Tag Archives: Son of God

HEBREWS CHAPTER 6

This chapter is a continuation of the section begun in 5:11, where the writer breaks off from his consideration of the subject of the Melchizedec priesthood of Christ. The section continues until the end of this chapter. This is the third parenthetical and warning passage in the epistle.

In chapter 2:1-4 there was a warning to those amongst the Hebrews who were neglecting to take advantage of the gospel that Christ and the apostles had preached.

In chapter 3:6 to 4:13, there was a warning to those who had professed to believe the gospel, but showed every sign of being like their ancestors who, although having come out of Egypt to travel to the promised land of Canaan, when the good news of the blessings of that land were announced to them, refused to go in. Some of the nation did, however, showing themselves to be true believers.

In this passage we have a similar division. Those of 5:11-14 and 6:9-20 who, although slow to learn, nonetheless truly believed, (see 6:9), and those who were not yet in the good of Christian things.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 6, VERSES 1 TO 8

6:1 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,

6:2 Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.

6:3 And this will we do, if God permit.

6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,

6:5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,

6:6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame.

6:7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:

6:8 But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.

 

6:1 Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection; not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works, and of faith toward God,

Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ- in 5:12 we find reference to “the first principles of oracles of God”, an expression alluding to the basic doctrines of the Old Testament, which are listed in 6:1-2. The believing Hebrews were urged to progress further than that. Now we have a reference to the principles of the doctrine of Christ, as He built upon Old Testament truth, and, in His words, fulfilled it, Matthew 5:17. He had not come to destroy the law and the prophets, but to bring out their full meaning, and as He did so, display a full expression of their teachings in His life. He magnified the law and made it honourable. He gave spiritual insights into the Old Testament as it foreshadowed and prepared the way for Him.

Let us go on unto perfection- a reference to the full truth as set out in New Testament. The Lord Jesus indicated that there were certain truths the disciples could not take in at that point, but after the Holy Spirit came at Pentecost He would guide them into all truth, John 16:12,13. There were things that John the Baptist could not tell those who listened to him, and they were reserved to a time after Pentecost. Notice the change of pronoun in John 3:11,12, where, speaking to Nicodemus, (who no doubt had listened to both John the Baptist and Christ preaching), the Lord Jesus referred to the announcement of earthly things which both He and John had made, “We speak that we do know”, and the heavenly things that He alone could tell, “I tell you heavenly things”.

Not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works- we now have a list of things which were basic truths as set out in the Old Testament oracles. Whilst these doctrines are good, there are more advanced things, which Christianity brings in. So, for instance, repentance in the Old Testament was a purely negative thing, as men turned from their works, which were sinful, and therefore were deserving of death. Repentance in the New Testament, however, is not only a turning from past sins, but it is also repentance which is prompted by the fact that God has appointed one to judge the world, having marked Him out by raising Him from the dead, Acts 17:30,31.

And of faith toward God- before Christ came, faith was in God, whereas now the words of the Lord Jesus to His disciples are applicable, “ye believe in God, believe also in Me”, John 14:1. Now that Christ has come, the truth of the fact that God is the Triune God is prominent, and Christ is to be believed as one who is equal with God.

6:2 Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment.

6:2 Of the doctrine of baptisms- under the tabernacle system, there were many ritual washings. Every sacrifice had to be washed before it was placed on the altar; the priests were not only washed all over when they were initially brought into the priesthood, but had to wash hands and feet before entering the tabernacle; brass pots that had been used to hold sin-offerings had to be cleansed with water; lepers had to be washed more than once; there were several washings during the Red heifer ceremony of Numbers 19. Thus many outward washings were required, but Christianity introduces the “washing of regeneration”, Titus 3:5, which deals with matters within. The Pharisees criticised the disciples for not engaging in ritual washings, and were rebuked by the Lord, Matthew 15:1-11. It is inward defilement that matters most.

And of laying on of hands- When the priests were consecrated, Moses laid hands on them; the priest laid hands on lepers at their restoration into the life of Israel; every worshipper had to lay his hands upon his offering to identify it as his own, so that the benefits of bringing it might be his. This physical act has now been transformed into an act of faith.

And of resurrection of the dead- the doctrine that the dead would be raised is found in the Old Testament. See Genesis 22:5 (with Hebrews 11:17-19); Exodus 3:6, (connect with Mark 12:26,27); Daniel 12:2; Hosea 13:14; John 11:24, (Martha’s statement of belief in the light of the Old Testament); Acts 26:6-8, (Israel’s Old Testament belief).

The expression is, literally, “resurrection of dead persons”. Through the ministry of the Lord Jesus there is introduced a further concept, that of “the resurrection out from among the dead”, as Mark 9:9,10 reads literally. In that passage the disciples were perplexed as to what was meant. The idea that before Christ reigns some of the dead will be raised was clear to them from Daniel 12:2,3. But that passage spoke of the righteous dead, and those who were left in the graves would be raised at the Great White Throne judgement. What perplexed them was that just one person, the Son of Man, would be raised, without anyone else being involved.

And of eternal judgement- that men who died in sin would be judged was clear from the Old Testament. See Genesis 18:25; Psalm 9:17, 50:6, 75:7, 94:2, Proverbs 15:24, 27:20; Isaiah 33:14; Daniel 12:2; Hebrews 12:23; Jude 7. But it was left to the Lord Jesus to speak of God as the one “who shall destroy both body and soul in hell, (Gehenna, the Lake of Fire), Matthew 10:28; of “outer darkness” and “weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth”, Matthew 25:30; of “everlasting fire”, Matthew 25:41; of the unrighteous departing into “everlasting punishment”, Matthew 25:46; of a place “where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched”, Mark 9:45.

6:3 And this will we do, if God permit.

And this will we do, if God permit- the nation was on probation, and in danger of rejection, so they had no reason to presume upon God’s goodness and mercy. The fig tree, (a figure of Israel after the flesh), had been given a time of opportunity, but it was in danger of being cut down as unfruitful, Luke 13:6-9. In Hebrews 12:28 the writer exhorts the Hebrews to “have grace”, which means to take advantage of the grace made available by God, grace in that context meaning the favour He shows them by allowing them to advance in Divine things.

The following words have caused much disquiet to believers, as they wonder whether they come into the category described here, and therefore cannot be eternally secure. It might be helpful to list the main ways in which Hebrews 6:4-6 has been interpreted. The question is: who are these that cannot be renewed to repentance? The following interpretations have been offered:

1. That it refers to true believers who apostatise.

BUT as we shall see in verse 6, the word for “fall away” is not the word for apostatise. In any case, it is not possible for a true believer to lose salvation, as we may see from the following Scriptures:

(a) In John 1:13 believers are described as born of God. They cannot be unborn.

(b) In John 6:39 the Lord Jesus declares that of all that the Father has given Him, He will lose nothing. Those who are given Him are those who believe in Him, verse 37. It is the will of God that the Son should keep all who the Father gives Him; is it possible that the Son of God is not competent enough to do this? Or that He will despise the gift His Father has given Him by losing it?

(c) In John 10:28,29 the Good Shepherd declares that His sheep shall never perish, nor be plucked out of either His hand or His Father’s. If it is possible to divide between the persons of the Godhead, then it possible to separate the sheep from Christ. But the Godhead is one, and cannot be divided. The sheep are safe, and safe for ever.

(d) In John 14:16,17 the Lord assures us that the Spirit of God abides with the believer for ever. Wherever the Spirit is, the believer is. It cannot be, therefore, that a true believer could be found in hell.

(e) In Romans 8:30 the apostle assures us that those who are justified by faith are, as far as the purpose of God is concerned, already glorified. That glory being connected with the purpose of God to surround His Son with those that are like Him. That purpose cannot be frustrated.

(f) Ephesians 2:5,6 makes clear that every true believer is associated with the resurrection, ascension and present session of Christ at the right hand of God in the heavenly places. If it is possible to unseat Christ from that position, it is possible to unseat the believer.

(g) Philippians 1:6 states that “He which hath begun a good work in you, will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ”. The security of the believer rests with God. It is, therefore, in safe hands.

(h) 1 John 1:7 assures us that as far as true believers are concerned, “the blood of Jesus Christ, His Son, cleanseth us from all sin”.

2. That it refers to true believers who backslide.

BUT, (a) the prodigal (who was a son when he left his father’s house), repented and returned, Luke 15:21. (b) John Mark, who wrote the Gospel according to Mark, had a lapse in his service for the Lord, Acts 13:13; 15:37-39, yet was recovered, and was described by the apostle Paul as “profitable to me for the ministry”, 2 Timothy 4:11.

3. That it refers to those who heard Christ and refused Him initially.

BUT, although it is true that God caused the nation of Israel to be judicially blinded when it rejected His Son, Romans 11:7-10, the gospel was still preached to that nation after Christ had returned to heaven. The word of Christ to His apostles was very clear, that the gospel was to be preached “beginning from Jerusalem”, Luke 24:47. The judicial blinding of Israel was not total, so that none could believe, but “in part”, Romans 11:25, so that individuals from the nation could still come to Christ. James is a classic example of one who had a close encounter with Christ, having lived in the same house for many years, but who did not believe until after the resurrection, 1 Corinthians 15:7.

4. That it refers to those who believed on Christ as a miracle worker, to whom He did not commit Himself, John 2:23,24.

BUT Nicodemus came out into the open and buried Christ, even though he was most probably amongst those who at first only believed in Christ as a miracle worker, to whom the Lord Jesus did not commit Himself, John 2:23-25. By coming out into open loyalty to the crucified Christ, he shows he had come to faith in a crucified Saviour.

5. That it refers to those who sank so low as to agree with Christ’s crucifixion.

BUT as we have seen, the word of Christ was, “beginning at Jerusalem”. In accordance with this the apostle Peter stood up in Jerusalem, and declared that although they had by wicked hands crucified and slain Him, they could save themselves from the wicked generation that had Christ’s blood on their hands, Acts 2:40.

6. That it refers to a hypothetical situation, where the writer uses the expression, “if they shall fall away” to imply that, if true believers apostatise, then God is put in an impossible position.

BUT the word for “fall away”, as we have noted, is not the word for apostasy. If refers to stumbling in the way. It is not true that it is not possible to restore those who have stumbled in some way. Nor is it true that those who stumble in this way crucify the Son of God afresh when they try to return to God and His ways. In any case, what connection is there between an encouragement to go on to perfection, and the statement that true believers cannot be renewed to repentance?

So these six options, for one reason or another, are not valid. In deciding who these people are we should note three things about them:

(a) If they were brought to repentance it would be for the second time, for they would be renewed again unto repentance, verse 6.

(b) By falling away, they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, verse 6. The nation of Israel had already crucified for itself the Son of God. If these people fall away, they will crucify Him again in the sense that they will then be siding with the verdict of the nation of Israel, and that crucifixion will now be intensely personal, for they will do it for themselves.

(c) They are said to fall away. As we have said, this is not the word for apostasy. It is only used here in its verbal form, but it is used elsewhere in a noun form. Some of the references are as follows: “who was delivered for our offences, Romans 4:25; “the forgiveness of sins“, Ephesians 1:7; “dead in trespasses and sins, Ephesians 2:1. So the word is used of the general sins of men, telling us it is not apostasy. It is also used in Romans 11:11, a very relevant passage. The apostle asks the question about the nation of Israel, “Have they stumbled that they should fall”. His answer is very decided, “God forbid”. Then he goes on to write, “but rather through their fall, salvation is come unto the Gentiles”. This seems to be contradictory, until we realise that two words for fall are used here. Israel has not stumbled at Christ so as to utterly fall and be totally cast off by God. But it is true that they have fallen in a limited sense. Now this latter word for fall, is the same as “fall away” in Hebrews 6:6. The nation was reaching a critical moment. Soon the city of Jerusalem would be destroyed, (for they had no continuing city on earth, Hebrews 13:14), and with it, the nation. The epistle to the Hebrews comes to them from God at this moment of crisis, and constitutes Christ’s last appeal to them. Those who had hesitated about accepting Him must decide, and decide quickly, or else their future will be bound up in a judged nation.

Summarising then, we can say these people have repented once, have not yet sided with the nation in crucifying Christ, and are in danger of making the decision to fall away from Him finally. The only people in Israel who fit this description are the disciples of John the Baptist. As we examine the statements in verses 4 and 5, we shall see this to be the case.

6:4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost,

For it is impossible- having spoken of a situation that God would count permissible, we now learn of a situation where God would find it impossible to do something. The reason it is impossible is because Christianity is the final word of God to man. What further revelation could there possibly be after His Son had manifested Him to perfection? Isaiah pictured the nation of Israel as a vineyard to which God had done everything possible. Despite this, they brought forth wild grapes. In the light of this Isaiah records God’s question, “What could have been done more to My vineyard, that I have not done in it?” Isaiah 5:4. Likewise in Christ’s day,  the nation had been blessed by the presence of the Son of God; what higher blessing could there be? There is nothing God can say to them beyond what His Son has already said.

For those who were once enlightened- the Lord Jesus said of John, that “he was a burning and a shining light: and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light”, John 5:35. They had welcomed the gospel of an imminent kingdom, the defeat of their enemies, and the bringing in of a glorious era of peace and prosperity for them. (See, for instance, the words of John’s father in Luke 1:67-75). They were only too ready to bask in this light. But when Christ came as the meek and mild one, who advocated that if your enemy struck you on the cheek, you should turn the other one towards him, so that he could strike that one also, they began to have second thoughts. Even John the Baptist began to wonder whether Jesus was really the true Messiah, Luke 7:20.

And have tasted of the heavenly gift- to taste means to experience. Job said, “For the ear trieth words, as the mouth tasteth meat”, Job 34:3, so as the disciples of John listened to him preach, they were experiencing something that had come from God in heaven as a gift. John himself had said, “A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven”, John 3:27. That passage goes on to describe the Son of God having everything given into His hand. John had limited things, Christ all things.

And were made partakers of the Holy Ghost- John the Baptist was filled with the Spirit of God before he was born, Luke 1:15. This was no doubt to fit him for his unique task of heralding the arrival of Christ. It was necessary that the workings of the flesh in him should be subdued from the first, so that he could be a suitable messenger of the King. So it was that as John’s disciples followed him, they were companions of a man filled with the Spirit, and in that sense were partakers, or companions, of the Holy Spirit. This placed a heavy responsibility upon them.

6:5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come,

And have tasted the good word of God- again the word “taste” is used, and in connection with two things, the word of God, and the powers of the age to come. The repetition of the word signals a change from thinking of John’s ministry to thinking of Christ’s. John encouraged his followers to leave him and follow Christ, for when he was told that the Lord Jesus was baptising many converts, instead of being sorry, he said, “He must increase, but I must decrease”, John 3:30. The spoken ministry of the Lord Jesus was very special, being God speaking by His Son, as Hebrews 1:2 has already explained. He said, “If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloak for their sin”, John 15:22. So to experience the word of God from the lips of one who is God, is an unparalleled privilege, and to despise it, an unparalleled sin.

And the powers of the world to come- this is the other thing tasted or experienced. Not only did Christ speak unique words, He did unique things, for He said, “If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin: but now they have both seen and hated both Me and My Father”, John 15:24. The miracles of Christ were on a different level to those performed by Old Testament prophets and New Testament apostles. He spoke of what the Father was doing, and then said, “for what things soever He doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise”, John 5:19. This means that His miracles were done in identically the same way as the Father. It was not a question of powers being imparted to a man, but inherent powers in the Son of God being manifested. This makes His miracles special, and justifies His statement, already quoted, that they were works “that none other man did”, John 15:24. Others had done miracles of the same sort, but not in an identical manner to the way the Son did.

We have already noticed in connection with Hebrews 2:5 that there are three words for world in the New Testament. The one used here is “age”, with emphasis on that period of time when Christ will reign here upon the earth. The powers of the age to come are the miracles the Lord Jesus performed during His ministry. These miracles had several purposes:

(i) They were an expression of His compassion and care.

(ii) They were a demonstration of His power.

(iii) They showed that He and His Father acted completely in harmony, John 5:17. He said that it was the Father who did the works, John 14:10.

(iv) They supported and illustrated the doctrines He unfolded, so that the teaching was both visual and vocal, John 14:11.

(v) They were an incentive for men to believe on Him, John 14:11.

(vi) They destroyed the works of the Devil, 1 John 3:8.

(vii) They were a fulfilment of Old Testament prophecy, Isaiah 35:5,6.

(viii) They were the sign that He was able to bring in kingdom conditions, Matthew 12:28.

It is the last purpose that is in view in this passage, for the power that will be needed to bring in the kingdom was clearly resident in Christ, as a reading of Matthew chapters 8 and 9 will show. He could remedy disease, danger, death, and could also deal with the demon forces of evil. Notice that these last two matters mentioned in verse 5, the word and the works, are the two things Christ responded with when the messengers from John the Baptist came, in Luke 7:2. He spoke of His miracles, and then of the preaching of the gospel to the poor. Then He said, “Blessed is he that is not offended in Me”. This is very relevant here, for those in view in this passage were, like John the Baptist, offended or stumbled by the difference between their Messianic aspirations and His character and works.

6:6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put Him to an open shame.

 If they shall fall away- as we have seen, this is not the regular word for apostasy. It is the word used by Paul as he described the response of Israel to Christ. Having been brought up to the heights of His teaching, they fell away from it because of unbelief.

To renew them again unto repentance- John’s disciples were in the unique position of having repented once, and yet needed to repent again. When the apostle Paul came across some of these disciples in Ephesus, they confessed that they had not heard of the coming of the Holy Spirit. It was not that they had never heard of the Holy Spirit, for John had spoken of Him. What they were ignorant of was the coming of the Spirit at Pentecost. This meant that they were not fully aware of the truth of Christianity. Paul explained that the ministry of John was preparatory, for “John verily baptised with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on Him which should come after Him, that is on Christ Jesus”, Acts 19:4. This is a very significant use of the title Christ Jesus, for it is one reserved for the Lord Jesus after He had returned to heaven; John the Baptist would certainly never have used it. The apostle is clearly rapidly bringing these men up to date. Their immediate response was to be baptised, not in the name of Christ Jesus, (which tells of His position in heaven), but in the name of the Lord Jesus, verse 5, (which tells of His authority). They are now in the good of Christian things, and by being baptised again, this time in recognition of the Lordship of Christ, they show they have repented of their failure to come onto proper Christian ground.

Seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put Him to an open shame- by deliberately turning from the full light of Christianity, they would take sides with their nation, who had crucified Christ. By so doing they would crucify Him afresh, this time to themselves personally. This was a very grave sin, and one for which there can be no remedy as long as it is persisted in. The writer adds, “put Him to an open shame”, to emphasise that this was no minor matter, but that the public disgrace of crucifixion was involved here. Was this really what they wanted Jesus of Nazareth to experience? Would John the Baptist, a man filled with the Spirit of God, have done this? Then why should his disciples?

The Jews had initially condemned Christ for claiming that He was the Son of God, Matthew 26:63-66; the secondary charge of claiming to be a king was only brought when they saw that Pilate the Governor was not interested in matters such as whether He was the Son of God, John 19:28-32.

6:7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God:

The writer now symbolises the two classes of people he has been addressing since 5:11. Those who were genuine believers, but immature, and those who were disciples of John the Baptist, and had failed, as yet, to give their allegiance to Christ. The former company is pictured here as earth or soil that takes advantage of what comes from heaven, and responds with things that the husbandman appreciates, and which he decides are suitable, or meet. Such persons are approved of by God, and receive His blessing. The writer will quote God’s promise of blessing to Abraham in verse 14.

We have noted the progression in the warning passages in the epistle. In chapter 2 the lesson is from Sinai; in chapters 3 and 4 from the march through the wilderness to the borders of the land; and now we are, so to speak, in the land, with two responses to the goodness of God as expressed by the rain. Moses said “My doctrine shall drop as the rain…because I will publish the name of the Lord”, Deuteronomy 32:2,3. And Isaiah wrote that God said, “For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater: So shall My word be that goeth out of my mouth: It shall not return unto Me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it”, Isaiah 55:10,11.

6:8 But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.

But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected- it might seem strange to use this illustration in relation to John’s disciples, until we remember that as far as their aspirations were concerned, they were in the kingdom. Had not both John the Baptist and Christ preached that the kingdom of heaven had drawn nigh? They had believed on that basis, and one of the reasons they did not give Christ their whole allegiance was that He did not seem to bring in the kingdom. Like the five foolish virgins of the parable, Matthew 25:1-13, they had gone forth to meet the bridegroom, in readiness to go the kingdom feast. Their lamps were burning simply and only with nationalistic fervour, and not the Spirit of God. This is why the wise virgins told them to go to those that sell oil, for their oil was available, at a price, from men, whereas the oil of the Spirit is a gift from God.

So it is that they, having received the same “rain” as believers had, instead of bringing forth herbs, beneficial and healthy, they brought forth thorns and briers, the sign of a cursed earth. Now when Christ reigns, the curse will be removed from the earth, (except from the serpent, Isaiah 65:25), so thorns and briers will be no longer. These people are introducing the sign of the curse into the place from which the curse will have been removed. Moreover, the thorns were used by men to put Christ to an open shame, for they mocked His claims to kingship by giving Him a wooden throne, (a cross); a wooden sceptre, (a reed); and a wooden crown, (of thorns).

And is nigh unto cursing- having produced the fruits of the curse, it is no surprise that they were in danger of the curse of God themselves, in contrast to the blessing others received. In the mercy of God that curse, which involves the rejection of them along with the rest of the unbelieving nation of Israel in AD 70, was only nigh- it had not yet been pronounced. But it was nigh, and they should not presume upon the patience of God, especially as the epistle was probably written around AD 68, just two years before the destruction of Jerusalem, which signalled the casting off of the nation.

Whose end is to be burned- such is the  end of thorns and briers, which, not being fit or useful to the landowner, are simply burned up out of the way.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 6, VERSES 9 TO 20

6:9 But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak.

6:10 For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of love, which ye have shewed toward His name, in that ye have ministered to the saints, and do minister.

6:11 And we desire that every one of you do shew the same diligence to the full assurance of hope unto the end:

6:12 That ye be not slothful, but followers of them who through faith and patience inherit the promises.

6:13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no greater, He sware by Himself,

6:14 Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee.

6:15 And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise.

6:16 For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.

6:17 Wherein God, willing more abundantly to shew unto the heirs of promise the immutability of His counsel, confirmed it by an oath:

6:18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:

6:19 Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and stedfast, and which entereth into that within the veil;

6:20 Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

 

The remaining part of the chapter may be divided as follows:

Verses 9-10 Past and present faith and practice.

Verses 11-20 Future faith and patience.

Verses 9-10       Past and present faith and practice.

6:9 But, beloved, we are persuaded better things of you, and things that accompany salvation, though we thus speak.

But, beloved- this is the only place in the epistle where these words occur, and they serve to reassure his believing readers that he means no ill towards them.

We are persuaded better things of you- the better things are like the herbs the husbandman is looking for. Since they had suffered the spoiling of their goods, and also that in Old Testament times poverty was a sign of unfaithfulness to God, they might become depressed. John the Baptist had been depressed when he was cast into prison and Christ did not rescue him, even though He came to “preach deliverance to the captives”, Luke 4:18. Christians walk by faith, not by sight, so external deliverances are not so important as spiritual progress. “Tribulation worketh patience”, Romans 5:3, so it is part of God’s education programme for us, building Christ-likeness into our souls.

And things that accompany salvation- what they are comes out in the passage, such as their work and labour of love done with diligence. This shows that those referred to in the previous verses were not true believers. Those who bring forth thorns and briers are not saved.

Though we thus speak- by speaking of one particular class of people in severe terms, the writer does not mean to include everyone in the condemnation. It is in the best spiritual interests of unbelievers that the truth of God’s word is brought to bear on them.

6:10 For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of love, which ye have showed toward His name, in that ye have ministered to the saints, and do minister.

For God is not unrighteous to forget your work and labour of love- because God has graciously undertaken to reward work and labour done for Him, it is a matter of righteousness for God to take account of that which He has promised to recompense. To forget rather than remember in the day of assessment would be an unrighteous thing, for it would make Him unfaithful to His promise, and this He cannot be. The work is the thing done, the labour is the toil to the point of weariness that the work involved.

Which ye have showed toward His name, in that ye have ministered to the saints, and do minister- the word for show means to show forth or prove. Their works were proof of their love of His name, which in turn showed that they were true believers. Abraham showed the reality of His faith by doing the work God required him to do, even though this meant offering up his son. James said that this act perfected his faith, for its reached its highest development then, James 2:21-23. These showed their love for the name of God by ministering to the saints in the past, and continuing to do so in the present. One major way in which love to God is expressed is by love to fellow-believers. As the apostle John wrote, “Whosoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth Him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of Him. By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep His commandments: and His commandments are not grievous”, 1 John 5:1-3. So those who have the life of God the Father, and as such are in His family, will also love the rest of the family. And they know that their love for the family is of the right sort, if it is the same love that they have for God. And how do they know that their love for God is true? By asking themselves whether they keep His commandments, for only those who have the life of God can do this.

Verses 11-20 Future faith and patience.

6:11 And we desire that every one of you do show the same diligence to the full assurance of hope unto the end:

And we desire that every one of you do show the same diligence- the writer expresses a desire on the behalf of the saints they ministered to, (those referred to in verse 10, hence the “we”, as the writer unites with them in thankfulness for the Hebrews’ labours), that their diligence might continue, and that all of them might be involved in it. Not that the saints were asking for a continuance of the help. But, rather, that the reward for work done by them might be the greater, to God’s glory. This is the same attitude as is shown by the apostle Paul as he wrote to the Philippians to thank them for their gifts, “Not because I desire a gift: but I desire fruit that may abound to your account”, Philippians 4:17. In the economy of God, a gift given to another, results in reward credited to the giver’s account, to be paid back in eternity.

To the full assurance of hope unto the end- this diligence would carry its own reward even now, for it would result in their souls being assured of the reality of their faith, and this in turn would give them great reason to hope in God for the future. The apostle John wrote, “My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue; but in deed and in truth. And hereby we know that we are of the truth, and shall assure our hearts before Him”, 1 John 3:18,19.

6:12 That ye be not slothful, but followers of them who through faith and patience inherit the promises.

That ye be not slothful- this is the opposite of the diligence of verse 11. It is the same as is translated “dull”, meaning sluggish, in 5:11. And herein lies the secret, for they were slothful in hearing the truth, and this resulted in slothfulness in practising the truth. If we do not respond to the word of God, our zeal for Him will lessen.

But followers of them who through faith and patience inherit the promises- having spoken in verses 9 and 10 of faith and practice, the writer now speaks of faith and promises. As converted Hebrews they would revere the ancient patriarchs, and seek to copy them. The patriarchs were marked by faith, but they coupled it with patience. Because they believed God, they also believed that His timing was best, and therefore waited with patience for the fulfilment of all He had promised. So confident were they of His faithfulness that they were not put off when those promises were not fulfilled quickly. The reason why they were so confident is given in the next verse.

6:13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because He could swear by no greater, He sware by Himself,

For when God made promise to Abraham- the particular promise in mind is the one of Genesis 22:15-18, but the terms of the promise are not in view here, just the principle involved. God had promised blessing to Abraham before. In Genesis 12, verses 1-3, and again in verse 7, it was simply a matter of God speaking and Abraham believing. In Genesis 15:1-6, again the word of God comes to Abraham and he believes it, and this is emphasised in Romans 4:1-5, to show that justification is by faith, and faith alone; faith which rests solely on the truth of the word of God. In Genesis 15:7-21, however, in response to Abraham’s question “How shall I know that I shall inherit it?” God entered into a covenant with him. But because Abraham was asleep when the covenant was made, it was an unconditional covenant, not depending on Abraham for its fulfilment at all. What guaranteed the covenant was the burning lamp that passed between the pieces of the covenant victim, instead of Abraham doing so. So it is that the apostle Paul, referring to this incident in Galatians 3:17, can say that “the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of no effect”. So the burning lamp is a figure of Christ, and it is He who shall bring in the fulfilment of God’s covenant with Abraham. In the instance in view here, however, it is a question of God’s oath. This oath was uttered in Genesis 22:15-18, after Abraham had shown his willingness to offer Isaac on the altar.

Because He could swear by no greater, He sware by Himself- God was prepared to put Himself under oath to assure Abraham that His promise was sure. But what can God use to guarantee His promise, since there is nothing greater that God? So He sware by all that He is, so that the very nature of God is the pledge that the promise will be fulfilled. If God can disintegrate, so can the promise. Since this is impossible, then the promise is sure.

6:14 Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee.

Saying, Surely blessing I will bless thee, and multiplying I will multiply thee- because the preceding words, in Genesis 22:16, say that God sware by Himself, then the word “surely” can be used here, for the promise is a sure as God Himself, and He will make sure the word is fulfilled.

6:15 And so, after he had patiently endured, he obtained the promise.

And so, after he had patiently endured- it had been many years since God’s original word to Abraham had been heard. Now it can be said of him that he has patiently endured, especially since the oath came after he had passed the severe trial of offering up Isaac on the altar.

He obtained the promise- as one who had patiently endured even that trial, he received confirmation of God’s promise. Of course it is said of Abraham and others in Hebrews 11:13 that they died without having received the promises. But that means they did not receive the fulfilment. The point in chapter 11 is that faith lays hold of unseen things, and to faith they are real and substantial, (see  Hebrews 11:1), even though unfulfilled at the time. Here the point is that God gave the promise and Abraham received it.

6:16 For men verily swear by the greater: and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.

For men verily swear by the greater- we learn two things about the oaths men make. Firstly, they support their oath by something greater than themselves. The Lord Jesus forbade His followers from doing this, since a believer’s word should be good enough, Matthew 5;33-37.

And an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife- The second thing about men’s oaths is that when they have sworn on oath, there is no strife or dispute about the terms of the arrangement being made.

6:17 Wherein God, willing more abundantly to show unto the heirs of promise the immutability of His counsel, confirmed it by an oath:

Wherein God- verse 16 is in parenthesis, to highlight the fact that men accept the assurance of an oath made by a fellow-man, so an oath on the part of God should be even more readily accepted. So the “wherein” refers to verses 13 and 14, which describe God promising on oath to Abraham. It was in that way that He confirmed His promise to Abraham.

Willing- it was not that God was reluctant to confirm His promise, as if He was unsure whether He could fulfil it. Rather, He wished to assure Abraham of the certainty of what He was promising.

More abundantly- He desired to go beyond what was necessary, so that His promise could be shown as certain.

To show unto the heirs of promise- He demonstrated that the promise was valid, by swearing on oath as well.

The immutability of His counsel- the word translated “immutability” was used in the legal circles of the time for the fact that a will was binding, and could not be changed. God is determined, and that should be enough for us when He promises; but He is willing for His determination to be abundantly demonstrated by His confirmatory oath.

6:18 That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us:

That by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie- both the promise and the oath were made by God speaking. But God cannot deny Himself, 2 Timothy 2:13, and since He is the God of truth, He can never go against the truth by speaking an untruth, for He cannot lie, Titus 1:2.

We might have a strong consolation- God’s promise gives us consolation; His oath makes the consolation (meaning encouragement), strong. The encouragement is given so that we show the diligence the writer urges us to in verse 11.

Who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us- beset by difficulty, and surrounded by those who were in danger of turning away from the faith, the believing Hebrews needed a place of safety, where they could take refuge. The storm of persecution and opposition was raging around them, so they need a safe haven in which to weigh anchor and be secure. In this place of safety they would be able to hold firmly to the hope that God had given them through both promise and oath. It was not that the hope would be stronger when they were in the refuge, but their hold on it would be strengthened. They flee so as to lay hold of the hope held out by the promise, even though they had the promise already. Those who thus flee show the genuineness of their faith.

6:19 Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul, both sure and steadfast, and which entereth into that within the veil;

Which hope we have as an anchor of the soul- the hope God gives by His promise is sure to anchor the soul, for both the promise and the hope are sure, so the hope based on these two things is sure too. It anchors the soul, fixing it immovably in the very character of God.

Both sure and steadfast- the hope is safe and secure, being rooted in God’s sure promise and His steadfast oath.

And which entereth into that within the veil- it is said that it was difficult to enter the harbour of Alexandria, especially during a storm. In such circumstances a boat would be launched from the storm-tossed vessel, which would carry the anchor within the harbour walls, and drop it in the quiet waters there. In this way the hopes of those on board the vessel would be anchored in a peaceful place, even though they themselves were still in the stormy waters outside. Notice that it is the hope that enters into that within the veil, not the believers. Their hold on the anchor chain is sure, through faith, and the anchor itself is sure and steadfast too, so all is secure. Where the veil is will be told us in the next verse.

6:20 Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

Whither the forerunner is for us entered- The forerunner has carried the anchor into the harbour, so those in the vessel outside have a link with what is within. The harbour is heaven itself, beyond the veil of the stellar heavens, the same thought as in 4:14. What a great encouragement to the Hebrew Christians who had given up earthly prospects, even legitimate Jewish ones. And to think that the forerunner, Christ Himself, has entered in for them, so as to act as their link with heaven.

Even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec- by this expression the writer links back with what he was speaking of in 5:10, and prepares the way for the truth he will unfold in chapter 7. Melchisedek had been unaffected by the wars going on all around him in Genesis 14, and was King of peace in the midst of it all, Hebrews 7:2. So Jesus has gone in to the place of peace, the sanctuary of God, and our link with Him ensures our souls can be at peace too. Especially as we remember he has gone in for us.

THE PERSON OF CHRIST His childhood

Luke2:40-52

This passage in Luke is the only inspired account of the boyhood of the Lord Jesus, giving insight into His attitude and behaviour as a youth.

The account corrects the apocryphal gospels that were written afterwards, in which fantastic and outlandish achievements were attributed to Christ. The apostles were led into all the truth by the Holy Spirit, John 16:13, and therefore during their lifetime no such gospels would be accepted. Once the true gospels had been written, the spurious were exposed as false, and rejected. Men like to drag them up in our day, in many cases basing popular and profitable novels and films on them. This is one of Satan’s ways of confusing men, and seeking to discredit the truth.

There were, according to Luke 1:1, those who with good intentions had written accounts of the Lord’s life. The four gospels replace these, and being sanctioned by the apostles, are the only ones inspired of God.

The passage includes the first recorded words of the Lord Jesus, and as such has special interest.

This event is the last at which Joseph is personally present, although he is mentioned later on, Matthew 13:55; John 6:42. It is suggested that he had died by the time Christ began His public ministry, although John 6:42 does indicate the people knew him. It does look as if Joseph was not alive at the time of the crucifixion, not only because he is not recorded as being there, whereas Mary was, but also because the Lord committed His mother to John, as if she had no husband to care for her.

The features that Luke notices about Joseph and Mary give some indication as to the sort of home in which the Lord Jesus and the other children of Mary grew up.

The Lord Jesus has left us an example that we should “follow His steps”, 1 Peter2:21. He is the perfect expression of that new sort of person our God expects us to be since we have “put on the new man”, Ephesians 4:24.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE GOSPEL OF LUKE CHAPTER 2, VERSES 39 TO 45

2:39 And when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth.

2:40 And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon Him.

2:41 Now His parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the passover.

2:42 And when He was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast.

2:43 And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and Joseph and His mother knew not of it.

2:44 But they, supposing Him to have been in the company, went a day’s journey; and they sought Him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance.

2:45 And when they found Him not, they turned back again to Jerusalem, seeking Him.

 

2:40 And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon Him.

And the child grew- so the Lord Jesus, brought back from being presented to the Lord at 40 days old, now grows up in every way in Nazareth. He grew physically as every normal child would be expected to do. God cannot be contained by even the heaven of heavens, 1 Kings 8:27, so there is no room for expansion with God as to His essence. But for the Lord Jesus, God manifest in flesh, there is. He grows because He is truly man.

And waxed strong in spirit- His enthusiasm and zeal for all things right and good was outstanding.

Filled with wisdom- intellectually and spiritually He was complete for each stage of His life. He was not “old before His years”, or “an old head on young shoulders”, but perfectly proper in His development at every period of His life. At each stage of His development He was as mature as He should be. There was no lapse, and yet neither was there anything of the prodigy about Him, so as to make Himself of reputation. Adam had never grown up, so He is superior to Adam even in this regard, and knows every experience we may know, from birth, (and perhaps even before, if the incident concerning the unborn John the Baptist in Luke 1:41 is a guide), through childhood and youth, until full-grown manhood.

And the grace of God was upon Him- this is the result of the foregoing. God looked upon Him with favour and approval. He was growing up before God as a tender plant, and as a root out of the dry ground of Israel, Isaiah 53:2.

2:41 Now His parents went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the Passover.

Now His parents- Joseph and Mary were His legal parents, for they had married before He was born. The relationship was unique, however, and this is brought out and insisted upon by the Lord in verse 49. Luke and Matthew give to us insights as to the character of Joseph and Mary. Joseph was a just man, but also caring and considerate, Matthew 1:19. He was quick to obey God, 1:24, and was prepared to accept the reproach that being married to Mary involved. As for Mary, she was clearly pure, and chaste; she was well versed in the Old Testament, as her song shows, Luke 1:46-55. She was willing to accept the stigma of bearing a child whose father, as far as men were concerned, was not known. Yet for all that she sang praise to God in the midst of it all. They were a remarkable and godly couple, and well-fitted for the task of bringing up the Lord Jesus.

Went to Jerusalem every year at the feast of the Passover- this shows they were devout Israelites, appreciating that God had placed His name at Jerusalem, Deuteronomy 16:6, and careful to observe the law which required them to be present at the feasts three times a year, Deuteronomy 16:16. When God said “three times ye shall…” He was referring to three seasons, for the feasts of Jehovah were in three sets, and Israelites were expected to be present at them all. Not all the women in Israel went up to the feasts, for God had said “all the males”, but Mary was clearly not content to stay behind.

2:42 And when He was twelve years old, they went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast.

And when He was twelve years old- it was at the age of 13 that Jewish boys had what was known as Bar Mitzvah, and they became “sons of the Law”. A ceremony was enacted, at which the young boy would read from the law, and other procedures would take place which formally introduced him into the public life of the nation. Significantly, Luke does not tell us about this, but rather tells us what took place before.  He was writing of one who, although subject to the Law of God, had come in grace to redeem from the Law, Galatians 4:4,5.  It was not unusual  for boys to go for the first time to the Passover a year or two earlier than age 13, and this is the case with the Child Jesus, as Luke calls Him in the next verse. He was eager and willing to accept the responsibilities that being a male in Israel brought.

They went up to Jerusalem after the custom of the feast- thus showing themselves to be careful observers of all that God had required of the nation. They were grateful for His deliverance at the time of the original Passover, and now they go to express their appreciation by taking a lamb to be offered on the altar. Notice that it is not said He was taken to Jerusalem; it is almost as if it was a foregone conclusion that He would go. So “they” means the three of them. The three of them had gone to Jerusalem when He was 40 days old, but then it is said He was brought, Luke 2:22.

They went according to the custom of the feast. In after years, the Lord Jesus went into the synagogue “as His custom was”, Luke 4:16; into the Mount of Olives to pray “as was His custom”, Luke22:39. So whether it was to worship, to listen to the word of God and teach it, or to pray, His were holy habits. The writer to the Hebrews exhorts us not to forsake the assembling of ourselves together, “as the manner (the word is the same as custom) of some is”, Hebrews 10:25. Some attend as a matter of custom, which is good, whereas others absent themselves as a matter of custom, which is not good.

2:43 And when they had fulfilled the days, as they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and Joseph and His mother knew not of it.

And when they had fulfilled the days- there was nothing half-hearted about their attendance. They were eager to stay as long as the ceremonies continued, lingering in the courts of the Lord as those who loved to be there. This is not to say that the worshippers were required to spend the whole of the seven days of the feast in Jerusalem, for the main events took place at the beginning, with the offering of the Passover lambs. So most would go home, as Mary and Joseph did.

The psalmist exclaimed, “My soul longeth, even fainteth for the courts of the Lord, Psalm 84;2, and reckoned that to spend one day there was worth more than a thousand days elsewhere, verse 10. We do well if we capture something of their enthusiasm. As the pilgrims made their way to Jerusalem they would sing psalms, and in particular the Psalms of Degrees, Psalms 120-134.

As they returned, the child Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem, and Joseph and His mother knew not of it- despite the zeal of Joseph and Mary, it was exceeded by the Lord Jesus. Indeed, it was said of Him later that the zeal of the Lord’s house had eaten Him up, John2:17.

2:44 But they, supposing Him to have been in the company, went a day’s journey; and they sought him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance.

But they, supposing Him to have been in the company, went a day’s journey- this is a very telling insight into the character of the Lord Jesus. Clearly, for 12 years the Lord had never given Joseph and Mary any cause for alarm. He had always acted responsibly, and could always be relied upon and trusted. He never got into mischief, nor did He lead others into it. It was because they knew this that his parents assumed he would be in the company, by which is meant the caravan of people returning to Nazareth from the feast.

And they sought Him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance- this shows that He had never been known to get into bad company. There was plenty of this in Nazareth, but He had always kept Himself separate. So His parents are confident that they will find Him amongst their relatives and friends, fellow devout worshippers who have been to Jerusalem with them.

2:45 And when they found Him not, they turned back again to Jerusalem, seeking Him.

And when they found Him not, they turned back again to Jerusalem, seeking Him- having been unable to find Him in the company, they naturally return to Jerusalem, no doubt by this time very worried. Many thoughts must have raced through their minds. Has He proved Himself an unfaithful son after all? Has He been intercepted, perhaps by Herod’s soldiers, as the circumstances of His birth are recalled, and the claim that He was King of the Jews remembered? Mary may also have thought of the words of Simeon about the sword piercing her soul, Luke2:35, and feared the worst. They would reproach themselves also for not having guarded Him as perhaps they should.

 

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE GOSPEL OF LUKE CHAPTER 2, VERSES 46 TO 52

2:46 And it came to pass, that after three days they found Him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions.

2:47 And all that heard Him were astonished at His understanding and answers.

2:48 And when they saw Him, they were amazed: and His mother said unto Him, Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, Thy father and I have sought thee sorrowing.

2:49 And He said unto them, How is it that ye sought Me? wist ye not that I must be about My Father’s business?

2:50 And they understood not the saying which He spake unto them.

2:51 And He went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: but His mother kept all these sayings in her heart.

2:52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.

 

2:46 And it came to pass, that after three days they found him in the temple, sitting in the midst of the doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions.

And it came to pass, that after three days- they went a day’s journey before they discovered He was not with them, verse 44. They would take almost a day’s journey to return, (even though no doubt they walked more quickly now, as they began to panic). Now the third day has arrived. According to Jewish reckoning a part of a day was counted as a whole day.

They found Him in the temple- when He came into the world, “He came unto His own”, John 1:11. This means His own things. He had come to His own land, for it was Immanuel’s land, Isaiah 7:14, 8:8, and He was Immanuel, Matthew 1:23. He came to His own throne, for He was sole heir of it, but He was refused as King. He now comes to the temple, which is His Father’s House, John2:16, and yet does not assert Himself as He will do when He purges it twice over during His ministry, John2:14-16; Matthew21:12,13.

Sitting in the midst of the doctors- these were the teachers of the law of Moses. He was not admiring the architecture, as the disciples did later, Matthew24:1. His primary interest was in the law of the Lord, as Psalm 1:2 said, “In His law doth He meditate day and night”. He was not a half-hearted bystander, merely curious about what was going on, for He was in the midst, for those who had an interest were no doubt invited to come closer, and this He did. On the Sabbaths and feast days the rabbis came out onto the terrace in the temple courts to teach any who cared to listen. This shows that Joseph and Mary did not stay the whole seven days of the feast, for this teaching would not have been taking place after the feast was over.

Both hearing them- He does not attempt to teach, for His public ministry had not begun. Then it would be said that “He taught as one having authority, and not as the scribes”, Matthew 7:28,29. They “marvelled at the gracious words that proceeded out of His mouth”, Luke 4:22, and on another occasion said, “Never man spake like this man”, John 7:46. On another occasion the authorities were baffled, saying, “How knoweth this man letters, having never learned”, John 7:15. He did not attend the Rabbi’s classes, and therefore in their eyes was unlearned. They dismissed the common people as those who know not the law and are cursed”, John 7:49, and He would be reckoned one of the common people. The difference between Himself and the scribes was that He was God’s Son, and spoke the words His Father wished Him to speak, John 8:26-28.

In His ministry the Lord Jesus exposed the hypocrisy of those in authority in Israel, Matthew 15:7-9, but He never tried to prevent the people listening to them. His words were, “The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses’ seat: all therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not”, Matthew 23:2,3.

And asking them questions- He is genuinely interested in their opinion on the various aspects of the law they would have been discussing. We must not think that because He is God, then He as man “knows it all”, for that would detract from the reality of His true manhood. One of the best ways to learn is to ask questions, as long as it done in the spirit of genuine enquiry, and not in a spirit of unbelief like Satan in Genesis 3:1.

2:47 And all that heard Him were astonished at His understanding and answers.

And all that heard Him were astonished at His understanding and answers- there was not one of the learned doctors that was not impressed with the fact that by His questions it was obvious that He thought deeply about the Scriptures. They could tell by the nature of His enquiries that His was no casual interest and insight. Not only was it the practice to allow questions from those learning, but also to ask questions, so that it could be assessed how much was being taken in. When this was done it became obvious that His answers disclosed a deep knowledge of the things of God. For a carpenter’s son from Nazareth, as they though Him to be, this was remarkable.

2:48 And when they saw Him, they were amazed: and His mother said unto Him, Son, why hast Thou thus dealt with us? behold, Thy father and I have sought Thee sorrowing.

And when they saw Him, they were amazed- as bystanders, Joseph and Mary look on at this remarkable scene. They seem not to have had any inkling that He had these abilities, for He had made Himself of no reputation, even with them. Strangely, they do not seem to think that His being with the doctors was an explanation for His staying behind when they left to go home after the feast.

And His mother said unto Him, Son, why hast Thou thus dealt with us?- their anxiety, panic, frustration, and self-reproach now changes to a feeling of slight censure. By her question Mary implies that He had not dealt with them as He should.

Behold, Thy father and I have sought Thee sorrowing- can it be that the one who has always been such a model son, all that godly parents could wish for, has now shown Himself less than thoughtful? They need to learn the perfect balance He keeps between duty to His parents, and duty to His God. He will not allow anything to detract from the latter. It is right to have natural affection, for the absence of it is one of the evil features of the last days, in2 Timothy 3:3, but love to God must come first.

There are two elements in this question from Mary that need a response. The first is “Thy father”, and the second is “sought Thee”.

2:49 And He said unto them, How is it that ye sought Me? wist ye not that I must be about My Father’s business?

And He said unto them, How is it that ye sought Me?- the two matters that need addressing in Mary’s remark are dealt with together. How is it that you have been so long in finding Me? Should you not have come first to the temple where I was most likely to be? It is a challenge to every believer to ask, “If others knew not where I was, where would they look first?”

Wist ye not that I must be about My Father’s business?- “wist” means “to know without being told”. They should have known by His previous history that that was where His interests lay. And as for “thy father”, meaning Joseph, the Lord is quick to safeguard His unique relationship with God. Really speaking He knows but one Father. To further His interests and to be involved in them, even when not publicly manifested to Israel, was His delight. This is the first recorded statement from the lips of the Lord Jesus, and is characteristic of Him. He had come into the world with the words, “Lo, I come to do Thy will”, Hebrews 10:7, and one of His last sayings on the cross was, “It is finished”, John 19:30. Notice the perfect balance between His responsibility to parents and to His Father in heaven. He gently reminds them of His prior commitment to His Father in heaven. He obviously was confident that His previous life in the home had given them no cause for concern, so why should this incident be any different? Especially as they knew that a visit to the Temple would produce in Him devout feelings.

2:50 And they understood not the saying which He spake unto them.

And they understood not the saying which He spake unto them- the idea of God as Father was not well known to them. It is true that the psalmist likened the care of Jehovah for His people to the pity a father has for his children, Psalm 103:13, but the concept of God as Father was unknown. They might have deduced it from Proverbs 30:4, “What is His name, and what is His Son’s name, if thou canst tell”, but they clearly had not. Nor had they taken account of the words of the angel to Mary, “Therefore also that holy thing that shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God”, Luke 1:35. They perhaps connected it with the word of God about Solomon, (since David was His father, Luke 1:32), “I will be to him a father, and he shall be to Me a son”, 2 Samuel 7:14. The idea of their boy being God manifest in flesh is not revealed to them yet. The eternal life which was with the Father is not yet manifest, for the beginning of that was at His baptism, when the Sonship of Christ was clearly made known from heaven in the ears of men.

Understood not- perhaps not until stood in the synagogue in Nazareth and claimed to be Messiah.

2:51 And He went down with them, and came to Nazareth, and was subject unto them: but His mother kept all these sayings in her heart.

And He went down with them- it is entirely appropriate for Him to do this now that His Father’s interests have been fostered. To have gone down with them when they left Jerusalem after the feast, would clearly have been wrong.

And came to Nazareth- He exchanges the holy precincts of the temple, with its worship and sacrifices, for the everyday life of Nazareth, yet He was able to grow up before His Father as a tender plant in both places.

And was subject unto them- He does not become subject unto them, as if His stay behind at Jerusalem was an example of insubjection. The verb “subject” is in the middle voice, telling us that it was an action He initiated Himself willingly. Subjection has the idea of obedience linked with it, so He kept the balance between obedience to His Father, and to His parents.

2:52 And Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and man.

And Jesus increased- this word means literally “to progress as a pioneer”. It speaks of steady and purposeful advance on the part of one who is earnest and determined.

In wisdom and stature- there was a perfectly balanced development of all His faculties, both mental and physical. This is the normal development of a real person. He had taken part of the same flesh and blood as other men, and yet He was at the same time God manifest in flesh. This, however, did not prevent Him being real man, sin apart. There are some who think that being God, the Lord Jesus did not need to learn. That He knew the alphabet without learning it, and so on. This verse refutes that idea, for He increased in wisdom.

Favour with God and man- the wise writer of the Book of Proverbs exhorts “Let not mercy and truth forsake thee: Bind them about thy neck; Write them upon the table of thine heart: so shalt thou find favour and good understanding in the sight of God and man”, Proverbs 3:3,4. It was not until His public ministry began, and His preaching exposed the sin of men, especially the ruling classes, that He began to be despised and rejected.

SPECIAL NOTE:

When God made man in the beginning, He made Him in His image and after His likeness. As the image of God Adam was to represent God to the rest of creation. As one after God’s likeness, he was to replicate God’s character. As such he had spirituality, able to appreciate Divine things, and relate to God in a meaningful and worshipful way. He also had rationality, with the ability to reason, decide, discriminate and advance in truth. He had personality, conscious of his relationship with God, and also self-conscious, aware of His responsibilities to the rest of God’s works. He had morality too, the ability to distinguish between good and evil, right and wrong.

 Sadly, Adam sinned, despite these great abilities, and he no longer represented God adequately. This is why there needed to be the introduction of the “second man”, the Lord Jesus. He is “the image of the invisible God”, Colossians 1:15, and He displays perfectly the features of God, for He is “God manifest in flesh”, 1 Timothy 3:16. We see this illustrated in the account we have just looked at. We see His spirituality as He gravitates towards those who taught the law of God in the temple. His rationality as He astonishes the learned doctors with His understanding and answers. His personality is clearly seen as He carefully and respectfully sets the record straight with regard to His relationship to God His Father, and Mary and Joseph His parents. His pure morality is seen in that, despite going back to live in Nazareth, (“Can any good thing come out of Nazareth”? John 1:46), He lived there as one in favour with God, an impossible thing if He was anything less than impeccably upright.

At last there is Man upon the earth who pleases God totally. Yet there is placed upon His people of seeking to be like this, for they are to put on the new man, (likeness to Christ), having been created in righteousness and true holiness.

THE PERSON OF CHRIST- His Deity

 One of the features of a local assembly is that it is a gathering in the name of the Lord Jesus.  “In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together”, 1 Corinthians 5:4.

 This means that all that He is gives character to the gathering.

 It also means that His name is the authority we have for gathering as we do.  We must constantly ask whether our practices conform to the dignity of His person.  This will affect how we dress and behave as we come together.  there is no room for that which is casual , wheter in clothing, speech, posture, or attitude, when we come together for the solemn purpoase of honouring the name of the Lord Jesus.

 We should not make “gathering in His name” a slogan, as if we are a sect.

 There were those who claimed to be super-spiritual at Corinth, and said “I of Christ”, 1 Corinthians 1:12.

 His name is enough to get saved by, (John 1:12), so it must be enough to gather by. 

All of the four gospels go back to a beginning of some sort in their narrative about Christ:
Mark- the beginning of (the preaching) of the gospel.  God’s Faithful Servant.
Luke- the beginning of His earthly life.  The Sympathetic Saviour.  (Luke also gives Christ’s genealogy back to Adam).
Matthew- the beginning of the nation, (Abraham), and the Kingdom, (David).  Christ as The Seed, (Galatians 3:16), and the Sovereign.
John- the beginning of creation.  The Son of God.

THE DEITY OF CHRIST:

 He is Son of God in a sense different to angels, Adam, or believers, who are all called sons of God.  The sonship of believers is derived, His is eternal, and therefore underived.

 In John 10:30-36, the expressions “I and My Father are one”, “makest Thyself God”, and “I am the Son of God”, mean the same thing, and signify His Deity.  If this were not so, the Jews would not have attempted to stone Him for blasphemy.

 To be the son of someone or something in Bible times meant to share their nature.  “Son of thunder”, “sons of Belial (worthlessness), “son of perdition”, “son of man”.  As Son of God, the Lord Jesus shares the nature of God.  Believers are sons by adoption; He is un-originated and eternal.

 If it were not so, He could not be the Only-begotten Son, for He would not be alone, and that title indicates He is.

THE DEITY OF CHRIST IS A CENTRAL DOCTRINE:

 The apostle Paul described himself as “separated unto the gospel of God…concerning His Son Jesus Christ our Lord”, Romans 1:1,3.

“and the blood of Jesus Christ, His Son, cleanseth from all sin”, 1 John 1:7.

“He that hath the Son hath life, and he that hath not the Son of God hath not life”, 1 John 5:12.

“Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God”, 1 John 4:15.

“Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living God…on this rock”, Matthew 16:16,18. 

THE DEITY OF CHRIST IS A CONSISTENT DOCTRINE
 In Genesis 1:1 a plural noun, “God”, is used with a singular verb, “created”.  This can only be possible if the three persons of the Godhead are one.

 In Malachi 3:1- “I will send My messenger, (John the Baptist), and he shall prepare the way before Me“.  Yet in Mark 1:2 we read, “As is written in the prophets, ‘Behold, I send My messenger before Thy face, which shall prepare Thy way before Thee’“.  So to prepare the way before Christ is to prepare the way before Jehovah.  Again, in Mark 1:3, John the Baptist prepares “the way of the Lord”, meaning Jehovah, for this is a quotation from Isaiah 40:3.  But John the Baptist prepared the way for Christ.

 In Matthew 2:23 we discover that the child born is “God with us”.

 In Revelation 22:12,13 the one who comes quickly declares, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last”. But these are Divine titles, as found in Revelation 1:8; Isaiah 41:4; 44:6.
So at the beginning and end of both the Old and the New Testaments, the Deity of Christ is set forth in some way.  And this is true of all that lies between.

THE DEITY OF CHRIST IS A CONTESTED DOCTRINE

“He is antichrist that denieth the Father and the Son”, 1 John 2:22.

“And it (the little horn, a symbol of the Antichrist) cast down the truth to the ground”, Daniel 8:12.

“Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know it is the last time”, 1 John 2:18.

“Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God.  He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son.  If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed:  for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds”, 2 John 9-11.

THE DEITY OF CHRIST IS A DOCTRINE TO BE CONTENDED FOR
“I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith”, 2 Timothy 4:7.

“It was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered to the saints”, Jude 3.

“If ye believe not that I am He, ye shall die in your sins”, John 8:24.

NOTES ON JOHN 1:1,2

THE ETERNAL EXISTENCE OF THE WORD
1:1    In the beginning was the Word- when the first thing that had a beginning began, then the Word already was.  This is a clear indication of His eternal existence.  That the Lord Jesus is meant is evident from verses 14 and 17, but John deliberately refrains from giving Him any personal name here, however, so that we may concentrate on His attributes.  A word is an expression of what is in the mind, so John is telling us that if God is going to be told out, it must be through Him who, because He is the Word, is able to perfectly express His mind. He is not a Word, one option among many, but the one and only discloser of the mind of God.
The use of the word “beginning” shows there is clearly a link with Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning God create”, but whereas Moses is starting at the beginning and going forward, John is starting at the beginning and going backwards into eternity, before time was.  Thus John is telling us of One who is able to bring eternal realities within the reach of men.

THE DISTINCT PERSONALITY OF THE WORD
And the Word was with God- If the first phrase tells of the pre-existence of the Word before time began, and therefore indicates His eternal being, this phrase tells of His co-existence.  To be with God tells us much more than that the Word was in the presence of God, although this is true.  By using a preposition that indicates “motion towards”, John is informing us that the Word was actively towards God, concentrating, in eternal perfection, on Him. This gives us great confidence, for it indicates that there is perfect harmony between the Word and God.  Their interests are the same, and nothing disturbs their communion.  This being the case, believing in His name is a safe thing to do, for it forges a link with God that cannot be broken.  The fact that weight is given to both “Word” and “God”, is indicative of the distinct personality of the Word. 

THE SUBSTANTIAL GODHOOD OF THE WORD
And the Word was God- A clear statement as to the Deity of the Word.  Note that although there are distinctions of Persons in the Godhead, for “the Word was with God”, yet there is identity of essence, for “the Word was God”.  This expression assures us that the One who is pre-existent, and co-existent, is co-equal with God as well.  This truth is emphasized not only in the teaching of the Lord Jesus, (see for instance John 5:17-29 and 10:30), but also in His miracles, which clearly demonstrated His Deity.  For example, He who had made the vine on the third day, Genesis 1:12,13, now acts on another “third day”, John 2:1, as He accelerates the lengthy process by which rainwater is made into the best wine, and thus manifests His power as Creator, with the result that His disciples believed on Him, John 2:11.

1:2    The same was in the beginning with God- John makes it clear that the truths stated in verse one were all true together at the beginning- there was no development or progress. It was not that He was the Word, and then was with God, and then was God, but rather that He who was with God, and was God, was this eternally, for the nature of God cannot change.  Deity does not develop, but is ever infinite.  “I am the Lord, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed”, Malachi 3:6. This statement by the prophet would have been a great comfort to the remnant in Israel as they faced four hundred years of change until Christ came.  Their preservation in those times is testimony to the unchangeableness of God.  We who wait for the second coming of Christ may likewise take heart.

THE CREATORIAL MAJESTY OF THE WORD
1:3    All things were made by Him- Having stated fundamental truths as to the nature of the Word, John now indicates the way in which the Word showed Himself to be God, even by bringing all things into being, something only God can do.  Literally rendered, the verse reads- “All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him not even one thing came into being which has come into being”.   John is writing about things coming to be that did not exist before- they are not revealed from their hiding-place. “Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear”, Hebrews 11:3.  All things came into being by, or through, the Word when “He spake, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast.” Psalm 33:9.  It follows logically, then, that He is not part of creation. There are those who appeal to this word “by” to say that the Word was only a high angelic intelligence, who was used by God to make all things as His subordinate.  But in Romans 11:36 it is said of God that all things are through Him, (and the apostle uses the same word as “by” here), so on this theory of subordination, God Himself must be acting for another! This, of course, is impossible. 
Perhaps as he penned these words the apostle John thought of the language of Isaiah 44:24, “I am the Lord that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by Myself:”.  Isaiah declared that the Lord, the God of heaven, had made all things by Himself, yet John, a sincere believer in the One True God, did not hesitate to say that the Word had made all things.  Since John was inspired by the same Spirit as Isaiah was, then we are forced to the conclusion that the Word is God, not only by the plain statement of verse 1, but also by the fact that He is Creator.
And without Him was not anything made that was made- there is no secret store of matter that derives its origin from some other power-source. Note how John puts things positively and negatively, (“all things were made by Him…without Him was nothing made”), in order that the truth might be hedged about on every side.  The first phrase “all things were made by Him”, might be thought by hostile minds to refer only to things, and not beings with life, leaving the way open to say that the Word was created first, and then brought things into existence. This second statement of the apostle instantly and conclusively disposes of such a blasphemous notion.  Everything that has begun to be, has done so through the Word, therefore the Word did not come into being, but ever is.

So it is that John establishes at the very beginning of His account of the life, death and resurrection of Christ, that He is indeed verily God.  As he brings his gospel to a close he assures us that “these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through His name”, John 20:31.

HEBREWS 5

HEBREWS 5
Survey of the chapter

The writer has told us in 4:14 that we have not a high priest after a certain sort.  Now he tells who was a high priest after that sort, even Aaron.  The shortcomings of Aaron are spoken of by way of contrast to Christ.  Then Aaron’s certain similarity to Christ in the way he was given the priesthood is set out.  Thirdly, the features that marked Christ when He was here in dependent manhood, which prepared Him for His present ministry.  Having introduced the Melchizedec order of priesthood for the first time in the epistle, the writer rebukes the Hebrews for not being in a mature state, and therefore unable to readily take in the truths they were about to be told.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-3 The infirmity of Aaron Christ was not self-condemned.
(b) Verses 4-6 The induction into the priesthood. Christ was not self-appointed.
(c) Verses 7-9 The intensity of Christ’s life-sufferings. Christ was not self-willed.
(d) Verses 10-14 The immaturity of the Hebrews. Christ was not appreciated.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 5, VERSES 1 TO 3:

5:1  For every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins:

5:2  Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way; for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity.

5:3  And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins.

(a) Verses 1-3
The infirmity of Aaron.
Christ was not self-condemned.

5:1
For every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God, that he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins:

For every high priest taken from among men is ordained for men in things pertaining to God- we are now given reasons why our high priest is not like other high priests, as 4: 15 with its negative statement had made clear He was not.  The first difference is that Aaron was taken from among men, whereas our high priest, although true man, is one of the persons of the Godhead.
That he may offer both gifts and sacrifices for sins- Aaron was appointed to minister to God in the priest’s office, in connection with “everything of the altar, and within the veil”, Numbers 18:7.  Christ on the other hand, began His ministry after the question of sins had been finally dealt with. 

5:2
Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way; for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity.

Who can have compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way- the word compassion is “metriopatheo”, meaning “to treat with mildness and moderation, and to bear gently with”.  This is in contrast to the “sumpatheo” of 4:15 that Christ is marked by.  Aaron’s dealings with the Israelites was measured and restricted, for the reason now given.
For that he himself also is compassed with infirmity- Aaron ministered from a position of weakness, and needed to moderate his responses to the people because of his own shortcomings.  They could turn round to him and point to what he did at the foot of Sinai, Exodus 32:1-8, when he made the molten calf, (unfaithfulness); or when his sons failed at their consecration and he had to hold his peace, Leviticus 10:3, (helplessness); or when he and Miriam criticised Moses, Numbers 12:1, (rebellion); or when he and Moses struck the rock instead of speaking to it, (disobedience and rash speaking), Numbers 20:10-12.  It is noticeable that these four examples of failure all involved speech or non-speech.  So Aaron announces at Sinai “these be thy gods O Israel, which brought you out of the land of Egypt”.  He had nothing to say when his sons died, but held his peace; he spoke against Moses, and was with Moses when the latter spake inadvisedly with his lips in the matter of water from the rock, Psalm 106:33.  These are examples of Aaron being ignorant and out of the way, showing he was flawed in character, and could not sympathise with the people from a position of moral superiority, as Christ can.  Those who were out of the way, (and therefore in a carnal state of mind), could rebuff him if he tried to remonstrate with them by saying that he himself had made mistakes.

5:3
And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins.

And by reason hereof he ought, as for the people, so also for himself, to offer for sins- this shows that infirmities lead to sin on the part of those who are ignorant of God’s ways, and wander away from them.  Aaron shares in this, and hence has to offer for his sins as well as the sins of others.  In fact, the offering for a priest was greater than for one of the people, for his responsibility was greater.
It is true that Paul gloried in his infirmities, 2 Corinthians 12:5, but only in the sense that he used the weakness they represented as a means of curbing his pride.  We have already noted in connection with 4:15 that our high priest is able to sympathise with us in our infirmities, without having the infirmities Himself.  He feels what we feel, because the pressure that comes to us through infirmities He knew because of His sympathy with the men and women of His day.  Chapter 7:27,28 makes very clear that our high priest did not have to offer for His own sins.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 5, VERSES 4 TO 6:

5:4  And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron.

5:5  So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee.

5:6  As He saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

(b) Verses 4-6
The induction into the priesthood.
Christ was not self-appointed.

5:4
And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron.

And no man taketh this honour unto himself, but he that is called of God, as was Aaron- no man is able to step forward and claim the priesthood as of right.  We remember the judgement which fell upon Uzziah for usurping the position of priest, and in effect, appointing himself, 2 Chronicles 27:16-23.  To be high priest was a great honour for Aaron, but he could not take it to himself on his own initiative.

5:5
So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto Him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee.

So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest- now the word glory can be used, for Christ receives the priesthood in the full glory of His own person.  It is not a case, as it was with Aaron, of an unworthy man being put into a worthy office, and therefore being honoured beyond his deserts, for Christ is worthy of all honour.  Rather, it is an office by which Christ glorifies His Father.  In so doing, He fulfils perfectly the desire of God that there be a priest who would minister unto Him in the priest’s office.  That said, He did not assert Himself so as to be appointed priest, but rather waited the Father’s time.  He was utterly deserving of glory, but nonetheless in humility waited.  Instead of glorifying Himself, He glorified the one who appointed Him, as the next words show.
But he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee- this is a quotation from Psalm 2:7.  The Father’s time has come, and a particular day dawns during which He will elevate His Son to priesthood.  There is no question of becoming a Son here, because as we have seen from chapter one, Christ’s sonship means He is God, and as such He cannot change.  It is a matter of being instated in a sphere of responsibility as Firstborn Son.  Hebrews 3:6 describes Christ as Son over God’s house, and part of His duty is to act as priest.
Psalm 2 can be thought of as initially referring to David or Solomon in a limited sense, but only as prefiguring Christ the true Messiah.  The nation of Israel was declared to be the firstborn son of God in Exodus 4:22,23; Hosea 11:1.  So the king, representing the nation as he did, was given the same title.  Hence the promise to Israel’s king in Psalm 89:27, “I will make him my firstborn, higher than the kings of the earth”.
Psalm 2:7 is quoted three times in the New Testament.  In Acts 13:33 the idea is of Him being placed in the position of responsibility as prophet, at His baptism.  In Hebrews 1:5 He is to be king over the earth in the future.  Here, His present ministry in heaven as high priest is in view.

 5:6
As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec- this is a quotation from Psalm 110.  Because He is risen and ascended, (and Peter interprets Psalm 110 as being about Christ’s ascension, not David’s, in Acts 2:34,35), He is clear of everything and anyone who could possibly prevent Him successfully carrying out His office.  He is therefore priest for ever, and will maintain His people through the whole of eternity.  Because He is priest after Melchizedec’s order, He does not need to sacrifice, for His ministry begins after Calvary is accomplished, and His sacrifice there was once-for-all in character.  We do not read of Melchizedec offering sacrifice, but he did succour and save Abraham when he was about to be tempted by the king of Sodom.  Like Christ, he was able to succour them that are tempted.
Note the “also”, linking Psalm 2 and Psalm 110 together as referring to the same event, namely, Christ’s ascension.  This shows that the linking of “this day have I begotten Thee” to the birth of Christ is incorrect.  After all, we are not begotten on our birthday.  There is clearly a vital link between Christ as Firstborn Son, charged with the responsibility of administering over God’s house, and His present position at the right hand of God which Psalm 110 opens with.  In Psalm 2:7 where the words are originally found, the “I” is emphatic. 

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 5, VERSES 7 TO 9:

5:7  Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared;

5:8  Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;

5:9  And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;

(c) Verses 7-9
The intensity of Christ’s life-sufferings.
Christ was not self-willed.

5:7
Who in the days of his flesh, when he had offered up prayers and supplications with strong crying and tears unto him that was able to save him from death, and was heard in that he feared;

Who in the days of his flesh- this reversion back to the days of His flesh shows that His priesthood began after He had left this scene.  The Jesus who is in heaven for us is the Jesus who was here in the flesh.  Aaron wore a garment of fine linen, that which had grown up in the earth.  Christ needed no special robe to make Him acceptable, but it is as if every day of His life in the flesh was another thread in Christ’s priestly robe.  There was no more fine and refined person than the Lord Jesus, and He bears that character in heaven.  The writer is now going to show that Christ’s qualifications to minister as our high priest are far superior to Aaron’s.  His flesh is a wider thought than His body.  The life of man is the life of flesh, and although sinless, Christ’s manhood was the same as ours, for He had taken part of the same flesh and blood as us, 2:14.  We are about to be shown the character of the earthly life of Christ, as opposed to the defects in the life of Aaron as high priest.
When he had offered up prayers- the psalmist related his prayers to the incense and the sacrifices that were offered to God in the temple, Psalm 141:2.  The writer sees this as being true of Christ, that His prayers arose to God with a fragrance and acceptance that was distinctive.  We do not read of Him praying in the temple courts, but wherever He lifted up His heart to God in prayer became a holy place.  Compare Matthew 12:6, where a cornfield becomes a temple if He is there.
And supplications- these are deeply felt needs, expressed by one who comes to another for help.  When down here in the flesh, Christ was entirely cast upon God for everything.
With strong crying- the word used here is one that imitates the cry of the raven.  The cry of a raven is instinctive, and cannot really be imitated by another bird, so cannot be forced or faked.  This therefore is the genuine cry of one who is in deep need.
And tears- when asked who the Jews thought He was, one of the names the disciples mentioned was Jeremiah, who was noted for his weeping.  Although He had a special joy as He pleased His Father, John 15:11, yet nonetheless it is true that He was the Man of Sorrows, meaning He was especially marked out as a sorrowing one, so much so that He personifies sorrow, for it finds its fullest expression in Him.
Unto him that was able to save him from death- so He had taken such a place of dependence and relative weakness, that He had to ask to be saved, not of course from sin, but from death itself.  But even in this He thought of His people, for He desired to issue forth in resurrection so that He might be their priest in heaven.  See Isaiah 49:8, where the day of salvation is the day of His resurrection.
And was heard in that he feared- not the fear of terror, but godly, reverential fear as expressed by one who is pious.  This fear is the mingling of love and filial fear which ideally expresses piety towards God.  His prayer to be saved from death was answered because of His personal piety.  As the Sin-bearer on the cross, His prayer seemed not to be heard, Psalm 22:2, but that does not mean it would not be answered, and answered it was, for He emerged in resurrection, Psalm 22:21. The most trying experience for Christ was to go into death, for He is the author of life, and death is alien and an enemy.  If He successfully passed through this experience with His piety intact, than we are sure no lesser trial could have spoiled Him.

5:8
Though he were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered;

Though he were a Son- as the Son of God He shared every attribute of God, including the right to command.  Yet He was being fitted for priesthood by His life-experiences down here, and hence has to learn things as a man that He could not learn as the Son of God in heaven.  And learn these things He did, even though He was still the Son of God when upon earth.  In order to have the moral right as a man to command people to obey, He must show He was obedient to His Father when here.
Yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered- He did not have to be disciplined so as to obey, but He did have to learn what it was to obey.  He now knows what it is to obey, and has responded in obedience to His Father’s every command, and thus has the moral right to expect obedience from His people. He obeyed even though that meant suffering, so we cannot make the excuse that the suffering we pass through exempts us from obedience.  As in all things, He has led the way as our Captain on the path of salvation and glory, 2:10.
He learned what it was to suffer, and to accept those sufferings as from His Father, and to obey Him despite the trials that came His way.  His life-sufferings did not make Him want to rebel, but to obey further.  In all these experiences He displayed the utmost piety, or godly fear. There was no questioning of the ways of God; no resentment; no doubting of God’s goodness. And because of this His prayer was heard, and He issued forth in resurrection to begin a priestly ministry on behalf of His people when they are tried in similar ways.  This is the most difficult way to learn what it is to obey.  To obey the command to not eat of the tree of knowledge involved no suffering for Adam, for there was a plentiful supply of fruit elsewhere in the garden.  To obey the command to speak to the rock involved no suffering for Aaron, but he disobeyed.  Christ however, in the most extreme pressure that suffering brings upon a man, nevertheless obeyed perfectly and willingly.  He did not try to excuse Himself from suffering and obeying on the basis that He was God’s Son.

5:9
And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;

And being made perfect- we have already seen how that Aaron was not morally superior to the people; but Christ is so different.  To be made perfect means here to be perfectly qualified to undertake a task successfully.  We have already learnt that He was made perfect though sufferings, 2:10.
He became the author of eternal salvation- so it is that the salvation we shall know in eternity, we may know now, in time. The salvation He authors knows no limit that time and circumstances could impose upon it. This is a sign of the eternal security of the believer. Just as He experienced salvation from the ultimate enemy, and emerged to never die or suffer again, so we shall know a like experience at the resurrection of the saints.  But in the here and now we may know the salvation from lesser troubles that His ministry as priest secures for us.
Unto all them that obey him- having established the moral right to expect others to obey, and having been given the task of administering as God’s Son over the house of God, He has every right to expect obedience.  We learned in chapters three and four that faith takes the form of obedience, and this becomes a definition of what a Christian is; all who claim to be believers, then, must demonstrate the genuineness of their claim by obeying God’s Son.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 5, VERSES 10 TO 14:

5:10  Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.

5:11  Of whom we have many things to say, and hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing.

5:12  For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat.

5:13  For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.

5:14  But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil. 

(d) Verses 10-14
The immaturity of the believers.
Christ was not appreciated.

5:10
Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.

Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec- the word for “called ” used here means “to salute, or address”.  As He ascended to God’s presence in heaven, God hailed Him as High Priest, showing that He was worthy of that high office.  This way of putting things shows that He becomes high priest in virtue of past piety shown. He is not high priest on probation, but God can confidently establish Him in the position, knowing beforehand that He will be faithful.  We do not read of other priests associated with Melchizedec, so he is never called high priest.  The Epistle to the Hebrews never calls believers priests, although the activities they are encouraged to engage in are certainly priestly in character.  The purpose of the epistle is to concentrate on the glories of Christ.  Peter’s first epistle is the one to turn to for information about Christian priesthood.
We never read of Melchizedec offering sacrifices, or ministering at an altar, for he is a foreshadowing of the one who entered into His priestly ministry with the work of sacrifice over.  What Melchizedec did do was (i) bless God, (ii) bless Abraham, (iii) receive tithes on God’s behalf, and (iv) offer Abraham succour and encouragement before the king of Sodom came to him with his tempting offer, see Genesis 14:17-20.
The order of Melchizedec has not to do with a line or succession of priests, but with the way the priesthood was arranged or ordered.  It is these features of Melchizedec’s priesthood that make him a fit example of Christ’s ministry.  Note that the word high can legitimately be added to the word priest now, for not only is the Lord Jesus ascended up on high, and high above all others in moral superiority, but He now has others associated with Him, and He is high over them as well.
Like Melchizedek, who met Abraham when he was flushed with success, and before the king of Sodom came with his temptations, Christ gives to those who ask Him that needed strength to overcome temptations.  Melchizedek succoured Abraham with bread and wine, ordinary foodstuffs but with deep significance.  The king of Sodom would have given Abraham a life of luxury, but he learnt to be content with ordinary fare.  Christ, too, brings forth the bread and wine.  The “bread” of His life lived in constant fellowship with the Father, and with constant victory over temptation.  The “wine” of His death, whereby He overcame the most fierce attack of the enemy and secured the salvation of His people.

5:11
Of whom we have many things to say, and hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing.

Of whom we have many things to say- which things he does say in chapter seven.
And hard to be uttered, seeing ye are dull of hearing- the difficulty lay not in the writer’s ability as a teacher, but rather in the dullness of understanding of the hearers.  This may confirm the idea that the words of this epistle were first given orally.  If they are the words of Apollos, then it is said of him that he was “an eloquent man, and mighty in the scriptures”, and “mightily convinced the Jews”, Acts 18:24,28.  The apostle Paul complained that he was hindered in his ministry by the immaturity of his readers, and he had to restrict what he said to them, 1 Corinthians 3:1-3.

5:12
For when for the time ye ought to be teachers, ye have need that one teach you again which be the first principles of the oracles of God; and are become such as have need of milk, and not of strong meat.

For when for the time ye ought to be teachers- it is the duty of those who preach and teach to do so with a view to preparing the next generation to pass on what they have learned.  The apostle Paul’s word to Timothy was, “And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also”, 2 Timothy 2:2. Judging by the time they had been saved, the Hebrews should have long ago developed as teachers.
Ye have need that one teach you again- they had forgotten what they had learned, and needed to be established in first things again.
Which be the first principles of the oracles of God- the oracles of God are the teachings from God found in the Old Testament.  The phrase is literally “the elements of the beginning of the oracles of God”.  So it is not even the beginning of the oracles that is in view, but the elements of that beginning.  The word elements was used of the alphabet, the rudimentary basis of all speech.  The oracles of God continue into the New Testament, the beginning of them was in the Old Testament, and it is the basic, foundational truths of God’s revelation that is in view here.  If the significance of Old Testament things had been more evident to them, perhaps there would not have been those amongst them who were inclined to return to Old Testament rituals.

5:13
For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe.

For every one that useth milk is unskilful in the word of righteousness: for he is a babe- the same sort of figure of speech the apostle Paul used in 1 Corinthians 3:1-3 just referred to.  The apostle Peter used this figure of speech in a different sense, for he encourages believers to earnestly desire the milk of the word as new-born babes earnestly desire milk, 1 Peter 2:2.  He is not advocating that we stay immature, but that we remain as those who strongly desire to learn from God.  Because the subject under discussion is Melchisidec, and he was king of righteousness, 7:2, the subject of righteousness will surely come up; but sadly the readers and hearers were immature in this.

5:14
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age- in contrast to being babes, the writer now speaks of those who have grown up.  For them, strong meat is an appropriate diet.
Even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil- he now defines those who are of full age; it is those who by exercise of conscience in the things of righteousness have matured, and are able to discern between good and evil.  For righteousness is the standard by which good and evil is known.  We see how important a knowledge of the things of God is, for it is needful so that we are able to lead moral lives.  It is important that the ministry of the word of God should address matters that are relevant to this great aim of living lives that please God.  Notice it is “by reason of use” that our senses are exercised; we must constantly exercise our spiritual senses, so that we do not get out of practice in the things of righteousness.  “Bodily exercise profiteth (to a) little: but godliness is profitable unto all things, having promise of the life that now is, and of that which is to come”, 1 Timothy 4:7,8.
The word “discern” has to do with distinguishing.  The words for good “kalon” and “evil”, (kakon), are very similar, so great care is even needed to distinguish them. Great care is needed, also, to distinguish between the good things of God’s oracles, and the evil things of man’s traditions in Judaism.

 

HEBREWS 4

HEBREWS 4

Survey of the chapter
Hebrews 4 continues the theme begun in chapter 2, namely, the movement of believers from earth to heaven, ably assisted by our captain who has led the way, 2:10, and who is our merciful and faithful high priest to support us when we are tempted, and the faithful Son over God’s house, ordering and administering for Him through His word to us.  The exhortations of chapter 3 were based on a quotation from Psalm 95, which described the attitude of the nation of Israel as they passed through the wilderness.  The emphasis in chapter 3 is on the failure of the majority, and the last verse quoted records God saying “They shall not enter into My rest”.

There is another way those words may legitimately be translated, however, as will be seen by reference to 4:3,5.  In these latter verses, instead of the impossibility of unbelievers entering into His rest because God says “They shall not”, the word is “If they shall enter”, meaning that the opportunity was open to some.  So when we come to chapter 4 we are thinking of true believers, who shall enter into rest.  There is still, however, the constant encouragement to the Hebrews to make these things good to themselves, since amongst them there were those in danger of apostatising.  They are reminded in verses 12 and 13 that the word of God that comes to them through the Son over God’s house is able to distinguish between mere profession and genuine faith.  This brings to an end the warning passage that began in 3:6.  In 4:14-16 the subject of the priesthood of Christ is resumed, as an encouragement to believers undergoing trial and temptation.

Structure of the chapter

(a) Verses 1-11 Entry into the rest of God.
(b)  Verses 12,13  Exposure of false profession by word of God.
(c) Verses 14-16  Encouragement to approach the throne of God.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE OF THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 4, VERSES 1 TO 11:

4:1  Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.

4:2  For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

4:3  For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.

4:4  For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.

4:5  And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.

4:6  Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:

4:7  Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.

4:8  For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.

4:9  There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God.

4:10  For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.

4:11  Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

(a) Verses 1-11
Entry into the rest of God.

4:1
Let us therefore fear, lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest, any of you should seem to come short of it.

Let us therefore fear- we are still in the warning passage that began in 3:6, so the Hebrews should realise the awful possibility of failure to enter in to what God had in store for them in Christ.  The wilderness was a testing-place for Israel, just as the world is for those who claim the name of Christ today.
Lest, a promise being left us of entering into his rest- the basis of the teaching of these chapters is the incident in the wilderness when Israel refused to enter into the land of promise.  Chapter 3 has concentrated on those who did not enter in, whereas this chapter will deal with those who do.  In Numbers 14:34 God spoke of His “breach of promise”, or His refusal to allow the people to enter in because they were unbelieving.  The expression means His refusal of them, not His unfaithfulness to His promise.
Now those who are allowed in are described, for there is a promise still left, it has not been withdrawn.  In chapter 3 the writer concentrated on the middle section of his quote from Psalm 95, which dealt with the failure of the people.  Now he emphasises the beginning and end of the quotation, which deals with God’s faithfulness in continuing to speak to the people day by day, and offering them the opportunity of entering into His rest.  The promise has been left, not only in Psalm 95, but also in the ministry of Christ to Israel.
Any of you should seem to come short of it- to come short of the rest is to not enter into it, just as many in Israel came short of entering into Canaan, for their carcases fell in the wilderness.  By saying “seem”, the writer is showing he envisages some may seem genuine but are not so.  Yet he says “seem to come short”, not “seem to be those who enter in.”  This is a reminder that he is referring to God’s knowledge of their hearts, as verse 13 will say.  They may appear to others to seem to be ready to enter in, but God sees that they come short.  The word for “seem” has the idea of opinion, so it is God’s opinion of them that is in view. 

4:2
For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them: but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it.

For unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them- Caleb and Joshua came back from spying out the land of Canaan and told good news about its fruitfulness, and that God was able to give them the land if they trusted Him, Numbers 13:25-30.  The Lord and His apostles had also preached the good news of the kingdom of God, available to Israel on the basis of repentance and faith, as 2:3,4 has reminded them.  A great salvation was offered to them, and proofs of Christ’s ability to bring in the kingdom were shown, not only by the Lord Himself, but by the apostles as well.  Interestingly the proof of the goodness of the land of Canaan was the bunch of grapes that the spies brought back with them.  Significantly, the Lord Jesus began His miracle ministry by turning water into wine, showing He could bring in kingdom conditions, John 2:1-11.
But the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard it- despite the encouragement to trust in God that Caleb and Joshua gave to the people, they refused to go in.  They therefore did not profit from the good things in store in the land.  It is clear that the kingdom can only be entered by believers.  Nicodemus had to learn to come to an end of himself as a Rabbi and Pharisee, and find his all in Christ crucified.  Only when born again through faith could he be fit for the kingdom, John 3:1-16.  It was on the borders of the promised land that the brazen serpent was lifted up, so that those who were bitten by the serpent, and hence were in danger of perishing in the wilderness, could be given life, and enter the land.  It was the generation that had been spared the judgement of God on their forefathers for refusing the land that were given this provision, for they too were in danger of dying outside of the land.

4:3
For we which have believed do enter into rest, as he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest: although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.

For we which have believed do enter into rest- clearly the rest that is spoken of in these verses is that which God calls His own, but which He invites others to enjoy.  God can only rest in what His Son achieves for His glory, and so the rest here is Christ’s kingdom on earth, when He shall administer for God as His Firstborn Son.  This has been in view ever since chapter 1:6-9.  When Israel refused to enter into the land, God said, “As truly as I live, all the earth shall be filled with the glory of the Lord”, Numbers 14:21.  So He is determined to bring in the glory-conditions of the reign of Christ, despite the unbelief of many. He also described the people of Israel as those who had seen His glory, and His miracles which He had done in Egypt and the wilderness, verse 22.  The generation the writer to the Hebrews addresses had also seen the miracles and glory of the Lord, but many had refused Him.  Nonetheless He will still come to them and set up His glorious kingdom, and “the earth shall be filled with the knowledge of the glory of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea”, Habakkuk 2:14.
In principle, because true believers are born again, and are able to see or discern the kingdom of God, John 3:3, they enter in that sense into rest in the present.  It only awaits the manifestation of that kingdom for everything to be fully realised, and then they shall enter the kingdom of God when it is manifest, John 3:5.
The same idea is found in Hebrews 12:18, 22, where believers are said to have come, not to Mount Sinai, but Mount Zion.  To come to Mount Sinai is to come into the bondage of the law in one’s heart; to come to Mount Zion is to come to the freedom of Christ’s glorious kingdom in one’s heart.  It was not a question of coming physically to either mountain, but coming in soul.  “Do enter” is in the tense which signifies something is happening in the present.
As he said, As I have sworn in my wrath, if they shall enter into my rest- because He has put Himself on oath, and because that oath is based on the fact that He lives, (see Numbers 14:21), then it cannot be withdrawn.  What can be withdrawn, however, is the offer to those who, by not believing, show themselves unfit for the kingdom.  The idea of wrath is not to the fore here, but it was appropriate in chapter 3 where the unbelief of the nation is emphasised.
Although the works were finished from the foundation of the world- it is interesting to notice that in chapter 1, immediately Christ is spoken of as being introduced into the earth to reign, then His work as creator of heavens and earth is mentioned, 1:10.  Instead of mentioning this when speaking of Christ as the one through whom the worlds were made, in verse 2, it is mentioned in connection with the reign of Christ.  The writer here connects God’s rest with the creation week, for Scripture makes clear that one of the primary purposes of the creation of the world was that Christ might rule over it for God, so that His glory might be displayed.  Adam had been given this task, equipped with glory and honour in order to be effective, but he failed, as chapter 2 explains.  Only Jesus can rule the habitable earth for God.  When He comes to reign He will set up His throne of glory, and judge the nations.  Those who believe in Him from among Israel, and also those from the Gentiles who are sympathetic to them, shall inherit the kingdom “prepared from the foundation of the world”, Matthew 25:34.  As Moses had said long before, “When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.  For the Lord’s portion is His people; Jacob is the lot of His inheritance”, Deuteronomy 32:8,9.
So when God rested from His six days of creation-work, He did so because the scene was now set for His kingdom to be established.  Initially granting rule to Adam, He did so with a view to demonstrating that only His Son become flesh could function as ruler effectively.  And only those who are in relationship with Him shall have any share in that glorious rule.
We are not to think that the works are not yet completed, and that is why the rest is not yet entered.  The works were finished long ago at the beginning- it is man who is not ready.  The Lord Jesus is recorded as having worked seven miracles on the sabbath day, so there is a coming together in His ministry of the idea of rest, and the “powers of the age to come”, 6:5 margin.

4:4
For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works.

For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise- the foundation of the world and the seventh day are spoken of together, for “in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested on the seventh day”, Exodus 20:11.  The creating of heaven and earth as to its material was on the first day, and then the “all that in them is” was made in the ensuing period, ending with the sixth day.  There is no allowance here for millions of years between the making of heaven and earth in Genesis 1:1, and the subsequent days of 24 hours each.  In fact, the Lord Jesus spoke of the making of male and female as being “from the beginning of the creation”, Mark 10:6.
And God did rest the seventh day from all his works- by resting on the seventh day God established a principle which shall be true to the end of time in relation to the earth.  It is not in man’s best interests to work without a break.  One of the reasons why the nation of Israel was taken into captivity was their failure to observe the sabbath, especially in regard to the cropping of the land.  As they had not let the land rest once every seven years for four hundred and ninety years, then it was forcibly rested for seventy years whilst Israel was in Babylon, 2 Chronicles 36:21.

4:5
And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest.

And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest- the writer again quotes from Psalm 95, and links the rest spoken of there with the rest spoken of in Genesis 2:2.  He does not distract us by precise details of the place where the passage is found.  No doubt most of his readers knew where to find the words anyway.  He makes no apology for quoting from the early chapters of Genesis, believing them to be equally the word of God with the rest of Scripture, see 2 Timothy 3:15-17.
Having rested Himself on the seventh day, God invites men to rest with Him, but this cannot be while they are in unbelief.  Verse 4 speaks of God’s works, and this verse of God’s rest.

4:6
Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:

Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein- notice the “must”, for God is determined to have others resting with Him.  This is why the invitation is still valid, six thousand years after the finishing of creation.  He must bring it to pass for He has sworn by Himself to do it, for He can only swear by Himself, 6:13.
And they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief- Abraham was not invited to rest, because the conditions were not right at that time, for “the Canaanite was then in the land”, Genesis 12:6.  He, Isaac and Jacob dwelt in tents in the land, they were not settled there, Hebrews 11:9.  The first ones to have the gospel of a rest available were those who came out of Egypt under Moses.  Sadly, as chapter 3 has described, they refused to enter in, not because the rest was not available, but because of unbelief.  The word used in this passage for unbelief has the idea of disobedience. 

4:7
Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts.

Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time- this entry into rest is not available indefinitely, for the opportunity is limited.  The readers of the epistle might miss out if they were not alert.  “In David” means in the book of psalms, written a long time after the book of Genesis, and even the book of Numbers, which records the refusal of the land.  God has waited patiently for others to join Him in true kingdom-rest.  Even David did not bring in rest.
As it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts- ominously the hardening of hearts is brought up here again, and explains why there is such a delay in bringing in the rest.  It cannot be entered by those who have hearts hardened by unbelief, 3:12,13.  There must be the fleshy heart of one who is responsive to the word of God. God promises “And I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh”, Ezekiel 36:26. Note the connection between Ezekiel 36 and 37, and the new birth of water and the Spirit in John 3.  (See notes on John 3 for more on this).

4:8
For if Jesus had given them rest, then would he not afterward have spoken of another day.

For if Jesus had given them rest- the Greek word for Joshua and Jesus is the same.  The reference here, of course, is to Joshua, but the translation as Jesus does serve to highlight the meaning, that is, “Salvation of Jehovah”.  Joshua was originally named “Oshea”, but after he had been faithful in spying out the land, and in view of his leadership in taking the people in to the land, he was renamed by Moses.  Oshea means simply “Salvation”, but no doubt to avoid any misunderstanding as they entered the land, his new name reminded them that the salvation the land represented was of Jehovah, not Joshua.
Of course the Lord Jesus fills out the meaning of the name perfectly, for He Himself is the salvation of Jehovah.  See Matthew 1:21.  He is the captain of our salvation, 2:10.  Joshua was not able to rule for God and make the land a rest for God.  He was not even of the kingly tribe of Judah, nor did the nation possess all the land under his leadership.
Then would he not afterward have spoken of another day- clear proof that the rest was not gained through Joshua is seen in the fact that God spoke of the rest as in the future, long after the time of Joshua, in David’s day.

4:9
There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God.

There remaineth therefore a rest to the people of God- the conclusion of the matter is that there is still the opportunity of entering into God’s rest, as long as those concerned are genuinely the people of God, and not a mixed company, with some true and others false.  The word for rest used here is a different one, meaning “a keeping of sabbath”, thus fusing the ideas of rest and seventh day together. 

4:10
For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his.

For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works, as God did from his- not only does the word for rest used in verse 9 merge together the thought of rest and seventh day, but here the idea of rest and ceasing from work as on the sabbath day are combined.  This verse speaks generally of the principle that the one who enters rest does so because he has stopped working.  But the stopping of work is deliberate ceasing, not through force of circumstances; it is a deliberate and meaningful action.  The verse does not say that the rest is entered yet, but simply that it is logical to say that someone who has entered into rest has stopped working.  So the principle established when God ceased working in creation week, is now applied to believers.
But we should not miss the implication of these words, namely that while we wait for the rest to come we should be diligently working for God’s interests, just as God worked for His interests on the six days of creation.  The next verse speaks of labouring to enter into rest, for only those who work deserve rest.  It is not work in the Epistle to the Galatians sense, where the idea of working for salvation is dealt with.  Here, work is commendable, just as God’s work was on days oone to six of the creation week.

4:11
Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest, lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief.

Let us labour therefore to enter into that rest- this shows that the rest is still future, and not some vague spiritualising of Scripture.  The idea in the word labour is that of diligence.  The whole epistle is designed to encourage diligent attention to Divine things.  To be yoked to a rabbi was to learn from him and practice what he practiced.  To be yoked to Christ is to do the same.  The more we learn of Him, the more we shall enter into the rest He gives. The kingdom age will be the manifestation of the glory of the Lord, and the more we learn of His glory now, the better fitted we shall be not only to enjoy spiritual things now, but to be fit for the kingdom in a day to come.
It is interesting to notice that it was at that critical point in the ministry of Christ when the nation were increasingly rejecting His word, that He offered rest to those who would come to Him, Matthew 11:25-29. But He also spoke of those who took His yoke upon them, (and this implies work), finding rest. As they gave diligence to enjoy the rest He gives, they would find rest, the rest that God enjoys.
Significantly, Matthew next records the incident where the disciples are criticised by the Pharisees for plucking ears of corn on the sabbath day, Matthew 12:1-9. The Lord refers them to an incident when David, the anointed king of Israel, (but a king pursued by his enemies), had eaten of the showbread from the tabernacle. Said He, “That in this place is one greater than the temple”, for His presence in the cornfield had sanctified it, and the corn had become as good as showbread. Such shall be the conditions when Christ reigns, for common things will become holy. See, for example, Zechariah 14:21, where even the cooking pots will be as holy as the golden plate on the high priest’s mitre. By plucking ears of corn the disciples, unwittingly, were “finding rest”, and “entering into rest”, and eating of the “old corn of the land”, Joshua 5:11.
Lest any man fall after the same example of unbelief- note the distinction between the people of God of verse 9, and any man, the latter word being used because profession is still being tested.  Those who fall would be illustrated by those who fell in the wilderness under the judgement of God, 3:17.  They illustrate the fall of those who have the kingdom presented to them, yet refuse it through disobedience.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 4, VERSES 12 TO 13

4:12  For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any twoedged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

4:13  Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.

(b) Verses 12,13
Exposure of false profession by word of God.

4:12
For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

The warning passage that is just finished exhorted the Hebrews to be responsive to the word of Christ as it came to them, and not harden their hearts when they heard it.

The word of God is the great test when the question of true or false profession is under consideration.  The following scriptures will make this clear:
“If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free”, John 8:31,32.
“He that is of God heareth God’s words: ye therefore hear them not, because ye are not of God”, John 8:47.
“But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.  My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me”, John 10:26,27.
“We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us”, 1 John 4:6.

For the word of God is quick, and powerful- the word of God is living and energetic, such is the statement here, and reminds us of how the warning passage began, even with the idea of the word of the Son, and the appeal to hear His voice, 3:6,7.  The word is “logos”, meaning the word of God as one whole body of truth, as opposed to particular parts of the scriptures.  The living word is able to expose dead profession, and the energetic word is able to expose a lack of zeal and diligence.
And sharper than any two-edged sword- the swords of men only act upon the physical body.  No matter how sharp they are they cannot reach the soul.
Piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit- probing deep within, the word of God tests profession, whether it is just the emotion of the soul, or the genuine response of the spirit in obedience to the word of God. Some see in this the proof that soul and spirit are distinguishable but not separable. It cannot be the case that they are not separable, since scripture speaks of souls going to sheol, but spirits going back to God, Psalm 16:10; Ecclesiastes 12:7.
And of the joints and marrow- these are the innermost parts of our body, which translate our intentions into action.  Just as the word can divide between the non-physical parts of us, so it can separate between the physical parts that are in fact united together closely.
Our joints are vital if our body is to be serviceable and active.  But our marrow is just as important, if not more so, for we can survive without some limbs and joints, but if the marrow of our bones is not functioning as it should, the whole body is affected, and even life itself.
The point is that the word of God is able to divide between that which is purely to do with action, and that which has to do with the life that enables and prompts the action.  The word of God is able to tell whether any particular activity is mere formal religion, or the exercise of one who has life from God.
The reference to that which is connected with the bone structure may be a reminder that the wilderness was strewn with the bones of those whose carcases had fallen in the desert.  Every lifeless bone was the sign that a spiritually lifeless Israelite had died.  This is why the cleansing of the red heifer was needed, Numbers 21, for it had to do with defilement through touching a bone or a grave.
And is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart- this is the test for the genuine believer, as to his motive for labouring.  The word discerned signifies that which criticises, assesses and analyses the activity in the heart, the innermost part of man, out of which are the issues of life, Proverbs 4:23.  Just as our physical heart pumps out blood saturated with oxygen, so that life may be maintained, so the moral counterpart of our being causes the spiritual life to flourish.  There is a connection between the marrow and the heart, inasmuch as the marrow ensures a good supply of fresh blood cells, and also removes unwanted dead cells.
The thoughts of a man, and the intentions based on them, are alike known fully by God.  He looks not on the outward appearance, but on the heart, 1 Samuel 16:7.  The majority of Israel allowed their thoughts to be influenced by the ten unfaithful spies.  They then signalled their intention to enter the land by force when it was not God’s will.  Both thoughts and intentions were wrong, Numbers 13:31-33; 14:40-45.

4:13
Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of Him with whom we have to do.

Neither is there any creature that is not manifest in His sight- this discernment of the soul, spirit and body of man, even to the extent of knowing his thoughts, applies to all men; none is exempt.  Note the subject is now God, not the word of God, but the word is the means by which men are opened up to God’s view.
But all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do- not only is the external covering of man no barrier to God’s eye, but He can penetrate deep within, as the first part of the verse has said.  Not only does God constantly look to assess us, but He keeps account, for the latter phrase here may be translated “with whom is our account”.  Perhaps, if this “word of exhortation”, 13:22, was originally spoken in a synagogue, there would be white-robed Pharisees listening, who needed to be reminded that outward things count for little with God; what matters is the state of the heart.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS CHAPTER 4, VERSES 14 TO 16:

4:14  Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.

4:15  For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.

4:16  Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need. 

(c) Verses 14-16
Encouragement to approach the throne of God.

The passage 4:14-5:14 deals in general with two things, first, 4:14-16, how our high priest enables us to succeed where Israel failed, then, second, 5:1-14, how Christ succeeds as high priest where Aaron failed.

4:14
Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession.

Seeing then that we have a great high priest- in chapters 3 and 4 we have seen how Christ acts as God’s apostle, bringing the word of God to bear upon the hearts and consciences of the people.  (It was especially as a prophet with direct access to God that Moses was described as faithful in all God’s house, Numbers 12:6-8).  But Christ is high priest as well, and this is emphasised from now on.  He is great because of the glories described in chapter 1.  He is high because He is over His people as a man over men, as chapter 2 showed.  He is great morally, He is high officially.  In chapter 2:9 He is seen crowned with glory (official), and honour, (moral).
It was declared before His birth that He would be great, Luke 1:32, and so it has come to pass.  He is great as prophet, Luke 7:16; as priest, in this passage; as king, Matthew 5:35. He is great because He is Firstborn Son of God, He is high because He is over God’s house.
That is passed into the heavens- the word for passed here means “to travel a road which leads through a place”.  The whole passage from chapter two has had the passing of the believer through this wilderness world in view, and how he may navigate through it successfully.  But Christ is our Captain, our file-leader, blazing a trail through this world, and so successful has He been that He has arrived in heaven.  The road He travelled here only had one destination, and He has safely arrived.  As He Himself said, “I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world: again, I leave the world, and go to the Father”, John 16:28.  His coming forth involved His apostleship.  His going to the Father involved His priesthood.  Really speaking, the heavenly ministry of Christ begins with this verse, and extends until the end of chapter 10.
Jesus the Son of God- He is still known as Jesus in heaven, even as He Himself indicated to Saul of Tarsus when He said, “I am Jesus whom thou persecutest”, Acts 9:5. But He is Son of God, the Firstborn charged with administering all things for God’s glory; in this instance, the ministry of priesthood.  As Jesus we may be assured of His sympathy, as Son of God we may be assured of His competency.
Let us hold fast our profession- He is the apostle and high priest of our profession, and we are encouraged to hold fast by the fact that it is He who is central to our faith.  This is a strong appeal to those who were wavering.  What greater incentive could there be to continue with Christian things, than that He is in control, and gives character to everything?  It was a feature of many in Israel that they did not hold fast or firm the profession they had made by coming out of Egypt under Moses.  The result was tragic, as we have seen, for instead of holding fast they let go.  The priestly ministry of Christ has as one of its objects the support of those who waver, lest they let slip by the things they had heard, 2:1.

4:15
For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin.

For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities- the sentence begins with “for”, and gives the reason why we should hold fast.  Notice the two negatives here- “we have not…who cannot”.  We should not immediately turn these into a positive, for if we do we shall lose the point of the argument.  The thought is that our situation is not the same as Israel’s, for they had a high priest who was unable to sympathise with the people, being compassed with infirmity.  The implications of that fact are described in 5:1-3.  We are in a better position, therefore a greater responsibility rests upon us.
Notice He is not said to be touched by our infirmities, but by the feeling of our infirmities.  In other words, without sharing in sinful infirmities, He draws upon His experience of temptation, in which He met with, and resisted, the temptation to sin.  He knows the feeling that believers have when infirmities tempt them to sin.  Again we must emphasise that He does not have the infirmity, but from outside of Himself came incitements to sin, which found in Him no response at all.  Because He resisted these fully, He has felt the pressure of them beyond all others.
We could think of the illustration of a sea wall. One section is built far beyond specifications, with the best quality materials and workmanship.  The adjoining section is built below specifications, with second-rate materials and poor workmanship.  Which section of the wall will feel the pressure of the storm most? Clearly, the fault-free section, for the other will give way easily.  So Christ, fault free in every sense, has withstood to the utmost, and therefore has felt the force of the storm of temptation beyond anything we shall know.  So the writer does not say He is touched by the feelings we have because He had what caused those feelings Himself, but because He was tempted.
In His temptation every aspect of a man’s attitude to God was tested.  He can be tempted in all points, because He has been made in all things like unto His brethren, (the word “points” is the same as “things” in Hebrews 2:17), and thus He suffers as a real man.  Although His temptations are over, He has taken His sympathetic heart to heaven, and fully knowing what our trials are like, can minister just the help we need.
Are we tempted to doubt God’s goodness?  He has been tempted by the Devil in that regard.  His suggestion that Christ should turn a stone into bread carried with it the implication that His Father had not been caring for Him enough.  The promise to the Messiah was “I will be to him a Father, and he shall be to me a Son”, Hebrews 1:5, but the Devil suggested that the Father had not been true to His pledge, and had left His Son without resources.  God had provided for multitudes of Israelites for forty years in the wilderness, yet His own Son had only been there for forty days, and there was no food!   Later on in the ministry of the Lord Jesus, He would point out that fathers do not give their sons stones when they ask for bread, Luke 11:11, yet here was the Son Himself, surrounded by stones, yet He had no bread!
What a trial this was, far greater than the temptation that had come to Adam with regard to food, for he was surrounded by a plentiful supply.  He did not need to eat of the forbidden fruit to save himself from starvation.  There was no dissatisfaction in the heart of the Lord Jesus, however, for He had better food than material bread.  Every word which proceeded out of the mouth of God was valued as His necessary food.  There had come no indication from the scriptures on which His soul fed, that He should turn a stone into bread, and thus He was content.  So absorbed with the word of God was He, that it is only after the temptation that He hungered physically.  By basing His reply to the Devil on God’s word, and especially since the quotation begins, “Man shall not live”, He clearly indicates that this victory over temptation can be ours as well as His, for we can all insert our name where the word “man” occurs.  He does not assert His Divine authority and say, “Verily, verily, I say unto you”, but simply quotes what is already written, as we may do. When we are tempted to doubt God’s goodness, we should cry for help, and He will show us in God’s word those things that demonstrate the reality of God’s goodness to us.
We also may be tempted to double-mindedness in relation to God, eager to worship and serve Him, but at the same time attracted to the glamour of this passing world  To those thus tempted, and who come to Him for help, there is the example of Christ’s resolute determination to serve God with undivided heart, and an equally resolute determination to resist the Devil.  Satan had tried to position himself between Christ and His Father, but the Lord would not tolerate this, and commanded the Devil to get behind him, clearly refusing to bow down to him.
The kingdoms of this world will one day be Christ’s, Revelation 11:15, but He will receive them from His Father, Psalm 2:8, and not from the Devil.  Those who triumph in this aspect of temptation do so because they rest in the
purpose of God.  How great would the Devil’s victory have been if he could have given the world to Christ without Calvary!
Then again, we may be tempted to wonder whether God’s promises are really true, and begin to doubt Him.  This temptation has come to our Saviour as well, but His firm rebuff to the Devil we may take up too, “Thou shall not tempt the Lord Thy God”. His word should be enough for us, just as it was for the Lord Jesus.  So the Lord refuses to cast Himself down from the pinnacle of the temple simply to see whether God’s word is true or not.
God’s provision, God’s purpose, God’s promises- is there anything not covered by these three? Christ has been tempted in all points like as we are, and we may overcome as He overcame, by the right use of the Word of God, as we are led by the Spirit of God in ways that glorify God.
What He is said to be touched with the feeling of is our infirmities, or manifestations of lack of strength. But here again, we should not assume that He sympathises with these because He had infirmities Himself.  It is true that Paul gloried in his infirmities, so they are not necessarily sinful, but still it is not the case that Christ possessed them.  Paul’s infirmities, by which is meant bodily weakness and ailments, were a direct result of the fall of man in Adam, and the consequent subjection to vanity that came with it.  The Lord Jesus did not share in the results of the fall, even as to His body.  He was not begotten of Joseph, thus He has no link with fallen humanity, either morally or physically.
Matthew tells us that when the Lord Jesus healed the men and women of His day, there was a partial fulfillment of the words of Isaiah 53:4.  In that passage the prophet describes the Messiah as One who “hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows”.  When Peter alludes to this in 1 Peter 2:24 he quotes it as “He bare our sins”.  This is the ultimate fulfillment of the words, but Matthew is concerned with their partial fulfillment, and so prefaces his reference to Isaiah 53 with the words “That it might be fulfilled”, and then quotes Isaiah with the words, “Himself took our infirmities and bare our sicknesses”.
This might seem to indicate a final fulfillment, until we remember that there are three ways in which quotations from the Old Testament are introduced by writers in the New Testament.
Where the Greek word “ina” is used, then it is “in order that it might be fulfilled”, and the prophecy has been finally fulfilled.
Where the word “tole” is found, then it is “was fulfilled”, and indicates that the event was merely a case in point, and what happened was an illustration of what was said in the prophecy, and it might be “fulfilled” in that way on another occasion.
Where the word “opus” is used, as is the case in Matthew 8:17, it is “so that it might be”, and the fulfillment is not complete, but an event which was within the scope and intention of the prophecy.
So Matthew is not saying that sins were borne during the life of the Lord Jesus, but he is saying that there was an event that was included in the scope of the prophecy of Isaiah, but which did not exhaust its meaning.  So when the Lord Jesus healed a person, He took upon Himself, in deep sympathy, the griefs and sorrows which that illness caused him, so that instead of the ill person bearing those sorrows, the Lord Jesus bore them for him.  Coupled with this, virtue or power went out from Christ to heal the disease that caused the sorrow, see Luke 8:46.  In this way He is touched, even now, by the feeling of our infirmities.  Remember, He is the Creator of men, and therefore is able to understand perfectly the difference between what He made man at the beginning, and what sin has made him to be now.
The Lord Jesus healed all manner of diseases, Matthew 4:23, and the power of the Lord was  present to heal all who were sick, even Pharisees, Luke 5:17.  The miracles that are recorded in detail are those that present to us some spiritual lesson, and illustrate some particular sinful condition of man.  For instance man is blind, unable to perceive the truth of God, deaf to the voice of God, dumb in the praise of God, lame as to the ways of God, defiled as to the holiness of God, and so on.  Those that are recorded in detail, however, are but a sample from the full range of disease that was dealt with by Christ.  There was nothing too hard for the Lord to deal with.
Remember also the pains of Calvary, for death by crucifixion was designed to inflict the most possible pain, for the longest possible time, in the most varied ways possible.  If anyone knew pain, it was our Saviour, especially since none of His senses was dulled by sin, unlike ordinary men.
There are not only body-infirmities, however, but weakness of mind and spirit.  Can He be touched by these, even though He had no weakness of mind or spirit?  Indeed He can, for He has been tested in body, soul and spirit.  His mental sufferings on the cross were of the extreme kind.  Who else has been forsaken of His God?  And He the Son of God in His bosom eternally!  There could be no greater trauma than this, than to cry unto God and to receive no answer, as if He were like those who regard iniquity in their heart, Psalm 66:18.  And to be separated from God, as if He were like those whose sins have hidden God’s face from them, Isaiah 59:2.
Even in His life He knew sadness because of the sin and unbelief of men; disappointment when His disciples made such slow progress in Divine things; grief as He wept over the city that would soon reject Him, and condemn itself, as a consequence, to be levelled to the ground.
Think of the grief of heart when His loyalty to God, His desires to be subject to Divine purpose, His confidence in Divine promises, were all called into question by the Devil in the wilderness.  How true was Isaiah’s word, He is a Man of Sorrows, and acquainted with grief.  But in all this He sinned not.
But the question remains as to how exactly our High Priest sympathises with us if He does not have what we have?  The answer is that it is precisely because He is apart from sin in any shape or form, that He is able to support, succour and save us from a position of strength.  It is not drowning men that save drowning men, but those who throw them a life-line whilst firmly standing on the rock.

But was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin- We must be very careful when considering the subject of the temptation of the Lord Jesus.  In our earnest attempt to understand it, (insofar as it is possible to do so), we must remember the uniqueness of His person.  He is the Son of God, and as such is not able to sin, or else God is able to sin.  When He took manhood, He did not cease to be what He always was.  Scripture teaches  that He who is in the form of God took upon Him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men.  Note that He took the likeness of men upon Himself as one who is in the form of God.  He added manhood to His Deity.  He did not modify His Deity to accommodate His manhood.  He now possesses two natures, yet remains one person.  Now it is persons that sin, not natures, so because He remains the same person He ever was, then for that reason He is not able to sin.  Because He remains God, like God He cannot be tempted with evil, James 1:13, for it holds no attraction for Him at all.  He does not have to weigh up the situation and make a decision whether to give in or not- for Him, sinning is not an option.
He is not able to sin for a related reason also.  When He came into the world, the Son of God expressed the resolve to do God’s will, Hebrews 10:7.  The fact that He did indeed perform the will of God perfectly, is not only known by His own testimony, “I do always those things which please him”, John 8:29; “I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do”, John 17:4, (and if it were not so He would have told us, John 14:2), but also from the fact that He has returned to the throne from which He was sent, and has sat down there with Divine approval, Hebrews 10:12.
It may be objected that the Lord Jesus did certain things which it is not possible for God the Father to do.  He slept, (But “He that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep”, Psalm 121:4), He hungered and thirsted, (but God needeth not anything, Acts 17:25), and He died, (but God is from everlasting to everlasting, Psalm 90:2; the Living God, Acts 14:15).  Christ did indeed experience these things, but He did so, not because His Deity was weakened or modified, but precisely because He was God, and as such could will to do these things.  It was part of what He willingly accepted when He became man.
We are told by those who believe that Christ did not sin, but could have done so, that He needs to be like that to relate to His people, who are capable of sinning.  The people of God, however, are born of God, and as such do not practice sin as a habit. 1 John 3:9.  They do, alas, commit sins, but they do so when acting after the flesh, and God does not look on His people as if they are in the flesh, but in the Spirit, Romans 8:9.  When believers commit sins they need, and have, an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the Righteous One, who pleads the value of His work at Calvary.
It is true that the statement, “Jesus Christ could not sin”, is not found in Scripture.  But the truth is certainly found there, and it is implied overwhelmingly by the whole doctrine about Christ and His Person.  Is it realistic to suggest that a person who could sin would be able to pass through this world with all its temptations, be assailed by the wickedest, cleverest force for evil in the world, even the Devil himself, and not succumb?  Also, if He could sin when on earth, how are we sure that He cannot sin now?  His condition has changed, it is true, but His person has not; if He could sin then, He could sin now.  This is unthinkable.
He was tempted in all points like as we are, “yet without sin”. This latter phrase may be misunderstood. “Without sin” means what it does in Hebrews 9:28, namely “apart from, cut off from, sin”.  When Christ comes again, He will not re-open the question of sin, for He dealt with that effectively by His first coming.  He will come totally separate from any notion of dealing with the sin of his people, but will have only their salvation before Him.  It is the same in connection with temptation.  It is not just that sin is absent from Christ, although that is true, but rather that He distanced Himself from sin in all its forms, cutting himself off from any notion that sin may be trifled with, and indulged in.  Now it is precisely because He did this, that He is in the strongest possible position to help us in our temptations, for He strengthens us to distance ourselves from sin too.

4:16
Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace, that we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need. 

Let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of grace- Because we have a High Priest like this, there should be a consequence, indicated by the “therefore”. His being far away in heaven does not mean He does not touch us, nor that we cannot touch Him, for we may freely approach the throne upon which He sits.  We should come with boldness to God’s throne, for it is a throne of grace and not of judgement for us.  Upon that throne is One who is for us, not against us, our sympathising high priest, and those resources which we need to enable us to overcome temptation are available for the asking.  He will show us from the Scriptures the way in which He met temptations, and so we shall be saved from falling.
Note it is a throne we approach, a place of stability and authority, where one sits who is in complete control of every situation.  It is the throne of grace, for there is no other throne that can be described thus.
That we may obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need- the priesthood of the Lord Jesus comes in when we are in danger of giving way to temptation.  Like Melchizedec, who brought bread and wine to Abraham to strengthen him before his trial with the king of Sodom, Genesis 14:17-24, Christ ministers to us the truth as to His triumphant life, (the bread), during which He successfully resisted all temptations.  He also imparts to us the truth as to His triumphant death, (the wine), when He not only resisted unto blood, striving against sin, Hebrews 12:2-4, but also died for our sins, 9:14.  By these means our souls are strengthened for the conflict.
But He succours as we come to the throne where He is, knowing that there is abundant mercy for the asking.  He is not like the priest in the parable, who passed by on the other side instead of showing mercy, Luke 10:31.  We need mercy or pity, because we are weak and failing at best, and when we acknowledge that, and do not try to act in our own strength, we may obtain the mercy.
We may also obtain what we seek for the present need, for the time of temptation is the time of need.  Every time when we have need of support in temptation we may find it in Christ.  The word find implies that we specifically seek for specific help; as He Himself said, “Seek, and ye shall find”, Matthew 7:7.

 

 

Miracles

Many today claim to be able to work miracles of one sort or another, and many more claim to be endowed with the sign-gifts that believers had in apostolic days.  These claims often cause doubts and anxieties to arise in the minds of believers who do not possess such abilities.  In the light of this, we do well to turn to the Scriptures of truth, so that we may be given guidance on these important and pressing issues.

DEFINITION OF MIRACLES
Miracles have been defined as “works of a supernatural origin and character, such as could not be produced by natural agents and means”.  W.E.Vine, Expository Dictionary of New Testament words.  They are exceptions to normal events, which occur due to the intervention of a power beyond natural power.
We must beware of devaluing the word miracle by using it of happenings which are simply out of the ordinary, or merely coincidences, or take place at a particularly opportune moment.  We must also beware of labelling as miraculous, events which would have occurred anyway.  An example of this would be illnesses that are known to go into remission naturally.  An event does not become a miracle because it is an answer to prayer.

WONDERS
The apostle Peter coupled three words together in the phrase “miracles and wonders and signs”, Acts 2:22.  The second of these words expresses the effect the miracle had upon those involved.  At best, in the case of miracles wrought by Christ and the apostles, those around would be constrained to believe on the Lord Jesus.  As He said in John 14:11 “Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me: or else believe Me for the very works’ sake”. (Note that belief in Himself is the goal in each case; it is not “believe Me or else believe the works”).  At worst, there were those who responded to Christ’s miracles by wanting to make Him king simply because He could multiply loaves.  He withdrew from such, John 6:15.

SIGNS
This word reminds us that the miracles had a lesson to teach, they had sign-ificance.  They were not simply acts of mercy and compassion, but doctrine made visible in vivid ways.  We see this especially in John 6, where the Lord’s long discourse on the Bread of Life is based on His miracle of feeding the five thousand.
Summarising, we may say that a miracle is an event beyond the normal, with an effect beyond the usual, giving expression to things beyond the natural.

SATAN’S COUNTERFEIT
We must always remember that Satan is able to imitate God’s work to a certain extent, as Moses and Aaron discovered in Exodus 7:11,12,22.  See also 2 Timothy 3:8,9.  This will come to a climax at the end times, when the Lawless One is revealed “whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders….” 2 Thessalonians 2:8,9.  Note that in this case the wonders are lying wonders, for they do not further the truth of God, but rather, the Devil’s lie.

A WORD OF WARNING
The current obsession in charismatic circles with happenings which are out-of-the-ordinary is conditioning professing Christians to look for exhilarating experiences, instead of being built up by the exposition of the Word of God.  It is part of Satan’s New Age strategy to influence the minds of men so that they give themselves over to spirit forces, and so further his end.  His object is to draw believers away from the written revelation of the Word of God, and attract them to “spiritual” experiences.

THE MIRACLES OF CHRIST
Christ’s miracles were a witness to His own person.  Those performed by the apostles witnessed to His person, too.  They were certainly not performed to bear witness to themselves.  See Acts 3:12; 14:8-18.  They also were one of the ways in which God confirmed certain vitally important truths, as we shall see.

(I)    THE WITNESS TO HIS PERSON AS THE SON OF GOD
John chapter 5 contains Christ’s first public discourse as far as John’s record goes.  Significantly, it concerns His Deity, and is preceded by the healing of the impotent man on the Sabbath day.  The Lord Jesus establishes His authority for healing on the day of rest by saying “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work”, verse 17.  The Jews understood very well what He was claiming by this statement, even “That God was His (own) Father, making Himself equal with God”, verse 18.
Later, in John 5:31-39, the Lord Jesus spoke of four witnesses to His person, these being John the Baptist, verse 33; the works which the Father had given Him to finish, verse 36; the Father, who bore witness at His baptism, verse 37; and finally the witness of the Old Testament Scriptures, verse 39.
So the works which the Father had given to Christ to do were a testimony to the genuineness of His person, that He was indeed the Son of God.  Hence John appeals to them in John 20:31 as the reason why men should believe.
The apostle Peter also appealed to the miracles and wonders and signs performed by Christ, but his purpose was to show that He was approved of God, Acts 2:22.  So whether it is a question of His person or His character, the matter is settled when the testimony of the  miracles is received.

(2)    THE WITNESS TO HIS PERSON AS THE CHRIST, OR MESSIAH OF ISRAEL
Not only did John record the miracles of Christ that we might believe that He is the Son of God, but also that we might know He is the long-promised Christ, or Messiah, John 20:31.  The prophets had told of the Messiah as one who would come to bring in what the Jews called “the age to come”, when He would reign over them from Jerusalem.  Hebrews 6:5 describes the miracles of Christ as the “powers of the world (age) to come”.  Isaiah had written that in the time of the kingdom, “the eyes of the blind shall be opened, and the ears of the deaf shall be unstopped.  Then shall the lame man leap as the hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing, Isaiah 35:5,6.  The fact that these things did indeed happen when Christ was here, is proof positive that He is the Messiah. 
So the miracles Christ did were not only expressions of compassion, but powerful and indisputable witness as to who He was.  So confident is the apostle John of this witness, that, guided by the Spirit of God, he bases on it his appeal to his readers to believe that Jesus is the Christ, that no less a gift than eternal life may be theirs.

THE MIRACLES OF THE APOSTLES AND OTHER SIGN-GIFTS

(I)    CONFIRMATION OF CHRIST’S PRESENCE IN HEAVEN
The resurrection and exaltation of Christ was confirmed by  things that could be seen and heard, Acts 2:32,33.  The seen things were the tongues of fire that sat upon each of the apostles.  The heard things were the spoken tongues or languages which the apostles were miraculously able to use when speaking to the foreign Jews who had gathered at Jerusalem for the Feast of Pentecost.
Note that Peter quotes from Joel 2 in his address on that occasion, not because all the events that passage mentions were coming to pass then, but because Joel spoke of the gift of the Holy Spirit, and also the opportunity to call upon the name of the Lord for salvation.  Those two things, the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, and the salvation of some in Israel, were what were relevant at that time.  Note also that Peter does not quote from the Old Testament passage which expressly speaks of tongues, namely Isaiah 28:11, because that was not so appropriate at that time.

(2)    CONFIRMATION OF THE PREACHING OF THE APOSTLES
The prophecy of the Lord Jesus in Mark 16:17,18, was that certain signs would follow them that believe.  What had been foretold indeed came to pass, for when Mark summarises the book of the Acts for us in verses 19 and 20, he writes in the past tense, and then ends with the words “confirming the word with (by means of) signs following”.  So the signs manifested in apostolic days were a confirmation from the Lord in heaven that what was preached was indeed God’s word.
With this agree the words of Hebrews 2:1-4, where the writer identifies three lines of testimony.  First, that of the Lord Himself when here, as He spoke of “so great salvation”.  Second, when those who heard Him confirmed to others what they had been taught, and third, when God bore witness to both these testimonies by enabling signs and wonders to be performed, giving added proof that what the apostles preached was of God.

(3)    CONFIRMATION THAT NON- JEWS HAVE RECEIVED THE HOLY SPIRIT
Apart from the initial pouring out of the Spirit on Jews only in Acts 2, there were certain groups that were dealt with separately by God, because they were special cases.
The Samaritans.  These were potentially a cause of friction amongst the believers, if they allowed the enmity between themselves and the Jews to spill over into their new life in Christ.  “The Jews have no dealings with the Samaritans”, John 4:9.  Hence in Acts 8:14-17, Peter and John are sent to Samaria to personally and directly lay hands on those who had believed from amongst the Samaritan nation, that they might receive the Holy Spirit after a delay.  That delay was not normal, since the moment a person believes and receives the gospel the Holy Spirit is given.  We know this from Galatians 3:2, where the apostle indicates that the Spirit is given when a person hears in faith.  (The indwelling of the Spirit of God is never presented to us in the New Testament. as something that can be earned, but rather the gracious gift of God the moment true faith is exercised).  But the Samaritan situation was not normal, given the bad relations between the two nations, so an unusual procedure was followed. And because the apostles themselves laid hands on the Samaritan believers that they might receive the Holy Spirit, they did not need confirmation of the fact, and therefore we do not read that the Samaritan believers responded by speaking in tongues.  They may have done so, but we are not expressly told.
The Gentiles.  Peter had needed a vision from the Lord to convince him that it was indeed the Lord’s purpose to call Gentiles to faith.  He had taken certain believers with him on his visit to Cornelius in order that they might be fellow-witnesses of what took place.  This was a wise precaution, for afterwards Peter was criticized for his actions.  These fellow-believers who companied with Peter were astonished that upon the Gentiles the Holy Spirit had been poured out, Acts 10:45.  But how did they know this?  Verse 46 begins with “for”, they knew they had received the Spirit “for they heard them speak with tongues, and magnify God”.  Hence, again, the speaking in tongues is audible proof of the gift of the Holy Spirit.
The disciples of John.  In Acts 19, the apostle Paul came across disciples of John the Baptist, who did not know that the Holy Spirit had been given at Pentecost.  Having heard of the Lord Jesus from Paul, they believed and were baptized.  Having received the Holy Spirit by the laying on of his hands, they spoke with tongues and prophesied.  No doubt this was a great encouragement to them, confirming that they had been right to cross over from allegiance to John to faith in Christ, a step John would have encouraged, see John 1:35-37; 3:25-30.

We see then that various special groups are dealt with by God in ways that are not regular.  Since they are special cases, they do not provide precedents for today.  Believers today receive the Holy Spirit the moment they believe, and do not need any to lay hands on them before this can happen.  Nor is the supposed speaking in tongues of some today, any evidence that they possess the Spirit of God.  After all, the devil-worshipping “Whirling Dervishes” of the Middle East utter sounds indistinguishable from modern tongues-speaking!

(4)    CONFIRMATION OF JUDGEMENT UPON UNBELIEF
God had warned Israel of the penalty of unbelief, namely that a foreign power would carry them away, and they would hear strange languages spoken by their captors, Deuteronomy 28:45-51.  He warned the people of the same danger in Isaiah 28:11.  The judgement fell when the Assyrians took the ten tribes into captivity.  Paul, in 1 Corinthians 14:21,22, used these Scriptures to show that tongues-speaking was a sign from God to those who believe not, just as the “tongues-speaking” of the Assyrians had been to unbelieving, idol-worshipping Israel in Isaiah’s day.

SUMMARY
Clearly the things that are confirmed by the gift of tongues were new at the time.  The gospel of a crucified and risen Christ; His ascension to heaven; the pouring out of the Spirit on the Gentiles; the particularly grave sin of rejecting a Saviour who had been received back into heaven, these were all fresh and different matters, and God graciously confirmed their reality by the exhibition of miracles. Once this confirmation has been done, it does not need to be repeated, or else doubt is cast upon the original confirmation, and upon the Scriptures which record it.
It is an historical fact that sign-gifts did cease.  Chrysostom, the well-known “church father”, was unable to find them practised in his day.  The onus is upon those who claim to perform miracles and speak in tongues today, to prove from Scripture that their return at the end of the age is to be expected. They should also offer evidence that what they do is identical in character to the signs of the apostolic age, and is accompanied by a strict adherence to apostolic doctrine and practice. 

THE NATURE OF THE SIGN GIFTS                                                Miracles and other signs did have an important role to play in the days when the record of the New Testament was not complete.  They are listed for us in three passages.  In Mark 16:17,18, we read of the casting out of demons, speaking with new tongues, taking up of serpents, drinking of deadly things without harm, and the laying of hands on the sick, so that they recovered.  Further on, in 1 Corinthians 12:8-10, we find mention of the word of wisdom, the word of knowledge, faith, gifts of healing, working of miracles, prophecy, discerning of spirits, divers kinds of tongues, and the interpretation of tongues.  A further two, namely helps and governments, are found in 1 Corinthians 12:28.

God never wastes time or energy on mere entertainment.  Each of these gifts had great usefulness.  A brief notice of each will make this clear.  The gifts of Mark 16:17,18 are mentioned in connection with the command of the Lord Jesus to go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature.  It is no surprise, then, to find that they are especially of use in pioneer evangelism.

(I)    GIFTS OF USE IN EVANGELISM
When God embarks upon a new phase in His dealings with men, Satan is always ready with his opposition, which often takes the form of demon activity.  This, however, was no problem to an evangelist penetrating a new area with the gospel, for he could cast out demons, being gifted to do so. He had no language problem, either, for he could speak with new tongues.  By ” new” is meant “unaccustomed”; that is, the one speaking was not used to the language, it was not his native dialect.  It does not mean new in the sense of newly-invented.
Hacking his way through the jungle, he inadvertently disturbs a sleeping cobra.  But this is no problem, either, for he can handle serpents!  Thirsty and hungry from his exertions, he drinks contaminated water, and eats the fruit of a poisonous tree, yet comes to no harm.  He finds himself in a clearing, where malaria-ridden natives huddle in their mud huts.  Imagine the effect upon these poor souls as he touches the untouchable, and they instantly recover.  What an introduction for the evangelist as he brings to them the gospel!
Notice that this man does not need to learn a language, or take a course in a school of tropical medicine, or learn botany, to prepare him for his mission, for he had been gifted by God.  But where is the missionary today who is so fitted?  He does not exist, for the simple reason that these gifts have been withdrawn in the wisdom of God.

(2)    GIFTS OF USE IN THE ASSEMBLY
The gifts mentioned in 1 Corinthians 12:8-10 are useful too, but most of them in connection with the gatherings of God’s people, as again we might expect given the context in which they are found.

THE GIFTS OF WISDOM AND KNOWLEDGE
How valuable a word of wisdom would have been in those early days when so many new things were happening, and before the scriptures of the New Testament were written.  Of course there was the written wisdom of the Old Testament, but it was not always relevant to the new conditions prevailing at that time.  So, too, the word of knowledge, insight directly from God on a particular, and perhaps strictly local problem.

THE GIFT OF FAITH
The tremendous challenges of those days would need to be met by men with the gift of faith, who could “move mountains” so that the work of God could go forward.  Needless to say, this faith is not saving faith, which is the common possession of all the people of God.

THE GIFTS OF HEALING AND MIRACLES
There were those with the gift of healing, (but with no mention of the laying on of hands), who like Paul in Acts 19:11,12, could heal from a distance.  This gift is distinguished from that of working of miracles, for whereas healing was a beneficial thing, sometimes miracles of judgement were necessary to preserve the testimony, as in Acts 5:5-11 and Acts 13:8-12.  The raising of the dead would also be classed as a miracle, rather than an act of healing.

THE GIFT OF PROPHECY
The gift of prophecy, or the forth-telling of the mind of God, was vitally necessary if the saints were to be built up in Christian doctrine.  The believers could not open their Bibles and find, say, Ephesians 3, for it had not yet been written.  Nor could the apostles be everywhere at once to personally teach the saints.  Hence the man gifted with insight into the mind of God filled a very real need.

THE GIFT OF DISCERNING OF SPIRITS
In those days there was no lack of imposters, and in order that the companies of the Lord’s people be not infiltrated by these, this gift was very necessary, so that the fraudulent might be kept out.

THE GIFTS OF TONGUES AND INTERPRETATION OF TONGUES
In the pioneer situation envisaged above in connection with Mark 16, the interpretation of tongues was not needed, for those addressed would all be of the same tongue.  The same would be the case on the Day of Pentecost, for each nationality could gather round the particular apostle that was miraculously speaking their language.
In the assembly gatherings at Corinth, however, there might be several languages represented in the one company, especially as Corinth was a cosmopolitan city, and near to the sea-port of Cenchrea.  If a brother began to speak the truth of God in the language of one of these groups, the fact that that group could testify to hearing their own language spoken accurately, (even though the speaker did not know the language), was in itself part of the object of that gift; it was a sign that God was at work.  But all things, according to 1 Corinthians 14:26, must be unto edifying, and so far only the minority that knows the tongue has been edified. There needs to be, then, the interpretation of that particular tongue, for the benefit of the rest.

THE GIFT OF HELPS AND GOVERNMENTS
As time went by, there would arise administrative needs such as distribution to the poor, so it was very necessary for some to be gifted with practical and organisational skills to enable this to be done without the work of preaching being held up.

THE EXERCISE OF THE GIFTS
A reading of 1 Corinthians 14 will show clearly that the gifts, particularly of prophecy and tongues, were to be exercised with dignity and restraint.  For instance, the maximum number allowed to speak in tongues during a meeting was three, verse 27, and that by course, or one after the other.  The spectacle of large numbers of people all speaking with tongues at the same time, would raise questions as to their sanity, verse 23.
The situation was similar with regard to the gift of prophecy.  Verses 32 and 33 make it clear that those who were gifted in this way did not abandon self-control, (which after all is a fruit of the Spirit, Galatians 5:23), but in an orderly and becoming way they edified the gathered saints.  If a revelation was given to a prophet sitting alongside the current speaker, then the latter was well able to hold his peace and defer to the other.
 “Let all things be done decently and in order”, is the final word of the apostle in chapter 14, for “God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints”, verse 33.  It is sadly true that many gatherings of those who claim to possess these gifts today, have not been notable for orderliness or dignity.  This raises serious doubts as to the validity of what they claim.

“THE TORONTO BLESSING”
The current obsession with this phenomenon is a very grave matter.  Far from being a repeat of apostolic practice, there is every indication that earnest, unsuspecting souls are being subjected to hypnosis in the name of Christ.  If this is what is happening, then it is outrageous, because the unbelieving public looks on, and finds that what they think of as Christianity, is represented by those who seem intent on making fools of themselves, instead of preaching Christ.

It is said that 90% of the population can be hypnotised without much difficulty.  Any run-of-the-mill secular hypnotist can induce feelings of being washed clean, of peace, of tingling sensations, of feelings of energy passing through the body, of seeing bright lights and so on.  He can make people lay down, go stiff, laugh uncontrollably, and also heal minor ailments like migraine and back pain. And all this without the power of the Holy Spirit at all!  Just unbelievers hypnotising unbelievers!

The methods by which these things are done in the world are in principle the same as are used in charismatic meetings.  The persuasive voice of the leader; the mind-numbing use of repetitive music; the exhortations to relax and give way; the encouragement to look for an experience which the leader assures everyone is about to come; the testimonies of those who have had the experience before; all these things combine together to produce a situation where almost everything can happen under the control, and touch, of the plausible master of ceremonies.  And all in the Name of the Lord!

THOU SHALT LOVE THE LORD THY GOD WITH ALL THY….MIND
It is highly dangerous for believers to abandon reason in favour of feelings.  The service of God is to be “reasonable service”, Romans 12:1, intelligent action as a result of a careful understanding of what God requires, as detailed in His Word.
We are NEVER called upon to abandon rational thought-processes, and give ourselves over to the influences abroad in the world.  Satan is determined to control the minds of men, so that they willingly do his bidding.  His strategy is to alter the state of a person’s consciousness, so that he may introduce a new set of perceptions, and cause the old values to be rejected, paving the way for the ultimate deception, the lie that the Antichrist is Christ.
Any supposedly Christian activity, therefore, which displays so many of the classic features of hypnotism, and which encourages the abandonment of reason, is highly suspect.

THE ALTERNATIVE
What alternative is there then, to the practices of the signs and wonders movement?  The answer is simple- the Scriptural alternative.  The apostle Paul makes clear in 1 Corinthians 13 that whereas prophecies, tongues and knowledge come to an end, faith, hope and love do not.  This is true whatever the phrase “that which is perfect” means.  The cultivation by the believer of these three cardinal Christian virtues will result in steady growth in Christ-likeness, which surely must be the main aim.

The apostle also makes clear in Ephesians 4 that the ascended Christ has given gifts to His people, which will ensure that they all “come…unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ”, Ephesians 4:13.  The gifts Christ has given are apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers.  Through their ministry the end-result God is looking for, even likeness to His Son, is certain to be achieved.

May the Lord revive His people, so that they once again have a love for His Word, and an earnest desire to put it into practice, to His glory alone.

THE BURNT OFFERING: PART 4

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE BOOK OF LEVITICUS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 14 TO 17

1:14  And if the burnt sacrifice for his offering to the Lord be of fowls, then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves, or of young pigeons.
1:15  And the priest shall bring it unto the altar, and wring off his head, and burn it on the altar; and the blood thereof shall be wrung out at the side of the altar:
1:16  And he shall pluck away his crop with his feathers, and cast it beside the altar on the east part, by the place of the ashes:
1:17  And he shall cleave it with the wings thereof, but shall not divide it asunder: and the priest shall burn it upon the altar, upon the wood that is upon the fire: it is a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the Lord.

SECTION 3    VERSES 14-17        THE OFFERING FROM THE FOWLS

1:14  And if the burnt sacrifice for his offering to the Lord be of fowls, then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves, or of young pigeons.

We now come to the third section of this interesting chapter.  If the bullock represents Christ in relation to the Father, and the sheep and goat emphasise His own exercise, then the birds would suggest Christ’s relation to the other person of the Godhead, namely, the Spirit of God.  In the very first mention of the Spirit, in Genesis 1:2, He is spoken of as “moving” or as the marginal rendering is, ‘fluttering’; so at the very beginning of the Scriptures He is spoken of under the figure of a bird.

Again, when a new world emerged from the waters of the flood, the dove was sent forth by Noah, and at first found no rest for the sole of her foot, but at last the waters of judgement receded and she returned no more; for the earth was now a suitable place for this clean bird.  The Spirit of God can only find rest in conditions in harmony with His Person, which is why the unbeliever cannot receive the Spirit of God; John 14:17.  Not until faith is exercised, and God creates anew, 2 Corinthians 5:17,18, are there fit conditions prevailing, enabling Him to dwell within the heart of the believer.  This was a lesson that Noah needed to learn, for it was not until the dove was happy with her surroundings that Noah was permitted to step out onto a new world.  All the time that the raven, the bird delighting in flesh, was satisfied, Noah was to remain in the ark.  Once the dove had indicated that suitable conditions were present, Noah could remove the covering of the ark on a significant day, namely, the first day of the first month.

These things are full of lessons for the believer.  Just as the “old world” was not spared, but rather “being overflowed with water, perished” 2 Peter 2:5; 3:6, so as far as the believer is concerned, “old things are passed away,” 2 Corinthians 5:17.  Swept away, so to speak, by the floods of Divine wrath against sin which Christ endured Psalm 88:7,16.  Just as Noah was able to step out into the new world that had emerged from the waters of the flood, so the believer enters into a new position in Christ, where new things that are of God are found.  Just as the new world of Genesis 8 was to be filled with the savour of a burnt sacrifice, so the believer is to live a life of self-sacrifice, or as the apostle puts it in 2 Corinthians 5:15, “they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto Him which died for them and rose again”.  Noah took of every clean beast, and every clean fowl and offered them upon the altar.  That which is clean in its nature, and that which finds the new creation congenial, can fittingly be consecrated to the service of God.

It was not only upon the new world that the dove found rest, but also on Noah and the ark.  In fact, there seems a special relationship between Noah and the dove, expressed, for instance, in Genesis 8:8, “he sent forth a dove from him”.  Again in verse 9, the dove “returned unto him into the ark…then he put forth his hand, and took her, and pulled her in unto him into the ark”.  Further on in verse 11, “the dove came in to him in the evening”.  So not only does the dove associate with the new world, but also with the one that found grace in the eyes of the Lord, and who was responsible for bringing others with him into conditions fresh and new.

There is another with whom the Spirit of God can associate happily, even Christ, who brings His people through death and judgement safely and introduces them to a new world of peace and purity.  See Romans 6:1-13; 1 Peter 3:18-22.

Let us notice some of the ways in which the Spirit of God is linked with the Lord Jesus.  Remember He shares Deity equally with the Father and the Son, a fact emphasised in Matthew 28.19 where new believers are to be baptised in “the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost”. Three Persons but only one name.  Not only is there a special relationship between the Spirit and Christ because of their Deity, but also as a man the Lord Jesus was in fellowship with the Spirit in a remarkable way.  Hence in Galatians 4:6 the Holy Spirit is described as the Spirit of God’s Son, and in Romans 8:9 as the Spirit of Christ.  There is no reason why the believer should not display the dignity of sonship, nor is there any excuse for lack of Christ-likeness, for the Spirit of God’s Son resides within, and empowers the Christian for a life which meets Divine approval.

There is a very marked contrast presented in Romans 1, for at the end of the chapter is a list of twenty-three of the gruesome iniquities of men, whereas at the beginning Jesus Christ is declared to be the Son of God with power, in accordance with the Spirit of Holiness.  How great is the difference between sinful man and that Holy One that was born amongst them!  One of the things that made the difference was that Christ and the Spirit were totally in harmony, whereas sinful men and the Spirit are totally at variance.

The whole of the life of the Lord Jesus was marked by holiness, total separateness from sin and its results.  Instead of the Lord looking down from heaven and concluding that there was none good and that they were unprofitable and filthy, He could look down upon Christ and not only say that He was well-pleased, but also signify it by the descent of the Holy Spirit in bodily shape as a dove, Luke 3:22.  In that scene beside the Jordan there is enacted a miniature of the history of the Saviour, for the descent into the Jordan, the river of judgement, is a preview of His descent into the waters of death and judgement at Calvary when that baptism for which He was straitened, was accomplished; Luke 12:50.  But then He came up straightway out of the waters, Matt 3:16, for when at last Christ would enter into death, it could not be that death should detain Him; as Peter said, “it was not possible that He should be holden of it,” Acts 2:24.  The grave must give up its conqueror “straightway”.  But then the heavens were opened unto Him at the Jordan, just as later they would open again to receive Him back in glory, 1 Timothy 3:16.  For, as Peter said again, “whom the heaven must receive,” Acts 3:21.  Consequent upon His return to heaven, He has prayed the Father, (and Luke says that Christ came up out of the waters of baptism praying), and He has sent another Comforter, even the Spirit of truth, John 14:16,17.  So whether it be the descending or the emerging, or being received by an opened heaven, or praying, each part of the baptism of Christ was a foreshadowing of glorious things that were yet to be.

Mention is made in all four of the Gospel records of this particular event in the life of the Lord Jesus, but it is characteristic of John’s approach that he records it as John the Baptist recalls it, and shows that the Deity of Christ is attested thereby.  John is heard saying “There standeth One among you, whom ye know not,” John 1:26, and by his use of the perfect tense for the word “know”, he indicates that their ignorance of Christ in the past was continuing into the present, but when he refers to himself and his ignorance of the Lord, he uses the pluperfect tense, thus putting his ignorance in the past but not continuing into the present.  What had changed John’s ignorance into insight?  Simply this, as he explains in John 1:33, that the God who sent him to baptise with water, also said that the One who would baptise with the Holy Spirit would have the Spirit of God descend upon Him and remain upon Him.  And this same One would baptise with the Holy Spirit.

Clearly, One who can administer a Divine Person, even the Holy Spirit, must Himself be a Divine Person.  Hence John says he saw and bare record.  That is, he saw the Spirit descending as God had said He would, and on the basis of that, he bare record of the implication that here was indeed the Son of God upon the earth amongst men.  Thus John the apostle records these things to further his God-given design of affirming the Deity of Christ.

Not only are there allusions to the connection between Christ and the Spirit to be seen in Leviticus chapter one, but also thoughts of resurrection also.  Firstly, the word for “dove” in the Hebrew is “yonah”, the direct equivalent of “Jonah”, (there being no ‘J’ in Hebrew).  Jonah was the prophet singled out by the Lord Himself as being a sign; for just as Jonah had been three days and nights in the whale‘s belly, so He, the Son of Man, would be three days and nights in the heart of the earth, Matthew 12:39,40.  Doubtless there are contrasts between the Lord Jesus and Jonah, especially with regard to Jonah’s disobedience, but nonetheless there are comparisons.  We must not forget in this connection the Saviour’s words, “a greater than Jonah is here” Matthew 12:41, meaning Himself.

Thus we find that Jonah experienced the great tempest, being cast into the midst of the raging sea, Jonah 1:15.  Christ also endured the tempest of Divine wrath, saying in the language of Psalm 42:7, “all Thy waves and Thy billows are gone over Me”.  And because He was afflicted with all God’s waves, the believer can say “there is no condemnation,” Romans 8:1.

Not only did Jonah experience the storm, and was subsequently “buried” in the great fish for three days and nights, but he was also brought out by God’s command and made to stand upon dry land again, thus becoming a figure of Christ risen.  As Jonah went to preach to the Gentile Ninevites and as he subsequently prophesied in Israel, he did so as a man who had gone through a death and resurrection experience, Jonah 3:3; 2 Kings 14:25.  So Christ, risen from the dead, has “preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh” Ephesians 2:17.   

We have already alluded to another Old Testament character who had a special association with the dove, namely Noah.  We have noted that the dove could only rest upon either the olive tree, Noah, or the new and cleansed earth.  So much for the dove set free by Noah, but what of her six companions, Genesis 7:3?  We read that Noah builded an altar to the Lord and took of every clean fowl and offered burnt offerings on the altar, and the Lord smelled a sweet smell, or a savour of rest.  So at last the turmoil and upheaval of the sinful pre-flood day, is replaced by a scene of rest that satisfied God.

There is a special significance in the use of the word “rest” in the marginal rendering of the expression “sweet savour” and it is just this, that it is the word for Noah.  Now when Noah’s father gave him his name, he uttered a prophecy, saying, “This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the Lord hath cursed,” Genesis 5:29.  Again, the word for “comfort ” is “Noah”.  Thus he is marked out by prophecy as a rest-bringer and a comforter.  Whether Lamech knew how his son would live up to the name he gave him, we are not told, but certainly there was deliverance in a very real way from a sin-cursed earth by means of the ark which Noah by faith prepared.  Thus through Noah there came rest for God and man; for God in the sweet savour of a sacrifice which rose from an altar on a renewed earth, and for man, in the deliverance from the world of violence and sin which prevailed before the flood.

So too by Christ there is rest from sin and its consequences.  Comfort, also, for when the Lord Jesus promised the Spirit of God to His people He expressed Himself thus, “I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter,” John 14:16.  And the word He used for “another” means another of the same sort.  So that by implication Christ is the Comforter of His people.

It may be asked why the thought of resurrection is found in the burnt offering at all.  The answer is surely this, that acceptance for Christ as a man was not only denoted by the word from heaven at His baptism, and every evidence during His life that He was approved by the Father, but also by the fact that He was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, Romans 6:4.  The idea of acceptance for Christ in resurrection is a Scriptural one, for when the apostle Paul is speaking of the acceptance of believers in 2 Corinthians 6:2, he quotes from an Old Testament passage, Isaiah 49:8, which speaks of the acceptance of the Messiah.  Though God’s servant through whom He would be glorified, nevertheless the Messiah would seem to have laboured in vain and moreover would be despised by the very nation He came to bless.  But He would be vindicated in resurrection and the despised of men would be shown to be accepted with God.  The One for whom there was no help or salvation upon the cross, would be saved out of death in accordance with His prayer, see Hebrews 5:7.  He who is heard in Psalm 22 praying to His God but receiving no answer, is at last answered at the point in the Psalm, verse 22, where it breaks out into the triumph of His rising from the dead.  Thus salvation, help and acceptance are found by Christ in resurrection conditions; and so they are also for believers, since the verse that initially spoke of Christ is applied to believers.  In fact, the theme of acceptance, of receiving one another, of commending one another, runs throughout the Second Epistle to the Corinthians.  The present age is one in which those who believe may be brought into full acceptance with God, and that atmosphere of acceptance should mark the dealings of the Lord’s people with each other.

So the salvation and acceptance of the believer is inseparably linked to Christ’s acceptance at God’s right hand, and that epistle which especially mentions the idea of being “accepted in the Beloved”, is also the one where salvation is spoken of in terms of being quickened, raised and seated in heavenly places in association with Christ.  See Ephesians 2:4-8.  It is by grace believers have been saved from death in trespasses and sins and linked to Christ in a heavenly way.

In confirmation of this, we recall that it was just before Jonah was brought to dry land that he uttered, (no doubt anticipating deliverance), “salvation is of the Lord”.  Salvation for Jonah meant being delivered from the tempest, from the whale’s belly and from all their accompanying distress, by being brought safely to dry land.  So the believer is brought to the security of a standing before God in grace, Romans 5:2.  But only because he is associated with a greater than Jonah, who not only rose from the dead, but rose to heaven also.

Let us return to the offerer of Leviticus 1:14.  He has a choice, so will he bring the turtle-doves or the young pigeons?  He has no large bullock to bring, but he will bring that which he used great energy to obtain, for clearly a dove is not so easily caught as a bullock.  In that connection, note the specific mention in Matthew 21:12 of “the seats of them that sold doves”, which the Saviour in His zeal overturned.  “Seats” and “sold” do not go with “doves”, for the latter speak of spiritual energy and of that which money cannot buy.

Thus the offerer unashamedly brought the poor man’s offering, not because he was lacking in spirituality, but rather the reverse, for “God hath chosen the poor of this world rich in faith,” James 2:5.  His gift was a foreshadowing of that time when He who was so rich, should become so poor, 2 Corinthians 8:9.

Again we ask, which will the offerer choose?  Will he select the turtle dove, a summer visitor to Palestine, or the young pigeon, the resident in the land?  Whichever he chooses will speak of Christ, for was He not at one and the same time a visitor and a resident in the promised land?

We might well think of the days of the prophets as the days of decline, with dark shadows approaching, the autumn of Israel’s experience.  The days of Malachi were winter indeed, with no warmth of love to God from the masses of Israel, no growth of appreciation of His Person, no fruit to His praise, but rather cold indifference and the idleness of apathy.  But Israel’s spring came with the arrival upon the scene of John the Baptist.  He it was who echoed the cry of the Song of Solomon 2:8, “Behold He cometh!”  At long last the winter is past, the rain is over and gone, the flowers appear on the earth and the sure sign of approaching summer is heard, the song of the turtle dove, verse 12.  Truly as Jeremiah said “the turtle observes the time of her coming,” 8:7 and “when the fulness of time was come, God sent forth His Son,” Gal 4.4.

Thus the choice of the turtle dove would remind the heart of God of the time when His Son would be in the world, and a spiritual man who had “come from above” would be able to tell what He had seen and heard with the Father.  The “voice of the turtle would be heard in their land” and there would be a response in the hearts of some, who would, by receiving the testimony of the One from above, set to their seal that God was true, and to them, as to Christ, the Father would give the Spirit without measure, John 3:31-34.  Well might we worship the Father for such a Visitor as this!  And like the self-abasing Psalmist say, “What is.. the son of man, that Thou visitest Him?”

The pigeon was a resident in Canaan and especially common in the valley of the river Jordan.  But it was a dove from heaven that descended upon the Lord at His baptism in that river, for heaven’s smile was upon Him.  In a very real sense the Lord Jesus was at home in the Land of Israel, for it was the land promised to Abraham and to his seed in Genesis 12:7.  That seed was Christ, as Galatians 3.16 indicates, and hence the land belonged to Him because of the promise of God.  But Christ had another and a prior claim, for He is Jesus-Jehovah, and as such could say, “the land is mine”, Leviticus 25:23.  Therefore as the God of Abraham, and the Son of Abraham, the Lord owned the land- it was His home.  The tragedy was that when He came to His own (home), His own people received Him not, John 1:11.  Like Simon the Pharisee, they washed not His feet to refresh Him after His journey to them, gave Him no kiss of welcome and affection, and refused Him the anointing that would have indicated they thought Him to be the Messiah, Luke 7:44-46.  Just as in Simon’s house there was one who gave to Him these things, so in the midst of the nation there were those who received Him gladly and to them gave He the authority to take their place as children of God, John 1:12.

1:15  And the priest shall bring it unto the altar, and wring off his head, and burn it on the altar; and the blood thereof shall be wrung out at the side of the altar:

There is a measure of intelligence in this sacrifice which is not at first apparent if we only consider the physical size of the animal brought.  There was an appreciation by the supplier of this dove that God is not so much interested in quantity, as in quality.  This principle applies to every aspect of the service of the Lord.  See 1 Corinthians 3:10-15 for instance, or Mark 12:41-44.  Not that He disregards quantity altogether, but He is not pleased with quantity at the expense of quality.  The man is not embarrassed by the apparent smallness of his present, for he is coming to One who reads the heart and who sees not as man sees.  He has no reservations as he delivers the bird to the priest to bring to the altar.

There might be a measure of pride and boastfulness lurking in the heart of the one who brought a bullock, for he was publicly bringing what all would recognise as a valuable animal, especially in the midst of a desert.  But there would be no such conceit with the man who brought a dove.  As believers, we might well learn a lesson from this, lest whilst professing to minister to the heart of God, we are in fact ministering to our own ego.  Let us remember the words of the Lord Jesus as He quoted Isaiah’s prophecy “This people draweth nigh unto Me with their mouth, and honoureth Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me,” Matthew 15:8.  By drawing near in such a way they displayed a grave lack of priestly intelligence as to the requirements of God.  And was it not sadly true that even amongst the believers at Corinth there were those “who had not the knowledge of God”?  They had a very limited grasp as to who the God of Christianity really was.  Let us not forget that fundamental statement of God in Hosea 6.6, “I desired mercy and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.”  In other words, the attitude of heart and mind of the offerer is more important than the animal offered.  May the Lord deliver us from the hypocrisy of appearing to bring a large and impressive offering, when in fact our hearts are not enlarged in love to God and His Son.

The wringing off of the head of gthe bird is clearly the equivalent of the killing of the bullock or sheep before the Lord.  Having been wrung off, the head is burnt as incense upon the altar, by itself.  Moreover, the head of the bird is said to be dealt with by the priest, whereas with the bullock or sheep all the parts are spoken of as being cut up by the offerer.  Thus the head is physically separated by being wrung off, and is also separated from the rest of the bird by being burnt first.

This separation highlights the importance of the head of the dove, and the incense of the burning of the head gives character to the subsequent actions of the priest, for the sweet savour arises as he proceeds further with the ritual.

Isaiah chapter one speaks of the ox knowing his owner, and this is indeed true, for a bullock will recognise the one who habitually feeds it and works with it.  But the head-knowledge of a dove is of a different sort, for Jeremiah says that the dove “knoweth the time of her coming”, and the context shows he is referring to the marvel of migration.

But the insight of the pigeon is slightly different, for that bird has a homing instinct; so whereas the dove knows how to leave home, the pigeon knows how to go back home.  How like Christ these thing are!  For He left the Fathers’ House to come into this “world of woe”, and then left the world, and went back to the Father.  While He was here, the Lord Jesus displayed insight in four main areas: His knowledge of the Father, e.g. John 8:55.  His knowledge of men, e.g. John 5:42.  His knowledge of the Cross beforehand, e.g. John 18:4.  His knowledge of His going and its time e.g. John 8:14; 13:1.

See how this fits in with the dove of the burnt offering.  As the one who knows the Father uniquely, Christ lived down here upon the earth for the Father’s delight, and manifested those features which mark Him out as God’s Beloved.  And as we have seen already, it is as Beloved that He renders His believing people acceptable.

As One who knew the hearts of men, He came to earth so that on the Cross He might deal with their shortcomings, and place believers in a position of favour.  The work of the Cross was executed by One whose knowledge of the Old Testament was total.  This is not to say that He went to the Cross in any fatalistic or automatic way, but He was not satisfied until He could say “It is finished”, and the whole of the ancient prophecies relating to His death were fulfilled to the very letter.

Like the dove, He had known the time of His coming, for it was “the time appointed of the Father,” Galatians 4:1-5.  The book of Genesis had begun with a man, Adam, who was “figure of Him that was to come,” Romans 5:14.  And it had ended with the ancient patriarch foretelling that Shiloh would come, and exclaiming, “I have waited for Thy salvation O Lord,” Genesis 49:18.  The word he used for salvation being the equivalent to Jesus.  So all down the years the prospect of Christ’s coming sustained the hearts of His waiting  people; it was almost as if He was already on His way!  For did not Micah say that His goings forth have been from of old?  Micah 5:2.  He also said “from everlasting,”  and thus we learn that it has ever been in the heart of Christ to come into this world for the sake of His Father’s interests and ours.

Like the pigeon, moreover, He knew the time to go home.  Time and again in John’s Gospel we read the expression, “His hour had not yet come”, but as last He can lift up His eyes into heaven, as if with longing gaze, and say “Father, the hour is come” and “I come to Thee”, John 17:1,11.  His occupation, when back home, will engage our thoughts a little later on.

Before we pass on from this consideration of the head of the dove, let us not lose the lesson for ourselves in all this.  Believers are bidden to “present their bodies a living sacrifice”, this being their “reasonable (logical, intelligent) service,” Romans 12:1.  There is a great need for the Lord’s people to surrender their sanctified intellectual powers to God, that, instead of using them for personal gain and advancement in this world, they may be at His disposal to use in the furthering of His interests.  May the Lord challenge us in these things.

Too many of the people of God have apparently lost the ability to think, and have settled down into a passive acceptance of all that reaches their ears, whether from the platform or, alas, from the world.  This is a potentially disastrous situation, for by being in such a state we lay ourselves open to the attacks of the enemy.  We need to be “casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ, 2 Corinthians 10:5.  Let us “prove all things; hold fast that which is good,” 1 Thessalonians 5:21; seeking true nobility, like those of Berea, who “received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so,” Acts 17:11.

The greater amount of blood from the bullock is sprinkled round about upon the altar, to give, as we have suggested, the assurance at eye-level of the acceptance of the offering, and the offerer’s acceptance through it.  With the dove, of course, there will be less blood, but to counteract this it is wrung out at the side or wall of the altar.  In other words, the blood is put where it may be easily seen, despite its smallness in quantity.  Does this not emphasise to us that the effect of the blood is governed, not by its quantity, but by its quality.  This lesson is taught again in Leviticus 16, where to effect the atonement for the whole house of Israel Aaron sprinkled the blood with his finger. The blood that can be held on a finger is all that God requires.  And if this is true of the blood of an animal, how much more of the blood of Christ?  For the Scriptures are absolutely silent as to the amount of blood that was shed at the Cross, but they are very insistent as to its quality.  “The precious blood of Christ” is the word of 1 Peter 1:19, whilst Paul says “in whom we have redemption through His blood, even the forgiveness of sins: Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature,” Colossians 1:14,15.

Let us rejoice in the effects of the blood of Christ, which effects accrue because of whose blood it was that was shed at Calvary.  Let us not, on the other hand, be influenced by the school of thought which wishes to remove the word blood from the Christian’s vocabulary, and in particular, from the preacher’s.  Let there be no mistaking the fact that “without shedding of blood is no remission,” Hebrews 9:22; and “it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul,” Leviticus 17:11.  Whilst there should not be an over-emphasis on the more harrowing details of the crucifixion of Christ, nevertheless we should remember that it was a cruel and violent death that was meted out to the Son of God; but then, sin is cruel and violent.  Coupled with this, the life of the soul is in the blood, and His soul was poured out unto death.  Everything that touched the altar was to be holy, Exodus 29:37, and the fact that this blood did so touch the altar indicated its holy character.  We would do well, then, to only have holy thoughts about the blood of Christ.

1:16  And he shall pluck away his crop with his feathers, and cast it beside the altar on the east part, by the place of the ashes:

This most interesting operation is, of course, only carried out in the case of the bird-offering.  First of all we may notice where it is the crop and feathers of the bird are cast.  If in the case of the lamb, the killing of the animal at the north side of the altar is specially mentioned, then here we have the east part specified as being the place of the ashes.  If the north side was the place of the shadows, then the east part was surely the place of the sun-rise.  For the rays of the rising sun would first strike the east wall of the altar, which, in fact, was the side nearest to the offerer as he approached it.  It is not too difficult to relate the place of the sun-rising with the place of resurrection.  The words of Mark are interesting in this connection, “And very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun.” Mark 16:2.  Couple this with the fact made known by John that the garden-tomb was in the place where Jesus was crucified, 19:41, or to put it another way, was in the “place of sacrifice”.  Then we readily see that the sun is rising on the east wall of the altar, so to speak, and is lighting up the place of the ashes.  For the ashes were evidence that a sacrifice had been offered and were carefully deposited, with due ceremony, (Leviticus 6:8-11), firstly at the base of the altar, and then without the camp in a clean place.

Correspondingly, the body of the Lord Jesus was reverently taken down from the cross and laid in a new tomb.  And all this took place “without the camp” Hebrews 13:12,13.  So like the ashes in the ancient ritual, his body was not only associated with the place of death as it lay buried, but at the same time was disassociated from the uncleanness of the camp of Israel.

Thus the link is maintained between the Christ who died, and the Christ who was buried, and the link is formally broken between Christ and Judaism.  But not only was He buried in a garden, but having risen from the dead, He appeared to Mary in that garden.  And these are the very things that the apostle links together in 1 Corinthians 15:1-8, “Christ died…He was buried…He rose again…He was seen”.  There can be no gospel without the setting forth of these fundamental doctrines, and they who preach, yet ignore them, betray the Son of God again.  Beware of a so-called gospel which appeals to some supposed good in man, whilst forgetting that it was man that put the Lord of glory on a cross.

But returning to Leviticus chapter 1, we note that it was the crop and the feathers of the bird that were cast onto the place of the ashes.  Incidentally, the word “cast” is the same as is used of Jonah, (whose name as we have said means ‘dove’), when he was cast into a watery grave during the tempest.  So this further reinforces the idea of resurrection present in these verses.  For Jonah was the man who died and rose again, in a figure,  Matthew 12:39,40.

The crop of the bird is the receptacle that holds undigested food; that which has been received and taken in, but which has not yet been assimilated and turned into energy.  Has this anything to teach us about Christ?  His own words were, to disciples who had gone away into Samaria to buy bread, “I have meat to eat that ye know not of”, and again “My meat is to do the will of Him that sent Me, and to finish His work” John 4:32,34.

We learn then that what sustained the Lord Jesus in His pathway down here was His doing of the will of God.  When in the wilderness being tempted of the devil, He had fasted for forty days, and yet it was only afterwards that He felt hunger.  What sustained Him during those forty days without food?  The answer is found in the first response of Christ to the devil, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God,” Matthew. 4:4.  It was the Word of God which gave Him strength and energy.  The lesson for believers is clear- they shall only overcome temptation to the degree in which the Word of God is their spiritual food.

So Christ’s meat, his food, his bread, was to do the will of God, and all the instructions the Father gave to Him were taken into His very being and translated into energetic effort for the Father’s honour, so that He can say at the end of His earthly ministry “I have finished the work which Thou gavest Me to do,” John 17:4.  So that which spoke of food undigested, energy unused, was absent when the dove was laid upon the altar, to present us with a fitting picture of Christ.

There is more we may learn from this, however, for the crop was cast on the spot which suggests resurrection, the east of the altar.  Certainly the work of revealing the Father has been gloriously completed to God’s evident satisfaction, John 12:28, but Christ has taken up further ministry in resurrection manhood.  He serves still and in fact has taken the servant’s place for ever.

This present, unfinished work He hinted at to Mary, in the garden, near the tomb, near the “place of the ashes”.  Said He “I ascend (and the word is the direct equivalent of the word “ascending offering” as found in Leviticus 1), unto My Father and your Father; and to My God and your God,” John 20:17.  What does this statement mean?  Notice first of all, that the Lord Jesus does not say “Our Father”, “Our God,” but carefully distinguishes His relationship to God from that of believers.  Whilst the true believer has God for his Father and for his God, yet it is on an entirely different basis.  The Lord Jesus is the Son of God from all eternity, for in the Scriptures sonship involves the sharing of nature, and God’s nature is eternal.  God is love, and love must have an object to love, hence we may say that Christ, the Son of His love, is His eternal Son.  Believers on the other hand, are children of God by new birth, and sons of God by adoption, and because of this are able to call God their Father.  Thus we have the same Father as the Lord Jesus has, but on a different basis.

We have the same God, too, but again the reason is different.  The Spirit of Christ in the psalmist expressed Himself thus: “I was cast upon Thee from the womb: Thou art My God from My mother’s belly,” Psalm 22:10.  So from the moment of His taking manhood the Lord regarded God as His God, for He had come into a position of submission and dependence, and needed the support and succour of His God whilst down here.  There was never any suspicion of independence with Christ, for He ever relied in faith upon God.  In fact He is the Author and Finisher of the true life of faith.

How different it is with unbelievers!  From our birth we rebelled against the will of God, for the mind of the flesh is “not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be,” Romans 8:7.  How often we demonstrated that our will was contrary to God’s, going astray as soon as we were born, speaking lies, Psalm 58:3.  But then God intervened in mercy, and because of the person and work of His Son we were given a new place before Him, with a new nature which responds to His will.  The life of faith then began for us, and there was given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness.  The only true God had become our God and Father.

Something more is needed, however, for we need One in the presence of God who can maintain us in our new-found position.  And this One we have in our ascended Saviour, who represents His people before God, and ministers as Advocate and High Priest.  This word “advocate” is the same as “comforter,” thus the support that Christ gave His own as a comforter on earth is continued for us in heaven, for He is Jesus Christ the same yesterday, (on earth), today, (in heaven), and for ever.  How appropriate that this should be suggested in the dove section of the chapter, for the Holy Spirit of God, who appeared as a dove at Jordan, is ‘another comforter’; another, that is, of a same sort as Christ, John 14:16.

The Lord Jesus acts as a advocate in relation to the sins of His people.  Note, in 1 John 2;1, the word “if”, “if any man sin.”  Not when, as if it would be habitual, but if, as being occasional and unusual.  The believer is expected to have done with sins, 1 Peter 2:24 margin, but should, unhappily, the need arise, communion with the Father and the Son is restored by the advocacy of Jesus Christ the righteous.  Christians are stated to be by constitution those who, far from denying they have a sin-principle within, confess that sometimes they allow it to assert itself, and sin spoils their relationship with their Father.  They are assured, however, that upon confession, this fellowship is restored.  See 1 John 1:8-2:2.

The basis upon which this can happen is two-fold, namely, the person and the work of Christ.  His personal presence with the Father as Advocate, representing their cause, defending their interests, ensures forgiveness and restoration when they confess.  And, says the apostle, “He is the propitiation for our sins.  Not ‘He was’, but “He is”.  For the same One who at Calvary became the satisfactory sin-offering by which propitiation was made, is now in heaven to plead His people’s cause when the accuser of the brethren seeks to do his diabolical work against them.

So much for our relationship to the Father, but the Lord also said “I ascend to…your God”.  This involves His priestly ministry as set out in the Epistle to the Hebrews.  As a Great Priest over the House of God, a position granted to Him at His ascension, (see Hebrews 4:14; 5:6; Psalm 110:4,1; Acts 2:34; Hebrews 9:11,12), the Lord Jesus is engaged in a ministry of succour, Hebrews 2:18, sympathy, Hebrews 4:15 and intercession Hebrews 7:25.

With regard to the latter, the Scripture assures us first of all that as High Priest He continueth ever, for His priesthood is not transferable.  Not only will His priesthood never degenerate into the lower order of Aaron, but, in contrast to the high priests of Old Testament times, who passed on their garments of office at death, He shall never hand over to another, for He continueth ever.  We can absolutely rely on His unfailing support.  There is no limit to His abilities and He is able to save to the uttermost those that come unto God by Him; no extremity is too hard for Him to deal with.  What a contrast to Aaron in Leviticus 10:3, for faced with an extreme situation, Aaron held his peace!  Our High Priest ever liveth to make intercession for us.

Hebrews 7.26 says such an High Priest “became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens”.  It is these things that distinguish Him from all others and interestingly, these words are used of the dove as well.  The dove was suitable for sacrifice and was therefore holy; we are exhorted to be harmless as doves; The Song of Solomon describes the bride as “my dove, my undefiled”; and we remember that after the Flood the dove would have no contact with the debris of a judged world, and in that sense was separate from sinners; and finally, we remember the words of David, written in the year of Absalom’s rebellion, when he was forced to flee over the brook Kidron, up the Mount of Olives- “Oh that I had wings like a dove! for then would I fly away and be at rest”! Psalm 55:6.  A foreshadowing of the occasion when David’s Son and David’s Lord would cross that same stream, climb that same hill, and after death and resurrection, would be made higher than the heavens and be at rest on the right hand of God.

Whilst in one sense He is “at rest”, in another sense, He is very active, occupied with the ministry of advocacy and priesthood we have briefly touched upon, and He successfully maintains His people in the place of acceptance into which His sacrifice at Calvary has brought them

The feathers are the glory of the dove, its beautiful plumage giving it distinction.  Yet they have no place on the altar.  We know that when Christ the Messiah of Israel came to that nation, they saw no beauty in Him that they should desire Him, Isaiah 53:2.  He did not match their expectations of a ruthless warrior treading down their enemies and giving them peace and stability in the land of Israel.  Nonetheless He was “glorious in the eyes of the Lord” Isaiah 49:5, and there were a few believing souls who “beheld His glory,” John 1:14.  He had deliberately chosen a pathway of no reputation, having taken a servant’s form, Philippians 2:7.

The nation of Israel had chosen for their first king one who was head and shoulders above them, 1 Samuel 9:2, whereas God’s choice was one described as the least, 1 Samuel 16:11, margin.  Thus God’s thoughts are shown to be different to man’s, in this, as in all matters.  He delights in those who take the low place, and He “resisteth the proud, and giveth grace to the humble,” 1 Peter 5:5.

So the feathers, which drew attention to the dove, and gave it glory, are taken from it, to remind us of the One who humbled Himself even unto death, and that the death of the Cross with all its shame and abuse.  But from this lowest place Christ has ascended to the highest, and the apostle Paul describes that ascension in words from Psalm 68- “Thou has ascended up on high”.  And whether we regard the thirteenth verse of that psalm as referring to the comparative obscurity of the ark as it was kept in the house of Amminadab, amongst the common and everyday cooking pots on the grate, to be followed by a position of glory in a Temple adorned with silver and gold; or whether we adopt the marginal rendering “sheepfolds” and think of David’s humble occupation as a shepherd, followed by the glory of sitting on Israel’s throne, the principle is clear, that the once despised and lowly one is surely to be placed in a position of glory.  And just as when the sun shines on the plumage of a bird it brings out beauties which are unseen on a cloudy day, so hidden glories shall yet be seen in Christ.

When those glories shine forth in the earth, His “time” will have come, of which He spoke in John 7:1-18.  His brethren according to the flesh sought to suggest that He should show Himself to the world, but they were unbelieving, as verse 5 says, and hence were ignorant of the purposes of God.  For the hour of which the Saviour spoke so often in John’s Gospel, the hour of His suffering at the Cross, when He would drink the cup of wrath from God (c.f. Mark 14:35,36), must transpire, before the “time”, the period of His glorious reign upon the earth, could run its course.  Their time of opportunity for blessing was always at hand, if they would but believe.  In a world full of hatred for Him, Christ’s present work was to testify of its evil and to go to the Cross to bring this world-system to an effective end as far as God is concerned, John 7:7,33.

In John 7 the season was the Feast of Tabernacles, when Israel commemorated their journey through the wilderness and their arrival in the Land of Promise.  The festival was a foretaste of the glorious Millennial reign of Christ on the earth, when Israel’s wandering among the nations will be over and they will enter into the rest that God has prepared for them, Hebrews 3:7-4.11.  What more suitable time, it might be thought, for One Who claimed to be the Messiah to manifest Himself.  But Christ does not move and act in line with natural reasoning, but in harmony with the counsels of the Father; hence He goes up to the feast, not as one who makes a display, but rather, in secret, so that He had to be sought out, and men asked “Where is He ?”  Thus He demonstrated that far from seeking His own glory, He sought only that of the One who had sent Him, and by this was demonstrated to be the true Messiah with no unrighteous motives or self-interest, John 7:18.

There is an important lesson here for believers.  We are not to be occupied with self and its aspirations, but rather should actively seek the lowly place, for “before honour, humility”.  Let us humble ourselves under the Mighty Hand of God, that He may exalt in due time.  Let us learn from the heap of feathers on the ashes beside the altar.

1:17  And he shall cleave it with the wings thereof, but shall not divide it asunder: and the priest shall burn it upon the altar, upon the wood that is upon the fire: it is a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the Lord.

We draw our consideration of the burnt offering to a close by taking account of a very precious thing.  The animals used as burnt offerings were cut in pieces and exposed fully upon the altar in clear view of the offerer, and consequently the excellence of the animal was fully known.  With the dove the procedure is different, for whilst the process of dividing was begun, (cleave it with the wings), it was not completed, (not divide it asunder).

We rejoice to know that the love, devotion, and energy of Christ have been fully exposed at the Cross, and there brought into full display.  But we also rejoice to know that there are depths in the person of Christ that we shall not know because we cannot know.  His own testimony was that “no man knoweth the Son, but the Father,” Matthew 11:27.  For whilst the Father may be known as the Son reveals Him, with the Son it is not so.  The Father is simply God, but the Son is God manifest in flesh, and great is this mystery of godliness.

Shall we not be content to allow Divine Persons to enjoy their infinite knowledge of One Another?  For “The secret things belong unto the Lord our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever,” Deuteronomy 29:29.

    O precious Saviour, we now Thee adore,
    We praise Thy Name;
    The Lord from heav’n, where Thou wast e’re before;
    We own Thy claim.
    Beloved object of the Father’s heart,
    His own dear Son, Thou didst of flesh take part.

    Thy sinless manhood, holy, pure and right,
    Hath fitted Thee
    To do God’s Will, and in that Will delight,
    Well pleased is He!
    For Thee the altar was the goal in view,
    There Thou didst go, with purpose glad and true.

    There all was yielded as an offering
    Of savour sweet
    On our behalf – for we had naught to bring,
    Nor could God meet.
    Thou didst the north, in shadows occupy,
    But rose in glory, and went up on high.

    Thy Father’s heart is fully satisfied,
    Thou hast done well.
    Nothing remains to do, since Thou hast died,
    We joy to tell.
    Accepted in God’s Well-beloved Son,
    In Him we stand, Who all God’s Will hath done.

    May be sung as a hymn to the tune “Sandon”.

ROMANS 1:1-17

THE GOSPEL DEFINED

Concise Notes on the Epistle to the Romans 

 

The Epistle to the Romans is a masterly exposition of the doctrines relative to the gospel of God. Under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit the apostle Paul was guided to unfold those truths which it is necessary to know and believe in order to be reckoned right in the sight of God, and also to live a life which is righteous before God and before men. 

Central to this gospel is the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, by whom the work of redemption which is the foundation of the gospel was effected at Calvary. It was there that He died for the ungodly, and subsequently rose from the dead and ascended to heaven to intercede for those who believe on Him. 

No preacher should venture to present the gospel to sinners without first gaining a working knowledge of at least the first eight chapters of this epistle. No believer should seek to testify in a personal way without such a knowledge, either. And certainly no unsaved person should dare to enter eternity without first becoming acquainted with the saving truths this epistle contains. Since the moment of departure from this world is unknown to us, it is important to gain this acquaintance as a matter of great urgency.

“Because there is wrath, beware lest He take thee away with His stroke, then a great ransom cannot deliver thee,”  Job 36:18. 

 

Like the rest of the Holy Scriptures, the epistle to the Romans is structured and orderly. We would do well to consider the general scheme of the epistle by way of introduction, for it will help in understanding the truth contained therein.

The epistle as a whole may be divided into three parts, each beginning on a personal note from the apostle, and each ending with a note of praise:-

Chapters 1-8.

 

GOD’S RIGHTEOUSNESS IMPUTED. 

Personal note: “I am ready to preach the gospel”, 1:15

Key phrase: “Him that justifieth the ungodly”, 4:5.

Concluding praise: “For I am persuaded”, 8:38.

 

[Chapters 1-8 may be further divided into two major sections as follows:-

1:1 to 5:11 THE SINS OF THE PERSON

The remedy- the blood of Christ;

The result- redemption and righteousness. 

5:12 to 8:39 THE PERSON WHO SINS

The remedy- death, burial and resurrection of Christ;

The result- identification and assurance.]

 

 Chapters 9-11. GOD’S WAYS DEFENDED. 

Personal note: “I have great heaviness”, 9:2.

Key phrase: “His ways past finding out”, 11:33.

Concluding praise: “For of Him, and through Him, and to Him, are all things: to whom be glory for ever. Amen”, 11:36.

 

Chapters 12-16. GOD’S SERVANTS INSTRUCTED. 

Personal note: “I beseech you, therefore, brethren”, 12:1.

Key phrase: “Him that is of power to stablish”, 16:25.

Concluding praise: “To God only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen.” 16:27. 

 

ROMANS CHAPTERS ONE TO EIGHT MAY BE DIVIDED INTO FOURTEEN SECTIONS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1 ROMANS 1:1-17

The Person of Christ is central to the gospel

SECTION 2 ROMANS 1:18-32

God’s wrath against men as their Creator 

SECTION 3 ROMANS 2:1-16

God’s wrath against men as their Moral Governor

SECTION 4 ROMANS 2:17-3:20

God’s wrath against men as their legislator

SECTION 5 ROMANS 3:21-26

The work of Christ is central to the gospel

SECTION 6 ROMANS 3:27-4:25

God’s grace towards men as their justifier

SECTION 7 ROMANS 5:1-11

The glory of God is central to the gospel

SECTION 8 ROMANS 5:12-21

Christ and Adam compared and contrasted

SECTION 9 ROMANS 6:1-23

The believer’s past and present position

SECTION 10 ROMANS 7:1-6

Deliverance from the law

SECTION 11 ROMANS 7:7-25

Defence of the law and despair under the law

SECTION 12 ROMANS 8:1-17

Life in the flesh and life in the Spirit

SECTION 13 ROMANS 8:18-27

Present suffering and future glory

SECTION 14 ROMANS 8:28-39

Overwhelmed or overcoming

 

There is a great need in these days to recognise that the gospel is God-centred, and Christ-centred, and not sinner-centred. The apostles “ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ”, Acts 5:42. Having taught who He was, they were then in a position to preach that He should be believed in and relied upon. It would be a useful exercise to note the number of verses about sinners and the number of verses about Christ in the gospel addresses recorded in the book of Acts.

THE WORDS OF THE BIBLE, THE CHRISTIAN SCRIPTURES, AS FOUND IN THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS CHAPTER 1, VERSES 1 TO 17

1:1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, separated unto the gospel of God,

1:2  (which He had promised afore by His prophets in the holy scriptures,)

 1:3 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;

1:4 And declared to be the Son of God with power, according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead:

1:5 By whom we have received grace and apostleship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his name:

1:6 Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ:

1:7 To all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to be saints: Grace to you and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ.

1:8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.

1:9 For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers;

1:10 Making request, if by any means now at length I might have a prosperous journey by the will of God to come unto you.

1:11 For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be established;

1:12 That is, that I may be comforted together with you by the mutual faith both of you and me.

1:13 Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto,) that I might have some fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles.

1:14 I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians; both to the wise, and to the unwise.

1:15 So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also.

1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

1:17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed from faith to faith: as it is written, The just shall live by faith.

 

SECTION 1: ROMANS 1:1-17

THE PERSON OF CHRIST IS CENTRAL TO THE GOSPEL

STRUCTURE OF SECTION 1

The person of Christ in relation to:

1 (a) 1:1                   Paul.

1 (b) 1:2                  The prophets.

1 (c) 1:3                  The people of Israel.

1 (d) 1:4                  God.

1 (e) 1:5                  People of all nations.

1 (f) 1:6,7               The people of God.

1 (g) 1:8-12            Paul’s ministry.

1 (h) 1:13-15         Paul’s motives.

1 (i) 1:16-17           Paul’s message.

 
SUBJECT OF SECTION 1

Having introduced himself as the writer of the epistle, Paul goes straight into his theme, which is the gospel of God. He shows that this gospel was promised in Old Testament times as the prophets foretold the coming of Christ. He has now come, and is preached as being relevant to all men. Having assured the believers at Rome to whom he writes that he has a great desire for their blessing, Paul then asserts his strong belief in the ability of the gospel of Christ to save those who believe it.

1:1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ- as a servant-slave, Paul was captive to Christ’s will, ready to be told “what thou must do,” Acts 9:6. Called to be an apostle- appointed by Christ’s call, Galatians 1:1; an apostle is a “sent one,” sent out from the presence of his superior to do what he commands. Separated unto the gospel of God- commissioned for Christ’s service, and committed to it, Acts 22:21. Singled out, and single-minded.

1 (b) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO THE PROPHETS

 1:2 Which He had promised afore- since Christ is the subject of gospel, to promise Him, (as God did through the Old Testament prophets), is to promise the gospel. By His prophets- because they were His, they spoke for God with authority. “But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth of all His prophets, that Christ should suffer, He hath so fulfilled,” Acts 3:18. “And beginning at Moses and all the prophets, He expounded unto them in all the scriptures the things concerning Himself,” Luke 24:27. See also Luke 1:69,70. In the holy scriptures- the writings of Old Testament are holy, for they express God’s holy will, and are completely separate in character from all other writings, being utterly reliable and trustworthy; “the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspiration of God…” 2 Timothy 3:15,16.

1 (c) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL

1:3 Concerning His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord- as God’s Son, the Lord Jesus shares the nature of God the Father, see on verse 4. Jesus is the name He was given when He came into manhood to save His people from their sins, Matthew 1:21. As Christ, He is the Anointed One, the Messiah of Old Testament predictions, see 1 Samuel 2:10; Psalm 2:2; Daniel 9:25. As our Lord, He is the One whose will is sovereign, and to whom believers readily submit themselves, Romans 14:7-9. Which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh- was made means “having come”, the same word as Galatians 4:4, “made of a woman.” As One who is of the seed of David, the Lord Jesus is qualified to bring in a future righteous kingdom on earth, see Luke 1:30-33. But the three main principles of that kingdom will be “righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit”, Romans 14:17, and these also sum up the blessings that come to those who believe the gospel. The apostle is careful not to alienate the Jewish element amongst his readers, so reminds them that the line of David clearly reaches to Christ, as Matthew chapter one shows. In fact, “according to the flesh” may include the idea that even a unbelieving man might consult the temple records and see this to be true. But he is also careful to point out that since Christ has become flesh, He is relevant to all men, not just Israel. He became real man, and as such is God’s Ideal Man.

1 (d) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO GOD

1:4 And declared to be the Son of God- note the change of verb; not made, but declared, for He is ever the Son of God, sharing the Father’s eternal, unchanging nature. The Lord Jesus indicated in John 10:30,36 that to be Son of God was to be one in essence and nature with the Father. If He had meant anything less than this, the Jews would not have tried to stone Him for blasphemy. With power, according to the Spirit of holiness- the declaration of Christ’s Deity is a powerful one, and is made in relation to the Spirit of holiness. Views differ as to whether this is a reference to the Holy Spirit, or to the spirit of the Lord Jesus. If the former, then the Holy Spirit empowers the declaration, but if the latter, then Christ’s own spirit, marked as it is by holiness, and by which He communed with His Father, is set in contrast to His being of the seed of David according to the flesh, by which means He associated with men on earth. Note the contrast with the unholiness of the men described in the second half of the chapter. By the resurrection of the dead- not resurrection from among the dead, but the resurrection of dead persons, Himself included. See for instance, John 11:4. Every time a dead person was raised by Christ, when He Himself was raised, and when the dead are raised at the resurrection, there is a powerful testimony to His Deity. See John 5:17-31.

1 (e) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO THE PEOPLE OF ALL NATIONS

 1:5 By whom we have received grace- grace is unmerited favour, and believing sinners are shown this when they are saved from their sins; but there is a constant need for the believer to receive Divine favour, in order that the Christian life may be lived effectively. “without Me ye can do nothing,” John 15:5. And apostleship- grace is the common portion of all the people of God, whereas apostleship was granted to only a few, who must have seen the Lord Jesus personally, 1 Corinthians 9:1. Divine favour was needed by apostles also for the discharge of their responsibilities. Note the incidental testimony to the Deity of Christ in that the grace which elsewhere is said to be the grace of God, 1 Corinthians 15:10, is here said to be from Christ Himself. For obedience to the faith- one object of the preaching of the gospel is to bring men to an obedient faith in Christ. The person of the Lord Jesus is presented to men that they may believe on Him and submit obediently to His Lordship. Among all nations- the epistle emphasises the universal need of man to hear and believe the gospel. See also verse 13. For His name means for the good of His name. The object of the apostle’s preaching was not just that sinners might be saved, but that the name of God’s Son, Jesus Christ our Lord might be honoured.

1 (f) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO THE PEOPLE OF GOD

 1:6 Among whom are ye also the called of Jesus Christ- the preaching of the gospel is the means by which Jesus Christ calls men and women to Himself, that they might enter into the blessings which He obtained at infinite cost when He died upon the cross at Calvary. The call is not only to Himself, but also away from self and the world.

1:7 To all that be in Rome- as is clear from the next statement, this means all the believers in Rome. Beloved of God- they were the object of Divine affections. Beloved is a title of the Lord Jesus, telling of the active love of the Father for Him; here it is used of believers. “Thou…hast loved them, as Thou hast loved Me,” John 17:23. Called to be saints- this means that they were constituted saints or separated ones by the call of Christ, not that they were called to develop into saints, although it is true that believers are to perfect holiness in the fear of God, 2 Corinthians 7:1. All true believers are saints, or holy ones, as far as their standing before God is concerned, but their current state of holiness varies with the individual. Grace to you and peace- grace has been described as “the fount of all mercies,” and peace “the crown of all blessings.” Grace (“Charis”) was a Gentile greeting, whereas peace (“Shalom”) was a Jewish salutation. Here they are combined in the apostle’s greeting to all believers in Rome, whether Jew or Gentile. In Christ there is neither Jew nor Greek, Galatians 3:28. From God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ- a further testimony to the Deity of Christ in that Divine blessings come equally from the Father and the Lord Jesus.

 1 (g) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO PAUL’S MINISTRY

 1:8 Verses 8-10 emphasise Paul’s attitude Godward, verses 11-15 his attitude towards believers. First I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all- giving thanks through Jesus Christ for their energetic faith and testimony. Note that even a leading apostle needed the Lord Jesus as mediator between himself and His God. That your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world- living as they did in the capital city of the Roman Empire, they were in a good position to spread the gospel, and this they had done diligently.

1:9 For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of His Son- the preaching of the gospel is a spiritual activity, and nothing of man or self must be allowed to intrude into it. It is also a priestly activity, as the word for serve indicates, so the preaching must be with dignity and holiness, with God’s glory as the end in view. That without ceasing I make mention of you always in my prayers- it is just as important to pray for converts after they are saved as it is to preach to sinners so that they may be saved. Note the apostle prayed for these believers even though he did not know many of them personally. See 1 Samuel 12:23.

1:10 Making request, if by any means now at length I might have a prosperous journey by the will of God to come unto you- in the ordering of God he was prevented for many years from visiting them, see 15:23, with the result that we have the benefit of his epistle to them, in which he sets out what he would have said if he had come. Note he subjected his movements to the over-riding will of God.

1:11 For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift- the gifts he had were for the edifying of the believers, not the advancing of self, Ephesians 4:11,12. To the end ye may be established- sound doctrine is vitally necessary if believers are to be firmly grounded in the faith, Ephesians 4:13-16.

1:12 That is, that I may be comforted together with you by the mutual faith both of you and me- the apostle is at pains not to elevate himself above them. He would be comforted by evidences of their genuine faith, and so would they be comforted by evidences of his faith.

1 (h) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO PAUL’S MOTIVES

 1:13 Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you, (but was let hitherto)- he had been let, or hindered, from coming to them by his desire to fully preach Christ elsewhere. He was concerned to preach Christ where others had not, Romans 15:20-24. Those at Rome had heard from others, see Acts 2:10. That I might have some fruit among you also- fruit means results for God’s glory from the making known of His truth. A tree does not produce fruit for itself, but for its owner, so Paul sought glory only for God in his service. He could only be fruitful through Christ- “He that abideth in Me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without Me ye can do nothing.” John 15:5. Even as among other Gentiles- Paul was commissioned to concentrate on preaching to Gentiles, Galatians 2:9, Acts 22:21.

1:14 I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the barbarians- it did not matter whether men were cultured or otherwise, Paul was concerned to discharge his debt of obligation to preach the gospel to them, for Christ had died for them all. Both to the wise, and to the unwise- those who sought God through philosophy, or those who were unthinking, all had a claim on his time and attention. “for necessity is laid upon me; yea, woe is unto me if I preach not the gospel!” 1 Corinthians 9:16. Note that the gospel is for all sorts of men, of whatever nationality, culture, or natural ability. 

1:15   So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also- as far as it depended on Paul, he stood ready to preach in Rome, for the message of the gospel is urgent, and is also of universal relevance.

1 (i) THE PERSON OF CHRIST IN RELATION TO PAUL’S MESSAGE

1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ- the preaching of the gospel is foolishness to men, 1 Corinthians 1:18, but those who have been saved know it is nothing to be embarrassed about. “and whosoever believeth on Him shall not be ashamed,” Romans 9:33. For it is the power of God unto salvation- the men of the world are perishing all the time they refuse the gospel, whereas believers not only know initial salvation from sin and judgement when they receive the gospel by faith, but are constantly saved from the pitfalls along the way by that same gospel. To everyone that believeth- this is the principle on which God acts in His dealings with men. To believe and to have faith mean the same, namely a firm persuasion based on hearing the word of God. See later passages in this epistle, such as 4:1-8; 10:8-13. To the Jew first- in the rich grace of God, the very nation which cast out the Son of God and crucified Him, is given the first opportunity to believe in Him. “And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem,” Luke 24:47. And also to the Greek- by Greek the apostle here means non-Jew. Since the common language throughout the Roman Empire was Greek, the Gentiles were known as Greeks.

1:17 For therein is the righteousness of God revealed- the expression “the righteousness of God” is used in two senses in this epistle. Here, the phrase means that Divine righteousness which is reckoned, or imputed, to those who believe, see 3:21,22; 4:3-5. Elsewhere, it means God’s attribute, that which He possesses intrinsically and eternally, see 3:25,26. Instead of God demanding that man become righteous by his own efforts, (a thing the apostle will show later in the epistle he cannot do), God is prepared, in grace, to reckon to be righteous those who receive the gospel. From faith to faith- literally “out from faith (on the principle of faith), to faith (with faith as the expected response).” God is prepared to reckon righteousness to a person, provided they come to Him on His terms. The sinner must abandon any idea that he can earn God’s favour, and rely totally on the person and work of the Lord Jesus, who died at Calvary so that his sins might be forgiven, and he might be made right in the sight of God. As it is written, “The just shall live by faith”- the truly just or righteous man is he who has spiritual life within on the principle of his faith in God, as is shown by the fact that he lives out that life by the same principle. The apostle had claimed at the beginning of this section that the gospel was promised through the prophets, and now he proves his point as he brings the section to a close by quoting Habakkuk 2:4. He thus disposes of any idea that he is teaching a new doctrine of his own devising.