Tag Archives: righteousness

GALATIANS 3

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Under “SELF-PRINT BOOKLETS” you will find help on printing the posts in booklet form.  Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

GALATIANS 3

We now come to that section of the epistle where the apostle brings forward seven reasons why grace is superior to law. It extends from Galatians 3:1-5:26. The seven reasons are presented in the form of contrasts between law and grace as follows:

Reason One
3:1-14
Grace results in blessing, whereas the law brings a curse.

Reason Two
3:15-29
Grace makes us heirs, law makes us transgressors.

Reason Three
4:1-10
Grace makes us sons, law is for infants.

Reason Four
4:11-18
Grace makes the apostle like an angel, law makes him like an enemy.

Reason Five
4:19-31
Grace makes us sons of free woman, the law, sons of the slave woman.

Reason Six
5:1-15
Grace helps us progress, the law only hinders.

Reason Seven
5:16-26
Grace results in the fruit of Spirit, the law results in works of the flesh.

 

By means of these reasons, the apostle deals with the errors of the three parties of law-teachers that opposed the gospel. These were:

1. Unbelieving Jews who taught that men should reject Christ and remain with the law of Moses.

2. False brethren who taught that Gentiles should be put under law before they believed the gospel, Acts 15:1.

3. Believers who were formerly of the Pharisees, who taught that believers should be circumcised and keep the law of Moses, Acts 15:5.

Each of these variations represents an attack on both the sufficiency of the work of Christ, and the grace of God. Just as the apostle gave no ground to Peter in chapter 2:11-21, so he gives no ground to these others. We should remember in this connection the words of Jude, telling us that the faith, (the body of Christian doctrine), has been delivered to the saints so that they contend for it. This may be done by preaching and teaching, or by conduct, as the truth is expressed in our lives.

Reason One
3:1-14
Grace brings blessing, law brings cursing

Structure of the section

(a) Verse 1 Christ crucified
(b) Verses 2-5 The Spirit received
(c) Verses 6-9 Abraham blessed
(d) Verses 10-12 Law-breaker cursed
(e) Verse 13 Christ made a curse
(f) Verse 14 Gentiles blessed

(a)   3:1
Christ crucified

3:1
O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?

O foolish Galatians, who hath bewitched you- the apostle has not referred to the Galatians since 1:11, after he has marvelled that they had moved away from grace. In that chapter he pronounced a curse on those who were leading them astray with another gospel which mixed law and grace. Now he turns to the Galatians themselves, and condemns their foolishness for listening to the false teachers. They should have proved all things, and only held fast that which is good, 1 Thessalonians 5:21. Christ has cancelled the wisdom of this world, whether it be Jewish or Gentilish in origin, and He is made unto us wisdom, 1 Corinthians 1:30, which is communicated to us by the Spirit of God, 1 Corinthians 2:10. To turn from wisdom is, by definition, folly, hence his description of them. The word bewitch reminds us that the flesh is fascinated by error, and only the teaching of the Spirit can counteract this.
That ye should not obey the truth- gospel truth is presented to men for the obedience of faith, Romans 1:5; 16:26, and since the just shall live by faith, (that is, shall live as Christians on the same principle as they became Christians), then obedience should mark the believer at all times. Note that the apostle will not have it suggested that the Christian life is lawless, (for the word “obey” implies commands), which is part of what the law-teachers would be saying.
Before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been set forth, crucified, among you?  Superstitious people around them would believe in “The evil eye”, the malign influence of evil spirits, to counteract which they would fix lucky charms to the walls of their houses. Believers do not fear the evil eye, however, for they know the power of evil was broken at the Cross. The setting forth of Christ crucified before their minds was enough to shield them from evil. Not in the form of an image or mascot, however, but in the preaching of the gospel.
The apostle borrows a word from civic life to convey the thought behind the word “set forth”. When a notable criminal was executed, the magistrate who dealt with the case would go to the marketplace and announce the fact publicly. This is what the apostle had done when he went to Galatia; he announced, not the death of a criminal, but the crucifixion of Christ between two criminals, for He was numbered with the transgressors, Isaiah 53:12; Mark 15:28.
Note that it is the crucifixion of Christ that is emphasised here, for the following reason. Our old man was crucified with Christ, so that what marked us before we were saved is gone as far as God is concerned. The apostle had used this truth in 2:20 to show that he, a man zealous for the law in former days, is crucified with Christ, and his life under the law is ended. Here there is a similar thought, but not as with the apostle the ending of his past as a Jew under the law, but the cancelling of the flesh, (the self-principle within us), which proudly thinks that it can keep the law.

(b)   3:2-5
The Spirit received.

3:2
This only would I learn of you, Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

This only would I learn of you- the answer to this question will settle the matter. It is a question of several parts. Having called them foolish because they had listened to the wisdom of the world, he now implies that they had enough Spirit-taught truth to answer his question. Each part of this question will take them progressively through their Christian experience, and show that God acted consistently at every stage. He begins with their conversion, then moves on to their desire to make progress in their new-found life in Christ. Next he refers to the persecution they suffered as a result of these things, then moves into the present, (“ministereth…worketh” in the present tense), and the ministry of God by the Spirit they currently knew.
Received ye the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?  The word “by” in both parts of the sentence is “ek”, meaning “on the principle of”. The references to the Spirit here after the mention of Christ crucified in verse 1 remind us that not until our old man has been crucified with Christ can the Spirit take up residence within us. He is holy and righteous, and cannot dwell where there are conditions contrary to His nature. The holy anointing oil, (a figure of the Spirit of God, see Zechariah 4:1-6), was not to be poured on man’s flesh; that is, literally, on Adam’s flesh, Exodus 30:32. The incident of the Brazen Serpent, (an illustration of the work of Calvary, John 3:14), was followed by the Springing Well, in Numbers 21:4-18, a reminder of the gift of the Holy Spirit, who is “a well of water, springing up into everlasting life”, John 4:14. The benefits of the crucifixion of Christ are received by faith, and on that same principle God gives the Spirit. This settles the question as to whether every believer has the Spirit, and on what condition. The apostle is very clear in Romans 8:9 when he writes, “Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his”.

3:3
Are ye so foolish? having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?

Are ye so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit are ye now made perfect by the flesh? To receive the Spirit at the moment of initial faith in Christ is to be henceforth reckoned by God to be “in the Spirit”, Romans 8:9. It is our responsibility to work this out in practice, so that we are not only “in the Spirit” as to standing, but also walk after the Spirit, following His leading. By doing this we shall perfect ourselves; that is, bring ourselves progressively into conformity with the perfect standing that God reckons us to have. But going over to law for sanctification necessarily involves the effort of the flesh, for the law does not extend its influence beyond death, and believers are risen with Christ. We are dead to the law by the body of Christ, for the process of death, burial and resurrection which the body of Christ experienced is our process too, for we are identified with Him, see Romans 7:1-6. The path to perfection, or full maturity, is not by way of law-keeping, but rather by the reproduction of Christ in our hearts and lives by the power of the Spirit.

3:4
Have ye suffered so many things in vain? if it be yet in vain.

Have ye suffered so many things in vain? Those who turned to Christ were liable to be persecuted by the Jews, as the Lord Himself had warned when He was here- “Remeber the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord.  If they have persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they have kept my saying, they will keep yours also.” John 15:20.  So convinced were the Jews that Christ was an imposter, that they took every opportunity to show their hostility to Him. Now that He was gone from their midst, they turned their attention to those who believed in His name.
The light that Christ brought into the world exposes the dark deeds of men, and so they hate the light, John 3:19-21. Believers are to shine as lights in the world, Philippians 2:15, and when they do this they attract the same hostility as Christ did from those who hate the light. King Saul not only threw his javelin at David, but at Jonathan also, when he realised he had sided with David, 1 Samuel 18:10,11; 19:9,10; 20:32,33.
It is not a vain thing to suffer in this way, for it bears testimony to the reality of salvation, which in turn is a token to the adversaries of the gospel that they are on the way to perdition, Philippians 1:28. This coupled with the fact that suffering is part of God’s process of refining our faith, and will result in praise for Him and His Son in a day to come, 1 Peter 1:7, shows that suffering for Christ is not a vain or pointless thing.
If it be yet in vain- whilst the apostle is clear in his own mind that to suffer for Christ is not a vain or empty thing to do, nevertheless he does wonder whether the Galatians still believe that.  They would have suffered in vain if they reverted to Judaism, for they could have started off with the law, and avoided the trouble which receiving the grace of Christ brings. By continuing with grace, they could yet show that they were genuine, and that they still believed that their sufferings were to purpose and gain.

3:5
He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth He it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?

He therefore that ministereth to you the Spirit, and worketh miracles among you, doeth He it by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith? The apostle has already made it clear in verse 2 that the Spirit is received initially when a person believes. Subsequently, the “supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ”, Philippians 1:19, is made when the need arises, the supply being, not more of the Spirit Himself, (for we cannot have anything less than the whole of a Divine person), but the power He gives to the believer to react to circumstances in the same way as Christ did.
Paul, confined to prison, had heard that there were those who preached so as to add affliction to his bonds. Lest he react to this situation in a way that is not Christ-like, he requested the Philippians to pray that a further supply of the Spirit of Jesus Christ might be given him, to enable him to respond to circumstances as Christ did.
So also in Ephesians 1:17, where the apostle prays that the believers, (whom he has already said have received the Spirit when they believed, verse 13), may be granted the Spirit of wisdom and understanding. In other words, that the Spirit may be known in His wisdom-imparting role. Those who are already believers, then, may have Spirit ministered unto them further in this way.
Was it the law-teachers who were able to work miracles, or those who came with the gospel of God’s grace? The answer is, of course, the latter, and affords proof from the present experience of the Galatians that God was at work on the principle of faith, not works. The word for the gifts given to believers, including that of miracle-working, is “charismaton”, which may be rendered literally as “grace-gift”, 1 Corinthians 12:4,10. It was not a law-gift. The law was confirmed by the judgement of law-breakers, whereas grace is confirmed by miracles and wonders and signs, Hebrews 2:2-4. So when the apostle asks the question, “On what principle does God minister further help by the Spirit, and also give the power for miracles to be done by the power of the Spirit?” The answer can only be, “On the same principle as He gave the Spirit to them initially, even on the principle of faith”.

(c)   3:6-9
Abraham blessed.

3:6
Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.

Even as- what happened to Abraham is on the same principle as what has happened to believers. The apostle introduces Abraham here because he is “the father of all them that believe”, Romans 4:11. He is the believer’s rôle model.
Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness- this is the first of seven quotations the apostle makes in this chapter. A simple promise was given to Abraham, as God showed him the stars of the night sky. The word was, “So shall thy seed be”, Genesis 15:5. Abraham believed in the Lord and His word to him, and God reckoned him righteous as a result.
Abraham, of course, lived long before the law was given, as the apostle will state in verse 17, and therefore if he was blessed of God, and became the father of those who believe, he did so, not through law-works, but through faith. The fact that God responded to Abraham’s faith by accounting him righteous, shows that faith is what God is looking for, not works. See Romans 4:1-5.

3:7
Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham.

Know ye therefore- the apostle urges the Galatians to take in the implications of what happened to Abraham, for it had relevance to them. They would get to know the truth if they understood the implication of the quotation, and so be delivered from their foolishness.
That they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham- at around the age of 13, a Jewish boy went through a ceremony which made him a “son of the Law”, and he committed himself to keep the Law. In effect, this is what the law-teachers wanted the Gentile Galatians to do. The truth is, however, is that the Galatians had become, not sons of the law when they believed, but sons of Abraham, a much better position.

3:8
And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.

And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith- it was always God’s intention to bless men when they believed, for “Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.” Acts 15:18.
Preached before the gospel unto Abraham- since the gospel concerns God’s Son, and He is the ultimate “son of Abraham”, Matthew 1:1, then to announce blessing through Abraham was to preach beforehand gospel-blessing.
Saying, “In thee shall all nations be blessed”- this is an allusion to Genesis 12:3,  which says, “all families of the earth”, an allusion to Genesis 10:31, where the descendants of Shem are listed “after their families…after their nations”. This is good news indeed, especially for Gentiles, for it shows God has not abandoned them. Peter, in Acts 3:25, quotes from Genesis 22:18, “And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed”, for he is emphasising that the first kindred to which Christ was sent was that of Israel, see verse 26. Here, however, the reference is Genesis 12:3. Abraham would be a blessing to all nations as he gave to them the example of faith. Other ways he would be a blessing are as follows:

1. The worship of the True God would be maintained by him in the midst of universal idolatry.
2. The tabernacle system of sacrifices, foreshadowing Calvary, would be given to his descendants.
3. The prophets would be of Israel.
4. Christ Himself would come of him.
5. The apostles would be of Israel.

3:9
So then they which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham.

So then- because God had foreseen that he would justify the heathen through faith, in fulfilment of the prophecy of Scripture just referred to.
They which be of faith are blessed with faithful Abraham- every true man of faith from amongst the nations of the earth takes his stand alongside Abraham as he believes God, and is blessed in the same way as Abraham was blessed. The Gentile does not have to come via the law.

(d)   3:10-12
Law-breaker cursed

3:10
For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

For as many as are of the works of the law- who take their stand, so to speak, alongside of Moses rather than Abraham.
Are under the curse- far from knowing the blessing Abraham knew, they know the opposite. In verse 8 there was glad news, now we have bad news. It is “the curse”, because Paul is about to quote the climax to the curses recited on Mount Ebal; it is the one that sums them all up.
For it is written, “Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that are written in the book of the law to do them”- this is the last curse that was to be recited from Mount Ebal when the children of Israel reached the land of Israel, Deuteronomy 27:13-26, Joshua 8:30-35. The words as found in the Old Testament are, “Cursed be he that confirmeth not all the words of this law to do them”. This is a not a misquotation by the apostle, for he is writing as an inspired man, just as much as Moses was an inspired man as he wrote Deuteronomy 27:26. Instead of quoting the word “confirmeth”, the apostle writes “continueth”. The point is that to confirm the words of the law means to continue in the practise of them. This is the way a man may confirm God’s law. Further to that, the verb “confirmeth” is in what is known as the Fifth Hebrew conjugation, which gives the idea of “cause to confirm”, giving us the impression of one who is determined to confirm the law by his action. This is the sense the apostle gives to it by the words “continueth…in all things”.
The other difference is that “all the words of this law” is quoted as “all things that are written in the book of the law”. This is an explanation, especially for the Gentile believers, that “this law”, means “the book of the law” that was given to Israel. The words of the law were to be inscribed on great stones in Mount Ebal, and they were “the words of this law” that were recited. But Paul is ensuring we realise that what was written on the stones was what was written in the book of the law.
To do them- this is an unusual phrase, and is found again in Hebrews 10:7,9, “I come to do thy will O God”. The idea is not simply carrying out God’s will, but doing so with the utmost devotion. Wanting to do that will, not just complying out of a sense of duty.

Note that nothing less than perfection is demanded here, for it is:

“Every one”, meaning all the people.

“Continueth not”, meaning all the time.

“In all things”, meaning all the commands.

“To do them”, meaning with all the heart.

3:11
But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, it is evident: for, The just shall live by faith.

But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident- only those who perfectly carry out the will of God as expressed in the law would ever be justified that way. This rules everyone out. The only One who kept the law perfectly, was the only One who did not need to be justified. In any case, the way to be justified has ever been by faith, not by works.
For, The just shall live by faith- the principle by which a believer lives is the principle of faith. It follows, therefore, that the principle upon which his life was received in the first place was faith also. Law-keeping depends on our efforts, whereas faith realises our efforts can never be enough, given that we are marked by failure; it then goes on to depend on the work of God.

3:12
And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them.

And the law is not of faith: but, The man that doeth them shall live in them- faith rests, law-keeping involves constant working, so the two are incompatible. To live “in” the works of law, means to live in virtue of the merit gained by doing them. The contrast is between living by faith in God, and living by supposed merit gained by ourselves.

(d)   3:12,13
Christ made a curse

3:13
Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree:

Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law- verse 10 has already stated that those who seek to please God by law-keeping are under His curse because of their failure to fully keep the law. Man is under obligation to God for his failure, yet has no means of discharging his debt of responsibility. This is why the apostle calls the principle of the law “beggarly elements”, 4:9, for they bring to poverty and bondage.
The answer to man’s bankrupt state as well as his state of bondage because of his failure to keep the law, is the redeeming work of Christ. In Old Testament times, a man who was hopelessly in debt could be rescued by a near-kinsman who had both the wealth and the willingness to redeem. Also, if a man was sold to be a slave, he could be rescued by his kinsman redeemer. By saying “us” the apostle first of all means believers who before had been Jews under the law; but in a secondary sense, Gentile believers are redeemed from the curse in the sense that the work of Christ ensures that they shall never know it in the future. Note that we are redeemed when we exercise initial faith in Christ, whereas the being made a curse happened at Calvary. In other words, we are redeemed at conversion, Christ was made a curse at Calvary.
Being made a curse for us, for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree- we need to know the context of these words, (for not everyone who is hanged is accursed of God, for he might be innocent). They come from Deuteronomy 21, where we read: “And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be to be put to death, and thou hang him on a tree: His body shall not remain all night upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;) that thy land be not defiled, which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance.” Deuteronomy 21:22,23.
So the man in question has committed a crime which, under the law of Moses, required him to be put to death. Furthermore, “he be to be put to death”, that is, the trial has taken place and he is reckoned to be deserving of death. If, after he has been stoned to death, it is thought appropriate that he be made a further public example, then he was to be hanged on a tree. Not, indeed, that this was their way of execution, for that was by stoning. The hanging takes place after he has died. But if all this took place, they must remember that his crime had defiled the land, so whilst they could hang him up as a warning to others, his body must not stay on the tree beyond the end of the day.
We can see now why Paul does not say, “As it is written”, as if what happened to the man happened to Christ. Rather, he writes, “for it is written”, because he wants to select just one feature of the scenario, and relate it to Calvary. That one feature is that those hanged on a tree were cursed of God, since their presence there was the sure sign that they had committed a crime of such seriousness that a public example must be made. The reason they were cursed was because they had broken God’s law, as verse 10 of our chapter has told us.

We may see several differences between the man who was hanged and the Lord Jesus:
First, the man was guilty of breaking the law. Christ kept the law.
Second, the man was stoned to death. Christ was crucified.
Third, the man was hanged after he had died. Christ was hanged when alive.
Fourth, the man’s body defiled the land, as his sin had done. Christ defiled nothing.
Fifth, the man was accursed of God because of his law-breaking. Christ was cursed of God because of our law-breaking.
Sixth, the man was cursed personally. Christ was made a curse representatively.
Seventh, the man’s body was buried that same day. Christ was indeed buried the same day He died, but not because He defiled the land, but because the authorities did not want questions asked at Passover time. The reason the Jews gave to Pilate as to why His body should be removed, was not an appeal to Deuteronomy 21, but because the next day was a high day. This would mean that the people would have time to see the body on the cross and wonder why He was there, John 19:31.
So Christ undertook to be made a curse, for He was reckoned by God to be dealing with all that our law-breaking deserved, and was treated accordingly, as if He had done the law-breaking. He absorbed the consequences of our law-breaking in Himself, so that only blessing results. God has transformed an act which normally brought disgrace on Israel, into an act which brought blessing within their reach. He is a curse for us, not to us. Note that this quotation begins in exactly the same way as the one in verse 10, “Cursed is every one”. Note He had to be made a curse, for in no way did He bring ill upon the people. In fact, Peter says of Him, “God sent him to bless you”, Acts 3:26.
There is an eighth difference between the man of Deuteronomy 21 and Christ and it is this. The man suffered only for what he had done, whereas Christ suffered for what all men had done. We may learn something of the meaning of this when we remember that there were four main consequences threatened if Israel failed to keep the law, as detailed in Deuteronomy 28, as follows:
There was a financial penalty, for their crops would fail, The Lord Jesus became poor at the cross, for He was cut off and had nothing, Daniel 9:26, margin; 2 Corinthians 8:9.
There was the physical curse, with disease and illness brought upon them. The Lord Jesus suffered physically as no other has done, as He endured the agonies of the cross.
There was governmental judgement, with no answer from heaven, which would be as brass to them. We learn from Psalm 22 that Christ was not answered when He cried to God at Calvary, and far from rescuing Him, God abandoned Him.
There was the political judgement, and Israel would be handed over to their enemies. So Christ was delivered to the Gentiles, and suffered a Gentile form of execution.

(f)   3:14
Gentiles blessed

3:14
That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ- it is only through Christ that Gentiles may have a claim on the blessing that Abraham knew, for He is the one whom God had in view when He promised that Abraham would be a blessing to the nations. Two things must happen before the Gentiles can be blessed in this way. First, it must become evident that Israel, with all their advantages, cannot keep the law, verses 11,12, and second, that there is one who can deal with the curse that a broken law brings, verse 13. These two matters now being settled, the obstacle to the blessing of the Gentiles is removed.
That we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith- the promise of the Spirit is the promised Spirit. It is the Spirit that is received, not just the promise. Compare Luke 24:49; Acts 1:4; 2:33. The selection of the gift of the Spirit is significant, since His is the power by which the Christian life is lived, not the energy of the flesh which the law used, Romans 8:3. The apostle has emphasised the Spirit in verse 1-5, and now we see why.  

Reason Two
3:15-29
Grace makes us heirs, the law makes us transgressors

Structure of the section

(a) Verses 15-18 The promise to the Seed
(b) Verses 19-25 The purpose of the Law
(c) Verses 26-29 The position of the believer

(a)   3:15-18
The promise to the Seed

Verse 16 The promise is confined
Verse 17 The promise is confirmed
Verses 17,18 The promise is constant

3:15
Brethren, I speak after the manner of men; Though it be but a man’s covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, or addeth thereto.

Brethren, I speak after the manner of men- the apostle argues from the case of a human situation to one in which God was involved. He does this in the next verses using several everyday things, as follows:

1. 3:15 A business contract
2. 3:24 A schoolmaster
3. 3:27 A cloak of manhood
4. 4:1 The laws of inheritance
5. 4:2 The powers of a father, known as “Pater potestas”
6. 4:3,4 Release from slavery
7. 4:5 The laws of adoption

Though it be but a man’s covenant- even though a covenant may only be between mere mortals.
Yet if it be confirmed, no man disannulleth, nor addeth thereto- once a matter is agreed, then no cancelling or adding is considered proper.

The promise confined

3:16
Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.

Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made- the literal order of the words is “Now to Abraham were the promises made, and to his seed”; this serves to distinguish the promises made to Abraham personally, and those made to his seed. Having established that a man-to-man covenant is stable, the apostle now brings in a God-to-man covenant, the one made with Abraham, and repeated subsequently. The word “made” means spoken, and now we learn the words that were spoken.
He saith not “And to seeds”, as of many- there are various groups and individuals who are called Abraham’s seed, and they are:

1. Isaac “in Isaac shall thy seed be called”, Genesis 21:12.
2. Ishmael “he is thy seed”, Genesis 21:13.
3. Natural descendants of Abraham “I know that ye are Abraham’s seed”, John 8:37.
4. Christ “And to thy seed, which is Christ, Galatians 3:16.
5. Spiritual sons of Abraham “And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed”, Galatians 3:29.

The context, and statements made in the New Testament, must decide who is in view in each case.

But as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ- the apostle makes clear here that God’s promise to Abraham’s seed was not to be shared. Only the one whom God had in mind as He promised would receive the blessing. Whether Abraham realised who was being spoken of it is not possible to determine, except that we know that he rejoiced to see Christ’s day, John 8:56, and so may have been given insights into this matter, especially as he was the “Friend of God”, James 2:23, and God was willing on another occasion to inform him of His intentions, Genesis 18:17.
The apostle is making clear that the promise of blessing was not made to any other than Christ, and He shares the blessing not with natural children of Abraham who are wedded to the law, (for they are of their father the Devil, John 8:44), but with those that He now calls His own, John 13:1, as we shall see in verse 29 of this chapter, where we read, “If ye be Christ’s”. “His own”, (meaning the nation of Israel), received Him not, John 1:11, and shut themselves out from blessing nationally.

The promise confirmed

3:17
And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

And this I say, that the covenant, which was confirmed before of God in Christ- this reminds us of the way in which the covenant made to Abraham was confirmed by God. We read of it in Genesis 15. God had promised Abraham that his seed would be as numerous as the stars of heaven, even though at that point he had no heir, verse 5. Abraham believed God when He said this, verse 6, (referred to in Galatians 3:6). Abraham asks how he will know that the promised land shall be his. In response God makes a covenant with him. The covenant victims were slain, and the carcases of the animals divided. Usually, after this, the parties entering into the covenant would walk between the pieces of the sacrifices, indicating that the covenant had been ratified in the death of the sacrifices, and also that if either party defaulted, then they deserved to be cut in pieces as those sacrificial victims had been.
On this occasion, however, there was a difference, for God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Abraham, Genesis 15:12. Instead of Abraham walking between the pieces, it was a burning lamp that passed between them. Now Isaiah looks on to the day when the covenant with Abraham will be fulfilled, and speaks of salvation going forth from Jerusalem as a “burning lamp”, Isaiah 62:1. But as is the case on several occasions in the Old Testament, the word for salvation is “yeshuah”, the equivalent to Jesus. He it is then that guarantees the covenant, so we can see why the apostle states that the covenant is confirmed in Christ. So the covenant is “to Christ”, for He is the Seed, verse 16, and it is “in Christ”, for He acts as surety for Abraham in the matter, verse 17.

The promise constant

The law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect- if a covenant between men is not alterable, how much more so a covenant between God and men. So nothing that was said by God at the giving of the law can cancel what He had previously said to Abraham, the father of the nation that was given the law. The four hundred and thirty years extends from the time of the original promise to Abraham in Genesis 12:7, BC 1921, and the giving of the law, in BC 1491, the same year Israel came out of Egypt. We are not told the precise date when God actually spoke the words of Genesis 13:15 quoted in verse 16 of this chapter. This shows the importance of the literal order of the words in verse 16, which serve to allow for the fact that the promise to Abraham and the promise to the seed in the words of Galatians 3:16, were at different times.
The dates actually given in the Scriptures are precise, so we should beware of thinking of them as rough approximations. For instance, we are told that the Israelites came out of Egypt “even the selfsame day” four hundred and thirty years after they began to sojourn in Canaan. They began their sojourn in Canaan when Abraham arrived in there at the first, for we read of him that “By faith he sojourned in the land of promise”, Hebrews 11:9. This was when he was seventy-five years old, Genesis 12:4,5. It was at that point that God appeared to Abraham and said, “Unto thy seed will I give this land”, verse 7. So the anniversary of the day Abraham crossed into Canaan, (“into the land of Canaan they came”), was the day they “went out from the land of Egypt”, Exodus 12:41.
The period of four hundred years mentioned on the day of the covenant with Abraham, Genesis 15:13 refers to the length of time that Egypt would afflict Abraham’s seed. This began when Ishmael, the son of Hagar, an Egyptian, mocked Isaac when he was made Abraham’s heir, Genesis 21:8,9. Ishmael was cast out, and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt, showing where the sympathies and attitudes of both of them were, verse 21.

3:18
For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.

For if the inheritance be of law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise– it is important to notice the word for “gave”. It contains within it the idea of grace, so God gave the promise to Abraham on the basis of His grace. Clearly, the promise cannot be of law and promise at the same time. So of this promise we may say:
It is given by God in grace, verse 18.
It is received by faith, verse 14.
It cannot be cancelled by the law, verse 17.
It is available even to Gentiles, verse 29.

(b)   3:19-25
The purpose of the Law

Verse 17 Not to cancel
Verse 21 Not to compete
Verse 19 To condemn
Verse 23 To confine
Verse 24 To control

Law is given to condemn

3:19
Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.

Wherefore then serveth the law?  What purpose was served by giving the law to Israel, when the promise to Abraham was already confirmed? There is a double answer to this question.
It was added because of transgressions- that is, literally, to create transgressions, so that it might come home forcibly to men that their sins were a transgression of God’s will. The law was not added to the promise, (for that is ruled out in verse 15), but was added to God’s ways of dealing with men. This is the first reason. The second reason is next given.
Till the seed should come to whom the promise was made- the law was an interim measure, regulating and holding the people in check, until such times as Christ the Seed of Abraham should come in grace.
And it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator- the law was given by the disposition of angels, as Stephen said, Acts 7:53. Paul is emphasising here that the law was not an arrangement between God and men directly, but angelic agents and a human agent, Moses, interposed. There was not the personal character to the arrangement that Abraham knew.

3:20
Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.

Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one- as just noticed, the law involved several parties; God, angels, Moses, and the people of Israel. The very fact that there was a mediator indicates this. With God’s arrangement with Abraham, however, one party, (Abraham), was asleep, and the covenant was confirmed not by him passing through the pieces, but the burning lamp, a figure of the Messiah, doing so. But Messiah is equal with God, so the Godhead alone is responsible for the fulfilment of the promise contained in the covenant. The unity of the Godhead is the guarantee of the fulfilment. The covenant of the law depended on man’s effort, whereas the covenant to Abraham depended on God’s oneness.

Law is not given to compete

3:21
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

Is the law then against the promises of God? Is there a competition between the covenants, both of which were brought in by God? Do they fight against one another?
God forbid- that cannot be the case, for both were given by God, and He does not conflict with Himself.
For if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law- the purpose of the giving of the law was not to enable a man to be righteous, but rather to show up the fact that he was unrighteous. It is true that the Lord Jesus said to the lawyer, after he had correctly summed up the law, “Thou hast answered right: this do and thou shalt live”, Luke 10:28. But as soon as a man is left to himself to keep the law, he finds that the law is “weak through the flesh”, and is powerless to enable him to earn life, Romans 8:3. Only if a law had been given that enabled men to be righteous would there be competition between law and the promise. But Abraham believed God and was accounted righteous, and that is the abiding principle, as is seen by its use by the apostle as he explains the gospel, Romans 4:3. It is also seen in the three-fold use of the text, “the just shall live by faith”, Romans 1:17; Galatians 3:11; Hebrews 10:38.

3:22
But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

But the scripture hath concluded all under sin- the word “but” introduces the real effect of the law, which is not to give life, but to place men under the heading “sinners”. This is a similar statement to that in Romans 3:19, where Paul writes “Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.” The scripture is the whole of the Old Testament considered as giving a united testimony.
That the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe- when the sinner realises that his only hope is faith in Christ, not faith in his own efforts through works of law, and when he exercises faith, the promise becomes good to him. So far from being against the promises of God, the law has a part to play in the conviction of the sinner, for he needs to realise he is a sinner, so that he will turn to Christ.

Law is given to confine

3:23
But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.

But before faith came- before faith in an incarnate, crucified and risen Christ was a possibility, or in other words, in Old Testament times.
We were kept under the law- notice the way in which the apostle uses “we” and “ye” in these verses. By “we” he means “we who are Jews by birth”, and by “ye”, he means “you who are Gentiles by birth”. The nation of Israel was protected and guarded by the law from the wild excesses of the nations all around them. This is why they had to be so ruthless in their dealings with the nations already in the land of Canaan when they arrived under Joshua. The iniquity of the Amorites had become full, and the inhabitants of the land were not fit to live.
Shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed- Israel was not only protected from things around, but also enclosed in view of things to come, the opportunity of faith in a manifested Christ. When Christ was revealed, so faith in Him was revealed as God’s way of blessing. The law and the prophets prophesied until John, and he exhorted the people that “they should believe on him which should come after him, that is on Christ Jesus”, Acts 19:4. 

Law is given to control

3:24
Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ- a schoolmaster in those times was a person, often a trusted slave, responsible for the well-being of the child under his care. It is not that the law is able to bring to Christ by its commandments, but rather it was an interim measure, protecting Israel’s interests until Christ arrived, and encouraging them to cast themselves upon the mercy of God when they saw they could not keep the law perfectly.  After all, the law included the provision of sacrifices for sin.
That we might be justified by faith- the apostle here defines what the result of the faith of verse 23 is. Abraham was reckoned righteous by God, and justification is the act of reckoning a person right.

3:25
But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster- as will be shown in the next verses, maturity comes in through Christ, and therefore the schoolmaster in charge of Israel in their state of immaturity is no longer needed. To cling to the law is to fail to realise that God’s purposes have moved on to their consummation in Christ.

3:26-29
The position of the believer

With the promise given, the law no longer needed, and with Christ come, the following new things are brought in for the believer:

Verse 26 New status
Verse 27 New start
Verse 27 New standard
Verses 28,29 New situation

New status

3:26
For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus- the apostle sees in the fact that those who were of the Gentiles have come into full relationship a sign that the need for the schoolmaster, the law, is over. Note it is not now, as in verse 7, that they were sons of Abraham, which indicated they followed Abraham’s example of faith. Here the point is that with the coming of the Son of God Himself, it is possible to be brought into the family of God by faith. Note it is Christ Jesus that their faith is in, the Risen and Ascended Man. As will be made clear in verse 28, the position given to the believer is one outside of this world system, and also outside the law system.

New start

3:27
For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

For as many of you as have been baptised into Christ have put on Christ- this does not suggest that some of them were not baptised, but rather, that every one that is baptised into Christ has indeed put on Christ. It is not possible to be baptised into Christ and not put Him on. Having been baptised, they pass, morally, out from the sphere where the law operates, and into the sphere where Christ is all.
The word of God to Joshua was “Moses my servant is dead; now therefore arise, go over this Jordan”, Joshua 1:2. With the representative of the law gone, the promise to Abraham of a land can begin to be fulfilled. The land of Canaan was named after the man Canaan. When Israel were “baptised” in the river Jordan, they emerged into a territory which had the name of a man upon it. So we have been baptised into Christ, and have emerged out of the waters of baptism into a sphere where the name of Christ is all-pervading.

New standard

According to the custom of the day, when a child came to maturity, and he was recognised as the son of his father, a cloak would be placed upon his shoulders. This was called the cloak of manhood. When we are baptised, we pledge to display the character of God’s Son in our lives, as if the cloak of His manhood has been put upon us.

New situation

3:28
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

There is neither Jew not Greek- the word “there” is an adverb with the same force as the preposition “in”. There is there, (that is, in Christ), neither Jew nor Greek. All such distinctions are irrelevant as far as our position in Christ is concerned, for that position is a heavenly one, whereas Jew and Gentile are distinctions that only relate to earth.
There is neither bond nor free- the distinctions of privilege which have come about as a result of the Fall are irrelevant. As the next verse will show, every believer is an heir; the fact that a slave had nothing, and that a free man only had riches of this world, is of no account.
There is neither male nor female- since to be in Christ Jesus is to be part of the heavenly order of things, even such basic things as gender differences are not relevant in this context. We have noticed that the apostle does make a distinction between “we” and “ye” in these verses. He elsewhere gives instruction as to the conduct of bond and free, and he maintains the distinction in the assembly between male and female. So the differences mentioned here are not completely eradicated, or else believers would not be able to get married. The point is that they are irrelevant, for the reason he now gives.
For ye are all one in Christ Jesus- however diverse they were before, they are, in Christ Jesus, a new entity. He will say in 6:15 that they are a new creation. Here, in context, they are the seed of Abraham. This phrase has nothing to do with church unity, but relates the the common position all believers have, whatever their earthly status.

3:29
And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

And- the apostle is carrying the argument forward from the statement of verse 28, and bringing it to a climax.
If ye be Christ’s- if Christ recognises you as His own, even though you were once Gentiles. He disowned the nation of Israel as a whole, even though it claimed to be the seed of Abraham, John 8:37. In 4:9 believers are said to be known of God, and here they are owned by Christ.
Then are ye Abraham’s seed- here is a further dimension to the idea of Abraham’s seed, and is the logical outcome of being the sons of Abraham by faith. This is a staggering statement, that Gentiles are Abraham’s seed! Zealous Jews would find this very difficult to accept, but John the Baptist had prepared them for the idea when he said that God was able to raise up children unto Abraham from the stones, Matthew 3:9. If He can do this with stones, He can do it with Gentile sinners. This does not mean that the nation of israel, as the descendants of Abraham, have no future.  They are destined for greatness when they receive their Messiah when He returns to earth to reign.
And heirs according to the promise- the promise being that in Abraham all nations would be blessed, verse 8. They are heirs according to promise, but certainly not heirs according to works.

ROMANS 5:12-21

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the contact form at the end of each article. We would be pleased to hear from you.

 

We now begin a study of that section of the Epistle to the Romans which runs from chapter 5 verse 12 to the end of chapter 8, which deals not so much with what we have done, (the word “sins” is only found once from 5:12-8:39), but what we are. In other words, the criminal, not the crimes he has committed. Now that his sins have been forgiven, what is a believer’s relationship with God? What of the nature which caused him to sin before he was saved? By what power is the Christian life lived? And is the security of the believer assured? These questions, and others besides, are answered in the next sections of the epistle.

It might be found helpful to read the summary sections first, to get an idea of the thought-flow of these dificult and complicated verses.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS CHAPTER 5, VERSES 12 TO 21 

5:12  Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

5:14  Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgement was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

5:17  For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

5:19  For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

Suject of Section 8

The apostle begins this fresh section of the epistle in which he deals with what we are by nature, by tracing that nature to Adam. By ‘nature’ is meant those essential features which combine to make a thing what it is. Through the sin and disobedience of the first man, who is the federal head of men as sinners, terrible consequences were passed on to all, which could only be remedied by the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, who becomes the head of those who believe. The teaching of the previous section has prepared the way for what is presented to us now. The apostle assumes we accept the testimony of the early chapters of the Book of Genesis, with its record of the formation of the first man, Adam, his disobedience and fall, and the descent of all mankind from him in a state of sin.

Section 8 Romans 5:12-21

Christ and Adam compared and contrasted
The whole of the purpose of God for mankind centres on the fact that His Son became man, and as such is the second man, the last Adam. He came to “restore that which he took not away”, Psalm 69:4, or, in other words, came to remedy the loss and damage that Adam had brought upon men by his sin.

Structure of Section 8
The passage is very complex, but may be clearer if we note its structure in the following form, where the numbers represent the verses of the section:-

12 [(13-14) 15-17] 18-21

 In other words, the main subject is in verses 12 and 18-21, and verses 13-17 form a parenthesis. Inside this parenthesis there is another, consisting of verses 13 and 14.

8(a) 5:12 Entrance of sin and its consequence
8(b) 5:13-14 Existence of sin before the law-age
8(c) 5:15  Effect of sin and God’s attitude
8(d) 5:16,17 Ending of death’s reign
8(e) 5:18 Extending of a gift to all
8(f) 5:19 Experience of justification by many
8(g) 5:20 Enhancement of sin by the law
8(h) 5:21 Ending of sin’s reign

Looking generally at the passage, we see that verse 12 introduces us to sin and death, verses 13 and 14 show that death is as a result of the sinful nature within, and not normally because of sins committed, verses 15 to 17 deal with death, and verses 18-21 with sin.

8(a) The entrance of sin and its consequence

5:12  Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: 

Wherefore – a logical connection. The word “therefore” introduces a logical consequence, but verses 12-21 of this chapter are not a logical consequence of the preceding chapters, but they do answer the questions that those chapters might raise, and hence have a logical connection. It is important to notice that the counterpart of “wherefore as” in this verse is the “therefore as” of verse 18, hence the parenthesis of verses 13-17 is required by the grammar of the passage.
As by one man- a reference to Adam, the first man, and the federal head of the human race as sinners. “God… hath made of one blood all nations of men…” Acts 17:26, so we are all descended from this one man. There are not many races on the earth, for all have common descent from Adam and Eve his wife.
Sin- the principle of revolt against God, expressed in disobedience.
Entered into the world- sin existed in Satan before he introduced it into the world of men by means of Adam’s trangression. Adam was the door by which we perish, Christ is the door by which we are saved, John 10:9. Sin found an entrance into Adam’s heart, and through him to the rest of the world of men, for he passed on his nature to his children. The man is singled out, even though the woman sinned first, for it is by the man that the nature is passed on to the children.
And death by sin- physical death is a direct consequence of Adam’s fall. He was warned by God that death would come if he sinned, but he disobeyed God’s commandment and reaped the consequences. As a result, his nature became that of a sinful creature, and he passed on that nature to us all. As a consequence, we too are fallen and sinful, and face certain death, but in the mercy of God we are allowed a period to repent. 
And so death passed upon all men
because death is the penalty for having a sinful nature, (“the wages of sin is death” 6:23), and that sinful nature is shared by all in the world because of their link with Adam the sinner. 
For that all have sinned
“for that” means, “on the basis of the fact that”. The fact that the apostle can say, looking back through time, whether during the law-age or before, “all have sinned”, is the basis of the logical conclusion that what Adam did has affected us all, and sin has in fact entered into the whole of the world of men. 

Summary
The sin and death which are in the world are the result of the sin of Adam the first man, who has passed on his sinful nature to us all.

8(b) The existence of sin before the law-age

5:13  (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.  

(For until the law sin was in the world- the principle of revolt against the rule of God that sin represents was in the world up until the formal giving of the law to Israel at Sinai.
But sin is not imputed when there is no law- the word translated imputed is only found here and Philemon 18, (“put that on mine account”). It means more than simply thinking of someone in a certain way, (which is the usual meaning of ‘impute’ in the New Testament), but goes further and involves putting something down in an account book as needing to be paid for. So whilst God did not overlook the fact that during the period from Adam to Moses men had sin within, He did not reckon it against them as needing to be paid for by instant death.

5:14  Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.  

Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses- despite the foregoing, men still died in the period between Adam’s sin and Moses’ lawgiving. This proves that death is the consequence of having a sinful nature, and not the consequence of sinning. Only in extreme circumstances are men struck down in death by God because they have committed a particular sin; it is not the general rule.
Even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam’s transgression- that is, those who had not gone against God’s will as expressed in a known law. Adam, like Israel, was formally given God’s law. The law God gave to Adam was “thou shalt not eat of it”, and the known penalty for transgression was “thou shalt surely die”, Genesis 2:7. It is said of Israel, “they like Adam have transgressed the covenant”, Hosea 6:7 margin. So both Adam and men under the law of Moses were given a commandment with a known penalty. Men in between Adam and Sinai were not in this situation, and therefore the fact that death reigned over them, (that is, was on the throne in their lives), was due to their nature from Adam, not their sinning like Adam.
Who is the figure of Him that was to come- the apostle rounds off this parenthesis by bringing together the two men that are to be compared and contrasted, Christ and Adam. Certain features about Adam in his official position as federal head of the human race provide both a comparison and a contrast with Christ the head of the new creation. 

Summary
That death has passed upon all men because of the act of another is proved by the fact that men died even though they had not transgressed a law they knew about. In His mercy, God promised the seed of the woman immediately sin had entered into the world. 

8(c) The effect of sin and God’s attitude

Key phrases
The offence of one…the gift in grace which is of one man. 

Note the formula in verses 15,16 and 17- “but not as…so also…for if…much more”. Note too that in verses 13-17 and verse 19, the contrast is between one and many, emphasising the greatness of the problem to be addressed, and the greatness of God’s remedy, whereas in verses 12 and 18, it is between one and all, emphasising the universality of the problem, and the universality of the opportunity for benefitting by the remedy.  

5:15  But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.  

But not as the offence, so also is the free gift- these words serve the dual purpose of introducing both a comparison and a contrast beteen Adam and Christ, as would be suggested by the word figure in verse 14. Both are heads of a race of people, both performed an act which affected those people, and both pass on their characteristics to the people. But the contrast is marked, for Adam brought in sin, death, and God’s judgement, whereas Christ brings in righteousness, life, and justification. By ‘the offence’ means a trespass, a false step. Adam’s false move has had devastating and universal consequences because of the attitude of heart which lay behind the act. The apostle assumes we accept the record of Genesis 3.  The free gift is God’s  gift in grace, freely bestowed. The words offence and gift are the key to the verse. 
For if through the offence of one many be dead
the long list of men that have died physically down the centuries is directly attributable to the trespass of a single man at the beginning.
Much more- despite the seemingly insurmountable problem, God has overcome it, not by revoking the command which brought the death, but by introducing something far higher and grander.
The grace of God- God’s answer is not further condemnation, John 3:17; Luke 9:56, but the display of grace, unmerited favour to a fallen race. The condemnation of sinners is a righteous necessity, but God has no obligation to bless, yet chooses to do so.
And the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ
 the word “gift” means an act of giving; the word “by ” is literally “in”, speaking of the character of the giving; the second use of the word “by” indicates the personal responsibility placed upon Jesus Christ to deal with the matter of the sin of man.  The grace of God is expressed in the person of Christ, the Last Adam. This contrasts with the personal responsibility of Adam for his offence (the offence of one) and its consequences.
Hath abounded unto many
God delights to overflow in grace, and he does this towards the same number, “the many”, that are affected by affected by Adam’s offence.  The offence of one man brought many into death, but the grace of God which is channelled hrough the one man Jesus Christ flows forth towards that same number, despite the fact that they are many.

Summary
The offence of one man, Adam, has resulted in the death of the many in the world, but the superabounding grace of God in Christ is expressed to that same number.

8(d) The ending of death’s reign

Key phrases
Death reigned through (the agency of) one…reign in life through (the agency of) one. 

5:16  And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgement was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.  

And not as it was by one that sinned- the emphasis is now on the one person, rather than the one act of offending.
So is the gift
that spoken of in verse 15, and defined in verse 17 as the gift of righteousness. The phrase “and not” emphasizes that the gift is of a different character to the offence whose effects have been passed on to us, Adam’s gift was deadly; Christ’s is life-giving. The phrase “so is”, on the other hand, emphasizes that there is a comparison between what the two men did.
For the judgement was by one- by is “ek” meaning “out of”, indicating the source. Opinions differ whether the word ‘one’ refers to one man, Adam, or one offence. The comparison with many offences would suggest the latter, although the many offences are committed by many. The point is that there is a great obstacle to be overcome, since one sin has had such ruinous effects, yet there has been a multitude of people since who have committed a multitude of sins, which makes the situation much worse. 
Unto condemnation
the word used here means ” a verdict pronounced with punishment following” a stronger word than is usually used, indicating the gravity of the situation. God’s verdict (“judgement”) went against man, and condemnation in the form of physical death was the result. 
But the free gift
the apostle now reverts back to his original word for gift used in verse 15, grace-gift, indicating how the obstacle of so many sins, (whose presence proves that man is under condemnation), is dealt with. Only grace can do this; the law is powerless, as 8:3 will show. 
Is of many offences
again “of” means “out of”, indicating the source. Just as the one sin of Adam was the reason why condemnation came, so in the wisdom of God, He has seen the many offences of Adam’s descendants as an opportunity for acting in grace, to His own glory. So the free gift is as a result of Adam’s sin, and its need to be remedied. This truth was misapplied by Paul’s opponents in 6:1.
Unto justification- “unto” means “with a view to”, for not all come into the good of what God is prepared to do. Not only does God justify in the sense of reckoning righteous, but in the context here justification means the lifting of the condemnation of death, giving the authority to reign in life. In this way the end of verse 16 prepares the way for the truth of verse 17.

5:17  For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

For if by one man’s offence death reigned by one- the offence of Adam brought death upon men as a tyrant ruling their lives. There is no other cause for death’s reign, for “by one” is repeated to reinforce the point.
Much more- again there is the counteracting of Adam’s fall, but also further blessing. See verse 20, “where sin abounded, grace did much more abound”. 
They which receive abundance of grace
the grace of God mentioned in verse 15, is available. Note the apostle limits it to “they which receive”, not the “many” in general; in other words, believers, not men generally.
And of the gift of righteousness- the gift consisting of righteousness.
Shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ)- instead of merely overthrowing the tyrant death, God enables the believer to reign, but only by the agency and strength of Jesus Christ. Note the “shall”, the full realisation of reigning in life is reserved for the future, although to be anticipated now, as detailed in chapter 6.  

Summary
By the agency of one man, Adam, death reigned over his race, but by the agency of another man, Jesus Christ, God’s grace ensures that those who receive His gift of righteousness reign in life, both now and in the future. And just as the one offence of one man was the starting point of the condemnation, so the many offences of many men has been viewed by God as the starting-point of a process which results in the condemnation being removed.  

8(e) The extending of a gift to all

Key phrases
Judgement came upon all…free gift came upon all. 

5:18  Therefore as by the offence of one judgement came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.  

Therefore as- means “so then”, the counterpart to the “wherefore as” of verse 12. The intervening verses have cleared the way for the truths of verses 18 and 19, and the apostle is now free to take the argument forward.
By the offence of one
the spotlight is again on two federal heads, Adam and Christ. Here, Adam is in view. 
Judgement came upon all men to condemnation
the word judgement has been supplied by the Authorised Version from verse 16 to give the sense. The sentence of the Judge went against Adam and his race. 
Even so
there is a straight comparison now, instead of the “as…much more” of the previous verses.
By the righteousness of one
the one supreme act of righteousness which Christ accomplished on the cross. Not His personal righteousness, for the meaning is fixed by the word used. The act of Adam in making a false step in relation to the will of God, is directly contrasted with the act of Christ when He fulfilled the will of God at the cross.  The Lord Jesus was not dealing with sin during His life, or else He would have been forsaken of God then as well.  It was only during the hours of darkness upon the cross that He was forsaken by His God. 
The free gift came upon all men
the words “free gift” are supplied from verse 16. Upon means “towards”- just as the condemnation came towards all, so does the gift. 
Unto justification of life
with a view to a cancellation of the condemnation, negatively, and the introduction into life in Christ, positively. Life in Christ is the theme of chapters 6 and 8. 

Summary
There is a correspondence between the consequence of Adam’s act, and that of Christ. The one was an offence which brought condemnation, the other was an act of righteousness which brings justification.

8(g) The experience of justification by many

Key phrases
One man’s disobedience….obedience of one. 

5:19  For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.  

For as- a more precise comparison even than the “as…even so” of verse 18, representing a refinement of the reasoning, which finds its climax in this verse, with its doctrine of the nature of men in Adam and men in Christ. The question might well be asked, How does verse 19 advance the argument, since it is so similar to verse 18? The answer is two-fold. First, the apostle now speaks of man by their constitution, made sinners and made righteous. Second, he implies how the state of being righteous is attained, for the disobedience of Adam may be contrasted not only with the obedience of Christ, but by inference with the obedience of faith.
By one man’s disobedience- the word is made up of two words, aside, and hear, giving the idea of refusal to hear. Adam had heard the command of God, but chose to “turn a deaf ear”.
Many were made sinners- made means “constituted”, the word being most often used of appointment to a position. The position appointed to men in Adam is that of being a sinner.
So by the obedience of one- Christ’s obedience to God even to the extent and extremity of the cross is in view, Philippians 2:8. Adam simply had to refrain from eating of the tree of knowledge, Christ had a heavy and sorrowful task before Him, even suffering on a tree, Acts 5:30, but did not waver in His obedience.
Shall many be made righteous- here the righteousness is based on the obedience of Christ, to preserve the contrast with Adam, whereas previously in the epistle the apostle has shown that it is by the obedience of our faith that righteousness is imputed to us.  

Summary
Adam’s disobedience resulted in man being constituted a sinner, whereas the obedience of Christ in going to the cross to deal with sin in obedience to His Father, has brought a state of righteousness to those who are linked to Him by the obedience of faith. 

 8(h) The enhancement of sin by the law

Having prepared the ground for a consideration of the believer’s life in Christ as detailed in chapters 6 and 8, the apostle now prepares for chapter 7, with its consideration of the believer in relation to the law of Moses.

5:20  Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

Moreover the law entered-  the law of Moses came onto the scene as a side-issue, “came side-ways in”. This shows that Adam was not put under law as the nation of Israel was at Sinai, as some teach.
That the offence might abound- not in the sense that the number of sins might be increased, but that they might be shown in their true light, so that by a formal giving of the law what was wrong might be highlighted. By this means the initial offence of Adam, verse 15, was exposed in the offences of his race, verse 16.
But where sin abounded- as the law showed up its evil. The apostle reverts to the more general term sin, rather than ‘offence’ and transgression’, in preparation for the next chapters. 
Grace did much more abound
the free favour of God is great enough to deal with all the offences, and to bring in positive things as well. Compare the “much more” of the reasoning of verses 15 and 17. 

8(i) The ending of sin’s reign

5:21  That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.

That- this means “in order that”, for the superabundance of grace has a purpose.
As sin hath reigned unto  death- the preposition “unto”, is literally “in”, and when it does not denote physical location, it speaks of either power or character, the context deciding. Here the power behind the throne during the reign of sin, is said to be death. Death made sin’s reign a tyranny. Cf. Hebrews 2:15.
Even so might grace reign- grace so abounds that it dominates the scene, sweeps sin off its throne, and robs death of its power over the believer.
Through righteousness- sin reigned in death, whereas grace reigns through righteousness. There is not, then, an exact parallel in the two ideas. God does not simply restore man to innocence, but to a position consistent with righteousness. So grace reigns on a righteous basis, in contrast to the reign of sin which was on the basis of the unrighteous act of Adam.
Unto eternal life- grace superabounds so that not only is death defeated, but eternal life, the life of God, is imparted, not the life of Adam regained.
By Jesus Christ our Lord- He is the direct means by which grace reigns and eternal life is imparted. This full title is fitting now that He has triumphed through the work of the cross, and overthrown the reign of sin. How believers enter into that triumph is the theme of the next three chapters.

 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

ROMANS 4

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website using the e-mail address martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk We would be pleased to hear from you.

The apostle now proceeds to illustrate the principles he has just now been stating at the end of chapter three.

Structure of the chapter

6(d)

4:1-5

The boasting of the natural man excluded

6(e)

4:6-8

The blessedness of the forgiven man explained

6(f)

4:9-12

The blessing for any man ensured

6(g)

4:13-22

The behaviour of the believing man examined

6(h)

4:23-25

The belief in the Risen Man expected


Special note on Abraham
It might be helpful, (since the apostle is going to use the experience of Abraham to illustrate his case), to list the events in Abraham’s life that are singled out for mention by New Testament writers.

1. The God of glory appears to Abram in Ur, Acts 7:2, and he responds in faith, Hebrews 11:8.

2. He reaches Canaan and lives there in faith, Genesis 12:5, Hebrews 11:9.

3. God promises him a son, and Abraham believes God, Genesis 15:5,6; Romans 4:3, Galatians 3:6.

4. Abraham listens to Sarah’s suggestion, and fathers a son, Ishmael, by Hagar, Genesis 16:2,15.

5. Thirteen silent years pass, Genesis 16:16; 17:1.

6. God promises Abraham that he will be the father of many nations, Genesis 17:4. His name is changed from Abram, meaning “exalted father” to Abraham, “father of a multitude”, in remembrance of this promise, Genesis 17:5, Romans 4:17.

7. Abraham and Sarah are both strengthened in faith, and despite their old age Isaac is born, Romans 4:19-21, Hebrews 11:11.

8. Abraham offers Isaac on Moriah, as an act of faith, Hebrews 11:17; obedience, Genesis 22:18; and righteousness, James 2:21-24.

Special note on circumcision
Considered literally and physically, circumcision was an operation performed on male children. God required this to be done on the eighth day of their lives in normal circumstances, for He, as Creator, had so made us that it is on that day we are least likely to bleed to death.

This operation is said to have some medical advantages, but the main point about circumcision is its spiritual significance. Because it was a procedure where the flesh was cut round, (hence the “circum”), and then cut off, (hence the “cision”), it became a sign of being cut off from others and separated off or sanctified to God. We may think of it in the following ways, as the doctrine develops in the Scriptures:

1. Circumcision and Abraham
After he had believed God and been reckoned righteous as a result, Abraham was commanded by God to be circumcised, even though he was an old man. He obeyed God, and circumcision became for him a seal or confirmation of the faith he already had, Romans 4:11.

2. Circumcision and Ishmael
At the same time, God required Abraham to circumcise his son Ishmael, so that he had a mark on his body signifying that God’s covenant was with Abraham, Genesis 17:26.

3. Circumcision and Isaac
When Isaac was born Abraham circumcised him on the eighth day, and he was thereby marked out as Abraham’s true seed, Genesis 21:4.

4. Circumcision and Moses
The rite of circumcision seems to have lapsed after Israel went into Egypt, for when Moses was returning from the desert of Midian it was found that his two sons were not circumcised. The account is in Exodus 4:18-20; 24-26.

When the law was given at Sinai, circumcision was required, as Leviticus 12:3 informs us. This is why the Lord Jesus, when referring to circumcision, said “Moses therefore gave unto you circumcision; (not because it is of Moses, but of the fathers:) and ye on the sabbath day circumcise a man. If a man on the sabbath day receive circumcision, that the law of Moses should not be broken; are ye angry at me, because I have made a man every whit whole on the sabbath day?” John 7:22,23. His point was that if a boy was born on a Friday, they would have no problem in circumcising him on the sabbath day, for that was eight days after he was born. Why then should they complain if He healed a man on the sabbath?

When a Hebrew parent circumcised a male child, there was a physical aspect, and a moral one. The physical aspect was that he now bore the mark of an Israelite on him. He was now of The Circumcision, the nation of Israel. But the moral side was that he was now committed to keeping the law of Moses. So important were these two aspects, that God sanctioned the work of circumcising on the day of rest, if the child had been born eight days before. After all, He who controls the timing of everything, even the birth of children, did not ordain that no Hebrew son should be born on a Friday.

Now no one was angry at a Hebrew parent who did this. Nor did they seek to kill him. Rather, they would applaud that he had kept the law. All this being the case, and they felt free to “break” the sabbath in this God-appointed way, then surely the Lord Jesus should not be persecuted for making a man entirely whole, and not merely ceremonially whole, on the sabbath.

For the healing of the impotent man did make him entirely whole. He was healed as to the body, so that he was able to rise at Christ’s bidding. He was healed as to the soul, for the misery of the last thirty-eight years was for ever gone, symbolised by his taking up his bed, for he would not need it again. And he was healed as to the spirit, for as he walked at Christ’s command, he went straight into the temple to praise God. Thereafter the moral implications of Christ’s words to him would be uppermost in his mind, “sin no more, lest a worse thing come upon thee”.

The Jews should ask themselves, which was better, to be miserable and powerless at the Pool of Bethesda, or to be in the temple with renewed body and spiritual joy? The law required that Israel “Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.” Exodus 20:8. But that holiness was not merely a negative idea, keeping the day as a special one, different to the rest of the week. It had its very important positive side, to set the day apart for spiritual purposes. And this Christ had done. He had enabled a man to sanctify the sabbath day in a way he could not have done all the while he was impotent.

So we could summarise the argument as follows: if the people who were angry with Christ to the extent of wishing to kill Him, were free to do a lesser thing on the sabbath in order to obey God’s law, surely He could do the greater thing. They did the lesser thing at God’s commandment, He acted likewise at the command of God His Father.

As a result of this connection between the law of Moses and circumcision, it became a sign of being under the law, so that the nation of Israel were the Circumcised, and the Gentiles all around were the Uncircumcised, even if the latter were in fact physically circumcised out of national custom. We have already seen these distinctions in Romans 2:24-29.

5. Circumcision and Joshua
We learn from Joshua 5:2-9 that those who had died under the judgment of God during the wilderness journey had not circumcised their male children. This was not surprising, since those who fell in the wilderness were not believers, Hebrews 3:17,18. The crossing of the Jordan represents a new beginning for Israel, so God commanded that the children be circumcised so that the “reproach of Egypt”, should be “rolled away” from them, Joshua 5:9. This introduces a third aspect of circumcision, for just as a portion of flesh was rolled away from the child, so association with Egypt was rolled away also, since this had not been done in the wilderness. Those who refused the land were also those who longed to return to Egypt. It is no surprise then that an operation that signified separation from Egypt did not appeal to them, and they allowed it to lapse. Centuries before, their ancestors had sold Joseph into Egypt, and eventually the rest of Jacob’s family followed. So they left Canaan and went to live in Egypt. Now whilst this was a fulfilment of prophecy, Genesis 15:13, nonetheless it was failure, and so it seems that this was called the reproach of Egypt, meaning the reproach and shame that came to them for going into Egypt. When they crossed the Jordan with Joshua, this was reversed, and their circumcision signified it.

6. Circumcision and Christ personally
When He was eight days old, Joseph and Mary had Christ circumcised, Luke 2:21, for He had come into the nation of Israel under the law. As the apostle Paul puts it, “But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law”, Galatians 4:4. He was thereby committed to keeping God’s law, which He did perfectly. Unlike other Jews, however, He was not under the law to force Him to obey God. Rather, He obeyed God and thereby kept the law.

7. Circumcision and Christ doctrinally
The apostle Paul wrote to the Colossian believers to warn them of the evil influences in the world around them which would seek to harm them. He tells them that they are “circumcised with the circumcision made without hands”, Colossians 2:11. Not only are believers complete in Christ, verse 10, but they are separated unto Him from the sphere where error flourishes. Christ cannot link sinners with Himself, so He must cut them off from their links with Adam so as to join them to Himself. This He did at the cross, where He dealt with all that Adam represented. This is the circumcision made without hands, for it is not physical, but moral and spiritual. The cross has cut off believers from the world, including the philosophy-world that was attacking the Colossians.

When God made a covenant with Abraham, He made physical circumcision the sign of that covenant. Abraham was now special to Himself, and had the mark on his body to prove it. Such a rite is no longer relevant, so that the apostle described physical circumcision as “concision”, a cutting along and a maiming, Philippians 3:2, whereas believers are now the true circumcision, properly cut off by God from their links with Adam’s world. This means they are cut off from the sphere where heretics operate, for such men are of the world, being unbelievers, and as such have no contact with the things of God.

When he is dealing with the case of the Jew in his epistle to the Romans, the apostle shows that true circumcision is a heart matter, “For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men but of God.” Romans 2:28,29. This is why Stephen was justified in calling the Jews who were about to stone him, “uncircumcised in heart and ears”, Acts 7:51.

True circumcision is now “putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ”, Colossians 2:11, and this happens at conversion. What is cut off is the body as the vehicle by which sins of the flesh are conceived and committed, the flesh being the sinful self, which is resident in the body. Paul calls the body “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6. He is there concerned with the sin-principle within, whereas here it is the sin-practice that is in view; nonetheless the idea is that the body is the base of operations from which sins proceed. As far as God is concerned, that body has been cut off so that it may be brought over into resurrection conditions to be used for God. That which is called “the body of sin” in Romans 6:6 can be presented to God in Romans 12:1, for God has wrought upon it to His glory.


6(d)   4:1-5
The boasting of the natural man excluded

4:1
What shall we say then that Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?

What shall we say then that Abraham, our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found? Abraham’s original name was Abram, meaning “exalted father.” God changed this to Abraham, meaning “father of a multitude” after He had promised to make him the father of many nations. The teaching of the chapter revolves around various aspects of the fatherhood of Abraham.
The literal order of the words is, “Abraham our father has found according to the flesh”. In other words, we should connect “according to the flesh” with “found”, and not with “father”. It is not the natural fatherhood of Abraham that is in view, because Gentile Christians do not have him as their natural father. The question on the mind of the apostle is what discovery did Abraham make as a natural man?

4:2
For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God.

For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory- if, as a natural man, Abraham had been able to earn justification, then he would have had reason to glory or boast in his achievement.
But not before God- such a theoretical justification would not be valid before God, for, as the apostle goes on to show, God’s dealings with Abraham were not on that basis.

4:3
For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

For what saith the scripture? Paul had stated in 3:21 that the righteousness of God was witnessed by the law and the prophets. He had appealed to the prophet Habakkuk in 1:17, and now he appeals to the law, (meaning, in this context, the writings of Moses), by quoting Genesis 15:6. Note the present tense of “saith,” for the apostle believes in the living, up-to-date voice of the scriptures, being God’s word, which “liveth and abideth for ever”, 1 Peter 1:23.
Abraham believed God- this is a reference to Genesis 15:6, after Abraham had declared that he was an old man who was soon to die childless. In response God showed him the multitude of the stars in the sky, and promised “So shall thy seed be”. Abram accepted what God said, even though it was naturally impossible for him and Sarah his wife to have a son. This is the essence of faith, the acceptance of God’s word without reserve, even though it goes beyond natural reasoning. The apostle deliberately uses an incident in the life of Abraham which does not involve him in any activity, such as moving from Ur in faith, Hebrews 11:8, or building an altar, Genesis 12:7.
Note that the apostle refers to the expression found in Genesis 15:6, “believed in the Lord”, and quotes it as “believed God”. To believe in the Lord is to have trust and confidence in the Lord as the one who keeps His promises. This was appropriate in Abraham’s situation, since God had just given Him a promise. This is not the context in Romans 4, where the apostle is dealing with the imputation of righteousness. To believe God is to accept that what He says is true, and the logical outcome of this is to believe Him. The inspired apostle is bringing out different aspects of the truth.
And it was counted unto him for righteousness- God was prepared to count or reckon Abraham to be a righteous man on the basis of his faith. It was not that Abraham was now perfect, but rather that God was prepared to think of him as a righteous man. The basis on which God did this was the then-future work of the Lord Jesus at Calvary, as the apostle has explained in 3:25. He was counted righteous because God anticipated Calvary.

4:4
Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

Now to him that worketh- the apostle gives an everyday illustration to show the difference between justification (being reckoned righteous) by works, and by grace. He had said in 3:24 that justification is by God’s grace, and now he shows this by using a practical example.
Is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt- during the working week the workman puts his employer under obligation, and he discharges that obligation by paying the appropriate wages (reward). God cannot be placed under obligation by any of His creatures however, so any benefit He gives must be on the basis of grace, that is, His free favour. To try to earn justification by works is pointless, since if God were to bless on that basis it would be at the expense of His own honour as the God of grace. Needless to say, God will never dishonour Himself in this or any other way.

4:5
But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

But to him that worketh not- the “but” introduces the alternative to working for righteousness. “Worketh not” involves a man renouncing all idea of being able to earn salvation by works.
But believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly- the opposite of working is resting, and this is what faith does as it relies on the promises of the God who blesses in grace. The ungodly are the impious, those who act contrary to God. We might be surprised that the apostle uses this strong word here, but he is preparing the way for the next example, that of David, in whose case it was a question of forgiveness for hideous sins. When David confessed those sins in Psalm 51 he spoke of having sinned against God, which is the essence of impiety. By using this severe word, the apostle assures us that the grace of God is not limited at all, for even daring rebels may be justified.
His faith is counted for righteousness- even an ungodly, (albeit repentant), man’s faith is valid, and finds a response from God, since the point about faith is in whom it rests. Of course, the ungodliness goes when he believes.

6(e)   4:6-8
The blessedness of the forgiven man described

4:6
Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works,

Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man- to be reckoned righteous is a great blessing, but Abraham does not describe it, so the apostle brings in David to do it for him. With Abraham it was a question of God imputing righteousness when he believed. In the case of David it was God not imputing sin when he repented.
David sinned badly in the matter of Bathsheba, Uriah’s wife, and 2 Samuel 11 records the sorry incident. Sadly, however, David remained silent, refusing to confess his sin, but at last he was brought to the point of acknowledging his sin, and confessing his transgressions unto the Lord. Then he began to know the blessedness of sins forgiven, and wrote Psalm 32 and Psalm 51 to describe that blessedness.
Note that although David’s sin was personal to him, he speaks of “the man”; in other words, this forgiveness is not limited to David, but is available to all who repent. Perhaps there is also an allusion to Nathan’s accusation of David using the words “Thou art the man”, 2 Samuel 12:7. The man who is convicted by the word of God and repents, is the same man who is forgiven.
Unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works- after he had repented, David wrote, “For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it: thou delightest not in burnt offering. The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit: a broken and a contrite heart, O God, thou wilt not despise.” Psalm 51:16,17. David shows deep insight into the ways of God, and realises that God looks for a broken spirit on the part of sinners, not their so-called good works. Thus David was forgiven by God apart from the work of bringing a sacrifice.

4:7
Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered.

Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered- in Psalm 32:1, quoted here, the word blessed is in the plural, signifying most blessed. This contains the idea of being spiritually prosperous. Instead of the misery of unconfessed sins, David now experiences the bliss of sins forgiven.
Iniquities are lawless acts, and David had been guilty of breaking the sixth commandment of the law by having Uriah slain; the seventh by taking Bathsheba whilst her husband was still alive; the eighth commandment by stealing another’s wife; the ninth commandment by deceiving Uriah into thinking he was in favour with the king; and the tenth commandment by coveting his neighbour’s wife at the outset.
Not only are iniquities or lawless acts forgiven by the One against whom they were committed, but the sins are covered, indicating that they were no longer under the eye of God. If God covers sins, they will never be uncovered. The lawlessness of David was in marked contrast to the concern of Uriah for the welfare of the ark, which contained the tables of the law, 2 Samuel 11:11.

4:8
Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin.

Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin- not only was David forgiven, but by the grace of God he was still reckoned to be a righteous man. His fall, although extremely regrettable and dishonourable, had not altered his standing before God. So Abraham illustrates the principle of the imputation of righteousness, whereas David illustrates the principle of the non-imputation of sin, whether past sins, or sins in the future, (note the “will”). The fact that both Abraham and David were believers before these events took place does not alter the principle.

6(f)   4:9-12
The blessing for any man ensured

4:9
Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness.

Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only? Does the use of David, a circumcised Jew, as an illustration, mean that the blessedness of having one’s sins forgiven is only available to Jews?
Or upon the uncircumcision also? Can Gentiles know this forgiveness?
For we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness- the apostle reverts to Abraham, his principal example in this passage, and restates the substance of verse 5, after which he had referred to David. He needs to go back to considering Abraham because of the matter of circumcision, which did not come up with David.

4:10
How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.

How was it then reckoned? When he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? This is the critical question. At what point in his career did Abraham believe God, and was reckoned righteous?
Not in circumcision- the apostle puts this first so that his denial might be unmistakeable. Abraham was justified by faith before he was circumcised.
But in uncircumcision- which means that those who are not circumcised, (that is, are Gentiles), may come into blessing as Abraham did. The apostle comments on this by writing, “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree: That the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ; that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.” Galatians 3:14. The personal blessing granted to Abraham was the gift of a son. The blessing that Gentiles receive when they believe is the gift of the Spirit, who guarantees all other spiritual blessings.

4:11
And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:

And he received the sign of circumcision- that is, the sign consisting of circumcision.
A seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised- the rite of circumcision was required by God as a sign that Abraham was in covenant relationship with God. But he only had this covenant relationship because he was a believer. So the circumcision became a seal or confirmation of the reality of his faith. As far as Abraham’s physical descendants were concerned, circumcision was simply a sign that they were of Abraham’s line; it said nothing about whether they had a personal relationship to God.
That he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also- Abraham was not the first man to exercise faith, but he is specially taken up by God as an example to those who believe. In this way his characteristics have been passed on, and in this sense he is their father, even though they are neither descended naturally from him, nor circumcised. Of course the apostle, by saying “all them that believe, though they be not circumcised” does not imply that all those who believe were formerly uncircumcised. He is emphasising that Abraham is even the father of those who were not circumcised before.

4:12
And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.

And the father of circumcision- not only is Abraham an example of faith, but he also demonstrates the principle of separation, the idea behind circumcision, a cutting off from the things of man to be involved in the things of God. The family of faith looks up to Abraham as a role-model.
To them who are not of the circumcision only- he is this example to all who believe, whether they were physically circumcised before, or not.
But who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised- believing Jews and Gentiles may find in Abraham one to follow, as he marks out the pathway of faith and separation.

6(c)   4:13-22
The behaviour of the believing man examined

The apostle has asked “Is He the God of the Jews only? Is He not also of the Gentiles?” and had answered his own question in 4:1-12, by the use of two Old Testament worthies, Abraham and David. Now he highlights the character of the God of Abraham and David, by further references to the life of Abraham.

4:13
For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith.

For the promise, that he should be the heir of the world- in Genesis 15, the passage the apostle has referred to, God promised Abraham the land of Canaan. But now the idea is extended to include the whole earth. In the final sense the seed of Abraham is Christ, Galatians 3:16,17, and He will inherit the earth, Psalm 2:8; Psalm 72:8.

When God made a covenant with Abraham, Abraham was asleep, so did not pass between the pieces of the covenant victim. But a burning lamp did, and Isaiah looks on to the time when Israel shall be restored to God, and at that time the salvation of Jerusalem shall be “as a lamp that burneth”, Isaiah 62:1. The word used for salvation there is “yeshuah”, the equivalent of the New Testament name Jesus. We can see why the apostle Paul wrote that the covenant was “confirmed…in Christ”, for He was the one who passed through the pieces that night, whilst Abraham was asleep. Abraham’s link with Christ will ensure that he and his seed, will inherit the world, for Christ will inherit the world. Note that the promise is not said by Paul to be to inherit the land of Israel, for that is reserved only for the spiritual seed of Abraham who are descended from him physically.
Was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith- God gave promises to Abraham because, having believed God, he was now righteous by faith. As the apostle points out in Galatians 3:17, the promise to Abraham was four hundred and thirty years before the law was given.

4:14
For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect:

For if they which are of the law be heirs- if the inheritance is on the basis of merit, then all is lost, because as soon as we seek to gain merit by works, the law confronts us as those who are transgressors unfit to inherit.

Faith is made void- if we introduce works, faith is robbed of its relevance, and is virtually cancelled, for works implies dependence on self, whereas faith implies dependence on God.

And the promise made of no effect- if no-one inherits, (either because they opt for law-works but cannot do them perfectly, or reject faith), the promise has not achieved its purpose.

4:15
Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.

Because the law worketh wrath- far from enabling man to inherit, the law exposes man’s failure, which merits Divine wrath. The reason for this is next given.
For where no law is, there is no transgression- the law shows up man’s transgressions, not his merit. Only in the absence of law is there absence of transgression, which in turn means absence of wrath. But since the Jew has the law on tables of stone, and the Gentile has the law written in his heart, then both are exposed to wrath as transgressors, being unable to keep the law.

4:16
Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all,

Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace- the line of thought regarding the promise resumes from verse 13 after the explanation of verses 14 and 15. God’s promise that Abraham and his seed would inherit the world was on the basis of grace (favour shown), not works (merit demanded).
To the end the promise might be sure to all the seed- because the promise is by grace, not law, it is sure to all those who believe. The spiritual seed of Abraham is considered as being of two origins, as is next said, but to both classes the promise is certain.
Not to that only which is of the law- meaning those believers who were formerly Jews. He is not saying that the promise originates from the law, but that some of the people who make up the seed originate from a nation under the law.
But to that also which is of the faith of Abraham- meaning Christians who were formerly Gentiles. As previously explained, this faith of Abraham’s was exercised when he was not circumcised, and therefore no different to a Gentile. The apostle is not speaking of two groups of people, Jews under law and Gentiles under faith, because that would contradict his former statement that those under law do not inherit, verse 13.
Who is the father of us all- that is, of all who are believers. Whether they were Jews or Gentiles formerly is not relevant in this connection.

4:17
(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he believed, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were.

(As it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations)- the promise here mentioned was given to Abraham in Genesis 17:5, after which God commanded him to be circumcised as a token of the covenant He had made with him. Paul no doubt chooses this promise because of its connection with circumcision, and also because it implies that Abraham would have a son, or else he could not be the father of many nations. So that is the initial meaning of the promise. But Paul also sees in this promise the fact that people from many nations will call Abraham their father in the faith. Abraham’s original name of Abram, “exalted father”, was changed by God to Abraham, meaning “father of a multitude”. It is Abraham’s reaction to the promise of a son that is developed in the next verses.
Before him whom he believed- in Genesis 17:1 God commanded Abraham to walk before Him and be perfect, which suggests that he had not walked before God wholeheartedly (perfectly) after Ishmael was born. It is only as he walks before God in faith that he is an example.
Even God, who quickeneth the dead- Abraham is now acting in the light of the fact that God is able to quicken his body, and that of Sarah, so that they may have a child. See Hebrews 11:12, where he is described as “him as good as dead.” Perhaps it was because of this that Abraham, in a later incident, believed God could raise Isaac from the dead if he offered him as a sacrifice, Hebrews 11:17-19.
And calleth those things that be not, as though they were- so sure is the birth of a son to Abraham that he can be called or named by God before his conception, Genesis 17:19.

4:18
Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be.

Who against hope- when all natural hopes of having a child were gone, and when natural reason said the situation was hopeless.
Believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations- his faith in God was exercised on the sure basis of the hope God’s promise gave him. Hope is not the object of his faith, but rather, God’s promise gave him a sure hope, and he believed on that basis.
According to that which was spoken, So shall thy seed be- his faith as he believed in God’s promise of a son, can be expressed in terms of his initial faith in Genesis 15:6, so the one exercise of faith was according to the other. His intervening lapse of faith is over.

4:19
And being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb:

And being not weak in faith- as temporarily he seems to have been when he fathered a child by Hagar.
He considered not his own body now dead, when he was about a hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah’s womb- before this he seems to have considered these obstacles to be insurmountable, for when he was told that he would have a son, “he laughed, and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? And shall Sarah, that is ninety years old, bear? Genesis 17:17, but now he thinks these doubts not worth taking into consideration.

4:20
He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God;

He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief- he did not doubt God’s word, implying he did before, when he laughed, Genesis 17:17. Compare also Sarah’s reaction, Genesis 18:12,13, then her return to wholehearted faith, Hebrews 11:11.
But was strong in faith, giving glory to God- this is the secret of his restoration, for he has captured again the sight of the God of glory who appeared to him in Ur of the Chaldees at the first, Acts 7:2.

4:21
And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform.

And being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, he was able also to perform- this is the proper response that should be made to the promises of God. Compare Mary’s response to the news that she, a virgin, would have a son, Luke 1:38, with Abraham and Sarah’s response in Genesis 17:17 and 18:12. Mary was fully persuaded, and Elizabeth, her kinswoman believed also, for she said, “there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord”, Luke 1:45, but Abraham and Sarah were unconvinced initially.

4:22
And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness.

And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness- this seems to make his being made righteous in Genesis 15 dependant on what happened 13 years later, which cannot be the case. Rather, the apostle is indicating that the faith of Abraham became strong again, after his temporary lapse when he laughed. He has now returned to the sort of faith that he manifest in Genesis 15. The apostle’s purpose is to return to the subject of being reckoned righteous, not only to apply it to us today, but also to prepare the way for the teaching found in 5:1-11.

6(h)   4:23-25
The belief in the Risen Man expected

4:23
Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him;

Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him- the account in Genesis of Abraham’s faith is not just for historical interest, or just so that we might admire his faith.

4:24
But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead;

But for us also- the principles involved are just as relevant today.
To whom it shall be imputed- the sense of “shall be” is “shall certainly be”. The “it” refers to the rightousness of verse 22.
If we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead- the same God that brought life out of death when the “dead” bodies of Abraham and Sarah produced a living son, has brought Jesus our Lord from the sphere of death. Abraham believed the birth of Isaac would happen, and Christians believe the resurrection of Christ has happened.
Note that faith is placed in Divine persons, not just in events. We are not only expected to believe the resurrection has taken place, but to believe on the One who performed it. Notice the title “Jesus our Lord”, reinforcing the previous statement, for if He is truly our Lord, then there is personal faith like Abraham’s, and if He is truly our Lord, then we have submitted to His authority by repenting, as David did.

4:25
Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification- the apostle implies two questions, and then answers them. It is as if he asks, “Why was He, Jesus our Lord, delivered by God to death?” The answer is “Because of our offences”. His second question is, “Why was He raised from the dead?” The answer, “Because of the justification which His death secures”. Thus the resurrection of Christ is God’s indication to us that the work of Calvary satisfies His every demand against our sins.
The mention of offences reminds us we were like David, having sinned. The mention of justification reminds us that the believer is justified, like Abraham. The apostle has now brought us back to the idea of justification, and so prepares for the truth of chapter 5, which begins, “Therefore, being justified by faith”.

 

 

 

 

ROMANS 3

We hope you find these notes helpful. Do feel free to download the material on this website for your own personal use, and also to distribute if you so wish. Please be aware that all the writing is copyright, so no alterations should be made.

Please feel free to comment on any aspect of what you find on this website by e-mailing: martin_margaret3@yahoo.co.uk. We would be pleased to hear from you.

Continuation of Section 4   2:17-3:20
God’s wrath against men as Legislator

Structure of 3:1-20

4(d)

3:1-8

The charge of infidelity

4(e)

3:9-20

The charge of iniquity

4(f)

3:18-20

The charged ones found guilty

The apostle anticipates objections to what he has just written, and in answering them accuses the Jews of infidelity. He asks a series of double questions, each followed by his answer. Each question and answer section has a particular feature about God as its theme. We could paraphrase these questions and answers as follows:

Theme, verse 2: the oracles of God.

First pair of questions, verse 1: “If previous verses at the end of chapter two are correct, then what is the value in being a Jew and being circumcised?”
Answer, verse 2: “There is much advantage in being a Jew, chiefly because it means ready access to the Scriptures, the oracles of God.”

Theme, verse 3: the faith of God.

Second pair of questions, verse 3: “If some did not believe, does that mean that faith in Him is not worthwhile?” Is faith in God pointless?
Answer, verse 4: “Not at all, (God forbid), because God is true, (He always speaks truth), but men, all of them, are liars. They lie by denying God’s word. It is those who do not believe who make God a liar, 1 John 5:10. So the fault lies with man, not God”.

Theme, verse 6: the righteousness of God.

Third pair of questions, verse 5: “If a good result is achieved when man repents, then has man’s unrighteousness enhanced God’s righteousness? If that is the case, is not God unrighteous when He judges sin?”
Answer, verse 6: “To speak like that is to say God will not judge men at all, which cannot be the case”.

Theme, verse 7: the truth of God.

Fourth pair of questions, verses 7,8: “If my life of denying the truth has enabled truth about God to be made known, then why should I be personally judged, (I also), even if the world is? And further to that, should we not actively sin in order to enhance God’s good name further?
Answer, none given, for the idea is so outrageous that it does not deserve a response.

We shall find that the apostle does not engage in an argument to prove the statements he makes, but is content to show their logical outcome, assuming we shall see the logic of his thinking. That God is true is a given fact as far as the apostle is concerned. He takes it for granted that God cannot be blamed for the reactions of men to His word, that He will definitely judge the world, and that He will condemn those who excuse their sin by saying it glorifies God. These propositions are accepted by reasonable people and do not need to be proved.

First pair of questions

3:1
What advantage then hath the Jew? or what profit is there of circumcision?

What advantage then hath the Jew?- the first possible objection has to do with the failures described in 2:21-24. It seems as though there is no benefit in being a Jew.
Or what profit is there of circumcision? In view of the truths set out in 2:25-29, where circumcised persons are said to be no better than the uncircumcised, it might be thought that there is no advantage in being circumcised if outward things are invalid.

Answer to first pair of questions

3:2
Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.

Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God– there are many and varied advantages in being a Jew, and they are listed in Romans 9:4,5. A chief one, which the apostle highlights here, is the possession of the living word of God, which the Jew was expected to observe. Note the connection between “committed”, (entrusted), and “did not believe”, verse 3, (were unfaithful to the trust).

Second pair of questions

3:3
For what if some did not believe? shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?

For what if some did not believe? The apostle has shown at the end of chapter two that simply being a Jew did not in itself gain the praise of God. Without faith it is impossible to please Him, Hebrews 11:6. Note the past tense, “did not believe”. He is thinking of two past instances of unbelief. The first, the lack of belief in the oracles committed to them on the part of Israel. The second, the lack of belief in Christ when He came. He Himself linked these two evidences of unbelief together when He said, “Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?” John 5:45-47.
Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? What is the situation if the majority of the nation to whom the oracles were committed did not believe those oracles, nor believe in Christ when He came in fulfilment of them? The faith of God is contrasted here with the unbelief of Israel. Of course God does not need to exercise faith in anything, so it is not that God has faith. The expression “faith of God” is unique to this passage, but there are seven instances in the New Testament of the phrase, or a similar one, “the faith of Christ”. The idea is of faith that is closely connected with Christ, having Him as its object. So the faith of God is the faith that God expects from men in response to His word, the living oracles of God. The Jew would probably protest that he had faith in the God of Israel. That may be so, but it was defective, and could not be described as the faith of God, the faith God was expecting.
So this question might be paraphrased as, “Does this mean that the unbelief of many in Israel has exposed what God was doing through His Old Testament word and His Son as being ineffective, and as such, should be abandoned?”
Most modern commentators, following the lead of the Revised Version, (a version not to be trusted), substitute “the faithfulness of God” here for “the faith of God” of the Authorised Version. We should remember, however, that Paul had at his disposal a perfectly good word for faithfulness, pistos, but he chose not to use it. The Greek word for faith is pistis, and is translated as faith 239 times in the New Testament. It is translated as assurance, belief, or fidelity, once each. So in the overwhelming majority of instances the word is translated faith.
It is all the more significant that Paul used the word pistis for faith, and did not use the word pistos, when we consider that he has just used the negative of that latter word, apistos, (meaning unbelief in the sense of unfaithfulness) which corresponds to it.
Does it not go without saying that God’s faithfulness, being part of His character, is not rendered useless by the unbelief of men? What does need to be shown is that faith in God is not useless.
Couple with this the fact that the translators of the Authorised Version would have weighed up this matter very carefully. Should we not be prepared to willingly defer to their skill, and to believe that God superintended their work in a remarkable and unrepeated way?
There is a similarly strange expression in Luke 6:12, where the literal rendering of “prayer to God” would be “the prayer of God”. Obviously God does not pray, but it seems the expression means “extraordinary and sublime devotion”. If this is a parallel case, then the faith of God is faith in God which is genuine and evident, and in contrast to the unbelief and hypocrisy of the majority in Israel.
So the point the apostle is making is that the word of God to the nation of Israel may have been met largely with unbelief and consequent unfaithfulness, but that in no wise means that the faith of the minority is useless. God is able to bless individual Jews even if in the main the nation rejects His word.
So Paul’s questions in verse 1, “what advantage?”, and “what profit?” are being answered; at the present time for individual Jews, and in the future for the nation.
To cross over from being amongst the majority to be amongst the minority, the Jew must do what David did when he owned up to his sin, which was committed contrary to the truth, and was an evidence of unfaithfulness. The apostle is about to quote David’s words on this matter.

Answer to second pair of questions

3:4
God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

God forbid- Far be the thought! The apostle strongly rejects the idea that man’s response to God can in any way mean that God’s purpose is frustrated.
Yea, let God be true, but every man a liar- not content with a negative rejection of the idea, the apostle makes a positive demand, which he prefaces with the word yea, telling of his strong feeling about the matter. He has that strong feeling because the honour of God is involved. When Satan came to tempt the woman in Eden, his first words were “Yea, hath God said?” Genesis 3:1. So from the very beginning, Satan has attempted to undermine the word of God. It is as if he said, “Yea, let God be untrue”. Here the apostle counters Satan’s attack on the truth of God and says, “Yea, let God be true”. Let the fact that God is true, and that all men are liars, govern our thinking in this matter. Paul energetically repudiates the idea that God’s word is at the mercy of men’s reaction to it.
When men do not believe the word of God, they elevate their thinking above God’s. They say in effect “I am right, but God is wrong”. Implied in that is the further thought, “I speak truth, but God is a liar”. Such is the wickedness of unbelief. But if the apostle strongly defends the idea that God is true, he equally strongly asserts that every man is a liar, especially when it comes to rejecting the word of God.
Since men are liars, they live out a lie in their lives, as the illustration from the life of David shows. As we have seen in 2:21-24, David broke every one of the last five commandments of the law, and in so doing broke them all, for to offend in one point is to be guilty of all, James 2:10. As a result of his experience, he was caused to acknowledge that God was right and he was wrong. This is an important point, so the apostle reinforces it with a relevant allusion to the Old Testament record.
As it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings- David came into direct confrontation with the word of God over the matter of his adultery with Bathsheba, and acted out a lie to cover his sin. See 2 Samuel 11; Psalm 32. The apostle quotes here from Psalm 51, one of David’s repentance psalms. As Psalm 32:3-5 indicates, David resisted acknowledging his sin at first, but at last came to the point where he gave in, and owned up to his wickedness. When he did this he justified or vindicated God and condemned himself, thus God was glorified as His sayings prevailed in David’s heart. The sayings being the specific commandments he had transgressed.
And mightest overcome when thou art judged- there was another consequence of David’s sin, apart from the rejection of God’s word. As Nathan said to him, “by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme”, 2 Samuel 12:14. By repenting, however, (saying in effect “I am a liar and God is true”), he relieved God of any blame when men pointed the finger at David, God’s anointed. In this way God overcame His accusers when they criticised Him.

Third pair of questions

3:5
But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man)

But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say? What can be said about the idea that the unrighteouness of the Jews, (as expressed by them breaking God’s righteous law), in some way brings God’s righteous ways into favourable display? “What shall we say” is usually used in the New Testament when the argument of an opponent is being refuted.
Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? Can God righteously express vengeance against men by judging them, when all the time they are doing that which gives Him fresh opportunity to glorify Himself?
(I speak as a man)- to speak like this is to speak as a natural man without the knowledge of God. To suggest that the righteous God of heaven is not righteous when He judges men is preposterous. To a believer the idea is abhorrent, illogical and unethical.

Answer to third pair of questions

3:6
God forbid: for then how shall God judge the world?

God forbid- again the apostle finds himself strongly rejecting the idea.
For then how shall God judge the world? That God will judge the world has been established in chapters 1 and 2, but this objection would destroy that truth, for it would undermine the just judgment of the world by God. He fully intends to judge the world, and do it in righteousness, Acts 17:31. The apostle goes on to point out in verses 7 and 8 two more consequences of this foolish notion.

Fourth pair of questions

3:7
For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I also judged as a sinner?

For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory; why yet am I judged as a sinner? If the truth about God contained in the oracles delivered to the Jews has been enhanced by my life lived contrary to that truth, (“my lie”), why am I still to be judged as a sinner? Surely I should be commended for giving God the opportunity to glorify Himself!

3:8
And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.

And not rather- this means, “And why should we not develop this idea further?”
(as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? Some were slandering Paul by saying that Paul taught the practice of evil so that good might come to God’s reputation.

Answer to fourth pair of questions

Whose damnation is just- this is so outrageous that the apostle is content to simply say that the judgment of those who suggest such things is just; it only needs the reminder of coming judgment to refute their argument. But let his opponents beware, for the judgment which is just and right for sinners generally, is just and right for slanderers too.

4(e) 3:9-17
The charge of iniquity

Having examined all classes of men, the apostle now presents his final argument on the subject of the universal sin of man, and the consequent danger of the wrath of God. The epistle to the Romans puts man in God’s Law-court, charges him in 1:19-3:8, presents written evidence in 3:9-18, pronounces him guilty in 3:19, then tells of the just means whereby his guilt may be removed, 3:20-25, and the repentant, believing sinner justified, 3:26.

3:9
What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin;

What then, are we better than they? In verse 1 the apostle had asked what advantage and profit the Jew had, and his answer was “Much every way.” Now, having disposed of the arguments of his opponents, he is able to ask a final question, which is, “Are we [Jews] better than they [Gentiles]?”
No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin- the Jew has outward advantages, but inwardly, as 2:21-24 shows, he is no better than sinful Gentiles. “Proved” here means “charged, incriminated, accused, put to the test in a judicial way”, and this has been done in 1:18-3:8. The proof in the sense of “the evidence that convinces” is about to be presented from the Old Testament scriptures, from which the apostle extracts fourteen statements proving conclusively that Jews are sinners.

3:10
As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:

As it is written- the fourteen statements the apostle now sets out are all taken from the Old Testament scriptures, with which the Jew was entrusted to enable him to please God. He did the reverse. It is testimony to the genuineness of those scriptures that even though they condemn them, they were carefully preserved by them.
There is none righteous, no, not one- the nature of man, even of the Jew, is corrupted and depraved by Adam’s fall. Psalm 14:3 reads, “there is none that doeth good, no, not one”, but as the apostle John says, “He that doeth righteous is righteous, even as he is righteous”, 1 John 3:7, for it is the nature that produces the results, such as goodness. If there is not a righteous nature, then there are no good actions, whatever men may claim.

3:11
There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

There is none that understandeth- this is the conclusion the apostle draws from Psalm 14:2, where “The Lord looked down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand, and seek God.” The fact that the next verse says “there is none that doeth good, no, not one”, shows that the conclusion the apostle draws here is valid. If they did understand and seek God they would have done good. The mind of man is ignorant of the truth of God, “having the understanding darkened”, as the apostle says in Ephesians 4:18.
There is none that seeketh after God- the attitude of man is one of apathy towards God. It was to Israel initially that God said, “Seek ye the Lord while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near.” Isaiah 55:6. The failure to seek is a sure sign of the lack of understanding, as Psalm 14:2, (already quoted above), indicates.

3:12
They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one.

They are all gone out of the way- the will of man makes him continue in the path of departure from God begun in the garden of Eden, Genesis 3. This is true of men generally, for “all we like sheep have gone astray”, Isaiah 53:6. It is also true of men individually, for the prophet went on to say, “we have turned every one to his own way”.
They are together become unprofitable- the life of man is unprofitable to God. This is true of men socially, for they are unprofitable together. There is no profit for God in human society. The reason this is so is given by the psalmist, “they are all together become filthy”, Psalm 14:3. The apostle interprets this for us, explaining that the filthiness is the cause of the unprofitableness to God, for He cannot approve of, or use, unclean things.
There is none that doeth good, no, not one- the works of man are contrary to God, who is essentially good. This is true of man individually.

3:13
Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:

Their throat is an open sepulchre- man is both defiled himself, and likely to defile others. The Lord Jesus likened the Pharisees of His day to whited sepulchres, “full of dead men’s bones, and all uncleanness”, Matthew 23:27. He also said they were like hidden graves that men walked over without knowing, and thus defiled themselves, Luke 11:44.
With their tongues they have used deceit- man is deceitful. “The wicked…go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies”, Psalm 58:3.
The poison of asps is under their lips- the words of men are dangerous. This is because they are worked upon by the god of this world. John the Baptist accused the Pharisees of being a “generation of vipers”, Matthew 3:7. And the Lord Himself told the Jews “Ye are of your father the devil”, John 8:44, and he is “that old serpent, called the devil”, Revelation 12:9.

3:14
Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness:

Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness- malice is expressed, (cursing), and malice is harboured, (bitterness). The result is that man’s words are damaging. All these statements were true of Paul when he was Saul of Tarsus, as he breathed out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, Acts 9:1. We could look upon this whole passage as a description of his pre-conversion state.

3:15
Their feet are swift to shed blood:

Their feet are swift to shed blood- the end result of man’s condition is that his life has the potential to be deadly. We see this in the haste with which the Jewish authorities tried and condemned Christ. They arrested Him and led Him away to Caiaphas, who had already said that He should die instead of the people, John 11:50. There was no intention of giving Him a fair trial. They took counsel against Him, not to find out the truth, but to put Him to death, John 11:53. They sought for witnesses, not to gather evidence, but to crucify Him, for that was their only object, Matthew 26:59.

3:16
Destruction and misery are in their ways:

Destruction and misery are in their ways- both in action and effect man is destructive. We see this in the actions of Saul of Tarsus, who by his own testimony “And I persecuted this way unto the death, binding and delivering into prisons both men and women.” Acts 22:4. And he adds later, “when they were put to death, I gave my voice against them”, 26:10.

3:17
And the way of peace have they not known:

And the way of peace have they not known- in his life man is discordant in relation to others, disturbed in relation to himself, and dislocated from God.

3:18
There is no fear of God before their eyes.

There is no fear of God before their eyes- defiance of God characterises man, and he expresses this by disregarding his responsibilities before God and before man.
These statements may appear to be extreme, but the point is that they describe what man is and does if left to himself. Condemnation comes upon us because we are sinners, as well as because we have sinned, so this passage serves to highlight both what we commit, and what we are. Man is totally depraved, which means he is affected by sin in all aspects of his person.
Note this does not mean that men are as bad as they can be, but they do have the potential to be as bad as they can be, and this extreme badness is exposed in verses 10-18. Note also the emphasis on spoken things, for Paul had summarised the sinner’s life as a lie, 3:7. And this living lie works itself out in ways that are hostile to the living and true God.
Finally, Paul turns his attention to man’s eyes, the vehicle by which sin entered the world at the beginning, for Eve saw the forbidden tree, and failed to fear God, Genesis 3:6. As a result, “all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world”, 1 John 2:16.

4(f)   3:18-20
The charged ones found guilty

3:19
Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

Now we know- the apostle has already stated that “as many as have sinned in the law shall be judged by the law”, 2:12, so what he is about to say is a known fact.
That what things soever the law saith- the word for saith gives emphasis to the content of the law.
It saith to them that are under the law- a different word for saith, giving emphasis to the personal challenge of the voice of the law. The law of Moses condemns the sins of verses 10-18. “them that are under the law” refers to the people of Israel, the ones through whom the whole of humanity was put to the test. Their main benefit, possession of the law and life under its authority, 3:1,2, becomes their main accuser.
That every mouth may be stopped- if Israel with all their advantages fails, then there is no hope for the rest of mankind. As the wise man said, “As in water face answereth to face, so the heart of man to man.” Proverbs 27:19. In other words, just as we look into a pool of water and see ourselves, so if we were to look into another man’s heart, we would see ourselves there also, for we all share the same nature. The mouths of sinners are stopped from protesting against the condemnation of God here, and in verse 27 they are stopped from boasting. Job confessed, “Behold I am vile; what shall I answer Thee? I will lay mine hand upon my mouth.” Job 40:4,5.
And all the world may become guilty before God- the whole world is “liable to punishment”, or “liable to pay penalty to God”, since the apostle has now proved universal sinfulness, and therefore universal guiltiness. Man has nothing to say in response to God’s verdict of “Guilty”. They make a great mistake who say they will wait until judgment day to find out their position. God in mercy has declared it to them already, whilst there is time to repent and believe. Man has been brought to trial, lost his case, and is liable now to punishment.

3:20
Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.

Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in His sight- if the law condemns us as sinners, it thereby disqualifies us from seeking to gain God’s approval by keeping it.
For by the law is the knowledge of sin- when the commandment confronts the will of man, it shows him to be hostile (for the mind of the flesh is enmity with God, and is not subject to the law of God, Romans 8:7) and exposes him as a sinner.

Section 5   Romans 3:21-26
The work of Christ is central to the gospel

Subject of Section 5
Having shown that man deserves nothing but wrath because of his sin, the apostle now explains that God is willing, in grace, to bestow upon men that which they do not deserve, which they can never earn, and which they will never be able fully to repay. How He does this, whilst still maintaining His just character, is detailed for us in the next few verses.
The expression “righteousness of God” is used in two ways in this passage. In verses 25 and 26 it is the attribute of righteousness which God possesses which is in view, the righteousness which is His intrinsically. In verses 21 and 22, however, the idea is of that righteousness which He reckons or imputes to a person when they believe. Of course the Divine righteousness that is imputed is of the same character as the intrinsic righteousness of God. The difference is that God has that righteousness as an essential attribute, (that is, an attribute of His essence), whereas man needs it to be granted to him, for he is unrighteous by nature. Divine righteousness reckoned is in direct contrast to human righteousness demanded, as when men were under the law.
The English language is derived from various sources, one of which gives us the adjective “righteous”, and another which gives us the adjective “just”. They mean the same thing, namely that which is right according to God’s standard. Righteousness was originally spelt right-wise-ness, meaning that which corresponds to right, just as clock-wise means that which corresponds to the direction the hands of the clock travel.
This passage, then, assures us that in the salvation of sinners, God acts in perfect conformity to the absolute standard of right that He represents in His own person. It also assures us that through faith a person is reckoned by God to be in conformity with that right character of His, not because he has attained such a position by his own efforts, but because God in grace blesses in this way on the basis of the work of Christ.
It is important to notice the emphasis on the righteousness of God, for this leading theme of the gospel is being forgotten today and is being replaced by an over-emphasis on the love of God. It is indeed important to proclaim the general love of God for sinners. We should note, however, that the love of God is spoken of in John 3:16 as being in the past, and that historic display of love which took place at Calvary is the once-for-all declaration of God’s attitude towards men. The grace and mercy of God which are based upon His love, Ephesians 2:4-7, should not be preached at the expense of announcing His righteous demands. The love of God is the expression of His nature, 1 John 4:8; but His nature is also righteous, and there cannot be conflict between the two. Divine love must act righteously, for “God is light, and in him is no darkness at all”, 1 John 1:5.

Structure of Section 5

5(a) 3:21 The righteousness of God and the law
5(b) 3:22 The righteousness of God and faith
5(c) 3:23 The righteousness of God and sin
5(d) 3:24 The righteousness of God and redemption
5(e) 3:25 The righteousness of God and propitiation
5(f) 3:26 The righteousness of God and justification

5(a)   3:21
The righteousness of God and the law

3:21
But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets;

But- the word presents us with the Divine alternative to the failure of man described in 1:18-3:20. The apostle now resumes where he broke off in 1:17, and having shown conclusively that man is totally unable to attain to personal righteousness, and deserves nothing but wrath from God, begins to unfold the wonder of the gospel which is able to bring sinners into a right relationship with God. Man deserves wrath but God intervenes.
Now- a different situation altogether prevails at the present time compared to the age of the law. See verses 25 and 26, with their references to “sins that are past”, and “at this time”.
The righteousness of God without the law is manifested- it is not now human righteousness demanded, as under the law of Moses, but Divine righteousness manifested. “without the law” means totally apart from attempts to keep the law to earn salvation.
Being witnessed by the law and prophets- the Old Testament gave abundant testimony to the righteous requirements of God. The law gave the directives, the prophets exposed the deviations. Paul is careful to emphasise that the gospel does not overthrow the righteousness of God expressed in the law, just as he emphasised in 1:1,2 that the gospel is in harmony with the Old Testament scriptures.

5(b)   3:22
The righteousness of God and faith

3:22
Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference:

Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ- not the unattainable righteousness through works, but that which is freely available to those whose faith is in Jesus Christ. It is not belief about Christ that saves, (although obviously the facts concerning Him must be accepted, for Christianity is based on historical events), but it is faith in, or upon, the Lord Jesus Christ which saves, involving unreserved reliance on Him alone for salvation, on the basis of His death at Calvary. “Faith of Jesus Christ” does not mean Christ’s personal faith, but the faith men place in Him, as opposed to putting faith in the law for salvation, which is in fact putting faith in themselves.
Unto all- the gospel makes a universal offer to men. No one is excluded from the opportunity of blessing, for just as no person is good enough in himself for God to accept him, so no person is too bad. The next phrase tells us the condition upon which that offer is made.
And upon all them that believe- belief in Christ is the unvarying principle upon which God acts. “Upon” signifies that there are objects in view, namely those who believe. Gospel blessing is only available on the condition that it is for those who believe, just as a shopkeeper displays his goods on the understanding that people will pay for them, not steal them. The goods are displayed with that condition in mind. The gospel is sent in the direction of, and arrives at, those who are prepared to believe. This is not to say that the gospel is only applicable to some, but rather that it is only available on the principle of faith.
For there is no difference- each individual, of whatever background, must take his place amongst the “all”, for there are no exceptions to the rule that righteousness can be received only by faith. There is no difference, for all need to believe; there is no difference, for all have sinned.

5(c)   3:23
The righteousness of God and sin

3:23
For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;

For all have sinned- this is the reason why salvation is made available to all. It is man’s sin, not man’s merit, that causes God to offer blessing to all, hence the “for,” or “because”. Note that the verb sinned is in the past.
And come short of the glory of God- this is the present consequence of past failure. It is too late for man to begin to earn merit, for he has a sinful record, and “God requireth that which is past,” Ecclesiastes 3:15. The glory of God may be defined as “the sum total of God’s attributes and the whole range of His characteristics which combine together to make Him alone worthy of worship”. The glory of God demands that man be righteous if he is to be accepted with Him, but man falls short because of his sin. The demands of God’s glory, however, have been met fully by Christ, hence the apostle goes on to speak of justification through Him. And those who are justified are as good as glorified, 8:30, and no longer come short.

5(d)   3:24
The righteousness of God and redemption

3:24
Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:

Being justified- the believer is reckoned to be righteous in the sight of God because of the merit of Christ’s work. To be reckoned or thought of by God as righteous, is the same as to be justified. Clearly the apostle is not describing the unrepentant sinner as being justified, but rather, he is referring back to verse 22, and describing “them that believe”.
Freely- this word is translated “without a cause” in John 15:25. There is no reason in man why God should justify him; the cause is found in Christ, for God forgives sins for the sake of Christ, Ephesians 4:32. There is no merit in man, and no hesitation with God.
By his grace- this is the motive in the heart of God which causes Him to justify sinners. Grace is unmerited favour to those who do not deserve it and can never repay it, and is an expression of Divine love, Ephesians 2:4,5.
Through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus- redemption is the means by which we may be justified. Sins committed put us under an obligation to God, for His righteous character demands that they be dealt with. We have no means of satisfying God’s demands, and so are constantly in debt to God. In Old Testament times, when a person was without resources, his near kinsman could act as his redeemer, provided he had both the resolve, and the resources. We see an example of this in Boaz in the book of Ruth.
If men are to have redemption, then they must find it in the One who gave His life a ransom for many, Matthew 20:28. A ransom was the price that must be paid in order to redeem. The Lord Jesus “gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity,” Titus 2:14. Notice it is “that he might”, an expression which tells of a possibility, for his death gives him the right to redeem when we believe. Elihu, Job’s friend, said about God, “Then he is gracious unto him, and saith, Deliver him from going down into the pit: I have found a ransom.” Job 33:24.

Special note on redemption
Redemption may be defined as “the setting free of a slave by the payment of a price”. That price being called a ransom. The carrying out of redemption is presented to us in the Old Testament in two ways. There were those redeemed from bondage, such as the nation of Israel, who were in Egypt as slaves to Pharoah the ruler. And there were those who were redeemed from bankruptcy, such as Ruth, in the book of Ruth. In either case the principle was the same, namely, a state of enslavement, the reality; one who was willing and able to pay the price that set free, the redeemer; the price paid, the ransom; the consequent setting free, the release; gratitude to the redeemer and service to him as the new owner, the response.

The reality
The following are scriptures that set out the reality of the fact that man is a slave to sin, and as such is in need of a redeemer.

1. “Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin“, John 8:34.

These are the words of Christ, and are based on the story of Abraham, Hagar, and Sarah. Hagar was a slave-girl, and Abraham, sadly, had a child by her, Ishmael. He then had a child by Sarah his wife, named Isaac. When the time of Isaac’s weaning came, Abraham made a great feast, and introduced his son Isaac to the community as his heir. Ishmael, a boy of thirteen at the time, mocked, and for this reason was cast out of Abraham’s house. We read this in Genesis 21:8-14. So when the Lord Jesus speaks of the son remaining in the house, and the slave not doing so, John 8:35, He is referring to this incident,.
The Jews claimed to be Abraham’s seed, but the Lord is confronting them with the truth that Ishmael was this too. Only those who are free because He has made them free are like Isaac, and remain in the house in fellowship with the father. Those who are slaves, like Ishmael, have no right to be in the house, but are cast out. The Jews, even though descended from Abraham physically through Isaac, were nonetheless morally like Ishmael, and as such were not in fellowship with God.

2. “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; but with the precious blood of Christ”, 1 Peter 1:18,19.

The apostle Peter is here referring to the departure of the children of Israel from Egypt, as recorded in Exodus chapters 12-15. The only silver and gold the Israelites had at that time was the money the Egyptians gave them to ensure they really went away. But it was not this money that purchased their freedom. What did purchase that freedom was the blood of the lamb on passover night.

3. “that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage”, Hebrews 2:14,15.

Every night, as an Israelite went to sleep, he feared dying with sin on his record. He may have offered a sin-offering during the day, but he may also have sinned on the way home. Christ came to deliver from that fear, and He does so by dealing completely and finally with the question of sins as far as those who believe are concerned. He also made of no effect the power of the devil over them so that they are freed from the fear of death. He did this by going into death voluntarily, and taking His life again by His own act, thus showing that He was in no way in bondage to the power of the devil. That triumph over the devil He shares with those who believe on Him.

4. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us”, Galatians 3:13.

The nation of Israel had been given the law at Sinai as a conditional covenant. The blessing of that covenant depended on their obedience. Because they had no ability to fully obey, they were under a curse, not a blessing. The only way to be set free from that curse was for someone who had not transgressed God’s law to take that curse upon Himself, and thus set free those who would believe in Him. This the Lord Jesus did when on the cross He accepted the consequences that the law-breaking of men had brought upon themselves, and bore those consequences instead.

5. “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.” Galatians 4:8.

Many of the Galatian believers to whom Paul is writing had been idol-worshippers before they were saved, and as such were in superstitious fear of the demon-influence behind those idols. The apostle calls this slave-service. The work of Christ at Calvary had set them free from that fear the moment they believed, since by His death He destroyed the power of the prince of this world, Satan himself, who holds men in slavery to superstition.

6. “And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the first-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.” Romans 8:23.

When Adam sinned and fell, he brought the creation of which he was head down with him. As a result, men’s bodies are in a state of corruption. This is true even of the body of believers in Christ, for their body is the last link with the world of Adam. When Christ comes for His people, He shall change their bodies, so that they are like His glorious body, Philippians 3:21. In this way the bondage of a corrupt body will be forever gone.

7. “None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him: (for the redemption of their soul is precious, and it ceaseth for ever:) that he should still live for ever, and not see corruption.” Psalm 49:7-9.

Psalm 49 is used by Jews as a funeral psalm, for it laments the fact that no-one can redeem another from going into death and the grave. This indicates that the prospect of dying and corrupting is a form of bondage to men, from which no ordinary man can redeem his fellow-man. Only the Lord Jesus can do this. The believer will one day rise from the dead with an incorrupt and incorruptible body, 1 Corinthians 15:42,53. More than that, because the Lord is coming to take His people to heaven, some of them will not even go into the grave at all.

8. “I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death“, Hosea 13:14.

Here God promises to deliver from the hold that the grave has on the bodies of believers. The apostle Paul alludes to this passage when he is dealing with the resurrection of the saints in 1 Corinthians 15:57. Christ shall rescue their bodies from the grave when He comes for His own.

The Redeemer
As we have said, one who undertakes to redeem must first be willing, and then be wealthy. The only one who is both willing to pay the price, and wealthy enough to do so, is the Lord Jesus. The price He was prepared to pay was nothing less than Himself, yielded up to God in death. The root cause of man’s slavery in all its forms is the sin that has brought death into the world. Because He was sinless, and not in any sort of slavery, the Lord Jesus was free to deal with our bondage.
When He preached in the synagogue at Nazareth, the Lord Jesus announced that He was the one of whom Isaiah prophesied in chapter 61 of his book. He quoted the words as follows, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, for he hath anointed me to…preach deliverance to the captives”, Luke 4:18. Yet He did not deliver John the Baptist from prison! The deliverance in view must therefore be of the spiritual kind, the kind of which the eight scriptures quoted above speak.
Redemption is illustrated for us in Exodus 12, where the blood of an innocent lamb was shed and sprinkled, and as a result Israel were delivered from bondage to Pharoah. The apostle Peter takes this up, and speaks of the precious blood of Christ, “as of a lamb without blemish and without spot”, 1 Peter 1:19. Since the blood represents the life of a person, the blood of Christ is precious because His Person is precious to God.
Things may be precious in three ways. They may be precious because they are special. An object may have little monetary value, yet be extremely precious because of what it represents. The blood of Christ is precious because He is without blemish and without spot. He is pure without as to character, and pure within as to nature, and as such is special to God, and to those who believe in Him.
Things can be also be precious because they are, in fact, valuable. Christ is God’s only begotten Son, John 3:16, and His dear Son, Colossians 1:13. God the Father values Him highly, yet freely delivered Him up for us all. We see how valuable His blood was by how precious He is, and by how much it has and will achieve.
Things can also be precious because they are memorable, reminding us of some great event. There was no greater event than the death of the Lord Jesus at Calvary. What could surpass the death of the Son of God? Throughout all eternity the redeemed shall sing a new song, and that song is prompted by the fact that the Lamb was slain, and has redeemed to God by His blood, Revelation 5:9.

The ransom
A ransom was the price paid so that a slave could be bought out of the market-place. On payment of this ransom-price, the slave became the property of the one purchasing his freedom. The ransom price that was necessary to buy sinners out of the slave-market of sin is nothing less than the blood of Christ. His own words were, “For even the Son of Man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.” Mark 10:45. Wonderful as His earthly ministry was, it was surpassed by what He did at Calvary, where He gave Himself, in all the glory of His person, to God.
1 Timothy 2:6 is to the same effect, where the apostle writes that He “gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time”. This is offered by the apostle as support for what he wrote previously in verse 4, where he stated that God’s desire is that all men should be saved. The genuineness of that desire is seen in that He has appointed His Son as the ransom for all.

The release
When a person believes on the Lord Jesus, having acknowledged slavery to sin, and the complete inability to deliver himself from bondage, certain things happen. We may think of them in connection with the eight scriptures quoted at the outset.

1. “Jesus answered them, whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.” John 8:34.

The Lord Jesus went on to say that “If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.” verse 36. The word “indeed” means “to the very core of your being”. In other words, absolutely free. Not free superficially, or provisionally, or temporarily, but free absolutely and permanently. Such is the thoroughness with which the Lord Jesus frees those who believe in Him.
How does this work out in practice? He also said in that chapter, “and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, verse 32. The truth of the scriptures, when believed, makes free in principle, and when applied to the life, makes free in practice.
An instance of this is the truth of the believer’s association with Christ in His burial and resurrection, which frees us as we act upon it. Romans 6:11 says, “Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord.” This is the way of practical deliverance, reckoning to be true in practice what is true in principle; making sure that the truth of the crucifixion, burial and resurrection of Christ affects our thinking and our acting. The apostle goes on in that same chapter to write, “But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine that was delivered you. Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.” Romans 6:17,18. To be free from sin does not mean that believers never sin, or even that they have no ability to sin, but it does mean that the sin-principle within has no right to hold them in bondage any more.

2. “Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers”, 1 Peter 1:18.

The vain conversation Peter refers to here is that empty way of life that dominates unsaved people. They have no power to break free from the course on which this world takes them, for the prince of this world ensures that there is plenty to occupy their minds and hearts. Redeemed persons are free of that, however, and their lives can now be taken up with that which is of God.

3. “that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil; and deliver them who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to bondage”, Hebrews 2:14,15.

The true believer does not fear death itself, even though he might fear the process of dying. The apostle Paul reminded the Corinthians that all things were theirs, including death, 1 Corinthians 3:21,22. It is but a servant who ushers them into the presence of their Lord. There is no need to have anxious fears such as an Israelite of old had, for the one who tormented men with the fear of death has been defeated, and his power broken.

4. “Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us”, Galatians 3:13.

There was a curse pronounced on those who were hung upon a tree or gallows in Old Testament times. Such an one was marked out as being cursed of God because of his crimes. Christ went further, however, for He was not only hung upon a tree or cross and numbered with the transgressors, but He was made a curse. He accepted responsibility for the law-breaking of men, and the judgment it involved. Because He is risen from the dead, we may be assured that no curse will come upon the true believer, since He dealt with the curse instead. It is blessing that comes to the believer, not cursing, Galatians 3:14.

5. “Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods.” Galatians 4:8.

Many of the Galatian believers had been idol-worshippers before they were saved. Their idols held them in superstitious fear. This was slavery indeed, with no prospect of release until they heard the message of deliverance through Christ which Paul preached. He could announce that Christ has spoiled the evil angels that held men in their grip, making a show over them openly by means of the cross, Colossians 2:15.
When God delivered Israel from Egypt, He also executed judgment on the gods of the Egyptians, Exodus 12:12, for they worshipped demons under the form of natural things like the river Nile, and frogs and lice. These were the things that God used to plague Egypt before the Exodus, thus showing their folly in worshipping them, and also showing His power over them.

6. “And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body.” Romans 8:23.

This is the part of redemption that is still in the future, yet is certain to take place. At the Lord’s coming the believer will enter into sonship, (here referred to as adoption), in the fullest possible way, being conformed to the image of God’s Son, Romans 8:29. This involves the change of the body, so that it is set free from the bondage that corruption and decay has brought it into because of Adam’s sin. Then, with bodies freed from every limitation, believers shall serve God as they ought.

7. “None of them can by any means redeem his brother, nor give to God a ransom for him…that he should still live for ever, and not see corruption“, Psalm 49:7,9.

Whilst it is true that believers still die, nevertheless the Lord Jesus said, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, If a man keep my saying, he shall never see death.” John 8:51. Such is the power of the everlasting life that believers possess, that even death is virtually a non-entity as far as they are concerned. Every person who has believed has already passed from death unto life, John 5:24, so that death is simply the necessary process on the way to the gaining of the resurrection body. The “resurrection chapter”, 1 Corinthians 15, states, using the illustration of the sowing of a seed, “that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die”, verse 36. The farmer who leaves the seed-corn in the barn and does not sow it, should not expect a harvest.

8. “I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death: O death, I will be thy plagues; O grave, I will be thy destruction: repentance shall be hid from mine eyes.” Hosea 13:14.

When he was setting out what shall happen at the resurrection of the saints, the apostle alluded to the verse quoted above. Hosea was prophesying, so he uses the future tense. The apostle wrote as if the saints had been raised, and he writes of their victory on that resurrection morning as they ask, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory? 1 Corinthians 15:55. The plague of death shall itself be plagued when Christ comes, and the grave shall be destroyed as far as its power is concerned. In Revelation 1:18 the Lord Jesus announced to John, “I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death.” He holds the keys of hell so that no believer of this age shall go there, but shall go to Paradise. He holds the keys of death so that every saint shall rise from the grave.

The response
How should the believer react to this redemption? To answer this we could ask how a slave who had a cruel master should respond when he is freed. Will he not be greatly relieved to be delivered from his former slave-master? Will he not do his best to please the one who has ransomed him? So the believer, delivered from the forms of cruel bondage we have listed, should indeed be grateful to his new Master. Especially as that Master has paid an extremely high price to set him free. There should be devotedness to the one who has set us free at such a cost to Himself. There is no danger of falling into the hands of a cruel slave-master again, since redemption, once known, can never be withdrawn.
But there is a feature about deliverance from slavery by Christ that is very unusual. The one-time slaves are elevated to being sons! This is the language of scripture, “But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ.” Galatians 4:4-7.
It is God’s desire to fill heaven with those who are like His Son, and He does it by redeeming those who are slaves to sin, and positioning them as His sons. “For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren.” Romans 8:29.

Having considered these various aspects of redemption, we can see that they combine the two ideas of deliverance from bondage and deliverance from bankrupcy. When the Israelites were in bondage in Egypt, they were not free to serve God. Because of this, they built up a debt of obligation to God from which only the blood of the lamb could rescue them. The same is true in the case of Ruth and Naomi. The latter had left the land of Israel with her husband, and gone to live in Moab. Whilst there, she could not go up to the temple to worship. As for Ruth her daughter-in-law, she would have been an idol worshipper before she converted to the faith of Israel. Both of them were in debt to God because of their previous failure to give Him His due. Only Boaz, their kinsman redeemer, could deliver them.

We return now to verse 25.

5(e)   3:25
The righteousness of God and propitiation

3:25
Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;

Whom God hath set forth- this verb is in the Middle Voice, which indicates that the one acting has a personal interest and involvement in the thing that is done. In this case, God has a personal interest in setting Christ Jesus forth. He did so in the words of John the Baptist, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29. Then He did it through the public death of Christ by crucifixion, and then again in the proclamation of the gospel.
To be a propitiation- propitiation is that aspect of the sacrificial death of the Lord Jesus at Calvary whereby He gave to God the full and satisfactory answer to the demands which the righteousness of God made against sins. By so doing, He enabled God to maintain His own integrity and at the same time justify those who believe the gospel.
As the “pro” at the beginning of the word suggests, it is a work done towards God; that is, in relation to what He is Himself. The results manward are secondary. Indeed the work of propitiation would be glorifying to God even if there were no results manward.
Through faith- this is the means by which the benefits resulting from propitiation are gained. Man’s faith does not bring about propitiation, nor does it add to it, but it is vitally necessary, since it is the condition God lays down whereby we may have the blessing that propitiation secures. Faith is the avenue down which the benefits of propitiation come to us.
In his blood- the blood of Christ is that which does finally what the blood of bulls and goats did typically on the Day of Atonement, Leviticus 16:15,16. Christ’s blood effects propitiation, faith secures the benefit. Propitiation is “through faith” only in the sense that only those who exercise faith are in the good of Christ’s work. This was the case on the Day of Atonement, for only those who afflicted their souls, (repented), and abstained from work, (the essence of faith, see Romans 4:5), could continue in the nation, and be in the good of the propitiation made. Leviticus 23:26-32 makes this clear.
To declare his righteousness- at Calvary every Divine attribute, including righteousness, was brought out into fullest display. Anticipating the cross, the Lord Jesus prayed, “Father, glorify thy name.” The Father’s immediate response was, “I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again”, John 12:28. Later, the Lord Jesus can say, as He anticipates the completion of His work on the cross, “Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him”, John 13:31. This is why the gospel can be called “the glorious gospel of the blessed God”, 1 Timothy 1:11, for the glory of God is told out as the truth of the gospel is proclaimed.
For the remission of sins that are past- this means “because of the passing over of sins done before”, that is, in Old Testament times. “Before” does not mean before conversion, but before Christ came into the world. Remission here is not forgiveness, but God passing by sins, and not dealing with them in immediate judgment. There was not, generally, the instant dealing with sins committed before Christ’s death which we might have thought a righteous God would have put into effect.
Through the forbearance of God- His forbearance means His holding up the process of immediately dealing with sins in judgment. Paul said that God winked at the former times of ignorance, Acts 17:30, not in the sense that He ignored what was going on, but He chose not to immediately judge men’s ignorance, and graciously bore with men in view of the coming of Christ. The work of Christ at the cross vindicates God for acting like this. At the present time the reason why sins are not instantly dealt with is because of His longsuffering and grace.

Special note on propitiation
We should never underestimate the importance of that aspect of the work of the Lord Jesus at Calvary known as propitiation. This is because the honour of God, the blessing of men, the introduction of Christ’s millenial kingdom, and the new heavens and the new earth, all depend upon it. When thinking of this vital matter, we need to be clear as to what propitiation actually is. It may be defined as follows: “Propitiation is that aspect of the work of Christ at Calvary whereby He gave to God complete answers to the questions raised by the existence of sin”.

There are seven instances of the use of forms of the word propitiation in the New Testament, and they are as follows, emphasised by being in bold type for the sake of clarity, although not found in bold in the Authorised Version:

1. “God be merciful to me a sinner”, Luke 18:13.

2. “whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood”, Romans 3:25.

3. “that He might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people”, Hebrews 2:17.

4. “For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness”, Hebrews 8:12.

5. “and over it the cherubims of glory shadowing the mercy seat“, Hebrews 9:5.

6. “And He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world”, 1 John 2:2.

7. “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins”, 1 John 4:10.

As we consider this subject in the light of the Scriptures, we could ask ourselves three main questions:

Why was propitiation necessary? How was propitiation achieved? What are the results of propitiation?

Why was propitiation necessary?

Because sins offend God
As God is the Absolute Standard of righteousness and holiness, all deviations from this standard are highly offensive to Him. Such is the intensity of His holiness that the simple mention of it is enough to make the posts of the doors of the temple in heaven move, Isaiah 6:3,4. His reaction to sin and iniquity is to turn from it, for He is of purer eyes than to behold evil, and He cannot look upon iniquity, Habakkuk 1:13. The very presence of sin in the universe is a grief to God.

Because as Moral Governor of the universe, He must be seen to deal with sins
God has enemies, both devilish and human, and He must be clear of any charge which they may level against Him that suggests He has ignored sins, or at least, ignored some sins. Eternity must not be allowed to run its course without this matter being settled. God deals with some sins instantly, but the majority seem to have gone unpunished. Sentence against an evil work has not been executed speedily, Ecclesiastes 8:11, since God is longsuffering, and waits to be gracious. This situation might give rise to the charge of indifference to sins, and so God must act to defend His honour.

Because God must have a just basis for continuing to have dealings with sinful men
One of the main purposes of the sacrifices on the Day of Atonement in Israel was that God might continue to dwell amongst them despite their uncleanness, Leviticus 16:16. So also when Christ was down here. It was only because God was not imputing trespasses so as to instantly judge them, but rather was working to reconcile men unto Himself, that He was prepared to have dealings with men in the person of His Son. As the apostle Paul says, “God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them”, 2 Corinthians 5:19.

Because if men are to be shown mercy, have their sins forgiven, and be reconciled to God, there must be a solid basis upon which these things can happen
God declares Himself to be a Saviour God. He cannot be fully satisfied solely by judging men. The fact that “God is light” demands that this be done, but “God is love” too, and delights to manifest Himself in grace.

Because the cycle of sin must be broken
In other words, if there is not to be an eternal succession of creations, falls, remedies for fall, and new creations, then there must be that established which is once for all, giving the complete answer to the question of sin. Unless this complete answer is given, the new heavens and new earth will not be safe from disturbance.

How was propitiation achieved?

The ceremonies of the Day of Atonement as described in Leviticus chapter 16 will help us here. We need to be very careful in our interpretation of them, however. We should remember two things. First, that the Old Testament teaches by way of contrast as well as by comparison. Second, that Christ’s ministry is in connection with a sanctuary which is “not of this building”, Hebrews 9:11. That means it is not part of the creation of Genesis chapter one. So even whilst acting on earth, He was operating in relation to a sphere that is not subject to the limitations of time, space, and matter.
In accordance with this, the writer to the Hebrews indicates that the going forth of the Lord Jesus outside the camp was the counterpart of the carrying of the carcase of the sin offering from the altar, where it had been slain, to a place of burning outside the camp, Leviticus 16:27; Hebrews 13:11,12. But this particular ritual took place almost at the end of the Day of Atonement proceedings, whereas the Lord Jesus went outside the camp before He died. We may say then that in one sense time is irrelevant as far as the work of Christ was concerned.
Again, what took place at the altar in the court of the tabernacle; before the ark in the Holiest of All; outside the camp at the place of burning, and in the wilderness where the scapegoat was taken and let go, all typified some aspect of the work of Christ. So place is irrelevant, too.
And so is matter irrelevant. Christ needed no visible ark to enable Him to convince His Father that His blood had been shed. When the repentant man of Luke 18:13 appealed to God to be merciful to him, (that is, to be gracious towards him on the ground of propitiation made), he went down to his house justified, despite the fact that there was no ark in the temple.
With these cautionary remarks in mind, we look now at Leviticus 16, and note those major parts of the ceremonies of that day which contribute towards making propitiation, the great end for which they were carried out.

A suitable sin offering was brought near
We must remember that the word “offer” that is used in Leviticus 16:6 means to bring near. A sacrifice must be offered before it can be laid on the altar. The blood that purges the conscience of God’s people is the blood of One who “offered himself without spot to God”, Hebrews 9:14. That is, of One who presented Himself for sacrifice in all the spotlessness of His person, confident that He met the approval of His God.

An offering was made sin
In Leviticus 16:9 a different word for offer is used, one which simply means to make. The offering is made in the sense that it is reckoned to be sin. So the animal, having had the sins of Aaron and his household figuratively transferred to it, is by that act made to represent those sins. Whatever happens to the animal subsequently, happens to the sin. The apostle Paul takes up this thought in 2 Corinthians 5:21 when he declares that God “hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” It is exceedingly solemn to think that God’s reaction to our sin became His reaction to Christ as the sinner’s substitute. So we may learn in the fullest sense what God’s reaction to sin is by looking to the cross where He forsook His Son and poured out His wrath upon Him. Such is the intensity of God’s hatred of sin, and such is His determination to deal with it, that He “spared not his own Son”, not shielding Him at all from the fury of His anger; not lessening the penalty, not relieving the pain. Who can tell the agony of Christ’s soul when He was dealt with by God as if He were sin! Of course, He remained personally what He always had been, pure and holy, just as the sin-offering is said to be most holy, Leviticus 6:17; but He was made sin as our representative.

The offering was slain and its blood was shed
“For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.” Leviticus 17:11. Such are the words of God to His people, teaching us that the shedding of blood is vitally important, for “without shedding of blood is no remission”, Hebrews 9:22. Accordingly, that sins might be dealt with, Christ “hath poured out his soul unto death”, Isaiah 53:12.

The carcase was burnt
Having been presented to God as a living animal at the altar, and having been slain and its blood retained, the animal’s carcase must be taken to the outside place, that it may be subjected to the fires of Divine holiness until nothing is left. How significant the contrast to Christ. For He was subjected to the Divine Fires whilst still alive, on the cross. How He must have suffered! Can we begin to take it in? Will not all eternity be needed to set forth what He was prepared to endure in love for our souls? But endure He did, and exhausted the fire of God’s wrath against sins. The fire exhausted the sin offering, but Christ exhausted the fire, and emerged in resurrection.
We must be careful to distinguish between punishment for sins and penalty for sins. Strictly speaking, no-one can bear the punishment for the sins of another, for personal culpability is implied in the word punishment. A person can bear the penalty for the sins of another, however, and this is what Christ has done. God can still justly punish sinners in the lake of fire, since they refused to believe in the One who bore the penalty, and thereby excluded themselves from the benefits He obtained. While it is true that propitiation is not made by the faith of a person, but by the blood of Christ, it is, nevertheless, made good to the person, (and only to the person), who believes, as Romans 3:25 makes clear.

The blood was sprinkled
We come now to the central action on the Day of Atonement, the sprinkling of the blood both of the bullock for Aaron and his house, and the goat for the nation of Israel, on the mercy-seat. This translates a word which signifies “the place for the covering of sin”. If God covers sins, then they are put completely out of His sight. We ought not to think of this covering as a temporary thing, or else we shall have difficulty understanding why God declared that Israel was cleansed from all their sins that day, Leviticus 16:30. It is true that the Scripture says “For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.” Hebrews 10:4, but what that blood symbolises, even the death of Christ, can. And that not only after Calvary, but before as well.
Now when the writer to the Hebrews referred to this Old Testament mercy-seat, he used the Greek word which means propitiatory, the place where God is propitiated in regard to sins. This makes clear that he did not see a distinction between covering and propitiating. There are various figures of speech used in connection with God dealing with sins. He removes them as far as the east is from the west, Psalm 103:12; He casts them behind His back, Isaiah 38:17; blots them out as if by a thick cloud, Isaiah 44:22; casts them into the depths of the sea, Micah 7:19. These are all metaphors, for sins are not material objects. When God does these things, then the matter is thoroughly dealt with. And so when He covers.
Christ has fully met every demand that God could make about sins. As one of the Persons of the Godhead, He has Divine insight into God’s requirements, and He has fully met those requirements. We are assured of this because He has sat down with confidence at the right hand of the Majesty on high, Hebrews 1:3. He purged sins in harmony with the majesty of God.
But He has also established a sure place in the presence of God for those who believe, so that the apostle Paul can speak of the grace wherein we stand, Romans 5:2. So dominant is the idea of grace with regard to that position, that the apostle uses the word grace to describe it. Only those who have “received the atonement”, Romans 5:11, are in that secure place before God.

The sins were confessed and carried away
The sin-offering for the people consisted of two goats, one for the Lord’s interests, and one for theirs. One, as we have seen, was slain so that its blood could be sprinkled on the mercy-seat. The other was called the scape-goat, or goat that was dismissed and went away. There was no double sin-offering for Aaron and his house, for he had seen the blood on the mercy-seat, and since he had not died, he knew it had been accepted, and his sins were gone. The rest of Israel did not have that experience, however, so to reassure them, they were able to see Aaron lay his hands on their goat, confess over it their sins, and then watch the goat, which carried its dreadful load of their sins, disappear into the wilderness, guided by a man whose fitness lay in his ability to take the animal to a place from which it could not return. The writer to the Hebrews takes up these things in Hebrews 9:26 and 28, where he speaks of Christ appearing to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. This is the counterpart of the blood of the first goat that was slain so that its blood could be sprinkled on the mercy-seat. Then he speaks of Christ bearing the sins of many, and now he is thinking of the scapegoat. When the Lord Jesus was forsaken of His God upon the Cross, He was in a judicial position equal to that of the scapegoat, which was accepted as an offering, but rejected because of the load it bore.

What are the results of propitiation?

The demands of God have been fully met
To satisfy God as the Moral Governor of the universe, an adequate and final answer must be found to the question of sin. The demands of His holiness and righteousness are such that He must respond to every sin. Only Christ is adequate for this situation. He it is who has “put away sin by the sacrifice of himself”, Hebrews 9:26. To put away in that verse means to abolish. As far as God is concerned, and in this context, sin is not. No charge can henceforth be made against God that He has ignored the presence of sin. On the contrary, He has taken account of each and every sin through His Son’s work at Calvary. John wrote, “He is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world”, 1 John 2:2. Of course “the sins of” is in italics in that verse, being physically absent from the Greek text. But the words are implied in the “ours” of the previous statement. If John had written “not for us only”, then the translation could have continued “but also for the whole world”. Since, however, he uses the possessive pronoun “ours”, which shows he is writing about the sins people possess, then “the sins of” must be inserted.

Now the apostle will write later “And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness.” 1 John 5:19. He sees mankind divided into two clearly defined sections, namely those who are “of God”, that is, believers, and “the whole world”. John not only clearly distinguishes between believers and the world, but just as clearly states that Christ is the propitiatory offering for both classes. That Christ became the propitiation for the whole world does not mean that the whole world will be saved, since propitiation is only made good to a person when he believes. It does mean, however, that no charge may be levelled against God for not making provision for men. Gospel-blessing may be genuinely offered to all men, for there is abundant provision for all.

God’s dealings were vindicated
In Old Testament times God blessed men by reckoning them righteous when they believed in Him. Romans 3:25 indicates that the propitiatory work of Christ vindicates God for so acting. It can be seen now that God was blessing in anticipation, crediting believers with the results of Christ’s work before they had been achieved. He also remitted, or passed over, their sins in forbearance, holding back from judging those sins in virtue of what His Son would do at Calvary.

God’s glory is fully displayed
There is no attribute of God that has not been fully expressed at Calvary. This is why the apostle Paul speaks of rejoicing in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement, Romans 5:11. By His sacrificial work at Calvary Christ has brought the character of God out into full and glorious display. Those who are brought by faith into the good of that work are enabled to behold that display, and rejoice in it. Would we know Divine holiness, or righteousness, or love, or wrath, or any other aspect of the Person of God? Then we must look to the cross for the sight of it. We shall not be disappointed.

God’s mercy is available
The repentant sinner who called upon God to be merciful to him is the first person in the New Testament to use a word based on propitiation; in effect praying, “God be merciful to me on the basis of propitiation”. He went down to his house justified, Luke 18:13,14. Under the terms of the New Covenant, God promises, “I will be merciful to their unrighteousness”, Hebrews 8:12. The mercy-seat was the same width and breadth as the ark, telling us that the ark (Christ as to His Person), and the mercy-seat, (Christ as to His work), were perfectly matched. But we are not told the thickness of the gold of the mercy-seat, for there is an infinite supply of mercy for those who believe, enough to keep them secure for all eternity.

God’s forgiveness is assured
In Hebrews 10:5-9 we have the Spirit of Christ in the psalmist foretelling His work of sacrifice. Then we have the Spirit’s direct testimony telling us of the results of that work, Hebrews 10:15-17. God promises emphatically that He will not remember the sins and iniquities of His people any more, since He brought those sins into remembrance at Calvary, and Christ dealt with them effectively there. “No more” means in no way, nor at any time. Note that God pledges to positively not remember, not negatively to forget. We may forget, and then remember again, whereas God promises never to remember for ever.

God’s people are preserved
The Lord Jesus spoke to Mary Magdalene after He was risen, and instructed her to tell the brethren that He was about to “ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God”, John 20:17. Thus He would still be the link between His people and God, maintaining them in His dual role of Advocate with the Father, and High Priest in things pertaining to God.
The basis of His advocacy is two-fold. His person, for He is Jesus Christ the righteous, and His work, for He is the propitiation for our sins, 1 John 2:1,2. The apostle John was concerned about believers sinning. The sins of believers are just as obnoxious to God, and just as deserving of wrath, as those of unbelievers. But we are “saved from wrath through Him”, Romans 5:9, as He pleads the merits of His work. He is, says John, the propitiatory offering for our sins. Not was, but is. In other words, the one who acts for us in heaven as our advocate, is the very same one who hung upon the cross as a sacrifice for our sins.
He is also our High priest. The language of Hebrews 2:17,18 is as follows, “Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people. For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted, he is able to succour them that are tempted”. These verses form a bridge between chapter two, with its emphasis on the reasons why the Lord Jesus took manhood, and chapters three and four, which tell of the way in which Israel were tempted in the wilderness.
Note in particular the word “for” which begins verse 18. Too little attention has been paid to this word, and hence the connection between verses 17 and 18 is often lost. The reason why we have a high priest who is merciful and faithful is that He has been here in manhood and suffered being tempted. When His people pass through temptation, then He undertakes to deal with their cause. Because He has been here, and has been tempted in all points like as we are, He is able to assist us when we cry to Him for help. The word for succour is used by the woman of Canaan in Matthew 15:25 when she cried out, “Lord, help me”. He is able to point us to the ways in which He overcame in the wilderness temptation, and thus we are strengthened to resist temptation.
But what if we fall, and sin? In that case He comes to our aid in another way. We see it typified negatively in Leviticus 10:16-20. The priests were commanded to eat the sin-offerings, if the blood thereof had not been brought into the sanctuary. But at the end of the consecration of the priesthood, Moses was angry on God’s behalf, for the priests had failed in this. Moses said, “God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord”, Leviticus 10:17. One of the functions of priesthood, then, was to personally identify with the sin-offering by eating it, and by so doing bear the iniquity of the congregation, taking responsibility for their failure, but doing so safeguarded by the fact that a sin-offering had been accepted by God. As they did this the scripture explicitly says they made atonement for the people, Leviticus 10:17. We see then what the writer to the Hebrews means when he speaks of Christ making reconciliation for the sins of the people as High Priest. He is indicating that Christ personally identifies Himself with His sin-offering work at Calvary, and thus takes responsibility for the failures of His people under temptation as He pleads their cause before God.

God’s purpose for the earth is furthered
When Adam the head of the first creation fell, all creation had to be subjected to vanity, or else a fallen man would have been head over an unfallen creation, Romans 8:19-23. Now that the Lord Jesus has obtained rights over the earth by His death, He is able to bring in new conditions for God. He can now righteously deliver the present creation from the bondage of corruption into which it was brought by the fall of man. Colossians 1:20 assures us that on the basis of the blood of His cross, all things, whether in earth or in heaven, shall be reconciled to God, for that alienation between God and His creation which took place at the fall can be remedied. Notice it is things, not people, that are spoken of in that verse as being reconciled.

God’s intention to create a new heavens and new earth can be realised
Unless the sin that has marred the first creation is dealt with, God cannot righteously introduce an eternal earth and heavens, for it would not have been evident that He was able to deal with the fall of the first creation. Having dealt with it through Christ, however, He is able to bring in new things that will never be spoiled. Daniel was told that Messiah the Prince would bring in “everlasting righteousness”, Daniel 9:24, and this He will do, on the basis of His death. It only remains for God to announce “Behold, I make all things new”, Revelation 21:5, and a “new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness”, shall be established, 2 Peter 3:13. At last there will be a settled and congenial place in which righteousness can dwell, after all the turmoil brought in by Adam’s sin. Then those profound words spoken by John the Baptist will be fully brought to pass, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world”, John 1:29.

5(f)   3:26
The righteousness of God and justification

3:26
To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.

To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness- having been shown that the work of propitiation vindicates God’s past dealings, we learn here of God’s righteous dealings in the present.
That he might be just- that is, might maintain His righteous character, even while He is blessing guilty sinners.
And the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus- the work of Christ enables God to be two things at the same time, namely, to be just, and also the one who reckons sinners just. It is part of His glory that He does not clear the guilty, Exodus 34:7, but He can with true justice forgive the guilty when they plead the work of Christ on their behalf.
The name Jesus emphasises that it is a real and historical man that enables God to justify. The sinless man has become the sin-offering, so that the sinful men of verses 10-18 might be sin-free.

Section 6   Romans 3:27-4:25
God’s grace towards men as their Justifier

Subject of Section 6
Having shown in a previous parenthesis, 1:18-3:20, the pressing need of the gospel in view of the wrath of God which hung over Jew and Gentile alike, and then having explained the terms of the gospel in 3:21-26, the apostle now expands on the expression he had used in verse 22, “unto all.” Does this really mean that the imputed righteousness of God is unto all men, without exception? Is the same God who is angry against the sins of Jews and Gentiles, also the God who will forgive those sins? To answer this question, the apostle selects two of the most revered figures in Old Testament history to convince his readers, whether Jew or Gentile, that the righteousness of God which comes through faith is indeed available to them all. Before he does this, however, he answers three initial questions that may be on the minds of his readers at this point.

Structure of Section 6

6(a)

3:27, 28

Question One: Can man boast?

6(b)

3:29,30

Question Two: Is God biased?

6(c)

3:31

Question Three: Is law banished?


6(a)   3:27,28
Question One: Can man boast?

3:27
Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith.

Where is boasting then? The mention of the glory of God in verse 23 has reminded the apostle that God deserves all the glory from His creatures. Does the gospel ensure this, or does it leave room for men to boast, reserving some glory for themselves?
It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith-the answer to this question is that boasting on the part of man is totally excluded by the “law of faith”, that is, the principle of faith. The gospel calls for faith, and by definition faith is reliance totally on another, and hence leaves no room for man to boast that he has tried to do the works of the law. The law of works could not exclude boasting, for it expected human effort, in which a man would tend to boast. The apostle returns to this in 4:1-8.

3:28
Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law- the word ‘conclude’ means ‘reckon with logical thought’. The truth of the gospel, summed up here by the phrase “justified by faith”, will stand the test of the most rigorous examination.

6(b)   3:29,30
Question Two: Is God biased?

3:29
Is he the God of the Jews only? is he not also of the Gentiles? Yes, of the Gentiles also:

Is he the God of the Jews only? Is he not also of the Gentiles? Given that God specially singled out the people of Israel for unique advantages in the Old Testament, is He still restricting His blessing to them?
Yes, of the Gentiles also- here is the answer, that the one and same God (“it is one God”, verse 30) who blesses Jews with salvation through faith, blesses Gentiles likewise. In this verse the apostle speaks of the two great divisions of humanity in the context of nationality, Jew and Gentile, whereas in the next verse he will refer to them in the context of religion, as those circumcised or uncircumcised.

3:30
Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.

Seeing it is one God- there is only one true God, and He is undivided in His person and in His intentions. He blesses men on consistent principles, which are in harmony with His own nature and character.
Which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and the uncircumcision through faith- since salvation is not through law-works, which law was given only to the Jews, the way is open for any to come. “By faith”, or literally “out of faith”, means on the principle of faith, as opposed to the principle of works which the Jews was familiar with, and to which circumcision committed them.
As for the Gentiles, here called the uncircumcision, justification is “through faith”, or literally “by the instrumentality of faith”, for the Gentiles did not have any other instrument before, for they were not interested in keeping God’s law. By circumcising their male sons, the Jews committed them to the law with its system of works, whereas Gentile boys were not thus committed. The apostle returns to this in 4:9-12.

6(c)   3:31
Question Three: Is law banished?

3:31
Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law.

Do we then make void the law through faith? Are the just requirements of the law cancelled and made of no effect by the gospel?
God forbid: yea, we establish the law- the apostle is emphatic that the gospel establishes the law, upholding as it does all the righteous principles set out in the law of Moses, and is just as insistent as the law in asserting that man is a sinner. See 1 Timothy 1:8-11, where the demands of the law, sound doctrine, and the gospel are in full agreement. Christ Himself said “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” Matthew 5:17,18.
In His death the Lord Jesus met all the claims of the God who had been offended by the breaking of His law, thus showing that far from being indifferent to the law, the gospel makes known that its claims are met in Christ, as the apostle makes clear in Galatians 3:10,13. After all, “justify” is a law-court word, indicating acquittal from all charge. Paul returns to this in 4:13-16.