Tag Archives: humility

1 PETER 5

1 PETER 5

Survey of the chapter
Having spoken of various aspects of the sufferings of Christ, some of which the believer may share, the apostle now turns to what we may call Pastoral Sufferings, those things that come upon those who dedicate themselves to the task of caring for the flock of God. This occupies most of the verses of the chapter, and is followed by a short section of greetings.

5:1
The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed:

The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder- as an older man, Peter is now more permanently in an assembly, apparently at Babylon, verse 13. When he was reinstated publicly as the first of the apostles on the shores of Galilee, Peter had been instructed by the Lord in the matter of fishing for souls by what the Lord did, as He showed that He was in total control of where and when and how many fish would be caught, John 21:6. So this was Peter’s evangelistic task, which he discharged faithfully. Now he is older, and the second charge from the Lord comes to the fore, that of feeding and caring for the sheep and lambs in the flock of God, verses 15-17. It is as one who has discharged this duty faithfully that the apostle writes to the elders in the churches scattered throughout Asia Minor. This is not to say that he did not shepherd before, or that he was not evangelising then, but that the emphasis has changed.

And a witness of the sufferings of Christ- the particular sufferings indicated here are those which the Lord endured because of His care for the “little flock”, who had gathered around Him. They are what we might call His pastoral sufferings. He was no hireling, fleeing when trouble came, but stood firm and defended the truth and His disciples, John 10:11,13. We see this very clearly when He was in Gethsemane, and the band came to arrest Him. He stepped forward and allowed Himself to be apprehended, but first asked that His disciples be allowed to make their escape, which they did, John 18:8.

And also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed- despite much failure on that terrible night, Peter was confident that, as a restored man, reward in the form of association with Christ in His glory awaited him, as it does all others who faithfully shepherd the flock.

5:2
Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind;

Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof- what Peter had been instructed to do on the shore of Lake Galilee, he now enjoins on those who shepherd the flock of God. They are to be fed, and not just led. Or rather, they are to be led into green pastures so as to be fed. It is the duty of shepherds to ensure that the sheep in their care are supplied with suitable spiritual food.

The expression “the oversight” is sometimes misused to refer to a company of elders or shepherds. Really, though, it is something that is done, the overseeing of the work of others to ensure that it is done to God’s glory, and also, as in this context, to watch over the flock, alert for danger, and ready to supply the needs of their souls. To take the oversight means to engage in the work of overseership as an elder or shepherd of the flock.

Not by constraint, but willingly- the task will not be done in a spiritual way if a man is coerced into doing the work. His heart must be in it, a heart for Christ’s glory and a heart for the welfare of believers.

Not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind- a true shepherd will not need financial incentives to undertake the work. In fact, the payment of a stipend is liable to attract the wrong sort of person. A great deal of resources have been diverted into the payment of salaries to men who should, if fitted to do the work, do it without monetary reward.

5:3
Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock.

Neither as being lords over God’s heritage, but being ensamples to the flock- an elder is not a ruler in the political sense of the word. The heritage, (the flock of God), belongs to God, and not to man. It is His “allotted portion”, such is the meaning of the word heritage. Instead of insisting that believer’s conform to his will, the true elder will show Christ-like features in his life, so that they may be followed by the rest of the flock. An Eastern shepherd did not drive his flock as a dictator, but led them as one who could be safely followed.

5:4
And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away.

And when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away- overseers should remember that they too are being overseen. The Chief Shepherd is keeping His watchful eye on both the flock and the undershepherds. With this in mind, they will be diligent, and their reward will be granted when Christ comes to reign. That reward will be in the form of a crown, which, unlike the fading and withering crowns awarded at the Olympic Games, will never decay, but shall abide eternally to Christ’s praise. Christ is the Good Shepherd as to His ability; Great Shepherd as to His activity; Chief Shepherd as to His authority.

5:5
Likewise, ye younger, submit yourselves unto the elder. Yea, all of you be subject one to another, and be clothed with humility: for God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble.

Likewise, ye younger, submit yourselves unto the elder- “the elder” is no more a sole shepherd of the flock than “the younger” implies there is only one young person in view. The idea is that the class of people described as younger are to be in submission to the class of people described as the elder. The New Testament knows nothing of the idea of one man being solely responsible for the leading of the flock. The “likewise” links back to verse 1, with “I exhort” addressed to the elders there; Peter is likewise exhorting the younger here.

Yea, all of you be subject one to another- this is the lesson Peter learned in the upper room, for the Lord detected that there was a spirit of rivalry amongst the disciples, “for there was a strife among them, which of them should be accounted the greatest”. He rebuked them saying, “The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so: but he that is greatest among you, let him be as the younger; and he that is chief, as he that doth serve. For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? Is not he that sitteth at meat? But I am among you as one that serveth”, Luke 22:24-27.

And be clothed with humility- Peter had watched in amazement and not a little discomfort, when the Lord Jesus rose from supper in the upper room, girded Himself with a towel, the symbol of service, and began to wash His disciples’ feet. What a powerful lesson in humility! The Lord of all, but girded like a servant! But He had taken the servant’s form so that He could be found in fashion as a man, Philippians 2:7,8. As such He is the supreme example of humility and service. As He said to the disciples, “For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you”, John 13:15.

For God resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble- when the proud rise up, then God marshalls His forces to resist them, meanwhile giving grace to the humble to bear with their bad attitude.

5:6
Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time:

Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time- as far as the younger ones are concerned, some of them will become elders in an assembly when they have matured. They are assured that when the due time comes they will be given this positiion by God. But the principle applies to all believers, for “he that humbleth himself shall be exalted” is the word of Christ, Luke 14:11, and those who take the low place on earth shall receive a correspondingly higher place in heaven and in the kingdom.

5:7
Casting all your care upon him; for he careth for you.

Casting all your care upon him- those who humble themselves are likely to be trodden down of men and lightly thought of. If that is the case, there is one on whom they can cast that burden of care. The psalmist wrote, “Cast thy burden upon the Lord, and he shall sustain thee: he shall never suffer the righteous to be moved”, Psalm 55:22.

For he careth for you- there is a special place in the heart of the Good Shepherd for those who are despised by men, for He Himself experienced the same. He acts to provide comfort and strength in that situation. From chapter 1 we learn that He was “manifested in these last times for you”, 1 Peter 1:20. In that same chapter we learn that there is an inheirtance “reserved in heaven for you”, 1:4. So the past and the future has provided examples of His concern for His people, and now in the present His unfailing care for the downtrodden is known.

5:8
Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

Be sober, be vigilant- to cast all care on Christ must not mean that we forget our personal responsibilities. The world is a place of great danger, and we need to be alert, aware, and watchful.

Because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour- just because the Chief Shepherd has provided us with shepherds to watch over us does not mean that we may be careless. It is such people that the Devil is seeking out. He will have no scruples in preying on the weak, and devouring them in the sense that they are overwhelmed by his opposition, and cowed into unfaithfulness to Christ. It is true that Satan has been robbed of much of his authority by the death, resurrection and ascension of Christ, (see Hebrews 2:14; Ephesians 4:8; Colossians 2:15), but it is still true that in the wisdom and ordering of God he is allowed a certain amount of opportunity to harrass the people of God.

We might ask why the roaring of the lion does not alert the sleepy saint? Perhaps the answer is that lions tend to roar after they have captured their prey. Amos the prophet, (who was also a herdsman, and knew the countryside well), wrote, “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?”, Amos 3:3. Then he asked, “Will a lion roar in the forest when he hath no prey? Will a young lion cry out of his den, if he have taken nothing?” verse 4. These two questions strongly suggest that a lion roars after he has captured his prey. So if we hear Satan roar, then we must be doubly watchful, for it may mean that he has already succeeded in devouring another saint.

5:9
Whom resist stedfast in the faith, knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world.

Whom resist stedfast in the faith- it is a sign that his power is limited in that even the sheep of the flock can resist him, such is the energy of the indwelling Spirit. As the apostle John wrote, “He that is in you is greater than he that is in the world”, 1 John 4:4. This power of the Spirit within is only effective as we avail ourselves of the truth of the faith, the body of Christian doctrine. The devil cannot stand before the truth of God, for it foretells his downfall and utter destruction in God’s good time. James exhorts us to “resist the devil and he will flee from you”, James 4:7. This is what happened when he tempted Christ was in the wilderness. He found that Christ resisted him by the use of the word of God, and he departed, defeated.

Knowing that the same afflictions are accomplished in your brethren that are in the world- the attacks of the enemy are known by all God’s children in the world. It is a worldwide phenomenon, but the Spirit and the word of God are sufficient for every believer, wherever they are and in whatever way they are attacked. The word “accomplished” is interesting, for it indicates a view of suffering that might be overlooked. Traumatic as afflictions are, they are part of a process whereby our God is accomplishing goals in His people. We have learnt from 1:7 that the trial of faith, when endured in proper fashion, will result in praise and honour and glory for the Lord Jesus when He comes to reign. So afflictions are not negative events, but the positive means whereby our God works out His purpose to glorify His Son. Painful as the afflictions may be at the time, the resulting glory will more than compensate, and, more importantly, will result in added glory for Christ when He comes.

5:10
But the God of all grace, who hath called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus, after that ye have suffered a while, make you perfect, stablish, strengthen, settle you.

But the God of all grace, who hath called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus- as the psalmist said, “The Lord will give grace and glory”, Psalm 84:11. He gives grace in the sense that His enabling ensures that trials may be endured in a God-fearing way. But He gives glory, for He has destined His people to be with Christ and like Christ for all eternity.

After that ye have suffered a while- so the idea of suffering is not incompatible with the prospect of glory, nor does the suffering indicate that the glory has been forfeited. Note the contrast between eternal glory and suffering for “a while”. The apostle Paul made a similar contrast when he wrote, “For our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory; while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal”, 2 Corinthians 4:17-18.

Make you perfect, stablish, strengthen, settle you- so all the while the sufferings are endured, the work of God continues in their souls. They do not put things “on hold” while the suffering is upon them; in fact, as we have seen, the sufferings are part of the work of God.

To perfect in this context means to adjust, for the sufferings might cause some dislocation of their spiritual attitudes, so they are unfitted for what God has in mind for them to do. The Lord will step in and repair the damage, as long as we are responsive. Note the apostle is asking a favour of God, that He will make them perfect. He does not impose these things on us however. The “God of all grace” is ready to step in with His favours.

They need to be stablished, for sufferings are unnerving, but the grand truths of the Christian faith are a sure foundation for the believer’s confidence in times of trial.

They need to be strengthened also, for sufferings are undermining and wearying, and will sap the believer’s vitality if he does not avail himself of the work of the Spirit, who strengthens us with might in the inner man, Ephesians 3:16. The words of the Lord to Peter were, “when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren”, Luke 22:32. Peter would deny his Lord, but afterwards, when he was recovered, he spent the rest of his life strengthening his brethren so that they did not fall as he had done.

Sufferings are also unsettling, raising doubts in the mind if we let them, but the truth of the word of God dispels all doubt.

5:11
To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen- this is really the end of the letter, and the apostle expresses the desire that, whatever the experiences that the Lord’s people go through, it may all result in glory for God, and the demonstration that He is in complete control, for He has dominion.

5:12
By Silvanus, a faithful brother unto you, as I suppose, I have written briefly, exhorting, and testifying that this is the true grace of God wherein ye stand.

By Silvanus, a faithful brother unto you, as I suppose, I have written briefly- we read of Silas in Acts 15,16, 17 and 18, and he is probably the same man as Peter calls Silvanus here. If so, it is pleasing to note that he, and Marcus, (presumably John Mark), are found with the apostle together, for Silas had been chosen as a replacement for Barnabas when he had a dispute with the apostle Paul about Mark, Acts 15:36-41. The matter is settled, and they can combine to greet the saints. It is good when differences are resolved on earth, rather than at the judgement seat of Christ.

By saying “I suppose” the apostle is not guessing. The word is based on logos, the origin of the word logic. Peter has assessed the character and conduct of Silvanus, and has come to the reasoned and logical conclusion that he is a faithful brother. That he was a brother “unto you”, would suggest that Silavanus had laboured amongst them at some time. Even though that was the case, he did not consider it to be below his station to simply be the apostle Peter’s secretary, for that was just as much service for the Lord as preaching. In fact, his preaching is forgotten (by earth at least, although not by God), but the words of the apostle that he wrote down are still with us.

Exhorting, and testifying that this is the true grace of God wherein ye stand- the apostle himself was confident that the doctrines of the gospel were true and valid, and on that basis he exhorted the saints. But some might be wavering in their faith, tested as it was by persecution. To these he writes to assure them that what they believed at the beginning when they first heard the gospel, (and it is possible that some of his readers had been at Jerusalem when the apostle preached on the day of Pentecost), was indeed the gospel of the grace of God, which, when believed, gives a sure standing before God. As the apostle Paul wrote, “we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand”, Romans 5:2. The apostle John exhorted his readers to “Let that therefore abide in you which ye have heard from the beginning. If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son and in the Father”, 1 John 2:24.

5:13
The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you; and so doth Marcus my son.

The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, saluteth you- it seems from this that the apostle Peter was based at Babylon in the assembly there, the very place to which the Jews had been taken as captives by Nebuchadnezzar long before. As the apostle to the circumcision he had a special ministry to them. What a triumph of Divine grace that in Satan’s city, (for Babylon has always been the earthly headquarters of Satan’s war against God down through the ages, from Babel onwards), there should be a company that formed part of the bride of Christ, and had no link with the Babylonian harlot, Revelation 17:3-6. Nedless to say, there is no evidence in the New Testament to suggest that the apostle Peter ever went to Rome, let alone was “Bishop of Rome”, as some teach. Those who speak of Peter as Bishop of Rome are clearly not wise to the truth of Scripture about bishops. Why then should we believe them about whether Peter was at Rome or not?

The fact that the church was elected reminds us that a church consists of individuals who have come into the good of the purpose of God, and as such form part of the company that the apostle Paul calls “God’s elect”, Romans 8:33. The apostle assumes that all in the church are genuine believers, and so can be said to be chosen, or elect, before the foundation of the world.

And so doth Marcus my son- in the Old Testament, especially in the days of Elisha, there were those known as the sons of the prophets. They were not necessarily physical sons of the prophets, but were those who were learning from them. Peter had clearly taken Mark under his care, and was responsible for instructing him in the things of God. This bore fruit, not least in the fact that he was responsible for the Second Gospel.

5:14
Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity. Peace be with you all that are in Christ Jesus. Amen.

Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity- what Peter cannot do because he is absent from them, he exhorts them all to do amongst themselves.

Peace be with you all that are in Christ Jesus. Amen- not only are Silas and Mark in harmony, but it is pleasing to see the apostle Peter using the title of Christ that was expecially used by the apostle Paul, showing that he was in sympathy with his teachings.

MATTHEW 18

MATTHEW 18

We hope you will find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of this article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

Survey of the chapter
After the seven parables of the kingdom in chapter 13, we learn in Matthew chapters 14 to 18 what the character of those in the kingdom of heaven must be like if they are to enter the kingdom of God. Remember that the kingdom of heaven is the sphere of profession, whereas the kingdom of God is the sphere of reality.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-6 The need for humility
(b) Verses 7-14 The need for consideration
(c) Verses 15-20 The importance of harmony between brethren
(d) Verses 21-35 The duty of forgiveness

(a) Verses 1-6
The need for humility

18:1
At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus, saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven?

At the same time came the disciples unto Jesus- we know from Mark 9:30-34 that the disciples had been disputing among themselves about who was greatest, and when they were inside the house in Capernaum the Lord confronted them. Matthew does not mention this, but he does tell us about the conversation with Peter in the house about the tribute money.

Is he linking the need for humility with the fact that the Lord had associated Himself with Peter in the matter of paying the tribute money? The coin that Peter took up from the fish was for “me and thee”, and this, coupled with the fact that the disciples had been arguing about who should be greatest whilst they were travelling along to Capernaum, brought things to a head. Did some of them resent that the Lord paid with the same coin as Peter did, as if he had some sort of equal status?

Saying, Who is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven? They had clearly not come to a decision about this matter, so agree to let the Lord settle the it. This question is most inappropriate, for the Lord has just told them that He is going to be betrayed and killed, 17:22,23. They had been exceeding sorry about this, but He had also said that He would be raised again, so perhaps they still thought there was hope of an imminent setting up of the kingdom. There should be no room for pride in the hearts of those who follow the rejected Man of Calvary. By going there He took the lowest place of all.

18:2
And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them,

And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them- it is said traditionally that this was a child of Peter. It is probable that the house they were in was Peter’s, (since the collectors of the tribute money seem to have come to the door of the house), and that the Lord Jesus made it His base when He was in Galilee, see Luke 4:38.

The child is put in the place of prominence to teach a lesson about not seeking prominence. It is safe to do this because a child will not normally seek position.

Notice that the child is happy to respond to the Lord’s invitation. In fact, Mark tells us that the Lord took him into His arms, Mark 9:36. The Lord Jesus was very interested in the welfare of children, and was most severe on those who ill-treat them, as we shall see in verse 6.

Child-abusers should be handed over to the civil authorities, even if they claim to be believers. To cover up their sin may be successful for a time, but the eventual scandal will be far more damaging to the testimony.

18:3
And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.

And said, Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven- they were already converted in the sense that they believed in Him, but they need a further conversion from the attitude of pride and self-seeking evident in their striving to be greatest. Although he had been set in the midst, we may be sure that the child did not seek that place of prominence, and was pleased when he was allowed to go. Children are valued members of the family, but their proper place is in the background. It is not in order for them to rule the household, and certainly should not be allowed to hold their parents to ransom.

18:4
Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven- this is the other side of the truth. Not only is self-seeking condemned, but self-abasement is commended. They learn that the way to show themselves to be converted is to show humility. This solves their dispute as to who was the greatest. The answer is who is the most humble. This is still the answer.

18:5
And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me.

And whoso shall receive one such little child in my name receiveth me- He so identifies Himself with the welfare of children, that to receive a child, (meaning to have its best interests at heart), is as good as receiving Him. In Mark’s account He adds, “and whosoever shall receive me, receiveth not me, but him that sent me”, Mark 9:37. This elevates the care and welfare of children to a very high level, and should encourage greatly those who have the care of children, either their own or other’s.

18:6
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.

But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me- this is the opposite of receiving a child. To cause a child to stumble so that he takes a wrong path may mean that he is astray the rest of his life. Children are very impressionable, and great care must be taken to introduce them only to the truth of God’s word, and not the ideas of men.

It is not just the child the Lord selected to illustrate His point that is in view. “These little ones” may be a reference to Peter’s family, for they are said to believe in Him.

It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea- we understand the strong feeling behind this statement, for the Lord is angry when children are harmed, whether physically, emotionally or spiritually. He is not laying down the precise penalty for child abuse, but is using a graphic metaphor to express extreme displeasure. There were two sorts of millstone, one being turned by hand, and the larger one, turned by an ass. It is the latter here. It would be better for him to be drowned in this way, never to be buried with honour, so as to cut short his evil works, and preserve little children from his wicked attentions, than to continue to accumulate sins.

(b) Verses 7-14
The need for consideration

18:7
Woe unto the world because of offences! for it must needs be that offences come; but woe to that man by whom the offence cometh!

Woe unto the world because of offences! The sins against children He has just spoken about are just a sample of the ways in which men sin against one another. As He surveys the scene, the Lord assesses the world as a place of misery and woe, and men’s offences are the cause.

For it must needs be that offences come- this supposes that the manifest kingdom of Christ has not yet been set up, since when He reigns offences will be dealt with immediately. It is necessary for evil to manifest itself so that the need for Him to reign becomes more apparent. It is also necessary so as to expose the wickedness of men to the full.

But woe to that man by whom the offence cometh! The woe is not now general but specific, “that man”, for each offence will be judged individually, unless, of course, it has been genuinely repented of and therefore forgiven.

18:8
Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire.

Wherefore if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, cut them off, and cast them from thee- in view of the foregoing statements, (hence the “wherefore”), drastic action must be taken. Again a strong metaphor is used, but it must not be taken literally. A similar statement is found in the passage in Matthew 5:27-32 where the Lord speaks of divorce. There it is only the eye that lusts after a woman and the hand that writes her a bill of divorcement that is mentioned, the foot not being relevant in that situation. Here it is the hand that performs an action and the foot that takes the person to perform the action that is in view.

A person may be offended by his own hand or foot in the sense that he can be enticed to sin by the thought of what that hand or foot can do.

It is better for thee to enter into life halt or maimed, rather than having two hands or two feet to be cast into everlasting fire- the Old Testament views everlasting life as life under the Messiah’s rule in the kingdom. It is better to be halt (lame), or maimed, (with one hand cut off) when the Messiah comes to set up His kingdom, than to be entire, (with both hands and feet, none having been cut off, metaphorically, meaning the tendency to offend has not been dealt with), but destined for the lake of fire, because the failure to deal with sin is a sign of an unconverted person.

18:9
And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.

And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: it is better for thee to enter into life with one eye, rather than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire- in Matthew 5 it was the eye that saw a woman that began the process which ended in adultery, but here the teaching is more general. Having had suggestions made to her by the Tempter, Eve “saw the tree that it was good for food”, so the lust of the eyes led her astray, Genesis 3:6. She was promised that her eyes would be opened, and indeed they were, but in the wrong sense, for she realised that she was no longer fit for the presence of God, verses 7 and 8.

The hand, foot and eye are not only to be dealt with initially, but are to be cast away, so that they are not used in a wrong way any more.

18:10
Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones- children should be valued, and not lightly esteemed. Those who do not value them are likely to abuse them in some way. We despise children when we think that sinning against them is of little account.

For I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven- what better indication could there be of the value of children than to say that their guardian angels are ever present before the Father? This is the complete opposite to despising them. This is a great comfort for the children, and an encouragement to treat them with care. It is also a warning to those who might be tempted to despise them, (or worse), for their angels give account before their Father.

18:11
For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost.

For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost- whilst this is a general statement of the grace of Christ in coming to save the lost, the particular context is that His love for children is so strong that it brought Him down from heaven to save them. It is a wonderful thing that angels are in the presence of God on their behalf; it is a more wonderful thing that the Son of God should become the Son of man in order to go to Calvary to save them.

18:12
How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray?

How think ye? In case such thinking is strange to them, the Lord gives them an illustration.

If a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray- some might be tempted to suggest that to lose one per cent of the flock is of little account.

Doth he not leave the ninety and nine- these sheep are safe in the fold, and can be left.

And goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray? No matter the hardship or the difficulty, the true shepherd will persevere in his search, such is his concern for just one sheep which is in danger.

18:13
And if so be that he find it, verily I say unto you, he rejoiceth more of that sheep, than of the ninety and nine which went not astray.

And if so be that he find it- such is the folly of some sheep that they stray so far that the most concerned shepherd cannot find them, so it is “if so be”, not “when”.

Verily I say unto you, he rejoiceth more of that sheep, than of the ninety and nine which went not astray- it is not that he rejoices because the one sheep went astray. The rejoicing is because he was able to find it.

18:14
Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.

Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish- we may measure the concern of the Father for the little ones by the trouble the Son of Man took to find it so as to rescue it from perishing. This does not mean that all shall be saved from perishing, (for it is “if”, not “when” in verse 13, as we have noticed), but it does show the desire of the Father for all. The desire of the Father may be disappointed through the wilfulness of the child.

(c) Verses 15-20
The importance of harmony between brethren

Survey of the section
Whilst it has a broadly different subject to the first half of the chapter, the word “moreover” which begins this section does alert us to the connection between the passages. For those who lack humility, and are full of themselves, are very likely to trespass against their brethren. In that situation those trespassed against must take righteous steps to deal with the matter, whilst themselves maintaining humility in that they do not remedy the situation by their own resources, but by God’s.

In the passage we have:

Verse 15(a) A sin committed
Verse 15(b) A sin condemned
Verse 15(c) A sin confessed
Verse 16 A sin continued
Verse 17 A sin confirmed on earth
Verse 18 A sin confirmed in heaven

 Structure of the section

(i Verses 15-18 The process to deal with trespasses
(ii) Verses 19,20 The prayer for wisdom
(iii) Verses 21-35 The parable about forgiveness

(i) Verses 15-18
The process to deal with trespasses

18:15
Moreover if thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone: if he shall hear thee, thou hast gained thy brother.

Moreover- as noted, this word suggests a link with the foregoing, but also a fresh aspect of truth. There is more, over and above what has already been said. The word also carries the idea of “but if”, so if it should come to pass that a brother does more than stumble another, (the subject of the previous verses), then the next line of approach should be adopted.

If thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone- Matthew’s gospel is the gospel of government, and order and righteousness must prevail amongst those who are in the kingdom of God. Since he claims to be a brother, he will be one of those who hears the word of God and does it, and will respond to the charge against him in a responsible way. The word trespass is translated sin in verse 21. Trespass is a crossing of a clearly-marked boundary. The word trespass, being in the aorist tense, is looked on as a definite act, not an imaginary one. We should remember the word of 1 Corinthians 8:12- “When ye sin so against the brethren, ye sin against Christ”.

There are those who are proud, and feel that they should always be pandered to, and when they feel that they have been deprived of their rights, they sulk, or get angry. Such will sometimes feel that they have been sinned against, when it is only their pride that has been hurt.

Go and tell him his fault between thee and him alone- the first stage is to confront the brother with his sin. The word for “tell” here is not simply to inform, but convict and rebuke. The fact that this is the first step will prevent flippant matters being raised, since there will be an awareness that those who bring light-weight charges are themselves liable to be examined.

There is nothing here about discussing the problem, or “praying it through”, or coming to an arrangement. If the matter is so clear-cut that a brother is free to meet another about it, then there is nothing to discuss, and repentance and forgiveness can follow. One genuinely repentant will want to make amends, in the language of the parable which follows, “I will pay thee all”, verse 29. The trespass offering included an element of recompense for the offended party, Leviticus 6:4,5.

Of course, if the other brother claims that he has been misunderstood, then righteous dealings will require that his case should be put forward.

If he shall hear thee that is, if he takes note of the brother who has been sinned against, and responds to what he has to say.

Thou hast gained thy brother- he has been temporarily lost to fellowship, for two cannot walk together if they are not agreed, Amos 3:3. If he repents, however, he has been recovered for fellowship.

18:16
But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.

But if will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more- the next stage in the process. The brother who has been sinned against should persist, and not give up on this prescribed process halfway.

That in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established- if the brother takes one other, there are two witnesses, if he takes two, then there are three witnesses. Note that the brother sinned against is allowed as a witness. The position of these others is not specified, for they are present only to testify to what is said; they have no mediating role. Not have they necessarily witnessed the event which caused the rift between the two brothers. They simply witness to the admission or rejection of the accusation, so that they can bear testimony to what was said on both sides. This, in itself, is a curb to any tendency for one party in the dispute to brow-beat or intimidate the other, knowing that words spoken and attitudes adopted are all noted by credible witnesses.

18:17
And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.

And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church- the double refusal of the offender now means that the matter is made more public, but only in the assembly. The law-courts of men are not the place to settle such matters. The Corinthian believers were making the mistake of taking one another to the law-courts, and the apostle had to rebuke them, see 1 Corinthians 6:1-8.

But if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican- clearly the church of chapter 16 is not available to deal with this matter. The Lord Jesus at this point introduces the idea that there will be a company in a locality that also can be named the church. This is developed in the epistles of Paul, to whom was entrusted the task of being a minister of the church, “to fulfil the word of God”, Colossians 2:24,25. In other words, the truth the apostle made known about the church finalised God’s revelation to His people.

This church is the final court of appeal in a locality, and no council, gathering of brothers from afar, or consultation with any supposed earthly headquarters is envisaged in this or any other situation. We should be clear, however, that if the offender has committed some crime that comes under the civil law of the land, he must be handed over to the authorities.

A heathen man is a pagan, who has no knowledge of God. A publican would be of the class that were notorious for their false dealing. Whether it be an unbeliever by nature, or one by practice, the unrepentant one is not now to be reckoned a believer at all, since he has not responded to the process laid down for believers to follow. This is why in 1 Corinthians 5:11 the apostle speaks of one who is “called a brother”. Whether he is or not is determined by whether he responds to the word of God by repentance.

18:18
Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Verily I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven:- note the “ye”, indicating that it is not the single brother who was sinned against, but all the church. If the man does not repent, then his sin is to be bound upon him until such times as he does turn from his sin. The decision, if arrived in accordance with scripture, has the sanction of heaven. This is why no earthly law-court needs to be involved in church matters, for civil courts have not the competence or right to deal with church matters. If it is a question of a civil offence, then it should be reported immediately to the appropriate authorities.

And whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven- when he does repent, the sin is loosed from him in the eyes of the church, with the assurance that this is the view of heaven too. The Jews had a saying that whatever was decided in the Sanhedrin was decided in heaven.

(b) Verses 19,20
The prayer for guidance

18:19
Again I say unto you, That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven.

Again I say unto you- we should note the relevance of the word “again”. Matthew uses this word seven times in a special sense. The references are as follows: 5:33; 13:44,45,47; 18:19; 19:24; 22:1. When these passages are examined it becomes clear that “again” in those settings means more that simply “another thing”. There is a continuation of a theme, but with a difference of emphasis. For instance, when the Lord says, “Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time”, 5:33, He then goes on to cancel what was said, rather than deepening the meaning of what was said of old time, which is what He does in the other examples He gives in His address on the mount.

So with that in mind we can say that the Lord is introducing a fresh idea, but one which has some connection with what has gone before. So the fresh idea is guidance during the process set out in verses 16-18. The connection is found in the mention of the two and the three of verses 19 and 20.

That if two of you shall agree on earth as touching any thing that they shall ask- this promise is especially relevant to the two or three witnesses that were involved in the procedure of verse 16. They have carried out the instructions of that verse, and the man who has trespassed has failed to hear them. (This could be either by refusing to meet them, or rejecting what they had to say if he did meet with them). They now need wisdom as to how to proceed righteously.

They meet together to discuss the matter, and because of the promise the Lord will give them in verse 20 they are able to come to a right decision as to how to proceed.

It shall be done for them of my Father which is in heaven- the Lord assures them even if there are only two acting in the matter, yet if they carry out His instructions correctly, then when they agree on a decision, the thing is duplicated in heaven, the “done for them” referring to the binding or loosing in heaven he spoke of in verse 18.

Notice the further reference to “on earth…in heaven”. The kingdom has not yet come in manifestation, and the King is not present, so meantime His righteous government is carried out through His subjects on earth, and is ratified in heaven.

18:20
For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

For where two or three are gathered together in my name- this verse contains a very special promise which has been laid hold of by believers as they meet together. Without taking away from its general application, we should note its significance in the context. The verse begins with “for”, and is giving to us the reason why the two persons of verse 19 may count on help in the matter on which they are agreed they need help. In verse 19 only two are mentioned, for even that minimum number may count on the Lord’s help. Here it is two or three, for the man who had been trespassed against had the option of taking either one or two others with him as he dealt with the matter, verse 16. Clearly the two or three are the one or two witnesses plus the offended brother.

They come together with the express purpose of acting in Christ’s name, and with His authority, He being absent from them in heaven.

There am I in the midst of them- so whilst He has ascended bodily to heaven, and in that sense, as He Himself said, “I am no more in the world”, John 17:11, He does promise to be in the midst of these two or three as they gather together to act for Him. The apostle Paul was not able to be present when the Corinthian believers met together to deal with evil in their company, but he was present in spirit, 1 Corinthians 5:3,4. This meant that he was wholly with them in what they were doing.

So it is here, with the added thought that the Lord is not just present in spirit, fully in harmony with what they are doing, but is in the midst, not on the fringe. He associates Himself completely with what they are doing, for they have gathered in His name, intent on serving His interests.

The verb used in the expression “gathered together” is the basis of the word synagogue, a collecting or convening together of people. So it is different to the word used in verse 17 for the church, which means “a called out company”.

(d) Verses 21-35
The duty of forgiveness

18:21
Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? till seven times?

Then came Peter to him, and said, Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Peter’s question has to do with a situation prior to that of verses 15-20. He rightly judges that it would be preferable to deal with possible problems early, before the drastic action detailed in those verses needs to be carried out.

Till seven times? Peter’s solution to the problem is inadequate, and fails to reflect the character of the King.

18:22
Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven.

Jesus saith unto him, I say not unto thee, Until seven times: but, Until seventy times seven- notice how high the standard of forgiveness is, being modelled on the attitude of God. We read in Ephesians 4:32, “And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ’s sake hath forgiven you”. God forgave us in view of all Christ is to Him, and all He did for us. Those who have been forgiven by God should be the special objects of our care, for this is Christ-like, and is the mark of a worthy walk before God.

Peter no doubt thought that to forgive seven times would be commendable; the Lord raised the standard from seven times seven, making forty nine, to seventy to the power of seven, which is eight million, two hundred and thirty five thousand, four hundred and thirty. This is a lifetime of forgiveness, for if we divide the number of days in seventy years into that large number, it comes to three hundred and twenty two. So if the same man came to Peter three hundred and twenty two times every day for seventy years, (that is every three minutes during his waking hours for the whole of his lifetime), and asked his forgiveness, then he was to forgive him. And so are we.

It is worth remembering that genuine forgiveness on the part of the one sinned against can only follow genuine repentance on the part of the one sinning. In Luke’s parallel passage this is emphasised- “Take heed to yourselves: If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him; and if he repent, forgive him. And if he trespass against thee seven times in a day, and seven times in a day turn again to thee, saying, I repent; thou shalt forgive him”, Luke 17:3,4.

So both grace and truth are to be in exercise; truth which rebukes and requires repentance, grace which grants that forgiveness when these conditions are met. So it has been with God. His rich grace has forgiven us for the sake of Christ. His truth demanded that we repent before we knew that forgiveness.

18:23
Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants.

Therefore is the kingdom of heaven likened unto a certain king, which would take account of his servants- as in so many of the parables, the kingdom of heaven is not so much like the main character in the parable, but like the main theme of the parable. So here, the main theme is forgiveness, and it is the king that first of all shows forgiveness, and then assesses whether his subjects have displayed that same attitude of forgiveness.

18:24
And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents.

And when he had begun to reckon, one was brought unto him, which owed him ten thousand talents- we here learn what “take account of his servants” means. The king is bringing his accounts up to date and in order. He finds one of his servants still owes him a vast sum of money.

18:25
But forasmuch as he had not to pay, his lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made.

But forasmuch as he had not to pay- the servant had run up a debt which he would never be able to pay off, just as we as sinners were in debt to God, but could never discharge ourselves.

His lord commanded him to be sold, and his wife, and children, and all that he had, and payment to be made- the only way of man’s devising was for the man, his wife and his children to be sold as slaves, so that the money raised could begin to pay off the debt. Notice it is not “clear the debt”, but “payment to be made”, so only part of the vast debt would be paid back by this means.

18:26
The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.

The servant therefore fell down, and worshipped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all- human remedies demand that the man be sold, but what will grace say? The man is honest enough to admit his debt, and sincerely desires to pay it off. This is the equivalent of repentance.

18:27
Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt.

Then the lord of that servant was moved with compassion, and loosed him, and forgave him the debt- compassion now comes into the reckoning, and on that basis the man is completely forgiven.

We may now apply this in a spiritual sense. Man is under obligation to God, and he can never pay off his debt, for he has sinned against an infinite God. But those who admit their debt, and show suitable contrition for building up the debt, may come into the good of God’s compassion. We are not told the grounds on which the king showed compassion to his servant, but we have already noted the language of Ephesians 4:32, and that God forgives men on the basis of what He sees in His Son.

18:28
But the same servant went out, and found one of his fellowservants, which owed him an hundred pence: and he laid hands on him, and took him by the throat, saying, Pay me that thou owest.

But the same servant went out, and found one of his fellowservants, which owed him an hundred pence- the contrast between the attitude of the king and this man could not be more marked. The servant is owed a pitiful sum, but instead of learning compassion from his own experience, he acts with cruelty and heartlessness.

And he laid hands on him, and took him by the throat, saying, Pay me that thou owest- he seems to not know the meaning of grace, which delights to bestow free favour.

18:29
And his fellowservant fell down at his feet, and besought him, saying, Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all.

And his fellowservant fell down at his feet, and besought him, saying, Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all- this is the promise that the first servant made, but how different the response to the promise in this case!

18:30
And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he should pay the debt.

And he would not: but went and cast him into prison, till he should pay the debt- if he had shown patience, he might have received his one hundred pence sooner. How is the man going to work to pay the debt if he is in prison? The servant is heartless, but also witless.

18:31
So when his fellowservants saw what was done, they were very sorry, and came and told unto their lord all that was done.

So when his fellowservants saw what was done, they were very sorry, and came and told unto their lord all that was done- the other servants have a commendable sense of what is right and fair, and also the desire that the wrong be righted.

18:32,33
Then his lord, after that he had called him, said unto him, O thou wicked servant, I forgave thee all that debt, because thou desiredst me: Shouldest not thou also have had compassion on thy fellowservant, even as I had pity on thee?

The parable began with a day of reckoning, when the lord of the servants assessed what their position was. Now for this unforgiving servant there is another day of reckoning, as he has to face the consequences of his actions. Note the servant should have had compassion “even as” his lord had with him. There should have been the same attitude. This is the main point of the parable, which comes after Peter’s question about forgiveness, and how far we should go in forgiving.

18:34
And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him.

And his lord was wroth, and delivered him to the tormentors, till he should pay all that was due unto him- so he who would not forgive an hundred pence debt, but threatened the debtor with prison, now finds he is in prison himself, and the compassion of his lord turns to anger, and he demands that the ten thousand talents be repaid. He finds that the refusal to show grace and compassion has its consequences.

18:35
So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses.

So likewise shall my heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not every one his brother their trespasses- again the Lord shows His knowledge of what the verdict will be, for in fact it will be administered by Himself in harmony with His Father’s mind on the matter. He said that “I can of mine own self do nothing; as I hear, I judge; and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me”, John 5:30.

We should remember that this parable is about the kingdom of heaven, the sphere of profession, and the man claims to be a brother but in fact is not, hence the severe judgment. In a similar situation the apostle Paul spoke of “a man that is called a brother”, 1 Corinthians 5:11. That he was a true brother, or in other words, a genuine believer, is shown in that he repented of his sin, as we learn from 2 Corinthians 2:6-10. There is no possibility of a true believer being “delivered to the tormentors”, verse 34. Whilst this is the case, true believers should not be complacent by manifesting an unforgiving spirit.