. We may say then that in one sense time is irrelevant as far as the work of Christ was concerned.
Again, what took place at the altar in the court of the tabernacle; before the ark in the Holiest of All; outside the camp at the place of burning, and in the wilderness where the scapegoat was taken and let go, all typified some aspect of the work of Christ. So place is irrelevant, too.
And so is matter irrelevant. Christ needed no visible ark to enable Him to convince His Father that His blood had been shed. When the repentant man of Luke 18:13 appealed to God to be merciful to him, (that is, to be gracious towards him on the ground of propitiation made), he went down to his house justified, despite the fact that there was no ark in the temple.
With these cautionary remarks in mind, we look now at Leviticus 16, and note those major parts of the ceremonies of that day which contribute towards making propitiation, the great end for which they were carried out.

A suitable sin offering was brought near
We must remember that the word “offer” that is used in Leviticus 16:6 means to bring near. A sacrifice must be offered before it can be laid on the altar. The blood that purges the conscience of God’s people is the blood of One who “offered himself without spot to God”, Hebrews 9:14. That is, of One who presented Himself for sacrifice in all the spotlessness of His person, confident that He met the approval of His God.

An offering was made sin
In Leviticus 16:9 a different word for offer is used, one which simply means to make. The offering is made in the sense that it is reckoned to be sin. So the animal, having had the sins of Aaron and his household figuratively transferred to it, is by that act made to represent those sins. Whatever happens to the animal subsequently, happens to the sin. The apostle Paul takes up this thought in 2 Corinthians 5:21 when he declares that God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” It is exceedingly solemn to think that God’s reaction to our sin became His reaction to Christ as the sinner’s substitute. So we may learn in the fullest sense what God’s reaction to sin is by looking to the cross where He forsook His Son and poured out His wrath upon Him. Such is the intensity of God’s hatred of sin, and such is His determination to deal with it, that He “spared not his own Son”, not shielding Him at all from the fury of His anger; not lessening the penalty, not relieving the pain. Who can tell the agony of Christ’s soul when He was dealt with by God as if He were sin! Of course, He remained personally what He always had been, pure and holy, just as the sin-offering is said to be most holy, Leviticus 6:17; but He was made sin as our representative.

The offering was slain and its blood was shed
“For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.” Leviticus 17:11. Such are the words of God to His people, teaching us that the shedding of blood is vitally important, for “without shedding of blood is no remission”, Hebrews 9:22. Accordingly, that sins might be dealt with, Christ “hath poured out his soul unto death”, Isaiah 53:12.

The carcase was burnt
Having been presented to God as a living animal at the altar, and having been slain and its blood retained, the animal’s carcase must be taken to the outside place, that it may be subjected to the fires of Divine holiness until nothing is left. How significant the contrast to Christ. For He was subjected to the Divine Fires whilst still alive, on the cross. How He must have suffered! Can we begin to take it in? Will not all eternity be needed to set forth what He was prepared to endure in love for our souls? But endure He did, and exhausted the fire of God’s wrath against sins. The fire exhausted the sin offering, but Christ exhausted the fire, and emerged in resurrection.
We must be careful to distinguish between punishment for sins and penalty for sins. Strictly speaking, no-one can bear the punishment for the sins of another, for personal culpability is implied in the word punishment. A person can bear the penalty for the sins of another, however, and this is what Christ has done. God can still justly punish sinners in the lake of fire, since they refused to believe in the One who bore the penalty, and thereby excluded themselves from the benefits He obtained. While it is true that propitiation is not made by the faith of a person, but by the blood of Christ, it is, nevertheless, made good to the person, (and only to the person), who believes, as Romans 3:25 makes clear.

The blood was sprinkled
We come now to the central action on the Day of Atonement, the sprinkling of the blood both of the bullock for Aaron and his house, and the goat for the nation of Israel, on the mercy-seat. This translates a word which signifies “the place for the covering of sin”. If God covers sins, then they are put completely out of His sight. We ought not to think of this covering as a temporary thing, or else we shall have difficulty understanding why God declared that Israel was cleansed from all their sins that day, Leviticus 16:30. It is true that the Scripture says “For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.” Hebrews 10:4, but what that blood symbolises, even the death of Christ, can. And that not only after Calvary, but before as well.
Now when the writer to the Hebrews referred to this Old Testament mercy-seat, he used the Greek word which means propitiatory, the place where God is propitiated in regard to sins. This makes clear that he did not see a distinction between covering and propitiating. There are various figures of speech used in connection with God dealing with sins. He removes them as far as the east is from the west, Psalm 103:12; He casts them behind His back, Isaiah 38:17; blots them out as if by a thick cloud, Isaiah 44:22; casts them into the depths of the sea, Micah 7:19. These are all metaphors, for sins are not material objects. When God does these things, then the matter is thoroughly dealt with. And so when He covers.
Christ has fully met every demand that God could make about sins. As one of the Persons of the Godhead, He has Divine insight into God’s requirements, and He has fully met those requirements. We are assured of this because He has sat down with confidence at the right hand of the Majesty on high, Hebrews 1:3. He purged sins in harmony with the majesty of God.
But He has also established a sure place in the presence of God for those who believe, so that the apostle Paul can speak of the grace wherein we stand, Romans 5:2. So dominant is the idea of grace with regard to that position, that the apostle uses the word grace to describe it. Only those who have “received the atonement”, Romans 5:11, are in that secure place before God.

The sins were confessed and carried away
The sin-offering for the people consisted of two goats, one for the Lord’s interests, and one for theirs. One, as we have seen, was slain so that its blood could be sprinkled on the mercy-seat. The other was called the scape-goat, or goat that was dismissed and went away. There was no double sin-offering for Aaron and his house, for he had seen the blood on the mercy-seat, and since he had not died, he knew it had been accepted, and his sins were gone. The rest of Israel did not have that experience, however, so to reassure them, they were able to see Aaron lay his hands on their goat, confess over it their sins, and then watch the goat, which carried its dreadful load of their sins, disappear into the wilderness, guided by a man whose fitness lay in his ability to take the animal to a place from which it could not return. The writer to the Hebrews takes up these things in Hebrews 9:26 and 28, where he speaks of Christ appearing to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. This is the counterpart of the blood of the first goat that was slain so that its blood could be sprinkled on the mercy-seat. Then he speaks of Christ bearing the sins of many, and now he is thinking of the scapegoat. When the Lord Jesus was forsaken of His God upon the Cross, He was in a judicial position equal to that of the scapegoat, which was accepted as an offering, but rejected because of the load it bore.

What are the results of propitiation?

The demands of God have been fully met
To satisfy God as the Moral Governor of the universe, an adequate and final answer must be found to the question of sin. The demands of His holiness and righteousness are such that He must respond to every sin. Only Christ is adequate for this situation. He it is who has “put away sin by the sacrifice of himself”, Hebrews 9:26. To put away in that verse means to abolish. As far as God is concerned, and in this context, sin is not. No charge can henceforth be made against God that He has ignored the presence of sin. On the contrary, He has taken account of each and every sin through His Son’s work at Calvary. John wrote, “He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world”, 1 John 2:2. Of course “the sins of” is in italics in that verse, being physically absent from the Greek text. But the words are implied in the “ours” of the previous statement. If John had written “not for us only”, then the translation could have continued “but also for the whole world”. Since, however, he uses the possessive pronoun “ours”, which shows he is writing about the sins people possess, then “the sins of” must be inserted.

Now the apostle will write later “And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.” 1 John 5:19. He sees mankind divided into two clearly defined sections, namely those who are “of God”, that is, believers, and “the whole world”. John not only clearly distinguishes between believers and the world, but just as clearly states that Christ is the propitiatory offering for both classes. That Christ became the propitiation for the whole world does not mean that the whole world will be saved, since propitiation is only made good to a person when he believes. It does mean, however, that no charge may be levelled against God for not making provision for men. Gospel-blessing may be genuinely offered to all men, for there is abundant provision for all.

God’s dealings were vindicated
In Old Testament times God blessed men by reckoning them righteous when they believed in Him. Romans 3:25 indicates that the propitiatory work of Christ vindicates God for so acting. It can be seen now that God was blessing in anticipation, crediting believers with the results of Christ’s work before they had been achieved. He also remitted, or passed over, their sins in forbearance, holding back from judging those sins in virtue of what His Son would do at Calvary.

God’s glory is fully displayed
There is no attribute of God that has not been fully expressed at Calvary. This is why the apostle Paul speaks of rejoicing in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement, Romans 5:11. By His sacrificial work at Calvary Christ has brought the character of God out into full and glorious display. Those who are brought by faith into the good of that work are enabled to behold that display, and rejoice in it. Would we know Divine holiness, or righteousness, or love, or wrath, or any other aspect of the Person of God? Then we must look to the cross for the sight of it. We shall not be disappointed.

God’s mercy is available
The repentant sinner who called upon God to be merciful to him is the first person in the New Testament to use a word based on propitiation; in effect praying, “God be merciful to me on the basis of propitiation”. He went down to his house justified, Luke 18:13,14. Under the terms of the New Covenant, God promises, “I will be merciful to their unrighteousness”, Hebrews 8:12. The mercy-seat was the same width and breadth as the ark, telling us that the ark (Christ as to His Person), and the mercy-seat, (Christ as to His work), were perfectly matched. But we are not told the thickness of the gold of the mercy-seat, for there is an infinite supply of mercy for those who believe, enough to keep them secure for all eternity.

God’s forgiveness is assured
In Hebrews 10:5-9 we have the Spirit of Christ in the psalmist foretelling His work of sacrifice. Then we have the Spirit’s direct testimony telling us of the results of that work, Hebrews 10:15-17. God promises emphatically that He will not remember the sins and iniquities of His people any more, since He brought those sins into remembrance at Calvary, and Christ dealt with them effectively there. “No more” means in no way, nor at any time. Note that God pledges to positively not remember, not negatively to forget. We may forget, and then remember again, whereas God promises never to remember for ever.

God’s people are preserved
The Lord Jesus spoke to Mary Magdalene after He was risen, and instructed her to tell the brethren that He was about to “ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God”, John 20:17. Thus He would still be the link between His people and God, maintaining them in His dual role of Advocate with the Father, and High Priest in things pertaining to God.
The basis of His advocacy is two-fold. His person, for He is Jesus Christ the righteous, and His work, for He is the propitiation for our sins, 1 John 2:1,2. The apostle John was concerned about believers sinning. The sins of believers are just as obnoxious to God, and just as deserving of wrath, as those of unbelievers. But we are “saved from wrath through Him”, Romans 5:9, as He pleads the merits of His work. He is, says John, the propitiatory offering for our sins. Not was, but is. In other words, the one who acts for us in heaven as our advocate, is the very same one who hung upon the cross as a sacrifice for our sins.
He is also our High priest. The language of Hebrews 2:17,18 is as follows, “Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted”. These verses form a bridge between chapter two, with its emphasis on the reasons why the Lord Jesus took manhood, and chapters three and four, which tell of the way in which Israel were tempted in the wilderness.
Note in particular the word “for” which begins verse 18. Too little attention has been paid to this word, and hence the connection between verses 17 and 18 is often lost. The reason why we have a high priest who is merciful and faithful is that He has been here in manhood and suffered being tempted. When His people pass through temptation, then He undertakes to deal with their cause. Because He has been here, and has been tempted in all points like as we are, He is able to assist us when we cry to Him for help. The word for succour is used by the woman of Canaan in Matthew 15:25 when she cried out, “Lord, help me”. He is able to point us to the ways in which He overcame in the wilderness temptation, and thus we are strengthened to resist temptation.
But what if we fall, and sin? In that case He comes to our aid in another way. We see it typified negatively in Leviticus 10:16-20. The priests were commanded to eat the sin-offerings, if the blood thereof had not been brought into the sanctuary. But at the end of the consecration of the priesthood, Moses was angry on God’s behalf, for the priests had failed in this. Moses said, “God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord”, Leviticus 10:17. One of the functions of priesthood, then, was to personally identify with the sin-offering by eating it, and by so doing bear the iniquity of the congregation, taking responsibility for their failure, but doing so safeguarded by the fact that a sin-offering had been accepted by God. As they did this the scripture explicitly says they made atonement for the people, Leviticus 10:17. We see then what the writer to the Hebrews means when he speaks of Christ making reconciliation for the sins of the people as High Priest. He is indicating that Christ personally identifies Himself with His sin-offering work at Calvary, and thus takes responsibility for the failures of His people under temptation as He pleads their cause before God.

God’s purpose for the earth is furthered
When Adam the head of the first creation fell, all creation had to be subjected to vanity, or else a fallen man would have been head over an unfallen creation, Romans 8:19-23. Now that the Lord Jesus has obtained rights over the earth by His death, He is able to bring in new conditions for God. He can now righteously deliver the present creation from the bondage of corruption into which it was brought by the fall of man. Colossians 1:20 assures us that on the basis of the blood of His cross, all things, whether in earth or in heaven, shall be reconciled to God, for that alienation between God and His creation which took place at the fall can be remedied. Notice it is things, not people, that are spoken of in that verse as being reconciled.

God’s intention to create a new heavens and new earth can be realised
Unless the sin that has marred the first creation is dealt with, God cannot righteously introduce an eternal earth and heavens, for it would not have been evident that He was able to deal with the fall of the first creation. Having dealt with it through Christ, however, He is able to bring in new things that will never be spoiled. Daniel was told that Messiah the Prince would bring in “everlasting righteousness”, Daniel 9:24, and this He will do, on the basis of His death. It only remains for God to announce “Behold, I make all things new”, Revelation 21:5, and a “new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness”, shall be established, 2 Peter 3:13. At last there will be a settled and congenial place in which righteousness can dwell, after all the turmoil brought in by Adam’s sin. Then those profound words spoken by John the Baptist will be fully brought to pass, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29.

5(f)   3:26
The righteousness of God and justification

3:26
To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness- having been shown that the work of propitiation vindicates God’s past dealings, we learn here of God’s righteous dealings in the present.
That he might be just- that is, might maintain His righteous character, even while He is blessing guilty sinners.
And the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus- the work of Christ enables God to be two things at the same time, namely, to be just, and also the one who reckons sinners just. It is part of His glory that He does not clear the guilty, Exodus 34:7, but He can with true justice forgive the guilty when they plead the work of Christ on their behalf.
The name Jesus emphasises that it is a real and historical man that enables God to justify. The sinless man has become the sin-offering, so that the sinful men of verses 10-18 might be sin-free.

Section 6   Romans 3:27-4:25
God’s grace towards men as their Justifier

Subject of Section 6
Having shown in a previous parenthesis, 1:18-3:20, the pressing need of the gospel in view of the wrath of God which hung over Jew and Gentile alike, and then having explained the terms of the gospel in 3:21-26, the apostle now expands on the expression he had used in verse 22, “unto all.” Does this really mean that the imputed righteousness of God is unto all men, without exception? Is the same God who is angry against the sins of Jews and Gentiles, also the God who will forgive those sins? To answer this question, the apostle selects two of the most revered figures in Old Testament history to convince his readers, whether Jew or Gentile, that the righteousness of God which comes through faith is indeed available to them all. Before he does this, however, he answers three initial questions that may be on the minds of his readers at this point.

Structure of Section 6

6(a)

3:27, 28

Question One: Can man boast?

6(b)

3:29,30

Question Two: Is God biased?

6(c)

3:31

Question Three: Is law banished?


6(a)   3:27,28
Question One: Can man boast?

3:27
Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

Where is boasting then? The mention of the glory of God in verse 23 has reminded the apostle that God deserves all the glory from His creatures. Does the gospel ensure this, or does it leave room for men to boast, reserving some glory for themselves?
It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith-the answer to this question is that boasting on the part of man is totally excluded by the “law of faith”, that is, the principle of faith. The gospel calls for faith, and by definition faith is reliance totally on another, and hence leaves no room for man to boast that he has tried to do the works of the law. The law of works could not exclude boasting, for it expected human effort, in which a man would tend to boast. The apostle returns to this in 4:1-8.

3:28
Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law- the word ‘conclude’ means ‘reckon with logical thought’. The truth of the gospel, summed up here by the phrase “justified by faith”, will stand the test of the most rigorous examination.

6(b)   3:29,30
Question Two: Is God biased?

3:29
Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:

Is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Given that God specially singled out the people of Israel for unique advantages in the Old Testament, is He still restricting His blessing to them?
Yes, of the Gentiles also- here is the answer, that the one and same God (“it is one God”, verse 30) who blesses Jews with salvation through faith, blesses Gentiles likewise. In this verse the apostle speaks of the two great divisions of humanity in the context of nationality, Jew and Gentile, whereas in the next verse he will refer to them in the context of religion, as those circumcised or uncircumcised.

3:30
Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

Seeing it is one God- there is only one true God, and He is undivided in His person and in His intentions. He blesses men on consistent principles, which are in harmony with His own nature and character.
Which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and the uncircumcision through faith- since salvation is not through law-works, which law was given only to the Jews, the way is open for any to come. “By faith”, or literally “out of faith”, means on the principle of faith, as opposed to the principle of works which the Jews was familiar with, and to which circumcision committed them.
As for the Gentiles, here called the uncircumcision, justification is “through faith”, or literally “by the instrumentality of faith”, for the Gentiles did not have any other instrument before, for they were not interested in keeping God’s law. By circumcising their male sons, the Jews committed them to the law with its system of works, whereas Gentile boys were not thus committed. The apostle returns to this in 4:9-12.

6(c)   3:31
Question Three: Is law banished?

3:31
Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

Do we then make void the law through faith? Are the just requirements of the law cancelled and made of no effect by the gospel?
God forbid: yea, we establish the law- the apostle is emphatic that the gospel establishes the law, upholding as it does all the righteous principles set out in the law of Moses, and is just as insistent as the law in asserting that man is a sinner. See 1 Timothy 1:8-11, where the demands of the law, sound doctrine, and the gospel are in full agreement. Christ Himself said “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” Matthew 5:17,18.
In His death the Lord Jesus met all the claims of the God who had been offended by the breaking of His law, thus showing that far from being indifferent to the law, the gospel makes known that its claims are met in Christ, as the apostle makes clear in Galatians 3:10,13. After all, “justify” is a law-court word, indicating acquittal from all charge. Paul returns to this in 4:13-16.